Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, June 2000, p. 3037-3044, Vol. 182, No. 11
Program in Molecular and Cell Biology,
University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas
75083-0688,1 and Department of
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of British Columbia,
Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada2
Received 1 November 1999/Accepted 15 March 2000
The expression of any given bacterial protein is predicted to
depend on (i) the transcriptional regulation of the promoter and the
translational regulation of its mRNA and (ii) the synthesis and
translation of total (bulk) mRNA. This is because total mRNA acts as a
competitor to the specific mRNA for the binding of initiation-ready free ribosomes. To characterize the effects of mRNA competition on gene
expression, the specific activity of The expression of a bacterial gene
can be studied by measuring the relative abundance of either its mRNA
or its protein product. Intuitively these two methods might seem to be
equivalent, but in fact they are not. Using artificially constructed
promoter-lacZ fusions integrated into the Escherichia
coli chromosome, we have previously determined the activities of a
number of constitutive mRNA promoters expressed as lacZ
transcripts per minute per promoter and as units of What causes gene expression at the transcriptional and
translational levels to respond in opposite directions to
changes in the growth rate? The answer to this question is rather
simple: the abundance in the cytoplasm of any given protein, or the
specific activity of an enzyme (activity per amount of protein),
reflects the distribution of translating ribosomes between the encoding mRNA and bulk mRNA. This distribution depends on two factors: (i) the relative amounts of the encoding mRNA and bulk mRNA and (ii) the translation frequencies of the encoding mRNA and bulk mRNA (see, e.g., reference 26).
In this report, we have considered the effects of bulk mRNA and
free ribosomes on the synthesis of Bacterial strains used.
The Escherichia coli
strains used in this work and their origins or constructions are
described in Table 1. Fusions of
lacZ with Pspc and the plasmid pBR322
promoters PRNAI and PRNAII
were constructed as previously described (17, 19). The
promoters were originally cloned in the plasmid vector pSL03 and then
recombined into the mal locus of the chromosome of
lac deletion derivatives of E. coli B/r (see
Table 1 for details). pSL03 was derived from the W205
trp-lac operon fusion (24) from which the
trp transcription terminator upstream of lacZ
(25) has been deleted (17). The operon fusions
carried the following promoter fragments: Pspc, from nucleotide (nt)
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
mRNA Composition and Control of Bacterial
Gene Expression


![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
-galactosidase expressed from
three different promoter-lacZ fusions
(Pspc-lacZ, PRNAI-lacZ, and PRNAII-lacZ) was measured (i) in a
relA+ background during exponential growth at
different rates and (ii) in relA+ and
relA derivatives of Escherichia coli B/r
after induction of a mild stringent or a relaxed response to raise or
lower, respectively, the level of ppGpp. Expression from all three
promoters was stimulated during slow exponential growth or at elevated
levels of ppGpp and was reduced during fast exponential growth or at
lower levels of ppGpp. From these observations and from other
considerations, we propose (i) that the concentration of free,
initiation-ready ribosomes is approximately constant and independent of
the growth rate and (ii) that bulk mRNA made during slow growth and at
elevated levels of ppGpp is less efficiently translated than bulk mRNA made during fast growth and at reduced levels of ppGpp. These features
lead to an indirect enhancement in the expression of LacZ (or of any
other protein) during growth in media of poor nutritional quality and
at increased levels of ppGpp.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
-galactosidase
activity (19). The transcriptional activities of these
promoters increased with increasing growth rate, whereas the specific
activity of
-galactosidase decreased. The rate of translation
initiation of lacZ mRNA was found to be rather constant,
with no indication of growth rate-dependent translational control
(17). Therefore, the discrepancy was not caused by any control on the translation of the lacZ reporter mRNA.
