This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maeda, H.
Right arrow Articles by Ishihama, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maeda, H.
Right arrow Articles by Ishihama, A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, February 2000, p. 1181-1184, Vol. 182, No. 4
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Two Extracytoplasmic Function Sigma Subunits, sigma E and sigma FecI, of Escherichia coli: Promoter Selectivity and Intracellular Levels

Hiroto Maeda,dagger Miki Jishage, Tasuku Nomura, Nobuyuki Fujita, and Akira Ishihama*

National Institute of Genetics, Department of Molecular Genetics, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-5840, Japan

Received 30 August 1999/Accepted 17 November 1999


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

The promoter selectivity of two extracytoplasmic function (ECF) subfamily sigma  subunits, sigma E (sigma 24) and sigma FecI (sigma 18), of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase was analyzed by using an in vitro transcription system and various promoters. The Esigma E holoenzyme recognized only the known cognate promoters, rpoEP2, rpoHP3, and degP, and the Esigma FecI recognized only one known cognate promoter, fecA. The strict promoter recognition properties of sigma E and sigma FecI are similar to those of other minor sigma  subunits. Transcription by Esigma E and Esigma FecI was enhanced by high concentrations of glutamate, as in the case of other minor sigma  subunits. The optimum temperature for transcription by Esigma FecI was low, around 25°C, apparently in agreement with the high rate of iron sequestration by E. coli at low temperatures. By quantitative Western blot analysis, the intracellular levels of sigma E and sigma FecI in the uninduced steady-state culture of E. coli W3110 (type A) were determined to be 0.7 to 2.0 and 0.1 to 0.2 fmol per µg of total proteins (or 3 to 9 and 0.4 to 0.9 molecules per cell), respectively, and less than 1% of the level of the major sigma 70 subunit.


    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

The DNA-dependent RNA polymerase of Escherichia coli is composed of the core enzyme with the subunit structure alpha 2beta beta ' and one of seven molecular species of the sigma  subunit, sigma 70, sigma N, sigma S, sigma H, sigma F, sigma E, or sigma FecI (11, 13). Molecular properties and functional specificity have been studied in detail for all of these sigma  subunits except for two, sigma E and sigma FecI. The sigma E subunit encoded by the rpoE gene controls transcription of the genes for extracytoplasmic stress response (3-5, 8, 25, 26, 31). The synthesis of sigma E is induced upon exposure to heat shock or ethanol stress or following accumulation of unfolded proteins in the periplasm (8, 26, 29, 33). The holoenzyme Esigma E is responsible for transcription of at least 10 genes (32), of which 4 have been identified, including rpoH, which encodes sigma H for transcription of the heat shock response genes (9, 31); degP, which encodes a periplasmic protease for degradation of misfolded proteins (14, 23, 31, 34); fkpA, which encodes a periplasmic peptidyl-prolyl isomerase (4); and rpoE itself (31). On the other hand, the fecI gene was originally identified as a regulatory gene for the ferric dicitrate transport system (30), but after sequencing, the FecI protein was recognized as a member of the extracytoplasmic function (ECF) subfamily of sigma  factor (hereafter referred to as sigma FecI in this report) (1, 24). Transcription of the ferric dicitrate transport system of E. coli is repressed by Fe2+-Fur and activated by ferric dicitrate (2, 7, 12). Ferric dicitrate does not have to enter into the cytoplasm for transcription activation, but it initiates a signal transduction pathway by binding to the outer membrane receptor FecA (2, 12). The signal is then transmitted through the inner membrane-associated FecR, which ultimately activates the sigma FecI subunit. The fecA promoter is the only one identified to date that is transcribed specifically by the Esigma FecI holoenzyme.

Here we performed the first systematic analysis of the promoter of sigma E and sigma FecI by using in vitro transcription assay systems. In addition, we determined the intracellular concentrations of these two ECF subfamily sigma  subunits in E. coli W3110 (A) growing at various phases.

