Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, October 1999, p. 6292-6299, Vol. 181, No. 20
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Analysis of Protein Synthesis Rates after
Initiation of Chromosome Replication in Escherichia
coli
Dorothée
Bechtloff,
Björn
Grünenfelder,
Thomas
Åkerlund,
and
Kurt
Nordström*
Department of Cell and Molecular Biology,
Biomedical Center, Uppsala University, S-751 24 Uppsala, Sweden
Received 4 May 1999/Accepted 11 August 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
The aim of this study was to investigate whether the synthesis
rates of some proteins change after the initiation of replication in
Escherichia coli. An intR1 strain, in which
chromosome replication is under the control of an R1 replicon
integrated into an inactivated oriC, was used to
synchronize chromosome replication, and the rates of protein synthesis
were analyzed by two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of
pulse-labeled proteins. Computerized image analysis was used to search
for proteins whose expression levels changed at least threefold after
initiation of a single round of chromosome replication, which revealed
7 out of about 1,000 detected proteins. The various synthesis rates of
three of these proteins turned out to be caused by unbalanced growth
and the synthesis of one protein was suppressed in the
intR1 strain. The rates of synthesis of the remaining three
could be correlated only to the synchronous initiation of replication.
These three proteins were analyzed by peptide mass mapping and appeared
to be the products of the dps, gapA, and
pyrI genes. Thus, the expression of the vast majority of
proteins is not influenced by the state of chromosome replication, and
a possible role of the replication-associated expression changes of the
three identified proteins in the cell cycle is not clear.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
A bacterial cell has to grow and
duplicate its constituents before it can divide and give rise to two
new daughter cells. Initiation of chromosome replication, partitioning
of the sister chromosomes, septum formation, and cell division occur at
specific times in the cell cycle (31), but the mechanisms
controlling the timing of these events are poorly understood. It is
possible that the occurrence of these cell cycle events partially
requires, or induces, changes in synthesis rates of specific proteins
at certain times in the cell cycle, as has been found for eukaryotic cells (3).
In the gram-negative bacterium Caulobacter crescentus,
several proteins have been shown to be differentially synthesized
during the cell cycle (8, 21). A recent two-dimensional
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2-D PAGE) analysis revealed that
about 14% of the proteins detected in synchronized cells are expressed
in a cell cycle-specific fashion (12a). In Escherichia
coli, the synthesis rates of some outer membrane proteins
(7), as well as the transcription rates of ftsZ
(12, 33), gidA, mioC, dnaA (6, 23, 29), dam, mukB,
seqA, iciA (32), and the
nrd operon (28), have been shown to vary during
the cell cycle. In contrast to the results obtained for C. crescentus, a 2-D PAGE analysis did not detect differential
protein expression during the E. coli cell cycle
(20). It is possible that the 2-D PAGE approach was not
sensitive enough to identify cell cycle-specific protein synthesis. The
2-D PAGE technique has been improved, and the development of
computerized image analysis has facilitated the analysis of complex
protein spot patterns on 2-D PAGE gels. Another difficulty in studying
cell cycle-related protein expression is to accurately synchronize
large enough amounts of E. coli cells to allow detection of
the proteins on a 2-D PAGE gel. This can be achieved with an E. coli intR1 strain, in which the initiation of replication is
uncoupled from its cell cycle control, thereby enabling accurate
synchronization of chromosome replication (but not cell size) of large
populations by using relatively small temperature shifts
(5). By using the intR1 strain
MG::71CW(pOU420) and 2-D PAGE combined with computerized
image analysis, we found that the expression of the vast majority of
proteins does not change during the cell cycle. Out of about 1,000 proteins detected on the 2-D gels, 3 that had replication-associated
expression changes were identified. These three proteins were analyzed
by peptide mass mapping and appeared to be the products of the
dps, gapA, and pyrI genes.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains.
The intR1 strain
MG::71CW(pOU420), derived from MG1655 (4), was
used to synchronize initiation of replication (5). The intR1 strains are oriC mutants in which a part of
the essential oriC sequence has been replaced by an R1
miniplasmid, pOU71 (Ampr). Thus, oriC is
inactivated in these strains and chromosomal replication is governed by
the plasmid R1 replicon (17). The strain
MG::71CW(pOU420) also contains the nonintegrated plasmid pOU420 (Cmr), which results in temperature-dependent
initiation of chromosome replication (5). At 40°C,
initiation of replication is at a wild-type level, whereas at 36°C,
initiation of replication is inhibited.
Media and growth conditions.
