Journal of Bacteriology, October 2000, p. 5470-5478, Vol. 182, No. 19
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


The John Innes Centre, Colney, Norwich NR4 7UH, United Kingdom
Received 9 February 2000/Accepted 3 July 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The whiA sporulation gene of Streptomyces
coelicolor A3(2), which plays a key role in switching aerial
hyphae away from continued extension growth and toward sporulation
septation, was cloned by complementation of whiA mutants.
DNA sequencing of the wild-type allele and five whiA
mutations verified that whiA is a gene encoding a protein
with homologues in all gram-positive bacteria whose genome sequence is
known, whether of high or low G+C content. No function has been
attributed to any of these WhiA-like proteins. In most cases, as in
S. coelicolor, the whiA-like gene is downstream of other conserved genes in an operon-like cluster. Phenotypic analysis
of a constructed disruption mutant confirmed that whiA is
essential for sporulation. whiA is transcribed from at
least two promoters, the most downstream of which is located within the
preceding gene and is strongly up-regulated when colonies are
undergoing sporulation. The up-regulation depends on a functional whiA gene, suggesting positive autoregulation, although it
is not known whether this is direct or indirect. Unlike the promoters of some other sporulation-regulatory genes, the whiA
promoter does not depend on the sporulation-specific
factor encoded
by whiG.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dispersal of the mycelial organism
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) occurs by the formation of
long chains of spores from aerial hyphae. A critical stage in this
process is the subdivision of a multigenomic apical aerial hyphal
compartment into many unigenomic prespore compartments by the
synchronous formation of regularly spaced sporulation septa (26,
38). At least six genetic loci (whiA, whiB,
whiG, whiH, whiI, and whiJ)
are needed for sporulation septation (8, 10), in addition to
cell division genes that are also involved in vegetative growth
(24, 25). These six early whi loci appear to play
no role in vegetative growth. Mutations in them have pleiotropic
effects on the later stages of sporulation, including weak or
undetectable transcription of the genes responsible for the production
of grey spore pigment (20), hence the white colony phenotype
after which they were named (18). Transcription of
sigF, which encodes a late sporulation sigma factor, is also dependent on these early whi genes (21, 28). The
complex early whi mutant phenotypes suggest that some or all
of the six "early" whi genes encode regulatory elements.
Indeed, whiG encodes a sigma factor (
WhiG
[11, 37]), whiH encodes a repressor-like
protein (31), and whiI encodes a response
regulator-like protein (1); the product of whiB
has features that resemble those of some transcription factors
(13, 34). Mutations in some other more recently discovered genes also affect sporulation septation but in a more allele-specific manner (30).
This paper is concerned with whiA. Like whiB
mutants, whiA and whiA whiB double mutants have
tightly coiled aerial hyphae that are markedly longer than normal spore
chains, contain uncondensed DNA, and lack sporulation septa and readily
detectable FtsZ (9, 15, 33). whiA and
whiB are therefore believed to play a role in the cessation
of aerial growth. Flärdh et al. (15) and Aínsa et al. (1) proposed that this is part of a hypothetical
sequentially dependent series of developmental decisions. In this
model, newly emerged aerial hyphae first switch to a
sporulation-specific mode of elongation through the action of
WhiG, eventually undergoing a WhiA- and WhiB-dependent
orderly cessation of elongation and DNA replication, presumably in
response to some signal(s); it is suggested that growth cessation then
sets off further signals, which activate the WhiH and WhiI proteins,
and the activated forms of these proteins switch on sporulation septation.
The available evidence points to a close interplay between WhiA and WhiB. whiB is one of at least six similar genes in S. coelicolor, all encoding small proteins whose conserved features include four cysteine residues ("Wbl" proteins [27, 34]). Likely orthologues of several of these six proteins are present in most actinomycetes, but no similar proteins are known in any other organisms (34). Here we characterize the whiA gene and show that it is the S. coelicolor version of a gene that is conserved and ubiquitous among gram-positive bacteria but for which there had been no functional attribution.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Strains and media.
S. coelicolor A3(2)-derived strains
used in this study were M145 (prototrophic, SCP1
SCP2
) (17), J1501 (hisA1 uraA1
strA1 Pgl
SCP1
SCP2
)
(7), and the whiA strains C13, C72, C73, C85,
C170, and C213 (all prototrophic SCP1+ SCP2+)
(8). Escherichia coli strains were the general
host DH5
(32) and the Dam
Dcm
HsdM
strain ET12567 (23). Media, culture
conditions, and transformation procedures for S. coelicolor
were as previously described (17), and those for E. coli strains were as described by Sambrook et al. (32).
