This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, D.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Allmansberger, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, D.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Allmansberger, R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, May 1999, p. 2942-2946, Vol. 181, No. 9
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Synthesis of the sigma D Protein Is Not Sufficient To Trigger Expression of Motility Functions in Bacillus subtilis

Dong-Hui Yang, Johannes von Kalckreuth, and Rudolf Allmansberger*

Lehrstuhl für Mikrobiologie, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany

Received 8 September 1998/Accepted 17 February 1999


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

The gene encoding sigma D, sigD, is transcribed from two promoter regions, the fla/che promoter region in front of the fla/che operon and PsigD directly in front of sigD. If sigma D is translated from transcripts originating from PsigD, the cell is unable to express motility functions but synthesizes autolysins. Therefore, one function of the additional promoter is to allow the cell to express autolysins without expressing motility functions as well.


    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Gene expression in bacteria is regulated primarily at the level of transcription. The specificity of transcription initiation, which rests on interactions between the RNA polymerase and the promoters with which it makes contact, is determined by sigma factors. Although most genes are preceded by promoters which are recognized by the main vegetative sigma factor, a subset of genes is preceded by promoters that are recognized by alternative sigmas. These genes are often part of regulons that encode products that are not necessary for normal vegetative bacterial growth but are important under specific circumstances. For example, in Bacillus subtilis most of the genes whose products are necessary for sporulation are transcribed by alternative sigma factors (see references 6, 10, and 20 for recent reviews). sigma H is the first alternative sigma factor in this regulatory cascade (10). Gene expression in the forespore is mediated by the activities of sigma F and sigma G, and transcription in the mother cell is dependent on sigma E and sigma K (20).

Sporulation is not the only response of B. subtilis to the stationary phase. The onset of stationary phase induces, at least, the synthesis and activity of two additional sigma factors that are not necessary for sporulation, sigma B and sigma D (10). The sigma B regulon is activated in response to different kinds of stress and stationary phase (2, 3). The proteins encoded by sigma B-dependent genes serve different physiological functions. It has been proposed that expression of these genes is advantageous during starvation and stress (11), but sigB mutants survive most of the stressful conditions as efficiently as the wild type does (2).

The B. subtilis transcription factor sigma D is necessary for the expression of genes required for bacterial motility and autolysins (12, 18, 22). Its counterpart in Escherichia coli, sigma F, serves a similar but more specialized function. With a single exception (13), all genes transcribed by E. coli sigma F are necessary for motility. Indeed, sigma F-negative E. coli strains are partially complemented by a functional copy of the B. subtilis sigD gene (5). The genes of the E. coli sigma F regulon are organized in several different regulatory groups (see reference 21 for a recent review). One major regulator, beside sigma F itself, is FlgM, an anti-sigma factor which binds to sigma F and blocks its activity (28).

In B. subtilis, transcription of the two different groups of genes which are dependent on sigma D containing RNA polymerase is influenced by several transition state regulators (19, 24, 30, 31). However, it is not clear whether these effects are due to a direct interaction of these proteins with sigma D-dependent promoters or are brought about by the physiological side effects of mutations in the genes encoding these regulators. One of the major regulators of sigma D activity is FlgM (4, 9, 26), the counterpart of the E. coli FlgM protein. In its absence, several operons encoding proteins necessary for the late flagellar synthesis are overproduced. Based on genetic data and due to the homology to E. coli FlgM, it is believed that B. subtilis FlgM acts as an anti-sigma factor.

The sigD gene is transcribed by the activity of at least two promoter regions (1, 7). The biological importance of the second promoter, present directly in front of the sigD gene, is not clear. We show that, at least under specific environmental conditions, this promoter is responsible for sigD transcription. If PsigD is the sole promoter to transcribe sigD, the transcription of motility functions is impaired. Therefore, we propose that one function of PsigD and PsigD-derived transcripts is to allow autolysin expression under circumstances which are not favorable for the expression of motility functions.

