Journal of Bacteriology, July 2001, p. 4374-4381, Vol. 183, No. 14
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.14.4374-4381.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Mikrobiologie/Biotechnologie, Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany
Received 27 December 2000/Accepted 9 April 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In contrast to recA of other bacteria, the recA gene of Streptomyces lividans has been described as indispensable for viability (G. Muth, D. Frese, A. Kleber, and W. Wohlleben, Mol. Gen. Genet. 255:420-428, 1997.). Therefore, a closer analysis of this gene was performed to detect possible unique features distinguishing the Streptomyces RecA protein from the well-characterized Escherichia coli RecA protein. The S. lividans recA gene restored UV resistance and recombination activity of an E. coli recA mutant. Also, transcriptional regulation was similar to that of E. coli recA. Gel retardation experiments showed that S. lividans recA is also under control of the Streptomyces SOS repressor LexA. The S. lividans recA gene could be replaced only by simultaneously expressing a plasmid encoded recA copy. Surprisingly, the recA expression plasmid could subsequently be eliminated using an incompatible plasmid without the loss of viability. Besides being UV sensitive and recombination deficient, all the mutants were blocked in sporulation. Genetic complementation restored UV resistance and recombination activity but did not affect the sporulation defect. This indicated that all the recA mutants had suffered from an additional mutation, which might allow toleration of a recA deficiency.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The RecA protein is the central enzyme in homologous recombination, DNA strand exchange, and recombinational DNA repair (reviewed in reference 15). In response to DNA damage, RecA becomes activated by the presence of single-stranded DNA and supports as a coprotease the autocatalytic cleavage of the SOS repressor LexA, UmuDC, and phage repressors (17). Digestion of LexA results in the induction of the SOS regulon, a set of more than 30 genes in Escherichia coli that are required for DNA repair, UV-induced mutagenesis, and inhibition of cell division (34). The E. coli recA gene has been analyzed in great detail. By three-dimensional structural, biochemical, and mutagenesis studies, protein regions have been proposed which are associated with distinct enzymatic activities of RecA (13). These regions include amino acid sequences for DNA binding, monomer-monomer interaction, filament formation, and LexA cleavage. Sequencing studies of more than 70 different procaryotic recA genes demonstrated that the deduced RecA proteins are highly conserved, with an overall similarity of between 43 and 100% (3). Only the N- and C-terminal regions, which are located on the outer surfaces of RecA filaments (32) and are involved in monomer interaction, display species-specific variety.
In Streptomyces, RecA is believed to be involved in genetic instability, manifested by the occurrence of large deletions comprising up to 1,000 kb, DNA amplifications, and DNA rearrangements (39). Treatment of Streptomyces cultures with agents inducing a SOS response enhances genetic instability (37). Although the recA genes of several Streptomyces strains have been cloned (1, 21, 26, 44), it was not possible to inactivate recA by targeted gene replacement. Only C-terminally truncated recA mutants with residual activity were isolated (1, 24). One of these mutants, FRECD3, missing the last 87 amino acid residues, was severely impaired in homologous recombination, highly UV sensitive, and defective in DNA amplification. The genetic instability of FRECD3 was about 70 times enhanced, and mutants that had lost the ends of the linear Streptomyces lividans chromosome (16) were segregated with a frequency of about 32% (38). Since a partial inactivation of recA had dramatic effects and since no completely defective recA mutants of S. lividans could be isolated, an essential role of recA for the viability of Streptomyces was suggested (24). A plausible hypothesis for a specific function of RecA in ensuring the viability of Streptomyces was proposed by Volff and Altenbuchner (38). In this model, RecA is required for the repair of single-stranded gaps which would cause the replication fork to collapse. Without the RecA-dependent reconstitution of the replication fork, a chromosomal end becomes lost (38). Recently, a Streptomyces rimosus mutant in which recA was disrupted was described (20). The mutant was UV sensitive, but its ability to perform homologous recombination was not analyzed. However, the presence of such a mutant indicated that at least in a specific strain background, recA could be inactivated without interfering with viability.
In this article, we address the question of what distinguishes the Streptomyces RecA protein from the RecA proteins of other bacteria, in our attempt to explain the different viability phenotypes of recA mutants. From gene inactivation studies in the presence of a second recA copy, we obtained evidence that recA could be inactivated only in strains that had suffered from an additional mutation, probably suppressing the lethal effects of RecA deficiency.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bacterial strains and media.
The E. coli strains
used for subcloning and gene expression were XL1-Blue (4)
and JM109 (43). The parental Streptomyces strain was S. lividans TK64 (12). E. coli cells were grown at 37°C in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium.
