Journal of Bacteriology, June 2001, p. 3589-3596, Vol. 183, No. 12
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.12.3589-3596.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Section of Microbiology, University of
California
Davis, Davis, California 95616
Received 8 December 2000/Accepted 28 March 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The sdeK gene is essential to the Myxococcus
xanthus developmental process. We reported previously, based on
sequence analysis (A. G. Garza, J. S. Pollack, B. Z. Harris, A. Lee, I. M. Keseler, E. F. Licking, and M. Singer,
J. Bacteriol. 180:4628-4637, 1998), that SdeK appears to
be a histidine kinase. In the present study, we have conducted both
biochemical and genetic analyses to test the hypothesis that SdeK is a
histidine kinase. An SdeK fusion protein containing an N-terminal
polyhistidine tag (His-SdeK) displays the biochemical characteristics
of a histidine kinase. Furthermore, histidine 286 of SdeK, the putative
site of phosphorylation, is required for both in vitro and in vivo
protein activity. The results of these assays have led us to conclude
that SdeK is indeed a histidine kinase. The developmental phenotype of
a
sdeK1 strain could not be rescued by codevelopment
with wild-type cells, indicating that the defect is not due to the
mutant's inability to produce an extracellular signal. Furthermore,
the
sdeK1 mutant was found to produce both A- and
C-signal, based on A-factor and codevelopment assays with a
csgA mutant, respectively. The expression patterns of
several Tn5lacZ transcriptional fusions were examined in
the
sdeK1-null background, and we found that all
C-signal-dependent fusions assayed also required SdeK for full
expression. Our results indicate that SdeK is a histidine kinase that
is part of a signal transduction pathway which, in concert with the
C-signal transduction pathway, controls the activation of
developmental-gene expression required to progress past the
aggregation stage.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The gram-negative soil bacterium Myxococcus xanthus undergoes multicellular development upon nutrient deprivation. The developmental process requires the coordinated effort of approximately 105 cells and culminates in the formation of the multicellular fruiting body (3). Within the fruiting body, rod-shaped vegetative cells differentiate into environmentally resistant, metabolically quiescent myxospores.
The transition from a colony of vegetatively growing rods to a spore-filled fruiting body requires cell-cell communication to coordinate changes in cell behavior and movement. These changes are facilitated by the production of several cell-derived extracellular signals (2, 6, 21). Production and reception of these signals result in a signal transduction cascade that directs the coordinated expression of specific developmentally regulated genes. Thus far, three signaling systems, the A-, C-, and E-signaling pathways, have been described in detail for M. xanthus (2, 6). To gain a better understanding of the relationship between the various signaling systems and gene expression, a battery of developmentally regulated Tn5lac fusions has been used to examine the dependence of gene expression on each signaling system (14-16, 20). Such analyses have allowed the identification of genetic regulatory circuits used by M. xanthus to control developmental-gene expression. Additionally, this type of genetic approach has allowed the placement of additional genes, such as those responsible for the reception and transduction of the various signals, onto the genetic regulatory circuits.
A-signaling mutants are blocked early in development (about 1 to 2 h poststarvation), and as such, expression of most developmentally regulated Tn5lacZ fusions is impaired. A-signal is a mixture of amino acids and peptides, believed to be produced by extracellular proteolysis, that acts as a quorum sensor (21). Defective C-signaling results in a developmental block at approximately 6 to 8 h post-starvation initiation, and activation of Tn5lac fusions expressed after this time point is diminished (15). C-signal activity requires the presence of a cell surface-associated protein, CsgA, which shares a high degree of sequence similarity and identity with members of the short-chain alcohol dehydrogenase family (22). CsgA is encoded by the csgA gene (7), and csgA mutants fail to aggregate or to sporulate properly (30). Furthermore, csgA mutants do not form the synchronous cell waves, or ripples, that are characteristic of developing cells. Little is known about how C-signal is transmitted. Transduction of C-signal does require FruA, a two-component response regulator (4). The phenotype of cells carrying a fruA mutation is similar to that of csgA mutant cells (32). Thus far, FruA is the only proposed component of the C-signal transduction pathway.
