Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, August 2001, p. 4839-4847, Vol. 183, No. 16
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.16.4839-4847.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Molecular, Antigenic, and Functional Analyses of
Omp2b Porin Size Variants of Brucella spp.
Jean-Yves
Paquet,1
Maria A.
Diaz,2
Stephanie
Genevrois,1
Maggy
Grayon,2
Jean-Michel
Verger,2
Xavier
De
Bolle,1
Jeremy H.
Lakey,3
Jean-Jacques
Letesson,1 and
Axel
Cloeckaert2,*
Unité de Recherche en Biologie Moléculaire
(URBM), Laboratoire d'Immunologie-Microbiologie, Facultés
Universitaires Notre-Dame de la Paix, 5000 Namur,
Belgium1; Laboratoire de Pathologie
Infectieuse et Immunologie, Institut National de la Recherche
Agronomique, 37380 Nouzilly, France2; and
School of Biochemistry and Genetics, The Medical School,
The University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE2 4HH, Newcastle-upon-Tyne,
United Kingdom3
Received 20 October 2000/Accepted 15 May 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Omp2a and Omp2b are highly homologous porins present in the outer
membrane of the bacteria from the genus Brucella, a
facultative intracellular pathogen. The genes coding for these proteins
are closely linked in the Brucella genome and oriented in
opposite directions. In this work, we present the cloning,
purification, and characterization of four Omp2b size variants found in
various Brucella species, and we compare their antigenic
and functional properties to the Omp2a and Omp2b porins of
Brucella melitensis reference strain 16M. The variation of
the Omp2a and Omp2b porin sequences among the various strains of the
genus Brucella seems to result mostly from multiple gene
conversions between the two highly homologous genes. As shown in this
study, this phenomenon has led to the creation of natural Omp2a and
Omp2b chimeric proteins in Omp2b porin size variants. The comparison by
liposome swelling assay of the porins sugar permeability suggested a
possible functional differences between Omp2a and Omp2b, with Omp2a
showing a more efficient pore in sugar diffusion. The sequence
variability in the Omp2b size variants was located in the predicted
external loops of the porin. Several epitopes recognized by anti-Omp2b monoclonal antibodies were mapped by comparison of the Omp2b size variants antigenicity, and two of them were located in the most exposed
surface loops. However, since variations are mostly driven by simple
exchanges of conserved motifs between the two genes (except for an
Omp2b version from an atypical strain of Brucella suis
biovar 3), the porin variability does not result in major antigenic
variability of the Brucella surface that could help the
bacteria during the reinfection of a host. Porin variation in
Brucella seems to result mainly in porin conductivity modifications.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Porins are abundant proteins in the
outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria. They create a controlled
permeability of the outer membrane toward small hydrophilic solutes
such as sugars that are otherwise not allowed to diffuse through the
outer membrane (for a review, see references 21, 22, and
24). In a sense, porins are the Achilles' heel of this
protective barrier, since they can act as receptors for bacteriophage
and colicins (13), surface-exposed antigens
(37), complement-binding sites (29), and the
gate of entry for some antibiotics (27, 28). In some pathogenic bacteria, such as Neisseria gonorrhoeae, porin
sequence variations between serotypes are well described and probably
allow successive infection by different serotypes presenting different surface-exposed epitopes (20). Neisseria porin
genes are subject to frequent horizontal transfer movements of genetic
material, allowing for numerous changes in sequence that can hamper
vaccine development (18).
Brucellae are gram-negative pathogens infecting numerous mammalian
species and causing economic losses in domestic cattle, sheep, and
goats, as well as human health problems in zones where they are
endemic. The mechanisms of pathogenicity of Brucella spp.
are still poorly understood. Brucella outer membrane
proteins (OMPs) have been extensively studied because of their
potential role as virulence factors, antigenic factors, and molecular
typing tools (7). Among the Brucella OMPs, the
Omp2a and Omp2b porin proteins behave biochemically much as the
classical nonspecific trimeric Escherichia coli porins, but
they are only remotely related to other known porins by their sequence
(25, 26). The pore-forming activities of Omp2a and Omp2b
differs slightly, B. melitensis 16M Omp2a showing
characteristics of a larger pore than B. melitensis 16M
Omp2b (J.-Y. Paquet et al., unpublished data). The predicted topology
for both Brucella porins is a 16-stranded
-barrel with large surface-exposed loops (30). The two
Brucella porins share 85% sequence identity and are encoded
in the same genetic locus. The omp2a and omp2b
genes are only 850 bp apart and are oriented in opposite directions
(Fig. 1). In Brucella abortus,
only omp2b has been shown to be expressed, and the presence
of Omp2a has never been detected (15). The pattern of
porin gene expression in the other Brucella strains is still
unknown. The polymorphism of both porin genes has been extensively
studied, and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) studies
have identified 11 omp2b variants and 8 omp2a
variants (6, 16). The omp2 locus sequences in
the different Brucella species show complex variability, involving gene conversion phenomenon between the closely related inverted gene copies (17). RFLP also revealed that
omp2b variants in several Brucella strains are
not only variable in sequence but also variable in size, indicating
that insertions and/or deletions had occurred in these genes
(6). These insertion/deletion variants are of particular
interest because their antigenic and functional characteristics could
have been drastically modified compared to the previously characterized
Omp2b porins from B. melitensis 16M or B. abortus
S19 (25, 26; Paquet et al., unpublished). The study of
their antigenic and pore-forming properties in relation to their
sequence could allow epitope mapping by use of anti-Omp2b monoclonal
antibodies (MAbs) (5) and give new clues about Omp2b topology.

