Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, June 2000, p. 3345-3352, Vol. 182, No. 12
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
An IS257-Derived Hybrid Promoter Directs Transcription
of a tetA(K) Tetracycline Resistance Gene in the
Staphylococcus aureus Chromosomal mec
Region
Alice E.
Simpson,
Ronald A.
Skurray, and
Neville
Firth*
School of Biological Sciences, University of
Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
Received 3 December 1999/Accepted 20 March 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Transcription of the tetA(K) tetracycline resistance
determinant encoded by an IS257-flanked cointegrated copy
of a pT181-like plasmid, located within the chromosomal mec
region of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
isolate, has been investigated. The results demonstrated that
transcription of tetA(K) in this strain is directed by both
an IS257-derived hybrid promoter, which is stronger than the native tetA(K) promoter in the autonomous form of
pT181, and a complete outwardly directed promoter identified within one
end of IS257. Despite lower gene dosage, the chromosomal
configuration was shown to afford a higher level of resistance than
that mediated by pT181 in an autonomous multicopy state. Furthermore,
competition studies revealed that a strain carrying the chromosomal
tetA(K) determinant exhibited a higher level of fitness in
the presence of tetracycline but not in its absence. This finding
suggests that tetracycline has been a selective factor in the emergence of strains carrying a cointegrated pT181-like plasmid in their chromosomes. The results highlight the potential of IS257
to influence the expression of neighboring genes, a property likely to
enhance its capacity to mediate advantageous genetic rearrangements.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The staphylococcal insertion element
IS257 has been found in association with determinants
encoding resistance to antiseptics and disinfectants,
aminoglycosides, bleomycin, cadmium, mercury, mupirocin, tetracycline,
trimethoprim, and virginiamycin in both Staphylococcus
aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (7). IS257, also known as IS431 (3), is 789 or 790 bp in length, is bounded by imperfect 27-bp terminal inverted
repeats, and contains a single gene encoding a transposase
(30). This element is a member of the IS6 family
of bacterial insertion sequences, which contains representatives
from both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria
(19). IS257-mediated cointegrate
formation is thought to be responsible for the incorporation of the
above-mentioned resistance determinants into staphylococcal chromosomes
and plasmids through the process of nonresolved replicative
transposition (33).
Four copies of IS257 are present in the region of the
chromosome associated with methicillin resistance (the mec
region) of the Australian clinical isolate SK1660 (8). Two
of these copies flank genes mediating resistance to mercurial
compounds, whereas the other copies flank a tetracycline resistance
determinant (see Fig. 1). The latter structure corresponds to a
cointegrated copy of a pT181-like plasmid that appears to have been
cointegrated into the chromosome as a consequence of IS257
insertion between the replication initiation gene, repC, and
tetA(K) (9), which encodes an efflux pump
conferring tetracycline resistance (10). Consistent with
such an insertion site, nucleotide sequencing of an equivalent segment
from a similar methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA)
strain, ANS46, revealed the presence of 8-bp target duplications at the
extremities of the integrated plasmid, corresponding to a sequence
located between repC and tetA(K) (20, 34). Retrospective studies have revealed that staphylococcal strains isolated in Australian hospitals prior to 1970 commonly contained an autonomous pT181-like plasmid, whereas later isolates, such as SK1660 and ANS46, typically possessed the chromosomally cointegrated form of the plasmid (9). Identically organized plasmid cointegrates have also been detected in the chromosomal mec region of MRSA strains isolated in the United States and
Greece (34).
In addition to facilitating the capture of resistance genes,
IS257 has been shown to play a role in the expression of the trimethoprim resistance gene, dfrA. In strains exhibiting
high-level trimethoprim resistance, transcription of dfrA is
directed by a hybrid promoter consisting of a
35 sequence encoded
within the end of IS257 and a
10 sequence located in the
adjacent sequence (15). Sequence analysis has suggested that
an analogous IS257-derived hybrid promoter might also be
responsible for transcription of tetA(K) in the chromosomal
pT181-like plasmid cointegrate of strains such as SK1660
(33). To further investigate the potential of IS257 to influence the expression of genes with which it is
associated, we have analyzed the transcription of the
tetA(K) gene from SK1660. A comparative analysis of
tetA(K) promoter strengths, levels of tetracycline
resistance, growth rates, and competitive fitness of strains carrying
the chromosomally cointegrated and autonomous forms of pT181 was
performed so as to gain insight into the possible reasons for the
emergence of strains carrying the cointegrate structure.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and primers.
The S. aureus and Escherichia coli strains and plasmids and
the oligonucleotides used in this study are listed in Table
1. All strains were cultured at 37°C in
Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (31) containing, where
appropriate, ampicillin (100 µg/ml), chloramphenicol (10 µg/ml),
spectinomycin (50 µg/ml), or tetracycline (various concentrations).
Recombinant plasmids were initially electroporated into E. coli DH5
(Table 1).