Previous work on early developmental-gene expression has identified a bifurcation early in the M. xanthus developmental pathway. One branch, designated the population starvation branch (31), requires the A-signal quorum sensor for expression of its genes. The genes on the second branch, designated the cellular starvation branch (31), require only the starvation initiation signal (p)ppGpp for expression. By studying mutants, it has been determined that both branches are required for fruiting-body development and sporulation, indicating that the branches eventually converge. Mutations in specific genes in either branch lead to developmental arrest. One such gene, which is on the cellular starvation branch, is sdeK (5, 16, 17), a proposed histidine kinase-encoding gene. Here we provide direct evidence that sdeK encodes a histidine kinase, and we further define the role that sdeK plays in developmental signal transduction. We also propose that SdeK may be the link between the cellular and population pathways and that the SdeK signal transduction pathway works in concert with the C-signal transduction pathway to regulate gene expression through the aggregation stage in M. xanthus development.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bacterial strains, transductions, and plasmids.
A complete
list of strains and plasmids used in this study is shown in Table
1. Plasmids were propagated in
Escherichia coli DH5
(8). M. xanthus DK1622, which is wild type for both fruiting-body formation and sporulation, was chosen as the wild-type strain for this
study (12). Strain MS1512 (DK1622
sdeK1) was
constructed as described previously for the DK101 derivative MS1503
(5). Myxophages Mx4 ts18 ts27
hrm and Mx8 clp2, which have been described previously (1, 24), were used to transduce the
Tn5lacZ transcriptional fusions employed in this study from
their parental strains (16) into MS1512. Myxophage Mx8 was
used to transduce
csgA::Tn5-132 (18) from DK5216 into MS1523. Plasmids pJEF39 and pJEF40
were introduced into MS1512 via electroporation as described previously (28). The resulting kanamycin-resistant transformants were
screened by Southern blot analysis (29) for confirmation
of a single insertion of the appropriate plasmid at the correct
chromosomal location, within the sdeK locus.
|
Media for growth, transductions, and development.
The
M. xanthus strains were grown with vigorous shaking at
32°C in CTT broth (1% Casitone [Difco Laboratories], 10 mM
Tris-HCl [pH 7.6], 1 mM
KH2PO4, 8 mM
MgSO4) or on CTT plates containing 1.5% agar
(Difco). CTT plates were supplemented with 40 µg of kanamycin
monosulfate (Sigma) per ml or 12.5 µg of oxytetracycline (Sigma) per
ml as required. Myxospores and transduced cells were suspended in CTT
soft agar (CTT broth containing 0.7% agar) prior to being plated.
E. coli DH5
was grown with shaking at 37°C in Luria
broth or on Luria-Bertani agar medium as described previously (29). Luria broth and Luria-Bertani agar medium were
supplemented with 40 µg of kanamycin monosulfate or 50 µg of
ampicillin (Sigma) per ml as needed. Stocks of the generalized
transducing phages Mx4 and Mx8 were prepared on donor cells grown with
vigorous shaking at 32°C in CYE broth (1% Casitone, 0.5% yeast
extract [Difco Laboratories], 8 mM MgSO4).
M. xanthus development was conducted at 32°C on TPM agar
medium, which is composed of TPM buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.6], 1 mM KH2PO4, 8 mM
MgSO4) and 1.5% agar.
Development, sporulation efficiencies, rippling assays, and
-galactosidase expression.
Vegetatively growing M. xanthus cells were harvested during mid-exponential phase by
centrifugation (7,700 × g for 5 min) and plated for
development as described previously (16). Progress of
fruiting-body development was observed visually by using a dissecting
microscope (Wild-Heerburg). Determination of sporulation efficiencies
was conducted as described previously (34).
-galactosidase activity (1 U being defined as the amount of enzyme required to produce 1 nmol
of o-nitrophenol min
1 mg of
protein
1) assays were performed on
quick-frozen cell extracts as described previously (16).
Developmental rescue experiments.
Wild-type DK1622 cells and
the isogenic
sdeK1 derivatives were prepared for
developmental assay as described above. Cells suspended in TPM medium
were mixed in equal proportions, applied to TPM agar in 20-µl
aliquots, and incubated at 32°C for 5 days.
A- and C-factor assays.
A-factor assays were conducted, as
described previously, by the in situ method (16). One unit
of A-factor is defined as the amount required to produce 1 U of
-galactosidase activity above background (21). C-factor
assays were performed by a developmental mixing protocol. Cells
defective for C-signal production (DK2630) were mixed with an equal
proportion of DK1512 (
sdeK1) cells, and the cell mixture
was plated for development as described above. Germinated spores
(100-colony sample size) were then scored for kanamycin resistance, to
determine lineage, by patching colonies onto CTT plates containing kanamycin.
Overproduction and purification of His-SdeK.