View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Genetic organization of the omp2 locus in
Brucella spp. The two opposite coding sequences are
represented by the white boxes. The primers used in this work to
amplify omp2b variant genes are represented by the short
bold arrows.
|
|
Throughout the following work, Omp2a and Omp2b porins from B. melitensis 16M and B. abortus S19 (15)
will be used as references since these strains are widely used in
different laboratories and they show the highest degree of divergence
among all Omp2a-Omp2b pairs sequenced.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plasmids and strains.
The following Brucella
strains were used in this study: B. melitensis 16M
(reference strain), B. abortus S19 (vaccine strain), B. abortus 45/20, B. suis 83-210 (biovar 3 atypical strain), B. ovis 63/290, and B. ovis
76-250. The porin variants of strains B. abortus 45/20,
B. ovis 63/290, and B. ovis 76-250 have been previously characterized by PCR-RFLP (6). B. abortus 45/20 has been used in the past as vaccine strain.
B. ovis 63/290 is the reference strain for B. ovis. B. ovis 76-250 is a field isolate from a ram in France. B. suis 83-210 has been isolated from a wild rodent in Australia.
Culture of Brucella strains and DNA extraction were
performed as described previously (6). Recombinant porin
production was obtained by cloning the genes into the pET3a plasmid
vector (Novagen, Madison, Wis.) and transforming the E. coli
strain BL21(DE3) harboring the pLyS plasmid (Novagen).
Cloning and sequencing of omp2b size variants and
their corresponding omp2a gene copies.
Porin genes
were PCR-amplified from genomic DNA of each strain and checked by RFLP
as described previously (6). Nucleotide sequencing of the
PCR products was performed as described previously (4).
To construct the expression vectors, the omp2b genes were
PCR amplified from the genomic DNA of the strain using the proofreading Pwo polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim) and the primers 2AF
(5'-GGCGGATCCCATATGGACGCAATCGTCGCGCCA-3') and 2BR
(5'-GGATCCGGTCAGCATAAAAAGCAAGC-3'). Since the signal peptide hampers the high-level production of outer membrane proteins (32, 36), the fragments amplified with these primers contain the omp2b open reading frame without the signal peptide coding
sequence. The first codon of the mature polypeptide (coding for an
alanine) is replaced by the ATG start codon. The resulting recombinant protein is thus equivalent to the mature wild-type protein with the
mutation A1M. Conservation of the correct sequence of the insert in the
expression vector was checked by nucleotide sequencing.
Purification of recombinant Omp2b size variants.
The
following protocol was modified from (32). Single fresh
colonies of BL21(DE3)/pLyS containing an expression vector were inoculated into a 10 ml of Luria-Bertani (LB) culture (containing 50 µg of ampicillin per ml) and grown overnight at 37°C with shaking. A 100-ml LB growth culture (containing 50 µg of ampicillin per ml)
was inoculated with 1 ml of the overnight preculture. The culture was
shaken at 37°C until an optical density at 600 nm of 0.7 was reached.
IPTG (isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside) at a final
concentration of 0.4 mM was added, and incubation resumed for an
additional 3 h. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at
1,500 × g for 20 min at 4°C. About 1 g of
bacterial pellet was obtained. The cells were resuspended in 3 ml of
TEN buffer (50 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 1 g of NaCl per liter; pH 8.0),
with phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) at a final concentration of
125 µM and lysozyme at a final concentration of 250 µg/ml. The
mixture was stirred for 20 min at room temperature, and then 4 mg of
deoxycholate sodium salt was added. The mixture was then shaken
vigorously at 37°C for 1 h. DNase I was added (final
concentration, 7 µg/ml), and the mixture was incubated at room
temperature for 1 h or until it was no longer viscous. The cell
lysate was then centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 20 min
at 4°C. The pellet was washed once in TEN buffer containing 125 µM
PMSF and resuspended in freshly made TEN buffer containing 125 µM
PMSF and 8 M urea. Resuspension was helped by sonication (four times
for 30 s each time at 4°C). The protein concentration was
determined with a Bio-Rad protein assay mixture (Bio-Rad, Munich,
Germany). Samples were diluted 1:1 in 10% (wt/vol) Zwittergent 3-14 (Calbiochem, La Jolla, Calif.), placed in a sonicator bath (Bransonic
Ultrasonic Cleaner B1200; Branson, Danbury, Conn.) for 1 h, and
then concentrated up to five times using an Ultrafree centrifugal
filter tube (Millipore, Bedford, Mass.) with an exclusion limit of
10,000 Da. Samples were loaded onto a Superose-12 column (Pharmacia,
Uppsala, Sweden) previously equilibrated with TEN containing 0.01%
(wt/vol) Zwittergent 3-14, with a column flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. The
protein-containing peaks were analyzed by sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and stained
with Coomassie blue.
Circular dichroism spectroscopy.
Far-UV circular dichroism
spectra were measured at between 190 and 250 nm using a 0.1-mm cell on
a Jobin-Yvon CD6 spectrometer at 20°C at a protein concentration of
200 to 400 µg/ml (20 single spectra were accumulated with a scan rate
of 0.5 nm/s).
Sequence analysis and topology prediction.
Multiple sequence
alignments were performed using the CLUSTALW alignment server
(38) and the MATCH-BOX program (9). The Omp2b
topology model has been described previously (31).
Briefly, PHD (33), Dsc (23), and Sopma
(19), three secondary structure prediction methods
previously tested for porin topology prediction, were applied on the
Omp2b amino acid mature sequence. A porin-specific transmembrane
-strand prediction was also performed by using the method described
by Schirmer and Cowan (35). All four predictions were used
to establish a consensus prediction, where a prediction for a
-strand was only taken as valid if it was given simultaneously by
several of the independent methods. The topology was deduced from the
alternance pattern of transmembrane
-strands: predicted strands are
connected either by short turns or long loops. Turns are periplasmic,
and loops are predicted to be exposed at the surface, as observed in
all outer membrane proteins to date (2). This prediction
method has previously been validated with a set of porins of known
structure (31).