Streptomyces strains were cultured as described previously
(12). The plasmids used are listed in Table
1. Antibiotics were added supplementally,
where appropriate, at the following concentrations: ampicillin, 150 µg ml
1; kanamycin, 50 µg
ml
1; thiostrepton, 25 µg
ml
1; gentamicin, 5 µg
ml
1; chloramphenicol, 10 µg
ml
1, hygromycin, 50 µg
ml
1; tetracycline, 15 µg
ml
1.
|
DNA manipulations. Standard procedures were as described by Hopwood et al. (12) and Sambrook et al. (30). Hybridization was performed with digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled dUTP and a DIG detection kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Gene replacement mutants were selected as described by Wohlleben and Muth (42).
Assay for UV sensitivity.
E. coli cultures were
grown till they reached an optical density at 600 nm of 0.8, harvested
by centrifugation, and resuspended in 0.8% NaCl. Serial dilutions were
plated onto LB agar containing 1 mM
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside and
irradiated with UV light (VL115c, 254 nm, 730 µW/cm2; Vilber Lourmat, Marne-La-Vallée,
France) at a distance of 10 cm for various periods (2, 5, 10, 15, and
20 s), followed by incubation in the dark. UV resistance of
S. lividans strains was determined as described by Muth et
al. (24).
Assay for genetic instability. The genetic instability of S. lividans strains was measured as the ratio of chloramphenicol-sensitive colonies, as described by Vierling et al. (36).
Assay for homologous recombination.
To assay the efficiency
of homologous recombination in E. coli, matings with the Hfr
donor strain KH500 (Hantke, Tübingen, Germany), which carries a
tetracycline resistance marker (Tn10) near the F
plasmid integration site, and a recA deletion strain, DK1
(14), harboring the plasmid pTWSl1 (Table 1), were
performed. The mobilization frequency (Table
2) of the tetracycline resistance marker
into DK1 was determined on
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside-containing medium. Recombination activity in S. lividans was measured
by its ability to integrate the temperature-sensitive plasmid pCK3S via
homologous recombination into the chromosome as described by Vierling
et al. (36).
|
Gel retardation experiments. The lexA gene of S. lividans TK64 was amplified by PCR using chromosomal DNA of S. lividans TK64 and the primers 5'-GGAATTCCATATGCACGCGATGAGCGACGC and 5'-CGGGATCCTCAGACGCGACGCAGTACGGCC, which were derived from the Streptomyces coelicolor lexA gene located on cosmid 5B8 (ftp://ftp.sanger.ac.uk/pub/S_coelicolor/sequences). PCR products were cloned under control of the rhamnose-inducible promoter in the expression plasmid pJOE2702 (33). E. coli JM109 (pJOE2702lexA) was grown at 37°C until it reached an optical density at 578 nm of 0.2 and induced with rhamnose (0.2%). Six hours after induction, the cells were harvested and disrupted with a French press. The upstream region of recA containing the putative SOS box was amplified with the primers 5'-GGAATTCCGTACGCTCGGAAGTGC and 5'-CGGGATCCTCGACATCACCCGTCA. The resulting fragment was 3'-end labeled with DIG-11-dUTP (Roche) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Thirty femtomoles of the labeled fragment was incubated at room temperature for 15 min with 11 µg of LexA-containing soluble crude extract in a total volume of 20 µl (binding buffer, 4 µl; poly[d(I-C)], 1 µl; poly-L-lysine, 1 µl [Digoxigenin Gelshift Kit; Roche]). Subsequently the reaction mixture was run on a 5% polyacrylamide gel and transferred to a nylon membrane by Southern blotting, and the DIG-labeled DNA complexes were visualized using anti-DIG-alkaline-phosphatase-conjugated antibody.
Immunoblotting. Immunoblotting was performed as described by Engels et al. (9) using polyclonal rabbit antisera raised against purified His-tagged S. lividans RecA protein (Vierling and Muth, unpublished data).
Construction of the recA replacement plasmid. A pUC18 subclone (pUC18rec) carrying a 2,820-bp chromosomal fragment of S. lividans TK64 that contained recA with its upstream and downstream regions was digested with BamHI and NcoI. Following Klenow treatment, the recA-containing BamHI-NcoI fragment was replaced by an aphII cassette. The NcoI site overlaps the putative start codon of recA, while the BamHI site is located 99 bp downstream of the recA stop codon in a noncoding region. The resulting plasmid was subsequently fused with pGMhyg (Muth, unpublished data), a hygromycin resistance-encoding, temperature-sensitive pSG5 derivative, yielding the recA replacement plasmid pKOrecA.
Construction of the replacement plasmid for the reconstitution of recA. A 3,271-bp fragment of the S. coelicolor cosmid 4H8 resulting from a XhoI/partial SalI digest was subcloned into pUC18, resulting in pSVXS. In order to distinguish the reconstituted recA gene from the wild-type gene, the single BamHI site located downstream of recA was eliminated by Klenow treatment. Subsequently the resulting plasmid was fused via EcoRI with the temperature-sensitive pGM8, yielding pRErecA.
Fixation of Streptomyces colonies for scanning
electron microscopy.
