Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, July 2000, p. 3816-3825, Vol. 182, No. 13
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Pheromone-Regulated Expression of Sex Pheromone
Plasmid pAD1-Encoded Aggregation Substance Depends on at Least Six
Upstream Genes and a cis-Acting, Orientation-Dependent
Factor
Albrecht B.
Muscholl-Silberhorn*
Universität Regensburg,
NWFIII-Mikrobiologie, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany
Received 3 February 2000/Accepted 13 April 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Conjugative transfer of Enterococcus faecalis-specific
sex pheromone plasmids relies on an adhesin, called aggregation
substance, to confer a tight cell-to-cell contact between the mating
partners. To analyze the dependence of pAD1-encoded aggregation
substance, Asa1, on pheromone induction, a variety of upstream
fragments were fused to an
-amylase reporter gene, amyL,
by use of a novel promoter probe vector, pAMY-em1. For
pheromone-regulated
-amylase activity, a total of at least six
genes, traB, traC, traA,
traE1, orfY, and orf1, are
required: TraB efficiently represses asa1 (by a mechanism
unrelated to its presumptive function in pheromone shutdown, since a
complete shutdown is observed exclusively in the presence of
traC); only traC can relieve
traB-mediated repression in a pheromone-dependent manner.
In addition to traB, traA is required but not
sufficient for negative control. Mutational inactivation of
traE1, orfY, or orf1, respectively,
results in a total loss of
-amylase activity for constructs normally
mediating constitutive expression. Inversion of a fragment covering
traA, P0, and traE1 without
disrupting any gene or control element switches off amyL or
asa1 expression, indicating the involvement of a
cis-acting, orientation-dependent factor (as had been shown
for plasmid pCF10). Unexpectedly, pAD1 represses all pAMY-em1
derivatives in trans, while its own pheromone-dependent
functions are unaffected. The discrepancy between the new data and
those of former studies defining TraE1 as a trans-acting
positive regulator is discussed.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Facultatively pathogenic
microorganisms differ largely with respect to the mechanisms by which
they affect their host. However, they all face the common problem that
they have to strictly distinguish between two totally different
"lifestyles," i.e., between living as commensals or even free in
nature and being involved in the process of colonizing tissues or
blood, which demands an alternate equipment of cell surface components,
exoproteins, and metabolic enzymes.
The gram-positive bacterium Enterococcus faecalis is a
commensal of the intestine, but under different circumstances may
infect the urinary tract, blood, or endocardium. The conditions
indispensable for the infectious pathway are still unknown, and there
is no common factor identified for all clinical isolates. However, sex pheromone plasmid-encoded aggregation substance is a widespread adhesin
shown to be involved in the colonization of various tissues (21,
28, 30). In addition, it plays an essential role in the
conjugative transfer of the sex pheromone plasmid on which it is
encoded in that it confers a tight contact between donor and recipient
cells, visible as large clumps. (For reviews of the sex pheromone
system, see references 7, 10, and
37.)
Therefore, regulation of aggregation substance is on three different
levels. Under normal growth conditions, its expression is totally shut
down. During the operation of the infectious pathway, there may be
various environmental factors inducing aggregation substance, among
them a component of blood serum (23) and several antibiotics
(16, 39). For conjugative plasmid transfer, the corresponding gene is transcribed in response to a plasmid-specific oligopeptide, called sex pheromone, secreted by recipient cells not
containing the corresponding plasmid. The latter phenomenon has been
known for a long time and has been investigated by several groups
(7, 10, 37). Especially for two different plasmids, pAD1and
pCF10, rather detailed data on the regulatory circuits are available.
Surprisingly, despite a similar overall organization of the regulatory
genes and highly homologous DNA regions (15), induction of
aggregation substance seems to involve two mechanistically distinct
strategies. While for the pAD1-encoded aggregation substance, Asa1, a
trans-acting protein, TraE1, obviously serves as the general inducer of transcription (25, 32) (a survey of the genetic data available for pAD1 is given in Fig. 1), the pCF10-encoded aggregation substance, Asc10, is expressed via transcriptional readthrough which involves a cis-acting,
orientation-dependent factor (6), a regulatory RNA molecule
interacting with ribosomal proteins, and a small proteinaceous
regulator (4, 5).
The question is whether two related plasmids may have developed totally
different strategies to regulate the same adhesin, or whether there are
common basic pathways only slightly modified to ensure a specific
response to the corresponding sex pheromone. This study presents data
on the regulation of sex pheromone plasmid pAD1, supporting in part the
second idea and addressing the function of several pAD1-specific genes.
These data were obtained by use of a newly constructed
-amylase-based promoter-probe vector.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Strains, plasmids, and growth conditions.
E. faecalis
strains OG1X (19) and OG1X(pAD1) were grown in
Todd-Hewitt-broth (THB; Oxoid). Escherichia coli cloning
strain TOP10F' (Invitrogen) was grown in Luria-Bertani broth
(24). Selective antibiotics were added as follows:
erythromycin, 800 µg/ml for E. coli and 20 µg/ml for
E. faecalis; chloramphenicol, 20 µg/ml for both organisms.
Construction of pAMY-em1 vector and derivatives containing pAD1
fragments.
pAMY-em1 is composed of the same genetic elements used
for the construction of expression vector pERM-ex1 (27). In
addition, a promoterless chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene
(cat) protected by a downstream terminator (1)
was integrated adjacent to the polylinker, but in the opposite
orientation relative to amyL.
