JB Tips for Better Browsing
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Hoover, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Hoover, T. R.

Journal of Bacteriology, November 2000, p. 6503-6508, Vol. 182, No. 22
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Transcription Initiation-Defective Forms of sigma 54 That Differ in Ability To Function with a Heteroduplex DNA Template

Mary T. Kelly,dagger John A. Ferguson III, and Timothy R. Hoover*

Department of Microbiology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602

Received 14 August 2000/Accepted 6 September 2000


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Transcription by sigma 54-RNA polymerase holoenzyme requires an activator that catalyzes isomerization of the closed promoter complex to an open complex. We examined mutant forms of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium sigma 54 that were defective in transcription initiation but retained core RNA polymerase- and promoter-binding activities. Four of the mutant proteins allowed activator-independent transcription from a heteroduplex DNA template. One of these mutant proteins, L124P V148A, had substitutions in a sequence that had not been shown previously to participate in the prevention of activator-independent transcription. The remaining mutants did not allow efficient activator-independent transcription from the heteroduplex DNA template and had substitutions within a conserved 20-amino-acid segment (Leu-179 to Leu-199), suggesting a role for this sequence in transcription initiation.


    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzyme consists of a core enzyme (alpha 2beta beta ') and a dissociable sigma  subunit. Bacteria often contain multiple sigma  factors with individual sequence specificities that direct holoenzyme to different classes of promoters (22). sigma 54 is a distinctive bacterial sigma factor that does not share significant sequence homology with other sigma factors. Transcription initiation by sigma 54-RNA polymerase holoenzyme (sigma 54-holoenzyme) occurs through a distinct mechanism that involves an activator or enhancer-binding protein (3). sigma 54-Holoenzyme binds to promoters to form stable closed complexes. Isomerization of these closed complexes to transcriptionally active open complexes requires an enhancer-binding protein, which generally binds to sites upstream of the promoter and contacts sigma 54-holoenzyme through DNA looping. This isomerization requires nucleoside triphosphate hydrolysis by the enhancer-binding protein.

Deletion analysis of sigma 54 has revealed that the protein consists of at least three functional regions (7, 16, 26, 32, 33). The 50 amino-terminal residues of sigma 54 constitute region I, which is rich in glutamine and leucine residues and plays a direct role in transcriptional activation (16, 17). Region II of sigma 54 from enteric bacteria, which extends from residue 50 to residue 120 and is highly acidic, appears to influence the rate of open complex formation, as well as suppress nonspecific DNA binding by holoenzyme (4, 32). Region III consists of 360 carboxy-terminal residues and contains determinants for binding of both core RNA polymerase and promoter DNA (7, 27, 28, 33). Additional functions for region III are likely, as some substitutions in this region disrupt one or more steps in transcription initiation following initial promoter recognition (11, 18).

When region I of sigma 54 is deleted, the resulting holoenzyme assumes a conformation believed to reflect polymerase isomerization (6). This isomerization is inhibited by a peptide containing the region I sequence, indicating that region I can elicit its effects on holoenzyme in trans (6, 14). Holoenzyme containing sigma 54 with region I deleted fails to initiate transcription under normal conditions but can initiate transcription independently of enhancer-binding protein from a transiently melted or premelted DNA template (6, 29). These studies suggest that region I inhibits isomerization of the holoenzyme to a form that can stably associate with single-stranded DNA (4). Productive interaction with the enhancer-binding protein apparently relieves this inhibition and permits transcription initiation in a reaction that requires nucleotide hydrolysis by the enhancer-binding protein (14).