Library screening. The library of M145 chromosomal DNA used in this study was cloned in the low-copy-number SCP2*-based vector pIJ698 and had previously been used to clone whiH (31). In brief, the library was represented by a regular array of 2,400 patches of transformants of J1501 (auxotroph). The library was replicated onto a densely inoculated lawn of mycelial fragments of the prototrophic whiA mutant C72 on plates of nonselective minimal medium (MM) supplemented with mannitol as the carbon source and histidine and uracil to permit the growth of J1501. After 4 days of incubation at 30°C, the plates were replicated onto selective MM lacking histidine and uracil and containing thiostrepton at 50 µg/ml to select for C72 recipients of the pIJ698 derivatives. After incubation for at least 4 days, the transconjugants were screened for restoration of the wild-type phenotype (grey, sporulating aerial mycelium) instead of the white, nonsporulating aerial mycelium of mutant C72.
Subcloning and sequencing. The 7-kb insert from pIJ6204 that complemented whiA (see Results) was cloned in both orientations into pDH5 (a vector, based on pUC119, that is unable to replicate in S. coelicolor and contains tsr, a thiostrepton resistance marker [16]), giving pIJ6217 and pIJ6218. The restriction map of the insert was established, and subclones with defined deletions were created by digesting pIJ6217 and pIJ6218 with restriction enzymes and then ligating to induce recircularization. Each subclone was passaged through the nonmethylating E. coli strain ET12567 and used to transform the whiA mutant C13, selecting for resistance to thiostrepton.
The 3.4-kb insert of the subclone that retained the ability to complement whiA mutants (see Results) was sequenced using dye termination chemistry and a model 373A DNA-sequencing system (Applied Biosystems) and then extended to an adjacent SacI site by using conventional sequencing as described by Bruton and Chater (6). The FRAME program (4) was used to detect open reading frames (ORFs). The sequencing of mutant alleles of whiA was as described by Ryding et al. (31). Sequences were processed using the GCG Inc. package (14), and databases were searched using BLAST (2). Preliminary sequence from unfinished genomes was obtained from The Institute of Genomic Research database (http://www.tigr.org). The sequence of S. coelicolor cosmid C54 (accession number AL035591) was obtained from the S. coelicolor Genome Project at The Sanger Centre (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Projects/S_coelicolor). Predictions of secondary structure were done at the PSA server (36) of the BioMolecular Engineering Research Centre (http://bmerc-www.bu.edu/psa).Disruption of ORF4. Plasmid pIJ6413 is a pDH5 derivative containing the 7-kb insert from pIJ6204, in which the only PstI site was within the insert, internal to ORF4. A copy of the hygromycin resistance marker hyg (40) was cloned into the PstI site to give pIJ6414. S. coelicolor M145 was transformed with pIJ6414 prepared from E. coli ET12567, selecting for hygromycin resistance. Chromosomal DNA from three transformants that were sensitive to thiostrepton (and hence were presumed to be the products of recombination events on either side of the hyg marker) was examined by Southern hybridization and found to show the correct restriction pattern.
Transcription analysis. To investigate transcription during development, RNA samples were isolated from cultures grown for different times on MM overlaid with cellophane disks (1). Indeed, the RNA samples for the wild-type strain M145 time course experiment used to study whiA transcription were the same as those reported in that study. S1 protection assays were performed using the hrdB probe as a control (21), with a probe generated by PCR (31). To provide a template for PCR to generate the whiA probe, a 0.47-kb PstI-SalI fragment from pIJ6221, containing the 5' end of whiA and the presumptive promoter region, was cloned into pIJ2925 (19) to give pIJ6412. For amplification, the primers were the radiolabeled oligonucleotide 5'-CTGCAGCAGGTCCGGGTGAC-3' (complement of nucleotides 2365 to 2384 of the deposited sequence) and the unlabeled oligonucleotide 5'-AATACCGCATCAGGCGCCATTCG-3', which anneals in the vector pIJ2925, generating a probe with a nonhomologous tail of 220 nucleotides. For high-resolution S1 mapping, the radiolabeled oligonucleotide was 5'-GCCAGCAGCTCCGGGTCGTG-3' (complement of nucleotides 2255 to 2274).
In vitro runoff transcription using purified
WhiG and
E. coli core RNA polymerase (37) was performed on
DNA generated by PCR with the oligonucleotides
5'-TGCTGGACGCGCTGGTCGAG-3' (nucleotides 1998 to 2017) and
5'-CCGCGTTCCCGGTGTCCAGC-3' (complement of nucleotides 2463 to 2482) and with pIJ6221 as the template. The PCR product was digested
with RsaI or AluI to produce templates of 285 and 221 nucleotides, respectively, in which the whiA ends of the
fragment are located 149 and 85 nucleotides downstream of the putative transcription start site.