The bacteria were grown
aerobically in M9 minimal medium (25) containing 0.2%
(wt/vol) glucose in thermostatically controlled rotary water baths
(Heto) with a maximum deviation of 0.2°C at 100 rpm. Chloramphenicol
(50 µg/ml) and ampicillin (20 µg/ml) were added for the
MG::71CW(pOU420) strain. Cell density was measured by
spectrophotometry with an LKB Novaspec II spectrophotometer at 550 nm.
Synchronization of replication.
In order to initiate a
synchronous single round of replication in an
MG::71CW(pOU420) culture, basically the same procedure was
used as described for EC::71CW(pOU420) (5). The
cells were grown exponentially for at least 10 generations at 40°C.
At an optical density at 550 nm of 0.040, the culture was shifted to 36°C for 150 min to inhibit initiation of chromosome replication and
allow for completion of replication. The culture was then shifted to
40°C for 8 min to initiate one round of replication and thereafter
returned to 36°C in order to block any further initiation
(5).
Flow cytometry.
Synchronized cultures were monitored by flow
cytometry (27). Cells of a growing culture (60 µl) were
fixed directly in 1 ml of 99.5% ethanol plus 350 µl of 10 mM Tris
(pH 7.5) and then stored at 4°C. The fixed cells were stained for
flow cytometry as described previously (5) and analyzed with
a Bryte HS flow cytometer (Bio-Rad).
Radioactive labeling.
At the appropriate time points, 6-ml
aliquots of the culture were pulse-labeled for 7 min with 0.4 ml of
14C-amino acid mix (NEC445E; DuPont) and then chased for 2 min with 0.5 ml of nonradioactive amino acid mix, containing a
0.5-mg/ml concentration each of A, D, E, F, G, H, I, K, L, P, R, S, T,
and Y (21). The labeled cells were immediately frozen in
liquid nitrogen and stored at
20°C.
2-D PAGE.
Several 2-D PAGE gels were made, and four
high-quality gels per time point were subjected to image analysis.
Samples for pulse-labeling were taken from two independent experiments,
and each sample was used for two independent gels. 2-D PAGE
(11) was performed with Millipore Investigator equipment and
chemicals according to the manual provided by Millipore. (The
Investigator system and chemicals are now provided by Genomic
Solutions, Inc., Chelmsford, Mass., but are referred to as Millipore
products.) Protein extracts were prepared by boiling the cells in small
amounts of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) (Serva) before adding the
high-molar-concentration urea solution according to the sample
preparation method for bacteria in the Investigator manual. The
first-dimension gels were focused to equilibrium for 18,000 V · h and contained ampholytes at pH 3 to 10 (3-10 2D; Millipore) and 10 mM
ChapsO (Merck). The second-dimension slab gels contained 12% Duracryl
(0.65% bis; Millipore) and analytic-grade C12 SDS. The
amount of proteins loaded onto each gel was normalized by the optical
density of the culture at the time of sampling. It was not necessary to
load exactly the same amount of radioactivity on each 2-D PAGE gel, as
the intensity differences between the gels were normalized by the
computer software used for the analysis (see below). The gels were
dried on Whatman paper and exposed to storage phosphor screens
(Molecular Dynamics) for 7 days, and proteins containing radioactivity
were detected with a storage phosphorimager (Molecular Dynamics) at a
resolution of 176 µm per pixel.
Computerized image analysis.
2-D Analyzer 6.1 software
(BioImage) was used for spot detection, quantification of the spot
intensities, gel matching, and statistical analysis. The intensity of a
spot reflects an arbitrary, relative unit for the rate of protein
synthesis. To correct for intensity differences between the 2-D PAGE
autoradiograms, each gel was normalized to the same reference gel by
multiplying all its spot intensities with the ratio between the total
gel intensities of the test gel and the reference gel. Intensity
changes were considered to be significant when the mean values of a
spot had an intensity ratio larger than three and a t test
level of significance of 0.05 for two time points, or when a spot could
not be detected at one time point. We decided that the intensity ratio
must be larger than three because the mean relative standard error of the spot intensities was 15.8%, where the ratio of the two extreme values of the 95% confidence interval with 3 df is 3. All candidate spots were checked on the gels by eye and those with insufficient quality were deselected. The isoelectric points (pI) and molecular weights (MW) were estimated from the positions of comigrated 2-D PAGE
marker proteins with known pI and MW (Bio-Rad).
Reverse staining of SDS-polyacrylamide gels.
The 2-D PAGE
gels were stained essentially according to the imidazole-SDS-Zn reverse
staining method developed by Fernandez-Patron et al. (10).
