Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, September 2001, p. 5041-5049, Vol. 183, No. 17
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.17.5041-5049.2001
Release of Compact Nucleoids with
Characteristic Shapes from Escherichia
coli
Steven B.
Zimmerman* and
Lizabeth D.
Murphy
Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National
Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National
Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-0560
Received 18 April 2001/Accepted 1 June 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The genomic DNA of bacteria is contained in one or a few compact
bodies known as nucleoids. We describe a simple procedure that retains
the general shape and compaction of nucleoids from Escherichia
coli upon cell lysis and nucleoid release from the cell
envelope. The procedure is a modification of that used for the
preparation of spermidine nucleoids (nucleoids released in the presence
of spermidine) (T. Kornberg, A. Lockwood, and A. Worcel, Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 71:3189-3193, 1974). Polylysine is added to
prevent the normal decompaction of nucleoids which occurs upon cell
lysis. Nucleoids retained their characteristic shapes in lysates of
exponential-phase cells or in lysates of cells treated with
chloramphenicol or nalidixate to alter nucleoid morphology. The notably
unstable nucleoids of rifampin-treated cells were obtained in compact,
stable form in such lysates. Nucleoids released in the presence of
polylysine were easily processed and provided well-defined DNA
fluorescence and phase-contrast images. Uniform populations of
nucleoids retaining characteristic shapes could be isolated after
formaldehyde fixation and heating with sodium dodecyl sulfate.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The genomic DNA of Escherichia
coli is localized in one or two compact bodies, known as
nucleoids, per cell (3, 15, 31, 36, 38, 40). There have
been many attempts to isolate representative nucleoids outside of cells
(24, 25). However, the various DNA-containing structures
that have been isolated generally have failed to meet this goal in two
important ways. First, the nucleoid DNA underwent the partial
decompaction that is associated with cell lysis (21).
Second, large amounts of residual envelope remained with the nucleoid
DNA, so that many such preparations are more accurately described as
lysed or broken cell preparations than as isolated nucleoids (see
footnote 6 of reference 20).
Evaluation of the released nucleoids is made difficult by a lack of
information on the structure of the original nucleoids within cells.
Here we use retention of the general shape of nucleoids in initial
cells as a criterion for evaluation of a new procedure for nucleoid
isolation. There have been few reports on the shapes of isolated
nucleoids; the doublet-shaped high-salt nucleoids (nucleoids released
in the presence of high salt concentrations) described by Hecht et al.
(10) and Van Ness and Pettijohn (33) and the
large DNA double structure found in high-salt nucleoids of a DNA gyrase
mutant by Steck and Drlica (28) are the only instances of
which we are aware.
We have used the distinctively shaped nucleoids formed in cells that
have been exposed to antibiotics (4, 5, 11, 12) as test
objects. The three antibiotics used here, chloramphenicol, nalidixate,
and rifampin, all promote the coalescence of nucleoids in cells and can
cause changes in nucleoid morphology and stability:
The nucleoid coalescence caused by chloramphenicol (17,
32) has been attributed to a loss of cotranslational insertion linkages between the DNA and the cell envelope when protein synthesis is inhibited; the loss of these expanding forces then presumably allows
coalescence and fuller compaction caused by the opposing cellular
forces (37, 40). The stable, round shape of nucleoids in
chloramphenicol-treated cells (11, 17, 27, 32, 35) provides structures that can be readily identified by light microscopy. In addition, nucleoids from chloramphenicol-treated cells are unusually
stable (20, 21), further adding to their utility as test objects.
Nalidixate treatment can cause the nucleoids within cells to form
elongated, crystalline bodies (14). Nalidixate is an
inhibitor of DNA gyrase (8, 29); presumably for this
reason, nalidixate-treated cells often contain nucleoids which have
failed to segregate properly (28). The resulting
DNA-containing structures provide distinctive test objects.
Rifampin causes two opposing effects. Cellular nucleoids are
transformed into compact axial rods (4). In contrast to
this form within cells, nucleoids removed from rifampin-treated cells have such a strong tendency to unfold (6, 23) that
isolation of compact nucleoids from rifampin-treated cells is a test in itself for the nucleoid isolation procedure.
In the following study, we describe conditions which released compact
nucleoids with characteristic cellular shapes. The conditions were
derived from the effects of polylysine on nucleoid unfolding that were
noted briefly in an earlier study (21). It is anticipated that preparations of compact nucleoids will have applications in
studies of nucleoid structure and segregation and in gene localization.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Materials.
