Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, January 1999, p. 375-381, Vol. 181, No. 2
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Sequence Analysis of the Gene Encoding Amylosucrase
from Neisseria polysaccharea and Characterization of the
Recombinant Enzyme
G. Potocki
De
Montalk,1
M.
Remaud-Simeon,1
R. M.
Willemot,1
V.
Planchot,2 and
P.
Monsan1,*
Centre de Bioingénierie Gilbert Durand,
UMR CNRS 5504, LA INRA DGBA, INSA, Complexe Scientifique de Rangueil,
31 077 Toulouse Cedex,1 and
INRA URPOI
44 316 Nantes Cedex 3,2 France
Received 24 June 1998/Accepted 21 October 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
The Neisseria polysaccharea gene encoding amylosucrase
was subcloned and expressed in Escherichia coli.
Sequencing revealed that the deduced amino acid sequence differs
significantly from that previously published. Comparison of the
sequence with that of enzymes of the
-amylase family predicted a
(
/
)8-barrel domain. Six of the eight highly conserved
regions in amylolytic enzymes are present in amylosucrase. Among them,
four constitute the active site in
-amylases. These sites were also
conserved in the sequence of glucosyltransferases and
dextransucrases. Nevertheless, the evolutionary tree does not show
strong homology between them. The amylosucrase was purified by
affinity chromatography between fusion protein glutathione
S-transferase-amylosucrase and glutathione-Sepharose 4B. The pure enzyme linearly elongated some branched chains of glycogen, to an average degree of polymerization of 75.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Amylosucrase is a
glucosyltransferase (EC 2.4.1.4) which catalyzes the transfer of
the D-glucopyranosyl unit from sucrose onto a glucan primer
and synthesizes an insoluble
-glucan, without using
-D-glucosylnucleoside-di-P as substrate (19-21,
28, 29, 42), unlike glycogen synthase. Indeed, the bacterial
synthesis of glycogen is frequently based on the transfer of glucose
from adenosine-5'-di-P-glucose (ADPG) onto an
-glucan chain, the
ADPG itself being formed by ADPG synthetase
(ADPG-
-D-glucose-1-P-adenyltransferase) from
-D-glucose-1-P (32).
Amylosucrase was first discovered in cultures of Neisseria
perflava (7). In 1974, Neisseria
polysaccharea was isolated from the throats of healthy children in
Europe and Africa (34). This nonpathogenic strain was
shown to possess an extracellular amylosucrase that uses sucrose to
produce a linear polymer composed of
-(1
4)glucopyranosyl
residues having strong similarities with amylose (5, 33,
35). More recently, Büttcher et al. (5) cloned
and sequenced the gene coding for amylosucrase from N. polysaccharea. They report that the deduced amino acid sequence of
the enzyme has homology with the
-amylase class of enzymes. However,
regions known to be essential for the catalytic activity of
-amylases were scarcely found in the amylosucrase sequence reported.
This study describes the subcloning and sequencing of the gene encoding
amylosucrase from N. polysaccharea isolated by Remaud-Simeon et al. (33). The deduced amino acid sequence differs
significantly from that published by Büttcher et al.
(5). This allowed us to compare it more specifically with
enzymes from the
-amylase family. The recombinant enzyme was then
overexpressed by Escherichia coli, purified, and characterized.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains.
N. polysaccharea ATCC 43768 was
used as the source of chromosomal DNA. E. coli C-600 was
used as the cloning host for direct expression screening of the gene
library. E. coli DH1 was used as the host for the pUC19 and
ptrc99a vectors; strain BL21 was used as the host for the expression
plasmid pGEX-6-P-3.
Vectors.
Phage
EMBL3A was used to construct the genomic
library. pUC19 (New England Biolabs) and ptrc99a (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech) were used for subcloning and overexpression, respectively.
pGEX-6-P-3 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) was used for expression of
amylosucrase fused to glutathione S-transferase (GST-AS).
Cloning of amylosucrase.
The gene library was constructed by
partially digesting DNA from N. polysaccharea with
Sau3A and cloning the fragments into BamHI sites
of
EMBL3A as previously described (33). The recombinant E. coli C-600 bacteria in YT medium soft agar were plated on
top of M9 medium containing nutritional supplements (MgSO4,
CaCl2, thiamine, threonine, and leucine) and 0.7% sucrose.
After 6 h of growth at 37°C, plaques appeared in the soft agar
(37). When sucrase activity was expressed, the enzyme
catalyzed the release of fructose and/or glucose which were metabolized
by the bacteria and stimulated growth around the plaque, forming a
halo. As sucrose cannot be utilized by E. coli C-600, the
halo appeared only around the plaque where sucrase activity was
expressed. Recombinant phage DNA purification was carried out as
described by Sambrook et al. (37). A 15-kb fragment was
purified (33) and digested with KpnI and
HindIII to isolate a 6-kb fragment that was inserted between the KpnI and HindIII sites of pUC19.
The plasmid obtained was named AS/pUC19. The fragment was shown to
encode amylosucrase. Activity of the subclone was detected as described below.
Sequencing.
The recombinant plasmid AS/pUC19 was
automatically sequenced over the entire length of the insert by Genome
Express (Grenoble, France), using the method of Sanger et al.
(38). The sequencing reaction was performed by PCR
amplification in a final volume of 20 µl, using 100 ng of PCR
products, 5 pmol of primer, and 9.5 µl of BigDyeTerminators premix,
in accordance with the Applied Biosystems protocol. After heating of
the mixture to 94°C for 2 min, the reaction was cycled as follows: 25 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 55°C, and 4 min at
60°C (Perkin-Elmer 9600 thermal cycler). Removal of excess of
BigDyeTerminators was performed by using Quick Spin columns (Boehringer
Mannheim). The samples were dried in a vacuum centrifuge and dissolved
with 2 µl of deionized formamide-EDTA (pH 8.0) (5/1). The samples
were loaded onto an Applied Biosystems 373A sequencer and run for
12 h on a 4.5% denaturing acrylamide gel. Each reaction
was repeated three times to verify the sequence obtained.