Reverse transcriptase-PCR was performed using the Titan One Tube RT-PCR
System (Boehringer Mannheim), under the conditions specified by the
manufacturer and with the primers mentioned above.
Microscopy. For phase-contrast microscopy of Streptomyces, strains were cultivated on MM for up to 5 days at 30°C. Then, coverslips were touched against the top of the colonies, and the impression preparations obtained were observed in a Zeiss Axiophot microscope. Photographs were taken using Kodak Technical pan film. For scanning electron microscopy, colonies were processed and examined as described by Flärdh et al. (15).
Nucleotide sequence accession number. The nucleotide sequence referred in the text has been deposited in the GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ databases under accession number AF106003.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The morphological phenotypes of whiA mutants.
Six
whiA mutants had previously been identified on the basis of
morphological phenotype combined with genetic mapping data (8). In broad agreement with earlier studies (8,
26), examination of the aerial hyphae of five of these mutants
(C13, C72, C73, C85, and C213) by phase-contrast microscopy revealed aerial hyphae that were long and tightly coiled (like those of the
constructed whiA null mutant shown in Fig.
1) and indistinguishable from those of
whiB mutants. (Some fragmentation of C13 aerial hyphae was
sometimes seen, although less than had previously been observed on MM
with glucose as a carbon source [8].) However, C170
produced only straight aerial hyphae (similar to those of whiG mutants), in contrast to the previous description
(8) (see below for a brief discussion).
|
Cloning of DNA complementing whiA mutants. A library of S. coelicolor DNA (31) was transferred by conjugation into the whiA mutant C72, and plasmids pIJ6203 and pIJ6204 caused sporulation and grey-pigment biosynthesis uniformly across the corresponding exconjugant patches. The same technique was used to transfer these plasmids into five other strains previously classified as whiA mutants (C13, C73, C85, C170, and C213 [8]). These plasmids fully restored grey-pigment biosynthesis and spore formation in C13 and C73. In C85, the plasmids only altered the degree of coiling and fragmentation of aerial hyphae, giving loosely coiled fragments, resembling those seen with whiH mutants (8, 31), and suggesting that C85 may contain both a whiA mutation and a mutation in another whi gene. Alternatively, whiA85 could be partially dominant. Neither pIJ6203 nor pIJ6204 affected the white-colony phenotype of C170, which was consistent with other evidence that it had acquired a second whi mutation (see below). Introducing either pIJ6203 or pIJ6204 into C213 restored spore pigment to at least wild-type levels, but the spacing of the sporulation septa was unusually variable, resulting in long and short spore compartments in the same spore chain. This effect was explained because C213 had been created by mutagenesis of an existing mutant (C58) that showed excessive production of spore pigment and also aberrant sporulation (H. M. Kieser, personal communication). Therefore, pIJ6203 and pIJ6204 complemented the whiA mutation and allowed the effect of the initial mutation to become apparent.
Plasmids with various parts of the 7-kb insert of pIJ6204 were used in attempts to complement C13. pIJ6221, containing a 3.4-kb XbaI-Asp718I fragment, restored sporulation in 94% of the transformants (the 6% of the transformants that were white may have arisen through homogenotization), while pIJ6223, whose insert (the 2.5-kb XbaI-PstI fragment) was just 0.9 kb shorter than that in pIJ6221, did not complement C13 (Fig. 2). This indicated that pIJ6221 contained most or all of the whiA gene, with at least part of it being located in the 0.9-kb PstI-Asp718I fragment.
|
whiA-like genes and the accompanying ORFs are widespread among gram-positive bacteria. DNA sequence analysis included the 3.4-kb XbaI-Asp718I fragment that complemented whiA13 and the sequence beyond the Asp718I site. This revealed the 3' end of one ORF (designated ORF1), three complete ORFs (ORF2, ORF3, and ORF4), and the 5' end of one ORF (ORF5), all orientated in the same direction and with little or no noncoding DNA between them. Subsequently, the sequence of cosmid C54 from the S. coelicolor genome project confirmed our primary sequence and also revealed a "mini-ORF" located immediately downstream of ORF4. The main features of this gene cluster are summarized in Fig. 2.
