Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, November 2000, p. 6014-6026, Vol. 182, No. 21
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Incompatibility Protein IncC and Global Regulator KorB Interact
in Active Partition of Promiscuous Plasmid RK2
Thomas M.
Rosche,
Azeem
Siddique,
Michelle H.
Larsen,
and
David H.
Figurski*
Department of Microbiology, College of
Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
10032
Received 10 April 2000/Accepted 5 August 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Replication of the broad-host-range, IncP
plasmid RK2 requires
two plasmid loci: trfA, the replication initiator gene, and oriV, the origin of replication. While these determinants
are sufficient for replication in a wide variety of bacteria, they do
not confer the stable maintenance of parental RK2 observed in its
hosts. The product of the incC gene has been proposed to function in the stable maintenance of RK2 because of its relatedness to
the ParA family of ATPases, some of which are known to be involved in
the active partition of plasmid and chromosomal DNA. Here we show that
IncC has the properties expected of a component of an active partition
system. The smaller polypeptide product of incC (IncC2)
exhibits a strong, replicon-independent incompatibility phenotype with
RK2. This incompatibility phenotype requires the global transcriptional
repressor, KorB, and the target for incC-mediated incompatibility is a KorB-binding site (OB). We found that
KorB and IncC interact in vivo by using the yeast two-hybrid system and
in vitro by using partially purified proteins. Elevated expression of
the incC and korB genes individually has no
obvious effect on Escherichia coli cell growth, but their
simultaneous overexpression is toxic, indicating a possible interaction
of IncC-KorB complexes with a vital host target. A region of RK2
bearing incC, korB, and multiple KorB-binding
sites is able to stabilize an unstable, heterologous plasmid in an
incC-dependent manner. Finally, elevated levels of IncC2
cause RK2 to aggregate, indicating a possible role for IncC in plasmid
pairing. These findings demonstrate that IncC, KorB, and at least one
KorB-binding site are components of an active partition system for the
promiscuous plasmid RK2.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The self-transmissible plasmids of
incompatibility group P (IncP) are known for their remarkably broad
host range. They are capable of promoting conjugative transfer to
diverse organisms, including gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria
and even some yeast species (14, 31, 35, 36, 67, 87). In
addition, IncP plasmids are maintained as stable, autonomously
replicating elements in a wide variety of gram-negative hosts (79,
83). The identical IncP
plasmids RK2, RP1, RP4, and R68
(67), as well as the related IncP
plasmid R751
(86), have been intensively studied to understand the basis
for the remarkable replicative promiscuity and segregational stability
observed in the various bacterial hosts.
RK2 is a 60,099-bp, self-transmissible IncP
plasmid originally
isolated from an antibiotic-resistant Klebsiella aerogenes strain cultured from a burn wound (40, 67). Conjugative
transfer of RK2 requires at least 19 genes involved in mating pair
formation and DNA processing (67). In contrast, replication
of RK2 requires a single plasmid-encoded gene, trfA, which
is necessary (6) and sufficient (77) for
replication initiation at the plasmid origin of replication,
oriV, in all hosts tested (68, 80). Control of
initiation is mediated largely through coupled complexes of TrfA and
oriV (48), and the plasmid is maintained at the moderate copy number of 5 to 10 plasmids per chromosome (24, 94). However, the minimal oriV-trfA replicon is not
sufficient for the remarkable stability observed of RK2 in its various
hosts (77), indicating the existence of additional
determinants that act to maintain the plasmid in a growing bacterial population.
Deletion studies of otherwise intact RK2 have shown that both the
kilE and par loci are involved in the stable
maintenance of RK2 in different hosts. The kilE locus, which
contains two operons encoding the kleABCDEF genes,
is required for the stable inheritance of RK2 in Pseudomonas
aeruginosa but not in Escherichia coli (50,
94). The predicted products of the kle genes are not
similar to any known or predicted proteins, and the mechanism of
stabilization imparted by kilE is not known. The
par locus encodes two plasmid maintenance functions
(30, 33, 70). The parDE operon specifies
a plasmid addiction system that is toxic to plasmidless
segregants that emerge after cell division (46, 71).
The adjacent and divergently transcribed parCBA operon expresses a multimer resolution system (20,
21). Both par operons contribute to the
stability of RK2, although the relative importance of each
operon varies from host to host (79).
Some low-copy plasmids, like P1, F, and R1, contain active partition
systems to ensure that a copy of the plasmid segregates to each
daughter cell at cell division (37, 44, 64, 93). These
systems share common features: an autoregulated operon of two genes and a nearby cis-acting sequence that has the
properties of a centromere-like element. One of the proteins (e.g.,
ParA of P1, SopA of F, and ParM of R1) has, or is predicted to have, ATPase activity (18, 19, 44, 62, 90). The second gene of the
operon encodes a DNA-binding protein (ParB of P1, SopB of F,
and ParR of R1), whose target is the nearby cis-acting
centromere-like element (17, 27, 44, 61). The genetic
properties of these plasmid stability loci, most notably their
incompatibility phenotypes, led to a model for active partition that
involves plasmid pairing through proteins bound to the cis
element, proper cellular localization of plasmid pairs at cell
division, and active separation of the plasmid pairs into the newly
forming daughter cells (3, 4, 65). Recent elegant studies
using fluorescence microscopy to visualize F and P1 plasmids in the
cell have provided dramatic evidence in support of this model (32,
63). Similar studies have also confirmed the active segregation
of bacterial chromosomes (32, 60, 91) and revealed
chromosomal determinants closely related to the active partition
systems of plasmids. Nevertheless, the composition of the host
machinery and the mechanism of active partition for plasmids and
chromosomes have remained elusive.
An active partition system has been proposed for plasmid RK2
(62). Meyer and Hinds (59) first identified an
incompatibility determinant (IncP1-II) in the region that encodes the
global transcriptional repressors KorA and KorB. Sequence analysis
subsequently revealed a third gene (designated incC)
overlapping korA in a different reading frame and extending
to the beginning of korB (84) (Fig. 1). Two polypeptides are expressed from
incC: the full-length IncC1 protein (38.1 kDa) and a shorter
IncC2 protein (27.5 kDa) that is initiated from an internal
translational start site (51, 84). The sequences of both
IncC polypeptides show significant relatedness with the partition
proteins ParA and SopA of P1 and F, respectively (62). This
similarity led to the proposal that IncC is a component of an active
partition system of RK2. Recent studies from the Thomas laboratory
provide strong evidence that incC is involved in plasmid
stabilization (9, 92).

View larger version (5K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
The korA operon of plasmid RK2. The
korA, incC, and korB genes (boldface
arrows) are described in the text. The korA gene is within
the incC coding sequence but in a different reading frame.
incC2 is the coding region for the small IncC2 polypeptide
product that results from an internal translation initiation site in
incC. korF and korG code for small
basic proteins of unknown function. p indicates the
promoter; OA and OB indicate the operators for
the KorA and KorB repressors, respectively; the angled arrow indicates
the transcriptional start site. ter indicates a putative
transcriptional terminator.
|
|
We have undertaken a systematic analysis of the properties of the
incC region with respect to incompatibility phenotypes, plasmid stabilization, cis-acting elements, and
protein-protein interactions to test for an active partition system on
RK2. Our results demonstrate that IncC, KorB, and a KorB-binding site
are components of an active partition complex.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacteria and plasmids.
E. coli strains were BL21(DE3,
pLysS) {F
hsdS gal dcm ompT [
D69
(lacUV5p-T7 gene 1)]} (81);
BR2943 {hsdR17 thi-1 relA1 supE44 endA1 gyrA96 recA1
[
DKC266(P1 repA+)]} (from D. Chattoraj);
DH5
[supE44
(laclZYA-argF)U169
hsdR17 recA1 endA1 gyrA96 thi-1 relA1 deoR
(
80dlac lacZ
M15)] (34); EKA335
(previously EKA340.2) [thr-1 leu-6 lacY1 thi-1 tonA21 supE44 rfbD1
trpE5
(argF-lac)U169
deoC1::Tn10(Tcs)
srl::Tn10 recA] (79); EKA13
(hsdR lacY leuB6
trpE5 recA1 gyrA), a spontaneous
nalidixic acid-resistant mutant of JA221 (from C. Yanofsky); LS1443
[pcnB80 zad::Tn10 hsdR2 mcrB1 araD139
(ara-leu)7696
lacX74 galU galK rpsL thi-1]
(from H. Shuman); and M15(pREP4) (Qiagen, Valencia, Calif.).
Saccharomyces cerevisiae stains were L40 (MATa
trp1 leu2 his3 URA3::lexA-lacZ
LYS2::lexA HIS3) (88) and L41 (MAT
trp1 leu2 his3 URA3::lexA-lacZ
LYS2::lexA HIS3) (from D. Shore).
The plasmids used in these experiments are described in Table
1 and Fig.