Promoter selectivity of the Esigma E and Esigma FecI holoenzymes. For analysis of the promoter selectivity of RNA polymerase holoenzymes containing sigma E or sigma FecI, two ECF family sigma  subunits were overexpressed in E. coli M15 by using plasmid pRPOE (14) or E. coli BL21(DE3) by using plasmid pETFecI. The plasmid pETFecI for the expression of sigma FecI protein with a hexahistidine tag (His6) at the C terminus was constructed by insertion of PCR-amplified FecI-coding sequence into pET-21b (Novagen) between the NdeI and HindIII sites. Both sigma E and sigma FecI were extracted from the inclusion bodies with an extraction buffer containing 0.5% Triton X-100 and purified by Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid affinity chromatography. For reconstitution of the holoenzymes, we purified the sigma -free core enzyme by chromatography of the purified RNA polymerase of E. coli W3350 (10) at least three times through phosphocellulose columns (6, 22). The repeated chromatography is essential for complete removal of traces of minor sigma  subunits. To detect the activity in vitro of purified sigma E, we used truncated DNA templates, each containing one of the three known promoters, i.e., the 210-bp EcoRI-SphI rpoE promoter fragment, the 220-bp EcoRI-SphI rpoH fragment, or the 214-bp EcoRI-SphI degP fragment, each producing specific transcripts of 71 (rpoE), 81 (rpoH), and 74 (degP) nucleotides in length, respectively. For detection of the sigma FecI activity, we used the only known FecI-dependent promoter, fecA, which produces RNA of 62 (fecA) nucleotides in length.

Under the standard transcription assay conditions for the Esigma 70 holoenzyme (E represents the core enzyme) (20), the reconstituted holoenzymes containing sigma E and sigma FecI produced specific transcripts directed by the respective cognate promoters (Fig. 1). None of the other holoenzymes containing sigma 70, sigma N, sigma S, sigma H, or sigma F, however, produced significant levels of transcripts from the sigma E-dependent rpoE, rpoH, and degP promoters or from the sigma FecI-dependent fecA promoter, even though all of these holoenzymes gave similar levels of the template-sized end-to-end transcripts, which migrated near the top of the gels (Fig. 1). On the other hand, both Esigma E and Esigma FecI holoenzymes were unable to transcribe the sigma 70-dependent lacUV5 (Fig. 1), trp, and rpsA promoters. Thus, we concluded that the ECF family sigma  subunits carry high selectivity for a specific set of the cognate promoters, as in the case of other minor sigma  subunits, sigma N, sigma H, and sigma F. In contrast to the strict promoter selectivity characteristic of the minor sigma  subunits, the sigma 70 subunit recognizes in vitro most sigma S-dependent promoters, and the sigma S subunit recognizes some sigma 70-dependent promoters (21, 35).


View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.   Transcription in vitro of truncated DNA templates by RNA polymerase holoenzymes Esigma E and Esigma FecI. RNA polymerase holoenzymes were reconstituted by mixing the core enzyme with each sigma  subunit in a core-to-sigma molar ratio of 1:4. Single-round transcription was carried out under the standard assay conditions (20) with 1 pmol each of seven different holoenzymes containing sigma 70, sigma N, sigma S, sigma H, sigma H, sigma F, sigma H, and sigma FecI (the species of sigma  subunit used is shown at the bottom of each gel lane) and 0.1 pmol each of three sigma E-dependent (rpoE [A], rpoH [B], and degP [C]) and one sigma FecI-dependent (fecA [D]) promoter. RNA products were separated by 8% PAGE in the presence of 8 M urea, and gels were analyzed with a Bio-Imaging Analyzer BAS-2000 (Fuji). Arrowheads indicate the specific transcripts from the test promoters, while open triangles indicate the template-sized nonspecific transcripts.

Stimulation of sigma E- and sigma FecI-dependent transcription by potassium glutamate. The reaction conditions such as DNA superhelicity, the species and concentrations of salts, trehalose, and polyphosphate, and the reaction temperature affect in vitro transcription in different ways for the different holoenzymes containing different sigma  subunits, presumably reflecting the difference in physiological conditions under which each sigma  subunit works (reviewed in references 15 and 16).