Most of ORF4 (termed SCC54.10c in the cosmid C54 annotation) was located between the PstI and Asp718I restriction sites mentioned in the section above, and so it was presumed to be responsible for the complementation of C13. This was confirmed in subsequent experiments (see below). Genes encoding WhiA-like products are present in the genomes of all sequenced gram-positive bacteria, showing amino acid identities ranging from 70% (mycobacteria) to 20-27% (low-G+C gram-positive bacteria). Moreover, a whiA-like gene is present only once in any one genome, and in all cases except mycoplasmas it is downstream of genes resembling ORF2 and ORF3. WhiA does not resemble any protein of known function. Of the adjacent and possibly cotranscribed genes, only ORF1 encodes a protein of predictable function (the ATP-binding cassette excision nuclease subunit C, widely conserved in many bacteria). ORF2 shows strong similarity to a gene of unknown function that is located three genes downstream of rpoN, the gene which encodes an atypical sigma factor (
54), in several gram-negative species. However,
neither the sequence near ORF2 in S. coelicolor nor the
complete sequence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
(12) contains any rpoN-like genes. Like ORF2,
ORF3 homologues also occur in phylogenetically diverse bacteria that do
not possess whiA-like genes. There are mini-ORFs unrelated to the one in S. coelicolor downstream of the
whiA-like gene in Bacillus subtilis and the
mycoplasmas (3) but not in M. tuberculosis. Finally, ORF5 is related to a number of carboxypeptidases from both
prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms.
Analysis of a constructed whiA null mutant. We constructed an S. coelicolor M145 derivative strain, J2401, carrying a whiA::hyg disruption in the chromosome. This mutant developed a white aerial mycelium, and no spores could be detected under phase-contrast microscopy or SEM. The aerial hyphae bore long and tightly coiled tip regions on slightly coiled "stalks," showing a phenotype indistinguishable from that of the original whiA point mutants. In the example shown in Fig. 1, the coiled part of the hypha is about 150 µm long whereas the wild-type spore chains seldom exceed 50 µm. Plasmid pIJ6204 (Fig. 2) restored full sporulation to J2401 (data not shown).
Sequencing the whiA mutant alleles.
For each of
five whiA mutants, a 1.5-kb region containing the promoter
region of whiA and the coding sequences of whiA
and the mini-ORF was sequenced. Two mutants had single-amino-acid substitutions in whiA: in C85 the mutation changed leucine
162 into proline, and in C213 the mutation changed leucine 196 into proline. In the alignment of WhiA-like proteins (Fig.
3), these two leucine residues are highly
conserved and are located inside regions with a high probability of
folding into a helix (following a prediction of the secondary structure
of WhiA), where the presence of the prolines would considerably distort
the structure. Two mutants had deletions causing frameshifts: in C170
the loss of a G nucleotide caused a frameshift from arginine 99 onward,
whereas in C72 the deletion of seven nucleotides (GCCTCGG)
produced a frameshift from arginine 306 onwards, adding 61 aberrant amino acids to the C terminus of WhiA.
|
|
Pro) could therefore represent a dominant allele, although the presence of a secondary mutation (perhaps in
whiH, to judge from the phenotype of C85/pIJ6204, although this has not been further studied) is an alternative explanation. IN
C170, the presence of a frameshift mutation in whiA confirms that this mutant was originally isolated and correctly classified as a
whiA mutant. The "abnormal" phenotype currently detected in C170 (remarkably similar to whiG mutants) could be
explained by the presence of a secondary mutation. The likely presence
of a second whi mutation in two of the six whiA
mutants was surprising and was not consistent with the results of an
earlier genetic analysis (8). Possibly, there may be a
selective advantage in such additional mutations: the aerial hyphae of
whiA mutants, which are normally used for subculture and
storage in the laboratory, have lower viability than the aerial hyphae
of other whi mutants (our unpublished observations), and the
accumulation of other mutations during culture preservation or
subculture may alleviate this effect.
Transcriptional analysis. whiA appears to be downstream of other genes in an operon, raising the possibility that at least part of its expression might arise from cotranscription with the upstream genes. Low-resolution S1 mapping and reverse transcription-PCR analysis of S. coelicolor M145 RNA (data not shown) showed that whiA could be transcribed both from a specific promoter within the gene immediately upstream, and from a promoter at least 200 nucleotides (perhaps much more) further upstream.