2. The following unpublished plasmids
were constructed
as indicated: pDB6, by spontaneous Ap
s
deletion of pACYC177 (
12); pRK21261, by ligation of a
HindIII
fragment encoding spectinomycin resistance with
HindIII-cleaved
pRK2108 (
25); pRK21484, by
PCR amplification of the
korB coding
region from pRK2108
using the oligonucleotide primers korBpp1
(5'-GCGGATCCATCGAGGGTAGAATGACTGCGGCTCAAGCCAAGAC-3') and
korBpp2
(5'-CGAGCCAAGCTTGCTCCTTGTAGCGGAACCGTTGTC-3')
followed by end filling
of the product using the Klenow fragment
of DNA polymerase I,
digestion with
BamHI and
HindIII, and ligation to
BamHI- and
HindIII-digested
pQE-8 (Qiagen); pRK21665, by PCR
amplification of the
korB coding
region from pRK2108 using
the oligonucleotide primers korB-1 (5'-GGCTCAAGCCAAGACCACCAAG-3')
and korBpp2, followed by ligation of the amplification product
to
pCRII (InVitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.); pRK21673, by ligation
of the
EcoRI fragment containing the
korB coding region
from pRK21665
to
EcoRI-digested pGAD10; pRK21674, by
ligation of the
EcoRI fragment
containing the
korB coding region from pRK21665 to
EcoRI-digested
pBTM116; pRK21841, by PCR amplification of
incC from pRK2108 using
the oligonucleotide primers IncCUP
(5'-GGGTGTTATCCATGAAGAAA-3')
and IncCLPS1
(5'-GTCGACAGTCATTGGGAAATCTCCA-3') followed by ligation
of
the amplification product to pCRII; pRK21842, by ligation of
the
EcoRI fragment containing the
incC coding region
from pRK21841
to an
EcoRI digest of pGAD10; pRK21845, by
ligation of the
incC-containing
EcoRI fragment
from pRK21841 to
EcoRI-digested pET-17b (Novagen,
Madison,
Wis.); pRK21984, by PCR amplification of IncC from pRK2526
using the
oligonucleotide primers IncC2_upstream
(5'-CGCCAAGAAAAAACAGGAAACCAAACG-3')
and IncC2_dnstream
(5'-CTTGAGCCGCAGTCATTGGGAAATCTC-3') followed
by ligation of
the amplification product to pCR2.1 (InVitrogen);
pRK21985, by
digestion of pRK21984 with
HindIII and
XbaI
and ligation
to
HindIII- and
XbaI-digested
pJAK16, a derivative of pMMB67 (
28)
(from J. Kornacki);
pRK22323, by PCR amplification of O
B3 from
pRK2101
(
24) using the oligonucleotide primers OB3up
(5'-CTGAAATCGGGAAGTGCGAAAAGCATCACCT-3')
and OB3dn
(5'-CCCTGCTTCGCAGCCTGGTATTCAGGCTCG-3'), followed by
ligation
of the amplification product into pCR2.1; pRK22324, by
digestion of
pRK2362 with
BssHII, followed by religation to form
an
in-frame deletion within
incC; pRK22327, by digestion of
pRK22323
with
EcoRI and ligation to an
EcoRI
digest of pZeRO (InVitrogen);
pRK22329, by digestion of pRK2362 with
EcoRV and
HindIII, followed
by ligation to
EcoRV- and
HindIII-digested pRK2101;
pRK22330,
by digestion of pRK22324 with
EcoRV and
HindIII, followed by ligation
to
EcoRV- and
HindIII-digested pRK2101; and pTR3, by digestion
and
religation of pZeRO with the compatible end-generating enzymes
SpeI and
XbaI.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Plasmids used to study the activities of
incC. A linear schematic of the RK2 map is shown on the top
line with landmark genetic determinants for reference (67).
Shown below are the cloned RK2 segments in different plasmid
derivatives. Boldface arrows indicate the direction of transcription,
angled arrows indicate transcription start sites, and indicates a
deletion. Tra1 and Tra2 are regions for conjugative transfer;
oriT is the origin of transfer. Tn1 is a
transposon that encodes resistance to ampicillin; Kmr and
Tcr indicate genes for resistance to kanamycin and
tetracycline, respectively. kfrA is a gene for a DNA-binding
protein of unknown function; upf54.8 is a putative gene of
unknown function. The specific KorB-binding sites (OB1,
OB2, and OB3) are indicated by filled
circles.
|
|
Media.
Media for growth of bacteria were Luria-Bertani (LB)
broth and M9-CAA medium (56). M9-CAA medium was supplemented
with tryptophan (50 µg/ml) when necessary. The following antibiotics
were used at the indicated concentrations: ampicillin, 50 µg/ml;
penicillin, 150 µg/ml; kanamycin, 50 µg/ml; chloramphenicol, 50 µg/ml; and zeocin, 50 µg/ml. To induce expression of proteins from
tacp or trcp promoters, the medium was
supplemented with 1 mM
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). To detect
Lac+ colonies, solid medium contained 40 µg of X-Gal
(5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-
-D-galactopyranoside) per
ml. Medium for growth of yeast was yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YEPD) and synthetic complete (SC) medium (5) lacking
histidine, tryptophan, and/or leucine.
DNA procedures.
Preparation of DNA from E. coli
was done by the alkaline lysis protocol (5). Preparation of
DNA from S. cerevisiae was done according to a glass bead
protocol (39). Agarose gel electrophoresis and
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) have been described previously (74). DNA manipulations with restriction
endonucleases, T4 DNA ligase, and the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase
I were done according to the manufacturers' recommendations.
Amplification of DNA by PCR was done with Taq DNA polymerase
(73). All cloned PCR products were confirmed by nucleotide
sequencing. Transformation of bacteria was done by the method of Cohen
et al. (13). Transformation of yeast was done by the method
of high-efficiency Li acetate transformation (75).
Incompatibility assays.
Strains were grown overnight at
37°C in broth with selection for both the tacp-incC2
plasmid and the test plasmid. Dilutions of the cultures were then
plated on medium selecting for the tacp plasmid alone
(single selection) with and without IPTG, as well as medium selecting
for both plasmids (double selection) with and without IPTG.
Single-selection medium was supplemented with X-Gal if the test plasmid
was Lac+. The presence of the test plasmid was screened for
either by taking the ratio of blue to white colonies or by picking
individual colonies from single-selection plates and moving them onto
medium with the appropriate antibiotic. For each assay, the viable cell count (CFU) of the single selection without IPTG was normalized to an
efficiency of plating (EOP) of 1.0. The CFU of other sets were then
obtained and the relative EOPs were calculated.
Plasmid stability assays.
Short-term stability assays (0 to
15 generations) were done as follows. Approximately 108
cells were scraped from a fresh selection plate and resuspended in 0.5 ml of LB broth. This sample was diluted 104- or
105-fold into fresh, nonselective medium and then grown at
37°C. Samples were taken every 2 h to obtain time points every
few generations, and then they were plated on both selective and
nonselective media to determine the number of generations of growth and
percent plasmid retention. For longer-term assays (>15 generations),
strains were grown overnight at 37°C in broth with selection for
resident plasmids. The cultures were diluted 106-fold into
nonselective medium, grown to stationary phase, and then diluted as
described above into fresh nonselective medium. At each time point,
dilutions were plated on nonselective medium, and plasmid retention was
measured by picking individual colonies and plating them onto selective medium.
Yeast two-hybrid assay.
Derivatives of pBTM116 (vector for
LexA DNA-binding domain fusions) were introduced into S. cerevisiae haploid strain L41 by transformation and selection for
growth on SC medium lacking tryptophan. Derivatives of pGAD10 (vector
for GAL4 activation domain fusions) were introduced into S. cerevisiae haploid strain L40 with selection for growth on SC
medium lacking leucine. To test for interactions between pBTM166 and
pGAD10 derivatives, diploid strains were constructed by spotting 5 µl
of the L41 and L40 strains together on a YEPD plate. Spots were
incubated overnight at 30°C, transferred to sterile velvet, and
replica-plated to SC medium lacking tryptophan and leucine to select
for the L40/41 a/
strain. Diploid strains containing both the
pBTM116 and pGAD10 derivatives were then tested for interaction of
fusion products. Broth cultures were grown overnight and
-galactosidase activity was measured as previously described
(5).
Purification of His-KorB.
The korB coding region,
beginning with the second codon, was fused in-frame with a 12-codon
open reading frame which includes an N-terminal six-His tag downstream
of an inducible promoter to generate pRK21484 (described above). The
korB gene fusion was induced in strain M15(pREP4). One
hundred milliliters of cells were grown in LB broth to an optical
density at 600 nm of 0.6 and then were induced by adding IPTG to a
final concentration of 1 mM. The culture was incubated at 37°C for
2.5 h, and the cells were collected by centrifugation at
4,000 × g for 10 min. The pellet was resuspended in
300 µl of sonication buffer A (50 mM NaH2PO4,
300 mM NaCl [pH 8.0]), supplemented with lysozyme (1 mg/ml). The
cells were maintained on ice for 5 min; 0.33 ml of 3 M NaCl was added,
and the mixture was maintained on ice an additional 5 min. The cells
were then sonicated on ice with four 30-s pulses. The sonicate was
passed over a Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid-agarose column (Qiagen), and the
His-KorB fusion protein was eluted with 40 mM imidazole. The final
concentration was approximately 110 µg/ml. His-KorB is competent for
binding its DNA target OB as determined by electrophoretic
mobility shift analysis (data not shown). Histidine-tagged
glutathione-S-transferase (GST-His), for use as a control
for binding specificity, was prepared similarly using the GST-His
expression plasmid pALEX (gift of S. J. Silverstein).
Preparation of T7-IncC extracts.
