Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, October 2000, p. 5663-5670, Vol. 182, No. 20
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Effects of Nonpolar Mutations in Each of the Seven Bacillus
subtilis mrp Genes Suggest Complex Interactions among the Gene
Products in Support of Na+ and Alkali but Not Cholate
Resistance
Masahiro
Ito,1
Arthur A.
Guffanti,2
Wei
Wang,2 and
Terry A.
Krulwich2,*
Faculty of Life Sciences, Toyo University,
Oura-gun, Gunma 374-0193, Japan,1 and
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mount
Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 100292
Received 14 June 2000/Accepted 25 July 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The Bacillus subtilis mrp (multiple resistance and pH)
operon supports Na+ and alkali resistance via an
Na+/H+ antiport, as well as cholate efflux and
resistance. Among the individual mutants with nonpolar mutations
in each of the seven mrp genes, only the mrpF
mutant exhibited cholate sensitivity and a cholate efflux defect that
were complemented by expression of the deleted gene in
trans. Expression of mrpF in the mrp null (VKN1) strain also restored cholate transport and increased
Na+ efflux, indicating that MrpF does not require even low
levels of other mrp gene expression for its own function.
In contrast to MrpF, MrpA function had earlier seemed to
depend upon at least modest expression of other mrp genes,
i.e., mrpA restored Na+ resistance and efflux
to strain VK6 (a polar mrpA mutant which expresses low
levels of mrpB to -G) but not to the null
strain VKN1. In a wild-type background, each nonpolar mutation in
individual mrp genes caused profound Na+
sensitivity at both pH 7.0 and 8.3. The mrpA and
mrpD mutants were particularly sensitive to alkaline pH
even without added Na+. While transport assays in membrane
vesicles from selected strains indicated that MrpA-dependent antiport
can occur by a secondary, proton motive force-dependent mechanism, the
requirement for multiple mrp gene products suggests that
there are features of energization, function, or stabilization that
differ from typical secondary membrane transporters. Northern analyses
indicated regulatory relationships among mrp genes as well.
All the mrp mutants, especially the mrpA,
-B, -D, -E, and -G mutants,
had elevated levels of mrp RNA relative to the wild type.
Expression of an upstream gene, maeN, that encodes an
Na+/malate symporter, was coordinately regulated with
mrp, although it is not part of the operon.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The mrp operon
was first identified in the genome of Bacillus subtilis as a
homologue of a locus that had been found to be centrally important to
cytoplasmic pH regulation in alkaliphilic Bacillus
halodurans C-125 (3, 16). A point mutation in the first
gene of the alkaliphile homologue resulted in loss of
Na+/H+ antiporter activity (3). Such
antiport is widely used by prokaryotes for alkali and Na+
resistance inasmuch as coupled Na+ exclusion and
H+ accumulation can be accomplished via electrogenic
exchange of cytoplasmic Na+ for a greater number of
H+ (14, 20). The complete mrp
operon of B. subtilis is predicted to encode seven
hydrophobic gene products (9, 12), as is also posited for
homologues from diverse organisms, including alkaliphilic
Bacillus pseudofirmus OF4 (14, 15),
Rhizobium meliloti (21), Staphylococcus
aureus (6), and others annotated in genome databases.
Apart from the apparent role of the alkaliphile mrp
operons in Na+-dependent pH homeostasis,
studies with mutants have suggested that the R. meliloti homologue, pha, may encode a
K+/H+ antiporter that is required for symbiotic
nitrogen fixation (21) and that B. subtilis mrp
(called ntr and sha by other investigators [12, 13]) has multiple functions. First, the B. subtilis mrp locus has been shown to play a role in
Na+ resistance and in both Na+- and
K+-dependent cytoplasmic pH homeostasis (9, 12).
This is consistent with one or more mrp genes encoding an
Na+(K+)/H+ antiport
activity. Recently, Kosono et al. (13) showed that a
B. subtilis mrpA (shaA) mutant fails to sporulate
normally and suggested that an early step in sporulation is sensitive
to the elevated cytoplasmic Na+ concentration that results
from mrp mutations. The second B. subtilis mrp
activity, in which the mrpF gene has been implicated, encompasses cholate and Na+ efflux activities, which may be
mechanistically coupled. Demonstration of cholate efflux activity has
thus far been made only in a mutant with a disruption in
mrpF that also lowered expression of mrpG (9), but in the current study, separate mutations in
mrpF and mrpG have been examined.
Before the discovery of the mrp operon and its
homologues, the well-studied examples of Na+/H+
antiporters all involved a single structural gene product
(20). Data to date suggest that monovalent
cation/H+ antiporter activity requires the first gene of
the operon, mrpA, in B. subtilis, but
that other genes of the operon are required for some
combination of antiporter activity, expression, and assembly (9, 12). That is, MrpA is necessary but not sufficient for Na+/H+ activity. Similarly, Hiramatsu et
al. (6) have suggested from studies in which the S. aureus homologue, designated mnh, was expressed in an
Na+-sensitive Escherichia coli mutant, that all
the genes of the operon may be required for the Na+
resistance conferred in that system. There are recent reports of
secondary multidrug transporters with two heterologous protein components (10, 18) but the complexity of the mrp
product interactions might be of a much higher order. In addition, the long-recognized sequence similarity of several mrp products
to membrane-embedded subunits of energy-coupled NADH dehydrogenase complexes (3, 9) raises the possibility that there is a capacity for electron transport that could provide a primary
energy coupling option for mrp functions.