A variety of pAD1 fragments were cloned into MCSI of pAMY-em1; Table
1 summarizes the constructs obtained and
their genotypes. For stable maintenance in E. faecalis,
constructs were linearized with AvrII and ligated to
E. coli-E. faecalis shuttle vector pWM401 (38)
cut with NheI (which at the same time removes the P15A ori from pWM401). The recombinant product obtained after
double selection with erythromycin and chloramphenicol in E. coli was electrotransformed into E. faecalis and
selected for by use of the same antibiotics. The integrity of
constructs was tested as described previously (25).
Mutational inactivation of pAD1 genes.
pAD1-encoded
orf1 was mutated according to Kunkel et al. (22);
with a single nucleotide exchange, a BamHI site was
introduced that converted the fourth orf1 codon into a stop codon.
traE1 was inactivated as follows. The pAEYP
31
construct was linearized by
FspI digestion, normally causing
a blunt-ended cut
within
traE1. To select for incorrect
restoration of the restriction
site, ligation products were submitted
to a second round of
FspI
digestion linearizing all plasmids
containing the correct recognition
sequence and transformed into
E. coli TOP10F'. Sequencing of a
selected plasmid
[pA(E)YP
31] nonsusceptible to
FspI revealed a

2 frameshift (the TGCGCA recognition sequence had been
changed
to
TGCA).
orfY was subcloned as a
HindIII-
AciI fragment (removing 84 bp from
the 3' end of
orfY) into pUC19 linearized with
HindIII-
AccI,
excised as an
NsiI-
XbaI fragment, and reintroduced into the
original
constructs partially digested with the same
enzymes.
To introduce a mutation into
traA, pBAEYP
31 was
cut with
NheI, and the single-stranded overhangs were filled
in with Klenow
fragment of DNA polymerase I and ligated. After
transformation
into
E. coli Top10F', only a derivative
containing a deletion
of about 300 bp within
traA (not
affecting neighboring sequences)
was obtained (pBEYP
31).
-Amylase activity assay.
Overnight cultures of E. faecalis strains containing pAMY-em1 constructs were inoculated
1:100 into 1 ml of fresh THB medium supplemented with 20-µg/ml
concentrations of chloramphenicol and erythromycin (with or without
synthetic sex pheromone cAD1). After ca. 5 h of incubation at
37°C, cultures were placed on ice, and 200 µl of each cell
suspension was removed for the determination of turbidity at a
wavelength of 600 nm. (Note that to dissolve cell aggregates grossly
influencing the turbidity, suspensions are mixed with 1 ml of 8 M urea;
this treatment does not detectably lyse E. faecalis cells or
break cell chains.) Turbidity should not exceed a value of about 0.7 to
ensure that cells are still exponentially growing. The rest of the
cultures were centrifuged at 4°C, and 700 µl of supernatant was
mixed with 200 µl of a precooled slurry of Phadebas reagent
(Pharmacia) in H2O. The mixtures were heavily stirred at
75°C on an Eppendorf shaker (Thermomixer 5436) until not more than
half of the slurry had lost its blue color (in order to guarantee
linearity of activity values). The reaction was stopped by placing the
suspensions on ice for several minutes, spinning them briefly in a
cooled centrifuge, and transferring 700 µl of supernatant to a
plastic cuvette containing 500 µl of 0.5 M NaOH (which stops the
reaction). Optical densities at 620 nm (OD620) were
determined, and the resulting values were equalized to standard
conditions (i.e., cell densities of OD600 = 1.0 and 15 min of amylase reaction time).
Activities in units per liter were deduced from the conversion table
supplied by the manufacturer (which, taking into account
the change in
assay conditions, suggested the values have to be
multiplied by a
factor of 0.085 [calculated from the altered dilution
rates]). One
unit is defined as the amount of enzyme catalyzing
the hydrolysis of 1 µmol of glucosidic linkage per
min.
Clumping assay.
Supernatants from overnight cultures of OG1X
strains containing pAMY-em1 constructs were boiled for 5 min to kill
residual E. faecalis cells and diluted with fresh THB in
steps of 1:2 with 24-well microtiter plates used as a reservoir. After
1:100 inoculation with an overnight culture of
OG1X(pAD1/pRBSamy) (the second plasmid required because
supernatants contain chloramphenicol and erythromycin), the microtiter
plates were gently shaken at 37°C for several hours, and the
formation of macroscopically visible aggregates was determined.
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The nucleotide
sequence of pAMY-em1 has been submitted to GenBank (accession no.
AJ243541).
 |
RESULTS |
Construction of a new
-amylase-based promoter probe vector.
Previous analyses of asa1 regulation mainly relied on three
different methods: (i) Northern blotting (2, 13, 25) (Fig. 1), (ii) clumping assays using
aggregation substance itself as a marker (11, 25), and (iii)
transcriptional lacZ fusions based on a
Tn917-derivative bearing a 'lacZ gene at one end
(29, 34). Transcriptional analysis is too time-consuming for
routine investigations and difficult to quantify. Clumping assays are easy to execute, but quantification is even less sensitive than Northern blotting. The use of Tn917lac suffers from the
random location of transposition sites and from the polar effect of the 8.5-kb insert inactivating the possibly essential downstream sequence. Furthermore, only the transposition site itself was analyzed for transcription, while the effects of mutations on distant DNA regions are difficult to address. Our own previous attempts to present the
lacZ gene on a definite promoter probe vector failed because of the instability of constructs. In addition, for assaying very weak
promoter activities,
-galactosidase may be inadequate, since this
cytoplasmic enzyme possibly is not quantitatively extracted from the
highly rigid E. faecalis cells.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Genetic organization of a pheromone-regulated pAD1
region and functions of several gene products according to previous
publications. Interrupted arrows indicate constitutive transcripts. m0
to m5, pheromone-inducible transcripts; Px,
presumptive promoters as localized by primer extension experiments.
rho-independent transcriptional terminators are indicated as
stem-loop structures.
|
|
Here, a new vector, pAMY-em1 (Fig.
