Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, May 2000, p. 2778-2786, Vol. 182, No. 10
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Transcriptional Control of Expression of Genes for Photosynthetic
Reaction Center and Light-Harvesting Proteins in the Purple Bacterium
Rhodovulum sulfidophilum
Shinji
Masuda,*
Kenji
V. P.
Nagashima,
Keizo
Shimada, and
Katsumi
Matsuura
Department of Biology, Tokyo Metropolitan
University, Minamiohsawa, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan
Received 8 December 1999/Accepted 29 February 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The purple photosynthetic bacterium Rhodovulum
sulfidophilum synthesizes photosynthetic apparatus even under
highly aerated conditions in the dark. To understand the
oxygen-independent expression of photosynthetic genes, the expression
of the puf operon coding for the light-harvesting 1 and
reaction center proteins was analyzed. Northern blot hybridization
analysis showed that puf mRNA synthesis was not
significantly repressed by oxygen in this bacterium. High-resolution 5'
mapping of the puf mRNA transcriptional initiation sites
and DNA sequence analysis of the puf upstream regulatory
region indicated that there are three possible promoters for the
puf operon expression, two of which have a high degree of
sequence similarity with those of Rhodobacter capsulatus,
which shows a high level of oxygen repression of photosystem synthesis.
Deletion analysis showed that the third promoter is oxygen independent,
but the activity of this promoter was not enough to explain the aerobic
level of mRNA. The posttranscriptional puf mRNA degradation
is not significantly influenced by oxygen in R. sulfidophilum. From these results, we conclude that
puf operon expression in R. sulfidophilum is weakly repressed by oxygen, perhaps as a result of the following: (i)
there are three promoters for puf operon transcription, at least one of which is oxygen independent; (ii) readthrough transcripts which may not be affected by oxygen may be significant in maintaining the puf mRNA levels; and (iii) the puf mRNA is
fairly stable even under aerobic conditions.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The purple photosynthetic bacterium
Rhodovulum sulfidophilum is a marine bacterium that can grow
by either photosynthesis or respiration on a wide range of organic
compounds (20). Like those of other purple bacteria, the
photosynthetic apparatus of R. sulfidophilum is composed of
three membrane-spanning pigment protein complexes known as the reaction
center (RC) and the light-harvesting 1 and 2 complexes (LH1 and LH2,
respectively). The light energy captured by LH1 and LH2 is transferred
to the RC, where the primary photochemical reaction takes place. The RC
complexes of most purple bacteria are known to consist of at least L,
M, and H subunits. The light-harvesting complexes are composed of two
membrane-spanning polypeptides,
and
subunits, which bind
bacteriochlorophylls (BChls) and carotenoids (13, 15, 48).
It is known that these proteins are encoded by three operons: the
puf operon, which encodes the LH1
and
polypeptides
and the RC-L and -M polypeptides; the puc operon, which
encodes the LH2
and
polypeptides; and the puh
operon, which encodes RC-H polypeptide (9, 26, 44, 46, 47).
Some purple bacteria have a pufC gene in the puf operon that encodes an RC-bound cytochrome subunit with four
c-type hemes. Recently, we sequenced the whole
puf operon of R. sulfidophilum and showed that
this bacterium has a pufC gene in the puf operon encoding a unique cytochrome subunit that contains only three possible
heme-binding sites (30).
In some purple bacteria such as Rhodobacter species, the
synthesis of the photosynthetic apparatus is regulated by oxygen concentration and light intensity. Many studies using Rhodobacter capsulatus and Rhodobacter sphaeroides have
demonstrated that photosystem synthesis is controlled at a number of
different levels in the cells (2-4, 11, 15, 24, 34, 45).
Much of the environmental regulation appears to be exerted at the level
of photosynthesis gene transcription (2, 3, 34, 45). The importance of the posttranscriptional mRNA degradative processes and
posttranslational effects in determining final levels of membrane-bound photosynthetic apparatus has also been reported (15, 24). In
contrast to Rhodobacter species, R. sulfidophilum
synthesizes the photosynthetic apparatus even under highly aerated
conditions in the dark (14). A study of the puc
operon of R. sulfidophilum showed that puc mRNA
synthesis is weakly repressed by oxygen but markedly suppressed by
high-intensity light (19). This is distinctly different from
the results shown for the Rhodobacter species, which show a
high degree of repression by oxygen and a weak repression by light
(2, 3).
The RegA-RegB two-component regulatory system was identified as a
transcriptional factor that anaerobically activates the expression of
the puf, puc, and puh operons in
R. capsulatus (31, 37). Genes homologous to
regA and regB were also found in R. sphaeroides and named prrA and prrB,
respectively (17, 36). Recently, we have found and
characterized the RegA-RegB regulatory system in R. sulfidophilum and showed that it controls the photosynthetic gene
expression in this bacterium (29), as it does in R. capsulatus (37). We also demonstrated that the
species-dependent difference in the repression of photosynthetic gene
expression under aerobic conditions is not the result of altered redox
sensing by the sensor kinase protein, RegB (29). These
observations suggested the presence of another redox-responding protein
that affects the RegB activity.
To date, high-resolution mRNA mapping for the identification of
transcription initiation sites in combination with detailed promoter
deletion studies for the puf operon has been undertaken only
with Rhodobacter species, although the location of the 5' ends of puf mRNA has been reported for several purple
bacteria (1, 5, 6, 12, 22, 27, 32, 33, 41). Genetic analyses
of the puf operon promoter from R. capsulatus
have indicated that transcription initiation sites and a
cis-acting regulatory site involved in oxygen and light
control of promoter activity are located far upstream from the 5' end
of the stable puf mRNA (1, 5). Our previous study
showed that R. sulfidophilum has a pufQ gene as
the first gene of the operon, as in R. capsulatus, and that
the DNA sequences upstream of the operons of R. sulfidophilum and R. capsulatus showed high similarity
(30). Thus, comparative studies of the R. sulfidophilum puf operon promoter would be useful for
understanding the molecular basis of the regulation of puf operon expression with respect to the oxygen-independent synthesis of
the photosynthetic apparatus in this bacterium.
In this study, we identified and characterized the R. sulfidophilum puf operon promoters. The results suggest that the
R. sulfidophilum puf operon has three possible transcription
initiation sites, one of which is oxygen and regA
independent. The promoter region was compared with that of the R. capsulatus puf promoter.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains and cultures.