The S. lividans wild type,
S. lividans SV64
recA, and the reconstituted mutant
SVRErecA were grown on R2YE agar for 5 days. Agar plugs were cut
out with a cork borer and fixed for 10 min in 2.5%
glutaraldehyde-100 mM cacodylate (pH 7.5). Subsequently the
plugs were washed in 100 mM cacodylate (10 min) and
H20 (10 min) and dehydrated (10 min) in 30, 50, 70, 90, and 100% EtOH. After critical point drying under
CO2, the mycelium was coated in a vacuum
evaporator with a thin layer of Au-Pd. Observations were made with a
Hitachi S-2460N scanning electron microscope with a secondary electron
mode operating at 10 kV.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
S. lividans recA complements the E. coli recA deletion mutant DK1 efficiently. In order to analyze whether the Streptomyces RecA protein has the same activities as the well-characterized E. coli RecA protein, we attempted complementation of an E. coli mutant devoid of recA. The presence of the plasmid pTWSl1, containing the recA gene under control of the lac promoter, complemented the UV sensitivity of the recA deletion mutant DK1 to wild-type levels (data not shown). This indicated the proficiency of the S. lividans RecA protein for recombinational repair and the ability to support cleavage of the E. coli LexA repressor. The ability to perform homologous recombination was studied by Hfr matings using DK1 (pTWSl1) as the recipient. The outgrowth of tetracycline-resistant DK1 (pTWSl) colonies demonstrated that the S. lividans recA gene was able to restore recombination activity in DK1 (Table 2). Therefore, the S. lividans RecA protein possesses the same basic activities as the E. coli RecA protein.
S. lividans recA is regulated by the
LexA repressor.
Next, we tested whether regulation of the
Streptomyces recA gene differs from that for other bacteria.
Previously it was shown that transcription of the recA
operon in S. lividans was induced following treatment with
the DNA-damaging methane methylsulfonate (36). This
indicated that as in all other bacteria, recA is regulated
by the SOS repressor LexA, which binds to so-called SOS boxes (Cheo
box) in the promoter region of the genes of the SOS response. In the
putative promoter region of the S. lividans recA gene, there
is a sequence, GAACATCCATTC, which resembles (as indicated by boldface type) the Bacillus
subtilis SOS box GAACNNNNGTT(C/T). To
analyze transcriptional regulation of recA by LexA, we
expressed the S. lividans lexA gene in E. coli as
described in Materials and Methods. A 109-bp fragment containing the
putative SOS box of the S. lividans recA gene was amplified
by PCR and 3' labeled with DIG. After incubation with LexA, the
reaction mixture was separated on a 5% Tris-borate-polyacrylamide gel,
blotted onto a nylon membrane, and visualized with anti-DIG antibody
conjugate. The retardation of the SOS box-containing fragment (Fig.
1) showed that the
Streptomyces LexA protein is able to bind the proposed SOS
box, indicating that LexA controls recA expression. When the
respective fragments were incubated with an E. coli crude
extract containing GlnR, a transcriptional regulator that binds in the
promoter region of the glnA gene (N. Weisschuh and A. Engels, personal communication), no retardation was observed (data not
shown).
|
The chromosomal recA gene of S.
lividans TK64 can be deleted in the presence of a plasmid-borne
recA copy.
Since it was not possible to detect any
significant difference between the activities conferred by the S. lividans and E. coli recA genes or their regulation, it
was essential to confirm that the inability to remove recA
from the genetic background was not the result of methodological
complications. Therefore, we proceeded to demonstrate that the
replacement plasmid was functional and that the homologous DNA
fragments are sufficient in size to allow efficient recombination. To
analyze whether the chromosomal recA fragment could be
deleted while expressing a plasmid-borne recA copy, the
recA gene of S. lividans was cloned under control of the thiostrepton-inducible tipA promoter
(23). Since S. lividans did not tolerate the
transformation with recA on a multicopy plasmid (unpublished
results), the expression cassette was inserted into a single-copy SCP2
derivative, yielding pEXrecA (Fig. 2).
|
A mutant deficient for recA can be generated by
curing the recA expression plasmid.
To study the
presumed detrimental effects of recA inactivation by
switching the tipA promoter on and off, first the
inducibility of recA expression in pEXrecA was analyzed. The
recA gene of pEXrecA was replaced by the promoterless
aphII gene from the transposon Tn5. Without
induction, the tipA promoter mediated resistance to
kanamycin (50 µg ml
1). On 0.5-µg
ml
1, 1 µg-ml
1, and
5-µg-ml
1 thiostrepton, respectively, a
resistance to kanamycin at concentrations of 150, 200, and 400 µg ml
1 was observed. The highest level of
resistance (at a kanamycin concentration of 600 µg
ml
1) was obtained by induction with 25 µg of
thiostrepton ml
1. Due to the basic activity of
the tipA promoter even in the absence of thiostrepton, it
was necessary to cure the recA mutant strains of plasmid
pEXrecA in order to analyze whether the strains survived in the absence
of RecA.
recA strains were transformed with the plasmid pIJ920.
pIJ920 is an SCP2 derivative containing the viomycin resistance gene
vph (18) and is incompatible with the
recA expression plasmid pEXrecA, which is also based on the
SCP2 replicon. By selecting for the viomycin resistance gene of pIJ920,
the pEXrecA plasmid could be displaced from the isolated
recA replacement mutants. Five out of 80 tested
viomycin-resistant transformants had lost the gentamicin and
thiostrepton resistance of pEXrecA. Southern blotting and PCR
experiments using internal recA primers confirmed the
absence of recA (Fig. 3).