To characterize both transcripts further, we carried out S1 mapping with a radiolabeled probe of 690 nucleotides. Of this, 470 nucleotides corresponded to a region covering the 3' end of ORF3 and the 5' end of whiA (where the whiA-specific promoter had been located) while the remaining 220 nucleotides corresponded to vector sequences, allowing us to differentiate between probe-probe reannealing artifacts, readthrough transcription, and transcription produced from the whiA-specific promoter. Using RNA samples isolated from a time course of surface cultures of the whiA+ strain M145, two signals were detected (Fig. 5), the larger one (ca. 470 nucleotides) being due to readthrough from a promoter located upstream of the region included in the probe and the smaller one (ca. 250 nucleotides) corresponding to the mRNA produced from the whiA-specific promoter. The temporal regulation of these two signals was quite different; the readthrough transcription was rather constant throughout the time course, while the signal corresponding to the whiA-specific promoter was strongly induced when spore formation was taking place and then decreased (Fig. 5). (This decrease might reflect a real decrease in in vivo abundance or might be an artifact of possibly less efficient extraction of RNA from spores than from mycelium.) The transcription of the control gene hrdB was essentially constant during the time course. Even though their exposure time was five times longer, the intensity of the bands corresponding to the longer whiA transcript at all time points was considerably lower than for hrdB. (Although quantitative comparisons between different RNA-DNA hybrids are fallible, we note that similar low band intensity was also obtained with a probe prepared with a different oligonucleotide as the labeled reverse primer, and in all cases the apparent efficiency of incorporation of the 32P end label into the primer had appeared to be comparable.) However, during its developmental up-regulation, the apparent strength of the whiA-specific promoter approached that of hrdB. Since it is likely that the promoter is strongly expressed only at a particular developmental stage in any one hypha and since aerial hyphal development is not synchronized in colonies, the whiA-specific promoter may well be very strong during its transient period of maximum expression.
|
35 and
10 regions
contained TGGA and GCCCCTAA sequences separated by 16 nucleotides. These sequences partly resemble those of S. coelicolor promoters dependent on the sporulation-specific sigma
factor
WhiG (the main difference being in the
10 box,
which in
WhiG-dependent promoters has the consensus
GCCGATAA, in which the central GA is completely conserved).
To further examine this possible dependence, we used purified
WhiG and E. coli RNA polymerase in an in
vitro runoff transcription assay on DNA templates containing the
whiA promoter. However, no transcript could be detected
(data not shown), although the
WhiG holoenzyme was
active in a positive-control experiment with the whiI
promoter (1). Using S1 mapping, we also detected the
whiA transcript in RNA samples isolated from a
whiG deletion mutant (data not shown), thus ruling out the
dependence of whiA on
WhiG.
An alternative candidate
10 sequence, TAAACT, separated by
5 bp from the transcription start point, is a potential recognition site for RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing the major sigma factor
HrdB (5). However, no appropriately spaced
classical
35-like sequence is present (the sequence TTGGAG,
similar to the proposed consensus for the
35 sequence of the
HrdB-dependent promoters, is, however, located 20 nucleotides upstream). In other bacteria, the absence of a
35-like
sequence is often correlated with a requirement for transcriptional
activation. If this were the case, the up-regulation of the
transcription of whiA from its own promoter could be
explained by the action of a transcription factor (perhaps WhiA itself)
whose activity and/or concentration could increase specifically during sporulation.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Characterization of the whiA sporulation locus in S. coelicolor. When the S. coelicolor whi mutants defective in sporulation were first isolated and characterized (8, 18), six of the mutations were mapped to the whiA locus, located between the hisC and argA markers, around the "12 o'clock" position in the chromosome. Here we have described the molecular nature of the whiA gene on the basis of a study of a fragment of DNA that complements the whiA mutations in four of the original mutants. (Two other mutants appeared to have accumulated second mutations in other whi genes.) The assignment of whiA to a particular ORF (ORF4) was based on the complementation of whiA mutants by subclones, the finding of different mutations affecting ORF4 in each of the whiA mutants, and the fact that the disruption of ORF4 produced a phenotype similar to that of the original whiA mutants.
In the mycobacterial species (distantly related actinomycetes), ORF1, ORF2, ORF3, and the whiA-like gene are conserved in the same order as in S. coelicolor, and only ORF2, ORF3, and the whiA-like gene are conserved in the other gram-positive organisms except Mycoplasma spp. The conservation of these genes indicates that this arrangement is ancient and significant and suggests that they may be coregulated. The readthrough transcription of whiA from an unknown start point(s)
possibly upstream of
the whole gene cluster
may well be important to whiA
activity, since the whiA13 mutation that probably uncouples
translation with the upstream gene produces a phenotype like that of
the whiA disruption mutant (although the whiA13
phenotype probably also arises in part from the altered
ribosome-binding site). Neither of the genes immediately upstream of
whiA are essential for viability, since they are both deleted in the C73 mutant, which is still able to undergo normal mycelial growth.
Is WhiA a transcriptional regulator?
In the constructed
whiA disruption mutant, transcription of whiA
from its own promoter has little of the sporulation-specific induction
that can be detected in the wild type. At the molecular level, it is
not clear whether this induction would involve a direct interaction
between WhiA and the whiA-specific promoter or whether WhiA
contributes to the activation of an unidentified transcriptional
activator or the inactivation of a repressor. The up-regulation of
whiA transcription seems to be associated with the
morphological checkpoints of sporulation septation or controlled
cessation of aerial growth, developmental stages that are not reached
in a whiA mutant. The transcriptional arrangement within the
operon would indicate that the WhiA protein is present throughout
growth, but perhaps in vegetative cells it is in an inactive form that
requires a signal before it is able to stimulate its own transcription.