The bacterial strains and
plasmids used in this study are listed in Table
1. R. capsulatus was
anaerobically grown at 30°C in 30-ml screw-cap bottles filled with
RCV medium (39). Wild-type R. sulfidophilum W4
and the regA-disrupted strain RESA1 were grown under the
same conditions as R. capsulatus in RCV medium supplemented with 0.35 M sodium chloride. Aerobic growth of R. capsulatus
and R. sulfidophilum was achieved by shaking a 10-ml culture
in a 100-ml conical flask at 200 rpm. Illumination was provided by 60-W
tungsten lamps. Escherichia coli strains DH5
and S17-1
were grown at 37°C in Luria-Bertani medium. Antibiotics were added at
the final concentrations given: to E. coli cultures,
ampicillin (100 µg/ml) or tetracycline (20 µg/ml), and to R. sulfidophilum cultures, kanamycin (50 µg/ml) or streptomycin (20 µg/ml), where necessary.
Conjugation techniques.
The pCF1010-derived plasmids were
mobilized into R. sulfidophilum cells by conjugation with
the mobilizing strain E. coli S17-1 (38).
Plasmid construction.
The plasmid pCF1010 (28)
was used to make transcriptional fusions of the R. sulfidophilum
puf operon promoter region to a promoterless lacZ gene
including a ribosome-binding site. First, a 2,580-bp
EcoRI-BamHI fragment containing pufQ,
pufB, pufA, and part of pufL as well
as 1,073 bp upstream of pufQ was cut out from the plasmid
pUFS101 (30) and cloned into
EcoRI/BamHI-cut pUC119, resulting in pUFS001.
This plasmid has a unique XbaI site just downstream of the
BamHI site (in the polycloning site). DNA fragments digested
by HincII-XbaI, NruI-XbaI,
SmaI-XbaI, and BalI-XbaI from pUFS001 (see Fig. 3) were cloned into
StuI/XbaI-cut pCF1010 to construct the
puf-lacZ fusions named pPS001, pPS002, pPS003, and pPS005,
respectively. A PstI-XbaI fragment from pUFS001
was cloned into PstI/XbaI-cut pCF1010 to
construct pPS004. A HincII-BalI fragment from
pUFS001 was cloned into StuI-cut pCF1010 and named pPS100.
For the construction of pPS200 and pPS300, two DNA fragments were
amplified by PCR using pUFS001 as a template DNA. The fragments were amplified by the combination of forward primer M13-F
(5'-CGACGTTGTAAAACGACGGCCAGT-3') and reverse primer
Z1200RXbaI (5'-TTTCTAGACCGAGCGGCAGGATATGAG-3') and forward primer M13-F and reverse primer Z940RXbaI
(5'-TTTCTAGAGCAAAGGCGCAGGGCAGCC-3'). Both
Z940RXbaI and Z1200RXbaI primers have additional polynucleotides at the
5' ends to give the XbaI sites in the fragments
(underlined). The DNA fragments amplified by M13-F and Z1200RXbaI
primers and M13-F and Z940RXbaI primers were digested with
HincII and XbaI and then ligated into the
StuI/XbaI-cut pCF1010, resulting in pPS200 and
pPS300, respectively. The sequence accuracy of the amplified fragments
was confirmed by sequencing using a 310A Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems).
-Galactosidase assays.
Cell extracts were prepared from
10-ml cultures showing an optical density of 0.5 to 0.6 at 660 nm, and
the
-galactosidase activity of the extracts was determined as
described by Young et al. (43). Protein content
determination was performed with a Bradford assay kit (Bio-Rad
Laboratories). Final results were obtained as the amount of
o-nitrophenyl-
-galactoside (ONPG) hydrolyzed per minute
per milligram of total protein. Results are the averages based on at
least three independent assays.
Northern hybridization analysis.
Total RNA of R. sulfidophilum and R. capsulatus cells grown till the
logarithmic growth phase, showing an optical density of 0.5 to 0.6 at
660 nm, was extracted using an RNeasy kit (Qiagen). The total amounts
of RNA obtained from the same amounts of the cells estimated from the
optical density varied by less than 15% among the various conditions.
Electrophoresis of the total RNA was performed in 1.0% agarose gels
containing formaldehyde (40 mM MOPS [morpholinepropanesulfonic acid],
10 mM sodium acetate, 1 mM EDTA, and 2.2 M formaldehyde, pH 7.0). After
electrophoresis, the RNA was transferred to positively charged nylon
membranes (Boehringer Mannheim) or a Hybond-N+ positively charged nylon membrane (Amersham). Four probes were used (probes A, B, C, and D,
shown in Fig. 1a). Probe A is a PCR product amplified with forward
primer ZENDF (5'-AGAGGGAGCTCGCATGT-3') and reverse primer L350R (5'-CCGGGTTTGTAGTGGAA-3') from cell lysates of
R. sulfidophilum or R. capsulatus as described
previously (30). Probe B is a 1.2-kb DNA fragment excised
from pUFS101 by ApaI endonuclease. Probe C is a PCR product
amplified with forward primer Z0F (5'-CGGAGTTCATGGTCTATT-3') and reverse primer B140R (5'-CCACGGGCGCCACTGCCA-3')
using pUFS001 as a template DNA. Probe D is a PCR product
amplified with forward primer Z590F (5'-CCATGTCGCCGAGATGCG-3')
and reverse primer Z0R (5'-AATAGACCATGAACTCCG-3')
using pUFS001 as a template DNA. These DNA fragments were labeled
with digoxigenin-dUTP as instructed by the manufacturer (Boehringer
Mannheim). Probe A of R. sulfidophilum and R. capsulatus was also labeled with [
-32P]dCTP using
a Random Primer DNA labeling kit (Takara). RNA Molecular Weight Marker
I (Boehringer Mannheim) was used as a molecular weight standard in some
cases. Hybridization was carried out with DIG Easy Hyb Granules
(Boehringer Mannheim) at 50°C for over 12 h. After
hybridization, the membrane was washed twice with 2× SSC (20× SSC is
3 M sodium chloride and 0.3 M sodium citrate, pH 7.0) and 0.1% sodium
dodecyl sulfate (SDS) for 5 min at room temperature and twice with
0.1× SSC and 0.1% SDS for 15 min at 65°C. For quantification of the
radiolabeled bands, a BAS 2000 photoimaging system (Fuji film) was used.
Half-life measurement of puf mRNA by Northern blot
analysis.