2),
was constructed by using

-amylase (
amyL) from
Bacillus licheniformis (
14) as a quantifiable
marker. This enzyme has been successfully used previously in
E. faecalis (
17) and combines several advantages. As an
exoprotein,
its activity can be determined from the supernatant without
cell
extraction by using a very simple assay (Phadebas reagent from
Pharmacia). Since AmyL is a thermophilic enzyme with a temperature
optimum of 75°C, a quantitative removal of residual cells (which
might change results by enzyme production during long-run assays)
is
not necessary. The promoterless
amyL gene was cloned
adjacent
to a large multiple cloning site (MCSI) containing many
restriction
sites for the integration of DNA fragments. To allow
analysis
of countertranscription from the same culture, a promoterless
cat gene (
1) was introduced in the opposite
orientation to
MCSI. (This marker gene was not used in the present
work.) An
erythromycin resistance gene (
ermAM) downstream of
amyL allows
selection in
E. coli and many
gram-positive bacteria (
9), and
a second MCS protected on
both sides by strong transcriptional
terminators the integration of
species-specific plasmid replicons.
A similar vector, pERM-ex1, has
been constructed for the purpose
of gene expression (
27).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Promoter probe vector pAMY-em1 (GenBank accession no.
AJ243541). amyL, promoterless -amylase gene from B. licheniformis; cat: promoterless chloramphenicol
acetyltransferase gene from Staphylococcus aureus plasmid
pC194; ermAM: erythromycin resistance gene from E. faecalis plasmid pAM 1; T0, T1, TTS1, and TTS2, transcriptional
terminators. Selected restriction sites present only once or twice are
indicated, the latter in parentheses.
|
|
After testing the vector for the absence of nonspecific promoter
activity

neither
E. faecalis nor
E. coli
expressed detectable
amounts of

-amylase

a variety of DNA fragments
derived from the
pAD1 sequence upstream of
asa1 were cloned
into pAMY-em1. In most
cases, the start codon of
asa1 was
fused to the start codon of
amyL by use of the
BspHI sites covering both ATG initiation sites.
Thus, true
translational fusions were created retaining all original
nucleotides
upstream of
asa1, including the ribosome binding site
(RBS).
Only for those constructs designed to test the role of
the region
between
orf1 and
asa1 was the RBS of
amyL used (RBS
amy).
From all constructs, the
3-kb gene for surface exclusion protein,
sea1
(
36), was excluded, since it encodes a cell surface protein
very probably not involved in
asa1 regulation. A survey of
all
constructs is given in Fig.
3 (also
see Table
1). To propagate
the plasmids in
E. faecalis, they
were integrated into the low-copy
shuttle vector pWM401 (see Materials
and Methods). Culture supernatants
of
E. faecalis OG1X
or OG1X(pAD1) containing one of the constructs
were submitted to
amylase assays as described in Materials and
Methods. Each construct
was tested at least three times.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Survey of pAMY-em1 constructs used in this study.
(Fusions involving the ermAM promoter [Perm]
were constructed by use of the related vector pERM-ex1
[27].) The nomenclature of constructs is given as
follows: genes are indicated by a one-letter code (B, traB;
C, traC; A, traA; E, traE1; Y,
orfY; and 1, orf1); promoters
(Px) and terminator T1 (TTS1) are
given only when they border disruptions of the original sequence; genes
given in parentheses have been destroyed by point mutations
(graphically marked by black triangles), while primes indicate the
removal of a few nucleotides from the 5' or 3' ends, respectively. The
diagrams of the constructs (in this and the following figures) are
aligned to the graphical representation of the pAD1 sequence given on
the top. Only complete genes (and those disrupted by point mutations)
are accented by thick lines. Restriction sites involved in the various
constructions are indicated.
|
|
traB and traC are both required for sex
pheromone-dependent asa1 expression.
In the first
approach, the complete transcriptional units defined by the promoters
determined previously for the regulatory region of pAD1 (13)
were successively added to the asa1-amyL fusion (Fig.
4). P3 and P1/2
turned out to be largely inactive. With the addition of
P0-traE1,
-amylase was constitutively
expressed at a high level (pEYP31). These data are
consistent with previous results showing that activation of the
P3 promoter (responsible for asa1 transcription)
is dependent on the activity of traE1 which was transcribed
from P0 in the absence of the negative regulator TraA
(25, 32). Addition of the traA gene
(pAEYP31) reduced amyL expression only slightly;
this is not surprising, since the strains all produce sex pheromone,
cAD1, which inactivates TraA (12).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Effects of various pAD1 fragments confined by
presumptive pAD1-specific promoters in the presence or absence of sex
pheromone cAD1. Black bars, -amylase activities of noninduced
E. faecalis OG1X cultures containing one of the pAMY-em1
constructs; grey bars, -amylase activities of E. faecalis
cultures induced by synthetic pheromone cAD1 (with pheromone
concentration about 100-fold of the minimal inductory concentration).