Antigenic analysis.
The anti-Omp2b specific MAbs
A68/25G05/A05, A68/15B06/C08, A63/05A07/A08, A63/04D11/G01,
A63/03H02/B01, A63/13G02/C08, and A63/08D08/C07 were previously
described (5).
For the Western blot experiments, the purified recombinant proteins or
Brucella sonicated whole-cell extracts were run on SDS-PAGE
and subsequently transferred to nitrocellulose (Millipore) using a
Mini-Protean II cell apparatus (Bio-Rad) at 100 mV for 1 h.
Blocking was done by incubating the membrane in Tris-buffered saline
(TBS; 0.15 M NaCl, 10 mM Tris; pH 7.5) containing 3% bovine serum
albumin (BSA) at room temperature for 2 h. The membranes were
incubated overnight at room temperature with ascitic fluids of the MAbs
diluted 500 times in TBS containing 1% BSA and 0.05% Tween 20 and
then washed twice in TBS containing 0.05% Tween 20. Horseradish
peroxidase conjugated with goat anti-mouse antibodies (GAM-HRP; Daxo
A/S) was used as the secondary antibody. Membranes were incubated with
GAM-HRP diluted 1,000 times in TBS-BSA-Tween for 1 h at room
temperature and then washed twice with TBS. Revelation was achieved by
incubating the washed membrane in a freshly made TBS solution
containing 0.06% 4-chloro-1-naphthol (Bio-Rad), first diluted in
methanol, and 5 mM H2O2. The reaction was
stopped with distilled water.
For the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), 96-well microplates
(Nunc) were coated with the purified proteins at 2 µg/ml or the
sonicated Brucella cells (at an absorbance value [600 nm]
of 1.0) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) overnight at 4°C. In the
case of the purified protein only, the plates were saturated with a
phosphate buffer with 4% casein hydrolysate. MAbs (500-fold-diluted
ascite fluid or 2-fold-diluted hybridoma spernate in PBS with 0.01%
Tween 20) were incubated in the plates for 1 h at 37°C. Binding
of the antibody was detected by further incubation for 1 h at
37°C with GAM-HRP (Daxo A/S) diluted 1,000-fold in PBS with 0.01%
Tween 20, and subsequent revelation with K-blue substrate (Neogen,
Lexington, Ky.). The reaction was stopped with 2N
H2SO4, and the plates were read at 450 nm with
an automated plate reader (model EL340; Bio-Tek).
Liposome swelling assays.
The following procedure is
modified from that of Douglas et al. (12). Soy bean
phosphatidylcholine (20 mg) was dried as a film at the bottom of a
glass round-bottom flask, and 500 µl of the porin sample (50 µg/ml
in TEN containing 0.01% Zwittergent 3-14) was added. The suspension
was homogenized by sonication and dried again at 50°C under vacuum
(in a rotating evaporator). The dried mixture was resuspended by
briefly vortexing in 2 ml of a solution of 5 mM Tris-10% (wt/vol)
Dextran T40 (Pharmacia) (pH 7.5). Liposomes were diluted in isotonic
solutions of arabinose, glucose, or N-acetylglucosamine, and
the initial rate of swelling was measured turbidimetrically at 450 nm
with a Uvikon 820 spectrophotometer. All rates were compared to the
arabinose swelling rate which was taken as 100%. The isotonicity of
the sugar solution was checked using a porin-free liposome preparation.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The nucleotide
sequences have been deposited in the GenBank database under accession
numbers AF268033, AF268034, AF268035, AY008719, AY008720, and AY008721.
 |
RESULTS |
Selection and sequence comparison of Omp2b size variants.
Figure 2A shows the HinfI
restriction patterns obtained for the omp2b genes PCR
amplified from B. abortus S19 (used as a reference), B. abortus 45/20, B. suis 83-210 (atypical biovar
3 isolate), B. ovis 63/290, and B. ovis 76-250. All restriction patterns show three fragments, but at least one
fragment for each pattern has a modified size compared to that of
omp2b of B. abortus S19. These size modifications
are also obvious when Omp2b is detected by a specific MAb in a Western
blot experiment using Brucella whole-cell extracts (Fig.
2b). Omp2b of B. abortus 45/20 is shorter than that of
B. abortus S19, while those of B. suis 83-210, B. ovis 76-250, and B. ovis 63/290 are clearly
longer in size. All PCR-amplified omp2b genes were
sequenced. The aligned nucleotide sequences, for the positions where
insertion or deletion explain gene size variation are shown in Fig.
3. The sequences inserted in the longer omp2b genes or deleted in the shorter version (B. ovis 76-250, B. ovis 63-290, and B. abortus
45/20, respectively) correspond to B. abortus S19
omp2a motifs. Interestingly, omp2b of B. suis 83-210 shows unique sequence motifs, different from both
reference omp2b and omp2a genes, but appearing at
positions identical to other omp2b and omp2a
divergences.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
(A) Size variation of omp2b shown by RFLP.
Agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR-amplified omp2b genes
digested with HinfI of B. abortus S19 (lane 2),
B. abortus 45/20 (lane 3), B. suis 83-210 (lane
4), B. ovis 63/290 (lane 5), and B. ovis 76-250 (lane 6) was done. Lane 1, DNA marker kit VI (Boehringer Mannheim). (B)
Size variation of the corresponding Omp2b protein shown by Western
blot. A Western blot with anti-Omp2b MAb A63/05A07/A08 after SDS-PAGE
of B. abortus S19 (lane 1), B. abortus 45/20
(lane 2), B. suis 83-210 (lane 3), B. ovis 63/290
(lane 4), and B. ovis 76-250 (lane 5) is shown.
|
|

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Multiple alignment of the nucleotide sequences of the
omp2b size variants. Only the part of the sequence
explaining the size differences between the variants are shown. These
variable regions are denominated from the topological features that
they encode (L3, L5, or L8) according to the topology model proposed by
Paquet et al. (31) (see also Fig. 5). The omp2b
sequences are named from their respective Brucella strain.
