Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, The
University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75083-0688
Glutamate enhances the yield of exotoxin A (ETA), which is induced
by iron limitation, from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. We tested the possibility that glutamate affects growth during iron restriction. We confirmed that iron limitation caused early entry into stationary phase but had no effect on the exponential growth rate. We showed that
glutamate, as well as citrate and isocitrate, partially overcame this
growth limitation. Glutamate had no effect on toxA
(ETA-encoding) transcription, which implies that glutamate primarily
increases the number of toxin-producing cells. In contrast, citrate and isocitrate diminished toxA transcription. Since glutamate,
citrate, and isocitrate stimulated growth, we suspected a block in the citric acid cycle. Iron limitation reduced the activity of the iron-containing aconitase 12-fold but had no effect on isocitrate dehydrogenase activity, which was assayed as a control. There is a
reciprocal relationship between aconitase activity and ETA synthesis,
and this correlation does not appear to be coincidental because
aconitase-specific effectors affect ETA synthesis. We tested whether a
metabolic block is sufficient to induce ETA synthesis, but an
aconitase-specific inhibitor diminished ETA production, which argues
against this possibility. Finally, we present preliminary evidence that
iron limitation may reversibly and posttranslationally inactivate
aconitase in vivo. In summary, the environmental factors that stimulate
ETA synthesis are related: glutamate bypasses an iron
limitation-dependent metabolic block that causes entry into stationary
phase. We speculate that one or more of the aconitases in P. aeruginosa may contribute to the control of virulence factor synthesis.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is
a gram-negative soil bacterium that can transiently colonize animal
hosts. Host defenses are usually sufficient to prevent infections, but
when these defenses are compromised (e.g., after burns, during
immunosuppressive therapy, or in wounds), P. aeruginosa
becomes an opportunistic pathogen that can cause serious
life-threatening infections. During such infections, P. aeruginosa secretes or carries on its outer membrane several
virulence factors that contribute to its pathogenicity. These include
pili, ADP-ribosyltransferase toxins (exotoxin A [ETA] and exoenzyme
S), rhamnolipids, hemolytic and nonhemolytic phospholipases, endotoxin,
proteases, and the exopolysaccharide alginate (10). Of
these, ETA is the most toxic (26).
Most of the known regulators of ETA synthesis control the synthesis of
RegA, which has been proposed to interact with RNA polymerase
holoenzyme and thereby facilitate open promoter complex formation
(36, 37). Transcription of regA requires the
products of vfr and pvdS. Vfr is a
Pseudomonas homologue of the cyclic AMP receptor protein
(38), and pvdS codes for an alternate sigma factor (31) which is also required for synthesis of the iron chelator pyoverdine (6). Finally, the iron-sensing ferric
uptake regulator (Fur) represses pvdS transcription
(31). Although several genes have been implicated in the
control of ETA synthesis, there are some significant gaps in our
knowledge. For example, a site for an activator of toxA
(ETA-encoding) expression has been identified, but the activator and
the factors that control its activity are not known (35). In
fact, no protein that interacts with the toxA promoter
region has been definitively identified.
Iron limitation is a major stimulus for ETA synthesis (3).
Iron-dependent regulation is mediated, in part, by Fur, which controls
PvdS synthesis. However, residual control by iron availability in
Pseudomonas fur mutants suggests the existence of a
Fur-independent mechanism of iron regulation (1). Two other
environmental factors stimulate ETA synthesis: entry into stationary
phase (2) and high levels of certain amino acids, such as
glutamate (25). The relationships between these factors are
poorly understood. Our primary purpose was to analyze the physiological
function of supplemental amino acids. We made the new observations that glutamate, citrate, and isocitrate partially mimic the
growth-stimulatory effect of exogenous iron; that iron limitation
resulted in a reduction in the activity of aconitase, an iron-sulfur
protein, thus accounting for the growth stimulation by glutamate; and
that there was a reciprocal correlation between aconitase activity and
ETA synthesis. We discuss the broader significance of the amino acid
supplementation and the circumstantial evidence that a bacterial
aconitase may have a regulatory function similar to that of the human
iron-regulatory protein 1 (IRP-1) (32).
(This work is presented as partial fulfillment for the requirements for
the Ph.D. degree at the University of Texas at Dallas for G. Somerville.)
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains.
The P. aeruginosa strains used
in this study were the prototrophic strain PA103 (27) and
PA103-CM1, which contains a chromosomal toxA-lacZ fusion.
