Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, April 2000, p. 2321-2325, Vol. 182, No. 8
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Characterization of the Promoter Elements for the
Staphylococcal Enterotoxin D Gene
Shuping
Zhang and
George C.
Stewart*
Department of Diagnostic
Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State
University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506
Received 1 November 1999/Accepted 21 January 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Deletion analysis of the promoter for the Staphylococcus
aureus enterotoxin D determinant indicated that a 52-bp sequence, from
34 to +18, was sufficient for sed promoter function
and agr regulation. A consensus
10 Pribnow box sequence,
a less conserved
35 sequence, and a TG dinucleotide motif were
present. Transcribed sequences (+1 to +18) are essential for promoter activity.
 |
TEXT |
Staphylococcal food poisoning is an
intoxication resulting from ingestion of foods contaminated with
enterotoxin producing Staphylococcus aureus strains
(16). The symptoms include emesis, diarrhea, abdominal
cramping, and in severe cases, fever and shock (6, 30, 31).
The staphylococcal enterotoxins are a group of secreted proteins that
cause emesis when orally administered to primates (6). To
date, a number of enterotoxins have been characterized based on their
serological reactivities and designated SEA to SEJ, including subtypes
SEC1 to SEC3 (5, 8, 24, 29, 32-34).
Though staphylococcal enterotoxins are similar in structure and
biological properties (22), they differ with respect to genetic localization, amount of toxin produced, and mechanism of gene
regulation. The genes for SEA and SEE are carried on prophage, some of
which are defective prophage. SED and SEJ gene determinants are carried
on the same penicillinase-type plasmid. The genes for SEB and SEC are
chromosomal, but the nature of the genetic elements on which they
reside has not been elucidated (7, 18, 19). SEB and SEC are
expressed in greater quantities than the other enterotoxins, often on
the order of 100 µg/ml of culture supernatant, whereas maximal
production of SEA, SED, and SEE is usually less than 10 µg/ml
(3). Furthermore, SEA is produced throughout the log phase
of growth, while SEB, SEC, and SED are produced in greater quantities
during the transition from the exponential to the stationary phases of
growth (5). The latter expression pattern is characteristic
of many staphylococcal exoprotein virulence factors which are under the
control of the accessory gene regulator (agr) two-component
regulatory system (25). The transcription of seb,
sec, and sed is subject to regulation by the
agr system. In agr mutant strains, mRNA
steady-state levels were reduced 4-fold for seb, 5.5-fold
for sed, and 2 to 3-fold for sec (2,
28).
Information regarding the promoter elements of the staphylococcal
enterotoxin genes is very limited. The sea promoter has been
identified by means of primer extension analysis in conjunction with
deletion mutagenesis. However, detailed characterization of the
promoters for the agr-regulated enterotoxin genes has not been reported. Promoter sequences for seb and sed
were defined by mapping the transcription start site and by comparison
to Escherichia coli promoter consensus
10 and
35
sequences. Mahmood and Khan found that a region upstream of the
35
element, at positions
93 to
58, is required for seb
expression (21). Although primer extension studies have been
carried out on sed, only a Pribnow box could be identified
in the sequence (2). No convincing
35 element was obvious
in the sequence analysis. As part of our effort to define the mechanism
by which RNAIII regulates sed transcription, this study was
undertaken to characterize the promoter and potential regulatory
sequences for sed. In this study, the transcription start
site was mapped by primer extension. The transcription start site and
bases which are critical to promoter function were identified through
characterization of site-specific sequence changes in the
sed promoter.
Construction of the deletion mutants and promoter analysis.
To
characterize the promoter sequences for sed, we cloned 1.7 kb of DNA immediately 5' to the ribosome binding site of sed and introduced a series of deletions into the sequence at either the 5'