We previously isolated several mutant forms of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium sigma 54 that were defective in transcription initiation but retained core- and DNA-binding activities (18). Further analysis of these mutant sigma 54 proteins, the results of which are presented here, revealed that certain amino acid substitutions in regions I and III allowed the holoenzyme to initiate transcription from a heteroduplex DNA template in the absence of enhancer-binding protein, suggesting that sequences within these regions influence isomerization of the holoenzyme. The remaining sigma 54 mutant proteins had amino acid substitutions within region III and represented a second class of mutants that did not allow efficient transcription from the heteroduplex template in the absence of enhancer-binding protein. The strains and plasmids used in this study are described in Table 1.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study

L179P retains core- and promoter-binding activities. Several mutant forms of sigma 54 were isolated previously that failed to function normally at the sigma 54-dependent glnA promoter (glnAp2) but retained promoter-binding activities (20). We included here a new sigma 54 mutant protein, L179P, that was identified using the same screening procedure following random mutagenesis of a plasmid-borne copy of ntrA (encodes sigma 54) with the Epicurian Coli XL1-Red strain (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.). We previously used a gel mobility shift assay with labeled oligonucleotides that corresponded to the -9 to -29 region of the Sinorhizobium meliloti nifH promoter to examine interactions between the mutant forms of sigma 54 and core RNA polymerase, as well as the binding of the mutant proteins to promoter sequences (20). One oligonucleotide was double stranded over its entire length (double-stranded probe), while in the second oligonucleotide residues -11 to -9 of the template strand were single stranded (fork junction probe). Guo and Gralla first demonstrated fork junction DNA-binding activity of sigma 54 using these probes (15), and we subsequently found that the sigma 54-holoenzyme bound the fork junction probe significantly better than it did the double-stranded probe (18).

We examined the binding of the L179P-holoenzyme to the fork junction and double-stranded probes. As observed with the wild-type holoenzyme, the L179P-holoenzyme shifted the fork junction probe more efficiently than the double-stranded probe (Fig. 1). L179P produced less of the holoenzyme-shifted species than wild-type sigma 54, suggesting that this mutant protein had reduced affinity for either core RNA polymerase or fork junction DNA. These gel mobility shift data, however, demonstrate that like the other mutant forms of sigma 54 described previously (20), L179P still binds the core and directs the holoenzyme to promoter sequences.


View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.   Gel mobility shift assay with double-stranded and fork junction probes. Binding of mutant forms of sigma 54-holoenzyme to the S. meliloti nifH promoter was analyzed by a gel mobility shift assay as previously described (18). Two different DNA probes were used for the gel mobility shift assays. One probe contained 21 bp of double-stranded DNA that included residues -9 through -29 of the nifH promoter. The second probe had 18 bp of double-stranded DNA, which included residues -12 through -29 of the nifH promoter plus a three-base 5' overhang of the template strand that corresponded to residues -9 through -11. Binding reaction mixtures contained 5 nM DNA probe and 6 µg of sonicated calf thymus DNA/ml along with 300 nM core RNA polymerase (lanes 1 and 2), 600 nM hexahistidine-tagged sigma 54 (lanes 3 and 4), 300 nM core plus 600 nM hexahistidine-tagged sigma 54 (lanes 5 and 6), and 300 nM core plus 600 nM hexahistidine-tagged L179P (lanes 7 and 8). Core RNA polymerase and histidine-tagged sigma 54 proteins were purified as previously described (20, 23). The double-stranded probe was used in odd-numbered lanes, while the fork junction probe was used in even-numbered lanes. The holoenzyme-shifted (h) and sigma 54-shifted (sigma ) species are indicated. Unbound probes are not shown.

Mutant forms of sigma 54 can be cross-linked to DctD. S. enterica serovar Typhimurium sigma 54 can be chemically cross-linked to the enhancer-binding protein S. meliloti C4-dicarboxylic acid transport protein D (DctD), suggesting that sigma 54 is a primary target for the enhancer-binding protein (20). Consistent with this hypothesis, mutant forms of DctD that failed to activate transcription and cross-linked poorly to sigma 54 have been isolated (31). Further support of this hypothesis comes from the observation that sigma 54 bound to heteroduplex DNA in the absence of core RNA polymerase undergoes a conformational change in a reaction that requires enhancer-binding protein and nucleotide hydrolysis (8).

