Journal of Bacteriology, January 2001, p. 221-228, Vol. 183, No. 1
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.1.221-228.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Department of Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294
Received 8 May 2000/Accepted 11 October 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In Escherichia coli, pyrimidine-mediated regulation of
upp expression occurs by UTP-sensitive selection of
alternative transcriptional start sites, which produces transcripts
that differ in the ability to be elongated. The upp
initially transcribed region contains the sequence GATTTTTTTTG
(nontemplate strand). Initiation can occur at either the first or
the second base in this sequence (designated G6 and A7, with numbering
from the promoter
10 region). High intracellular UTP levels favor
initiation at position A7; however, the resulting transcripts are
subject to reiterative transcription (i.e., repetitive UMP addition)
within the 8-bp T · A tract in the initially transcribed region
and are aborted. In contrast, low intracellular UTP levels favor
initiation at position G6, which results in transcripts that can, in
part, avoid reiterative transcription and be elongated normally. In
this study, we examined the regulatory requirement for the long T
· A tract in the upp initially transcribed region. We
constructed upp promoter mutations that shorten the T
· A tract to 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, or 2 bp and examined the effects of these
mutations on upp expression and regulation. The results
indicate that pyrimidine-mediated regulation is gradually reduced as
the T · A tract is shortened from 7 to 3 bp; at which point
regulation ceases. This reduction in regulation is due to
large-percentage increases in upp expression in cells grown
under conditions of pyrimidine excess. Quantitation of cellular
transcripts and in vitro transcription studies indicate that the
observed effects of a shortened T · A tract on upp
expression and regulation are due to increases in the fraction of both
G6- and A7-initiated transcripts that avoid reiterative transcription and are elongated normally.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Reiterative transcription (also referred to as pseudotemplated transcription, transcriptional slippage, and RNA polymerase stuttering) is a reaction catalyzed by a number of bacterial, phage, viral, and eukaryotic RNA polymerases (15, 16, 19). In this reaction, nucleotides are repetitively added to the 3' end of a nascent transcript due to slippage between the transcript and the DNA or RNA template. Typically, slippage occurs between a homopolymeric sequence in the transcript and at least three complementary bases in the template (37). In most cases, the mechanism involves one or more rounds of a one-base upstream shift of the transcript so that the same nucleotide in the template specifies multiple residues in the transcript (10, 13). Recent studies indicate that reiterative transcription plays an important role in the expression and regulation of a number of bacterial and viral genes by a variety of mechanisms (13, 18, 20, 29).
One of these genes is the upp gene of Escherichia coli. The upp gene encodes the pyrimidine salvage enzyme uracil phosphoribosyltransferase, which catalyzes the formation of UMP from uracil and phosphoribosylpyrophosphate (4). The upp gene appears to be the first gene of an operon that also contains the uraA gene, encoding uracil permease, and perhaps a third, uncharacterized gene designated b2496 (3, 7). A sequence resembling a strong intrinsic transcriptional terminator is located between the upp and uraA genes (3). The function of this terminator-like sequence in the expression and regulation of downstream genes is unknown.
Expression of the upp gene, and presumably cotranscribed
genes, is negatively regulated over a sixfold range by pyrimidine availability (4, 30, 35). This regulation occurs mainly by
UTP-sensitive selection of alternative transcriptional start sites,
which produces transcripts that differ in the ability to be
productively elongated (35). The upp initially
transcribed region contains the sequence GATTTTTTTTG
(nontemplate strand) (Fig. 1).
Transcription is initiated primarily at the first two bases in this
sequence, designated G6 and A7 (numbering from the promoter
10
region). High intracellular levels of UTP, due to ample pyrimidine
availability or synthesis, favor initiation at position A7. However,
the resulting transcripts are subject to reiterative transcription
(i.e., repetitive UMP addition) within the 8-bp T · A tract in
the initially transcribed region. These transcripts, with the general
sequence AUUUUn (where n equals 1 to >50), are not
extended to include downstream sequences and are eventually aborted. In
contrast, low intracellular levels of UTP, caused by pyrimidine
limitation, strongly favor initiation at position G6. This start site
switch appears to be caused by inhibition of initiation at position A7,
which relies on a high concentration of UTP to form the critical first
internucleotide bond of the transcript (23, 26).
