![[Feedback]](/icons/banner/feedbackACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[For Subscribers]](/icons/banner/subscriberACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Archive]](/icons/banner/archiveACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Search]](/icons/banner/searchACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Contents]](/icons/banner/tocACT.gif){kind=icon}
Journal of Bacteriology, October 2000, p. 5641-5652, Vol. 182, No. 20
Keys to Symbiotic Harmony
Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire des
Plantes Supérieures (LBMPS), Université de
Genève, 1292 Chambésy/Geneva, Switzerland
At least three different sets of
symbiotic signals (here, they are compared to locks and keys) are
exchanged between legumes and rhizobia during nodule development.
Flavonoids, the first of these, emanate from the plant and interact
with rhizobial NodD proteins that serve as both environmental
sensors and activators of transcription. A second set of signals
is synthesized when NodD-flavonoid complexes activate
transcription from nod boxes. Most of the genes
immediately downstream of these promoters are involved in the
synthesis of lipo-oligosaccharidic Nod factors that provoke
deformation of root hairs and allow rhizobia to enter the root through
infection threads. Fine-tuning of transcription of nodulation
(nod) genes is probably related to sequence variations in
individual nod boxes (there are 19 on the symbiotic plasmid of the broad-host-range Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234).
Other rhizobial products seem to be necessary for continued
infection thread development, and these represent a third set of
signals. Among them are extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) and related
compounds, as well as proteins exported by the type three
secretion system (TTSS). In the latter case, flavonoids also activate
protein secretion, suggesting that the same keys can unlock
different doors.
Symbioses are nearly ubiquitous, and many are also persistent
(56). Mutualistic, nitrogen-fixing associations
between members of the plant family Leguminosae, and
the soil bacteria Azorhizobium, Bradyrhizobium,
Mesorhizobium, and Rhizobium (collectively called rhizobia) contribute substantially to plant productivity
(111). Legume-Rhizobium symbioses are
marriages between two vastly different genomes. In rhizobia,
these include a chromosome plus zero to many plasmids, totalling 6 to 9 Mbp (71). In contrast, genomes of legumes are much larger,
some comprising more than 20 chromosomes with total DNA contents that
range from about 450 to 4,500 Mbp per haploid genome (1C)
(1). As examples, the model legumes Lotus
japonicus and Medicago truncatula have six or eight
chromosomes totalling 450 and 500 Mbp/1C (14), respectively.
Common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) and related species (e.g.,
Vigna unguiculata) (both genera belong to the tribe
Phaseoleae) have 11 chromosomes each (24) with
DNA contents of 637 (1) and 540 Mbp/1C (50). Furthermore, several widely cultivated legumes such as Arachis hypogaea, Glycine max, and Medicago sativa
are effectively polyploid, although in G. max most loci
segregate as if they were diploid. Legume genomes are thus at least 50 times larger than those of their microsymbionts. Given this
disparity, it is difficult to imagine that theirs is a marriage of
equals. Nevertheless, their respective contributions are probably not
vastly different (see reference 48).
Which partner initiates contact? Since plants are nonmotile, it is
tempting to think that courtship begins when bacteria advance into the
legume rhizosphere. Yet chemotaxis and motility among rhizobia are
clearly not essential for nodulation (see reference 30). Rather than "love at first sight" other,
more subtle factors help the partners match each other. Foremost among
these are phenolic substances, especially flavonoids. Although small
quantities are excreted continuously, flavonoid concentrations in the
rhizosphere increase in response to compatible rhizobia (82, 94,
117). In turn, rhizobia use these plant products for their own
ends. Some flavonoids induce the expression of nodulation
(nod, noe, and nol) and related genes
(see reference 12), while others are catabolized
(15, 79, 80). Degradation leads first to the appearance of
chalcones, which can be more efficient inducers of nod genes
than the flavonoids themselves (41).
Plant "attractiveness" probably correlates with the spectrum of
phenolic compounds (especially flavonoids) that it secretes. Rhizobia
respond to these advances through NodD and related proteins which act
as both sensors of the environment and activators of transcription
(93). Once derepressed, nodulation and other genes direct
the synthesis and release of substances that profoundly affect legume
roots (see below). It is as if plants construct elaborate "bowers,"
replete with flavonoids and other attractants, to entice rhizobia
towards them. If this bower analogy reflects reality, then the various
types of bower should mirror legume host range. This poses two
questions. Do bowers exist? And if yes, are their decorations unique?
Although it is impossible, given the limited information available to
definitively answer these questions, a tentative yes seems to be the
most likely answer to the first for the following reasons. (i) Legumes
support considerably larger rhizosphere populations than nonlegumes do
(see reference 3). (ii) These larger populations are
enriched in rhizobia (see reference 10). (iii) The
roots of M. sativa are surrounded by a coarse, granular,
mucilaginous material contained within a membranous layer of greater
electron density (17). Rhizobia penetrate this outer
"membrane" and form an almost continuous layer five to ten cells
deep. (iv) Rhizobia rapidly proliferate around the roots of developing
legumes (see reference 10). (v) Although the
evidence is not completely consistent, there are indications that
production of nod gene-inducing flavonoids is restricted to
the elongating root hair zone from which most nodules later develop
(117).
It is as if niches in the legume rhizosphere are tailored to rhizobia,
but the question remains What is important, however, is the composition and concentration of the
flavonoid mixture that is liberated into the rhizosphere by the future
hosts. Perhaps not surprisingly, there is much less available data on
this (Table 1). Of the six legumes
analyzed, two have restricted host ranges (Medicago and
Vicia), but four of the six (G. max, P. vulgaris, Robinia pseudoacacia, and Sesbania rastrata) can be nodulated by the broad-host-range
Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234. In other words, these four
legumes form nodules with NGR234 in addition to their homologous
Rhizobium, implying that these hosts are relatively
nonselective for rhizobia. Indeed, P. vulgaris is known to
be promiscuous (61). To various degrees, this also applies
to various soybean cultivars (53), and probably also to
R. pseudoacacia (59, 89; W. J. Broughton, unpublished data). It is therefore reasonable to ask if a
broad-host-range key is hidden among the quantities and patterns of
flavonoids secreted by the roots of P. vulgaris. Although it
seems as if P. vulgaris secretes higher concentrations of a
larger spectrum of flavonoids than the other legumes, little of this
data is truly quantitative. Furthermore, developmental, environmental,
and nutritional factors influence secretion into the rhizosphere,
rendering the interpretation of interspecies data even more difficult
(91). Thus, although it remains likely that flavonoids in
the rhizosphere are a key to host range, a definitive answer to this
question must await detailed, quantitative analyses of secretions from a range of legumes.
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
MINIREVIEW
and
INTRODUCTION
Top
Introduction
References
LEGUME BOWERS ARE DECORATED WITH FLAVONOIDS
are these niches especially enticing? Almost
all constituents of a plant can make their way into the rhizosphere at
some time or other (112). Exudates from living roots include
amino acids, CO2, hormones (including ethylene), organic
acids, phenolic substances, sugars, vitamins, etc., as well as
polysaccharides and proteins (particularly enzymes) (73, 74). Among other roles, this carbon efflux attracts organisms (both mutualistic and pathogenic) towards the roots. Stachel et al.