The latter strain was constructed as follows. The toxA
promoter region was removed from pRC362 (5) as a 760-bp PvuII-BamHI fragment and ligated into the
SmaI and BamHI sites in the polylinker of pRS414
(34), which has lacZ immediately downstream of
the BamHI site. The first 24 bp of the toxA gene were joined in frame to the N terminus of lacZ by
linearizing the plasmid at the unique BamHI site, filling in
with the Klenow fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase,
and religating. The toxA-lacZ fusion was removed as a 2.7-kb
EcoRI-SacI fragment, which replaced the
corresponding fragment of pUJ9 (8). This plasmid has a T7
terminator at the end of lacZ and allows excision of the
toxA-lacZ fusion as a NotI fragment. The 4.2-kb
NotI fragment was inserted into the transposon vector pUT,
which contains the mini-Tn5 streptomycin/spectinomycine
resistance gene cassette, and the plasmid was transformed into E. coli S17-1(
pir) (19). The donor E. coli strain was grown overnight at 37°C; the recipient strain,
PA103, was grown at 43°C. Mobilization of the
toxA-lacZ-containing pUT derivative was achieved by mixing
the two strains in a 1:3 ratio (donor to recipient), collecting the
cells on a 0.45-µm-pore-size filter, and allowing the cells to mate
on an LB plate at 32°C. The next day the cells were eluted and an
appropriate dilution was plated on LB plates with streptomycin (500 µg/ml). This selects against E. coli, which is not
resistant to such a high concentration of streptomycin, and selects for
the transconjugates. This procedure selects for cells with a random
insertion of the fusion onto the chromosome
the fusion does not
replace the wild-type toxA gene. The P. aeruginosa strain designated PA103-CM1 was chosen based on a
quantitative assay for
-galactosidase that showed iron regulation.
Media and growth conditions.
Pseudomonas cultures were
grown in either 2xYT (29), deferrated trypticase soy broth
dialysate (DTSB) (20), or Pseudomonas isolation
agar (Difco) at 32°C. DTSB was supplemented with 1 mM MgSO4 and with other compounds as noted. Liquid cultures
were shaken at 250 rpm. The flask-to-medium volume ratio was always 20:1. The removal of iron from DTSB was not quantitative but was sufficient to limit growth (see Results). Most of the time, growth ceased at the same cell density, but there was some variation from
batch to batch of medium. Occasionally the iron chelation was so
efficient that it was necessary to add 1 µM FeSO4 to
obtain sufficient growth.
Biochemical assays.
Aconitase activity was assayed by the
method of Gruer and Guest (17). Briefly, 1.5-ml cultures
were harvested at the indicated times, resuspended in Tris-citrate (20 mM, pH 8.0), and ultrasonically disrupted. The suspension was then
centrifuged for 5 min at 12,000 rpm to remove cell debris. The
cell-free lysate was then assayed for aconitase activity. Enzyme
activity was determined spectrophotometrically by monitoring the
formation of cis-aconitate from isocitrate at 240 nm
according to the method of Kennedy et al. (21).
Isocitrate dehydrogenase activity was assayed by the method of
Williamson and Corkey (39). Cell-free lysates were prepared as described above for the aconitase assays. Enzymatic activity was
assayed spectrophotometrically at 30°C by monitoring the formation of
NADPH in the presence of isocitrate.
-Galactosidase activity was determined by the method of Miller
(30).
Protein concentrations were determined by the method of Lowry et al.
(28), using bovine serum albumin as the standard.
The variations in results from cells grown with different batches of
media was much greater than for cells grown with the same batch of
medium. This variation probably resulted from slight differences in
iron content of these media, despite efforts to ensure that the
iron-limited medium was prepared in the same way each time. Slight
differences in a limiting nutrient can obviously have dramatic effects
on growth. Because of this variability, the results presented were from
one experiment, with assays done in triplicate, unless otherwise noted.
The variability reported is for these triplicate determinations. All
experiments were done at least twice, and in cases where cells had been
grown in different batches of media, the results were always in agreement.
 |
RESULTS |
Effect of glutamate during iron-restricted growth.
The first
studies on ETA synthesis showed that the optimal medium was a broth
that contained glycerol and albumin (7, 25). Because albumin
and several amino acids stimulated growth, it was concluded that
toxigenic medium was nitrogen limiting (25). It was
subsequently shown that iron limitation induced ETA synthesis (2,
3). Glutamate is still routinely added to iron-limited toxigenic
medium, but its function, if any, has not been reexamined. It is
possible that glutamate counters an effect of iron limitation.