The apparent positive autoregulation of whiA is in
interesting contrast to the apparent autorepression of whiH
and whiI, which make up a
WhiG-dependent part
of the regulatory network for sporulation septation (1, 31).
We note that both whiA and whiB (which are
expressed independently of
WhiG) have a low-level
constitutive promoter and a stronger developmentally regulated promoter
(35).
-helices or
-strands, arranged without any apparent
periodicity or pattern, some of them being connected by turns
containing proline residues. However, the rest of the protein (residues
157 to the end) shows a very high probability of folding into several
-helixes of variable length (10 to 26 residues), some of them also
connected by proline-containing loops (Fig. 3).
WhiA may act by controlling the cessation of aerial hyphal growth. Among the whi mutants, one striking feature of both whiA and whiB mutants is that they produce long and tightly coiled aerial hyphae. The study of the phenotypes of different whi mutants and the analysis of double mutants has given rise to the idea that WhiA and WhiB are responsible for the decision to stop the growth of the aerial hyphae in a coordinated manner prior to sporulation septation (15). Although this might be the consequence simply of WhiA and WhiB accumulation to some critical level, it is also possible that one or both proteins may respond to some aspect of cellular physiology; for example, they could sense the gradual extinction of a compound that is present in limited quantities in the closed-off aerial hypha. (A variant of this would involve WhiA and WhiB detecting a signal that increases in strength when continued growth becomes limited.) The observation that whiA mRNA is maximally abundant when aerial hyphae are beginning to form spores leads us to suggest that the interaction of WhiA with some such signal is necessary for its positive autoregulation.
An additional perspective is suggested by looking at the morphological development of other actinomycetes. Members of the genera Microbispora and Microtetraspora produce short chains of only two and four spores, respectively, suggesting that they have evolved a mechanism by which they are able to strictly limit the number of chromosomal replications in the cell that is destined to form spores. Perhaps Streptomyces has a similar mechanism that is much less obvious because of the difficulty in precisely counting the relatively large number of spores in individual chains. One might imagine a model in which WhiA and WhiB combine to detect a changed level of a signal and then coordinate the completion of a fixed number of further cycles of DNA replication with the associated cessation of cell growth. It might be interesting to examine carefully the DNA phenotypes of stationary-phase cells in single-celled bacteria containing mutations in their whiA-like genes.| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
N.J.R. and J.A.A. contributed equally to this work.
This work was supported by the Commitment and Development programme of the BBSRC (grant CAD 04380) and by a John Innes Foundation studentship to N.J.R.
We are grateful to Helen M. Kieser for providing filters containing the S. coelicolor cosmids and for providing lyophilized samples of the whi mutants. We acknowledge The Sanger Centre S. coelicolor genome-sequencing team for providing the sequence of cosmid C54 (and all the other cosmids, of course!) and The Institute of Genomic Research for making available the database of the unfinished genomes. We thank Sebastien Mouz, Tobias Kieser, Mervyn Bibb, Mark Buttner, and Gabriella Kelemen for critical reading of the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: The John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Colney, Norwich NR4 7UH, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1603-450297. Fax: 44-1603-450045. E-mail: chater{at}bbsrc.ac.uk.
Present address: Departamento de Microbiología, Medicina
Preventiva y Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Present address: Department of Microbiology, Michigan State
University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1101.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Aínsa, J. A., H. D. Parry, and K. F. Chater. 1999. A response regulator-like protein that functions at an intermediate stage of sporulation in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Mol. Microbiol. 34:607-619[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 2. |
Altschul, S. F.,
T. L. Madden,
A. A. Schffer,
J. Zhang,
Z. Zhang,
W. Miller, and D. J. Lipman.
1997.
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs.
Nucleic Acids Res.
25:3389-3402 |
| 3. | Bellgard, M. I., and T. Gojobori. 1999. Identification of a ribonuclease H gene in both Mycoplasma genitalium and Mycoplasma pneumoniae by a new method for exhaustive identification of ORFs in the complete genome sequences. FEBS Lett. 445:6-8[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 4. | Bibb, M. J., P. R. Findlay, and M. W. Johnson. 1984. The relationship between base composition and codon usage in bacterial genes and its use for the simple and reliable identification of protein-coding sequences. Gene 30:157-166[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 5. |
Bourn, W. R., and B. Babb.
1995.
Computer assisted identification and classification of streptomycete promoters.
Nucleic Acids Res.