or 3' end by exonuclease III digestion (Erase-A-Base; Promega). All
deletions were verified by sequencing, and nucleotide positions were
numbered relative to the start site of transcription (+1). The deleted
sed promoter region sequences were then fused with a
promoterless chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (cat) gene
carried by pMH109 (17). The sed promoter activity
was then determined by measuring the expression level of cat
(Fig. 1). The upstream boundary of the
promoter element was defined by promoter active deletions which
extended to position
34. The downstream boundary of the promoter
element was identified as +24. Deletions up to this position did not
appreciably affect sed promoter activity and the
agr-regulatory effect, but deletions which extended beyond these endpoint sequences resulted in a loss of promoter function. The
insert of plasmid pZS2688, containing sed sequences from
34 to +7, failed to drive measurable cat expression. This
suggested that sequences beyond the start site of transcription were
required for transcription from the sed promoter. Therefore,
the essential promoter sequences appeared to be contained within the
sequence between
34 to +24. To confirm this, plasmid pZS2074
containing sed promoter sequences from
34 to +24 was
created. When CAT activity was measured from lysates of cells bearing
this plasmid, the insert in pZS2704 retained promoter activity and the
agr-stimulatory effect comparable to that of the 1.7-kb
insert in pZS2605. Therefore, the 58-bp fragment contained in pZS2074
possessed all required promoter elements and the cis
sequences responsible for the stimulation of transcription which occurs
in agr wild-type hosts.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Deletion analysis of the sed promoter. Arrows
indicate the inverted repeat sequence located within the intergenic
region of sed and sej. The transcription start
site of sed is indicated as +1. Lines represent the
remaining part of the sed promoter which were fused with a
promoterless cat gene in pMH109. Deletions are numbered
according to distance from the transcription start site. Promoter
activities were analyzed by measuring CAT expression levels in both
KSI2054 (Agr+) and ISP546 (Agr ) host strains
(33). CAT values were converted to relative expression (Rel.
Exp.), which is the value obtained with the deletion mutant divided by
the value obtained with the wild-type sed promoter in strain
KSI2054. The agr stimulation index (ASI) is the CAT value
obtained with KSI2054 divided by the value obtained from ISP546 cells
bearing the same plasmid.
|
|
Mapping the sed transcription start site.
To
confirm that the 58-bp promoter fragment accurately reflected the
sed promoter activity, the transcription start site was mapped. First, we mapped the transcription start site when the intact
upstream sequences were present. RNA was isolated (14) from
S. aureus strains KSI2054 (agr+)
and ISP546 (agr) harboring plasmid pZS2607 (carrying 1.7 kb of DNA immediately 5' to the sed ribosome binding site
[34]). Primer extension assays (9) revealed
a reverse-transcribed DNA fragment at a position corresponding to the T
residue located 265 bp upstream of the translation start site (S. Zhang
and G. C. Stewart, unpublished data). This is in agreement with
the results of Bayles and Iandolo (2). To map the
transcription start site from the 58-bp promoter, RNA was isolated from
KSI2054 and IPS546 harboring pZS2704. The same start site of
transcription was identified with the 58-bp promoter fragment as was
seen with the intact upstream sequence (Fig.
2). The signal is stronger with the RNA
isolated from the agr+ host (compare lane 4 to
lane 3), consistent with the results obtained with the CAT assays. The
primer extension assay was also carried out with RNA isolated from
cells bearing the lac-sed hybrid promoter. This promoter has
the
35 and spacer sequences from the lac promoter and the
Pribnow box and downstream sequences from the sed promoter.
This promoter is stronger than the wild-type sed promoter
(Fig. 3, pZS2743), but the start site of
transcription is unchanged (Fig. 2, lanes 1 and 2).