-galactosidase expressed from
three artificial promoter-lacZ fusions carrying the
promoters for the spc ribosomal protein operon
(Pspc), the pBR322 plasmid replication inhibitor
RNAI (PRNAI), and the pBR322 replication primer
RNAII (PRNAII). In previous studies involving
measurements of transcripts by hybridization,
Pspc and PRNAI were found
to be constitutive, without specific control;
PRNAII was positively regulated by ppGpp but was
constitutive in the absence of ppGpp (19). The experiments
presented here suggest to us that many poorly translated mRNAs
(e.g., those with weak ribosome binding sites) accumulate during slow
growth in poor media and, conversely, many frequently translated
mRNAs (e.g., those with strong ribosome binding sites) accumulate
during fast growth in rich media. This keeps the concentration of free
ribosomes approximately constant as the growth rate increases, in spite
of an increasing concentration of total ribosomes. Moreover, it
produces an apparent stimulation in the expression of any given protein
under conditions of slow growth or at increased intracellular levels of
ppGpp. These results have implications for the expression of any
bacterial gene, including the control of the synthesis of ribosomal RNA
and ribosomal proteins, and for the interpretation of data obtained
with reporter systems.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
51 relative to the transcription start through rplN (the first gene of the spc operon, encoding
ribosomal protein L14), ending at nt +453; PRNAI,
from nt
77 to +32; and PRNAII, from nt
63 to
+63. All promoter fragments carried EcoRI and
BamHI sites at their 5' or 3' ends, respectively, for
insertion into the multiple cloning site of pSL03. For the experiment
for which results are shown in Fig. 2, a spc-lac operon
fusion was used in which Pspc was directly linked
to lacZ (from nt
51 to +59) without rplN.
Previous studies have shown that strains in which lacZ is
directly linked to Pspc may show an anomalous
growth rate-dependent reduction in the accumulation of lacZ
mRNA (17). The reason for this effect is not known;
possibly, sequences close to the 5' end of the spc
operon transcript interact with sequences in the
trp-lac mRNA leader to produce a fortuitous signal which
either causes transcription termination or shortens the mRNA
lifetime. Inclusion of rplN in the construct ensures that
such effects are absent (17). Inclusion of additional
sequences upstream of Pspc (up to 105 bp upstream
of position
51) had no measurable effect on
-galactosidase
expression; this suggests that the region upstream of
Pspc is devoid of regulatory elements.
TABLE 1.
Bacterial strains
Conditions of growth. Cultures were grown at 37°C in medium C (11) supplemented with either 0.2% (vol/vol) glycerol or 0.2% (wt/vol) glucose, with or without 0.8% Difco Casamino Acids plus 50 µg of tryptophan/ml, or in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (23) with 0.2% glucose. Minimal media were supplemented with phenylalanine and threonine as required, at 50 µg/ml. Experimental cultures were inoculated from overnight cultures in glycerol minimal medium by diluting at least 250-fold into minimal media or 2,000-fold into amino acid-supplemented media.
Growth was measured as the increase in turbidity at 600 nm with a 1-cm light path (optical density at 600 nm [OD600]). Since the turbidity is not exactly proportional to the culture density, the observed values, after subtraction of the medium blank, were corrected for nonlinearity (2). The corrected OD values deviated by less than 1% from the average exponential curve, so that the inaccuracy of the average OD used for determination of the specific enzyme activity was about 1%.
-Galactosidase assays.
Assays for
-galactosidase
activity were performed with four to five 10-µl samples of culture
taken at different times during exponential growth as described
previously (18). The specific activity of
-galactosidase
was expressed as the increase in A420 per hour
of incubation of the assay at 30°C per OD600 unit of culture in the assay. The specific activity values obtained from different samples of a given culture generally deviated from the average by less than 2%. Greater deviations, up to 10%, were
sometimes observed in repeat experiments carried out with cultures
grown on different days. The reproducibility of the assays can also be
seen from Fig. 2c and d: the fact that, for growth without pseudomonic
acid, all measured points lie on a straight line with a slope of 1.0 implies that the specific enzyme activity was exactly the same for all
assays during threefold exponential growth of the culture.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Enzyme expression during exponential growth at different
rates.
The specific activities of
-galactosidase expressed from
Pspc, PRNAI, and
PRNAII in the ppGpp-proficient E. coli
B/r strains SL106, YX101, and YX102 (Table 1; the
promoter-lacZ fusions in these strains are integrated into
the mal locus of the bacterial chromosome [see Materials
and Methods]), respectively, were measured during exponential growth
in different media (Fig. 1). For all three promoters, the specific activity of
-galactosidase decreased with increasing growth rate in the range between 1.0 and 3.0 doublings/h. The specific activities for Pspc and
PRNAI decreased in parallel, about 2.5-fold for
the threefold increase in growth rate, whereas the specific activity
for PRNAII decreased more than fivefold over this
range of growth rates (Fig. 1). Previous transcription assays with
E. coli K-12 strains showed that the activities of Pspc and PRNAI are not
significantly affected by the presence of ppGpp at the low
("basal") levels accumulating during slow exponential growth in
ppGpp-proficient (relA+ spoT+)
strains. In contrast, PRNAII was stimulated by
the low level of ppGpp under those conditions
(19). Since cytoplasmic levels of ppGpp also
decrease with increasing growth rate (31), the steeper
decrease in the enzyme activity curve for PRNAII
in comparison to the curves for the other two promoters is consistent
with positive control of PRNAII by
ppGpp. Results similar to those for
Pspc in Fig. 1 have been reported previously
(17); the data are shown here for the purposes of comparison
and further analysis.
|
Enzyme expression during the stringent and relaxed response.