Low-gelling temperature agarose (type VII),
chloramphenicol, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI),
crystallized chicken egg white lysozyme (EC 3.2.1.17), E. coli DNA, sodium deoxycholate, spermidine · 3HCl, Brij 58 (polyoxyethylene 20 cetyl ether), rifampin, sodium nalidixate,
sucrose, and poly-L-lysine (molecular
weight,~9,000) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co.; diethylmalonic
acid (98%) was purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co.
Cell growth and antibiotic treatments.
Exponential-phase
E. coli K-12 C600 was grown at 37°C in 180 ml of
Luria-Bertani medium (26) in a 500-ml Erlenmeyer
flask in a rotary shaker (New Brunswick G-25D; 275 rpm). The DNA of the
cells was fluorescently labeled (1) by addition of 0.5 µg of DAPI/ml at an A600 of 0.17. At
an A600 of ~0.5, the culture was
chilled by swirling the flask in ice-water for 5 min, and the
absorbance of the chilled culture was measured. Aliquots of chilled
culture equal to 27.6 ml × (0.5/A600) were centrifuged for 10 min
at 10,000 × g and 3°C, and each pellet was
resuspended at 0°C in 0.5 ml of 20% sucrose-0.1 M NaCl-10 mM
Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.1). The resuspended cells were immediately lysed
to minimize autolytic changes (9). Cells for treatment
with antibiotics were grown and prelabeled with DAPI as described
above. Chloramphenicol (final concentration, 30 µg/ml), sodium
nalidixate (40 µg/ml), or rifampin (40 µg/ml) was added at an
A600 of 0.25, and shaking at 37°C
was continued for 1 h before the cells were harvested and
resuspended as described above.
Polylysine-spermidine lysis procedure.
Resuspended cells (1 volume) were incubated for 1 min at 0°C with 1/5 volume of a solution
containing 120 mM Tris · HCl buffer (pH 8.1), 50 mM sodium EDTA
(pH 7), and 400 µg of lysozyme/ml; a lower lysozyme concentration in
the same medium was used in some experiments. Polylysine (1/5 volume of
an aqueous solution of 5 mg of poly-L-lysine · HBr/ml; molecular weight, ~9,000) was then added. After incubation
for 1 min at 0°C, 1/5 volume of 1% Brij 58-0.4% sodium
deoxycholate-10 mM sodium EDTA (pH 7)-10 mM spermidine · 3HCl
was added. The turbid mixture was incubated for 5 min at 37°C and
rechilled. The partially clarified lysate was stored at 5°C. Lysates
prepared with or without polylysine had a pH of about 6.2 to 6.7.
Large cellular components in the lysate, i.e., released nucleoids and
lysed and unlysed cells, were separated from the excess reagents used
in the lysis procedure and from released cytoplasmic materials by
centrifugation through a layer of buffered sucrose. Lysate (1.5 ml) was
layered over 8 ml of 15% sucrose in solution A (20 mM sodium
diethylmalonate buffer [pH 7.1], 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM
-mercaptoethanol) and centrifuged for 20 min at 10,000 × g (8,000 rpm) in a swinging-bucket rotor (HB-4 rotor,
Sorvall) at 3°C. The pellet was resuspended in 500 µl of 15%
sucrose in solution A by trituration and gentle agitation over a period
of several minutes, yielding a nonviscous, opalescent mixture.
Sucrose gradient centrifugation of SDS-treated, HCHO-fixed
samples.
Relatively homogeneous suspensions of nucleoids were
isolated from formaldehyde (HCHO)-fixed preparations that had been
treated with sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). The resuspended pellet
described above was fixed in 2% HCHO for 1 h at 0°C and kept
for
1 day at 5°C. SDS (3%) was added, and the samples were heated
for 30 min at 50°C, chilled, and stored at 5°C. Precipitated SDS
which formed at lower temperatures was redissolved by brief warming to
room temperature, and samples of 0.95 ml were layered over sucrose
gradients (gradient volume, 10.0 ml; 15 to 30% sucrose in solution A).