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Primer extension mapping of the transcription start
site. RNA was isolated from S. aureus ISP546 (lanes 1 and 3)
and KSI2054 (lanes 2 and 4) harboring plasmid pZS2704 (lanes 3 and 4)
or pZS2743 (lanes 1 and 2) at an optical density at 540 nm of 1.2. Reverse transcription was carried out using the primer cat3, which
anneals to a site near the 5' end of the cat gene. The
samples were loaded into adjacent lanes of a sequencing gel, and the
lanes between the two sets were left blank. The sequence ladder was
generated using the same primer and pZS2704 as the template. The
transcription start site is indicated as +1.
|
|

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
(A) The promoter sequences of sed and
lac are presented in the top and bottom lines, respectively.
The 35, 10, and +1 sequences of the sed promoter are
underlined. For the hybrid promoters, dashed lines indicate
sed sequences and the indicated bases signify replacement by
lac promoter sequences. (B) Activity of mutant forms of the
sed promoter. Dashed lines indicate sed
sequences, bases indicate base substitutions, and blank spaces indicate
deleted bases. CAT assays were conducted with the wild-type (wt) strain
KSI2054 harboring the corresponding plasmids. CAT values are expressed
as nanomoles of chloramphenicol acetylated per minute per milligram
(dry weight) of cells. Average values from three independent
determinations and standard deviations are given.
|
|
Five bases upstream of the +1 position in the
sed promoter
there is a sequence, TATAAT, that matches the consensus
Pribnow
box of bacterial promoters. A less conserved

35 (ATGAAA)
is located
17-bp upstream from the

10 element. The
sed promoter also contains
a TG dinucleotide at position

14/

13. This dinucleotide is an
important element of procaryotic
promoters with poor

35 elements
(
1,
27).
Promoter distal sequences are required for sed promoter
function.
The 58-bp fragment, encompassing nucleotide positions
34 to +24, displayed comparable promoter activity to that of the
undeleted sed promoter. However, the fragment containing
sequences from
34 to +7 failed to drive cat gene
expression. Sequences downstream of +1 appear to be required for
sed promoter function. To test this possibility, we created
a series of sed-lac hybrid promoters by fusing the 5'
portion of the sed promoter with the 3' portion of the
S. aureus lactose operon (lac) promoter sequences
(26). This approach permitted a study of the role of the
downstream sequence without interrupting the distance between the
transcription and the translation start sites. Then the cat
expression levels of these hybrid constructs were analyzed (Fig. 3A).
The results showed that when the sed sequences from
12 to
+24 were replaced with lac sequences (pZS2746, sed/lac), the
promoter function was abolished. This hybrid promoter still had the
35 of sed, the
10 sequences are the same in the two
promoters, and the spacer region was very similar to that of the
sed (16 identical bases out of 17). Thus, the lack of
promoter activity was most likely the result of the substitution of
lac for sed sequences distal to the +1 position.
When the sed sequence was extended to +7 and +14 to generate
pZS2771 (M11) and pZS2781 (M12), these hybrid promoters had only barely
detectable activity. To determine the 3' boundary of the sed
promoter, additional hybrid promoters (pZS2832, pZS2833, pZS2834, and
pZS2835) were generated by replacing the last eight, six, four, and two
bases of the 58-bp fragment with the corresponding lac
promoter sequences. The CAT assay results indicated that the eight-base
replacement (+17 to +24) abolished the sed promoter
function, but a six-base replacement (+19 to +24) resulted in a
2.5-fold increase in promoter activity, relative to that obtained with
the wild-type 58-bp sequence. The CAT values for pZS2834 (four-base
replacement, +21 to +24) and pZS2835 (two-base replacement, +23 to +24)
had essentially no effect on sed promoter activity. To
further define the 3' terminus of the sed promoter, plasmid
pZS2852 was created by replacing the last seven bases of the 58-bp
sed promoter (T+18 to C+24) with
lac sequences. This hybrid promoter was active, although it
resulted in a CAT expression level lower than obtained with the 58-bp
sed promoter. Thus, the downstream boundary of the
sed promoter is nucleotide position +17.
To confirm the activity of the