Transcription of PsigD and sigma D-dependent genes in minimal medium. We were interested in determining whether temporal regulation of PsigD is identical in minimal medium and in complex medium. To that end, we constructed plasmid pSD26 (Table 1) by inserting the 120-bp EcoRI-Sau3AI fragment from pSD5 (1) into EcoRI-SnaBI-digested pDH32M (15). All cloning experiments were done with E. coli DH5alpha as the host. The resulting plasmid harbors a 96-bp PsigD-encoding fragment of the fla/che operon (positions 1104 to 1200 in reference 23) as a transcriptional fusion with the lacZ gene. The plasmid was linearized and integrated into the amyE gene of B. subtilis 168 to give B. subtilis SD26. In the resulting strain lacZ transcription was dependent solely on PsigD activity. In addition, we constructed pSD28 by ligating the 0.9-kbp ClaI fragment from pSD26 into pKL2 (32). To obtain pSD28N, pSD28 was digested with PacI and EcoRI and ligated to the 0.5-kb PacI-EcoRI fragment from pSD5. This plasmid, which also encodes a transcriptional fusion of sigD to lacZ, was integrated into the fla/che operon of B. subtilis 168 to give B. subtilis SD28N. In this strain, lacZ expression was driven by PsigD activity and the activity of the promoters directing the expression of the fla/che operon. We grew B. subtilis SD26 and SD28N in MOPSO minimal medium (16) with different concentrations of glucose as the carbon source. At glucose concentrations less than 0.2%, the C source was the growth-limiting factor (Fig. 1). Samples were removed at different growth stages, and beta -galactosidase assays were done as described previously (27). Each experiment was repeated at least three times. Only the results of a single experiment are given. In MOPSO minimal medium, both PsigD-dependent and fla/che-dependent beta -galactosidase expression at the beginning of stationary phase were repressed in the presence of 0.2% glucose. At glucose concentrations of 0.1% and lower, beta -galactosidase activity was induced at the onset of stationary phase, presumably due to the depletion of glucose. PsigD-dependent activity of B. subtilis SD26 exceeded the fla/che-dependent activity of B. subtilis SD28N if the glucose concentration was less than 0.1%. This seems rather surprising since, as mentioned above, PsigD drives LacZ expression in B. subtilis SD26 whereas the beta -galactosidase synthesis determined in B. subtilis SD28N is driven by PsigD plus the activity of the promoters in front of the fla/che operon. Under all other conditions tested, the beta -galactosidase activity of B. subtilis SD28N exceeded the activity of B. subtilis SD26 (data not shown). A possible explanation of the higher levels of beta -galactosidase in B. subtilis SD26 than B. subtilis SD28N in minimal medium is the site of integration of the constructs in each strain. The PsigD-lacZ fusion was integrated into the amyE locus. amyE is next to the origin of replication, whereas the fla/che operon is near the terminus of the chromosome (17). If the chromosome is replicating, the majority of the cells contain two copies of amyE and therefore of PsigD-lacZ but only a single copy of the fla/che operon. The fact that LacZ expression determined in B. subtilis SD28N did not exceed the expression determined in B. subtilis SD26 indicated that PsigD activity was far higher than the activity of the promoter region in front of the operon. This implied that the synthesis of the proteins encoded by the upper part of the fla/che operon was reduced or even abolished.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Strains and plasmids used during this study


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.   PsigD and fla/che-dependent beta -galactosidase expression in minimal medium with different amounts of glucose as the carbon source. Shaded symbols indicate growth of B. subtilis SD26 with the indicated amount of glucose; solid symbols indicate beta -galactosidase activity of B. subtilis SD26; and open symbols indicate beta -galactosidase activity of B. subtilis SD28N. Circles, 0.2% glucose; squares, 0.1% glucose; triangles, 0.05% glucose; inverted triangles; 0.02% glucose. Activity units are those of Miller (25).