To test this possibility, we first compared the growth of P. aeruginosa PA103 in DTSB medium, which is iron restricted, with growth in iron-supplemented DTSB. The final cell density was much lower
with limiting iron, but the growth rates were independent of iron
availability (Fig. 1A). These results
confirm previous results (3, 12, 13). We will refer to the
low-iron-dependent entry into stationary phase as iron limitation or
iron restriction. Adding iron to an iron-depleted culture immediately
stimulated growth (Fig. 1B), which implies that the effects of iron
limitation are readily reversible, at least at this stage of growth.
Glutamate significantly increased the cell yield of iron-limited cells
by delaying the time when growth slowed (Fig.
2 and Table
1).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Iron-restricted growth of PA103. (A) Growth of PA103 in
DTSB without supplemental iron or with 100 µM FeSO4. (B)
Parallel cultures were grown in iron-limited DTSB for 6 h.
Supplemental iron [100 µM
Fe(NH4)2(SO4)2] was
added to one ( ) but not the other ().
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Additions to DTSB affect the growth yield but not the
growth rate. PA103 cultures were grown in DTSB with no supplement or
with the indicated supplement at 50 mM.
|
|
These results imply that limiting iron supports optimal growth
until iron is essentially depleted, which then causes entry into
stationary phase. The point at which cell growth ceased varied from
batch to batch of medium. Iglewski and coworkers have reported iron-limited entry into stationary phase at a cell density that was 10 times higher than we observed, although this result varied significantly from report to report (3, 12, 13). The
variability probably results from differences in the efficiency of iron
extraction during medium preparation. From the effect of iron
concentration on growth, we estimate that 1 µM
FeSO4 supports a cell density that increases the
A600 by 0.6. This is probably an overestimate because some medium components bypass the effects of iron limitation (described below). Nonetheless, growth without exogenous iron ceased at
an A600 of about 0.6 (Fig. 2). From this, we
estimate that about 1 µM iron remains in DTSB after iron extraction.
At such low levels, small variations in iron content will have
significant effects on growth. However, these batch variations had no
effect on the pattern of results, and they do not affect our conclusions.
Function of glutamate.
It was originally proposed that
glutamate overcomes a deficiency of nitrogen (25). However,
it is also possible that glutamate provides carbon and energy, as it
does for Haemophilus influenzae, which lacks several citric
acid cycle enzymes (11). To distinguish between these
possibilities, we examined the effects of several citric acid cycle
intermediates on the growth of iron-restricted cells (Table 1).
Stimulation of growth by nonnitrogenous intermediates would imply that
iron restriction imposes a carbon or energy limitation. Isocitrate and
citrate increased the growth yield almost as well as glutamate (Table
1). Malate and
-ketoglutarate stimulated growth but not as well as
glutamate, whereas succinate did not affect growth (Fig. 2 and Table
1). None of these supplements altered the growth rate (Fig. 2). Since
nonnitrogenous compounds stimulated growth, we conclude that glutamate
primarily provides carbon or energy. The fact that glutamate is the
best growth supplement suggests either that the provision of nitrogen
stimulates growth slightly or that glutamate is transported more
efficiently than the other compounds.
The effect of glutamate on specific toxA (ETA-coding)
expression has not been examined since iron limitation was shown to induce ETA. It is possible that glutamate simply increases the number
of toxin-producing cells without affecting expression. To test this
possibility, we assessed toxA expression by measuring
-galactosidase from strain PA103-CM1, which contains a
toxA-lacZ fusion on the chromosome (Table 1). Iron reduced
-galactosidase activity and ETA (measured by a direct immunological
assay) fourfold (not shown), which implies that the major control is
transcriptional and that
-galactosidase accurately reflects
toxA expression. These results confirm previous observations
(2, 3, 14).
Glutamate had little effect on
-galactosidase (Table 1). We conclude
that glutamate does not control toxA expression; i.e., it
does not contribute to the induction signal. Therefore, the only effect
of glutamate is to stimulate the growth of toxin-producing cells.
In contrast, the other growth-stimulating supplements did affect
toxA expression. Isocitrate and citrate reduced
-galactosidase activity two- to threefold, whereas malate increased
-galactosidase activity 50% (Table 1). These results suggest that
some growth-stimulating compounds can affect the inducing signal.
Iron limitation and aconitase activity.
Since some citric acid
cycle intermediates, but especially citrate, isocitrate, and glutamate,
enhanced growth, we suspected that iron limitation inactivated a citric
acid cycle enzyme that is required for the synthesis of
-ketoglutarate, the precursor for glutamate. Therefore, we examined
the effects of iron limitation on two citric acid cycle enzymes,
aconitase and isocitrate dehydrogenase (Fig.
