Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, June 2000, p. 3097-3103, Vol. 182, No. 11
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
A Membrane-Bound Flavocytochrome
c-Sulfide Dehydrogenase from the Purple Phototrophic Sulfur
Bacterium Ectothiorhodospira vacuolata
Vesna
Kostanjevecki,1
Ann
Brigé,1
Terrance E.
Meyer,2
Michael A.
Cusanovich,2
Yves
Guisez,1 and
Jozef
Van Beeumen1,*
Laboratory for Protein Biochemistry and
Protein Engineering, University of Ghent, 9000 Ghent,
Belgium,1 and Department of
Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
857212
Received 24 November 1999/Accepted 3 March 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The amino acid sequence of Ectothiorhodospira vacuolata
cytochrome c-552, isolated from membranes with
n-butanol, shows that it is a protein of 77 amino acid
residues with a molecular mass of 9,041 Da. It is closely related to
the cytochrome subunit of Chlorobium limicola f. sp.
thiosulfatophilum flavocytochrome c-sulfide dehydrogenase (FCSD), having 49% identity. These data allowed isolation of a 5.5-kb subgenomic clone which contains the cytochrome gene and an adjacent flavoprotein gene as in other species which have
an FCSD. The cytochrome subunit has a signal peptide with a normal
cleavage site, but the flavoprotein subunit has a signal sequence which
suggests that the mature protein has an N-terminal cysteine,
characteristic of a diacyl glycerol-modified lipoprotein. The membrane
localization of FCSD was confirmed by Western blotting with antibodies
raised against Chromatium vinosum FCSD. When aligned according to the three-dimensional structure of Chromatium
FCSD, all but one of the side chains near the flavin are conserved. These include the Cys 42 flavin adenine dinucleotide binding site; the
Cys 161-Cys 337 disulfide; Glu 167, which modulates the reactivity with
sulfite; and aromatic residues which may function as charge transfer
acceptors from the flavin-sulfite adduct (C. vinosum numbering). The genetic context of FCSD is different from that in other
species in that flanking genes are not conserved. The transcript is
only large enough to encode the two FCSD subunits. Furthermore,
Northern hybridization showed that the production of E. vacuolata FCSD mRNA is regulated by sulfide. All cultures that
contained sulfide in the medium had elevated levels of FCSD RNA
compared with cells grown on organics (acetate, malate, or succinate)
or thiosulfate alone, consistent with the role of FCSD in sulfide oxidation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Flavocytochrome c-sulfide
dehydrogenase (FCSD) was first identified by Bartsch and Kamen
(6) in the purple phototrophic bacterium Chromatium
vinosum, recently renamed Allochromatium vinosum
(21). It was subsequently found in the green phototrophic bacterium Chlorobium limicola f. sp.
thiosulfatophilum (7, 30) and in six other
species of purple and green bacteria, Chromatium gracile
(4, 5) and Chromatium purpuratum (24),
both now assigned to the genus Marichromatium
(21); Chromatium tepidum (20);
Thiocapsa roseopersicina (54); Chlorobium
limicola f. sp. thiosulfatophilum (43); and
Chlorobium phaeobacteroides (16). A
membrane-bound form of FCSD was discovered in the nonphototrophic aerobic bacterium Thiobacillus sp. W5 (50). A
gene homologous to the flavoprotein subunit of FCSD was found to be
associated with the genes for thiosulfate oxidation in Paracoccus
denitrificans, but the adjacent cytochrome gene was more divergent
than expected (52). The genome sequence of Aquifex
aeolicus contains two FCSD flavoprotein genes associated with one
for a Rieske iron-sulfur protein, and a thiosulfate utilization operon
is located elsewhere in the genome (14). Thus, there appears
to be a correlation between the presence of FCSD and sulfur metabolism.
The Chromatium and Chlorobium flavocytochromes
c were found to have sulfide dehydrogenase activity in vitro
(19, 25) and presumably are involved in sulfur metabolism in
vivo. A common characteristic of the bacteria in which this enzyme is
found is the ability to utilize reduced sulfur compounds as electron
donors for carbon dioxide fixation. Thus, all species of green and
purple sulfur bacteria utilize elemental sulfur and hydrogen sulfide, approximately half the species use thiosulfate, and a few use sulfite
or tetrathionate (10). However, thiosulfate and sulfite are
not oxidized by FCSD. Once the genes for C. vinosum FCSD
were cloned and sequenced, the periplasmic location of the enzyme was established by the presence of signal sequences (15).
The discovery of a homologous enzyme, sulfide-quinone reductase (SQR),
in some photosynthetic and nonphotosynthetic sulfur bacteria (2,
39, 40, 41) plus the isolation of the Rhodobacter capsulatus SQR gene brought a new perspective on the involvement of FCSD and SQR in sulfide oxidation. During the oxidation of sulfide,
sulfur globules are deposited either in the periplasmic space, as in
Chromatium species (34), or extracellularly (in Chlorobium and Ectothiorhodospira species)
(18). Thus, sulfide oxidation generally occurs on the
periplasmic side of the cytoplasmic membrane in purple and green sulfur
bacteria, where FCSD is localized. The location of the R. capsulatus SQR was not clear until recently because the protein
appeared to have no N-terminal signal peptide for translocation into
the periplasmic space (41). It has now been documented from
gene fusion experiments that R. capsulatus SQR functions on
the periplasmic side of the cytoplasmic membrane, using an unknown
mechanism for translocation (38). Genes for FCSD have not
been found in R. capsulatus, nor have SQR genes been
conclusively demonstrated in either Chromatium or
Chlorobium. On the other hand, disruption of the FCSD genes
in C. vinosum had no effect on sulfide oxidation
(35). However, there are two FCSD genes in the C. tepidum genome (http://www.tigr.org), suggesting that if there are
two sets of FCSD genes in C. vinosum, the effects of a
knockout mutation would be negated. Nevertheless, which of the two
enzymes, FCSD or SQR, is the sulfide-oxidizing enzyme in
Chromatium and Chlorobium remains to be determined.