Induction of motility functions is absent in minimal medium. Some of the proteins encoded by the fla/che operon are necessary for the basal structure of the flagellum. If this structure is missing, the flagellum cannot be assembled. Therefore, the synthesis of proteins necessary for motility which are encoded by genes and operons beside fla/che would be a waste of energy. We therefore asked whether operons which are under direct control of sigma D are expressed in MOPSO minimal medium. We constructed B. subtilis MOT and B. subtilis FLI strains encoding fusions of lacZ to PmotAB and Pfli, respectively, by transforming B. subtilis 168 with chromosomal DNA from B. subtilis Pmot-171 and PfliD-224 obtained from A. Galizzi (8). In addition, we transformed B. subtilis 168 with plasmid pHY5S, obtained from J. Sekiguchi, to give B. subtilis HY5S. This strain harbors a fusion of the promoter of cwlB, encoding the major autolysin, to lacZ. The strains were grown in MOPSO minimal medium with 0.05% glucose. The results of this experiment are depicted in Fig. 2. Whereas transcription of the PcwlB-dependent lacZ gene was induced at the onset of stationary phase, Pfli- and PmotAB-dependent transcription was not. Therefore, it was clear that in MOPSO medium with limiting amounts of glucose, the induction of sigma D synthesis is not a sufficient signal for the induction of transcription of motility genes but a signal for elevated autolysin synthesis. Mutations in the putative anti-sigma factor FlgM restore hag and motAB transcription in strains with an interrupted fla/che operon (26). Since FlgM has an identical effect on autolysin genes and motility genes (26), it seems unlikely that FlgM is the regulator responsible for this effect.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.   Expression of PmotAB-lacZ (), Pfli-lacZ (black-down-triangle ), and PcwlB-lacZ () in minimal medium with 0.05% glucose as the carbon source. beta -Galactosidase activity is plotted against OD600 of the culture. Activity units are those of Miller (25).