In the current study, individual in-frame deletions were made in
each of the B. subtilis mrp genes for which no such
mutations had been made earlier, i.e., mrpB,
-C, -D, -E, -F, and
-G. For each of those strains, a version was also made in
which an active copy of the disrupted gene was returned to the
amyE locus of the chromosome under the control of an IPTG
(isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside)-inducible promoter.
Each mrp gene was similarly introduced into the
amyE locus of an mrp null mutant, VKN1, of
B. subtilis, and into that of a polar mutant, VK6, that
lacks mrpA and expresses mrpB to -G at
greatly reduced levels. Resistance and transport studies have supported
earlier indications that MrpF is the Na+-cholate efflux
protein and further show that MrpF activity is independent of the
expression of additional mrp genes. By contrast, MrpA
function, which is shown to correlate with a protonophore-sensitive Na+ efflux activity, requires all six other mrp
genes. In addition, evidence is presented for a complex regulatory
relationship between loss of function of particular mrp
genes and expression of the polycistronic mrp mRNA.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and general growth conditions.
The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in
Table 1. The bacteria were routinely
grown at 30°C in malate-containing, potassium-replete TKM medium
(9). For experiments in which mrp genes were
introduced into the amyE locus under control of the
pspac promoter, 200 µM IPTG was included in
the growth medium.
Northern analyses.
Cells were grown, RNA was prepared, and
the Northern procedures were carried out according to methods described
by others (2). Three different probes were employed: (i) a
probe to a gene upstream of the mrp operon that
encodes maeN (yufR) was prepared using primers
yufR1 and yufR2; (ii) a probe to part of mrpA was prepared
using primers BsmrpA1 and mrpA2T7; and (iii) a probe to part of
mrpG was prepared using primers BsmrpG1 and mrpG2T7. For
these preparations as well as other PCRs, either Pfx (Life Tech) or
Vent (New England Biolabs) DNA polymerase was used. The PCR products
were first gel purified and then eluted using a gel extraction kit
(Qiagen). The probes were then used as DNA templates for random priming
32P labeling using a random-primed DNA labeling kit (Roche
Diagnostics). The locations of the probes are indicated in Fig.
1.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Schematic diagram of the yufR
(maeN)-mrp region of the B. subtilis
chromosome that indicates the probes used for Northern analyses and the
primers used in construction of new mrp deletion strains.
|
|
Construction of mutant strains.
For each type of mutant, the
phenotype of the strain used in the studies was the same as that of
several other strains from the construction protocol. Each mutant that
was used in the subsequent studies was initially confirmed to have the
expected PCR profile and was then directly shown to contain the
expected sequence. Sequencing was conducted at the Biotechnology Center
at Utah State University (Logan, Utah) with an ABI-100 model 377 sequencer. All in-frame mutations were constructed by gene splicing via
overlap extension, as described by others (7). For the
deletions of mrpB, mrpC, and mrpE, the
approach was precisely as used in earlier construction of the VK1A
(mrpA deletion, previously called VK1) strain
(9). For deletions in mrpD, mrpF, and
mrpG, the earlier approach alone did not yield the desired
mutations; therefore, gene splicing via overlap extension was used as
the first step, followed by steps that resulted in the introduction of
a spectinomycin resistance (Spr) cassette gene,
spc (19), into the deleted area.
(i) For construction of in-frame mutant VK1B with a deletion in
mrpB, two independent PCRs were performed on wild-type DNA with the sets of primers shown in Fig. 1, BF-XI and B-MR plus BR-B2 and
B-MF. The sequences of the primers used in this study will be made
available from the authors. BF-X1 has additional nucleotides encoding
an XbaI site. BR-B2 has additional nucleotides encoding a
BglII site. The two purified PCR products were used as
templates for a second PCR with primers BF-X1 and BR-B2. The purified
product of this reaction was digested with XbaI and
BglII and then cloned into XbaI- and
BglII-digested pDH88. The resulting plasmid, pDHB1, was
integrated into the mrpB locus in the chromosome by a single
crossover using chloramphenicol resistance for selection (5). To prepare strains that had lost the plasmid sequences, leaving a mutated mrpB, cells were grown under nonselective
conditions on LBK plates, and the strains thus obtained were confirmed
as above.
(ii) For construction of in-frame mutant VK1C with a deletion in
mrpC, the strategy (Fig. 1) was the same as for VK1B except that the primer pairs were CF-X1 and C-MR plus CR-B2 and C-MF. The two
purified PCR products were used as templates for a second PCR using
primers CF-X1 and CR-B2. The product of this reaction was cloned into
pDH88 as above, resulting in plasmid pDHC1, which was integrated into
the mrpC locus. Strains that had lost the plasmid sequences
were isolated and confirmed.
(iii) For construction of in-frame mutant VK1D with a deletion in
mrpD, two PCRs were performed on wild-type DNA with primer pairs CF-X1 and D-MRS1 plus MRPFB2 and D-MFS1 (Fig. 1). MRPFB2 has
additional nucleotides encoding a BglII site. D-MRS 1 and D-MFS1 have additional nucleotides encoding a SmaI site in
the middle of each primer. The two purified PCR products were used as
templates for a second PCR with primers CF-X1 and MRPFB2. The purified
product of this reaction was digested with XbaI and
BglII and then cloned into XbaI- and
BamHI-digested pGEM11Zf(+) (Apr; Promega). The
recombinant plasmid was digested with SmaI. Just before the
SmaI site, the third amino acid from the N terminus of MrpD
is encoded, and just after the SmaI site, the third amino acid from the C terminus of MrpD is encoded. A gene encoding
Spr was amplified by PCR using primers SpcA and SpcB. The
PCR product encoded only the open reading frame region of the
spc gene. The spc gene was ligated
to this linear plasmid in frame, resulting in a recombinant plasmid
encoding a chimeric protein containing a small part of MrpD and the
Spcr protein. This chimeric protein conferred spectinomycin
resistance. After isolation, the recombinant plasmid, pGEMD1, was
digested with XbaI, and the linear plasmid was introduced
into wild-type B. subtilis. Mutants with deletions in
mrpD were identified by spectinomycin resistance (150 µg/ml) and confirmed.
