Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, March 1999, p. 1530-1536, Vol. 181, No. 5
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Role of Ribosome Release in Regulation of
tna Operon Expression in Escherichia
coli
Kouacou Vincent
Konan and
Charles
Yanofsky*
Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford
University, Stanford, California 94305-5020
Received 3 June 1998/Accepted 17 December 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Expression of the degradative tryptophanase (tna)
operon of Escherichia coli is regulated by catabolite
repression and tryptophan-induced transcription antitermination. In
cultures growing in the absence of added tryptophan, transcription of
the structural genes of the tna operon is limited by
Rho-dependent transcription termination in the leader region of the
operon. Tryptophan induction prevents this Rho-dependent termination,
and requires in-frame translation of a 24-residue leader peptide coding
region, tnaC, that contains a single, crucial, Trp codon.
Studies with a lacZ reporter construct lacking the spacer
region between tnaC and the first major structural gene,
tnaA, suggested that tryptophan induction might involve cis action by the TnaC leader peptide on the ribosome
translating the tnaC coding region. The leader peptide was
hypothesized to inhibit ribosome release at the
tnaC stop codon, thereby blocking Rho's access to the
transcript. Regulatory studies with deletion constructs of the
tna operon of Proteus vulgaris supported this interpretation. In the present study the putative role of the tnaC stop codon in tna operon regulation in
E. coli was examined further by replacing the natural
tnaC stop codon, UGA, with UAG or UAA in a
tnaC-stop codon-tnaA'-'lacZ reporter construct.
Basal level expression was reduced to 20 and 50% when the UGA stop
codon was replaced by UAG or UAA, respectively, consistent with the finding that in E. coli translation terminates more
efficiently at UAG and UAA than at UGA. Tryptophan induction was
observed in strains with any of the stop codons. However, when UAG or
UAA replaced UGA, the induced level of expression was also reduced to
15 and 50% of that obtained with UGA as the tnaC stop
codon, respectively. Introduction of a mutant allele encoding a
temperature-sensitive release factor 1, prfA1, increased
basal level expression 60-fold when the tnaC stop codon was
UAG and 3-fold when this stop codon was UAA; basal level expression was
reduced by 50% in the construct with the natural stop codon, UGA. In
strains with any of the three stop codons and the prfA1
mutation, the induced levels of tna operon expression were
virtually identical. The effects of tnaC stop codon
identity on expression were also examined in the absence of Rho action,
using tnaC-stop codon-'lacZ constructs that
lack the tnaC-tnaA spacer region. Expression was low in
the absence of tnaC stop codon suppression. In most
cases, tryptophan addition resulted in about 50% inhibition
of expression when UGA was replaced by UAG or UAA and the appropriate
suppressor was present. Introduction of the prfA1 mutant
allele increased expression of the suppressed construct with the
UAG stop codon; tryptophan addition also resulted in ca. 50%
inhibition. These findings provide additional evidence implicating the
behavior of the ribosome translating tnaC in the regulation
of tna operon expression.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Tryptophanase is a multifunctional
enzyme that degrades L-tryptophan to indole, pyruvate, and
ammonia (27) by a
-elimination reaction
(34). Bacteria with tryptophanase activity can utilize tryptophan as a source of carbon, nitrogen, and energy
(23). In addition, since the
-elimination reaction is
reversible, tryptophanase can synthesize L-tryptophan from
indole and L-serine, L-cysteine, or pyruvate
and ammonia (34, 53).
Transcription of the tna operon of E. coli has
been shown to be regulated by catabolite repression of transcription
initiation (1, 39, 40) and by tryptophan-induced
transcription antitermination (46). The tryptophanase
(tna) operon has been cloned and sequenced from
Escherichia coli (10), Proteus
vulgaris (24), Enterobacter aerogenes
(26), Symbiobacterium thermophilum
(22), and the pathogen Haemophilus
influenzae type b (30). The tna operon of
E. coli contains two major structural genes, the promoter
proximal gene, tnaA, encoding tryptophanase, and a distal
gene, tnaB, encoding a low-affinity, high-capacity,
tryptophan permease (10, 12). tnaA is preceded by
a transcribed regulatory leader region containing a short open reading
frame, tnaC, specifying a 24-residue leader peptide.
Between tnaC and tnaA there is a ca. 200-bp
spacer region containing several transcription pause sites. When cells
grow in the absence of inducer, tryptophan, transcription is subject to
Rho-dependent transcription termination (45) at these pause sites. In the presence of inducer, termination at these sites is
prevented and expression is elevated 15- to 100-fold (46). Induction requires translation of tnaC, which encodes a
peptide with a single Trp residue at position 12. Tryptophan induction is not observed when the tnaC start codon is replaced by
a stop codon, or when the Trp codon at position 12 is
replaced by codons specifying other amino acids (13, 17,
47). Additional residues in the TnaC peptide are also essential
for induction, particularly several residues near the Trp residue
(15).
Several classes of tna operon constitutive mutants have been
isolated; these show elevated expression of the operon in the absence
of added tryptophan (46). Many constitutive mutants have
single base pair changes in a 9-bp sequence at the distal end of
tnaC (46) which has homology to boxA
of bacteriophage
(14). boxA is critical for
proper antitermination, not termination, in phage
(9)
and other systems (21, 50). Deletion of a putative Rho
utilization (rut) site located immediately following the
tnaC UGA stop codon also results in constitutive
expression of the operon (17). Because the
boxA-like sequence in the tna operon does
not behave like a typical boxA, it is conceivable that
recognition of both the boxA-like sequence and the presumed rut site are required for Rho-dependent transcription
termination in this operon. A third class of constitutive
mutants contains +1 or
1 frameshift mutations in tnaC
that allow translation to proceed well beyond the presumed
rut site that follows the tnaC stop codon
(17). Continued translation presumably interferes with Rho
action. However, it is unlikely that tryptophan induction involves frameshifting, because stop codons introduced in the +1 and
1 reading frames between Trp codon 12 and the
tnaC stop codon do not affect either basal level
expression or tryptophan induction (15). Similarly,
introducing stop codons in the +1 or
1 reading frame immediately
following tnaC does not interfere with the effects of
induction (25).