The stimulation or reduction of the production of a protein under slow-
or fast-growth conditions can be mimicked by artificially altering the
intracellular level of ppGpp. Pseudomonic acid is a
competitive inhibitor of isoleucyl tRNA synthetase and, at low concentrations, causes mild amino acid deprivation (14). A
relA+ and a
relA strain carrying
Pspc-lacZ operon fusions
(strains SL104 and SL111, respectively [Table 1]) were treated with
pseudomonic acid. Culture mass accumulation was always reduced by the
addition of pseudomonic acid (Fig. 2a and
b). Under these conditions, expression of
lacZ from Pspc was stimulated by a
high ppGpp concentration (the stringent response [Fig. 2c])
and reduced by a low ppGpp concentration (the relaxed
response [Fig. 2d]). As during exponential growth, the expression of
lacZ from this promoter correlates with the ppGpp
concentration.
|
-galactosidase activity relative to
the accumulation of total culture mass decreased in the same manner as
that observed during mild amino acid starvation of a
relA
strain (data not shown).
Amino acid deprivation experiments as shown in Fig. 2 for
Pspc were also performed with
relA+ and
relA strains carrying a
PRNAI-lacZ or a
PRNAII-lacZ fusion (strains YX101
through YX104). Again, enzyme expression was stimulated when the level
of ppGpp was raised and was inhibited when the ppGpp level was lowered (Fig.
3). However, the stimulation during the
stringent response and the inhibition during the relaxed response were
exaggerated with the PRNAII-lacZ
strains in comparison to those for the PRNAI
strains. Apparently, changes in the level of ppGpp during a
mild stringent or a relaxed response affect enzyme expression from
PRNAI and Pspc (Fig. 2 and
3a and b) only indirectly, whereas enzyme expression from
PRNAII (Fig. 3c and d) is, in addition,
stimulated by a direct effect of ppGpp on transcription.
Together, the direct and indirect effects produce the stronger response
of
-galactosidase expression from PRNAII in
comparison to those from the other two promoters, whose transcriptional activity is not affected by ppGpp during exponential growth
(19).
|
promoter (PL) and the
-lactamase promoter
(Pbla), whose transcription is also not
significantly affected by ppGpp during exponential growth
(19). During the stringent and the relaxed response, the
expression of lacZ from the promoters showed the same
apparent positive correlation to the ppGpp concentration as
that observed for Pspc and
PRNAI (data not shown). Since
Pspc, PRNAI,
PL, and Pbla are not known
to have any common control elements, it is unlikely that the effect of
ppGpp on enzyme expression is specific for these particular
promoters. Rather, the effect is more likely to be related to general
physiological aspects of bacterial growth that are affected by
ppGpp (see Discussion).
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Translational competition between bulk mRNA and specific
mRNA.
In the following, we consider the effect of total (bulk)
mRNA and its translation on enzyme expression during exponential growth in different media. For this purpose, the expression of
-galactosidase from Pspc (Fig. 1) was chosen
as an example. The same logic applies to the expression of any stable
protein, whether it is measured by enzyme assays, radioactive labeling,
protein staining, Western blotting, or some other means. This
discussion requires additional information about spc
promoter activity, bulk mRNA synthesis, total RNA synthesis, and
protein synthesis. This information was obtained from previous
measurements in the same E. coli B/r background and is
summarized (with references) in Table 2.