The sequences of the oligonucleotide probes used to differentiate
omp2a from omp2b (16) are
underlined.
|
|
Presence of omp2a motifs in omp2b variants
extends further the region implicated in size variation. Moreover,
omp2b genes from other Brucella strains, present
in the databases, also bear omp2a motifs in their sequence.
This is summarized in Fig. 4 with a
schematic representation of the deduced amino acid sequences, including
the corresponding Omp2a amino acid sequences, which actually show very
little sequence divergence with reference Omp2a. This schematic
alignment shows that Omp2b of B. ovis 63/290 is almost
similar to a typical Omp2a protein as previously described (17), whereas Omp2b of B. abortus 45/20 and
B. ovis 76-250, although mostly Omp2b-like, show
Omp2a-specific motifs on their sequences. Thus, the B. abortus 45/20, B. ovis 63/290, and B. ovis
76-250 Omp2b size variants appear to be natural chimeric proteins of
the Omp2b and Omp2a pair previously characterized in B. melitensis 16M or in B. abortus S19 (25,
26).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Schematic representation of multiple amino acid sequence
alignment of the Omp2b size variants along with their corresponding
Omp2a. This alignment includes sequences not obtained in this study but
found in sequence databases. Sequences are subdivided in stretches of
10 residues, numbered following the B. melitensis 16M Omp2b
sequence. A change in color indicates the presence of substitutions
(the number inside the box indicates the number of substitutions
compared to Omp2b of B. melitensis 16M among the 10 residues). The red color always indicates identity with motifs specific
for Omp2a. The yellow color indicates sequence motifs not present in
reference Omp2b nor in reference Omp2a but conserved between variants
that share this color. The blue and green colors indicate motifs
specific, respectively, of B. ovis 63/290 Omp2b and B. suis 83-210 Omp2b. Hatching in the box symbolizes a deletion;
double hatching symbolizes an insertion, always compared to the Omp2b
sequence of B. melitensis 16M. This figure clearly shows
that motif exchanges between Omp2a and Omp2b are common among all
Brucella strains, suggesting that gene conversion as a
phenomenon occurred several times during Brucella evolution,
thus explaining most of the Omp2b variation between strains, except the
variation found in the B. suis 83-210 Omp2b porin.
Interestingly, as shown in this figure, Omp2a of both B. ovis strains is truncated in its C-terminal end due to the
presence of a stop codon, leading probably to a nonfunctional porin.
B. abortus 45/20 Omp2a shows the same deletion as in
B. abortus S19 Omp2a characterized by others (15, 16,
17, 25, 26).
|
|
Topological analysis of Omp2b size variants.
In Fig. 5, the locations of the
insertions, deletions, and substitutions between Omp2b variants and
Omp2a have been shown on the Omp2b topology model (31).
Substitutions were also positioned on another topology model for Omp2b,
which was based on alternative prediction methods and published by
Mobasheri et al. (26). The main substitution positions on
both models are the following.

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Topology of the Omp2b size variants. The Omp2b
sequence of B. abortus S19 is presented in yellow as a
reference sequence and is numbered according to the mature protein. The
first two lines present two different Omp2b topology models (model 1 is
from Paquet et al. [31] and model 2 is from Mobasheri et
al. [26]). Colored boxes represent predicted
transmembrane -strands. L, segments that symbolize surface-exposed
loops numbered from 1 to 8, the L3 segment being the porin predicted
constriction loop. Each substitution for all the sequences examined is
figured (the conserved residues are not shown). Deletions are
symbolized by yellow "-" boxes. Insertions are detailed beneath the
figure and are indicated on the topology as red boxes.
|
|
In the Omp2b size variants, numerous amino acid substitutions (not
deletions or insertions) occur in the region between residues 60 and
100. On both models, this region includes the B4 and B5
-strands, as
well as the predicted T3/T2 periplasmic turns. A 13-residue insertion,
substituting an N-E-T motif at position 103 in the reference Omp2b, is
present in Omp2a and in Omp2b from B. ovis 63/290 and
B. ovis 76-250. Both topology models locate this insertion
at the beginning of the L3 loop. In all porins of known structure, the
L3 loop is folded into the
barrel, constricting the pore, and is
thus a crucial determinant of the porin pore-forming characteristics.
Another variable region in Brucella Omp2 porins is located
between residues 175 and 190. Both topology models locate this variable
region in a surface-exposed loop, although the numbering of this loop
varies according to the model (L4 loop in Mobashery's model, L5 loop
in our study). On this loop, reference Omp2a and Omp2b of B. abortus 45/20 and Omp2b of B. ovis 63/290 all show a
deletion along with six residue substitutions, compared to reference
Omp2b. In the case of B. abortus 45/20, this is the only
"Omp2a-specific" signature, whereas Omp2b of B. ovis
63/290 presents other Omp2a-specific motifs in its N-terminal part. The B. suis 83-210 Omp2b porin shows a 15-residue insertion at
position 184, modifying drastically the length and physicochemical
properties of the L4/L5 loop in this porin. Omp2b of B. suis
83-210 shows also a large replacement of a part of the L8 loop, leading
to an addition of negatively charged residues. This replacement does not affect the C-terminal transmembrane strand.
In summary, the major sequence differences (insertion and/or deletion)
between the Omp2b size variants, reference Omp2a, and reference Omp2b
all occur in external loops, but minor substitutions are distributed
between residues 35 and the C terminus.
Antigenic analysis and partial epitope mapping of Omp2b size
variants.