(98, 99) were probably the first to use fusions between reporter genes and inducible loci of soil bacteria to monitor the
effect of plant secretions on the activity of microbial genes. Similar
techniques were rapidly applied to rhizobia (31, 72, 83),
with the result that flavonoids produced via the phenylpropanoid biosynthetic pathway were identified as the strongest inducers of
nod gene expression (see references 100
and 110). Significant differences in the flavonoid
compositions of seeds, roots, and root exudates of G. max,
P. vulgaris, M. sativa, Trifolium
repens, and Vicia sativa exist (see reference
70). Many flavonoids are stored and released as
glycosides or related conjugates (58). These conjugates,
which are more soluble in water than aglycones, are usually less active
in inducing nod genes, but they diffuse readily and can be
hydrolyzed to more-active substances (40).
TABLE 1.
nod gene-inducing flavonoids in secretions
from the roots of legumes
| |
MIXED COUPLES FLAVONOIDS AND TRANSCRIPTIONAL ACTIVATORS |
|---|
In addition to being catabolized, flavonoids interact with a class of transcriptional activators of the LysR family that bind to highly conserved 49-bp DNA motifs (nod boxes) found in the promoter regions of many nodulation loci. These NodD proteins act both as sensors of the plant signal and as activators of transcription of nod loci. Although NodD proteins bind to nod boxes even in the absence of an inducer, flavonoids and related substances are generally required for the expression of nod genes. NodD proteins are localized in the cytoplasmic membrane of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae, where an inducing flavonoid, naringenin, also accumulates. Direct binding of inducers to NodD has not been demonstrated, but point mutations in nodD affect recognition of inducing molecules and cause extension of host range. NodD proteins also share conserved ligand-interacting domains with various nuclear receptors (see references 12 and 70).
Despite the fact that nodD genes are present in all
rhizobia, their symbiotic characteristics vary from one species
to anotherSome strains, such as R. leguminosarum bv.
trifolii, have only one nodD gene, and in these cases, its
mutation renders the strain incapable of nodulation
(Nod
). In contrast, Bradyrhizobium japonicum,
strain NGR234, Rhizobium meliloti, and Rhizobium
tropici possess two to five copies of nodD. In
R. meliloti, mutation of all three nodD
copies is required to abolish nodulation, whereas inactivation of
nodD1 is sufficient to render NGR234 Nod (Fig.
1). nodD products of various
Rhizobium species respond in different ways to
flavonoids, and NodD homologues from the same strain may have various
flavonoid preferences. Synergistic interactions between different
secreted flavonoids have also been reported (97). In
R. meliloti, NodD1 is activated when cells are supplied with
a complex plant seed extract or the flavonoid luteolin. NodD2 only
derepresses transcription when supplied with the complex extract, not
with purified luteolin, while NodD3 apparently modulates the
expression of nod genes even in the absence of any plant
factor. Together with syrM, nodD3 of
R. meliloti constitutes a self-amplifying positive
regulatory circuit that is involved in regulation of nod
genes within the developing nodule. In contrast, NodD1 of NGR234
responds to a wide range of inducing molecules which include phenolics
that are inhibitors in other rhizobia (e.g., vanillin and
iso-vanillin), as well as several estrogenic compounds
(2). Transfer of the nodD1 gene of NGR234 to
restricted-host-range rhizobia extends the nodulation capacity of the
recipients to new hosts that include the nonlegume Parasponia
andersonii (4, 70).
|
Given the above, do flavonoid keys and NodD protein locks control
bacterial access to legumes? (Fig. 2).
Some correlations between the spectrum of flavonoids able to interact
with NodD proteins and the broadness of host range exist. Nevertheless, variations in the ability of these proteins to differentially sense
inducing molecules and regulate the expression of nod genes are insufficient to explain host specificity. Furthermore, other species-specific sensor-activator systems contribute to the control of
bacterial host range. For instance, nodV and nodW
of B. japonicum are essential for the nodulation of
Macroptilium atropurpureum, Vigna radiata, and
V. unguiculata but contribute only marginally to the
symbiosis with G. max. Thus, alternatives to NodD- and flavonoid-sensing regulatory systems coexist (35, 54, 70).
|
Special mechanisms that down-regulate expression of nod genes are apparently required for optimal nodulation of M. sativa by R. meliloti and of Pisum sativum by R. leguminosarum bv. viciae strain Tom (70). In R. meliloti, NolR represses the transcription of the nodD genes as well as those genes necessary for the synthesis of the core Nod factor structures (nodABC). In B. japonicum, repression of nod gene expression by NolA is probably an indirect effect mediated perhaps by nodD2. B. japonicum nolA, and R. meliloti nolR mutants retain the ability to nodulate their respective hosts, albeit at lower efficiency, suggesting that fine-tuning of nod gene expression is required for optimal nodulation (55). Similarly, a nodD2 mutant of NGR234 (Fig. 1) fails to repress expression of the nodABCIJnolOnoeI operon after the initial flavonoid induction and, in contrast with the wild-type strain, is unable to form nitrogen-fixing nodules on V. unguiculata and Cajanus cajan.
As an added complexity, the symbiotic plasmid of NGR234 (pNGR234a) carries 19 nod boxes (Fig. 1), five of which control the expression of the known nod operons nodABCIJnolOnoeI, nodSU, nodZ, noeE, and nolL (33). Apparently, nod boxes with up to 11 base mismatches (compared to the consensus sequence) are still functional and regulate gene expression in a NodD1-dependent manner (68). It is possible, however, that some of these nod boxes have higher affinities for certain NodD1-inducer complexes over others. Thus, a microsymbiont such as NGR234 has many possibilities for optimizing expression of nod genes. First, NodD1 may interact with a spectrum of inducing molecules to produce complexes that could trigger transcription from selected nod boxes. Second, supplementary activators of transcription (e.g., SyrM1 [38] and y4xI [109]) could, together with NodD1, form a regulatory network that exerts interlaced control over dispersed nodulation loci. Third, repressors such as NodD2 and NolR (29) further modulate nod gene expression. Together, these systems control the expression of nodulation genes in a host-specific way, possibly resulting in the secretion of different sets of molecular signals.
| |
NOD FACTORS AND BETROTHAL |
|---|
Flavonoid activation of nod genes results in the
synthesis and secretion of a family of lipo-chito-oligosaccharidic Nod
factors. Assembly of the chitin backbone is performed by an
N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase encoded by nodC
(Fig. 3). Chain elongation by NodC
takes place at the nonreducing terminus. Then, the deacetylase
NodB removes the N-acetyl moiety from the nonreducing
terminus of the N-acetylglucosamine oligosaccharides.