|
-galactosidase in the cytoplasm, expressed as the amount of
enzyme as a proportion of total protein
(
-Gal/Pt), equals the quotient of
the rates of synthesis of
-galactosidase and total protein
[(d
-Gal/dt)/(dPt/dt)]. If
lacZ mRNA and average bulk mRNA were translated with
equal efficiencies (equal translation initiations per minute per
mRNA molecule), then the ratio of the synthesis rate of
-galactosidase to that of total protein (i.e., the specific
activity) would reflect the proportion of lacZ mRNA in
total (bulk) mRNA
(Rlac/Rm). However, since
lacZ mRNA and bulk mRNA may be translated
differently, one has to consider the translation rate of
lacZ mRNA
[(d
-Gal/dt)/Rlac] relative to
the average translation rate of total mRNA
[(dPt/dt)/Rm]. Using
these parameters and notations, the specific activity of
-galactosidase can be related to the transcription and translation
of lacZ and bulk mRNA as follows:
|
(1) |
|
-Gal/dt)/Rlac]/[(dPt/dt)/Rm]},
reflects the translation efficiency of lacZ mRNA
relative to that of bulk mRNA.
The amount of lacZ mRNA (Rlac, in
relative units) expressed from Pspc in E. coli B/r has been determined previously with hybridization assays
applied to given amounts of total RNA (Rt)
(17). As a consequence,
Rlac/Rt, rather than
Rlac/Rm, is the parameter actually observed. To obtain Rlac/Rm, the
observed Rlac/Rt, is divided by the
fraction of total RNA that is mRNA
(Rm/Rt). Since no hybridization probe is available for total mRNA,
Rm/Rt was found indirectly. By using
a hybridization probe for rRNA with pulse-labeled total RNA and
correcting for the synthesis of tRNA, the rate of stable RNA synthesis
(sum of rRNA plus tRNA) has previously been determined as a fraction of
the rate of total RNA synthesis
(rs/rt) (31). From
rs/rt, the rate of mRNA
synthesis was found, also as a fraction of the rate of total RNA
synthesis, as the difference rm/rt = (1
rs/rt). By combining
rm/rt with the average mRNA
lifetime,
m, the ratio of the amounts,
Rm/Rt, can be obtained. Using
published data for Rlac/Rt,
rs/rt, and
m,
and additional data on the macromolecular composition of E. coli B/r (i.e., total RNA and protein), all parameters occurring
in equation 1 above have been calculated (Table 2; for details and
references, see table footnotes) and plotted as functions of the growth
rate (Fig. 4). It can be seen that the
specific activity of
-galactosidase decreases (Fig. 4a) even though
the amount of lacZ mRNA as a proportion of total mRNA (Rlac/Rm) increases (Fig.
4b), and the rate of translation initiation per lacZ
mRNA [(d
-Gal/dt)/Rlac] is
approximately constant (Fig. 4c). This apparent discrepancy is
explained by the higher rate of translation of bulk mRNA at high
growth rates (Fig. 4d). In other words, the specific activity of
-galactosidase decreases with increasing growth rate (Fig. 4a),
despite an increasing abundance of its mRNA (Fig. 4b), mainly
because of an increasing translation of bulk mRNA (Fig. 4d). The
reason for this increased translation of bulk mRNA is discussed
below.
|
Decay of bulk mRNA.
In Table 2, the average life of total
(bulk) mRNA (
m) has not been observed.
The decay of total mRNA is expected to be complex, with
higher-order kinetics, reflecting at first the fast decay of the
least-stable mRNAs and later the slower decay of the more-stable mRNAs. Since no data about the growth rate dependence of the decay of total mRNA are available, we have used instead the average functional lifetimes of lacZ mRNA, which are 1.9 and 2.4 min in E. coli B/r growing at 1 and 3 doublings/h,
respectively (18). These lifetimes were assumed to be
representative for bulk mRNA. If the lifetimes of different
mRNA species differ by constant factors from the lacZ
mRNA lifetimes (i.e., a different factor for each mRNA species,
but the same mRNA species-dependent factor for all growth rates),
then the curves for Rlac/Rm (Fig.
4b) and (dPt/dt)/Rm (Fig.
4d) would shift in parallel either up or down, depending on whether the
average
m values for bulk mRNA are
greater or smaller than those of lacZ mRNA. However, if
the
m of bulk mRNA increases with the
growth rate more than the
m of
lacZ mRNA, then the curves in Fig. 4b and d would
increase less steeply. The lifetime of ribosomal protein mRNAs does
indeed appear to increase with increasing growth rate more than the
lifetime of lacZ mRNA (18); therefore, the
relative abundance of lacZ mRNA (Fig. 4b) and the
translation of bulk mRNA (Fig. 4d) might increase somewhat less
steeply with the growth rate than is shown.