34 to +18 fragment, plasmid pZS2853
was created by PCR amplification of the

34 to +18 DNA
fragment, which
was then cloned into pMH109 to create a promoter
which differed from
that of pZS2852 in that it lacked the +19
to +24
lac
sequences. The CAT assay results showed that the promoter
strength of
this 52-bp fragment was comparable to that of pZS2833
(six-base
replacement) and was about 2.3-fold higher than that
of the 58-bp
sed promoter (Fig.
3B).
Contribution of the
35 sequences to sed promoter
function.
To determine the role of the putative
35 sequence in
sed promoter function, the 5' end of the 58-bp fragment was
either deleted or mutated. The promoter activity of the mutants were
measured (Fig. 3B). Deletion of the first 5, 10, and 15 bases (pZS2782, pZS2783, and pZS2784) destroyed the promoter function completely. Two
mutant promoters (pZS2836 and pZS2837) with the putative
35 element
altered to give a consensus sequence (TTGACA) were created by oligonucleotide-mediated site-directed mutagenesis (34). The promoter of pZS2836 (M25) consists of bases
34 to +24, whereas pZS2837 (M25') includes only bases
34 to +7. The promoter strengths of both pZS2836 and pZS2837 were dramatically increased. The
cat expression level was increased almost fivefold for
pZS2836 relative to that exhibited by the 58-bp wild-type sequence. The
level of expression was 4.7-fold higher for pZS2837. More
significantly, the activity exhibited by the pZS2837 insert indicated
that the requirement for the +8 to +18 sequence to produce an active
promoter was eliminated with the introduction of the improved
35
element sequence. However, introduction of the consensus
35 sequences caused instability of the plasmids. When pZS2836 and pZS2837 were transduced into S. aureus KSI2054, the majority of the
transductants did not produce chloramphenicol resistance. Subsequent
sequence analysis indicated that deletions occurred either within the
promoter region or the cat structure gene. In addition, a
strain bearing a point mutation (A
29 to T; pZS2719)
within the
35 sequence was isolated. This mutation resulted in a
1.7-fold reduction in promoter activity.
Effect of point mutations on sed promoter
function.
To determine the role of bases outside of the
35 and
10 elements, single or double mutations were introduced into the
sed promoter region (Fig. 3B). Mutations within the spacer
region, A
22 to C and A
21 to G (pZS2720 and
pZS2721), led to moderate reductions in cat expression
levels, whereas a G
27-to-T transversion mutation
(pZS2773) had no effect on sed promoter activity. Base
substitutions near the
10 sequence had profound effects on
sed promoter function. When G
13 was changed to
T (pZS2772), the cat expression level was reduced to barely detectable level. Mutations G
5 to T and C (pZS2874 and pZS2875) and A
4 to T (pZS2876) led to a three- to
fourfold reduction in cat expression level. Double mutations
A
4A
3 to TT (pZS2877) abolished
sed promoter activity. Base changes adjacent to the
transcriptional start site also influenced the promoter strength. When
G
1 or G+2 was changed to T (pZS2774 or
pZS2775), an increase in cat expression resulted. Base
substitutions within the downstream region, G+8 to T and C
(pZS2750 and pZS2751), increased expression about twofold.
The rate of transcription from constitutive promoters depends on the
sequences of the

35 and

10 promoter elements (
12).
However, bases outside of these core promoter elements are also
important for promoter function. Footprint analyses have revealed
protected regions as far upstream as

70 and downstream to +20
in
E. coli promoters (
10,
11,
20). An AT-rich
upstream region
can enhance promoter activity by facilitating promoter
bending
and wrapping around the RNA polymerase. Mahmood and Khan
demonstrated
that the upstream region between

93 and

58 was
required for
seb expression but that sequences distal to +1
were not required
(
21). Bases upstream from the