Furthermore, immunoblots with RecA-specific antisera were negative
(Fig. 4).
|
|
The recA mutant SV64 displayed a classical
recA phenotype.
To assay for recombinational
activity, the SV64
recA mutant was transformed with the plasmid pCK3S
(24), a temperature-sensitive pGM derivative that carries
a 550-bp fragment of the TK64 snpR gene, encoding the
regulator of the metalloprotease SnpA. Following a temperature shift to
39°C to eliminate autonomously replicating plasmids, the cultures
were homogenized, and serial dilutions of the mycelial fragments were
plated in parallel on LB agar and LB containing thiostrepton. The ratio
of the titer obtained on thiostrepton plates allowing the outgrowth
only of colonies with pCK3S in their chromosome to the titer on LB agar
revealed the recombination frequency. While the plasmid pCK3S
was integrated into the chromosome of TK64 at a frequency of about 54%
(titer on LB agar, 4.5 × 106; titer on thiostrepton, 2.4 × 106), integration of pCK3S into the SV64
recA
chromosome did not occur (titer on LB agar, 5.0 × 106;
titer on thiostrepton, 0). Furthermore, the recA deletion
mutant S. lividans SV64
recA was highly sensitive to UV
irradiation. Although still more than 10% of the wild-type fragments
survived a UV dose of 73 J/m2, about 99.99% of
S. lividans SV64
recA mycelial fragments were destroyed
(Fig. 5). To analyze the effects of
recA deficiency on genetic instability, mycelial fragments
of the S. lividans wild type and the recA mutant
SV64
recA were plated on soja-mannitol-agar. After 7 days, the
mycelium was scraped off, homogenized, and replated. After three
rounds, dilutions were plated and single colonies were subsequently
picked and placed on chloramphenicol-containing and
chloramphenicol-free medium. The recA mutant, SV64
recA,
had segregated chloramphenicol-sensitive colonies with a frequency of
6.2%, about 12.5 times that of the wild type.
|
The recA mutant SV64 represents a whi
mutant.
Besides the defects in homologous recombination, UV
resistance, and genetic instability, all recA mutants were
impaired in sporulation. On R5- or soja-mannitol-agar, a white aerial
mycelium was formed that contained no spores. The aerial mycelium was
further studied by scanning electron microscopy. The mutant SV64
recA formed long straight unseptated hyphae with little or no curling (Fig.
6). Obviously, sporulation was blocked at
an early time point in the life cycle of S. lividans. Thus,
the recA mutant had a phenotype similar to that described
for the S. coelicolor whi mutants (6).
|
Reconstitution of recA does not complement the
sporulation defect.
To analyze whether the sporulation defect was
an effect of recA inactivation or the recA mutant
had suffered from an additional mutation, we complemented the mutant by
reconstituting a wild-type recA gene into the chromosome of
S. lividans SV64
recA: using the plasmid pRErecA, the
aphII gene was replaced by the S. coelicolor recA
gene, which differs from the S. lividans recA gene by two base-pair substitutions (see Discussion). The plasmid pRErecA carries a
3,172-bp chromosomal fragment of S. coelicolor A(3)2 with
1,161 bp upstream and 885 bp of the downstream region of recA. To distinguish the reconstituted recA gene
from the wild-type recA gene, the BamHI site
located in the intergenic region 96 bp downstream of recA
was eliminated by Klenow treatment. Following a temperature shift,
transformants were picked on thiostrepton- and kanamycin-containing
media to screen for tsr and aphII sensitive colonies that probably had replaced the aphII gene by a
double crossover event. The correct replacement event was confirmed by Southern blot analysis and PCR. By reverse transcription-PCR analysis, the inducibility of recA transcription (data not shown) in
response to the DNA-damaging methane methylsulfonate was found to be
indistinguishable from that of the parent S. lividans TK64
strain (36). The reconstituted mutant was fully
complemented with regard to UV sensitivity (Fig. 5) and recombination
activity. The integration of the recombination test plasmid occurred
with a frequency of 29%, which is on the same order as in the wild
type. However, the reconstitution of recA did not affect the
sporulation deficiency of S. lividans SV64
recA. Scanning
electron microscopy also revealed no difference in the S. lividans SV64
recA mutant (data not shown). This clearly demonstrates that the mutants have suffered from an additional mutation
affecting morphologic differentiation and that the sporulation defect
was not a consequence of inactivation of recA.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To investigate whether the Streptomyces RecA protein had functions different from those of other RecA proteins, we complemented an E. coli recA mutant with the S. lividans recA gene. Expression of the S. lividans recA gene in DK1 (14) restored UV resistance and recombination activity in Hfr matings to the wild-type level. This suggests that the S. lividans RecA protein fulfills all the enzymatic activities that have been ascribed to E. coli RecA, namely protease activity to support cleavage of the LexA repressor, proficiency for recombinational DNA repair, and the ability to perform homologous recombination (13). Furthermore, there is no evidence that the Streptomyces RecA protein might have a distinct activity, since the deduced amino acid sequence of the S. lividans RecA protein is, besides the species-specific C terminus, highly similar to that of other bacterial RecA proteins (3).