3).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Effects of iron restriction on aconitase (A) and
isocitrate dehydrogenase (B) activities over time in PA103 cultures
grown in iron-limited DTSB or DTSB with 100 µM FeSO4.
|
|
Aconitase catalyzes the conversion of citrate to isocitrate via
cis-aconitate, and a labile [4Fe-4S] cluster is required
for catalytic activity. In eucaryotes, aconitase activity is sensitive to iron availability (9, 21). Therefore, we considered the possibility that iron limitation impairs aconitase activity in P. aeruginosa. There was a fourfold drop in aconitase activity when
iron-limited cultures of PA103 entered stationary phase. In contrast,
there was a threefold increase in aconitase activity from iron-replete
cultures (Fig. 3A). The net effect was an approximately 12-fold
difference in aconitase activity between iron-limited and iron-replete cells.
We also assayed isocitrate dehydrogenase, which catalyzes the reaction
after the aconitase reaction: the NADP-dependent oxidation of
isocitrate to
-ketoglutarate. It does not contain iron, and its
activity should not be affected by iron availability. Nonetheless, its
inactivation could also conceivably account for the growth stimulation
by glutamate. However, neither iron availability nor entry into
stationary phase adversely affected its activity (Fig. 3B). We conclude
that iron limitation specifically reduces aconitase activity.
Reciprocal relationship between aconitase activity and ETA
synthesis.
Iron availability affects both aconitase activity and
ETA synthesis. Therefore, we examined how closely these two activities correlated as a function of exogenous iron. Cells were grown for 14 h and then assayed for aconitase and
-galactosidase from
PA103-CM1. A reciprocal correlation between aconitase and
-galactosidase activities was readily apparent (Fig.
4A). Replotting
-galactosidase activity as a function of the reciprocal of aconitase activity shows a
linear relationship, which breaks down only when
-galactosidase activity is nearly maximal (Fig. 4B). In other words, aconitase activity is low when toxA is expressed.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Transcription of toxA inversely
correlates with aconitase activity in PA103. (A) Aconitase activity
( ) and toxA expression ( -galactosidase activity from a
strain with a toxA-lacZ fusion) ( ) in cultures of
PA103-CM1 grown for 14 h in increasing concentrations of
FeSO4. (B) Replot of the data from panel A, showing
the inverse correlation between aconitase activity and toxA
transcription.
|
|
Such a correlation is not particularly surprising, since all reactions
sensitive to iron availability should be affected once iron is
depleted. If the correlation is coincidental, then the factors that
specifically affect aconitase activity should have absolutely no
influence on ETA synthesis. Therefore, we examined the effect of
supplemental isocitrate on aconitase activity. Isocitrate is a product
of the aconitase reaction, and its presence may prevent the reduction
in aconitase activity, possibly by stabilizing the protein. We compared
aconitase activities at several times for cells grown with either
isocitrate or glutamate. Isocitrate stabilized aconitase activity about
twofold (Fig. 5A). Isocitrate had the opposite effect on
-galactosidase activity, reducing its activity two- to threefold (Fig. 5B). These results further confirm the reciprocal correlation between aconitase activity and ETA synthesis. They also suggest that the reciprocal correlation between aconitase activity and ETA synthesis might not be coincidental.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Isocitrate stabilizes aconitase and reduces
toxA expression. (A) Aconitase activities of PA103-CM1
cultures grown in DTSB supplemented with 50 mM glutamate ( ) or
isocitrate ( ). (B) -Galactosidase activity of cultures from panel
A.
|
|
A metabolic block in the citric acid cycle is not sufficient to
induce ETA synthesis.
A possible explanation for the reciprocal
relationship between aconitase activity and ETA synthesis is that an
iron limitation-dependent metabolic block in the citric acid cycle is
sufficient to stimulate ETA synthesis. To test this possibility, we
examined the effect of fluorocitrate, an aconitase-specific inhibitor,
on ETA synthesis. Aconitase converts fluorocitrate to
fluoro-cis-aconitate and then to
4-hydroxy-trans-aconitate, which binds tightly, but not
covalently, to aconitase. The latter intermediate inhibits aconitase
activity. At the same time that 4-hydroxy-trans-aconitate
inhibits aconitase, it also stabilizes the [4Fe-4S] cluster and thus
prevents aconitase's conversion into the enzymatically inactive
[3Fe-4S] form (23). The inhibition by
4-hydroxy-trans-aconitate is reversible; therefore, when
cell extracts are prepared and aconitase is saturated with substrate,
aconitase activity can be measured. This leads to the apparently
paradoxical situation in which an increase in aconitase activity from a
crude extract, which results from stabilization of the [4Fe-4S]
cluster, implies a proportional inhibition of aconitase activity in
vivo. If fluorocitrate stimulates ETA synthesis, we would conclude that
a metabolic block induces ETA synthesis. This result was not observed.