To generate SK5323 (Table 1), which carries a single copy of the
tetA(K) gene behind the IS257 hybrid promoter in
the RN4220 chromosome, pSK5321 (Table 1) was constructed. A 2.9-kb PCR
product amplified from the SK1660 chromosome, using primers
IS257-719 and pT181-3025 (Table 1), and cut with
HindIII was cloned into pCL84 (Table 1) in the same
orientation as the HindIII fragment carrying the
tetA(K) gene, which it replaced. The pCL84 vector inserts
into the lipase gene (geh) of the staphylococcal chromosome (14). Following transformation of pSK5321 into the S. aureus RN4220 derivative CYL316 (Table 1), which contains the
integrase-encoding plasmid pYL112
19, the integrants were selected on
LB agar containing 3 µg of tetracycline/ml. Loss of lipase activity
in a selected transformant was confirmed on Sierra medium
(1), which permits identification of lipase mutants; a
precipitate surrounds colonies expressing lipase activity. SK5318
(Table 1) was constructed by integrating a copy of pCL84, which carries
the tetA(K) gene and promoter region from pT181
(14), into the CYL316 chromosome. All clones constructed
from the products of PCRs were sequenced to confirm that no mutations
had been incorporated during amplification. Insertions into the
geh gene were checked by PCR using the primers pT181-1095
and geh-2488 (Table 1), which are complementary to sequences
within tetA(K) and geh, respectively. SK5323 and
SK5318 were cured of pYL112
19 by a previously described method
(18).
DNA isolation, recombinant DNA techniques, and bacterial
electroporation.
Plasmid DNA was isolated from E. coli
using the Quantum Prep miniprep kit (Bio-Rad) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. S. aureus DNA isolations were
performed as described previously (18). All restriction
endonuclease digestion and ligation reactions were carried out in
accordance with the manufacturers' instructions. DNA cloning was
performed by standard techniques (31). PCR was undertaken
using Pfu (Stratagene) or Pyrostase (Molecular Genetic Resources) enzymes, according to the manufacturers' instructions, in
an MJ Research PTC-100 with Hot Bonnet. Primers were synthesized using
a Beckman Oligo 1000 DNA synthesizer. Electroporation of E. coli (5) and S. aureus (32) was
performed with a Bio-Rad Gene Pulser with a pulse controller.
DNA sequencing.
Automated cycle sequencing was performed by
the Sydney University and Prince Alfred Macromolecular Analysis Centre
or the Australian Genome Research Facility. Manual sequencing was
carried out with a Sequitherm sequencing kit (Epicentre Technologies) to obtain sequence ladders for transcript mapping. Sequence data was
stored and assembled with the program SEQUENCHER (Gene Codes Corporation).
Transcript mapping by primer extension.
Total cellular RNA
was isolated from S. aureus strains as previously described
(15). Transcript mapping was performed essentially as
described by Ausubel et al. (2). Two primers were used; oligonucleotide pT181-1010 (Table 1), complementary to sequences within
the tetA(K) structural gene and 145 bp from the expected hybrid promoter transcription start point (TSP), and oligonucleotide pT181-904 (Table 1), 43 bp from the expected TSP.
Northern hybridization.
Total cellular RNA was isolated from
S. aureus strains using a high-speed reciprocating
homogenizer (FastPREP apparatus; BIO101) and a FastRNA isolation kit
(BIO101), according to the manufacturer's instructions. An approximate
total RNA concentration for each sample was determined
spectrophotometrically (QuantaGene; Pharmacia Biotech). Accurate
estimation of the relative RNA content of individual samples was
achieved by electrophoresis of aliquots through a 1.0% agarose gel in
TAE buffer (40 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.5], 5 mM sodium acetate, 1 mM EDTA),
ethidium bromide staining, visualization with a Molecular Imager FX
(Bio-Rad), and quantitation by volume analysis of the 16S and 23S rRNA
bands in the resulting image using the software Quantity One (Bio-Rad).
Aliquots containing equal amounts of total RNA (approximately 14 µg)
were electrophoresed through a 2.2 M formaldehyde-1.5% agarose gel in
MOPS buffer (20 mM 3-N-morpholinopropanesulfonic acid, 8 mM
sodium acetate, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.0). RNA was transferred to a Hybond N+
membrane (Amersham) via capillary action. The DNA probe consisted of a 484-bp internal tetA(K) fragment amplified from pT181 using
primers pT181-1095 and pT181-1578 (Table 1). The probe was purified by using a Microcon YM-100 (Millipore) and radiolabeled with
[
-32P]dCTP by the random-primed method (Ready-To-Go
labeling kit; Pharmacia). Hybridization was performed by standard
methods (31). The membrane was imaged with a storage
phosphor screen (Kodak) and a Molecular Imager FX. Relative amounts of
tetA(K) mRNA were quantitated by volume analysis.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
The MIC of
tetracycline for a strain was determined by the standard agar dilution
method according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory
Standards guidelines for antimicrobial susceptibility testing
(24).
Inhibition studies.
Overnight cultures grown in the absence
or presence of 2 µg of tetracycline/ml were diluted to an optical
density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.05 and subcultured into 4 ml
of LB medium in the presence of tetracycline at 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 128 µg/ml. After growth for 3.5 h, the OD600 of
the culture was determined.
Growth studies.
Overnight cultures grown in LB medium were
diluted to an OD600 of 0.05 and subcultured into 100 ml of
LB medium, LB medium containing 1 µg of tetracycline/ml, and LB
medium containing 5 µg of tetracycline/ml. The OD600 was
determined at the beginning of the experiment and subsequently at 0.5-h
intervals for 3.5 h.