The standard reaction mixture to give maximum-level transcription of lacUV5 by the Esigma 70 holoenzyme contains 50 mM NaCl (Fig. 2C) (see also reference 20). The optimum concentrations of NaCl to give maximum transcription activity on trp, recA, and rpsA templates were between 50 and 100 nM (data not shown). The activity of Esigma 70 holoenzyme is, however, negligible at NaCl concentrations above 200 mM (Fig. 2C) (see also references 8 and 28). In contrast, transcription of rpoE by Esigma E (Fig. 2A) and of fecA by Esigma FecI (Fig. 2B) stays almost at the same level, between 50 and 300 mM NaCl, indicating that transcription by these two holoenzymes is relatively resistant to inhibition by high NaCl concentrations. Previously, we found that high concentrations of glutamate enhance transcription by the Esigma S and Esigma F holoenzymes (6, 22). Here we also examined the effect of increasing concentrations of potassium glutamate. As shown in Fig. 2A and B, transcription by both Esigma E and Esigma FecI holoenzymes was significantly enhanced upon increasing the potassium glutamate concentration up to at least 400 mM. The molecular mechanism underlying the activation of minor sigma -dependent transcription by high concentrations of glutamate remains to be solved.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.   Effects of salt concentrations on in vitro transcription by RNA polymerase Esigma H and Esigma FecI holoenzymes. Single-round transcription was carried out by using 0.1 pmol of each of three test promoters, rpoE (A), fecA (B), and lacUV5 (C), and 1 pmol each of three different forms of the reconstituted holoenzyme, Esigma E (A), Esigma FecI (B), and Esigma 70 (C), under the standard reaction conditions except that 50 mM NaCl was replaced by the indicated concentrations of either NaCl or K glutamate. Transcripts were fractionated by 8% PAGE, and gels were examined with a Bio-Imaging Analyzer BAS2000 (Fuji). The maximum levels of transcription observed with each template are set at 100%.

Preference for low temperatures of sigma FecI-dependent transcription. The optimum temperature for maximum-level transcription by the regular holoenzyme Esigma 70 is about 37°C, whereas the optimum temperature of transcription of certain promoters by Esigma H and Esigma F significantly deviates from this optimum temperature for the Esigma 70 holoenzyme (22, 36). We then examined the effect of reaction temperature on rpoE promoter-directed transcription by Esigma E and fecA promoter-directed transcription by Esigma FecI. As shown in Fig. 3A, the optimum temperature for maximum transcription by Esigma E was 37°C, but about half the maximum-level activity was retained above 50°C, indicating that transcription by Esigma E predominates at high temperatures, in good agreement with the expected role of sigma E in response to extremely high temperatures (8).


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.   Effect of temperature on in vitro transcription by RNA polymerase Esigma E and Esigma FecI holoenzymes. Single-round transcription was carried out with 0.1 pmol each of two test promoters, rpoE (A) and fecA (B), and 1 pmol each of either Esigma E (A) or Esigma FecI (B) holoenzyme under the standard reaction conditions in the presence of 400 mM K glutamate. Both preincubation for RNA polymerase-promoter complex formation and incubation for transcription were carried out at the various temperatures indicated. The maximum levels of transcription observed with each template are set at 100%.

In contrast, fecA promoter-directed transcription by Esigma FecI was at the maximum at around 25°C and linearly decreased thereafter up to 52°C, where the activity was almost negligible (Fig. 3B). Among seven species of the holoenzyme examined under the same conditions, the Esigma FecI species required the lowest temperature to give the maximum activity of transcription. The acquisition of iron by bacteria is known to be more efficient at low temperatures (37). The in vivo activation of sigma FecI-dependent transcription at low temperatures awaits further analysis.

Intracellular levels of the sigma E and sigma FecI proteins. Previously, we determined the intracellular concentrations of sigma 70, sigma N, sigma S, sigma H, and sigma F in E. coli W3110 (type A lineage) by the quantitative Western blot method (17, 19). Here we determined the concentration of two ECF family subunits, sigma E and sigma FecI, in the same cell extracts of E. coli W3110 (A) used in our previous determination. In the exponential growth phase, the concentrations of sigma E and sigma FecI were 0.7 to 2.0 and 0.1 to 0.2 fmol per µg of total proteins, respectively (Fig. 4). In the same extract, the concentration of the major sigma  subunit, sigma 70, is 150 to 170 fmol/µg of total proteins (17). The number of sigma 70 molecules per cell is estimated to be around 700 (19). The numbers of sigma E and sigma FecI molecules per cell can then be calculated to be 3 to 9 and 0.4 to 0.9, respectively. The level of sigma E stayed constant throughout the growth phase examined, but the sigma FecI level further decreased in the stationary phase (Fig. 4). The critical factors leading to induction of the synthesis or activation of the ECF family sigma  subunits, however, remain unclear. Taken together with the previous determinations (17, 19), we conclude that under the steady state of cell growth, the uninduced levels of the minor subunits sigma S, sigma H, sigma E, and sigma FecI are all lower than 1% of the level of the major sigma 70 subunit.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.   Intracellular concentrations of sigma E and sigma FecI in E. coli W3110 (type A). E. coli W3110 (type A) was grown with shaking in Luria-Bertani medium at 37°C. Cell extract was prepared by the method of Jishage et al. (17, 19). The protein concentration of cell lysates was determined by using the Bio-Rad protein assay kit. Polyclonal antibodies against sigma E and sigma FecI were raised in rabbits by injecting the overexpressed and purified sigma  proteins. The quantitative Western blot analysis was employed for the measurement of sigma  subunits exactly as described in previous reports (17, 19). The immunostained blots were developed with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Dojindo). Staining intensity was measured with a PDI image analyzer system equipped with a white light scanner. (A) Aliquots containing 10 µg of total proteins from cell lysates of E. coli W3110 (A) prepared at various times of the cell culture (see B for the growth curve) were subjected to quantitative Western blot analysis using anti-sigma E and anti-sigma FecI antibodies. (B) E. coli W3100 (type A) was grown in Luria-Bertani medium at 37°C under the same conditions employed in the determination of other sigma  subunits (17, 19), and growth was monitored by measuring the turbidity with a Klett-Summerson photometer. At the indicated time points labeled 1 to 7, aliquots were taken for preparation of the cell lysates.

