Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, September 1999, p. 5624-5635, Vol. 181, No. 18
Krebs Institute for Biomolecular Research,
Received 16 February 1999/Accepted 2 July 1999
The gene (dctA) encoding the aerobic
C4-dicarboxylate transporter (DctA) of Escherichia
coli was previously mapped to the 79-min region of the linkage
map. The nucleotide sequence of this region reveals two candidates for
the dctA gene: f428 at 79.3 min and the
o157a-o424-o328 (or orfQMP) operon at 79.9 min.
The f428 gene encodes a homologue of the
Sinorhizobium meliloti and Rhizobium
leguminosarum H+/C4-dicarboxylate
symporter, DctA, whereas the orfQMP operon encodes homologues of the aerobic periplasmic-binding protein- dependent C4-dicarboxylate transport system (DctQ, DctM, and DctP) of
Rhodobacter capsulatus. To determine which, if either, of
these loci specify the E. coli DctA system, the chromosomal
f428 and orfM genes were inactivated by
inserting Spr or Apr cassettes, respectively.
The resulting f428 mutant was unable to grow aerobically
with fumarate or malate as the sole carbon source and grew poorly with
succinate. Furthermore, fumarate uptake was abolished in the
f428 mutant and succinate transport was ~10-fold lower
than that of the wild type. The growth and fumarate transport deficiencies of the f428 mutant were complemented by
transformation with an f428-containing plasmid. No growth
defect was found for the orfM mutant. In combination, the
above findings confirm that f428 corresponds to the
dctA gene and indicate that the orfQMP products
play no role in C4-dicarboxylate transport. Regulation studies with a dctA-lacZ (f428-lacZ)
transcriptional fusion showed that dctA is subject to
cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP)-dependent catabolite repression and
ArcA-mediated anaerobic repression and is weakly induced by the
DcuS-DcuR system in response to C4-dicarboxylates and
citrate. Interestingly, in a dctA mutant, expression of
dctA is constitutive with respect to
C4-dicarboxylate induction, suggesting that DctA regulates
its own synthesis. Northern blot analysis revealed a single,
monocistronic dctA transcript and confirmed that
dctA is subject to regulation by catabolite repression and CRP. Reverse transcriptase-mediated primer extension indicated a single
transcriptional start site centered 81 bp downstream of a strongly
predicted CRP-binding site.
Escherichia coli can
utilize C4-dicarboxylates as a carbon and energy source
under aerobic and anaerobic conditions (9, 50, 56).
Anaerobically, the uptake, exchange, and efflux of C4-dicarboxylates (fumarate, malate, maleate, and
succinate) and L-aspartate are mediated by the three
independent dicarboxylate uptake (Dcu) systems, DcuA, DcuB, and DcuC
(9, 12, 13, 50, 56). These Dcu systems appear to be active
solely under anaerobic conditions (9).
Aerobically, uptake of C4-dicarboxylates is mediated by a
secondary transporter and/or a binding-protein-dependent system, designated Dct (20, 24). The Dct system has an apparent
Km of 10 to 20 µM for
C4-dicarboxylates and is driven by the electrochemical proton gradient (15), and its activity is induced by
succinate and is subject to catabolite repression (20, 27).
The corresponding dctA mutants cannot utilize the
C4-dicarboxylates malate and fumarate but grow normally on
the monocarboxylate lactate (27). Transport across the outer
membrane may be mediated by a C4-dicarboxylate-binding protein (Cbt; Kd for
C4-dicarboxylates of 30 to 50 µM) and a porin (3, 4,
25-30).
Three genetic loci (cbt at 16.6 min, dctA at 79.3 min, and dctB at 16.4 min) are involved in aerobic
C4-dicarboxylate transport (27). The nucleotide
sequence of the 76- to 81.5-min region revealed a putative
dctA gene (f428) encoding a protein (DctA) most
closely resembling the DctA proteins of Sinorhizobium
meliloti and Rhizobium leguminosarum (62 to 63%
identity) that function as H+/C4-dicarboxylate
symporters (51). The DctA proteins are members of a family
that includes the Na+/H+ glutamate symporters
(GltP/GltT). A role for the putative dctA gene of E. coli in the utilization of C4-dicarboxylates (and the cyclic monocarboxylate orotate) has been suggested by complementation studies with Salmonella typhimurium dctA or outA
mutants (2, 51). The coding regions corresponding to the
dctB (predicted to encode an inner membrane protein) and
cbt (predicted to encode the binding protein) genes have yet
to be identified (23).
In addition to the dctA (f428) gene, E. coli contains three apparently cotranscribed genes
(o157-o424-o328 or orfQMP) at 79.9 min that
encode products 23 to 32% identical to the DctPQM components of the
periplasmic binding protein-dependent C4-dicarboxylate transport system of Rhodobacter capsulatus (11, 46,
51). The orfQMP genes are apparently part of a large
operon involved in pentose sugar metabolism (11, 42). This
suggests that the orfQMP products form a pentose sugar
transporter, although, given their similarity to the R. capsulatus DctPQM components, it is also possible that they
transport C4-dicarboxylates.
To investigate the potential roles of the dctA and
orfQMP genes of E. coli in
C4-dicarboxylate transport, the corresponding genes were
inactivated and the phenotypes of the resulting mutants were studied.
The results showed that the dctA (f428) product is required for aerobic growth on malate and fumarate and mediates the
transport of C4-dicarboxylates. Interestingly,
dctA mutants were still able to grow aerobically on
succinate, indicating the presence of an uncharacterized transporter
with specificity for succinate. In contrast, the orfQMP
products play no apparent role in C4-dicarboxylate
utilization and transport. Transcript mapping and regulatory studies
with a dctA-lacZ transcriptional fusion showed that the
dctA gene is monocistronic, has a single transcriptional start site, and is activated by cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) in
the absence of glucose, repressed by ArcA during anaerobiosis, and
weakly activated by the recently identified DcuS-DcuR system (13,
57) in the presence of C4-dicarboxylates. In
addition, inactivation of dctA led to constitutive
dctA-lacZ expression with respect to
C4-dicarboxylates, suggesting that DctA regulates its own
synthesis through an interaction with DcuS in a manner similar to that
proposed for DctA- and DctB-dependent regulation of dctA in
S. meliloti and R. leguminosarum.
Subcloning the dctA (f428) and
orfQMP genes.