Activities (units per liter) always refer to the constructs given
immediately on the right.
|
|
Complementation of the constructs with original pAD1 should change
results fundamentally: since transcription from P
3 was
shown to be activated in
trans by TraE1 gene product
(
25), even
the smallest fragment (pP
31)
originating at P
3 should allow inducible

-amylase
expression via pAD1-born TraE1. Surprisingly, not only
cAD1-induced
OG1X(pAD1/pP
31) failed to produce detectable amounts
of

-amylase (not shown); pAD1 shut down
amyL activity of all
pAMY-em1 derivatives

even those which per se resulted in strong
constitutive expression (e.g., pAEYP
31). This effect is not
due
to plasmid incompatibility or instability, since in all cases,
the
intact pAMY-em1 constructs could be isolated and retransformed
into
E. coli TOP10F', where

-amylase activity was restored.
(In
E. coli,
amyL expression probably originates
nonspecifically from
one of the many promoter-like structures found in
the low-G+C
DNA of
E. faecalis.) In all of these strains,
pAD1-encoded aggregation
substance remained normally inducible by cAD1,
since the characteristic
cell clumping was observed after exposure to
sex
pheromone.
In the next step, the pAD1 sequence fused to
amyL was
further extended for two key elements involved in sex pheromone
control:
traC, encoding a cell surface lipoprotein
responsible for sex
pheromone sensing (
31), and
traB, with a presumptive function
of the gene product in the
shutdown of chromosomally encoded cAD1
(
35). With these
additional genes,
amyL expression was considerably
reduced
(about 14-fold) when compared to that expressed by pAEYP
31
(Fig.
4). Addition of cAD1 to the nutrient broth increased expression
about 10-fold, but to a level below that of the constitutively
expressing construct pAEYP
31. Deletion of
traC
from the
traB-traC operon (without affecting the common
promoter) totally shut down
amyL expression, irrespective of
the presence of sex pheromone,
but with dependence on
traA,
the additional deletion of which
(pBEYP
31) completely
relieved repression. A deletion of
traB
(pCAEYP
31)
further increased constitutive expression
compared to that of
pAEYP
31.
These data still may be explained with the predicted functions of
traB and
traC (compare with the results in Fig.
1):
traB gene product switches off cAD1 production and
therefore self-inducibility.
If externally added cAD1 is internalized
exclusively by TraC,
the deletion of
traC would make the
cells totally insensitive
to sex pheromone induction. However, some
doubts about this interpretation
emerge when the supernatants of
the corresponding strains are
tested for cAD1 content:
OG1X(pBAEYP
31) containing the complete
traB gene still secretes active sex pheromone [although in
a markedly
reduced amount, since the supernatant was active down to a
1:64
dilution, compared to a still active 1:256 dilution for
OG1X(pAEYP
31)
supernatant]. Very surprisingly, the
only strains completely defective
in cAD1 production are
OG1X(pCAEYP
31) and OG1X(pBCAEYP
31) expressing
TraC. Here, no clumping could be induced even when the
pAD1-containing
cells were grown in undiluted or slightly THB-enriched
supernatant.
This total lack of active cAD1 cannot be explained by a
possible
overproduction of inhibitory pheromone iAD1: when supernatants
from OG1X(pAEYP
31) are mixed 1:1 with supernatants from
OG1X(pBCAEYP
31),
the minimal inductory concentration is
reduced by a factor of
about (or slightly greater than) 2, as expected
for a diluent
lacking both cAD1 and
iAD1.
asa1 regulation involves a cis-acting
factor in an orientation-dependent manner.
The most obvious
discrepancy between the regulation models of pAD1 and pCF10 lies in the
fact that pCF10 is submitted to the action of a cis-acting
factor probably tracking along the DNA in an orientation-dependent
manner (6), while for pAD1, the TraE1 protein was shown to
act in trans as a diffusible activator of the P3
promoter (25, 32). To verify the model for pAD1 by using the
amyL-based assay system, a fragment of the constitutive pAEYP31 construct covering the complete sequence from
traA to traE1 was inverted relative to the
amyL gene (Fig. 5). A strain containing the resulting construct (pEA/YP31) failed to
produce
-amylase (irrespective of the presence of cAD1). Further
removal of the P1/2-orfY and
P3-orf1 regions (pEA/YP1, pEA/P31,
and pEA/RBSamy) did not restore
-amylase activity. The
possibility that the disruption of the original sequence necessary for
the rearrangement may have affected an essential structure can be
largely excluded, since the used NsiI site (i) lies within a
sequence lacking any open reading frame (ORF) or striking nucleotide
sequence motif and (ii) even in the highly active constructs contains
some additional nucleotides from a polylinker used for intermediate
cloning. Only when part of traA and its downstream
terminator were deleted in addition (pEP0/P31)
could some basic
-amylase activity be measured, probably
representing the constitutive countertranscription from the
bidirectional P0 promoter responsible for permanent
traA expression.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Nondisruptive inversion of the region from
traA through traE1. The mode of inversion
involving a HincII-NsiI fragment (or
NheI-NsiI for EP0/P31) is
indicated by broken arrows. (Since there is no difference between
induced and noninduced cultures, only results for noninduced cultures
are indicated in this and the subsequent figures.)
|
|
Therefore, a
cis-acting orientation-dependent factor similar
to that of pCF10 has to be claimed for pAD1 too. Whatever its
nature
may be, it obviously is encoded within the 2.3-kb region
from
traA to
traE1 or at least initiates its
cis-acting function
within this
region.
traE1, orfY, and orf1 regions
are essential.