Cells were grown for 10 h in DTSB supplemented with 50 mM citrate
instead of 50 mM glutamate, in order to minimize the effects of the
subsequent medium shift. Cells were then resuspended and incubated for
4 h in DTSB without glutamate but with either 2 mM citrate or 2 mM
fluorocitrate. The latter incubation permits ETA synthesis and supports
a fourfold increase in cell density. Fluorocitrate increased aconitase
activity measured from extracts 12-fold (Fig.
6). This increase probably results from
two factors: stabilization of the Fe-S center, which inhibits activity
in vivo, and new synthesis of aconitase. The greatly elevated activity may result from fluorocitrate-dependent inhibition, which stimulates compensatory synthesis of more aconitase. In either case, inhibition of
aconitase by fluorocitrate must be invoked to explain the increase in
activity. The 12-fold increase in aconitase activity is accompanied by
a four-fold reduction in
-galactosidase activity (Fig. 6). These
results show that the metabolic block imposed by fluorocitrate impairs
ETA synthesis. This is contrary to the expectation of the metabolic
block hypothesis, which predicts an increase in ETA synthesis.
Therefore, these results suggest that a metabolic block is not
sufficient to induce ETA synthesis.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Fluorocitrate stabilizes aconitase and inhibits
toxA expression. PA103-CM1, which contains a chromosomal
toxA-lacZ fusion, was grown for 10 h in DTSB
supplemented with citrate. The cells were then harvested and
resuspended in prewarmed DTSB supplemented with either 2 mM citrate or
2 mM fluorocitrate. These cultures were grown for 4 h and then
assayed for -galactosidase and aconitase activities. The data
represents the averages of two independent experiments with each assay
done in triplicate, with the standard deviation for each also
presented.
|
|
Evidence for posttranslational aconitase inactivation.
Two
explanations could account for the diminished aconitase activity from
iron-restricted cells. First, iron depletion could prevent aconitase
synthesis, and subsequent cell growth could dilute aconitase activity.
Alternately, iron restriction could posttranslationally inactivate
aconitase by loss of iron from its essential [4Fe-4S] cluster. If
iron depletion reversibly inactivates aconitase, then addition of iron
to iron-limited cells would reactivate aconitase. To test this
possibility, we incubated cells in the presence of a protein synthesis
inhibitor, which should prevent an increase in newly synthesized
aconitase. Figure 7B shows the growth of
iron-limited cells to which exogenous iron was added. Without
gentamicin, growth resumed at a faster rate, which implies that iron is
being transported into the cell under the conditions of the experiment.
With gentamicin, growth ceased, which implies substantial, although
perhaps not complete, inhibition of protein synthesis. Under these
conditions, exogenous iron increased aconitase activity fourfold (Fig.
7A).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
In vivo reactivation of aconitase. (A) PA103 was grown
in iron-limited DTSB for 6 h (A600 of
~2.0), at which time the culture was split into four equal volumes.
Two of the cultures were treated with 20 µg/ml of gentamicin, (Gm),
and two were untreated. The cultures were incubated for an additional
15 min, and then one treated and one untreated culture were
supplemented with
Fe(NH4)2(SO4)2 to a
concentration of 100 µM. The cultures were incubated for an
additional 45 min, harvested, and assayed for aconitase activity.
Without gentamicin, the cell density increased by about 15% without
iron and 30% with iron. The data represent the averages from two
independent cultures done on different days. The assays were done in
triplicate, with error bars indicating the standard deviations. (B)
Growth of iron-limited PA103 with ( ) or without gentamicin ( ).
Both cultures were supplemented with 100 µM
Fe(NH4)2(SO4)2 15 min
after addition of gentamicin to one culture.
|
|
It is tempting to conclude that iron limitation reversibly and
posttranslationally inactivates aconitase. Such a conclusion would be
consistent with the extraordinary sensitivity of the E. coli
aconitase to oxygen radicals (18), which suggests that the
[4Fe-4S] cluster is accessible and readily disassembled. It is also
consistent with the effects of iron limitation on the homologous
aconitases in eucaryotes. However, regardless of how effective the
protein synthesis inhibitor is, even if protein synthesis is
undetectable, it could still be argued that ribosomes preferentially
translate aconitase mRNA. Therefore, only biochemical experiments can
definitively establish that the reduction in aconitase activity results
from reversible inactivation. Our initial attempts to reactivate
aconitase in vitro have failed, but these experiments were performed in
an aerobic environment, which may prevent reactivation. Therefore, we
consider the conclusion that iron reactivates aconitase posttranslationally to be tentative. The major physiological
conclusions of this report depend only on the fact that aconitase
activity is reduced, not on the mechanism of the reduction.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Glutamate and virulence factor synthesis.