23:3696-3703 |
| 6. |
Bruton, C. J., and K. F. Chater.
1987.
Nucleotide sequence of IS110, an insertion sequence of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2).
Nucleic Acids Res.
15:7053-7065 |
| 7. |
Chater, K. F.,
C. J. Bruton,
A. A. King, and J. E. Suárez.
1982.
The expression of Streptomyces and Escherichia coli drug resistance determinants cloned into the Streptomyces phage C31.
Gene
19:21-32[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8. | Chater, K. F. 1972. A morphological and genetic mapping study of white colony mutants of Streptomyces coelicolor. J. Gen. Microbiol. 72:9-28[Medline]. |
| 9. | Chater, K. F. 1975. Construction and phenotypes of double sporulation deficient mutants in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). J. Gen. Microbiol. 87:312-325[Medline]. |
| 10. | Chater, K. F. 1998. Taking a genetic scalpel to the Streptomyces colony. Microbiology 144:1465-1478. |
| 11. | Chater, K. F., C. J. Bruton, K. A. Plaskitt, M. J. Buttner, C. Méndez, and J. Helmann. 1989. The developmental fate of S. coelicolor hyphae depends crucially on a gene product homologous with the motility sigma factor of B. subtilis. Cell 59:133-143[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 12. | Cole, S. T., R. Brosch, J. Parkhill, T. Garnier, C. Churcher, D. Harris, S. V. Gordon, K. Eiglmeier, S. Gas, C. E. Barry III, F. Tekaia, K. Badcock, D. Basham, D. Brown, T. Chillingworth, R. Connor, R. Davies, K. Devlin, T. Feltwell, S. Gentles, N. Hamlin, S. Holroyd, T. Hornsby, K. Jagels, A. Krogh, J. McLean, S. Moule, L. Murphy, K. Oliver, J. Osborne, M. A. Quail, M.-A. Rajandream, J. Rogers, S. Rutter, K. Seeger, J. Skelton, R. Squares, S. Squares, J. E. Sulston, K. Taylor, S. Whitehead, and B. G. Barrell. 1998. Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence. Nature 393:537-544[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 13. | Davis, N. K., and K. F. Chater. 1992. The Streptomyces coelicolor whiB gene encodes a small transcription factor-like protein dispensable for growth but essential for sporulation. Mol. Gen. Genet. 232:351-358[Medline]. |
| 14. | Devereux, J., P. Haeberli, and O. Smithies. 1984. A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res. 12:387-395. |
| 15. |
Flärdh, K.,
K. C. Findlay, and K. F. Chater.
1999.
Association of early sporulation genes with suggested developmental decision points in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2).
Microbiology
145:2229-2243 |
| 16. |
Hilleman, D.,
A. Puhler, and W. Wohlleben.
1991.
Gene disruption and gene replacement in Streptomyces via single stranded DNA transformation of integration vectors.
Nucleic Acids Res.
19:727-731 |
| 17. | Hopwood, D. A., M. J. Bibb, K. F. Chater, T. Kieser, C. J. Bruton, H. M. Kieser, D. J. Lydiate, C. P. Smith, J. M. Ward, and H. Schrempf. 1985. Genetic manipulation of Streptomyces: a laboratory manual. The John Innes Foundation, Norwich, England. |
| 18. | Hopwood, D. A., H. Wildermuth, and H. M. Palmer. 1970. Mutants of Streptomyces coelicolor defective in sporulation. J. Gen. Microbiol. 61:397-408[Medline]. |
| 19. | Janssen, G. R., and M. J. Bibb. 1993. Derivatives of pUC18 that have BglII sites flanking a modified multiple cloning site and that retain the ability to identify recombinant clones by visual screening of Escherichia coli colonies. Gene 124:133-134[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 20. |
Kelemen, G. H.,
P. Brian,
K. Flärdh,
L. Chamberlin,
K. F. Chater, and M. J. Buttner.
1998.
Developmental regulation of the transcription of whiE, a locus specifying the polyketide spore pigment in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2).
J. Bacteriol.
180:2515-2521 |
| 21. |
Kelemen, G. H.,
G. L. Brown,
J. Kormanec,
L. Potú ková,
K. F. Chater, and M. J. Buttner.
1996.
The positions of the sigma factor genes, whiG and sigF, in the hierarchy controlling the development of spore chains in the aerial hyphae of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2).
Mol. Microbiol.
21:593-603[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22. |
Kieser, H. M.,
T. Kieser, and D. A. Hopwood.
1992.
A combined genetic and physical map of the chromosome of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2).