There are at least three small ORFs carried on pAD1
which are not present on pCF10. While traE1 and
orf1 are unique to pAD1 (and related cAD1-inducible
plasmids) (15), orfY is ubiquitous for most sex
pheromone plasmids, but at least in the special case of pCF10, it is
disrupted by a stop codon, leaving only a truncated 198-bp ORF
(prgT) (20). These ORFs might be responsible for pheromone specificity of induction. To test their involvement in
asa1 regulation, each of them (in common with some bordering sequences) was independently deleted from the constitutive construct pAEYP31. As shown in Fig. 6a,
none of them could be removed without a nearly complete loss of
-amylase activity.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Deletions of traE1, orfY, and
orf1 genes from the constitutive pAEYP31
construct. (a) Gross deletions covering a great part of the gene
(traE1) or the complete DNA region (orfY or
orf1). (b) Point mutations of traE1 and
orf1 and 3' truncation of orfY (see Materials and
Methods for details).
|
|
traE1, orfY, and orf1 gene
products are essential.
The essential roles of traE1,
orfY, and orf1 regions need not necessarily be
connected with the respective gene products, but might be dependent on
other genetic information encoded on the corresponding sequence. It
therefore was necessary to specifically mutate the peptides without
grossly changing the nucleotide sequence. traE1 was mutated
by the introduction of a
2-bp frameshift, and orf1 was
mutated by creating a stop codon near its 5' end (see Materials and
Methods). In the case of orfY, the complete 3' end downstream of the unique AciI site (84 bp) was removed.
Again, OG1X strains containing any of these constructs [and a double mutant, pA(E)Y'P31, given in Fig. 3] largely failed to
produce
-amylase (Fig. 6b), which implies an indispensable positive
involvement of all three translation products in asa1 expression.
orfY and traA contribute to negative
regulation.
Interestingly, orfY seems to exhibit
additional negative effects: Fig. 7a
shows a pair of constructs differing with respect to the presence of
orfY. Here, expression was achieved by removal of
transcriptional terminators TTS1 and TTS2 along with traE1. In these cases, the presence of orfY reduced rather than
increased
-amylase activity. The same may hold true for
orf1, but measurable effects are so weak that activity
values may be considered as nonsignificant (not shown).
traE1 could not be tested for possible negative effects,
since removal of one or both of the upstream terminators without
deleting traE1 has toxic effects on E. faecalis.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Negative effects of orfY (a) and
traA (b). Several pairs of constructs are compared,
differing only with respect to the corresponding gene.
|
|
TraA has been known for a long time as a key negative regulator of
aggregation substance; its disruption within pAD1 results
in a
constitutively clumping strain (
18,
29). In this study,
these data could largely be confirmed. It was shown that (in the
absence of the
traB-traC operon) TraA is not sufficient for
a
shutdown of
asa1 expression, but helps to keep the TTS1
and -2
terminators locked. These effects become visible when
traE1, known
to exhibit autoinduction (
25), is
deleted from several constructs
(three pairs of constructs differing
with respect to the presence
of
traA are shown in Fig.
7b).
The site of action is not located
within the terminator region, since
the constitutive
amyL expression
observed when both
terminators are deleted still is modified by
traA. This is
consistent with data defining a binding site for
TraA in the
P
0 promoter region (
32).
 |
DISCUSSION |
In the present study, it could be shown that regulation of
pAD1-encoded aggregation substance at least involves a total of 10 kb
upstream of the corresponding asa1 gene. All ORFs of >100 bp within this region, except for sea1 encoding the surface
exclusion protein, are required for sex pheromone-controlled
asa1 expression. On the other hand, several important
structures were excluded from a detailed analysis: iad
(8) coding for inhibitory sex pheromone; traD,
which encodes immediately downstream from iad but is
transcribed in the opposite direction (2, 33); and a small
ORF immediately upstream of asa1, which encodes an RAPC amino acid motif conserved for most, if not all, sex pheromone plasmids
(27). The roles of these ORFs were not addressed
independently of the genes investigated in detail; therefore, their
functions might further complicate the picture of pAD1 regulation
presented here.
Mutation of any of the genes tested either results in constitutive
expression (traB or traA) or totally shuts down
expression (traC, traE1, orfY, or
orf1). As for pCF10, regulation involves a
cis-acting orientation-dependent factor encoded
or at least initiating its function
within the 2.3-kb region covering
traA through traE1, since its pure inversion
results in a total loss of expression. In probably all cases, the
proteins encoded by the ORFs rather than their nucleotide sequences are
necessary for regulation. For orfY, a specific role of the
deleted 3'-terminal 84 bp on the nucleotide level cannot totally be
excluded, although there are no hints at all from the DNA sequence
(e.g., repeats, conserved motifs, or possible secondary structures).
orfY (and possibly orf1) plays an ambiguous role
in that it exhibits an additional negative effect. The function of TraA
as a negative regulator of asa1 expression could be
established; however, it was not sufficient for a complete repression,
since it probably is inactivated by cAD1 still produced by the tested strains
provided that the pheromone is internalized despite the lack
of a specific uptake system (see below). If this is the case, nonspecific internalization must be rather efficient, since addition of
cAD1 to the culture broth of OG1X(pAEYP31) does not
significantly raise
-amylase activity (Fig. 4).