After centrifugation for 15 min at 5,000 rpm in a swinging-bucket rotor
(SW40 rotor; Beckman) at 5°C, fractions were collected by piercing
the bottoms of the tubes and allowing the contents to drip into tared
tubes; fraction volumes were calculated from fraction weights and
solution densities of control gradients. Fractions were analyzed for
DNA by fluorometry; aliquots (0.5 ml; containing
2 µg of DNA
diluted in 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer [pH 7.4]-0.01% SDS) were
mixed with 1.0 ml of 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4)-0.15 µg
of DAPI/ml, and their fluorescence was measured with a Hoefer DynaQuant
200 fluorometer with a cuvette (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) using
E. coli DNA as the standard.
Light microscopy.
Samples of 3 to 5 µl were added to glass
slides and briefly mixed by use of a pipette tip with an equal volume
of 2% low-gelling-temperature agarose
20 mM sodium diethylmalonate
buffer (pH 7.1) that had been liquefied and equilibrated to 37°C.
Coverslips were immediately added and fixed in place with Vaspar
(22) applied along the edges. The slides were monitored by
phase-contrast microscopy; DNA (DAPI) fluorescence or combined
phase-contrast and DNA fluorescence exposures were made at intervals.
A Zeiss Axioskop microscope (model 20 with a 100-W mercury arc) with
phase-contrast and epifluorescence optics and Zeiss filter
set 02 (for
DAPI images) was used with a Snappy video capture
device (Play Inc.)
for images from a Panasonic color digital camera
(model GP-KR222). A
Sony color video monitor (model PVM 14N2U)
was used for image
selection.
Electron microscopy.
Samples for electron microscopy were
fixed with an equal volume of buffered 4% HCHO-1% glutaraldehyde
(fixative solution) for 1 h at 0°C and centrifuged for 10 min at
12,000 × g and 3°C, and the pellets were stored in
fresh aliquots of fixative solution. Subsequent steps were carried out
at Paragon Bioservices, Inc., Baltimore, Md. Pellets were postfixed in
buffered OsO4 for 1 h; after embedding was
done with epoxy resin, sections of ~70 nm were stained first with 2%
uranyl acetate and then with 0.2% lead citrate and examined in a Zeiss
electron microscope (model 10C).
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Polylysine-spermidine lysis procedure for nucleoid release.
The polylysine-spermidine lysis procedure is based upon the ability of
polylysine to prevent nucleoid decompaction upon cell lysis
(21). The procedure incorporates the detergent lysis
protocol described by Kornberg et al. (13) with two
important modifications. First, polylysine was added before lysis in
order to retain nucleoid shape. Second, the temperature of the
detergent lysis step was increased from 10°C to 37°C to promote
increased release of nucleoids from the residual cell envelope. The
increased release at the higher temperature may result from more
effective detergent action on membranes (16) and/or
increased autolytic effects.
The lysis procedure is rapid. The cells, generally prelabeled with
DAPI, were resuspended at 0°C in a medium causing limited
plasmolysis. After treatment for 1 min at 0°C with egg white
lysozyme,
polylysine was added, and the suspension was kept for 1 min
at
0°C. A detergent-spermidine-EDTA mixture was added, and the
suspension
was kept for 5 min at 37°C, during which time its
turbidity decreased
substantially as lysis
proceeded.
Applications of the polylysine-spermidine lysis procedure to
exponential-phase cells and to chloramphenicol-treated cells
of
E. coli C600 are shown in Fig.
1 and
2, respectively. The top
pictures in
both figures are phase-contrast images used to visualize
cells, cell
ghosts, nucleoids, and larger debris; the bottom picture
of each pair
is a DAPI fluorescence image of the same microscope
field used to show
DNA localization. The characteristic dumbbell
shape of the nucleoids in
exponential-phase cells (
15,
31)
is illustrated in Fig.
1A, and the rounded nucleoids of chloramphenicol-treated
cells
(
11,
17,
27,
32,
35) are shown in Fig.
2A.


View larger version (186K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Comparison by light microscopy of exponential-phase
E. coli cells with a polylysine-spermidine lysate of
those cells and with nucleoids isolated from the lysate. (Upper
panels) Phase-contrast images. (Lower panels) DNA fluorescence images
of the same fields. The color of fluorescence images is
inverted. (A) Exponential-phase cells of E. coli.