Ectothiorhodospira species make up a small family of mostly
marine and halophilic purple phototrophic bacteria, all of which utilize sulfide for growth. Unlike Chromatium, but similar
to Chlorobium, elemental sulfur is deposited outside the
cells in the growth medium. The soluble electron transfer proteins of
Ectothiorhodospira are generally similar to those of
Chromatium. Thus, they are dominated by HiPIP
(high-potential iron-sulfur protein) and cytochrome c' (26, 27, 31). FCSD has not been previously reported to occur in this family of bacteria.
The amino acid sequences of the cytochrome subunits of
Chromatium and Chlorobium FCSDs have been
determined (47, 48), as has that of the
Chromatium flavoprotein subunit (49). The three-dimensional structure of Chromatium FCSD has also been
determined (12). We now report the nucleotide sequence of an
Ectothiorhodospira vacuolata FCSD gene and its flanking
regions, which shows that FCSD is more widespread than previously
thought and that the genetic context is not the same as that in
Chromatium. The membrane localization of the E. vacuolata protein is documented by immunoblotting.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Strains and media.
E. vacuolata
1 strain 2111, obtained from the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und
Zellkulturen (DSMZ) was grown on DSMZ medium 1448, which is a
modification of the American Type Culture Collection medium 1410 (30 g
of NaCl/liter instead of 140 g/liter). The culture was grown by
anaerobic photosynthesis in light provided by a 40-W tungsten lamp at
30°C. Escherichia coli strains were grown on Luria-Bertani
medium (36) supplemented with 100 µg of carbenicillin.
Strain XL-1 blue was used as a recipient to detect
-complementation
for pUC18 derivatives on Luria-Bertani plates supplemented with 80 µM
IPTG (isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactoside) and 32 µg of X-Gal
(5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-
-D-galactoside) per ml.
Isolation and purification of cytochrome c-552.
Cells were harvested by centrifugation and broken in a Ribi cell
fractionator (an automated French press). The membranes were sedimented
by ultracentrifugation for 3 h in a Spinco Ti45 rotor. They were
resuspended in water at 4°C, and an equal volume of n-butanol at
20°C was added with stirring
(46). After centrifugation, the top layer containing butanol
and colored pigments was removed. The underlying water layer contained
the protein of interest. Cytochrome c-552 chromatographed
with HiPIP on DEAE-cellulose and eluted after cytochrome
c4. It appeared to exist as both monomer and
dimer when chromatographed on Sephadex G-50. The combined Sephadex
fractions were chromatographed on DEAE-cellulose developed with 20 mM
Tris-HCl containing 2.5 mM NaCl, which resolved the cytochrome
c-552 from a HiPIP isozyme.
Amino acid sequence determination of cytochrome
c-552.
The covalently bound heme was removed from the
native protein by treatment with HgCl2 in 8 M urea-0.1 M
HCl at 37°C for 16 h (1). After separation of the
apoprotein from heme and salts by gel filtration (Sephadex G-25, 5%
HCOOH), the N-terminal sequence was determined by using a freeze-dried
aliquot of 400 pmol of the apoprotein. To identify the cysteine
residues of the heme binding site, a 1.3-nmol aliquot of apoprotein was
treated with 3-bromopropylamine. The alkylated cysteine residues could
then be detected by sequence analysis (22). A second aliquot
of 9.5 nmol of the apoprotein was digested for 3 h with
Staphylococcus aureus protease at pH 4, using an
enzyme-to-substrate ratio of 1:40. A third aliquot of 9 nmol was
subjected to partial acid hydrolysis in 2% formic acid for 2 h at
106°C. The peptides were separated by reversed-phase high-performance
liquid chromatography (SMART system; Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) on a
PEPSII column using a gradient of 0.07% trifluoroacetic acid in water
(solvent A) and 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid in acetonitrile (solvent
B). Sequence determination was performed on a 477A or 476A pulsed liquid sequenator, with on-line analysis of the
phenylthiohydantoin-amino acids on a 120A analyzer (PE Biosystems,
Foster City, Calif.). Sequencing reagents were from the same firm. The
masses of the holoprotein, apoprotein, and peptides were determined by
using either plasma desorption, electrospray ionization, or
matrix-assisted laser desorption mass spectrometry on a Biopolymer
(Uppsala, Sweden) analyzer (BIO-ION), a BIO-Q triple-quadruple
instrument (Micromass, Altrincham, United Kingdom), or a TOF-SPEC SE
time-of-flight analyzer (Micromass, Whytenshaw, United Kingdom), respectively.
DNA techniques.
E. vacuolata genomic DNA was isolated
by the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide method (3). On the
basis of the cytochrome c-552 protein sequence, a set of
degenerate primers was designed. The N-terminal primer, EVM8, had the
sequence 5' ATGGCHACHACHTGYTAYG 3', and the C-terminal
primer, EVT61, had the sequence 5' AGCTTGATYTCYTCRTCHGTRTA 3'.