His-SdeK was
overproduced using the plasmid pTrcHisB (Invitrogen). The putative
sdeK open reading frame (ORF) was cloned into pTrcHisB as a
1.6-kb BamHI-HindIII fragment from psdeK1 to
form psdeK2 (Table 1). An additional 33 bases at the 5' end of the putative sdeK ORF were included in the clone because of
restriction site availability. As a result, SdeK contained an
additional 11 amino acids at its N terminus. The overexpressed SdeK
contained an N-terminal polyhistidine tag. E. coli cells
containing the plasmid psdeK2 were grown as described above and induced
to express His-SdeK by the addition of 1 mM
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) when
culture turbidity reached an optical density at 600 nm of 0.3. Protein
was overproduced for 3 h, at which point the cells were
pelleted (1,000 × g for 10 min) and stored at
20°C.
80°C until needed.
Phosphorylation assays.
Frozen aliquots of His-SdeK or
His-SdeKH286A protein were thawed to room temperature and diluted
10-fold in 20 mM Tris (pH 8.7). The protein was incubated 1 h on
ice to allow refolding. The phosphorylation assays were performed with
a 30-µl reaction volume containing 50 mM Tris (pH 7.6), 50 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, and 0.1 mM EDTA. Refolded
protein was added to a final concentration of 0.5 µM. The reaction
was initiated by the addition of 30 µCi of
[
-32P]ATP (6,000 Ci/mmol; NEN Life Science
Products, Inc.). The reaction mixture was incubated at room temperature
for 10 min, and the reaction was stopped by addition of 0.2 volume of
5× protein loading buffer (250 mM Tris [pH 6.8], 10% glycerol,
0.02% bromophenol blue, 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 150 mM
-mercaptoethanol). The samples were heated for 3 min at 55°C and
subsequently loaded onto an SDS-12% polyacrylamide gel.
Electrophoresis was performed at a constant 200 V for approximately
1 h. The gel was subsequently soaked in approximately 15 ml of SDS
running buffer (100 mM Tris base, 800 mM glycine, 35 mM SDS) twice, for
20 min each time, to remove any unincorporated
[
-32P]ATP. Labeled protein was detected with
a PhosphorImager (Storm 840; Molecular Dynamics).
20°C was added to a final concentration of 0.4 µM. Unlabeled ATP (Sigma) was added to the reaction mixture to
a final concentration of 830 µM. The labeling reaction was initiated
by the addition of 10 µCi of [
-32P]ATP.
Site-directed mutagenesis. The plasmid psdeK2 (Table 1) was used as the template for mutagenesis. The single-stranded primers used to generate His-SdeKH286A and SdeKH286A within psdeK2.5 and pJEF40, respectively, were primer 1 (5'-GGCGTGCTGGGCGCGGACCTGGGCAATCC-3') and primer 2 (5'-GGATTGCCCAGGTCCGCGCCCAGCACGCC-3') (Fisher). Mutagenesis was carried out by the method described by the manufacturer of the ExSite kit (Stratagene).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
SdeK is a histidine kinase.
As reported previously, the ORF
contains the
4408 Tn5lacZ insertion, which disrupts a
gene that encodes a histidine kinase, as determined by sequence
analysis (5). The defining characteristic of histidine
kinases is an autophosphorylation activity in which ATP is used to
phosphorylate a conserved histidine residue (9, 27). To
determine whether SdeK possesses this activity, an N-terminal polyhistidine-tagged SdeK fusion protein (His-SdeK) was constructed and
purified from E. coli DH5
. When overexpressed
in E. coli, the His-SdeK fusion protein formed inclusion
bodies, which were then purified, solubilized, and refolded as
described in Materials and Methods. The His-SdeK purification scheme
yielded a protein preparation of approximately 70 to 80% purity, as
determined by Coomassie staining of the polyacrylamide gel after
electrophoresis (data not shown). The soluble, refolded protein
preparation was then assayed for autophosphorylation in the presence of
[
-32P]ATP. A parallel assay was performed on
MBP-EnvZ (a gift from M. Igo) as a positive control. Figure
1 shows that both the His-SdeK fusion
protein (lane 2) and the MBP-EnvZ control (lane 1) were labeled in the
presence of [
-32P]ATP.