Cells of R. sulfidophilum were grown till the
logarithmic growth phase, showing an optical density of 0.5 to 0.6 at
660 nm. Then, rifampin was added to the cultures (500 µg/ml), and
cells were collected at various time points. Total RNA was isolated with an RNeasy kit. Total RNA (3 µg per lane) was electrophoresed on
1.0% formaldehyde agarose gels and transferred to a Hybond-N+ positively charged nylon membrane. Probe C was used as a
puf-specific DNA probe (see "Northern hybridization
analysis" and Fig. 1a). The probe was labeled with
[
-32P]dCTP using a Random Primer DNA labeling kit.
DNA-RNA hybridization was carried out with DIG Easy Hyb at 50°C as
instructed by the manufacturer. After hybridization, the membrane was
washed twice with 2× SSC and 0.1% SDS for 5 min at room temperature
and twice with 0.1× SSC and 0.1% SDS for 15 min at 65°C. For
half-life measurement, the radiolabeled bands were quantified using a
BAS 2000 photoimaging system.
Primer extension experiment.
Total RNA of R. sulfidophilum grown till the logarithmic growth phase, showing an
optical density of 0.5 to 0.6 at 660 nm, was extracted with an RNeasy
kit from aerobically and photosynthetically grown cells. Primers used
in this experiment were Z1100R
(5'-GTCGAGCAGTG CCTGGGCGTCCTC-3'), Z0R
(5'-AATAGACCATGAACTCCG-3'), and AENDR
(5'-TCATGGGCGTGATGATCC-3') (nucleotide numbers of the 5'
ends of the primers in the sequence with GenBank accession no. AB020784
are 975, 1218, and 1353, respectively). These primers were labeled at
the 5' end with [
-32P]ATP using a DNA MEGALABEL
labeling kit (Takara). To determine the 5' end of the puf
operon mRNA, a mixture containing 20 µg of RNA, 50 mM Tris
hydrochloride (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, and 0.5 pmol of primer in a final volume of 50 µl was incubated at 80°C for
2 min and then at 60°C for 45 min for DNA-RNA hybridization. Then,
four deoxynucleoside triphosphates (final concentration, 0.5 mM each)
and 20 U of reverse transcriptase (Rous-associated virus-2) were added
to the mixture, and the primer extension reaction proceeded at 42°C
for 1 h. The DNA synthesized was extracted with phenol-chloroform
(1:1), precipitated with ethanol, and suspended in Tris-EDTA buffer.
DNA was electrophoresed on a 6% polyacrylamide gel containing 8 M urea
with a sequencing ladder, using the same DNA primers. Sequencing gels
were dried and exposed to film with an intensifying screen at
80°C.
Measurement of BChl content.
Membranes were obtained by
sonicating cells grown until mid-logarithmic phase, showing an optical
density of 0.5 to 0.6 at 660 nm, followed by differential
ultracentrifugation as described previously (30). BChl
contents in the membranes were determined using acetone-methanol (7:2)
extract as described previously (10). Membrane protein
content was determined with a Lowry assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories).
Then, the relative values of BChl content per membrane protein in each
sample were calculated.
Materials.
Restriction endonucleases and reverse
transcriptase were purchased from Takara. Synthetic oligonucleotide
primers were purchased from Life Technologies, Inc.
[
-32P]ATP and [
-32P]dCTP were
purchased from Amersham.
 |
RESULTS |
Northern blot analysis.
Figure
1a shows the structure of the R. sulfidophilum puf operon, which consists of six puf
genes, pufQ, -B, -A, -L,
-M, and -C (30). The puf
operon transcripts were analyzed by Northern blot hybridization with
the four puf-specific probes (probes A to D). As shown in
Fig. 1b, probe A, corresponding to pufQBA and part of
pufL (Fig. 1a), was hybridized with a 0.5-kb mRNA and also
weakly with an approximately 3.5-kb mRNA. Probe B, corresponding to
pufC (Fig. 1a), was hybridized with the 3.5-kb mRNA but not with the 0.5-kb mRNA. These two bands were not detected with probe D,
which consisted mainly of the 3' end of bchZ and a small 5' segment of the pufQ gene, but they were detected with probe
C, which consisted of pufB and part of the pufQ
gene (Fig. 1b). The transcription of the puf operon appeared
to be terminated after pufC because the signal nucleotide
sequence for the typical Rho-independent transcriptional termination
was found downstream of the puf operon (30).
These observations indicated that the large transcript (3.5 kb) and the
small transcript (0.5 kb) in Fig. 1b encode pufBALMC and
pufBA, respectively. The small transcript (0.5 kb) was more abundant than the large transcript (3.5 kb). This difference may be a
factor that is thought to adjust the ratio of LH1 peptides to RC
proteins, as previously suggested for R. capsulatus (7, 25, 47).

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Physical map and expression of the puf operon
of R. sulfidophilum. (a) Gene arrangement of the R. sulfidophilum puf operon. The genes are indicated by open boxes:
Q, pufQ; B, pufB; A, pufA; L,
pufL; M, pufM; C, pufC. The positions
of putative hairpin structures are indicated by open circles. DNA
probes used in Northern hybridization experiments are indicated by
thick lines. (b) Northern hybridization analysis of mRNA transcripts
with four different specific probes for the R. sulfidophilum
puf operon. Total RNA was extracted from R. sulfidophilum grown under anaerobic light conditions. The
digoxigenin-dUTP-labeled probe A, probe B, probe C, and probe D were
used. The lengths of the standard RNAs are indicated on the left. (c)
Effects of oxygen and light on puf operon transcription in
R. sulfidophilum and R. capsulatus. Three
micrograms of total RNA isolated from cells grown under four different
conditions (LL-ANA, anaerobic low-intensity light [3
W/m2]; HL-ANA, anaerobic high-intensity light [100
W/m2]; DR-AER, aerobic dark; and HL-AER, aerobic
high-intensity light [100 W/m2]) was loaded on each lane.
Northern hybridization was performed with the 32P-labeled
probe A of R. sulfidophilum or R. capsulatus.