(iv) For construction of in-frame mutant VK1E with a deletion in
mrpE, the strategy was the same as for VK1B (Fig. 1) except that the primer pairs were EF-X1 and E-MR plus ER-B2 and E-MF. The two
purified PCR products were used as templates for a second PCR with
primers EF-X1 and ER-B2. The purified PCR product was cloned into
pDH88, resulting in plasmid pDHE1, which was integrated into the
mrpE locus. Clones that had lost the plasmid sequence were
isolated and confirmed.
(v) For construction of in-frame mutant VK1F with a deletion in
mrpF, two PCR were performed on wild-type DNA with the sets of primers shown in Fig. 1, FF-X1 and F-MRS1 plus FR-B1 and F-MFS1 (Table 2). FF-X1 has additional
nucleotides encoding an XbaI site. FR-B1 has additional
nucleotides encoding a BamHI site. F-MRS1 and F-MFS1 have
additional nucleotides encoding a SmaI site in the middle of
each primer. The two purified PCR products were used as templates
for a second PCR with primers FF-X1 and FR-B1. The purified product of
this reaction was digested with XbaI and BamHI
and then cloned into XbaI- and BamHI-digested
pGEM11Zf(+). The recombinant plasmid was digested with SmaI.
Just before the SmaI site, the first amino acid from the N
terminus of MrpF is encoded, and just after the SmaI site,
the sixth animo acid from the C terminus of MrpF is encoded. A
recombinant plasmid, pGEMF1, containing a very short part of
mrpF and an Spr gene was constructed as for
VK1D. The plasmid was introduced into B. subtilis, and
deletion of mrpF was confirmed.
(vi) For construction of in-frame mutant VK1G with a deletion in
mrpG, the strategy was as for VK1F. Two independent PCRs were performed on wild-type DNA using primer pairs GF-X1 and G-MRS1 plus FR-B1 and G-MFS1. GF-X1 has additional nucleotides encoding an
XbaI site; FR-B1 has a BamHI site; and G-MRS1 and
G-MFS1 have a SmaI site in the middle of each primer. The
two purified PCR products were used as templates for a second PCR with
primers GF-X1 and FR-B1. The PCR product was cloned into pGEM11Zf(+) as for VK1F. The recombinant plasmid was digested with SmaI.
Just before the SmaI site, the sixth amino acid from the N
terminus of MrpG is encoded, and just after the SmaI
site, the stop codon of MrpG is encoded. A recombinant plasmid
containing a small part of mrpG and a spectinomycin
resistance gene was introduced into B. subtilis, and
deletion of mrpG was confirmed.
Integration of various mrp genes into the amyE
locus of particular mutant strains was performed as described elsewhere
using plasmid pDR67 (8). For construction of a plasmid
carrying the intact mrpB gene, PCR was performed on
wild-type DNA using primers MRPBX1 and MRPBB2 (Fig. 1). For
mrpC, the primers were MRPCX1 and MRPCB2. For
mrpD, the primers were MRPDX1 and MRPDB2. For mrpE, the primers were MRPEX1 and MRPEB2. For
mrpF, the primers were MRPFX1 and MRPFB2. For
mrpG, the primers were MRPGX1 and ER-B2. Each
amplified fragment was cloned into XbaI- and
BglII-digested pDR67, yielding pDRB1, pDRC1, pDRD1, pDRE1,
pDRF1, and pDRG1, respectively. Each plasmid was linearized with
NruI and used to transform particular mutants to a
chloramphenicol-resistant, amylase-negative phenotype. The plasmids
used in this study are listed together with the bacterial strains in
Table 1. All were confirmed to have the correct sequences.
Determination of MICs of Na+ and inhibition profile
for cholate.
The MIC of Na+ was determined in TKM
medium at pH 7.0 or 8.3 exactly as described elsewhere (9).
Sensitivity to cholate was also assessed as previously described
(9).
Transport assays.
Measurements of cholate efflux were
conducted on whole cells that were preloaded with cholate and then
assayed using a filtration assay as described in connection with
earlier studies of the mrp operon (9).
Measurements of 22Na+ efflux were conducted in
both whole cells and right-side-out membrane vesicles. The whole-cell
22Na+ efflux assays conducted in connection
with MrpF function were carried out precisely as described earlier
(9). For the assays in membrane vesicles, right-side-out
vesicles were prepared by a modification of the method of Kaback
(11). Protoplasts were prepared from logarithmic-phase cells
by incubating at 37°C in 100 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.5)-20%
sucrose-300 µg of lysozyme per ml until the cells had rounded up.
The protoplasts were shocked in 50 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.5) plus
1 mM MgSO4 by diluting 100-fold and passing through a
syringe with a 19G1/2 needle. Vesicles were passively loaded with 5 mM
22NaCl (10 µCi/ml) for 18 h at 4°C. For assays of
Na+ efflux energized by the electron transport chain,
vesicles (100 µg of protein/ml) were incubated at 10°C. No further
additions were made, or 10 mM potassium ascorbate-0.1 mM
phenazine methosulfate (PMS) was added. The protonophore carbonyl
cyanide p-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) was added to some
reactions, as indicated. Samples were taken at various times and
filtered, and radioactivity was measured by liquid scintillation counting.