The probe was amplified by PCR using Taq polymerase
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) under the following
conditions: 95°C, 2 min; 5 precycles (94°C, 30 s; 50°C,
60 s; 72°C, 30 s); 30 cycles (94°C, 30 s; 52°C,
30 s; 72°C, 60 s); 72°C, 10 min (followed by 4°C). The
amplified fragment of 177 bp was cloned in the pGEM-T vector (Promega)
and labeled via PCR with dioxigenin-dUTP (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals). Via Southern hybridization, a BamHI fragment was identified. A BamHI pUC18 library was then constructed
and analyzed (36). Detection and identification of
transformants were done with the nonradioactive digoxigenin-DNA
detection system (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Double-stranded
plasmid DNA was sequenced using dye terminator cycle sequencing (PE
Biosystems). The sequencing was started from both ends with the
universal primers M13F and M13R (England Biolabs, Inc., Beverly, Mass.)
and was continued with the specific primers 552/3 (5'
CGCCACCGTCATGGATC 3') and 552/4 (5' GCTGCCGGCACTGTGTC 3'),
created on the basis of the c-552 DNA sequences. New
primers were synthesized at approximately 450-nucleotide intervals
based on the results of the previous sequencing.
Membrane protein purification and Western blotting.
Ten
liters of E. vacuolata culture was harvested in the
exponential phase. Membranes were purified from French press-lysed cells via ultracentrifugation (160,000 × g 3 h)
combining the EDTA-lysozyme method (32) and fractionation
with 20% (NH4)2SO4. The membranes
were solubilized with 1% Triton X-100-10 mM Tris-HCl and 10 mM EDTA,
pH 8 (3-h incubation; 4°C), and insoluble material was removed by
ultracentrifugation. The supernatant was desalted and adsorbed on a
DEAE-Sepharose column. The purification protocol was performed
basically as described in reference 50 with the exception of using the above-mentioned Triton-Tris-EDTA buffer. Proteins were eluted with a linear gradient of 0 to 0.5 M KCl in the
same buffer. The pooled fractions were desalted, concentrated, and
further purified by loading them on a Q-Sepharose Fast Flow column in
the above-mentioned buffer and gradient. The purified protein was
identified on sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) gels by silver and heme
staining. Western blotting was performed following the manufacturer's
instructions for the enhanced chemiluminescence membrane (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech, Roosendaal, The Netherlands) and using an antibody
against C. vinosum FCSD.
Protein electrophoresis.
SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (PAGE) was performed on vertical 10% polyacrylamide
gels (28) stained for protein with Coomassie blue or silver.
The gels used for heme staining were incubated for 10 min in a 10%
trichloroacetic acid solution; the staining itself was performed as
described in reference 45. PAGE as well as
protein-blotting experiments were performed using the Mini Protean
equipment (Bio-Rad, Veenendaal, The Netherlands).
RNA extraction and Northern analysis.
Total RNA from
E. vacuolata was extracted with LiCl (3) and
electrophoresed in 2% agarose formaldehyde gels. All RNA samples were
treated with RNase-free DNase I (Sigma) for 10 min at 37°C. Afterwards, 14 µl of denaturation mix (9.2 µl of formamide, 3 µl
of formaldehyde, and 1.8 µl of MOPS buffer (40 mM
morpholinopropanesulfonic acid, 10 mM sodium acetate, 2 mM EDTA, pH
7.2) was added to 15 µg of RNA. Denaturation was carried out at
65°C for 5 min, followed by cooling on ice. Before the mixture was
loaded onto the gels, 2 µl of loading buffer was added.
Digoxigenin-labeled pSPTNeo RNA (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) was
treated as described above and used as a size marker on the gels. The
RNA was transferred by capillary blotting in SSC buffer (3 M NaCl, 300 mM sodium citrate, pH 7), fixed to positively charged nylon membranes
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals), and fixed by UV irradiation.
Prehybridization, hybridization (42°C for 16 h), and
chemiluminescent detection were carried out essentially as prescribed
by Boehringer (The DIG System User's Guide for Filter
Hybridization, Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany, 1993). In
order to study the regulation of FCSD by sulfide, it was necessary to
use 0.05 mg of cysteine/ml in the growth medium to maintain anaerobiosis.
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Isolation of cytochrome c-552.
The soluble
electron transfer proteins of E. vacuolata strain
1 (DSM
2111) are very similar to those of Ectothiorhodospira shaposhnikovii (26, 27). There are at least two HiPIP
isozymes and cytochromes c', c4, and
b5 (unpublished work). Following buffer solubilization of these proteins, we extracted the membrane fraction with butanol to identify peripheral electron transfer proteins. Additional HiPIP and cytochrome c4 were
released, along with a small cytochrome c-552 that
cochromatographed with a third HiPIP isozyme from which it was
difficult to separate it. (We have also found four soluble HiPIP
isozymes as well as cytochrome c4 in the related
species Ectothiorhodospira mobilis [unpublished]). In
addition, an abundant, high-molecular-weight cytochrome
c-553 was easily separated by gel filtration. This protein
has not been further characterized but is likely to be the tetraheme
reaction center cytochrome, based upon its general occurrence in purple bacteria and its membrane localization. Cytochrome c-552 was
purified as described in Materials and Methods.
Amino acid sequence analysis of the solubilized cytochrome
c-552.
