This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bowers, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Dombroski, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bowers, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Dombroski, A. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, January 2000, p. 221-224, Vol. 182, No. 1
0021-9193/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Effects of Amino Acid Substitutions at Conserved and Acidic Residues within Region 1.1 of Escherichia coli sigma 70

Christina Wilson Bowers, Andrea McCracken, and Alicia J. Dombroski*

Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas 77030

Received 14 September 1999/Accepted 6 October 1999


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Amino acid substitutions in Escherichia coli sigma 70 were generated and characterized in an analysis of the role of region 1.1 in transcription initiation. Several acidic and conserved residues are tolerant of substitution. However, replacement of aspartic acid 61 with alanine results in inactivity caused by structural and functional thermolability.


    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Core RNA polymerase (alpha 2beta beta ') requires the variable specificity subunit, sigma (sigma ), to direct promoter-dependent transcription (1, 3, 4, 12, 18, 22, 23, 26). Following promoter binding, holoenzyme (alpha 2beta beta 'sigma ) progresses through several intermediate complexes, en route to a stable initiated open complex (2, 14). sigma  factor has been implicated in stages of initiation beyond promoter recognition (8, 9, 13, 15, 17). Recently, we showed that the conserved amino terminal domain (region 1) of Escherichia coli sigma 70 is important for the process of strand melting and initiated complex formation at the lambda  pR promoter (24).

Region 1 is unique to the primary sigma  factors, yet little is known of its function. Deletion of region 1.1 (amino acids 1 to 100) from sigma 70 has two major consequences for holoenzyme. The first is inefficient progression from the closed to the strand-separated open complex. This can be overcome by increasing the time allowed for formation of holoenzyme-promoter complexes and is lessened by addition of region 1.1 in trans. The second and more deleterious effect is impaired transition from the strand-separated open complex to a stable initiated complex (RPinit). According to this analysis, amino acids between positions 50 and 75 of sigma 70 are critical for proper initiation in vitro (24).

A comparison of region 1.1 among several primary sigma  factors revealed conserved residues at positions 52 (glycine [G]), 53 (isoleucine [I]), 55 (valine [V]), and 61 (aspartic acid [D]), as well as a high degree of acidity (40%) within the segment from amino acids 50 to 75 (24). Here, we test whether alterations at these conserved positions or in the overall acidity of the region influence initiation by holoenzyme (Esigma ).

Site-directed mutagenesis (10) and the Expand high fidelity PCR system (Boehringer Mannheim) were used to create substitutions at positions 52, 53, 55, 61, 57, 58, 63, 64, and 69 (Table 1). rpoD was mutagenized in M13 phage (10) and amplified with oligonucleotides that incorporated restriction sites at the 5' and 3' ends of the fragment. The restricted fragments were ligated into pQE30-T (24). PCR mutagenesis was used to amplify a fragment corresponding to the 3' end of the rpoD gene with a 5' mutagenic oligonucleotide and a 3' oligonucleotide that incorporated a restriction site. A concurrent round of amplification included a 5' oligonucleotide complementary to the 5' end of rpoD and a 3' oligonucleotide with complementarity to an internal segment of rpoD, downstream from the genetic alteration(s). The 5' and 3' PCR fragments were mixed, and the full-length mutagenized rpoD gene was amplified, gel isolated, digested, ligated into pQE30-T, transformed into E. coli XL1 Blue (Stratagene), and sequenced to confirm the changes. The plasmids were transformed into E. coli 19284 (rpoD800, W3110 srl::Tn10 recA lacIq) to test for function in vivo (24). Transformation mixtures were split and spread onto Luria-Bertani plates containing ampicillin (100 mg/ml), kanamycin (30 mg/ml), and 2% glucose and then incubated at 32 and 44°C, to evaluate complementation of the rpoD800 temperature-sensitive growth defect at 44°C. Plasmids were likewise transformed into strain CAG20176 to test growth in the absence of chromosomal rpoD expression at 32°C (11, 24).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Region 1.1 amino acid substitution mutantsa

Mutants were generated that replaced either acidic, conserved, or, at position 61, both conserved and acidic amino acids with alanine (A). Replacement of glutamic acid (E) at position 69 (E69) with A had no effect on sigma 70 function in vivo (Table 1). Double mutations replacing E at positions 57 and 58 or D at positions 63 and 64 reduced the overall acidity of region 1.1, but neither affected sigma 70 function in vivo (Table 1). Replacement of conserved D61 with A, however, rendered sigma 70 nonfunctional.