Finally, an acyltransferase coded by nodA, links the acyl
chain to the acetyl-free carbon C-2 of the nonreducing end of the
oligosaccharide (Fig. 3). Simple Nod factors comprising three to six
N-acetyl-D-glucosamine residues and an acyl
chain from the general fatty acid metabolism have biological activity (62). Basic Nod factors as well as their more sophisticated cousins are mitogenic, a trait that they share with plant hormones (see
reference 86). Yet they are unique in provoking
curling of the root hairs (Hac), and it is within the folds of highly curled root hairs that rhizobia gain entry into the plant. Is it
possible that Nod factors are also keys to legume doors (Fig. 2)? Proof
that Nod factors are able to unlock legume doors was obtained by
using various rhizobial mutants that are unable to synthesize Nod
factors (and thus nodulate) and "complementing" them for nodulation
by the external addition of Nod factors. Simultaneous addition of
NodNGR factors and nodABC mutants of NGR234 or
B. japonicum USDA110 to the roots of G. max,
Macroptilium atropurpureum, and V. unguiculata
permits these strains to nodulate and fix nitrogen on their respective
hosts (85, 86). NodNGR factors also allow Rhizobium
fredii strain USDA257 to nodulate the nonhost Calopogonium caeruleum (85). Similarly, coapplication of purified
A. caulinodans Nod factors and a nodA mutant of
the same strain restores formation of outer cortical infection pockets
in S. rostrata (19).
|
Although it seems clear from the above that Nod factors are keys,
another question must be asked"do different Nod factor keys
exist?" In fact, most Nod factors are modified in species-specific ways, suggesting that each Rhizobium produces a different
set of keys (examples of some of the modifications found are shown in
Fig. 4). Yet in itself,
this is not proof that these various keys fit different locks. A recent
report stated that "The results demonstrate that none of the studied
substitutions (to Nod factors of A. caulinodans) is strictly
required for triggering normal nodule formation" (20).
Perhaps instead, legume locks recognize common motifs, which would
imply that Nod factors are more like master keys that are able to open
many legume doors.
|
Initially, classification of rhizobia was based predominantly on the legume from which it was isolated (43). Only in the early 1960s were extensive microbiological criteria used to separate rhizobia into different groups (36, 63). With the dawning of modern rhizobiology, it became obvious that rhizobia are not restricted to one host or at best a few hosts. Indeed, diverse soil bacteria possess variable capacities to nodulate legumes. Some are more or less dedicated to the legume from which they were isolated, but others are promiscuous and can form effective, nitrogen-fixing associations with many genera of legumes (70). An overview of the legumes' rhizobial requirements (in particular their Nod factors), as well as an indication of legume host range, is presented in Fig. 4. Several trends are obvious. First, at least nine legume tribes have extended preferences for rhizobia (those shaded in yellow). Second, promiscuous hosts are found among tribes possessing both determinate and indeterminate nodules. Third, as promiscuous hosts exist in both relatively primitive and advanced tribes, broad host range is probably the ancestral trait. Fourth, restricted host range, as evinced by the tribes Cicereae, Vicieae, and Trifolieae, is probably a specialization that is peculiar to a specific geographic niche (Middle East and Europe). It is manifested mostly by a requirement for Nod factors containing polyunsaturated fatty acids (12).
It thus seems as if the first Nod factors were indeed the equivalent of master keys and that in many instances, they have retained this function. "Baroque" modifications, which presumably evolved later, have served two purposes. One is a form of specialization which probably restricts host range as in the examples described above, while the other effect has been to render the molecules more stable, particularly in the rhizosphere (see reference 70).
| |
NODULES, THE CONJUGAL ABODE |
|---|
Nod factors allow rhizobia to enter the plant but do not guarantee successful symbiosis. Other inputs, from both partners, are necessary for this. Rhizobia enter roots along corridors in root hairs that are largely constructed by the plant and called infection threads (Fig. 2). Although Nod factors probably initiate infection thread development (105), it is not unreasonable to assume that in entering a "house" of the plant's making, the rhizobia need to make certain changes for their own comfort. Failure to do so results in abortion of infection threads, a process in which phenolic substances accumulate, triggering a hypersensitive reaction (108). One essential modification to the corridor is insulation to protect the rhizobia from the plant cytoplasm (103). Part of this insulation is seen as the peribacteroid or symbiosome membrane in infected cortical cells (113). What is it made of? In 1977, Dart (16) summarized the premolecular era knowledge of infection threads as follows. "Histochemically the thread wall contains the same components of pectic substances, hemicelluloses, and some cellulose, as the root hair tip, and electron micrographs of infection threads in root hairs and nodules show similar structure to the primary wall of plant cells". And further "Rhizobium is presumed to produce the `zoogloeal matrix surrounding the bacteria ...' which probably contain `mucopolysaccharides.'"
The infection thread wall is unlikely to be a simple introgression of
the root hair wall, however, as it is more resistant to treatment with
cell wall-degrading enzymes (42). Furthermore, overexpression of an Erwinia carotovora extracellular
cellulase produced by R. fredii (51) had no
effect on nodulation of V. unguiculata, confirming
Higashi et al.'s findings (42). Obviously, the infection
thread is difficult to purify, so most indications have come from
indirect analyses, by using methods that involve microscopy or by
studying the effects of mutations. Mutations in both bacterial (7,
21, 64, 65, 104) and plant (32, 102, 116) genes and
their effect on infection thread development have been reported. Some
of the rhizobial genes that play a role in infection thread development
are involved in synthesis of various polysaccharides that range from
alternating 
-linked residues of mannose and
3-deoxy-D-manno-2-octulosonic acid, through
branched exopolysaccharides of R. meliloti and NGR234, to
the cyclic glucans of B. japonicum (Table
2). Perhaps the products of these genes are required for infection thread formation on certain plants, but not
on others (69, 70). How they function or where they are
located within the infection thread has not been elucidated. It is also
possible that extracellular carbohydrates help suppress defense
reactions in the plant (52).
|
More recently, other rhizobial secretion products have also been implicated in nodulation of particular plants. Many rhizobia possess a TTSS. Included among the proteins secreted via this machinery are NolJ, NolX, and y4xL (109; W. J. Deakin, H. B. Krishnan, and C. Marie, personal communication). Transcription of the genes encoding these proteins is dependent on NodD and flavonoids but occurs later than nod genes, implying that the secreted proteins play a role within the plant (109). As the same genes are not expressed in nodules, they are most probably expressed in infection threads. Null mutations in genes controlling TTSS secretion result in phenotypes that vary with the plant host. One explanation of why rhizobia that are unable to secrete carbohydrates and/or proteins have contrasting effects on their hosts concerns the possibility that certain plants produce homologues of these molecules (70). A sort of functional complementation could therefore exist, and only when a plant lacking the homologue was challenged with rhizobia mutated in the same gene, would an effect on infection thread development be seen. Similarly, although this has been less well-documented, plant mutants that require secreted polysaccharides and/or proteins for full nodule development should exist.