Competition studies.
Equal proportions of overnight cultures
of strains SK5319 and SK5323 were diluted to an OD600 of
0.05 and used to inoculate 10 ml of LB medium or LB medium containing 1 µg of tetracycline/ml. These mixed cultures were diluted 10,000-fold
each day in fresh medium for 8 days; such dilution results in
approximately 13.3 generations per day, a value confirmed by viable
counts on selected days. The relative proportions of each strain were
determined at the beginning of the experiment and subsequently every
24 h by spreading dilutions of the mixed culture on Sierra medium
(1) and scoring for lipase activity. DNA isolations from
colonies identified by lipase activity to be SK5319 confirmed the
presence of pT181.
Statistical analysis.
Statistical analysis was carried out
with Statview (SAS Institute Inc.). Differences between groups were
evaluated by Fisher's protected least significant difference test
after analysis of variance, and by repeated-measures analysis where
appropriate. A significant difference was defined as a P
value of <0.05.
 |
RESULTS |
Structure of the cointegrated pT181-like plasmid in the SK1660
chromosome.
The previous identification of a putative
IS257-derived hybrid promoter upstream of tetA(K)
in the pT181-like chromosomal cointegrate was based on the published
IS257 insertion site in the strain ANS46 (20) and
assumed sequence identity between the integrated plasmid and pT181
(33). Amplification and sequencing of both
IS257-plasmid junctions from SK1660 confirmed that this strain possesses the same cointegrate structure as ANS46, including the
same target duplication at the extremities of the plasmid (Fig.
1). The tetA(K) gene and
upstream sequence were found to be identical to those of pT181
(13). However, sequencing of the replication region of the
cointegrated plasmid revealed that the repC gene
contains a 10-bp duplication (corresponding to nucleotides [nt] 4370 to 4379 of pT181 [GenBank entry J01764]) which has resulted in
a truncated RepC protein of only 30 amino acids, consistent with the
suggestion that the repC gene of the cointegrated pT181 in
ANS46 is defective (6). These findings, therefore, confirm the presence of the proposed hybrid promoter upstream of
tetA(K) in SK1660, designated Phybrid,
consisting of the candidate
35 and
10 sequences, TTGCAA
and TATATT, respectively, separated by 17 bp (Fig.
2).

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Genetic organization of pT181 in the mec
region of the chromosome of MRSA strains ANS46 and SK1660 (map adapted
from Gillespie et al. [8] and Matthews et al.
[20]). The IS257-plasmid junctions in
SK1660 were amplified using the primer pairs IS257-719 and
pT181-2334BamHI, and IS257-685BglII
and pT181-3936 (Table 1) and sequenced. The plasmid sequence obtained,
shown as a solid line in the enlarged view, corresponds to nt 1 to 2335 and nt 3975 to 4439 of the pT181 sequence (GenBank entry J01764). The
following genes are shown: cad, cadmium resistance;
ermA, resistance to macrolides, lincosamides, and
streptogramin B; mec, methicillin resistance;
merAB, mercury resistance; and spc, spectinomycin
resistance. The locations of Tn554 and a related structure,
Tn554, are indicated. Copies of IS257 are
represented by solid boxes; the arrows indicate the direction of
IS257 transposase transcription. The pT181 genes shown, with
directions of transcription indicated by boxes with pointed ends, are
pre, plasmid recombination; repC, replication
initiation; and tetA(K), tetracycline resistance. The
approximate positions of the 35 and 10 sequences for the
IS257 hybrid promoter are shown. Eight-base pair target
duplication sequences are denoted by dashed arrows.
|
|

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Organization of tetA(K) promoters in pT181
and SK1660. The sequence corresponds to that obtained from the
tetA(K) regions of pT181 and the chromosome of SK1660. The
boxed sequence represents IS257 sequence. The arrow
underneath the sequence represents the terminal inverted repeat of
IS257. The arrows above the sequence represent TSPs
identified in this study. The solid boxes represent 10 and 35
sequences of the promoters PtetA(K),
Phybrid, and Pout. The sequence in lowercase
letters represents the 8-bp target duplication. The number at the end
of the sequence indicates the position in the pT181 sequence (GenBank
entry J01764).
|
|
Transcription of tetA(K).
To determine if the
putative hybrid promoter upstream of tetA(K) in SK1660 is
functional, primer extension studies were performed. For comparison,
equivalent studies were undertaken with strain RN2424 (Table 1) to
determine the TSP of tetA(K) in the autonomously carried
plasmid pT181 (data not shown). As summarized in Fig. 2, two extension
products were obtained for SK1660. The position of the more intense
product corresponded to a thymine residue 117 bp upstream of the
tetA(K) start codon and is consistent with a TSP
expected for Phybrid, designated TSP1, thereby confirming its activity. The weaker extension product, designated TSP2,
corresponded to a thymine residue 164 bp upstream from the
tetA(K) start codon. Examination of the sequence
upstream of TSP2 revealed the presence of an appropriately
positioned candidate promoter, Pout, consisting of the
35
and
10 sequences, TTCATA and TAAAAT,
respectively, separated by 18 bp. Pout represents a
complete, outwardly directed promoter within one end of
IS257. Thus, transcription of tetA(K) in SK1660
initiates at two sites; the majority of tetA(K) transcripts appear to initiate within the cointegrated plasmid, directed by Phybrid, whereas a smaller proportion originate within the
upstream copy of IS257, directed by Pout (Fig.