35 element
are not required for
sed expression, but sequences
downstream of +1 are essential for
sed promoter function.
Thus, the promoters for these two staphylococcal
enterotoxin genes are
fundamentally different. Hybrid promoter
analysis revealed that the
region downstream from +1 to +18 was
required for
sed
promoter activity, and a base substitution (G
+8 to T or C)
within this region also affected the promoter strength.
Studies have
shown that the downstream regions of certain
E. coli promoters can influence the transcription rate by affecting promoter
clearance (
13). During this process, sigma factor is
released
from RNA polymerase holoenzyme which allows the elongation
steps
to proceed. Expression of
sed does not occur when the
+1 distal
sequences are derived from the staphylococcal
lac
promoter but
is restored when sequences from the
seb
promoter are used (Zhang
and Stewart, unpublished data). This is
interesting because these
sequences are not required for expression
from the
seb promoter.
When base substitutions were introduced into the
sed
promoter to create a consensus

35 element, the
cat
expression level
was increased approximately fivefold and the
downstream region
requirement was eliminated. Based on these data, the
role of the
downstream region may be to compensate for the poor

35
sequence.
This could be accomplished by DNA bending to enable a better
interaction
with RNA polymerase, rather than just playing a
rate-limiting
role in the late steps of transcription
initiation.
A required T
14G
13 dinucleotide was found
one base upstream of the Pribnow box sequence. In studies of
E. coli promoters, it has been proposed that RNA polymerase makes an
additional
contact with the TG dinucleotide during transcription
initiation,
which lowers the thermal energy required for the strand
separation
(
1,
27). Compilation analysis of
Bacillus
subtilis promoter
sequences also indicated that this dinucleotide
pair is conserved
in extended

10 element promoter sequences from this
organism
(
15). The TG motif was also shown to be a conserved
feature
in 26% of
Lactobacillus promoters and is an
important determinant
of promoter strength (
23).
In addition to the TG dinucleotide, bases immediately downstream of
the Pribnow box also play a vital role in
sed promoter
function. Base substitutions within this region (G
5 to
T
or C, A
4 to T, A
3A
4 to TT)
either abolished
the promoter activity or reduced it dramatically.
These findings
suggest that not only the
T
14G
13 dinucleotide but
those bases
downstream from the