Reactivity of anti-Omp2b MAbs against total cellular
protein extract of B. abortus S19, B. abortus
45/20, B. suis 83-210, B. ovis 63/290, and
B. ovis 76-250 was assessed by Western blot and ELISA (Table
1). Only Omp2b is supposed to be produced
in Brucella, the omp2a gene being only expressed
when the intergenic region is artificially reversed (15).
Both MAbs A68/25G05/A05 and A68/15B06/C08 recognize only folded Omp2b
and react thus only in the ELISA, and their reactivity is lost in the
Western blot. Conversely, some MAbs can only recognize Omp2b in
denatured extracts (Western blot).
Loss of MAb reactivity correlated with sequence variability. The most
probable locations on the Omp2b sequence of the epitopes recognized by
MAbs A63/11E05/D11, A63/13G02/C04, A63/04D11/G01, A68/25G05/A05, and
A68/15B06/C08 are shown in Fig. 6. The
epitope recognized by MAb A63/11E05/D11 has been located between
residues 30 and 150 because this is where the two B. ovis
strains diverge from all the other strains, and they are not recognized
by the antibody. The epitopes recognized by MAbs A63/04D11/G01 and
A63/13G02/C04 are probably located in the only significant region of
variation between B. suis 83-210 Omp2b and all other
Brucella porins, i.e., the L8 loop.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Localization of Omp2b epitopes recognized by the MAbs
which present differences of reactivity between the size variants. The
boxes shaded in gray show places where substitutions, deletions, or
insertions between Omp2b and Omp2a occur (the number of the
substitution is indicated beneath the box). The external loops of the
predicted topology are also indicated. The linear epitope recognized by
the two MAbs between brackets have been identified with truncated Omp2b
in another study (11).
|
|
MAbs A68/25G05/A05 and A68/15B06/C08 recognize nonlinear
surface-exposed epitopes (5). Size variant porins are
chimeric porins between Omp2b (recognized by both MAbs
[30]) and Omp2a (not recognized by any of these two MAbs
[30]). B. ovis 76-250 and B. abortus 45/20 are recognized by both MAbs, which indicates that
the epitopes are located in the C-terminal loops of the protein. B. ovis 63/290 is not recognized by MAb A68/25G05/A05, which
indicates that region 220 to 260, with only 3 substitions between Omp2b and Omp2a-type porin is important for the recognition by this antibody.
This region encompasses the predicted L6 and L7 external loops. It is
also probable that the L8 loop is implicated in the A68/25G05/A05-recognized epitope, because B. suis 83-210 is
not recognized by this antibody. This indicated that several surface loops are probably involved in this nonlinear epitope.
The A68/15B06/C08 binding site probably does not include the L6 loop
since this MAb does recognize B. ovis 63/290. From the fact
that B. suis 83-210 is not recognized by MAb A68/15B06/C08, we can deduce that the epitope recognized by this antibody includes the
L8 external loop. We cannot exclude the involvement of loop L7 since
reference Omp2a is not recognized and shows only a few substitutions in
the L8 loop. Thus, for these latter two MAbs, it should be noted that
the true epitope may also include other parts of the protein because if
several loops form the conformational epitope, the modification of just
one of these loops could lead to the absence of this epitope.
Purification and refolding of Omp2b size variants.
In order to
prepare large amounts of purified porins, Omp2b size variants from the
following strains were produced in the T7 expression system in E. coli: B. abortus 45/20, B. ovis 76-250, and B. suis 83-210, along with Omp2b and Omp2a from B. melitensis 16M. All porin size variants were successfully
purified, with a final yield of 1 to 4 mg of pure protein by 100 ml of
culture. The purity of the protein sample was greater than 95% as
determined by SDS-PAGE. Contamination with native E. coli
porin was excluded by a Western blot experiment realized with the
purified porin and chicken egg polyclonal antibodies directed against
total extract of the strain BL21(DE3) (data not shown). This is
understandable because recombinant Omp2b is produced without signal
peptide and is accumulated in inclusion bodies instead of being
exported to the outer membrane along with the endogenous E. coli porins. The B. melitensis 16M reference porins
were refolded into a native trimeric form as shown by circular
dichroism spectroscopy (Fig. 7A),
analysis of antigenic properties (30), and quaternary
structure (Fig. 7B). Omp2b size variants were also refolded at least
partly as native trimers (Fig. 7B). The only exception was the B. suis 83-210 Omp2b porin, which was never observed in an oligomeric form in our experiment; data on functionnal properties must be taken
with caution for this particular variant. The Omp2b refolded trimers
are recognized by both A68/15B06/C08 and A68/25G05/A05 MAbs, suggesting
that conformational epitopes were recovered by the refolded porins
(30).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
(A) Circular dichroim spectroscopy of OmpF, the
archetype of porins purified from E. coli (bold line),
refolded B. melitensis 16M Omp2b (gray line), or Omp2a
(black line). All three proteins show a very high content of
-strands, although Omp2a is comparatively richer in the -helix
component. These spectra suggest a correct recovery of secondary
structure for the refolded Brucella porins. (B) Western blot
with purified Brucella porins (lane 1, B
melitensis 16M Omp2b; lane 2, B. abortus 45/20 Omp2b;
lane 3, B. ovis 76-250 Omp2b; lane 4, B. suis
83-210 Omp2b) and detection with a mix of MAbs directed against Omp2b.
Purified trimers are unstable in the presence of SDS, and several
quaternary states are visible: trimers at about 90 kDa, dimers, and
several forms of monomers. The refolded Omp2b size variants, with the
exception of that of B. suis 83-210, show a pattern with
trimeric state, suggesting that correct refolding also occurred for the
variant porins, although quantification was not possible with this
experiment.
|
|
Differential sugar permeation of Omp2b size variants.
