Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, October 2000, p. 5700-5705, Vol. 182, No. 20
Unité de Bactériologie
Moléculaire et Médicale1 and
Laboratoire de Génomique des Microorganismes
Pathogènes,4 Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris
Cedex 15, France; Department of Microbiology and Immunology,
Health Sciences Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West
Virginia 26506-91772; and Pittsburgh
Bacteriophage Institute and Department of Biological Sciences,
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
152603
Received 16 May 2000/Accepted 24 July 2000
We have discovered that LE1, one of the plaque-forming phages
previously described as lytic for the Leptospira biflexa
saprophytic spirochete (I. Saint Girons, D. Margarita, P. Amouriaux,
and G. Baranton, Res. Microbiol. 141:1131-1138, 1990), was indeed
temperate. LE1 was found to be unusual, as Southern blot analysis
indicated that it is one of the few phages to replicate in the prophage state as a circular plasmid. The unavailability of such small endogenous replicons has hindered genetic experimentation in
Leptospira. We have developed a shuttle vector with DNA
derived from LE1. Random LE1 DNA fragments were cloned into a pGEM
7Zf(+) derivative devoid of most of the bla gene but
carrying a kanamycin resistance marker from the gram-positive bacterium
Enterococcus (Streptococcus) faecalis. These constructs were transformed into L. biflexa strain Patoc 1 by electroporation, giving rise to
kanamycin-resistant transformants. A 2.2-kb fragment from LE1 was
responsible for replication of the vector in L. biflexa.
However, a larger region including an intact parA gene
homologue was necessary for the stability of the shuttle vector. Direct
repeats and AT-rich regions characterized the LE1 origin of
replication. Our data indicate that the replicon derived from the LE1
leptophage, together with the kanamycin resistance gene, is a promising
tool with which to develop the genetics of Leptospira species.
Temperate bacteriophages, in
contrast to virulent phages, can lysogenize their bacterial hosts. Most
of these temperate phages integrate their DNA into host DNA. Some
phages such as P1 and N15 are unusual in that they behave like a
plasmid in the prophage state (12, 19).
The genus Leptospira belongs to the order
Spirochaetales and is composed of both pathogenic and
saprophytic species (10). 16S RNA analysis indicates that
this phylum of eubacteria has a deep branching lineage (26).
Few genetic tools are available for spirochetes (20);
however, isolation of phage particles has been reported over the last
10 years. A transducing phage was recently used for developing the
genetics of Brachyspira (Serpulina) hyodysenteriae (11). Numerous linear and circular
plasmids are found in Borrelia burgdorferi, and one of them,
a circular cp32 plasmid, was identified as a bacteriophage
(8). An endogenous plasmid from Treponema
denticola was engineered as a shuttle vector (5), while
a broad-host-range plasmid was developed as a cloning vector for
B. burgdorferi (23).
No plasmid had been found to be part of the Leptospira spp.
genome, which is composed of two chromosomes (CI and CII)
(27). The only available potential genetic tools consist of
plaque-forming bacteriophages (LE1, LE3, and LE4) which were isolated
from sewage water (21). These bacteriophages do not infect
representative species of pathogenic Leptospira spp., and
their host range is restricted to strain Patoc 1 (Pasteur Institute) of
the Leptospira biflexa saprophytic species (21).
Here we show that LE1 is a temperate phage which behaves like a plasmid
within its host. We then cloned and characterized, at the nucleotide
level, the region of the origin of replication of the LE1 genome. The
L. biflexa-Escherichia coli shuttle vector thus constructed
contains replication functions of the LE1 leptophage and a gene for
antibiotic resistance to kanamycin from the gram-positive bacterium
Enterococcus faecalis. It represents the first demonstration
of DNA entry within Leptospira and is a stepping stone
towards the development of the genetics of Leptospira species.
(This work represents a portion of a thesis submitted by Pascale Bourhy
to the University of Paris VII for a Ph.D. degree.)
Bacterial strains and media.