The nucleotide sequence data were screened by using the ORF (open
reading frame) Finder program
(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gorf/gorf.orfig) to locate the
amylosucrase gene. Homology searches with proteins in GenBank
were carried out with BEAUTY
(http://dot.imgen.bcm.tmc.edu:9331/seq-search/protein-search.html) and Pfam (http://genome.wustl.edu/pfam/cgi-bin/hmm-page.cgi). Restriction sites of the amylosucrase sequence were determined with PCGene; the theoretical molecular weight and pI were determined by
using SWISS-2-D-PAGE (http://expasy.hcuge.ch/ch2d/pi-tool.html). The
evolutionary tree was constructed with ClustalW
(http://ebi.ac.uk/clustalw/).
Enzyme extraction methods.
Cultured recombinant bacteria
were centrifuged (8,000 × g, 10 min, 4°C), and the
culture supernatant was stored at 4°C for assay. Depending on the
intended use the bacterial pellet underwent one of two treatments.
(i) Osmotic shock.
To extract enzyme secreted into the
periplasmic space, the pellet was washed with 0.01 M Tris-HCl-0.03 M
NaCl (pH 7.3) and then centrifuged (5,000 × g, 5 min,
4°C). It was resuspended, concentrated to 1/20 the initial culture
volume with hypertonic solution (0.03 M Tris, 20% [wt/vol]
methyl-
-D-glucopyranoside, 1 mM EDTA [pH 7.3]), gently
mixed for 10 min at room temperature, and then centrifuged (5,000 × g, 5 min, 4°C); cells were resuspended and concentrated
to 1/20 the initial culture volume with hypotonic solution (water).
Then the pellet was centrifuged again (7,500 × g, 10 min, 4°C), and the supernatant was stored at 4°C.
(ii) Sonication.
To extract the intracellular enzyme, the
bacterial pellet was resuspended and concentrated at an optical density
at 600 nm of 80 in 50 mM maleate buffer (pH 6.4) or, for strain BL21,
in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 140 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1.8 mM KH2PO4
[pH 7.3]). After sonication, 1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100 was added to
the extract. After 30 min at 4°C and centrifugation (10,000 × g, 10 min, 4°C), the supernatant was stored at 4°C.
Amylosucrase assay.
The amylosucrase assay was carried out
at 30°C in 50 mM maleate buffer (pH 6.4) supplemented with sucrose
(50 g/liter) and glycogen (0.1 g/liter) (G-8751; Sigma Chemical Co.) as
a primer. Activities of the GST-AS amylosucrase fusion protein
and the purification fractions were measured at 30°C in sample
buffer (pH 7.0) in the presence of sucrose (50 g/liter) and
glycogen (0.1 g/liter).
One unit of amylosucrase corresponds to the amount of enzyme that
catalyzes the production of 1 µmol of fructose per min in the assay
conditions. The concentration of fructose was measured by
the dinitrosalicylic acid method, using fructose as a standard (39).
The production of fructose is related to the production of an
-glucan that precipitates in the tube. A slight amount of glucose, corresponding to a sucrose hydrolytic activity of amylosucrase, was
produced. However, it always constituted less than 12% of total
reducing sugars in assay conditions and thus was neglected. Protein
content was determined by the Bradford and micro-Bradford methods,
using bovine serum albumin as the standard (4).
Overexpression of amylosucrase.
For high-level expression,
the gene encoding amylosucrase was first amplified by PCR and cloned
into the expression vector ptrc99a, to obtain plasmid AS/ptrc99a. PCR
was carried out with DNA from recombinant
EMBL3A with a 15-kb insert
fragment as the matrix. The PCR primer oligonucleotides were
synthesized by Isoprim (Toulouse, France).
The direct primer
5'-AATCGGAGCAGGCACCATGGTGACCCCCACGCAG-3'
introduces the NcoI restriction site (boldface) around the authentic ATG codon and is located between bases 120 and 153 of the
amylosucrase gene nucleotide sequence. In the reverse primer 5'-ACGGCATTTGGGAAGCTTGCGTCAGGCGATTTCGAGC-3',
located between bases 2031 and 2067, a
HindIII site (boldface) was created to allow cloning.
The fragment obtained was ligated into ptrc99a digested with
NcoI and HindIII. The underlined bases
correspond to the mutations generated by PCR to introduce the
restriction sites.
Purification of amylosucrase.
Affinity chromatography
between the GST-AS fusion protein and the glutathione-Sepharose 4B
support was performed to purify the amylosucrase.
(i) Cloning of the GST-AS fusion protein.
To clone GST-AS,
we used the expression vector pGEX-6-P-3, which includes the GST
protein just downstream of the strong promoter Ptac and upstream of the cloning site. Cloning
was carried out between the EcoRI and NotI
restriction sites. The amylosucrase gene was amplified by PCR from
AS/pUC19, using the direct primer 5'-CAGCAAGTCGGTTTGAATTCACAGTACCTCAAAACACGC-3'
and reverse primer
5'-TCCGGTTCGGCGCAGCGGCCGCCTGAAACGGTTCAGA-3', including the EcoRI and NotI
restriction sites, respectively. These primers are localized
between bases 151 and 189 and bases 2067 and 2103, respectively,
of the amylosucrase gene nucleotide sequence. PCR was carried out in
the presence of 10% (vol/vol) dimethyl sulfoxide so as to avoid
nonspecific hybridization of the primers and thus the amplification of
interfering fragments. The PCR fragment was cloned into the
EcoRI and NotI sites of the vector pGEX-6-P-3.
This cloning results in a mutated amylosucrase in positions 11 and 12 (I
N and L
S), with deletions of amino acids 1 to 10, corresponding
to the first part of the putative signal sequence described by
Büttcher et al. (5). The plasmid obtained was used to
transform a protease-negative strain E. coli BL21.
(ii) Purification.