(B) Polylysine-spermidine lysate of exponential-phase cells. (C)
SDS-treated, HCHO-fixed nucleoids isolated by sucrose gradient
centrifugation from the lysate used in panel B. See Fig. 5A for
fractions pooled. Bar, 5 µm.
|
|


View larger version (191K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Comparison by light microscopy of
chloramphenicol-treated E. coli cells with a
polylysine-spermidine lysate of those cells and with nucleoids isolated
from the lysate. (Upper panels) Phase-contrast images. (Lower panels)
DNA fluorescence images of the same fields. The color of fluorescence
images is inverted. (A) Chloramphenicol-treated cells of E.
coli. (B) Polylysine-spermidine lysate of
chloramphenicol-treated cells. (C) SDS-treated, HCHO-fixed nucleoids
isolated by sucrose gradient centrifugation from the lysate used in
panel B. See Fig. 5B for fractions pooled. Bar, 5 µm.
|
|
Lysates of exponential-phase cells and chloramphenicol-treated cells
are shown in Fig.
1B and
2B, respectively. About 20 to
80% of the cell
nucleoids were released from cell envelope material
in such
preparations; the remaining nucleoids were within cell
ghosts or in the
small fraction of unlysed cells. Characteristic
shapes of the nucleoids
within the cells were preserved upon lysis,
both for the nucleoids
released from cell envelopes and for those
retained within cell
ghosts.
The nucleoids in lysates of exponential-phase cells appeared to be more
compact than the nucleoids within the corresponding
cells (Fig.
1A
versus 1B). In contrast, the sizes of the nucleoids
in lysates of
chloramphenicol-treated cells were similar to those
of the cellular
nucleoids from which they came (Fig.
2A versus
2B), possibly because of
their already higher degree of compaction
due to antibiotic
exposure.
Retention of nucleoid size and shape after lysis of
chloramphenicol-treated cells was also seen by electron microscopy.
Thin
sections of pellets of chloramphenicol-treated cells and from
a
lysate of those cells are shown in Fig.
3A and B, respectively;
the shapes and
dimensions of the nucleoids released from chloramphenicol-treated
cells
were similar to those of the nucleoid voids in the sections
of the
cells. Images of the rounded nucleoids formed in response
to
chloramphenicol in both Fig.
2 and
3 suggested a puckered toroidal
model for the chloramphenicol-treated nucleoid, as if the round
shape
of the nucleoid had been distorted to fit within the cell.
Such a model
has not been proposed previously, to our knowledge,
and is being
further evaluated.

View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Electron microscopy of chloramphenicol-treated E.
coli cells and a polylysine-spermidine lysate of those cells.
Shown are thin sections of pellets obtained from
chloramphenicol-treated cells (A) or from a polylysine-spermidine
lysate of those cells (B). Bar, 2 µm. (Inset) Threefold-higher
magnification.
|
|
Nucleoids in lysates of exponential-phase cells were stable for at
least several days at 5°C and could be transferred by pipette,
mixed
by swirling, and so forth without noticeable changes in
their
appearance. Some preparations slowly accumulated aggregates,
suggesting
that some unfolding was occurring (
18). The stability
and
ease of manipulation of these preparations are in contrast
to the
extreme lability of high-salt nucleoid preparations (
39)
or, to a lesser extent, of spermidine nucleoid preparations (
18,
19).
Nucleoids that had been sedimented through a sucrose cushion were
further tested for stability and sensitivity to several
agents.
Nucleoids from chloramphenicol-treated cells were very
stable,
appearing unchanged after 7 weeks at 5°C or after heating
for 5 min
at 65°C; characteristic round shapes were present after
5 min at
100°C. Nucleoids from both exponential-phase cells and
chloramphenicol-treated cells were degraded by pancreatic DNase
and
extensively unfolded in the presence of trypsin or at high
NaCl
concentrations. Pancreatic RNase had no obvious effect on
nucleoid
morphology (S. B. Zimmerman and L. D. Murphy, unpublished
data).
Polycation effects.
Three polycations, polylysine, lysozyme,
and spermidine, are added in relatively large amounts in the
polylysine-spermidine lysis procedure.
(i) Lysozyme.
Lysozyme was required for cell lysis. Final
concentrations in the lysates of between 5 and 50 µg of lysozyme/ml
produced efficient lysis with all of the cell preparations used here.
Other strains of E. coli, other species, or cells grown
under other conditions may require different lysozyme exposures. The
current procedure does not lyse stationary-phase cells; adaptation of
the efficient technique of Witholt et al. (34) for
spheroplast preparation from stationary-phase cells may be useful for
such samples but has not been tested.
(ii) Spermidine.
The diffuse DNA released in the absence of
spermidine (Fig. 4B) may be contrasted
with the compact DNA in its presence (Fig. 4C). A stabilizing effect of
spermidine on isolated high-salt nucleoids was shown by Flink and
Pettijohn (7).