Purified
recombinant Omp2b size variants and reference porins were tested for
their permeability toward small sugars (Fig. 8). An ANOVA2 model was used for
statistical analysis. Permeation rates for glucose and
N-acetylglucosamine relative to arabinose were significantly
lower for B. suis 83-210 Omp2b than for reference B. melitensis Omp2b (Fobs = 6.2908, P < 0.0005). Omp2b of B. ovis 76-250 showed no strong
modification of its permeation rate compared to the reference Omp2b
porin, whereas Omp2b of B. abortus 45/20 had a significantly
higher permeation rate for N-acetylglucosamine (Fobs = 17.0087, P < 0.0005). This points out the crucial role of the 170 to 200 region, which is the only region of divergence between the Omp2b of B. abortus 45/20 and the other Omp2b
porins, in the determination of pore characteristics. This 170 to 200 region is subject to a small deletion in the B. abortus
45/20 Omp2b porin as in the reference Omp2a porin, this deletion being located in the L5 loop in our topology model. The L5 loop of B. abortus 45/20 Omp2b and reference Omp2a is shorter by five
residues but still richer in negatively charged residues (three Asps in Omp2a against two Asps in Omp2b) than the L5 loop of reference Omp2b.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Comparison of sugar permeability of the Omp2b size
variants with the reference Omp2b and Omp2a porins of B. melitensis 16M. The graph shows the relative permeation rate of
glucose (180 Da) and N-acetylglucosamine (221 Da) compared
to arabinose (150 Da) rate, taken as 100%, for all purified variants.
The experiments were conducted in quintuplate for every point, and
standard deviations are shown for the 221-Da point.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Omp2b porin size variants, identified by PCR-RFLP and Western blot
analysis, have been cloned and sequenced in order to understand the
mechanisms by which such a polymorphism occurs. Furthermore, the effect
of the variation on porin structure, function, and antigenicity has
been assessed.
The nature of the polymorphism in this group of Omp2b size variants is
of particular interest. It is neither due to free sequence variation,
as observed for other porins such as the PorA and PorB porins from
Neisseria spp. (10, 18), nor to horizontal
transfers of sequence motifs from one strain to another as observed in
Neisseria meningitidis porins (14). Variability
in Brucella porins seems to be mainly the result of a
variable assembly of defined sequence motifs found in the two
omp2 porin gene copies. The peculiar genomic organization of
the omp2 locus has probably allowed for genetic conversions
between omp2b and omp2a, as has already been
proposed for B. ovis 63/290 and B. neotomae 5K33
(17). The proposed mechanisms would consist of a
correction of part of the omp2b coding sequence using
omp2a as template. The present work shows that such
conversions may have occurred at several distinct moments in the
evolution of the genus Brucella, resulting in the observed
size variations of the genes.
In terms of evolution, the omp2 locus recently reported from
a Brucella strain (B202R) isolated from a Minke whale is of
particular interest (4). The Omp2b sequence from this
strain shows first an "Omp2a-type" N-terminal part, then a long
"Omp2b-type" sequence, and then again an "Omp2a-type" C
terminus (Fig. 4). Also, its Omp2a sequence is almost identical to this
composite Omp2b sequence, which makes this locus a good candidate to
represent the "primitive" omp2 locus.
Only in Omp2b of B. suis 83-210 is the size variation truly
the result of mere sequence variability. The 15- and 10-residue insertions in its Omp2b loops L5 and L8 are not found in its Omp2a sequence, suggesting that no gene conversion occurred in this strain.
The most important sequence divergences observed between
Brucella porins are two insertions and/or deletions located
in the beginning of the loops L3 and L5 by the topology models. In the Neisseria PorB porin, sequence variability is also found in
external loops but not in loop L3, the pore-constricting loop, as
suggested by homology modeling (10). Neisseria
porin variants are thus supposed to differ highly in antigenicity but
in pore-forming activity (10). In contrast, as shown in
this study Brucella porins appear to be not truly variable
in antigenicity, since their variation is mostly due to exchanges of
only two different types of motifs.
Comparison of MAb reactivity patterns of the Omp2b porin size variants
and their sequences allowed us to partially map the epitopes for five
of the MAbs. A partial epitope mapping has been previously realized
using Omp2b truncations (11), and our results are in
agreement with this approach. The results obtained with the truncated
proteins showed, in addition to the data presented here, that MAbs
A63/13G02/C04 and A63/04D11/G01 recognize two different epitopes in the
C-terminal part of Omp2b. Due to the misfolded nature of the truncated
protein, this approach failed to identify nonlinear epitopes recognized
by MAbs A68/25G05/A05 and A68/15B06/C08. In contrast, the use of
natural chimeric porins proved to be useful in determining which parts
of the protein are implicated in these nonlinear surface-exposed
epitopes, namely, the predicted loops L6, L7, and L8. The strong
binding of MAbs A68/25G05/A05 and A68/15B06/C08 to the
Brucella cell surface (1, 5) suggests a strong
surface exposure of these loops, which is in agreement with the
proposed role in bacterial adhesion of the RGD-containing L6 loop
(3).
Comparison of pore-forming activity of the Omp2b size variants led to
interesting results concerning the structural basis of Omp2a and Omp2b
difference in sugar permeability, even if caution must be taken while
interpreting results obtained with refolded porins, which probably need
confirmation with native porins. Because of the crucial role in
pore-forming activity played by the constriction L3 loop in most porins
(21), it has been hypothetically proposed that the
strongly modified and notably more negatively charged L3 loop of Omp2a
would be responsible for a change in the permeability of the porin
(31). Unexpectedly, Omp2b of B. ovis 76-250, a chimeric Omp2b with an Omp2a-type L3 loop, did not show any increase in
sugar permeability. A sugar permeability comparable to Omp2a permeability was observed with Omp2b of B. abortus 45/20,
which is identical to reference Omp2b but with an Omp2a-type L5 loop, which actually makes this Omp2b size variant the shortest known Omp2b
porin. The L5 loop appears thus to be a critical determinant in
Brucella porin sugar permeability. This is confirmed by the lower permeability of Omp2b of B. suis 83-210, which has a
large insertion in the L5 loop, although in this case a large insertion also occurred in the L8 loop. The L5 loop could possibly participate in
the formation of the pore "external mouth," which serves to prescreen the solute in porins of known structure (8, 21). The small deletion present in Omp2a and Omp2b of B. abortus
45/20 could possibly enlarge this external mouth of the pore.