2).
A single extension product was detected with RNA isolated from S. aureus RN2424, identifying a TSP at approximately the same position as that recognized for Phybrid in SK1660 (Fig. 2).
It would therefore appear that the same
10 sequence is utilized by Phybrid and the native promoter for tetA(K)
in the autonomous form of pT181, designated
PtetA(K) (Fig. 2). A candidate
35
sequence for PtetA(K), TTAATA, is
located 17 bp upstream of this
10 sequence. It should be noted that
although the TSPs identified in Fig. 2 were obtained using primer
pT181-904, which is complementary to sequences located upstream of
tetA(K), equivalent experiments utilizing primer pT181-1010,
which is complementary to sequences located within the
tetA(K) coding sequence, identified the same TSPs, thereby
ruling out the possibility of other promoters closer to
tetA(K).
Comparative levels of tetA(K) transcription.
To
investigate the comparative levels of tetA(K) transcription,
a DNA segment from strain SK1660 encoding tetA(K) and
upstream IS257-derived sequences, including
Phybrid and Pout, was cloned into the
integration vector, pCL84 (14), and subsequently inserted into the chromosomal lipase gene (geh) of S. aureus RN4220 to generate strain SK5323. For comparison, an
equivalent fragment of pT181, encompassing tetA(K) and its
native promoter, was similarly inserted into the RN4220 chromosome to
generate SK5318. Northern hybridization (Fig.
3) demonstrated an approximately sixfold
increase in the amount of tetA(K) mRNA in SK5323 cells
carrying a single copy of the tetA(K) gene, in comparison to
SK5319 cells carrying autonomous pT181 present in multiple copies;
pT181 is normally maintained at approximately 20 copies per cell
(27). An equivalent strong transcript from the clinical
strain SK1660 was similarly detected (data not shown).

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Northern blot analysis of tetA(K)
transcription. The size of the transcript, shown as 1.6 kb, was
determined using coelectrophoresed RNA markers. The numbers shown at
the bottom indicate the amounts of transcript relative to that detected
in SK5319 (lane 5). The lanes were loaded with RNA from RN4220 (lane
1), SK5318 (lanes 2 and 3), SK5319 (lanes 4 and 5), and SK5323 (lanes 6 and 7). The RNAs in lanes 3, 5, and 7 were isolated from strains grown
in the presence of 2 µg of tetracycline/ml, and the RNAs in lanes 1, 2, 4, and 6 were isolated from strains grown without selection.
|
|
It therefore appears that the lower gene dosage due to the chromosomal
integration of tetA(K) is compensated for by the
generation of a stronger promoter. Indeed, comparison of
the amount of tetA(K) transcript in SK5318 and SK5323
cells, carrying chromosomal tetA(K) behind the native and
hybrid promoters, respectively, in the presence of tetracycline (Fig.
3, lanes 3 and 7), suggests an approximately 60-fold increase in
promoter strength for the hybrid promoter. A twofold increase in
the amount of tetA(K) transcript is seen in SK5319 and
SK5323 cells grown in the presence of tetracycline (Fig. 3, lanes
4 to 7).
Comparative levels of tetracycline susceptibility.
Since
tetA(K) is present as only a single copy in the chromosome
of S. aureus SK1660, rather than approximately 20 copies typically carried by a cell harboring autonomous pT181 (27), and is transcribed from a different promoter configuration, we were
interested in ascertaining the level of tetracycline resistance expressed by this strain. The MIC of tetracycline for SK1660 was found
to be two to four times higher than that for RN2424, which contains
autonomous pT181 (Table
2). However, this comparison is
complicated, since the tetracycline resistance phenotype of a clinical
strain such as SK1660 could reflect factors other than the genetic
context of its tetA(K) gene. For example, SK1660 is thought
to possess an additional determinant which mediates resistance to both
tetracycline and the semisynthetic derivative, minocycline (9). A more informative comparison is provided by
analysis of the tetracycline susceptibilities of
tetA(K)-containing RN4220 derivatives. The MIC of
tetracycline for SK5323, bearing Phybrid, was twice that
for SK5319, containing pT181, and eight times higher than that for
SK5318, which contains chromosomal PtetA(K) (Table 2). This pattern was observed irrespective of whether the cells
were initially grown in the absence of tetracycline or preexposed to
the antibiotic; preexposure resulted in reduced susceptibility values,
presumably due to the protective effect of preexisting TetA(K) protein.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Tetracycline resistance of S. aureus RN4220
and tetA(K)-containing derivatives. Overnight cultures grown
in the absence (A) or presence (B) of tetracycline (2 µg/ml) were
subcultured in the presence of tetracycline at the indicated
concentrations. The OD was then determined after 3.5 h. Each data
point is the mean of six experiments. Data for the following strains
are shown: RN4220 ( ), SK5318 ( ; PtetA(K)
in the chromosome), SK5319 ( ; PtetA(K) in
pT181), and SK5323 ( ; Pout and Phybrid in
the chromosome); for promoter configurations, see Fig. 2. The error
bars represent standard error.