The precise mechanism by which added tryptophan induces tna
operon expression is not known. Previous studies indicated that no unique regulatory factor other than TnaC is needed for induction (15, 16). Specifically, a plasmid containing a foreign
promoter, the E. coli tna leader regulatory region, and a
lacZ translational fusion to the first 20 codons of
tnaA responded to tryptophan induction when introduced into
two bacterial species that do not produce tryptophanase
(15). Thus, if additional factors are required for
induction, they are likely to be components common to many bacterial
species, including those that lack a tna operon (15). All tests of TnaC trans-activation have
given negative results (46).
A hypothesis consistent with all the observations made to date is that
in the presence of inducer, the nascent TnaC peptide acts in
cis on the ribosome translating tnaC and inhibits
its release at the tnaC stop codon. The inhibited
ribosome would interfere with Rho's binding to the tna
transcript, thereby preventing transcription termination. If ribosome
release or stalling were essential in the regulation of tna
operon expression, then peptide chain release factors and the
ribosome release factor could be influential in setting the basal or
induced level of expression of the operon. In E. coli, two codon-specific peptide chain release factors (RF1 and RF2) direct termination of protein synthesis; RF1 recognizes UAG
and UAA stop codons (54), whereas RF2 acts at the UGA
and UAA stop codons (6). Unlike other prokaryotic RF2s,
E. coli RF2 terminates translation weakly at UGA and UAA
stop codons (33, 48). The third release factor, RF3,
enhances the activity of RF1 and RF2 and lacks nonsense codon
specificity (18, 31).
In previous studies performed to examine models invoking ribosome
release or stalling, we designed and tested a construct that would not
be subject to Rho regulation. This construct,
tnaC-UGA-'lacZ, lacks the tnaC-tnaA
spacer region within which Rho-dependent termination occurs
(28). Its expression is dependent on translation of the UGA
codon and synthesis of a TnaC-'LacZ fusion protein. Using this
construct and various nonsense suppressors, we showed that addition of
inducer inhibited
-galactosidase (
-Gal) formation and that this
inhibition was dependent upon the presence of Trp residue 12 in the
TnaC portion of the fusion protein (28). We found that
inactivation of the structural gene for RF3 (55), increased
-Gal production 30-fold, and this increase was also reduced by the
presence of tryptophan (28). In a parallel study with
deletion derivatives of the tna operon of
P. vulgaris, it was observed that a deletion that
places the Shine-Dalgarno region for tnaA (in
tnaA'-'lacZ fusion) near the tnaC stop codon
results in tryptophan inhibition of tnaA'-'lacZ expression
(25).
In this report, we extend our examination of the role of the
tnaC stop codon by replacing the natural UGA stop
codon with UAG and UAA. We show that the presence of UAG or UAA
leads to a reduction of both basal and induced expression with
tnaC-stop codon-tnaA'-'lacZ constructs
containing the intact tnaC-tnaA spacer region. We also show
that a temperature-sensitive mutation altering RF1 increases basal
level expression in strains with UAG or UAA as the tnaC stop
codon, but not in a strain with UGA. The induced levels of
expression in these same strains are indistinguishable. We also examine
the role of the three stop codons in a tnaC-stop codon-'lacZ fusion construct and show that tryptophan
addition inhibits reading past the stop codon; however, this
inhibition is not as pronounced when UAG or UAA replaces UGA. An RF1
mutation increased expression of the UAG construct in the presence and absence of tryptophan. These findings support the hypothesis that in
the presence of tryptophan, TnaC peptide inhibition of ribosome release
at the tnaC stop codon may be the crucial event that
regulates Rho-dependent termination in the tna
operon leader region.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains and plasmids.
The E. coli
strains and the plasmids used in this study are listed in Table
1. Strains VK700, VK800, and VK900 and
their derivatives are all single lysogens carrying
RS45
(44) with various inserts. To prepare these strains, the
tnaC-UA(G/A)-'lacZ and the
tnaC-UAG-tnaA'-'lacZ fusions from pRS552 (Table
1) were independently crossed into phage
RS45 (44) and
the recombinant phage genome was inserted into the chromosome of
CY15076 (Table 1). prfA1(Ts) (37, 38) or the
serU suppressors [su UAG or su UG(A/G)] (2, 28)
were introduced into VK100 (28), VK700, or VK800 by P1
transduction. Mutant trpA9761 is an amber mutant of
trpA in E. coli. The trpA9761 allele
was introduced into appropriate strains by transduction. Plasmids were
introduced into various strains by transformation (41),
selecting for the appropriate antibiotic resistance marker.
Media and enzyme assay.
Vogel and Bonner minimal medium
(49) was used throughout. For
-Gal assays
(32), cultures were generally grown with shaking at 30 or
37°C in minimal medium plus 0.2% glycerol-0.05% acid-hydrolyzed casein, with or without L-tryptophan (100 µg/ml). When
appropriate, media were supplemented with kanamycin (30 µg/ml),
tetracycline (15 µg/ml), or ampicillin (100 µg/ml).