We wished to determine if any of the sigma 54 mutant proteins were deficient in cross-linking to DctD and therefore altered in the ability to make productive contact with the enhancer-binding protein. Since the sigma 54 mutant proteins were isolated originally based on their failure to function with nitrogen regulatory protein C (NtrC) at glnAp2 in vivo (18), we first verified that these mutant proteins were also defective in functioning with DctD in vivo. For these assays, we used DctD(Delta 1-142), which is a truncated, constitutively active form of the protein that lacks the first 142 amino-terminal residues (21). We examined the ability of the mutant forms of sigma 54 to function with DctD(Delta 1-142) in activating transcription from a plasmid-borne dctA'-'lacZ reporter gene in Escherichia coli strain YMC11, which otherwise lacks sigma 54. DctD-mediated transcriptional activation with the mutant forms of sigma 54 ranged from 1 to 19% of the activity achieved with wild-type sigma 54 (Table 2). These values were consistent with the activities observed for the mutant sigma 54 proteins with NtrC at glnAp2 in vivo (18).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2.   Abilities of mutant forms of sigma 54 to function with DctD(Delta 1-142) at a dctA'-'lacZ reporter gene in vivo

Each of the mutant forms of sigma 54 was purified and examined for the ability to cross-link to DctD(Delta 1-142) using succinimidyl 4-(N-maleimidomethyl)cyclohexane-1-carboxylate as the cross-linking reagent as described previously (20). All of the mutant sigma 54 proteins cross-linked efficiently to DctD(Delta 1-142) (data not shown), indicating that none of them were defective in gross interactions with this enhancer-binding protein. Since the cross-linking assay provides only a qualitative assessment of interactions between sigma 54 and DctD, we cannot rule out the possibility that some of the mutant proteins had reduced affinities for DctD or that some of the substitutions in these mutant proteins interfered with specific contacts between sigma 54 and DctD required for transcriptional activation.

Certain mutant forms of sigma 54 allow activator-independent transcription. We initially used an in vitro transcription assay to examine the abilities of the sigma 54 mutant proteins to support transcription from a supercoiled template that carried the S. enterica serovar Typhimurium glnA promoter region. In this transcription assay, heparin was added immediately before the nucleotides to prevent reinitiation but allow transcription from stable open complexes. None of the sigma 54 mutant proteins supported transcription under these conditions, except the L46P mutant protein, which had given the highest activity in vivo (Table 2). The level of transcript generated with the L46P mutant protein was ~5% of that generated with wild-type sigma 54 (Fig. 2). Addition of heparin to the transcription assay reaction after addition of the nucleotides did not alter the results of the assays with the mutant proteins (data not shown). These data confirmed our earlier in vivo findings that these mutant sigma 54 proteins were defective in their function at glnAp2 (18).


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.   In vitro transcription with mutant forms of sigma 54 from the glnA promoter regulatory region on a supercoiled DNA template. Transcription assays were carried out as described previously (24, 31). Assay reaction mixtures contained 400 nM maltose-binding protein-NtrC, 20 mM carbamoyl phosphate, 100 nM core RNA polymerase, and a 300 nM concentration of either hexahistidine-tagged sigma 54 (lane 1), L37P (lane 2), L46P (lane 3), E32K G189V (lane 4), L124P V148A (lane 5), L179P (lane 6), L199P D231G (lane 7), or L333P (lane 8). The arrow indicates the transcript from the glnA promoter.

Previous studies demonstrated that when region I of sigma 54 is deleted, the resulting holoenzyme can initiate transcription in the absence of enhancer-binding protein from a premelted, heteroduplex DNA template (6). We used this linear, heteroduplex template to determine if any of the mutant sigma 54 proteins would allow activator-independent transcription. The template spanned nucleotides -60 to +28 of the S. meliloti nifH promoter, and the DNA strands from -10 to -1 were noncomplementary (6).