It is obvious from the above that rather than being a simple inwardly growing plant cell wall, the infection thread is a composite, symbiotic structure. Some of its' constituents are listed in Table 2. Undoubtedly, many remain to be discovered, but those listed show a tantalizing diversity. It is possible for example, that arabinogalactans and xyloglucans are functional homologues of some rhizobial carbohydrates? What roles do enzymes play? And secreted proteins like NodO? Is it possible that NolJ, NolX, and y4xL have enzymatic activity? (Unfortunately, their amino acid sequences do not suggest a function.) Could any of the molecules listed in Table 2 be part of a signal transduction pathway? Although much research will be needed to answer these questions, it is clear that continued infection thread development (and thus effective, nitrogen-fixing nodules) is dependent on the presence and composition of some of these components. Or, to continue our analogy, rhizobia have a third set of keys that are used to open doors in the infection thread corridor (Fig. 2).
| |
LEGUME LOCKS? |
|---|
Legume locks could take a number of forms, one of which might resemble receptors such as those involved in transduction of hormonal signals. Whether such symbiotic receptors exist in legumes has not been fully clarified, and the data that exists only concerns lock two (Fig. 2). Two putative Nod-factor binding sites (NFSB) have been characterized in Medicago species (6, 66). Most probably NFSB1 of M. truncatula can be assigned to minor roles because it seems to be involved in processes other than nodulation (70). NFSB2, on the other hand, was isolated from the microsomal fraction of Medicago varia cell suspension cultures and has high affinity for O-acetylated Nod factors (37, 66). Yet NFSB2 discriminates neither for the presence of sulfate on the reducing sugar nor for the number and/or positions of double bonds in the acyl chain. Finally, a lectin has been found on the surface of roots of Dolichos biflorus and other legumes that binds Nod factors and has apyrase activity (26, 87). Unfortunately, it is not clear what roles NFSB1 and NFSB2 as well as the lectin-apyrases play in symbiotic signal exchange.
Mutant screening programs have the advantage of first identifying a phenotype and later the corresponding gene. By inserting the transposon Ac into wild-type Lotus japonicus, Schauser et al. (90) found a mutation in the nin gene which is required for the formation of infection threads and the initiation of nodule primordia. It seems likely that nin encodes a membrane-spanning transcription factor which is related to the mid genes of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii where they regulate sexual reproduction in response to nitrogen starvation. It thus seems as if a combination of classic biochemical analyses combined with molecular-genetic approaches is beginning to identify putative locks to the legume door.
| |
MANY KEYS, MUCH HARMONY? |
|---|
Symbiotic control is thus exercised at three or more
checkpointsflavonoids
NodD proteins, Nod factorsHac or bacterial
entry, as well as EPS and/or proteinsinfection threads (Fig. 2).
Courtship begins as rhizobia enter elaborately decorated legume bowers. Liaisons between flavonoids and NodD proteins signal the beginning of
the "courtship." Anything that perturbs this intimacy (e.g., unsuitable flavonoids, mutant NodD proteins) terminates nodule development. Next, NodD-flavonoid complexes activate transcription from
various nod box promoters (Fig. 1). Courtship continues as the enzymes encoded by nod genes synthesize a family of Nod
factors that serve as keys to legume doors. Then, the couple jointly
modifies their house especially to insulate the microsymbiont from the plant cytoplasm and to lower oxygen tensions for nitrogen fixation. Once these challenges have been overcome, both partners live happily exchanging carbohydrates and fixed nitrogen with each other.
Although the above summarizes legume-Rhizobium associations, it does not explain why a particular legume prefers a certain type of Rhizobium, or why some rhizobia like NGR234 can nodulate so many plants (Fig. 4). Most probably the solutions to these puzzles lie in the nature of the locks and keys themselves. Plants excrete a variety of more- or less-enticing flavonoids (key 1 in Fig. 2). Rhizobia possess one to many copies of NodD that may associate with several (or a number of) flavonoids. In turn, flavonoid-NodD complexes (lock 1 in Fig. 2) activate expression of genes downstream of nod boxes (Fig. 1). Enzymes encoded by the nod genes synthesize small to large families of Nod factors (key 2 in Fig. 2), some of which cause Hac or rhizobial entry on (a) specific plant(s) (lock 2). Once they are within the plant, symbiotic components of both partners are necessary for infection thread development (keys and locks 3). Some rhizobia possess the flavonoid-inducible TTSS, suggesting that TTSS (and other) proteins represent additional keys. Other rhizobia excrete various polysaccharides which may function in a similar manner. In summary, simple answers as to why a bacterium like NGR234 can live in harmony with so many plants may include the following. (i) It has a NodD lock that can be opened by many keys (a large variety of flavonoids). (ii) It produces many different keys (the family of >80 Nod factors). (iii) It has alternate keys for the same lock (both EPS and TTSS proteins) (Fig. 2). Rhizobia with narrower host ranges may lack one or more of these locks or keys.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We are deeply indebted to Nick Brewin, Ton van Brussel, Jim Cooper, Peter Graham, Peter Müller, Don Phillips, Alf Pühler, Gary Stacey, Christian Staehelin, Wolfgang Streit, and Dietrich Werner for helpful comments on the manuscript. Dora Gerber is thanked for unfailing support of our work.
Financial assistance was provided by the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique and the Université de Genève.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: LBMPS, Université de Genève, 1 ch. de l'Impératrice, 1292 Chambésy/Geneva, Switzerland. Phone: 41(22)906-1740. Fax: 41(22)906-1741. E-mail: broughtw{at}sc2a.unige.ch.
Present address: Université du Littoral, IR2B, F-62327
Boulogne sur Mer Cédex, France.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
Top
Introduction
References
|
|---|
| 1. | Arumuganathan, K., and E. D. Earle. 1991. Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 9:208-218. |
| 2. | Bassam, B. J., M. A. Djordjevic, J. W. Redmond, M. Batley, and B. G. Rolfe. 1988. Identification of a nodD-dependent locus in the Rhizobium strain NGR234 activated by phenolic factors secreted by soybeans and other legumes. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 1:161-168[Medline]. |
| 3. | Bazin, M. J., P. Markham, E. M. Scott, and J. M. Lynch. 1990. Population dynamics and rhizosphere interactions, p. 99-127. In J. M. Lynch (ed.), The rhizosphere. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, United Kingdom. |
| 4. | Bender, G. L., M. Nayudu, K. K. L. Strange, and B. G. Rolfe. 1988. The nodD1 gene from Rhizobium strain NGR234 is a key determinant in the extension of host range to the nonlegume Parasponia. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 1:259-266. |
| 5. | Bolanos-Vásquez, M. C., and D. Werner. 1997. Effects of Rhizobium tropici, R. etli, and R. leguminosarum bv phaseoli on nod gene-inducing flavonoids in root extracts of Phaseolus vulgaris. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 10:339-346. |
| 6. | Bono, J. J., J. Riond, K. C. Nicolaou, N. J. Bockovich, V. A. Estevez, J. V. Cullimore, and R. Ranjeva. 1995. Characterization of a binding site for chemically synthesized lipo-oligosaccharidic NodRm factors in particulate fractions prepared from roots. Plant J. 7:253-260[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 7. |
Breedveld, M. W.,
H. C. Cremers,
M. Batley,
M. A. Posthumus,
L. P. Zevenhuizen,
C. A. Wijffelman, and A. J. Zehnder.
1993.
Polysaccharide synthesis in relation to nodulation behavior of Rhizobium leguminosarum.