The
Leptospira strains (Reference National Center, Institut
Pasteur, Paris, France) used in this study are as follows: (i) L. biflexa serovar patoc strain Patoc 1 and Leptospira
meyeri serovar semaranga strain Veldrat Semarang 173 (18), which belong to saprophytic species, and (ii)
Leptospira interrogans serovar icterohaemorrhagiae strain
Verdun, Leptospira inadai serovar lyme strain Lyme 10, and
Leptospira fainei serovar hurstbridge strain BU T6, which
belong to pathogenic species. The LE1 lysogens of L. biflexa
strain Patoc 1 were called 3c and 6c. Leptospira strains were grown in EMJH medium (9, 13). Solid EMJH medium was prepared at a concentration of 1.1% agar. E. coli JM 109 (Promega) and XL10-Gold (Stratagene) competent strains were used for
the propagation of plasmids and for cloning experiments, respectively. E. coli strains were grown in LB (22). Mitomycin
C (Sigma) was used at a concentration from 1 to 100 ng/ml;
isopropyl- Phage purification and DNA extraction.
Large quantities of
high-titer lysates of LE1 leptophage were produced by infection of
exponentially growing L. biflexa strain Patoc 1 cells with a
multiplicity of infection of 0.01 as described previously
(21). Titer was determined by the soft agar overlay method
(0.8% agar-0.23% EMJH base) (Difco) (21). Phage DNA was extracted three times with phenol, followed by ethanol precipitation.
Cloning of the phage origin of replication.
The pGEMK
plasmid vector, used in this study, was constructed by replacing the
ampicillin cassette with the kanamycin resistance cassette (in the same
orientation) as follows. The kanamycin cassette (1,060 bp) derived from
Enterococcus (Streptococcus) faecalis (24) was amplified with pAT21 as the template and the two
primers 5'-ATCGGCTCCGTCGATACTAT-3' and
5'-GTAGTCTCATACCTGTCAACGCCTACAT-3' (Eurogentec).
PfuTurbo DNA polymerase (Stratagene) was used according to
the manufacturer's specifications. Most of the bla gene
conferring ampicillin resistance (from the ScaI site to the
BsaAI site) from pGEM 7Zf(+) (Promega) was thus replaced by
the kanamycin cassette, giving rise to pGEMK.
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
The LE1 Bacteriophage Replicates as a Plasmid
within Leptospira biflexa: Construction of an L. biflexa-Escherichia coli Shuttle Vector
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG) was used at a
concentration of 0.5 mM; 3-indolyl-
-D-galactopyranoside (X-Gal) was used at 80 µg/ml; and ampicillin, tobramycin, and kanamycin were used at concentrations of 100, 20, and 50 µg/ml, respectively.
Electroporation.
A notable feature of the electroporation
method for Leptospira is the temperature of 20°C for
washing the cells (as with electroporation of Lactobacillus
spp. [14]), instead of the usual 4°C and the use of
water instead of an electroporation buffer. Briefly, 50 ml of a
log-phase culture of L. biflexa strain Patoc 1 (2 × 108 to 5 × 108 cells per ml) was pelleted
at 4,000 × g for 20 min at 20°C, washed twice with a
half volume of sterile, deionized water (for an injectable preparation,
pH 6, B. Braun), resuspended with 200 µl of water (final volume, 300 µl), and used immediately. Fifty microliters of cell suspension
(4 × 109 cells) was mixed with 10 to 2,000 ng of
plasmid DNA (in 5 µl of water), kept at 4°C for 10 min, and then
transferred to a 0.2-cm-diameter ice-cold electroporation cuvette
(Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, Calif.) at 4°C. One pulse was
delivered from a gene pulser with a Pulse controller (set at 1.8 [or
2.5] kV, 25 µF, and 200
, producing a time constant of 4.5 ms;
Bio-Rad). One milliliter of EMJH liquid medium was immediately added to
the cuvette, and the cells were transferred to a 20-ml culture tube.
Cultures were incubated at 30°C for 24 to 48 h with shaking in
the absence of selection. Then 500 µl was plated (in duplicate), in
solid EMJH medium with kanamycin (EMJK), with a soft agar overlay
(0.8% agar-0.23% EMJH base). Plates were incubated for 4 to 6 days
at 30°C. A survival curve was performed by plating the cells before
and after electroporation on solid EMJH. A survival rate of 0.1 to 1%
was obtained. Plasmid DNA was extracted from Kanr L. biflexa cultures by the alkaline lysis method using the Wizard Plus Maxipreps DNA purification system (Promega).