Translation frequency of lacZ mRNA at different growth rates. The approximately constant rate of translation of lacZ mRNA (Fig. 4c) could have several explanations: either (i) the lacZ ribosome binding site is saturated with ribosomes and initiation factors at all growth rates, (ii) the translation of lacZ mRNA is subject to a specific control that keeps it constant at all growth rates, or (iii) the concentrations of "initiation-ready" free ribosomes are nearly constant at all growth rates. Since the rate of translation of lacZ mRNA increases severalfold in the presence of the antibiotic rifampin when the amount of total mRNA decreases due to the inhibition of transcription (18), we conclude that, during normal exponential growth, the lacZ ribosome binding site is not saturated. Moreover, despite extensive study, there is no evidence to suggest that translation of lacZ mRNA is subject to any specific control. This leads us to suggest that the concentration of initiation-ready ribosomes (i.e., mature 30S ribosomal subunits with IF3, ready to bind to an mRNA ribosome binding site in the presence of saturating or constant concentrations of IF1, IF2, and initiator tRNA) is relatively constant and subsaturating at different growth rates. This causes the observed constant frequency of lacZ mRNA translation (Fig. 4c).
Translation frequency of bulk mRNA at different growth rates. Several features could contribute to the increasing average rate of translation initiation of bulk mRNA at increasing growth rates (Fig. 4d) despite a constant concentration of free, initiation-ready ribosomes and/or factors (see above). First, the average mRNA present during growth in rich media may have more-efficient ribosome binding sites than mRNA made during growth in poor media. Alternatively or in addition, the rate of translation of some mRNAs may be controlled by special regulatory sites such that translation is favored at high growth rates. The second possibility, i.e., control that favors translation at high growth rates, has been found to occur for ribosomal protein mRNAs (reviewed in reference 15), but it is not known to be the rule for most other mRNAs. Therefore, both more-efficient ribosome binding sites on constitutive mRNAs made during growth in rich media compared to more-repressible mRNAs made during growth in poor media and translational control of certain mRNAs are inferred to contribute to the increased translation of bulk mRNA at high growth rates. Whatever the exact cause, the increased translation makes bulk mRNA an increasingly better competitor for ribosome binding to lacZ mRNA as the population of mRNAs changes with increasing growth rate.
Effect of ppGpp on protein and enzyme expression.
During a mild stringent or a mild relaxed response, the
-galactosidase specific activities expressed from both
Pspc-lacZ and
PRNAI-lacZ operon fusions
were increased and reduced, respectively (Fig. 2 and 3). Based on the
analysis of the growth rate dependence of enzyme expression above, we
suggest that ppGpp affects the accumulation and quality of
bulk mRNAs and thereby causes the apparent positive control of
enzyme expression by ppGpp. Indirect stimulation of
lacZ expression by ppGpp (Fig. 2 and 3) could be produced in a number of ways. For example, ppGpp might
directly or indirectly stimulate the synthesis of mRNAs with weak
ribosome binding sites, or it might inhibit the synthesis of mRNAs
with strong ribosome binding sites. Indirect effects of ppGpp
on transcription are expected for promoters controlled by DNA binding
factors like Fis, H-NS, or Lrp (see, e.g., references 9, 29,
34 and 36), whose syntheses depend on
ppGpp. LacZ expression may also be increased if
ppGpp stimulates the decay of mRNAs with strong ribosome
binding sites (e.g., ribosomal protein mRNAs
[18]). Any one or all of these effects might
contribute to the apparent stimulation of enzyme expression by ppGpp.
Combined effects of growth rate and ppGpp on bacterial gene expression. The effects of ppGpp and growth rate on bulk mRNA synthesis and translation are superimposed on the direct transcriptional control by ppGpp. Three cases are to be distinguished, as follows.
(i) If a promoter is under positive transcriptional control by ppGpp, as is PRNAII, then the direct and indirect effects of ppGpp are additive, so that the specific activity of
-galactosidase decreases with increasing growth
rate or at reduced levels of ppGpp more than the specific
activity expressed from most other mRNA promoters that are not
affected by ppGpp (e.g., Pspc,
PRNAI,
PL, and
Pbla [19]), as observed (Fig.
1). Earlier reports suggest that the promoters of the histidine
biosynthetic operon and the lac operon
are also under positive control by ppGpp (27, 28,
32).