After electrophoresis the gels were washed twice for 15 min each in
distilled water and then soaked in a solution containing 0.2 M
imidazole and 0.1% SDS for 15 min with gentle shaking. This solution
was discarded and the gels were incubated in 0.2 M ZnSO4
solution until the gel background became white (after approximately 30 to 60 s). This reaction was stopped by washing the gels three
times in distilled water. The protein spots of interest were cut out of
the gels and were stored in distilled water at 4°C. Prior to protein
identification, the gel pieces were soaked in 25 mM Tris-HCl-100 mM
dithiothreitol (pH 8.3) solution (10) until they became
transparent again.
Protein identification.
The procedures described by
Shevchenko et al. (26) were used to identify the individual
proteins. Briefly, the gel pieces were washed with 50 mM
NH4HCO3-acetonitrile (1:1) followed by dehydration with acetonitrile and drying by vacuum centrifugation. The
proteins were reduced with 200 µl of 10 mM dithiothreitol-50 mM
NH4HCO3 for 1 h at 56°C and alkylated in
200 µl of 55 mM iodoacetamide-50 mM NH4HCO3
for 15 min. The gel pieces were washed several times in 50 mM
NH4HCO3 followed by dehydration with
acetonitrile and drying by vacuum centrifugation. The proteins were
digested overnight with modified trypsin (Promega) at 37°C. A small
aliquot of the generated peptide mixtures was analyzed by
matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass
spectrometry on a Voyager-DE STR instrument (Perceptive Biosystems,
Framingham, Mass.). The remaining peptides were extracted with 25 mM
NH4HCO3-acetonitrile (1:1) followed by
extraction with 25 mM NH4HCO3-5% formic acid. The combined extracts were dried by vacuum centrifugation. Peptide mixtures were purified on purification capillaries with POROS R2
perfusion chromatography material. The peptides were eluted in 50%
MeOH-5% HCOOH directly into the nanospray capillary by centrifugation
and analyzed on a prototype QqTOF mass spectrometer (Sciex, Toronto,
Canada) equipped with a nanoelectrospray source (Protana A/S, Odense,
Denmark). Proteins were identified by checking a nonredundant sequence
database containing more than 320,000 entries by using the determined
peptide masses and the partial amino acid sequences (peptide sequence
tags) deduced from the tandem mass spectra. The search software used
was PepSea version 1.1 (Protana A/S).
 |
RESULTS |
Synchronization of replication in MG::71CW(pOU420).
In the intR1 strain MG::71CW(pOU420), chromosome
replication is under the control of an integrated R1 miniplasmid.
Initiation of replication is temperature dependent and can be
reversibly turned on and off by temperature shifts of 4°C, such that
the entire population is synchronized with respect to initiation of chromosome replication without large secondary effects due to heat and
cold shock responses (5).
To synchronize the initiation of replication in
MG::71CW(pOU420), the cells were essentially grown as
described for strain EC::71CW(pOU420) (5). To
block initiation of chromosome replication and allow subsequent
completion of ongoing replications, an exponentially growing culture
was shifted from 40 to 36°C (time zero) and incubated for 150 min
(5). To initiate one round of chromosome replication, the
culture was then shifted to 40°C for 8 min, and it was returned to
36°C for the rest of the experiment to inhibit further initiations. Flow cytometry data of a synchronized culture (Fig.
1) showed that 10 min before the
transient temperature upshift (140 min after the downshift to 36°C),
most cells (60 to 70% of the population) contained one chromosome.
After the temperature upshift, the DNA content peak gradually increased
to two chromosome equivalents for a little more than 40 min (until 190 min). It then remained stable at this position until 60 min after the
temperature upshift (210 min), when a new peak at one chromosome
equivalent appeared. This peak increased steadily until 120 min
after the temperature upshift (270 min), when about half of the
population contained one chromosome and the other half contained more
DNA.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Flow cytometry data showing the DNA distribution
of an MG::71CW(pOU420) culture with synchronized
replication. A culture growing exponentially in M9 medium at 40°C was
shifted to 36°C at time zero. After 150 min, the culture was shifted
to 40°C for 8 min and then returned to 36°C. The samples were taken
at the times (in minutes) indicated in the upper right corners of the
panels. About 24,000 cells were counted in each sample. chrom.,
chromosome.
|
|
With the short temperature upshift after the completion of replication,
replication was initiated and proceeded synchronously
in most cells.
