Department of Applied Biological Science,
Faculty of Science and Technology, Science University of Tokyo,
2641 Yamazaki, Noda, Chiba 278-8510,1 and
Department of Biotechnology, The University of Tokyo,
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657,2 Japan
 |
TEXT |
L-Lactate dehydrogenase
(L-LDH; EC 1.1.1.27) and L-malate
dehydrogenase (L-MDH; EC 1.1.1.37) are similar with respect to both protein structure and catalytic machinery, and they catalyze oxidation-reduction of common 2-ketoacids and
L-2-hydroxyacids with NAD as the coenzyme (1, 19,
26). Nevertheless, unless artificially modified, most
L-LDHs and L-MDHs strictly
discriminate their own substrates, pyruvate (L-lactate) and
oxaloacetate (L-malate), respectively (15),
although a duck
-crystallin (37) and the Bifidobacterium longum (11) L-LDHs
are known to exhibit relatively high L-MDH activities that
are only 25- and 44-fold, respectively, lower than their own
L-LDH activities.
In lactic acid bacteria such as lactobacilli, L-LDHs show a
great variety of catalytic properties and play key roles in the fermentation of lactic acid, acting in the last step of the anaerobic glycolysis pathway by converting pyruvate and NADH to
L-lactate and NAD+ (19). While
vertebrate cells possess nonallosteric L-LDH isozymes, depending on the tissue (19), many bacterial cells possess
allosteric types of L-LDHs, which usually require fructose
1,6-bisphosphate [Fru(1,6)P2] for activity
(13). We are carrying out a comparative study of the
nonallosteric and allosteric types of L-LDHs from Lactobacillus pentosus, previously called L. plantarum, and L. casei, respectively, to
understand their structure-function relationships (28-30). In the course of this study, we found that these
two enzymes exhibit marked activities toward oxaloacetate that are
comparable to their activities for pyruvate.
The cultivation of Escherichia coli cells harboring
expression plasmids for the genes encoding the L-LDHs of
L. pentosus JCM1558 (=ATCC 8041) and L. casei IAM
12473 (=ATCC 393) and purification of the enzymes were performed
essentially as described previously (29, 30). Protein
concentrations were determined with Bio-Rad protein assay reagent by
the Bradford method (4), using bovine serum albumin as the
standard. All enzyme assays were performed at 30°C. The 2-ketoacid
reduction by L. pentosus L-LDH was assayed in 50 mM sodium MES (morpholineethanesulfonic acid) buffer (pH 6.0)
containing 0.1 mM NADH and various concentrations of sodium pyruvate,
oxaloacetate, or another 2-ketoacid. The reduction of pyruvate and
oxaloacetate by the L. casei enzymes was assayed in 50 mM
sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) and sodium MOPS
(morpholinepropanesulfonic acid) buffer (pH 7.0), respectively. The
assay mixtures for oxaloacetate were freshly prepared before each use,
using newly purchased oxaloacetic acid (Wako Fine Chemicals, Osaka,
Japan). One unit was defined as the catalytic rate of the conversion of
1 µmol of substrate per min. Since the catalytic reactions by the
L. pentosus and L. casei enzymes in the presence
of Fru(1,6)P2 were markedly inhibited by high
concentrations of substrates, kinetic parameters such as
Km and maximal velocity
(Vmax) were estimated using only data obtained
at substrate concentrations sufficiently low and noninhibitory to give
linear lines on double-reciprocal plots. For reactions that showed
significant cooperativity, the Hill equation (6) was used
for sigmoidal curve fitting to obtain kinetic parameters such as Hill
coefficient (h) and half-saturating substrate concentration (S0.5).
Oligodeoxynucleotide 5'-GTT GTG ATT ACC GCT GGC GCC AAT CAA AAG CCT GGC
GAA TCA CG-3' was purchased from Takara Shuzo to obtain a mutant
L. pentosus L-LDH (P101N). Site-directed
mutagenesis was performed with a GeneEditor in vitro mutagenesis kit (Promega).
When oxaloacetate was used as the substrate, L. pentosus
L-LDH exhibited high catalytic activity that was comparable
to the activity toward pyruvate (Fig.
