Journal of Bacteriology, March 1999, p. 1793-1800, Vol. 181, No. 6
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Institut Jacques Monod, CNRS/Université Paris 7
Denis
Diderot 2, 75251 Paris Cedex 05, France
Received 30 September 1998/Accepted 12 January 1999
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In Saccharomyces cerevisiae the FUR4-encoded uracil permease catalyzes the first step of the pyrimidine salvage pathway. The availability of uracil has a negative regulatory effect upon its own transport. Uracil causes a decrease in the level of uracil permease, partly by decreasing the FUR4 mRNA level in a promoter-independent fashion, probably by increasing its instability. Uracil entry also triggers more rapid degradation of the existing permease by promoting high efficiency of ubiquitination of the permease that signals its internalization. A direct binding of intracellular uracil to the permease is possibly involved in this feedback regulation, as the behavior of the permease is similar in mutant cells unable to convert intracellular uracil into UMP. We used cells impaired in the ubiquitination step to show that the addition of uracil produces rapid inhibition of uracil transport. This may be the first response prior to the removal of the permease from the plasma membrane. Similar down-regulation of uracil uptake, involving several processes, was observed under adverse conditions mainly corresponding to a decrease in the cellular content of ribosomes. These results suggest that uracil of exogenous or catabolic origin down-regulates the cognate permease to prevent buildup of excess intracellular uracil-derived nucleotides.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pyrimidine nucleotides are precursors for the synthesis of nucleic acids, are involved in postranslational modification of proteins, such as glycosylation, and are precursors for phospholipids. With the exception of some parasites, cells display a capacity for de novo pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthesis by a well-conserved metabolic pathway that starts with the formation of carbamoyl phosphate. Cells can also convert free pyrimidine bases or nucleosides to nucleotides, although this process differs in different organisms. The free bases which originate from the environment or from the catabolic breakdown of RNA are salvaged, and hence this other route is known as the pyrimidine salvage pathway. Both pathways provide UMP as first pyrimidine nucleotide from which all others are derived.
In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the de novo pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthesis has been elucidated by genetic and biochemical studies. The key regulation of the pathway involves the URA2-encoded multifunctional protein that is feedback inhibited by UTP, the final product of the pathway (20, 29, 38). The highly efficient salvage pathway in yeast involves the uptake of uracil, cytosine, and uridine, mediated by specific permeases (13, 23). Intracellular cytosine is then quantitatively converted to uracil by deamination, and uracil gives UMP in a single step catalyzed by the FUR1-encoded uracil phosphoribosyltransferase (26). Uridine is directly converted into UMP by a specific kinase. The salvage pathway is able to quench de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis. The presence of uracil in the growth medium indeed decreases the transcription of the URA2 gene (38). The intracellular level of uracil is the result of a balance between its entry catalyzed by the FUR4-encoded uracil permease characterized as a proton symport (4, 17), and its excretion is catalyzed by another energy-dependent carrier which has not been characterized at the molecular level (7, 22).
As uracil permease catalyzes one of the first steps of the salvage pathway, it is a candidate for control of the pathway. A mutation named dhu1, not linked to the FUR4 gene, results in an enhanced synthesis of FUR4 transcript and hence in more uracil permease (4). The half-life of the uracil permease is decreased by various adverse metabolic conditions, including nutritional starvation and mild heat shock. Internalization by endocytosis is the first step in the degradation of the permease that occurs in the vacuole (49). A PEST-like sequence in the N terminus of the protein mediates phosphorylation of several serine residues. This, in turn, is required for production of ubiquitin-permease conjugates that signal the endocytosis of the permease (9, 32).
Many yeast transporters are regulated by the availability of their substrate or alternate preferred nutrient. Both the synthesis and half-lives of these proteins are subject to negative and positive controls. For example, the synthesis of the galactose permease is induced by its substrate, and glucose triggers its inactivation (18). Similarly, the maltose permease undergoes glucose-triggered catabolite degradation (33, 39). This phenomenon is not restricted to sugar transporters. Expression of the general amino acid Gap1 permease is blocked, and preexisting Gap1p is submitted to catabolite inactivation when cells grown on a poor nitrogen source are provided with ammonium (reference 45 and references within). In contrast, some other transporters appear to be negatively controlled by their own substrate. Thus, the presence of inositol in the growth medium promotes inactivation of the inositol permease and repression of its synthesis (30, 31). Copper uptake, mediated by Ctr1p, is highly responsive to copper availability, being induced by copper deprivation and decreased by an excess of copper (5, 36). Similarly, transcription of the ZRT1 gene, encoding the high-affinity zinc transporter, is repressed in cells replete with zinc, and endocytosis of the transporter is triggered by the exposure of cells to high levels of zinc (11). The regulation is more sophisticated when a single nutrient such as glucose can be transported by a family of homologous transporters (1). In the latter case, two members of the family, the SNF3 and RGT2 gene products, are involved in the nutrient-induced expression of some other members and thereby act as glucose sensors (37). One member of a family of amino acid transporters also appears to act as a sensor for external amino acids (6, 19).