10 element are involved in transcription
initiation, possibly by facilitating strand separation and open
complex
formation.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by Public Health Service grant AI45778 from
the National Institutes of Health.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine,
Kansas State University, 1800 Denison Ave., Manhattan, KS 66506. Phone: (785) 532-4419. Fax: (785) 532-4039. E-mail:
stewart{at}vet.ksu.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Barne, K. A.,
J. A. Bown,
S. J. W. Busby, and S. D. Minchin.
1997.
Region 2.5 of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase 70 subunit is responsible for the recognition of the "extended 10" motif at promoters.
EMBO J.
16:4034-4040[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bayles, K. W., and J. J. Iandolo.
1989.
Genetic and molecular analysis of the gene encoding staphylococcal enterotoxin D.
J. Bacteriol.
171:4799-4806[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Bergdoll, M. S.
1979.
Staphylococcal intoxications, p. 443-493.
In
H. Riemann, and F. L. Bryan (ed.), Foodborne infections and intoxications. Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 4.
|
Bergdoll, M. S.
1983.
Enterotoxins, p. 559-598.
In
C. S. F. Easmon, and C. Adlam (ed.), Staphylococcal and streptococcal infections. Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 5.
|
Bergdoll, M. S.,
J. K. Czop, and S. S. Gould.
1974.
Enterotoxin synthesis by the staphylococci.
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
236:307-316[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Betley, M. J.,
D. W. Borst, and L. B. Regassa.
1992.
Staphylococcal enterotoxins, toxic shock syndrome toxin, and streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxins: a comparative study of their molecular biology.
Chem. Immunol.
55:1-35[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Betley, M. J., and J. J. Mekalanos.
1989.
Staphylococcal enterotoxin A is encoded by a phage.
Science
229:185-187.
|
| 8.
| Bohach, G. A., C. V. Stauffacher, D. H. Ohlendorf, Y. I. Chi, G. M. Vath, and P. M. Schlievert. The staphylococcal and streptococcal pyrogenic toxin
family. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 391:131-154.
|
| 9.
|
Borst, D. W., and M. J. Betley.
1994.
Promoter analysis of the staphylococcal enterotoxin A gene.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:1883-1888[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Busby, S. D.,
A. Spassky, and B. Chan.
1987.
RNA polymerase makes important contacts upstream from base pair 49 at the Escherichia coli galactose operon p1 promoter.
Gene
53:145-152[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Coulombe, B., and Z. F. Burton.
1999.
DNA bending and wrapping around RNA polymerase: a "revolutionary" model describing transcriptional mechanisms.
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
63:457-478[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Craig, M. L.,
W. C. Suh, and M. T. Record, Jr.
1995.
HO and DNase I probing of E 70 RNA polymerase- PR promoter open complex: Mg2+ binding and its structural consequences at the transcription start site.
Biochemistry
34:15624-15632[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Ellinger, T.,
D. Behnke,
H. Bujard, and J. D. Gralla.
1994.
Stalling of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase in the +6 to +12 region in vivo is associated with tight binding to consensus promoter elements.
J. Mol. Biol.
239:455-465[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Hart, M. E.,
M. S. Smeltzer, and J. J. Iandolo.
1993.
The extracellular protein regulator (xpr) affects exoprotein and agr mRNA levels in Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Bacteriol.
24:7875-7879.
|
| 15.
|
Helmann, J. D.
1995.
Compilation and analysis of Bacillus subtilis A-dependent promoter sequences: evidence for extended contact between RNA polymerase and upstream promoter DNA.
Nucleic Acids Res.
23:2351-2360[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Holmberg, S., and P. A. Blake.
1984.
Staphylococcal food poisoning in the United States.
JAMA
251:487-489[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Hudson, M. C., and G. C. Stewart.
1986.
Differential utilization of Staphylococcus aureus promoter sequences by Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis.
Gene
48:93-100[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Iandolo, J. J.
1989.
Genetic analysis of extracellular toxins of Staphylococcus aureus.
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
43:375-402[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Johns, M. B., Jr., and S. A. Khan.
1998.
Staphylococcal enterotoxin B gene is associated with a discrete genetic element.
J. Bacteriol.
170:4033-4039.
|
| 20.
|
Kammerer, W.,
U. Deuschle,
R. Gentz, and H. Bujard.
1986.
Functional dissection of Escherichia coli promoters: information in the transcribed region is involved in late steps of the overall process.
EMBO J.
5:2995-3000[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Mahmood, R., and S. A. Khan.
1990.
Role of the upstream region in the expression of the staphylococcal enterotoxin B gene.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:4652-4656[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Marrack, P., and J. Kappler.
1990.
The staphylococcal enterotoxins and their relatives.
Science
248:705-711[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
McCracken, A., and P. Timms.
1999.
