Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, September 2001, p. 5058-5066, Vol. 183, No. 17
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.17.5058-5066.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Halohydrin Dehalogenases Are Structurally and
Mechanistically Related to Short-Chain Dehydrogenases/Reductases
Johan E. T.
van Hylckama
Vlieg,
Lixia
Tang,
Jeffrey H.
Lutje Spelberg,
Tim
Smilda,
Gerrit J.
Poelarends,
Tjibbe
Bosma,
Annet E. J.
van
Merode,
Marco W.
Fraaije, and
Dick B.
Janssen*
Biochemical Laboratory, Groningen
Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of
Groningen, NL-9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
Received 16 January 2001/Accepted 1 March 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Halohydrin dehalogenases, also known as haloalcohol dehalogenases
or halohydrin hydrogen-halide lyases, catalyze the nucleophilic displacement of a halogen by a vicinal hydroxyl function in halohydrins to yield epoxides. Three novel bacterial genes encoding halohydrin dehalogenases were cloned and expressed in Escherichia
coli, and the enzymes were shown to display remarkable
differences in substrate specificity. The halohydrin dehalogenase of
Agrobacterium radiobacter strain AD1, designated HheC,
was purified to homogeneity. The kcat and
Km values of this 28-kDa protein with
1,3-dichloro-2-propanol were 37 s
1 and 0.010 mM,
respectively. A sequence homology search as well as secondary and
tertiary structure predictions indicated that the halohydrin
dehalogenases are structurally similar to proteins belonging to the
family of short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases (SDRs). Moreover,
catalytically important serine and tyrosine residues that are highly
conserved in the SDR family are also present in HheC and other
halohydrin dehalogenases. The third essential catalytic residue in the
SDR family, a lysine, is replaced by an arginine in halohydrin
dehalogenases. A site-directed mutagenesis study, with HheC as a model
enzyme, supports a mechanism for halohydrin dehalogenases in which the
conserved Tyr145 acts as a catalytic base and Ser132 is involved in
substrate binding. The primary role of Arg149 may be lowering of the
pKa of Tyr145, which abstracts a proton from the substrate
hydroxyl group to increase its nucleophilicity for displacement of the
neighboring halide. The proposed mechanism is fundamentally different
from that of the well-studied hydrolytic dehalogenases, since it does
not involve a covalent enzyme-substrate intermediate.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Halogenated aliphatics constitute an
important class of environmental pollutants. Various microorganisms
have evolved that are able to degrade some of these compounds and use
them as sole sources of carbon and energy. Such organisms are of
importance for bioremediation of polluted soil, groundwater, and
wastewater. In most cases, specialized enzymes, designated
dehalogenases, catalyze the cleavage of the carbon-halogen bonds, which
is a key detoxification reaction. Hydrolytic dehalogenases have been studied extensively, which has resulted in detailed insight into the
structure and mechanism of several enzymes of this class (8, 33). For other dehalogenases, structural and mechanistic data are hardly available.
Halohydrin dehalogenases, also referred to as haloalcohol dehalogenases
or halohydrin hydrogen-halide lyases, occur in the degradation pathways
of halopropanols and 1,2-dibromoethane, where they catalyze the
nucleophilic displacement of a halogen by a vicinal hydroxyl group in
halohydrins, yielding an epoxide, a proton, and a halide ion (7,
22, 30, 31). These enzymes also efficiently catalyze the reverse
reaction, the halogenation of epoxides, and the dehalogenation of
vicinal chlorocarbonyls to hydroxycarbonyls (2, 14, 31).
The interest in halohydrin dehalogenases increased when it was found
that the dehalogenation of halohydrins may proceed with high
enantioselectivity, making these enzymes useful catalysts for the
production of optically pure epoxides and halohydrins (1,
14-16).
In this study, we report the cloning of three bacterial halohydrin
dehalogenase genes. Sequence analysis suggested that these proteins are
similar to proteins of the short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR)
family. The amino acids Ser132, Tyr145, and Arg149 were identified as
the catalytic residues and are proposed to play a role highly similar
to that of the conserved residues involved in the redox reaction
catalyzed by the SDR family proteins.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Materials.