The complete amino acid sequence of the small
cytochrome c-552 was determined as shown in Fig.
1. Cytochrome c-552 contains 77 residues and a single heme binding site near the N terminus. The
sequence is clearly that of a class I cytochrome and is most closely
related to the 86-residue cytochrome subunit of C. limicola FCSD (49% identity with no internal insertions or deletions)
(48) (Fig. 2). It is 26%
identical to the first half, including one gap (a gap is defined as an
insertion or deletion), and 19% identical (with four gaps) to the
second half of the 174-residue diheme cytochrome subunit of C. vinosum FCSD (47). These results strongly suggested the
presence of an associated flavoprotein subunit in E. vacuolata.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Amino acid sequence of the cytochrome subunit of
flavocytochrome c from E. vacuolata. The
N-terminal sequences of the apoprotein and the modified apoprotein are
indicated by N-apo and N-mod, respectively. Peptides obtained after
cleavage with S. aureus protease or after partial acid
hydrolysis are named Ec and AH, respectively. The arrows indicate
residues chemically identified during Edman degradation. An asterisk
means that the sequence analysis was deliberately stopped. Mass
spectrometry was used to determine the molecular weight of each of the
peptides (results not shown).
|
|

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Alignment of the amino acid sequences of the FCSD
E. vacuolata (1) and C. limicola f. sp.
thiosulfatophilum (2) monoheme cytochrome subunits
(48), with the diheme cytochrome subunit of C. vinosum (47), first half (3) and second half (4). The
amino acids in boldface represent the heme binding site.
|
|
Gene sequence of the FCSD locus.
Based upon the amino acid
sequence of cytochrome c-552, we obtained a subgenomic clone
of 5.5 kb. The translated cytochrome gene contains a 28-residue signal
sequence and has a normal Ala-Thr-Ala recognition sequence for cleavage
by the signal peptidase (51). The derived mature protein
sequence was identical to that of the cytochrome sequenced by Edman
degradation. Sixteen bases downstream of the cytochrome gene is a
1,290-base open reading frame which encodes a 430-residue protein
homologous to the flavoprotein subunit of Chromatium FCSD.
There is a 33-residue signal peptide which does not have an obvious
cleavage site. It thus appears that the leader is not cleaved or is
cleaved in front of Cys 25, to which a diacyl glycerol may be attached,
as is the case in lipoproteins (33). The flavoprotein
subunit is 50% identical to that of Chromatium, and there
are only six small gaps in the protein sequence alignment (Fig.
3). The FCSD of Thiobacillus
sp strain W5 is membrane bound and has a small monoheme cytochrome
subunit, suggesting close similarity to the E. vacuolata
protein (50).

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Alignment of the complete amino acid sequences of the
FCSD flavoprotein subunits from E. vacuolata (1), C. vinosum (49) (2), P. denitrificans
(52) (partial) (3), and A. aeolicus
(14) (starts with position 40) (4). The boxed amino acids
represent more than 75% conserved positions.
|
|
The FCSD polypeptide chain is predicted to fold in three domains
(12), which are comparable to those of glutathione
reductase. The first domain in the latter protein binds flavin adenine
dinucleotide (FAD), the second domain binds a pyridine nucleotide, and
the third domain provides the subunit interface. Although the second domain is present in FCSD, it does not interact with pyridine nucleotides because of the presence of a unique disulfide bond between
Cys 161 and Cys 337 that blocks access to that side of the FAD. The
functional role of this domain in FCSD is unknown. SQR apparently has
the same three domains and the same disulfide found in FCSD. The SQR
gene is not closely associated with a cytochrome, but SQR interacts
with membrane proteins, presumably where quinone is reduced, and this
binding is likely to be mediated by the third domain, which in the FCSD
flavoprotein binds the cytochrome c subunit.
FCSD is a membrane protein.
Since no FCSD was found in the
soluble extracts and only the cytochrome subunit was solubilized with
butanol, we attempted to confirm that FCSD was localized in the
membrane fraction by extraction with the detergent Triton X-100. The
purification protocol yielded a small amount of partially purified
FCSD. SDS-PAGE of the enzyme showed two abundant protein bands with
molecular masses of 46 and 10 kDa. Heme staining revealed that the
10-kDa band was the cytochrome c-552 subunit (Fig.
4). The spectra of the dithionite-reduced
enzyme showed the characteristic maxima for cytochrome c,
417 (
band), 524 (
band), and 552 (
band) nm, similar to those
of the butanol-solubilized cytochrome. The oxidized spectrum did not
display shoulders at 450 and 480 nm or bleaching with dithionite, which
is typical of FCSD flavin. This may be due to modification of the
native enzyme during the treatment with Triton X-100. Immunoblotting of
the solubilized membrane fraction and of the soluble protein fraction
clearly indicated that the flavoprotein subunit reacted with an
antibody against the C. vinosum flavoprotein. It was present
in the membrane fraction but not in the soluble fraction (Fig. 4B).

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
(A) SDS-PAGE profiles of FCSD from E. vacuolata. Lane 1, heme-stained cytochrome c-552; lane
2, Coomassie blue-stained flavoprotein and cytochrome c-552
subunits solubilized with Triton X-100 and partially purified as
described in the text. (B) Localization of E. vacuolata FCSD
in the membrane protein fraction. The Western blot was performed using
C. vinosum flavoprotein subunit antibodies. Lanes: 1, E. vacuolata soluble protein fraction; 2, E. vacuolata membrane protein fraction; 3, C. vinosum FCSD
(1 µg of native protein).
|
|
Flanking genes.