Our primary
objective was to analyze glutamate's effect on ETA synthesis, which
was first observed 25 years ago (25). We found that
glutamate delayed the entry of iron-limited cells into stationary
phase. Several citric acid cycle intermediates, especially citrate and
isocitrate, had a similar effect. These results suggested that iron
limitation impaired citric acid cycle metabolism, and we found that
iron limitation specifically reduced aconitase activity. The growth
stimulation by citrate, which is the substrate for aconitase, does not
contradict this conclusion, since citrate may either stabilize
aconitase or increase the reaction rate of residual aconitase.
Glutamate has no apparent effect on toxA expression.
Nonetheless, factors such as glutamate that stimulate the growth of
toxin-producing cells may determine the outcome of an infection. This
may be especially true for pathogens that produce toxins that are
induced by iron limitation. If the iron-free form of aconitase
regulates virulence factor synthesis (a possibility that is discussed
below), then the moment the regulatory function of aconitase is
activated is the same moment that metabolism through the citric acid
cycle is impaired. In this case, total toxin production would be
proportional to the extent that the metabolic block is circumvented,
assuming that nothing interferes with the induction signal.
Aconitases in E. coli and P. aeruginosa.
E.
coli has two, and possibly three, aconitases. AcnB is the major
aconitase during exponential growth (16). A second
aconitase, AcnA, is induced during stress in stationary phase, and
genetic evidence suggests that its induction requires iron
(17). A double mutant without AcnA and AcnB still has
residual activity, which suggests that there may be a third aconitase
(16). Analysis of the partially complete P. aeruginosa genome sequence suggests that there are three
aconitase-specifying genes: two are homologous to E. coli
acnA, and one is homologous to E. coli acnB. The
multiplicity of aconitases can explain some of the results presented in
this report if the P. aeruginosa aconitases are similar to
the E. coli enzymes. For example, the 12-fold difference in
total aconitase activity between iron-replete and iron-limited cells
might be the result of differential effects on two different
aconitases. Iron restriction might cause a fourfold reduction in the
activity of the exponential phase aconitase and, in addition, failure
to induce the iron-inducible stationary phase aconitase. This would also explain the extent of the apparent iron reactivation of aconitase from iron-limited cells. In the absence of the iron-inducible stationary phase aconitase, iron would be expected to increase aconitase activity only fourfold, and this is exactly what is observed
(Fig. 7A).
Aconitase and virulence factor synthesis in other pathogens.
The amino acid sequences of aconitases are highly conserved (15,
32), which might suggest that conditions that reduce aconitase
activity in one organism probably do so in other organisms as well.
Since oxidative stress, which inactivates E. coli aconitase activity (18), and iron restriction are frequently
encountered by pathogens, it is possible that such environments are
generally associated with a reduction in aconitase activity. If so,
then the stimulatory effect of amino acids and citric acid cycle
intermediates on virulence factor synthesis may be more general than is
currently recognized. For example, since the same amino acids that
stimulate ETA synthesis also stimulate cholera toxin synthesis in
Vibrio cholerae (4), cholera toxin synthesis may
also negatively correlate with aconitase activity. If this is true,
then agents that stabilize aconitase, such as isocitrate and
fluorocitrate, may also impede virulence factor synthesis in other pathogens.
Iron, aconitase, and ETA synthesis.
Iron is essential
for most bacteria, and complex and diverse mechanisms have evolved to
sense and respond to iron restriction. Iron limitation was first
implicated in microbial virulence over 50 years ago (33),
and since then has been shown to be important for many pathogens.
Iron availability regulates gene expression in bacteria and eucaryotes.
The best-characterized iron-sensing regulator in P. aeruginosa (and other bacteria) is Fur. An iron-Fur complex
normally represses gene expression. For example, it represses
pvdS, which codes for a sigma factor that is required for
regA and toxA (ETA) expression (24,
31). In eucaryotes, the best-characterized iron-sensing
regulators are the cytoplasmic aconitases. These aconitases, such as
the human IRP-1, bind to mRNA and can either inhibit translation or
impede degradation (for reviews, see references 18
and 22). Binding to mRNA becomes possible after iron
limitation results in disassembly of the [4Fe-4S] cluster and
aconitase inactivation (9, 21). In other words, it is the
iron-free form of the eucaryotic aconitases that regulates gene
expression. Bacterial aconitases are homologous to IRP-1. The homology
of E. coli AcnA to IRP-1 led to the suggestion that it may
have a regulatory function (32). This conjecture has yet to
be proven.