(ii) If a promoter is under negative transcriptional control by
ppGpp, as are the P1 promoters of rrn
operons (19), then both transcriptional activity and
the expression of a reporter enzyme from P1 increase with increasing
growth rate (10, 13, 19, 35). But in this instance, the
transcriptional activity of rrnB P1 increases about 40-fold
in the range of growth rates studied (between 0.7 and 3.0 doublings/h),
whereas the specific activity of
-galactosidase expressed from
rrnB P1 increases only about 15-fold (19, 35).
Thus, the indirect effects of bulk mRNA subtract from the direct
transcriptional effect of ppGpp on P1.
(iii) An intermediate situation is represented by the P2 promoters of
rrn operons, whose transcriptional activity
increases with growth rate less than transcription from rrn
P1 but more than transcription from mRNA promoters (19).
-Galactosidase expression from rrnB P2 is approximately
constant and independent of the bacterial growth rate (10, 19,
35). Thus, for rrnB P2, the effects of an increasing
rate of transcription from the promoter and increasing competition of
bulk mRNA for translation compensate for one another. The constancy
of the specific activity of
-galactosidase expressed from
rrnB P2 has previously been interpreted as an indication of
a lack of "growth rate-dependent control" (see, e.g., reference
10). We suggest that it is more likely to be a
coincidence of two opposing effects on gene expression.
Control of rRNA synthesis: role of free RNA polymerase concentration and ppGpp. Using a lacZ reporter system and lacZ mRNA hybridization assays, the absolute activities of the rrnB P1 and P2 promoters, expressed as number of transcripts per minute per promoter, were previously found to increase with increasing growth rate (19). Since no specific control factors or factor binding sites have ever been associated with rrn P2 promoters, we have assumed that rrn P2 promoters are constitutive, so that their activity is affected only by the concentration of free RNA polymerase and the promoter-specific parameters Vmax and Km, representing the maximum promoter activity at saturation with free RNA polymerase and the free RNA polymerase concentration at half-maximal activity. In the absence of ppGpp, the rrn P1 promoters are also constitutive; accordingly, their activity also depends only on the free RNA polymerase concentration and the associated Vmax and Km values. The Km value for P1 promoters is affected by the DNA binding factors Fis and H-NS. In addition, in normal ppGpp-proficient strains, P1 activity was found to be inhibited by ppGpp. As a result, the P1 activity was lower than the P2 activity during slow bacterial growth, when basal (exponential-growth) levels of ppGpp are highest, and higher than the P2 activity during fast bacterial growth, when basal levels of ppGpp are lowest. Thus, in our model (19), the growth rate regulation of ribosome synthesis depends both on the concentration of free RNA polymerase, which determines the frequency of transcription initiation at both P1 and P2, and on the concentration of ppGpp, which selectively reduces expression from P1 under slow-growth conditions.
Role of ppGpp in the control of ribosomal protein
synthesis.
It has been reported that the rate of synthesis of
spc mRNA from the normal spc operon
relative to the rate of total mRNA synthesis increases with
increasing growth rate (8, 20). This is similar to the
growth rate-dependent increase in the mRNA amounts,
Rlac/Rm, determined above for the
Pspc-rplN-lacZ fusion (Fig. 4b).
Since the rate of ribosomal protein synthesis as a proportion of total
protein synthesis (denoted by
r [3]) increases with increasing growth rate
similarly to the rate of spc mRNA synthesis per total
mRNA synthesis, it has been suggested that the control of ribosomal
protein synthesis occurs mainly at the transcriptional level (4,
8, 20). This interpretation was based on the two implicit
assumptions that (i) spc mRNA and bulk mRNA are
translated approximately equally and (ii) spc mRNA and
bulk mRNA have approximately equal lifetimes. Based on the considerations above (Fig. 4) and previous measurements of
spc mRNA lifetimes (18), both assumptions
appear to be unjustified. The increasing rate of synthesis of ribosomal
proteins from the spc operon with increasing growth
rate is mediated through control of the decay of spc
mRNA; similar mechanisms presumably control the decay of other
ribosomal protein mRNAs (18, 22). This control of the
mRNA lifetime adjusts the synthesis of ribosomal proteins to the
ppGpp-dependent synthesis of rRNA, overriding any
transcriptional regulation of ribosomal protein operons or superimposed effects of bulk mRNA translation.
