Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, January 2000, p. 327-336, Vol. 182, No. 2
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Visualization of Repair of Double-Strand Breaks in
the Bacteriophage T7 Genome without Normal DNA
Replication
Ying-Ta
Lai and
Warren
Masker*
Department of Biochemistry, Temple University
School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140
Received 14 June 1999/Accepted 27 October 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
An in vitro system based on extracts of Escherichia
coli infected with bacteriophage T7 is able to repair
double-strand breaks in a T7 genome with efficiencies of 20% or more.
To achieve this high repair efficiency it is necessary that the
reaction mixtures contain molecules of donor DNA that bracket the
double-strand break. Gaps as long as 1,600 nucleotides are repaired
almost as efficiently as simple double-strand breaks. DNA synthesis was measured while repair was taking place. It was found that the amount of
DNA synthesis associated with repair of a double-strand break was below
the level of detection possible with this system. Furthermore, repair
efficiencies were the same with or without normal levels of T7 DNA
polymerase. However, the repair required the 5'
3' exonuclease
encoded by T7 gene 6. The high efficiency of DNA repair allowed
visualization of the repaired product after in vitro repair, thereby
assuring that the repair took place in vitro rather than during an in
vivo growth step after packaging.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Double-strand breaks in DNA confront
the cell with potentially disastrous consequences, in the form of
permanent loss of genetic information. Double-strand breaks can result
from DNA-damaging agents (7), aberrant interactions
between topoisomerases and DNA (11, 43), or from
collapsed replication forks (2, 19). To counteract the
deleterious effects of double-strand breaks, most organisms maintain
elaborate repair mechanisms directed against these lesions (3,
7). Recombination with undamaged portions of homologous genomes
offers an economical scheme for rescue of partial genomes formed by
double-strand breaks. A connection between double-strand breaks and
recombination (both homologous and illegitimate) has been well
established in a number of biological systems, including yeasts,
bacteria, and bacteriophages (9, 12, 32, 44, 46, 53, 54).
Our laboratory has been examining the repair of double-strand breaks by
using an in vitro system based on extracts made from Escherichia
coli infected with bacteriophage T7 (13, 21, 25, 55).
In this system, DNA replication closely mimics the in vivo replication
of T7 DNA (4, 28). Moreover, the in vitro system is able to
carry out at least some steps of homologous recombination (22, 23,
27, 38, 39). To study double-strand break repair, breaks are
experimentally introduced with a restriction endonuclease at a
predetermined site in the T7 genome. The broken genomes are then
incubated in the in vitro system before the DNA is recovered and
packaged into infective T7 phage. The yield of viable phage reflects
the number of intact genomes and, therefore, the efficiency of
double-strand break repair. Double-strand breaks are repaired
efficiently in this system, and repair of the breaks is often
accompanied by acquisition of genetic information from other DNA
molecules present in the same reactions (25). When a
double-strand break occurs between a pair of direct repeats, the break
can increase the frequency of deletion of the region between the
repeats by 2 or more orders of magnitude (13, 55).
Although double-strand breaks in the T7 genome can be repaired by
direct ligation of the two partial genomes formed by the break, repair
is more than 2 orders of magnitude higher if the reactions contain
intact DNA molecules that bracket the break site (21). The
repaired DNA acquires genetic information from the donor DNA
(25). The relationship between repair efficiency and the
relative positions of the double-strand break and the ends of the donor
DNA molecules suggests that the double-strand break is widened to a gap
prior to its repair (21). The exact function of the donor
DNA is unclear, but clues to its role in the repair process can be
gleaned from what is known from other biological systems (1, 6, 9,
20, 24, 31, 36, 41, 51, 52). Figure
1 outlines some possible mechanisms by
which donor DNA could participate in repair of a double-strand break. A
form of the double-strand break repair model, successfully applied to
yeast (36, 46, 51), might account for both the repair of the
double-strand break and the accompanying transfer of genetic
information from donor to T7 genome. In this model, the double-strand
break is widened to a gap before the 3' ends of the broken genome each
invade a homologous donor DNA molecule. Both strands of the donor DNA
serve as a template for DNA synthesis that copies information from the
donor to the repaired genome in a nonreciprocal fashion. Variations of
this model also use the donor DNA as a template but allow for
independent synthesis of single-strand tails on each partial
genome. Annealing of these tails repairs the break, again with transfer
of information to the repaired genome (36). A second
mechanism, shown in the center of Fig. 1, is double-strand
break-induced replication fork formation. This mechanism involves
invasion of a single-stranded end of the broken DNA into the unbroken
duplex region of the donor so as to form a three-stranded D-loop.
Nicking of the displaced strand of the D-loop followed by ligation
between the invading strand and the nicked strand of the D-loop
establishes a replication fork. The replication fork advances until it
reaches the end of the donor DNA. If necessary, the process is repeated
with the ends of the newly synthesized DNA, forming new replication
forks until the genome is completely replicated. This mechanism is
characterized by canonical DNA replication fork progression rather than
repair-like DNA synthesis that generates single-stranded tails. A third
possibility, shown on the right side of Fig. 1, is physical
incorporation of the donor DNA into the recipient repaired genomes. It
is known that in T7, as in other systems (25, 33, 53), a
double-strand break encourages recombination. The molecular
nature of the double-strand break-induced recombination events in T7 is
not understood, and the enzymes involved are not known. A pair of
crossovers between the donor and broken genomes, one on either side of
the break, could seal the break while carrying genetic information from
donor to recipient. Or, digestion of one DNA strand at the ends created by the double-strand break could produce complementary single-strand tails on the recombining DNA molecules which could allow recombination via single-strand annealing.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Possible roles for donor DNA in repair of a
double-strand break. In all three models the double-strand break is
first widened to a gap. In scheme A, both strands of the donor DNA
serve as a template for new DNA synthesis. The 3' ends on each partial
genome invade the donor DNA and synthesize long single-strand tails
which can then anneal with each other to close the break while
transferring information from donor to repaired genome in a
nonreciprocal fashion (36, 51). Alternatively, the DNA
molecules could form a pair of Holliday junctions which, after
resolution, would repair the genome and transfer markers from the donor
DNA (17, 53). In scheme B, ends formed by a double-strand
break invade a homologous segment of DNA and form a replication fork
(1, 8, 20, 32). In our experimental design, ends on either
the genome with one double-strand break or the donor DNA could initiate
formation of a new replication fork. DNA synthesis elongates the
partially repaired genome. This process is repeated until an intact,
fully functional genome is completed. In scheme C, recombinational
crossovers between the genome with one double-strand break and the
donor DNA physically incorporate the donor DNA into the gap in the
repaired genome. The nature of the crossovers is poorly understood and
might involve elements of scheme A. The third mechanism (C) is imagined
to proceed with very limited DNA synthesis.