1A), exhibiting Km
and Vmax values slightly higher than those for
pyruvate (Table 1). The less than threefold differences in the oxaloacetate and pyruvate
Km values indicate that the observed
L-MDH activities arise mostly from oxaloacetate in the
assay mixture, not from contaminant pyruvate. In addition to
oxaloacetate, hydroxypyruvate was a good substrate for the enzyme
reaction, exhibiting Km and
Vmax values virtually the same as those for
oxaloacetate. While the enzyme was relatively active toward
2-ketobutylate and phenylpyruvate, it was less active toward
2-ketoglutarate and 2-ketoacid substrates with long aliphatic chains,
such as 2-ketovalerate, 2-ketocaproate, and 2-ketoisocaproate (Table
1), which are favorable substrates for the
L-2-hydroxyisocaproate dehydrogenase from L. confusus (27).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Saturation curves for pyruvate and oxaloacetate for the
wild-type and mutant L. pentosus L-LDHs.
Reaction velocities for the wild-type (A) and P101N mutant (B) L. pentosus L-LDHs were measured in the presence of the
indicated concentrations of pyruvate (open symbols) or oxaloacetate
(closed symbols). Dashed and solid lines indicate the calculated
saturation curves for pyruvate and oxaloacetate, respectively, by
kinetic parameters shown in Table 1.
|
|
Unlike the L. pentosus enzyme, the L. casei
enzyme is a representative allosteric L-LDH that
requires Fru(1,6)P2 to exhibit its activity (14, 18,
20). Under acidic conditions such as pH 5.0, the L. casei enzyme shows marked catalytic activity even in the absence
of Fru(1,6)P2, giving a sigmoidal saturation curve for
substrate pyruvate but a hyperbolic saturation curve in the
presence of Fru(1,6)P2. When oxaloacetate was used as
the substrate at pH 5.0, the L. casei enzyme also exhibited
high catalytic activity toward oxaloacetate in both the absence and
presence of Fru(1,6)P2 (Fig.
2). In the absence of
Fru(1,6)P2, for oxaloacetate a sigmoidal saturation curve
was obtained for the enzyme reaction; as for pyruvate, an h
value slightly higher than that for pyruvate was observed (Table
2). Under these conditions, we observed
for oxaloacetate only an about twofold lower
Vmax and slightly higher S0.5 for the enzyme reaction than for pyruvate.
In the presence of 5 mM Fru(1,6)P2, on the other hand, the
L. casei enzyme gave a hyperbolic saturation curve for
oxaloacetate, as for pyruvate (Fig. 2), and slightly higher
Km and lower Vmax values
for oxaloacetate than for pyruvate (Table 2).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Saturation curves for pyruvate and oxaloacetate for
L. casei L-LDH at pH 5.0. Reaction velocities
were measured in the presence of the indicated concentrations of
pyruvate (open symbols) or oxaloacetate (closed symbols), without
(circles) or with (squares) 5 mM Fru(1,6)P2. Dashed and
solid lines indicate the calculated saturation curves for pyruvate and
oxaloacetate, respectively, by kinetic parameters shown in Table 2.
|
|
Under neutral conditions such as pH 7.0, on the other hand, it is known
that the L. casei enzyme absolutely requires
Fru(1,6)P2 for activity, and the activation function of
Fru(1,6)P2 is markedly improved in the presence of certain
divalent cations such as Mn2+ (14, 18, 20). At
pH 7.0, the L. casei enzyme exhibited no apparent catalytic
activity toward oxaloacetate in the absence or in the presence of a
nonsaturating concentration (5 mM) of Fru(1,6)P2, where
pyruvate gives a sigmoidal saturation curve for the enzyme reaction
(14, 18). Like the activity toward pyruvate, however, the
activity toward oxaloacetate was also greatly enhanced by addition
of 10 mM MnSO4 in the presence of 5 mM
Fru(1,6)P2, giving a hyperbolic saturation curve with about
1.4- and 1.2-fold reduced Km and
Vmax values, respectively, compared with those for pyruvate (Table 2).
Since the two Lactobacillus enzymes were essentially
randomly chosen from the allosteric and nonallosteric types of
Lactobacillus L-LDHs, respectively, it is likely
that Lactobacillus L-LDHs generally exhibit such
a broad substrate specificity regardless of their allosteric
properties. Significant L-MDH activity has been observed in
cell extracts of L. plantarum, L. casei,
L. acidophilus, and L. helveticus (10,
25). These four lactobacilli also exhibit marked activities of
citrate synthase, aconitase, citrate lyase, fumarase, and fumarate
reductase but possibly lack isocitrate dehydrogenase, 2-ketoglutarate
dehydrogenase, and succinate dehydrogenase activities, indicating that
lactobacilli are deficient in biosynthetic and bioenergetic functions
required for the complete citric acid cycle (25). This
suggests that Lactobacillus L-LDHs do not
physiologically catalyze the oxidation of L-malate, but can
effect the reduction of oxaloacetate to L-malate in such an
incomplete citric acid cycle, though L. plantarum cells may
possess another protein that can catalyze oxaloacetate reduction with
NADH (10).