Ethidium bromide staining of 16S rRNA (lower panel, rRNA) was used to
confirm equivalent loading of total RNA.
|
|
To test the effects of oxygen and light on the expression of the
R. sulfidophilum puf operon, the levels of the two
puf mRNA transcripts were analyzed by Northern hybridization
under four different growth conditions (Fig. 1c). Total RNAs were
isolated from cells grown under anaerobic low-intensity-light (3 W/m2), anaerobic high-intensity-light (100 W/m2), aerobic dark, and aerobic high-intensity-light
(100 W/m2) conditions (LL-ANA, HL-ANA, DR-AER, and HL-AER,
respectively, in Fig. 1c). The analyses were also performed with
R. capsulatus (Fig. 1c). Because R. capsulatus
has a pufX instead of a pufC gene in the
puf operon (44), the large transcript of the
puf operon of R. capsulatus is shorter (2.7 kb)
than that of R. sulfidophilum (3.5 kb) (Fig. 1c) (46,
47). Quantitative values digitized by a photoimaging system are
shown in Table 2. The
puf-specific mRNAs were also monitored by dot blot
hybridization, and the results are identical to those of the Northern
hybridization analysis (standard deviations are <20%). Under
anaerobic conditions, the decrease in light intensity from 100 to 3 W/m2 resulted in increased levels of the puf
mRNA (about a 30 and 15% increase for the small and large transcripts,
respectively) in both R. sulfidophilum and R. capsulatus (Table 2). However, the relative levels of
puf mRNA under aerobic growth conditions were different
between these two species. In R. capsulatus, the relative
levels of the small and large transcripts were about 30 and 20% for
aerobic dark and aerobic high-intensity-light conditions, respectively,
and only a trace amount of photopigment was observed in such conditions
(Table 2). The results were in agreement with previous studies (7,
26, 46, 47) in the sense that not only photopigment synthesis but
also the cellular levels of puf mRNA were strongly affected
by oxygen. On the other hand, the relative level of puf mRNA
was about 85% for aerobic dark conditions in R. sulfidophilum (Table 2), which was consistent with the relative
BChl content in cells grown under the same conditions (84%) (Table 2).
Thus, in contrast to R. capsulatus, a high level of
puf mRNA was still maintained in R. sulfidophilum
even under aerobic conditions in the dark, although a significant
decrease was observed when high light was used under aerobic conditions (Table 2). The BChl content in R. sulfidophilum cells grown
under aerobic high-intensity-light conditions was 51% of that under anaerobic high-intensity-light conditions, whereas in R. capsulatus the relative BChl content was <1%, although both
species contain significant amounts of puf mRNA (~20 to
39%) (Table 2). This observation implies that regulation of BChl
synthesis differs in these two species.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2.
Effects of oxygen and light on puf mRNA
levels, pufQ- and pufL-lacZ expression, and
photopigment synthesisa
|
|
Primer extension analysis.
To determine the possible
transcription initiation site of the R. sulfidophilum puf
operon, we performed RNA 5'-end mapping by primer extension analysis.
The 32P-labeled primers (Z1100R, Z0R, and AENDR: see
Materials and Methods) were hybridized to the total RNA extracted from
cells grown under anaerobic light and aerobic dark conditions (Fig.
2,
and +, respectively). Using a Z0R
primer, two 5' ends of puf mRNA were observed. One had a
less intense signal corresponding to 11 bp downstream from the
pufQ start codon (pufP3), and the other showed a
more intense signal corresponding to 132 bp upstream from the pufQ start codon (pufP2) (Fig. 2B). Results
obtained with the AENDR primer also showed the presence of the two 5'
ends of the puf mRNA at the corresponding positions (data
not shown). A third 5' end of the puf mRNA was detected by
the Z1100R primer (pufP1) (Fig. 2A). This site was resolved
to a position much farther upstream (332 bp) from the pufQ
start codon. These 5' ends of puf mRNA are indicated in Fig.
3 as P1, P2, and P3. All three
transcripts were detected in both anaerobically and aerobically grown
cells, but the relative band intensity between the conditions was
different depending on the initiation sites.

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Primer extension mapping of the 5' end of puf
operon transcripts. Total cellular RNA isolated from R. sulfidophilum grown under aerobic dark conditions (+) and
anaerobic light conditions ( ) was hybridized with 5'-end-labeled
Z1100R primer (A) or Z0R primer (B) (see Materials and Methods). Lanes
G, A, T, and C show sequence ladders using the same synthetic primers.
The numbers of 5' and 3' ends shown in the nucleotide sequences are the
nucleotide numbering in the GenBank sequence with accession no.
AB020784.
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Deletion analysis of R. sulfidophilum puf
operon. 5' and 3' deletions were constructed by using DNA-restricted
and PCR-generated fragments (see Materials and Methods). These
deletions were fused to the lacZ gene to construct various
puf-lacZ transcriptional fusions. -Galactosidase
activities associated with the transcriptional fusions on plasmids
present in R. sulfidophilum cells were determined under
different growth conditions (LL-ANA, anaerobic low-intensity light [3
W/m2]; HL-ANA, anaerobic high-intensity light [100
W/m2]; DK-AER, aerobic dark; HL-AER, aerobic
high-intensity light [100 W/m2]). Values in parentheses
are the standard deviations of at least three independent assays. No
activity was detected for the sequence without insertion of the
lacZ fusion (vector only). The positions of three 5' ends of
puf mRNA determined in experiments in Fig. 2 are indicated
by arrows (P1, pufP1; P2, pufP2; P3,
pufP3).
|
|
Deletion analysis of the puf operon promoter.
In
order to analyze the R. sulfidophilum puf operon promoter, a
nested set of deletions was constructed in the region of DNA upstream
from the pufL gene. The deleted DNA fragments were cloned into the promoter testing vector, pCF1010 (28), to construct puf-lacZ transcriptional fusions (Fig. 3). These constructs
were introduced into R. sulfidophilum cells and assayed for
-galactosidase activity levels under anaerobic low-intensity-light
(3 W/m2), anaerobic high-intensity-light (100 W/m2), aerobic dark, and aerobic high-intensity-light (100 W/m2) conditions (LL-ANA, HL-ANA, DR-AER, and HL-AER,
respectively, in Fig. 3). The largest fragment, which extended from 584 bp upstream of pufP1 to pufL (pPS001), showed the
highest lacZ expression under anaerobic low-intensity-light
conditions.
-Galactosidase activity of the plasmid was reduced by
aeration and high-light illumination, suggesting that the
transcriptional activity assayed with this lacZ fusion was
repressed by oxygen and high-intensity light. High-light repression of
lacZ activity was more apparent under aerobic conditions
than under anaerobic conditions for this construct. Deletion of 303 and
540 bp from the 5' end of the largest fragment (pPS002 and pPS003,
respectively) resulted in different levels of lacZ activity.
A comparison of the activities with the largest fragment (pPS001)
indicates that the values were reduced under anaerobic low-light,
anaerobic high-light, and aerobic dark conditions (~30 to 50%) but
increased under aerobic high-light conditions (~280 to 480%).