Transcripts initiated at position G6 can, at least in part, avoid
reiterative transcription and be elongated normally. This effect is
apparently due to the formation of a relatively stable hybrid between
the 5' end of the G6 transcript and the DNA template.
|
Several other E. coli operons encoding pyrimidine metabolic
enzymes are regulated by mechanisms that employ reiterative
transcription. The codBA operon, which encodes the
pyrimidine salvage enzymes cytosine permease and cytosine deaminase, is
regulated over a 30-fold range by a mechanism that is entirely
analogous to that described for the upp gene
(29). Interestingly, the codBA initially transcribed region, GATTTTTTG, contains only a 6-bp T
· A tract, and the G and A start sites (i.e., G7 and A8) are 1 base
further downstream from the promoter
10 region than in the
upp promoter (Fig. 1). The latter difference contributes
significantly to the higher range of codBA regulation. (S. M. Dylla and C. L. Turnbough, Jr., unpublished data).
The pyrBI operon, which encodes the two subunits of the pyrimidine biosynthetic enzyme aspartate transcarbamylase, is regulated over a sevenfold range by a UTP-sensitive reiterative transcription mechanism that differs fundamentally from the upp and codBA mechanisms (20). The pyrBI initially transcribed region, AATTTGCC, contains a 3-bp T · A tract and a single transcriptional start site (Fig. 1). The key regulatory event occurs after the synthesis of the first five bases of the transcript, AAUUU, at which point the transcript can reversibly slip on the DNA template and has the potential to engage in reiterative transcription. The extent of reiterative transcription versus strictly templated transcription is controlled by the intracellular level of UTP. High UTP levels favor reiterative transcription, which produces transcripts with the sequence AAUUUUn (where n equals 1 to >30). These transcripts are always aborted. In contrast, low UTP levels favor the addition of a G residue as the sixth base in the transcript. This addition precludes reiterative transcription, and the AAUUUG transcript may be elongated to a full-length pyrBI transcript. The carAB operon, which encodes the two subunits of the pyrimidine biosynthetic enzyme carbamoyl phosphate synthetase, is regulated over a threefold range by a mechanism equivalent to that described for the pyrBI operon (Fig. 1) (12). The function of the four control mechanisms described above is to adjust pyrimidine salvage and biosynthetic enzyme levels to the cellular need for pyrimidine nucleotides.
A comparison of the reiterative transcription control mechanisms for the upp, codBA, pyrBI, and carAB operons and a rudimentary understanding of the requirements for reiterative transcription raise an obvious question. Is the very long T · A tract in the upp initially transcribed region required for regulation? In this study, we investigated this question. We constructed upp promoter mutations that systematically shorten the T · A tract in the initially transcribed region and examined the effects of these mutations on upp expression and regulation. The results indicate, unexpectedly, that a very long T · A tract (i.e., 7 or 8 bp) is, in fact, required for normal regulation. Additional examination of upp transcription provided an explanation for this requirement.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bacterial strains.
E. coli K-12 strain CLT42
[F
car-94
(argF-lac)U169
rpsL150 thiA1 relA1 deoC1 ptsF25 flbB5301 rbsR] (32)
was used as the parent in the construction of seven lambda lysogens
used in this study. These strains were constructed by inserting into
the CLT42 chromosomal lambda attachment site a single copy of a
recombinant lambda bacteriophage that carries either the wild type or a
mutant version of a upp::lacZ gene
fusion. The wild-type fusion contains the wild-type upp
promoter region, while the six mutant fusions contain 1- to 6-bp
deletions in the T · A tract of the upp initially transcribed region (i.e., T tract in Fig. 1). The construction of two
of the lysogens, which carry either the wild-type or 6-bp deletion
promoter region in the gene fusion, was described previously (35). Essentially the same procedure was used here to
construct five additional lysogens in which the
upp::lacZ gene fusions contain 1- to
5-bp deletions in the T · A tract of the upp
initially transcribed region. A brief summary of the steps involved in
the construction of all seven lysogens is provided below.
Construction of gene fusions.
