Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, October 2000, p. 5922-5924, Vol. 182, No. 20
E9916 INSERM, Faculté de
Médecine
Received 15 May 2000/Accepted 6 July 2000
Conjugational crosses trigger SOS induction in Escherichia
coli F The SOS response is a set of
cellular responses induced by the exposure of bacterial cells to a
variety of genotoxic and metabolic stresses which generally interfere
with DNA replication (3, 10, 16). Regulation of the SOS
system is mediated by the LexA and RecA proteins. LexA acts as a
repressor of about 30 genes, including recA and
lexA. The SOS-inducing signal is single-strand DNA, to which
RecA binds and becomes activated as a coprotease (RecA*). RecA*
promotes proteolytic self-cleavage of the LexA repressor and of some
phage repressors, such as Strong SOS induction occurs in recipient cells during interspecies
conjugation, whereas only a weak induction takes place during
intraspecies matings (7). This SOS induction was measured using a recA::lacZ operon fusion, which
gives a mean value of the global recA expression in a
population of recipient cells (7). In the present study, we
wanted to detect SOS induction in individual recipient cells. To that
end, we used an epigenetic switch as a reporter system that responds to
inactivation of the The Hfr strains used in this study were Salmonella enterica
serovar Typhimurium SA977 and Escherichia coli
PK3 (7). SOS induction in E. coli
F Whereas the interspecies (Salmonella serovar
Typhimurium × E. coli) conjugation triggers a potent
SOS response (Gal+ phenotype) in 1 to 2% of the recipient
cells, no SOS induction was detected during intraspecies (E. coli × E. coli) conjugation (Table
1). Interspecies conjugation had no
detectable effect on recipient cell viability compared with
intraspecies crosses (data not shown). Therefore, the strong SOS
response to interspecies mating observed previously using a
recA::lacZ fusion (7) is not
due to the massive dying of exconjugant cells. No measurable induction
of SOS was observed when there was no transfer of DNA (e.g., when
Salmonella serovar Typhimurium was also F
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
No Genetic Barriers between Salmonella
enterica Serovar Typhimurium and Escherichia coli in
SOS-Induced Mismatch Repair-Deficient Cells
"Necker
Enfants malades," Université
René Descartes, 75015 Paris, France
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
cells mated with Salmonella
enterica serovar Typhimurium Hfr donors. Using an epigenetic
indicator of SOS induction, we showed that a strong SOS response
occurring in a subpopulation of mated mismatch repair-deficient cells
totally abolishes genetic barriers between these two genera.
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
CI, thus derepressing the SOS regulon
(3, 4, 13).
CI repressor (18) to assess the
following: (i) any potential heterogeneity of SOS induction among
individual recipient cells, (ii) the viability of the recipient cells
that have undergone strong SOS induction, and (iii) possible
correlations between the levels of SOS induction and interspecies
recombination in individual cells.
cells was monitored in MT1-derived strains bearing a
cI-cro-gal fusion whereby the expression of the
gal operon was under negative control by the CI repressor of
phage lambda (18). Whereas the MT1 cells displayed a
Gal
phenotype (white colonies on MacConkey agar-galactose
plates) when the
cI gene was expressed, temporary
RecA*-assisted inactivation of the CI repressor during SOS induction
resulted in a heritable epigenetic Gal+ phenotype (red
colonies on MacConkey agar-galactose plates) (16, 18). An
isogenic strain called MT5 has a noninducible cI
(Ind
) mutation that detects, by color change, only the
rare mutations in the cI gene. MT1 strain derivatives were
constructed by P1-mediated transduction of the following alleles:
mutS201::Tn5, lexA1
(Ind
) (coding for a noncleavable LexA repressor)
malB::Tn9, and recAo98 (an operator constitutive and RecA-overproducing mutant)
srl::Tn10 (7). Conjugations
were performed as described previously (7). Ilv+
recombinants were selected on M63 minimal medium plates and scored after 48 h at 37°C. All recipient strains were resistant to
nalidixic acid, which was used to counterselect donor cells.
or
when DNA transfer was prevented by nalidixic acid [data not shown]).
TABLE 1.
Interspecies and intraspecies conjugational recombination
in bacterial crosses and analysis of SOS induction in E. coli recipient exconjugant cells
A previous study of the SOS response to interspecies matings suggested that the activation of RecA occurs during one of the early RecA-mediated recombination steps, i.e., during homology search, homologous pairing, or heteroduplex formation (7). The RecA filament-single-strand DNA complex is expected to have a longer half-life during interspecies recombination than during intraspecies recombination, as suggested by in vitro experiments (2, 21). Consequently, the persistence of the RecA* filament is expected to be longer, and therefore the level of SOS induction is expected to be higher, in the interspecies matings. Since the RecA* protein in the RecA*-single-strand DNA complex seems to lose its coprotease activity once engaged in the strand exchange process (1, 14), efficient intraspecies recombination might not leave enough time for the free single-strand DNA-RecA complex to induce a strong SOS response. However, for the present study we cannot completely rule out the possibility that SOS is induced by the cleavage of the Salmonella serovar Typhimurium DNA by the E. coli recipient cell restriction endonucleases.
The induction of the LexA regulon is gradual, and the extent to which a
given gene is induced depends on the decrease of the LexA repressor
pool in response to a given inducing treatment and on the relative
affinity of the LexA repressor for the specific operator (LexA box)
(20). Although the cleavage of LexA and
CI repressors is
promoted by RecA*, LexA is cleaved at least 10 times faster than
CI
(for a review, see reference 20). These differences
lead to the full induction of some SOS genes (e.g., recA) at
low UV doses that are insufficient to induce prophage
(13). This may also explain why the weak SOS induction
during intraspecies conjugation observed with
recA::lacZ gene fusions (7)
was not detected with the cI-cro-gal epigenetic
system (Table 1).
As expected, no SOS induction was detected in cells carrying
lexA1 (encoding a noncleavable LexA repressor), whereas
introduction of the RecA-overproducing recAoc
allele (recAo98) in this strain restores wild-type levels of
induction (Table 1). Therefore, RecA concentration is rate limiting for
both recombination and
CI cleavage during interspecies conjugation.
Because RecA binding to the single-strand DNA is required for both SOS
induction and recombination, higher concentrations of RecA are likely
to result in simultaneous increases in the total length of DNA
available for recombination and the amount of RecA* (19).
The methyl-directed mismatch repair system (MRS) prevents interspecies recombination (12), presumably by the recognition of noncomplementary nucleotides in the heteroduplex DNA intermediates by the MutS and -L proteins (15, 21). We found that inhibition of recombination by the MRS is even more pronounced when the SOS system is induced. The inactivation of the mutS gene in the lexA+ cells increased interspecies recombination (2.2 × 103-fold) more than in the lexA1 background (5.0 × 102-fold) (Table 1). This increase was statistically significant (Mann-Whitney test; P = 0.033). One possibility is that the high RecA concentrations may act to increase the number of contacts between diverged DNAs and/or the lengths of heteroduplex DNA regions, thereby increasing the number of mismatches and the likelihood that the MRS will dissociate the recombination intermediates.
Although inactivation of the MRS alone increases the frequency of
interspecies recombination 2,000-fold, it does not completely restore
it to the frequency observed during intraspecies recombination (by a
factor of 20 [Table 1]). However, the interspecies recombination frequencies among the SOS-induced (Gal+) mutS
transconjugants are 20-fold higher than among noninduced (Gal
) transconjugants from the same culture. The
SOS-induced (Gal+) and noninduced (Gal
)
E. coli F
mutS recipient
interspecies exconjugants from MacConkey agar-galactose plates (Table
1) were analyzed for Ilv+ recombination using M63 minimal
medium selective plates. Of the 778 Gal+ (SOS-induced)
exconjugants tested, 96 (1.2 × 10
1) were
ILv+ recombinants, whereas out of 778 Gal
(noninduced) exconjugants, only 5 (6.0 × 10
3) were
ILv+ recombinants. About one-quarter of all
interspecies recombination events occurred in the 1.5% of
mutS female cells which had undergone strong SOS induction.
Therefore, the interspecies recombination frequency among SOS-induced
mutS bacteria (12%) is approximately the same as the
intraspecies recombination frequency observed in the overall population
(10%) (Table 1).
However, there are circumstances under which a strong SOS induction cannot stimulate interspecies recombination, e.g., a very high level of DNA divergence or reduced hybrid viability. Even under these conditions, strong SOS induction may still increase genetic variability in the population of the recipient bacteria because SOS induction increases mutagenesis, chromosomal rearrangements, transposon excision, and transposition (11, 17). Such stimulation of genetic polymorphism can facilitate and accelerate the adaptation of bacterial populations to new and/or changing environments.
We have demonstrated that, together, a strong SOS induction and a nonfunctional MRS can result in a complete abolition of genetic barriers between two bacterial genera that have diverged about 16% within their genes. This apparent ignoring (in terms of gene exchange) of 100 to 150 million years of divergent evolution is quite impressive, in particular when considering that it could be occurring in a small percentage of all natural E. coli and Salmonella isolates because they are MRS deficient (6, 8). Such genetic promiscuity, i.e., an efficient horizontal transfer of chromosomal genes, may account for the structure of bacterial genomes (5, 9).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
The connection between interspecies sex and SOS was suggested to us by David S. Thaler during his postdoctoral visit in 1988. We thank Justin Courcelle for critical reading of the manuscript. We also thank both of the anonymous referees for their helpful criticism.
This work was supported by grants from Association pour la Recherche
contre le Cancer, Ligue Nationale Française contre le Cancer,
Ministère de la Recherche
"Programme de Recherche Fondamentale en Microbiologie et Maladies Infectieuses et Parasitaires," and Ministère de l'aménagement du territoire et de
l'environnement
"Programme Environnement et Santé."
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: E9916 INSERM,
Faculté de Médecine
"Necker
Enfants malades,"
Université Rene Descartes-Paris V, 156 Rue de Vaugirard, 75730 Paris Cedex 15, France. Phone: (33) 1 40 61 53 21. Fax: (33) 1 40 61 53 22. E-mail: matic{at}necker.fr.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Craig, N. L., and J. W. Roberts.
1980.
E. coli RecA protein-directed cleavage of phage repressor requires polynucleotide.
Nature
283:26-30[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2. |
DasGupta, C., and C. M. Radding.
1982.
Polar branch migration promoted by RecA protein: effect of mismatched base pairs.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
79:762-766 |
| 3. | Friedberg, E. C., G. C. Walker, and W. Siede. 1995. DNA repair and mutagenesis. ASM Press, Washington, D.C. |
| 4. |
Kim, B., and J. W. Little.
1993.
LexA and CI repressors as enzymes: specific cleavage in an intermolecular reaction.
Cell
73:1165-1173[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5. | Lawrence, J. G., and H. Ochman. 1997. Amelioration of bacterial genomes: rates of change and exchange. J. Mol. Evol. 44:383-397[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 6. |
LeClerc, J. E.,
B. Li,
W. L. Payne, and T. A. Cebula.
1996.
High mutation frequencies among Escherichia coli and Salmonella pathogens.
Science
274:1208-1211 |
| 7. | Matic, I., C. Rayssiguier, and M. Radman. 1995. Interspecies gene exchange in bacteria: the role of SOS and mismatch repair systems in evolution of species. Cell 80:507-515[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. |
Matic, M.,
M. Radman,
F. Taddei,
B. Picard,
C. Doit,
E. Binguen,
E. Denamur,
J. Elion,
J. E. LeClerc, and T. A. Cebula.
1997.
Highly variable mutation rates in commensal and pathogenic E. coli.
Science
277:1833-1834 |
| 9. | Milkman, R., and M. McCane. 1995. DNA sequence variation and recombination in E. coli, p. 127-142. In Population genetics of bacteria. Cambridge University Press, Leicester, United Kingdom. |
| 10. | Radman, M. 1974. Phenomenology of an inducible mutagenic DNA repair pathway in Escherichia coli: SOS repair hypothesis, p. 128-142. In L. Prakash, F. Sherman, M. Miller, C. Lawrence, and H. W. Tabor (ed.), Molecular and environmental aspects of mutagenesis. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, Ill. |
| 11. | Radman, M., I. Matic, J. Halliday, and F. Taddei. 1995. Editing DNA replication and recombination by mismatch repair: from bacterial genetics to mechanisms of predisposition to cancer in humans. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 347:97-103[Medline]. |
| 12. | Rayssiguier, C., D. S. Thaler, and M. Radman. 1989. The barrier to recombination between Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium is disrupted in mismatch-repair mutants. Nature 342:396-401[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 13. | Roberts, J. W., and R. Devoret. 1983. Lysogenic induction, p. 123-144. In R. W. Hendrix, J. W. Roberts, F. W. Stahl, and R. A. Weisberg (ed.), Lambda II. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 14. | Roberts, J. W., E. M. Phizicky, D. G. Burbee, C. W. Roberts, and P. L. Moreau. 1982. A brief consideration of the SOS inducing signal. Biochimie 64:805-807[Medline]. |
| 15. |
Stambuk, S., and M. Radman.
1998.
Mechanism and control of interspecies recombination in Escherichia coli. I. Mismatch repair, methylation, recombination and replication functions.
Genetics
150:533-542 |
| 16. |
Taddei, F.,
I. Matic, and M. Radman.
1995.
Cyclic AMP-dependent SOS induction and mutagenesis in resting bacterial populations.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:11736-11740 |
| 17. | Taddei, F., M. Vulic, M. Radman, and I. Matic. 1997. Genetic variability and adaptation to stress, p. 271-290. In R. Bijlsma, and V. Loeschcke (ed.), Environmental stress, adaptation, and evolution. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland. |
| 18. | Toman, Z., C. Dambly-Chaudière, L. Tenenbaum, and M. Radman. 1985. A system for detection of genetic and epigenetic alternations in Escherichia coli induced by DNA-damaging agents. J. Mol. Biol. 186:97-105[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 19. |
Vulic, M.,
F. Dionisio,
F. Taddei, and M. Radman.
1997.
Molecular keys to speciation: DNA polymorphism and the control of genetic exchange in enterobacteria.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:9763-9767 |
| 20. |
Walker, G. C.
1984.
Mutagenesis and inducible responses to deoxyribonucleic acid damage in Escherichia coli.
Microbiol. Rev.
48:60-93 |
| 21. |
Worth, L., Jr.,
S. Clark,
M. Radman, and P. Modrich.
1994.
Mismatch repair proteins MutS and MutL inhibit RecA-catalyzed strand transfer between diverged DNAs.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:3238-3241 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Appl. Environ. Microbiol. | Infect. Immun. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|---|---|
| Mol. Cell. Biol. | J. Virol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. |
| ALL ASM JOURNALS |