In all bacteria, it has been shown that transcription of DNA
damage-inducible genes is controlled by LexA, which binds to so-called
SOS boxes in promoter regions (17). By sequence comparison and site-directed mutagenesis combined with gel retardation assays and
hydroxyl radical footprint protection assays, Winterling et al.
proposed a new consensus sequence (CGAACRNRYGTTYC) for SOS boxes of
gram-positive bacteria (40, 41). Although the SOS box of
the S. lividans recA gene
(CGAACATCCATTCT) differs from this
consensus sequence in three positions (shown in bold) and does
not form a perfect palindrome, the binding of S. lividans
LexA and the inducibility by DNA damaging agents demonstrated its
functionality. The same sequence, CGAACATC(C/T)ATTCT, is also found in
front of all the other Streptomyces recA genes where sequence information is available (EMBL accession no. AL020958) (1). As in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and
M. smegmatis (22), this SOS box overlaps with a
consensus sequence of a heat shock promoter. This putative heat shock
promoter of the Streptomyces recA genes has been postulated
by sequence similarity (26), but in M. smegmatis, a transcriptional start site of the recA gene corresponding to this heat shock promoter was mapped by primer extension (27). The overlap of the SOS box with the
10
or
35 promoter region is a common feature and was described for
various genes of the SOS response (10). A second
putative SOS box (TGAACG(G/C)CA(G/A)TTCG) (conserved bases shown in bold) is present within the N-terminal coding region of Streptomyces recA (amino acid position +18)
(1). However, its involvement in SOS regulation has not
been investigated. Two LexA binding sites have also been described for
several other LexA-regulated genes, e.g., B. subtilis dinC
and dinR, recN or lexA from E. coli (10). Although the Streptomyces SOS
box is not a perfect palindrome, the presence of two binding sites may indicate tight regulation by LexA. Note that the promoter region of the
S. coelicolor (EMBL accession no. AL022268) and
Streptomyces clavuligerus (EMBL accession no. AJ224870)
lexA genes also contain putative SOS boxes. These boxes lie
148 and 76 bp upstream of the putative translational start of
lexA, respectively. The lexA SOS boxes differ
from the recA SOS box in six positions (shown in bold)
(CGAACGTGTGTTTG) and fit
perfectly the proposed consensus sequence. A gel retardation reaction
performed with an 86-bp PCR fragment containing the putative SOS box of lexA showed that the Streptomyces LexA is able to
bind the proposed SOS box (Vierling and Muth, unpublished results),
indicating that LexA is autoregulative also in S. coelicolor.
Because the S. lividans recA gene neither conferred a function distinct from that of E. coli recA nor differed in its regulation from that of other bacteria, we tested whether it was possible to replace the chromosomal recA gene in the presence of a plasmid-borne recA copy. This turned out to be a successful approach. The chromosomal recA gene could be efficiently replaced with a frequency of about 1%, whereas it was not possible (>0.03%) without the simultaneous recA expression.
Since the tipA promoter in pEXrecA is not tightly repressed in the absence of thiostrepton, resulting in a basal level of recA expression, it was not possible to study the presumed toxicity of recA inactivation by switching the tipA promoter on and off. Therefore, we had to cure the recA expression plasmid to demonstrate the indispensability of recA. To our surprise, we observed that following the replacement of the chromosomal recA fragment, it was possible to cure the recA expression plasmid pEXrecA without a lethal effect. Displacing the resident recA expression plasmid by the incompatible plasmid pIJ920 (18) was a very efficient curing technique. In contrast to other described curing methods, such as growth at elevated temperatures or treatment with intercalating dyes (8), plasmid curing by incompatibility is not associated with any mutagenic side effects.
There are two possible explanations of why the generation of a completely defective recA mutant succeeded only by this procedure whereas it was not possible by the classical protocol.