The replication time was around 40 min, and the
first cell divisions
occurred around 60 min after initiation of
replication (i.e., about 20 min after termination of replication).
However, the cells continued to
divide during the following 60
min, so the amount of cells containing
one chromosome increased
over
time.
Replication-associated protein synthesis.
Several reports have
shown that certain E. coli genes change their transcription
rate during the cell cycle (see the introduction). To see whether such
changes could be found at the protein expression level, we investigated
the synthesis rates of individual proteins 10 min before (140 min after
the downshift to 36°C) and 20 (170 min), 40 (190 min), 50 (200 min),
and 60 (210 min) min after the transient temperature upshift to 40°C
that initiated synchronous replication. These times were chosen since
they represent specific events during the replication and cell division
cycle: 140 min after the downshift to 36°C is just before initiation,
170 min is at about midreplication, 190 min is around replication
termination, and 210 min is at the first cell divisions. At each point,
the proteins were pulse-labeled with 14C-labeled amino
acids for 7 min (see Materials and Methods).
The pulse-labeled proteins were separated on 2-D PAGE gels, and nearly
1,000 spots were detected (Fig.
2).
Because isoelectric
focusing was run to equilibrium in the first
dimension and a 12%
polyacrylamide gel was used in the second
dimension, only proteins
with pI from 4 to 7 and MW from 15 × 10
3 to 100 × 10
3 were resolved. Most
E. coli proteins are found within this pI
and MW range
(
18,
22).

View larger version (164K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
2-D PAGE autoradiogram of a 7-min pulse 50 min after
initiation of a single round of replication in strain
MG::71CW(pOU420). About 1,000 spots were detected on the gel.
Spots 1 to 7 show significant changes in their intensities after
synchronous initiation of replication in MG::71CW(pOU420).
Proteins A, B, and C are intR1 specific. Protein a was
chosen as an example of replication-independent protein synthesis. The
heat shock proteins H1 (HtpG), H2 (DnaK), and H3 (GroEL) were
identified by comparison with an E. coli 2-D PAGE database
(30). The numbers at the top are pI, and the numbers on the
right are MW, in thousands.
|
|
Four gels were made for each time point in order to enable a
statistical analysis of the collected data (see Materials and
Methods).
The spots on the different 2-D gels were quantified
and matched by
computerized image analysis. Spots of good quality
whose mean intensity
increased or decreased at least threefold
between two time points (see
Materials and Methods) were sought.
The intensity of a spot reflects an
arbitrary, relative unit for
the rate of protein synthesis. Seven
candidate spots were found
(proteins 1 to 7) (Fig.
2 to
4 and
Tables
1 and
2) out of about
1,000 spots which could
be detected by 2-D PAGE. Spots 1 and 2
had the highest intensity at 170 min (midreplication [Fig.
4]),
spot 3 at 190 min (at replication
termination [Fig.
4]), and spots
4 to 7 at 210 min (at first cell
division [Fig.
4]).

View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Identical sections of 2-D PAGE autoradiograms at each
time point investigated after synchronous initiation of replication in
MG::71CW(pOU420). Spots 1, 3, 5, and 6, whose intensities
were found to change significantly after synchronous initiation of
replication, and the example for continuous synthesis, protein a, are
indicated. The time (in minutes) after the temperature downshift to
36°C is indicated in the upper right corner of each panel. At 150 min, replication was synchronously initiated by a transient (8-min)
upshift to 40°C.
|
|

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Quantification (spot intensity; the scale is relative)
of spots 1 to 7 and a during temperature shift experiments with
MG::71CW(pOU420) and MG1655. In order to synchronize
replication, exponentially growing MG::71CW(pOU420) cells
were shifted from 40 to 36°C at time zero to block the initiation of
replication. After 150 min the cells were shifted to 40°C for 8 min
to synchronously initiate replication (filled squares). As a control,
new MG::71CW(pOU420) cultures were grown as explained above
without a shift to 40°C after 150 min (open circles). MG1655 (open
triangles) was grown like MG::71CW(pOU420), with the 8-min
temperature upshift to 40°C after 150 min at 36°C. The values for
the relative synthesis rates were placed in the middle of the 7-min
window during which the proteins were pulse-labeled. Each value is the
mean for four gels. Vertical bars show standard errors. The start of
the 8-min shift to 40°C for initiation of replication is indicated by
a vertical line at 150 min.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Estimated pI and MW of proteins 1 to 7, whose expressions
changed significantly after synchronous initiation of replication
in MG::71CW(pOU420)
|
|
For spot 2, the two extreme values differed just threefold, but as the
spot was located at the very basic end, a region which
is difficult to
reproduce, the interpretation of this result may
be
ambiguous.