In addition to the synthesis control, the activity is negatively regulated, at least in the case of sigma E subunit, by a membrane-bound anti-sigma factor, RseA (5, 27). Such an activity control of the sigma  subunit has been found for both sigma F (28) and sigma 70 (18). However, the factor affecting the sigma FecI activity has not yet been identified.

We thank S. Kusano and T. S. Kundu for preparation of sigma S, sigma H, and sigma F and A. Iwata and S. Ueda for preparation of anti-sigma E and anti-sigma FecI antibodies.

This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan and from CREST (Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology) of the Japan Science and Technology Corporation.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan. Phone: 81-559-81-6741. Fax: 81-559-81-6746. E-mail: aishiham{at}lab.nig.ac.jp.

dagger Permanent address: Kagoshima University, Faculty of Fisheries, Kagoshima 890-0056, Japan.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Angerer, A., S. Enz, M. Ochs, and V. Braun. 1995. Transcriptional regulation of ferric citrate transport in Escherichia coli. FecI belongs to subfamily of sigma 70-type factors that respond to extracytoplasmic stimuli. Mol. Microbiol. 18:163-174[CrossRef][Medline].
2. Braun, V. 1997. Surface signaling: novel transcription initiation mechanism starting from the cell surface. Arch. Microbiol. 167:325-331[CrossRef][Medline].
3. Connolly, L., A. De Las Penas, B. M. Alba, and C. A. Gross. 1997. The response to extracytoplasmic stress in Escherichia coli is controlled by partially overlapping pathways. Genes Dev. 11:2012-2021[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. Danese, P. N., and T. J. Silhavy. 1997. The sigma E and the Cpx signal transduction systems control the synthesis of periplasmic protein-folding enzymes in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev. 11:1183-1193[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. De Las Penas, A., L. Connolly, and C. A. Gross. 1997. The sigma E-mediated response to extracytoplasmic stress in Escherichia coli is transduced by RseA and RseB, two negative regulators of sigma E. Mol. Microbiol. 24:373-385[CrossRef][Medline].
6. Ding, Q., S. Kusano, V. Villarejo, and A. Ishihama. 1995. Promoter selectivity control of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase by ionic strength: differential recognition of osmo-regulated promoters by Esigma D and Esigma S holoenzymes. Mol. Microbiol. 16:649-655[CrossRef][Medline].
7. Enz, S., V. Braun, and J. H. Crosa. 1995. Transcription of the region encoding the ferric dicitrate-transport system in Escherichia coli: similarity between promoters for fecA and for extracytoplasmic function sigma factors. Gene 163:13-18[CrossRef][Medline].
8. Erickson, J. W., and C. A. Gross. 1989. Identification of the sigma E subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: a second alternative sigma  factor involved in high-temperature gene expression. Genes Dev. 3:1462-1471[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9. Erickson, J. W., V. Vaughn, W. A. Walter, F. C. Neidhardt, and C. A. Gross. 1987. Regulation of the promoters and transcripts of rpoH, the Escherichia coli heat shock regulatory gene. Genes Dev. 1:419-432[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10. Fujita, N., T. Nomura, and A. Ishihama. 1987. Promoter selectivity of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: purification and properties of holoenzyme containing the heat-shock sigma subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 262:1855-1859[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Gross, C. A., M. Lonetto, and R. Losick. 1992. Bacterial sigma factors, p. 129-176. In K. Yamamoto, and S. McKnight (ed.), Transcriptional regulation. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
12. Harle, C., I. Kim, A. Angerer, and V. Braun. 1995. Signal transfer through three compartments: transcription initiation of the Escherichia coli ferric citrate transport system from the cell surface. EMBO J. 14:1430-1438[Medline].
13. Helmann, J. D., and M. J. Chamberlin. 1988. Structure and function of bacterial sigma factors. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 57:839-872[CrossRef][Medline].
14. Hiratsu, K., M. Amemura, H. Nashimoto, H. Shinagawa, and K. Makino. 1995. The rpoE gene of Escherichia coli, which encodes sigma E, is essential for bacterial growth at high temperature. J. Bacteriol. 177:2918-2922[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15. Ishihama, A. 1997. Adaptation of gene expression in stationary phase bacteria. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 7:582-588[CrossRef][Medline].
16. Ishihama, A. 1999. Modulation of the nucleoid, the transcription apparatus, and the translation machinery in bacteria for stationary phase survival. Genes Cells 3:135-143.