Purification was carried out at 4°C
except during the elution step. A 2-ml column of glutathione-Sepharose
4B (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) was equilibrated with 30 ml of PBS and
then with 6 ml of PBS-1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100. A volume of 1.5 ml
of enzyme extract from the sonication supernatant (corresponding to
12.3 mg of protein and 12.2 U of amylosucrase activity) was injected into the column, which was then washed with 70 ml of PBS. The fusion
protein was eluted with 2 ml of elution buffer (20 mM reduced glutathione-G-4251 [Sigma], 100 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 120 mM NaCl) after 10 min of contact at room temperature. The procedure was carried
out three times. The column was regenerated to remove residual
noneluted fusion proteins by using 30 ml of PBS-3 M NaCl and then 10 ml of 70% (vol/vol) ethanol and was then equilibrated with 30 ml of
PreScission buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.0], 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA,
1 mM dithiothreitol). The fraction containing the eluted fusion protein
was dialyzed against PreScission buffer at 4°C overnight. The fusion
protein was then subjected to proteolysis at 4°C for 4 h by
adding 2 U of PreScission protease (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) per 100 µg of fusion protein. The mixture was then injected into the
glutathione-Sepharose 4B column, the purified amylosucrase being eluted
in the PreScission buffer. The column was eluted and regenerated as
described above and then equilibrated and stored in PBS at 4°C.
Electrophoresis.
Electrophoresis was carried out with the
PHAST system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Under denaturing conditions,
the sample was diluted with denaturing buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM
EDTA, 2.5% [wt/vol] sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 5% [wt/vol]
-mercaptoethanol, 0.01% [wt/vol] bromophenol blue) and heated to
90°C for 1 min before being placed on a polyacrylamide PhastGel
gradient 8-25 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The buffer system in
PhastGel SDS buffer strips was 0.2 M tricine (trailing ion)-0.2 M
Tris-0.55% SDS (pH 8.1).
Under native conditions, the front-line marker was added to the sample
(10 µg of bromophenol blue per ml) and placed on a polyacrylamide
PhastGel gradient 8-25. The buffer system in PhastGel native buffer
strips was 0.88 M L-alanine-0.25 M Tris (pH 8.8).
The isoelectric point of amylosucrase was determined by using PhastGel
IEF 3-9 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), which is a homogeneous polyacrylamide gel containing Pharmalyte carrier ampholytes. For these
three types of electrophoresis, the proteins were stained with 0.5%
(wt/vol) AgNO3.
Production and characterization of the polymer synthesized.
The synthesis reaction was performed at 30°C for 24 h in
PreScission buffer, supplemented with sucrose (50 g/liter) and oyster glycogen (1 g/liter) with 19.5 mg of pure amylosucrase per liter. The
reaction was stopped by adding 60% (vol/vol) dimethyl sulfoxide (which
solubilized the water-insoluble polymer) and heating to 100°C for
1 h. The polymer was then precipitated with ethanol at 4°C and
dried by solvent exchange (ethanol-acetone).
(i)
-Amylolysis and deramification experiments.
Glucans
(0.8%) were solubilized in dimethyl sulfoxide. After dilution in 50 mM
morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) buffer (pH 7.0) to a final
concentration of 2 mg/ml, 10 µl of
-amylase from
Bacillus sp. (2000 U/mg; Megazyme) was added, and the
reaction was run for 3 h at 40°C. The determination of reducing
ends was performed as described by Nelson (27).
Deramification was performed with isomylase from Hayashibara.
Solubilized glucans were diluted in 50 mM citrate buffer (pH 3.8) to a
final concentration of 2 mg/ml; 5 µl of isoamylase from Pseudomonas sp. (5,900 U/mg) was added, and the reaction was
performed at 37°C for 48 h.
Concentrations were checked by the sulfuric acid-orcinol colorimetric
method. After total digestion by glucoamylase (Megazyme), glucose was
measured by the glucose-oxidase/peroxidase method (31).
(ii) Sample preparation for high-performance size-exclusion
chromatography (HPSEC)-MALLS.
To prepare
-glucan solutions in
0.1 M KOH, amylose powder was dispersed in 1 M KOH, gently stirred
overnight at 4°C, and then diluted to 0.1 M KOH. For water solutions,
-glucan powder was dispersed by boiling for 5 to 30 min, until the
aqueous buffer used as the eluent was clarified.
-Glucan solutions
were then cooled to room temperature.
Prior to the injection of 200 µl, all samples were filtered directly
into the autosampler cell through Durapore HV (0.45-µm-pore-size) membranes without affecting the
-glucan concentrations, which were
in the range 1 to 5 g/liter. Concentrations were checked before
injection by the sulfuric acid-orcinol colorimetric method (31);
-glucan sample recovery calculated from the area of
the refractive index profile was always greater than 95%.
(iii) HPSEC.
The HPSEC system was used as described
previously (3). Dual detection of solutes was carried out
with a detector Dawn DSP-F MALLS (Wyatt Technology Corporation, Santa
Barbara, Calif.) and a differential refractive index detector (Erma
ERC-7510) in series.
The size exclusion chromatography (SEC) system comprised a precolumn
and three Shodex OHpak KB-800 series columns (300 by 8 mm; Showa Denko
K.K., Tokyo, Japan), connected in the order KB-806-KB-805-KB-804. The
columns were maintained at 30°C via Crococil temperature control
(Cluzeau, Bordeaux, France). The eluent was water taken from a
Milli-RO-6-Plus and Milli-Q-Plus water purification system (Millipore,
Bedford, Mass.) to which 0.02% (wt/wt) sodium azide was added. It was
carefully degassed and filtered through Durapore GV
(0.22-µm-pore-size) membranes (Millipore) before use. The mobile
phase (flow rate of 1 ml/min) was filtered on-line before the injector
through Durapore GV (0.22-µm pore-size) and VV (0.1-µm-pore-size)
membranes. The sample (200 µl) was injected into the HPSEC system.
(iv) Data analysis.
For each sampling time of the elution
pattern corresponding to one elution volume
(Vi), a concentration
(ci) is calculated from the differential
refractive index response. Following this determination, measurement of
the light scattered by the 15 Dawn-F photodiodes allows the
determination of molecular weight (Mi) and
radius of gyration (Ri = <rg2 >i1/2) of
-glucans
by ASTRA version 1.4, based on the equation
where K is the optical constant,
Rq is the excess Rayleigh ratio of the solute,
is the wavelength (632.8 nm) of the incident laser beam, and
ci is calculated from the differential
refractive index response (dn/dc being the refractive index
increment with a value of 0.146 ml/g for
-glucans) (30).