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Effects of polylysine and spermidine on lysis of
exponential-phase E. coli. Lysates were prepared from
exponential-phase E. coli using 0.34 mg of polylysine/ml
as described in Materials and Methods except polylysine omitted (A),
spermidine omitted (B), or no omissions (C). Bar, 5 µm. Simultaneous
phase-contrast and DNA fluorescence images are shown without color
inversion to emphasize the diffuse DNA fluorescence in panels A and
B.
|
|
(iii) Polylysine.
The concentration of polylysine present at
the time of cell lysis was critical in determining the efficiency of
lysis and the recovery of compact nucleoids. At low concentrations of
polylysine (a final concentration of <0.2 mg/ml in the lysates), lysis
released diffuse clouds of DNA (Fig. 4A); similar diffuse images were
obtained for lysates of antibiotic-treated cells that were made in the absence of polylysine (data not shown). At ~0.3 to 0.8 mg of
polylysine/ml, lysis released compact nucleoids (Fig. 4C). The
efficiency of cell lysis decreased as the polylysine concentration
increased. At polylysine concentrations of over 1.0 mg/ml, cells
clumped and were not lysed (data not shown).
The mechanisms of the cation effects are certain to be complex. All
three polycations presumably contribute to the compaction
and
stabilization of nucleoids by charge neutralization and cross-linking
of DNA. The addition of polylysine (final concentration, 0.7 mg/ml)
inhibited the activity of endogenous DNase in the lysates or added
pancreatic DNase I (Zimmerman and Murphy, unpublished). Polycation
effects on cell autolysins and/or membrane stability are also
likely,
given the strong stabilizing effects of both polylysine
and spermidine
on spheroplasts and protoplasts (
30).
Isolation of HCHO-fixed nucleoids from polylysine-spermidine
lysates.
The larger objects in the lysates could be quickly
separated from the bulk of released cytoplasmic materials and unbound
reagents by sedimentation through a layer of buffered 15%
sucrose. The free nucleoids, ghosts, and unlysed cells formed a
pellet which was readily resuspended without obvious changes in the
microscopic appearance of these materials. Attempts to separate the
released nucleoids from ghosts or unlysed cells by sucrose gradient
centrifugation of the redispersed pellets from the 15% sucrose step
gradient were partially successful. Preparations from either
exponential-phase or chloramphenicol-treated cell lysates gave
broad sedimentation zones (Fig. 5A
or B, respectively) in which the proportion of free nucleoids relative
to that of nucleoids in ghosts or unlysed cells was increased
severalfold (data not shown).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Sucrose gradient centrifugation of polylysine-spermidine
lysates of exponential-phase or chloramphenicol-treated E.
coli. Samples applied to the gradients were prepared by
centrifugation of polylysine-spermidine lysates through buffered 15%
sucrose; pellets were redispersed and fixed with HCHO as described in
Materials and Methods (solid lines). Broken lines represent samples
that were further incubated in 3% SDS for 30 min at 50°C before
application to the gradients; the two broken lines in panel A are
duplicate samples. (A) Samples from a lysate of exponential-phase cells
(prepared with a final concentration of 5 µg of lysozyme/ml in the
lysate); 360 µg of DNA was added to the gradient. (B) Samples from a
lysate of chloramphenicol-treated cells; 530 µg of DNA was added to
gradient. Horizontal bars indicate the fractions pooled (from the
samples shown by the broken lines) that were used for Fig. 1C and 2C,
respectively.
|
|
Relatively homogeneous preparations of isolated nucleoids that were
microscopically free of envelope materials could be easily
obtained
from either exponential-phase cells or chloramphenicol-treated
cells by
use of HCHO-fixed polylysine-spermidine lysates. HCHO-fixed
nucleoids
were remarkably stable to exposure to SDS, retaining
their shape and
compaction after heating for 30 min at 50°C in
3% SDS; this
treatment solubilized virtually all of the visible
envelope remnants in
HCHO-fixed lysates. In contrast, SDS exposure
of unfixed nucleoids led
to their immediate unfolding, accompanied
by an enormous increase in
viscosity.
Sucrose gradient centrifugation profiles of heated, SDS-treated,
HCHO-fixed material from exponential-phase cells and
chloramphenicol-treated
cells are shown in Fig.
5A and B, respectively.