Here we investigated the effect of exogenous pyrimidines on the uracil permease which is the sole transporter involved in uracil uptake (24). We show that uracil down-regulates its own transport by acting at several levels, increasing the turnover rate of the cognate permease and probably also that of its transcript. The presence of uracil and other environmental changes trigger an inactivation and an enhanced ubiquitination of uracil permease which signals its endocytosis.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Strains, plasmids, and growth conditions.
The yeast strains
and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table
1. Yeast strains were transformed
according to the method described by Gietz et al. (10).
Cells were grown at 30°C (or 24°C for
act1-3-thermosensitive cells) in minimal medium that contained 0.67% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids, supplemented with 0.05% Casamino Acids. Unless otherwise indicated, the carbon source was 2% glucose or 4% galactose plus 0.02% glucose.
act1-3 cells grown at 24°C were heat shocked by the
addition of an equal volume of the same medium previously warmed to
48°C, immediately resulting in the restrictive temperature 36°C.
|
Disruption of the FUR1 locus. A replacement cassette with long flanking homology regions (50) was used to disrupt the FUR1 gene in strain 23344C. PCR amplification performed with Pwo polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim), from wild-type genomic DNA with the oligonucleotide primers L1 (5'-GACATGCTTTCTCATGACTGCC-3') and L2 (5'-GGGGATCCGTCGACCTGCAGCGTACCGGGTTCATGGTTCAAGAAG-3') and L3 (5'-AACGAGCTCGAATTCATCGATGATATAAATAAATCACACCCGAACACC-3') and L4 (5'-GATTGGCTAGAGGACAGTACCCG-3') generated two DNA products corresponding to the FUR1 promoter and terminator, respectively (26), with 25-bp extensions (underlined) homologous to the KanMX4 marker containing the geneticin resistance gene (51). In a second PCR amplification, one strand of each of these molecules was used as a long primer, with KanMX4 as the template. The resulting linear fragment was used to transform 23344C cells. Correct integration at the FUR1 locus in geneticin-resistant cells was confirmed by whole-cell PCR.
Plasmid construction.
The plasmid pFL38gF, containing the
FUR4 gene on the CEN vector pFL38 (2), was
constructed by subcloning a KpnI-PstI fragment, containing the FUR4 gene under the control of the
GAL10 promoter, derived from plasmid p195gF (Table 1). A
plasmid p195
5'gF containing no FUR4 5' untranslated
region (UTR) was constructed from p195gF. The first step was the
insertion of the missing 14 bp downstream of the GAL10
promoter and a 3' PstI restriction site at 57 bp upstream
from the start codon by site-directed mutagenesis with the Stratagene
Chameleon double-stranded DNA site-directed mutagenesis kit. Then the
FUR4 5' UTR region was deleted by replacing a 2,434-bp PstI-PstI fragment in the construct by a 2,375-bp
PstI-PstI fragment (amplified by PCR with the
oligonucleotides 5'-GCTATGACCATGATTACGCCAAGC-3' and 5'-CGAGCTGCAGATAATGCCAGACAATCTATC-3') containing
only 4 bp upstream of the initiating ATG codon (underlined). For
construction of a FUR4-lacZ reporter plasmid, the promoter
region of FUR4 was PCR amplified from yeast genomic DNA with
forward 5'-GCTCTAGACAGATTTTAGTAGACAAGCGCGAGG-3' and reverse
5'-GCTCTAGAATCATTATTCCCTCCTATTCTTATTATGCGTAGG-3' primers containing sequences for XbaI restriction
sites (underlined), 350 nucleotides of the 5' UTR region, and the
initiating ATG (in bold in the reverse primer). This fragment was
ligated to the lacZ gene of the 2µm-based plasmid YEp368
(35).
RNA isolation and Northern analysis. Total yeast RNA, isolated as described previously (42), was electrophoresed on agarose-formaldehyde gels and transferred to nylon membranes by vacuum blotting. 32P-labeled probes were made with the random primer DNA labeling system (Boehringer Mannheim). The FUR4 probe was derived from a 1.15-kb BglII-PvuII fragment of the coding sequence isolated from plasmid pfF. The ACT1 probe consisted of a 1.1-kb XhoI-HindIII fragment. The FCY2 probe was a 1.033-kb fragment generated by PCR amplification from wild-type genomic DNA with primers 5'-GACTTGGAGAAGAGAGATCTCCCTG-3' and 5'-CCGTTCAGAGAGTTAGGAACCAG-3'. Membranes were stripped and rehybridized with another probe when required by standard procedures. Northern blot signals were quantified with a PhosphorImaging analyzer and ImageQuant software from Molecular Dynamics. The values reported are the averages of duplicate determinations from at least two independent experiments.
Measurement of mRNA half-life. The half-life of FUR4 mRNA was measured by blocking transcription by glucose repression in NC122sp6 cells transformed with the pgF plasmid containing the FUR4 gene under the control of the GAL10 promoter. Cells were grown in minimal medium with 1% galactose as a carbon source to an A600 of 0.5, and 2% glucose was added. Before and after transcription arrest, aliquots (20 ml) were filtered, and filters were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. RNA samples were then prepared and analyzed as described above.