Mi and Ri are obtained
from the y intercept to zero angle and from the slope of the
expected straight line, respectively. The lowest errors for determined
Mi and radius of gyration Ri = <rg2 >i1/2) values were
obtained by the Debye method; only the eight lowest angles were used
(from 22° to 90°) with a second-order polynomial fit.
Weight average molar mass (
w) is
then calculated as
The root-mean-square z-average radius of gyration
G (
G = <
g2 >z1/2) is
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The amylosucrase gene
sequence has been submitted to the EMBL nucleotide sequence database
and assigned accession no. AJ011781.
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Sequencing of the N. polysaccharea gene coding for
amylosucrase.
The sonicated cell extracts of E. coli
DH1 clones transformed by plasmid AS/pUC19 tested positive for
amylosucrase activity in the amylosucrase assay. Plasmid AS/pUC19 was
sequenced on the full length of the 6-kb insert. An ORF search in the
six possible reading frames revealed the presence of seven ORFs of 500 nucleotides (nt) or more. The deduced amino acid sequences from the
seven ORFs were subjected to protein sequence comparison using Pfam. Only one of the seven ORFs belongs to a known enzyme family; it corresponds to the amylosucrase gene. This ORF consists of 1,911 nucleotides nt encoding a protein of 636 amino acids. Also, no ORF of
more than 500 bases was present in the same reading frame as that of
the gene encoding amylosucrase. No protein capable of interfering in
the enzymatic reaction catalyzed by amylosucrase is present near it.
Therefore, the amylosucrase from N. polysaccharea is
not expressed via a multigenic system.
The previously identified (5) regulatory elements promoting
gene expression are present in the amylosucrase gene sequence. The
consensus sequences of bacterial promoters are located between nt 26 and 33 and between nt 50 and 55 of the amylosucrase gene nucleotide
sequence; the putative Shine-Dalgarno sequence is located between nt
126 and 129.
The coding sequence described in this report is 98.6% identical to a
sequence previously published (5) but differs in several regions. Its length is 1,911 bp instead of the 1,842 for the sequence previously published, the termination codon appearing 53 bp after that
of the cited sequence. The deduced amino acid sequence exhibits only
76% identity with the previously published sequence. In particular, comparison of the two sequences shows that four regions (A-183 to
W-202, R-274 to Q-312, S-507 to T-537, and R-579 to A-636) are totally
different. For this reason, the sequence was determined with an
automatic sequencer; it was checked three times, using different
primers, to confirm the amylosucrase gene sequence reported here.
In addition, the EcoNI restriction profile of the
amylosucrase gene cloned into the vector ptrc99a revealed errors in the previously published sequence (5), as the authors have now confirmed (15a). In the nucleotide sequence reported here,
two EcoNI sites can be identified, digestion being effective
after bases 1066 and 1993 and resulting in two DNA fragments of 927 and
5,109 bp. In the previously published sequence, only the second site
was reported, because of the omissions of C-1067 and G-1072.
Sequence comparison of amylosucrase with related
enzymes.
A characteristic (
/
)8-barrel fold
was predicted in the protein structure by using Pfam. In
addition, the eight-stranded
/
barrel is interrupted by the
presence of a separate folding module (70 amino acids) homologous
to a calcium-binding domain, protruding between
strand 3 and helix
3 (17). This domain is included in the part of the sequence
that could correspond to domain B of amylolytic enzymes (G-184 to
F-298 [amylosucrase numbering]) (11). The protein may also
contain a C-terminal
barrel (17). These results suggest
that amylosucrase is a member of the
-amylase family.
Sequence comparisons revealed that the sequence of amylosucrase
contains six of the eight highly conserved regions in amylolytic enzymes (10). The multiple alignment corresponding to these sites is presented in Fig. 1A. Sites II,
V, VI, and VII are the four best-conserved regions in the active site
of the
-amylase family (40). The invariant amino acid
residues are all conserved in the amylosucrase sequence, except E-230
(numbering for
-amylase from Aspergillus oryzae). Indeed,
sites III and VI are not sufficiently similar to the amylosucrase
sequence to be localized.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Conserved sequence stretches (I to VIII) in
amylosucrase, in the -amylase superfamily (A), and in
glucosyltransferases (B) (12). The second line denotes the
elements of secondary structure, as determined for pig pancreatic
-amylase. Enzymes are numbered from the N-terminal end; invariable
residues are in boldface. (A) AS, amylosucrase (N. polysaccharea); AMY, -amylase (pig pancreas); OGL,
oligo-1,6-glucosidase (Bacillus cereus); AGL,
-glucosidase (Saccharomyces cerevisiae); PUL, pullulanase
(B. stearothermophilus); APU, amylopullulanase
(Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum); CMD,
cyclomaltodextrinase (B. sphaericus); MTH,
maltotetraohydrolase (Pseudomonas saccharophila); ISA,
isoamylase (P. amyloderamosa); DGL, dextran-glucosidase
(Streptococcus mutans); MHH, maltohexaohydrolase
(Bacillus sp. strain 707); NPU, neopullulanase (B. stearothermophilus); BRE, branching enzyme (E. coli);
CGT, cyclodextrin-glycosyltransferase (B. circulans); GDE,
glycogen-debranching enzyme (human muscle); TAK, -amylase (A. oryzae). (B) AS, amylosucrase (N. polysaccharea);
DSRB (Leuconostoc mesenteroides NRRL B-1299); DSRA (L. mesenteroides NRRL B-1299); GTFD (S. mutans GS5); GTFK
(S. salivarius ATCC 25975); GTFS (S. downei Mfe
28); GFTI (S. sobrinus OMZ176 serotype D); GTFC (S. mutans GS5); GTFB (S. mutans GS5); DSRS (L. mesenteroides NRRL B-512F).
|
|
Some of the residues in the consensus sequences have been determined to
play a role in amylolytic activity. Particularly, D-294 and D-401,
corresponding to D-206 and D-297 in
-amylase from A. oryzae, are two of the crucial invariant carboxylic acid residues
from the catalytic triad involved in bond cleavage, the third being
E-230 (A. oryzae
-amylase numbering) (8, 15, 16, 24,
25, 40, 41).