About 10 to 30%
of the nucleoids applied to the gradients could be
recovered in
fractions which retained the unaggregated, characteristic
shapes
shown in Fig.
1C and
2C, respectively. Many of the remaining
nucleoids
in the gradients appeared to be aggregates of the same
characteristic
units.
Lysates of cells exposed to nalidixate or rifampin.
Nalidixate
treatment caused most of the dividing cells to retain their DNA in a
distinctively shaped structure that was positioned on either side of
the demarcation between the dividing cells (Fig. 6A, upper panel). Such apparently
incompletely resolved structures were found in the
polylysine-spermidine lysates of these cells, both within cell
envelopes and as free bodies (Fig. 6A, lower panel).

View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Comparison by light microscopy of rifampin- or
nalidixate-treated E. coli cells with components of
polylysine-spermidine lysates of those cells. (A) Nalidixate treatment.
(B) Rifampin treatment. (Upper panels) Cells after antibiotic
exposures. (Lower panels) Selected images from lysates of those cells.
Images are simultaneous phase-contrast and DNA fluorescence exposures
shown with inverted color. Bar, 5 µm.
|
|
Rifampin-treated cells were tested because of the instability of their
nucleoids upon cell lysis under previous protocols
(
6,
23). The compact nucleoids of rifampin-treated cells
(Fig.
6B,
upper panel) were, indeed, recovered as compact bodies
in
polylysine-spermidine lysates of these cells, again occurring
in part
within cell envelopes and in part as free nucleoids (Fig.
6B, lower
panel).
Applications of the polylysine-spermidine lysis procedure.
The
long history of nucleoid isolation from E. coli (24,
25) suggests the importance ascribed to successful isolation procedures. The question becomes not only how to isolate a nucleoid that retains significant attributes of its cellular structure but how
to determine if that has actually been accomplished. We have used
morphology as a criterion. Nucleoids prepared by the polylysine-spermidine procedure retained the general nucleoid shapes
that were present in the cells from which they came and had levels of
DNA compaction similar to or greater than those in the cells. Such
properties support the use of polylysine-spermidine nucleoids for a
number of purposes.
(i) Structural studies.
Both the released nucleoids and the
ghost-enclosed nucleoids are stable, and their components are
accessible to many structural probes. Their nucleic acids can be
inventoried and probed with nucleases to test for repetitive
structures. The presence or the absence of "histone-like" and
other proteins will be of interest. Comparisons between
nucleoids from exponential-phase cells and nucleoids from
cells exposed to various antibiotics or nucleoids from mutants with
mutations in various constituents of the nucleoid may provide
structural insights. The well-defined images of the compact released
nucleoids offer the possibility of viewing nucleoids during
decompaction caused by a variety of modalities. Several treatments of
nucleoids from chloramphenicol-treated cells appeared to cause
an isometric expansion in a preliminary survey.
(ii) Gene localization.
Nucleoids in polylysine-spermidine
lysates may be useful in gene localization studies, such as those using
fluorescence in situ hybridization or green fluorescent protein derivatives.
(iii) Characterization of unstable nucleoid configurations.
The effects of polycations may be useful for the isolation of otherwise
unstable nucleoids, as illustrated here with nucleoids of
rifampin-treated cells.
(iv) Size and shape markers.
The regular geometrical shapes of
the released nucleoids, particularly those from chloramphenicol-treated
cells, suggest their use as standard particles. The uniform particles
present after SDS treatment of HCHO-fixed nucleoids may be useful in
calibrations or tests of theories of sedimentation and in studies of
the effects of morphological changes on transport or optical
properties. Additional forms may be generated by variations in
antibiotic exposure or by cross-linking.
(v) Nucleoid visualization.
The nucleoids in
polylysine-spermidine lysates, both released and retained within
ghosts, are sharply defined and can be visualized in dilute media by
phase-contrast microscopy. Even nucleoids within spheroplasts, such as
those prepared by the method of Birdsell and Cota-Robles
(2), but in the presence of polylysine are very clearly
defined by phase-contrast microscopy (Zimmerman and Murphy, unpublished).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
The comments of Gary Felsenfeld, Martin Gellert, and J. L. Rosner are very much appreciated.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: National
Institutes of Health, Building 5, Room 328W, Bethesda, MD 20892-0560. Phone: (301) 496-2208. Fax: (301) 496-0201. E-mail:
stevenz{at}bdg5.niddk.nih.gov.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Åkerlund, T.,
R. Bernander, and K. Nordström.
1992.