In some assays Na+ efflux was driven by a potassium
diffusion potential. The membrane vesicles loaded with 5 mM
22Na+ in buffer containing 100 mM potassium
phosphate (pH 7.5) were treated with 10 µM valinomycin and diluted to
various extents into 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) in order to generate
potassium diffusion potentials of different magnitudes. Samples were
taken at 5 s after dilution, and radioactivity was counted as
above. Protein was determined by the method of Lowry et al.
(17), using egg white lysozyme as the standard.
 |
RESULTS |
Northern analyses of the mutant strains.
Northern analyses
were conducted on each of the newly constructed strains, the VK1A
strain constructed earlier (9), and the wild type. Three
different probes were used. One was to the upstream maeN
(yufR) gene, which has been shown to encode an
Na+/malate symporter (Y. Wei, unpublished data). This gene
is transcribed in the same direction as the mrp genes, and
the possibility that it is cotranscribed or coregulated with them was
of interest. The other two probes were to the mrp genes at
the ends of the known operon, mrpA and
mrpG. These probes were used to determine whether the new
in-frame deletion mutations were in fact nonpolar, and whether all of
the new mutants exhibited increased mrp RNA abundance. The
mrpA deletion in strain VK1A had earlier been shown to be
nonpolar and to result in much higher levels of mrp RNA than
the wild type (9). As shown in Fig.
2, all the new inframe deletion mutations
(mrp BCDEF) are nonpolar inasmuch as the cells express
mrpG at wild-type levels of RNA abundance or greater. In
Fig. 2, an arrow indicates the location of the wild-type mrp band. This band could only be visualized more distinctly upon longer
exposures, which made it too difficult to discern any detail in most of
the other lanes. The sizes of the mrp bands in the mutants
were as expected from the size of the deletion combined, in three of
them, with the introduction of a cassette. As had been observed for
mrp RNA in VK1A (9) (which is shown again in Fig.
2 together with the new mutants), the new mutants with deletions in
mrpB, mrpE, mrpD, and mrpG
all exhibited a significant increase in mrp RNA, as did the
retested mrpA mutant. Two of the new mutants with deletions
in mrpC or mrpF did not exhibit an elevation of
mrp RNA comparable to that seen in the other strains, although there was still an increase relative to the wild-type strain.
In the RNA preparations from some of the mutants, there were also bands
that reacted with mrp gene probes that were smaller than the
major, expected band and may represent degradation products.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Northern analyses of mutants with individual deletions
in each of the seven B. subtilis mrp genes. RNA was prepared
from wild-type B. subtilis and probed with the DNA probes
corresponding to parts of the first and last mrp genes and
to part of the upstream maeN (yufR) gene. The
locations of the probes are shown in Fig. 1, and the procedures are
described in Materials and Methods. The strain is indicated above each
lane, e.g., Wt, wild type; A, VK1A; etc. The probe used for the
particular blot is indicated below the panel.
|
|
A distinct band corresponding to the molecular size of MaeN
alone was observed with the maeN probe. This indicates that
maeN is expressed on a transcript that probably encodes no
other genes and is not included on the large mrp transcript
under the conditions used here. Interestingly, the level of
maeN RNA, which was higher in the wild type than the level
of mrp RNA, exhibited a pattern of increase among the
mrp mutants that was similar to that for mrp RNA. maeN RNA was elevated over its wild-type
level in all the mrp mutants except the
mrpA mutant. That mutant, VK1A, showed less
maeN RNA than the wild type. Among the other
mrp mutants, there again appeared to be a smaller increase
in the strains with deletions in mrpC or mrpF
relative to the other, maeN-overexpressing mutants.
MrpF-dependent cholate resistance, cholate efflux, and
Na+ efflux.
Cholate resistance was examined in our
initial studies of the B. subtilis mrp operon
because the BLAST analysis (1) of the deduced
mrpF product revealed sequence similarities to
Na+-coupled bile acid transporters. The difference in
cholate resistance found between the wild type and mrpF
(polar) mutant, VK15, was significant and reproducible but not large
enough to be captured as a difference in MIC (9). As shown
in Fig. 3 for each of the single
mrp gene mutants and their complemented versions, a large
increase in sensitivity to cholate was found only in the new
mrpF (nonpolar) mutant VK1F, and only in that mutant was the restoration of an active gene in the amyE locus accompanied
by significantly greater resistance to cholate. To correlate the resistance with cholate transport capacity, the efflux of cholate from
preloaded cells of the wild type was compared to efflux from the
mrpF and mrpG mutants, VK1F and VK1G,
respectively, and the versions of each in which the affected gene was
expressed from the amyE locus. As shown in Fig.
4A, efflux of cholate was not defective
in the mrpG mutant strain but was significantly reduced in
the mrpF mutant strain VK1F. Expression in trans
of the mrpF gene in VK1F increased the cholate efflux
activity of the mutant almost to the level in VK1G (Fig. 4A) or the
wild-type strain (Fig. 4B). Earlier studies indicated that expression
of mrpF in the mrp null strain of B. subtilis did not restore cholate resistance to that strain
(9). However, the results here led us to reexamine the
possibility that MrpF can function independently of any other mrp genes in experiments in which transport of cholate
itself was assayed. Efflux and resistance might not be observed in
parallel, for example, if cholate reentry was pronounced relative to
the capacity and rate of efflux. As shown in Fig. 4B, expression of mrpF under control of an IPTG-inducible promoter in the
amyE locus of mrp null strain VKN1 resulted in a
dramatic increase in cholate efflux. Expression of mrpF in
strain VKN1 also resulted in an increase in Na+ efflux
(Fig. 5), although, as noted below, this
increase too was not sufficient to be reflected in an increase in
Na+ resistance.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Sensitivity of wild type (wt) and mrp mutant
strains of B. subtilis to growth inhibition by cholate.