Yeast cell extracts and Western immunoblotting. Yeast cell extracts were prepared, and aliquots, corresponding roughly to 5.106 cells, were electrophoresed in 10% polyacrylamide sodium dodecyl sulfate-Tricine gels. The separated proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and probed with an antiserum recognizing the last 10 residues of the permease (kindly provided by R. Jund and M. R. Chevallier [44]), used without further purification. Bound primary antibodies were detected with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G and chemiluminescence (Boehringer Mannheim).
-Galactosidase assay.
-Galactosidase activity was
measured on chloroform-permeabilized cells that were grown to early
exponential phase (41). Assays were performed in triplicate
on two separate cultures, and activities are expressed as Miller units
(A420 × 1000/min/A600).
Measurement of uracil uptake. Uracil uptake was measured in exponentially-growing cells as previously described (44). One milliliter of yeast culture was incubated with 5 mM [14C]uracil (NEN Life Science Products) for 20 s at 30°C and then quickly filtered through Whatman GF/C filters, which were washed twice with ice-cold water and assessed for radioactivity.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Exogenous pyrimidines decrease the uracil permease level. To assess whether the steady-state level of the yeast uracil permease depends upon the availability of uracil, we analyzed crude extracts of cells grown in the presence or absence of uracil. Western blots were probed with an antiserum raised against the last 10 residues of uracil permease (Fig. 1). The chromosome-encoded uracil permease, normally produced in very small amounts, is not detectable in extracts of wild-type cells (48). dhu1 mutant cells that overproduce uracil permease (4) were thus used. The presence of uracil in a synthetic minimal growth medium decreased the amount of uracil permease in cells, and the decrease was greater in dhu1 cells grown in rich medium (lanes 1 to 3). As estimated by Western analysis of serial dilutions of extracts, the concentration of permease was two- and fivefold lower in cells grown in the presence of uracil or in rich medium, respectively. The effect of rich medium was presumably due to the fact that the yeast extract contained substantial amounts of uracil (and other pyrimidine bases). In wild-type cells transformed with a CEN-based plasmid bearing the FUR4 gene under the control of the GAL10 promoter, the permease level was also decreased two- to threefold by the presence of uracil in the growth medium (Fig. 1, lanes 4 to 5). Phosphorylation of the permease results in the appearance of several bands on immunoblots. Analysis of the effect of alkaline phosphatase treatment and the banding pattern of a less-phosphorylated mutant permease indicate that the faster-running bands correspond to lower levels of phosphorylation (32, 48). The presence of uracil resulted in a banding pattern which corresponds to an enrichment in less-phosphorylated permease species (Fig. 1, lanes 1 to 5).
|
FUR4 mRNA steady-state levels respond to uracil entry. To investigate the mechanism by which uracil exerts negative control on the level of permease, Northern blot analysis quantified by phosphorimagery (Fig. 2) was performed to determine whether the abundance of FUR4 mRNA was sensitive to the availability of uracil. The single genomic copy of FUR4 produced a barely detectable transcript (compare lanes 1 and 2). As previously described (4), the transcript was produced in dhu1 mutant cells at six- to eightfold above the wild-type chromosomal level. The presence of uracil in minimal medium did not significantly change the amount of mRNA, whereas growth on rich medium resulted in a 40% decrease of FUR4 mRNA. These results are consistent with the steady-state level of protein, which was also more sensitive to growth in rich medium than to the presence of uracil (Fig. 1, lanes 1 to 3). The steady-state level of the FUR4 transcript was approximately 40- to 50-fold higher in cells transformed with a 2 µm-based plasmid than in wild-type untransformed cells. There was approximately half as much FUR4 mRNA in cells replete with uracil (by adding uracil or cytosine to the growth medium) than in uracil-starved cells (Fig. 2, lanes 6 to 8). A negative effect of uracil was also obtained with cells that harbored the FUR4 gene on a multicopy plasmid under the control of the GAL10 promoter (lanes 9 and 10). With weaker FUR4 overexpression, from a centromeric plasmid, the mRNA level was not sensitive to the presence of uracil in the medium (lanes 11 and 12). Therefore, negative control of the steady-state level of the FUR4 transcript appears to require a high level of uracil entry. In contrast to the varation in the level of FUR4 mRNA, that of FCY2 mRNA (normalized to ACT1 mRNA) remained similar under all these conditions. Thus, there is no feedback effect of cytosine on the FCY2-encoded purine-cytosine permease, and the down-regulation of FUR4 mRNA due to uracil is a specific effect. As uracil exerted its negative control in the absence of the endogenous FUR4 promoter, it most probably acts on mRNA stability and not on transcription.
|
-galactosidase under the
control of the FUR4 promoter. W303 cells were cotransformed
with the multicopy plasmid pfZ bearing the FUR4-lacZ fusion
and p195gF overproducing uracil permease from the GAL10
promoter. Cells were grown in minimal medium, with galactose as a
carbon source, to logarithmic phase and were then assayed for
-galactosidase activity. The level of
-galactosidase activity
(75 ± 8 units) was consistent with low expression of the
FUR4 gene. Under conditions that resulted in a twofold
decrease in the FUR4 mRNA level, i.e., growth in the
presence of uracil (40 µg/ml), there was no significant change in
FUR4-driven
-galactosidase activity. We also checked that
-galactosidase activity was not derepressed when cells grown
overnight in the presence of uracil were transferred to medium without
uracil and grown for 4 more h. Therefore, uracil has no effect on the
transcription of the FUR4 gene and presumably acts at a
posttranscriptional step.