J. Bacteriol.
175:750-757 |
| 8. | Brewin, N. J. 1998. Tissue and cell invasion by Rhizobium: the structure and development of infection threads and symbiosomes, p. 417-429. In H. P. Spaink, A. Kondorosi, and P. J. J. Hooykaas (ed.), The Rhizobiaceae. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. |
| 9. | Brewin, N. J., A. L. Rae, S. Perotto, E. L. Kannenberg, E. A. Rathbun, M. M. Lucas, A. Gunder, L. Bolanos, I. V. Kardailsky, K. E. Wilson, J. L. Firmin, and J. A. Downie. 1994. Bacterial and plant glycoconjugates at the Rhizobium-legume interface. Biochem. Soc. Symp. 60:61-73[Medline]. |
| 10. | Broughton, W. J. 1978. Control of specificity in legume-Rhizobium associations. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 45:165-194. |
| 11. | Broughton, W. J., P. Y. Chan, S. Padmanabhan, and I. K. P. Tan. 1975. Rhizobia in tropical legumes. I. Preliminary studies of antibiotic sensitivity, pH and temperature optima. Malaysian Agric. Res. 4:141-153. |
| 12. | Broughton, W. J., and X. Perret. 1999. Genealogy of legume-Rhizobium symbioses. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2:305-311[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 13. |
Cheng, H. P., and G. C. Walker.
1998.
Succinoglycan is required for initiation and elongation of infection threads during nodulation of alfalfa by Rhizobium meliloti.
J. Bacteriol.
180:5183-5191 |
| 14. | Cook, D. R., K. VandenBosch, F. J. de Bruijn, and T. Huguet. 1997. Model legumes get the nod. Plant Cell 9:275-281[CrossRef]. |
| 15. | Cooper, J. E., J. R. Rao, L. De Cooman, T. M. McCorry, A. J. Bjourson, H. L. Steele, W. J. Broughton, and D. Werner. 1997. Biochemical and molecular analyses of rhizobial responses to legume flavonoids, p. 115-118. In A. B. Legocki, H. Bothe, and A. Pühler (ed.), Biological fixation of nitrogen for ecology and sustainable agriculture. Springer, Berlin, Germany. |
| 16. | Dart, P. 1977. Infection and development of leguminous nodules, p. 367-472. In R. W. F. Hardy, and W. S. Silver (ed.), A treatise on dinitrogen fixation. Cambridge University Press, London, United Kingdom. |
| 17. |
Dart, P. J.
1971.
Scanning electron microscopy of plant roots.
J. Exp. Bot.
22:163-168 |
| 18. |
Dazzo, F. B.,
G. L. Truchet,
R. I. Hollingsworth,
E. M. Hrabak,
H. S. Pankratz,
S. Philip-Hollingsworth,
J. L. Salzwedel,
K. Chapman,
L. Appenzeller, and A. Squartini.
1991.
Rhizobium lipopolysaccharide modulates infection thread development in white clover root hairs.
J. Bacteriol.
173:5371-5384 |
| 19. | D'Haeze, W., M. Gao, R. De Rycke, M. van Montagu, G. Engler, and M. Holsters. 1998. Roles for azorhizobial Nod factors and surface polysaccharides in intercellular invasion and nodule penetration, respectively. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 11:999-1008[CrossRef]. |
| 20. |
D'Haeze, W.,
P. Mergaert,
J.-C. Promé, and M. Holsters.
2000.
Nod factor requirements for efficient stem and root nodulation of the tropical legume Sesbania rostrata.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:15676-15684 |
| 21. | Dickstein, R., D. C. Scheirer, W. H. Fowle, and F. M. Ausubel. 1991. Nodules elicited by Rhizobium meliloti heme mutants are arrested at an early stage of development. Mol. Gen. Genet. 230:423-432[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 22. | Djordjevic, S. P., and B. G. Rolfe. 1986. The structure of the exopolysaccharide from Rhizobium sp. strain ANU280 (NGR234). Carbohydr. Res. 148:87-99. |
| 23. | Downie, J. A. 1998. Functions of rhizobial nodulation genes, p. 387-402. In H. P. Spaink, A. Kondorosi, and P. J. J. Hooykaas (ed.), The Rhizobiaceae. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. |
| 24. | Duke, J. A. 1981. Handbook of legumes of world economic importance, 1st ed. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y. |
| 25. |
Dunlap, J.,
E. Minami,
A. A. Bhagwat,
D. L. Keister, and G. Stacey.
1996.
Nodule development induced by mutants of Bradyrhizobium japonicum defective in cyclic -glucan synthesis.
Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.
9:546-555[Medline].
|
| 26. |
Etzler, M. E.,
G. Kalsi,
N. N. Ewing,
N. J. Roberts,
R. B. Day, and J. B. Murphy.
1999.
A nod factor binding protein with apyrase activity from legume roots.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:5856-5861 |
| 27. | Faizah, A. W., S. Padmanabhan, W. J. Broughton, and C. K. John. 1979. Rhizobia in tropical legumes. V. Problems involved in selecting inoculants for soyabeans, p. 392-409. In W. J. Broughton, C. K. John, J. C. Rajarao, and B. Lim (ed.), Soil microbiology and plant nutrition. University of Malaya Press, Kuala Lumpur, Malayasia. |
| 28. | Fedorova, E., R. Thomson, L. F. Whitehead, O. Maudoux, M. K. Udvardi, and D. A. Day. 1999. Localization of H+-ATPase in soybean root nodules. Planta 209:25-32[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 29. | Fellay, R., M. Hanin, G. Montorzi, J. Frey, C. Freiberg, W. Golinowski, C. Staehelin, W. J. Broughton, and S. Jabbouri. 1998. nodD2 of Rhizobium sp. NGR234 is involved in the repression of the nodABC operon. Mol. Microbiol. 27:1039-1050[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 30. |
Fellay, R.,
P. Rochepeau,
B. Reli , and W. J. Broughton.
1995.
Signals to and emanating from Rhizobium largely control symbiotic specificity, p. 199-220.
In
U. S. Singh, R. P. Singh, and K. Kohmoto (ed.), Pathogenesis & host specificity in plant diseases: histopathological, biochemical, genetic and molecular bases, vol. 1. Prokaryotes. Pergamon/Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom.
|
| 31. | Firmin, J. L., K. E. Wilson, L. Rossen, and A. W. B. Johnston. 1986. Flavonoid activation of nodulation genes in Rhizobium reversed by other compounds present in plants. Nature 324:90-92[CrossRef]. |
| 32. |
Francisco, P. B., and S. Akao.
1993.
Autoregulation and nitrate inhibition of nodule formation in soybean cv. enrei and its nodulation mutants.
J. Exp. Bot.
44:547-553 |
| 33. | Freiberg, C., R. Fellay, A. Bairoch, W. J. Broughton, A. Rosenthal, and X. Perret. 1997. Molecular basis of symbiosis between Rhizobium and legumes. Nature 387:394-401[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 34. | Gardner, C. D., D. J. Sherrier, I. V. Kardailsky, and N. J. Brewin. 1996. Localization of lipoxygenase proteins and mRNA in pea nodules: identification of lipoxygenase in the lumen of infection threads. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 9:282-289. |
| 35. |
Göttfert, M.,
P. Grob, and H. Hennecke.
1990.