Temperature effect.
It is well documented that temperature
shifts affect gene expression, and it is possible that the temperature
shifts necessary to initiate synchronous replication in
MG::71CW(pOU420) influenced the synthesis rates of some
proteins. As a control for temperature response, the wild-type strain,
MG1655, was grown as described for a synchronization-of-replication
experiment, and the 2-D PAGE patterns 10 min before (140 min after the
downshift to 36°C) and 20 min after (170 min) the transient
temperature upshift to 40°C were investigated. No spots showed
significant (at least threefold) changes in their intensities between
the two time points (data not shown), indicating that no heat or cold
shock genes were induced at significant levels. The known heat shock
proteins HptG, DnaK, and GroEL could be identified on the 2-D gels by
comparing them with an E. coli 2-D PAGE database
(30), and their synthesis rates before and after the
transient temperature upshift are shown in Fig.
5. For all three heat shock proteins, the
transient 4°C temperature upshift did not induce any heat shock
response after 20 min. The spot intensities of HptG and DnaK were
similar in the intR1 and wild-type gels. However, the spot
intensity of GroEL was twofold higher in the intR1 gels than
in the wild-type gels, which, again, was not considered to be
significant. Finally, none of the seven candidate spots showed a
significant change in intensity between the two time points on the
wild-type gels.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Quantification (spot intensity) of the heat shock
proteins HtpG, DnaK, and GroEL 10 min before (140 min after the
temperature shift to 36°C [grey bars]) and 20 min after (170 min
[white bars]) the 8-min temperature upshift to 40°C in MG1655 and
MG::71CW(pOU420). The heat shock proteins were identified by
comparison with an E. coli 2-D PAGE database
(30). Data are the means for four gels. Vertical bars show
standard errors.
|
|
intR1-specific protein synthesis.
The
intR1 strain contains the free plasmid pOU420 and, moreover,
a deletion of the leftmost part of oriC, which is replaced by a derivative of the plasmid R1 replicon. These changes in the genotype might influence the interpretation of our results, and some of
the observed variations in spot intensity may be effects of the
intR1 construct. To find out which proteins were
intR1 specific, the 2-D PAGE patterns of exponentially
growing cultures of MG::71CW(pOU420) and the parental strain,
MG1655, were compared. Three spots were found to be intR1
specific (spots A, B, and C in Fig. 2). These spots had pI and MW that
are close to those predicted for the plasmid-encoded
-lactamase,
chloramphenicol acetyltransferase, and
cI857 repressor.
One of the candidate spots (spot 5 in Fig. 2) was found to be repressed
fourfold in the intR1 strain. Additionally, another two
spots whose intensities differed around threefold between the two
strains were found (not shown). Thus, although relatively few
differences were found for the intR1 strain and the wild
type during exponential growth conditions, one candidate spot was found
to be repressed in the intR1 strain.
Influence of growth at the nonpermissive temperature.
In order
to synchronize replication, initiation of replication was blocked in
MG::71CW(pOU420) by a temperature shift from 40 to 36°C
(nonpermissive temperature), and the culture was kept at the
nonpermissive temperature for the rest of the experiment, except for
the transient shift to 40°C to initiate a single round of
replication. Thus, as the cells continue to grow in the absence of
chromosome replication for a substantial period (data not shown), they
may enter a state of unbalanced growth which could influence the
expression level of certain proteins. To determine the effect of
unbalanced growth, we grew new cultures of MG::71CW(pOU420) as described for the synchronization of replication without initiating a single round of replication. The 2-D PAGE patterns at 0 (exponentially growing culture), 20, 60, 170, and 210 min after the
shift to the nonpermissive temperature were studied. Of the seven
candidate spots, spots 3, 6, and 7 showed similar kinetics after 150 min in cultures both with and without a transient temperature upshift. Therefore, spots 3, 6, and 7 are unlikely to be regulated in a replication- or cell cycle-specific fashion. Hence, proteins 1, 2, and
4 were regarded to be cell cycle specific and were subjected to further analysis.
Protein identification.
After imidazole-SDS-Zn reverse
staining of the gels, protein spots 1, 2, and 4 were cut out from the
gels. The proteins were analyzed by peptide mass mapping and partial
sequencing. The final identification was done by comparison with a
sequence database by using the determined peptide masses and the
partial amino acid sequences deduced from the tandem mass spectra. It
turned out that spot 1 corresponds to
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH, encoded by the
gene gapA) and spot 2 corresponds to PyrI, the regulatory
chain of aspartate transcarbamoylase (ATCase), which is involved in the
synthesis of the pyrimidines from aspartate. Protein spot 4 was
identified as Dps, also known as PexB, a
stationary-phase-specific protein from E. coli (Table
2).