|
|
Extensive DNA synthesis accompanies recovery from double-strand breaks
in many biological systems, including E. coli and its phages
lambda and T4. Recombination-dependent replication, the formation of
new replication forks via recombination with intact DNA molecules (as
in Fig. 1B), offers an efficient and economical means of rescuing
partial genomes generated by double-strand breaks (9, 31,
32). Reconstruction of DNA replication forks from recombination
between partial and intact genomes represents a major part of
bacteriophage T4's infective cycle (8, 32). In E. coli, collapsed replication forks are reestablished by
recombination with intact regions of the bacterial chromosome
(1, 19, 20). A dnaE mutation in the major
E. coli DNA replicase, DNA polymerase III, blocks formation
of recombination intermediates that accompany repair of a double-strand
break (20). Given the importance of recombinational
reconstruction of DNA replication forks in other systems and the
similarity between the basic DNA replication process in E. coli, lambda, T4, and T7, we considered whether in T7 formation of
new replication forks at a break site (Fig. 1B) provides a major route
to double-strand break repair. Inhibition of DNA replication should put
an end to any repair pathway involving extensive DNA replication via
establishment of new replication forks after invasion of ends created
by double-strand breaks into intact homologues. In particular,
recombination-dependent replication beginning at a recombination event
at the break site and extending to the end of the genome would be
precluded by inhibition of normal DNA replication. This would either
force the double-strand ends into alternative repair pathways or
permanently inactivate partial genomes that invade homologous DNA
molecules by freezing the newly formed replication forks. The data
presented below show that in T7, simple double-strand breaks and gaps
of 1,600 nucleotides (nt) are repaired with about the same efficiency
whether or not T7 DNA polymerase is present at its normal level. These
data suggest either that establishment of new replication forks is not
a primary means for double-strand break repair in the in vitro system
employed in this study or that alternative pathways for this mode of
repair are robust enough to handle a double-strand break in every DNA
molecule with no apparent loss in efficiency when the phage DNA
polymerase is inactivated.
An intrinsic limitation of using packaging to assay double-strand break
repair is that for some applications it is impossible to separate the
steps taking place during the in vitro repair reactions from those
taking place in either the packaging reactions or the in vivo growth
step needed to convert the single phage particle created by in vitro
packaging into a visible plaque. To circumvent this concern, we
repaired broken T7 genomes in vitro, recovered the DNA product from
those reactions, and cut it with KpnI to separate the
segment that had the double-strand break from the rest of the genome.
After electrophoresis, an intact restriction fragment that covered the
region where the double-strand break had been placed was recovered
under conditions in which donor DNA was present and repair could
proceed. This KpnI "D" band was not found in the product
of reactions that did not contain donor DNA, thereby indicating that
the intact KpnI D band arose as a result of repair of the
double-strand break. Double-strand break repair, as monitored by direct
visualization, was seen whether or not T7 DNA polymerase was present.
These data corroborate the experiments employing in vitro packaging and
demonstrate repair without normal levels of T7 DNA polymerase.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacteria and bacteriophage.
E. coli strains included
W3110 (wild type, sup0) O11' (supE),
and N2668 [lig-7(Ts)]. T7 phage were from the collection
of F. W. Studier (47, 49). Amber mutants used in the
extract preparations included am29 in gene 3 (endonuclease
I), am28 in gene 5 (DNA polymerase), and am147 in
gene 6 (5'
3' exonuclease). The
A mutation is a deletion from
the promoter of gene 1.3 (T7 ligase) to gene 1.5 (35). (The
functions of the nonessential genes 1.4 and 1.5 have not been
determined.) The sequence of the entire T7 genome has been reported by
Dunn and Studier (5). In some experiments, inserts of DNA
were placed in an XhoI site that had been engineered at
position 6663 in the T7 ligase gene (gene 1.3). The construction of
this phage, designated T7X, has been described previously
(35). The construction and sequences of the specific T7
inserts used in this study have been described in detail previously (21).
Growth conditions.
Bacteria were grown at either 32 or
37°C with rapid aeration in L broth (30). Agar plates made
with T broth (30) were used to grow bacteria at 32°C.
DNA.
DNA was prepared as previously described
(37). DNA concentrations are reported as nucleotide
phosphorous equivalents. For reference, 1 nmol nucleotide phosphorous
of DNA is equivalent to 7.3 × 109 T7 genomes. When
1.5 nmol of BstXI-digested donor DNA is added to 1.5 nmol of
DNA in the form of T7 genomes, there is one molecule of the relevant
restriction fragment for every genome. Restriction enzymes were
purchased from New England Biolabs and used according to the
supplier's instructions. For double-strand break repair reactions,
breaks were placed in the T7 ligase gene by digestion with a
restriction enzyme (usually BamHI or XhoI). The
donor DNA used to repair the breaks was T7 6
ss
DNA digested with BstXI. The
ss
mutation in the donor DNA refers to "suicide in
Shigella" and confers upon phage that carry that mutation
the ability to grow equally well on E. coli or
Shigella sonnei. The presence of the ss
mutation is incidental to the experiments reported here. Digestion with
BstXI cuts the T7 genome into 12 fragments and effectively precludes reassembly into a functional genome. All restriction digests
were checked by agarose gel electrophoresis. Radioactively labeled
[32P]dCTP was purchased from ICN. The radioactive
precursor was included in DNA repair reactions, portions of the
reaction mix were dried on a Whatman GF/C filter, and the radioactivity
on the filter was measured with a liquid scintillation counter to allow
a determination of the number of 32P counts per minute that
corresponds to a picomole of nucleotide. Product DNA from the in vitro
reactions was precipitated with 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA)
including 0.1 M PPi. The acid-precipitated DNA was
collected on Whatman GF/C filters, and the amount of radioactivity was
determined with a liquid scintillation counter.