Cells were grown in TKM medium (pH 7.0) in the presence (hatched bars)
or absence (open bars) of 0.08% (wt/vol) cholate. After 6 h of
incubation with shaking at 30°C, the A600 was
determined. The results represent the mean of at least eight
determinations, and standard deviations are shown as error bars.
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Cholate efflux from whole cells of wild-type and
selected mrp mutant strains of B. subtilis. The
cells were starved and loaded with 20 µM [14C]cholate.
Efflux was initiated by diluting 100-fold into buffer containing 10 mM
glucose. Samples were taken at various times, filtered, and washed. The
radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation counting. (A)
mrpF mutant VKIF and mrpG mutant VK1G, both
without (solid symbols) and with (open symbols) the deleted gene
expressed from an IPTG-inducible promoter in the amyE locus.
(B) Wild-type strain, the mrp null mutant VKN1, and VKN1
expressing mrpF under control of an IPTG-inducible promoter
in the amyE locus.
|
|

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
22Na+ efflux from wild-type (wt)
B. subtilis, the mrp null strain VKN1, and VKN1
expressing mrpF in trans. The cells were washed,
energy depleted, and loaded with 5 mM 22NaCl as described
previously (9). Efflux was initiated by diluting the cell
suspension 100-fold into buffer containing 5 mM NaCl with no further
additions ( ) or in the presence of 10 mM glucose ( ). Samples were
taken at various times, filtered, and washed. The radioactivity was
determined by liquid scintillation counting.
|
|
Na+ and alkali- sensitivity of the mrp
mutants.
The MIC of Na+ was determined in the wild
type (BD99), in the mrp null strain (VKN1), in each of the
single mrp gene deletion strains, and in each of the
deletion strains with the gene restored in the amyE locus.
The determinations were made at pH 7.0 and at pH 8.3 as described in
Materials and Methods. The two pHs were examined because of the role of
the Na+/H+ antiport in both Na+ and
alkali resistance and because Na+ cytotoxicity is elevated
at alkaline pH (14, 20). A record was kept of the
A600 after 15 h of growth in the absence of
added Na+ at each pH (i.e., the same time at which growth
was recorded for Na+-containing cultures) as an indicator
of cell yield of each mutant at the two pHs. As shown in Table 2, all
of the mrp mutants were from 6 to >10 times more sensitive
to Na+ than the wild-type strain at pH 7.0, and there were
no major differences in the absorbances reached by the different
mutants and the wild type in the absence of added Na+.
Restoration of the mutated gene to each of the single deletion mutants
resulted in complementation in trans that resulted in essentially
wild-type MICs for each of the mutants. At pH 8.3, the patterns were
more complex. First, the mrpA and mrpD mutants, VK1A and VK1D, respectively, exhibited poor growth at the elevated pH
in the absence of added Na+. This deficit was especially
pronounced with VK1D, in which reintroduction of the gene in the
amyE locus did not completely restore wild-type levels of
growth. Second, all of the mutants exhibited at least 10-fold-greater sensitivity to Na+ than the wild type
at pH 8.3, but the sensitivity of the mrpA, mrpB, mrpD, and mrpE mutants (VK1A, VK1B,
VK1D, and VK1E, respectively) was reproducibly greater than that of the
other three strains, with VK1D being the most Na+ sensitive
of all the mutants. The most sensitive strains were also those that
were not completely complemented up to wild-type levels upon
restoration of the affected gene in trans.
Effects of expression of individual mrp genes in
trans on the Na+ resistance of VK6 and VKN1
mutant strains.
Unlike cholate resistance, which depended upon the
status of a single mrp gene, wild-type levels of
Na+ resistance clearly depended upon the status of multiple
mrp genes. Previous work had shown that expression of
mrpA from an IPTG-inducible promoter in the amyE
locus of mutant strain VK6 led to a significant increase in the
Na+ resistance as well as the 22Na+
efflux activity of that strain. VK6 has a disrupted mrpA and reduced expression of mrpB through -G
(9). No such increase in either resistance or efflux was
observed upon expression of mrpA in the mrp null
strain VKN1. We sought to assess whether MrpA is the likeliest
candidate for the Na+-translocating protein in
Mrp-dependent Na+/H+ antiport, albeit dependent
in some manner on all the other mrp gene products as well.
Each mrp gene was individually expressed in VK6
(VK6/mrpA through VK6/mrpG) and VKN1, and the MIC
of Na+ was determined pH 7.0 and 8.3. As expected from
earlier assays (9), expression of mrpA and
mrpF increased the resistance of strain VK6 to
Na+. Only mrpB expression among all the
remaining mrp genes caused a significant increase in
resistance and that was restricted to pH 7.0 (Table
3). In the mrp null strain
VKN1, no single mrp gene caused a significant, reproducible
increase in Na+ resistance (data not shown).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3.
Na+ resistance of the polar mrpA
mutant of B. subtilis strain VK6 upon expression of
individual mrpA genes
|
|
Energy-dependent efflux of 22Na+
from right-side-out membrane vesicles of B. subtilis
wild-type and selected mrp mutant strains.
Prior
studies of mrp-dependent Na+ fluxes had been
conducted on respiring whole cells, in which significant cyanide- and
protonophore-dependent inhibition was observed, especially for efflux
from cells of mutant VK1A, in which mrpA expression was
induced in trans (9). Reproducible data showing
that an imposed diffusion potential could also energize such efflux had
not been obtained in the whole-cell system. In order to further explore
an MrpA-dependent capacity for secondary Na+/H+ antiport, right-side-out membrane
vesicles of the wild-type and selected mutant strains were
assayed for MrpA- and energy-dependent 22Na+
efflux. Ascorbate-PMS was found to support significant
enhancement of the rate of 22Na+ efflux from
vesicles prepared from the wild type and from VK1A/mrpA but
only slight enhancement of efflux from the control preparations from
the null VKN1 or VK1A strains (Fig. 6).