Two other invariant residues (H-122 and H-296 [A. oryzae
-amylase numbering]) are constituents of the active site of
-amylases (9, 40). They correspond to H-195 and H-400 in
amylosucrase and could be among the three histidine residues involved
in stabilization of the substrate-binding transition state in CGTase of
the alkalophilic Bacillus sp. 1011 (26) and in
-amylase from A. oryzae (12, 22).
From these studies, it can be concluded that amylosucrase is a member
of the
-amylase family and that some of the invariant residues are
probably involved in amylosucrase activity. The catalytic mechanism of
this enzyme may therefore resemble that of
-amylases, especially for
the formation of the glucosyl enzyme intermediate.
In addition, these results support the recent studies predicting that
glucosyltransferases are also members of the
-amylase family
(6, 18), possess a circularly permuted
(
/
)8 barrel (18), and also share features
for glucosidic cleavage with
-amylases. Amylosucrase being
itself a glucosyltransferase acting on sucrose, the sequences
of dextransucrases and glucosyltransferases were studied to localize
conserved sites (Fig. 1B). The catalytic triad of
-amylases is also
conserved in glucosyltransferases and has been shown to be crucial for
activity (6, 14). Indeed, residue D-451 of
glucosyltransferase GTFB from Streptococcus mutans GS5, corresponding to D-294 in amylosucrase, was found to be involved in the
establishment of the glucosyl enzyme intermediate and has been shown to
be necessary for transferase activity (14). In dextransucrase from Leuconostoc mesenteroides, the
corresponding residue was also shown to be part of sucrose-binding site
(23). In addition, residue D-401 of amylosucrase corresponds
to D-547 of glucosyltransferase GTFS from Streptococcus
downei Mfe 28, which carries a carboxylic group that could be
implicated in the catalytic mechanism (18). Further enzyme
crystallization and X-ray diffraction studies will be crucial for
understanding the catalytic mechanism of amylosucrase and the
features it has in common with both amylolytic enzymes and glucosyltransferases.
An unrooted evolutionary tree was calculated on the conserved sites I,
II, IV, V, VII, and VIII of amylolytic enzymes, glucosyltransferases, and dextransucrases (Fig. 2).
Amylosucrase is situated on one of the longest branches of the tree,
indicating that it does not resemble any of the others. Surprisingly,
it does not belong to the dextransucrase and glucosyltransferase group,
even though it is a glucosyltransferase.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Evolutionary tree of amylolytic enzymes,
glucosyltransferases, and amylosucrase, based on stretches I, II, IV,
V, VII, and VIII. Abbreviations are given in the legend to Fig. 1;
branch lengths are proportional to the sequence divergency. A similar
tree can be found in reference 12.
|
|
Overexpression of the amylosucrase gene.
As the amylosucrase
gene was previously shown to contain a putative signal peptide sequence
(5), the recombinant enzyme was tested for extracellular,
periplasmic, or intracellular activity. E. coli DH1
transformation with plasmid AS/ptrc99a and induction by 2.5 mM
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside, allowed
determination of the initial activity in the enzyme extract: 30 U/liter
of culture after osmotic shock, 3 U/liter of culture in the culture
supernatant, and 658 U/liter of culture with sonication; 95% of the
enzyme is intracellular, which confirms that E. coli cannot
recognize or process the previously described putative signal peptide
(5).
Purification of amylosucrase obtained from the GST-AS fusion
protein.
The yields obtained at various steps of the purification
process and specific activities are presented in Table
1. The glutathione-eluted sample consists
of pure fusion protein (see Fig. 3A). The purification process enabled
a pure amylosucrase fraction to be obtained, as shown by the
electrophoresis revealed with silver nitrate (Fig. 3A), with a specific activity of 9,565 U/g. The total yield of the purification was 38%; this value would
have been increased to 43% if the fusion proteins contained in the
washing solution of the first affinity chromatography had been
recycled. The low yield is due mainly to the 50% loss in protein
during the proteolytic cleavage step; a white precipitate that seemed
to represent partial aggregation of proteins appeared during the
incubation. The total purification factor was 9.6.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Purification of amylosucrase. (A) Expression of GST-AS
fusion protein in pGEX-6-P-3 and purification of amylosucrase by using
glutathione-Sepharose 4B. Electrophoresis was in denaturing conditions.
Lanes: 1, low-molecular-weight electrophoresis calibration kit
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech); 2, sonicate supernatant of E. coli BL21 cells transformed with GST-AS expression plasmid
pGEX-6-P-3 (142 ng); 3, eluate following purification of sonicate on
glutathione-Sepharose 4B and elution with elution buffer (purified
GST-AS) (117 ng); 4, flowthrough following PreScission protease
digestion of GST-AS (purified amylosucrase) (111 ng); 5, low-molecular-weight electrophoresis calibration kit (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech). (B) Electrophoresis in native conditions. Lanes: 1, high-molecular-weight electrophoresis calibration kit (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech); 2, purified amylosucrase (148 ng); 3, low-molecular-weight electrophoresis calibration kit (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech). (C) Isoelectric focusing. Lanes: 1, isoelectric
focusing calibration kit (Pharmacia); 2, purified amylosucrase (98 ng).
|
|
The pure enzyme was subjected to several electrophoreses. Under both
native and denaturing conditions, the molecular mass obtained was
70 ± 2 kDa (Fig. 3B). This result demonstrates the monomeric
structure of the amylosucrase from N. polysaccharea and also confirms the predicted molecular mass of
the amylosucrase truncated by the deletion of its 11 N-terminal
amino acids i.e., 71.7 kDa. The pI obtained by isoelectric focusing was
4.9 ± 0.2, which does not differ significantly from the predicted
pI of 5.44 for the purified protein (Fig. 3C).
Characterization of the glucan synthesized by pure
amylosucrase.
Amylosucrase catalyzes the synthesis of
-(1
4)-glucan from sucrose without any primer (5).
Nevertheless, the polymer-synthesizing rate has been shown to
be greatly increased in the presence of a glucan primer, and
particularly of glycogen (33). To determine the role of the
primer in the activated reaction, the polymer synthesized by pure
amylosucrase from sucrose, with glycogen as a primer, was analyzed.