In vitro repair.
Extracts used for in vitro repair reactions
were prepared by using phage that had genes 1.3 to 1.5 removed with the
A deletion. This means that ligase-positive phage could not be
produced via recombination with endogenous DNA in the extracts used for
repair or packaging. Moreover, since the ligase gene was the site of double-strand breaks, the presence of the
A mutation avoided homology between the break site and any endogenous DNA that might remain in the extracts, thereby reducing concern that endogenous DNA
might contribute to repair reactions. The
A mutation also reduces,
by about 1.4 kb, the length of the 3.6-kb KpnI D fragment which in the wild type extends from position 5617 to 9192. This fragment was used to visualize repair of the double-strand breaks. The
difference between
A and wild-type KpnI bands allows easy distinction between exogenous DNA and any endogenous DNA that contaminates the reaction mixtures. Extracts for double-strand break
repair were prepared with either T7
A 3
(lacking
ligase and endonuclease), T7
A 3
5
(lacking ligase, endonuclease, and DNA polymerase), or T7
A 3
5
6
(lacking ligase,
endonuclease, DNA polymerase, and 5'
3' exonuclease). The
preparation of these extracts has been described in detail previously
(10, 26, 29). Unless stated otherwise, 0.05-ml reaction
mixtures included 1.5 nmol of DNA, consisting of broken or intact T7
genomes plus 1.5 nmol of BstXI-digested donor DNA. The
0.01-ml extract is the equivalent of protein extracted from 109 phage-infected cells. Thus, a typical in vitro reaction
begins with about 1010 genome equivalents of DNA and the
amount of protein present in 109 cells. This ratio of DNA
to protein is a reasonable approximation of the early stage of a
typical T7 infection. The in vitro reactions were provided with 0.3 mM
concentrations of each of the four deoxynucleoside triphosphates. This
amount is in excess of what is expected to be contributed endogenously
by the extracts used for in vitro DNA repair. Details of the reactions
are the same as used in earlier studies (14).
In vitro packaging.
Extracts for in vitro packaging were
prepared with T7
A 3
5
6
,
as previously described (18). DNA recovered from the in
vitro repair reactions was diluted in an appropriate reaction buffer (14) and incubated at 32°C for 60 min with packaging
extracts. The dilutions were such that 7.4% of the in vitro repair
reaction volume was added to each packaging reaction. For a repair
reaction mixture including 1.5 nmol of T7 DNA, the equivalent of 110 pmol of DNA was present in each packaging reaction. Repair reactions were carried out in triplicate. Values shown in the tables are averages
of these determinations. This averaging procedure gives reproducible
results and avoids errors that might be caused by an occasional
anomalous packaging reaction.
All of the experiments reported in this paper were repeated at least
twice with no significant changes in results. Since undefined differences in the extracts used for repair and packaging cause some
quantitative variation in results, variations in repair efficiency of a
factor of about 2 are not considered significant.
 |
RESULTS |
We compared the relative abilities of extracts made with T7 with
amber mutations in genes 3, 5, and 6 and extracts made with T7
deficient in only gene 3 to repair double-strand breaks in a T7 genome.
Gene 3 encodes an endonuclease and gene 6 encodes an exonuclease, both
of which are essential for breakdown of host DNA to be used as a
precursor for T7 DNA replication (47). Because deoxynucleoside triphosphates are provided as precursors during in
vitro DNA reactions, neither of these proteins are essential for in
vitro DNA replication. Because only very limited DNA synthesis goes on
during in vivo preparation of phage-infected cells to be used for
extracts in the in vitro system, the amount of endogenous DNA present
in extracts from gene 3 mutants is low. This reduces contamination of
the in vitro reactions with endogenous DNA and increases the dependence
on exogenous DNA to be used as a substrate. Moreover, reducing gene 3 protein helps avoid spurious nuclease activity against the exogenous
DNA in the in vitro reactions. The amount of in vitro DNA replication
carried out by this system is essentially the same irrespective of
whether wild-type, 3
, or 3
6
phage are used for extract preparation (28). Our earlier
studies (14, 21, 25, 55) had shown that the gene 3 protein
is not necessary for efficient repair of double-strand breaks, and all
experiments in the present study were performed by using T7 with gene 3 inactivated. The extracts made with T7 3
5
6
phage are similar to the ones used to package T7 DNA
and, in addition to the endonuclease deficiency, are deficient in the T7 DNA polymerase encoded by gene 5 and the 5'
3' exonuclease encoded by gene 6 (50). Table
1 shows that with normal levels of DNA
polymerase and exonuclease present, double-strand breaks in the T7
genome were repaired with nearly 20% efficiency. This repair depends
on extracts from T7-infected E. coli and on donor DNA
molecules that overlap the site of the break. Extracts made with T7
missing the phage DNA polymerase and the exonuclease encoded by gene 6 as well as the gene 3 endonuclease were more than 60-fold-less capable
of dealing with the double-strand break (Table 1). The limited amount
of double-strand break repair that was achieved without normal levels
of the gene 5 or 6 product depends heavily upon the availability of
donor DNA (Table 1). The lower yield of phage found by using intact DNA
and extracts from T7 3
5
6
rather than from T7 3
was not unexpected. Previous
studies have shown that the absence of gene 6 reduces the ability of
the packaging system to produce viable phage (4). This may
be due to a role for the gene 6 product in maturation of the T7 genomes
prior to packaging (28). The lack of carryover of gene 6 product from the DNA repair reactions to the packaging reactions can
account for the lower phage yield found when T7 3
5
6
were used as the source of extract.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Double-strand breaks are not repaired without normal
levels of T7 DNA polymerase and T7 gene
6 exonucleasea
|
|
To increase the sensitivity of repair reactions performed by using
extracts made with T7 3
5
6
,
we supplemented these reactions with a small amount of extract made
with T7 3
5
. These reactions do not contain
T7 DNA polymerase but, because of the low levels of gene 6 exonuclease
added to the repair reactions, produce DNA that can be packaged very
efficiently so as to generate large amounts of T7 phage. Table
2 shows that with intact T7 DNA, nearly
the same phage yield was achieved whether an extract from T7
3
or combined extracts from T7 3
5
6
and T7 3
5
were used. The combined extracts were also able to repair double-strand breaks with an efficiency more than half that achieved with T7 3
extracts (Table 2). This result shows that
double-strand breaks can be repaired without normal levels of T7 DNA
polymerase but, because of the need for the extract from T7
3
5
, also shows the need for the gene 6 exonuclease in double-strand break repair. The data in Table 2 also
show that, in the absence of normal levels of T7 DNA polymerase,
double-strand break repair requires donor DNA molecules and that
information from these donor molecules is recombined into the repaired
genomes.