The wild-type sigma 54-holoenzyme was only able to initiate transcription from the heteroduplex template weakly (Fig. 3, lane 1). Likewise, holoenzymes formed with the L179P mutant protein, the L199P D231G double-mutant protein, or the E32K G189V double-mutant protein initiated transcription from the heteroduplex template poorly. In contrast, holoenzymes containing L37P, L46P, L333P, or the double mutation L124P V148A initiated transcription efficiently from the heteroduplex template (Fig. 3, lanes 2 to 4 and 8). Amino acid substitutions in sigma 54 that result in activator-independent transcription have been described previously (10, 11, 26, 29), with the substitutions in these mutant proteins occurring primarily within a leucine-rich patch of region I and a very limited number of sites in region III. In general, these previous activator-independent mutant proteins retained significant activity in vivo. In contrast, holoenzymes with L37P, L333P, and the double mutation L124P V148A were severely impaired in the ability to function in vivo and in that regard are more like region I deletion mutant enzymes which do not support transcription initiation from homoduplex DNA templates (8). This result is not surprising, however, given that the mutant proteins in this study were chosen based on their failure to function at glnAp2 in vivo (18).


View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.   In vitro transcription assays using a heteroduplex DNA template. Transcription assays were carried out using a heteroduplex DNA template that spanned residues -60 to +28 of the S. meliloti nifH promoter and was noncomplementary between residues -10 and -1. The heteroduplex template was generated using two oligonucleotides as previously described (6). Transcription assays were conducted as previously described (6), except that 7.5 µCi of [alpha -32P]CTP (3,000 Ci/mmol) was used to label the transcripts. Reaction mixtures contained 100 nM core RNA polymerase, 300 nM hexahistidine-tagged sigma 54 proteins, and 30 nM heteroduplex DNA template. The sigma 54 proteins assayed were the wild type (lane 1) and the L37P (lane 2), L46P (lane 3), L333P (lane 4), E32K G189A (lane 5), L179P (lane 6), L199P D231G (lane 7), and L124P V148A (lane 8) mutant proteins. The arrow indicates the 28-base transcript.

Alanine scanning mutagenesis of the region around Leu-333. The similarities between the L37P and L333P mutant proteins in the ability to support activator-independent transcription (Fig. 3) and the reduced affinity for fork junction DNA (18) prompted us to examine conserved residues in the vicinity of Leu-333. Leu-333 lies within a well-conserved region of sigma 54 that was shown previously to be cross-linked to DNA upon UV irradiation of sigma 54-promoter complexes (5). It is also close to a putative helix-turn-helix motif that has been implicated in recognition of the -12 region of the promoter (12, 23). When we compared the sequences of this portion of sigma 54 proteins from 25 different bacteria, we noted that it was similar to a motif from single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (Fig. 4A). This motif from single-stranded DNA-binding proteins, (R/K)-N4-5-(K/R)-N4-6-(Y/F)-N5-8-(Y/F/N)-N6-9-(Y/C)-N9-(E/D)-N7-9-(Y/W)-N4-8-(Y/F/E)-N11-12-(R/K), is thought to stabilize the binding of single-stranded DNA by stacking interactions between aromatic residues and bases and electrostatic interactions between basic residues and phosphate groups of single-stranded DNA (25).


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.   Alanine scanning mutagenesis of conserved residues near Leu-333. (A) Amino acid sequence of the sigma 54 protein from S. enterica serovar Typhimurium near Leu-333. The PILEUP program was used to compare sequences around Leu-333 from sigma 54 proteins from 25 bacteria. The sequence shown spans residues 328 to 404. Leu-333 is marked with a dot over the sequence. Boldface letters indicate residues that are identical in at least 22 of the 25 sigma 54 protein sequences, and italic letters indicate residues that are similar in at least 22 of the sigma 54 protein sequences. Arrows indicate the residues where alanine substitutions were introduced. The stars indicate residues that align with the single-stranded DNA-binding motif, which is indicated on the bottom line. The sequence that is cross-linked to promoter DNA upon UV irradiation (5) is indicated, as is a putative helix-turn-helix motif that appears to be involved in DNA binding (23). (B) Glutamine synthetase activities observed with sigma 54 mutant proteins. Cells were grown in a modified E medium that lacked sodium ammonium phosphate and was supplemented with acid-hydrolyzed Casamino Acids at 1 mg/liter as described previously (18). Glutamine synthetase activities of strains that express the alanine substitution sigma 54 mutant proteins were carried out using the gamma -glutamyl transferase assay as described previously (18). Glutamine synthetase activities were expressed as micromoles of gamma -glutamyl hydroxymate per minute per milligram of protein, and all assays were done at least twice. Error bars show one standard deviation for each data set. The wild-type and mutant ntrA alleles, which were carried on plasmids, were under the control of the E. coli lac promoter-operator and were overexpressed by including 100 µM isopropyl-beta -thiogalactopyranoside in the growth medium. The no-protein designation indicates the glutamine synthetase activity from S. enterica serovar Typhimurium strain TRH134 without a plasmid-borne ntrA allele. (C) Repression of ant'-'lacZ reporter gene in S. enterica serovar Typhimurium strain TRH107 by sigma 54 proteins. beta -Galactosidase assays were done in triplicate with strain TRH107, carrying plasmids that encode the sigma 54 proteins indicated, as described previously (1, 18). Error bars show one standard deviation for each data set. The no-protein control shows the activity for strain TRH107 with no plasmid-borne ntrA allele.

