Journal of Bacteriology, September 2001, p. 5041-5049, Vol. 183, No. 17
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.17.5041-5049.2001
Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-0560
Received 18 April 2001/Accepted 1 June 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The genomic DNA of bacteria is contained in one or a few compact bodies known as nucleoids. We describe a simple procedure that retains the general shape and compaction of nucleoids from Escherichia coli upon cell lysis and nucleoid release from the cell envelope. The procedure is a modification of that used for the preparation of spermidine nucleoids (nucleoids released in the presence of spermidine) (T. Kornberg, A. Lockwood, and A. Worcel, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71:3189-3193, 1974). Polylysine is added to prevent the normal decompaction of nucleoids which occurs upon cell lysis. Nucleoids retained their characteristic shapes in lysates of exponential-phase cells or in lysates of cells treated with chloramphenicol or nalidixate to alter nucleoid morphology. The notably unstable nucleoids of rifampin-treated cells were obtained in compact, stable form in such lysates. Nucleoids released in the presence of polylysine were easily processed and provided well-defined DNA fluorescence and phase-contrast images. Uniform populations of nucleoids retaining characteristic shapes could be isolated after formaldehyde fixation and heating with sodium dodecyl sulfate.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The genomic DNA of Escherichia coli is localized in one or two compact bodies, known as nucleoids, per cell (3, 15, 31, 36, 38, 40). There have been many attempts to isolate representative nucleoids outside of cells (24, 25). However, the various DNA-containing structures that have been isolated generally have failed to meet this goal in two important ways. First, the nucleoid DNA underwent the partial decompaction that is associated with cell lysis (21). Second, large amounts of residual envelope remained with the nucleoid DNA, so that many such preparations are more accurately described as lysed or broken cell preparations than as isolated nucleoids (see footnote 6 of reference 20).
Evaluation of the released nucleoids is made difficult by a lack of information on the structure of the original nucleoids within cells. Here we use retention of the general shape of nucleoids in initial cells as a criterion for evaluation of a new procedure for nucleoid isolation. There have been few reports on the shapes of isolated nucleoids; the doublet-shaped high-salt nucleoids (nucleoids released in the presence of high salt concentrations) described by Hecht et al. (10) and Van Ness and Pettijohn (33) and the large DNA double structure found in high-salt nucleoids of a DNA gyrase mutant by Steck and Drlica (28) are the only instances of which we are aware.
We have used the distinctively shaped nucleoids formed in cells that have been exposed to antibiotics (4, 5, 11, 12) as test objects. The three antibiotics used here, chloramphenicol, nalidixate, and rifampin, all promote the coalescence of nucleoids in cells and can cause changes in nucleoid morphology and stability:
The nucleoid coalescence caused by chloramphenicol (17, 32) has been attributed to a loss of cotranslational insertion linkages between the DNA and the cell envelope when protein synthesis is inhibited; the loss of these expanding forces then presumably allows coalescence and fuller compaction caused by the opposing cellular forces (37, 40). The stable, round shape of nucleoids in chloramphenicol-treated cells (11, 17, 27, 32, 35) provides structures that can be readily identified by light microscopy. In addition, nucleoids from chloramphenicol-treated cells are unusually stable (20, 21), further adding to their utility as test objects.
Nalidixate treatment can cause the nucleoids within cells to form elongated, crystalline bodies (14). Nalidixate is an inhibitor of DNA gyrase (8, 29); presumably for this reason, nalidixate-treated cells often contain nucleoids which have failed to segregate properly (28). The resulting DNA-containing structures provide distinctive test objects.
Rifampin causes two opposing effects. Cellular nucleoids are transformed into compact axial rods (4). In contrast to this form within cells, nucleoids removed from rifampin-treated cells have such a strong tendency to unfold (6, 23) that isolation of compact nucleoids from rifampin-treated cells is a test in itself for the nucleoid isolation procedure.
In the following study, we describe conditions which released compact nucleoids with characteristic cellular shapes. The conditions were derived from the effects of polylysine on nucleoid unfolding that were noted briefly in an earlier study (21). It is anticipated that preparations of compact nucleoids will have applications in studies of nucleoid structure and segregation and in gene localization.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials. Low-gelling temperature agarose (type VII), chloramphenicol, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), crystallized chicken egg white lysozyme (EC 3.2.1.17), E. coli DNA, sodium deoxycholate, spermidine · 3HCl, Brij 58 (polyoxyethylene 20 cetyl ether), rifampin, sodium nalidixate, sucrose, and poly-L-lysine (molecular weight,~9,000) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co.; diethylmalonic acid (98%) was purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co.