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this investigation, we studied replication-associated
protein expression in E. coli using 2-D PAGE combined
with computerized image analysis. Chromosome replication was
synchronized in the intR1 strain MG::71CW(pOU420),
in which initiation of replication is controlled by temperature
(5). The observed cell cycle parameters were in agreement
with previously published data (13); the replication time
(the C period) was about 40 min, and the time from termination of
replication until cell division (the D period) was around 20 min.
However, although the cells replicated synchronously, cell division
took place from 60 min until at least 120 min after initiation. This
might be explained by the fact that cell division presumably occurs at
certain critical lengths (5), and as the cell length was not
synchronized in the population, individual cells reached the critical
length at different times after termination of replication.
Using computer-aided analysis of the 2-D PAGE spot patterns of
pulse-labeled proteins, we found that the synthesis rates of the vast
majority of proteins remained constant after synchronous initiation of
replication, which is in agreement with previously published data
(20). A temperature effect on protein expression could not
be detected; no significant changes were observed in the wild
type 20 min after a transient temperature shift of 4°C. The
expression of 7 proteins out of about 1,000 detected on the 2-D gels
was found to vary at least threefold after synchronized initiation of
replication. However, the expression of proteins 3, 6, and 7 showed
similar changes in a nonshifted control culture, indicating that their
expression changes were not replication specific but presumably an
effect of unbalanced growth caused by the block of replication. Because
protein 5 was repressed fourfold in the intR1 strain
compared to the wild type, its observed expression changes are most
likely an effect of the intR1 genotype. Therefore, the
differential expression of finally only three proteins (i.e., 1, 2, and
4) could be correlated with the synchronous initiation of replication.
It should be pointed out that we did not consider spot intensity
changes that differed less than threefold, and many cell cycle- or
replication cycle-regulated proteins may thus have been missed, e.g.,
FtsZ, whose transcription rate has been shown to vary about twofold
during the cell cycle (12). When the expression limit was
lowered to twofold in the analysis procedure, the number of candidate
spots increased to at least 20 (data not shown). Although these changes
are below the mean 95% level of significance (see Materials and
Methods), they may still represent proteins that are cell cycle
regulated. In addition, as we measured only one time point during
replication (20 min after synchronous initiation of replication),
proteins expressed just after initiation (0 to 10 min) and just before
termination (30 to 40 min) may have been missed. Also, all proteins
which might be up- or down-regulated before the initiation of
replication were missed because the initiation of replication was
uncoupled from the normal cell cycle in the cells used for
synchronization. Thus, our data presumably represents an underestimate
of the number of proteins that are differentially expressed after
initiation of replication.
The replication-dependently expressed proteins 1, 2, and 4 were
identified by mass spectrometry analysis (Table 2). Both proteins 1 and
2 had their highest synthesis rates at midreplication, and they
represent GAPDH (the product of gapA) and PyrI (ATCase), respectively. GAPDH is involved in one of the main metabolic pathways, glycolysis. It catalyzes the oxidative phosphorylation of
D-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate into 1,3-bisphosphoglycerate
(14, 15). ATCase is an enzyme which catalyzes the first
committed step in the synthesis of pyrimidines from aspartate (16,
24). It consists of six identical catalytic subunits, the gene
products of pyrB, and six identical regulatory chains coded
for by pyrI. The enzyme catalyzes the reaction of carbamoyl
phosphate with L-aspartate to yield
N-carbamoyl-L-aspartate and phosphate. Protein 4 was found to be the stationary-phase-specific protein Dps (PexB). It
binds DNA unspecifically and protects it against oxidative stress. It
is found mainly in stationary-phase cells, where its expression is
controlled by
s and integration host factor
(2), but it can also be induced by oxidative stress in
exponentially growing cells. In this case, induction is goverened by
OxyR and
70 (2). In our synchronization
experiment it had the highest rate of expression at the time cell
division started. Beside its role as a DNA-protecting protein, Dps also
seems to have an effect on the global pattern of gene expression, which
has been shown by use of dps null mutants and 2-D gel
electrophoresis (1).