The transcriptional activity was detected in the construct pPS004,
which contained one of the three 5' ends (pufP3). Removal of
all the sites of the mRNA 5' ends, yielding the construct pPS005, caused a very low level of lacZ expression (approximately
50-fold reduction relative to the most active fragment, pPS001).
Deletion of 1.4 kb from the 3' end of the largest fragment, yielding
the construct designated pPS100, resulted in reduced lacZ
activity (~25 to 60%) although the fragment contained the same 5'
end and all three sites of the mRNA 5' ends. The fragment of pPS200
containing only one of the three 5' ends (pufP1) showed
significant lacZ activity, but the removal of an additional
282 nucleotides with pufP1, yielding the plasmid pPS300,
caused no lacZ activity. The in vivo expression activities
observed with these vectors support the presence of at least two
possible promoters (pufP1 and pufP3) based on the
results of the primer extension analysis. The effect of light
intensities on lacZ activity in some constructs was the opposite under aerobic conditions from what it was under anaerobic conditions. The transcriptional activities of pufQ-lacZ
(pPS100) and pufL-lacZ (pPS001) under four different growth
conditions are summarized in Table 2 as values relative to those for
anaerobic high-light conditions. The relative BChl contents in cells
grown under four different growth conditions were in general agreement with the puf mRNA contents, although most of the BChl in the
membrane could be present in the puc-encoded LH2 complex.
However, the puf operon expression measured by the
pufQ- or pufL-lacZ transcriptional fusions was
not directly correlated with the BChl levels (Table 2). This may be due
to the lack of upstream sequences on these plasmid-borne fusions. A
readthrough transcription from the upstream region may be present in
the R. sulfidophilum puf operon (see Discussion).
Decay rate of puf mRNA in R. sulfidophilum.
In order to examine the posttranscriptional control of puf
operon expression in R. sulfidophilum, the half-lives of
both small (0.5-kb) and large (3.5-kb) puf transcripts were
determined under anaerobic and aerobic growth conditions by Northern
hybridization with the 32P-labeled probe C (Fig. 1a)
corresponding to pufB and part of the pufQ gene.
Results are shown in Fig. 4. The
half-lives of 3.5-kb puf mRNA were about 10 and 13 min in
aerobic and anaerobic conditions, respectively, whereas the half-lives
of 0.5-kb mRNA isolated from aerobically and anaerobically grown
cultures did not show a significant difference, with values of about 40 min. We also performed corresponding measurements with R. capsulatus (data not shown). The results obtained were similar to
those of the previous study, which showed that the half-lives of the
larger puf transcript (2.7 kb) were about 3 and 8 min in
aerobically and anaerobically grown cultures, respectively, and that
those of the smaller RNA (0.5 kb) were about 30 min under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions (23). The larger transcript was
degraded about twice as fast under aerobic conditions in R. capsulatus but only about 1.3 times faster under aerobic than
under anaerobic conditions in R. sulfidophilum. The
stability of puf mRNA was only weakly influenced by oxygen
tension in R. sulfidophilum.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
puf mRNA decay kinetics in R. sulfidophilum. Three micrograms of total RNA isolated from
rifampin-treated R. sulfidophilum cells grown under aerobic
dark and anaerobic light conditions was loaded on each lane.
Hybridization was performed with the 32P-labeled probe C
(Fig. 1a). The optical density of the bands was plotted against the
time of RNA isolation (squares, aerobic conditions; circles, anaerobic
conditions). The half-lives calculated from these blots for the 3.5-kb
mRNA were about 10 min under aerobic conditions (dashed line) and about
13 min under anaerobic conditions (solid line). For the 0.5-kb mRNA,
the half-lives were about 40 min under both aerobic conditions (dashed
line) and anaerobic conditions (solid line).
|
|
Influence of regA mutation on the control of
transcription of R. sulfidophilum puf operon.
We
previously constructed a regA deletion mutant (RESA1) from
R. sulfidophilum and showed that the RegA-RegB regulatory
cascade has an important role for the expression of photosynthesis
genes in this bacterium, as in the Rhodobacter species
(29). To test the effects of the regulatory mutant on the
promoter activity of puf operon in R. sulfidophilum, we assayed the
-galactosidase activity of
various puf-lacZ fusions in RESA1. As shown in Fig. 5, the effects of
-galactosidase
activity caused by regA mutation fell into three types. In
one type, the transcriptional pufL-lacZ fusions containing
all three promoters (pPS001, pPS002, and pPS003 [Fig. 3]) exhibited
nearly baseline levels of lacZ activity in RESA1 (Fig. 5A
for pPS001; data for pPS002 and pPS003 are not shown). In contrast, a
construct containing only the pufP3 promoter (pPS004 [Fig.
3]) retained the
-galactosidase activity in the regA
mutant as much as in the wild-type cells (Fig. 5B). The third type is a
pufQ-lacZ transcriptional fusion from which the 3' end was
deleted from a DNA fragment of pPS001 (pPS100 [Fig. 3]) and which
showed a low level of
-galactosidase activity even in the mutant
while still containing the same 5' end of pPS001 (16 and 28% of those
in wild-type cells under anaerobic and aerobic conditions, respectively
[Fig. 5C]).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Measurement of puf operon transcriptional
activity in wild-type (W.T.) and regA-disrupted R. sulfidophilum strains. Bars represent -galactosidase activities
associated with the puf-lacZ transcriptional fusions, pPS001
(A), pPS004 (B), and pPS100 (C) (Fig. 3), in cells grown under
anaerobic high-intensity light (100 W/m2)
( O2) or aerobic dark conditions (+O2). Data
for the wild type are taken from the results shown in Fig. 3. Units of
-galactosidase activity represent micromoles of ONPG hydrolyzed per
minute per milligram of total protein.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Three possible puf operon promoters in R. sulfidophilum.
In this study, the R. sulfidophilum puf
operon and its promoters were analyzed to clarify the mechanism of the
oxygen-independent expression of photosynthetic genes. Primer extension
analysis showed that there are three 5' ends of puf mRNA
(pufP1, pufP2, and pufP3 in Fig. 2).