To determine the extent to which the amber mutation in gene 5 had
blocked DNA replication in this system, we measured the amount of DNA
synthesis during in vitro reactions using both intact T7 genomes and
genomes that had a double-strand break at the BamHI site.
DNA repair reactions including [32P]dCTP were performed.
Samples were removed from the reactions at timed intervals, and the
amount of acid-precipitable radioactive DNA was measured. Figure
2A shows that under the reaction
conditions used to repair double-strand breaks, the amount of DNA
synthesis carried out using extracts made with T7 3
5
6
was about 10% of what was measured
under identical conditions using extracts made with T7 3
.
With extracts made from T7 3
5
, DNA
synthesis was higher but still much lower than what was found with the
T7 3
extract. Given the small amount of synthesis
measured, the small difference is of questionable significance. A
determination of DNA synthesis was made both with T7 genomes with a
double-strand break and with donor DNA fragments present in the
reactions (Fig. 2B). The level of synthesis achieved by extracts made
from T7 3
5
6
was much lower
than that carried out with extract from T7 3
-infected
cells even when broken T7 genomes and donor DNA were both present in
the reactions. The mutation in gene 5 causes a major reduction in DNA
synthesis. The level of residual DNA synthesis was about the same
irrespective of whether double-strand break repair-proficient extracts
from T7 3
5
-infected cells or double-strand
break repair-deficient extracts from T7 3
5
6
-infected cells were used. Also, little difference in
the amount of DNA synthesis could be seen when broken and intact T7
genomes were compared, irrespective of a functional gene 5 product.
Thus, when replication of the T7 genomes is blocked, some residual DNA synthesis persists whether or not repair takes place. Taken at face
value, the data (Fig. 2) show approximately 40 pmol of difference between synthesis using T7 3
5
and that
using T7 3
5
6
extracts. This
amounts to about 1,000 bp of new synthesis per 40,000-bp genome. The
source of this DNA synthesis is not known but may represent repair-like
DNA synthesis needed to maintain the integrity of T7 genomes. There is
no reason to believe that the residual synthesis seen with the gene 5 mutants represents repair-like DNA synthesis associated with the repair
of double-strand breaks.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
In vitro DNA synthesis. (A) In vitro reaction mixtures
of 0.250 ml included a 0.050-ml extract from T7-infected E. coli, 7.5 nmol of DNA in the form of intact T7 genomes, and 7.5 nmol of BstXI-digested T7 6 ss
DNA as the donor. Reaction mixtures, which included
[32P]dCTP, were incubated at 37°C. At intervals,
0.050 ml of the reaction mixture was removed and 3 ml of 10%
(wt/vol) TCA with 0.1 M PPi was added. The DNA was
collected on Whatman GF/C filters, and the
radioactivity was determined. The plot shows picomoles of
total DNA present in a 0.050-ml sample. Extracts were prepared with T7
A 3 ( ), T7 A 3 5
( ), or T7 A 3 5 6
( ). (B) Identical experiment except that the wild-type T7X genomes
were cut at position 6663 with XhoI. Symbols in panel B are
the same as in panel A.
|
|
T7 genomes with a >1,600-nt gap were prepared with the substrate shown
in Fig. 3. This DNA substrate has a 76-bp
insert placed in the XhoI site of gene 1.3. However, because
of a deletion between genes 1.3 and 1.7, the insert ends with a
BclI site in gene 1.7. Effectively, a cut at one of the
restriction sites within the inserts generates a >1,600-nt gap in the
T7 genome. Because there are no repeats at its ends, the insert will
not delete from the genome at detectable frequency and cannot grow on a
lig-7(Ts) host (34, 35). Genes 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, and 1.7 are non-essential (48), so T7 with this insert
and deletion can grow normally on a wild-type E. coli host.
The insert has five unique restriction sites which can be used to
introduce double-strand breaks. Break sites in genomes cut with these
restriction enzymes have no homology with donor DNA from wild-type T7
in the region between genes 1.3 and 1.7, so intact ligase-positive
genomes can be formed only by filling in the gapped region between gene
1.3 and 1.7. This could be accomplished by a recombinational crossover
between broken genome and the BstXI fragment left of
position 6663 and a second crossover right of position 8311 in gene
1.7, or the donor DNA could be used as template for at least 1,600 nt
of DNA synthesis. Previous experiments in which ligase-positive
revertants of this gapped genome were sequenced showed that in all
cases where intact genomes were formed after interaction with wild-type
donor DNA, they took on the wild-type sequence of the donor
(21). T7 genomes with the insert and deletion shown in Fig.
3 were cut with BamHI and then added to the in vitro
reactions in place of the genomes with a simple double-strand break to
see if they could be repaired sufficiently to generate viable T7 phage.
Table 3 shows that gaps in a T7 genome
are repaired efficiently in the absence of normal levels of T7 DNA
polymerase. Under normal reaction conditions, with T7 DNA polymerase
present, about 14% of the double-strand breaks were repaired and
nearly 80% of these were derived from the donor DNA, as evidenced by
their ligase-positive genotype (Table 3). When extracts missing T7 DNA
polymerase were used, the amount of DNA repair was essentially
unchanged from what was measured with normal levels of DNA synthesis.