J. Bacteriol.
174:5496-5507 |
| 23. | MacNeil, D. J., K. M. Gewain, C. L. Ruby, G. Dezeny, P. H. Gibbons, and T. MacNeil. 1992. Analysis of Streptomyces avermitilis genes required for avermectin biosynthesis utilising a novel integrative vector. Gene 111:61-68[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 24. | McCormick, J. R., E. P. Su, A. Driks, and R. Losick. 1994. Growth and viability of Streptomyces coelicolor mutant for the cell division gene ftsZ. Mol. Microbiol. 14:243-254[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 25. |
McCormick, J. R., and R. Losick.
1996.
Cell division gene ftsQ is required for efficient sporulation but not growth and viability in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2).
J. Bacteriol.
178:5295-5301 |
| 26. | McVittie, A. M. 1974. Ultrastructural studies on sporulation in wild-type and white colony mutants of Streptomyces coelicolor. J. Gen. Microbiol. 81:291-302[Medline]. |
| 27. |
Molle, V.,
W. J. Palframan,
K. C. Findlay, and M. J. Buttner.
2000.
WhiD and WhiB: homologous proteins required for different stages of sporulation in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2).
J. Bacteriol.
182:1286-1295 |
| 28. |
Potú ková, L.,
G. H. Kelemen,
K. C. Findlay,
M. A. Lonetto,
M. J. Buttner, and J. Kormanec.
1995.
A new RNA polymerase sigma factor, F, is required for the late stages of morphological differentiation in Streptomyces spp.
Mol. Microbiol.
17:37-48[Medline].
|
| 29. | Redenbach, M., H. M. Kieser, D. Denapaite, A. Eichner, J. Cullum, H. Kinashi, and D. A. Hopwood. 1996. A set of ordered cosmids and a detailed genetic and physical map for the 8 Mb Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) chromosome. Mol. Microbiol. 21:77-96[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 30. |
Ryding, N. J.,
M. J. Bibb,
V. Molle,
K. C. Findlay,
K. F. Chater, and M. J. Buttner.
1999.
New sporulation loci in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2).
J. Bacteriol.
181:5419-5425 |
| 31. | Ryding, N. J., G. H. Kelemen, C. A. Whatling, K. Flärdh, M. J. Buttner, and K. F. Chater. 1998. A developmentally regulated gene encoding a repressor-like protein is essential for sporulation in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Mol. Microbiol. 29:343-357[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 32. | Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 33. | Schwedock, J., J. R. McCormick, E. R. Angert, J. R. Nodwell, and R. Losick. 1997. Assembly of the cell division protein FtsZ into ladder-like structures in the aerial hyphae of Streptomyces coelicolor. Mol. Microbiol. 25:847-858[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 34. |
Soliveri, J. A.,
J. Gomez,
W. R. Bishai, and K. F. Chater.
2000.
Multiple paralogous genes related to the Streptomyces coelicolor developmental regulatory gene whiB are present in Streptomyces and other actinomycetes.
Microbiology
146:333-343 |
| 35. |
Soliveri, J.,
K. L. Brown,
M. J. Buttner, and K. F. Chater.
1992.
Two promoters for the whiB sporulation gene of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) and their activities in relation to development.
J. Bacteriol.
174:6215-6220 |
| 36. | Stultz, C. M., R. Nambudripad, R. H. Lathrop, and J. V. White. 1997. Predicting protein structure with probabilistic models. In N. Allewell, and C. Woodward (ed.), Protein structural biology in bio-medical research. Advances in molecular and cell biology, vol. 22. JAI Press, Greenwich, Conn. |
| 37. |
Tan, H.,
H. Yang,
Y. Tian,
W. Wu,
C. A. Whatling,
L. C. Chamberlin,
M. J. Buttner,
J. Nodwell, and K. F. Chater.
1998.
The Streptomyces coelicolor sporulation-specific WhiG form of RNA polymerase transcribes a gene encoding a ProX-like protein that is dispensable for sporulation.
Gene
212:137-146[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 38. | Wildermuth, H., and D. A. Hopwood. 1970. Septation during sporulation in Streptomyces coelicolor. J. Gen. Microbiol. 60:57-59. |
| 39. | Wright, F., and M. J. Bibb. 1992. Codon usage in the G+C-rich Streptomyces genome. Gene 113:55-65[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 40. |
Zalacaín, M.,
A. González,
M. C. Guerrero,
R. J. Mattaliano,
F. Malpartida, and A. Jiménez.
1986.
Nucleotide sequence of the hygromycin B phosphotransferase gene from Streptomyces hygroscopicus.
Nucleic Acids Res.
14:1565-1581 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Appl. Environ. Microbiol. | Infect. Immun. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|---|---|
| Mol. Cell. Biol. | J. Virol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. |
| ALL ASM JOURNALS |