-Gal assays
were performed as described by Miller (32);
-Gal activity
is reported in Miller units (32). For tryptophan synthetase
(TSase)
and
2 assays, cultures were grown overnight
at 37°C in the same minimal medium supplemented with 0.2% glycerol,
0.05% acid-hydrolyzed casein, and indole (4 µg/ml). Cells were
collected by centrifugation, washed, and frozen. Each frozen pellet was
resuspended in 0.1 M Tris buffer, pH 7.8, and disrupted by sonication.
The sonication extracts were centrifuged and the cell supernatants were
assayed for TSase activity in the indole plus serine to tryptophan
reaction (8) in the presence and absence of excess wild-type
TSase
or
2. For a definition of the unit of specific
activity, and for other assay conditions, see the work of Creighton and
Yanofsky (8).
Site-directed mutagenesis.
Two PCR-based methods
(28) were used to introduce point mutations in the
tnaC region. In the standard PCR approach, the VK1 primer,
5'-CGG AAT TCA GCT TCT GTA TTG GTA AG-3', has a sequence of
nucleotides identical to the region upstream of tnaC and
contains an EcoRI site at its 5' end. The mutagenic TNAC-UAG
primer, 5'-GGG ATC CCC GGG AAT CTA AGG GCG GTG ATC-3', and
TNAC-UAA primer, 5'-TCC CCC GGG AAT TTA AGG GCG GTG-3',
contain a BamHI site and a SmaI site at
their respective 5' ends. Primer pairs VK1 and TNAC-UAG or VK1 and
TNAC-UAA were used with Taq polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim
Co., Indianapolis, Ind.) to amplify the 353- and 347-bp PCR products,
respectively. These products were individually cloned into the pCRII
vector (Invitrogen Co., San Diego, Calif.), and sequences were
confirmed by dideoxy sequencing (42). The 353-bp insert in
the pCRII vector was digested with EcoRI and
BamHI, purified by using the GENECLEAN II kit (BIO 101 Inc.,
La Jolla, Calif.), and subcloned into the EcoRI-,
BamHI- cleaved pRS552 (44) to give the
tnaC-UAG-'lacZ construct. To prepare the
tnaC-UAA-'lacZ construct, the 347-bp insert in
the pCRII vector was first cloned into the EcoRI-, and
SmaI- cleaved sites of pBluescript (41). The
resulting recombinant was digested with EcoRI and
BamHI, and the insert was subcloned into the
EcoRI-, BamHI-cut sites of pRS552 (44).
The megaprimer PCR method (
43) was used to make the
tnaC-UAG-
tnaA'-'lacZ construct. First, the
LACZ-RT primer, 5'-GCG ATT
AAG TTG GGT AAC GCC AGG-3', and
the mutagenic TNAC-UAG-TNA primer,
5'-CAC CGC CCT TAG TTT GCC CTT
CTG-3', were used with
Taq polymerase
to amplify a
305-bp product. This product was then purified by
using a PCR
purification kit (QIAGEN Inc., Chatsworth, Calif.)
and combined with
the VK1 primer, 5'-CGG AAT TCA GCT TCT GTA TTG
GTA AG-3', to
amplify the final 675-bp PCR product. This product
was also cloned into
the pCRII vector and sequenced (
42). The
resulting 675-bp
insert was cleaved with
EcoRI and
BamHI, purified
by using the GENECLEAN II kit, and subcloned into the
EcoRI-,
BamHI-cleaved pRS552 vector
(
44). This approach was also used
to introduce the primer
sequences 5'-CGC CCT TAG TTT G
AC CTT CTG
TAG CCA
TCA-3' and 5'-CAC CGC CCT TAG TT
G
ACC CTT CTG TAG CCA
TCA-3' (with mutational changes
underlined) into the
tnaC-UAG-
tnaA'-'lacZ construct.
 |
RESULTS |
Basal and induced expression from tnaC-stop
codon-tnaA'-'lacZ constructs in which UAG or UAA
replaces UGA as the tnaC stop codon.
To determine
whether the identity of the tnaC stop codon influences
basal or induced expression of the tna operon,
constructs containing each of the three stop codons were prepared
and integrated into the E. coli chromosome, and the
-Gal
activities of the resulting strains were determined. The natural
tnaC stop codon of E. coli is UGA (Fig.
1) (10, 46). With constructs
containing the UAG and UAA stop codons, basal expression of the
operon was 20 and 50%, respectively, of that observed with the
UGA stop codon (Table 2). These
findings are consistent with evidence demonstrating that in E. coli, RF1 terminates translation more efficiently than RF2
(7, 48). Following growth with tryptophan as inducer, the
same pattern was observed; induced expression was only 15 or 60%,
respectively, of that obtained with the tnaC-UGA stop codon construct (Table 2). These findings establish that both basal
and induced expression of the tna operon are
influenced by the identity of the tnaC stop codon.

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Schematic representations of the basic tna
operon-'lacZ fusions employed in this study. (A)
tnaC-UGA-tnaA'-'lacZ construct in strain SVS1144.
The underlined rut site is part of the natural
tnaC-tnaA spacer region, which also contains Rho-dependent
termination sites (45). (B)
tnaC-UGA-'lacZ construct in strain VK100.
tnaC, its UGA stop codon, and a five-codon junction
are in phase with lacZ lacking its first eight codons.