(i) For unknown reasons, the recA-containing DNA fragment is only a poor substrate for recombination enzymes. Overexpression of the RecA protein from the thiostrepton-inducible tipA promoter could confer an enhanced recombination activity that allowed even the recombination of poor substrates. A 10-fold stimulation of homologous recombination by the overexpression of a bacterial recA gene has already been reported for plant and mammalian cells (29, 31). However, in S. lividans (pEXrecA), induction of recA overexpression did not result in an enhanced recombination rate. Neither under inducing conditions nor under noninducing conditions was the integration rate of a test plasmid with a 540-bp fragment, suitable for homologous recombination, increased (unpublished results). In contrast, the presence of the recA expression plasmid had only negative effects on the integration frequency of the test plasmid. This was probably due to the detrimental effects of recA overexpression (36) interfering with the survival of the integrants.
(ii) The recA mutant had acquired an additional mutation
which suppresses the toxic effects of recA inactivation.
Since up to now no suppressor mutations for recA have been
described (15), the mutation must affect a function that
allows the cell to survive with recA deficiency. The
plasmid-borne copy of recA which is under control of the
tipA promoter might be just sufficient to override the
lethal effect of RecA deficiency but might not be able to complement
recA with wild-type efficiency. Therefore, selection
pressure could exist to select for such suppressing mutations. The
reasons for the lethal effects of inactivation of recA in
Streptomyces are not known, but a role of RecA in the repair
of damaged replication forks was suggested (38). In an alternative model, the recombination patching model, RecA
activity is required for the replication of the ends of the linear
chromosome. Since the recA mutant SV64
recA still
contained a linear chromosome, it was possible recently to disprove
this model (C.-H. Huang, H.-H. Lee, S.-H. Chou, and C. W. Chen,
personal communication). Although E. coli recA mutants are
viable, they are also severely affected and show slower growth,
probably due to the generation of up to 50% dead cells
(5). If the lethal effect of recA inactivation reflects a defect in DNA repair, a suppressing mutation could stimulate
RecA-independent repair mechanisms or delay cell division to provide
more time for the repair. The requirement for a second mutation would
explain why neither by classical mutagenesis (11) nor by
conventional gene inactivation techniques (1, 24) has it
been possible to isolate recA mutants of S. coelicolor, S. lividans, or Streptomyces
ambofaciens. A recA mutant was described only for
S. rimosus (20). Since the genotype of this
strain was not characterized in detail, there is no information
available about the presence of any additional defects.
Beside the classical recA phenotype, UV sensitivity,
deficiency in homologous recombination, and enhanced genetic
instability, all the mutants were sporulation deficient. It should be
stressed that some of the mutants were isolated in independent
experiments. S. lividans SV64
recA strains had the
morphology of so-called whi mutants (6). This
was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy of the recA
mutant. Obviously, the differentiation was blocked in an early stage
before the formation of septation. Thus, the mutant resembles
whiA, whiB, whiG, whiH, whiI, or whiJ mutants of S. coelicolor, with which the formation of sporulation septa is
essentially abolished (7). Since the recA
mutant formed long straight hyphae with little to no curling, the
morphology was similar to that described for whiG mutants
(35).
All defects of the classical recA phenotype could be fully
restored by the S. lividans recA gene when placed under
control of the thiostrepton-inducible tipA promoter on a
single-copy SCP2 derivative or by the reintroduction of the S. coelicolor recA gene at the original chromosomal position. The
S. coelicolor recA gene differs from that of S. lividans by two base-pair substitutions (shown in bold): a
CGT-CGG exchange that had no effect on the amino
acid composition and a GCG to ACG substitution
that changes an alanine to a threonine. This amino acid exchange is
localized at position 369 in the C-terminal end, which is not conserved
in bacterial RecA proteins (3). However, complementation
did not affect the sporulation deficiency, demonstrating that the block
in morphologic differentiation was not caused by the inactivation of
recA. This might be a clear indication that S. lividans SV64
recA had acquired an additional mutation that could suppress the toxic effects of recA deficiency. During
vegetative growth of the Streptomyces substrate mycelium,
only very few cross walls are formed in the growing hyphae. The
formation of cross walls, which corresponds to the cell division of
unicellular bacteria, occurs in the Streptomyces life cycle
mainly during differentiation. The aerial mycelium erected from the
substrate mycelium becomes fragmented into spore chains and finally is
released (6). A mutation blocking the septation of the
Streptomyces aerial mycelium could have an effect for
Streptomyces similar to the inhibition of cell division by
SulA during the SOS response in E. coli, in preventing
Streptomyces from producing nonviable spores with damaged DNA.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This research was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB-323).