To test directly the influence of uracil on mRNA stability, the
kinetics of decay of FUR4 mRNA were studied. Cells disrupted for the chromosomal copy of FUR4 but expressing
FUR4 under the control of the GAL10 promoter were
used. The loss of preexisting mRNA was followed by Northern blot
analysis after glucose arrest of FUR4 transcription,
quantified, and normalized to ACT1 mRNA levels (Fig.
3A). Under these conditions, the
half-life of FUR4 mRNA was 2 to 3 min, consistent with the
value previously determined by another method, for the transcript
produced from the endogenous promoter (4). It is, however,
much shorter than the average half-life (20 min) of yeast mRNA
(15). The experiment was repeated with cells fed with uracil
for 1 h: the FUR4 mRNA level was half that in
uracil-starved cells at time zero, but the decay observed after the
addition of glucose was the same (Fig. 3A). Varying the preincubation
time with uracil did not affect the decay, and no difference in the
stability of the transcript in the absence or presence of uracil was
detected. Failure to detect a uracil-induced increase in the transcript
turnover rate may have occurred because a transient upshift due to
glucose overrides the effect of uracil. The addition of glucose to
cells growing on a less-efficient carbon source produces numerous
changes, some of which are transient (reference 28
and references within). There is some evidence for this type of
upregulation of the FUR4 transcript. The transcript produced
from the native promoter is similarly abundant in cells grown in
minimal medium containing either galactose or glucose as a carbon
source (data not shown). However, the addition of glucose to
galactose-grown cells resulted in a rapid increase of the transcript
level (Fig. 3B). Conversely, the FUR4 transcript level was
transiently decreased in wild-type cells after a mild temperature shock
from 24 to 37°C (Fig. 3C). This latter transient decrease is similar
to that of the ribosomal protein mRNAs whose transient increase in the
rate of degradation is the main reason for the overall decline in mRNA
content following mild heat shock (16).
|
Uracil-induced degradation of uracil permease. Uracil permease undergoes endocytosis at a basal rate under normal growth conditions and more rapidly under adverse conditions (49). Under both conditions, ubiquitination mediated by the Npi1 ubiquitin-protein ligase is required for the internalization step of endocytosis (9). We wanted to determine whether exogenous uracil affects the turnover rate of the permease. The level of uracil permease was monitored in wild-type cells producing the permease under the control of the GAL10 promoter, after repression by glucose of new permease synthesis. Protein extracts were prepared at various times and analyzed by Western immunoblotting. Exogenous uracil indeed resulted in an acceleration of the permease turnover rate (Fig. 4, lanes 1 to 5). Uracil-induced degradation also involved ubiquitination, since the permease was equally stabilized with or without added uracil in npi1 mutant cells (data not shown). It was shown above that uracil must enter the cells to trigger faster turnover of its cognate permease. We determined whether this was due to intracellular uracil itself or to a metabolite. Disruption of the FUR1 gene renders cells unable to utilize exogenous uracil and cytosine (26). The level of the permease produced under the control of the GAL10 promoter was examined in FUR1-disrupted cells shifted to a glucose medium that contained or did not contain uracil. The permease was degraded more rapidly in the presence of uracil (Fig. 4, lanes 6 to 10). Therefore, the transport of uracil into cells was sufficient to trigger increased turnover of the permease. The direct binding of intracellular uracil to the permease may increase the efficiency of permease internalization, and this uracil-induced event may be regulated by the phosphorylation level of the permease, as uracil favored underphosphorylated species (Fig. 1 and 4).
|
Ubiquitin-permease conjugates are up-regulated in uracil-exposed or stressed cells. A direct relationship between ubiquitination and efficient removal of permease from the plasma membrane has been suggested (9, 32). We therefore tested whether the presence of uracil stimulated permease ubiquitination. Conditional thermosensitive act1-3 cells were used, as they are defective for the internalization step of endocytosis and thus accumulate ubiquitin-permease conjugates (9). act1-3 cells expressing galactose-driven permease were subjected to the galactose shut-off procedure in the presence or absence of uracil. Extracts from cells withdrawn at various times after transfer to the restrictive temperature 36°C were analyzed by Western blotting (Fig. 5A). Minor permease species were detected just above the main permease signal. These species that are ubiquitin conjugates (9) were more abundant in the presence of added uracil. An enrichment in ubiquitin-conjugates was also observed in response to general stress. Cysteine was found fortuitously to promote accelerated permease turnover (9). The addition of 5 mM cysteine to act1-3 cells, simultaneously with transfer at the restrictive temperature, led to substantial enrichment in ubiquitin-permease conjugates within a few minutes (Fig. 5B). A similar effect, although weaker, was observed when 15 mM 2-mercaptoethanol was added (data not shown). The addition of such thiol compounds alters the balance between reduced and oxidized intracellular glutathione (34) that controls various processes, including the disulfide formation machinery of the endoplasmic reticulum, and thus triggers the unfolding response. These data indicate that the increased turnover of uracil permease, whatever its origin, resulted from an increase in the extent of ubiquitination, which in turn speeded internalization of the permease.