Cell growth and antibiotic treatments. Exponential-phase E. coli K-12 C600 was grown at 37°C in 180 ml of Luria-Bertani medium (26) in a 500-ml Erlenmeyer flask in a rotary shaker (New Brunswick G-25D; 275 rpm). The DNA of the cells was fluorescently labeled (1) by addition of 0.5 µg of DAPI/ml at an A600 of 0.17. At an A600 of ~0.5, the culture was chilled by swirling the flask in ice-water for 5 min, and the absorbance of the chilled culture was measured. Aliquots of chilled culture equal to 27.6 ml × (0.5/A600) were centrifuged for 10 min at 10,000 × g and 3°C, and each pellet was resuspended at 0°C in 0.5 ml of 20% sucrose-0.1 M NaCl-10 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.1). The resuspended cells were immediately lysed to minimize autolytic changes (9). Cells for treatment with antibiotics were grown and prelabeled with DAPI as described above. Chloramphenicol (final concentration, 30 µg/ml), sodium nalidixate (40 µg/ml), or rifampin (40 µg/ml) was added at an A600 of 0.25, and shaking at 37°C was continued for 1 h before the cells were harvested and resuspended as described above.
Polylysine-spermidine lysis procedure. Resuspended cells (1 volume) were incubated for 1 min at 0°C with 1/5 volume of a solution containing 120 mM Tris · HCl buffer (pH 8.1), 50 mM sodium EDTA (pH 7), and 400 µg of lysozyme/ml; a lower lysozyme concentration in the same medium was used in some experiments. Polylysine (1/5 volume of an aqueous solution of 5 mg of poly-L-lysine · HBr/ml; molecular weight, ~9,000) was then added. After incubation for 1 min at 0°C, 1/5 volume of 1% Brij 58-0.4% sodium deoxycholate-10 mM sodium EDTA (pH 7)-10 mM spermidine · 3HCl was added. The turbid mixture was incubated for 5 min at 37°C and rechilled. The partially clarified lysate was stored at 5°C. Lysates prepared with or without polylysine had a pH of about 6.2 to 6.7.
Large cellular components in the lysate, i.e., released nucleoids and lysed and unlysed cells, were separated from the excess reagents used in the lysis procedure and from released cytoplasmic materials by centrifugation through a layer of buffered sucrose. Lysate (1.5 ml) was layered over 8 ml of 15% sucrose in solution A (20 mM sodium diethylmalonate buffer [pH 7.1], 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM
-mercaptoethanol) and centrifuged for 20 min at 10,000 × g (8,000 rpm) in a swinging-bucket rotor (HB-4 rotor,
Sorvall) at 3°C. The pellet was resuspended in 500 µl of 15%
sucrose in solution A by trituration and gentle agitation over a period
of several minutes, yielding a nonviscous, opalescent mixture.
Sucrose gradient centrifugation of SDS-treated, HCHO-fixed
samples.
Relatively homogeneous suspensions of nucleoids were
isolated from formaldehyde (HCHO)-fixed preparations that had been
treated with sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). The resuspended pellet
described above was fixed in 2% HCHO for 1 h at 0°C and kept
for
1 day at 5°C. SDS (3%) was added, and the samples were heated
for 30 min at 50°C, chilled, and stored at 5°C. Precipitated SDS
which formed at lower temperatures was redissolved by brief warming to
room temperature, and samples of 0.95 ml were layered over sucrose
gradients (gradient volume, 10.0 ml; 15 to 30% sucrose in solution A).
After centrifugation for 15 min at 5,000 rpm in a swinging-bucket rotor
(SW40 rotor; Beckman) at 5°C, fractions were collected by piercing
the bottoms of the tubes and allowing the contents to drip into tared
tubes; fraction volumes were calculated from fraction weights and
solution densities of control gradients. Fractions were analyzed for
DNA by fluorometry; aliquots (0.5 ml; containing
2 µg of DNA
diluted in 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer [pH 7.4]-0.01% SDS) were
mixed with 1.0 ml of 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4)-0.15 µg
of DAPI/ml, and their fluorescence was measured with a Hoefer DynaQuant
200 fluorometer with a cuvette (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) using
E. coli DNA as the standard.
Light microscopy.