Two possible open reading frames were found
adjacent to the E. vacuolata FCSD genes. Upstream, in the
same orientation, there is the 3' end of a gene for a 132-residue-long
protein which by BLAST search appears to be homologous to the
htrB gene of E. coli. The HtrB gene codes for
lauroyl acyltransferase involved in the biosynthesis of the outer
membrane lipid A (13). It is separated from the FCSD
cytochrome subunit gene by 558 bases. The HtrB gene product is also a
heat shock protein required for cell viability at high temperature in
E. coli and is present in Haemophilus influenzae (29) as well. Separated by 236 bases downstream of the
flavoprotein subunit gene, and in the opposite orientation, there is a
large open reading frame (orf4) encoding a protein of at
least 567 amino acid residues. It is unclear where it begins, but the
initiator codon seems to be a TTG triplet starting at base 4313, 9 bases downstream of a possible ribosome binding site (GGAG). A BLAST search shows that it has a large number of homologs. The strongest similarity is to four proteins derived from Synechocystis
(SLR359, SLL267, SLR1305, and SLR2077) (23), with more than
40% identity. The functional roles of these proteins are unknown, but
the orf4 product is also related to a lesser extent to
diguanylate cyclases and phosphodiesterases. These proteins show the
greatest conservation in the C-terminal 400 residues, which contain
characteristic GGDEF and EAL motifs (44). It is remarkable
that a gene similar to orf4 is located downstream of
R. capsulatus SQR in the same opposing orientation as in
E. vacuolata. This context is quite different from that of
the FCSD gene in Chromatium, where it was found that the
flavoprotein gene is separated from the cytochrome gene by only 15 nucleotides (15, 35). Upstream, a tetraheme cytochrome and a
homolog of ankyrin were found. The tetraheme cytochrome is part of a
multigene locus in Thiosphaera pantotropha, H. influenzae, and Alcaligenes eutrophus (8, 17,
42) which contains several electron transfer proteins involved in
nitrate reduction. Ankyrin serves to bind proteins together and/or to
bind them to the membrane (9). Downstream of the
Chromatium FCSD gene, there are no genes located in the 446 bases that were sequenced. Thus, the FCSD gene is probably not part of
a multigene operon in Chromatium and E. vacuolata
because of the lack of conservation of flanking genes and the small
sizes of the transcripts (see below).
Influence of sulfur compounds on the growth of E. vacuolata.
FCSD transcription and expression in E. vacuolata was studied by examining growth in different media. The
best growth was obtained under photoheterotrophic conditions in DSMZ
medium combining acetate as a carbon source and sulfide as an electron
donor. These results are in agreement with the report of Zakharchuk and
Ivanovskii (53), who described increased assimilation of
14C-acetate in E. shaposhnikovii cells in the
presence of thiosulfate, sulfide, and bicarbonate. To study the
influence of carbon sources on photosynthetic activity, cells were
grown on minimal medium supplemented with acetate, succinate, or
malate, all of which supported growth. Removal of sulfide, however,
reduced growth compared to that in a photomixotrophic medium, as did
replacing acetate with sodium malate or succinate. RNA was extracted
from these cells and analyzed by Northern blotting with probes specific for both the heme and the flavoprotein subunits of FCSD. The size and
the hybridization pattern were the same with both probes. The
transcript of about 3 kb corresponds to an operon that contains the
cytochrome and flavoprotein genes but no others. The
Chromatium FCSD transcript is also just large enough to
include the two subunit genes (15). The intensity of the RNA
transcripts increased in cells grown on sulfide or thiosulfate plus
CO2 or on sulfide plus acetate. In view of the fact that
some sulfide can be produced from thiosulfate (10, 11), we
conclude that sulfide induces FCSD expression (Fig.
5). In the absence of sulfide or
thiosulfate, FCSD expression is significantly reduced, confirming the
role of sulfide for FCSD induction under anoxygenic photosynthesis.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Northern blot of RNA isolated from E. vacuolata. Total RNA was isolated from a 100-ml culture growing
exponentially in minimal Pfennig medium supplemented with the following
compounds: malate (lane 1), sodium thiosulfate (lane 2), sodium sulfide
(lane 3), sodium sulfide and acetate (lane 4), acetate (lane 5), and
succinate (lane 6). Fifty micrograms of RNA was loaded per lane.
Northern hybridization was performed with a digoxigenin-labeled probe
amplified with the fcsd gene template. Note the elevated
levels of FCSD transcript in the cultures containing sulfide.
|
|
Functional importance of conserved residues in FCSD proteins.