The UGA stop codon (shown in boldface type) in both constructs was
also changed to UAG or UAA.
|
|
In strain PDG1184, the
tnaC stop codon was replaced by a
leucine codon, UUA (
17). This change allows translation
to proceed
five codons beyond the last sense codon of
tnaC, to a UAG termination
codon (
17). Such a
construct exhibits expression levels much
like those of the UAG
construct VK800; however, basal level expression
is two-fold higher
(Table
2).
Effects of the presence of a mutant RF1 on tna
operon expression.
Mutant allele prfA1
encodes a temperature-sensitive RF1. This allele was introduced into
appropriate strains, and basal and induced expression were measured
(Table 3). Since strains with prfA1 are temperature sensitive for growth, they were grown
at the permissive temperature, 30°C (38). The
prfA1 allele increased basal expression of the constructs
with the UAG and UAA stop codons 60- and 3-fold, respectively; it
reduced both basal and induced expression of the construct with the
wild-type tnaC UGA stop codon by 50%. Induced
expression levels of strains with the prfA1 allele and any
of the three tnaC stop codons were virtually identical (Table 3). The prfA1 allele increased basal level expression of the construct in strain PDG1184 sevenfold, but there was little induced expression (Table 3).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3.
Effects of a prfA1 mutation on basal and
induced expression in strains with one of three stop codons
(at 30°C)
|
|
Test for suppression of the trpA9761 amber mutation in
VK801 derivatives.
The high basal level expression observed in
strain VK801 (tnaC-UAG-tnaA'-'lacZ/prfA1) (Table
3) could be due to specific suppression of the tnaC UAG stop
codon by a resident UAG suppressor. Suppression would allow
translation to continue four codons downstream from the
tnaC stop codon. Previous findings argue against this possibility. First, suppression of the tnaC stop codon
should at best approach expression in strain PDG1184, in which a sense codon replaces the tnaC stop codon. As shown in
Table 2, strain PDG1184 does not exhibit high basal expression in the
absence of tryptophan. Second, suppression of the tnaC
UAG stop codon in strain VK800
(tnaC-UAG-tnaA'-'lacZ) gives basal and induced expression levels comparable to those of strain PDG1184 (Table 2).
Two tests were performed to rule out significant amber suppression
in strain VK801 containing
prfA1. An amber mutation that
is
known to respond to all tested amber and ochre suppressors,
trpA9761, was introduced into VK801, yielding strain VK805
(Tables
1 and
4). Isolates of VK805 were
observed to be tryptophan-dependent,
indicating that the
prfA1 alteration does not allow natural suppression
of the
trpA9761 amber codon by insertion of an amino acid
that
restores TSase

activity. Although
trpA9761 is known
to be suppressed
to prototrophy by known amber and ochre suppressors,
it is conceivable
that the
prfA1 mutation allows insertion
of an amino acid that
does not restore TSase

activity. The
trpA system provides an
excellent test of this possibility
since virtually all
trpA missense
mutants produce an
enzymatically inactive protein that nevertheless
can complex with TSase
2 and activate this subunit 30-fold in
the
indole plus serine to tryptophan reaction. Two isolates of
strain
VK805 were examined, and no significant TSase

protein
was observed,
demonstrating the absence of significant amber suppression
(Table
4). Other data also indicate that the increased
tna
operon
expression associated with the
prfA1
allele is not due to significant
amber suppression (see Table
7).
Effects of introducing UGA stop codons in the
1 or +1
potential reading frames immediately following the tnaC UAG
stop codon.
Point mutations were introduced in the spacer
region of the tnaC-UAG-tnaA'-'lacZ construct to
test whether there is ribosomal frameshifting beyond the
tnaC UAG stop codon in the prfA1 mutant background (Table 5). The resulting
constructs tnaC-UAG UUUGAC and
tnaC-UAG UUGACC, introduce out-of-frame UGA stop
codons (shown in boldface type). In a prfA1 mutant
background, any
1 or +1 frameshift would allow translation to
terminate at a UGA codon immediately following the normal UAG stop
codon and would presumably result in
-Gal production similar to
that obtained in strain PDG1184 (Table 3). In Table 5, the presence of
the prfA1 allele resulted in a 5- to 10-fold increase in the
basal level of
-Gal activity in strains with the constructs
tnaC-UAG UUUGAC (strain VK1101) and tnaC-UAG
UUGACC (strain VK1201), respectively; a similar increase (18-fold) in
the basal level of
-Gal expression was observed with the control
strain VK801 (Table 5). These findings indicate that ribosomal
frameshifting beyond the tnaC UAG stop codon is not
responsible for the increase in the basal level expression in a
prfA1 mutant background. Note that the changes introduced following the tnaC stop codon do influence the absolute
levels of basal and induced expression.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 5.
Introducing the UGA stop codon in the 1 or +1
reading frame immediately following tnaC-UAG does not
appreciably alter the response to prfA1
|
|
Tryptophan inhibition of translational readthrough beyond the
tnaC stop codon in constructs lacking the
tnaC-tnaA spacer region.
In a previous study
(28) we designed and tested a construct that we believed
would permit analysis of the effects of inducer in the absence of
Rho-dependent termination. This construct,
tnaC-UGA-'lacZ, lacks the tnaC-tnaA
spacer region. It contains the tna promoter through the
tnaC UGA stop codon, has an added in-phase
five-codon junction, and is followed by lacZ minus its
first eight codons (5) (Fig. 1). Since this construct
lacks the tnaC-tnaA spacer region, Rho action should be
eliminated. Our previous findings supported this expectation
(28).