|
|
The impact of each promoter configuration on the tetracycline
resistance of an entire bacterial population was investigated using
growth inhibition studies (Fig. 4). Statistical analysis revealed that,
in comparison to SK5319, SK5323 was significantly less inhibited in
tetracycline concentrations ranging from 2 to 32 µg/ml for both
preexposed and naïve cells (P < 0.05). The growth of SK5319, preexposed to tetracycline, was significantly stronger than that of SK5318 in tetracycline concentrations ranging from 2 to 128 µg/ml (P < 0.05), presumably
reflecting its greater tetA(K) copy number in the multicopy
pT181 plasmid. Interestingly, in the absence of preexposure to
tetracycline, no significant difference in growth was detected between
SK5319 and either the background strain RN4220 or SK5318 within the
3.5-h period of the experiment. This result probably reflects a lag in
the expression of TetA(K), which is thought to be inducible by
translation attenuation (13). The increased basal level of
TetA(K) present in SK5323, resulting from enhanced transcription of
tetA(K), presumably mitigates lag in this strain at this
level of tetracycline.
Influence of promoter configuration on bacterial growth.
The
studies described above demonstrated that a chromosomal
tetA(K) gene behind Phybrid affords a higher
degree of tetracycline resistance than that mediated by pT181. It is
conceivable that this configuration might also be advantageous in the
absence or in the presence of low levels of tetracycline, since it
would be expected to relieve any burden associated with carriage of a
multicopy plasmid. Growth studies revealed that in the absence of
tetracycline there was no significant difference between the growth
rates of the four strains in the 3.5-h period of the experiment (Fig.
5A). However, at low (Fig. 5B) and
intermediate (Fig. 5C) levels of tetracycline (1 and 5 µg/ml,
respectively), SK5323 cells grew significantly better than cells
carrying all other promoter configurations (P < 0.0001
in all cases except SK5323 versus SK5319 at 1 µg/ml, where
P was <0.05). The curves shown in Fig. 5B and C emphasize a
reduced lag in the growth of SK5323, in which tetA(K) is
expressed from Phybrid, in comparison to the other strains.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Relative growth of S. aureus strains carrying
various tetA(K) promoter configurations. Overnight cultures
were subcultured in LB medium (A), LB medium containing 1 µg of
tetracycline/ml (B), and LB medium containing 5 µg of tetracycline/ml
(C). Each data point is the mean of three experiments. Data for the
following strains are shown: RN4220 ( ), SK5318 ( ;
PtetA(K) in the chromosome), SK5319 ( ;
PtetA(K) in pT181), and SK5323 ( ;
Pout and Phybrid in the chromosome); for
promoter configurations, see Fig. 2. The error bars represent standard
error.
|
|
Relative fitness of tetracycline-resistant strains.
To
determine if the properties associated with the hybrid promoter, viz.,
lower susceptibility to tetracycline and reduced lag time in its
presence, result in improved relative fitness, competition assays
between strains SK5323 and SK5319 were undertaken. In essence, with
respect to tetA(K)-mediated tetracycline resistance, the
former is equivalent to the clinical isolate SK1660, whereas the latter
corresponds to its presumed progenitor carrying the autonomous pT181
plasmid. Consistent with the growth studies (Fig. 5A), in the absence
of tetracycline (Fig. 6A), no significant difference between the fitnesses of SK5323 and SK5319 was detected during 8 days. Conversely, in the presence of a subinhibitory level of
tetracycline (1 µg/ml [Fig. 6B]), SK5323 cells had a significantly
higher level of fitness than those of strain SK5319 (P < 0.0001).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Relative fitness of S. aureus strains
carrying different tetA(K) promoter configurations. Equal
proportions of SK5323 ( ; Pout and Phybrid in
the chromosome) and SK5319 ( ; PtetA(K) in
pT181) cells were used to inoculate LB medium (A) or LB medium
containing 1 µg of tetracycline/ml (B); for promoter configurations,
see Fig. 2. Eight days of growth represents approximately 100 generations. Each data point is the mean of four experiments. The error
bars represent standard error.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
This study has confirmed that IS257-mediated
cointegration of a pT181-like plasmid into the chromosome of the MRSA
strain SK1660 generated a novel hybrid promoter for the
tetA(K) gene such that a
35 sequence closer to optimal
is utilized for transcription. This conclusion is based on
remapping of the native tetA(K) promoter on pT181 to the
intergenic region upstream of the gene (Fig. 2). A tetA(K)
promoter was previously reported within the upstream repC
gene (21), but the
35 and
10 sequences identified,
TCGACT-22 bp-TGCAAA, respectively, represent a suboptimal match to
the canonical promoter consensus (TTGACA-17 bp-TATAAT for
35 and
10 sequences, respectively) (11, 22). Since we
were unable to detect a primer extension product corresponding to a TSP
from this promoter, it is possible that the species previously
identified by S1 nuclease mapping (21) was derived from a
processed form of the repC transcript. Our transcript
mapping also identified a TSP for a complete, outwardly directed
promoter, Pout, located at one end of IS257.