By employing deletion analyses, two of the three 5' ends of
puf mRNA were mapped as the possible transcription initiation sites at positions 332 bp upstream and 11 bp downstream of
the pufQ start codon (pufP1 and pufP3,
respectively [Fig. 2 and 3]), because the deletion of
pufP1 or pufP3 from the inserted fragment of
lacZ fusions resulted in significant reduction of the
lacZ activity (Fig. 3). The other 5' end found in the primer extension analysis (pufP2; 132 bp upstream from
pufQ) was not directly supported as a transcription
initiation site by the deletion analysis because of the lack of
appropriate restriction sites. In R. capsulatus, two
puf transcription initiation sites have been reported and
mapped to positions 316 and 129 bp upstream of the pufQ
start codon. The nucleotide sequence alignment of puf operon
promoter regions of R. capsulatus and R. sulfidophilum revealed that the two puf transcription
initiation sites of R. capsulatus are located near the
corresponding sites of pufP1 and pufP2 of
R. sulfidophilum (separated by 9 and 4 bp, respectively) (data not shown) (1, 5). The regions are highly conserved between these two species, suggesting that the pufP2 of
R. sulfidophilum is also a transcription initiation site, as
in R. capsulatus.
Oxygen regulation on the puf operon expression in
R. sulfidophilum.
Northern blot hybridization experiments
showed that the mRNA levels of the R. sulfidophilum puf
operon were mostly maintained even under aerobic dark conditions (Fig.
1c), which was consistent with the relative BChl content in the cells
(Table 2). This observation is in contrast to that in the
Rhodobacter species (Fig. 1c) (7, 26, 46, 47),
indicating that the aerobic synthesis of the photosynthetic apparatus
in R. sulfidophilum seems to be mostly due to the
puf operon expression, which is weakly sensitive to oxygen
and regulated at the transcriptional level.
Deletion analysis showed that one of the possible promoters,
pufP3, was expressed independently of oxygen (Fig. 3,
pPS004). The activity of the promoter can contribute to the aerobic
expression of the puf operon. However, the activity of the
major promoter for the puf operon transcription located far
upstream from the pufB gene, pufP1, showed
fivefold-lower levels under aerobic dark than under anaerobic
high-intensity-light conditions (Fig. 3, pPS200). Probably, as a
result, the transcriptional activities of both pufQ-lacZ
(pPS100) and pufL-lacZ (pPS001) fusions were repressed by
oxygen by a factor of three when the activities were compared between
the aerobic dark and anaerobic high-intensity-light conditions (Table 2
and Fig. 3). On the other hand, only a 15% decrease in the amount of
mRNA was observed under aerobic dark conditions (Table 2). A similar
difference was also observed under aerobic high-intensity-light
conditions. The transcriptional pufQ-lacZ and
pufL-lacZ activities showed very low levels under such
conditions (2 and 7%, respectively, compared to values for anaerobic
high-intensity-light conditions) (Table 2). However, the amounts of the
two puf mRNA transcripts were 39 and 21% for the small and
large transcript, respectively, when those two growth conditions were
compared (Table 2). Thus, the puf-specific transcriptional activity does not directly reflect the level of puf mRNA
under aerobic growth conditions (Table 2). The transcriptional overlap (readthrough transcription) must be a factor causing the absence of
direct correlation between the level of chromosomally derived puf mRNA and transcriptional activity of DNA segments
inserted into the lacZ fusion plasmid. Since the stop codon
of bchZ overlaps the start codon of pufQ in
R. sulfidophilum (30) and the puf promoters (at least pufP1) are located in the
bchZ gene (Fig. 3), the readthrough should exist between the
transcription for bchZ and that for the puf
operon, as shown for R. capsulatus (40, 43).
Previous studies using R. capsulatus have shown that decay
of mRNA is an important factor in controlling puf operon
expression (1, 18, 21, 23, 24). In this study, we measured
the decay time of puf operon transcripts under aerobic and
anaerobic conditions. For R. sulfidophilum, the large
puf mRNA was less stable by a factor of 0.77 (Fig. 4) under
aerobic conditions than under anaerobic conditions. This number,
however, was 0.38 (data not shown) in R. capsulatus
(23). The difference in relative stability of this molecule
between the two bacterial species seems to contribute to the high
content of the puf mRNA under aerobic conditions in R. sulfidophilum. However, this contribution is not sufficient to
explain the higher content of puf mRNA than that expected
from the puf promoter activity (Table 2).
Light regulation of puf operon expression in R. sulfidophilum.
Light regulation of puf operon
expression is apparent under aerobic conditions in R. sulfidophilum (Fig. 1c and Table 2). pufQ- and
pufL-lacZ activities were highly repressed by high-intensity light under aerobic conditions (~6 to 20% of those under aerobic dark conditions). Similarly, high-light illumination also resulted in
lower levels of chromosomally derived puf mRNA under such
conditions (~24 to 45% of those under aerobic dark conditions).
Since the major fraction of puf mRNA seems to be derived
from the readthrough transcription under aerobic conditions as
discussed above, the readthrough activity may also be repressed to some
extent by high-intensity light under aerobic conditions.
The effect of light on the puf operon-specific promoters was
analyzed by deletion analysis, and the results were a little complicated. The strains containing pPS004 covering only
pufP3 showed the high-light repression under aerobic
conditions, whereas pPS200, covering only pufP1, and pPS003,
from which the 5' end of 540 bp was deleted from the largest fragment
(pPS001), did not exhibit the light repression (Fig. 3). Plasmid
pPS002, from which 303 bp was deleted from the 5' end of pPS001, showed
a unique phenotype in that high-intensity light activated the promoter activity under aerobic conditions (Fig. 3). These observations suggest
that there are several light-dependent cis regulatory sites
on the puf operon promoters. It was also suggested that the
HincII-NruI region (584 to 281 bp upstream from
the first transcription initiation site, respectively) is an important
regulatory site responsible not only for the elevation of the
puf operon transcription responding to anaerobiosis but also
for the light regulation of the puf operon expression (Fig.
3). Unidentified regulatory factors may bind to this region and
interact with RNA polymerase mediated by other protein factors.
RegA-RegB regulatory system for puf operon expression
in R. sulfidophilum.
As mentioned previously, two promoters
in the R. capsulatus puf operon have been reported. The
R. capsulatus upstream promoter corresponding to
pufP1 of R. sulfidophilum is highly expressed and
regulated (1, 5). It was recently reported that the response
regulator RegA binds to this promoter region (8, 16). It is
clear from puf-lacZ fusion analysis that RegA is involved in
activating puf operon transcription in R. sulfidophilum through association with the upstream region of the
PstI site located between pufP1 and
pufP3 (Fig. 5A and B). The promoter activity of
pufP1 may be regulated by the RegA-RegB regulatory system in R. sulfidophilum, as in R. capsulatus (8,
16).