Cell division in Escherichia coli minB mutants.
Mol. Microbiol.
6:2073-2083[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Birdsell, D. C., and E. H. Cota-Robles.
1967.
Production and ultrastructure of lysozyme and ethylenediaminetetraacetate-lysozyme spheroplasts of Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
93:427-437[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Drlica, K., and A. J. Bendich.
2000.
Chromosome, bacterial, p. 808-821.
In
J. Lederberg (ed.), Encyclopedia of microbiology, 2nd ed., vol. 1. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, Calif.
|
| 4.
|
Dworsky, P., and M. Schaechter.
1973.
Effect of rifampin on the structure and membrane attachment of the nucleoid of Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
116:1364-1374[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Dworsky, P.
1974.
Einfluss von Inhibitoren der Protein- und Nucleinsäuresynthese auf die Gestalt des Nucleoids von Escherichia coli.
Z. Allg. Mikrobiol.
14:3-28.
|
| 6.
|
Dworsky, P.
1975.
Unfolding of the chromosome of Escherichia coli after treatment with rifampicin.
Z. Allg. Mikrobiol.
15:243-247[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Flink, I., and D. E. Pettijohn.
1975.
Polyamines stabilise DNA folds.
Nature
253:62-63[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Gellert, M.,
K. Mizuuchi,
M. H. O'Dea,
T. Itoh, and J. Tomizawa.
1977.
Nalidixic acid resistance: a second genetic character involved in DNA gyrase activity.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
74:4772-4776[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Godson, G. N.
1967.
A technique of rapid lysis for the preparation of Escherichia coli polyribosomes.
Methods Enzymol.
12A:503-516.
|
| 10.
|
Hecht, R. M.,
R. T. Taggart, and D. E. Pettijohn.
1975.
Size and DNA content of purified E. coli nucleoids observed by fluorescence microscopy.
Nature
253:60-62[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Kellenberger, E.,
A. Ryter, and J. Séchaud.
1958.
Electron microscope study of DNA-containing plasms. II. Vegetative and mature phage DNA as compared with normal bacterial nucleoids in different physiological states.
J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol.
4:671-678[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Kellenberger, E.
1960.
The physical state of the bacterial nucleus.
Symp. Soc. Gen. Microbiol.
10:39-66.
|
| 13.
|
Kornberg, T.,
A. Lockwood, and A. Worcel.
1974.
Replication of the Escherichia coli chromosome with a soluble enzyme system.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
71:3189-3193[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Levin-Zaidman, S.,
D. Frenkiel-Krispin,
E. Shimoni,
I. Sabanay,
S. G. Wolf, and A. Minsky.
2000.
Ordered intracellular RecA-DNA assemblies: a potential site of in vivo RecA-mediated activities.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97:6791-6796[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Mason, D. J., and D. M. Powelson.
1956.
Nuclear division as observed in live bacteria by a new technique.
J. Bacteriol.
71:474-479[Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Meyer, M.,
M. A. De Jong,
C. L. Woldringh, and N. Nanninga.
1976.
Factors affecting the release of folded chromosomes from Escherichia coli.
Eur. J. Biochem.
63:469-475[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Morgan, C.,
H. S. Rosenkranz,
H. S. Carr, and H. M. Rose.
1967.
Electron microscopy of chloramphenicol-treated Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
93:1987-2002[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Murphy, L. D., and S. B. Zimmerman.
1997.
Isolation and characterization of spermidine nucleoids from Escherichia coli.
J. Struct. Biol.
119:321-335[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Murphy, L. D., and S. B. Zimmerman.
1997.
Stabilization of compact spermidine nucleoids from Escherichia coli under crowded conditions: implications for in vivo nucleoid structure.
J. Struct. Biol.
119:336-346[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Murphy, L. D., and S. B. Zimmerman.
2000.
Multiple restraints to the unfolding of spermidine nucleoids from Escherichia coli.
J. Struct. Biol.
132:46-62[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Murphy, L. D., and S. B. Zimmerman.
2001.
A limited loss of DNA compaction accompanying the release of cytoplasm from cells of Escherichia coli.
J. Struct. Biol.
133:75-86[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Murray, R. G. E.,
R. N. Doetsch, and C. F. Robinow.
1994.
Determinative and cytological light microscopy, p. 26.