Several residues in the flavoprotein were identified from the
three-dimensional structure as having possible functional importance (12). The FAD is covalently bound to Cys 42 (Chromatium numbering), and this residue is conserved in
E. vacuolata. Glu 167 is conserved in nearly all the
proteins of the glutathione reductase family of enzymes
(37), including the Chromatium and
E. vacuolata FCSDs, and is located near the N5
position of the FAD. In FCSD, Glu 167 modulates the reactivity of the
FAD with sulfite when ionized at pH 6 and presumably has a role to play
in the oxidation of sulfide. The disulfide Cys 161-Cys 337 is adjacent
to the FAD; it is conserved and also modulates the reactivity of the
FAD with sulfite when it is cleaved by sulfite above pH 8.5. Incidentally, this disulfide is also present in SQR (38),
suggesting that it may be essential for the oxidation of sulfide. Trp
128, Tyr 306, and Trp 391 are all near the flavin, and any one of them could act as the charge transfer acceptor for the flavin-sulfite adduct. Trp 128 and Trp 391 are conserved, but Tyr 306 is replaced by
His in E. vacuolata. This should affect the redox potential of the FAD in a pH-dependent manner because of its location at the
positive N-terminal end of the helix. Thus, FAD may have a higher redox
potential at low pH when the His is protonated, provided that the
charge on the helix does not prevent His protonation within the
physiological range of pH. A higher potential should make the FAD more
reactive with sulfite and other nucleophiles.
The results presented here establish that an FCSD is present in
E. vacuolata, thus further expanding the distribution of
this protein to a third family of photosynthetic sulfur bacteria.
Notably, the genetic contexts of the E. vacuolata and
Chromatium FCSDs are quite distinct, indicating that the
FCSD gene is not part of a multigene operon. Importantly, it is quite
clear that E. vacuolata FCSD is a membrane-bound as opposed
to a soluble protein as in other species of green and purple
photosynthetic bacteria; thus, it may be present in other species and
not detected in a soluble form. The E. vacuolata FCSD is
clearly regulated by sulfide, although the Chromatium FCSD
is not. This is consistent with the view that FCSD functions in vivo as
sulfide dehydrogenase in E. vacuolata if not in all species
of sulfur bacteria in which it is found.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
J.V.B. is indebted to the Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk
Onderzoek-Vlaanderen for research projects G.0068.96 and G.0054.97. This work was also supported by grant GM 21277 from the National Institutes of Health to M.A.C.
We acknowledge D. Brune for helpful discussions and for correction of
the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Biochemistry, Physiology and Microbiology, Laboratory of Protein
Biochemistry and Protein Engineering, University of Ghent,
Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium. Phone: 32-92645109. Fax:
32-92645338. E-mail: Jozef.vanbeeumen{at}rug.ac.be.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Ambler, R. P., and M. Wynn.
1973.
The amino acid sequences of cytochromes c-551 from three species of Pseudomonas.
Biochem. J.
131:485-498[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Arieli, B.,
Y. Shahak,
D. Taglicht,
G. Hauska, and E. Padan.
1994.
Purification and characterization of sulfide-quinone reductase (SQR), a novel enzyme driving anoxygenic photosynthesis in Oscillatoria limnetica.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:5705-5711[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Ausubel, F. M.,
R. Bocut,
R. E. Kingston,
D. D. Moore,
J. G. Seidman,
J. A. Smith, and K. Strohl (ed.).
1990.
Current protocols in molecular biology.
Wiley Interscience, New York, N.Y.
|
| 4.
|
Bartsch, R. G.
1978.
Cytochromes, p. 249-279.
In
R. K. Clayton, and W. R. Sistrom (ed.), The photosynthetic bacteria. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 5.
|
Bartsch, R. G.
1991.
The distribution of soluble metallo-redox proteins in purple phototrophic bacteria.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1058:28-30[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Bartsch, R. G., and M. D. Kamen.
1960.
Isolation and properties of two soluble heme proteins in extracts of the photoanaerobe Chromatium.
J. Biol. Chem.
235:825-831[Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Bartsch, R. G.,
T. E. Meyer, and A. B. Robinson.
1968.
Complex c-type cytochromes with bound flavin, p. 443-451.
In
K. Okunuki, M. D. Kamen, and I. Sekuzu (ed.), Structure and function of cytochromes. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, Japan.
|
| 8.
|
Berks, B. C.,
D. J. Richardson,
A. Reilly,
A. C. Willis, and S. J. Ferguson.
1995.
The napEDABC gene cluster encoding the periplasmic nitrate reductase system of Thiosphaera pantotropha.
Biochem. J.
309:983-992.
|
| 9.
|
Bork, P.
1993.
Hundreds of ankyrin-like repeats in functionally diverse proteins: mobile modules that cross phyla horizontally?
Proteins
17:363-374[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Brune, D. C.
1989.
Sulfur oxidation by phototrophic bacteria.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
973:189-221.
|
| 11.
|
Brune, D. C.
1995.
Sulfur compounds as photosynthetic electron donors, p. 847-870.
In
R. E. Blankenship, M. T. Madigan, and C. E. Bauer (ed.), Anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, N.Y.
|
| 12.
|
Chen, Z. W.,
M. Koh,
G. Van Driessche,
J. J. Van Beeumen,
R. G. Bartsch,
T. E. Meyer,
M. A. Cusanovich, and F. S. Mathews.
1994.
The structure of flavocytochrome c sulfide dehydrogenase from a purple phototrophic bacterium.
Science
266:430-432[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Clementz, T.,
J. J. Bednarski, and C. R. Raetz.
1996.
Function of the htrB high temperature requirement gene of Escherichia coli in the acylation of lipid A: HtrB catalyzed incorporation of laurate.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:12095-12102[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Deckert, G.,
P. V. Warren,
T. Gaasterland,
W. G. Young,
A. L. Lenox,
D. E. Graham,
R. Overbeek,
M. A. Snead,
M. Keller,
M. Aujay,
R. Huber,
R. A. Feldman,
J. M. Short,
G. J. Olsen, and R. V. Swanson.
1998.
The complete genome of the hyperthermophilic bacterium Aquifex aeolicus.