The dctA (f428)
and orfQMP genes were subcloned from phages Inactivation of dctA (f428) and
orfQMP.
A 1.7-kb fragment containing the putative
dctA gene was PCR amplified from pGS753 by using
Pfu DNA polymerase (Stratagene) and primers annealing ~300
bp upstream and ~100 bp downstream of the dctA coding
region, and the 1.7-kb product was subcloned into the SmaI
site of pSU18 to generate pDctA (Fig. 1). The cloned dctA
gene was disrupted by inserting a 1.9-kb SmaI fragment
containing the spc cassette of pHP45
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Inactivation and Regulation of the Aerobic
C4-Dicarboxylate Transport (dctA) Gene of
Escherichia coli

![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
605 and
578, respectively (21), by standard procedures
(36). DNA was isolated from the liquid lysates as described
by Miller (36). A 4.9-kb BglII-SalI
restriction fragment containing dctA was subcloned from
605 into the BamHI and SalI sites of pSU18, generating plasmid pGS753 (Fig. 1 and
Table 1). Similarly, a 5.9-kb
HindIII-BamHI fragment, containing
orfQMP, was isolated from
578 and inserted into pSU18,
generating pGS754 (Fig. 1 and Table 1).

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Restriction maps of the dctA-orfQMP region of
the E. coli chromosome. The inserts cloned in
578,
605, pGS753, pGS754, pGS928, pDctA, pOrfQMP, pDctA::Sp and
pOrfQMP::Ap are shown along with E. coli DNA
(thick black lines) and the Apr and Spr
resistance cassettes (open bars). Relevant restriction sites are
indicated: B, BamHI; Bc,
BclI; Bg, BglII; Bs,
BsphI; C, ClaI; E,
EcoRI; H, HindIII; Hp,
HpaI; P, PstI; S,
SalI; and Sm, SmaI. Restriction sites
within vector DNA are denoted by a v, and hybrid restriction
sites no longer recognized by the corresponding enzymes are in
parentheses. Solid arrows indicate the positions and polarities of
relevant structural genes. The hatched bar represents the DNA fragment
used as a hybridization probe, and a strongly predicted stem-loop
structure is also indicated. Coordinates are from reference
51.
TABLE 1.
Strains, phages, and plasmids used in this study
Spc into the
HpaI site of pDctA, generating pDctA::Sp (Fig. 1).
A similar strategy was used to disrupt the orfQMP operon. A
3.1-kb fragment containing the orfQMP genes was PCR
amplified from plasmid pGS754 with Pfu and primers annealing ~250 bp upstream of orfQ and ~150 bp downstream of
orfP. The 3.1-kb PCR product was subcloned into the
SmaI site of pSU18, generating pOrfQMP (Fig. 1), and the
operon was disrupted by inserting the amp cassette contained
in the 2.6-kb SmaI fragment of pHP45
Ap into the
Klenow-infilled BsphI site of pGS754 to generate
pOrfQMP::Ap (Fig. 1). The chromosomal dctA and
orfQMP genes were replaced by the disrupted versions in
pDctA::Sp and pOrfQMP::Ap by allelic exchange
(37). This was achieved by transforming JC7623 (recBC sbcB) with pDctA::Sp or pOrfQMP::Ap and
isolating potential dctA::spc and
orfM::amp mutants by screening for
Spr Cms or Apr Cms
colonies. The successful disruption of the dctA and
orfM genes was confirmed by PCR and Southern blot analyses
(Fig. 2). PCR amplification and Southern
blotting of the dctA and orfM genes gave the
expected band sizes for the parental strain and representative Spr Cms or Apr Cms
mutants (MDO1 and MDO2, respectively), indicating that the
corresponding dctA or orfM genes had indeed been
disrupted with the spc or amp cassette (Fig. 1
and 2). Finally, the dctA::spc and
orfM::amp mutations of strains MDO1 and
MDO2 were transferred to the wild-type strain, AN387, by phage
P1-mediated transductions (36) to produce the mutants MDO800
(AN387, dctA::spc) and MDO900 (AN387,
orfM::amp). The identities of the
resulting mutants were confirmed by PCR analysis (results not shown).

View larger version (53K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 2.
PCR and Southern blot analysis of
dctA::spc and
orfM::amp mutants. PCR (A and B) and
Southern blotting (C and D) were performed, as described in Materials
and Methods, with chromosomal DNA from JC7623 (lanes 1), JC7623
dctA::spc (MDO1) (lanes 2), and JC7623
orfM::amp (MDO2) (lanes 3), together
with PCR primers or hybridization probes specific for the
dctA (A and C) and orfQMP (B and D) regions. The
sizes of the PCR products and major hybridizing bands are shown.
Analysis of MDO3 gave results similar to those of MDO2 (data not
shown).
Southern blot analysis of dctA and orfQMP mutants. Chromosomal DNA was isolated from JC7623 and the Spr Cms and Apr Cms derivatives (34). Southern blotting was performed with 10 µg of chromosomal DNA digested with PstI (dctA analysis) or with HindIII and BamHI (orfQMP analysis), separated by agarose electrophoresis, and blotted onto nylon membranes (41). Hybridizations were carried out at 63°C, and for the dctA analysis the hybridization probe was the digoxigenin-labeled 4.9-kb insert of pGS753, whereas for the orfQMP analysis the hybridization probe was the digoxigenin-labeled 5.9-kb insert of pGS754.
[14C]fumarate and [14C]succinate
uptake experiments.
Cultures were grown aerobically to late
exponential phase in 500 ml of Luria broth (L broth), and the bacteria
were harvested by centrifugation (2,000 × g for 15 min
at 4°C), resuspended in 100 ml of M9 salts solution (Sigma) at 4°C,
centrifuged as before, and finally resuspended in 5 ml of M9 salts
solution and kept on ice for up to 6 h before use. Uptake of
[14C]fumarate or [14C]succinate (1.8 to 2.2 Gbq mmol
1; NEN) was measured in a stirred Clark-type
oxygen electrode assembly at 37°C under aerobic conditions (11,
45, 46). Aliquots (5 µl) of cell suspension were added to 2 ml
of M9 salts solution and equilibrated for 1 min before the addition of
the radiolabeled substrate to a final concentration of 20 µM
[14C]fumarate or [14C]succinate. Samples
(0.1 ml) were taken after 20 s and thereafter at 30-s intervals,
immediately added to 5 ml of stop buffer (64 mM phosphate buffer [pH
7.0], 10 mM fumarate, 0.2 mM sodium fluoroacetate), and filtered
rapidly through Whatman GF/F filters. The filters were dried and
assayed for radioactivity by scintillation counting. The total protein
contents of the cell suspensions were determined by the Lowry et al.
assay (32).
Construction of the dctA-lacZ transcriptional
fusion.
The 0.9-kb HpaI-HpaI
f651'-dctA' fragment of pGS753 was subcloned into the
SmaI site of pRS528 (49) to generate pGS928, carrying a dctA-lacZ transcriptional fusion (Fig. 1). The
dctA-lacZ fusion was transferred to phage
RS45
(49) by in vivo homologous recombination as described by
Simons et al. (49), and the resulting Lac+
phage,
RS45(dctA'-lacZYA), was used to create a
monolysogenic derivative of MC4100, JRG3351 (
lac
dctA-lacZYA).
crp) was infected with
RS45(dctA'-lacZYA) to generate the monolysogen JRG4016(pGS279), which was subsequently cured of pGS279 by being propagated under nonselective conditions (Table 1).
Growth media and conditions. Cultures were grown at 37°C either aerobically (50 ml in 250-ml conical flasks at 250 rpm) or anaerobically (10 ml in filled and sealed Bijou bottles) in L broth or M9 minimal salts (Sigma) with various carbon sources.
-Galactosidase measurements.
-Galactosidase specific
activities (expressed in micromoles of
o-nitrophenyl-
-D-galactopyranoside [ONPG]
per minute per milligram of protein) were determined for samples taken
at 0.5- to 1-h intervals from two independent cultures. Each sample was assayed in duplicate, as described previously (12).
Northern hybridization and primer extension analysis. Total RNA was extracted by a method (12) based upon that described by Aiba et al. (1). The 0.46-kb ClaI-PstI dctA fragment of pDctA (Fig. 1) was used as the hybridization probe. Reverse transcriptase-mediated primer extension analysis was performed (12, 39) with two independent primers for each promoter (see reference 51 for coordinates): P1dctA (5'-2235ATCGCTGTCAGGACCTGAAAGTAAAGGCTT2206-3') and P2dctA (5'-2211TAGAAATGGCCAAGGAGAATACCAATGGCT2182-3'). Sequence ladders were generated with the T7 Sequenase DNA sequencing kit (Amersham) together with pGS753 as template and the primers described above. A potential CRP site was identified by using the score-matrix searching option of the xnip program (53) and a score matrix derived from 25 experimentally determined CRP-binding sites.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Growth properties of the dctA and orfM mutants. The wild type and dctA mutant grew identically under aerobic conditions in L broth (data not shown) and minimal medium containing 0.4% glucose (Fig. 3A), 0.4% fructose, 40 mM lactate, 40 mM acetate, or 0.4% glycerol (data not shown) as the sole carbon source. However, the dctA mutant (MDO800) failed to grow with malate or fumarate as the sole carbon source and grew more slowly than the wild type with succinate (Fig. 3). The growth difference on succinate was fully complemented by pDctA (Fig. 3B), but the growth defects on fumarate and malate were only partially restored by pDctA (Fig. 3C and D). However, AN387(pDctA) grew at the same rate as MDO800(pDctA) in fumarate and malate minimal medium (Fig. 3C and D), showing that pDctA lowers the fumarate- and malate-dependent growth of the parental strain. No growth defects were detected for the orfM mutant, MDO900, under the same conditions.
|
Fumarate and succinate uptake properties of the dctA mutant. To determine whether the dctA::spc mutation affects transport or some other metabolic function, [14C]fumarate uptake was compared in the wild type and dctA mutant, and in the corresponding pDctA (dctA+) transformants, after aerobic growth to late log phase in L broth (Fig. 4). High levels of fumarate transport activity (~56 pmol of fumarate/min/mg of protein with 20 µM fumarate) were observed for the wild type (AN387), and although no uptake activity was detected with the dctA mutant, it was fully restored in the pDctA transformant (Fig. 4). This shows that the growth defects of the dctA mutant are due to deficient C4-dicarboxylate transport (Dct) activity and that the failure to transport fumarate is due to inactivation of the dctA gene. The Dct activity of AN387 was inhibited to below detectable levels by a 100-fold excess of unlabeled fumarate but was not affected by 100-fold excess lactate, pyruvate, or acetate (data not shown). This indicates that neither lactate, pyruvate, nor acetate is transported by the DctA system. Dct activity for AN387 in L broth was 19-fold higher during the stationary phase than the early log phase (not shown), probably due to stationary-phase induction of dctA transcription (see below).
|
Environmental factors affecting dctA expression.
To provide a more complete understanding of the role of DctA in
C4-dicarboxylic acid transport, factors that regulate
dctA expression were examined by using a strain harboring a
single-copy dctA-lacZ transcriptional fusion: JRG3351
(MC4100/
RS45[dctA'-lacZYA]). The fusion contains
0.43 kb of the upstream f651 gene, the 0.18-kb f651-dctA intergenic region, and 0.3 kb of the
dctA coding region (Fig. 1). The activity of the
dctA-lacZ fusion in single copy (see below) indicated that
the dctA gene possesses an independent promoter and
therefore, contrary to a previous suggestion (51), is not
dependent on the upstream f651 gene for transcription.
|
|
|
Effects of global regulators on dctA-lacZ
expression.
The above studies show that dctA expression
is strongly affected by catabolite repression, repressed in the absence
of oxygen, induced in the stationary phase, and induced ca. twofold in
the presence of citrate and C4-dicarboxylates. The roles of
the global transcriptional regulators, ArcA, FNR, CRP, and RpoS, in the
regulation of dctA transcription were investigated by
studying the appropriate regulatory mutants. The postexponential
anaerobic expression of the dctA-lacZ fusion under fumarate
respiratory conditions was 18-fold higher in the
arcA
strain, JRG4011, than in the arcA+ parental
strain, JRG3351 (Fig. 8A), but
transformation of the
arcA strain with the
arcA-containing plasmid, pRB38, restored the anaerobic
repression of dctA expression, resulting in expression levels similar to those of the wild type (Fig. 8A). In contrast, the
fnr mutation of JRG4013 increased dctA
expression by only twofold. This effect was reversed by supplying the
multicopy fnr+ plasmid, pCH21 (Fig. 8A). Similar
results were observed with cultures grown under fermentative conditions
(L broth plus 0.4% fructose), where postexponential dctA
expression was 12- and 2-fold higher in the arcA and
fnr mutants (2.4 and 0.4 µmol/min/mg), respectively, than
in the wild type (0.2 µmol/min/mg). These results indicate that the
anaerobic repression of dctA is mediated primarily by ArcA,
with a minor contribution from FNR that is likely to be related to the
activation of arcA expression by FNR (6).
|
fnr mutation caused a 2.4-fold
reduction in aerobic dctA expression (Fig. 8B), which
suggests a minor aerobic role for FNR in the aerobic induction of
dctA expression, as has been observed previously for eight
unidentified E. coli gene products (44). There
was only a slight (1.4-fold) reduction in dctA expression in
the
arcA strain (Fig. 8B), indicating that Arc has little
effect on dctA expression aerobically.
The ~30-fold postexponential repression of dctA expression
by glucose in L broth observed under aerobic conditions was largely reversed by the addition of cAMP (from 0.17 to 2.9 µmol/min/mg), which provides a strong indication that dctA is activated by
the cAMP-CRP complex (Fig. 8C). Furthermore, aerobic dctA
expression in L broth was virtually abolished by the
crp
mutation of JRG4016 (Fig. 8D), resulting in a 275-fold reduction of
dctA expression from 5.5 to 0.02 µmol/min/mg.
Complementation of the
crp mutation by the
crp+ plasmid, pGS279, increased dctA
expression ~130-fold to a level similar to that of the corresponding
parental transformant, JRG3351 (Fig. 8D). Expression of dctA
was unaffected by the rpoS mutation of SCA345, showing that
dctA transcription is RpoS independent (data not shown).
These observations strongly suggest that the cAMP-CRP complex is a
major transcriptional activator for dctA expression and is
responsible for the observed stationary-phase induction.
The strong CRP-mediated catabolite repression of dctA
expression is in agreement with the prevention of induction of Dct
activity by glucose: the presence of glucose in succinate minimal
medium caused a ~50-fold reduction in Dct activity (20),
which compares well with the ~67-fold reduction in aerobic
postexponential dctA expression caused by the presence of
glucose in succinate minimal medium (Fig. 7A). The observed CRP
regulation is also consistent with the inability of mutants lacking
phosphotransferase system components to grow on succinate
(54) and the reestablishment of Dct activity in
cya (adenyl cyclase) mutants by the addition of cAMP to the
growth medium (27). In addition, the ca. twofold induction
of dctA expression by C4-dicarboxylates matches
the two- to threefold maleate-dependent induction of Dct activity in
minimal medium containing various carbon sources (20).
Therefore, Dct activity and dctA transcription are
regulated in parallel in response to catabolite repression and
C4-dicarboxylates, indicating that Dct activity is
regulated mainly at the level of transcription.
Roles of DcuS-DcuR and DctA in the C4-dicarboxylate-dependent regulation of dctA-lacZ expression. The possibility that the C4-dicarboxylate-dependent induction of dctA expression is mediated by the recently discovered two-component C4-dicarboxylate-responsive DcuS-DcuR system was tested by using a dcuS mutant, JRG3984. Under aerobic conditions in L broth, the dcuS mutation caused a twofold reduction in postexponential dctA expression and abolished dctA induction by C4-dicarboxylates or citrate (Fig. 6B). These findings are consistent with the recent report that dctA is induced fourfold by C4-dicarboxylates in a DcuS-DcuR-dependent manner (13). The dctA gene could thus be a member of the DcuSR regulon, along with the dcuB-fumB (specifying an anaerobic C4-dicarboxylate transporter and the anaerobic fumarase) and frdABCD (encoding fumarate reductase) operons (13, 57). However, it should be noted that these results contradict those of Zientz et al. (57), who concluded that the C4-dicarboxylate induction of dctA is DcuS-DcuR independent.
The possibility that the DctA protein is involved in regulating its own synthesis either directly or indirectly (via its transport activity) was tested by comparing dctA expression in JRG3351 (dctA-lacZ dctA+) and JRG4005 (dctA-lacZ dctA::spc) during aerobic growth in glycerol (0.4%) minimal medium with and without 50 mM malate, succinate, or maleate (Fig. 9). The dctA mutation resulted in a 2.6-fold increase in dctA expression in the absence of C4-dicarboxylates, suggesting that DctA represses its own synthesis. Interestingly, the C4-dicarboxylates no longer induced dctA-lacZ expression in the dctA mutant. Therefore, the dctA mutation results in the constitutive expression of dctA-lacZ with respect to the presence or absence of C4-dicarboxylates. A similar phenomenon has been reported for the dctA genes of R. leguminosarum and S. meliloti (17, 40, 55). It has been suggested that in these species, in the absence of C4-dicarboxylates DctA interacts with the C4-dicarboxylate-sensing histidine-kinase (DctB) in a way that inhibits signal transduction from DctB to the cognate response regulator (DctD). In the presence of substrate, the DctA-mediated inhibition of DctB activity is thought to be relieved, leading to the induction of dctA by DctD (18, 55). It is possible that an analogous mechanism operates aerobically in E. coli, whereby the C4-dicarboxylate-sensing histidine kinase activity of DcuS is inhibited by DctA in the absence, but not the presence, of C4-dicarboxylates (and presumably citrate).
|
Citrate induces dcuB expression in a DcuS-DcuR-dependent manner. Although the DcuS-DcuR system is known to respond to external C4-dicarboxylates (aspartate, fumarate, malate, maleate, succinate, and tartrate) (12, 13, 57), it had not been shown to respond to citrate until tested here (Fig. 6). To determine whether other members of the DcuSR regulon are also induced by citrate in a DcuS-DcuR-dependent fashion, expression of a dcuB-lacZ transcriptional fusion was measured following anaerobic growth to the late log phase (25 h of growth to an optical density at 650 nm of ~0.4) in minimal medium containing 0.4% glycerol and 50 mM trimethylamine oxide, with and without 50 mM citrate. The expression of dcuB was induced ~20-fold by citrate in the dcuS+ strain (JRG3835) (0.59 ± 0.05 and 0.032 ± 0.01 µmol of ONPG/min/mg of protein in the presence and absence, respectively, of citrate) but not in the dcuS mutant, JRG3983 (0.009 ± 0.0004 and 0.012 ± 0.002 µmol/min/mg, respectively), and in the presence of citrate, dcuB expression was 66-fold greater in the dcuS+ strain than the dcuS mutant. As expected, these results show that dcuB (like dctA) is induced by citrate in a DcuS-DcuR-dependent manner. This confirms that the DcuS-DcuR system responds to citrate as well as to C4-dicarboxylates.
Northern blot analysis of dctA transcription.
Northern hybridization was performed to determine the size of the
dctA transcript and to correlate its abundance with
expression of the dctA-lacZ fusion (Fig.
10A). Total RNA was extracted from MC1000 (wild type), JRG1999 (
crp), and a pGS279
(crp+) transformant of JRG1999, grown to
stationary phase in L broth with and without 0.4% glucose, and then
hybridized with a labeled dctA fragment (Fig. 10A). A single
dctA-hybridizing (1,300-nucleotide [nt]) transcript was
detected for the wild type grown in the absence of glucose (Fig. 10A).
The size corresponds to that expected for a monocistronic
dctA transcript initiating at the promoter identified in the
f651-dctA intergenic region (see below) and terminating at
an inverted repeat (bp 96402 to 96372) located 15 bp downstream of the
dctA stop codon (bp 96417) (GenBank accession no. U00039). No dctA-hybridizing transcript was detected for the wild
type grown with glucose or from the crp mutant grown in the
absence of glucose. However, a single major hybridizing band
corresponding to the 1,300-nt dctA transcript was observed
in the pGS279-complemented crp strain grown in the absence
of glucose. Thus, the dctA Northern blot analysis supports
the conclusions derived from the studies with the dctA-lacZ
fusion that dctA transcription is strongly activated by the
cAMP-CRP complex. Also, contrary to an earlier prediction
(51) that dctA forms an operon with the upstream f651 gene (encoding a serpin-like protein), dctA
appears to be monocistronic (Fig. 1).
|
Transcriptional start site of the dctA gene.
The
5' end of the dctA transcript was defined by primer
extension analysis (Fig. 10B). A single primer extension product
corresponding to a start site at G-97752, 51 bp upstream of the
anticipated dctA translational start codon, was detected
(Fig. 10C). It matches the start site determined for the
dctA gene of Salmonella typhimurium (2) and is preceded by appropriately positioned
10 and
35 sites, which are separated by the optimal distance, 17 bp. The
35 site is relatively poor, and this would explain why
dctA expression is weak in the absence of cAMP-CRP
activation. There is a strongly predicted CRP-binding site at bp
81.5, which is consistent with the strong cAMP-CRP activation of
dctA expression (Fig. 10C), and this indicates that
dctA is expressed from a class I CRP-dependent promoter
(5). Although ArcA binding-site consensus sequences have
been proposed (8, 33), they do not allow the accurate prediction of ArcA-binding sites (47). Therefore, it is not possible to locate potential ArcA-binding sites by sequence analysis, although it is presumed that dctA is directly repressed by ArcA.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The coidentity of dctA and f428 was previously assumed because of the high degree (~63%) of amino acid sequence identity between the translation products of the E. coli f428 gene and the rhizobial dctA genes (51), together with the close locations of the E. coli f428 and dctA genes in the respective physical and linkage maps (19, 25, 51). The data presented here confirm that f428 does indeed correspond to the dctA gene encoding the aerobic C4-dicarboxylate transporter of E. coli. The dctA::spc mutant was unable to grow aerobically on fumarate or malate and grew weakly on succinate, which is consistent with the phenotype reported by Kay and Kornberg (19). Anaerobic growth was not affected, nor was aerobic growth on other carbon sources, indicating that dctA is strictly concerned with aerobic C4-dicarboxylate metabolism. The growth defects of the dctA mutant were complemented by a multicopy dctA+ plasmid, confirming that the mutant phenotype is indeed caused by the inactivation of the chromosomal dctA gene. No comparable effects were detected for the orfM::amp mutant, suggesting that the orfQMP genes are not required for C4-dicarboxylate transport. The overexpressed orfP-encoded periplasmic-binding protein has also been shown not to bind C4-dicarboxylates (11a). The orfQMP genes would appear to form part of a nine-gene cluster that is required for L-lyxose utilization (42, 51), and so these genes are likely to be involved in the transport of L-lyxose or some other pentose sugar.
The role of DctA in the aerobic transport of C4-dicarboxylates was confirmed by the aerobic fumarate transport deficiency of the dctA mutant and its complementation by a dctA+ plasmid. Overall, the results show that DctA is probably the sole mediator of fumarate and malate transport under aerobic conditions and that there is at least one undefined transporter (SucT) mediating the aerobic uptake of succinate, albeit at relatively low rates. Possible candidates are the products of the ygjU and o463 genes at 70 and 39 min (respectively), which encode DctA homologues with 27 and 20% sequence identity relative to DctA, or the ygjE (a potential tartrate/succinate antiporter), citT/ybdS (a citrate/succinate antiporter), and ybhI (a potential tricarboxylate transporter) genes (37a, 38).
Previous work has shown that a dctA mutant of Salmonella typhimurium cannot use orotate, a cyclic monocarboxylate, for pyrimidine synthesis, but that the lesion could be complemented by a dctA+ plasmid encoding the E. coli DctA protein, which is 95% identical to the S. typhimurium protein (2). The S. typhimurium dctA mutant was reported to be unable to grow on solid medium containing fumarate and malate, and it grew weakly with succinate, but no transport studies or attempts to complement the nutritional phenotype were made (2), nor was the capacity of the mutant to undergo aerobic growth on other carboxylates and anaerobic growth on C4-dicarboxylates tested. A role for E. coli dctA in C4-dicarboxylate transport has also been implied in a recent study (4a) showing that the inability of an E. coli atp deletion strain to grow on C4-dicarboxylates can be complemented by a dctA+ plasmid.
Expression of a dctA-lacZ transcriptional fusion was found to be subject to strong CRP-mediated catabolite repression and ArcA-mediated anaerobic repression. Despite an earlier report to the contrary (56), the present results clearly support the view that the DcuS-DcuR system is involved in the C4-dicarboxylate-dependent regulation of dctA (13). In a dctA mutant, dctA-lacZ expression was constitutive with respect to the presence or absence of C4-dicarboxylates, indicating a role for DctA in regulating its own synthesis. By analogy to the mechanism proposed for rhizobial dctA autoregulation (17, 18, 40, 55), it is suggested that in aerobically grown E. coli in the absence of exogenous C4-dicarboxylates, DcuS is inhibited by inactive (nontransporting) DctA. Conversely, in the presence of C4-dicarboxylates, DctA would be active (transporting) and the inhibition of DcuS would be relieved, thus allowing signal transduction from DcuR to DcuS and the consequent induction of dctA. Such a mechanism implies that DcuS activity is dictated by the status of DctA. However, anaerobically, DcuS appears to directly sense external C4-dicarboxylates in way that is independent of DctA or the DcuA, DcuB, and DcuC proteins (13, 57), suggesting that DcuS has two modes of operation, one that acts anaerobically and one that acts aerobically. Switching between the anaerobic and aerobic modes could be mediated by the central PAS domain of DcuS. The proposed redox-sensing role of the PAS domain would be consistent with this suggestion (13).
Previous work had shown that the DcuS-DcuR system is responsive to external C4-dicarboxylates, namely, aspartate, fumarate, malate, maleate, succinate, and tartrate (13, 57). In this study, citrate was also found to be a coeffector for the DcuS-DcuR system, indicating that DcuS has broader ligand specificity than was previously realized. It is likely that the induction of the DcuSR regulon by citrate is physiologically significant, since, although most E. coli strains cannot utilize citrate aerobically, under anaerobic conditions citrate can be converted to fumarate for respiratory purposes (38). The anaerobic utilization of citrate would require the expression of the fumarate reductase operon, frdABCD, and the anaerobic fumarase gene of the dcuB-fumB operon. Appropriately, these operons are members of the DcuSR regulon (13, 57) and would therefore be induced by external citrate.
The pattern of dctA regulation is largely consistent with the role of its product in the aerobic uptake of C4-dicarboxylates. The strong CRP activation of dctA ensures that external C4-dicarboxylates are taken up for catabolic purposes only in the absence of "more preferable" carbon and energy sources, such as glucose. The anaerobic repression of dctA by ArcA limits the function of DctA to aerobic conditions. This is desirable since DctA is thought to be a proton symporter and would therefore consume energy, whereas the anaerobic C4-dicarboxylate transporters can act in substrate-product exchange (antiport) mode and would therefore be non-energy consuming, a property that is likely to be important under the relatively low-energy-yielding conditions of anaerobic respiration. The relatively weak induction of dctA expression by C4-dicarboxylates (and citrate) is unlikely to have any major impact on the C4-dicarboxylate metabolism. Interestingly, a dcuS mutant exhibits the same growth defects as the dctA mutant, namely, no growth on fumarate and malate, and weak growth on succinate (13). This suggests that the dcuS mutant is devoid of Dct activity, which in turn suggests that DcuS (or DcuR, since the dcuS mutation is likely to have a polar effect on dcuR) could have a direct effect on DctA transport activity. This possibility is supported by the observation that the dcuS mutant totally lacks Dct activity (7a), although dctA transcription is only halved. The physiological purpose of such a regulatory mechanism is unclear but could be related to the need to ensure that DctA does not mediate net export of C4-dicarboxylates, which could otherwise occur when external C4-dicarboxylate concentrations are low.
The regulatory features of the dctA gene are reminiscent of those of the genes encoding the aerobic CAC (citric acid cycle) enzymes. Like dctA, CAC enzymes are regulated at the level of transcription by CRP-mediated catabolite repression and by the oxygen/redox-responsive, two-component ArcBA system (7). This mode of regulation ensures that CAC activity is relatively low both anaerobically, when the ability of the cycle to supply energy is restricted, and aerobically during growth on glycolytic substrates (such as glucose), when the full cycle is unnecessary because sufficient energy can be derived through glycolysis. Since the role of DctA is to deliver external C4-dicarboxylates for consumption via the aerobically operating CAC, it is physiologically appropriate that dctA regulation should largely match that of the aerobic CAC enzymes.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Paul Bond and Peter Cotterell for technical assistance.
We thank the BBSRC for awarding a Special Studentship (S.J.D.), a Project Grant (S.C.A. and J.R.G.), and an Advanced Fellowship (S.C.A.). We also thank the Iranian government for providing a postgraduate research scholarship (D.O.).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: School of Animal & Microbial Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, P.O. Box 228, Reading RG6 6AJ, United Kingdom. Phone: 118-987-5123, ext. 7045/7886. Fax: 118-931-0180. E-mail: s.c.andrews{at}reading.ac.uk.
Present address: Department of Genetics, Uromeiya Medical School,
Uromeiya, Iran.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Aiba, H.,
S. Adkya, and B. de Crombrugghe.
1981.
Evidence for a functional gal promoter in intact Escherichia coli cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
256:11905-11910 |
| 2. |
Baker, K. E.,
K. P. Ditullio,
J. Neuhard, and R. A. Kelln.
1996.
Utilization of orotate as a pyrimidine source by Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli requires the dicarboxylate transport protein encoded by dctA.
J. Bacteriol.
178:7099-7105 |
| 3. | Bewick, M. A., and T. C. Y. Lo. 1979. Dicarboxylic acid transport in Escherichia coli K12: involvement of a binding protein in the translocation of dicarboxylic acids across the outer membrane of the cell envelope. Can. J. Biochem. 57:653-661[Medline]. |
| 4. | Bewick, M. A., and T. C. Y. Lo. 1980. Localization of the dicarboxylate binding protein in the cell envelope of Escherichia coli K12. Can. J. Biochem. 58:885-897[Medline]. |
| 4a. |
Boogerd, F. C.,
L. Boe,
O. Michelsen, and P. R. Jensen.
1998.
atp mutants of Escherichia coli fail to grow on succinate due to a transport deficiency.
J. Bacteriol.
180:5855-5859 |
| 5. | Busby, S., and R. H. Ebright. 1997. Transcription activation at class II CAP-dependent promoters. Mol. Microbiol. 23:853-859[Medline]. |
| 6. | Compan, I., and D. Touati. 1994. Anaerobic activation of arcA transcription in Escherichia coli: roles of Fnr and ArcA. Mol. Microbiol. 11:955-964[Medline]. |
| 7. | Cronan, J. E., and D. LaPorte. 1996. Tricarboxylic acid cycle and glyoxylate bypass, p. 206-216. In F. C. Neidhardt, R. Curtiss III, J. L. Ingraham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, W. S. Reznikoff, M. Riley, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed., vol. 1. ASM Press, Washington, D.C. |
| 7a. | Davies, S., S. C. Andrews, and D. J. Kelly. Unpublished data. |
| 8. | Drapal, N., and G. Sawers. 1995. Purification of ArcA and analysis of its specific interaction with the pfl promoter-regulatory region. Mol. Microbiol. 16:597-607[Medline]. |
| 9. |
Engel, P.,
R. Kramer, and G. Unden.
1992.
Anaerobic fumarate transport in Escherichia coli by an fnr-dependent dicarboxylate uptake system which is different from aerobic dicarboxylate uptake.
J. Bacteriol.
174:5533-5539 |
| 10. |
Fellay, R.,
J. Frey, and H. Krisch.
1987.
Interposon mutagenesis of soil and water bacteria a family of DNA fragments designed for in vitro insertional mutagenesis of Gram-negative bacteria.
Gene
52:147-154[Medline].
|
| 11. |
Forward, J. A.,
M. C. Behrendt,
N. R. Wyborn,
R. Cross, and D. J. Kelly.
1997.
TRAP transporters: a new family of periplasmic solute transport systems encoded by the dctQMP genes of Rhodobacter capsulatus and by homologs in diverse gram-negative bacteria.
J. Bacteriol.
179:5482-5493 |
| 11a. | Gibson, M., S. C. Andrews, and D. J. Kelly. Unpublished results. |
| 12. |
Golby, P.,
D. J. Kelly,
J. R. Guest, and S. C. Andrews.
1998.
Transcriptional regulation and organization of the dcuA and dcuB genes, encoding homologous anaerobic C4-dicarboxylate transporters in Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
180:6586-6596 |
| 13. |
Golby, P.,
S. Davies,
D. J. Kelly,
J. R. Guest, and S. Andrews.
1999.
Identification and characterization of a two-component sensor-kinase and response-regulator system (DcuS-DcuR) controlling gene expression in response to C4-dicarboxylates in Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
181:1238-1248 |
| 14. | Guest, J. R., J. Green, A. S. Irvine, and S. Spiro. 1996. The FNR modulon and FNR-regulated gene expression, p. 317-342. In E. C. C. Lin, and A. S. Lynch (ed.), Regulation of gene expression in Escherichia coli. Landes Co. and Chapman & Hall, Washington, D.C. |
| 15. | Gutowski, S. J., and H. Rosenberg. 1975. Succinate uptake and related proton movements in Escherichia coli K12. Biochem. J. 152:647-654[Medline]. |
| 16. |
Jamison, D. J., and C. F. Higgins.
1984.
Anaerobic and leucine-dependent expression of a peptide transport gene in Salmonella typhimurium.
J. Bacteriol.
160:131-136 |
| 17. |
Jording, D.,
P. K. Sharma,
R. Schmidt,
T. Engelke,
C. Uhde, and A. Pühler.
1992.
Regulatory aspects of the C4-dicarboxylate transport in Rhizobium meliloti transcriptional activation and dependence on effective symbiosis.
J. Plant Physiol.
141:18-27.
|
| 18. | Jording, D., C. Uhde, R. Schmidt, and A. Pühler. 1994. The C4-dicarboxylate transport-system of Rhizobium meliloti and its role in nitrogen-fixation during symbiosis with alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Experienta 50:874-883. |
| 19. | Kay, W. W., and H. L. Kornberg. 1969. Genetic control of the uptake of C4 dicarboxylic acids by Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 3:93-96[Medline]. |
| 20. | Kay, W. W., and H. L. Kornberg. 1971. The uptake of C4 dicarboxylic acids by Escherichia coli. Eur. J. Biochem. 18:274-281[Medline]. |
| 21. | Kohara, Y., K. Akiyama, and K. Isono. 1987. The physical map of the whole E. coli genome. Cell 50:495-508[Medline]. |
| 22. | Kolter, R., D. A. Siegele, and A. Tormo. 1993. The stationary phase of the bacterial life cycle. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 47:855-874[Medline]. |
| 23. | Lin, E. C. C. 1996. Dissimilatory pathways for sugars, polyols, and carboxylates, p. 307-342. In F. C. Neidhardt, R. Curtiss III, J. L. Ingraham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, W. S. Reznikoff, M. Riley, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed. ASM Press, Washington, D.C. |
| 24. | Lo, T. C. Y. 1977. The molecular mechanism of dicarboxylic acid transport in Escherichia coli K12. J. Supramol. Struct. 7:463-480[Medline]. |
| 25. |
Lo, T. C. Y., and M. A. Bewick.
1978.
The molecular mechanism of dicarboxylic acid transport in Escherichia coli K12.
J. Biol. Chem.
253:7826-7831 |
| 26. |
Lo, T. C. Y., and M. A. Bewick.
1981.
Use of a nonpenetrating substrate analogue to study the molecular mechanism of the outer membrane dicarboxylic acid transport in Escherichia coli K12.
J. Biol. Chem.
256:5511-5517 |
| 27. |
Lo, T. C. Y.,
K. Rayman, and B. D. Sanwal.
1972.
Transport of succinate in Escherichia coli K12.
J. Biol. Chem.
247:6323-6331 |
| 28. |
Lo, T. C. Y., and B. D. Sanwal.
1975.
Isolation of the soluble substrate recognition component of the dicarboxylate transport system of Escherichia coli K12.
J. Biol. Chem.
250:1600-1602 |
| 29. | Lo, T. C. Y., and B. D. Sanwal. 1975. Genetic analysis of mutants of Escherichia coli K12 defective in dicarboxylate transport. Mol. Gen. Genet. 140:303-307[Medline]. |
| 30. | Lo, T. C. Y., and B. D. Sanwal. 1975. Membrane bound substrate recognition components of the dicarboxylate transport system of Escherichia coli. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 63:278-285[Medline]. |
| 31. |
Loewen, P. C., and R. Hengge-Aronis.
1994.
The role of the sigma factor S (KatF) in bacterial global regulation.
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
48:53-80[Medline].
|
| 32. |
Lowry, O. H.,
N. J. Rosebrough,
A. L. Farr, and R. J. Randall.
1951.
Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.
J. Biol. Chem.
193:265-275 |
| 33. |
Lynch, A. S., and E. C. C. Lin.
1996.
Transcriptional control mediated by the ArcA two-component response regulator protein of Escherichia coli: characterization of DNA binding at target promoters.
J. Bacteriol.
178:6238-6249 |
| 34. | Marmur, J. 1964. A procedure for the isolation of deoxyribonucleic acid from microorganisms. Methods Enzymol. 6:726-739. |
| 35. |
Martinez, E.,
B. Bartolomé, and F. De La Cruz.
1988.
pACYC184-derived cloning vectors containing the multiple cloning site and lacZ reporter gene of pUC8/9 and pUC18/19 plasmids.
Gene
68:159-162[Medline].
|
| 36. | Miller, J. H. 1992. A short course in bacterial genetics: a laboratory manual and handbook for E. coli and related bacteria. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 37. | Oden, K. L., L. C. DeVeaux, C. R. T. Vibat, J. E. Cronan, Jr., and R. B. Gennis. 1990. Genomic replacement in Escherichia coli K-12 using covalently closed circular plasmid DNA. Gene 96:29-36[Medline]. |
| 37a. | Paulsen, Ian T. January 1999, posting date. Sequences. [Online.] http://www.biology.ucsd.edu/~ipaulsen/transport/ecoli.html. [8 February 1999, last date accessed.] |
| 38. |
Pos, K. M.,
P. Dimroth, and M. Bott.
1998.
The Escherichia coli citrate carrier CitT: a member of a novel eubacterial transporter family relaed to the 2-oxoglutarate/malate translocator from spinach chloroplasts.
J. Bacteriol.
180:4160-4165 |
| 39. | Quail, M. A., D. J. Haydon, and J. R. Guest. 1994. The pdhR-aceEF-lpd operon of Escherichia coli expresses the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex. Mol. Microbiol. 12:95-104[Medline]. |
| 40. | Ronson, C. W., and P. M. Ashwood. 1985. Genes involved in the carbon metabolism of bacteroids, p. 201-207. In H. J. Evans, P. J. Bottomley, and W. E. Newton (ed.), Nitrogen fixation research progress. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. |
| 41. | Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 42. |
Sanchez, J. C.,
R. Gimenez,
A. Schneider,
W. Fessner,
L. Baldoma,
J. Aguilar, and J. Badia.
1994.
Activation of a cryptic gene encoding a kinase for L-xylose opens a new pathway for the utilisation of L-lyxose by Escherichia coli.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:29665-29669 |
| 43. |
Sawers, G., and B. Suppmann.
1992.
Anaerobic induction of pyruvate formate-lyase gene expression is mediated by the ArcA and FNR proteins.
J. Bacteriol.
174:3474-3478 |
| 44. | Sawers, R. G., E. Zeheleih, and A. Böck. 1988. Two-dimensional gel electrophoretic analysis of Escherichia coli proteins: influence of various anaerobic growth conditions and the fnr gene product on cellular protein composition. Arch. Microbiol. 149:240-244[Medline]. |
| 45. | Shaw, J. G., and D. J. Kelly. 1991. Binding-protein dependent transport of C4-dicarboxylates in Rhodobacter capsulatus. Arch. Microbiol. 155:466-472. |
| 46. | Shaw, J. G., M. J. Hamblin, and D. J. Kelly. 1991. Purification, characterisation and nucleotide sequence of the periplasmic C4-dicarboxylate binding protein (DctP) from Rhodobacter capsulatus. Mol. Microbiol. 5:3055-306291[Medline]. |
| 47. | Shen, J., and R. P. Gunsalus. 1997. Role of multiple ArcA recognition sites in anaerobic regulation of succinate dehydrogenase (sdhCDAB) gene expression in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 26:223-236[Medline]. |
| 48. | Silhavy, T. J., M. L. Barman, and L. W. Enquist. 1984. Experiments with gene fusions. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 49. | Simons, R. W., F. Houman, and N. Kleckner. 1987. Improved single and multicopy lac-based cloning vectors for protein and operon fusions. Gene 53:85-96[Medline]. |
| 50. |
Six, S.,
S. C. Andrews,
G. Unden, and J. R. Guest.
1994.
Escherichia coli possesses two homologous anaerobic C4-dicarboxylate membrane transporters (DcuA and DcuB) distinct from the aerobic dicarboxylate transport system (Dct).
J. Bacteriol.
176:6470-6478 |
| 51. |
Sofia, H. J.,
V. Burland,
D. L. Daniels,
G. Plunkett III, and F. R. Blattner.
1994.
Analysis of the Escherichia coli genome. V. DNA sequence of the region from 76.0 to 81.5 minutes.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:2576-2586 |
| 52. | Spiro, S., and J. R. Guest. 1988. Inactivation of the FNR protein of Escherichia coli by targeted mutagenesis in the N-terminal region. Mol. Microbiol. 2:701-707[Medline]. |
| 53. | Staden, R. 1996. The Staden sequence-analysis package. Mol. Biotechnol. 5:233-241[Medline]. |
| 54. | Wang, R. J., and M. L. Morse. 1968. Carbohydrate accumulation and metabolism in Escherichia coli. I. Description of pleiotropic mutants. J. Mol. Biol. 32:59-66[Medline]. |
| 55. | Yarosh, O. K., T. C. Charles, and T. M. Finan. 1989. Analysis of C4-dicarboxylate transport genes in Rhizobium meliloti. Mol. Microbiol. 3:813-823[Medline]. |
| 56. |
Zientz, E.,
S. Six, and G. Unden.
1996.
Identification of a third secondary carrier (DcuC) for anaerobic C4-dicarboxylate transport in Escherichia coli: roles of the three Dcu carriers in uptake and exchange.
J. Bacteriol.
178:7241-7247 |
| 57. |
Zientz, E.,
J. Bongaerts, and G. Unden.
1998.
Fumarate regulation of gene expression in Escherichia coli by the DcuSR (dcuSR genes) two-component regulatory system.
J. Bacteriol.
180:5421-5425 |
| 58. |
Zientz, E.,
I. G. Janausch,
S. Six, and G. Unden.
1999.
Functioning of DcuC as the C4-dicarboxylate carrier during glucose fermentation of Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
181:3716-3720 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»