Transcription of sigma D-dependent genes is affected by insertions within the fla/che operon. Whereas sigma D synthesis in minimal medium seemed to be dependent mainly on sigD transcription starting from PsigD, at least two different classes of transcripts, originating either from PsigD or from the fla/che promoter region, are used as a template for sigma D synthesis in complex medium (1). The results described above indicated that PsigD-driven sigD expression induces transcription of autolysin genes but is not sufficient to allow transcription of sigma D-dependent motility genes. If this is indeed the case, the temporal regulation of PmotAB, Pfli, and PcwlB should be different as well. PcwlB has to become active as soon as PsigD-dependent sigma D synthesis commences, whereas Pfli and PmotAB activity must parallel the Pfla/che-dependent sigma D synthesis. We therefore grew B. subtilis MOT, FLI, HY5S, SD26, and SD28N in parallel in NB medium (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom). The cells were grown at 42°C, a temperature which allows a better differentiation between PsigD- and fla/che-dependent sigma D expression (32a). Figure 3 shows the result of this experiment. The maximal beta -galactosidase activity of each single strain was taken as 100%. In accordance with previous data (1), PsigD activity was induced at an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of about 0.5 and reached maximal values at an OD600 of about 0.6. The temporal regulation of cwlB-dependent LacZ expression was similar, but that of PmotAB-, Pfli-, and fla/che-dependent beta -galactosidase expression was different. PmotAB- and Pfli-dependent activity did not commence until the OD600 reached 0.7. Maximal activity of fla/che-, PmotAB-, and Pfli-dependent beta -galactosidase activity was obtained at an OD600 of about 1. This result is in accordance with the model proposed above. To test the model in vivo, we created an artificial situation where fla/che transcription is blocked in front of sigD. To do so, we constructed plasmids pSD28teo and pSD30teo. First, we created plasmid pSD30N by digesting pSD28N with PacI and BamHI. The protruding ends were trimmed with T4 DNA polymerase, and the plasmid was religated. In pSD30N, PsigD was completely removed. pSD28T and pSD30T were obtained by inserting the Omega  element of pHP45Omega (29), which harbors two transcriptional terminators, as a BamHI fragment into BglII-digested pSD28N or as a SmaI fragment into XbaI-digested pSD30N to give pSD28T and pSD30T, respectively. The lacZ and cat genes were deleted by digesting the plasmids with SnaBI. The fragments which code for the 5' end of the sigD gene were ligated to a 1-kb fragment, created by a SmaI-SnaBI double digest of pBEST501 (14), to give pSD28teo and pSD30teo, respectively. The resulting plasmids confer neomycin resistance to both E. coli and B. subtilis. Integration of pSD28teo into the B. subtilis chromosome inserted the two transcription terminators between orfB and PsigD. In this strain, PsigD was the only promoter to transcribe sigD. Integration of pSD30teo inserted the terminators between PsigD and sigD. Therefore, sigD expression was most probably completely abolished. These plasmids were integrated into the fla/che operon of B. subtilis strains which harbored either the Pfli, PmotAB, or PcwlB fusions to lacZ. The beta -galactosidase activity of the respective strains grown in NB medium was determined. Integration of pSD30teo resulted in a loss of beta -galactosidase activity (data not shown). Therefore, it seemed unlikely that readthrough from the fla/che operon occurred. PcwlB induction during mid-log phase was not changed by the insertion of pSD28teo, but the same integration had a striking effect on PmotAB and Pfli; the activity of both promoters was severely reduced (Fig. 4). It is not possible to explain this result by the lack of transcription of any gene. In B. subtilis SD28teo, all genes encoded by the native fla/che operon are transcribed either by the activity of the fla/che promoter region or by the activity of PsigD as soon as PsigD is induced (1). However, during mid-log phase, transcription of the motAB and the fli genes was not activated whereas PcwlB activity was induced. The results are in agreement with our model. Transcription of the entire fla/che operon as a single transcript is necessary to allow sigma D to transcribe genes encoding motility functions, whereas PsigD activity is sufficient only to drive autolysin expression. We are unable to provide any mechanistic explanation for this phenomenon; nevertheless, this observation is in agreement with some recently published data. Complementation of a sigD-negative B. subtilis strain with a plasmid-located copy of sigD does not restore the motility-negative phenotype of the strain but makes it autolysin positive (33). Mutations which cause a severe reduction of sigD expression also cause a reduced expression of autolysins and motility functions. Overexpression of sigma D restores autolysin synthesis but does not influence motility functions (31). Taken together, our results and the results from other groups indicate that transcription of sigD alone allows the expression of autolysins but not the expression of motility functions. Therefore, one of the functions of PsigD is to allow high-level expression of autolysins under circumstances which are not favorable for expression of motility genes. The molecular mechanism which allows this differentiation between the two classes of sigma D-dependent genes is under investigation.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.   Relative beta -galactosidase activity of different B. subtilis strains plotted against OD600. Bacteria were grown in NB medium at 42°C, a temperature which allows a better distinction between PsigD- and Pfla/che-dependent beta -galactosidase activity (data not shown). The maximal activity obtained during growth for each single strain was taken as 100%. , B. subtilis SD26 (PsigD-lacZ); black-down-triangle , B. subtilis SD28T (fla/che-lacZ); open circle , B. subtilis HY5S (PcwlB-lacZ); , B. subtilis MOT (PmotAB-lacZ); down-triangle, B. subtilis FLI (Pfli-lacZ).


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.   Influence of an integration into the fla/che operon on sigma D-dependent gene expression. PmotAB-lacZ (squares), Pfli-lacZ (inverted triangles), and PcwlB-lacZ (circles) activity was determined in a B. subtilis 168 background (solid symbols) and in a B. subtilis SD28teo background (open symbols). Shaded triangles indicate growth of B. subtilis SD28teo/Pfli-lacZ. Activity units are those of Miller (25).


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank J. Sekiguchi (Shinishu University, Nagano, Japan) for donating plasmid pHY5S and A. Galizzi (Universita di Pavia, Pavia, Italy) for providing chromosomal DNA from B. subtilis PfliD-224 and Pmot-171.