|
Phosphorylated His-SdeK displays lability characteristics indicative of a histidine phosphate label. The stability of the phosphorylated His-SdeK fusion protein was assayed at a high temperature and under acidic and basic conditions to determine whether the phosphorylated His-SdeK protein was phosphorylated on a histidine residue. Phosphohistidyl residues are heat and acid labile but base stable, while phosphoester groups, such as phosphoserines and phosphotyrosines, are heat and acid stable but base labile (1a, 27). Heating of phosphorylated His-SdeK at 100°C for 10 min resulted in a significant decrease in phosphorylation activity, as determined by phosphorimaging (Fig. 1, lane 5). The loss of phosphorylated protein was not due to heat-induced protein degradation (data not shown). Furthermore, after incubation of an SDS-polyacrylamide gel containing phosphorylated His-SdeK for 30 min at 50°C in pH 4 buffer, phosphorylated protein was no longer detectable by phosphorimaging (Fig. 1, lane 7). Coomassie staining of the gel indicated that the loss of labeled protein did not result from protein degradation. Incubation in basic buffer (see Materials and Methods) yielded no change in intensity of the labeled His-SdeK (Fig. 1, lane 9). A phosphorylated MBP-EnvZ control displayed similar characteristics in each experiment (Fig. 1, lanes 4, 6, and 8).
H286 in SdeK is required for activity. It was determined, based on protein sequence alignment, that the putative site of autophosphorylation of SdeK is H286 (5). To test whether this histidine is required for autophosphorylation of His-SdeK, the residue was changed to an alanine by site-directed mutagenesis (see Materials and Methods). The gene encoding the SdeK mutant protein in which an alanine is substituted for the histidine at position 286 (SdeKH286A) is carried on the plasmid psdeK2.5 (Table 1). Sequencing of psdeK2.5 verified that no additional mutations were introduced during the site-directed mutagenesis. The corresponding fusion protein, His-SdeKH286A, was then expressed, purified, and assayed for activity in parallel with the wild-type His-SdeK fusion. Equal amounts of wild-type and mutant protein were assayed in each reaction. The His-SdeKH286A fusion protein exhibited no detectable autophosphorylation activity (Fig. 1, compare lanes 2 and 3). Thus, H286 is essential for His-SdeK activity.
As a further test of the importance of H286 in SdeK, the sdeKH286A mutant was assayed for its ability to complement the developmental and sporulation defects of MS1512, a strain that carries a deletion in sdeK (
sdeK1). The plasmid pJEF40, which carries a 3-kb
fragment containing the sdeKH286A ORF and the chromosomal
region required for its full expression (5), was used to
construct a tandem duplication at the sdeK locus, yielding
strain MS1527. A single insertion of the plasmid into the correct
chromosomal locus was confirmed by Southern analysis (data not shown).
As a control, plasmid pJEF39, carrying a fragment that was identical
with the exception of containing the wild-type sdeK locus,
was also analyzed for complementation of the
sdeK1
phenotype. The
sdeK1 phenotype persisted in MS1527
(<104 spores/ml) (Fig.
2), while the wild-type copy was
able to complement the developmental block (Fig. 2) and sporulation
defect (108 spores/ml). Together, these studies
provide in vivo evidence that H286 is essential for SdeK activity.
|
Is sdeK required for extracellular signaling? If the defects in fruiting-body formation and sporulation in the sdeK mutant strain are caused by a deficiency in extracellular signal production, then codevelopment with wild-type cells should rescue the developmental phenotype. Isogenic wild-type DK1622 cells and DK4300 (sdeK::Tn5lac) cells were mixed at a 1:1 ratio and allowed to codevelop on TPM agar. After 3 days, spores were harvested and assayed for viability. To determine whether any of the spores were derived from DK4300 cells, 100 colonies were scored on CTT plates containing kanamycin. None of the 100 colonies scored after codevelopment was kanamycin resistant, indicating that there was no rescue of the DK4300 sporulation defect by codevelopment with wild-type cells.
The
sdeK mutant produces both A- and
C-signal.
While the above-described experiments demonstrated that
the phenotype of an sdeK-null mutant cannot be rescued
extracellularly, the experiments did not specifically address whether
sdeK1 cells are defective in the production of specific
extracellular signals. Therefore, we assayed the ability of the
sdeK1 mutant to produce A- and C-signal. A-signal
production by wild-type, asgA476, and
sdeK1
cells was assayed directly by measuring the amount of A-factor released
into the cell suspension (20, 28). Conditioned medium was
assayed for A-factor activity by using the A-factor-dependent
4521
Tn5lacZ gene fusion as a reporter as previously described (20, 28). The results, shown in Table
2, indicated that the levels of A-factor
produced by
sdeK1 cells were equivalent to those produced
by wild-type cells, thereby demonstrating that
sdeK1
cells are capable of producing A-factor.