Construction of
upp::lacZ gene fusions employed the
multicopy plasmid pMLB1034, which contains the lacZ gene
without a promoter, a ribosomal binding site, and the first eight
codons for
-galactosidase (34). This plasmid contains
an EcoRI/SmaI/BamHI cloning site immediately preceding the lacZ gene. Gene fusions were made
by first digesting plasmid pMLB1034 with EcoRI and
BamHI and then ligating the linear plasmid to an
EcoRI-BamHI restriction fragment containing the
wild-type upp promoter region (from
100 to +127, numbering
from the first transcriptional initiation site) or an equivalent
fragment containing a mutant promoter region. The downstream sequence
in these promoter region fragments extends through upp codon
30. The resulting plasmids were transformed into strain CLT240 (CLT42
pcnB80 zad::Tn10). The
pcnB80 mutation of this strain reduces the plasmid copy
number, which is essential for maintaining (at least some) mutant
fusion plasmids free of secondary mutations that reduce
upp::lacZ expression. All fusion
constructions were confirmed by DNA sequence analysis.
Transfer of gene fusions from plasmids to the E. coli chromosome. Wild-type and mutant upp::lacZ gene fusions carried on derivatives of plasmid pMLB1034 (in strain CLT240) were individually transferred to the chromosome of strain CLT42 by using phage lambda RZ5 (31). The presence of a single prophage at the lambda attachment site on the chromosome was determined by PCR analysis (35).
Restriction digests, ligations, transformations, PCR, site-directed mutagenesis, and DNA preparations. Conditions for restriction digests, ligations, and transformations were as previously described (32). PCR amplification of DNA was performed with Pfu DNA polymerase (Stratagene), using the reaction mixture recommended by the supplier. PCR conditions were: 95°C for 5 min; then 95°C for 1 min, 60°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min for 30 cycles; and finally 72°C for 5 min. Site-directed mutations were introduced into the upp promoter region by using a PCR-based procedure similar to that described by Barettino et al. (6). The resulting mutations were verified by DNA sequence analysis. DNA was prepared essentially as previously described (35).
Media and culture methods.
Cells used for enzyme assays and
RNA isolations were grown in N
C
medium
(1) supplemented with 10 mM NH4Cl, 0.4%
(wt/vol) glucose, 0.015 mM thiamine hydrochloride, 1 mM arginine, and
either 1 mM uracil or 0.25 mM UMP. Cultures were incubated at 37°C
with shaking and grown to an optical density at 650 nm of 0.5 (mid-log
phase). Culture densities were measured with a Gilford model 260 spectrophotometer, and doubling times (which vary slightly with culture
density when UMP is the pyrimidine source) were determined between
optical densities of 0.1 and 0.2
Enzyme assays.
Cell extracts were prepared by sonic
oscillation (31).
-Galactosidase activity
(24) and protein concentration (22) were
determined as previously described.
Isolation of cellular RNA and primer extension mapping. Cellular RNA was isolated quantitatively as described by Wilson et al. (36). Primer extension mapping of the 5' ends of upp::lacZ transcripts was performed as described by Liu and Turnbough (21), except that 50 µg of RNA from uracil-grown cells and 42 µg of RNA from UMP-grown cells were used for analysis. The different amounts of RNA, which were isolated from the same mass of cells, reflect the different levels of stable RNA in cells growing at different rates. The primer used in these experiments was 5'TTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTG, which was labeled with 32P at the 5' end (5). This primer hybridizes to the lacZ sequence just downstream from the fusion junction in the upp::lacZ transcript. In these experiments, the primer was in large molar excess. In addition to the standard procedure of identifying transcript-specific primer extension products by alignment with bands in a sequencing ladder, identities were confirmed by spiking sequencing reactions with primer extension products prior to analysis by gel electrophoresis (data not shown).
In vitro transcription.