Samples of 3 to 5 µl were added to glass
slides and briefly mixed by use of a pipette tip with an equal volume
of 2% low-gelling-temperature agarose
20 mM sodium diethylmalonate
buffer (pH 7.1) that had been liquefied and equilibrated to 37°C.
Coverslips were immediately added and fixed in place with Vaspar
(22) applied along the edges. The slides were monitored by
phase-contrast microscopy; DNA (DAPI) fluorescence or combined
phase-contrast and DNA fluorescence exposures were made at intervals.
Electron microscopy. Samples for electron microscopy were fixed with an equal volume of buffered 4% HCHO-1% glutaraldehyde (fixative solution) for 1 h at 0°C and centrifuged for 10 min at 12,000 × g and 3°C, and the pellets were stored in fresh aliquots of fixative solution. Subsequent steps were carried out at Paragon Bioservices, Inc., Baltimore, Md. Pellets were postfixed in buffered OsO4 for 1 h; after embedding was done with epoxy resin, sections of ~70 nm were stained first with 2% uranyl acetate and then with 0.2% lead citrate and examined in a Zeiss electron microscope (model 10C).
| |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Polylysine-spermidine lysis procedure for nucleoid release. The polylysine-spermidine lysis procedure is based upon the ability of polylysine to prevent nucleoid decompaction upon cell lysis (21). The procedure incorporates the detergent lysis protocol described by Kornberg et al. (13) with two important modifications. First, polylysine was added before lysis in order to retain nucleoid shape. Second, the temperature of the detergent lysis step was increased from 10°C to 37°C to promote increased release of nucleoids from the residual cell envelope. The increased release at the higher temperature may result from more effective detergent action on membranes (16) and/or increased autolytic effects.
The lysis procedure is rapid. The cells, generally prelabeled with DAPI, were resuspended at 0°C in a medium causing limited plasmolysis. After treatment for 1 min at 0°C with egg white lysozyme, polylysine was added, and the suspension was kept for 1 min at 0°C. A detergent-spermidine-EDTA mixture was added, and the suspension was kept for 5 min at 37°C, during which time its turbidity decreased substantially as lysis proceeded. Applications of the polylysine-spermidine lysis procedure to exponential-phase cells and to chloramphenicol-treated cells of E. coli C600 are shown in Fig. 1 and 2, respectively. The top pictures in both figures are phase-contrast images used to visualize cells, cell ghosts, nucleoids, and larger debris; the bottom picture of each pair is a DAPI fluorescence image of the same microscope field used to show DNA localization. The characteristic dumbbell shape of the nucleoids in exponential-phase cells (15, 31) is illustrated in Fig. 1A, and the rounded nucleoids of chloramphenicol-treated cells (11, 17, 27, 32, 35) are shown in Fig. 2A.
|
|
|
Polycation effects. Three polycations, polylysine, lysozyme, and spermidine, are added in relatively large amounts in the polylysine-spermidine lysis procedure.
(i) Lysozyme. Lysozyme was required for cell lysis. Final concentrations in the lysates of between 5 and 50 µg of lysozyme/ml produced efficient lysis with all of the cell preparations used here. Other strains of E. coli, other species, or cells grown under other conditions may require different lysozyme exposures. The current procedure does not lyse stationary-phase cells; adaptation of the efficient technique of Witholt et al. (34) for spheroplast preparation from stationary-phase cells may be useful for such samples but has not been tested.
(ii) Spermidine.
The diffuse DNA released in the absence of
spermidine (Fig. 4B) may be contrasted
with the compact DNA in its presence (Fig. 4C). A stabilizing effect of
spermidine on isolated high-salt nucleoids was shown by Flink and
Pettijohn (7).
|
(iii) Polylysine. The concentration of polylysine present at the time of cell lysis was critical in determining the efficiency of lysis and the recovery of compact nucleoids. At low concentrations of polylysine (a final concentration of <0.2 mg/ml in the lysates), lysis released diffuse clouds of DNA (Fig. 4A); similar diffuse images were obtained for lysates of antibiotic-treated cells that were made in the absence of polylysine (data not shown). At ~0.3 to 0.8 mg of polylysine/ml, lysis released compact nucleoids (Fig. 4C). The efficiency of cell lysis decreased as the polylysine concentration increased. At polylysine concentrations of over 1.0 mg/ml, cells clumped and were not lysed (data not shown).