Again, in 75% of the cases, the repaired genomes became wild type for
the T7 ligase gene.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
T7 genome with a 1.6-kb gap. An insert of
double-stranded DNA with the sequence shown in the upper part of the
figure was placed between the XhoI site in gene 1.3 and the
BclI site in gene 1.7. The sequence of the insert is shown
in uppercase letters, while the surrounding T7 sequence is shown in
lowercase letters. The insert has a unique BamHI site
which, when cut effectively, produces a >1,600-nt gap in the T7
genome. The figure shows the generation of this gap next to the
relevant BstXI fragment of donor DNA. The homology needed
for recombinational repair of the gapped genome by any of the models
outlined in Fig. 1 is available only in genes 1.3 and 1.7. The bottom
line of the figure shows a repaired genome with either a portion of the
donor DNA or the information from that donor DNA inserted into the
gap.
|
|
The data presented thus far demonstrate that, as determined by
production of genomes that can be packaged so as to produce infective
phage, either a double-strand break or a 1,600-nt gap in the T7
genome can be repaired efficiently without the normal amount of T7 DNA
polymerase. The high efficiency of repair prompted us to attempt
visualization of double-strand break repair without resorting to in
vitro packaging of the repaired genomes as a means of detecting
successful repair events (Fig. 4).
Genomes from T7X, wild-type T7 with a single XhoI site
created at position 6663, were treated with XhoI to
introduce double-strand breaks in the genomes. The broken DNA molecules
were incubated in the in vitro repair reactions together with extracts
made from E. coli infected with T7 3
5
6
supplemented with extracts made with T7
3
5
. In one reaction, donor DNA, in the
form of a BstXI digest of T7 genomes, was included, while
the other reaction served as a control in which double-strand break
repair was limited by the absence of donor DNA, as in Table 2. DNA from
these reactions was extracted with phenol to remove proteins and then
treated with RNase. The DNA was digested with KpnI and
subjected to electrophoresis. Figure 4 shows a genetic map of
bacteriophage T7 with the XhoI and KpnI sites
marked. The KpnI D fragment extends from position 5617 to
9192 and covers the double-strand break site near 6663. Thus, a
double-strand break obliterates this restriction fragment, while the
restoration of a 3.6-kb fragment is diagnostic of repair of the break.
Use of the KpnI digest also removes concern that endogenous
DNA in the extracts might yield products which appear as repaired
genomes. Since all extracts used in this study carry the
A mutation,
any endogenous DNA remaining in the reactions would not be able to
produce a normal-sized KpnI D fragment. Furthermore, digesting the product DNA with KpnI avoided complications
due to formation of concatemers of T7 genomes which form end to end during normal T7 maturation either in vivo (42) or in this
in vitro system (28). The presence of concatemers frustrates
detection of single genome-sized DNA molecules, so internal restriction fragments such as KpnI D become a much more reliable
indicator of the physical integrity of the region near the
double-strand break. Figure 4 shows that the KpnI D fragment
was clearly detectable if donor DNA molecules were present. In numerous
repeats of this experiment, the 3.6-kb band was detected after repair
involving donor DNA molecules even though the 1.0- or 2.5-kb fragments
expected after KpnI digestion of the unrepaired
XhoI-digested DNA were barely detectable. The poor recovery
of the smaller fragments and the BstXI fragments of donor
DNA may be due to digestion of DNA near double-strand ends, as
previously suggested (21). DNA not repaired early after
introduction into the in vitro system appears to be at least partially
degraded during the 30-min duration of the in vitro DNA repair
reactions.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Visualization of repaired T7 genomes. The map of the T7
genome shows all KpnI recognition sites and the single
XhoI site. In vitro repair reaction mixtures were either
complete or, as a control, missing donor DNA. Both reactions included a
9:1 mixture of extracts from E. coli infected with T7 A
3 5 6 or T7 A
3 5 . Products from the in vitro reactions
were subjected to electrophoresis at 46 V for 2 h in a 0.4%
agarose gel in 0.5× Tris-borate-EDTA buffer (40). The gel
was stained with ethidium bromide to give the pattern shown. Lane M
consists of a HindIII digest of lambda DNA as molecular
weight markers. Lane 1 is missing donor DNA, and lane 2 shows the
product of the complete reaction.
|
|
Experiments similar to those represented by Fig. 4 were performed by
using extracts with normal levels of T7 DNA polymerase (T7
3
). Figure 5 shows a
comparison of a repair reaction performed under conditions of normal
DNA replication (i.e., with an extract prepared with T7
A
3
) with and without donor DNA. Again, a double-strand
break was placed in the XhoI site of T7X DNA, and the DNA
was incubated with (lane 2) or without (lane 1) BstXI
fragments as donor DNA and then treated with KpnI and RNase
prior to electrophoresis on an agarose gel. Figure 5 shows recovery of
the normal-sized KpnI D fragment only when donor DNA was
present. As an additional control, an experiment similar to that in
Fig. 4 was carried out by using an EcoRII fragment as an
indicator of double-strand break repair. EcoRII cuts the
39,937-bp T7 genome at two sites, 2365 and 8187, to produce fragments
of 2,365, 5,822, and 31,750 bp long (5). A double-strand
break at position 6663 cleaves the 5.8-kb fragment into 4.3- and 1.5-kb
pieces. Thus, the presence of a normal-sized 5.8-kb fragment after
EcoRII digestion is indicative of repair of the
double-strand break. Figure 6 shows an in
vitro repair experiment carried out with combined extracts made by
using T7
A 3
5
6
and T7
A 3
5
and DNA that had a double-strand
break at the XhoI site. The reaction shown in lane 2 included donor DNA in the form of BstXI fragments of the T7
genome and shows a pronounced band at the 5.8-kb position. This 5.8-kb
band was not found in the reaction without donor DNA present (lane 1).