The role of the remaining genes which have been investigated previously
will have to be modified or newly defined according to the data
presented. TraB efficiently represses aggregation substance, but not
simply by avoiding self-induction via its assumed function as a
repressor of cAD1 production. This can be excluded, since constructs
containing traB still promote expression and secretion of
active cAD1 in E. faecalis. Only the addition of traC, irrespective of the presence of traB,
switches off cAD1 production, an effect that cannot simply be explained
by the primary function of TraC lipoprotein as a pheromone-specific
oligopeptide transporter. It may be argued that TraC surface protein
traps all self-produced cAD1 from the supernatant
but why does this not induce asa1 expression (in the case of
pBCAEYP31 [Fig. 4]) while externally added pheromone does?
Last but not least, and contrary to our own previous results
(25), TraE1 cannot be simply a trans-acting
protein directly effecting transcription from the P3
promoter. If this were the case, the inversion of a fragment containing
the complete traE1 gene, including its original upstream
sequence, which covers the corresponding P0 promoter,
should not alter activity. Instead, this manipulation switches off
asa1 expression, proving the involvement of an
orientation-dependent mechanism, as has been shown for pCF10 (6).
The most puzzling result was that even complete pAD1 cannot activate
the P3 promoter in trans, a strategy which has
proven successful previously (25, 26). The fact that pAD1
inactivates the otherwise constitutive pAMY-em1 constructs would
imply the existence of a pAD1-encoded, trans-acting
super-repressor. However, even the control plasmid
(pPermRBSamy) constitutively expressing amyL and not containing any pAD1 sequence is affected by
pAD1, in that
-amylase activity is reduced to about 50% of its
normal value (data not shown). Maybe the cellular secretion system
mediating
-amylase export out of the cell is influenced by pAD1
(possibly via simple competition by pAD1-encoded surface proteins).
This effect should be independent of pAD1-specific sequences and
therefore cannot explain either why amyL preceded by pAD1
sequences is nearly completely switched off, contrary to the incomplete
inactivation of pPermRBSamy control plasmid.
Updating of the model for asa1 regulation.
How can
the data presented here and in previous publications be integrated into
a conclusive regulation model? The following view combines all of the
negative and positive effects shown for the various regulatory genes.
Under noninducing conditions, transcription within the regulatory
region is locked by a cooperative action of TraB and TraA. While TraA
binds directly to the P0 promoter region (32),
TraB acts in a still unclear way (but not simply by the shutdown of sex
pheromone production). OrfY and Orf1 proteins could occupy specific
positions upstream from their own coding regions, thus contributing to
repression by preventing accidental transcription events. Additional
factors help to keep the TTS1 and TTS2 terminators locked. Inhibitory
pheromone iAD1 (8) competes with trace amounts of the sex
pheromone cAD1, possibly present in the environment or produced by the
cell itself, and traD countertranscription (2)
interferes with transcription from the P0 promoter in the
direction of traE1.
TraA does not prevent transcription from P
0, since both
iad and
traA itself are constitutively expressed
(however, transcription
stops at the transcriptional terminators
located downstream of
these genes); it is more likely that TraA
prevents residual TraE1
molecules from binding to its recognition site
in the P
0 region.
This at the same time is the clue to the
rapid induction by very
low concentrations of sex pheromone: the
affinity of TraA for
its DNA binding site is directly relieved by cAD1
binding to TraA
protein, and the site becomes accessible for TraE1.
DNA-bound
TraE1 modifies RNA polymerase in that it now can pass over
the
downstream terminators. Transcription of
traE1
reinforces the
initiation of transcription by positive feedback
(
25). When
the active complex meets with OrfY and Orf1 gene
products bound
to their specific sites on the DNA (or to a DNA-binding
cofactor),
the proteins form an active complex initiating transcription
at
P
2 and P
3, respectively. (P
1 is
a weakly constitutive promoter
causing a basic
orfY-sea1
transcription terminating downstream
of
sea1
[
13].) If only one of the proteins is lacking,
transcription
of
asa1 is
prevented.
Alternatively, the active complex may be required for the extension of
a super-transcript initiating at P
0. Such a mechanism
is
discussed for sex pheromone plasmid pCF10 (in references
3 and
4). If this were the case,
however, the transcript would
be processed immediately after RNA
polymerase has transcribed
the processing sites, since a precursor
transcript cannot be detected
by Northern blotting of mRNA isolated
shortly after induction
(
13).
In addition, the involvement of a pAD1-encoded RNA molecule or
molecules as for the pCF10 system (
4) must be considered.
The pCF10-encoded
prgQ transcripts have been shown to
interact
directly with ribosomal proteins, which probably results in a
posttranscriptional control of Asc10 expression (the pCF10-encoded
aggregation substance).
prgQ is carried within the region
most
conserved among all sex pheromone plasmids (
15). It
seems unlikely
that a function attributed to this region for one
plasmid should
be totally irrelevant to the others. This mechanism may
be rather
a common principle of the regulation of all sex pheromone
plasmids,
while specificity is guaranteed by minor sequence variations
or
specific proteins (such as TraE1 and Orf1 gene products in the
pAD1
system).
The attractivity of the suggested model lies in the fact that it
supports both possible functions of TraE1 as a
trans-acting
and
cis-acting factor: As a typical protein, it diffuses
readily
through the cell, but only in its DNA-bound conformation is
able
to interact with its cofactors to form an active transcription
initiation complex. This conformation is permanently maintained
when
TraE1 tracks along the DNA. Nevertheless, the idea of TraE1
having a
dual function as a
cis- and
trans-acting factor
is still
speculative and must be checked on a molecular
level.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
I am grateful to E. Silberhorn for excellent technical help, P. Hols for providing pGIP61 as a source of
-amylase, and R. Wirth for
helpful discussions and continuous support.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address:
Universität Regensburg, NWFIII-Mikrobiologie,
Universitätsstraße 31, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany. Phone:
49-(0)941 943 1828. Fax: 49-(0)941 943 1824. E-mail: albrecht.muscholl{at}biologie.uni-regensburg.de.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Band, L.,
D. G. Yansura, and D. J. Henner.
1983.