Although it has been shown that Gln102, Asp197, and Thr246 (positions
are numbered according to Eventoff et al. 8)
directly participate in substrate discrimination by Bacillus
stearothermophilus L-LDH (35), all of
these amino acids are highly conserved in the Lactobacillus
enzymes, as in the case of other usual L-LDHs. On the other
hand, it is also known that the active-site loop comprising positions
98 to 110 of L-LDH is essentially involved in the catalytic
reaction (5) and substrate recognition (22, 35,
36). It is notable that Bacillus and
Lactobacillus L-LDHs have different amino acids,
i.e., Asn and Pro, respectively, at position 101 in the active-site
loop (Fig. 3), although the two types of
L-LDH are relatively close to each other evolutionarily (16), suggesting that L-LDHs from aerobic and
anaerobic gram-positive bacteria may be distinguished by whether there
is Asn or Pro at this position. The ternary complex structure of the
B. stearothermophilus enzyme indicates that the side chain
of Asn101 forms a hydrogen bond with the Gln102 main chain and thereby
stabilizes the turn structure of the active-site loop
(34). It is possible that the Asn101-to-Pro change affects
the structure or flexibility of the active-site loop, since Pro limits
the dihedral angles of the linked peptide bonds, besides impairing the
ability to form the corresponding hydrogen bond. For L. pentosus L-LDH, the replacement of Pro101 with Asn
significantly reduced activities toward pyruvate and, to a much greater
extent, oxaloacetate (Fig. 1). The substitution increased the
oxaloacetate Km (6.5-fold) more than the
pyruvate Km (2.2-fold) (Table 1), and increased the activity toward pyruvate/activity toward oxaloacetate ratio from
2.2 to 7.8, when enzyme activity was evaluated on the basis of
Vmax/Km. Like the
activity toward oxaloacetate, enzyme activities toward other
alternative 2-ketoacid substrates were reduced by the Pro101-to-Asn
change more than the activity toward pyruvate, with an apparently
similar trend. These results indicate that Pro101 contributes to
widening of the substrate specificity of the Lactobacillus
enzyme, although it is unlikely that only Pro101 is critical for the
broad substrate specificity of the L. pentosus enzyme. It is
known that in most L-LDHs the guanidino group of Arg171
forms a bidental, ionic hydrogen bond with the carboxyl group of
substrate pyruvate and allows pyruvate to be strongly bound and
properly oriented in the catalytic site (17). Recently, we
determined the three-dimensional structure of the L. pentosus holoenzyme at 2.3-Å resolution, where the guanidino
group undergoes an unusual intersubunit interaction across the Q-axis
subunit interface (H. Uchikoba et al., unpublished results). Through
crystallography and site-directed mutagenesis, we are further
investigating the unusual substrate recognition of
Lactobacillus L-LDHs.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Alignment of amino acid sequences of the active-site
loops of L-LDHs of bacilli and lactic acid bacteria. LPLDH,
L. pentosus (28); LCLDH, L. casei
(23); LPLLDH, L. plantarum (9);
PALDH, Pediococcus acidilactici (12); SPLDH,
Streptococcus mutans (30); STLDH, S. thermophilus (31); LLLDH, Lactococcus
lactis (16, 24); BSLDH, B. stearothermophilus (2); BCLDH, B. caldotenax (3); BMLDH, B. megaterium
(33); BPLDH, B. psychrosaccharolyticus
(32); DFMLDH, dogfish muscle (31). Proline
residues conserved in L-LDHs of lactic acid bacteria are
shaded.
|
|
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Science Research to
H.T. from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan.
| 1.
|
Banaszak, L. J., and R. A. Bradshaw.
1975.
Malate dehydrogenase, p. 369-397.
In
P. D. Boyer (ed.), The enzymes, 3rd ed., vol. 11. Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 2.
|
Barstow, D. A.,
A. R. Clarke,
W. N. Chia,
D. Wigley,
A. F. Sharman,
J. J. Holbrook,
T. Atkinson, and N. P. Minton.
1986.
Cloning, expression, and complete nucleotide sequence of the Bacillus stearothermophilus L-lactate dehydrogenase gene.
Gene
46:47-55[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Barstow, D. A.,
J. P. Murphy,
A. F. Sharman,
A. R. Clarke,
J. J. Holbrook, and T. Atkinson.
1987.
Amino acid sequence of L-lactate dehydrogenase of Bacillus caldotenax deduced from the nucleotide sequence of the cloned gene.