It must be stressed that the results obtained here on sugar
permeability do not preclude the possibility that the L3 loop could
have a strong influence on ion movements through the
Brucella porins. The influence of charged residues of the L3
and L5 loops on ion conductance and ion selectivity remains to be
elucidated. On the other hand, the constriction of the pore may rather
be exerted by the L5, instead of the L3 loop, in Brucella porins.
The question remains as to why the omp2b gene has sometimes
been corrected with the omp2a template during
Brucella evolution. Has sugar permeability modification
provided a selective advantage to some Brucella strains? It
must be stressed that Brucella membrane permeability is
probably not solely dependent on Omp2b and Omp2a permeability, but that
other potentially strain-specific factors, such as other outer membrane
components (34, 39), could be implicated as well. Since
the expression of omp2a has never been observed, the
conservation of this porin gene copy in all Brucella strains
remains also to be explained. Comparisons between Brucella strains of omp2a and omp2b gene expression
patterns during the infectious cycle and the related variation in outer
membrane permeability constitute exciting new questions to be resolved.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
J.-Y. Paquet and S. Genevrois were recipients of a fellowship
from the Fond pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l'Industrie et l'Agriculture (FRIA, Brussels, Belgium).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Station de
Pathologie Aviaire et Parasitologie, Institut National de la
Recherche Agronomique, 37380 Nouzilly, France. Phone: (33)
2-47-42-77-50. Fax: (33) 2-47-42-77-74. E-mail:
cloeckae{at}tours.inra.fr.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bowden, R. A.,
A. Cloeckaert,
M. S. Zygmunt,
S. Bernard, and G. Dubray.
1995.
Surface exposure of outer membrane protein and lipopolysaccharide epitopes in Brucella species studied by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and flow cytometry.
Infect. Immun.
63:3945-3952[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Buchanan, S. K.
1999.
-Barrel proteins from bacterial outer membranes: structure, function and refolding.
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
9:455-461[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Campbell, G. A.,
L. G. Adams, and B. A. Sowa.
1994.
Mechanisms of binding of Brucella abortus to mononuclear phagocytes from cows naturally resistant or susceptible to brucellosis.
Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol.
41:295-306[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Clavareau, C.,
V. Wellemans,
K. Walravens,
M. Tryland,
J. M. Verger,
M. Grayon,
A. Cloeckaert,
J. J. Letesson, and J. Godfroid.
1998.
Phenotypic and molecular characterization of a Brucella strain isolated from a minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata).
Microbiology
144:3267-3273[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Cloeckaert, A.,
P. de Wergifosse,
G. Dubray, and J. N. Limet.
1990.
Identification of seven surface-exposed Brucella outer membrane proteins by use of monoclonal antibodies: immunogold labeling for electron microscopy and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Infect. Immun.
58:3980-3987[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Cloeckaert, A.,
J. M. Verger,
M. Grayon, and O. Grépinet.
1995.
Restriction site polymorphism of the genes encoding the major 25 kDa and 36 kDa outer-membrane proteins of Brucella.
Microbiology
141:2111-2121[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Cloeckaert, A.,
J. M. Verger,
M. Grayon, and N. Vizcaino.
1996.
Molecular and immunological characterization of the major outer membrane proteins of Brucella.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
145:1-8[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Cowan, S. W.,
T. Schirmer,
G. Rummel,
M. Steirt,
R. Ghosh,
R. A. Pauptit,
J. N. Jansonius, and J. P. Rosenbusch.
1992.
Crystal structure explains functional properties of two E. coli porins.
Nature
358:727-733[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Depiereux, E., and E. Feytmans.
1992.
MATCH-BOX: a fundamentally new algorithm for the simultaneous alignment of several protein sequences.
Comput. Appl. Biosci.
8:501-509[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Derrick, J. P.,
R. Urwin,
J. Suker,
I. M. Feavers, and M. C. Maiden.
1999.
Structural and evolutionary inference from molecular variation in Neisseria porins.
Infect. Immun.
67:2406-2413[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
de Wergifosse, P.
1992.
Analyse génétique et immunologique de deux protéines de la membrane externe de Brucella abortus: l'Omp25 et l'Omp36. Ph.D. thesis.
Catholic University of Louvain, Louvain, Belgium.
|
| 12.
|
Douglas, J. T.,
E. Y. Rosenberg,
H. Nikaido,
D. R. Verstreate, and A. J. Winter.
1984.
Porins of Brucella species.
Infect. Immun.
44:16-21[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Evans, L. J.,
A. Cooper, and J. H. Lakey.
1996.
Direct measurement of the association of a protein with a family of membrane receptors.
J. Mol. Biol.
255:559-563[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Feavers, I. M.,
A. B. Heath,
J. A. Bygraves, and M. C. Maiden.
1992.
Role of horizontal genetic exchange in the antigenic variation of the class 1 outer membrane protein of Neisseria meningitidis.
Mol. Microbiol.
6:489-495[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Ficht, T. A.,
S. W. Bearden,
B. A. Sowa, and L. G. Adams.
1989.
DNA sequence and expression of the 36-kilodalton outer membrane protein gene of Brucella abortus.
Infect. Immun.