In conclusion, this report shows that the vast majority of proteins do
not change their rates of expression after initiation of replication in
E. coli. However, the synthesis rates of three proteins were
found to change significantly during synchronous replication. These
expression changes could be correlated only with the synchronous
initiation of replication. The role of these three proteins in the
E. coli cell cycle is not clear and will be further studied
by cell cycle characterization of mutant strains. It is still possible
that the synthesis of these three proteins varies depending on the
state of replication without being involved in the progression of the
cell cycle.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Santanu Dasgupta for critical reading of the manuscript
and Rolf Bernander for much helpful advice during the work.
This work was supported by grants from the Swedish Natural Science
Research Council and the Swedish Cancer Society. Björn Grünenfelder was supported by an Erasmus scholarship. The
identification of the proteins was performed as contract work by
Protana A/S.
Dorothée Bechtloff and Björn Grünenfelder contributed
equally to this work.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Cell and Molecular Biology, Biomedical Center, Uppsala University, Box 596, S-751 24 Uppsala, Sweden. Phone: 46 18 174526. Fax: 46 18 530396. E-mail: Kurt.Nordstroem{at}icm.uu.se.
Present address: Department of Molecular Microbiology, Biozentrum,
University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Present address: Department of Bacteriology, Swedish Institute for
Infectious Disease Control, S-171 82 Solna, Sweden.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Almirón, M.,
A. J. Link,
D. Furlong, and R. Kolter.
1992.
A novel DNA binding protein with regulatory and protective roles in starved Escherichia coli.
Genes Dev.
6:2646-2654[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Altuvia, S.,
M. Almirón,
G. Huisman,
R. Kolter, and G. Storz.
1994.
The dps promoter is activated by OxyR during growth and by IHF and s in stationary phase.
Mol. Microbiol.
13:265-272[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Andrews, B. J., and I. Herskowitz.
1990.
Regulation of cell cycle-dependent gene expression in yeast.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:14057-14060[Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Bachmann, B. J.
1996.
Derivations and genotypes of some mutant derivatives of Escherichia coli K-12, p. 2460-2488.
In
F. C. Neidhardt, R. Curtiss III, J. L. Ingraham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, W. S. Reznikoff, M. Riley, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed. ASM Press, Washington, D.C..
|
| 5.
|
Bernander, R.,
T. Åkerlund, and K. Nordström.
1995.
Inhibition and restart of initiation of chromosome replication: effects on exponentially growing Escherichia coli cells.
J. Bacteriol.
177:1670-1682[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Bogan, J. A., and C. E. Helmstetter.
1996.
mioC transcription, initiation of replication, and the eclipse in Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
178:3201-3206[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Boyd, A., and I. B. Holland.
1979.
Regulation of the synthesis of surface protein in the cell cycle of E. coli B/r.
Cell
18:287-296[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Domian, I. J.,
K. C. Quon, and L. Shapiro.
1996.
The control of temporal and spatial organization during the Caulobacter cell cycle.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
6:538-544[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Feller, A.,
A. Piérard,
N. Glansdorff,
D. Charlier, and M. Crabeel.
1981.
Mutation of gene encoding regulatory polypeptide of aspartate carbamoyltransferase.
Nature
292:370-373[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Fernandez-Patron, C.,
M. Calero,
P. Rodriguez Collazo,
J. R. Garcia,
J. Madrazo,
A. Musacchio,
F. Soriano,
R. Estrada,
R. Frank,
L. R. Castellanos-Serra, and E. Mendez.
1995.
Protein reverse staining: high-efficiency microanalysis of unmodified proteins detected on electrophoresis gels.
Anal. Biochem.
224:203-211[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Garrels, J. I.
1979.
Two dimensional gel electrophoresis and computer analysis of proteins synthesized by clonal cell lines.
J. Biol. Chem.
254:7961-7977[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Garrido, T.,
M. Sanchez,
P. Palacios,
M. Aldea, and M. Vicente.
1993.
Transcription of ftsZ oscillates during the cell cycle of Escherichia coli.
EMBO J.
12:3957-3965[Medline].
|
| 12a.
| Grünenfelder, B. Unpublished data.
|
| 13.
|
Helmstetter, C. E.
1996.
Timing of synthetic activities in the cell cycle, p. 1627-1639.
In
F. C. Neidhardt, R. Curtiss III, J. L. Ingraham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, W. S. Reznikoff, M. Riley, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed. ASM Press, Washington, D.C..
|
| 14.
|
Hillman, J. D., and D. G. Fraenkel.
1975.
Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase mutants of Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
122:1175-1179[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Irani, M., and P. L. Maitra.
1974.