Stability of shuttle vectors within Leptospira. Kanr Leptospira cells were grown in EMJH liquid medium with no selective pressure (dilution, 1/10 for 24 h at 30°C). Another 1/100 dilution was grown in fresh antibiotic-free EMJH medium for an additional 48 h. This last procedure was repeated twice. Cells were plated onto EMJH agar plates without antibiotic, and colonies were transferred onto plates with and without kanamycin. The percentage of resistant cells after 18 generations was determined.
PFGE and Southern blotting.
Previously described procedures
were used for the preparation of high-molecular-weight genomic DNA,
restriction endonuclease digestions in situ, pulsed-field gel
electrophoresis (PFGE), Southern blotting, and DNA hybridization
(6). PFGE was performed in a contour-clamped homogeneous
electric field DRII apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories). A program with a
ramping from 2 to 15 s for 20 h at 200 V was used for the
separations. Fragment sizes were determined by comparison of band
mobilities with those of bacteriophage
DNA multimers (monomer, 44.3 kb) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosomes (Bio-Rad
Laboratories). The [
-33P]dATP labeling of the LE1
probe (digested by HindIII) was performed with a
Megaprime kit (Amersham). Hybridizations were carried out for 18 h
at 68°C.
DNA sequencing and sequence analysis. DNA sequencing was performed as described previously (3). Nucleic acid and deduced amino acid sequences were analyzed by using BLAST software (National Center for Biotechnology Information) and programs from the Genetics Computer Group software package.
Nucleotide sequence accession number. The GenBank accession number of the nucleotide sequence of the replication origin of LE1 is AF 261714.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
LE1 lysogenizes L. biflexa strain Patoc 1. The lysogenic states of the three previously isolated leptophages (LE1, LE3, and LE4) were reevaluated. Plaques obtained with LE3 and LE4 at days 3 and 4 after infection of L. biflexa strain Patoc 1 were clear, while those obtained with LE1 were slightly turbid. Clones isolated from the center of 14 turbid plaques obtained with LE1 were found to be resistant to superinfection by LE1 but were sensitive to LE3 and LE4. Lysogeny has the property of producing phage either spontaneously or in some cases after induction. In order to discriminate between phage-resistant clones and lysogens, we tested phage production by the 14 clones. All were found to spontaneously produce phage particles. Clone 6c was examined in detail. This clone produced phage at a level of approximately 1,000 PFU per ml after 3 days in culture. In addition, LE1 phage was found to be inducible, with a maximum yield of 108 PFU/ml from clone 6c using mitomycin C at 10 ng/ml. It was concluded that LE1 is a temperate phage but that LE3 and LE4 are lytic.
LE1 replicates as a circular plasmid.
We determined whether
LE1 leptophage DNA is inserted into the genome or whether it replicates
as a plasmid. Restriction fragments produced following digestion of DNA
from the lysogens were separated by PFGE and probed with labeled LE1
DNA. Results representative of three independent experiments are shown
in Fig. 1. DNAs from the L. biflexa lysogens 3c and 6c, which either had not been digested or
had been digested with NotI, gave a strong signal in the
wells and a faint signal at 70 kb. DNAs from the L. biflexa
lysogens 3c and 6c digested with SgrAI gave a faint signal
in the wells and a strong signal at 70 kb, in agreement with the
migration of the virion DNA, indicative of linearity (21).
No signal was obtained with control leptospiral DNA. A likely
explanation is that LE1 DNA, originating from the lysogen, is a
supercoiled circular molecule which is trapped in the well of the
agarose gel when it is unrestricted. One can conclude that LE1 is not
integrated into the L. biflexa genome but that it behaves
like an autonomous replicon of 70 kb.