In strain VK100 containing this construct
(
tnaC-UGA-'
lacZ) with or without UGA
suppressors, the presence of tryptophan led
to an 80% decrease in

-Gal activity (
28). To measure expression
in strains
with derivatives of this construct in which the UGA
stop
codon was replaced by UAG or UAA, strains VK700
(
tnaC-UAG-'
lacZ)
and VK900
(
tnaC-UAA-'
lacZ) were prepared (Table
6).
When grown
in minimal medium with or without tryptophan, strains VK100
(
tnaC-UGA-'
lacZ),
VK700
(
tnaC-UAG-'
lacZ), and VK900
(
tnaC-UAA-'
lacZ) had very low

-Gal levels,
indicating that these strains lack active nonsense
suppressors (Table
6). Introducing appropriate suppressors
into
these strains did lead to an increase in expression, in the
presence
or absence of tryptophan. In contrast to our results with the
tnaC-UGA-'
lacZ construct (Table
6), the presence
of the UAG or
UAA stop codon coupled with the appropriate
suppressor allowed
only modest tryptophan inhibition of expression (30 to 60% inhibition
with UAG or UAA versus 80% inhibition with UGA).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 6.
Tryptophan inhibition of translation beyond the
tnaC stop codon in constructs lacking the
tnaC-tnaA spacer region
|
|
To examine the effects of the temperature-sensitive RF1 on translation
beyond the
tnaC UAG stop codon,
prfA1 was
introduced
into strain VK700 (
tnaC-UAG-'
lacZ),
yielding strain VK701 (
tnaC-UAG-'lacZ/
prfA1)
(Table
7). Note that all the strains in
Table
7 were grown at
30°C. VK701 showed very low levels of
expression, with or without
inducer. This result supports the finding
that strain VK801 (Table
3) lacks an effective UAG suppressor.
Addition of a plasmid containing
a UAG-reading tRNA
His
suppressor (
35) into control strain VK700 increased
basal expression
appreciably and allowed 40% inhibition by the inducer
(Table
7).
Introduction of this suppressor into strain VK701
(containing
prfA1) increased expression almost threefold
compared to VK700
bearing a suppressor and allowed 50% inhibition of
expression
by tryptophan.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 7.
Effects of a prfA1 mutation on tryptophan
inhibition of translation of the
tnaC-UAG-'lacZ construct (at 30°C)
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Studies with the tna operon of E. coli have identified features of the tna leader region
that are necessary for this operon's regulation by
transcriptional attenuation. In the absence of an inducer,
transcription is terminated by the action of Rho factor, at one of
several transcription pause sites located in the leader region
preceding tnaA, the first major structural gene of the operon (45). Mutational changes that allow
high-level constitutive expression of the operon in the absence
of inducer have identified cell components and sequences that are
necessary for transcription termination. These mutations alter Rho
factor, change bases in critical regulatory sequences in the
tna leader region (boxA, the rut
site), or allow translation from the tnaC coding sequence to
proceed in other reading frames, beyond the presumed rut
site in the tna transcript. These observations and other
experimental findings suggest that when cells grow without inducer, Rho
factor generally binds to the leader segment of the tna
transcript, moves 3' on the transcript until it interacts with a paused
polymerase molecule in the leader region, and then directs the
polymerase to terminate transcription.
In the presence of added tryptophan, Rho-dependent termination in the
leader region of the tna operon is prevented.
Induction requires translation of a 24-residue peptide coding region,
tnaC, located near the 5' end of the transcript
(17). Several residues of TnaC are essential for induction,
suggesting that the peptide as such participates in the induction
process. Some tryptophan analogs which do not appear to be
incorporated into protein also function as inducers; thus, an inducer
may act without being incorporated into the TnaC leader peptide
(15, 16). Stop codons introduced in the +1 or
1
reading frames within tnaC, or following tnaC, do
not affect either basal or induced expression, establishing that
tryptophan induction does not involve frameshifting (15, 16,
25). Introducing an in-phase stop codon within the distal segment of tnaC does prevent induction (15).
How added tryptophan is used as the signal that leads to
inhibition of Rho-dependent termination is a basic unanswered question. One possibility is that the TnaC peptide is modified in some
manner when produced in cells growing with excess tryptophan and that the altered peptide blocks Rho action. Alternatively, in the
presence of added tryptophan some cell component could interact with
the TnaC peptide, altering its properties so that it blocks Rho
action. Two previous studies (28, 55) and this report have
focused on how the peptide may act in preventing termination. In prior analyses with a suppressed tnaC-stop
codon-'lacZ fusion lacking the tnaC-tnaA
spacer region, the addition of tryptophan led to inhibition of
translation beyond the tnaC stop codon (28).
Tryptophan addition also reversed the increased expression resulting
from inactivation of RF3 (28). In related studies with the
tna operon of P. vulgaris, it was
shown that added tryptophan inhibited expression of a
tnaA'-'lacZ translational fusion in which the
tnaA ribosome binding site was placed close to the
tnaC stop codon (25). These effects of
inducer were not observed when the critical tryptophan codon in the
leader peptide coding region was replaced by some other codon
(28). The most straightforward interpretation of these
observations is that in the presence of tryptophan, the TnaC leader
peptide acts in cis on the translating ribosome, preventing its release at the tnaC stop codon. The stalled ribosome
would block Rho's access to the transcript, thereby inhibiting termination.
In the present study we examined the effect of changing the natural
tnaC UGA stop codon of E. coli to the other
stop codons, UAG and UAA. We also analyzed the effects of
introducing a temperature-sensitive mutant allele, prfA1,
that alters RF1. With a lacZ reporter construct that allows
Rho-dependent termination, changing the natural UGA stop codon to
UAG lowered basal and induced expression of the operon by ca.