We introduced alanine substitutions at five conserved positions near Leu-333 by site-directed mutagenesis as described previously (18). Substitutions were introduced at Trp-328, Lys-331, Arg-336, Arg-342, and Gln-351. Two of these residues, Arg-336 and Arg-342, are located within the region of the protein that can be cross-linked to promoter DNA and are also part of the sequence that resembles the single-stranded DNA-binding motif. Gln-351 occurred in all 25 of the sigma 54 protein sequences that we compared, while Trp-328 occurred in 20 of these sequences and lysine or arginine occurred at position 331 in 20 of these sequences. During the course of our experiments, Chaney and Buck (11) introduced alanine substitutions at Trp-328, Arg-336, and Arg-342 in Klebsiella pneumoniae sigma 54 and reported that the R336A mutation allowed activator-independent transcription.

The alanine substitution mutant proteins that we generated were overexpressed at comparable levels, and each conferred glutamine prototrophy on an S. enterica serovar Typhimurium strain that lacked sigma 54 (strain TRH134), indicating that these mutant forms of sigma 54 could function with NtrC at glnAp2 (data not shown). Glutamine prototrophy is not a quantitative indicator of the functionality of sigma 54 mutant proteins, so we examined the abilities of these mutant proteins to initiate transcription from glnAp2 by measuring glutamine synthetase activities. Strains expressing the alanine substitution mutant proteins had glutamine synthetase activities that were comparable to that of a strain that expresses wild-type sigma 54 (Fig. 4B).

We also assessed the DNA-binding activities of the alanine substitution mutant proteins by examining their abilities to repress the transcription of an ant'-'lacZ reporter gene in vivo. For these assays, we used an S. enterica serovar Typhimurium strain (TRH107) that contained a partially deleted P22 prophage bearing an ant'-'lacZ reporter gene in which the S. meliloti nifH promoter overlapped the ant promoter (1). Binding of the sigma 54-holoenzyme to the nifH promoter in the prophage represses transcription from the ant'-'lacZ reporter gene (1, 18). Overexpression of wild-type sigma 54 repressed transcription from the ant'-'lacZ reporter gene about sevenfold (Fig. 4C). With the exception of R336A, the mutant sigma 54 proteins repressed transcription from the ant'-'lacZ reporter gene as well as or better than wild-type sigma 54. Interestingly, the R336A mutant protein, which functioned as well as wild-type sigma 54 from glnAp2, only repressed transcription from the ant'-'lacZ reporter by ~25%, suggesting that the R336A-holoenzyme had reduced affinity for promoter sequences. Chaney and Buck (11) similarly observed that the K. pneumoniae sigma 54 R336A mutant protein had reduced affinity for the nifH promoter but supported ~70% of the level of expression from a glnAp2-lacZ reporter gene that was achieved with wild-type sigma 54. Arg-336 is in a region of the protein that can be cross-linked to DNA following UV irradiation of sigma 54-promoter complexes (5), and it has been proposed that Arg-336 participates in a sigma 54-DNA interaction that helps keep the closed complex from undergoing isomerization in the absence of enhancer-binding protein (11).