We thank W. Hillen (Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany) for financial support.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Lehrstuhl für Mikrobiologie, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Staudtstr. 5, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany. Phone: 49 9131 8528084. Fax: 49 9131 8528082. E-mail: rallmans{at}biologie.uni-erlangen.de.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Allmansberger, R. 1997. Temporal regulation of sigD from Bacillus subtilis depends on a minor promoter in front of the gene. J. Bacteriol. 179:6531-6535[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2. Boylan, S. A., A. R. Redfield, M. S. Brody, and C. W. Price. 1993. Stress-induced activation of the sigma B transcription factor of Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 175:7931-7937[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Boylan, S. A., A. Rutherford, S. M. Thomas, and C. W. Price. 1992. Activation of Bacillus subtilis transcription factor sigma B by a regulatory pathway responsive to stationary-phase signals. J. Bacteriol. 174:3695-3706[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. Caramori, T., D. Barilla, C. Nessi, L. Sacchi, and A. Galizzi. 1996. Role of FlgM in sigmaD-dependent gene expression in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 178:3113-3118[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Chen, Y. F., and J. D. Helmann. 1992. Restoration of motility to an Escherichia coli fliA flagellar mutant by a Bacillus subtilis sigma factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:5123-5127[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6. Errington, J. 1993. Bacillus subtilis sporulation: regulation of gene expression and control of morphogenesis. Microbiol. Rev. 57:1-33[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7. Estacio, W., S. S. Anna-Arriola, M. Adedipe, and L. M. Márquez-Magaña. 1998. Dual promoters are responsible for transcription initiation of the fla/che operon in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 180:3548-3555[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8. Fredrick, K., T. Caramori, Y. F. Chen, A. Galizzi, and J. D. Helmann. 1995. Promoter architecture in the flagellar regulon of Bacillus subtilis: high-level expression of flagellin by the sigma D RNA polymerase requires an upstream promoter element. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:2582-2586[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9. Fredrick, K., and J. D. Helmann. 1996. FlgM is a primary regulator of sigma D activity, and its absence restores motility to a sinR mutant. J. Bacteriol. 178:7010-7013[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10. Haldenwang, W. G. 1995. The sigma factors of Bacillus subtilis. Microbiol. Rev. 59:1-30[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Hecker, M., W. Schumann, and U. Völker. 1996. Heat-shock and general stress response in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 19:417-428[Medline].
12. Helmann, J. D. 1991. Alternative sigma factors and the regulation of flagellar gene expression. Mol. Microbiol. 5:2875-2882[Medline].
13. Ide, N., and K. Kutsukake. 1997. Identification of a novel Escherichia coli gene whose expression is dependent on the flagellum-specific sigma factor, FliA, but dispensable for motility development. Gene 199:19-23[Medline].
14. Itaya, M., K. Kondo, and T. Tanaka. 1989. A neomycin resistance cassette selectable in a single copy state in the Bacillus subtilis chromosome. Nucleic Acids Res. 17:4410[Free Full Text].
15. Kraus, A., C. Hueck, D. Gartner, and W. Hillen. 1994. Catabolite repression of the Bacillus subtilis xyl operon involves a cis element functional in the context of an unrelated sequence, and glucose exerts additional XylR-dependent repression. J. Bacteriol. 176:1738-1745[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16. Krispin, O., and R. Allmansberger. 1995. Changes in DNA supertwist as a response of Bacillus subtilis towards different kinds of stress. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 134:129-135[Medline].
17. Kunst, F., N. Ogasawara, I. Moszer, A. M. Albertini, G. Alloni, V. Azevedo, M. G. Bertero, P. Bessieres, A. Bolotin, S. Borchert, R. Borriss, L. Boursier, A. Brans, M. Braun, S. C. Brignell, S. Bron, S. Brouillet, C. V. Bruschi, B. Caldwell, V. Capuano, N. M. Carter, S. K. Choi, J. J. Codani, I. F. Connerton, A. Danchin, et al. 1997. The complete genome sequence of the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Nature 390:249-256[Medline].