The incC coding
region, beginning with the second codon, was fused in-frame to a
34-codon open reading frame whose transcriptional and translational
initiation signals were provided by the bacteriophage T7 gene
10 in the plasmid vector pET-17b (Novagen). This region includes the 12 codons for the leader peptide (T7 · TAG epitope) of T7 gene 10 product. The incC fusion
protein was designated T7-IncC, and the resulting plasmid was pRK21845
(described above). T7-incC was induced in strain
BL21(DE3, pLysS), which contains an IPTG-inducible T7 RNA
polymerase gene (81). For induction, cells were grown in LB
broth to an optical density at 600 nm of 0.6, and T7 polymerase was
induced by adding IPTG to a final concentration of 1 mM. Incubation
continued at 37°C for 3 h; cells were then collected by
centrifugation at 4,000 × g for 10 min; and the pellet was stored at
70°C. The pellet was thawed and resuspended in 300 µl of sonication buffer B (100 mM NaCl, 50 mM
NaH2PO4, 20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0]) with 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl flouride. The suspension was sonicated on ice with
two 15-s pulses. PAGE showed that T7-IncC constituted about 50% of the
total protein, or approximately 140 µg/ml. The resulting lysate was
probed by Western immunoblot analysis for T7-IncC with the
chemiluminescence Amersham Life Sciences (Arlington Heights, Ill.) ECL
kit and rainbow molecular weight markers. Anti-T7 · TAG
monoclonal antibody directed against the T7 gene 10 leader
peptide was obtained from Novagen. The remaining lysate was stored at
70°C for future use. For controls, isogenic vector (pET-17b)
extracts were made at the same time.
Immuno-affinity assay.
To clear the lysates of proteins that
interact nonspecifically with the Sepharose beads, 10 µl each of the
T7-IncC and vector control extracts were preadsorbed to 10 µl of
protein A-Sepharose beads (Pharmacia, Piscataway, N.J.) in 180 µl of
adsorption buffer (20 mM NaHPO4, pH 7.0) at room
temperature for 1.5 h. The beads were centrifuged, and the
supernatant was used as the source of T7-IncC (or vector extract) for
the assay. The anti-T7 · TAG monoclonal antibody was bound to
protein A by adding 2 µl of antibody to 10 µl of protein
A-Sepharose beads, 180 µl of adsorption buffer, and 10 µl of
10-mg/ml bovine serum albumin. The antibody-bead mixture was incubated
on a rocker at 4°C for 1.5 h and washed twice in 200 µl of
adsorption buffer. The precleared T7-IncC and vector extracts were each
added to the antibody-bead complex and incubated on a rocker at 4°C
for 1.5 h and then washed 4 times in 200 µl of adsorption
buffer. The precipitated bead complex was resuspended in 180 µl of
binding buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 8.0), and increasing amounts (5 to 50 µl) of purified His-KorB were added. The complex was incubated on a
rocker at 4°C for 1.5 h and washed four times in 200 µl of
binding buffer. The complex was resuspended in 50 µl of sodium
dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-PAGE sample buffer, boiled for 7 min, and then
analyzed by Western blotting using the Amersham Life Sciences ECL
detection kit and rabbit polyclonal anti-KorB antisera (Cocalico
Biologicals, Reamstown, Pa.).
Oligohistidine affinity assay.
His-KorB was added to 25 µl
of TALON metal affinity resin (Clontech, Palo Alto, Calif.) along with
10 µl of 10-mg/ml bovine serum albumin (as a nonspecific competitor)
and adsorption buffer (20 mM NaHPO4, pH 7.0) to give a
final volume of 200 µl. The His-KorB-TALON complex was incubated on a
rocker at 4°C for 25 min and washed twice in 200 µl of adsorption
buffer. Increasing amounts of T7-IncC extract (5 to 50 µl) were added
to the complex; the suspension was then incubated on a rocker at 4°C
for 25 min and washed four times in 200 µl of adsorption buffer. The
resulting complex was resuspended in 50 µl of SDS-PAGE sample buffer,
boiled for 7 min, and then analyzed by Western blotting using the
Amersham Life Sciences ECL detection kit and the anti-T7 · TAG
monoclonal antibody (Novagen).
 |
RESULTS |
Elevated expression of IncC2 causes strong incompatibility with
RK2.
Previous studies have demonstrated that plasmids carrying a
region of RK2 encoding incC can destabilize RK2 derivatives
present in the same cell (59). To determine if
incC alone is sufficient to confer this incompatibility
phenotype, the portion of incC that encodes the IncC2
polypeptide (incC2) (Fig. 1) was amplified by PCR and cloned
downstream of the IPTG-inducible tacp promoter. We confirmed
that induction of incC2 in the absence of any other plasmid
in the cell has no obvious effect on the growth of the culture or
colony formation. We then tested the effect of incC2 induction on the RK2lac plasmid pRK2526, an otherwise
wild-type RK2 plasmid with lacZYA inserted into the gene for
tetracycline resistance. We have previously shown that
RK2lac is stably maintained in E. coli in the
absence of selection (79). However, induction of
incC2 in trans to RK2lac gave evidence
of strong incompatibility (Table 2). The
EOP of the culture was reduced >105-fold when selection
was maintained for both plasmids, indicating that the plasmids could
not coexist in the same cell under inducing conditions. This was
confirmed by plating the cells on IPTG- and X-Gal-containing medium in
the absence of selection for RK2lac. The colonies that arose
were white (Lac
), indicating that the RK2lac
plasmid was no longer present. However, even in the absence of
selection for RK2lac, the EOP was reduced 10-fold. This
result might be expected if loss of RK2lac triggers the
parDE plasmid addiction system, which is toxic to
plasmidless segregants. The effect of incC2 induction was
therefore tested on the RK2lac
par derivative pRK21382.
In this case, the EOP was not reduced and all colonies were
Lac
. Essentially the same incompatibility phenotypes were
observed for the tacp promoter fused to a derivative of the
complete incC coding region that lacks the translational
start site for the korA gene and includes the IncC2
translational start site (data not shown). These results show that
elevated expression of IncC causes severe destabilization of RK2.
IncC-mediated incompatibility is replicon-independent.
We
next determined if IncC-mediated incompatibility results
from interference with RK2 replication. The RK2
trfA
plasmid pRK21591 has an inactive RK2 replicon, and it replicates using
the plasmid P1 replication system, which is insensitive to
incC2 induction (data not shown). Just as with wild-type
RK2, induction of incC2 caused a dramatic loss of
RK2
trfA (Table 2), indicating that IncC-mediated
incompatibility is not caused by interference with RK2 replication. As
before, the reduction in EOP on single selection is probably due to the
parDE plasmid addiction system. Conversely, we tested the
effect of incC2 induction on the maintenance of the
mini-RK2 plasmid pRR10, which consists entirely of the minimum replication determinants, the trfA gene and oriV,
along with an Apr marker. In contrast to the results with
wild-type RK2, induction of incC2 had no effect on the
mini-replicon (Table 2). These results show that the target for
IncC-mediated incompatibility lies outside the RK2 replication determinants.
IncC-mediated incompatibility requires KorB.
Replicon-independent incompatibility is consistent with a role for IncC
in active partition. We therefore used the strong incompatibility
phenotype to identify other factors that function with IncC. To
identify the target for IncC-mediated incompatibility, we examined a
variety of plasmids carrying different portions of RK2 (Table
3). Plasmids with large segments of RK2,
such as pRK2013 and pRK21261, are sensitive to the IncC-mediated
incompatibility. The smallest RK2 segment to confer sensitivity is
present on plasmid pRK2362, which carries korA,
incC, and korB (Fig. 2). In contrast, plasmid
pRK2366, an isogenic korB mutant derivative of pRK2362 that
has a small deletion at the 3'-end of korB, is not affected by induction of incC2. This result shows that
korB is required for sensitivity to IncC-mediated
incompatibility and indicates a new function for KorB beyond its role
in transcriptional regulation.
The KorB-binding site (OB) confers sensitivity to
IncC-mediated incompatibility.
Because KorB is a DNA-binding
protein, we tested the possibility that the presence of its binding
site (OB) is required for sensitivity to IncC-mediated
incompatibility. KorB binds to a 13-bp palindromic DNA sequence that is
present on RK2 in 12 nearly identical, well-distributed copies
(OB1-12), 6 of which are involved in transcriptional
regulation (67). All the IncC-sensitive plasmids we tested
to this point contained at least one KorB-binding site, including the
smallest (pRK2362), which has a single site (OB1) in the
korA promoter. We therefore tested plasmid pRK2178, which is comparable to pRK2362, except that it lacks the
KorB-binding site in the korA promoter (Fig. 2). The
results (Table 3) showed that pRK2178 is insensitive to induction of
incC2 in trans, indicating that the KorB-binding
site may be required for sensitivity to IncC-mediated incompatibility.
To confirm that a KorB-binding site is the target for IncC-mediated
incompatibility, we inserted a single site (O
B3) into
a
plasmid vector (pRK22327) and tested its sensitivity to IncC-mediated
incompatibility by placing it in
trans to the
incC+ korB+
OB1+ plasmid pRK2362. Growth of the cells
under selection for pRK2362
resulted in rapid loss of the
O
B+ plasmid from the population (Fig.
3). The vector control (pTR3)
was not
destabilized, indicating that the presence of the KorB-binding
site on
the plasmid caused it to become incompatible with pRK2362.
Isogenic
derivatives of pRK2362 lacking
korB (pRK2366) or
incC (pRK22324) failed to destabilize the
O
B+ plasmid (Fig.
3). Thus, the destabilization
of the O
B+ plasmid is dependent on
incC and
korB, and the KorB-binding site
is the
target of IncC-mediated incompatibility.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
The KorB-binding site is the target for IncC-mediated
incompatibility. The OB+ plasmid pRK22327
(black bars) and the vector control plasmid pTR3 (shaded bars) were
tested for sensitivity to IncC-mediated incompatibility in E. coli LS1443 containing pRK2362, pRK2366, pRK22324, or pKJ1
(vector). The presence (+) or absence ( ) of incC,
korB, and OB1 on these plasmids is indicated at
the bottom. After overnight growth under selection, 100% of cells
contained both plasmids. Strains were then grown for 20 to 22 generations without selection for pRK22327 or pTR3, as described in
Materials and Methods. Shown are the percentages of plasmid-containing
cells after unselected growth, as determined by picking colonies and
testing for the ampicillin resistance marker on pRK22327 and pTR3.
Plotted are the averages of two experiments (error bars, standard
deviations).
|
|
To determine if an O
B site is necessary on both plasmids,
we attempted to test the O
B+ plasmid in the
presence of the
incC+ korB+
O
B
plasmid pRK2178 but were unable to
construct the strain. This
incompatibility is independent of
incC but dependent on
korB,
since it occurred
with the isogenic
incC
korB+
O
B
plasmid pRK2300, but not the vector
control. This mode of destabilization
is distinct from IncC-mediated
incompatibility. Since KorB is
expected to be expressed at high levels
from pRK2178 and pRK2300
(see below), this phenotype is similar to the
ParB- and SopB-induced
silencing of
parS- and
sopC-containing plasmids, respectively
(
55,
72).
This phenotype is the subject of another
study.
IncC-dependent stabilization of a heterologous plasmid.
The
IncC-mediated incompatibility phenotypes are consistent with a role for
IncC, KorB, and the KorB-binding site in the active partition of RK2.
We next tested the prediction that these elements should stabilize an
unstable plasmid. The copy number of the ColE1-related replicon pMB1 is
reduced to 10% of normal in pcnB mutants of E. coli (54). As a result, pMB1-derived plasmid vectors,
like pBR322, are lost at a significant rate from pcnB cells
during unselected growth (Fig. 4A). We
tested the stability of pRK2101, a pMB1 replicon-containing plasmid
carrying the incC region on a 6-kb RK2 segment (Fig. 2), and
found that it was significantly more stable than pBR322 (Fig. 4A). The
stable maintenance of pRK2101 did not result from a significant increase in copy number relative to pBR322. We used a unit copy F
plasmid replicon as an internal control in these strains to determine
the relative copy numbers of pBR322 and pRK2101. Agarose gel
electrophoresis of plasmid DNA showed (i) that both plasmids have copy
numbers comparable to that of the F replicon control plasmid and (ii)
that the copy number of pRK2101 was at most 50% higher than pBR322
(data not shown). Thus, the lower rate of loss of pRK2101 relative to
that of pBR322 suggested that the incC region of RK2 can
stabilize a heterologous plasmid in a replication-independent manner.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
IncC-dependent stabilization of an unstable plasmid. (A)
The pMB1 replicon-based plasmids pRK2101 (incC+)
( ) and pBR322 (vector) ( ) were tested for their maintenance in
the pcnB strain LS1443. Plasmid loss was assayed by growing
cells in the absence of selection for several generations. Cells were
plated at regular intervals on medium containing ampicillin to
determine plasmid-containing cells and on nonselective medium to
determine total cells. (B) The P15A replicon-based plasmids pRK22329
(incC+) ( ), pRK22330 ( incC)
( ), and pKJ1 (vector) ( ) were tested for their maintenance in
LS1443, as described for panel A. The P15A replicon is highly
unstable in the pcnB strain, and even the zero time point
shows a high proportion of plasmidless cells. Plotted are averages of
three experiments (error bars, standard deviations). The results are
highly reproducible, and error bars are visible only for some of the
points.
|
|
The P15A replicon of vector pKJ1 also exhibits a reduced copy number in
a
pcnB host, even lower than that of a coresident
F replicon
control plasmid (data not shown). It is more unstable
than pBR322 in
this host and colonies of pKJ1-containing cells
contain a significant
fraction of plasmidless cells even on ampicillin
selection (Fig.
4B
[
t = 0]). Some plasmidless cells are likely
to
survive within a colony on ampicillin medium because the
plasmid-containing
cells produce an ampicillin-degrading

-lactamase.
To determine
if an
incC-containing region smaller than 6 kb
can stabilize a
heterologous P15A plasmid, we examined the stability of
the P15A
derivative pRK2362, which is
incC+
korB+ O
B1
+, but we were unable
to detect stabilization relative to the P15A
vector control (data not
shown). Plasmid pRK22329 is a P15A derivative
that encodes all the
determinants present on pRK2101. It is isogenic
with pRK2362 but
contains the additional downstream genes
korF,
korG,
kfrA, and
upf54.8, as well as
two additional KorB-binding
sites (O
B2 and O
B3)
(Fig.
2). We found that plasmid pRK22329 was
stabilized relative to the
P15A vector control (Fig.
4B). An isogenic
incC derivative
(pRK22330), which has an in-frame deletion within
incC (Fig.
2), was not stabilized (Fig.
4B), indicating that the
stabilization was
dependent on
incC. Relative copy numbers were
again
determined using an F plasmid replicon as an internal control,
as was
done above for the pMB1 plasmids. Both the
incC+
and
incC plasmids displayed copy numbers comparable to
that
of the coresident F replicon (data not shown). Thus,
incC does
not appear to stabilize by increasing plasmid copy
number. The
stabilization of pRK2101 and pRK22329, while significant
and highly
reproducible, was not complete, and we discuss possible
reasons
below. Nevertheless, the results are consistent with a role for
incC in the active partition of
RK2.
Interaction of IncC and KorB in vivo and in vitro.
Current
models for active partition hold that the ATP-hydrolyzing protein and
the DNA-binding protein interact to facilitate the formation of plasmid
pairs or the positioning of the plasmids in the cell. There is good
evidence for the interactions of these proteins in the P1, F, and R1
plasmid systems (10, 18, 38, 44, 47, 95). If IncC and KorB
have similar functions in partition, they may be expected to interact.
To test for the possible interaction of IncC and KorB, we first used
the yeast two-hybrid system (
22). The
korB coding
region
was fused to the coding region for the LexA DNA-binding
[LexA(DB)]
domain in plasmid pBTM116, and
incC was fused
to the coding region
for the GAL4 transcriptional activation domain
[GAL4(AD)] in plasmid
pGAD10. As a control, a fusion of GAL4(AD) with
korB was also
made. The fusion proteins were expressed in
different combinations
with each other and vector controls in a yeast
strain containing
a
lacZ reporter gene with LexA-binding
sites at the promoter.
Quantitative

-galactosidase assays
revealed significant
lacZ expression when both the
lexA(
DB)-
korB fusion and the
GAL4(AD)-
korB fusion were expressed together in the cell,
but not when either
fusion was expressed alone (Table
4). This result was expected,
because
KorB is known to form dimers (
7). Significant
lacZ expression also occurred when both the
lexA(
DB)-
korB fusion and
the
GAL4(AD)-
incC fusion were expressed together in the cell,
but not with either fusion alone (Table
4). These results indicate
an
interaction between the IncC and KorB moieties of the fusion
proteins.
Next we tested for the direct interaction of IncC and KorB proteins in
vitro with affinity binding assays. An epitope-tagged
version of IncC
(T7-IncC) was expressed from a gene fusion, in
which the coding region
for the T7 · TAG epitope was fused to
the second codon at the 5'
end of the
incC coding region. Likewise,
an
amino-terminal six-histidine-tagged version of KorB (His-KorB)
was expressed from a fusion constructed by cloning
korB from
its
second codon into vector pQE-8. In the first experiment, the
T7-IncC
fusion protein was captured from
E. coli extracts
using protein
A-coated Sepharose beads bound to a monoclonal antibody
specific
for the T7 · TAG epitope. Purified His-KorB was then
added to
the coated beads. After unbound protein was removed by
washing,
the proteins on the beads were separated by SDS-PAGE, and
Western
blot analysis was done using anti-KorB polyclonal antiserum to
detect the presence of KorB. His-KorB was found to bind to
T7-IncC-coated
beads and binding was dependent on the presence of
T7-IncC on
the beads (Fig.
5A). A
purified GST-His fusion did not show detectable
binding to the beads
(Fig.
5B), indicating that the T7-IncC-His-KorB
interaction observed
is specific. Cell extracts with wild-type
KorB showed results similar
to those of His-KorB (data not shown).
We did the converse experiment
to confirm the interaction. Purified
His-KorB was bound to a
histidine-affinity resin (TALON), and
increasing amounts of a
T7-IncC-containing sonicate were added.
The complexes were washed to
remove unbound protein, and the bound
proteins were separated by
SDS-PAGE. Western blot analysis was
done using the anti-T7 · TAG
monoclonal antibody to detect the
presence of T7-IncC. T7-IncC was
found to bind to His-KorB-coated
beads, and binding was dependent on
the presence of His-KorB (Fig.
6). Taken
together, these data show that IncC and KorB proteins
physically
interact.


View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Binding of KorB to IncC on a solid matrix. (A) T7-IncC
was bound to Protein A-Sepharose containing the anti-T7 · TAG
monoclonal antibody (Mab), as described in Materials and Methods.
Increasing amounts of partially purified His-KorB were added, the beads
were washed, and the proteins bound to beads were separated by
SDS-PAGE. Western blot analysis was used to assay the presence of
His-KorB (indicated by the arrow). Vector, extract made with the
T7 · TAG vector as a control; IncC, extract with T7-IncC; KorB,
His-KorB; Mab, protein A-Sepharose beads coated with anti-T7 · TAG monoclonal antibody. Control lanes 1, 9, and 11 to 13 contained 50 µl of His-KorB solution (110 µg/ml); experimental lanes 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 contained 0, 5, 10, 25, and 50 µl, respectively. The His-KorB
in lanes 1 and 9 was applied directly to the gel. (B) Control for
binding specificity using purified GST-His. Samples were prepared as
for panel A, except that approximately 5 µg of GST-His was used in
place of His-KorB. The GST-His in lane 1 (1.25 µg) was applied
directly to the gel.
|
|

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Binding of IncC to KorB on a solid matrix. His-KorB was
bound to TALON beads, as described in Materials and Methods. Increasing
amounts of extracts containing T7-IncC were added, the beads were
washed, and the proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE. Western blot
analysis was used to assay the presence of T7-IncC (indicated by the
arrow). Vector, extract made with the T7 · TAG vector as a
control; IncC, extract with T7-IncC; KorB, His-KorB; beads, TALON
beads. Control lanes 1, 2, and 8 contain 1 µl of the relevant
extract; control lanes 11, 12, and 13 contain 50 µl of the relevant
extract; experimental lanes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 contain 0, 5, 10, 25, and
50 µl of T7-IncC extract (containing approximately 140 µg of
T7-IncC per ml), respectively. The T7-IncC in lanes 1 and 8 was applied
directly to the gel.
|
|
Cooverexpression of IncC2 and KorB is toxic to E. coli
cells.
The results above showed that induction of incC2
is not deleterious to the growth of E. coli host cells.
Plasmid pRK2300 is a multicopy P15A derivative that contains
korA, korB, and korF but lacks
incC (Table 1; Fig. 2). If the in-frame incC
deletion is nonpolar, the remaining genes are predicted to be expressed at higher-than-normal levels because the korA promoter
in this plasmid lacks the operator OB1 for KorB repression.
This plasmid has no effect on the growth of E. coli.
However, cells containing both pRK2300 and the tacp-incC2
plasmid pRK21985 have markedly reduced EOP on IPTG-containing
medium, even in the absence of selection (Table
5). Thus, the plasmids are toxic to
E. coli when incC2 is induced. To determine if
incC and korB are sufficient for the toxicity, we
examined the effect of coinduction of tacp-incC2 (on
pRK21985) and trcp-korB (on the compatible plasmid pRK21408) (Fig. 7). Coinduction resulted in a
marked reduction in E. coli colony size, whereas induction
of either gene alone had no significant effect. After two days, the
colonies are largely nonviable, except for IPTG-insensitive
variants (data not shown). Thus, simultaneous overexpression of
incC2 and korB is toxic to cell growth.

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Simultaneous overexpression of incC2 and
korB is toxic to E. coli. E. coli
EKA13 strains contained the following combinations of incC
and korB plasmids and vector controls: pRK21985
(tacp-incC2) and pRK21408 (trcp-korB), pJAK16
(incC2 vector control) and pRK353 (korB vector
control), pRK21985 and pRK353, and pJAK16 and pRK21408. Strains were
grown overnight at 37°C with selection for both plasmids and then
were plated on medium containing 1 mM IPTG or medium lacking IPTG.
Shown are colonies from cells containing pJAK16 and pRK353 on
IPTG-containing medium (A) and pRK21985 and pRK21408 on medium lacking
IPTG (B) and containing IPTG (C). Magnification is the same for all
frames. Results from the other combinations were essentially equivalent
to those in panel A, with the exception that the strain with pJAK16 and
pRK21408 produced slightly smaller colonies on IPTG.
|
|
High levels of IncC2 cause oligocopy RK2 to segregate with low-copy
kinetics.
We have shown that induction of incC2 causes
the loss of RK2 under nonselective growth conditions. RK2 is present in
the cell at 5 to 10 copies per chromosome (24, 94), and we
were surprised by how easily RK2 was lost upon induction of
incC2. We therefore examined the kinetics of RK2 loss from
the population after induction. The RK2lac
par plasmid
pRK21382 was used to prevent the triggering of toxicity by the
parDE plasmid addiction system. Upon induction of
incC2, RK2lac
par was rapidly lost from the
population (Fig. 8). The observed plasmid
loss curve was similar to the theoretical curves for a nonreplicating
plasmid with a copy number of one or two. Massive plasmid degradation
was not triggered by induction of incC2, because
RK2lac
par-containing cells were present after overnight
growth in IPTG-containing broth (data not shown). These results
indicate that high levels of IncC2 cause the multiple copies of RK2 in
the cell to form an aggregate, which then segregates as a unit to
generate a plasmidless daughter cell at cell division.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Elevated IncC2 causes RK2 to segregate as a unit.
E. coli EKA335 strains contained either pJAK16 (vector) or
pRK21985 (tacp-incC) in addition to pRK21382 (RK2lac
par). Strains were grown overnight in LB broth with selection
for pRK21985 and pRK21382 and then were diluted 1:50 into prewarmed LB
broth with selection only for pRK21985 and grown to a cell density of
approximately 2 × 108 cells/ml to allow the cells to
exit lag phase. At time zero a 10 3 dilution of each
culture was inoculated into prewarmed medium with or without 1 mM IPTG
and with chloramphenicol to select pRK21895 only. At various times,
samples were plated on medium with selection for the
tacp-incC2 plasmid and X-Gal to assay RK2lac
par retention. Plasmids RK2lac par plus pJAK16:
, no IPTG; , with IPTG. Plasmids RK2lac par plus
pRK21985: , no IPTG; , with IPTG. The theoretical curves for loss
of a nonreplicating plasmid of copy numbers 1 and 2 (n = 1 and n = 2, respectively) are shown.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have undertaken a systematic analysis of the incC
determinant to understand its role in the stable maintenance of the
promiscuous plasmid RK2. First we showed that the IncC2 product of the
incC gene is sufficient to exert replicon-independent
incompatibility, a property indicative of plasmid maintenance
determinants (3, 65). We then exploited this phenotype to
identify other factors that function with IncC. One of these factors
was found to be KorB, a protein known previously only as a
transcriptional repressor that acts on several operons of the
RK2 kor regulon (25, 67). Our studies revealed
that KorB is required for IncC-mediated incompatibility and that the
KorB and IncC proteins physically interact. A second factor is the
cis-acting DNA site (OB) for binding of KorB. A role for OB was revealed by the finding that a plasmid
containing a single copy of OB is destabilized by
IncC-mediated incompatibility. We also showed that the incC
region of RK2 is able to stabilize an unstable, heterologous plasmid in
cis in an incC-dependent manner. These results
lead us to conclude that IncC, KorB, and OB comprise at
least part of an active partition system on plasmid RK2.
In the well-studied active partition systems of plasmids P1 and F, the
ATPase (ParA and SopA, respectively), the DNA-binding protein (ParB and
SopB, respectively) and the cis-acting element (parS and sopC, respectively) are sufficient to
stabilize an unstable plasmid (1, 2, 37, 64, 66). Similar
results have been observed for the analogous components of the related
partition systems of R1 and NR1 (29, 44, 82). In contrast, a
region of RK2 containing incC, korB, and
OB1 of RK2 was not sufficient to stabilize an unstable
plasmid in E. coli, and an OB3-containing plasmid was not stabilized with incC2 and korB in
trans (data not shown). However, a larger RK2 region that
includes incC, korB, and OB1 plus
additional downstream genes (korF, korG,
kfrA, and upf54.8) and two other copies of the
KorB-binding site (OB2 and OB3) showed
significant stabilization activity that is dependent on the presence of
an intact incC gene (Fig. 4). It is possible that one or
more of the additional genes or OB sites is required for
stabilization activity. Indeed, Williams et al. (92) have presented intriguing evidence suggesting that OB1,
OB2, and OB3 sites are not equivalent and that
OB3 is the preferred site for an incC-dependent
stabilization activity. However, it is difficult to rule out the
effects of structural changes, as different fragments of RK2 in test
vectors can affect plasmid maintenance independent of partition
functions (76). We are currently seeking to establish a
well-defined, manipulable system in which a plasmid containing the
required OB site(s) is stabilized by the controlled
expression of the appropriate genes in trans.
The observed stabilization of the pMB1 and P15A replicons in a
pcnB host by the larger incC-korB-OB
region (pRK2101 and pRK22329, respectively) was significant relative to
the vector and highly reproducible (Fig. 4). Nevertheless, these
plasmids were still lost at a significant rate. One explanation is that
the replicons occasionally fail to replicate in the pcnB
host, thus leading to plasmidless segregants regardless of a
stabilization mechanism. It is also possible that the copy number is
too low in this host for adequate expression of the partition system
components or that E. coli is not the most suitable host for
the RK2 partition system. Another possibility is that other genes may
be required to enhance the efficiency of the basic
incC-korB-OB partition system. In support of
this idea, Bignell et al. (9) have recently shown that a
larger region of RK2 is even better able to stabilize an unstable plasmid.
The IncC protein was predicted to be involved in partition on the basis
of sequence similarity to regions of the ParA and SopA partition
proteins of plasmids P1 and F, respectively (62). Both the
ParA and SopA proteins have been shown to interact with the cognate
DNA-binding proteins ParB and SopB (10, 15, 18, 38, 47, 61,
95). The ParM protein of plasmid R1, which has no sequence
relationship with ParA or SopA, but is thought to have a similar
function in partition, interacts with the DNA-binding protein ParR
(44). Thus, if IncC is involved in active partition, it is
predicted to interact with a DNA-binding protein. Our finding that KorB
and its binding site OB are required for IncC-mediated incompatibility suggested that KorB is the interacting protein. Recent
studies have shown that IncC can affect the binding of KorB to its
target site, suggestive of a physical interaction (43, 52).
We show here, both by yeast two-hybrid analysis and by in vitro studies
with partially purified proteins, that IncC and KorB directly interact.
The discovery that KorB functions both as an active partition protein
with IncC and a global transcriptional repressor is a remarkable
finding that distinguishes the RK2 system from any other plasmid
partition system. KorB is involved in the control of multiple
operons of the kor regulon, a feature unique to IncP promiscuous plasmids (25, 67). The regulated operons
include genes for replication initiation, conjugative transfer, and
stable maintenance in P. aeruginosa (67, 94). In
addition, KorB is an autorepressor of the incC-korB
operon along with KorA (Fig. 1). An early clue that KorB might
have a function other than that of a transcriptional regulator was that
both RK2 and the related, but distinct, IncP
plasmid R751 have
multiple KorB-binding sites distributed around their genomes (67,
86). Only some of these sites are involved in transcriptional
regulation. Others are conserved in their location but occur downstream
of or within genes and have no obvious function. KorB binds as a dimer
to a 13-bp palindromic sequence, and there is evidence that KorB can
form tetramers (7) that may be able to couple separated
OB sites. These properties of the IncC-KorB system resemble
the Soj-SpoOJ system of Bacillus subtilis. SpoOJ is involved
in chromosome segregation in vegetative and sporulating cells (11,
41, 78). SpoOJ binds to eight sites on the B. subtilis
chromosome (53), and recently Soj has been shown to organize
the SpoOJ-bound sites into a condensed structure (57). The
multiple OB sites on IncP plasmids may likewise be involved
in the production of a specialized, KorB- and IncC-mediated, nucleoprotein structure required for efficient partition.
A prediction of the current plasmid partition model is that plasmid
copies pair prior to their segregation into daughter cells (2,
3). Electron microscopic studies have implicated partition proteins of plasmid R1 in the pairing of DNA fragments containing the
cis element in vitro (45). Remarkable genetic
studies on the incompatibility properties of the plasmid P1
parS site and smaller, yet functional, derivatives have
demonstrated a requirement for equivalent nucleoprotein structures, a
result that can best be explained by the pairing model (16, 17,
58). In addition, recent results of fluorescence microscopy on
the cellular locations of plasmids P1 and F indicate that the plasmids
localize to the division plane of the cell and then segregate to the
1/4 and 3/4 positions prior to cell division (32, 63), a
finding consistent with active partition of plasmid pairs. In this
study, we found that elevated levels of IncC cause RK2 to be lost at a
rate equivalent to that of a plasmid with a copy number of 1 to 2, even
though there are at least 10 to 15 copies of RK2 in the cell at cell division. This result indicates that elevated levels of IncC can cause
the copies of RK2 to aggregate and therefore segregate as a unit.
Aggregation could result from overpairing caused by intermolecular interactions of the multiple KorB sites to form an interlocked plasmid
aggregate. We suggest that these results indicate a role for IncC in
the pairing of RK2 molecules prior to segregation.
Remarkably little is known about the basic mechanism for directed DNA
movement into daughter cells. Because models for partition require an
interaction with an as yet unidentified host cell apparatus (3,
26, 42, 89, 93), the broad host range of IncP plasmids makes them
particularly interesting. Has the IncC-KorB partition system evolved to
exploit universal properties of host cell DNA segregation machinery
such that it can function in a wide variety of bacterial hosts, or is
it specific only for certain hosts? We have shown here that high levels
of IncC and KorB together are toxic to cell growth, and it is
reasonable to suggest that they interact with and perturb the machinery
for chromosome segregation. It will be interesting to determine if
toxicity occurs in other hosts and if it reflects the host range of
incC-dependent stabilization. The toxicity phenotype may
also provide a genetic tool for the identification of components of a
host segregation apparatus that interacts with the IncC-KorB partition
system. Since the discovery of the kor regulon on
promiscuous IncP plasmids (25), the genes of the
kilA, kilC, and kilE loci have been
suggested to encode host-specific functions for stable plasmid
maintenance, and studies with kilE support this model
(94). Given the strong evidence that IncC, KorB, and
OB constitute the basis for a partition system on IncP
plasmids, we are investigating the possibility that the gene products
of the kil loci function through this basic system.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This research was supported by NIH grant R01-GM29085 to D.H.F.
and Cancer Center support grant CA13696 to Columbia University. T.M.R.
and M.H.L. were partially supported by NIH training grant AI07161.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Microbiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 701 W. 168th St., New York, NY 10032. Phone: (212) 305-3425. Fax: (212)
305-1468. E-mail: figurski{at}cuccfa.ccc.columbia.edu.
Present address: Department of Microbiology, University of Texas
Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390.
Present address: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert
Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Austin, S., and A. Abeles.
1983.
Partition of unit-copy miniplasmids to daughter cells. I. P1 and F miniplasmids contain discrete, interchangeable sequences sufficient to promote equipartition.
J. Mol. Biol.
169:353-372[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Austin, S., and A. Abeles.
1983.
Partition of unit-copy miniplasmids to daughter cells. II. The partition region of miniplasmid P1 encodes an essential protein and a centromere-like site at which it acts.
J. Mol. Biol.
169:373-387[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Austin, S., and K. Nordström.
1990.
Partition-mediated incompatibility of bacterial plasmids.
Cell
60:351-354[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Austin, S. J.
1988.
Plasmid partition.
Plasmid
20:1-9[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Ausubel, F. M.,
R. Brent,
R. E. Kingston,
D. D. Moore,
J. G. Seidman,
J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl (ed.).
1989.
Current protocols in molecular biology. J.
Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y.
|
| 6.
|
Ayres, E. K.,
V. J. Thomson,
G. Merino,
D. Balderes, and D. H. Figurski.
1993.
Precise deletions in large prokaryotic genomes by vector-mediated excision (VEX): the trfA gene of promiscuous plasmid RK2 is essential for replication in several gram-negative hosts.
J. Mol. Biol.
230:174-185[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Balzer, D.,
G. Ziegelin,
W. Pansegrau,
V. Kruft, and E. Lanka.
1992.
KorB protein of promiscuous plasmid RP4 recognizes inverted sequence repetitions in regions essential for conjugative plasmid transfer.
Nucleic Acids Res.
20:1851-1858[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Bechhofer, D. H.,
J. A. Kornacki,
W. Firshein, and D. H. Figurski.
1986.
Gene control in broad host-range plasmid RK2: expression, polypeptide product, and multiple regulatory functions of korB.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
83:394-398[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Bignell, C. R.,
A. S. Haines,
D. Khare, and C. M. Thomas.
1999.
Effect of growth rate and incC mutation on symmetric plasmid distribution by the IncP-1 partitioning apparatus.
Mol. Microbiol.
34:205-216[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Bouet, J. Y., and B. E. Funnell.
1999.
P1 ParA interacts with the P1 partition complex at parS and an ATP-ADP switch controls ParA activities.
EMBO J.
18:1415-1424[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Cervin, M. A.,
G. B. Spiegelman,
B. Raether,
K. Ohlsen,
M. Perego, and J. A. Hoch.
1998.
A negative regulator linking chromosome segregation to developmental transcription in Bacillus subtilis.
Mol. Microbiol.
29:85-95[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Chang, A. C. Y., and S. N. Cohen.
1978.
Construction and characterization of amplifiable multicopy DNA cloning vehicles derived from the P15A cryptic miniplasmid.
J. Bacteriol.
134:1141-1156[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Cohen, S. N.,
A. C. Y. Chang, and L. Hsu.
1972.
Nonchromosomal antibiotic resistance in bacteria: genetic transformation of Escherichia coli by R-factor DNA.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
69:2110-2114[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Datta, N., and R. Hedges.
1972.
Host ranges of R factors.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
70:453-460[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Davey, M. J., and B. E. Funnell.
1997.
Modulation of the P1 plasmid partition protein ParA by ATP, ADP, and P1 ParB.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:15286-15292[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Davis, M. A., and S. J. Austin.
1988.
Recognition of the P1 plasmid centromere analog involves binding of the ParB protein and is modified by a specific host factor.
EMBO J.
7:1881-1888[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Davis, M. A.,
K. A. Martin, and S. J. Austin.
1990.
Specificity switching of the P1 plasmid centromere-like site.
EMBO J.
9:991-998[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Davis, M. A.,
K. A. Martin, and S. J. Austin.
1992.
Biochemical activities of the ParA partition protein of the P1 plasmid.
Mol. Microbiol.
6:1141-1147[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Davis, M. A.,
L. Radnedge,
K. A. Martin,
F. Hayes,
B. Youngren, and S. J. Austin.
1996.
The P1 ParA protein and its ATPase activity play a direct role in the segregation of plasmid copies to daughter cells.
Mol. Microbiol.
21:1029-1036[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Easter, C. L.,
H. Schwab, and D. R. Helinski.
1998.
Role of the parCBA operon of the broad-host-range plasmid RK2 in stable plasmid maintenance.
J. Bacteriol.
180:6023-6030[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Eberl, L.,
C. S. Kristensen,
M. Givskov,
E. Grohmann,
M. Gerlitz, and H. Schwab.
1994.
Analysis of the multimer resolution system encoded by the parCBA operon of broad-host-range plasmid RP4.
Mol. Microbiol.
12:131-141[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Fields, S., and O. Song.
1989.
A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions.
Nature
340:245-246[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Figurski, D. H., and D. R. Helinski.
1979.
Replication of an origin-containing derivative of plasmid RK2 dependent on a plasmid function provided in trans.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
76:1648-1652[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Figurski, D. H.,
R. J. Meyer, and D. R. Helinski.
1979.
Suppression of ColE1 replication properties by the IncP-1 plasmid RK2 in hybrid plasmids constructed in vitro.
J. Mol. Biol.
133:295-318[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Figurski, D. H.,
R. F. Pohlman,
D. H. Bechhofer,
A. S. Prince, and C. A. Kelton.
1982.
Broad host range plasmid RK2 encodes multiple kil genes potentially lethal to Escherichia coli host cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
79:1935-1939[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Firshein, W., and P. Kim.
1997.
Plasmid replication and partition in Escherichia coli: is the cell membrane the key?
Mol. Microbiol.
23:1-10[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Funnell, B. E.
1988.
Mini-P1 plasmid partitioning: excess ParB protein destabilizes plasmids containing the centromere parS.
J. Bacteriol.
170:954-960[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Fürste, J. P.,
W. Pansegrau,
R. Frank,
H. Blocker,
P. Scholz,
M. Bagdasarian, and E. Lanka.
1986.
Molecular cloning of the plasmid RP4 primase region in a multi-host-range tacP expression vector.
Gene
48:119-131[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Gerdes, K., and S. Molin.
1986.
Partitioning of plasmid R1. Structural and functional analysis of the parA locus.
J. Mol. Biol.
190:269-279[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Gerlitz, M.,
O. Hrabak, and H. Schwab.
1990.
Partitioning of broad-host-range plasmid RP4 is a complex system involving site-specific recombination.
J. Bacteriol.
172:6194-6203[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Giebelhaus, L. A.,
L. Frost,
E. Lanka,
E. P. Gormley,
J. E. Davies, and B. Leskiw.
1996.
The Tra2 core of the IncP plasmid RP4 is required for intergeneric mating between Escherichia coli and Streptomyces lividans.
J. Bacteriol.
178:6378-6381[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Gordon, G. S.,
D. Sitnikov,
C. D. Webb,
A. Teleman,
A. Straight,
R. Losick,
A. W. Murray, and A. Wright.
1997.
Chromosome and low copy plasmid segregation in E. coli: visual evidence for distinct mechanisms.
Cell
90:1113-1121[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Grinter, N. J.,
G. Brewster, and P. T. Barth.
1989.
Two mechanisms for the stable inheritance of plasmid RP4.
Plasmid
22:203-214[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Hanahan, D.
1983.
Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids.
J. Mol. Biol.
166:557-580[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Hayman, G. T., and P. L. Bolen.
1993.
Movement of shuttle plasmids from Escherichia coli into yeasts other than Saccharomyces cerevisiae using trans-kingdom conjugation.
Plasmid
30:251-257[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Heinemann, J. A., and G. Sprague.
1989.
Bacterial conjugative plasmids mobilize DNA transfer between bacteria and yeast.
Nature
340:205-209[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Hiraga, S.
1992.
Chromosome and plasmid partition in Escherichia coli.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
61:283-306[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Hirano, M.,
H. Mori,
T. Onogi,
M. Yamazoe,
H. Niki,
T. Ogura, and S. Hiraga.
1998.
Autoregulation of the partition genes of the mini-F plasmid and the intracellular localization of their products in Escherichia coli.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
257:392-403[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Hoffman, C. S., and F. Winston.
1987.
A ten-minute DNA preparation from yeast efficiently releases autonomous plasmids for transformation of Escherichia coli.
Gene
57:267-272[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Ingram, L. C.,
M. H. Richmond, and R. B. Sykes.
1973.
Molecular characterization of the R factors implicated in the carbenicillin resistance of a sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from burns.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
3:279-288[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Ireton, K.,
N. W. Gunther, and A. D. Grossman.
1994.
spoOJ is required for normal chromosome segregation as well as the initiation of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis.
J. Bacteriol.
176:5320-5329[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Jacob, F.,
S. Brenner, and F. Cuzin.
1963.
On the regulation of DNA replication in bacteria.
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.
28:329-348[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Jagura-Burdzy, G.,
K. Kostelidou,
J. Pole,
D. Khare,
A. Jones,
D. R. Williams, and C. M. Thomas.
1999.
IncC of broad-host-range plasmid RK2 modulates KorB transcriptional repressor activity in vivo and operator binding in vitro.
J. Bacteriol.
181:2807-2815[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Jensen, R. B., and K. Gerdes.
1997.
Partitioning of plasmid R1. The ParM protein exhibits ATPase activity and interacts with the centromere-like ParR-parC complex.
J. Mol. Biol.
269:505-513[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Jensen, R. B.,
R. Lurz, and K. Gerdes.
1998.
Mechanism of DNA segregation in prokaryotes: replicon pairing by parC of plasmid R1.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:8550-8555[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Jovanovic, O. S.,
E. K. Ayres, and D. H. Figurski.
1994.
Host-inhibitory functions encoded by promiscuous plasmids: transient arrest of Escherichia coli segregants that fail to inherit plasmid RK2.
J. Mol. Biol.
237:52-64[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Kim, S. K., and J. Shim.
1999.
Interaction between F plasmid partition proteins SopA and SopB.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
263:113-117[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Kittell, B. L., and D. R. Helinski.
1991.
Iteron inhibition of plasmid RK2 replication in vitro: evidence for intermolecular coupling of replication origins as a mechanism for RK2 replication control.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:1389-1393[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Kolter, R., and D. R. Helinski.
1978.
Construction of plasmid R6K derivatives in vitro: characterization of the R6K replication region.
Plasmid
1:571-580[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 50.
|
Kornacki, J. A.,
C.-H. Chang, and D. H. Figurski.
1993.
The kil-kor regulon of promiscuous plasmid RK2: structure, products, and regulation of two operons that constitute the kilE locus.
J. Bacteriol.
175:5078-5090[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 51.
|
Kornacki, J. A.,
A. H. West, and W. Firshein.
1984.
Proteins encoded by the trans-acting replication and maintenance regions of broad host range plasmid RK2.
Plasmid
11:48-57[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 52.
|
Kostelidou, K., and C. M. Thomas.
2000.
The hierarchy of KorB binding at its 12 binding sites on the broad-host-range plasmid RK2 and modulation of this binding by IncC1 protein.
J. Mol. Biol.
295:411-422[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 53.
|
Lin, D. C., and A. D. Grossman.
1998.
Identification and characterization of a bacterial chromosome partitioning site.
Cell
92:675-685[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 54.
|
Lopilato, J.,
S. Bortner, and J. Beckwith.
1986.
Mutations in a new chromosomal gene of Escherichia coli K-12, pcnB, reduce plasmid copy number of pBR322 and its derivatives.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
205:285-290[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 55.
|
Lynch, A. S., and J. C. Wang.
1995.
SopB protein-mediated silencing of genes linked to the sopC locus of Escherichia coli F plasmid.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:1896-1900[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 56.
|
Maniatis, T.,
E. F. Fritsch, and J. Sambrook.
1982.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 57.
|
Marston, A. L., and J. Errington.
1999.
Dynamic movement of the ParA-like Soj protein of B. subtilis and its dual role in nucleoid organization and developmental regulation.
Mol. Cell
4:673-682[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 58.
|
Martin, K. A.,
S. A. Friedman, and S. J. Austin.
1987.
Partition site of the P1 plasmid.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
84:8544-8547[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 59.
|
Meyer, R., and M. Hinds.
1982.
Multiple mechanisms for expression of incompatibility by broad-host-range plasmid RK2.
J. Bacteriol.
152:1078-1090[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 60.
|
Mohl, D. A., and J. W. Gober.
1997.
Cell cycle-dependent polar localization of chromosome partitioning proteins in Caulobacter crescentus.
Cell
88:675-684[Medline].
|
| 61.
|
Mori, H.,
Y. Mori,
C. Ichinose,
H. Niki,
T. Ogura,
A. Kato, and S. Hiraga.
1989.
Purification and characterization of SopA and SopB proteins essential for F plasmid partitioning.
J. Biol. Chem.
264:15535-15541[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 62.
|
Motallebi-Veshareh, M.,
D. A. Rouch, and C. M. Thomas.
1990.
A family of ATPases involved in active partitioning of diverse bacterial plasmids.
Mol. Microbiol.
4:1455-1463[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 63.
|
Niki, H., and S. Hiraga.
1997.
Subcellular distribution of actively partitioning F plasmid during the cell division cycle in E. coli.
Cell
90:951-957[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 64.
|
Nordström, K., and S. J. Austin.
1989.
Mechanisms that contribute to the stable segregation of plasmids.
Annu. Rev. Genet.
23:37-69[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 65.
|
Novick, R. P.
1987.
Plasmid incompatibility.
Microbiol. Rev.
51:381-395[Free Full Text].
|
| 66.
|
Ogura, T., and S. Hiraga.