Conclusions. Region I of sigma 54 functions as an intramolecular inhibitor that prevents isomerization of the closed complex to the open complex, but it also has a role in DNA melting in response to the enhancer-binding protein (6, 13, 29). Two of the mutants that were analyzed here, L37P and L46P, had single amino acid substitutions in region I and allowed activator-independent transcription from the heteroduplex template, indicating that these amino acid substitutions disrupt the inhibitory effect of region I on the holoenzyme. Leu-37 is within a small leucine-rich patch, residues Leu-25 through Leu-37, that was shown previously to be important for mediation of the inhibitory effect of region I on the holoenzyme (10, 26, 30). Substitution of arginine for Leu-37 in E. coli sigma 54 was shown previously to allow activator-independent transcription. The L37R mutant protein, however, remained responsive to enhancer-binding protein in vitro, allowing NtrC-mediated activation to about 50% of the level observed with wild-type sigma 54 (26). The L37P mutant protein described in this study appeared to be more severely impaired in the ability to respond to enhancer-binding protein, which likely reflects disruption of secondary structure in the protein by the proline substitution. Casaz and coworkers identified two other areas within region I, residues 15 to 17 and 42 to 47, that are important for inhibition of the conformational change in the holoenzyme and responsiveness to the activator (10). Consistent with these previous results, the L46P mutant enzyme was capable of activator-independent transcription from the heteroduplex template and also appeared to be impaired in the ability to respond to enhancer-binding protein, but not as severely as the L37P mutant protein.

Not all of the mutant sigma 54 proteins with amino acid substitutions in region I that we used in our study were capable of activator-independent transcription, as the E32K G189V double-mutant protein failed to activate transcription from the heteroduplex template. Since both substitutions in this double-mutant protein are needed for loss of function (18), we cannot rule out the possibility that the substitution of valine for Gly-189 interfered with the ability of the protein to initiate transcription from the heteroduplex template.

Holoenzymes formed with L37P or L333P were capable of efficient activator-independent transcription from the heteroduplex template (Fig. 3) and also had diminished fork junction DNA-binding activities (18). These observations suggest that these two sigma 54 mutant proteins stabilize the same conformation of holoenzyme, indicating that region I may function together with a sequence around Leu-333 in region III to prevent isomerization of the closed complex in the absence of enhancer-binding protein. We identified here a second sequence within region III that also appears to be important in keeping holoenzyme locked in the closed complex conformation prior to activation. Like the L333P mutant protein, the L124P V148A mutant protein allowed activator-independent transcription from the heteroduplex DNA template (Fig. 3). Unlike the L333P mutant protein, the L124P V148A mutant protein retained fork junction DNA-binding activity (18), suggesting that the L124P V148 mutant protein stabilizes a conformation of the holoenzyme that differs from that of the L333P-holoenzyme. Leu-124 and Val-148 lie within the minimal core-binding domain of sigma 54, which spans residues 120 to 215, and Leu-124 is also located in a portion of the protein that is protected from hydroxyl radical cleavage by core RNA polymerase (9). It is possible that the sequence around Leu-124 interacts directly with core RNA polymerase to prevent isomerization of the closed complex prior to activation.

The remaining mutant forms of sigma 54 examined here, L179P, E32K G189V, and L199P D231G, did not allow efficient activator-independent transcription from the heteroduplex DNA template. Gel mobility shift assays showed that these mutant forms of sigma 54 retained core RNA polymerase and fork junction DNA-binding activities (18; Fig. 1). Taken together, these findings indicate that these mutant forms of sigma 54 represent a different class of mutant proteins. While both amino acid substitutions were required for loss of function in the two double-mutant proteins (18), all of these mutant proteins had an amino acid substitution within a well-conserved 20-amino-acid segment (Leu-179 to Leu-199) in the core-binding domain of sigma 54. It is possible that this segment of sigma 54 participates in some function in transcription initiation following formation of the closed complex, such as mediation of signal transduction from the enhancer-binding protein.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Frank Gherardini and John Olson for helpful comments on the manuscript and Sydney Kustu for providing the NtrC and NtrB proteins. We also thank Paula Buice for her assistance in isolating the L179P mutant protein.