View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Visualization of double-strand break repair during
normal DNA replication. In vitro repair reactions were performed as
described in the legend to Fig. 4 except that an extract made with T7
A 3 was used instead of the extract made with a T7 DNA
polymerase mutant. DNA recovered from the reactions was digested with
KpnI and subjected to electrophoresis as in Fig. 4. Lane M
consists of a HindIII digest of lambda DNA as molecular
weight markers. Lane 1 is missing donor DNA, and lane 2 shows the
product of the complete reaction.
|
|

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Visualization of double-strand break repair with DNA cut
by EcoRII. In vitro repair reactions were performed with a
9:1 mixture of extracts from E. coli infected with T7
A 3 5 6 or T7 A
3 5 . DNA recovered from the reactions was
digested with EcoRII and subjected to electrophoresis as in
Fig. 4. Lane M consists of a HindIII
digest of lambda DNA as molecular weight markers. Lane 1 shows a
reaction without donor DNA, and lane 2 shows the product of a complete
reaction.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have previously shown that recombination with a homologous DNA
molecule represents the major avenue for repair of double-strand breaks
in an in vitro system based on T7-infected E. coli
(21). In this study, we consider the extent to which the
donor DNA is replicated during double-strand break repair in T7. There
are at least three possible mechanisms by which a segment of donor DNA
could rescue a double-strand break or gap in the T7 genome. In one
model, after the break is widened to a gap, 3' ends on each fragment of
the broken genome invade the duplex donor DNA molecule. These ends then
become the primers for DNA synthesis that copies information from the
donor to the repaired recipient. The two invasion steps can occur in a
coordinate fashion or could be independent. The latter case would
produce single-strand tails extending from each of the broken genomes.
Annealing between these complementary single-stranded tails, perhaps
mediated by the T7 gene 2.5 product (15, 16), would rejoin
the broken genome and transfer genetic information from the donor DNA
to the repaired genome in a nonreciprocal fashion. This type of repair
is essentially the same as the original double-strand break model of
recombination (36, 51). It requires only a limited level of
DNA synthesis to copy the template provided by the donor DNA. A second
possible mechanism involves invasion of the broken strand ends into a
homologous segment, followed by establishment of a replication fork.
This mechanism provides a very attractive means for rescuing collapsed replication forks and would provide T7 with an economical way of
recouping its investment in synthesis of partial genomes which would
otherwise be lost (19). Establishment of new replication forks via recombination is a major factor in bacteriophage T4's infective cycle (32). Repair of double-strand breaks in T4
requires extensive DNA synthesis (8). There is compelling
evidence that in E. coli broken genomes use the RecBC
pathway of homologous recombination to establish new DNA replication
forks and that this repair pathway is blocked in the absence of a major
subunit of E. coli DNA polymerase III (20). In
the experimental scheme employed in the present work, the donor DNA is
a BstXI restriction fragment extending only from position
3870 to 9633. Therefore, rescue by this second mechanism would require
two steps and establishment of a new replication fork at each end of
the donor DNA molecule. This model requires substantial DNA
replication. The amount of DNA replication depends on the order and
position of invasion events and the direction of replication fork
progression. Synthesis from the break site to the end of the T7 genome
would require, on average, replication of half of the 40,000-bp genome.
The third possibility is physical incorporation of the donor DNA into a gap on the genome. Presumably this would require crossovers between the
broken genome and the donor DNA on either side of the gap. This model
does not require extensive DNA synthesis, although a limited amount of
new DNA may need to be manufactured at the ends where the crossovers
take place. An earlier study is in accord with double-strand exchange
between recombining T7 DNA segments (22). That study is not
strictly compatible, since it was based on plasmid-genome
recombination. A different study, also dealing with plasmid-genome
recombination, favored incorporation of only a single strand of DNA
from the plasmid to the genome and new synthesis of a complementary
strand (45). Thus, the possibility of double-stranded
crossovers between donor and recipient DNA as a means of repairing
double-strand breaks appears to be an open question.
The data presented in this study show that repair of a double-strand
break is very efficient in extracts made from T7-infected E. coli. The high repair efficiency (approximately 20% [Table 1])
is even more remarkable considering that under these experimental conditions essentially every T7 genome had a double-strand break and
the protein-to-DNA ratio was chosen to match that of a phage-infected cell a few minutes after infection (10 genome equivalents per cell
equivalent of protein). Thus, especially aggressive repair activity is
required to handle this level of molecular catastrophe. It should be
kept in mind, however, that the data we present here do not prove that
rescue of a collapsed replication fork via the model shown in Fig. 1B
does not take place in T7-infected E. coli. Also, there is
always some concern that the in vitro system does not truly mimic the
in vivo situation. We do claim that blocking such a repair pathway by
inhibiting replication has only a small effect on the efficiency of
double-strand break repair and that other, replication-independent,
mechanisms are sufficient to handle double-strand break repair in this
in vitro system. Our data are not in accord with establishment of new
replication forks at the break site as a primary repair mechanism.
Single-strand annealing (Fig. 1A) remains a viable alternative but, if
it occurs, must involve only a limited level of DNA synthesis, possibly
by one of the E. coli DNA polymerases. The third model,
double-stranded crossovers between donor and recipient DNA, is easiest
to reconcile with the lack of dependence on T7 DNA polymerase.
Extracts made with T7 having an amber mutation in gene 5 show markedly
lower rates of DNA synthesis (Fig. 2). In the absence of normal levels
of gene 5 product, the residual DNA synthesis is the same whether
broken or intact DNA is used for the substrate. Extracts mutant in
genes 3, 5, and 6 are unable to perform double-strand break
repair but show about the same rate of DNA synthesis as extracts
made from T7 with only genes 3 and 5 inactivated. These observations
suggest that the residual DNA synthesis seen with the gene 5 mutants is
not due to DNA synthesis that is part of the double-strand break
repair. Although the residual levels of DNA replication are low, they
have been detected reproducibly. We suggest that perhaps nicks appear
in the DNA as the result of DNA damage or as part of normal metabolism.
Repair-like DNA synthesis at these nicks, perhaps by E. coli
DNA polymerase I, leads to this background level of DNA synthesis.