80%. Changing the UAA stop codon to UGA reduced basal and induced
expression by 50%. The reduced expression observed with the UAG stop
codon relative to the UGA stop codon could be explained most
simply if RF1 dissociates the translating ribosome from the
tnaC UAG stop codon more rapidly than does RF2 at the UGA stop codon. More rapid release could allow more rapid binding of Rho factor. This interpretation is consistent with the conclusion that in E. coli RF1 terminates translation more efficiently
than RF2 (33, 48). Support for this interpretation is also
provided by the observation that a mutant allele specifying a
temperature-sensitive RF1, when examined at the permissive temperature,
led to a 60-fold increase in basal level expression when the
tnaC stop codon was UAG (Table 3). In fact, expression
was increased only twofold further by the addition of tryptophan.
It is also conceivable that in the presence of the mutant RF1, the
nucleotide sequence including the UAG stop codon permits efficient
translational frameshifting and reading into the presumed rut site. However, introduction of a UGA stop codon in
the
1 or +1 reading frame immediately following the tnaC
UAG stop codon did not eliminate the increased basal level
expression of the tnaC-UAG construct in a prfA1
mutant background. Furthermore, our findings with an in-phase
tnaC-UAG-5 codon junction-'lacZ construct
(Table 6) that requires suppression of the UAG stop codon for
-galactosidase production also argue against this possibility. Thus,
it appears that the rate of ribosome release at the tnaC stop codon (and not ribosomal frameshifting beyond the
tnaC UAG stop codon) may be the key event that
determines whether Rho factor will terminate transcription in the
leader region of the operon.
In an early study with the tnaC-UGA-5 codon
junction-'lacZ construct, we observed that under a variety
of conditions allowing in-phase reading of the tnaC UGA stop
codon, addition of tryptophan to the culture medium led to ca. 80%
inhibition of
-Gal production (28). In this study, the
UGA stop codon was changed to UAG or UAA, and the resulting
constructs were tested in the presence of appropriate suppressors. We
found that in all but one strain (containing a Trp-inserting UAG
suppressor) tryptophan addition had a 30 to 60% inhibitory effect on
-Gal production (Table 6). Introduction of the prfA1
alteration resulted in a threefold increase in translation of the UAG
stop codon (Table 7). In this case, the altered RF1 clearly allows
increased in-phase translation. Tryptophan addition to this strain led
to 50% inhibition of
-Gal production (Table 7). These findings
demonstrate that stop codon identity does influence the ability of
tryptophan to inhibit ribosome movement beyond the suppressed
tnaC stop codon.
Inhibition of ribosome function by a leader peptide has been documented
in other systems. In prokaryotes, the five-residue leader peptide,
MVKTD, encoded by the cat leader sequence (19, 29), and the eight-residue peptide, MSTSKNAD, encoded by the cmlA leader sequence, act in cis to block
movement of the translating ribosome (29) by inhibiting its
peptidyltransferase activity (20, 29). In both cases,
blocking the translating ribosome allows downstream translation of a
structural gene conferring drug resistance. In eukaryotes, the
24-residue upstream open reading frame (uORF) encoded upstream of the
arg-2 gene of Neurospora crassa (51,
52) and the 22-residue uORF2 encoded by the gp48 gene of
cytomegalovirus (3, 4, 11) have been reported to act in
cis to block release of their translating ribosomes. In
these cases, stalling of the translating ribosome at the respective uORF termination codon appears to inhibit translation of a
downstream ORF. Additional analyses focused on the TnaC peptide of the
tna operon should reveal how TnaC acts to increase
this operon's expression.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
prfA1(Ts) was kindly supplied by S. M. Rydén. serU [su UG(A/G)] and serU (su
UAG) were gifts from E. Murgola and J. R. Beckwith, respectively.
We are indebted to Virginia Horn for her technical assistance with
E. coli strain production. We are also grateful to Peter
Margolis, Kristin Black, and M. C. Yee for their critical reading
of this manuscript.
These studies were supported by grant GM09738 to C.Y. from the United
States Public Health Service. K.V.K. is a Postdoctoral Fellow supported
by grant GM09738.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5020. Phone: (650) 725-1835. Fax: (650) 725-8221. E-mail:
yanofsky{at}cmgm.stanford.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Botsford, J. L., and R. D. DeMoss.
1971.
Catabolite repression of tryptophanase in Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
105:303-312[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Brenner, S., and J. R. Beckwith.
1965.
Ochre mutants, a new class of suppressible nonsense mutants.
J. Mol. Biol.
13:629-637.
|
| 3.
|
Cao, J., and A. P. Geballe.
1996.
Coding sequence-dependent ribosomal arrest at termination of translation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:603-608[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Cao, J., and A. P. Geballe.
1996.
Inhibition of nascent-peptide release at translation termination.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:7109-7114[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Casadaban, M. J.,
J. Chou, and S. N. Cohen.
1980.
In vitro gene fusions that join an enzymatically active -galactosidase segment to amino-terminal fragments of exogenous proteins: Escherichia coli plasmid vectors for detection and cloning of translational initiation signals.
J. Bacteriol.
143:971-980[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Caskey, C. T.,
W. C. Forrester,
W. Tate, and C. D. Ward.
1984.
Cloning of the Escherichia coli release factor 2 gene.
J. Bacteriol.
158:365-368[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Craigen, W. J.,
R. G. Cook,
W. P. Tate, and T. Caskey.
1985.
Bacterial peptide chain release factors: conserved primary structure and possible frameshift regulation of release factor 2.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
82:3616-3620[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Creighton, T. E., and C. Yanofsky.
1970.