Comparison of activities obtained with pPS100 with those of pPS001
indicates that deletion of the BalI-BamHI region
located between pufQ and pufL (Fig. 3) resulted
in reduced lacZ activity (~25 to 60%) although the
fragment contained the same 5' end and all possible promoters. In
addition, deletion of this region recovered some puf operon
transcriptional activity in a regA mutant (Fig. 5A and C),
suggesting that the region has a possible cis site which is
involved in the transcriptional control of puf operon expression by the RegA-RegB regulatory system. Further genetic characterization of the R. sulfidophilum puf operon should
be useful in clarifying the details of the control mechanisms of puf operon expression in purple bacteria.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Alastair G. McEwan and Anthony L. Shaw (University of
Queensland) for generous provision of materials.
This work was supported in part by grants from the Ministry of
Education, Science, and Culture of Japan and a special grant (1999)
from Tokyo Metropolitan University.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Biology, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Minamiohsawa, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan. Phone: 81-426-77-2582. Fax: 81-426-77-2559. E-mail: masuda-shinji{at}c.metro-u.ac.jp.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Adams, C. W.,
M. E. Forrest,
S. N. Cohen, and J. T. Beatty.
1989.
Structural and functional analysis of transcriptional control of the Rhodobacter capsulatus puf operon.
J. Bacteriol.
171:473-482[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Bauer, C. E.
1995.
Regulation of photosynthesis gene expression, p. 1221-1234.
In
R. E. Blankenship, M. T. Madigan, and C. E. Bauer (ed.), Anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
|
| 3.
|
Bauer, C. E., and T. H. Bird.
1996.
Regulatory circuits controlling photosynthesis gene expression.
Cell
85:5-8[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Bauer, C. E.,
J. Buggy, and C. Mosley.
1993.
Control of photosystem genes in Rhodobacter capsulatus.
Trends Genet.
9:56-60[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Bauer, C. E.,
D. A. Young, and B. L. Marrs.
1988.
Analysis of the Rhodobacter capsulatus puf operon.
J. Biol. Chem.
263:4820-4827[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Belanger, G., and G. Gingras.
1988.
Structure and expression of the puf operon messenger RNA in Rhodospirillum rubrum.
J. Biol. Chem.
263:7639-7645[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Belasco, J. G.,
T. J. Beatty,
C. W. Adams,
A. Von Gabain, and S. N. Cohen.
1985.
Differential expression of photosynthesis genes in R. capsulatus results from segmental differences in stability within the polycistronic rxcA transcript.
Cell
40:171-181[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Bowman, W. C.,
S. Du,
C. E. Bauer, and R. G. Kranz.
1999.
In vitro activation and repression of photosynthesis gene expression in Rhodobacter capsulatus.
Mol. Microbiol.
33:429-437[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Clark, W. G.,
E. Davidson, and B. L. Marrs.
1984.
Variation of levels of mRNA coding for antenna and reaction center polypeptides in Rhodopseudomonas capsulata in response to changes in oxygen concentration.
J. Bacteriol.
157:945-948[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Clayton, R. K.
1966.
Spectroscopic analysis of bacteriochlorophylls in vitro and in vivo.
Photochem. Photobiol.
5:669-677.
|
| 11.
|
Cohen-Bazire, G.,
W. R. Sistrom, and R. Y. Stanier.
1957.
Kinetic studies of pigment synthesis by non-sulfur purple photosynthetic bacteria.
J. Cell Comp. Physiol.
49:25-68.
|
| 12.
|
DeHoff, B. S.,
J. K. Lee,
T. J. Donohue,
R. I. Gumport, and S. Kaplan.
1988.
In vivo analysis of puf operon expression in Rhodobacter sphaeroides following deletion of a putative inter-cistronic terminator.
J. Bacteriol.
170:4681-4692[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Deisenhofer, J.,
O. Epp,
K. Miki,
R. Huber, and H. Michel.
1985.
Structure of the protein subunit in the photosynthetic reaction centre of Rhodopseudomonas viridis at 3A resolution.
Nature
318:618-624[CrossRef].
|
| 14.
|
Doi, M.,
Y. Shioi,
N. Gad'on,
J. R. Golecki, and G. Drews.
1991.
Spectroscopical studies on the light-harvesting pigment-protein complex II from dark-aerobic and light-anaerobic grown cells of Rhodobacter sulfidophilus.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1058:235-241[CrossRef].
|
| 15.
|
Drews, G., and R. J. Golecki.
1995.
Structure, molecular organization, and biosynthesis of membranes of purple bacteria, P. 231-257.
In
R. E. Blankenship, M. T. Madigan, and C. E. Bauer (ed.), Anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
|
| 16.
|
Du, S.,
T. H. Bird, and C. E. Bauer.
1998.
DNA-binding characteristics of RegA*: a constitutively active anaerobic activator of photosynthesis gene expression in Rhodobacter capsulatus.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:18509-18513[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Eraso, J. M., and S. Kaplan.
1994.
prrA, a putative response regulator involved in oxygen regulation of photosynthesis gene expression in Rhodobacter sphaeroides.
J. Bacteriol.
176:32-43[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Fritsch, J.,
R. Rothfuchs,
R. Rauhut, and G. Klug.
1995.
Identification of an mRNA element promoting rate-limiting cleavage of the polycistronic puf mRNA in Rhodobacter capsulatus by an enzyme similar to RNase E.
Mol. Microbiol.
15:1017-1029[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Hagemann, G. E.,
E. K. Katsiou,
H. Forkl,
A. C. J. Steindorf, and M. H. Tadros.
1997.
Gene cloning and regulation of gene expression of the puc operon from Rhodovulum sulfidophilum.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1351:341-358[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Hansen, T. A., and H. Veldkamp.
1973.
Rhodopseudomonas sulfidophila, nov. spec., a new species of the purple nonsulfur bacteria.
Arch. Mikrobiol.
92:45-58[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Heck, C.,
R. Rothfuchs,
A. Jager,
R. Rauhut, and G. Klug.
1996.
Effect of the pufQ-pufB intercistronic region on puf mRNA stability in Rhodobacter capsulatus.
Mol. Microbiol.
20:1165-1178[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Hunter, C. N.,
P. McGlynn,
M. K. Ashby,
J. G. Burgess, and J. D. Olsen.
1991.
DNA sequencing and complementation/deletion analysis of the bchCA-puf operon region of Rhodobacter sphaeroides: in vivo mapping of the oxygen-regulated puf promoter.
Mol. Microbiol.
5:2649-2661[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Klug, G.
1991.
Endnucleolytic degradation of puf mRNA in Rhodobacter capsulatus is influenced by oxygen.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:1765-1769[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Klug, G.