It is tempting to speculate that one or more of the P. aeruginosa aconitases may have a regulatory function. Such a
hypothesis may be the simplest explanation for the absolute reciprocal
correlation between aconitase activity and ETA synthesis. It could be
argued that this correlation is coincidental. If so, then
aconitase-specific effectors should not have affected ETA synthesis.
However, two different aconitase-specific effectors, isocitrate and
fluorocitrate, significantly suppressed ETA synthesis. Both of these
effectors appear to stabilize aconitase, but isocitrate stimulates
aconitase activity whereas fluorocitrate inhibits activity. These
results imply that aconitase activity in vivo does not correlate with ETA synthesis. Instead, they suggest that stabilization of
iron-containing aconitase per se impairs ETA synthesis and that
iron-free aconitase activates toxA expression. However, the
physiological results presented in this report cannot prove this
hypothesis. Proof would require a combination of genetics and
biochemistry. We are actively testing this hypothesis.
| 1.
|
Barton, H. A.,
Z. Johnson,
C. D. Cox,
A. I. Vasil, and M. L. Vasil.
1996.
Ferric uptake regulator mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with distinct alterations in the iron-dependent repression of exotoxin A and siderophores in aerobic and microaerobic environments.
Mol. Microbiol.
21:1001-1017[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bjorn, M. J.,
B. H. Iglewski,
S. K. Ives,
J. C. Sadoff, and M. L. Vasil.
1978.
Effect of iron on yields of exotoxin A in cultures of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA-103.
Infect. Immun.
19:785-791[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Bjorn, M. J.,
P. A. Sokol, and B. H. Iglewski.
1979.
Influence of iron on yields of extracellular products in Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultures.
J. Bacteriol.
138:193-200[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Callahan, L. T., and S. H. Richardson.
1973.
Biochemistry of Vibrio cholerae virulence. III. Nutritional requirements for toxin production and the effects of pH on toxin elaboration in chemically defined media.
Infect. Immun.
7:567-572[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Chen, S. T.,
E. M. Jordan,
R. B. Wilson,
R. K. Draper, and R. C. Clowes.
1987.
Transcription and expression of the exotoxin A gene of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
133:3081-3091[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Cunliffe, H. E.,
T. R. Merriman, and I. L. Lamont.
1995.
Cloning and characterization of pvdS, a gene required for pyoverdine synthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: PvdS is probably an alternative sigma factor.
J. Bacteriol.
177:2744-2750[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
DeBell, R. M.
1979.
Production of exotoxin A by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a chemically defined medium.
Infect. Immun.
24:132-138[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
de Lorenzo, V.,
M. Herrero,
U. Jakubzik, and K. N. Timmis.
1990.
Mini-Tn5 transposon derivatives for insertion mutagenesis, promoter probing, and chromosomal insertion of cloned DNA in gram-negative eubacteria.
J. Bacteriol.
172:6568-6572[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Emptage, M. H.,
J. L. Dreyers,
M. C. Kennedy, and H. Beinert.
1983.
Optical and EPR characterization of different species of active and inactive aconitase.
J. Biol. Chem.
258:11106-11111[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Fick, R. B.
1993.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa: the microbial hyena and its role in disease: an introduction, p. 1-5.
In
R. B. Fick (ed.), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the opportunist: pathogenesis and disease. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
|
| 11.
|
Fleischmann, R. D.,
M. D. Adams,
O. White,
R. A. Clayton,
E. F. Kirkness,
A. R. Kerlavage,
C. J. Bult,
J. F. Tomb,
B. A. Dougherty,
J. M. Merrick, et al.
1995.
Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd.
Science
269:496-512[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Frank, D. W., and B. H. Iglewski.
1988.
Kinetics of toxA and regA mRNA accumulation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
J. Bacteriol.
170:4477-4483[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Frank, D. W.,
D. G. Storey,
M. S. Hindahl, and B. H. Iglewski.
1989.
Differential regulation by iron of regA and toxA transcript accumulation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
J. Bacteriol.
171:5304-5313[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Grant, C. C., and M. L. Vasil.
1986.
Analysis of transcription of the exotoxin A gene of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
J. Bacteriol.
168:1112-1119[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Gruer, M. J.,
P. J. Artymiuk, and J. R. Guest.
1997.
The aconitase family: three structural variations on a common theme.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
22:3-6[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Gruer, M. J.,
A. J. Bradbury, and J. R. Guest.
1997.
Construction and properties of aconitase mutants of Escherichia coli.
Microbiology
143:1837-1846[Abstract].
|
| 17.
|
Gruer, M. J., and J. R. Guest.
1994.