In
P. Gerhardt, et al. (ed.), Methods for general and molecular bacteriology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 23.
|
Pettijohn, D. E., and R. Hecht.
1973.
RNA molecules bound to the folded bacterial genome stabilize DNA folds and segregate domains of supercoiling.
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.
38:31-41.
|
| 24.
|
Pettijohn, D. E.
1976.
Prokaryotic DNA in nucleoid structure.
Crit. Rev. Biochem.
4:175-202[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Pettijohn, D. E.
1996.
The nucleoid, p. 158-166.
In
F. C. Neidhardt, et al. (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed., vol. 1. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 26.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed., vol. 3. , p. A.1.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 27.
|
Schaechter, M., and V. O. Laing.
1961.
Direct observation of fusion of bacterial nuclei.
J. Bacteriol.
81:667-668[Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Steck, T. R., and K. Drlica.
1984.
Bacterial chromosome segregation: evidence for DNA gyrase involvement in decatenation.
Cell
36:1081-1088[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Sugino, A.,
C. L. Peebles,
K. N. Kreuzer, and N. R. Cozzarelli.
1977.
Mechanism of action of nalidixic acid: purification of Escherichia coli nalA gene product and its relationship to DNA gyrase and a novel nicking-closing enzyme.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
74:4767-4771[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Tabor, C. W.
1962.
Stabilization of protoplasts and spheroplasts by spermine and other polyamines.
J. Bacteriol.
83:1101-1111[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Valkenburg, J. A. C.,
C. L. Woldringh,
G. J. Brakenhoff,
H. T. M. van der Voort, and N. Nanninga.
1985.
Confocal scanning light microscopy of the Escherichia coli nucleoid: comparison with phase-contrast and electron microscope images.
J. Bacteriol.
161:478-483[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Van Helvoort, J. M. L. M.,
J. Kool, and C. L. Woldringh.
1996.
Chloramphenicol causes fusion of separated nucleoids in Escherichia coli K-12 cells and filaments.
J. Bacteriol.
178:4289-4293[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Van Ness, J., and D. E. Pettijohn.
1979.
A simple autoradiographic method for investigating long range chromosome substructure: size and number of DNA molecules in isolated nucleoids of Escherichia coli.
J. Mol. Biol.
129:501-508[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Witholt, B.,
M. Boekhout,
M. Brock,
J. Kingma,
H. van Heerikhuizen, and L. de Leij.
1976.
An efficient and reproducible procedure for the formation of spheroplasts from variously grown Escherichia coli.
Anal. Biochem.
74:160-170[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Woldringh, C. L., and N. Nanninga.
1976.
Organization of the nucleoplasm in Escherichia coli visualized by phase-contrast light microscopy, freeze fracturing, and thin sectioning.
J. Bacteriol.
127:1455-1464[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Woldringh, C. L., and N. Nanninga.
1985.
Structure of nucleoid and cytoplasm in the intact cell, p. 161-197.
In
N. Nanninga (ed.), Molecular cytology of Escherichia coli. Academic Press Ltd., London, England.
|
| 37.
|
Woldringh, C. L.,
P. R. Jensen, and H. V. Westerhoff.
1995.
Structure and partitioning of bacterial DNA: determined by a balance of compaction and expansion forces?
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
131:235-242[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Woldringh, C. L., and T. Odijk.
1999.
Structure of DNA within the bacterial cell: physics and physiology, p. 171-187.
In
R. L. Charlebois (ed.), Organization of the prokaryotic genome. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 39.
|
Worcel, A., and E. Burgi.
1972.
On the structure of the folded chromosome of Escherichia coli.
J. Mol. Biol.
71:127-147[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Zimmerman, S. B., and L. D. Murphy.
1996.
Macromolecular crowding and the mandatory condensation of DNA in bacteria.
FEBS Lett.
390:245-248[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Journal of Bacteriology, September 2001, p. 5041-5049, Vol. 183, No. 17
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.17.5041-5049.2001
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Cabrera, J. E., Cagliero, C., Quan, S., Squires, C. L., Jin, D. J.
(2009). Active Transcription of rRNA Operons Condenses the Nucleoid in Escherichia coli: Examining the Effect of Transcription on Nucleoid Structure in the Absence of Transertion. J. Bacteriol.
191: 4180-4185
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kar, S., Edgar, R., Adhya, S.
(2005). Nucleoid remodeling by an altered HU protein: Reorganization of the transcription program. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
102: 16397-16402
[Abstract]
[Full Text]