|
DNA transfer into L. biflexa by electrotransformation. Knowing that other spirochetes could be transformed by electroporation (for a review, see reference 20), we assumed that electroporation would be a likely technique for introducing DNA into Leptospira spp. The strategy consisted of two steps. First, we cloned LE1 DNA fragments into a plasmid vector with the aim of selecting the replication origin of the LE1 leptophage DNA. The vector plasmid chosen (pGEMK; see Materials and Methods) had an E. coli origin of replication and harbored a kanamycin resistance cassette from a gram-positive bacterium (24). Second, electroporation of L. biflexa strain Patoc 1 with selection for kanamycin resistance was performed. A set of 26 recombinant plasmids which represents twice the LE1 genome was thus constructed by cloning LE1 partial restriction fragments (mean size of 5 kb). This set of 26 recombinant plasmids was used as a mixture to transform L. biflexa strain Patoc 1 by electroporation. The transformants obtained were resistant to kanamycin and sensitive to tobramycin, indicating that they were not spontaneous mutants but bona fide transformants. Reelectrotranformation of L. biflexa with a plasmid extracted from Kanr L. biflexa cells also yielded Kanr transformants. Plasmid DNAs extracted from several Kanr L. biflexa transformants and analyzed after amplification in E. coli showed identical restriction profiles. One of the recombinant plasmids (pGKLep1) was further analyzed. Plasmid pGKLep1, isolated from the transformants, appeared to be identical by restriction analysis to one of the original 26 recombinant input plasmids that carried a 5.2-kb-long fragment from LE1 DNA. Electrotransformation of L. biflexa with pGKLep1 was quite efficient and gave reproducible results, yielding 100,000 transformants per µg of DNA. The number of transformants was found to be proportional to DNA concentrations up to 10 ng.
A shuttle vector with the LE1 origin of replication. We showed that pGKLep1, a recombinant plasmid carrying 5.2 kb from the 70-kb LE1 leptophage DNA, could shuttle between L. biflexa and E. coli. This result indicates that pGKLep1 contains the origin replication of the LE1 leptophage, which allows replication of the plasmid within L. biflexa strain Patoc 1. The capacity of pGKLep1 to replicate in other species of Leptospira was analyzed. The strain Veldrat Semarang 173 serovar semaranga from L. meyeri, another saprophytic species, was found to be transformable by pGKLep1. However, attempts to transform three strains belonging to three different pathogenic species, L. interrogans, L. inadai, and L. fainei, were unsuccessful.
We determined whether a DNA fragment shorter than 5.2 kb was sufficient for replication within L. biflexa. A restriction endonuclease map of pGKLep1 allowed us to locate sites for ClaI, MluI, BamHI, and SacI. Restriction fragments were then subcloned and yielded pGKLep2 to pGKLep5 (Fig. 2). Electrotransformation of L. biflexa was performed with the latter recombinant plasmids. Only plasmid pGKLep4 with a SacI-BamHI 2.2-kb-long insert retained the ability to replicate in L. biflexa (Fig. 2). Southern blots of DNA extracted from L. biflexa transformed (either with pGKLep1 or with pGKLep4) with pGKLep1 as a probe confirm that both pGKLep1 and pGKLep4 replicate as autonomous plasmids (Fig. 3). Stability analyses of pGKLep1 and pGKLep4 were performed by diluting L. biflexa transformants in antibiotic-free medium and then testing for antibiotic resistance after 18 generations. While 99% of the leptospiral cells transformed with pGKLep1 were still Kanr after 18 generations, only 40% of the leptospiral cells transformed with pGKLep4 were still Kanr after 18 generations. The instability of pGKLep4 versus the stability of pGKLep1 was confirmed twice.
|
|
Sequence analysis of the LE1 origin of replication region.
We
have determined the sequence of the Sau3A 5.2-kb-long
fragment from LE1 responsible for replication in L. biflexa
(Fig. 4). The replication region of
pGKLep1 contains five possible open reading frames (ORFs) (Fig. 4A)
with no detectable homology at the nucleotide level with DNA sequences
from the public databases. However, the amino acid sequence of Orf2
exhibits 31% identity with an immunity repressor protein from the
Bacillus subtilis temperate bacteriophage
105. In
addition, the amino acid sequence of Orf3 shows homologies with the
ParA protein (up to 30% identity with ParAs from a wide variety of
bacteria, including the spirochete B. burgdorferi), which is
involved in the partitioning of low-copy-number plasmids
(22).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Genetic tools for spirochetes were scarce and nonexistent for the genus Leptospira. Until now, no small replicon had been isolated from Leptospira. However, LE1, one of the leptophages found at first to be lytic for L. biflexa (21), was shown on closer analysis to be temperate. This property led to our search for integration of the 70-kb-long LE1 DNA into the L. biflexa genome. No integration was found; rather, LE1 was found to replicate like a plasmid within L. biflexa. This property renders the LE1 leptophage similar to coliphages P1 and N15 (which is linear), both of which replicate as autonomous replicons (12, 19). Recently, a B. burgdorferi phage which also replicates as a circular plasmid has been described (8).