Purified RNA polymerase holoenzyme
containing
70 was prepared as previously described
(8, 9, 11). DNA templates for in vitro transcription were
gel-purified PvuII restriction fragments (derived from
plasmid DNA) containing either the wild-type or mutant upp
promoter regions. These fragments were identical to the
EcoRI-BamHI restriction fragments used for
construction of upp::lacZ gene fusions,
except for several base pairs at each end. Transcription reaction
mixtures (10 µl) contained 10 nM DNA template; 100 nM RNA polymerase;
20 mM Tris-acetate (pH 7.9); 10 mM magnesium acetate; 100 mM potassium
glutamate; 0.2 mM Na2EDTA; 0.1 mM dithiothreitol; 200 µM
each ATP, CTP, and GTP; and either 50 or 1,000 µM UTP. The reaction
mixture included either [
-32P]ATP or
[
-32P]GTP (purchased from NEN) at a specific activity
of 0.625 Ci/mmol. Reactions were initiated by addition of RNA
polymerase, and the reaction mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 15 min. Heparin (1 µl of a 1-mg/ml solution) was then added to the
mixture, and incubation was continued for an additional 10 min to
permit the completion of elongating transcripts. Reactions were
terminated by adding 10 µl of stop solution (7 M urea, 2 mM
Na2EDTA, 0.025% [wt/vol] each bromophenol blue and
xylene cyanol) and placing the samples on ice. The samples were heated
at 100°C for 3 min, and an equal volume of each sample was removed
and run on a 25% polyacrylamide (29:1 acrylamide-bisacrylamide
ratio)-50 mM Tris-borate (pH 8.3)-1 mM Na2EDTA sequencing
gel containing 7 M urea (28). Transcripts were visualized
by autoradiography and quantitated by scanning gels with a Molecular
Dynamics PhosphorImager. Transcripts were identified as previously
described (35).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effects of shortening the T · A tract in the upp
initially transcribed region on
upp::lacZ expression and
regulation.
To examine the regulatory role of the long T · A tract in the upp initially transcribed region, we first
constructed seven isogenic E. coli strains each containing
either a wild-type or a mutant
upp::lacZ gene fusion. Each gene fusion
was carried on a lambda bacteriophage and inserted in single copy into
the chromosomal lambda attachment site of strain CLT42 (car-94
lacZYA). The wild-type fusion contains the wild-type
upp promoter region, and the six mutant fusions contain 1- to 6-bp deletions in the 8-bp T · A tract of the upp
initially transcribed region. The promoters for the
upp::lacZ gene fusions (and the fusions
themselves) are hereafter referred to as Tn
promoters (and fusions), where n equals the number of T
· A base pairs present in the initially transcribed region.
-galactosidase activity.
The results show that wild-type (T8) fusion expression was
regulated over a nearly sixfold range by pyrimidine availability (Table
1). Expression and regulation of the
T7 fusion were essentially the same as those of the
wild-type fusion. In contrast, regulation of
upp::lacZ expression was significantly
and steadily decreased as the length of the T · A tract was
gradually reduced to 3 bp, at which point only a basal level of
regulation (i.e., 1.5-fold) was detectable. This basal level of
regulation, detected with both the T3 and T2
fusions, is most likely unrelated to control by reiterative
transcription, because this reaction does not occur at the
T2 promoter (see below). The steady decrease in regulation observed with the T6, T5, T4, and
T3 fusions was due primarily to large percentage increases
of upp::lacZ expression in cells grown
under conditions of pyrimidine excess (i.e., on uracil). Expression of
these fusions also changed in cells grown under conditions of
pyrimidine limitation (i.e., on UMP), but not as uniformly or
dramatically (on a percentage basis). Expression levels increased
gradually as the T · A tract was shortened to 5 bp and then
decreased gradually as the T · A tract was shortened further.
Possible reasons for this pattern are discussed below. Overall, the
results indicate that shortening of the T · A tract relieves
negative regulation imposed by the reiterative transcription control
mechanism.
|
Analysis of upp::lacZ transcripts
initiated at wild-type and mutant promoters.
To further elucidate
the effects of the deletions in the T · A tract, we used
quantitative primer extension mapping to measure the levels and
determine the start sites of upp::lacZ
transcripts synthesized in wild-type and mutant fusion strains grown on
uracil or UMP. Cellular RNA was isolated from cultures that were
essentially identical to those described in Table 1. The primer used in
these experiments hybridizes to the lacZ sequence contained
in the fusions and therefore detects only
upp::lacZ transcripts in the
lacZYA strains. It should also be noted that
nonproductive transcripts initiated at positions G6 and A7 (e.g.,
GAUn and AUn) are not
detected in this assay. The results are shown in Fig. 2. In
the case of the wild-type (T8) and T7 fusions,
only transcripts initiated at the G6 start site were detected in
uracil- and UMP-grown cells (Fig. 2A). The relative levels of these
transcripts closely paralleled the cellular
-galactosidase
activities described above (Fig. 2B and Table 1), as expected for
transcriptionally controlled fusions. In the case of the fusions
containing shorter T · A tracts, transcripts initiated at both
upp start sites (i.e., G6 and A7) were
detected, indicating avoidance of reiterative transcription by A7
transcripts. At least with the T6, T5, and
T4 fusions, G6 transcript levels were also increased (Fig.