17. Jishage, M., and A. Ishihama. 1995. Regulation of RNA polymerase sigma subunit synthesis in Escherichia coli: intracellular levels of sigma 70 and sigma 38. J. Bacteriol. 177:6832-6835[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18. Jishage, M., and A. Ishihama. 1998. A stationary-phase protein in Escherichia coli with binding activity to the major sigma  subunit of RNA polymerase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:4953-4958[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19. Jishage, M., A. Iwata, S. Ueda, and A. Ishihama. 1996. Regulation of RNA polymerase sigma subunit synthesis in Escherichia coli: intracellular levels of four species of sigma subunit under various growth conditions. J. Bacteriol. 178:5447-5451[Abstract/Free Full Text].
20. Kajitani, M., and A. Ishihama. 1983. Determination of the promoter strength in the mixed transcription system: promoters of lactose, tryptophan and ribosomal protein L10 operons from Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 11:671-686[Abstract/Free Full Text].
21. Kolb, A., D. Kotlarz, S. Kusano, and A. Ishihama. 1995. Selectivity of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase Esigma 38 for overlapping promoters and ability to support CRP activation. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:819-826[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22. Kundu, T. K., S. Kusano, and A. Ishihama. 1997. Promoter selectivity of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase sigma F holoenzyme involved in transcription of flagellar and chemotaxis genes. J. Bacteriol. 179:4264-4269[Abstract/Free Full Text].
23. Lipinska, B., O. Fayet, L. Baird, and C. Georgopoulos. 1989. Identification, characterization, and mapping of the Escherichia coli htrA gene, whose product is essential for bacterial growth only at elevated temperatures. J. Bacteriol. 171:1574-1584[Abstract/Free Full Text].
24. Lonetto, M., K. L. Brown, K. E. Rudd, and M. J. Buttner. 1994. Analysis of the Streptomyces coelicolor sigma-E gene reveals the existence of a subfamily of eubacterial RNA polymerase sigma factors involved in the regulation of extracytoplasmic functions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:7573-7577[Abstract/Free Full Text].
25. Mecsas, J., P. E. Rouviere, J. W. Erickson, T. J. Donohue, and C. A. Gross. 1993. The activity of sigma E, an Escherichia coli heat-inducible sigma -factor, is modulated by expression of outer membrane proteins. Genes Dev. 7:2618-2628[Abstract/Free Full Text].
26. Missiakas, D., J.-M. Betton, and S. Raina. 1996. New components of protein folding in extracytoplasmic compartments of Escherichia coli SurA, FkpA and Skp/OmpH. Mol. Microbiol. 21:871-884[CrossRef][Medline].
27. Missiakas, D., M. P. Mayer, M. Lemaire, C. Georgopoulos, and S. Raina. 1997. Modulation of the Escherichia coli sigma E (RpoE) heat-shock transcription-factor activity by the RseA, RseB and RseC proteins. Mol. Microbiol. 24:355-371[CrossRef][Medline].
28. Ohnishi, K., K. Kutsukake, H. Suzuki, and T. Iino. 1992. A novel transcriptional regulation mechanism in the flagellar regulon of Salmonella typhimurium: an antisigma factor inhibits the activity of flagellum-specific factor, sigma F. Mol. Microbiol. 6:3149-3157[Medline].
29. Pogliano, J., A. S. Lynch, D. Berlin, E. C. Lin, and J. Beckwith. 1997. Regulation of Escherichia coli cell envelope proteins involved in protein folding and degradation by the Cpx two-component system. Genes Dev. 11:1169-1182[Abstract/Free Full Text].
30. Pressler, U., H. Staudenmaier, L. Zimmermann, and V. Baun. 1988. Genetics of the iron dicitrate transport system of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 170:2716-2724[Abstract/Free Full Text].
31. Raina, S., D. Missiakas, and C. Georgopoulos. 1995. The rpoE gene encoding the sigma E (sigma 24) heat shock sigma factor of Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 14:1043-1055[Medline].
32. Rouviere, P. E., A. De Las Penas, J. Meares, C. Z. Lu, K. E. Rudd, and C. A. Gross. 1995. rpoE, the gene encoding the second heat-shock sigma factor, sigma E, in Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 14:1032-1042[Medline].
33. Rouviere, P. E., and C. A. Gross. 1996. SurA, a periplasmic protein with peptidyl-prolyl isomerase activity, participates in the assembly of outer membrane porins. Genes Dev. 10:3170-3182[Abstract/Free Full Text].
34. Strauch, K. L., and J. Beckwith. 1988. An Escherichia coli mutation preventing degradation of abnormal periplasmic proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:1576-1580[Abstract/Free Full Text].
35. Tanaka, K., S. Kusano, N. Fujita, A. Ishihama, and H. Takahashi. 1995. Promoter determinants for Escherichia coli RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing sigma 38 (the rpoS gene product). Nucleic Acids Res. 23:827-834[Abstract/Free Full Text].
36. Ueshima, R., N. Fujita, and A. Ishihama. 1989. DNA supercoiling and temperature shift affect the promoter selectivity of Escherichia coli rpoH gene encoding the heat-shock sigma subunit of RNA polymerase. Mol. Gen. Genet. 215:185-189[CrossRef][Medline].
37. Worsham, P. L., and J. Konisky. 1984. Effect of growth temperature on the acquisition of iron by Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 158:163-168[Abstract/Free Full Text].