Construction of a vector for cloning promoters in Bacillus subtilis.
Gene
26:313-315[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bastos, M. C. F.,
H. Tomita,
K. Tanimoto, and D. B. Clewell.
1998.
Regulation of the Enterococcus faecalis pAD1-related sex pheromone response: analyses of traD expression and its role in controlling conjugation functions.
Mol. Microbiol.
30:381-392[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Bensing, B. A.,
B. J. Meyer, and G. M. Dunny.
1996.
Sensitive detection of bacterial transcription initiation sites and differentiation from RNA processing sites in the pheromone-induced plasmid transfer system of Enterococcus faecalis.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:7794-7799[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Bensing, B. A., and G. M. Dunny.
1997.
Pheromone-inducible expression of an aggregation protein in Enterococcus faecalis requires interaction of a plasmid-encoded RNA with components of the ribosome.
Mol. Microbiol.
24:295-308[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Bensing, B. A.,
D. A. Manias, and G. M. Dunny.
1997.
Pheromone cCF10 and plasmid pCF10-encoded regulatory molecules act post-transcriptionally to activate expression of downstream conjugation functions.
Mol. Microbiol.
24:285-294[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Chung, J. W., and G. M. Dunny.
1992.
cis-acting, orientation-dependent, positive control system activates pheromone inducible conjugation functions at distances greater than 10 kilobases upstream from its target in Enterococcus faecalis.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:9020-9024[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Clewell, D. B.
1999.
Sex pheromone systems in enterococci, p. 47-65.
In
G. M. Dunny, and S. C. Winans (ed.), Cell-cell signaling in bacteria. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 8.
|
Clewell, D. B.,
L. T. Pontius,
F. Y. An,
Y. Ike,
A. Suzuki, and J. Nakayama.
1990.
Nucleotide sequence of the sex pheromone inhibitor (iAD1) determinant of Enterococcus faecalis conjugative plasmid pAD1.
Plasmid
24:156-161[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Courvalin, P., and C. Carlier.
1987.
Tn1545: a conjugative shuttle transposon.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
206:259-264[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Dunny, G. M., and B. A. Leonard.
1997.
Cell-cell communication in Gram-positive bacteria.
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
51:527-564[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Ehrenfeld, E. E., and D. B. Clewell.
1987.
Transfer functions of the Streptococcus faecalis plasmid pAD1: organization of plasmid DNA encoding response to sex pheromone.
J. Bacteriol.
169:3473-3481[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Fujimoto, S., and D. B. Clewell.
1998.
Regulation of the pAD1 sex pheromone response of Enterococcus faecalis by direct interaction between the cAD1 peptide mating signal and the negatively regulating, DNA-binding TraA protein.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:6430-6435[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Galli, D.,
A. Friesenegger, and R. Wirth.
1992.
Transcriptional control of sex-pheromone-inducible genes on plasmid pAD1 of Enterococcus faecalis and sequence analysis of a third structural gene for (pPD1-encoded) aggregation substance.
Mol. Microbiol.
6:1297-1308[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Gray, G. L.,
S. E. Mainzer,
M. W. Rey,
M. H. Lamsa,
K. L. Kindle,
C. Carmona, and C. Requadt.
1986.
Structural genes encoding the thermophilic -amylases of Bacillus stearothermophilus and Bacillus licheniformis.
J. Bacteriol.
166:635-643[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Hirt, H.,
R. Wirth, and A. Muscholl.
1996.
Comparative analysis of eighteen sex pheromone plasmids: detection of a new insertion element on pPD1 and implications for the evolution of this plasmid family.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
252:640-647[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Höfner, H.,
R. Wirth,
R. Marre,
G. Wanner, and E. Straube.
1995.
Subinhibitory concentrations of daptomycin enhance adherence of Enterococcus faecalis to in vitro cultivated renal tubuloepithelial cells and induce a sex pheromone plasmid-encoded adhesin.
Med. Microbiol. Lett.
4:140-149.
|
| 17.
|
Hols, P.,
A. Baulard,
D. Garmyn,
B. Delplace,
S. Hogan, and J. Delcour.
1992.
Isolation and characterisation of genetic expression and secretion signals from Enterococcus faecalis through the use of broad-host-range -amylase probe vectors.
Gene
118:21-30[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Ike, Y., and D. B. Clewell.
1884.
Genetic analysis of the pAD1 pheromone response in Streptococcus faecalis, using Tn917 as an insertional mutagen.
J. Bacteriol.
158:777-783.
|
| 19.
|
Ike, Y.,
R. A. Craig,
B. A. White,
Y. Yagi, and D. B. Clewell.
1983.
Modification of Streptococcus faecalis sex pheromones after acquisition of plasmid DNA.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
80:5369-5373[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Kao, S.-M.,
S. B. Olmsted,
A. S. Viksnins,
J. C. Gallo, and G. M. Dunny.
1991.
Molecular and genetic analysis of a region of plasmid pCF10 containing positive control genes and structural genes encoding surface proteins involved in pheromone-inducible conjugation in Enterococcus faecalis.
J. Bacteriol.
173:7650-7664[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Kreft, B.,
R. Marre,
U. Schramm, and R. Wirth.
1992.