The protonophore CCCP abolished the ascorbate-PMS-dependent efflux.
The four preparations were then examined at a range of imposed
valinomycin-mediated K+ diffusion potentials, with points
taken during the initial efflux period under each condition. The
percent 22Na+ remaining at 5 s is plotted
in Fig. 7 for each preparation as a
function of the magnitude of the imposed diffusion potential. The
difference among the preparations correlated well, especially at the
lowest diffusion potential established,
60 mV, with the ascorbate-PMS-dependent pattern. That is, Na+ efflux from
the wild type and VK1A/mrpA was significantly greater than that from VKN1 or VK1A. At higher imposed potentials, efflux via
some other transporter may be a more dominant contributor to the
observed pattern.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Ascorbate-PMS-dependent 22Na+
efflux from right-side-out membrane vesicles of wild-type B. subtilis (BD99), mrp null mutant VKN1, mrpA
mutant VK1A, and VK1A to which mrpA is restored in the
amyE locus. The vesicles were passively loaded overnight at
4°C with 5 mM 22NaCl in 100 mM potassium phosphate (pH
7.5) plus 5 mM MgSO4. For assays of Na+ efflux,
vesicles (100 µg of protein/ml) were incubated at 10°C. No further
additions were made ( ), or 10 mM potassium ascorbate plus 0.1 mM PMS
was added in the absence ( ) or presence ( ) of 10 µM CCCP.
Samples were taken at various times and rapidly filtered. The
radioactivity on the filters was measured by liquid scintillation
counting.
|
|

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Efflux of 22Na+ from
right-side-out membrane vesicles of wild-type B. subtilis
(BD99) and strains VKN1, VK1A, and VK1A/mrpA as a function
of the magnitude of an imposed potassium diffusion potential. Membrane
vesicles were loaded with 22Na+ as described in
the legend to Fig. 6 in buffer containing 100 mM potassium phosphate
and 10 µM valinomycin. These vesicles were diluted to different
extents into 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), in order to generate diffusion
potentials of different magnitudes (indicated on the bottom of the
figure). Samples were taken at 5 s after dilution and rapidly
filtered. The radioactivity was determined by scintillation counting.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The mrp operon and its homologues are widely
distributed among diverse prokaryotes and function in multiple
processes involving ion-coupled transport reactions. Thus far, only one
of these operons, the mrp operon of B. subtilis, has been shown to catalyze different transport reactions
that relate to different gene products within the operon. The
major finding of the current study is that MrpF can function in cholate
and Na+ efflux independently of any other mrp
gene product, whereas MrpA-dependent Na+/H+
antiport activity and Na+ resistance are highly dependent
upon other mrp gene products, probably requiring all six of
them. MrpA is a strong candidate for a major, if not sole, structural
gene for Mrp-encoded Na+/H+ antiport, since the
antiport activity of mrpA mutant VK1A, which has elevated
levels of all the remaining mrp genes, has low
Na+ resistance and efflux activities. In addition,
mrpA overexpression in mutant VK6 (polar) elevates the
Na+ resistance of that strain more than overexpression of
any of the other mrp genes.
We tentatively hypothesize that the Na+ efflux catalyzed by
MrpF is coupled to solute efflux (e.g., endogenous cholate-like substrate and/or exogenous cholate-like compounds) rather than being a
true Na+/H+ antiport mode of this independent
transporter. However, the assays conducted to date of MrpF-dependent
cholate and Na+ efflux have not shown that there actually
is coupling between the two substrates. In the whole cells in which the
assays have thus far been conducted, there are complications of high
contaminating Na+ levels, multiple antiporters apart from
mrp, and the potential presence of an endogenous substrate
that could substitute for preloaded cholate. Attempts to assess
coupling of cholate efflux by MrpF in vesicles from the current
B. subtilis strains were not undertaken because of their
substantial Na+/H+ antiport activities as well
as difficulties that we have had in making good everted vesicle
preparations from these strains. Future studies will attempt to clarify
the possible Na+-cholate coupling in everted vesicles from
appropriate Escherichia coli strains if, as is now
anticipated, expression of MrpF alone yields an active transporter.
Moreover, attempts will be made to identify a transport activity for
additional mrp gene products, especially MrpB and MrpC.
The basis for the MrpB-dependent increase in the
Na+ resistance of strain VK6 at pH 7.0 is of
interest. The Block+ program for motif analysis (4) does not provide
useful clues vis à vis a specific MrpB transport activity, but
indicates that MrpC has some similarities to Na+-coupled
organic acid transporters. If there were one or more additional
contributors to overall Mrp-dependent Na+ efflux, that
would explain why mrpA and mrpF mutants have
slightly but reproducibly higher Na+ resistance than the
mrp null strain VKN1 at pH 7.0. No attempt can be made to
interpret the differences in MIC at pH 8.3, since the levels of
Na+ that are toxic to the mrp mutants at that pH
are already in the range of contaminating Na+, and
thus assessments of differences are unlikely to be accurate. The
striking growth deficit of mrpA and mrpD mutants
in the absence of added Na+ at pH 8.3 might in fact reflect
a much greater Na+ sensitivity, effected by contaminating
levels, in these strains. The evident importance of
mrpD at high pH is intriguing, especially since its
overexpression does not increase the Na+- resistance of
polar mrpA strain VK6, and thus it is unlikely to be an
antiport protein itself.