Additional substitutions at position 61 addressed the contribution of the amino acid side chain. Both E and serine (S) could functionally substitute for D, indicating that polarity rather than side chain charge at this position is more important for function (Table 1). D61 is found in a cluster of acidic residues; however, simultaneous substitution of D63 and D64 did not impair function in vivo, indicating that D61 does not require the flanking acidic residues. A quintuple mutation combining E57,58A with D61A and D63,64A was inactive in vivo. Since both of the double mutants were functional, the lethal phenotype is probably caused predominantly by D61A. Substitutions G52A, V55A, or V55I functioned at least as well as the wild type (Table 1). Because sigma 70V55A and sigma 70V55I function in vivo, the size and shape of the hydrophobic side chain at this position are not critical. sigma 70I53A was inactive in vivo and seriously defective in vitro, and its characterization has been reported elsewhere (25).

These results argue that the overall acidity of region 1.1 is not a major factor in its participation in transcription initiation. Conserved D61, however, appears to be important for sigma 70 structure and/or function in vivo. To address the basis for the inactivity of sigma 70D61A, the protein was overexpressed and purified (24) for characterization in vitro.

Run-off transcription analysis was performed to assess the overall effect of the D61A substitution on RNA synthesis (24). A time course at 37°C indicated that Esigma 70D61A was impaired in transcription, while Esigma 70G52A and Esigma 70E57,58A exhibited transcription rates similar to Esigma 70 (Fig. 1A). Esigma 70D61A was also defective for abortive transcription (24) at 37°C (Fig. 1B). One explanation for the inactivity of sigma 70D61A is thermolability of the protein. Thus, we examined the effect of temperature on run-off transcription. At 25°C, Esigma 70D61A activity was indistinguishable from Esigma 70. At higher temperatures, a transcriptional defect became apparent (Fig. 1C), with loss of activity as the temperature increased. The functional mutants Esigma 70G52A and Esigma 70E57,58A were not affected by increasing temperature, as compared to Esigma 70.




View larger version (211760K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.   Run-off transcription analysis. (A) A representative run-off transcription time course experiment is shown for Esigma 70 and sigma 70 mutants at 37°C. Each experiment was repeated at least five times, and the error was less than 15%. (B) Abortive transcription by Esigma 70D61A at 37°C. Synthesis of the three nucleotide abortive RNA transcripts (ApUpG) from lambda  pR is shown relative to the wild type. The holoenzyme concentration was 0.008 µM and the template concentration was 1.5 nM. (C) Run-off transcription as a function of temperature. A comparison of run-off transcription activities at 60 min at 25 and 42°C is shown. Activities are normalized to the wild type, and the error indicated was less than 15%. WT, wild type.

Because sigma 70D61A was functionally thermolabile in vitro, the possibility that it was structurally thermolabile was assessed by comparing susceptibility to trypsin digestion at 25, 37, and 42°C. Consistent with its transcriptional activity, sigma 70D61A exhibited increased sensitivity to trypsin digestion at 42°C (Fig. 2A). The failure of sigma 70D61A to complement rpoD mutant strains in vivo may therefore be caused by instability of the protein. To test this idea, we used immunoblotting to compare the levels of the wild type and sigma 70D61A after a shift from 37 to 44°C (Fig. 2B). At the time of the upshift, there was significantly more wild-type sigma 70 present, and it remained stable for longer than 80 min (Fig. 2B). Conversely, sigma 70D61A was much less stable, becoming nearly undetectable by 80 min. The D61A substitution appears to cause a structural disruption in sigma 70 that results in proteolytic instability both in vivo and in vitro and functional instability during transcription initiation. Other mutations in region 1.1 have also been reported to result in structural instability (5).