Efficiency of transcription from promoter sequence variants in Lactobacillus is both strain and context dependent.
J. Bacteriol.
181:6569-6572[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Munson, S. H.,
M. T. Tremaine,
M. J. Betley, and R. A. Welch.
1998.
Identification and characterization of staphylococcal enterotoxin type G and I from Staphylococcus aureus.
Infect. Immun.
66:3337-3348[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Novick, R. P.,
H. F. Ross,
S. J. Projan,
J. Kornblum,
B. Kreiswirth, and S. L. Moghazeh.
1993.
Synthesis of staphylococcal virulence factors is controlled by a regulatory RNA molecule.
EMBO J.
12:3967-3975[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Oskouian, B., and G. C. Stewart.
1990.
Repression and catabolite repression of the lactose operon of Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Bacteriol.
172:3804-3812[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Ponnambalam, S.,
C. Webster,
A. Bingham, and S. Busby.
1986.
Transcription initiation at the Escherichia coli galactose operon promoters in the absence of the normal 35 region sequences.
J. Biol. Chem.
261:16043-16048[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Regassa, L. B.,
J. L. Couch, and M. J. Betley.
1991.
Steady-state staphylococcal enterotoxin type C mRNA is affected by a product of the accessory gene regulator (agr) and by glucose.
Infect. Immun.
59:955-962[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Ren, K.,
J. D. Bannan,
V. V. Pancholi,
A. L. Cheung,
J. C. Robbins,
V. A. Fischetti, and J. B. Zabriskie.
1994.
Characterization and biological properties of a new staphylococcal enterotoxin.
J. Exp. Med.
180:1675-1683[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Rizkallah, M. F.,
A. Tolaymat,
J. S. Martinez,
P. M. Schlievert, and E. M. Ayoub.
1989.
Toxic shock syndrome caused by a strain of Staphylococcus aureus that produces enterotoxin C but not toxic shock syndrome toxin-1.
Am. J. Dis. Child.
143:848-849[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Schlievert, P. M.
1986.
Staphylococcal enterotoxin B and toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 are significantly associated with nonmenstrual TSS.
Lancet
i:1149-1150.
|
| 32.
|
Su, Y.-C., and A. C. L. Wang.
1995.
Identification and purification of a new staphylococcal enterotoxin, H.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
61:1438-1443[Abstract].
|
| 33.
|
Van den Bussche, R. A.,
J. D. Lyon, and G. A. Bohach.
1993.
Molecular evolution of the staphylococcal pyrogenic toxin gene family.
Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.
2:281-292[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Zhang, S.,
J. J. Iandolo, and G. C. Stewart.
1998.
The enterotoxin D plasmid of Staphylococcus aureus encodes a second enterotoxin determinant (sej).
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
168:227-233[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Journal of Bacteriology, April 2000, p. 2321-2325, Vol. 182, No. 8
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Sugiyama, Y., Okii, K., Murakami, Y., Yokoyama, T., Takesue, Y., Ohge, H., Sueda, T., Hiyama, E.
(2009). Changes in the agr Locus Affect Enteritis Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol.
47: 1528-1535
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rajkovic, A., Moualij, B. E., Uyttendaele, M., Brolet, P., Zorzi, W., Heinen, E., Foubert, E., Debevere, J.
(2006). Immunoquantitative Real-Time PCR for Detection and Quantification of Staphylococcus aureus Enterotoxin B in Foods.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
72: 6593-6599
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tseng, C. W., Stewart, G. C.
(2005). Rot Repression of Enterotoxin B Expression in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol.
187: 5301-5309
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Qiu, R., Pei, W., Zhang, L., Lin, J., Ji, G.
(2005). Identification of the Putative Staphylococcal AgrB Catalytic Residues Involving the Proteolytic Cleavage of AgrD to Generate Autoinducing Peptide. J. Biol. Chem.
280: 16695-16704
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gao, J., Stewart, G. C.
(2004). Regulatory Elements of the Staphylococcus aureus Protein A (Spa) Promoter. J. Bacteriol.
186: 3738-3748
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tseng, C. W., Zhang, S., Stewart, G. C.
(2004). Accessory Gene Regulator Control of Staphyloccoccal Enterotoxin D Gene Expression. J. Bacteriol.
186: 1793-1801
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Klotz, M., Opper, S., Heeg, K., Zimmermann, S.
(2003). Detection of Staphylococcus aureus Enterotoxins A to D by Real-Time Fluorescence PCR Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 4683-4687
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
McAleese, F. M., Foster, T. J.
(2003). Analysis of mutations in the Staphylococcus aureus clfB promoter leading to increased expression. Microbiology
149: 99-109
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhang, L., Gray, L., Novick, R. P., Ji, G.
(2002). Transmembrane Topology of AgrB, the Protein Involved in the Post-translational Modification of AgrD in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 34736-34742
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Vojtov, N., Ross, H. F., Novick, R. P.
(2002). Global repression of exotoxin synthesis by staphylococcal superantigens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
99: 10102-10107
[Abstract]
[Full Text]