Proposed regulatory pathway encoded by the nodV and nodW genes, determinants of host specificity in Bradyrhizobium japonicum.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:2680-2684 |
| 36. | Graham, P. H. 1964. The application of computer techniques to the taxonomy of the root-nodule bacteria of legumes. J. Gen. Microbiol. 35:511-517. |
| 37. |
Gressent, F.,
S. Drouillard,
N. Mantegazza,
E. Samain,
R. A. Geremia,
H. Canut,
A. Niebel,
H. Driguez,
R. Ranjeva,
J. Cullimore, and J. J. Bono.
1999.
Ligand specificity of a high-affinity binding site for lipo-chitooligosaccharidic nod factors in Medicago cell suspension cultures.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:4704-4709 |
| 38. | Hanin, M., S. Jabbouri, W. J. Broughton, and R. Fellay. 1998. SyrM1 of Rhizobium sp. NGR234 activates transcription of symbiotic loci and controls the level of sulfated Nod factors. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 11:343-350. |
| 39. | Hanin, M., S. Jabbouri, W. J. Broughton, R. Fellay, and D. Quesada-Vincens. 1999. Molecular aspects of host-specific nodulation, p. 1-37. In G. Stacey, and N. Keen (ed.), Plant-microbe interactions, vol. 4. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, Minn. |
| 40. |
Hartwig, H. A., and D. A. Phillips.
1991.
Release and modification of nod-gene-inducing flavonoids from alfalfa seeds.
Plant Physiol.
95:804-807 |
| 41. |
Hartwig, U. A.,
C. A. Maxwell,
C. M. Joseph, and D. A. Phillips.
1990.
Effects of alfalfa nod gene-inducing flavonoids on nodABC transcription in Rhizobium meliloti strains containing different nodD genes.
J. Bacteriol.
172:2769-2773 |
| 42. | Higashi, S., K. Kushiyama, M. Abe, G. D. Reyes, and I. J. Manguiat. 1987. Electron-microscopic studies of the root nodule of Pterocarpus indicus. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 33:241-245. |
| 43. | Hiltner, L., and K. Störmer. 1903. Neue Untersuchungen über die Wurzelknöllchen der Leguminosen und deren Erreger. Arb. Biol. Abteil. Land- Forstwirth. Kaiser. Gesund. 3:151-307. |
| 44. |
Hungria, M.,
C. M. Joseph, and D. A. Phillips.
1991.
Rhizobium nod gene inducers exuded naturally from roots of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L).
Plant Physiol.
97:759-764 |
| 45. | Ikram, A., and W. J. Broughton. 1978. Rhizobia in tropical legumes. XII. Inoculation of Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) DC, p. 205-210. In The winged bean. Philippine Council for Agricultural Research, Los Banos, Laguna, The Philippines. |
| 46. | Ikram, A., and W. J. Broughton. 1980. Rhizobia in tropical legumes. VII. Effectiveness of different isolates on Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) DC. Soil Biol. Biochem. 12:77-82. |
| 47. | Ikram, A., S. Padmanabhan, C. K. John, and W. J. Broughton. 1978. Rhizobia in tropical legumes. VI. Glasshouse and field trials with rhizobia for Centrosema pubescens Benth. J. Sains. 2:33-42. |
| 48. | Irving, H. R., N. M. Boukli, M. N. Kelly, and W. J. Broughton. 2000. Nod-factors in symbiotic development of root hairs, p. 241-265. In R. W. Ridge, and A. M. C. Emons (ed.), Root hairs: cell and molecular biology. Springer, Tokyo, Japan. |
| 49. |
Kape, R.,
M. Parniske,
S. Brandt, and D. Werner.
1992.
Isoliquiritigenin, a strong nod gene- and glyceollin resistance-inducing flavonoid from soybean root exudate.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
58:1705-1710 |
| 50. | Krause, A., C. J. Sigrist, I. Dehning, H. Sommer, and W. J. Broughton. 1994. Accumulation of transcripts encoding a lipid transfer-like protein during deformation of nodulation-competent Vigna unguiculata root hairs. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 7:411-418[Medline]. |
| 51. | Krishnan, H. B., and S. Pueppke. 1994. Cloned cellulase gene from Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora is expressed in Rhizobium fredii but does not influence nodulation of cowpea. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 119:289-294. |
| 52. |
LeVier, K.,
R. W. Phillips,
V. K. Grippe,
R. M. Roop, and G. C. Walker.
2000.
Similar requirements of a plant symbiont and a mammalian pathogen for prolonged intracellular survival.
Science
287:2492-2493 |
| 53. | Lewin, A., C. Rosenberg, H. Meyer z.A., C.-H. Wong, L. Nelson, J.-F. Manen, J. Stanley, D. N. Dowling, J. Dénarié, and W. J. Broughton. 1987. Multiple host-specificity loci of the broad host range Rhizobium sp. NGR 234 selected using the widely compatible legume Vigna unguiculata. Plant Mol. Biol. 8:447-459[CrossRef]. |
| 54. |
Loh, J.,
M. Garcia, and G. Stacey.
1997.
NodV and NodW, a second flavonoid regulation system regulating nod gene expression in Bradyrhizobium japonicum.
J. Bacteriol.
179:3013-3020 |
| 55. |
Loh, J.,
M. G. Stacey,
M. J. Sadowsky, and G. Stacey.
1999.
The Bradyrhizobium japonicum nolA gene encodes three functionally distinct proteins.
J. Bacteriol.
181:1544-1554 |
| 56. | Margulis, L. 1993. Symbiosis in cell evolution. Microbial communities in the archean and proterozoic eons, 2nd ed. W. H. Freeman and Co., New York, N.Y. |
| 57. |
Maxwell, C. A.,
U. A. Hartwig,
C. M. Joseph, and D. A. Phillips.
1989.
A chalcone and two related flavonoids released from alfalfa roots induce nod genes of Rhizobium meliloti.
Plant Physiol.
91:842-847 |
| 58. |
Maxwell, C. A., and D. A. Phillips.
1990.
Concurrent synthesis and release of nod-gene-inducing flavonoids from alfalfa roots.
Plant Physiol.
93:1552-1558 |
| 59. |
McCray-Batzli, J.,
W. R. Graves, and P. van Berkum.
1992.
Diversity among rhizobia effective with Robinia pseudoacacia.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
58:2137-2143 |
| 60. | Messens, E., D. Geelen, M. van Montagu, and M. Holsters. 1991. 7,4-Dihydroxyflavanone is the major Azorhizobium nod gene-inducing factor present in Sesbania rostrata seedling exudate. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 4:262-267. |
| 61. | Michiels, J., B. Dombrecht, N. Vermeiren, C.-W. Xi, E. Luyten, and J. Vanderleyden. 1998. Phaseolus vulgaris is a non-selective host for nodulation. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 26:193-205. |
| 62. | Minami, E., H. Kouchi, J. R. Cohn, T. Ogawa, and G. Stacey. 1996. Expression of the early nodulin, ENOD40, in response to various lipo-chitin signal molecules. Plant J. 10:23-32[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 63. | Moffett, M. L., and R. R. Colwell. 1968. Adansonian analysis of the Rhizobiaceae. J. Gen. Microbiol. 51:245-266[Medline]. |
| 64. | Müller, P., K. Ahrens, T. Keller, and A. Klaucke. 1995. A Tn-phoA insertion within the Bradyrhizobium japonicum sipS gene, homologous to prokaryotic signal peptidases, results in extensive changes in the expression of PBM-specific nodulins of infected soybean (Glycine max) cells. Mol. Microbiol. 18:831-840[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 65. |
Newman, J. D.,
R. J. Diebold,
B. W. Schultz, and K. D. Noel.
1994.