View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.   Stability of sigma 70D61A in vitro and in vivo. (A) Limited trypsinolysis. sigma 70D61A (2 µg) was subjected to trypsin digestion at three temperatures, as indicated, to assess possible structural defects. Wedges indicate increasing trypsin concentration (0.0125, 0.0625, and 0.025 µg). Digestion of wild-type (WT) sigma 70 is shown for reference in the top panel. Fragments were resolved on a sodium dodecyl sulfate-8% polyacrylamide gel and visualized with Coomassie brilliant blue staining. (B) Immunoblot analysis of culture lysates of strain 19284 (wild-type [WT] sigma 70 and sigma 70D61A). Exponentially growing cells at 37°C were upshifted to 44°C. Lysates were prepared from cells harvested at the indicated time points following temperature upshift, and proteins were resolved on a sodium dodecyl sulfate-8% polyacrylamide gel. Following Western transfer, histidine-tagged sigma 70 proteins were detected by using a six-His-tagged monoclonal antibody (Clontech).

A more thorough evaluation of the initiation properties of the mutants was conducted to determine if a particular step in the process was affected by the substitutions. The first step in initiation is promoter recognition and binding by RNA polymerase. Nitrocellulose filter retention has been used to evaluate DNA binding at lambda  pR, and the complexes retained are open complexes (6, 7, 16, 19, 20). Holoenzyme (1 nM) was incubated with a 32P-5'-end-labeled DNA fragment containing lambda  pR (0.1 nM). The binding of Esigma 70D61A to lambda  pR was indistinguishable from Esigma 70 as well as the functional mutants Esigma 70G52A and Esigma 70E57,58A (data not shown).

Addition of nucleoside triphosphates (NTPs) to open complexes allows progression to RPinit, which are stable to an 0.8 M NaCl wash (16, 21). The ability of NTPs to stabilize Esigma 70D61A-lambda pR open complexes was assessed. Esigma 70Delta 100, previously shown to be defective in RPinit formation (24), was compared for reference. Under low-stringency wash conditions (0.1 M NaCl), at 2 and 30 min after adding holoenzyme to DNA, each Esigma 70 derivative bound to lambda  pR as well as the wild type (Fig. 3). Under high-stringency wash conditions (0.8 M NaCl), the Esigma 70E57,58A complexes were retained as well as the wild type. Interestingly, the Esigma 70G52A complexes were less stable than Esigma 70, but this mutant was still able to complement in vivo. Esigma 70D61A-lambda pR complexes were unstable at 2 min, but by 30 min they were indistinguishable from Esigma 70, indicating a slower rate of RPinit formation.


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.   Stability of initiated complexes. Nitrocellulose filter retention under low (0.1 M NaCl)- and high (0.8 M NaCl)-stringency wash conditions is shown. The fraction of mutant complexes retained is normalized to the fraction of wild-type (WT) complexes retained after allowing formation for 2 and 30 min following mixing of RNA polymerase with DNA. Amino acid substitutions are indicated.

Impaired run-off transcription, combined with the slow rate of RPinit formation by Esigma 70D61A, could be caused by difficulty in open complex formation. KMnO4 footprinting analysis was performed to assess the ability of Esigma 70D61A to form open complexes (24). Strand melting for Esigma 70D61A occurred as efficiently as for Esigma 70 in the absence and presence of NTPs, even at the times when RPinit formation was impaired (data not shown). Open complex formation by Esigma 70G52A was also examined, since the RPinit were slightly less stable than they were for Esigma 70, but no differences relative to Esigma 70 were detected.