The mechanisms of the cation effects are certain to be complex. All three polycations presumably contribute to the compaction and stabilization of nucleoids by charge neutralization and cross-linking of DNA. The addition of polylysine (final concentration, 0.7 mg/ml) inhibited the activity of endogenous DNase in the lysates or added pancreatic DNase I (Zimmerman and Murphy, unpublished). Polycation effects on cell autolysins and/or membrane stability are also likely, given the strong stabilizing effects of both polylysine and spermidine on spheroplasts and protoplasts (30).Isolation of HCHO-fixed nucleoids from polylysine-spermidine
lysates.
The larger objects in the lysates could be quickly
separated from the bulk of released cytoplasmic materials and unbound
reagents by sedimentation through a layer of buffered 15%
sucrose. The free nucleoids, ghosts, and unlysed cells formed a
pellet which was readily resuspended without obvious changes in the
microscopic appearance of these materials. Attempts to separate the
released nucleoids from ghosts or unlysed cells by sucrose gradient
centrifugation of the redispersed pellets from the 15% sucrose step
gradient were partially successful. Preparations from either
exponential-phase or chloramphenicol-treated cell lysates gave
broad sedimentation zones (Fig. 5A
or B, respectively) in which the proportion of free nucleoids relative
to that of nucleoids in ghosts or unlysed cells was increased
severalfold (data not shown).
|
Lysates of cells exposed to nalidixate or rifampin.
Nalidixate
treatment caused most of the dividing cells to retain their DNA in a
distinctively shaped structure that was positioned on either side of
the demarcation between the dividing cells (Fig. 6A, upper panel). Such apparently
incompletely resolved structures were found in the
polylysine-spermidine lysates of these cells, both within cell
envelopes and as free bodies (Fig. 6A, lower panel).
|
Applications of the polylysine-spermidine lysis procedure. The long history of nucleoid isolation from E. coli (24, 25) suggests the importance ascribed to successful isolation procedures. The question becomes not only how to isolate a nucleoid that retains significant attributes of its cellular structure but how to determine if that has actually been accomplished. We have used morphology as a criterion. Nucleoids prepared by the polylysine-spermidine procedure retained the general nucleoid shapes that were present in the cells from which they came and had levels of DNA compaction similar to or greater than those in the cells. Such properties support the use of polylysine-spermidine nucleoids for a number of purposes.
(i) Structural studies. Both the released nucleoids and the ghost-enclosed nucleoids are stable, and their components are accessible to many structural probes. Their nucleic acids can be inventoried and probed with nucleases to test for repetitive structures. The presence or the absence of "histone-like" and other proteins will be of interest. Comparisons between nucleoids from exponential-phase cells and nucleoids from cells exposed to various antibiotics or nucleoids from mutants with mutations in various constituents of the nucleoid may provide structural insights. The well-defined images of the compact released nucleoids offer the possibility of viewing nucleoids during decompaction caused by a variety of modalities. Several treatments of nucleoids from chloramphenicol-treated cells appeared to cause an isometric expansion in a preliminary survey.
(ii) Gene localization. Nucleoids in polylysine-spermidine lysates may be useful in gene localization studies, such as those using fluorescence in situ hybridization or green fluorescent protein derivatives.
(iii) Characterization of unstable nucleoid configurations. The effects of polycations may be useful for the isolation of otherwise unstable nucleoids, as illustrated here with nucleoids of rifampin-treated cells.
(iv) Size and shape markers. The regular geometrical shapes of the released nucleoids, particularly those from chloramphenicol-treated cells, suggest their use as standard particles. The uniform particles present after SDS treatment of HCHO-fixed nucleoids may be useful in calibrations or tests of theories of sedimentation and in studies of the effects of morphological changes on transport or optical properties. Additional forms may be generated by variations in antibiotic exposure or by cross-linking.
(v) Nucleoid visualization. The nucleoids in polylysine-spermidine lysates, both released and retained within ghosts, are sharply defined and can be visualized in dilute media by phase-contrast microscopy. Even nucleoids within spheroplasts, such as those prepared by the method of Birdsell and Cota-Robles (2), but in the presence of polylysine are very clearly defined by phase-contrast microscopy (Zimmerman and Murphy, unpublished).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
The comments of Gary Felsenfeld, Martin Gellert, and J. L. Rosner are very much appreciated.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: National Institutes of Health, Building 5, Room 328W, Bethesda, MD 20892-0560. Phone: (301) 496-2208. Fax: (301) 496-0201. E-mail: stevenz{at}bdg5.niddk.nih.gov.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Åkerlund, T., R. Bernander, and K. Nordström. 1992. Cell division in Escherichia coli minB mutants. Mol. Microbiol. 6:2073-2083[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 2. |
Birdsell, D. C., and E. H. Cota-Robles.