|
Permease may be inhibited before its internalization. For several transporters negatively controlled by their ligands, inactivation precedes internalization (25, 30). We assessed whether exogenous uracil might have such an effect on its cognate permease. Npi1 cells were used to address this possibility, as they are defective for ubiquitination of uracil permease and hence for its internalization (9). The amount of permease immunodetected in these cells was maintained equally in the absence and presence of uracil (see above). After glucose arrest of galactose-driven permease synthesis, npi1 cells were provided with uracil for various times, collected by filtration, thoroughly washed to eliminate cold uracil, and tested for uracil uptake activity (Fig. 6). The rate of uracil uptake fell very rapidly (half-time, 1 min). The presence of uracil did not completely abolish uptake; a new steady-state level of activity was established. This inhibition could be reversed by removing uracil from the growth medium (Fig. 6). The recovery of uracil uptake activity could not be due to neosynthesized permease, since the addition of glucose had shut off the GAL10 promoter. The kinetics of recovery were slower than those of inactivation and probably involved the removal of excess internal uracil by its further metabolization. Parental cells exposed to uracil under similar conditions displayed a decrease in activity, with the same kinetics (data not shown). This inactivation allows more rapid adjustment of uracil uptake than endocytic internalization of the permease, which is a relatively slow process. Uracil-induced inhibition could not be evidenced in FL200 wild-type cells that expressed only the chromosome-encoded uracil permease, but interestingly, cytosine availability producing an intracellular concentration of uracil higher than that produced by uracil import (22) rapidly inhibited the chromosomal uracil permease (data not shown). These results suggest that the inhibition was due to direct binding of intracellular uracil to a site on the cytoplasmic domain of the permease.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We describe the down-regulation of uracil uptake activity in yeast by exogenous pyrimidines. This type of regulation was proposed in pioneering work on pyrimidine uptake and metabolism (13). We showed that the down-regulation is due to events at three levels as follows: the synthesis and degradation rates of the permease and the decrease of its catalytic activity. Note that FUR4 gene transcription is under the control of the dhu1 locus (4). Neither the DHU1 gene nor conditions causing FUR4 derepression have been identified, but we showed that the constitutively derepressed uracil permease in dhu1 cells displayed the same behavior toward exogenous uracil and cytosine as that observed in wild-type cells. FUR4-disrupted cells display no obvious phenotypic defect, at least not under standard laboratory conditions, and thus uracil permease is a nonessential protein. It is unclear why uracil permease is regulated so tightly. Yeast cells, like other organisms, salvage uracil of exogenous or catabolic origin but must avoid high cellular levels of dUTP because the utilization of dUTP produces extensively uracil-substituted DNA that has been shown to be lethal (8). Although overexpression of uracil permease did not impair cell growth, the availability of uracil to such cells resulted in a 20 to 40% increase in doubling time compared to that of control cells that import uracil only by the chromosome-encoded permease. High levels of intracellular uracil and/or its derived nucleotides may be detrimental to cells, and down-regulation of the uracil permease may prevent excessive uracil uptake. This possibility is consistent with the observation of substantial release of uracil into the growth medium by cells impaired in the feedback regulation of the pyrimidine biosynthetic pathway (23).
The reduction in the steady-state abundance of FUR4 mRNA due
to exposure to uracil cannot be accounted for by a transcriptional event because the decreases in the steady-state level after the addition of uracil were equal whether permease expression was controlled by its own promoter or by the GAL10
promoter. Moreover,
-galactosidase activity expressed from a
FUR4-lacZ fusion was not sensitive to the presence of
uracil. Therefore, the negative effect of uracil may involve enhanced
instability of the transcript. This effect required a high uracil
uptake activity and was associated with a decrease in growth rate.
However, there was no simple relationship between growth rate and the
abundance of the FUR4 transcript. For example, the abundance
of the transcript was the same whether cells were grown on galactose or
glucose (doubling time, 4 and 3 h, respectively). Exogenous uracil
and cytosine positively control the mRNA level of the FUR1
gene encoding uracil phosphoribosyl transferase, which converts uracil
into UMP (27). The opposite effects of exogenous pyrimidine
on the abundance of FUR4 and FUR1 transcripts
presumably contribute to the maintenance of the intracellular pool of
uracil at a homeostatic low level. Indeed, subsequent metabolization of
uracil was not required for down-regulation of the FUR4 mRNA
abundance, as the effect was observed in FUR1-disrupted cells (data not shown).