18. Kuroda, A., and J. Sekiguchi. 1993. High-level transcription of the major Bacillus subtilis autolysin operon depends on expression of the sigma D gene and is affected by a sin (flaD) mutation. J. Bacteriol. 175:795-801[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19. Liu, J., and P. Zuber. 1998. A molecular switch controlling competence and motility: competence regulatory factors ComS, MecA, and ComK control sigma D-dependent gene expression in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 180:4243-4251[Abstract/Free Full Text].
20. Losick, R., and P. Stragier. 1992. Crisscross regulation of cell-type-specific gene expression during development in B. subtilis. Nature 355:601-604[Medline].
21. MacNab, R. 1996. Flagella and motility, p. 123-145. In F. C. Neidhardt, R. Curtiss III, J. L. Ingraham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, W. S. Reznikoff, M. Riley, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed., vol. 1. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
22. Marquez, L. M., J. D. Helmann, E. Ferrari, H. M. Parker, G. W. Ordal, and M. J. Chamberlin. 1990. Studies of sigma D-dependent functions in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 172:3435-3443[Abstract/Free Full Text].
23. Marquez-Magana, L. M., and M. J. Chamberlin. 1994. Characterization of the sigD transcription unit of Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 176:2427-2434[Abstract/Free Full Text].
24. Marquez-Magana, L. M., D. B. Mirel, and M. J. Chamberlin. 1994. Regulation of sigma D expression and activity by spo0, abrB, and sin gene products in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 176:2435-2438[Abstract/Free Full Text].
25. Miller, J. 1972. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
26. Mirel, D. B., P. Lauer, and M. J. Chamberlin. 1994. Identification of flagellar synthesis regulatory and structural genes in a sigma D-dependent operon of Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 176:4492-4500[Abstract/Free Full Text].
27. Moch, C., O. Schrögel, and R. Allmansberger. 1998. The sigma D-dependent transcription of the ywcG gene from Bacillus subtilis is dependent on an excess of glucose and glutamate. Mol. Microbiol. 27:889-898[Medline].
28. Ohnishi, K., K. Kutsukake, H. Suzuki, and T. Lino. 1992. A novel transcriptional regulation mechanism in the flagellar regulon of Salmonella typhimurium: an antisigma factor inhibits the activity of the flagellum-specific sigma factor, sigma F. Mol. Microbiol. 6:3149-3157[Medline].
29. Prentki, P., and H. M. Krisch. 1984. In vitro insertional mutagenesis with a selectable DNA fragment. Gene 29:303-313[Medline].
30. Rashid, M. H., and J. Sekiguchi. 1996. flaD (sinR) mutations affect SigD-dependent functions at multiple points in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 178:6640-6643[Abstract/Free Full Text].
31. Rashid, M. H., A. Tamakoshi, and J. Sekiguchi. 1996. Effects of mecA and mecB (clpC) mutations on expression of sigD, which encodes an alternative sigma factor, and autolysin operons and on flagellin synthesis in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 178:4861-4869[Abstract/Free Full Text].
32. Schrögel, O., O. Krispin, and R. Allmansberger. 1996. Expression of a pepT homologue from Bacillus subtilis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 145:341-348[Medline].
32a. von Kalckreuth, J., and R. Allmansberger.
33. Yamanaka, K., J. Araki, M. Takano, and J. Sekiguchi. 1997. Characterization of Bacillus subtilis mutants resistant to cold shock-induced autolysis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 150:269-275[Medline].


Journal of Bacteriology, May 1999, p. 2942-2946, Vol. 181, No. 9
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • West, J. T., Estacio, W., Márquez-Magaña, L. (2000). Relative Roles of the fla/che PA, PD-3, and PsigD Promoters in Regulating Motility and sigD Expression in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 182: 4841-4848 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, D.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Allmansberger, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, D.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Allmansberger, R.