2A), indicating that these transcripts more efficiently avoided
reiterative transcription. As with the wild-type and T7
fusions, the relative levels of total upp::lacZ transcripts specified by the
T6, T5, T4, T3, and
T2 fusions closely reflected cellular
-galactosidase
activities.
|
Analysis of short transcripts initiated at wild-type and mutant
upp promoters in vitro.
To directly analyze the
effects of the deletions in the T · A tract of the
upp initially transcribed region on reiterative transcription, we examined the short transcripts produced by
transcription of wild-type and mutant upp promoter regions
in vitro. These short transcripts include both the aborted products of
reiterative transcription and the products of simple abortive
initiation involving strictly templated transcription. Transcripts up
to approximately 12 bases in length can be produced by simple abortive
initiation at the upp promoter. We analyzed G6 and A7
transcripts separately by using either [
-32P]GTP or
[
-32P]ATP, respectively, to label the 5' ends of
transcripts. Transcription reaction mixtures contained either 50 or
1,000 µM UTP (200 µM each other nucleoside triphosphate) for the
synthesis of G6 and A7 transcripts, respectively, to maximize
initiation at the start site of interest. These UTP concentrations
(i.e., 50 and 1,000 µM) roughly mimic those found in cells grown
under conditions of pyrimidine limitation or excess, respectively
(2, 25). Transcripts produced in vitro were separated on a
25% polyacrylamide sequencing gel and visualized by autoradiography.
U > C (29).
|
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although extensive reiterative transcription can occur at promoters that contain a T · A tract in the initially transcribed region as short as 3 bp (12, 17, 20), a much longer T · A tract is clearly required for normal pyrimidine-mediated regulation of upp expression in E. coli. The 8-bp T · A tract in the wild-type upp promoter can be shortened by a single base pair with minimal effect, but longer deletions significantly and progressively reduce the range of regulation. Regulation involving reiterative transcription appears to be completely eliminated when the T · A tract contains three or fewer base pairs.
The progressive loss of regulation caused by the deletion mutations is due primarily to regular increases in the level of upp expression in cells grown under conditions of pyrimidine excess (Table 1). These increases are due, in large part, to the avoidance of reiterative transcription by a significant fraction of A7 transcripts (Fig. 2A), which are the predominant products of transcriptional initiation at the upp promoter in uracil-grown cells (35). The fraction of A7 transcripts that avoid reiterative transcription increases as the length of the T · A tract decreases, as clearly indicated by the quantitative primer extension mapping of cellular transcripts (Fig. 2C).
A similar but less dramatic pattern of avoidance of reiterative transcription by A7 transcripts is observed in vitro (Fig. 4). Transcription of wild-type and mutant upp promoters indicates that avoidance of reiterative transcription by A7 transcripts, resulting in strictly templated transcription, can occur only when the T · A tract is shortened to six or fewer base pairs. The level of strictly templated transcription, as indicated by the products of simple abortive initiation, increases as the length of the T · A tract is reduced. However, a high level of reiterative transcription still occurs in vitro at all promoters except the T2 promoter, at which reiterative transcription is abolished. The fact that reiterative transcription is so robust at promoters like T3 and T4, while regulation is severely restricted at these promoters, is somewhat surprising. One possible explanation is that only a very low percentage of initiation events need to be redirected from the reiterative to the strictly templated transcription pathway to produce the maximum level of full-length transcripts. Another explanation, at least for the T3 promoter, is that some transcripts can enter the reiterative transcription pathway and then switch to the strictly templated mode to produce full-length transcripts. Clear evidence for such a switch at the T3 promoter is provided by the results of quantitative primer extension mapping of cellular transcripts (Fig. 2A). Why such a switch is restricted to the T3 promoter remains to be determined.