In summary, the D61A mutation renders sigma 70 nonfunctional in vivo and functionally and structurally thermolabile in vitro, manifested in a slow rate of RPinit formation. Alanine substitution at acidic residues 57, 58, 63, 64, and 69 has no effect on sigma 70 function in vivo or in vitro. Therefore, acidity of region 1.1 is not a major contributing factor to the initiation properties of sigma 70, but amino acids, including D61, are very important for structural stability.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by National Institutes of Health grant GM 56453.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, The University of Texas Health Science Center, 6431 Fannin JFB1.765, Houston, TX 77030. Phone: (713) 500-5442. Fax: (713) 500-5499. E-mail: dombros{at}utmmg.med.uth.tmc.edu.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Daniels, D., R. Zuber, and R. Losick. 1990. Two amino acids in an RNA polymerase sigma  factor involved in recognition of adjacent base pairs in the -10 region of a cognate promoter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:8075-8079[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2. deHaseth, P. L., M. L. Zupanic, and M. T. Record, Jr. 1998. RNA polymerase-promoter interactions: the comings and goings of RNA polymerase. J. Bacteriol. 180:3019-3025[Free Full Text].
3. Dombroski, A. J., W. A. Walter, M. T. Record, Jr., D. A. Siegele, and C. A. Gross. 1992. Polypeptides containing highly conserved regions of transcription initiation factor sigma 70 exhibit specificity of binding to promoter DNA. Cell 70:501-512[CrossRef][Medline].
4. Gardella, T., H. Moyle, and M. M. Susskind. 1989. A mutant Escherichia coli sigma 70 subunit of RNA polymerase with altered promoter specificity. J. Mol. Biol. 206:579-590[CrossRef][Medline].
5. Gopal, V., and D. Chatterji. 1997. Mutations in the 1.1 subdomain of Escherichia coli sigma factor sigma 70 and disruption of its overall structure. Eur. J. Biochem. 244:613-618[Medline].
6. Hinkle, D. C., and M. J. Chamberlin. 1972. Studies of the binding of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase to DNA. I. The role of the sigma subunit in site selection. J. Mol. Biol. 70:157-185[CrossRef][Medline].
7. Hinkle, D. C., and M. J. Chamberlin. 1972. Studies of the binding of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase to DNA. II. Kinetics of the binding reaction. J. Mol. Biol. 70:187-195[CrossRef][Medline].
8. Huang, X., F. J. Lopez de Saro, and J. D. Helmann. 1997. sigma factor mutations affecting the sequence-selective interaction of RNA polymerase with -10 region single-stranded DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:2603-2609[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9. Juang, Y., and J. D. Helmann. 1994. A promoter melting region in the primary sigma  factor of Bacillus subtilis. J. Mol. Biol. 235:1470-1488[CrossRef][Medline].
10. Kunkel, T. A., J. D. Roberts, and R. A. Zakour. 1987. Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Methods Enzymol. 154:367-382[Medline].
11. Lonetto, M. A., V. Rhodius, K. Lamberg, P. Kiley, S. Busby, and C. Gross. 1998. Identification of a contact site for different transcriptional activators in region 4 of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase sigma 70 subunit. J. Mol. Biol. 284:1353-1365[CrossRef][Medline].
12. Losick, R., and J. Pero. 1981. Cascades of sigma factors. Cell 25:582-584[CrossRef][Medline].
13. Marr, M. T., and J. W. Roberts. 1997. Promoter recognition as measured by binding of polymerase to nontemplate strand oligonucleotide. Science 276:1258-1260[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14. Record, M. T., Jr., W. S. Reznikoff, M. L. Craig, K. L. McQuade, and P. J. Schlax. 1996. Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (Esigma 70), promoters, and the kinetics of the steps of transcription initiation, p. 792-820. In F. C. Neidhardt, R. Curtiss III, J. L. Ingraham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, W. S. Reznikoff, M. Riley, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed., vol. 1. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