Aggregation substance of Enterococcus faecalis mediates adhesion to cultured renal tubular cells.
Infect. Immun.
60:25-30[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Kunkel, T. A.,
J. D. Roberts, and R. A. Zabour.
1987.
Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection.
Methods Enzymol.
154:367-382[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Leonard, B. A.,
H. Hirt, and G. M. Dunny.
1997.
Regulation of aggregation substance expression by bacterial and host factors.
Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.
418:785-787[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Miller, J. H.
1972.
Experiments in molecular genetics.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 25.
|
Muscholl, A.,
D. Galli,
G. Wanner, and R. Wirth.
1993.
Sex pheromone plasmid pAD1-encoded aggregation substance of Enterococcus faecalis is positively regulated in trans by traE1.
Eur. J. Biochem.
214:333-338[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Muscholl-Silberhorn, A. B.
1998.
Analysis of the clumping-mediating domain(s) of sex pheromone plasmid pAD1-encoded aggregation substance.
Eur. J. Biochem.
258:515-520[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Muscholl-Silberhorn, A. B.
1999.
Cloning and functional analysis of Asa373, a novel adhesin unrelated to the other sex pheromone plasmid-encoded aggregation substances of Enterococcus faecalis.
Mol. Microbiol.
34:620-630[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Olmsted, S. B.,
G. M. Dunny,
S. L. Erlandsen, and C. L. Wells.
1994.
A plasmid-encoded surface protein on Enterococcus faecalis augments its internalization by cultured intestinal epithelial cells.
J. Infect. Dis.
170:1549-1556[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Pontius, L. T., and D. B. Clewell.
1992.
Conjugative transfer of Enterococcus faecalis plasmid pAD1: nucleotide sequence and transcriptional fusion analysis of a region involved in positive regulation.
J. Bacteriol.
174:3152-3160[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Schlievert, P. M.,
P. J. Gahr,
A. P. Assimacopoulos,
M. M. Dinges,
J. A. Stoehr,
J. W. Harmala,
H. Hirt, and G. M. Dunny.
1998.
Aggregation and binding substances enhance pathogenicity in rabbit models of Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis.
Infect. Immun.
66:218-223[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Tanimoto, K.,
F. Y. An, and D. B. Clewell.
1993.
Characterization of the traC determinant of the Enterococcus faecalis hemolysin-bacteriocin plasmid pAD1: binding of sex pheromone.
J. Bacteriol.
175:5260-5264[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Tanimoto, K., and D. B. Clewell.
1993.
Regulation of the pAD1-encoded sex pheromone response in Enterococcus faecalis: expression of the positive regulator TraE1.
J. Bacteriol.
175:1008-1018[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Tomita, H., and D. B. Clewell.
2000.
A pAD1-encoded small RNA molecule, mD, negatively regulates Enterococcus faecalis pheromone response by enhancing transcription termination.
J. Bacteriol.
182:1062-1073[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Weaver, K. E., and D. B. Clewell.
1988.
Regulation of the pAD1 sex pheromone response in Enterococcus faecalis: construction and characterization of lacZ transcriptional fusions in a key control region of the plasmid.
J. Bacteriol.
170:4343-4352[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Weaver, K. E., and D. B. Clewell.
1990.
Regulation of the pAD1 sex pheromone response in Enterococcus faecalis: effects of host strain and traA, traB, and C region mutants on expression of an E region pheromone-inducible lacZ fusion.
J. Bacteriol.
172:2633-2641[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Weidlich, G.,
R. Wirth, and D. Galli.
1992.
Sex pheromone plasmid pAD1-encoded surface exclusion protein of Enterococcus faecalis.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
233:161-168[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Wirth, R.
1994.
The sex pheromone system of Enterococcus faecalis: more than "just" a plasmid collection mechanism?
Eur. J. Biochem.
222:235-246[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Wirth, R.,
F. Y. An, and D. B. Clewell.
1987.
Highly efficient cloning system for Streptococcus faecalis: protoplast transformation, shuttle vectors, and applications, p. 25-27.
In
J. J. Ferretti, and R. Curtiss III (ed.), Streptococcal genetics. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 39.
|
Wu, K.,
F. Y. An, and D. B. Clewell.
1999.
Enterococcus faecalis pheromone-responding plasmid pAD1 gives rise to an aggregation (clumping) response when cells are exposed to subinhibitory concentrations of chloramphenicol, erythromycin, or tetracycline.
Plasmid
41:82-88[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Journal of Bacteriology, July 2000, p. 3816-3825, Vol. 182, No. 13
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Zheng, B., Tomita, H., Inoue, T., Ike, Y.
(2009). Isolation of VanB-Type Enterococcus faecalis Strains from Nosocomial Infections: First Report of the Isolation and Identification of the Pheromone-Responsive Plasmids pMG2200, Encoding VanB-Type Vancomycin Resistance and a Bac41-Type Bacteriocin, and pMG2201, Encoding Erythromycin Resistance and Cytolysin (Hly/Bac). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
53: 735-747
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hirt, H., Manias, D. A., Bryan, E. M., Klein, J. R., Marklund, J. K., Staddon, J. H., Paustian, M. L., Kapur, V., Dunny, G. M.
(2005). Characterization of the Pheromone Response of the Enterococcus faecalis Conjugative Plasmid pCF10: Complete Sequence and Comparative Analysis of the Transcriptional and Phenotypic Responses of pCF10-Containing Cells to Pheromone Induction. J. Bacteriol.
187: 1044-1054
[Abstract]
[Full Text]