Avoidance of reiterative transcription by A7 transcripts initiated at mutant upp promoters may explain the loss of most, if not all, regulation of upp expression. However, avoidance of reiterative transcription at the mutant promoters is not restricted to A7 transcripts. The data from quantitative primer extension mapping of cellular transcripts indicate that approximately one-third of the G6 transcripts initiated at the wild-type upp promoter are subject to reiterative transcription (Fig. 2B). This reiterative transcription appears to be affected by shortening of the T · A tract similarly to that observed with the A7 transcripts. For example, reducing the length of the T · A tract to six or fewer base pairs causes an increase in the level of cellular G6 transcripts, which in this case can be detected in cells grown under conditions of either pyrimidine excess or limitation (Fig. 2A). However, the pattern of these increases is different than that observed with A7 transcripts. There is not a steady increase in the level of G6 transcripts with progressive shortening of the T · A tract. Instead, the highest levels of G6 transcripts are observed with the T6 and T5 promoters, with progressively lower levels of G6 transcripts with promoters T4, T3, and T2. This pattern may indicate that shortening of the T · A tract to 6 bp is sufficient to achieve maximum avoidance of reiterative transcription by G6 transcripts. Consistent with this idea is the observation that in vitro, reiterative transcription involving G6 transcripts was sharply reduced by shortening of the T · A tract to six or fewer base pairs (Fig. 3). The relative decreases observed in vivo in G6 transcript levels with promoters T4, T3, and T2 may reflect secondary effects on promoter strength or transcript stability. Consistent with these proposals, in vitro production of all short G6 transcripts at promoters T4, T3, and T2 was relatively low (Fig. 3), perhaps indicating reduced promoter activity, and in vivo degradation of G6 and A7 upp::lacZ transcripts was greatly enhanced in the case of the T2 promoter (Fig. 2A).
Overall, the results of this study indicate that a long T · A tract in the initially transcribed region of the wild-type upp promoter is necessary to achieve a particular balance between reiterative and strictly templated transcription involving G6 and A7 transcripts. This balance establishes a maximum or physiologically appropriate level of upp regulation. A long run of seven or eight T · A base pairs is required to ensure that essentially all A7 transcripts will engage in nonproductive reiterative transcription. A run of eight T · A base pairs is still short enough to allow the majority of G6 transcripts to avoid reiterative transcription and produce translatable mRNA. Presumably, the avoidance of reiterative transcription by G6 transcripts can occur by virtue of an rG · dC base pair formed by the 5' G residue of the transcript and its complementary C residue in the DNA template. The formation of this strong base pair inhibits upstream slippage of the nascent transcript that is a prerequisite for reiterative transcription.
The ability of G6 transcripts to avoid reiterative transcription is likely to be related to another feature of the transcriptional initiation complex, and that is the length of the RNA-DNA hybrid formed between the nascent transcript and the DNA template. The results presented in this paper are consistent with the formation of an 8-bp RNA-DNA hybrid during initiation of G6 transcripts. Such a hybrid would explain the elimination of essentially all reiterative transcription involving G6 transcripts at mutant promoters containing six or fewer base pairs in the T · A tract. The nascent transcripts synthesized at these promoters would be part of a relatively stable hybrid, anchored by a 5' rG · dC base pair, during the addition of all of the U residues specified by the T · A tract. The fact that about one-third of the G6 transcripts initiated at the T7 and wild-type (T8) promoters engage in reiterative transcription indicates that the RNA-DNA hybrid, at least a permanent hybrid, does not extend beyond 8 bp. The factors that allow most of the latter transcripts to avoid reiterative transcription (assuming that the 8-bp hybrid is correct) remain to be determined. Thus, the suggested length of the RNA-DNA hybrid at the upp promoter is the same as, or similar to, the 8- to 9-bp hybrid detected during transcriptional elongation (27, 33). It will be of interest to determine in future studies if the RNA-DNA hybrid length is the same at all promoters. If not, then the capacity to engage in reiterative transcription during initiation could be affected by this difference.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Y.C. and S.M.D. contributed equally to this work, and either person could have been listed as the first author.
This work was supported by Public Health Service grant GM29466 from the National Institutes of Health.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: UAB Department of Microbiology, BBRB 409, 1530 3rd Ave. S., Birmingham AL 35294-2170. Phone: (205) 934-6289. Fax: (205) 975-5479. E-mail: ChuckT{at}uab.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Alper, M. D., and B. N. Ames.