The first step was the analysis by HPSEC to check the homogeneity of
the sample. Native glycogen showed one peak whose concentration maximum
occurred at an elution volume (Ve) of
approximately 21.6 ml. The same pattern was observed for the modified
glycogen but at a lower Ve, 20.8 ml (Fig.
4). This result demonstrates that the
product obtained is composed of one macromolecule population presenting
a
w higher than that for the
initial glycogen.
w values
determined for the initial glycogen and modified molecule are 9.9 × 106 and 15.3 × 106 g/mol,
respectively.
G, values which give
relevant information about macromolecule size (43), were
also determined from the SEC-MALLS results.
G values for native and modified
glycogens are 20 ± 4 and 25 ± 1.7 nm, respectively. This
change is in agreement with the variation in
w. Mi and
Ri were calculated for each elution volume
(Vi) of the elution pattern. In Fig.
5, Ri is plotted
versus Mi for native and modified glycogens and
for one wheat amylose standard (2, 36); this plot allows
comparison of glycogen with a linear macromolecule, demonstrating
clearly that SEC behavior of branched macromolecule such as native and modified glycogens are very different from that of a linear molecule, irrespective of molecular mass. Obviously, modified glycogen behavior is similar to that of neither initial glycogen nor amylose. At the same Mi, Ri
values for modified glycogen are higher than for native glycogen. These
results could be related to the branching differences between
these two samples: modified glycogen presented an expanded structure,
excluding the occurrence of the same branching pattern as in
glycogen.
-Amylase is known to be an exo-type enzyme digesting external
chains up to certain residues from a branch point. The different branching pattern were confirmed by measuring the
-amylolysis limit (percentage of digested material). The
-amylolysis
values for the initial and modified glycogens were 65 and 77%,
respectively. Deramification of each form of glycogen was performed
with isoamylase. Products obtained after glycogen deramification
exhibited a broad population of DP 12. For the modified glycogen, we
detected a major peak at the same average DP and a white precipitate
corresponding to longer chains.
Linear glucan or the linear part of a ramified glucan is able to form
complexes with iodine, and the absorption maximum of the glucan-iodine
complex (
max) depends on the linear glucan average chain
length (13). The initial glycogen presents a
max at 435 nm, in contrast to 605 nm for the modified
glycogen.
max at 435 nm is in agreement with values
usually obtained for short chains such as DP 12 obtained after glycogen
deramification.
max at 605 nm is characteristic of
linear chains with an average DP of around 75 glucosyl units.
On this basis, the enzymatic action of amylosucrase on glycogen could
result from (i) extension of all external chains from the nonreducing
ends, with DP increasing from 12 to 18 glucosyl units uniformly; (ii)
creation of a new population of
-glucans; or (iii) extension of some
external chains from the nonreducing ends (Fig.
6).
The first possibility should have given a
max of around
480 to 490 nm, whereas the 605 nm measured suggests the presence of
longer linear chains. Deramification and Dionex results also contradict
this view. The increase in
-amylolysis before and after amylosucrase
synthesis is in relation with the increase of the molecular mass and
should have corresponded to an extension of the chain length from 12 to
18 glucosyl units, assuming that all of the glycogen's ramifications
were lengthened equally. Although the Dionex procedure does not give an
exact DP of the longer precipitated chains, the presence of a majority
of chains with the same DP as in the initial glycogen demonstrates that
elongation occurred on only a limited number of chains. In the case of
the second hypothesis, the HPSEC profile would have had two peaks,
corresponding to the native glycogen and de novo-synthesized amylose.
The third hypothesis is consistent with the difficulties encountered
during the deramification experiments, where released chains should
have precipitated since they are located in the dissolving gap
described by Aberle et al. (1), as well with the HPSEC
results
at same Mi for modified glycogen as for
the initial one, Ri is different, corresponding for the same molecular mass to a more expanded structure.
In conclusion, the sucrose consumption rate is increased in the
presence of glycogen, and some of the polymer branchings are linearly
elongated, showing that amylosucrase transfers the glucose residue onto
the nonreducing ends of the glycogen molecule. This enzyme could thus
be used to modify glycogen structure.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank P. Escalier for technical assistance in purification
work. We thank B. Canard and I. Varlet for having graciously furnished
DNA bank of N. polysaccharea.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Centre de
Bioingénierie Gilbert Durand, UMR CNRS 5504, LA INRA DGBA, INSA,
Complexe Scientifique de Rangueil, 31 077 Toulouse Cedex, France.
Phone: 33 5 61 55 94 15. Fax: 33 5 61 55 94 00. E-mail:
monsan{at}insa_tlse.fr.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Aberle, T.,
W. Burchard,
W. Vorwerg, and S. Radosta.
1994.
Conformational contributions of amylose and amylopectin to the structural properties of starches from various sources.
Starch
46:329-335.
|
| 2.
|
Banks, W., and C. T. Greenwood.
1975.
Starch and its components.
University Press, Edinburgh, Scotland.
|
| 3.
|
Bello-Perez, A.,
P. Roger,
B. Baud, and P. Colonna.
1998.
Macromolecular features of starches determined by aqueous high-performance size exclusion chromatography.
J. Cereal Sci.
27:267-278.
|
| 4.
|
Bradford, M. M.
1976.
A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.
Anal. Biochem.
72:248-254[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Büttcher, V.,
T. Welsh,
L. Willmitzer, and J. Kossmann.
1997.
Cloning and characterization of the gene for amylosucrase from Neisseria polysaccharea: production of a linear -1,4-glucan.
J. Bacteriol.
179:3324-3330[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Devulapalle, K. S.,
S. D. Goodman,
Q. Gao,
A. Hemsley, and G. Mooser.
1997.
Knowledge-based model of a glucosyltransferase from the oral bacterial group of mutans streptococci.
Protein Sci.
6:2489-2493[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Hehre, E. J.,
D. M. Hamilton, and A. S. Carlson.
1949.
Synthesis of a polysaccharide of the starch-glycogen class from sucrose by a cell-free, bacterial enzyme system (amylosucrase).
J. Biol. Chem.
177:267-279[Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Holm, L.,
A. K. Koivula,
P. M. Lehtovaara,
A. Hemminki, and J. K. C. Knowles.
1990.