1967.
Production and ultrastructure of lysozyme and ethylenediaminetetraacetate-lysozyme spheroplasts of Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
93:427-437 |
| 3. | Drlica, K., and A. J. Bendich. 2000. Chromosome, bacterial, p. 808-821. In J. Lederberg (ed.), Encyclopedia of microbiology, 2nd ed., vol. 1. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, Calif. |
| 4. |
Dworsky, P., and M. Schaechter.
1973.
Effect of rifampin on the structure and membrane attachment of the nucleoid of Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
116:1364-1374 |
| 5. | Dworsky, P. 1974. Einfluss von Inhibitoren der Protein- und Nucleinsäuresynthese auf die Gestalt des Nucleoids von Escherichia coli. Z. Allg. Mikrobiol. 14:3-28. |
| 6. | Dworsky, P. 1975. Unfolding of the chromosome of Escherichia coli after treatment with rifampicin. Z. Allg. Mikrobiol. 15:243-247[Medline]. |
| 7. | Flink, I., and D. E. Pettijohn. 1975. Polyamines stabilise DNA folds. Nature 253:62-63[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. |
Gellert, M.,
K. Mizuuchi,
M. H. O'Dea,
T. Itoh, and J. Tomizawa.
1977.
Nalidixic acid resistance: a second genetic character involved in DNA gyrase activity.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
74:4772-4776 |
| 9. | Godson, G. N. 1967. A technique of rapid lysis for the preparation of Escherichia coli polyribosomes. Methods Enzymol. 12A:503-516. |
| 10. | Hecht, R. M., R. T. Taggart, and D. E. Pettijohn. 1975. Size and DNA content of purified E. coli nucleoids observed by fluorescence microscopy. Nature 253:60-62[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 11. |
Kellenberger, E.,
A. Ryter, and J. Séchaud.
1958.
Electron microscope study of DNA-containing plasms. II. Vegetative and mature phage DNA as compared with normal bacterial nucleoids in different physiological states.
J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol.
4:671-678 |
| 12. | Kellenberger, E. 1960. The physical state of the bacterial nucleus. Symp. Soc. Gen. Microbiol. 10:39-66. |
| 13. |
Kornberg, T.,
A. Lockwood, and A. Worcel.
1974.
Replication of the Escherichia coli chromosome with a soluble enzyme system.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
71:3189-3193 |
| 14. |
Levin-Zaidman, S.,
D. Frenkiel-Krispin,
E. Shimoni,
I. Sabanay,
S. G. Wolf, and A. Minsky.
2000.
Ordered intracellular RecA-DNA assemblies: a potential site of in vivo RecA-mediated activities.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97:6791-6796 |
| 15. |
Mason, D. J., and D. M. Powelson.
1956.
Nuclear division as observed in live bacteria by a new technique.
J. Bacteriol.
71:474-479 |
| 16. | Meyer, M., M. A. De Jong, C. L. Woldringh, and N. Nanninga. 1976. Factors affecting the release of folded chromosomes from Escherichia coli. Eur. J. Biochem. 63:469-475[Medline]. |
| 17. |
Morgan, C.,
H. S. Rosenkranz,
H. S. Carr, and H. M. Rose.
1967.