1978.
Transport of antibiotics and metabolite analogs by systems under cyclic AMP control: positive selection of Salmonella typhimurium cya and crp mutants.
J. Bacteriol.
133:149-157 |
| 2. | Andersen, J. T., K. F. Jensen, and P. Poulsen. 1991. Role of transcription pausing in the control of the pyrE attenuator in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 5:327-333[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 3. |
Andersen, P. S.,
D. Frees,
R. Fast, and B. Mygind.
1995.
Uracil uptake in Escherichia coli K-12: isolation of uraA mutants and cloning of the gene.
J. Bacteriol.
177:2008-2013 |
| 4. | Andersen, P. S., J. M. Smith, and B. Mygind. 1992. Characterization of the upp gene encoding uracil phosphoribosyltransferase of Escherichia coli K12. Eur. J. Biochem. 204:51-56[Medline]. |
| 5. | Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. S. Struhl (ed.). 1989. Current protocols in molecular biology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y. |
| 6. |
Barettino, D.,
M. Feigenbutz,
R. Valcárcel, and H. G. Stunnenberg.
1993.
Improved method for PCR-mediated site-directed mutagenesis.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:541-542 |
| 7. |
Blattner, F. R.,
G. Plunkett III,
C. A. Bloch,
N. T. Perna,
V. Burland,
M. Riley,
J. Collado-Vides,
J. D. Glasner,
C. K. Rode,
G. F. Mayhew,
J. Gregor,
N. W. Davis,
H. A. Kirkpatrick,
M. A. Goeden,
D. J. Rose,
B. Mau, and Y. Shao.
1997.
The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12.
Science
277:1453-1462 |
| 8. | Burgess, R. R., and J. J. Jendrisak. 1975. A procedure for the rapid, large-scale purification of Escherichia coli DNA-dependent RNA polymerase involving polymin P precipitation and DNA-cellulose chromatography. Biochemistry 14:4634-4638[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 9. | Gonzalez, N., J. Wiggs, and M. J. Chamberlin. 1977. A simple procedure for resolution of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase holoenzyme from core polymerase. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 182:404-408[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 10. | Guo, H.-C., and J. W. Roberts. 1990. Heterogeneous initiation due to slippage at the bacteriophage 82 late gene promoter in vitro. Biochemistry 29:10702-10709[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 11. | Hager, D. A., D. J. Jin, and R. R. Burgess. 1990. Use of mono Q high-resolution ion-exchange chromatography to obtain highly pure and active Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. Biochemistry 29:7890-7894[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 12. |
Han, X., and C. L. Turnbough, Jr.
1998.
Regulation of carAB expression in Escherichia coli occurs in part through UTP-sensitive reiterative transcription.
J. Bacteriol.
180:705-713 |
| 13. |
Hausmann, S.,
D. Garcin,
C. Delenda, and D. Kolakofsky.
1999.
The versatility of paramyxovirus RNA polymerase stuttering.
J. Virol.
73:5568-5576 |
| 14. |
Jacques, J.-P., and M. M. Susskind.
1990.
Pseudo-templated transcription by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase at a mutant promoter.
Genes Dev.
4:1801-1810 |
| 15. |
Jacques, J.-P., and D. Kolakofsky.
1991.
Pseudo-templated transcription in prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms.
Genes Dev.
5:707-713 |
| 16. |
Jeong, S. W.,
W. H. Lang, and R. H. Reeder.
1996.
The yeast transcription terminator for RNA polymerase I is designed to prevent polymerase slippage.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:16104-16110 |
| 17. |
Jin, D. J.
1994.
Slippage synthesis at the galP2 promoter of Escherichia coli and its regulation by UTP concentration and cAMP-cAMP receptor protein.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:17221-17227 |
| 18. |
Larsen, B.,
N. M. Wills,
C. Nelson,
J. F. Atkins, and R. F. Gesteland.
2000.
Nonlinearity in genetic decoding: homologous DNA replicase genes use alternatives of transcriptional slippage or translational frameshifting.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97:1683-1688 |
| 19. |
Linton, M. F.,
M. Raabe,
V. Pierotti, and S. G. Young.
1997.