1995.
Post-transcriptional control of photosynthesis gene expression, p. 1235-1244.
In
R. E. Blankenship, M. T. Madigan, and C. E. Bauer (ed.), Anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
|
| 25.
|
Klug, G.,
C. W. Adams,
J. Belasco,
B. Doerge, and S. N. Cohen.
1987.
Biological consequences of segmental alterations in mRNA stability: effects of deletion of the inter-cistronic hairpin loop region of Rhodobacter capsulatus puf operon.
EMBO J.
6:3515-3520[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Klug, G.,
N. Kaufmann, and G. Drews.
1985.
Gene expression of pigment-binding proteins of the bacterial photosynthetic apparatus: transcription and assembly in the membrane of Rhodopseudomonas capsulata.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
82:6485-6489[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Lee, J. K.,
B. S. DeHoff,
T. J. Donohue,
R. I. Gumport, and S. Kaplan.
1989.
Transcriptional analysis of puf operon expression in Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1 and an intercistronic transcription terminator mutant.
J. Biol. Chem.
264:19354-19365[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Lee, J. K., and S. Kaplan.
1995.
Transcriptional regulation of puc operon expression in Rhodobacter sphaeroides.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:20453-20458[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Masuda, S.,
Y. Matsumoto,
K. V. P. Nagashima,
K. Shimada,
K. Inoue,
C. E. Bauer, and K. Matsuura.
1999.
Structural and functional analyses of photosynthetic regulatory genes regA and regB from Rhodovulum sulfidophilum, Roseobacter denitrificans, and Rhodobacter capsulatus.
J. Bacteriol.
181:4205-4215[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Masuda, S.,
M. Yoshida,
K. V. P. Nagashima,
K. Shimada, and K. Matsuura.
1999.
A new cytochrome subunit bound to the photosynthetic reaction center in the purple bacterium, Rhodovulum sulfidophilum.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:10795-10801[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Mosley, C. S.,
J. Y. Suzuki, and C. E. Bauer.
1994.
Identification and molecular genetic characterization of a sensor kinase responsible for coordinately regulating light harvesting and reaction center gene expression in anaerobiosis.
J. Bacteriol.
176:7566-7573[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Nagashima, K. V. P.,
K. Matsuura,
S. Ohyama, and K. Shimada.
1994.
Primary structure and transcription of genes encoding B870 and photosynthetic reaction center apoproteins from Rubrivivax gelatinosus.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:2477-2484[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Nishimura, K.,
H. Shimada,
H. Ohta,
T. Masuda,
Y. Shioi, and K. Takamiya.
1996.
Expression of the puf operon in an aerobic photosynthetic bacterium, Roseobacter denitrificans.
Plant Cell Physiol.
37:153-159[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Pemberton, J. M.,
I. M. Horne, and A. G. McEwan.
1998.
Regulation of photosynthetic gene expression in purple bacteria.
Microbiology
144:267-278[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Pfenning, N., and H. G. Truper.
1971.
Type and neotype strains of the species of phototrophic bacteria maintained in pure culture.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
21:19-24[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Phillips-Jones, M. K., and C. N. Hunter.
1994.
Cloning and nucleotide sequence of regA, a putative response regulator gene of Rhodobacter sphaeroides.
FEBS Lett.
116:269-276[CrossRef].
|
| 37.
|
Sganga, M. W., and C. E. Bauer.
1992.
Regulatory factors controlling photosynthetic reaction center and light-harvesting gene expression in Rhodobacter capsulatus.
Cell
68:945-954[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Simon, R.,
U. Priefer, and A. Puhler.
1983.
A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in Gram negative bacteria.
Bio/Technology
1:37-45.
|
| 39.
|
Weaver, P. F.,
J. D. Wall, and H. Gest.
1975.
Characterization of Rhodopseudomonas capsulata.
Arch. Microbiol.
105:207-216[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Wellington, C. L., and J. T. Beatty.
1991.
Overlapping mRNA transcripts of photosynthesis gene operons in Rhodobacter capsulatus.
J. Bacteriol.
173:1432-1443[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Wiessner, C.,
I. Dunger, and H. Michel.
1990.
Structure and transcription of the genes encoding the B1015 light-harvesting complex and subunits and the photosynthetic reaction center L, M, and cytochrome c subunits from Rhodopseudomonas viridis.
J. Bacteriol.
172:2877-2887[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Yanisch-Perron, C.,
J. Vieira, and J. Messing.
1985.
Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors.
Gene
33:103-119[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Young, D. A.,
C. E. Bauer,
J. C. Williams, and B. L. Marrs.
1989.
Genetic evidence for superoperonal organization of genes for photosynthetic pigments and pigment binding proteins in Rhodobacter capsulatus.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
218:1-12[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Youvan, D. C.,
E. J. Bylina,
M. Alberti,
H. Begusch, and J. E. Hearst.
1984.
Nucleotide and deduced polypeptide sequence of the photosynthetic reaction center, B870 antenna and flanking polypeptides from R. capsulata.
Cell
37:949-957[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Zeilstra-Ryalls, J.,
J. M. Eraso,
M. Gomelsky,
A. Yeliseev,
J. O'Gara, and S. Kaplan.
1998.
Control of photosystem formation in Rhodobacter sphaeroides.
J. Bacteriol.
180:2801-2809[Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Zhu, Y. S., and J. E. Hearst.
1986.
Regulation of expression of genes for light-harvesting antenna proteins LH-I and LH-II; reaction center for polypeptides RC-L, RC-M, and RC-H; and enzymes of bacteriochlorophyll and carotenoid biosynthesis in Rhodobacter capsulatus by light and oxygen.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
83:7613-7617[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Zhu, Y. S.,
P. L. Kiley,
T. J. Donohue, and S. Kaplan.
1986.
Origin of the mRNA stoichiometry of the puf operon in Rhodobacter sphaeroides.
J. Biol. Chem.
261:10366-10374[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Zuber, H., and R. J. Cogdell.
1995.
Structure and organization of purple bacterial antenna complexes, p. 315-348.
In
R. E. Blankenship, M. T. Madigan, and C. E. Bauer (ed.), Anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
|
Journal of Bacteriology, May 2000, p. 2778-2786, Vol. 182, No. 10
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Karr, E. A., Sattley, W. M., Jung, D. O., Madigan, M. T., Achenbach, L. A.
(2003). Remarkable Diversity of Phototrophic Purple Bacteria in a Permanently Frozen Antarctic Lake. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
69: 4910-4914
[Abstract]
[Full Text]