Nature
392:353-358[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Dolata, M. M.,
J. J. Van Beeumen,
R. P. Ambler,
T. E. Meyer, and M. A. Cusanovich.
1993.
Nucleotide sequence of the heme subunit of flavocytochrome c from the purple phototrophic bacterium, Chromatium vinosum.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:14426-14431[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Fischer, U.
1989.
Characterization of two soluble basic cytochromes isolated from the anoxygenic phototrophic sulfur bacterium Chlorobium phaeobacteroides.
Z. Naturforsch. Sect. C
44:71-76.
|
| 17.
|
Fleischmann, R. D.,
M. D. Adams,
O. White,
R. A. Clayton,
E. F. Kirkness,
A. R. Kerlavage,
C. J. Bult,
J. F. Tomb,
B. A. Dougherty, and J. M. Merrick.
1995.
Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd.
Science
269:496-512[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Friedrich, C. G.
1998.
Physiology and genetics of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria.
Adv. Microb. Physiol.
39:235-289[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Fukumori, Y., and T. Yamanaka.
1979.
Flavocytochrome c of Chromatium vinosum.
J. Biochem.
85:1405-1414[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Garcia-Castillo, M. C.,
B. S. Lou,
M. R. Ondrias,
D. E. Robertson, and D. B. Knaff.
1994.
Characterization of flavocytochrome c-552 from the thermophilic photosynthetic bacterium Chromatium tepidum.
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
315:262-266[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Imhoff, J. F.,
J. Süling, and R. Petri.
1998.
Phylogenetic relationships among the Chromateaceae, their taxonomic reclassification and description of the new genera Allochromatium, Halochromatium, Isochromatium, Marichromatium, Thiococcus, Thiohalocapsa, and Thermochromatium.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
48:1129-1143[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Jue, R. A., and H. E. Hale.
1993.
Identification of cysteine residues alkylated with 3-bromopropylamine by protein sequence analysis.
Anal. Biochem.
210:39-44[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Kaneko, T.,
S. Sato,
H. Kotani,
A. Tanaka,
E. Asamizu,
Y. Nakamura,
N. Miyajima,
M. Hirosawa,
M. Sugiura,
S. Sasamoto,
T. Kimura,
T. Hosouchi,
A. Masuno,
A. Muraki,
N. Nakazaki,
K. Naruo,
S. Okumura,
S. Shimpo,
C. Takeuchi,
T. Wada,
A. Watanabe,
M. Yamada,
M. Yasuda, and S. Tabata.
1996.
Sequence analysis of the genome of the unicellular cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC6803. II. Sequence determination of the entire genome and assignment of potential protein-coding regions.
DNA Res.
3:109-136[Abstract].
|
| 24.
|
Kerfeld, C. A.,
C. Dhan,
M. Hirasawa,
S. Kleis-San Francisco,
T. O. Yeates, and D. B. Knaff.
1996.
Isolation and characterization of soluble electron transfer proteins from Chromatium purpuratum.
Biochemistry
35:7812-7818[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Kusai, A., and T. Yamanaka.
1973.
Cytochrome c (553, Chlorobium thiosulfatophilum) is a sulfide-cytochrome c reductase.
FEBS Lett.
34:235-237[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Küsche, W. H., and H. G. Trüper.
1984.
Iron sulfur proteins of the purple sulfur bacterium Ectothiorhodospira shaposhnikovii.
Arch. Microbiol.
137:266-271[CrossRef].
|
| 27.
|
Küsche, W. H., and H. G. Trüper.
1984.
Cytochromes of the purple sulfur bacterium Ectothiorhodospira shaposhnikovii.
Z. Naturforsch. Sect. C
39:894-901.
|
| 28.
|
Laemlli, U. K.
1970.
Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.
Nature
227:680-685[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Lee, N.-G.,
M. G. Sunshine,
J. J. Engstrom,
B. W. Gibson, and M. A. Apicella.
1995.
Mutation of the htrB locus of Haemophilus influenzae nontypeable strain 2019 is associated with modifications of lipid A and phosphorylation of the lipo-oligosaccharide.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:27151-27159[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Meyer, T. E.,
R. G. Bartsch,
M. A. Cusanovich, and J. H. Mathewson.
1968.
The cytochromes of Chlorobium thiosulfatophilum.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
153:854-861[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Meyer, T. E.,
W. P. Vorkink,
G. Tollin, and M. A. Cusanovich.
1985.
Chromatium flavocytochrome c kinetics of reduction of the heme subunit and the flavocytochrome mitochondrial cytochrome c complex.
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
236:52-58[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Myers, C. R., and J. M. Myers.
1992.
Localization of cytochromes to the outer membrane of anaerobically grown Shewanella putrefaciens MR-1.
J. Bacteriol.
147:3429-3438.
|
| 33.
|
Myers, J. M., and C. R. Myers.
1998.
Isolation and sequence of omcA, a gene encoding a decaheme outer membrane cytochrome c of Shewanella putrefaciens MR-1, and detection of omcA homologs in other strains of S. putrefaciens.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1373:237-251[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Pattaragulwanit, K.,
D. C. Brune,
G. Truper, and C. Dahl.
1998.
Molecular genetic evidence for extracytoplasmic localization of sulfur globules in Chromatium vinosum.
Arch. Microbiol.
169:434-444[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Reinartz, M.,
J. Tschape,
T. Bruser,
H. G. Truper, and C. Dahl.
1998.