|
sdeK1 cells are able to produce
C-factor, the
sdeK1 mutant was tested for its ability to
ripple. The rippling phenomenon associated with early development is
known to require C-signaling (23). When
sdeK1 cells were plated for development on CF agar, they
were observed to ripple to the same extent and in the same time period
as wild-type cells (data not shown). As a further test of C-signal
production by the
sdeK1 cells, the mutant cells were
assayed for the ability to rescue the development and sporulation
phenotype of a csgA mutant. Isogenic DK1622 wild-type and
sdeK1 cells were codeveloped with the kanamycin-resistant DK1622 csgA strain DK2630 (csgA741). The
sdeK1 strain was able to rescue development of the
csgA741 strain during coincubation. The sporulation
efficiency of each mixture after 3 days of development is presented in
Table 3. When
sdeK1 cells
were codeveloped with csgA741 cells, the csgA741
cells sporulated at or near wild-type levels. To determine whether any
of these viable spores were derived from the
sdeK1 strain
as a result of developmental rescue by the csgA741 mutant,
colonies were scored on CTT plates containing kanamycin. None of the
100 colonies scored after codevelopment of the
sdeK1 and
csgA741 strains was kanamycin resistant, indicating that the
sdeK1 cells rescued the csgA741 cells for
development and sporulation, not vice versa. These data demonstrate
that
sdeK1 cells are able to produce C-signal.
|
SdeK is required for activation of developmental-gene
expression.
To further define the role played by SdeK in M. xanthus development and to determine the timing of its action,
expression of several Tn5lac reporter fusions in the
sdeK1 mutant background was studied. Nine developmentally
regulated Tn5lacZ fusions were transduced into the
sdeK1 strain. All transductants were verified for
single-copy insertion at the appropriate location by Southern analysis
prior to use. Isogenic wild-type and
sdeK1 strains
carrying each of the nine Tn5lac reporter fusions
individually were assayed for developmental expression of each fusion.
Two of the fusions,
4455 and
4469, like sdeK, lie on
the cellular starvation pathway branch and require only the starvation
initiation signal for expression. They are expressed independently of
A- and C-signal. The
4455 fusion, which is activated between 1 and
2 h poststarvation, is expressed at wild-type levels in the
sdeK1 background (data not shown), while
4469
expression, which is activated at approximately 4 h
poststarvation, is increased about twofold over wild-type levels (Fig.
3A).
|
4445 and
4521, lie on the population
starvation branch and require both (p)ppGpp and A-signal for
expression. Both fusions are expressed at wild-type levels throughout
development. This is consistent with the fact that
sdeK1
cells are able to produce A-signal. These data indicate that these
cells are able to receive and transduce A-signal, at least up until the
time at which these fusions are expressed.
The final set of fusions tested,
4400,
4403,
4406,
4414,
and
4435, requires starvation initiation signal and both A- and
C-signal for full expression. The expression patterns of these fusions
in the
sdeK1 background fall into two classes. Class I
fusions, which include
4403,
4406, and
4435, are
essentially not expressed in the
sdeK1 mutant (Fig. 3B to
D, respectively), indicating that sdeK is absolutely
required for activation of these genes. Expression of the class II
fusions, which include
4400 and
4414, is only partially affected
by the
sdeK1 mutation. Expression of
4400 in the
sdeK1 background is decreased approximately fourfold in
comparison to wild-type expression (Fig. 3E). Similarly, a fourfold
decrease in expression of the
4414 fusion in the
sdeK1 background in comparison to wild-type expression was observed (Fig.
3F), which is similar to previous results (19).
The partial dependence observed for
4400 and
4414 expression in
the sdeK-null background was also seen when expression of these fusions was examined in a csgA-null background
(15). So that a direct comparison could be made, we
assayed
4400 and
4414 expression in the csgA-null
background ourselves. We found that the
4400 expression pattern in
the csgA mutant background was similar to that seen in the
sdeK1 background (Fig. 3E). Expression of the
4414
fusion in the csgA background was decreased approximately eight- and twofold in comparison to the wild-type and
sdeK1 backgrounds, respectively (Fig. 3F). These data
suggest that the
sdeK1 mutant may be defective in
C-signal reception and/or transduction.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The sdeK gene was originally defined by the
4408
Tn5lacZ transcriptional fusion. We previously reported that
sdeK expression is dependent on (p)ppGpp and becomes
activated when cells begin to enter stationary phase (5),
which resulted in its classification as a starvation-dependent gene.