The studies of MrpA-dependent Na+ efflux in the
right-side-out vesicles of VK1A/mrpA support the earlier
indication from whole-cell assays (9) that the
Na+/H+ antiporter can function as a secondary,
proton motive force-dependent antiporter. However, although not shown,
we were unable to demonstrate efflux at pH 8.0 and 8.3 in these
vesicles even though Mrp-dependent Na+ efflux in
malate-utilizing cells is clearly an important function at this pH. The
possibility of a primary coupling mode for Mrp-dependent Na+/H+ antiport, using redox energy, is
underscored by the importance and efficacy of the Mrp system in cells
at elevated pH; by the complex dependence of the antiport on multiple
mrp gene products; by the importance of MrpD at elevated pH;
and by the strong sequence similarity between several mrp
gene products
especially MrpA, MrpB, MrpE, and MrpD
to hydrophobic
subunits of energy-coupled NADH dehydrogenase and to regions of other
redox proteins (as analyzed via BLAST [1] and Block+
[4]). To explore possible primary energization, we are
undertaking studies of the Bacillus mrp operons
expressed in various E. coli strains. If a redox-dependent activity and complex formation are supported, it will be important to
identify the electron donors and acceptors which would facilitate any
subsequent efforts to study a purified Mrp complex.
Another final set of observations of interest in the current study
emerge from the Northern analyses. Evidently, deletion of any of the
mrp genes results in a significant increase in
mrp expression, with the effect being somewhat smaller in
mrpC and mrpF mutants. A simple interpretation
would be that a rise in cytoplasmic Na+ leads to the
overexpression. Even if correct, there are many features left to
elucidate, including the basis for the difference between the effect in
mrpC and mrpF mutant strains as well as the
elements and mechanism of the putative regulatory effect. Another
finding that will merit further exploration is that expression of
maeN, which encodes an Na+-malate symporter, is
partially coordinated with expression of mrp except that its
basal expression is much greater and lower rather than greater levels
of maeN RNA are observed in the mrpA mutant VK1A.
The greatly reduced levels of maeN RNA in the VK1A strain
may reflect disruption of some feature in the regulatory interaction
between maeN and mrp that is lost during
construction of the mrpA deletion. The regulatory coupling
of maeN and mrp suggests the importance under at
least some growth conditions of coordinating a full Na+
cycle. Such a cycle would encompass Na+/malate symport and
Na+ reextrusion in exchange for H+ and also
coupled to (MrpF-dependent) efflux of external chaotropes (e.g.,
cholate) and perhaps additional metabolic by-products. Under alkaline
pH conditions, such an Na+-coupled cycle could be
particularly important for achieving both substrate uptake and
cytoplasmic pH regulation, and its efficacy would be enhanced if a
primary, redox-coupled energization option existed for one or more of
the efflux activities.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported in part by research grants
DE-FG02-86ER13559 from the Department of Energy and GM28454 from
the National Institute of General Medical Sciences to T.A.K. and from
the Inoue Enryo Memorial Foundation for Promoting Science to M.I.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Box 1020, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mount Sinai School of
Medicine, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029. Phone: (212)
241-7280. Fax: (212) 996-7214. E-mail:
terry.krulwich{at}mssm.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Altschul, S. F.,
W. Gish,
W. Miller,
E. F. Myers, and D. J. Lipman.
1990.
Basic local alignment search tool.
J. Mol. Biol.
215:403-410[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Dimari, J. F., and D. Bechhofer.
1991.
Initiation of mRNA decay in Bacillus subtilis.
Mol. Microbiol.
7:705-717.
|
| 3.
|
Hamamoto, T.,
M. Hashimoto,
M. Hino,
M. Kitada,
Y. Seto,
T. Kudo, and K. Horikoshi.
1994.
Characterization of a gene responsible for the Na+/H+ antiporter system of alkalophilic Bacillus species strain C-125.
Mol. Microbiol.
14:939-946[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Henikoff, S., and J. G. Henikoff.
1994.
Protein family classification based on searching a database of blocks.
Genomics
19:97-107[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Henner, D. J.
1990.
Inducible expression of regulatory genes in Bacillus subtilis.
Methods Enzymol.
185:223-228[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Hiramatsu, T.,
K. Kodama,
T. Kuroda,
T. Mizushima, and T. Tsuchiya.
1998.
A putative multisubunit Na+/H+ antiporter from Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Bacteriol.
180:6442-6448.
|
| 7.
|
Horton, R. M.
1996.
In vitro recombination and mutagenesis of DNA.
Methods Mol. Biol.
67:141-149.
|
| 8.
|
Ireton, D. D.,
Z. Rudner,
K. J. Siranosian, and A. D. Grossman.
1993.
Integration of multiple developmental signals in Bacillus subtilis through Spo0A transcription factor.
Genes Dev.
7:283-294[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Ito, M.,
A. A. Guffanti,
B. Oudega, and T. A. Krulwich.
1999.
mrp, a multigene, multifunctional locus in Bacillus subtilis with roles in resistance to cholate and to Na+ and in pH homeostasis.
J. Bacteriol.
181:2394-2402[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Jack, D. L,
M. L. Storms,
J. H. Tchieu,
I. T. Paulsen, and M. H. Saier, Jr.
2000.
A broad-specificity multidrug efflux pump requiring a pair of homologous SMR-type proteins.
J. Bacteriol.
182:2311-2313[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Kaback, H. R.
1971.
Bacterial membranes.
Methods Enzymol.
22:99-120.
|
| 12.
|
Kosono, S.,
S. Morotomi,
M. Kitada, and T. Kudo.
1999.