Random mutagenesis used to probe the structure and function of Bacillus stearothermophilus alpha-amylase.
Protein Eng.
3:181-191[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Ishikawa, K.,
I. Matsui,
K. Honda, and H. Nakatani.
1992.
Multi-functional roles of a histidine residue in human pancreatic -amylase.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
183:286-291[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Janecek, S.
1994.
Parallel / -barrels of -amylase, cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase and oligo-1,6-glucosidase versus the barrel of -amylase: evolutionary distance is a reflection of unrelated sequences.
FEBS Lett.
353:119-123[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Janecek, S.,
B. Svensson, and B. Henrissat.
1997.
Domain evolution in the -amylase family.
J. Mol. Evol.
45:322-331[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Jespersen, H. M.,
E. A. MacGregor,
B. Henrissat,
M. R. Sierks, and B. Svensson.
1993.
Starch- and glycogen-debranching and branching enzymes: prediction of structural features of the catalytic ( / )8-barrel domain and evolutionary relationship to other amylolytic enzymes.
J. Protein Chem.
12:791-805[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
John, M.,
J. Schmidt, and H. Kneifel.
1983.
Iodine-maltosaccharide complexes: relation between chain-length and colour.
Carbohydr. Res.
119:254-259.
|
| 14.
|
Kato, C.,
Y. Nakano,
M. Lis, and H. K. Kuramitsu.
1992.
Molecular genetic analysis of the catalytic site of Streptococcus mutans glucosyltransferases.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
189:1184-1188[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Klein, C.,
J. Hollender,
H. Bender, and G. E. Schulz.
1992.
Catalytic center of cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase derived from X-ray structure analysis combined with site-directed mutagenesis.
Biochemistry
31:8740-8746[Medline].
|
| 15a.
| Kossmann, J. 1998. Personal communication.
|
| 16.
|
Kuriki, T.,
H. Takata,
S. Okada, and T. Imanaka.
1991.
Analysis of the active center of Bacillus stearothermophilus neopullulanase.
J. Bacteriol.
135:1521-1528.
|
| 17.
|
Larson, S. B.,
A. Greenwood,
D. Cascio,
J. Day, and A. McPherson.
1994.
Refined molecular structure of pig pancreatic -amylase at 2.1 Å resolution.
J. Mol. Biol.
235:1560-1584[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
MacGregor, E. A.,
H. M. Jespersen, and B. Svensson.
1996.
A circular permuted -amylase-type / -barrel structure in glucan-synthesizing glucosyltransferases.
FEBS Lett.
378:263-266[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
MacKenzie, C. R.,
K. G. Johnson, and I. J. McDonald.
1977.
Glycogen synthesis by amylosucrase from Neisseria perflava.
Can. J. Microbiol.
23:1303-1307[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
MacKenzie, C. R.,
I. J. McDonald, and K. G. Johnson.
1978.
Glycogen metabolism in the genus Neisseria: synthesis from sucrose by amylosucrase.
Can. J. Microbiol.
24:357-362[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
MacKenzie, C. R.,
M. B. Perry,
I. J. McDonald, and K. G. Johnson.
1978.
Structure of the D-glucans produced by Neisseria perflava.
Can. J. Microbiol.
24:1419-1422[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Matsuura, Y.,
M. Kusunoki,
W. Harada, and M. Kakudo.
1984.
Structure and possible catalytic residues of Taka-amylase A.
J. Biochem.
95:697-702[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Monchois, V.,
M. Remaud-Simeon,
R. R. B. Russel,
P. Monsan, and R. M. Willemot.
1997.
Characterization of Leuconostoc mesenteroides NRRL B-512F dextransucrase (DSRS) and identification of amino-acid residues playing a key role in enzyme activity.
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
48:465-472[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Nagashima, T.,
S. Tada,
K. Kitamoto,
K. Gomi,
C. Kummagai, and H. Toda.
1992.
Site-directed mutagenesis of catalytic active-site residues of Taka-amylase A.
Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.
56:207-210[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Nakamura, A.,
K. Haga,
S. Ogawa,
K. Kuwano,
K. Kimura, and K. Yamane.
1992.
Functional relationships between cyclodextrin glucanotransferases from an alkalophilic Bacillus and -amylases.
FEBS Lett.
296:37-40[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Nakamura, A.,
K. Haga, and K. Yamane.
1993.
Three histidine residues in the active center of cyclodextrin glucanotransferase from alkalophilic Bacillus sp. 1011: effects of the replacement on pH dependence and transition-state stabilization.
Biochemistry
32:6624-6631[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Nelson, H.
1944.
A photometric adaptation of the Somogyi method for the determination of glucose.
J. Biol. Chem.
153:375-380[Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Okada, G., and E. J. Hehre.
1973.
De novo synthesis of glycosidic linkages by glycosylases: utilization of -D-glucopyranosyl fluoride by amylosucrase.
Carbohydr. Res.
26:240-243[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Okada, G., and E. J. Hehre.
1974.
New studies on amylosucrase, a bacterial -D-glucosylase that directly converts sucrose to a glycogen-like -glucan.
J. Biol. Chem.
249:126-135[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Pashall, E. F., and J. F. Foster.
1952.
Further studies by light scattering of amylose aggregates. Particle weight under various conditions.
J. Polym. Sci.
9:85-52.
|
| 31.
|
Planchot, V.,
P. Colonna, and L. Saulnier.
1997.
Dosage des glucides et des amyloses, p. 346-397.
In
B. Godon, and W. Loisel (ed.), Guide pratique d'analyses dans les industries des céreales.Publication Lavoisier, Paris, France.
|
| 32.
|
Preiss, J.,
J. L. Ozbun,
J. S. Hawker,
E. Greenberg, and C. Lammel.
1973.
ADPG synthetase and ADPG- -glucan-4-glucosyltransferase: enzymes involved in bacterial glycogen and plant starch biosynthesis.
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
210:265-277[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Remaud-Simeon, M.,
F. Albaret,
B. Canard,
I. Varlet,
P. Colonna,
R. M. Willemot, and P. Monsan.
1995.
Studies on a recombinant amylosucrase, p. 313-320.