Since LE1 replicates as a plasmid, the next step was to isolate its origin of replication. Its isolation relied on the introduction of DNA into Leptospira. Previous attempts to electrotransform Leptospira strains from diverse pathogenic species with broad-host-range plasmids had failed (C. Baril, J. L. Herrmann, and I. Saint Girons, unpublished). To maximize our chances of detecting electrotransformation of Leptospira, we addressed two major issues. The first was the availability of a leptospiral replication origin, which was resolved by using the origin from leptophage LE1. The second was the choice of a selection marker. This was resolved by using an antibiotic resistance cassette from a gram-positive bacterium (Enterococcus faecalis). This marker was chosen for three reasons. First, the known sequences of Leptospira spp. genes are more similar to gene sequences from gram-positive than from gram-negative bacteria (2); second, the 30% GC content of Enterococcus faecalis is similar to that of Leptospira (34 to 39%); and third, the 3'5"-aminoglycoside phosphotransferase conferred resistance to kanamycin but not to tobramycin, a property which allowed distinction of transformants from spontaneous Kanr mutants which are also tobramycin resistant. We hypothesized that this kanamycin cassette would likely be expressed in Leptospira species. In addition, we had deleted the bla gene from the original plasmid pGEM 7Zf(+) (Promega), since penicillin derivatives are used to treat leptospirosis.
We thus reported for the first time the construction of an L. biflexa-E. coli shuttle vector with the following characteristics: (i) an E. coli origin of replication, (ii) a kanamycin cassette from Enterococcus faecalis, and (iii) a 2.2-kb fragment from LE1 leptophage DNA which contains its origin of replication. This shuttle vector, pGKLep4, could shuttle by electrotransformation between E. coli and L. biflexa and by regular transformation between L. biflexa and E. coli. The efficiency of electroporation of L. biflexa and L. meyeri (two saprophytic species) by pGKLep1, comprising the origin of replication region of the LE1 leptophage, is quite efficient when its electroporation efficiency is compared to the low electroporation efficiencies of other spirochetes with replicons derived from broad-host-range plasmids that need micrograms of DNA for electroporation (5, 23). However, no extrachromosomal replication of pGKLep1 has been demonstrated for representatives of three pathogenic Leptospira species. This may be due to several causes: (i) a replication origin unrecognized by these different species, (ii) a low electroporation efficiency, and (iii) the presence of restriction enzymes (D. E. A. Boursaux, unpublished data, 1996). Further studies will be needed to extend DNA transfer to all species of Leptospira.
The 2.2-kb fragment of LE1 necessary for replication has several features that are common to plasmid replication origins. These features include both AT-rich regions and direct repeats. In addition, the COOH terminus of a ParA homologue (Orf3) is also present in pGKLep4, further suggesting that this region functions as the LE1 replication origin. Indeed, in P1 and P7 bacteriophages, the partitioning operon, consisting of the parA and parB genes, is adjacent to the replication origin (1, 17) and a soj or parA homologue is found near the oriC region of many bacterial chromosomes (16). Both ParA and ParB are required for plasmid stability (25). All bacterial ParA-like proteins share a specific version of the Walker A motif for ATP binding (15), which facilitates their recognition. In contrast, sequence homology among ParB homologues can be more difficult to discern. In pGKLep1, we found Orf4, 134 bp downstream of the parA homologue and transcribed in the same direction. Orf4 has no significant similarity to genes of other bacteria but is located in an arrangement suggestive of the parB counterpart of a parA-parB operon (25). Along the same lines, such a genetic organization, with a parA homologue and an adjacent ORF of unknown function (both transcribed in the same direction and of sizes similar to those of Orf3 and Orf4 of pGKLep1), was also found in the numerous B. burgdorferi plasmids (4, 17a). The high stability of pGKLep1 suggests that the plasmid partition system is complete within the 5.2-kb fragment from LE1. In contrast, the low stability of pGKLep4 in L. biflexa may be due to an incomplete partitioning system, consisting of only the 3'-terminal fragment of the parA homologue.