Eur. J. Biochem.
165:581-596[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Bradford, M. M.
1976.
A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.
Anal. Biochem.
72:248-254[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Clarke, A. R.,
D. B. Wigley,
W. N. Chia,
D. A. Barstow,
T. Atkinson, and J. J. Holbrook.
1986.
Site-directed mutagenesis reveals role of mobile arginine residue in lactate dehydrogenase catalysis.
Nature
324:699-702[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Dixon, M., and E. C. Webb.
1979.
Enzyme, 3rd ed., p. 400-402.
Longman, London, United Kingdom.
|
| 7.
|
Duncan, M. J., and J. D. Hillman.
1991.
DNA sequence and in vitro mutagenesis of the gene encoding the fructose-1,6-diphosphate-dependent L-(+)-lactate dehydrogenase of Streptococcus mutans.
Infect. Immun.
59:3930-3934[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Eventoff, W.,
M. G. Rossmann,
S. S. Taylor,
H.-J. Torff,
H. Meyer,
W. Keil, and H.-H. Kiltz.
1977.
Structural adaptations of lactate dehydrogenase isozymes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
74:2677-2681[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Ferain, T.,
D. Garmyn,
N. Bernard,
P. Hols, and J. Delcour.
1994.
Lactobacillus plantarum ldhL gene: overexpression and deletion.
J. Bacteriol.
176:596-601[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Ferain, T.,
A. N. Schanck, and J. Delcour.
1996.
13C nuclear magnetic resonance analysis of glucose and citrate end products in an ldhL-ldhD double-knockout strain of Lactobacillus plantarum.
J. Bacteriol.
178:7311-7315[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Fushinobu, S.,
T. Ohta, and H. Matsuzawa.
1998.
Homotropic activation via the subunit interaction and allosteric symmetry revealed on analysis of hybrid enzymes of L-lactate dehydrogenase.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:2971-2976[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Garmyn, D.,
T. Ferain,
N. Bernard,
P. Hols, and J. Delcour.
1995.
Cloning, nucleotide sequence, and transcriptional analysis of the Pediococcus acidilactici L-(+)-lactate dehydrogenase gene.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
61:266-272[Abstract].
|
| 13.
|
Garvie, E. I.
1980.
Bacterial lactate dehydrogenases.
Microbiol. Rev.
44:106-139[Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Gordon, G. L., and H. W. Doelle.
1976.
Purification, properties and immunological relationship of L-(+)-lactate dehydrogenase from Lactobacillus casei.
Eur. J. Biochem.
67:543-555[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Goward, C. R., and D. J. Nicholls.
1994.
Malate dehydrogenase: a model for structure, evolution, and catalysis.
Protein Sci.
3:1883-1888[Abstract].
|
| 16.
|
Griffin, H. G.,
S. R. Swindell, and M. J. Gasson.
1992.
Cloning and sequence analysis of the gene encoding L-lactate dehydrogenase from Lactococcus lactis: evolutionary relationships between 21 different LDH enzymes.
Gene
122:193-197[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Hart, K. W.,
A. R. Clarke,
D. B. Wigley,
A. D. Waldman,
W. N. Chia,
D. A. Barstow,
T. Atkinson,
J. B. Jones, and J. J. Holbrook.
1986.
A strong carboxylate-arginine interaction is important in substrate orientation and recognition in lactate dehydrogenase.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
914:294-298.
|
| 18.
|
Hensel, R.,
U. Mayr,
K. O. Stetter, and O. Kandler.
1977.
Comparative studies of lactic acid dehydrogenases in lactic acid bacteria. 1. Purification and kinetics of the allosteric L-lactic acid dehydrogenase from Lactobacillus casei ssp. casei and Lactobacillus curvatus.
Arch. Microbiol.
112:81-93[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Holbrook, J. J.,
A. Liljas,
S. J. Steindel, and M. G. Rossmann.
1975.
Lactate dehydrogenase, p. 191-292.
In
P. D. Boyer (ed.), The enzymes, 3rd ed., vol. 11. Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 20.
|
Holland, R., and G. G. Pritchard.
1975.
Regulation of the L-lactate dehydrogenase from Lactobacillus casei by fructose-1,6-bisphosphate and metal ions.
J. Bacteriol.
121:777-784[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Ito, Y., and T. Sasaki.
1994.
Cloning and nucleotide sequence of L-lactate dehydrogenase gene from Streptococcus thermophilus M-192.
Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.
58:1569-1573[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Kallwass, H. K. W.,
M. A. Luyten,
W. Parris,
M. Gold,
C. M. Kay, and J. B. Jones.
1992.
Effects of Gln102Arg and Cys97Gly mutations of the structural specificity and stereospecificity of the L-lactate dehydrogenase from Bacillus stearothermophilus.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
114:4551-4557[CrossRef].
|
| 23.
|
Kim, S. F.,
S. J. Baek, and M. Y. Pack.
1991.
Cloning and nucleotide sequence of the Lactobacillus casei lactate dehydrogenase gene.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
57:2413-2417[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Llanos, R. M.,
A. J. Hillier, and B. E. Davidson.
1992.
Cloning, nucleotide sequence, expression, and chromosomal location of ldh, the gene encoding L-(+)-lactate dehydrogenase, from Lactococcus lactis.
J. Bacteriol.
174:6956-6964[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Morishita, T., and M. Yajima.
1995.
Incomplete operation of biosynthetic and bioenergenic functions of the citric acid cycle in multiple autotrophic Lactobacilli.
Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.
59:251-255.
|
| 26.
|
Rossmann, M. G.,
A. Liljas,
C.-I. Brändén, and L. J. Banaszak.
1975.
Evolutionary and structural relationships among dehydrogenases, p. 61-102.
In
P. D. Boyer (ed.), The enzymes, 3rd ed., vol. 11. Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 27.
|
Schütte, H.,
W. Hummel, and M.-R. Kula.
1984.
L-2-Hydroxyisocaproate dehydrogenase. A new enzyme from Lactobacillus confusus for the stereospecific reduction of 2-ketocarboxylic acid.
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
19:167-176[CrossRef].
|
| 28.
|
Taguchi, H., and T. Ohta.
1991.
D-Lactate dehydrogenase is a member of D-isomer-specific 2-hydroxyacid dehydrogenase family.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:12588-12594[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Taguchi, H., and T. Ohta.
1992.
Unusual amino acid substitution in the anion-binding site of Lactobacillus plantarum non-allosteric L-lactate dehydrogenase.
Eur. J. Biochem.
209:993-998[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Taguchi, H., and T. Ohta.
1995.
Role of histidine 188 in fructose 1,6-bisphosphate- and divalent cation-regulated L-lactate dehydrogenase of Lactobacillus casei.
Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.
59:451-458[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Taylor, S. S.
1977.
Amino acid sequence of dogfish muscle lactate dehydrogenase.
J. Biol. Chem.
252:1799-1806[Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Vckovski, V.,
D. Schlatter, and H. Zuber.
1990.
Structure and function of L-lactate dehydrogenase from thermophilic and mesophilic bacteria. IX. Identification, isolation and nucleotide sequence of two L-lactate dehydrogenase genes of the psychrophilic bacterium Bacillus psychrosaccharolyticus.
Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler
371:103-110[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Waldvogel, S.,
H. Weber, and H. Zuber.
1987.
Structure and function of L-lactate dehydrogenase from thermophilic and mesophilic bacteria. VII. Nucleotide sequence of the lactate dehydrogenase gene from the mesophilic bacterium Bacillus megaterium. Preparation and properties of a hybrid lactate dehydrogenase comprising moieties of the B. megaterium and B. stearothermophilus enzymes.
Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler
368:1391-1399[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Wigley, D. B.,
S. J. Gamblin,
J. P. Turkenburg,
E. J. Dodson,
K. Piontek,
H. Muirhead, and J. J. Holbrook.
1992.
Structure of a ternary complex of an allosteric lactate dehydrogenase from Bacillus stearothermophilus at 2.5 Å resolution.
J. Mol. Biol.
223:317-335[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Wilks, H. M.,
K. W. Hart,
R. Feeney,
C. R. Dunn,
H. Muirhead,
W. N. Chia,
D. A. Barstow,
T. Atkinson,
A. R. Clarke, and J. J. Holbrook.
1988.
A specific, highly active malate dehydrogenase by redesign of a lactate dehydrogenase framework.
Science
242:1541-1544[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Wilks, H. M.,
D. J. Halsall,
T. Atkinson,
W. N. Chia,
A. R. Clarke, and J. J. Holbrook.
1990.
Designs for a broad substrate specificity ketoacid dehydrogenase.
Biochemistry
29:8587-8591[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Wu, C.-Y.,
S.-T. Chen,
S.-H. Chiou, and K.-T. Wang.
1992.
Kinetic analysis of duck -crystallin with L-lactate dehydrogenase activity: determination of kinetic constants and comparison of substrate specificity.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
186:874-880[CrossRef][Medline].
|