Sulfide oxidation in the phototrophic sulfur bacterium Chromatium vinosum.
Arch. Microbiol.
170:59-68[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 37.
|
Schulz, G. E., and P. A. Karplus.
1987.
Enzymes with active-site redox-active disulfide bonds.
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
16:81-84.
|
| 38.
|
Schutz, M.,
I. Maldener,
C. Griesbeck, and G. Hauska.
1999.
Sulfide-quinone reductase from Rhodobacter capsulatus: requirement for growth, periplasmic localization, and extension of gene sequence analysis.
J. Bacteriol.
181:6516-6523[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Schutz, M.,
Y. Shahak,
E. Padan, and G. Hauska.
1997.
Sulfide-quinone reductase from Rhodobacter capsulatus.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:9890-9894[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Shahak, Y.,
B. Arieli,
E. Padan, and G. Hauska.
1992.
Sulfide quinone reductase (SQR) activity in Chlorobium.
FEBS Lett.
299:127-130[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Shahak, Y.,
M. Schutz,
M. Bronstein,
C. Griesbeck,
G. Hauska, and E. Padan.
1999.
Sulfide-dependent anoxygenic photosynthesis in prokaryotes, p. 217-228.
In
G. A. Peschek, W. Loffelhardt, and G. Schmetterer (ed.), The phototrophic prokaryotes. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, N.Y.
|
| 42.
|
Siddiqui, R. A.,
U. Warnecke-Eberz,
A. Hengsberger,
B. Schneider,
S. Kostka, and B. Friedrich.
1993.
Structure and function of a periplasmic nitrate reductase in Alcaligenes eutrophus H16.
J. Bacteriol.
175:5867-5876[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Steinmetz, M. A., and U. Fischer.
1981.
Cytochromes of the non-thiosulfate-utilizing green sulfur bacterium Chlorobium limicola.
Arch. Microbiol.
130:31-37[CrossRef].
|
| 44.
|
Tal, R.,
H. C. Wong,
R. Calhoon,
D. Gelfand,
A. L. Fear,
G. Volman,
R. Mayer,
P. Ross,
D. Amikam,
H. Weinhouse,
A. Cohen,
S. Sapir,
P. Ohana, and M. Benziman.
1998.
Three cdg operons control cellular turnover of cyclic di-GMP in Acetobacter xylinum: genetic organization and occurrence of conserved domains in isoenzymes.
J. Bacteriol.
180:4416-4425[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Thomas, P. E.,
D. Ryan, and W. Ledwin.
1976.
An improved staining procedure for the detection of the peroxidase activity of cytochrome P-450 on sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gels.
Anal. Biochem.
75:168-176[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Tissieres, A.
1956.
Purification and properties and the specific biological activity of cytochromes c4 and c5 from Azotobacter vinelandii.
Biochem. J.
64:582-589[Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Van Beeumen, J. J.,
H. Demol,
B. Samyn,
R. G. Bartsch,
T. E. Meyer,
M. M. Dolata, and M. A. Cusanovich.
1991.
Covalent structure of the diheme cytochrome subunit and amino terminal sequence of the flavoprotein subunit of flavocytochrome c from Chromatium vinosum.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:12921-12931[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Van Beeumen, J. J.,
S. Van Bun,
T. E. Meyer,
R. G. Bartsch, and M. A. Cusanovich.
1990.
Complete amino acid sequence of the cytochrome subunit and amino-terminal sequence of the flavin subunit of flavocytochrome c (sulfide dehydrogenase) from Chlorobium thiosulfatophilum.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:9793-9799[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Van Driessche, G.,
M. Koh,
Z. W. Chen,
F. S. Mathews,
T. E. Meyer,
R. G. Bartsch,
M. A. Cusanovich, and J. J. Van Beeumen.
1996.
Covalent structure of the flavoprotein subunit of the flavocytochrome c: sulfide dehydrogenase from the purple phototrophic bacterium Chromatium vinosum.
Protein Sci.
5:1753-1764[Abstract].
|
| 50.
|
Visser, M.,
G. A. H. de Jong,
L. A. Robertson, and J. G. Kuenen.
1997.
A novel membrane-bound flavocytochrome c sulfide dehydrogenase from the colourless sulfur bacterium Thiobacillus sp. W5.
Arch. Microbiol.
167:295-301[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Von Heijne, G.
1992.
Membrane protein structure prediction, hydrophobicity analysis and the positive-inside rule.
J. Mol. Biol.
225:487-495[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 52.
|
Wodara, C.,
F. Bardischewsky, and C. G. Friedrich.
1997.
Cloning and characterization of sulfite dehydrogenase, two c-type cytochromes, and a flavoprotein of Paracoccus denitrificans GB17: essential role of sulfite dehydrogenase in lithotrophic sulfur oxidation.
J. Bacteriol.
179:5014-5023[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 53.
|
Zakharchuk, L. M., and R. N. Ivanovskii.
1980.
Acetate metabolism in Ectothiorhodospira shaposhnikovii growing in dark.
Mikrobiologiia
49:14-19[Medline].
|
| 54.
|
Zorin, N. A., and I. N. Gogotov.
1980.
Purification and properties of cytochrome c-552 from purple sulfur bacterium Thiocapsa roseopersicina.
Biokhimia
45:1134-1138. (English translation.)
|
Journal of Bacteriology, June 2000, p. 3097-3103, Vol. 182, No. 11
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.