-galactosidase synthesis expressed from
Pspc observed here (Fig. 2). This discrepancy can
be explained as follows. The wild-type spc operon
mRNA carries a control site at which the regulatory ribosomal
protein S8 binds under conditions of reduced rRNA synthesis (e.g.,
during the stringent response). The binding of S8 to its own mRNA
initiates a regulatory pathway that accelerates the decay of
spc operon mRNA, thereby adjusting ribosomal
protein synthesis to the accumulation of rRNA (reviewed in reference
15). Therefore, we suggest that the changes in the
synthesis of spc ribosomal proteins that have been observed
previously during the stringent and the relaxed response or during
chloramphenicol treatment are the result of a regulation of
spc mRNA decay in response to ppGpp-dependent
changes in rRNA synthesis (18). This regulation requires
specific control sites on the normal spc mRNA which are not present in the spc-lac fusion mRNA used here.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work has been supported by grants from the NIH and MRC.
We thank Mans Ehrenberg for valuable comments regarding the biochemistry of translation initiation.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of British Columbia, 2146 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada. Phone: (604) 822-5975. Fax: (604) 822-5227. E-mail: patrick.p.dennis{at}ubc.ca.
Present address: Pathology Department, National Taiwan University
Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Present address: University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
at Dallas/Veterans Administration, Dallas, TX 75216.
§ Present address: hbremer{at}attglobal.net.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Baracchini, E., and H. Bremer. 1987. Determination of synthesis rate and lifetime of bacterial mRNAs. Anal. Biochem. 167:245-260[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 2. |
Bipatnath, M.,
P. P. Dennis, and H. Bremer.
1998.
Initiation and velocity of chromosome replication in Escherichia coli B/r and K-12.
J. Bacteriol.
180:265-273 |
| 3. | Blumenthal, R. M., P. G. Lemaux, F. C. Neidhardt, and P. P. Dennis. 1976. The effects of the relA gene on the synthesis of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and other transcription and translation proteins in Escherichia coli. B. Mol. Gen. Genet. 149:291-296. |
| 4. | Bremer, H., and P. P. Dennis. 1996. Modulation of chemical composition and other parameters of the cell by growth rate, p. 1553-1569. In F. C. Neidhardt, R. Curtiss III, J. L. Ingraham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, W. S. Reznikoff, M. Riley, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed. ASM Press, Washington, D.C. |
| 5. | Dennis, P. P. 1976. Effects of chloramphenicol on the transcriptional activities of ribosomal RNA and ribosomal protein genes in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 108:535-546[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 6. |
Dennis, P. P., and M. Nomura.
1974.
Stringent control of ribosomal protein gene expression in Escherichia coli.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
71:3819-3823 |
| 7. | Dennis, P. P., and M. Nomura. 1975. Stringent control of the transcriptional activities of ribosomal protein genes in Escherichia coli. Nature (London) 255:460-465[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. | Gausing, K. 1977. Regulation of ribosome production in Escherichia coli: synthesis and stability of ribosomal RNA and ribosomal protein mRNA at different growth rates. J. Mol. Biol. 115:335-354[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 9. |
Gosink, K. K.,
W. Ross,
S. Leirmo,
R. Osuna,
S. E. Finkel,
R. C. Johnson, and R. Gourse.
1993.
DNA binding and bending are necessary but not sufficient for Fis-dependent activation of rrnB P1.
J. Bacteriol.
175:1580-1589 |
| 10. | Gourse, R. L., H. A. De Boer, and M. Nomura. 1986. DNA determinants of rRNA synthesis in E. coli: growth rate-dependent regulation, feedback inhibition, upstream activation, antitermination. Cell 44:197-205[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 11. | Helmstetter, C. 1967. Rate of DNA synthesis during the division cycle of Escherichia coli B/r. J. Mol. Biol. 24:417-427[CrossRef]. |
| 12. |
Hernandez, V. J., and H. Bremer.
1991.
Escherichia coli ppGpp synthetase II activity requires spoT.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:5991-5999 |
| 13. |
Hernandez, V. J., and H. Bremer.
1993.
Characterization of RNA and DNA synthesis in Escherichia coli strains devoid of ppGpp.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:10851-10862 |
| 14. | Hughes, J., and G. Mellows. 1978. Inhibition of isoleucyl-transfer ribonucleic acid synthetase in Escherichia coli by pseudomonic acid. Biochem. J. 176:305-318[Medline]. |
| 15. | Keener, J., and M. Nomura. 1996. Regulation of ribosome synthesis, p. 1417-1431. In F. C. Neidhardt, R. Curtiss III, J. L. Ingraham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, W. S. Reznikoff, M. Riley, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed. ASM Press, Washington, D.C. |
| 16. |
Lagosky, P., and F. Chang.