Uracil permease mRNA is also sensitive to environmental changes. The synthesis and/or degradation rates of many transcripts change, often transiently, in response to various stresses. Mild heat shock, nutritional deprivation, progression through the growth curve cycle, and an upshift in carbon source can all modulate the level of both ribosomal RNAs and mRNAs for ribosomal proteins (21, 28, 52) and have similar effects upon the FUR4 mRNA and/or protein (this study and reference 49). As uracil-derived nucleotides are found mostly in ribosomes, this is not likely to be fortuitous. Moreover, as stressful conditions that activate permease turnover also lead to degradation of ribosomes, uracil of catabolic origin may signal down-regulation of the permease in cells subjected to stress.
We show that accelerated turnover of the uracil permease resulted from increased ubiquitination efficiency, indicating that the formation of ubiquitin conjugates is indeed the rate-limiting step in the internalization of the permease. Any stress, whatever its origin, may increase the activity of the ubiquitin conjugation system toward a set of target proteins, including uracil permease. Enhanced turnover triggered by uracil is more likely due to a change of the permease itself. The change in its phosphorylation pattern in response to uracil might induce it to change its conformation such that it becomes more susceptible to ubiquitination. By using mutant permeases, it was previously shown that phosphorylation of a PEST-like sequence is a prerequisite for efficient ubiquitination (32). The uracil permease is phosphorylated mainly, but not exclusively, within the PEST-like sequence, since phosphorylation was strongly reduced but not abolished in a mutant permease from which the PEST sequence had been deleted (32). Data presented here that linked uracil-induced underphosphorylation to more efficient ubiquitination might indicate that the phosphorylation of a residue lying outside the PEST-like sequence negatively controls the ubiquitination process. It is interesting that uracil permease was both less phosphorylated and less stable in galactose-grown cells than in glucose-grown cells (48, 49). Thus, a lower phosphorylation level, either in the presence of uracil or in galactose-grown cells, appeared to be correlated with a higher turnover rate for the permease.
In contrast, the underphosphorylation is not involved in the substantial loss of permease activity triggered by the exposure of cells to uracil, since the change of the phosphorylation level (shown in Fig. 1 and 4) did not occur within the short time that was required for the loss of most of the uptake activity (data not shown). In the case of the spermidine transporter, a direct binding of intracellular substrate to an allosteric site has been proposed to account for ligand-induced inactivation (25). Similarly, the feedback inhibition of uracil permease is possibly mediated by the direct binding of excess uracil to a site on the cytoplasmic side of the permease, since we have shown that uracil has to be taken up for the down-regulation of the uracil permease. Our results are thus coherent with a model in which the binding of uracil to the permease first induces a conformational change to an inactive form, ensuring a rapid decrease in uptake before the protein is internalized.
The regulation of inositol permease was previously compared with that of uracil permease (40). The data presented here emphasize the similarities of their behaviors. Both uracil and inositol permeases are down-regulated at several levels upon exposure to their own substrates, and both uracil and inositol can be excreted by yeast cells, indicating that their intracellular concentration must be held down to appropriate levels. Whether common elements regulate these down-regulations remains to be determined.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Rosine Labbe-Bois for invaluable advice, Danièle Urban-Grimal for constructive discussions and critical reading of the manuscript, and Alex Edelman for editorial assistance.
This work was supported by a special grant from CNRS (program Biologie Cellulaire, project no. 96105).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institut Jacques Monod, CNRS/Université Paris 7-Denis Diderot, 2, Place Jussieu, 75251 Paris Cedex 05, France. Phone: 33 1 44 27 47 24. Fax: 33 1 44 27 59 94. E-mail: volland{at}ijm.jussieu.fr.
Present address: Laboratoire de Biologie et Biochimie parasitaires
et fongiques, 369, rue Jules Guesde, 59651-Villeneuve d'Ascq, France.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Bisson, L. F., D. M. Coons, A. L. Kruckeberg, and D. A. Lewis. 1993. Yeast sugar transporters. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 28:259-308[Medline]. |
| 2. | Bonneaud, N., O. Ozier-Kalogeropoulos, G. Y. Li, M. Labouesse, L. Minvielle-Sebastia, and F. Lacroute. 1991. A family of low and high copy replicative, integrative and single-stranded S. cerevisiae/E. coli shuttle vectors. Yeast 7:609-615[Medline]. |
| 3. | Cereghino, G. P., and I. E. Scheffler. 1996. Genetic analysis of glucose regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: control of transcription versus mRNA turnover. EMBO J. 15:363-374[Medline]. |
| 4. |
Chevallier, M. R.
1982.
Cloning and transcriptional control of a eucaryotic permease gene.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
2:977-984 |
| 5. |
Dancis, A.,
D. Haile,
D. S. Yuan, and R. D. Klausner.
1994.
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae copper transporter protein (Ctr1p).
J. Biol. Chem.
269:25660-25667 |
| 6. | Didion, T., B. Regenberg, M. U. Jorgensen, M. C. Kielland-Brandt, and H. A. Andersen. 1998. The permease homologue Ssy1p controls the expression of amino acid and peptide transporter genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Microbiol. 27:643-650[Medline]. |
| 7. | Eddy, A. A. 1997. Expulsion of uracil and thymine from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: contrasting responses to changes in the proton electrochemical gradient. Microbiology 143:219-229[Abstract]. |
| 8. | Gadsden, M. H., E. M. McIntosh, J. C. Game, P. J. Wilson, and R. H. Haynes. 1993. dUTP pyrophosphatase is an essential enzyme in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 12:4425-4431[Medline]. |
| 9. |
Galan, J. M.,
V. Moreau,
B. André,
C. Volland, and R. Haguenauer-Tsapis.
1996.