1983.
Partition mechanism of F plasmid: two plasmid gene-encoded products and a cis-acting region are involved in partition.
Cell
32:351-360[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 67.
|
Pansegrau, W.,
E. Lanka,
P. T. Barth,
D. H. Figurski,
D. G. Guiney,
D. Haas,
D. R. Helinski,
H. Schwab,
V. A. Stanisich, and C. M. Thomas.
1994.
Complete nucleotide sequence of Birmingham IncP plasmids: compilation and comparative analysis.
J. Mol. Biol.
239:623-663[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 68.
|
Perri, S.,
D. R. Helinski, and A. Toukdarian.
1991.
Interaction of plasmid-encoded replication initiation proteins with the origin of DNA replication in broad host range plasmid RK2.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:12536-12543[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 69.
|
Pohlman, R. F., and D. H. Figurski.
1983.
Essential genes of plasmid RK2 in Escherichia coli: trfB region controls a kil gene near trfA.
J. Bacteriol.
156:584-591[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 70.
|
Roberts, R. C.,
R. Burioni, and D. R. Helinski.
1990.
Genetic characterization of the stabilizing functions of a region of broad-host-range plasmid RK2.
J. Bacteriol.
172:6204-6216[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 71.
|
Roberts, R. C.,
A. Ström, and D. R. Helinski.
1994.
The parDE operon of broad-host-range plasmid RK2 specifies growth inhibition associated with plasmid loss.
J. Mol. Biol.
237:35-51[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 72.
|
Rodionov, O.,
M. Lobocka, and M. Yarmolinsky.
1999.
Silencing of genes flanking the P1 plasmid centromere.
Science
283:546-549[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 73.
|
Saiki, R. K.,
D. H. Gelfand,
S. Stoffel,
S. I. Scharf,
R. Higuchi,
G. T. Horn,
K. B. Mullis, and H. A. Erlich.
1988.
Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase.
Science
239:487-491[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 74.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 75.
|
Schiestl, R. H., and R. D. Gietz.
1989.
High efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells using single-stranded nucleic acids as a carrier.
Curr. Genet.
16:339-346[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 76.
|
Schmidhauser, T. J.,
D. H. Bechhofer,
D. H. Figurski, and D. R. Helinski.
1989.
Host-specific effects of the korA-korB operon and oriT region on the maintenance of miniplasmid derivatives of broad host-range plasmid RK2.
Plasmid
21:99-112[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 77.
|
Schmidhauser, T. J., and D. R. Helinski.
1985.
Regions of broad-host-range plasmid RK2 involved in replication and stable maintenance in nine species of gram-negative bacteria.
J. Bacteriol.
164:446-455[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 78.
|
Sharpe, M. E., and J. Errington.
1996.
The Bacillus subtilis soj-spoOJ locus is required for a centromere-like function involved in prespore chromosome partitioning.
Mol. Microbiol.
21:501-509[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 79.
|
Sia, E. A.,
R. C. Roberts,
C. Easter,
D. R. Helinski, and D. H. Figurski.
1995.
Different relative importances of the par operons and the effect of conjugal transfer on the maintenance of intact promiscuous plasmid RK2.
J. Bacteriol.
177:2789-2797[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 80.
|
Smith, C. A., and C. M. Thomas.
1984.
Nucleotide sequence of the trfA gene of broad host-range plasmid RK2.
J. Mol. Biol.
175:251-262[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 81.
|
Studier, F. W., and B. A. Moffatt.
1986.
Use of bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase to direct selective high-level expression of cloned genes.
J. Mol. Biol.
189:113-130[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 82.
|
Tabuchi, A.,
Y. N. Min,
C. K. Kim,
Y. L. Fan,
D. D. Womble, and R. H. Rownd.
1988.
Genetic organization and nucleotide sequence of the stability locus of IncFII plasmid NR1.
J. Mol. Biol.
202:511-525[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 83.
|
Thomas, C. M., and D. R. Helinski.
1989.
Vegetative replication and stable inheritance of IncP plasmids, p. 1-25.
In
C. M. Thomas (ed.), Promiscuous plasmids of gram-negative bacteria. Academic Press Ltd., San Diego, Calif.
|
| 84.
|
Thomas, C. M., and C. A. Smith.
1986.
The trfB region of broad host range plasmid RK2: the nucleotide sequence reveals incC and key regulatory gene trfB/korA/korD as overlapping genes.
Nucleic Acids Res.
14:4453-4469[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 85.
|
Thomson, V. J.,
O. S. Jovanovic,
R. F. Pohlman,
C.-H. Chang, and D. H. Figurski.
1993.
Structure, function, and regulation of the kilB locus of promiscuous plasmid RK2.
J. Bacteriol.
175:2423-2435[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 86.
|
Thorsted, P. B.,
D. P. Macartney,
P. Akhtar,
A. S. Haines,
N. Ali,
P. Davidson,
T. Stafford,
M. J. Pocklington,
W. Pansegrau,
B. M. Wilkins,
E. Lanka, and C. M. Thomas.
1998.
Complete sequence of the IncP plasmid R751: implications for evolution and organisation of the IncP backbone.
J. Mol. Biol.
282:969-990[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 87.
|
Trieu-Cuot, P.,
C. Carlier,
M. Martin, and P. Courvalin.
1987.
Plasmid transfer by conjugation from Escherichia coli to gram-positive bacteria.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
48:289-294[CrossRef].
|
| 88.
|
Votjek, A. B.,
S. M. Hollenberg, and J. A. Cooper.
1993.
Mammalian Ras interacts directly with the serine/threonine kinase Raf.
Cell
74:205-214[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 89.
|
Wake, R. G., and J. Errington.
1995.
Chromosome partitioning in bacteria.
Annu. Rev. Genet.
29:41-67[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 90.
|
Watanabe, E.,
M. Wachi,
M. Yamasaki, and K. Nagai.
1992.
ATPase activity of SopA, a protein essential for active partitioning of F plasmid.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
234:346-352[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 91.
|
Webb, C. D.,
A. Teleman,
S. Gordon,
A. Straight,
A. Belmont,
D. C. Lin,
A. D. Grossman,
A. Wright, and R. Losick.
1997.
Bipolar localization of the replication origin regions of chromosomes in vegetative and sporulating cells of B. subtilis.
Cell
88:667-674[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 92.
|
Williams, D. R.,
D. P. Macartney, and C. M. Thomas.
1998.
The partitioning activity of the RK2 central control region requires only incC, korB and KorB-binding site OB3 but other KorB-binding sites form destabilizing complexes in the absence of OB3.
Microbiol.
144:3369-3378[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 93.
|
Williams, D. R., and C. M. Thomas.
1992.
Active partitioning of bacterial plasmids.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
138:1-16[Free Full Text].
|
| 94.
|
Wilson, J. W.,
E. A. Sia, and D. H. Figurski.
1997.
The kilE locus of promiscuous IncP plasmid RK2 is required for stable maintenance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
J. Bacteriol.
179:2339-2347[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 95.
|
Youngren, B., and S. Austin.
1997.
Altered ParA partition proteins of plasmid P1 act via the partition site to block plasmid propagation.
Mol. Microbiol.
25:1023-1030[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Journal of Bacteriology, November 2000, p. 6014-6026, Vol. 182, No. 21
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Kolatka, K., Witosinska, M., Pierechod, M., Konieczny, I.
(2008). Bacterial partitioning proteins affect the subcellular location of broad-host-range plasmid RK2. Microbiology
154: 2847-2856
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yao, S., Helinski, D. R., Toukdarian, A.
(2007). Localization of the Naturally Occurring Plasmid ColE1 at the Cell Pole. J. Bacteriol.
189: 1946-1953
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Johnson, E. P., Yao, S., Helinski, D. R.
(2005). Gyrase Inhibitors and Thymine Starvation Disrupt the Normal Pattern of Plasmid RK2 Localization in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol.
187: 3538-3547
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Leonard, T. A, Moller-Jensen, J., Lowe, J.
(2005). Towards understanding the molecular basis of bacterial DNA segregation. Phil Trans R Soc B
360: 523-535
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bartosik, A. A., Lasocki, K., Mierzejewska, J., Thomas, C. M., Jagura-Burdzy, G.
(2004). ParB of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Interactions with Its Partner ParA and Its Target parS and Specific Effects on Bacterial Growth. J. Bacteriol.
186: 6983-6998
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Siddique, A., Figurski, D. H.
(2002). The Active Partition Gene incC of IncP Plasmids Is Required for Stable Maintenance in a Broad Range of Hosts. J. Bacteriol.
184: 1788-1793
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lukaszewicz, M., Kostelidou, K., Bartosik, A. A., Cooke, G. D., Thomas, C. M., Jagura-Burdzy, G.
(2002). Functional dissection of the ParB homologue (KorB) from IncP-1 plasmid RK2. Nucleic Acids Res
30: 1046-1055
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Delbruck, H., Ziegelin, G., Lanka, E., Heinemann, U.
(2002). An Src Homology 3-like Domain Is Responsible for Dimerization of the Repressor Protein KorB Encoded by the Promiscuous IncP Plasmid RP4. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 4191-4198
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bhattacharjee, M. K., Kachlany, S. C., Fine, D. H., Figurski, D. H.
(2001). Nonspecific Adherence and Fibril Biogenesis by Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans: TadA Protein Is an ATPase. J. Bacteriol.
183: 5927-5936
[Abstract]
[Full Text]