Journal of Bacteriology, February 2000, p. 1181-1184, Vol. 182, No. 4
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Grigorova, I. L., Phleger, N. J., Mutalik, V. K., Gross, C. A. (2006). Insights into transcriptional regulation and {sigma} competition from an equilibrium model of RNA polymerase binding to DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 5332-5337 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Egler, M., Grosse, C., Grass, G., Nies, D. H. (2005). Role of the Extracytoplasmic Function Protein Family Sigma Factor RpoE in Metal Resistance of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 187: 2297-2307 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Shimada, T., Makinoshima, H., Ogawa, Y., Miki, T., Maeda, M., Ishihama, A. (2004). Classification and Strength Measurement of Stationary-Phase Promoters by Use of a Newly Developed Promoter Cloning Vector. J. Bacteriol. 186: 7112-7122 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Yoshida, M., Kashiwagi, K., Shigemasa, A., Taniguchi, S., Yamamoto, K., Makinoshima, H., Ishihama, A., Igarashi, K. (2004). A Unifying Model for the Role of Polyamines in Bacterial Cell Growth, the Polyamine Modulon. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 46008-46013 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Enz, S., Mahren, S., Menzel, C., Braun, V. (2003). Analysis of the Ferric Citrate Transport Gene Promoter of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 185: 2387-2391 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jishage, M., Dasgupta, D., Ishihama, A. (2001). Mapping of the Rsd Contact Site on the Sigma 70 Subunit of Escherichia coli RNA Polymerase. J. Bacteriol. 183: 2952-2956 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Burger, M., Woods, R. G., McCarthy, C., Beacham, I. R. (2000). Temperature regulation of protease in Pseudomonas fluorescens LS107d2 by an ECF sigma factor and a transmembrane activator. Microbiology 146: 3149-3155 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Collinet, B., Yuzawa, H., Chen, T., Herrera, C., Missiakas, D. (2000). RseB Binding to the Periplasmic Domain of RseA Modulates the RseA:sigma E Interaction in the Cytoplasm and the Availability of sigma E{middle dot}RNA Polymerase. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 33898-33904 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Maeda, H., Fujita, N., Ishihama, A. (2000). Competition among seven Escherichia coli {sigma} subunits: relative binding affinities to the core RNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 3497-3503 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Yoshida, M., Kashiwagi, K., Kawai, G., Ishihama, A., Igarashi, K. (2001). Polyamine Enhancement of the Synthesis of Adenylate Cyclase at the Translational Level and the Consequential Stimulation of the Synthesis of the RNA Polymerase sigma 28 Subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 16289-16295 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maeda, H.
Right arrow Articles by Ishihama, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maeda, H.
Right arrow Articles by Ishihama, A.