This work was supported by award MCB-9974558 to T.R.H. from the National Science Foundation.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology, 527 Biological Sciences Building, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602. Phone: (706) 542-2675. Fax: (706) 542-2674. E-mail: trhoover{at}arches.uga.edu.

dagger Present address: Department of Biochemistry, Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Sciences, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Ashraf, S. I., M. T. Kelly, Y.-K. Wang, and T. R. Hoover. 1997. Genetic analysis of the Rhizobium meliloti nifH promoter, using the P22 challenge phage system. J. Bacteriol. 179:2356-2362[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2. Backman, K. C., Y.-M. Chen, and B. Magasanik. 1981. Physical and genetic characterization of the glnA-glnG region of the Escherichia coli chromosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:3743-3747[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Buck, M., M.-T. Gallegos, D. J. Studholme, Y. Guo, and J. D. Gralla. 2000. The bacterial enhancer-dependent sigma 54 (sigma N) transcription factor. J. Bacteriol. 182:4129-4136[Free Full Text].
4. Cannon, W., M. Chaney, and M. Buck. 1999. Characterization of holoenzyme lacking sigma N regions I and II. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:2478-2486[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Cannon, W., F. Claverie-Martin, S. Austin, and M. Buck. 1994. Identification of a DNA-contacting surface in the transcription factor sigma-54. Mol. Microbiol. 11:227-236[Medline].
6. Cannon, W., M.-T. Gallegos, P. Casaz, and M. Buck. 1999. Amino-terminal sequences of sigma N (sigma 54) inhibit RNA polymerase isomerization. Genes Dev. 13:357-370[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7. Cannon, W., S. Missailidis, C. Smith, A. Cottier, S. Austin, M. Moore, and M. Buck. 1995. Core RNA polymerase and promoter DNA interactions of purified domains of sigma N: bipartite functions. J. Mol. Biol. 248:781-803[CrossRef][Medline].
8. Cannon, W. V., M.-T. Gallegos, and M. Buck. 2000. Isomerization of a binary sigma-promoter DNA complex by transcription activators. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7:594-601[CrossRef][Medline].
9. Casaz, P., and M. Buck. 1999. Region I modifies DNA-binding domain conformation of sigma 54 within the holoenzyme. J. Mol. Biol. 285:507-514[CrossRef][Medline].
10. Casaz, P., M.-T. Gallegos, and M. Buck. 1999. Systematic analysis of sigma 54 N-terminal sequences identifies regions involved in positive and negative regulation of transcription. J. Mol. Biol. 292:229-239[CrossRef][Medline].
11. Chaney, M., and M. Buck. 1999. The sigma54 DNA-binding domain includes a determinant of enhancer responsiveness. Mol. Microbiol. 33:1200-1209[CrossRef][Medline].
12. Coppard, J. R., and M. J. Merrick. 1991. Cassette mutagenesis implicates a helix-turn-helix motif in promoter recognition by the novel RNA polymerase sigma factor sigma 54. Mol. Microbiol. 5:1309-1317[CrossRef][Medline].
13. Gallegos, M.-T., and M. Buck. 1999. Sequences in sigma N determining holoenzyme formation and properties. J. Mol. Biol. 288:539-553[CrossRef][Medline].
14. Gallegos, M.-T., W. V. Cannon, and M. Buck. 1999. Functions of the sigma 54 region I in trans and implication for transcription activation. J. Biol. Chem. 274:25285-25290[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15. Guo, Y., and J. D. Gralla. 1998. Promoter opening via a DNA fork junction binding activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:11655-11660[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16. Hsieh, M., and J. D. Gralla. 1994. Analysis of the N-terminal leucine heptad and hexad repeats of sigma 54. J. Mol. Biol. 239:15-24[CrossRef][Medline].