The perspectives of the availability of a shuttle vector for the genus Leptospira supplies researchers with a genetic tool for mutagenesis, complementation of mutants, regulation of gene expression, and heterologous expression of genes from other spirochetes.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
The Institut Pasteur supported this work. Sabbatical leaves from West Virginia University, Morgantown, are acknowledged for N. Charon (supported by Public Health Service grant AI29743) in I. Saint Girons's and R. Hendrix's laboratories and D. Yelton (supported by USDA grant CRIS 0162600) in I. Saint Girons's laboratory. M. Picardeau thanks the Foundation de France for financial support (Prix Jacques Monod).
We thank F. Brossier for the gift of the pAT21 plasmid and the corresponding oligonucleotides; A. Labigne, C. Wandersman, A. Fouet, and P. Trieu-Cuot for helpful discussions; and G. Baranton, C. Werts, and A. Brenot for their constant interest in this work.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Unité de Bactériologie Moléculaire et Médicale, Institut Pasteur, 25 rue du docteur Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France. Phone: 33 1 45 68 83 66. Fax: 33 1 40 61 30 01. E-mail: isgirons{at}pasteur.fr.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Abeles, A. L., S. A. Friedman, and S. J. Austin. 1985. Partition of unit-copy miniplasmids to daughter cells. III. The DNA sequence and functional organization of the P1 partition region. J. Mol. Biol. 185:261-272[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 2. | Baril, C., C. Richaud, E. Fournié, G. Baranton, and I. Saint Girons. 1992. Cloning of dapD, aroD and asd of Leptospira interrogans serovar icterohaemorrhagiae, and nucleotide sequence of the asd gene. J. Gen. Microbiol. 138:47-53[Medline]. |
| 3. |
Buchrieser, C.,
C. Rusniok,
L. Frangeul,
E. Couve,
A. Billault,
F. Kunst,
E. Carniel, and P. Glaser.
1999.
The 102-kilobase pgm locus of Yersinia pestis: Sequence analysis and comparison of selected regions among different Yersinia pestis and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis strains.
Infect. Immun.
67:4851-4861 |
| 4. | Casjens, S., N. Palmer, R. van Vugt, W. M. Huang, B. Stevenson, P. Rosa, R. Lathigra, G. Sutton, J. Peterson, R. J. Dodson, D. Haft, E. Hickey, M. Gwinn, O. White, and C. Fraser. 2000. A bacterial genome in flux: the twelve linear and nine circular extrachromosomal DNAs in an infectious isolate of the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. Mol. Microbiol. 35:490-516[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 5. |
Chi, B.,
S. Chauhan, and H. K. Kuramitsu.
1999.
Development of a system for expressing heterologous genes in the oral spirochete Treponema denticola and its use in expression of the Treponema pallidum flaA gene.
Infect. Immun.
67:3653-3656 |
| 6. |
Davidson, B. E.,
J. MacDougall, and I. Saint Girons.
1992.
Physical map of the linear chromosome of the bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi 212, a causative agent of Lyme disease, and localization of rRNA genes.
J. Bacteriol.
174:3766-3774 |
| 7. |
DelSolar, G.,
R. Giraldo,
M. Ruiz-Echevarria,
M. Espinosa, and R. Diaz-Orejas.
1998.
Replication and control of circular bacterial plasmids.
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
62:434-464 |
| 8. |
Eggers, C. H., and D. S. Samuels.
1999.
Molecular evidence for a new bacteriophage of Borrelia burgdorferi.