Northern hybridization suggested that the chromosomal
Phybrid is a considerably more powerful promoter
than PtetA(K) of the multicopy plasmid pT181
(Fig. 3), so that it more than compensates for the reduced gene dosage
of this genetic context. Although a proportion of the
tetA(K) transcripts present in SK1660 cells initiate at
Pout, image analysis of primer extension products suggests
that, in comparison to Phybrid, it makes a relatively minor
contribution (less than 10%). The relative strengths of these
promoters probably reflect variations in their sequences. Phybrid possesses an optimal TTG trinucleotide at the start
of its
35 sequence, rather than TTA in the native
tetA(K) promoter of pT181 (Fig. 2 and
7). Sequence differences both upstream
and in the 7 bp downstream of the
35 sequences (Fig. 2) may also contribute to the different strengths of these promoters.
Pout possesses both a suboptimal
35 sequence and an 18-bp
spacer region.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
IS257 hybrid promoters. The sequences shown
are from the plasmids pSK1 (29), pGO400 (23), and
pRW001 (4) and the chromosomes of the MRSA strains R155
(34) and SK1660. Genes encoding resistance to the following
compounds are shown: aminoglycosides (aadA), cadmium
(cadD), trimethoprim (dfrA), mupirocin
(mupA), and tetracycline [tetA(K)]. Where a DNA
segment corresponds to a cointegrated plasmid or remnant thereof, the
name of that plasmid is given in brackets. Copies of IS257
are denoted by solid boxes. The canonical promoter consensus is shown
at the top. The TSPs mapped for dfrA on pSK1 (15)
and tetA(K) on SK1660 (this study) are indicated. Eight-base
pair target duplication sequences are denoted by dashed arrows.
|
|
The enhanced transcription afforded by the hybrid promoter was found to
translate into higher levels of tetracycline resistance associated with
strains carrying this configuration (Fig. 4 and Table 2). Exposure to
tetracycline resulted in an approximately twofold increase in the
amount of tetA(K) mRNA detected in cells carrying pT181
and the SK1660-derived chromosomal structure (Fig. 3) and a two- to
fourfold increase in resistance for all tetA(K)-containing strains (Table 2). pT181 tetA(K) is thought to be regulated
via translational attenuation (13), and this mechanism is
expected to be operational in SK1660 also, since equivalent transcripts are produced in both cases (Fig. 3). Indeed, the equivalent levels of
induction expressed by strains containing distinct promoter configurations is consistent with a posttranscriptional regulatory mechanism. It is thought that binding of the ribosomes during translation, induced by the presence of tetracycline, provides some
protection from degradation of the tetA(K) message
(21). This may account for the increased amount of
tetA(K) mRNA detected in the Northern blot. The reduced
susceptibility associated with preexposure to tetracycline might
therefore be a consequence of protection afforded by existing TetA(K)
protein, resulting from a combination of induced translation and
message stabilization.
Competition studies suggested that the cointegration of a pT181-like
plasmid into the chromosome has produced a strain with greater
relative fitness than its progenitor carrying the autonomous form of
the plasmid, but only in the presence of tetracycline. Since no
competitive advantage was observed in media without tetracycline, it
would seem likely that the cointegrate structure was selected by
the presence of this antibiotic. It should be realized that this
evolutionary event may not necessarily have coincided with the
emergence of MRSA strains such as SK1660 around 1970. Rather, the
cointegrate structure could have arisen in another host strain and
subsequently been transferred into an SK1660 ancestor as part of a
mec region cassette (12).
Although greater levels of resistance were found to be conferred by the
chromosomally cointegrated plasmid than by its autonomous form, this
property may not represent the most significant selective advantage mediated by the former configuration, since we found that a
relative fitness advantage was manifested at only 1 µg of
tetracycline/ml (Fig. 6B). Furthermore, as the growth curve shown in Fig. 5B illustrates, at this concentration, SK5319, harboring autonomous pT181, achieved a growth rate comparable to that of SK5323, which possesses the cointegrated form. However, SK5323 exhibited less lag than SK5319 (Fig. 5B). We therefore suggest that, in
addition to the capacity to grow in the presence of higher levels of
tetracycline, strains such as SK1660 are also evolutionarily advantaged
by exhibiting reduced lag upon exposure to even low levels of the
antibiotic. Both of these traits are likely to have contributed to the
emergence of such strains through the course of evolution. Lenski and
coworkers (17) have similarly noted the relationship among
promoter strength, lag, and fitness in the inducible tetracycline
resistance system encoded by Tn10 of E. coli.
The IS257-derived hybrid promoter driving transcription of
tetA(K) in SK1660 is the second confirmed example of
such a promoter; the first mediates dfrA-encoded
high-level trimethoprim resistance (Fig. 7) (15).
IS257 has been found to insert into several locations in
pT181, with no apparent insertion site specificity (16, 25, 35). It is therefore likely that cointegrate structures
equivalent to that of SK1660 found in other strains (34) are
clonal in nature, rather than arising from independent IS257
transposition events. From the reported sequences, we have identified
additional potential IS257-derived hybrid promoters upstream
of the genes aadA (34), cadD
(4), and mupA (23), which mediate
resistance to aminoglycosides, cadmium, and mupirocin, respectively
(Fig. 7) (33). In each case, a good match to the
10
promoter consensus sequence is present adjacent to a copy of
IS257 such that it is an optimal 17 bp from the
35
sequence at the end of this element. In the chromosome of R155 and in
the plasmid pRW001, the putative hybrid promoters appear to have arisen
as a result of IS257-mediated cointegrative capture of a
small plasmid.
In addition to the hybrid promoter, the studies described here also
revealed the existence of a complete outwardly directed promoter within
IS257. Despite the fact that it is considerably weaker than
Phybrid, it is nonetheless possible that Pout
alone could be sufficient for the transcription of neighboring genes in
situations where no hybrid promoter is present. It would seem likely
that IS257 plays a role in the transcription of more genes than previously recognized. The capacity of IS257 to
influence adjacent gene expression enhances its potential to effect
beneficial genetic rearrangements, thereby contributing to the
flexibility of the staphylococcal genome and hence the ability of the
organism to adapt to an environment of widespread antimicrobial use.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Chia Lee for providing the plasmids pCL84 and
pYL112
19 and Melissa Brown for critical reading of the manuscript.
This work was supported in part by Project Grant 980075 from the
National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia). A.E.S. was
the recipient of an Australian Postgraduate Award.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: School of
Biological Sciences, Macleay Building A12, University of Sydney,
Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia. Phone: 61 2 9351-5035. Fax: 61 2 9351-4771. E-mail: nfirth{at}bio.usyd.edu.au.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Atlas, R. M.
1993.
Alphabetical listing of media-S, p. 782-862.
In
L. C. Parks (ed.), Handbook of microbiological media. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
|
| 2.
|
Ausubel, F. M.,
R. Brent,
R. E. Kingston,
D. D. Moore,
J. G. Seidman,
J. S. Smith, and K. Struhl.
1990.
Current protocols in molecular biology.
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
| 3.
|
Barberis-Maino, L.,
C. Ryffel,
F. H. Kayser, and B. Berger-Bachi.
1990.
Complete nucleotide sequence of IS431mec in Staphylococcus aureus.
Nucleic Acids Res.
18:5548[Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Crupper, S. S.,
V. Worrell,
G. C. Stewart, and J. J. Iandolo.
1999.
Cloning and expression of cadD, a new cadmium resistance gene of Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Bacteriol.
181:4071-4075[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Dower, W. J.,
J. F. Miller, and C. W. Ragsdale.
1988.
High efficiency transformation of E. coli by high voltage electroporation.
Nucleic Acids Res.
16:6127-6145[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Dubin, D. T.,
P. R. Matthews,
S. G. Chikramane, and P. R. Stewart.
1991.
Physical mapping of the mec region of an American methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
35:1661-1665[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Firth, N., and R. A. Skurray.
1998.
Mobile elements in the evolution and spread of multiple-drug resistance in staphylococci.
Drug Resist. Updates
1:49-58[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Gillespie, M. T.,
B. R. Lyon,
L. S. L. Loo,
P. R. Matthews,
P. R. Stewart, and R. A. Skurray.
1987.
Homologous direct repeat sequences associated with mercury, methicillin, tetracycline and trimethoprim resistance determinants in Staphylococcus aureus.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
43:165-171.
|
| 9.
|
Gillespie, M. T.,
J. W. May, and R. A. Skurray.
1986.
Detection of an integrated tetracycline resistance plasmid in the chromosome of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
132:1723-1728[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Guay, G. G.,
S. A. Khan, and D. M. Rothstein.
1993.
The tet(K) gene of plasmid pT181 of Staphylococcus aureus encodes an efflux protein that contains 14 transmembrane helices.
Plasmid
30:163-166[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Hawley, D. K., and W. R. McClure.
1983.
Compilation and analysis of Escherichia coli promoter DNA sequences.
Nucleic Acids Res.
11:2237-2255[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Ito, T.,
Y. Katayama, and K. Hiramatsu.
1999.
Cloning and nucleotide sequence determination of the entire mec DNA of pre-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus N315.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43:1449-1458[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Khan, S. A., and R. P. Novick.
1983.
Complete nucleotide sequence of pT181, a tetracycline-resistance plasmid from Staphylococcus aureus.
Plasmid
10:251-259[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Lee, C. Y.,
S. L. Buranen, and Z. Ye.
1991.
Construction of single-copy integration vectors for Staphylococcus aureus.
Gene
103:101-105[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Leelaporn, A.,
N. Firth,
M. E. Byrne,
E. Roper, and R. A. Skurray.
1994.
Possible role of insertion sequence IS257 in dissemination and expression of high- and low-level trimethoprim resistance in staphylococci.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
38:2238-2244[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Leelaporn, A.,
N. Firth,
I. T. Paulsen, and R. A. Skurray.
1996.
IS257-mediated cointegration in the evolution of a family of staphylococcal trimethoprim resistance plasmids.
J. Bacteriol.
178:6070-6073[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Lenski, R. E.,
V. Souza,
L. P. Duong,
Q. G. Phan,
T. N. Nguyen, and K. P. Bertrand.
1994.
Epistatic effects of promoter and repressor functions of the Tn10 tetracycline-resistance operon on the fitness of Escherichia coli.
Mol. Ecol.
3:127-135[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Lyon, B. R.,
J. W. May, and R. A. Skurray.
1983.
Analysis of plasmids in nosocomial strains of multiple-antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
23:817-826[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Mahillon, J., and M. Chandler.
1998.
Insertion sequences.
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
62:725-774[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Matthews, P. R.,
B. Inglis, and P. R. Stewart.
1990.