Although sdeK is expressed immediately upon starvation,
disruption of sdeK results in both a block in M. xanthus development approximately 6 to 8 h poststarvation at the early aggregation stage and a strong sporulation defect (5, 15). Analysis of the sdeK sequence led to the
conclusion that sdeK encodes a histidine kinase. Here we
have presented biochemical and genetic data demonstrating that SdeK is
a histidine kinase and have further characterized the role that SdeK
plays in M. xanthus development.
SdeK shares a high degree of sequence similarity and identity with the
PhoR family of histidine kinases (5). The feature that
best defines a histidine kinase is its ability to autophosphorylate on
a conserved histidine residue (9, 27). We constructed an
SdeK fusion protein with a polyhistidine tag at its N terminus (His-SdeK) and found that it was phosphorylated when incubated with
[
-32P]ATP. Based on sequence analysis of
SdeK, H286 was identified as the putative phosphorylation site. When
this residue was changed to an alanine by site-directed mutagenesis,
the protein was no longer phosphorylated in vitro, nor was it able to
complement the
sdeK1 phenotype. Thus, H286 is required
for in vitro phosphorylation of His-SdeK and in vivo function of SdeK.
Phosphorylated His-Sdek also shows the heat and acid lability and base
stability indicative of histidine kinases. Analysis of these data has
led us to conclude that SdeK is a histidine kinase.
SdeK and C-signal both exert control over a similar set of genes. The fact that M. xanthus development does not progress beyond the aggregation stage (6 to 8 h poststarvation) when sdeK is disrupted indicates that SdeK plays a critical role in development. We demonstrated that sdeK cells are able to produce both A- and C-signal to wild-type levels and cannot be rescued extracellularly when codeveloped with wild-type cells. These data indicate that SdeK is not involved in the production of extracellular signals.
Although it was evident that SdeK is not required for signal production, the role of sdeK in signal reception and transmission was not clear. To address this issue, we assayed the effect of
sdeK1 on the expression of three classes of
Tn5lac fusions: two starvation dependent and A-signal
independent, two A-signal dependent, and five C-signal dependent. The
studies presented in this paper demonstrated two effects of
sdeK on developmental-gene expression. First,
sdeK may play a negative role in the regulation of some starvation-dependent and A-signal-independent fusions, as determined based on the twofold increase in expression of
4469 in the
sdeK1 background. Although this is only a twofold effect,
it is possible that the SdeK signal transduction pathway modulates a
negative regulator of
4469 gene expression. Alternatively, the
effect could be indirect, due to a general disruption of the early
developmental program by
sdeK1. The significance of the
increase in
4469 expression is difficult to ascertain at this time
and will be a focus of the continued study of this gene.
Second, sdeK was found to be required for the expression of
all C-signal-dependent genes examined. Expression of three of these
fusions,
4403,
4406, and
4435, was ostensibly eliminated in
the
sdeK1 strain. All three fusions have previously been
shown to be absolutely dependent on C-signal for expression
(15). The
4400 fusion in the
sdeK1
background was expressed at approximately 25% of wild-type levels,
which is the same decrease observed for this fusion in an isogenic
csgA mutant (Fig. 3E). This is consistent with reports from
other laboratories stating that expression of
4400 is only partially
dependent on C-signal (15). Finally, expression of the
4414 fusion, which defines the devTRS locus, was
decreased about fourfold in the
sdeK1 background and
eightfold in the csgA-null background (Fig. 3F). Although
the observed effect on devTRS expression by a
csgA mutation was stronger than that observed previously,
expression was still induced approximately fivefold over vegetative
levels. This is consistent with the conclusion that devTRS
expression is partially dependent on csgA (15).
What role does the SdeK signal transduction pathway play in
development?
We have previously proposed that M.
xanthus cells monitor their nutritional status by monitoring
their translation efficiency via relA and the stringent
response (31). Our current model for the regulation of
early developmental-gene expression is depicted in Fig.
4. Upon activation of the developmental
program, a bifurcation in the pathway occurs. One branch, designated
the population-sensing branch, leads to A-signal production and
reception; in addition, this branch controls production and reception
of C-signal, a second extracellular signaling system required for
aggregation (13, 23). The second branch acts independently
of any extracellular signals and only requires starvation for
activation of gene expression (31). This branch has been
designated the cellular starvation branch. Genes under the control of
this branch include
4469 and sdeK (31).