15. Roberts, C. W., and J. W. Roberts. 1996. Base-specific recognition of the nontemplate strand of promoter DNA by E. coli RNA polymerase. Cell 86:495-501[CrossRef][Medline].
16. Roe, J., R. R. Burgess, and M. T. Record, Jr. 1984. Kinetics and mechanism of the interaction of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase with the lambda PR promoter. J. Mol. Biol. 176:495-521[CrossRef][Medline].
17. Rong, J. C., and J. D. Helmann. 1994. Genetic and physiological studies of Bacillus subtilis sigma A mutants defective in promoter melting. J. Bacteriol. 176:5218-5224[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18. Siegele, D. A., J. C. Hu, W. A. Walter, and C. A. Gross. 1989. Altered promoter recognition by mutant forms of the sigma 70 subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. J. Mol. Biol. 206:591-603[CrossRef][Medline].
19. Strauss, H. S., R. R. Burgess, and M. T. Record, Jr. 1980. Binding of Escherichia coli ribonucleic acid polymerase holoenzyme to a bacteriophage T7 promoter-containing fragment: evaluation of promoter binding constants as a function of solution conditions. Biochemistry 19:3504-3515[CrossRef][Medline].
20. Strauss, H. S., R. R. Burgess, and M. T. Record, Jr. 1980. Binding of Escherichia coli ribonucleic acid polymerase holoenzyme to a bacteriophage T7 promoter-containing fragment: selectivity exists over a wide range of solution conditions. Biochemistry 19:3496-3504[CrossRef][Medline].
21. Taylor, W. E., and R. R. Burgess. 1979. Escherichia coli RNA polymerase binding and initiation of transcription on fragments of lambda rifd 18 DNA containing promoters for lambda  genes and for rrnB, tufB, rplK,A, rplJ,L, and rpoB,C genes. Gene 6:331-365[CrossRef][Medline].
22. Travers, A. A., and R. R. Burgess. 1969. Cyclic re-use of the RNA polymerase sigma factor. Nature (London) 222:537-540[CrossRef][Medline].
23. Waldburger, C., T. Gardella, R. Wong, and M. M. Susskind. 1990. Changes in conserved region 2 of Escherichia coli sigma 70 affecting promoter recognition. J. Mol. Biol. 215:267-276[CrossRef][Medline].
24. Wilson, C., and A. J. Dombroski. 1997. Region 1 of sigma 70 is required for efficient isomerization and initiation of transcription by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. J. Mol. Biol. 267:60-74[CrossRef][Medline].
25. Wilson Bowers, C., and A. J. Dombroski. 1999. A mutation in region 1.1 of sigma 70 affects promoter DNA binding by E. coli RNA polymerase holoenzyme. EMBO J. 18:101-108.
26. Zuber, P., J. Healy, H. L. Carter III, S. Cutting, C. P. Moran, Jr., and R. Losick. 1989. Mutation changing the specificity of an RNA polymerase sigma factor. J. Mol. Biol. 206:605-614[CrossRef][Medline].


Journal of Bacteriology, January 2000, p. 221-224, Vol. 182, No. 1
0021-9193/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Gowrishankar, J., Yamamoto, K., Subbarayan, P. R., Ishihama, A. (2003). In Vitro Properties of RpoS ({sigma}S) Mutants of Escherichia coli with Postulated N-Terminal Subregion 1.1 or C-Terminal Region 4 Deleted. J. Bacteriol. 185: 2673-2679 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Givens, J. R., McGovern, C. L., Dombroski, A. J. (2001). Formation of Intermediate Transcription Initiation Complexes at pfliD and pflgM by {sigma}28 RNA Polymerase. J. Bacteriol. 183: 6244-6252 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Southern, E., Merrick, M. (2000). The role of Region II in the RNA polymerase {sigma} factor {sigma}N ({sigma}54). Nucleic Acids Res 28: 2563-2570 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bowers, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Dombroski, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bowers, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Dombroski, A. J.