Infection of soybean and pea nodules by Rhizobium spp. purine auxotrophs in the presence of 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide riboside.
J. Bacteriol.
176:3286-3294 |
| 66. | Niebel, A., J. J. Bono, R. Ranjeva, and J. V. Cullimore. 1997. Identification of a high affinity binding site for lipo-oligosaccharidic NodRm factors in the microsomal fraction of Medicago cell suspension cultures. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 10:132-134. |
| 67. | Niehaus, K., D. Kapp, and A. Pühler. 1993. Plant defense and delayed infection of alfalfa pseudonodules induced by an exopolysaccharide (EPS-I)-deficient Rhizobium meliloti mutant. Planta 190:415-425. |
| 68. | Perret, X., C. Freiberg, A. Rosenthal, W. J. Broughton, and R. Fellay. 1999. High-resolution transcriptional analysis of the symbiotic plasmid of Rhizobium sp. NGR234. Mol. Microbiol. 32:415-425[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 69. |
Pellock, B. J.,
H.-P. Cheng, and G. C. Walker.
2000.
Alfalfa root nodule invasion efficiency is dependent on Sinorhizobium meliloti polysaccharides.
J. Bacteriol.
182:4310-4318 |
| 70. |
Perret, X.,
C. Staehelin, and W. J. Broughton.
2000.
Molecular basis of symbiotic promiscuity.
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
64:180-201 |
| 71. | Perret, X., V. Viprey, and W. J. Broughton. 2000. Physical and genetic analysis of the broad host-range Rhizobium sp. NGR234, p. 679-692. In E. W. Triplett (ed.), Prokaryotic nitrogen fixation. Horizon Scientific Press, Wymondham, United Kingdom. |
| 72. |
Peters, N. K.,
J. W. Frost, and S. R. Long.
1986.
A plant flavone, luteolin, induces expression of Rhizobium meliloti nodulation genes.
Science
233:977-980 |
| 73. | Phillips, D. A., and W. Streit. 1996. Legume signals to rhizobial symbionts: a new approach for defining rhizosphere colonization, p. 236-271. In G. Stacey, and N. Keen (ed.), Plant-microbe interactions. I. Plant-microbe relationships. Chapman and Hall, New York, N.Y. |
| 74. | Phillips, D. A., and W. R. Streit. 1997. Applying plant-microbe signalling concepts to alfalfa: roles for secondary metabolites, p. 319-342. In B. D. McKersie, and D. C. W. Brown (ed.), Biotechnology and the improvements of forage legumes. CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom. |
| 75. |
Price, N. P.,
B. Reli,
F. Talmont,
A. Lewin,
D. Promé,
S. G. Pueppke,
F. Maillet,
J. Dénarié,
J.-C. Promé, and W. J. Broughton.
1992.
Broad-host-range Rhizobium species strain NGR234 secretes a family of carbamoylated, and fucosylated, nodulation signals that are O-acetylated or sulphated.
Mol. Microbiol.
6:3575-3584[Medline].
|
| 76. |
Pueppke, S. G.,
M. C. Bolanos-Vásquez,
D. Werner,
M.-P. Bec-Ferté,
J.-C. Promé, and H. B. Krishnan.
1998.
Release of flavonoids by the soybean cultivars McCall and Peking and their perception as signals by the nitrogen-fixing symbiont Sinorhizobium fredii.
Plant Physiol.
117:599-608 |
| 77. | Pueppke, S. G., and W. J. Broughton. 1999. Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234 and R. fredii USDA257 share exceptionally broad, nested host ranges. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 12:293-318[Medline]. |
| 78. | Rae, A. L., P. Bonfantefasolo, and N. J. Brewin. 1992. Structure and growth of infection threads in the legume symbiosis with Rhizobium leguminosarum. Plant J. 2:385-395[CrossRef]. |
| 79. |
Rao, J. R., and J. E. Cooper.
1994.
Rhizobia catabolize nod gene-inducing flavonoids via C-ring fission mechanisms.
J. Bacteriol.
176:5409-5413 |
| 80. | Rao, J. R., and J. E. Cooper. 1995. Soybean nodulating rhizobia modify nod gene inducers daidzein and genistein to yield aromatic products that can influence gene inducing activity. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 8:855-862. |
| 81. | Recourt, K., J. Schripsema, J. W. Kijne, A. A. N. van Brussel, and B. J. J. Lugtenberg. 1991. Inoculation of Vicia sativa subsp. nigra roots with Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae results in release of nod gene activating flavonones and chalcones. Plant Mol. Biol. 16:841-852[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 82. | Recourt, K., M. Verkerke, J. Schripsema, A. A. N. van Brussel, B. J. J. Lugtenberg, and J. W. Kijne. 1992. Major flavonoids in uninoculated and inoculated roots of Viciae sativa subsp. nigra are four conjugates of the nodulation gene inhibitor kaempferol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 18:505-513[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 83. | Redmond, J. W., M. Batley, M. A. Djordjevic, R. W. Innes, P. L. Kuempel, and B. G. Rolfe. 1986. Flavones induce expression of nodulation genes in Rhizobium. Nature 323:632-635[CrossRef]. |
| 84. |
Reli, B.,
R. Fellay,
A. Lewin,
X. Perret,
N. P. J. Price,
P. Rochepeau, and W. J. Broughton.
1993.
nod genes and Nod factors of Rhizobium species NGR234, p. 183-189.
In
R. Palacios, J. Mora, and W. E. Newton (ed.), New horizons in nitrogen fixation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
|
| 85. |
Reli, B.,
X. Perret,
M. T. Estrada-Garcia,
J. Kopcinska,
W. Golinowski,
H. B. Krishnan,
S. G. Pueppke, and W. J. Broughton.
1994.
Nod factors of Rhizobium are a key to the legume door.
Mol. Microbiol.
13:171-178[Medline].
|
| 86. |
Reli, B.,
F. Talmont,
J. Kopcinska,
W. Golinowski,
J.-C. Promé, and W. J. Broughton.
1993.
Biological activity of Rhizobium sp. NGR234 Nod-factors on Macroptilium atropurpureum.
Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.