Chorismate to tryptophan (Escherichia coli)-anthranilate synthetase, PR transferase, PRA isomerase, InGP synthetase, tryptophan synthetase.
Methods Enzymol.
17:365-380.
|
| 9.
|
Das, A.
1992.
How the phage lambda N gene product suppresses transcription termination: communication of RNA poymerase with regulatory proteins mediated by signals in nascent RNA.
J. Bacteriol.
174:6711-6716[Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Deeley, M. C., and C. Yanofsky.
1981.
Nucleotide sequence of the structural gene for tryptophanase of Escherichia coli K-12.
J. Bacteriol.
147:787-796[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Degnin, C. R.,
M. R. Schleiss,
J. Cao, and A. P. Geballe.
1993.
Translational inhibition mediated by a short upstream open reading frame in the human cytomegalovirus gpUL4 (gp480) transcript.
J. Virol.
67:5514-5522[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Edwards, R. M., and M. D. Yudkin.
1982.
Location of the gene for the low-affinity tryptophan-specific permease of Escherichia coli.
Biochem. J.
204:617-619[Medline].
|
| 13.
| Eshoo, M., and C. Yanofsky. Unpublished results.
|
| 14.
|
Friedman, D. I.
1988.
Regulation of phage gene expression by termination and antitermination of transcription, p. 263-319.
In
R. Calendar (ed.), The bacteriophages, vol. 2. Plenum Publishing Corp., New York, N.Y.
|
| 15.
|
Gish, K., and C. Yanofsky.
1995.
Evidence suggesting cis action by the tnaC leader peptide in regulating transcription attenuation in the tryptophanase operon of Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
177:7245-7254[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Gish, K., and C. Yanofsky.
1993.
Inhibition of expression of the tryptophanase operon in Escherichia coli by extrachromosomal copies of the tna leader region.
J. Bacteriol.
175:3380-3387[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Gollnick, P., and C. Yanofsky.
1990.
tRNATrp translation of leader peptide codon 12 and other factors that regulate expression of the tryptophanase operon.
J. Bacteriol.
172:3100-3107[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Grentzmann, G.,
D. Brechemier-Baey,
V. Heurgue,
L. Mora, and R. Buckingham.
1994.
Localization and characterization of the gene encoding release factor RF3 in Escherichia coli.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:5848-5852[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Gu, Z.,
R. Harrod,
E. J. Rogers, and P. S. Lovett.
1994.
Anti-peptidyl transferase leader peptides of attenuation regulated chloramphenicol resistance genes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:5612-5616[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Gu, Z.,
E. J. Rogers, and P. S. Lovett.
1993.
Peptidyltransferase inhibition by the nascent leader peptide of an inducible cat gene.
J. Bacteriol.
173:5309-5313.
|
| 21.
|
Heinrich, T.,
C. Condon,
T. Pfeiffer, and R. K. Hartmann.
1995.
Point mutations in the leader boxA of a plasmid-encoded Escherichia coli rrnB operon cause defective antitermination in vivo.
J. Bacteriol.
177:3793-3800[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Hirahara, T.,
S. Suzuki,
S. Horinouchi, and T. Beppu.
1992.
Cloning, nucleotide sequences, and overexpression in Escherichia coli of tandem copies of a tryptophanase gene in an obligately symbiotic thermophile, Symbiobacterium thermophilum.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
58:2633-2642[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Hopkins, F. G., and S. W. Cole.
1903.
A contribution to the chemistry of proteid. Part II. The constitution of tryptophanase, and the action of bacteria upon it.
J. Physiol. (London)
29:451-466.
|
| 24.
|
Kamath, A. V., and C. Yanofsky.
1992.
Characterization of the tryptophanase operon of Proteus vulgaris.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:19978-19985[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Kamath, A. V., and C. Yanofsky.
1997.
Roles of the tnaC-tnaA spacer region and Rho factor in regulating expression of the tryptophanase operon of Proteus vulgaris.
J. Bacteriol.
179:1780-1786[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Kawasaki, K.,
A. Yokota,
S. Oita,
C. Kobayashi,
S. Yoshikawa,
S. Kawamoto,
S. Takao, and F. Tomita.
1993.
Cloning and characterization of a tryptophanase gene from Enterobacter aerogenes SM-18.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
139:3275-3281[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Kazarinoff, M. N., and E. E. Snell.
1977.
Essential arginine residues in tryptophanase from Escherichia coli.
J. Biol. Chem.
252:7598-7602[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Konan, K. V., and C. Yanofsky.
1997.
Regulation of the Escherichia coli tna operon: nascent leader peptide control at the tnaC stop codon.
J. Bacteriol.
179:1774-1779[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Lovett, P. S., and E. J. Rogers.
1996.
Ribosome regulation by the nascent peptide.
Microbiol. Rev.
60:366-385[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Martin, K.,
G. Morlin,
A. Smith,
A. Nordike,
A. Eisenstark, and M. Golomb.
1998.
The tryptophanase gene cluster of Haemophilus influenzae type b: evidence for horizontal gene transfer.
J. Bacteriol.
180:107-118[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Mikuni, O.,
K. Ito,
J. Moffat,
K. Matsumura,
K. McCaughan,
T. Nobukuni,
W. Tate, and Y. Nakamura.
1994.
Identification of the prfC gene, which encodes peptide-chain-release factor 3 of Escherichia coli.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:5798-5802[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Miller, J.
1972.
Experiments in molecular genetics.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 33.
|
Nakamura, Y., and K. Ito.
1998.
How protein reads the stop codon and terminates translation.