We thank D. Fink for critical reading of the manuscript, A. Radunz for preparing the antibodies, C. F. Bardele and H. Schoepmann for taking the electron micrographs, and K. Hantke for providing strain KH500.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Mikrobiologie/Biotechnologie, Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany. Phone: 49 7071 2974637 or 49 7071 2976945. Fax: 49 7071 295979. E-mail: gmuth{at}biotech.uni-tuebingen.de.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Aigle, B., A. C. Holl, J. F. Angulo, P. Leblond, and B. Decaris. 1997. Characterization of two Streptomyces ambofaciens recA mutants: identification of the RecA protein by immunoblotting. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 149:181-187[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 2. | Arnold, W., and A. Pühler. 1988. A family of high-copy-number plasmid vectors with single end-label sites for rapid nucleotide sequencing. Gene 70:171-179[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 3. | Brendel, V., L. Brocchieri, S. J. Sandler, A. J. Clark, and S. Karlin. 1997. Evolutionary comparisons of RecA-like proteins across all major kingdoms of living organisms. J. Mol. Evol. 44:528-541[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 4. | Bullock, W. O., J. M. Fernandez, and J. M. Short. 2000. XL1-blue, a high efficiency plasmid transforming recA Escherichia coli strain with beta galactosidase selection. BioTechniques 5:376-378. |
| 5. |
Capaldo, F. N.,
G. Ramsey, and S. D. Barbour.
1974.
Analysis of the growth of recombination-deficient strains of E. coli K-12.
J. Bacteriol.
118:242-249 |
| 6. | Chater, K. F. 1993. Genetics of differentiation in Streptomyces. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 47:685-713[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 7. | Chater, K. F. 1998. Taking a genetic scalpel to the Streptomyces colony. Microbiology (United Kingdom) 144:1465-1478. |
| 8. | Crameri, R., J. E. Davies, and R. Hütter. 1986. Plasmid curing and generation of mutations induced with ethidium bromide in streptomycetes. J. Gen. Microbiol. 132:819-824[Medline]. |
| 9. | Engels, A., U. Kahmann, H. G. Ruppel, and E. K. Pistorius. 1997. Isolation, partial characterization and localization of a dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase from the Cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC6803. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1340:33-44[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 10. | Friedberg, E. C., G. C. Walker, and W. Siede. 1995. DNA repair and mutagenesis. ASM Press, Washington, D.C. |
| 11. | Harold, R. J., and D. A. Hopwood. 1970. Ultraviolet-sensitive mutants of Streptomyces coelicolor. II. Genetics. Mutat. Res. 10:439-448[Medline]. |
| 12. | Hopwood, D. A., M. J. Bibb, K. F. Chater, T. Kieser, C. J. Bruton, H. M. Kieser, D. J. Lydiate, C. P. Smith, J. M. Ward, and H. Schrempf. 1985. Genetic manipulation of Streptomyces, a laboratory manual. The John Innes Institute, Norwich, United Kingdom. |
| 13. |
Kowalczykowski, S. C.,
D. A. Dixon,
A. K. Eggleston,
S. D. Lauder, and W. M. Rehrauer.
1994.
Biochemistry of homologous recombination in Escherichia coli.
Microbiol. Rev.
58:401-465 |
| 14. | Kurnit, D. M. 1989. Escherichia coli recA deletion strains that are highly competent for transformation and for in vivo phage packaging. Gene 82:313-315[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 15. |
Kuzminov, A.
1999.
Recombinational repair of DNA damage in Escherichia coli and bacteriophage lambda.
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
63:751-813 |
| 16. | Lin, Y.-S., H. M. Kieser, D. A. Hopwood, and C. W. Chen. 1993. The chromosomal DNA of Streptomyces lividans 66 is linear. Mol. Microbiol. 10:923-933[Medline]. |
| 17. | Little, J. W. 1991. Mechanism of specific LexA cleavage: autodigestion and the role of RecA coprotease. Biochimie 73:411-421[Medline]. |
| 18. | Lydiate, D. J., F. Malpartida, and D. A. Hopwood. 1985. The Streptomyces plasmid SCP2*: its functional analysis and development into useful cloning vectors. Gene 35:223-235[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 19. | Malpartida, F., M. Zalacain, A. Jimenez, and J. Davies. 1983. Molecular cloning and expression in Streptomyces lividans of a hygromycin B phosphotransferase gene from Streptomyces hygroscopicus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 117:6-12[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 20. | Mikoc, A., I. Ahel, and V. Gamulin. 2000. Construction and characterization of a Streptomyces rimosus recA mutant: the RecA-deficient strain remains viable. Mol. Gen. Genet. 264:227-232[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 21. | Mikoc, A., D. Vujaklija, and V. Gamulin. 1997. The recA gene from Streptomyces rimosus R6: sequence and expression in Escherichia coli. Res. Microbiol. 148:397-403[Medline]. |
| 22. |
Movahedzadeh, F.,
M. J. Colston, and E. O. Davis.
1997.
Determination of DNA sequences required for regulated Mycobacterium tuberculosis RecA expression in response to DNA-damaging agents suggests that two modes of regulation exist.
J. Bacteriol.
179:3509-3518 |
| 23. |
Murakami, T.,
T. G. Holt, and C. J. Thompson.
1989.
Thiostrepton-induced gene expression in Streptomyces lividans.