6:764-774[Medline].
|
| 87. | Roberts, N. J., J. Brigham, B. Wu, J. B. Murphy, H. Volpin, D. A. Phillips, and M. E. Etzler. 1999. A Nod factor-binding lectin is a member of a distinct class of apyrases that may be unique to the legumes. Mol. Gen. Genet. 262:261-267[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 88. | Rolfe, B. G., R. W. Carlson, R. W. Ridge, F. B. Dazzo, P. F. Mateos, and C. E. Pankhurst. 1996. Defective infection and nodulation of clovers by exopolysaccharide mutants of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 23:285-303. |
| 89. | Schäfers, B., and D. Werner. 1993. Nodulation of Robinia pseudoacacia by two Rhizobium strains. Nitr. Fix. Tree Res. Rep. 11:121-126. |
| 90. | Schauser, L., A. Roussis, J. Stiller, and J. Stougaard. 1999. A plant regulator controlling development of symbiotic root nodules. Nature 402:191-195[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 91. | Scheidemann, P., and A. Wetzel. 1997. Identification and characterization of flavonoids in the root exudate of Robinia pseudoacacia. Trees 11:316-321[CrossRef]. |
| 92. |
Scheres, B.,
F. van Engelen,
E. van der Knaap,
C. van de Wiel,
A. van Kammen, and T. Bisseling.
1990.
Sequential induction of nodulin gene expression in the developing pea nodule.
Plant Cell
2:687-700 |
| 93. |
Schlaman, H. R. M.,
R. J. H. Okker, and B. J. J. Lugtenberg.
1992.
Regulation of nodulation gene expression by NodD in rhizobia.
J. Bacteriol.
174:5177-5182 |
| 94. | Schmidt, P. E., W. J. Broughton, and D. Werner. 1994. Nod factors of Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Rhizobium sp. NGR234 induce flavonoid accumulation in soybean root exudate. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 7:384-390. |
| 95. | Sherrier, D. J., and K. A. VandenBosch. 1994. Localization of repetitive proline-rich proteins in the extracellular matrix of pea nodules. Protoplasma 183:148-161[CrossRef]. |
| 96. | Skorupska, A., U. Bialek, T. Urbaniksypniewska, and A. van Lammeren. 1995. Two types of nodules induced on Trifolium pratense by mutants of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii deficient in exopolysaccharide production. J. Plant Physiol. 147:93-100. |
| 97. |
Smit, G.,
V. Puvanesarajah,
R. W. Carlson,
W. M. Barbour, and G. Stacey.
1992.
Bradyrhizobium japonicum nodD1 can be specifically induced by soybean flavonoids that do not induce the nodYABCSUIJ operon.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:310-318 |
| 98. |
Stachel, S. E.,
G. An,
C. Flores, and E. W. Nester.
1985.
A Tn3 lacZ transposon for the random generation of -galactosidase gene fusions: application to the analysis of gene expression in Agrobacterium.
EMBO J.
4:891-898[Medline].
|
| 99. | Stachel, S. E., E. Messens, M. van Montagu, and P. Zambryski. 1985. Identification of the signal molecules produced by wounded plant cells that activate T-DNA transfer in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Nature 318:624-629[CrossRef]. |
| 100. | Stafford, H. A. 1997. Roles of flavonoids in symbiotic and defense reactions in legume roots. Bot. Rev. 63:27-39. |
| 101. | Trinick, M. J. 1980. Relationships amongst the fast-growing rhizobia of Lablab purpureus, Leucaena leucocephala, Mimosa spp., Acacia farnesiana and Sesbania grandiflora and their affinities with other rhizobial groups. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 49:39-53. |
| 102. | Tsyganov, V. E., E. V. Morzhina, S. Y. Stefanov, A. Y. Borisov, V. K. Lebsky, and I. A. Tikhonovich. 1998. The pea (Pisum sativum L.) genes sym33 and sym40 control infection thread formation and root nodule function. Mol. Gen. Genet. 259:491-503[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 103. | Udvardit, M. K., and D. A. Day. 1997. Metabolite transport across symbiotic membranes of legume nodules. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48:493-523[CrossRef]. |
| 104. | Utrup, L. J., A. J. Cary, and J. H. Norris. 1993. Five nodulation mutants of white sweetclover (Melilotus-alba Desr) exhibit distinct phenotypes blocked at root hair curling, infection thread development, and nodule organogenesis. Plant Physiol. 103:925-932[Abstract]. |
| 105. |
van Brussel, A. A. N.,
R. Bakhuizen,
P. C. van Spronsen,
H. P. Spaink,
T. Tak,
B. J. J. Lugtenberg, and J. W. Kijne.
1992.
Induction of preinfection thread structures in the leguminous host plant by mitogenic lipo-oligosaccharides of Rhizobium.
Science
257:70-72 |
| 106. | VandenBosch, K. A., J. B. Desmond, J. P. Knox, S. Perotto, G. W. Butcher, and N. J. Brewin. 1989. Common components of the infection thread matrix and the intercellular space identified by immunocytochemical analysis of pea nodules and uninfected roots. EMBO J. 8:335-342[Medline]. |
| 107. | van Workum, W. A. T., S. van Slageren, A. A. N. van Brussel, and J. W. Kijne. 1998. Role of exopolysaccharides of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae as host plant-specific molecules required for infection thread formation during nodulation of Vicia sativa. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 11:1233-1241. |
| 108. | Vasse, J., F. de Billy, and G. Truchet. 1993. Abortion of infection during the Rhizobium meliloti symbiotic interaction is accompanied by a hypersensitive reaction. Plant J. 4:555-566[CrossRef]. |
| 109. | Viprey, V., A. Del Greco, W. Golinowski, W. J. Broughton, and X. Perret. 1998. Symbiotic implications of type III protein secretion machinery in Rhizobium. Mol. Microbiol. 28:1381-1389[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 110. | Werner, D. 1998. Organic signals between plants and microorganisms. In R. Pinton, Z. Varanini, and P. Nannipieri (ed.), The rhizosphere: biochemistry and organic substances at the soil-plant interface. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, N.Y. |
| 111. | Werner, D. 1992. Symbiosis of plants and microbes, 1st ed. Chapman & Hall, London, United Kingdom. |
| 112. | Whipps, J. M. 1990. Carbon economy, p. 59-97. In J. M. Lynch (ed.), The rhizosphere. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, United Kingdom. |
| 113. | Whitehead, L. F., and D. A. Day. 1997. The peribacteroid membrane. Physiol. Plant. 100:30-44. |
| 114. | Wilson, J. K. 1939. Leguminous plants and their associated organisms. Cornell University Agricultural Experimental Station memoir 221. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y. |
| 115. | Wong, C. H., R. Patchamathu, H. Meyer z. A., C. E. Pankhurst, and W. J. Broughton. 1988. Rhizobia in tropical legumes: ineffective nodulation of Arachis hypogaea L. by fast-growing strains. Soil Biol. Biochem. 20:677-681[CrossRef]. |
| 116. | Wu, C. F., R. Dickstein, A. J. Cary, and J. H. Norris. 1996. The auxin transport inhibitor N-(1-naphthyl)phtalamic acid elicits pseudonodules on nonnodulating mutants of white sweetclover. Plant Physiol. 110:502-510. |
| 117. | Zuanazzi, J. A. S., P. H. Clergeot, J.-C. Quirion, H.-P. Husson, A. Kondorosi, and P. Ratet. 1998. Production of Sinorhizobium meliloti nod gene activator and repressor flavonoids from Medicago sativa roots. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 11:784-794[CrossRef]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
54 promoters. 
(omega cassette) marks the
position of insertion or deletion (accompanying black boxes) mutations
in various loci or genes. Only mutants containing the 