Electron microscopy of chloramphenicol-treated Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
93:1987-2002 |
| 18. | Murphy, L. D., and S. B. Zimmerman. 1997. Isolation and characterization of spermidine nucleoids from Escherichia coli. J. Struct. Biol. 119:321-335[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 19. | Murphy, L. D., and S. B. Zimmerman. 1997. Stabilization of compact spermidine nucleoids from Escherichia coli under crowded conditions: implications for in vivo nucleoid structure. J. Struct. Biol. 119:336-346[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 20. | Murphy, L. D., and S. B. Zimmerman. 2000. Multiple restraints to the unfolding of spermidine nucleoids from Escherichia coli. J. Struct. Biol. 132:46-62[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 21. | Murphy, L. D., and S. B. Zimmerman. 2001. A limited loss of DNA compaction accompanying the release of cytoplasm from cells of Escherichia coli. J. Struct. Biol. 133:75-86[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 22. | Murray, R. G. E., R. N. Doetsch, and C. F. Robinow. 1994. Determinative and cytological light microscopy, p. 26. In P. Gerhardt, et al. (ed.), Methods for general and molecular bacteriology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. |
| 23. | Pettijohn, D. E., and R. Hecht. 1973. RNA molecules bound to the folded bacterial genome stabilize DNA folds and segregate domains of supercoiling. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 38:31-41. |
| 24. | Pettijohn, D. E. 1976. Prokaryotic DNA in nucleoid structure. Crit. Rev. Biochem. 4:175-202[Medline]. |
| 25. | Pettijohn, D. E. 1996. The nucleoid, p. 158-166. In F. C. Neidhardt, et al. (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed., vol. 1. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. |
| 26. | Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed., vol. 3. , p. A.1. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 27. |
Schaechter, M., and V. O. Laing.
1961.
Direct observation of fusion of bacterial nuclei.
J. Bacteriol.
81:667-668 |
| 28. | Steck, T. R., and K. Drlica. 1984. Bacterial chromosome segregation: evidence for DNA gyrase involvement in decatenation. Cell 36:1081-1088[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 29. |
Sugino, A.,
C. L. Peebles,
K. N. Kreuzer, and N. R. Cozzarelli.
1977.
Mechanism of action of nalidixic acid: purification of Escherichia coli nalA gene product and its relationship to DNA gyrase and a novel nicking-closing enzyme.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
74:4767-4771 |
| 30. |
Tabor, C. W.
1962.
Stabilization of protoplasts and spheroplasts by spermine and other polyamines.
J. Bacteriol.
83:1101-1111 |
| 31. |
Valkenburg, J. A. C.,
C. L. Woldringh,
G. J. Brakenhoff,
H. T. M. van der Voort, and N. Nanninga.
1985.
Confocal scanning light microscopy of the Escherichia coli nucleoid: comparison with phase-contrast and electron microscope images.
J. Bacteriol.
161:478-483 |
| 32. |
Van Helvoort, J. M. L. M.,
J. Kool, and C. L. Woldringh.
1996.
Chloramphenicol causes fusion of separated nucleoids in Escherichia coli K-12 cells and filaments.
J. Bacteriol.
178:4289-4293 |
| 33. | Van Ness, J., and D. E. Pettijohn. 1979. A simple autoradiographic method for investigating long range chromosome substructure: size and number of DNA molecules in isolated nucleoids of Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 129:501-508[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 34. | Witholt, B., M. Boekhout, M. Brock, J. Kingma, H. van Heerikhuizen, and L. de Leij. 1976. An efficient and reproducible procedure for the formation of spheroplasts from variously grown Escherichia coli. Anal. Biochem. 74:160-170[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 35. |
Woldringh, C. L., and N. Nanninga.
1976.
Organization of the nucleoplasm in Escherichia coli visualized by phase-contrast light microscopy, freeze fracturing, and thin sectioning.
J. Bacteriol.
127:1455-1464 |
| 36. | Woldringh, C. L., and N. Nanninga. 1985. Structure of nucleoid and cytoplasm in the intact cell, p. 161-197. In N. Nanninga (ed.), Molecular cytology of Escherichia coli. Academic Press Ltd., London, England. |
| 37. | Woldringh, C. L., P. R. Jensen, and H. V. Westerhoff. 1995. Structure and partitioning of bacterial DNA: determined by a balance of compaction and expansion forces? FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 131:235-242[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 38. | Woldringh, C. L., and T. Odijk. 1999. Structure of DNA within the bacterial cell: physics and physiology, p. 171-187. In R. L. Charlebois (ed.), Organization of the prokaryotic genome. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. |
| 39. | Worcel, A., and E. Burgi. 1972. On the structure of the folded chromosome of Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 71:127-147[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 40. | Zimmerman, S. B., and L. D. Murphy. 1996. Macromolecular crowding and the mandatory condensation of DNA in bacteria. FEBS Lett. 390:245-248[CrossRef][Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Appl. Environ. Microbiol. | Infect. Immun. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|---|---|
| Mol. Cell. Biol. | J. Virol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. |
| ALL ASM JOURNALS |