Genes Cells
3:265-278[Abstract].
|
| 34.
|
Newton, W. A., and E. E. Snell.
1964.
Catalytic properties of tryptophanase, a multifunctional pyridoxal phosphate enzyme.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
51:382-389[Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Normanly, J.,
J.-M. Masson,
L. G. Kleina, and J. Abelson.
1986.
Contruction of two Escherichia coli amber suppressor genes: tRNAPheCUA and tRNACysCUA.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
83:6548-6552[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Raftery, L. A.,
J. B. Egan,
S. W. Cline, and M. Yarus.
1984.
Defined set of cloned termination suppressors: in vivo activity of isogenic UAG, UAA, and UGA suppressor tRNAs.
J. Bacteriol.
158:849-859[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Roesser, J. R., and C. Yanofsky.
1988.
Ribosome release modulates basal level expression of the trp operon of Escherichia coli.
J. Biol. Chem.
263:14251-14255[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Ryden, S. M., and L. A. Isaksson.
1984.
A temperature-sensitive mutant of Escherichia coli that shows enhanced misreading of UAG/A and increased efficiency for some tRNA nonsense suppressors.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
193:38-45[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Saier, M. H. J.
1993.
Regulatory interactions involving the proteins of the phosphotransferase system in enteric bacteria.
J. Cell. Biochem.
51:62-68[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Saier, M. H. J., and J. Reizer.
1994.
The bacterial phosphotransferase system: new frontiers 30 years later.
Mol. Microbiol.
13:755-764[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, N.Y.
|
| 42.
|
Sanger, F.,
S. Nicklen, and A. R. Coulson.
1977.
DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
74:5463-5467[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Sarkar, G., and S. S. Sommer.
1990.
The "megaprimer" method of site-directed mutagenesis.
BioTechniques
8:404-407[Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Simons, R. W.,
F. Houman, and N. Kleckner.
1987.
Improved single and multicopy lac-based cloning vectors for protein and operon fusions.
Gene
53:85-96[Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Stewart, V.,
R. Landick, and C. Yanofsky.
1986.
Rho-dependent transcription termination in the tryptophanase operon leader region of Escherichia coli K-12.
J. Bacteriol.
166:217-223[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Stewart, V., and C. Yanofsky.
1985.
Evidence for transcription antitermination control of tryptophanase operon expression in Escherichia coli K-12.
J. Bacteriol.
164:731-740[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Stewart, V., and C. Yanofsky.
1986.
Role of leader peptide synthesis in tryptophanase operon expression in Escherichia coli K-12.
J. Bacteriol.
167:383-386[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Uno, M.,
K. Ito, and Y. Nakamura.
1996.
Functional specificity of amino acid at position 246 in the tRNA mimicry domain of bacterial release factor 2.
Biochimie
78:935-943[Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Vogel, H. J., and D. M. Bonner.
1956.
Acetylornithase of Escherichia coli: partial purification and some properties.
J. Biol. Chem.
218:97-106[Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Vogel, U., and K. F. Jensen.
1995.
Effects of the antiterminator BoxA on transcription elongation kinetics and ppGpp inhibition of transcription elongation in Escherichia coli.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:18335-18340[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 51.
|
Wang, Z., and M. S. Sachs.
1997.
Arginine-specific regulation mediated by the Neurospora crassa arg-2 upstream open reading frame in a homologous, cell-free in vitro translation system.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:255-261[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 52.
|
Wang, Z., and M. S. Sachs.
1997.
Ribosome stalling is responsible for arginine-specific translation attenuation in Neurospora crassa.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:4904-4913[Abstract].
|
| 53.
|
Watanabe, T., and E. E. Snell.
1972.
Reversibility of the tryptophanase reaction: synthesis of tryptophan from indole, pyruvate and ammonia.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
69:1086-1090[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 54.
|
Weiss, R. B.,
J. P. Murphy, and J. A. Gallant.
1984.
Genetic screen for cloned release factor genes.
J. Bacteriol.
158:362-364[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 55.
|
Yanofsky, C.,
V. Horn, and Y. Nakamura.
1996.
Loss or overproduction of polypeptide release factor 3 influences expression of the tryptophanase operon of Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
178:3755-3762[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Bacteriology, March 1999, p. 1530-1536, Vol. 181, No. 5
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Stewart, V.
(2008). The Ribosome: a Metabolite-Responsive Transcription Regulator. J. Bacteriol.
190: 4787-4790
[Full Text]
-
Morris, D. R., Geballe, A. P.
(2000). Upstream Open Reading Frames as Regulators of mRNA Translation. Mol. Cell. Biol.
20: 8635-8642
[Full Text]
-
Konan, K. V., Yanofsky, C.
(2000). Rho-Dependent Transcription Termination in the tna Operon of Escherichia coli: Roles of the boxA Sequence and the rut Site. J. Bacteriol.
182: 3981-3988
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yanofsky, C.
(2000). Transcription Attenuation: Once Viewed as a Novel Regulatory Strategy. J. Bacteriol.
182: 1-8
[Full Text]
-
Wang, Z., Gaba, A., Sachs, M. S.
(1999). A Highly Conserved Mechanism of Regulated Ribosome Stalling Mediated by Fungal Arginine Attenuator Peptides That Appears Independent of the Charging Status of Arginyl-tRNAs. J. Biol. Chem.
274: 37565-37574
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gong, F., Yanofsky, C.
(2001). Reproducing tna Operon Regulation in Vitro in an S-30 System. TRYPTOPHAN INDUCTION INHIBITS CLEAVAGE OF TnaC PEPTIDYL-tRNA. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 1974-1983
[Abstract]
[Full Text]