Clustering of resistance genes in the mec region of the chromosome of Staphylococcus aureus, p. 69-83.
In
R. P. Novick (ed.), Molecular biology of the staphylococci. VCH, New York, N.Y.
|
| 21.
|
Mojumdar, M., and S. A. Khan.
1988.
Characterization of the tetracycline resistance gene of plasmid pT181 of Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Bacteriol.
170:5522-5528[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Moran, C. P.,
N. Lang,
S. F. J. LeGrice,
G. Lee,
M. Stephens,
A. L. Sonenshein,
J. Pero, and R. Losick.
1982.
Nucleotide sequences that signal the initiation of transcription and translation in Bacillus subtilis.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
186:339-346[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Morton, T. M.,
J. L. Johnston,
J. Patterson, and G. L. Archer.
1995.
Characterization of a conjugative staphylococcal mupirocin resistance plasmid.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
39:1272-1280[Abstract].
|
| 24.
|
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.
1997.
Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 4th ed.
Approved standard M7-A4. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
|
| 25.
|
Needham, C.,
M. Rahman,
K. G. H. Dyke, and W. C. Noble.
1994.
An investigation of plasmids from Staphylococcus aureus that mediate resistance to mupirocin and tetracycline.
Microbiology
140:2577-2583[Abstract].
|
| 26.
|
Novick, R.,
R. C. Sanchez,
A. Gruss, and I. Edelman.
1980.
Involvement of the cell envelope in plasmid maintenance: plasmid curing during the regeneration of protoplasts.
Plasmid
3:348-358[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Novick, R. P.
1989.
Staphylococcal plasmids and their replication.
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
43:537-565[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Novick, R. P.
1990.
The Staphylococcus as a molecular genetic system, p. 1-37.
In
R. P. Novick (ed.), Molecular biology of the staphylococci. VCH, New York, N.Y.
|
| 29.
|
Rouch, D. A.,
L. J. Messerotti,
L. S. Loo,
C. A. Jackson, and R. A. Skurray.
1989.
Trimethoprim resistance transposon Tn4003 from Staphylococcus aureus encodes genes for a dihydrofolate reductase and thymidylate synthetase flanked by three copies of IS257.
Mol. Microbiol.
3:161-175[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Rouch, D. A., and R. A. Skurray.
1989.
IS257 from Staphylococcus aureus: member of an insertion sequence superfamily prevalent among gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.
Gene
76:195-205[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 32.
|
Schenk, S., and R. A. Laddaga.
1992.
Improved method for electroporation of Staphylococcus aureus.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
73:133-138[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Skurray, R. A., and N. Firth.
1997.
Molecular evolution of multiply-antibiotic-resistant staphylococci.
Ciba Found. Symp.
207:167-183[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Stewart, P. R.,
D. T. Dubin,
S. G. Chikramane,
B. Inglis,
P. R. Matthews, and S. M. Poston.
1994.
IS257 and small plasmid insertions in the mec region of the chromosome of Staphylococcus aureus.
Plasmid
31:12-20[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Werckenthin, C.,
S. Schwarz, and M. C. Roberts.
1996.
Integration of pT181-like tetracycline resistance plasmids into large staphylococcal plasmids involves IS257.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
40:2542-2544[Abstract].
|
Journal of Bacteriology, June 2000, p. 3345-3352, Vol. 182, No. 12
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Fujimura, T., Murakami, K.
(2008). Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Isolate with High-Level Methicillin Resistance with an lytH Mutation Caused by IS1182 Insertion. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 643-647
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tuchscherr, L. P. N., Gomez, M. I., Buzzola, F. R., Calvinho, L. F., Lee, J. C., Sordelli, D. O.
(2007). Characterization of a New Variant of IS257 That Has Displaced the Capsule Genes within Bovine Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun.
75: 5483-5488
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Depardieu, F., Podglajen, I., Leclercq, R., Collatz, E., Courvalin, P.
(2007). Modes and Modulations of Antibiotic Resistance Gene Expression. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
20: 79-114
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bjorland, J., Steinum, T., Sunde, M., Waage, S., Sviland, S., Oppegaard, H., Heir, E.
(2006). Deletion of pT181-like sequence in an smr-encoding mosaic plasmid harboured by a persistent bovine Staphylococcus warneri strain. J Antimicrob Chemother
57: 46-51
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mitchell, C., Gao, L., Demuth, D. R.
(2003). Positive and Negative cis-Acting Regulatory Sequences Control Expression of Leukotoxin in Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans 652. Infect. Immun.
71: 5640-5649
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ribera, A., Roca, I., Ruiz, J., Gibert, I., Vila, J.
(2003). Partial characterization of a transposon containing the tet(A) determinant in a clinical isolate of Acinetobacter baumannii. J Antimicrob Chemother
52: 477-480
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rohrer, S., Maki, H., Berger-Bachi, B.
(2003). What makes resistance to methicillin heterogeneous?. J Med Microbiol
52: 605-607
[Full Text]
-
Ida, T., Okamoto, R., Nonoyama, M., Irinoda, K., Kurazono, M., Inoue, M.
(2002). Antagonism between Aminoglycosides and {beta}-Lactams in a Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolate Involves Induction of an Aminoglycoside-Modifying Enzyme. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
46: 1516-1521
[Abstract]
[Full Text]