Analyses of a Bacillus subtilis homologue of the Na+/H+ antiporter gene which is important for pH homeostasis of alkaliphilic Bacillus sp. C-125.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1409:171-175[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Kosono, S.,
Y. Ohashi,
F. Kawamura,
M. Kitada, and T. Kudo.
2000.
Function of a principal Na+/H+ antiporter, ShaA, is required for initiation of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis.
J. Bacteriol.
182:898-904[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Krulwich, T. A.,
A. A. Guffanti, and M. Ito.
1999.
pH tolerance in Bacillus: alkaliphiles vs non-alkaliphiles, p. 167-182.
In
D. J. Chadwick, and G. Cardew (ed.), Bacterial responses to pH. Wiley, Chichester, England.
|
| 15.
|
Krulwich, T. A.,
M. Ito,
R. Gilmour,
D. B. Hicks, and A. A. Guffanti.
1998.
Energetics of alkaliphilic Bacillus species: physiology and molecules.
Adv. Microb. Physiol.
40:410-438.
|
| 16.
|
Kudo, T.,
M. Hino,
M. Kitada, and K. Horikoshi.
1990.
DNA sequences required for the alkalophily of Bacillus sp. strain C-125 are located close together on its chromosomal DNA.
J. Bacteriol.
172:7282-7283[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Lowry, O. H.,
N. J. Rosebrough,
A. L. Farr, and R. J. Randall.
1951.
Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.
J. Biol. Chem.
193:205-275[Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Masaoka, Y.,
Y. Ueno,
Y. Morita,
T. Kuroda,
T. Mizushima, and T. Tsuchiya.
2000.
A two-component multidrug efflux pump, EbrAB, in Bacillus subtilis.
J. Bacteriol.
182:2307-2310[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Murphy, E.,
L. Huwyler, and M. D. D. Bastos.
1985.
Transposon Tn554: complete nucleotide sequence and isolation of transposition defective and antibiotic-sensitive mutants.
EMBO J.
4:3357-3365[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Padan, E., and T. A. Krulwich.
2000.
Sodium stress, p. 117-130.
In
G. Storz, and R. Hengge-Aronis (ed.), Bacterial stress responses. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
|
| 21.
|
Putnoky, P.,
A. Kerezt,
T. Nakamura,
G. Endre,
E. Grosskopf,
P. Kiss, and A. Kondorosi.
1998.
The pha cluster of Rhizobium meliloti involved in pH adaptation and symbiosis encodes a novel type of K+ efflux system.
Mol. Microbiol.
28:1091-1101[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Journal of Bacteriology, October 2000, p. 5663-5670, Vol. 182, No. 20
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Morino, M., Natsui, S., Swartz, T. H., Krulwich, T. A., Ito, M.
(2008). Single Gene Deletions of mrpA to mrpG and mrpE Point Mutations Affect Activity of the Mrp Na+/H+ Antiporter of Alkaliphilic Bacillus and Formation of Hetero-Oligomeric Mrp Complexes. J. Bacteriol.
190: 4162-4172
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kajiyama, Y., Otagiri, M., Sekiguchi, J., Kosono, S., Kudo, T.
(2007). Complex Formation by the mrpABCDEFG Gene Products, Which Constitute a Principal Na+/H+ Antiporter in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol.
189: 7511-7514
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Swartz, T. H., Ito, M., Ohira, T., Natsui, S., Hicks, D. B., Krulwich, T. A.
(2007). Catalytic Properties of Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus Members of the Secondary Cation/Proton Antiporter-3 (Mrp) Family Are Revealed by an Optimized Assay in an Escherichia coli Host. J. Bacteriol.
189: 3081-3090
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Fang, G., Rocha, E., Danchin, A.
(2005). How Essential Are Nonessential Genes?. Mol Biol Evol
22: 2147-2156
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kosono, S., Haga, K., Tomizawa, R., Kajiyama, Y., Hatano, K., Takeda, S., Wakai, Y., Hino, M., Kudo, T.
(2005). Characterization of a Multigene-Encoded Sodium/Hydrogen Antiporter (Sha) from Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Its Involvement in Pathogenesis. J. Bacteriol.
187: 5242-5248
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Blanco-Rivero, A., Leganes, F., Fernandez-Valiente, E., Calle, P., Fernandez-Pinas, F.
(2005). mrpA, a gene with roles in resistance to Na+ and adaptation to alkaline pH in the cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. PCC7120. Microbiology
151: 1671-1682
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pomati, F., Burns, B. P., Neilan, B. A.
(2004). Identification of an Na+-Dependent Transporter Associated with Saxitoxin-Producing Strains of the Cyanobacterium Anabaena circinalis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
70: 4711-4719
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ito, M., Xu, H., Guffanti, A. A., Wei, Y., Zvi, L., Clapham, D. E., Krulwich, T. A.
(2004). The voltage-gated Na+ channel NaVBP has a role in motility, chemotaxis, and pH homeostasis of an alkaliphilic Bacillus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
101: 10566-10571
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Doan, T., Servant, P., Tojo, S., Yamaguchi, H., Lerondel, G., Yoshida, K.-I., Fujita, Y., Aymerich, S.
(2003). The Bacillus subtilis ywkA gene encodes a malic enzyme and its transcription is activated by the YufL/YufM two-component system in response to malate. Microbiology
149: 2331-2343
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gardan, R., Cossart, P., The European Listeria Genome Consortium,, , Labadie, J.
(2003). Identification of Listeria monocytogenes Genes Involved in Salt and Alkaline-pH Tolerance. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
69: 3137-3143
[Abstract]
[Full Text]