J. Bacteriol.
171:1459-1466 |
| 24. | Muth, G., D. Frese, A. Kleber, and W. Wohlleben. 1997. Mutational analysis of the Streptomyces lividans recA gene suggests that only mutants with residual activity remain viable. Mol. Gen. Genet. 255:420-428[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 25. | Muth, G., B. Nussbaumer, W. Wohlleben, and A. Pühler. 1989. A vector system with temperature-sensitive replication for gene disruption and mutational cloning in streptomycetes. Mol. Gen. Genet. 219:341-348[CrossRef]. |
| 26. | Nussbaumer, B., and W. Wohlleben. 1994. Identification, isolation and sequencing of the recA gene of Streptomyces lividans TK24. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 118:57-64[Medline]. |
| 27. | Papavinasasundaram, K. G., F. Movahedzadeh, J. T. Keer, N. G. Stoker, M. J. Colston, and E. O. Davis. 1997. Mycobacterial recA is cotranscribed with a potential regulatory gene called recX. Mol. Microbiol. 24:141-153[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 28. | Redenbach, M., H. M. Kieser, D. Denapaite, A. Eichner, J. Cullum, H. Kinashi, and D. A. Hopwood. 1996. A set of ordered cosmids and a detailed genetic and physical map for the 8 Mb Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) chromosome. Mol. Microbiol. 21:77-96[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 29. |
Reiss, B.,
M. Klemm,
H. Kosak, and J. Schell.
1996.
RecA protein stimulates homologous recombination in plants.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:3094-3098 |
| 30. | Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 31. | Scherbakova, O. G., V. A. Lanzov, H. Ogawa, and M. V. Filatov. 2000. Overexpression of bacterial RecA protein stimulates homologous recombination in somatic mammalian cells. Mutat. Res. 459:65-71[Medline]. |
| 32. | Story, R. M., I. T. Weber, and T. A. Steit. 1992. The structure of the E. coli RecA protein monomer and polymer. Nature 355:318-325[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 33. | Stumpp, T., B. Wilms, and J. Altenbuchner. 2000. Ein neues, L-Rhamnose-induzierbares Expressionssystem für Escherichia coli. BioSpektrum 6:33-36. |
| 34. | Sutton, M. D., B. T. Smith, V. G. Godoy, and G. C. Walker. 2000. The SOS response: recent insights into umuDC-dependent mutagenesis and DNA damage tolerance. Annu. Rev. Genet. 34:479-497[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 35. |
Tan, H. R.,
H. H. Yang,
Y. Q. Tian,
W. Wu,
C. A. Whatling,
L. C. Chamberlin,
M. J. Buttner,
J. Nodwell, and K. F. Chater.
1998.
The Streptomyces coelicolor sporulation-specific WhiG form of RNA polymerase transcribes a gene encoding a ProX-like protein that is dispensable for sporulation.
Gene
212:137-146[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36. |
Vierling, S.,
T. Weber,
W. Wohlleben, and G. Muth.
2000.
Transcriptional and mutational analyses of the Streptomyces lividans recX gene and its interference with RecA activity.
J. Bacteriol.
182:4005-4011 |
| 37. | Volff, J.-N., D. Vandewiele, J.-M. Simonet, and B. Decaris. 1993. Stimulation of genetic instability in Streptomyces ambofaciens ATCC 23877 by antibiotics that interact with DNA gyrase. J. Gen. Microbiol. 139:2551-2558[Medline]. |
| 38. |
Volff, J. N., and J. Altenbuchner.
1997.
Influence of disruption of the recA gene on genetic instability and genome rearrangement in Streptomyces lividans.
J. Bacteriol.
179:2440-2445 |
| 39. | Volff, J. N., and J. Altenbuchner. 1998. Genetic instability of the Streptomyces chromosome. Mol. Microbiol. 27:239-246[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 40. |
Winterling, K. W.,
D. Chafin,
J. J. Hayes,
J. L. A. S. Sun,
R. E. Yasbin, and R. Woodgate.
1998.
The Bacillus subtilis DinR binding site: redefinition of the consensus sequence.
J. Bacteriol.
180:2201-2211 |
| 41. |
Winterling, K. W.,
A. S. Levine,
R. E. Yasbin, and R. Woodgate.
1997.
Characterization of DinR, the Bacillus subtilis SOS repressor.
J. Bacteriol.
179:1698-1703 |
| 42. |
Wohlleben, W., and G. Muth.
1993.
Streptomyces plasmid vectors, p. 147-175.
In
K. G. Hardy (ed.), Plasmids a practical approach, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 43. | Yanish-Perron, C. R., J. Viera, and J. Messing. 1985. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene 33:103-119[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 44. | Yao, W., and L. C. Vining. 1994. Cloning and sequence analysis of a recA-like gene from Streptomyces venezuelae ISP5230. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 118:51-56[CrossRef][Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Appl. Environ. Microbiol. | Infect. Immun. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|---|---|
| Mol. Cell. Biol. | J. Virol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. |
| ALL ASM JOURNALS |