Based on the fusion data presented in this paper, we confirm that these
two branches converge at approximately 6 to 8 h post-development
initiation (15). The question now becomes the following:
what is the mechanism by which SdeK and its signal transduction pathway
interact with the C-signaling pathway to alter gene expression at this
point in development?
|
SdeK1 phenotype. Phenotypically, the
resulting double mutant (
SdeK1 FruAD59E) behaves like the
sdeK1 parent (E. Ellehauge and L. Søgaard-Anderson,
personal communication). The constitutively active form of FruA does,
however, complement the developmental and sporulation defects of a
fruA mutant strain (4). These results indicate
that FruA is not the SdeK cognate response regulator and that SdeK acts
either downstream or independently of FruA to control
developmental-gene expression.
An alternative model holds that the SdeK and the C-signaling pathways
coordinately control gene expression by acting independently on genes
expressed relatively early in development (e.g.,
4400 and
devTRS). The separate C-signaling and SdeK signal
transduction pathways might subsequently merge to form a single
pathway, thus affecting expression of subsequently expressed genes
(e.g.,
4403,
4406, and
4435) via a common regulatory
component. There is circumstantial evidence implicating the
devTRS operon as a possible candidate for the gene(s) that
codes for this common factor. Julien et al. have reported that the
abolishment of expression of several Tn5lac fusions after
devTRS is expressed in a devTRS-null background (11).
It is clear that the identification of the SdeK cognate response
regulator would significantly aid our understanding of how the SdeK
signal transduction pathway and the C-signal pathway coordinately
regulate developmental-gene expression at the 6- to 8-h juncture. We
have used a variety of biochemical approaches in an attempt to identify
the SdeK cognate response regulator; however, these approaches have not
been successful. Genetic methods are presently being employed to
identify this gene.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank M. Igo for the gift of MBP-EnvZ and for advice on the phosphorylation assays and E. Baldwin for advice on His-SdeK purification. We also thank T. Powers for critical reading of the manuscript.
This work was supported in part by a National Institutes of Health grant (GM54592) to M.S.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Section of Microbiology, University of California, Davis, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616. Phone: (530) 752-9005. Fax: (530) 752-9014. E-mail: mhsinger{at}ucdavis.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Campos, J. M., J. Geisselsoder, and D. R. Zusman. 1978. Isolation of bacteriophage Mx4, a generalized transducing phage for Myxococcus xanthus. J. Mol. Biol. 11:167-178. |
| 1a. |
Cullen, P. J.,
W. C. Bowman, and R. G. Kranz.
1996.
In vitro reconstitution and characterization of the Rhodobacter capsulatus NtrB and NtrC two-component system.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:6530-6536 |
| 2. |
Downard, J.,
S. V. Ramaswamy, and K.-S. Kil.
1993.
Identification of esg, a genetic locus involved in cell-cell signaling during Myxococcus xanthus development.
J. Bacteriol.
175:7762-7770 |
| 3. |
Dworkin, M., and D. Kaiser.
1985.
Cell interactions in myxobacterial growth and development.
Science
230:18-24 |
| 4. | Ellehauge, E., M. Norregaard-Madsen, and L. Søgaard-Andersen. 1998. The FruA signal transduction protein provides a checkpoint for the temporal co-ordination of inter-cellular signals in Myxococcus xanthus development. Mol. Microbiol. 30:807-817[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 5. |
Garza, A. G.,
J. S. Pollack,
B. Z. Harris,
A. Lee,
I. M. Keseler,
E. F. Licking, and M. Singer.
1998.
SdeK is required for early fruiting body development in Myxococcus xanthus.
J. Bacteriol.
180:4628-4637 |
| 6. | Hagen, D. C., A. P. Bretscher, and D. Kaiser. 1978. Synergism between morphogenetic mutants of Myxococcus xanthus. Dev. Biol. 64:284-296[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 7. |
Hagen, T. J., and L. J. Shimkets.
1990.
Nucleotide sequence and transcription products of the csg locus of Myxococcus xanthus.
J. Bacteriol.
172:15-23 |
| 8. | Hanahan, D. 1983. Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J. Mol. Biol. 166:557-560[Medline]. |
| 9. | Hoch, J. A. 2000. Two-component and phosphorelay signal transduction. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 3:165-170[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 10. | Huang, K. J., and M. M. Igo. 1996. Identification of the bases in the ompF regulatory region, which interact with the transcription factor OmpR. J. Mol. Biol. 262:615-628[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 11. |
Julien, B.,
D. Kaiser, and A. Garza.
2000.
Spatial control of cell differentiation in Myxococcus xanthus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97:9098-9103 |
| 12. |
Kaiser, D.
1979.