Reading-frame restoration by transcriptional slippage at long stretches of adenine residues in mammalian cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:14127-14132 |
| 20. |
Liu, C.,
L. S. Heath, and C. L. Turnbough, Jr.
1994.
Regulation of pyrBI operon expression in Escherichia coli by UTP-sensitive reiterative RNA synthesis during transcriptional initiation.
Genes Dev.
8:2904-2912 |
| 21. |
Liu, J., and C. L. Turnbough, Jr.
1994.
Effects of transcriptional start site sequence and position on nucleotide-sensitive selection of alternative start sites at the pyrC promoter in Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
176:2938-2945 |
| 22. |
Lowry, O. H.,
N. J. Rosebrough,
A. L. Farr, and R. J. Randall.
1951.
Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.
J. Biol. Chem.
193:265-275 |
| 23. |
McClure, W. R.,
C. L. Cech, and D. E. Johnston.
1978.
A steady state assay for the RNA polymerase initiation reaction.
J. Biol. Chem.
253:8941-8948 |
| 24. | Miller, J. H. 1972. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 25. | Neuhard, J., and P. Nygaard. 1987. Purines and pyrimidines, p. 445-473. In F. C. Neidhardt, J. L. Ingraham, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: cellular and molecular biology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. |
| 26. |
Nierman, W. C., and M. J. Chamberlin.
1979.
Studies of RNA chain initiation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase bound to T7 DNA. Direct analysis of the kinetics and extent of RNA chain initiation at T7 promoter A1.
J. Biol. Chem.
254:7921-7926 |
| 27. | Nudler, E., A. Mustaev, E. Lukhtanov, and A. Goldfarb. 1997. The RNA-DNA hybrid maintains the register of transcription by preventing backtracking of RNA polymerase. Cell 89:33-41[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 28. | Qi, F., C. Liu, L. S. Heath, and C. L. Turnbough, Jr. 1996. In vitro assay for reiterative transcription during transcriptional initiation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. Methods Enzymol. 273:71-85[Medline]. |
| 29. | Qi, F., and C. L. Turnbough, Jr. 1995. Regulation of codBA operon expression in Escherichia coli by UTP-dependent reiterative transcription and UTP-sensitive transcriptional start site switching. J. Mol. Biol. 254:552-565[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 30. | Rasmussen, U. B., B. Mygind, and P. Nygaard. 1986. Purification and some properties of uracil phosphoribosyltransferase from Escherichia coli K12. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 881:268-275[Medline]. |
| 31. |
Roland, K. L.,
C. Liu, and C. L. Turnbough, Jr.
1988.
Role of the ribosome in suppressing transcriptional termination at the pyrBI attenuator of Escherichia coli K-12.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
85:7149-7153 |
| 32. |
Roland, K. L.,
F. E. Powell, and C. L. Turnbough, Jr.
1985.
Role of translation and attenuation in the control of pyrBI operon expression in Escherichia coli K-12.
J. Bacteriol.
163:991-999 |
| 33. | Sidorenkov, I., N. Komissarova, and M. Kashlev. 1998. Crucial role of the RNA:DNA hybrid in the processivity of transcription. Mol. Cell 2:55-64[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 34. | Silhavy, T. J., M. L. Berman, and L. W. Enquist. 1984. Experiments with gene fusions. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 35. |
Tu, A.-H. T., and C. L. Turnbough, Jr.
1997.
Regulation of upp expression in Escherichia coli by UTP-sensitive selection of transcriptional start sites coupled with UTP-dependent reiterative transcription.
J. Bacteriol.
179:6665-6673 |
| 36. |
Wilson, H. R.,
C. D. Archer,
J. Liu, and C. L. Turnbough, Jr.
1992.
Translational control of pyrC expression mediated by nucleotide-sensitive selection of transcriptional start sites in Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
174:514-524 |
| 37. | Xiong, X. F., and W. S. Reznikoff. 1993. Transcriptional slippage during the transcription initiation process at a mutant lac promoter in vivo. J. Mol. Biol. 231:569-580[CrossRef][Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Appl. Environ. Microbiol. | Infect. Immun. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|---|---|
| Mol. Cell. Biol. | J. Virol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. |
| ALL ASM JOURNALS |