57:3281-3291[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Ficht, T. A.,
S. W. Bearden,
B. A. Sowa, and H. Marquis.
1990.
Genetic variation at the omp2 porin locus of the brucellae: species-specific markers.
Mol. Microbiol.
4:1135-1142[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Ficht, T. A.,
H. S. Husseinen,
J. Derr, and S. W. Bearden.
1996.
Species-specific sequences at the omp2 locus of Brucella type strains.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
46:329-331[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Fudyk, T. C.,
I. W. Maclean,
J. N. Simonsen,
E. N. Njagi,
J. Kimani,
R. C. Brunham, and F. A. Plummer.
1999.
Genetic diversity and mosaicism at the por locus of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
J. Bacteriol.
181:5591-5599[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Georgeon, C., and G. Deleage.
1995.
SOPMA: significant improvements in protein secondary structure prediction by consensus prediction from multiple alignments.
CABIOS
11:681-684[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Hobbs, M. M.,
T. M. Alcorn,
R. H. Davis,
W. Fischer,
J. C. Thomas,
I. Martin,
C. Ison,
P. F. Sparling, and M. S. Cohen.
1999.
Molecular typing of Neisseria gonorrhoeae causing repeated infections: evolution of porin during passage within a community.
J. Infect. Dis.
179:371-381[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Jap, B. K., and P. J. Walian.
1996.
Structure and functional mechanism of porins.
Physiol. Rev.
76:1073-1088[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Jeanteur, D.,
T. Schirmer,
D. Fourel,
V. Simonet,
G. Rummel,
C. Widmer,
J. P. Rosenbusch,
F. Pattus, and J. M. Pagès.
1994.
Structural and fonctional alterations of a colicin-resistant mutant of OmpF porin from Escherichia coli.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:10675-10679[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
King, R. D., and J. E. Sternberg.
1996.
Identification and application of the concepts important for accurate and reliable protein secondary structure prediction.
Protein Sci.
5:2298-2310[Abstract].
|
| 24.
|
Klebba, P. E., and S. M. Newton.
1998.
Mechanisms of solute transport through outer membrane porins: burning down the house.
Curr. Opin. Microbiol.
1:238-247[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Marquis, H., and T. A. Ficht.
1993.
The omp2 gene locus of Brucella abortus encodes two homologous outer membrane proteins with properties characteristic of bacterial porins.
Infect. Immun.
61:3785-3790[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Mobasheri, H.,
T. A. Ficht,
H. Marquis,
E. J. Lea, and J. H. Lakey.
1997.
Brucella Omp2a and Omp2b porins: single channel measurements and topology prediction.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
155:23-30[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Mortimer, P. G., and L. J. Piddock.
1993.
The accumulation of five antibacterial agents in porin-deficient mutants of Escherichia coli.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
32:195-213[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Nikaido, H.,
W. Liu, and E. Y. Rosenberg.
1990.
Outer membrane permeability and beta-lactamase stability of dipolar ionic cephalosporins containing methoxyimino substituents.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
34:337-342[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Nogueras, M. M.,
S. Merino,
A. Aguilar,
V. J. Benedi, and J. M. Tomas.
2000.
Cloning, sequencing, and role in serum susceptibility of porin II from mesophilic Aeromonas hydrophila.
Infect. Immun.
68:1849-1854[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Paquet, J. Y.,
X. De Bolle,
P. Mertens,
S. Genevrois,
A. Tibor,
E. Depireux,
J. H. Lakey, and J. J. Letesson.
1999.
Antigenic properties of Brucella Omp2a and Omp2b porins purified from recombinant Escherichia coli and renatured in vitro.
Arch. Physiol. Biochem.
107:B20.
|
| 31.
|
Paquet, J. Y.,
C. Vinals,
J. Wouters,
J. J. Letesson, and E. Depiereux.
2000.
Topology prediction of Brucella abortus Omp2b and Omp2a porins after critical assessment of transmembrane beta strands prediction by several secondary structure prediction methods.
J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn.
17:747-757[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Qi, H. L.,
J. Y. Tai, and M. S. Blake.
1994.
Expression of large amounts of neisserial porin proteins in Escherichia coli and refolding of the proteins into native trimers.
Infect. Immun.
62:2432-2439[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Rost, B., and C. Sander.
1993.
Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy.
J. Mol. Biol.
232:584-599[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Samartzidou, H., and A. H. Delcour.
1999.
Excretion of endogenous cadaverine leads to a decrease in porin-mediated outer membrane permeability.
J. Bacteriol.
181:791-798[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Schirmer, T., and S. W. Cowan.
1993.
Prediction of membrane-spanning -strands and its application to maltoporin.
Protein Sci.
2:1361-1363[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Schmid, B.,
M. Krömer, and G. E. Schulz.
1996.
Expression of porin from Rhodopseudomonas blastica in Escherichia coli inclusion bodies and folding into exact native structure.
FEBS Lett.
381:111-114[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Singh, S. P.,
S. R. Singh,
Y. U. Williams,
L. Jones, and T. Abdullah.
1995.
Antigenic determinants of the OmpC porin from Salmonella typhimurium.
Infect. Immun.
63:4600-4605[Abstract].
|
| 38.
|
Thompson, J. D.,
D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson.
1994.
CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:4673-4680[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Vizcaino, N.,
A. Cloeckaert,
M. S. Zygmunt, and G. Dubray.
1996.
Cloning, nucleotide sequence, and expression of the Brucella melitensis omp31 gene coding for an immunogenic major outer membrane protein.
Infect. Immun.
64:3744-3751[Abstract].
|
Journal of Bacteriology, August 2001, p. 4839-4847, Vol. 183, No. 16
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.16.4839-4847.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Nikaido, H.
(2003). Molecular Basis of Bacterial Outer Membrane Permeability Revisited. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
67: 593-656
[Abstract]
[Full Text]