Ubiquitination mediated by the Npi1p/Rsp5p ubiquitin-protein ligase is required for endocytosis of the yeast uracil permease.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:10946-10952 |
| 10. |
Gietz, D.,
A. St. Jean,
R. A. Woods, and R. H. Schiestl.
1992.
Improved method for high efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells.
Nucleic Acids Res.
20:1425 |
| 11. |
Gitan, R. S.,
H. Luo,
J. Rodgers,
M. Broderius, and D. Eide.
1998.
Zinc-induced inactivation of the yeast ZRT1 zinc transporter occurs through endocytosis and vacuolar degradation.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:28617-28624 |
| 12. |
Gonzalez, C. I., and C. E. Martin.
1996.
Fatty acid-responsive control of mRNA stability.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:25801-25809 |
| 13. | Grenson, M. 1969. The utilization of exogenous pyrimidines and the recycling of uridine-5-phosphate derivatives in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as studied by means of mutants affected in pyrimidine uptake and metabolism. Eur. J. Biochem. 11:249-260[Medline]. |
| 14. | Hein, C., J. Y. Springael, C. Volland, R. Haguenauer-Tsapis, and B. André. 1995. NPI1, an essential yeast gene involved in induced degradation of Gap1 and Fur4 permeases, encodes the Rsp5 ubiquitin-protein ligase. Mol. Microbiol. 18:77-87[Medline]. |
| 15. |
Herrick, D.,
R. Parker, and A. Jacobson.
1990.
Identification and comparison of stable and unstable mRNAs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10:2269-2284 |
| 16. |
Herruer, M. H.,
W. H. Mager,
H. A. Raué,
P. Vreken,
E. Wilms, and R. J. Planta.
1988.
Mild temperature shock affects transcription of yeast ribosomal protein genes as well as the stability of their mRNAs.
Nucleic Acids Res.
16:7917-7929 |
| 17. | Hopkins, P., M. R. Chevallier, R. Jund, and A. A. Eddy. 1988. Use of plasmid vectors to show that the uracil and cytosin permeases of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae are electrogenic proton symports. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 49:173-177. |
| 18. |
Horak, J., and D. H. Wolf.
1997.
Catabolite inactivation of the galactose transporter in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: ubiquitination, endocytosis, and degradation in the vacuole.
J. Bacteriol.
179:1541-1549 |
| 19. |
Iraqui, I.,
S. Vissers,
F. Bernard,
J.-O. De Craene,
E. Boles,
A. Urrestarazu, and B. André.
1999.
Amino acid signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a permease-like sensor of external amino acids and F-box protein Grr1p are required for transcriptional induction of the AGP1 gene, which encodes a broad-specificity amino acid permease.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:989-1001 |
| 20. | Jaquet, L., M. Lollier, J. L. Souciet, and S. Potier. 1993. Genetic analysis of yeast strains lacking negative feedback control: a one-step method for positive selection and cloning of carbamoylphosphate synthetase-aspartate transcarbamoylase mutants unable to respond to UTP. Mol. Gen. Genet. 241:81-88[Medline]. |
| 21. | Ju, Q., and J. R. Warner. 1994. Ribosome synthesis during the growth cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 10:151-157[Medline]. |
| 22. | Jund, R., M. R. Chevallier, and F. Lacroute. 1977. Uracil transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Membr. Biol. 36:233-251[Medline]. |
| 23. |
Jund, R., and F. Lacroute.
1970.
Genetic and physiological aspects of resistance to 5-fluoropyrimidines in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J. Bacteriol.
102:607-615 |
| 24. | Jund, R., E. Weber, and M. R. Chevallier. 1988. Primary structure of the uracil transport protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eur. J. Biochem. 171:417-424[Medline]. |
| 25. |
Kaouass, M.,
I. Gamache,
D. Ramotar,
M. Audette, and R. Poulin.
1998.
The spermidine transport system is regulated by ligand inactivation, endocytosis, and by the Npr1p Ser/Thr protein kinase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:2109-2117 |
| 26. | Kern, L., J. de Montigny, R. Jund, and F. Lacroute. 1990. The FUR1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: cloning, structure and expression of wild-type and mutant alleles. Gene 88:149-157[Medline]. |
| 27. | Kern, L., J. de Montigny, F. Lacroute, and R. Jund. 1991. Regulation of the pyrimidine salvage pathway by the FUR1 gene product of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Genet. 19:333-337[Medline]. |
| 28. |
Klein, C., and K. Struhl.
1994.
Protein kinase A mediates growth-regulated expression of yeast ribosomal protein genes by modulating RAP1 transcriptional activity.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:1920-1928 |
| 29. |
Lacroute, F.
1968.