Social gliding is correlated with the presence of pili in Myxococcus xanthus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
76:5952-5956 |
| 13. | Kim, S. K., and D. Kaiser. 1990. C-factor: a cell-cell signaling protein required for fruiting body morphogenesis of Myxococcus xanthus. Cell 61:19-26[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 14. |
Kroos, L., and D. Kaiser.
1984.
Construction of Tn5lac, a transposon that fuses lacZ expression to exogenous promoters, and its introduction into Myxococcus xanthus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
81:5816-5820 |
| 15. |
Kroos, L., and D. Kaiser.
1987.
Expression of many developmentally regulated genes in Myxococcus depends on a sequence of cell interactions.
Genes Dev.
1:840-854 |
| 16. | Kroos, L., A. Kuspa, and D. Kaiser. 1986. A global analysis of developmentally regulated genes in Myxococcus xanthus. Dev. Biol. 117:252-266[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 17. |
Kroos, L.,
A. Kuspa, and D. Kaiser.
1990.
Defects in fruiting body development caused by Tn5 lac insertions in Myxococcus xanthus.
J. Bacteriol.
172:484-487 |
| 18. |
Kuner, J., and D. Kaiser.
1981.
Introduction of transposon Tn5 into Myxococcus for analysis of developmental and other nonselectable mutants.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
78:425-429 |
| 19. | Kuspa, A. 1986. Ph.D. thesis. Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, Calif. |
| 20. | Kuspa, A., L. Kroos, and D. Kaiser. 1986. Intercellular signaling is required for developmental gene expression in Myxococcus xanthus. Dev. Biol. 117:267-276[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 21. |
Kuspa, A.,
L. Plamann, and D. Kaiser.
1992.
Identification of heat-stable A-factor from Myxococcus xanthus.
J. Bacteriol.
174:3319-3326 |
| 22. |
Lee, K., and L. J. Shimkets.
1994.
Cloning and characterization of the socA locus which restores development to Myxococcus xanthus C-signaling mutants.
J. Bacteriol.
176:2200-2209 |
| 23. |
Li, S.-F.,
B. Lee, and L. J. Shimkets.
1992.
CsgA expression entrains Myxococcus xanthus development.
Genes Dev.
6:401-410 |
| 24. | Martin, S., T. Sodergren, T. Mauda, and D. Kaiser. 1978. Systematic isolation of transducing phages for Myxococcus xanthus. Virology 88:44-53[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 25. | Martson, F. A. O., and D. L. Hartley. 1990. Solubilization of protein aggregates. Methods Enzymol. 182:264-276[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 26. | Ogawa, M., S. Fujitani, X. H. Mao, S. Inouye, and T. Komano. 1996. FruA, a putative transcription factor essential for the development of Myxococcus xanthus. Mol. Microbiol. 22:757-767[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 27. | Parkinson, J. K., and E. C. Kofoid. 1992. Communication modules in bacterial signaling proteins. Annu. Rev. Genet. 26:71-112[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 28. |
Plamann, L.,
A. Kuspa, and D. Kaiser.
1992.
Proteins that rescue A-signal-defective mutants of Myxococcus xanthus.
J. Bacteriol.
174:3311-3318 |
| 29. | Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 30. |
Shimkets, L. J., and D. Kaiser.
1982.
Induction of coordinated movement of Myxococcus xanthus cells.
J. Bacteriol.
152:451-461 |
| 31. |
Singer, M., and D. Kaiser.
1995.
Ectopic production of guanosine penta- and tetraphosphate can initiate early developmental gene expression in Myxococcus xanthus.
Genes Dev.
9:1633-1644 |
| 32. |
Søgaard-Andersen, L., and D. Kaiser.
1996.
C factor, a cell surface-associated intercellular signaling protein, stimulates the Frz signal transduction system in Myxococcus xanthus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:2675-2679 |
| 33. | Spratt, B. G., P. J. Hedge, S. T. Heesen, A. Edelman, and J. K. Broome-Smith. 1986. Kanamycin-resistant vectors that are analogs of plasmids pUC8, pUC9, pEMBL8, and pEMBL9. Gene 41:337-342[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 34. |
Thöny-Meyer, L., and D. Kaiser.
1993.
devRS, an autoregulated and essential genetic locus for fruiting body development in Myxococcus xanthus.
J. Bacteriol.
175:7450-7462 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Appl. Environ. Microbiol. | Infect. Immun. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|---|---|
| Mol. Cell. Biol. | J. Virol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. |
| ALL ASM JOURNALS |