Isolation and characterization of Escherichia coli mutants defective in enzymes of glycolysis.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
56:127-133[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Jones, M. E.,
L. Spector, and F. Lipmann.
1955.
Carbamyl phosphate, the carbamyl donor in enzymatic citrulline synthesis.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
77:819-820.
|
| 17.
|
Koppes, L., and K. Nordström.
1986.
Insertion of an R1 plasmid into the origin of replication of the E. coli chromosome: random timing of replication of the hybrid chromosome.
Cell
44:117-124[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Link, A. J.,
K. Robison, and G. M. Church.
1997.
Comparing the predicted and observed properties of proteins encoded in the genome of Escherichia coli K-12.
Electrophoresis
18:1259-1313[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Lomovskaya, O. L.,
J. P. Kidwell, and A. Martin.
1994.
Characterization of the 38-dependent expression of a core Escherichia coli starvation gene, pexB.
J. Bacteriol.
176:3928-3935[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Lutkenhaus, J. F.,
B. A. Moore,
M. Masters, and W. D. Donachie.
1979.
Individual proteins are synthesized continuously throughout the Escherichia coli cell cycle.
J. Bacteriol.
138:352-360[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Milhausen, M., and N. Agabian.
1981.
Regulation of polypeptide synthesis during Caulobacter development: two-dimensional gel analysis.
J. Bacteriol.
148:163-173[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
O'Farrell, P. Z.,
H. M. Goodman, and P. H. O'Farrell.
1977.
High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of basic as well as acidic proteins.
Cell
12:1133-1141[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Ogawa, T., and T. Okazaki.
1994.
Cell cycle-dependent transcription from the gid and mioC promoters of Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
176:1609-1615[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Reichard, P., and G. Hanshoff.
1956.
Aspartate carbamyl transferase from Escherichia coli.
Acta Chem. Scand.
10:548-566.
|
| 25.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 26.
|
Shevchenko, A.,
M. Wilm,
O. Vorm, and M. Mann.
1996.
Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins from silver-stained polyacrylamide gels.
Anal. Chem.
68:850-858[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Skarstad, K.,
R. Bernander,
S. Wold,
H. B. Steen, and E. Boye.
1996.
Cell cycle analysis of microorganisms, p. 241-255.
In
M. Al-Rubeai, and A. N. Emery (ed.), Flow cytometry applications in cell culture. Marcel Dekker, New York, N.Y.
|
| 28.
|
Sun, L.,
B. A. Jacobson,
B. S. Dien,
F. Srienc, and J. A. Fuchs.
1994.
Cell cycle regulation of the Escherichia coli nrd operon: requirement for a cis-acting upstream AT-rich sequence.
J. Bacteriol.
176:2415-2426[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Theisen, P. W.,
J. E. Grimwade,
A. C. Leonard,
J. A. Bogan, and C. E. Helmstetter.
1993.
Correlation of gene transcription with the time of initiation of chromosome replication in Escherichia coli.
Mol. Microbiol.
10:575-584[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
VanBogelen, R. A.,
K. Z. Abshire,
A. Pertsemlidis,
R. L. Clark, and F. C. Neidhardt.
1996.
Gene-protein database of Escherichia coli K-12, edition 6, p. 2067-2117.
In
F. C. Neidhardt, R. Curtiss III, J. L. Ingraham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, W. S. Reznikoff, M. Riley, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed. ASM Press, Washington, D.C..
|
| 31.
|
Vinella, D., and R. D'Ari.
1995.
Overview of controls in the Escherichia coli cell cycle.
Bioessays
17:527-536[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Zhou, P.,
J. A. Bogan,
K. Welch,
S. R. Pickett,
H. J. Wang,
A. Zaritsky, and C. E. Helmstetter.
1997.
Gene transcription and chromosome replication in Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
179:163-169[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Zhou, P., and C. E. Helmstetter.
1994.
Relationship between ftsZ gene expression and chromosome replication in Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
176:6100-6106[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Bacteriology, October 1999, p. 6292-6299, Vol. 181, No. 20
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Kim, J., Yoshimura, S. H., Hizume, K., Ohniwa, R. L., Ishihama, A., Takeyasu, K.
(2004). Fundamental structural units of the Escherichia coli nucleoid revealed by atomic force microscopy. Nucleic Acids Res
32: 1982-1992
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rueda, S., Vicente, M., Mingorance, J.
(2003). Concentration and Assembly of the Division Ring Proteins FtsZ, FtsA, and ZipA during the Escherichia coli Cell Cycle. J. Bacteriol.
185: 3344-3351
[Abstract]
[Full Text]