Regulation of pyrimidine biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J. Bacteriol.
95:824-832 |
| 30. |
Lai, K.,
C. P. Bolognese,
S. Swift, and P. McGraw.
1995.
Regulation of inositol transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae involves inositol-induced changes in permease stability and endocytic degradation in the vacuole.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:2525-2534 |
| 31. |
Lai, K., and P. McGraw.
1994.
Dual control of inositol transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by irreversible inactivation of permease and regulation of permease synthesis by INO2, INO4, and OPI1.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:2245-2251 |
| 32. |
Marchal, C.,
R. Haguenauer-Tsapis, and D. Urban-Grimal.
1998.
A PEST-like sequence mediates phosphorylation and efficient ubiquitination of the yeast uracil permease.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:314-321 |
| 33. |
Medintz, I.,
H. Jiang,
E. K. Han,
W. Cui, and C. Michels.
1996.
Characterization of the glucose-induced inactivation of maltose permease in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J. Bacteriol.
178:2245-2254 |
| 34. |
Meister, A.
1988.
Glutathione metabolism and its selective modification.
J. Biol. Chem.
263:17205-17208 |
| 35. | Myers, A. M., A. Tzagoloff, D. M. Kinney, and C. J. Lusty. 1986. Yeast shuttle and integrative vectors with multiple cloning sites suitable for construction of lacZ fusions. Gene 45:299-310[Medline]. |
| 36. | Ooi, C. E., E. Rabinovich, A. Dancis, J. S. Bonifacino, and R. D. Klausner. 1996. Copper-dependent degradation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae plasma membrane copper transporter Ctr1p in the apparent absence of endocytosis. EMBO J. 15:3515-3523[Medline]. |
| 37. | Ozcan, S., J. Dover, and M. Johnston. 1998. Glucose sensing and signaling by two glucose receptors in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 17:2566-2573[Medline]. |
| 38. | Potier, S., F. Lacroute, J. C. Hubert, and J. L. Souciet. 1990. Studies on transcription of the yeast URA2 gene. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 60:215-219[Medline]. |
| 39. |
Riballo, E.,
M. Herweijer,
D. H. Wolf, and R. Lagunas.
1995.
Catabolite inactivation of the yeast maltose transporter occurs in the vacuole after internalization by endocytosis.
J. Bacteriol.
177:5622-5627 |
| 40. | Robinson, K. S., K. Lai, T. A. Cannon, and P. McGraw. 1996. Inositol transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is regulated by transcriptional and degradative endocytic mechanisms during the growth cycle that are distinct from inositol-induced regulation. Mol. Biol. Cell 7:81-89[Abstract]. |
| 41. | Rose, M. D., F. Winston, and P. Hieter. 1990. Methods in yeast genetics: a laboratory course manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 42. |
Schmitt, M. E.,
T. A. Brown, and B. L. Trumpower.
1990.
A rapid method for preparation of RNA from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Nucleic Acids Res.
18:3091-3092 |
| 43. |
Shortle, D.,
P. Novick, and D. Botstein.
1984.
Construction and genetic characterization of temperature-sensitive mutant allele of the yeast actin gene.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
81:4889-4893 |
| 44. |
Silve, S.,
C. Volland,
C. Garnier,
R. Jund,
M. R. Chevallier, and R. Haguenauer-Tsapis.
1991.
Membrane insertion of uracil permease, a polytopic yeast plasma membrane protein.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:1114-1124 |
| 45. |
Springael, J.-Y., and B. Andre.
1998.
Nitrogen regulated ubiquitination of the Gap1 permease of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Biol. Cell
9:1253-1263 |
| 46. | Thomas, B. J., and R. Rothstein. 1989. Elevated recombination rates in transcriptionally active DNA. Cell 56:619-630[Medline]. |
| 47. | Urban-Grimal, D., B. Pinson, J. Chevallier, and R. Haguenauer-Tsapis. 1995. Replacement of Lys by Glu in a transmembrane segment strongly impairs the function of the uracil permease from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem. J. 308:847-851. |
| 48. |
Volland, C.,
C. Garnier, and R. Haguenauer-Tsapis.
1992.
In vivo phosphorylation of the yeast uracil permease.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:23767-23771 |
| 49. |
Volland, C.,
D. Urban-Grimal,
G. Géraud, and R. Haguenauer-Tsapis.
1994.
Endocytosis and degradation of the yeast uracil permease under adverse conditions.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:9833-9841 |
| 50. | Wach, A. 1996. PCR-synthesis of marker cassettes with long flanking homology regions for gene disruptions in S. cerevisiae. Yeast 12:259-265[Medline]. |
| 51. | Wach, A., A. Brachat, R. Pöhlmann, and P. Philippsen. 1994. New heterologous modules for classical or PCR-based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 10:1793-1808[Medline]. |
| 52. | Woolford, J. L., Jr., and J. Warner. 1991. The ribosome and its synthesis, p. 587-626. In E. W. Jones, J. R. Pringle, and J. R. Broach (ed.), The molecular and cellular biology of the yeast saccharomyces, vol. 1. Genome dynamics, protein synthesis and energetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||