In
S. B. Petersen, B. Svensson, and S. Pedersen (ed.), Carbohydrate bioengineering. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
|
| 34.
|
Riou, J. Y.,
M. Guibourdenche, and M. Y. Popoff.
1983.
A new taxon in the genus Neisseria.
Ann. Microbiol. (Inst. Pasteur)
134B:257-267.
|
| 35.
|
Riou, J. Y.,
M. Guibourdenche,
M. B. Perry,
L. L. MacLean, and D. W. Griffith.
1986.
Structure of the exocellular D-glucan produced by Neisseria polysaccharea.
Can. J. Microbiol.
32:909-911[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Roger, P., and P. Colonna.
1996.
Molecular weight distribution of amylose fractions obtained by aqueous leaching of maize starch.
Int. J. Biol. Macromol.
19:51-61[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 38.
|
Sanger, F.,
S. Nicklen, and A. R. Coulson.
1977.
DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
74:5463-5467[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Sumner, J. B., and S. F. Howell.
1935.
A method for determination of invertase activity.
J. Biol. Chem.
108:51-54[Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Svensson, B.
1994.
Protein engineering in the -amylase family: catalytic mechanism, substrate specificity, and stability.
Plant Mol. Biol.
25:141-157[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Svensson, B.,
T. P. Frandsen,
I. Matsui,
N. Juge,
H. P. Fierobe,
B. Stoffer, and K. W. Rodenburg.
1995.
Mutational analysis of catalytic mechanism and specificity in amylolytic enzymes, p. 125-145.
In
S. B. Petersen, B. Svensson, and S. Pedersen (ed.), Carbohydrate bioengineering. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
|
| 42.
|
Tao, B. Y.,
P. J. Reilly, and J. F. Robyt.
1988.
Neisseria perflava amylosucrase: characterization of its product polysaccharide and a study of its inhibition by sucrose derivatives.
Carbohydr. Res.
181:163-173[Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Van Krevelen, D. W.
1990.
Properties of polymers.
Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
|
Journal of Bacteriology, January 1999, p. 375-381, Vol. 181, No. 2
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Emond, S., Andre, I., Jaziri, K., Potocki-Veronese, G., Mondon, P., Bouayadi, K., Kharrat, H., Monsan, P., Remaud-Simeon, M.
(2008). Combinatorial engineering to enhance thermostability of amylosucrase. Protein Sci.
17: 967-976
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Emond, S., Mondon, P., Pizzut-Serin, S., Douchy, L., Crozet, F., Bouayadi, K., Kharrat, H., Potocki-Veronese, G., Monsan, P., Remaud-Simeon, M.
(2008). A novel random mutagenesis approach using human mutagenic DNA polymerases to generate enzyme variant libraries. Protein Eng Des Sel
21: 267-274
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Emond, S., Potocki-Veronese, G., Mondon, P., Bouayadi, K., Kharrat, H., Monsan, P., Remaud-Simeon, M.
(2007). Optimized and Automated Protocols for High-Throughput Screening of Amylosucrase Libraries. J Biomol Screen
12: 715-723
[Abstract]
-
Moulis, C., Joucla, G., Harrison, D., Fabre, E., Potocki-Veronese, G., Monsan, P., Remaud-Simeon, M.
(2006). Understanding the Polymerization Mechanism of Glycoside-Hydrolase Family 70 Glucansucrases. J. Biol. Chem.
281: 31254-31267
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kralj, S., Stripling, E., Sanders, P., van Geel-Schutten, G. H., Dijkhuizen, L.
(2005). Highly Hydrolytic Reuteransucrase from Probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri Strain ATCC 55730. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
71: 3942-3950
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Shah, D. S. H., Joucla, G., Remaud-Simeon, M., Russell, R. R. B.
(2004). Conserved Repeat Motifs and Glucan Binding by Glucansucrases of Oral Streptococci and Leuconostoc mesenteroides. J. Bacteriol.
186: 8301-8308
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kim, H.-S., Park, H.-J., Heu, S., Jung, J.
(2004). Molecular and Functional Characterization of a Unique Sucrose Hydrolase from Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. glycines. J. Bacteriol.
186: 411-418
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Albenne, C., Skov, L. K., Mirza, O., Gajhede, M., Feller, G., D'Amico, S., Andre, G., Potocki-Veronese, G., van der Veen, B. A., Monsan, P., Remaud-Simeon, M.
(2004). Molecular Basis of the Amylose-like Polymer Formation Catalyzed by Neisseria polysaccharea Amylosucrase. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 726-734
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhu, P., Tsang, R. S. W., Tsai, C.-M.
(2003). Nonencapsulated Neisseria meningitidis Strain Produces Amylopectin from Sucrose: Altering the Concept for Differentiation between N. meningitidis and N. polysaccharea. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 273-278
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Skov, L. K., Mirza, O., Sprogoe, D., Dar, I., Remaud-Simeon, M., Albenne, C., Monsan, P., Gajhede, M.
(2002). Oligosaccharide and Sucrose Complexes of Amylosucrase. STRUCTURAL IMPLICATIONS FOR THE POLYMERASE ACTIVITY. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 47741-47747
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bozonnet, S., Dols-Laffargue, M., Fabre, E., Pizzut, S., Remaud-Simeon, M., Monsan, P., Willemot, R.-M.
(2002). Molecular Characterization of DSR-E, an {alpha}-1,2 Linkage-Synthesizing Dextransucrase with Two Catalytic Domains. J. Bacteriol.
184: 5753-5761
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kralj, S., van Geel-Schutten, G. H., Rahaoui, H., Leer, R. J., Faber, E. J., van der Maarel, M. J. E. C., Dijkhuizen, L.
(2002). Molecular Characterization of a Novel Glucosyltransferase from Lactobacillus reuteri Strain 121 Synthesizing a Unique, Highly Branched Glucan with {alpha}-(1->4) and {alpha}-(1->6) Glucosidic Bonds. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
68: 4283-4291
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Skov, L. K., Mirza, O., Henriksen, A., De Montalk, G. P., Remaud-Simeon, M., Sarcabal, P., Willemot, R.-M., Monsan, P., Gajhede, M.
(2001). Amylosucrase, a Glucan-synthesizing Enzyme from the alpha -Amylase Family. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 25273-25278
[Abstract]
[Full Text]