Initial efforts to produce infective T7 genomes in this system showed
dependence on host DNA polymerase I in order to generate full-length
genomes (29). The repair synthesis level may be exaggerated
in the experiments presented here because inactivation of T7 ligase by
the
A mutation makes the phage DNA metabolism entirely dependent on
the host ligase, thereby reducing the capacity to close transient
interruptions in the DNA and inviting increased activity of DNA
polymerase I.
The high efficiency of double-strand break repair in this system
allowed visualization of KpnI restriction fragment D, which is normally found with intact T7 genomes but which breaks into smaller
fragments when a double-strand break is placed in the XhoI
site (Fig. 4). Visualization of the repair product was achieved both
with and without normal levels of T7 DNA polymerase. Visualization of
the repaired genome is a less quantitative determinant of DNA repair
than packaging of DNA to produce viable phage, as in Tables 1 through
3. While it is clear from the relative intensities of the C and D bands
in the right lane of Fig. 5 that substantial repair of the
double-strand break took place, this estimate of repair efficiency is
crude relative to the quantitative data recovered after packaging.
However, the visualization technique has the advantage of decoupling
the repair reaction from the packaging reaction and provides evidence
that repair of the double-strand breaks (without normal levels of T7
DNA polymerase) takes place during the in vitro reactions rather than
either during the packaging step or during the in vivo growth step that
follows packaging. Techniques based on detection of recombinant
products after electrophoresis and hybridization with appropriate
probes, rather than on the phenotype of phage produced after packaging,
provide the most convincing evidence for in vitro recombination of T7
DNA (22). Similarly, visualization of a repaired
product DNA complements the packaging technique as a way of
monitoring double-strand break repair in the T7 system.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
This work was supported by Public Health Service research grant
GM-55278 from the National Institutes of Health.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Biochemistry, Temple University School of Medicine, 3400 N. Broad St., Philadelphia, PA 19140. Phone: (215) 707-3973. Fax: (215) 707-7536. E-mail: wmasker{at}thunder.ocis.temple.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Asai, T.,
D. B. Bates, and T. Kogoma.
1994.
DNA replication triggered by double strand breaks in E. coli. Dependence on homologous recombination functions.
Cell
78:1051-1061[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bierne, H., and B. Michel.
1994.
When replication forks stop.
Mol. Microbiol.
13:17-23[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Chu, G.
1997.
Double strand break repair.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:24097-24100[Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Dodson, L. A.,
R. S. Foote,
S. Mitra, and W. E. Masker.
1982.
Mutagenesis of bacteriophage T7 in vitro by incorporation of O6-methylguanine during DNA synthesis.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
79:7440-7444[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Dunn, J. H., and F. W. Studier.
1983.
The complete nucleotide sequence of bacteriophage T7 DNA and the locations of T7 genetic elements.
J. Mol. Biol.
166:477-535[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Fishman-Lobell, J., and J. E. Haber.
1992.
Removal of nonhomologous DNA ends in double-strand break recombination: the role of the ultraviolet repair gene RAD1.
Science
258:480-484[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Friedberg, E. C.,
G. C. Walker, and W. Siede.
1995.
DNA repair and mutagenesis.
ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
|
| 8.
|
George, J. W., and K. Kreuzer.
1996.
Repair of double-strand breaks in bacteriophage T4 by a mechanism that involves extensive DNA replication.
Genetics
143:1507-1520[Abstract].
|
| 9.
|
Haber, J. E.
1999.
DNA recombination: the replication connection.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
24:271-275[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Hinkle, D. C., and C. C. Richardson.
1974.
Bacteriophage T7 deoxyribonucleic acid replication in vitro. Requirements for deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis and characterization of the product.
J. Biol. Chem.
249:2974-2984[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Ikeda, H.,
K. Aoki, and A. Naito.
1982.
Illegitimate recombination mediated in vitro by DNA gyrase of Escherichia coli: structure of recombinant DNA molecules.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
79:3724-3728[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Jeggo, P. A.,
G. G. Taccioli, and S. P. Jackson.
1995.
Menage a trois, double-strand break repair and DNA-PK.
Bioessays
17:949-957[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Kong, D., and W. Masker.
1994.
Deletion between direct repeats in T7 DNA stimulated by double-strand breaks.
J. Bacteriol.
176:5904-5911[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Kong, D., and W. Masker.
1993.
Deletion between directly repeated DNA sequences measured in extracts of bacteriophage T7-infected Escherichia coli.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:7721-7727[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Kong, D.,
N. G. Nossal, and C. C. Richardson.
1997.
Role of the bacteriophage T7 and T4 single-stranded DNA-binding proteins in the formation of joint molecules and DNA helicase-catalyzed polar branch migration.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:8380-8387[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Kong, D., and C. C. Richardson.
1996.
Single stranded DNA binding protein and DNA helicase of bacteriophage T7 mediate homologous strand exchange.
EMBO J.
15:2010-2019[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Kowalalckowski, S. C.,
D. A. Dixon,
A. K. Eggleston,
S. D. Lauder, and W. M. Rehrauer.
1994.
Biochemistry of homologous recombination in Escherichia coli.
Microbiol. Rev.
28:401-465.
|
| 18.
|
Kuemmerle, N. B., and W. E. Masker.
1977.
In vitro packaging of UV radiation-damaged DNA from bacteriophage T7.
J. Virol.
23:509-522[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Kuzminov, A.
1995.
Collapse and repair of replication forks in Escherichia coli.
Mol. Microbiol.
16:373-384[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Kuzminov, A., and F. W. Stahl.
1999.
Double-strand end repair via the RecBC pathway in Escherichia coli primes DNA replication.
Genes Dev.
13:345-356[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Lai, Y.-T., and W. Masker.
1998.
In vitro repair of gaps in bacteriophage T7 DNA.
J. Bacteriol.
180:6193-6202[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Lee, D., and P. D. Sadowski.
1983.
In vitro recombination of bacteriophage T7 DNA detected by a direct physical assay.
J. Virol.
48:647-653[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Lee, D.,
D. Vetter,
L. Beatty, and P. D. Sadowski.
1985.