1981.
Correlation between RNA synthesis and basal level guanosine 5'-diphosphate 3'-diphosphate in relaxed mutants of Escherichia coli.
J. Biol. Chem.
256:11651-11656 |
| 17. |
Liang, S.,
P. P. Dennis, and H. Bremer.
1998.
Expression of lacZ from the promoter of the Escherichia coli spc operon cloned into vectors carrying the W205 trp-lac fusion.
J. Bacteriol.
180:6090-6100 |
| 18. | Liang, S., M. Ehrenberg, P. P. Dennis, and H. Bremer. 1999. Decay of rplN and lacZ mRNA in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 288:521-538[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 19. | Liang, S., M. Bipatnath, Y.-C. Xu, S.-L. Chen, P. P. Dennis, M. Ehrenberg, and H. Bremer. 1999. Activities of constitutive promoters in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 292:19-37[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 20. |
Little, R., and H. Bremer.
1984.
Transcription of ribosomal component genes and lac in a relA+/relA pair of Escherichia coli strains.
J. Bacteriol.
159:863-869 |
| 21. | Maher, D., and P. Dennis. 1977. In vivo transcription of E. coli genes coding for rRNA, ribosomal proteins and subunits of RNA polymerase: influence of the stringent control system. Mol. Gen. Genet. 155:203-211[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 22. |
Mattheakis, L.,
L. Vu,
F. Sor, and M. Nomura.
1989.
Retroregulation of the synthesis of ribosomal proteins L14 and L24 by feedback repressor S8 in Escherichia coli.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:448-452 |
| 23. | Miller, J. 1972. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 24. | Mitchell, D. H., W. S. Reznikoff, and J. R. Beckwith. 1975. Genetic fusions defining trp and lac operon regulatory elements. J. Mol. Biol. 93:331-350[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 25. | Mott, J. E., J. L. Galloway, and T. Platt. 1985. Maturation of Escherichia coli tryptophan operon mRNA: evidence for 3' exonucleolytic processing after rho-dependent termination. EMBO J. 4:1887-1891[Medline]. |
| 26. |
Pease, A. J., and R. E. Wolf.
1994.
Determination of the growth rate-regulated steps in expression of the Escherichia coli K-12 gnd gene.
J. Bacteriol.
176:115-122 |
| 27. |
Primakoff, P., and S. W. Artz.
1979.
Positive control of lac operon expression in vitro by guanosine 5'-diphosphate 3'-diphosphate.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
76:1726-1730 |
| 28. |
Riggs, D. C.,
R. D. Mueller,
H. S. Kwan, and S. W. Artz.
1986.
Promoter domain mediates guanosine tetraphosphate activation of the histidine operon.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
83:9333-9337 |
| 29. | Ross, W., J. F. Thompson, J. T. Newlands, and R. L. Gourse. 1990. E. coli Fis protein activates ribosomal RNA transcription in vitro and in vivo. EMBO J. 9:3733-3742[Medline]. |
| 30. |
Ryals, J., and H. Bremer.
1982.
RelA-dependent RNA polymerase activity in Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
150:168-179 |
| 31. |
Ryals, J.,
R. Little, and H. Bremer.
1982.
Control of rRNA and tRNA syntheses in Escherichia coli by guanosine tetraphosphate.
J. Bacteriol.
151:1261-1268 |
| 32. |
Shand, R. F.,
P. H. Blum,
R. D. Mueller,
D. C. Riggs, and S. W. Artz.
1989.
Correlation between histidine operon expression and guanosine 5'-diphosphate 3'-diphosphate levels during amino acid downshift in stringent and relaxed strains of Salmonella typhimurium.
J. Bacteriol.
171:737-743 |
| 33. | Schleif, R. 1967. Control of the production of ribosomal protein. J. Mol. Biol. 27:41-55[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 34. | Wagner, R. 1994. The regulation of ribosomal RNA synthesis and bacterial cell growth. Arch. Microbiol. 161:100-109[Medline]. |
| 35. |
Zhang, X.-Y., and H. Bremer.
1995.
Control of the Escherichia coli rrnB P1 promoter strength by ppGpp.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:11181-11195 |
| 36. | Zhang, X.-Y., and H. Bremer. 1996. Effects of Fis on ribosome synthesis and activity and on promoter activities in E. coli. J. Mol. Biol. 259:27-40[CrossRef][Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»