Two genetically-distinct and differentially-regulated aconitases (AcnA and AcnB) in Escherichia coli.
Microbiology
140:2531-2541[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
Hentze, M. W., and L. C. Kuhn.
1996.
Molecular control of vertebrate iron metabolism: mRNA-based regulatory circuits operated by iron, nitric oxide, and oxidative stress.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:8175-8182[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Herrero, M.,
V. de Lorenzo, and K. N. Timmis.
1990.
Transposon vectors containing non-antibiotic resistance selection markers for cloning and stable chromosomal insertion of foreign genes in gram-negative bacteria.
J. Bacteriol.
172:6557-6567[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Iglewski, B. H., and J. C. Sadoff.
1979.
Toxin inhibitors of protein synthesis: production, purification, and assay of Pseudomonas aeruginosa toxin A.
Methods Enzymol.
60:780-793[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Kennedy, M. C.,
M. H. Emptage,
J. L. Dreyer, and H. Beinert.
1983.
The role of iron in the activation-inactivation of aconitase.
J. Biol. Chem.
258:11098-11105[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Klausner, R. D., and J. B. Harford.
1989.
cis-trans models for post-transcriptional gene regulation.
Science
246:870-872[Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Lauble, H.,
M. C. Kennedy,
M. H. Emptage,
H. Beinert, and C. D. Stout.
1996.
The reaction of fluorocitrate with aconitase and the crystal structure of the enzyme-inhibitor complex.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:13699-13703[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Leoni, L.,
A. Ciervo,
N. Orsi, and P. Visca.
1996.
Iron-regulated transcription of the pvdA gene in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: effect of Fur and PvdS on promoter activity.
J. Bacteriol.
178:2299-2313[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Liu, P. V.
1973.
Exotoxins of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. I. Factors that influence the production of exotoxin A.
J. Infect. Dis.
128:506-513[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Liu, P. V.
1974.
Extracellular toxins of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
J. Infect. Dis.
130(Suppl):S94-S99.
|
| 27.
|
Liu, P. V.
1966.
The roles of various fractions of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in its pathogenesis. 3. Identity of the lethal toxins produced in vitro and in vivo.
J. Infect. Dis.
116:481-489[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Lowry, O. H.,
N. J. Rosebrough,
L. Farr, and R. J. Randall.
1951.
Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.
J. Biol. Chem.
193:265-275[Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Maniatis, T.,
E. F. Fritsch, and J. Sambrook.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 30.
|
Miller, J. H.
1972.
Experiments in molecular genetics.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 31.
|
Ochsner, U. A.,
Z. Johnson,
I. L. Lamont,
H. E. Cunliffe, and M. L. Vasil.
1996.
Exotoxin A production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa requires the iron-regulated pvdS gene encoding an alternative sigma factor.
Mol. Microbiol.
21:1019-1028[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Prodromou, C.,
P. J. Artymiuk, and J. R. Guest.
1992.
The aconitase of Escherichia coli. Nucleotide sequence of the aconitase gene and amino acid sequence similarity with mitochondrial aconitases, the iron-responsive-element-binding protein and isopropylmalate isomerases.
Eur. J. Biochem.
204:599-609[Medline]. (Erratum, 207:1129.)
|
| 33.
|
Schade, A. L., and L. Caroline.
1944.
Raw hen egg white and the role of iron in growth inhibition of Shigella dysenteriae, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Science
100:14-15[Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Simons, R. W.,
F. Houman, and N. Kleckner.
1987.
Improved single and multicopy lac-based cloning vectors for protein and operon fusions.
Gene
53:85-96[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Tsaur, M. L., and R. C. Clowes.
1989.
Localization of the control region for expression of exotoxin A in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
J. Bacteriol.
171:2599-2604[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Walker, S. L.,
L. S. Hiremath, and D. R. Galloway.
1995.
ToxR (RegA) activates Escherichia coli RNA polymerase to initiate transcription of Pseudomonas aeruginosa toxA.
Gene
154:15-21[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Walker, S. L.,
L. S. Hiremath,
D. J. Wozniak, and D. R. Galloway.
1994.
ToxR (RegA)-mediated in vitro transcription of Pseudomonas aeruginosa toxA.
Gene
150:87-92[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
West, S. E.,
A. K. Sample, and L. J. Runyen-Janecky.
1994.
The vfr gene product, required for Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A and protease production, belongs to the cyclic AMP receptor protein family.
J. Bacteriol.
176:7532-7542[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Williamson, J. R., and B. E. Corkey.
1969.
Assays of Intermediates of the citric acid cycle and related compounds by fluorometric enzyme methods.
Methods Enzymol.
13:434-513.
|