In vitro recombination of bacteriophage T7 DNA: further characterization of the reaction using plasmid DNA.
Can. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.
63:243-248[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Lin, F.-L.,
K. Sperle, and N. Sternberg.
1984.
Model for homologous recombination during transfer of DNA in mouse L cells: role for DNA ends in the recombination product.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
4:1020-1034[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Masker, W.
1992.
In vitro repair of double-strand breaks accompanied by recombination in bacteriophage T7 DNA.
J. Bacteriol.
174:155-160[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Masker, W. E.
1977.
Deoxyribonucleic acid repair in vitro by extracts of Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
129:1415-1423[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Masker, W. E., and N. B. Kuemmerle.
1980.
In vitro recombination of bacteriophage T7 DNA damaged by UV radiation.
J. Virol.
33:330-339[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Masker, W. E.,
N. B. Kuemmerle, and D. P. Allison.
1978.
In vitro packaging of bacteriophage T7 DNA synthesized in vitro.
J. Virol.
23:149-163.
|
| 29.
|
Masker, W. E., and C. C. Richardson.
1976.
Bacteriophage T7 deoxyribonucleic acid replication in vitro. V. Synthesis of intact chromosomes of bacteriophage T7.
J. Mol. Biol.
100:543-556[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Miller, J. H.
1972.
Experiments in molecular genetics.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 31.
|
Mosig, G.
1987.
The essential role of recombination in phage T4 growth.
Annu. Rev. Genet.
21:347-371[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Mosig, G.
1998.
Recombination and recombination-dependent DNA replication in bacteriophage T4.
Annu. Rev. Genet.
32:379-413[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Myers, R. C., and F. W. Stahl.
1994.
Chi and the RecBCD enzyme of Escherichia coli.
Annu. Rev. Genet.
28:49-70[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Pierce, J. C.,
D. Kong, and W. Masker.
1991.
The effect of the length of direct repeats and the presence of palindromes on deletion between directly repeated DNA sequences in bacteriophage T7.
Nucleic Acids Res.
19:3901-3905[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Pierce, J. C., and W. E. Masker.
1989.
Genetic deletions between directly repeated sequences in bacteriophage T7.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
217:215-222[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Resnick, M.
1976.
The repair of double strand breaks in DNA: a model involving recombination.
J. Theor. Biol.
59:97-106[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Richardson, C. C.
1966.
The 5'-terminal nucleotides of bacteriophage T7 deoxyribonucleic acid.
J. Mol. Biol.
15:49-61[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Roeder, G. S., and P. D. Sadowski.
1978.
Pathways of recombination of bacteriophage T7 DNA in vitro.
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.
43:1023-1032.
|
| 39.
|
Sadowski, P. D.,
W. Bradley,
D. Lee, and L. Roberts.
1980.
Genetic recombination of bacteriophage T7 DNA in vitro, p. 941-952.
In
B. Alberts, and C. F. Fox (ed.), Molecular mechanisms of replication and genetic recombination. Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 40.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 41.
|
Schulte-Frhlinde, D.,
K.-H. Worm, and M. Merz.
1993.
Double strand breaks in plasmid DNA and the induction of deletions.
Mutat. Res.
299:233-250[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Serwer, P.
1974.
Fast-sedimenting DNA from T7-infected Escherichia coli.
Virology
59:70-88[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Shimizu, H.,
H. Yamaguchi,
Y. Ashizawa,
Y. Kohno,
M. Asami,
J. Kato, and H. Ikeda.
1997.
Short-homology-independent illegitimate recombination in Escherichia coli: Distinct mechanism from short-homology-dependent illegitimate recombination.
J. Mol. Biol.
266:297-305[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Shinohara, A., and T. Ogawa.
1995.
Homologous recombination and the roles of double strand breaks.
Trends Exp. Biochem.
20:387-391.
|
| 45.
|
Smith, R. D., and R. C. Miller, Jr.
1982.
Plasmid-bacteriophage Recombination. II. Density transfer analysis.
Virology
119:439-449[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Stahl, F.
1996.
Meiotic recombination in yeast: coronation of the double-strand-break repair model.
Cell
87:965-968[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Studier, F. W.
1972.
Bacteriophage T7.
Science
176:367-376[Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Studier, F. W.
1973.
Genetic analysis of non-essential bacteriophage T7 genes.
J. Mol. Biol.
79:227-236[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Studier, F. W.
1969.
The genetics and physiology of bacteriophage T7.
Virology
39:562-574[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 50.
|
Studier, F. W.,
A. H. Rosenberg,
M. N. Simon, and J. J. Dunn.
1979.
Genetic and physical mapping in the early region of bacteriophage T7 DNA.
J. Mol. Biol.
135:917-937[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Szostak, J. W.,
T. L. Orr-Waever,
R. Rothstein, and F. W. Stahl.
1983.
The double strand break repair model for recombination.
Cell
33:25-35[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 52.
|
Takahashi, N.,
K. Kusano,
T. Yokochi,
Y. Kitamura,
H. Yoshikura, and I. Kobayashi.
1997.
Genetic recombination through double-strand break repair: shift from two-progeny mode to one-progeny mode by heterologous inserts.
Genetics
146:9-26[Abstract].
|
| 53.
|
Thaler, S., and F. W. Stahl.
1988.
DNA double-chain breaks in recombination of phage lambda and of yeast.
Annu. Rev. Genet.
22:169-197[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 54.
|
Weaver, D. T.
1995.
What to do at an end: DNA double-strand-break repair.
Trends Genet.
11:388-392[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 55.
|
Yang, Y., and W. Masker.
1997.
Double-strand breaks increase the incidence of genetic deletion associated with intermolecular recombination in bacteriophage T7.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
255:277-284[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Journal of Bacteriology, January 2000, p. 327-336, Vol. 182, No. 2
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Yu, M., Masker, W.
(2001). T7 Single Strand DNA Binding Protein but Not T7 Helicase Is Required for DNA Double Strand Break Repair. J. Bacteriol.
183: 1862-1869
[Abstract]
[Full Text]