J. Bacteriol.
181:7308-7313 |
| 9. | Ellinghausen, H. C., and W. G. McCullough. 1965. Nutrition of Leptospira pomona and growth of 13 other serotypes: fractionation of oleic albumin complex and medium bovine albumin and polysorbate 80. Am. J. Vet. Res. 26:45-51[Medline]. |
| 10. | Faine, S., B. Adler, C. Bolin, and P. Perolat. 1999. Leptospira and leptospirosis, 2nd ed. Medisci, Melbourne, Australia. |
| 11. |
Humphrey, S. B.,
T. B. Stanton,
N. S. Jensen, and R. L. Zuerner.
1997.
Purification and characterization of VSH-1, a generalized transducing bacteriophage of Serpulina hyodysenteriae.
J. Bacteriol.
179:323-329 |
| 12. | Ikeda, H., and J.-I. Tomizawa. 1968. Prophage P1, an extrachromosomal replication unit. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 33:791-798[Medline]. |
| 13. |
Johnson, R. C., and V. G. Harris.
1967.
Differentiation of pathogenic and saprophytic Leptospires. I. Growth at low temperatures.
J. Bacteriol.
94:27-31 |
| 14. | Josson, K., T. Scheirlinck, F. Michiels, C. Platteeuw, P. Stanssens, H. Joos, P. Dhaese, M. Zabeau, and J. Mahillon. 1989. Characterization of a gram-positive broad host range plasmid isolated from Lactobacillus hilgardii. Plasmid 21:9-20[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 15. | Koonin, E. V. 1993. A superfamily of ATPases with diverse functions containing either classical or deviant ATP-binding motif. J. Mol. Biol. 229:1165-1174[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 16. | Lin, D., and A. Grossman. 1998. Identification and characterization of a bacterial chromosome partitioning site. Cell 92:675-685[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 17. | Ludkte, D. N., B. G. Eichorn, and S. J. Austin. 1989. Plasmid-partition functions of the P7 prophage. J. Mol. Biol. 209:393-406[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 17a. | Picardeau, M., J. R. Lobry, and B. J. Hinnebusch. Analyzing DNA strand compositional asymmetry to identify candidate replication origins of Borrelia burgdorferi linear and circular plasmids. Genome Res., in press. |
| 18. | Postic, D., N. Riquelme-Sertour, F. Merien, P. Perolat, and G. Baranton. 2000. Interest of partial rDNA gene sequences to resolve heterogeneities between Leptospira collections: application to L. meyeri. Res. Microbiol. 151:333-341[Medline]. |
| 19. | Ravin, V. K., and M. G. Shulga. 1970. Evidence for extrachromosomal location of prophage N15. Virology 40:800-807[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 20. | Rosa, P., B. Stevenson, and K. Tilly. 1999. Genetic methods in Borrelia and other spirochetes. Methods Microbiol. 29:209-227. |
| 21. | Saint Girons, I., D. Margarita, P. Amouriaux, and G. Baranton. 1990. First isolation of bacteriophages for a spirochaete: potential genetic tools for Leptospira. Res. Microbiol. 141:1131-1138[Medline]. |
| 22. | Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 23. |
Sartakova, M.,
E. Dobrikova, and F. C. Cabello.
2000.
Development of an extrachromosomal cloning vector system for use in Borrelia burgdorferi.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97:4850-4855 |
| 24. | Trieu-Cuot, P., and P. Courvalin. 1983. Nucleotide sequence of the Streptococcus faecalis plasmid gene encoding the 3'5"-aminoglycoside phosphotransferase type III. Gene 23:331-341[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 25. | Williams, D., and C. Thomas. 1992. Active partitioning of bacterial plasmids. J. Gen. Microbiol. 138:1-16[Medline]. |
| 26. |
Woese, C. R.
1987.
Bacterial evolution.
Microbiol. Rev.
51:221-271 |
| 27. |
Zuerner, R. L.,
J. L. Herrmann, and I. Saint Girons.
1993.
Comparison of genetic maps for two Leptospira interrogans serovars provides evidence for two chromosomes and intraspecies heterogeneity.
J. Bacteriol.
175:5445-5451 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Appl. Environ. Microbiol. | Infect. Immun. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|---|---|
| Mol. Cell. Biol. | J. Virol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. |
| ALL ASM JOURNALS |