17. Hsieh, M., Y. Tintut, and J. D. Gralla. 1994. Functional roles for the glutamines within the glutamine-rich region of the transcription factor sigma 54. J. Biol. Chem. 269:373-378[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18. Kelly, M. T., and T. R. Hoover. 1999. Mutant forms of Salmonella typhimurium sigma 54 defective in initiation but not promoter binding activity. J. Bacteriol. 181:3351-3357[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19. Ledebur, H., and B. T. Nixon. 1992. Tandem DctD-binding sites of the Rhizobium meliloti dctA upstream activating sequence are essential for optimal function despite a 50- to 100-fold difference in affinity for DctD. Mol. Microbiol. 6:3479-3492[CrossRef][Medline].
20. Lee, J. H., and T. R. Hoover. 1995. Protein crosslinking studies suggest that Rhizobium meliloti C4-dicarboxylic acid transport protein D, a sigma 54-dependent transcriptional activator, interacts with sigma 54 and the beta  subunit of RNA polymerase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:9702-9706[Abstract/Free Full Text].
21. Lee, J. H., D. Scholl, B. T. Nixon, and T. R. Hoover. 1994. Constitutive ATP hydrolysis and transcriptional activation by a stable, truncated form of Rhizobium meliloti DCTD, a sigma 54-dependent transcriptional activator. J. Biol. Chem. 269:20401-20409[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22. Lonetto, M., M. Gribskov, and C. A. Gross. 1992. The sigma 70 family: sequence conservation and evolutionary relationships. J. Bacteriol. 174:3843-3849[Free Full Text].
23. Merrick, M., and S. Chambers. 1992. The helix-turn-helix motif of sigma 54 is involved in recognition of the -13 promoter region. J. Bacteriol. 174:7221-7226[Abstract/Free Full Text].
24. Porter, S. C., A. K. North, A. B. Wedel, and S. Kustu. 1993. Oligomerization of NTRC at the glnA enhancer is required for transcriptional activation. Genes Dev. 7:2258-2272[Abstract/Free Full Text].
25. Prasad, B. V. V., and P. W. Chiu. 1987. Sequence comparison of single-stranded DNA binding proteins and its structural implications. J. Mol. Biol. 193:579-584[CrossRef][Medline].
26. Syed, A., and J. Gralla. 1998. Identification of an N-terminal region of sigma 54 required for enhancer responsiveness. J. Bacteriol. 180:5619-5625[Abstract/Free Full Text].
27. Taylor, M., R. Butler, S. Chambers, M. Casimiro, F. Badii, and M. Merrick. 1996. The RpoN-box motif of the RNA polymerase sigma factor sigma N plays a role in promoter recognition. Mol. Microbiol. 22:1045-1054[CrossRef][Medline].
28. Tintut, Y., and J. D. Gralla. 1995. PCR mutagenesis identifies a polymerase binding sequence of sigma 54 that includes a sigma 70 homology region. J. Bacteriol. 177:5818-5825[Abstract/Free Full Text].
29. Wang, J. T., A. Syed, and J. D. Gralla. 1997. Multiple pathways to bypass the enhancer requirement of sigma 54 RNA polymerase: roles for DNA and protein determinants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:9538-9543[Abstract/Free Full Text].
30. Wang, J. T., A. Syed, M. Hsieh, and J. D. Gralla. 1995. Converting Escherichia coli RNA polymerase into an enhancer-responsive enzyme: role of an NH2-terminal leucine patch in sigma 54. Science 270:992-994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
31. Wang, Y.-K., J. H. Lee, J. M. Brewer, and T. R. Hoover. 1997. A conserved region in the sigma 54-dependent activator DctD is involved in both binding to RNA polymerase and coupling ATP hydrolysis to activation. Mol. Microbiol. 26:373-386[CrossRef][Medline].
32. Wong, C., and J. D. Gralla. 1992. A role for the acidic trimer repeat region of transcription factor sigma 54 in setting the rate and temperature dependence of promoter melting in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 267:24762-24768[Abstract/Free Full Text].
33. Wong, C., Y. Tintut, and J. D. Gralla. 1994. The domain structure of sigma 54 as determined by analysis of a set of deletion mutants. J. Mol. Biol. 236:81-90[CrossRef][Medline].


Journal of Bacteriology, November 2000, p. 6503-6508, Vol. 182, No. 22
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Hoover, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Hoover, T. R.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS