Journal of Bacteriology, September 1999, p. 5662-5668, Vol. 181, No. 18
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Environmental Engineering and Science, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-4020
Received 30 March 1999/Accepted 7 July 1999
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Anaerobic mineralization of ethylbenzene by the denitrifying
bacterium Azoarcus sp. strain EB1 was recently shown to be
initiated by dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to 1-phenylethanol.
1-Phenylethanol is converted to benzoate (benzoyl coenzyme A) via
acetophenone as transient intermediate. We developed in vitro assays to
examine ethylbenzene dehydrogenase and 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase
activities in cell extracts of this strain. With
p-benzoquinone as the electron acceptor, cell extracts of
Azoarcus sp. strain EB1 catalyzed ethylbenzene oxidation at
a specific rate of 10 nmol min
1 [mg of
protein]
1 and an apparent Km for
ethylbenzene of approximately 60 µM. The membrane-associated
ethylbenzene dehydrogenase activity was found to oxidize
4-fluoroethylbenzene and propylbenzene but was unable to transform
4-chloro-ethylbenzene, the ethyltoluenes, and styrene. Enzymatic
ethylbenzene oxidation was stereospecific, with
(S)-(
)-1-phenylethanol being the only enantiomer detected
by chiral high-pressure liquid chromatography analysis. Moreover, cell
extracts catalyzed the oxidation of
(S)-(
)-1-phenylethanol but not of
(R)-(+)-1-phenylethanol to acetophenone. When cell extracts
were dialyzed, (S)-(
)-1-phenylethanol oxidation occurred
only in the presence of NAD+, suggesting that
NAD+ is the physiological electron acceptor of
1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase. Both ethylbenzene dehydrogenase and
1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase activities were present in
Azoarcus sp. strain EB1 cells that were grown anaerobically
on ethylbenzene, 1-phenylethanol, and acetophenone, but these
activities were absent in benzoate-grown cells.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Gasoline spills and leaking underground fuel storage vessels have resulted in the release of BTEX compounds (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and the xylene isomers) to the natural environment. The toxic properties (8, 21) of these compounds, in combination with their relatively high water solubility (7), have resulted in compromised water resources, which are often rendered anaerobic by oxygen-consuming microorganisms. Aerobic degradation of alkylbenzenes is initiated by the well-characterized oxygenases, which use molecular oxygen as a cosubstrate (12). However, recent studies with anaerobic microorganisms have shown that novel enzymatic reactions can be used as a means of initiating mineralization of alkylbenzenes in the absence of molecular oxygen. In vitro studies on anaerobic toluene oxidation in denitrifying and sulfate-reducing bacteria have shown that anaerobic toluene degradation is initiated by the addition of toluene to fumarate to form benzylsuccinate (3-5, 19). It has also been shown that in Azoarcus sp. strain T, m-xylene mineralization (16) is initiated by a homologous activation to form (3-methylbenzyl)succinate from m-xylene and fumarate. Benzylsuccinate and (3-methylbenzyl)succinate are mineralized via benzoate (or benzoyl coenzyme A [benzoyl-CoA]) and 3-methylbenzoate (or 3-methyl benzoyl-CoA), respectively, as transient intermediates.
In contrast to anaerobic metabolism of methylbenzenes, ethylbenzene mineralization is initiated by dehydrogenation at the methylene carbon of the alkyl side chain to form 1-phenylethanol (2) (Fig. 1). 1-Phenylethanol is further oxidized to acetophenone (Fig. 1). It has been hypothesized (20) and preliminary evidence supports (2) that acetophenone is then carboxylated to form benzoyl acetate (benzoyl acetyl-CoA). Benzoyl acetyl-CoA is proposed to be further degraded via a thiolytic cleavage to form benzoyl-CoA, a common intermediate of anaerobic aromatic metabolism (11), and acetyl-CoA. We now report the first in vitro characterization of ethylbenzene dehydrogenase and 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase in cell extracts of strain EB1.
|
Because strain EB1 shows 99% identity to Azoarcus sp. based upon the previously determined 16S rDNA sequence (2), we refer to this bacterium as Azoarcus sp. strain EB1.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Growth of Azoarcus sp. strain EB1. Unless otherwise noted, cells of Azoarcus sp. strain EB1 were grown anaerobically in 1- or 2-liter batch cultures on mineral medium supplemented with ethylbenzene and nitrate as described previously (2).
Preparation of cell extract.
Cells (1 to 10 liters) growing
exponentially, with a doubling time of 11 h, to an optical density
at 400 nm of 0.3 were harvested under anaerobic conditions by
centrifugation (10,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C). The
cell pellet was washed in 100 ml of anoxic 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH
7.5), recentrifuged, and resuspended in approximately 3 ml of the same
buffer. The cells were then ruptured anaerobically by three passages
through a French pressure cell at 138 MPa. Unbroken cells and cellular
debris were removed by anaerobic centrifugation (12,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C). The supernatant was defined as cell
extract. The cell extract (8 to 20 mg of protein/ml) was used
immediately or stored in 1-ml aliquots at
20°C.
Fractionation of cell extract. Cell extract was separated into membrane and cytoplasmic fractions by ultracentrifugation (150,000 × g for 2 h at 4°C). The supernatant was defined as the cytoplasmic fraction. The solid pellet was resuspended in anoxic 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) buffer to a volume equal to the precentrifugation volume and defined as the membrane fraction.
Ethylbenzene dehydrogenase and 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase assays. Anaerobic in vitro assays of ethylbenzene dehydrogenase and 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase activities were performed at room temperature (23°C) in 5-ml vials fitted with Teflon-lined Mininert (Alltech Associates, Inc., Deerfield, Ill.) caps. The 1-ml assay mixture contained 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.5) and 1 µmol of p-benzoquinone (added from a 20 mM stock solution in 70% ethanol) as an electron acceptor. Approximately 800 nmol of ethylbenzene was added for the ethylbenzene dehydrogenase standard assay, and approximately 800 nmol of 1-phenylethanol was added for the 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase assay. Addition of 0.25 to 1 mg of protein as cell extract initiated the reactions. The assay mixture was incubated for 1 to 20 min in an anaerobic chamber (10% hydrogen, 10% carbon dioxide, 80% nitrogen [Coy Laboratory Products, Grass Lake, Mich.]) while shaking (approximately 100 rpm). Addition of 100 µl of concentrated hydrochloric acid was used to stop the reaction at selected time intervals. The transformation products, 1-phenylethanol or acetophenone or both, were extracted into 1 ml of hexane (with an efficiency of 40 and 70%, respectively) and quantified by gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID) or gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) or both. Product yields of duplicate assays were typically within ca. 10%. Rates for ethylbenzene dehydrogenase activity were calculated by dividing the sum of the amount of 1-phenylethanol and acetophenone formed by the elapsed time. The rate for 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase was calculated by dividing the amount of acetophenone produced by the elapsed time.
Aerobic assays were performed by purging air into the assay mixture for 2 min before adding the volatile substrate. The reaction was initiated by addition of ethylbenzene or 1-phenylethanol. For substrate specificity assays, 800 nmol of the substrate (o-, m-, or p-ethyltoluene, 4-fluoroethylbenzene, 4-chloroethylbenzene, propylbenzene, or styrene) was added. Oxidation products (alcohols and ketones homologous to 1-phenylethanol and acetophenone) of these substrates were identified and quantified by GC-FID or GC-MS analysis following extraction into 1 ml of hexane. The assay buffer used for optimum pH determination was an anaerobic mixture of constant ionic strength containing 100 mM Tris, 50 mM 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES), and 50 mM acetic acid (10). Km values were calculated from a nonlinear least-squares fit of experimental data to the equation v = Vmax × S/(Km + S) by using the computer program SCIENTIST (MicroMath Scientific Software, Salt Lake City, Utah). The range of substrate concentrations used for the determination of Km values was 10 to 800 µM ethylbenzene for ethylbenzene dehydrogenase activity and 10 to 600 µM 1-phenylethanol for 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase activity.Other enzyme assays. Malate dehydrogenase (22) and NADH:p-benzoquinone oxidoreductase activities were determined in photometric assays by monitoring the absorbance at 340 nm. The 1-ml NADH:p-benzoquinone oxidoreductase assay mixture contained 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.5), 1 mM p-benzoquinone, 0.25 mM NADH, and approximately 0.02 mg of protein as cell extract. The reaction was started by the addition of p-benzoquinone. The progress of the reaction was monitored by measuring the decrease in absorbance at 340 nm. Under our assay conditions, NADH oxidation by p-benzoquinone occurred both chemically and enzymatically. Therefore, the abiotic rate (assay mixture without cell extract; approximately 100 nmol/min) was subtracted from the total rate to determine the rate of the enzyme-catalyzed reaction.
Cell suspension experiment. Cell suspension experiments were performed as previously described (2) with ethylbenzene and nitrate as substrates. The cell suspension reactions were halted by centrifugation at 10,000 × g (20 min at 4°C) after 2 h of anaerobic incubation while shaking (approximately 100 rpm). The supernatant was immediately extracted with 20 ml of hexane. The hexane extract was concentrated approximately fourfold and analyzed by chiral high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC).
Chemical analysis. Optical density and absorbance measurements were made with an HP model 8451A diode array spectrophotometer (Hewlett-Packard).
1-Phenylethanol, acetophenone, 1-phenyl-1-propanol, propiophenone, 4-fluoro-1-phenylethanol, 4-fluoroacetophenone, 4-chloro-1-phenylethanol, and 4-chloroacetophenone were analyzed with an Hewlett-Packard 5890 Series II gas chromatograph-flame ionization detector (Hewlett-Packard) equipped with a DB 1701 fused-silica capillary column (length, 30 m; inside diameter, 0.32 mm; J&W Scientific) with a flow rate of 1 ml/min. Compounds were identified by comparison of retention times to authentic standards, and their identities were confirmed by GC-MS. Detection limits were approximately 1 nmol. Analyses of 1-phenylethanol, acetophenone, 1-phenyl-1-propanol, and propiophenone were isothermal at 90°C. The retention times of 1-phenylethanol, acetophenone, 1-phenyl-1-propanol, and propiophenone were 11.5, 10.4, 17.5, and 16.6 min, respectively. 4-Fluoro-1-phenylethanol and 4-fluoroacetophenone were analyzed by GC-FID with an 80°C isocratic temperature setting. The retention times for 4-fluoro-1-phenylethanol and 4-fluoroacetophenone were 22.4 and 16.1 min, respectively. 4-Chloro-1-phenylethanol and 4-chloroacetophenone were analyzed by GC-FID with a temperature program of isocratic 90°C for 15 min followed by a temperature gradient of 10°C per min up to 200°C. The retention times for 4-chloro-1-phenylethanol and 4-chloroacetophenone were 22.2 and 20.6 min, respectively. Products of the ethylbenzene dehydrogenase assays with 2-, 3-, or 4-ethyltoluene as substrate were analyzed by GC-MS. No authentic standards were commercially available for comparison; therefore, products could be identified only by peak detection and an analysis of the molecular mass. The detection limit was estimated to be approximately 10 nmol based on the detection limit of similar compounds such as 1-phenylethanol and acetophenone. GC-MS analyses were performed as described previously (2). Chiral high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was performed with an HP 1050 series pump system (Hewlett-Packard) equipped with a 25-cm Chiralpak AD (Chiral Technologies Inc., Exton, Penn.) column and 100-µl sample loop. Chromatographic conditions were as described previously (18). (R)-(+)-1-phenylethanol and (S)-(
)-1-phenylethanol were identified by comparison of
retention times to those of authentic chiral standards and by
coinjection with optically pure (R)-(+)-1-phenylethanol and
(S)-(
)-1-phenylethanol. Retention times varied by several minutes per day but were approximately 48 min for
(S)-(
)-1-phenylethanol and 45 min for
(R)-(+)-1-phenylethanol. The response also varied by day,
with a detection limit of approximately 10 nmol.
Protein was determined by the method of Bradford (6) by
using a commercially available dye-binding assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif.). Bovine serum albumin was used as the standard.
Chemicals and solutions. Chemicals were reagent grade and were purchased from Sigma or Aldrich (Milwaukee, Wis.). 4-Fluoroethylbenzene and 4-chloroethylbenzene were purchased from Lancaster Synthesis, Inc. (Windam, N.H.). All solutions except for p-benzoquinone (20 mM) and menaquinone (10 mM) were prepared with distilled water; p-benzoquinone and menaquinone solutions were prepared with 70% ethanol in distilled water.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ethylbenzene dehydrogenase and 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase
activities in cell extracts.
The denitrifying bacterium
Azoarcus sp. strain EB1 was previously shown to completely
mineralize ethylbenzene to carbon dioxide via the initial metabolic
intermediates 1-phenylethanol and acetophenone (2). We
developed assays to characterize ethylbenzene dehydrogenase and
1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase activities in vitro. When establishing assays for these redox reactions, we examined physiological and artificial electron acceptors with a standard-state redox potential (E0') that was more positive than that of the redox pair,
1-phenylethanol/ethylbenzene (E0' =
12 mV) (calculated
from data in references 9 and 13) and of acetophenone/1-phenylethanol (E0' =
265 mV)
(calculated from data in references 1 and
13). Initial experiments revealed that when 1 mM
p-benzoquinone was used as the electron acceptor, ethylbenzene was oxidized to both 1-phenylethanol and acetophenone. We
did not expect ethylbenzene to be transformed beyond 1-phenylethanol and acetophenone, since our in vitro assay mixture did not contain an
energy source (e.g., ATP), which was expected to be required for
carboxylation of acetophenone to benzoyl acetate (Fig. 1). As is
evident from Table 1, the highest
specific activity was detected with p-benzoquinone. Among
all electron acceptors tested, none was identified that served only for
ethylbenzene oxidation but not for 1-phenylethanol oxidation.
Therefore, we assayed ethylbenzene dehydrogenase activity with
p-benzoquinone and defined the activity as the sum of
1-phenylethanol and acetophenone formed per unit time. Under standard
assay conditions, ethylbenzene dehydrogenase activity was found in cell
extracts of Azoarcus sp. strain EB1 at a specific rate of 5 to 10 nmol min
1 [mg of protein]
1. The
amounts of reaction products increased linearly over time for at least
20 min, as shown in Fig. 2. Ethylbenzene
dehydrogenase activity was linearly dependent upon the protein
concentration, and heat-treated cell extracts did not display any
activity (data not shown). The optimum pH for the assay was 7.5, with
constant-ionic-strength buffers between pH 4 and 10 tested (data not
shown). The ethylbenzene dehydrogenase activity was not oxygen
sensitive, since addition of the reducing agent titanium(III) citrate
(up to 0.2 mM) to the standard assay mixture did not increase activity
(data not shown). The assay could also be performed under aerobic
conditions without a loss of activity.
|
|
1 [mg of protein]
1.
Unfrozen cell extract had a specific activity of approximately 50 nmol
min
1 [mg of protein]
1. The rate of
1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase activity was protein dependent, and
heat-treated cell extracts were inactive (data not shown). The
1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase activity did not appear to be oxygen
sensitive, since acetophenone was formed in the ethylbenzene
dehydrogenase assay under aerobic conditions and oxygen could serve as
an electron acceptor for 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase activity (Table
1).
|
Localization of the ethylbenzene dehydrogenase and 1-phenylethanol
dehydrogenase activities.
The cytoplasmic and membrane fractions
were tested for ethylbenzene dehydrogenase and 1-phenylethanol
dehydrogenase activities. As shown in Table
2, the membrane fraction contained
approximately half of the recovered ethylbenzene dehydrogenase activity
whereas 70% of the 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase activity was found in the cytoplasmic fraction. Malate dehydrogenase (22) and
NADH:p-benzoquinone oxidoreductase activities were used as
cytoplasmic and membrane marker activities, respectively. The
distribution of ethylbenzene dehydrogenase activity between the
cytoplasmic and membrane fractions suggests that ethylbenzene
dehydrogenase activity is membrane associated. Preliminary experiments
show that ethylbenzene dehydrogenase activity can be solubilized by a
high sodium chloride concentration (data not shown).
|
Substrate specificity of ethylbenzene dehydrogenase activity. We tested whether several ethylbenzene derivatives could be transformed by cell extracts of ethylbenzene-grown Azoarcus sp. strain EB1. After the incubation period, reaction products were extracted and analyzed by GC-FID and GC-MS. In assay mixtures that contained o-, m-, or p-ethyltoluene as the substrate, no transformation products could be detected following 10 min of incubation (the detection limit was approximately 10 nmol). Moreover, addition of 700 nmol of these compounds to the standard ethylbenzene dehydrogenase assay mixture did not inhibit ethylbenzene oxidation (data not shown). Oxidation products of the halogenated ethylbenzene, 4-chloroethylbenzene, were not detected by GC-FID or GC-MS analysis (detection limit, 1 nmol) following 10 min or 1 h of incubation, but oxidation products of 4-fluoroethylbenzene were detected. After 10 min of incubation, approximately 200 nmol of 4-fluoroacetophenone were detected. We also tested propylbenzene as a substrate and detected small amounts of 1-phenylpropanol (3 nmol) and propiophenone (0.5 nmol) by GC-FID and GC-MS analysis following 20 min of incubation.
As we showed previously, ethylbenzene oxidation to 1-phenylethanol is a dehydrogenation reaction where the hydroxyl group of 1-phenylethanol is derived from water. One possible mechanism for this enzymatic reaction is the initial desaturation of the ethyl side chain to form styrene, followed by hydration of styrene to form 1-phenylethanol. To test the hypothesis that styrene is a free intermediate of enzymatic ethylbenzene oxidation, styrene was used as a substrate for ethylbenzene dehydrogenase or as an inhibitor of ethylbenzene oxidation or both. No products were detected by GC-FID or GC-MS analysis following a 30-min incubation of the ethylbenzene dehydrogenase assay mixture with styrene as the sole substrate, nor did addition of styrene (800 nmol) to the standard ethylbenzene dehydrogenase assay mixture inhibit ethylbenzene dehydrogenase activity. The specific oxidation rate of ethylbenzene in the presence of styrene was 9.6 nmol min
1 [mg of protein]
1, compared to 10 nmol min
1 [mg of protein]
1 in the absence
of styrene. This observation suggests that styrene is not a free
intermediate of ethylbenzene oxidation to 1-phenylethanol.
Stereospecificity of ethylbenzene dehydrogenase and
stereoselectivity of 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase.
Because the
C-1 carbon of 1-phenylethanol is a chiral center, we investigated
whether (S)-(
)-1-phenylethanol,
(R)-(+)-1-phenylethanol, or both enantiomers were formed
from ethylbenzene. The concentration of 1-phenylethanol in the in vitro
assay mixture was too low to be analyzed by chiral HPLC. Therefore, we
isolated 1-phenylethanol from ethylbenzene-metabolizing cell
suspensions of Azoarcus sp. strain EB1. When the
metabolically produced 1-phenylethanol, coinjected with
(S)-(
)-1-phenylethanol, was applied to the chiral HPLC
column, the 1-phenylethanol coeluted with the
(S)-(
)-1-phenylethanol standard (as evidenced by a single
larger peak [Fig. 4]). However, when
metabolically produced 1-phenylethanol, coinjected with
(R)-(+)-1-phenylethanol, was analyzed, an additional peak
eluting at the time of (R)-(+)-1-phenylethanol elution was
detected which was not present in the metabolic sample. These
chromatograms revealed that only the (S) enantiomer of
1-phenylethanol was formed from ethylbenzene by Azoarcus sp.
strain EB1.
|
)-1-phenylethanol was oxidized to acetophenone but that (R)-(+)-1-phenylethanol was not transformed (data not
shown). In addition, 100 µM (R)-(+)-1-phenylethanol did
not inhibit the oxidation of (S)-(
)-1-phenylethanol (at 20 to 200 µM) to acetophenone. These results provide experimental
evidence that 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase is a stereoselective
enzyme, oxidizing only the (S) enantiomer of
1-phenylethanol.
1-Phenylethanol dehydrogenase activity in dialyzed cell
extracts.
In the standard 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase assay, we
observed 1-phenylethanol oxidation with p-benzoquinone as
the electron acceptor. Of this activity, 70% was found in the
cytoplasmic fraction (Table 2). To investigate this unusual coupling of
a quinone to the cytoplasmic 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase, we examined this activity more closely. Using the standard 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase assay, we found that 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase activity increased linearly with p-benzoquinone
concentration up to 5 mM (data not shown). These findings led us to
reason that an electron carrier that coupled 1-phenylethanol oxidation
to p-benzoquinone reduction may be present in the cell
extract. Hence, we dialyzed the cell extract overnight and reexamined
the in vitro assay. Following dialysis, the rate of 1-phenylethanol
oxidation with p-benzoquinone as electron acceptor was
reduced to 2 nmol min
1 [mg of protein]
1.
In contrast, when NAD+, a common electron acceptor for
cytoplasmic alcohol dehydrogenases, was used as the sole electron
acceptor in the assay, the specific activity before and after dialysis
was similar, i.e., 5 (Table 1) and 7 nmol min
1 [mg of
protein]
1, respectively. To test whether
NAD+ may be involved as an electron carrier between
1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase and p-benzoquinone reductase,
we attempted to reconstitute the 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase activity
observed in our standard cell extract assay by using dialyzed cell
extract. When these assay mixtures were amended with 10 µM
NAD+ plus 1 mM p-benzoquinone, a specific
activity for 1-phenylethanol oxidation of 30 nmol min
1
[mg of protein]
1 was observed. This result suggests
that the 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase activity detected in undialyzed
cell extracts may involve a coupling of 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase
activity, which presumably used residual NAD+ as the
electron acceptor, and an NADH:p-benzoquinone oxidoreductase activity, which oxidized NADH. Enzymatic NADH oxidation by
p-benzoquinone occurred very rapidly (0.7 µmol
min
1 [mg of protein]
1). Therefore, this
activity would not be the rate-limiting step in the assay with dialyzed
cell extract or in the standard 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase assay
(Fig. 3; Table 1).
1 [mg of protein]
1, which would
suggest a high Km for p-benzoquinone
in the NADH:p-benzoquinone oxidoreductase activity. This
observation is consistent with our earlier observation with undialyzed
cell extracts.
The 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase activity was much lower with
NAD+ as the sole electron acceptor than with small amounts
of NAD+ plus 1 mM p-benzoquinone. In addition, a
spectrophotometric assay monitoring the absorbance at 340 nm for
1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase showed that the rate of NADH formation
decreased rapidly (data not shown). One possible explanation is an
inhibition of 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase activity by NADH. We also
found that addition of 1 mM NADH to the 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase
assay mixture resulted in an 86% decrease in activity (data not
shown). To circumvent this apparent inhibition by NADH, we investigated
the reverse reaction of 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase, the reduction of
acetophenone to 1-phenylethanol. In this new assay, enzymatic reduction
of acetophenone to 1-phenylethanol was monitored spectrophotometrically (NADH depletion at 340 nm) or by GC (1-phenylethanol formation). We
discovered that the specific activity as measured by the decrease in
NADH and/or the formation of 1-phenylethanol consisted of two rates, an initial high rate (5 to 10 nmol min
1 [mg
of protein]
1) followed by a much lower rate (0.5 to 2 nmol min
1) after 1 to 3 min. Only the initial high
rate was dependent upon protein concentration (data not shown).
The 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase assays with dialyzed cell extracts
suggest that NAD+ is a likely physiological electron
acceptor for 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase. Furthermore,
1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase activity may be tightly regulated by the
concentration of NADH.
Induction of enzyme activities.
We investigated which
anaerobic growth substrates would lead to the expression of
ethylbenzene dehydrogenase and 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase activities
in Azoarcus sp. strain EB1. We found that when
Azoarcus sp. strain EB1 was grown anaerobically on
ethylbenzene, 1-phenylethanol, or acetophenone, both ethylbenzene
dehydrogenase and 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase activities were found
at high specific rates (Table 3).
Conversely, if cells were grown anaerobically on benzoate, neither
1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase nor ethylbenzene dehydrogenase activity
was found. This suggests that the initial anaerobic ethylbenzene
degradation intermediates were able to induce these activities but
benzoate was not.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Anaerobic ethylbenzene mineralization is initiated by a novel
enzymatic reaction, the oxidation of ethylbenzene to 1-phenylethanol catalyzed by an ethylbenzene dehydrogenase activity (2, 20) (Fig. 1). This activity and a 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase activity represent the first reactions in the anaerobic ethylbenzene degradation pathway (Fig. 1). We examined the ethylbenzene dehydrogenase and 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase activities in cell extracts of
ethylbenzene grown cells of Azoarcus sp. strain EB1. By
using p-benzoquinone as an electron acceptor, the
ethylbenzene dehydrogenase activity of approximately 10 nmol
min
1 [mg of protein]
1 detected in vitro
accounts for approximately 10% of the observed rate of ethylbenzene
consumption in cell suspension
0.1 µmol min
1 [mg of
protein]
1 (2) (Fig. 2). The highest specific
activity in vitro was observed when p-benzoquinone served as
the electron acceptor (Table 1), and this activity was membrane
associated (Table 2). These findings suggest that a quinone is the
physiological electron acceptor for ethylbenzene dehydrogenase.
Recently, Rabus and Heider (19) reported ethylbenzene
dehydrogenase activity in cell extracts of ethylbenzene-grown
denitrifying strain EbN1 at a specific rate of 10 to 30 pmol
min
1 [mg of protein]
1. In these studies,
nitrate was used as the electron acceptor. The 1,000-fold-higher
specific activity observed in our cell extract may be due to the
selection of p-benzoquinone as the electron acceptor and to
differences in experimental handling.
We explored the substrate specificity of the ethylbenzene dehydrogenase activity. When ring-substituted ethylbenzenes were tested as substrates for ethylbenzene dehydrogenase activity, only 4-fluoroethylbenzene was oxidized. After 10 min of incubation in the standard ethylbenzene dehydrogenase assay, 4-fluoroethylbenzene was transformed to an extent similar to that of ethylbenzene (approximately 0.2 µmol compared to 0.1 µmol), suggesting that activation of ethylbenzene at the para position may not be essential for the enzymatic dehydrogenation reaction. The methyl- and 4-chloro-substituted ethylbenzenes may not have been oxidized due to steric hindrance by the ring substituents.
The effect of the alkyl side chain on ethylbenzene dehydrogenase activity was examined with propylbenzene as substrate. Propylbenzene, which is not a growth substrate for Azoarcus sp. strain EB1 (15a), was transformed to 1-phenylpropanol and propiophenone at a low rate (approximately 2 nmol was detected after 10 min), suggesting that the methyl group in the alpha position with respect to the methylene carbon of ethylbenzene may not be crucial for catalysis. The low activity observed with propylbenzene as the substrate may be due to suboptimal binding of the substrate at the active site. The propylbenzene- and ethylbenzene-mineralizing, denitrifying bacterium PbN1 was found to utilize 1-phenyl-1-propanol and propiophenone, but not 1-phenyl-2-propanol, as growth substrates under denitrifying conditions (20). It is therefore conceivable that an enzyme activity related to the ethylbenzene dehydrogenase activity described here is involved in the first step of anaerobic propylbenzene mineralization.
In one possible reaction mechanism of ethylbenzene dehydrogenase, ethylbenzene may be transformed to 1-phenylethanol in a two-step process consisting of a dehydrogenation followed by a hydration. A two-step dehydrogenation-hydration reaction has been proposed for p-cresol methylhydroxylase (14). This enzyme catalyzes the oxidation of p-cresol under aerobic (14) and denitrifying (15) conditions by dehydrogenation of p-cresol to a quinone methide, which is hydrated to form p-hydroxybenzyl alcohol. However, for p-cresol methylhydroxylase activity, the hydroxyl group para to the alkyl group is required for activity (17), suggesting that the para hydroxyl group may assist in the removal of a hydride. Oxidation of ethylbenzene could also involve a dehydrogenation-hydration mechanism, which would form styrene as an intermediate. When we assayed styrene as the substrate in the standard ethylbenzene dehydrogenase assay, we did not detect any 1-phenylethanol or acetophenone. Furthermore, styrene did not inhibit the rate of ethylbenzene oxidation. These observations are consistent with the notion that styrene is not a free intermediate in ethylbenzene oxidation to 1-phenylethanol.
Similar to p-cresol methylhydroxylase, the ethylbenzene dehydrogenase activity is insensitive to molecular oxygen. This is interesting since Azoarcus sp. strain EB1 can grow on ethylbenzene only under denitrifying conditions (2). However, this strain is able to grow aerobically with 1-phenylethanol. This may suggest that the expression of ethylbenzene dehydrogenase or ethylbenzene uptake may be coregulated by molecular oxygen.
The second enzyme of anaerobic ethylbenzene mineralization is
1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase (Fig. 1). 1-Phenylethanol dehydrogenase activity was found in the cytoplasmic fraction of Azoarcus
sp. strain EB1 (Table 2). Examination of the 1-phenylethanol
dehydrogenase activity with dialyzed cell extract suggests that
NAD+ is the most likely electron acceptor in this reaction.
Consistent with the stereospecific formation of
(S)-(
)-1-phenylethanol by ethylbenzene dehydrogenase (Fig.
4) is the finding that in cell extracts, only this enantiomer was
oxidized to acetophenone.
Under denitrifying conditions, both enzyme activities, ethylbenzene dehydrogenase and 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase, were present in cells grown with 1-phenylethanol and acetophenone as the substrate, whereas in benzoate-grown cells these activities were not detected. These findings are consistent with the different protein banding patterns detected by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of cell extracts from strain EbN1 grown on ethylbenzene or benzoate (19).
The ethylbenzene dehydrogenase and 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase activities described here support the proposed pathway of anaerobic ethylbenzene and 1-phenylethanol degradation (Fig. 1) (2). The information concerning these activities and the assays developed to measure them can now be used for purification of the environmentally relevant ethylbenzene dehydrogenase and 1-phenylethanol dehydrogenase activities.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Funding for this project was provided by a grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through the Western Region Hazardous Substance Research Center and National Science Foundation grant MCB 9733535.
We thank Bettina Rosner for technical advice.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Environmental Engineering and Science, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4020. Phone: (650) 723-3668. Fax: (650) 725-3164. E-mail: spormann{at}ce.stanford.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Department of Chemical Engineering, Penn State University. 1991. Physical and thermodynamic properties of pure chemicals. Data compilation. Design Institute for Physical Property Data University Park, Pa. |
| 2. |
Ball, H. A.,
H. A. Johnson,
M. Reinhard, and A. M. Spormann.
1996.
Initial reactions in anaerobic ethylbenzene oxidation by a denitrifying bacterium, strain EB1.
J. Bacteriol.
178:5755-5761 |
| 3. |
Beller, H. R., and A. M. Spormann.
1997.
Anaerobic activation of toluene and o-xylene by addition to fumarate in denitrifying strain T.
J. Bacteriol.
179:670-676 |
| 4. | Beller, H. R., and A. M. Spormann. 1997. Benzylsuccinate formation as a means of anaerobic toluene activation by sulfate-reducing strain PRTOL1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:3729-3731[Abstract]. |
| 5. | Biegert, T., G. Fuchs, and J. Heider. 1996. Evidence that anaerobic oxidation of toluene in the denitrifying bacterium Thauera aromatica is initiated by formation of benzylsuccinate from toluene and fumarate. Eur. J. Biochem. 238:661-668[Medline]. |
| 6. | Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:248-254[Medline]. |
| 7. | Cline, P. V., J. J. Delfino, and P. S. C. Rao. 1991. Partitioning of aromatic constituents into water from gasoline and other complex solvent mixtures. Environ. Sci. Technol. 25:914-920. |
| 8. | Dean, B. J. 1985. Recent findings on the genetic toxicology of benzene, toluene, xylenes, and phenols. Mutat. Res. 154:153-181[Medline]. |
| 9. | Dean, J. A. (ed.). 1992. Lange's handbook of chemistry, 14th ed. McGraw-Hill Publishers, New York, N.Y. |
| 10. | Ellis, K. J., and J. F. Morrison. 1982. Buffers of constant ionic strength for studying pH-dependent processes. Methods Enzymol. 87:405-426[Medline]. |
| 11. | Fuchs, G., M. E. S. Mohamed, U. Altenschmidt, J. Kock, A. Lack, R. Brackmann, C. Lochmeyer, and B. Oswald. 1994. Biochemistry of anaerobic biodegradation of aromatic compounds, p. 513-553. In C. Ratledge (ed.), Biochemistry of microbial degradation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Mass. |
| 12. | Gibson, D. T., and V. Subramanian. 1984. Microbial degradation of aromatic hydrocarbons, p. 181-252. In D. Gibson (ed.), Microbial degradation of organic compounds. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y. |
| 13. | Guthrie, P. 1978. Equilibrium constants for a series of simple aldol condensations and linear free energy relations with other carbonyl addition reactions. Can. J. Chem. 56:962-973. |
| 14. | Hopper, D. J. 1976. The hydroxylation of p-cresol and its conversion to p-hydroxybenzaldehyde in Pseudomonas putida. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 69:462-468[Medline]. |
| 15. |
Hopper, D. J.,
I. D. Bossert, and M. E. Rhodes-Roberts.
1991.
p-Cresol methylhydroxylase from a denitrifying bacterium involved in anaerobic degradation of p-cresol.
J. Bacteriol.
173:1298-1301 |
| 15a. | Johnson, H., and A. Spormann. Unpublished data. |
| 16. | Krieger, C. K., H. R. Beller, M. Reinhard, and A. M. Spormann. Initial reactions in anaerobic oxidation of m-xylene by the denitrifying bacterium Azoarcus sp. strain T. Submitted for publication. |
| 17. | McIntire, W., D. J. Hopper, and T. J. Singer. 1985. p-Cresol methylhydroxylase: assay and general principles. Biochem. J. 228:325-335[Medline]. |
| 18. | Naemura, K., M. Murata, R. Tanaka, M. Yano, K. Hirose, and Y. Tobe. 1996. Enantioselective acylation of primary and secondary alcohols catalyzed by lipase QL from Alcaligenes sp.: a predictive active-site model for lipase QL to identify which enantiomer of an alcohol reacts faster in this acylation. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 7:3285-3294. |
| 19. | Rabus, R., and J. Heider. 1998. Initial reactions of anaerobic metabolism of alkylbenzenes in denitrifying and sulfate-reducing bacteria. Arch. Microbiol. 170:377-384. |
| 20. | Rabus, R., and F. Widdel. 1995. Anaerobic degradation of ethylbenzene and other aromatic hydrocarbons by new denitrifying bacteria. Arch. Microbiol. 163:96-103[Medline]. |
| 21. | Sittig, M. 1985. Handbook of toxic and hazardous chemicals and carcinogens, 2nd ed. Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, N.J. |
| 22. | Stams, A. J. M., D. R. Kremer, K. Nicolay, G. H. Weenk, and T. A. Hansen. 1984. Pathway of propionate formation in Desulfobulbus propionicus. Arch. Microbiol. 139:167-173. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Appl. Environ. Microbiol. | Infect. Immun. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|---|---|
| Mol. Cell. Biol. | J. Virol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. |
| ALL ASM JOURNALS |