All chemicals were purchased from Acros Chimica,
Merck, Aldrich, or Sigma. Molecular biology enzymes were purchased from
Boehringer. Oligonucleotide primers were supplied by Eurosequence BV,
Groningen, The Netherlands.
Strains and growth conditions.
Agrobacterium
radiobacter strain AD1 and Arthrobacter sp. strain AD2
were maintained on nutrient broth at 30°C. Mycobacterium sp. strain GP1 was maintained on selective plates with 1-propanol or
1,2-dibromoethane as a carbon source as described before
(22). Escherichia coli strains HB101
(6), JM101 (35), and BL21(DE3) (28) were grown at 37°C in Luria-Bertani medium. For
selection of recombinants carrying plasmids, the appropriate antibiotic was added at the following concentrations: 50 µg
ml
1 for kanamycin, 50 µg
ml
1 for ampicillin, and 12.5 µg
ml
1 for tetracycline. E. coli
BL21(DE3) grown at 17°C was used for high-level expression of
recombinant halohydrin dehalogenase driven by the T7 promoter in
plasmid pGEF+ (25).
Construction and screening of genomic libraries of halohydrin
dehalogenase-producing bacteria.
Procedures for the isolation and
manipulation of DNA were performed essentially as described by Sambrook
et al. (24). The construction of a genomic library of
Mycobacterium sp. strain GP1 was described before
(22). The same procedure was used to construct a genomic
library of A. radiobacter strain AD1 in the cosmid vector
pLAFR3 (27). Restriction analysis of plasmids isolated
from 16 transduced E. coli HB101 clones showed that all plasmids contained inserts. About 1,000 transductants were screened for
halohydrin dehalogenase activity by monitoring halide production with
1,3-dichloro-2-propanol as a substrate as described before (22).
PCR and construction of expression vectors for halohydrin
dehalogenase genes.
For overexpression, the halohydrin
dehalogenase genes were amplified by PCR under conditions described
before (32). The hheC gene was amplified from a
plasmid preparation of pAD1-9B2 with the forward primer PFHheC
(5'-ATCTGACCATGGCAACCGCAATTG-3') and the reverse primer PRHheC
(5'-CCCAACGGATCCACGAACCACGGC-3') (NcoI and BamHI sites underlined, start codon
shown in boldface, and substituted nucleotides shown in italics). The
hheBGP1 gene starting with the second
possible start codon was amplified from recombinant cosmid pGP1-4B5
(22) with the forward primer
PF1HheBGP1 (5'-AAAACCATGGCTAACGGAAGACTGGCAGGC-3')
and reverse primer PRHheBGP1
(5'-GGGCTGTGGATCCTCTCAGGTGGCCCAGCCGCC-3'). The hheAAD2 gene was directly amplified from
cells of Arthrobacter sp. strain AD2 with the forward primer
PFHheAAD2
(5'-GAACCATGGTGATCGCCCTCGTGAC-3') and the reverse primer PRHheAAD2
(5'-TGGCTATCTGCCCTAACCATGGCC-3'). The
hheAAD2 gene was cloned behind the T7
promoter in the NcoI site, and hheC and
hheBGP1 were cloned between the
NcoI and BamHI sites of the expression vector
pGEF+ (25).
Nucleotide sequencing.
Sequencing on double-stranded DNA was
performed with the Amersham Thermo Sequenase cycle sequencing kit
(Amersham BV, Roosendaal, The Netherlands), with 7-deaza-dGTP and 5'
Cy5 fluorescent primers. Sequence reactions were run on the Pharmacia
ALF-Express automatic sequencing machine (Uppsala, Sweden) at the
BioMedical Technology Centre (Academic Hospital, Groningen, The
Netherlands). Both strands were sequenced to ensure accuracy.
Homology searches and structure prediction.
The BLAST
program was used to screen DNA and protein databases for similar
proteins. Multiple sequence alignments were made in ClustalW v1.7.
Secondary structures were predicted with the programs SopM
(10) and SSP (26). Tertiary structure
modeling was done by comparative protein modeling to known
three-dimensional structures of members of the SDR protein family with
the program SWISS-MODEL (12) by using the structures of
2HSD, 1AE1, 2AE1, 1AHH, and 1A4U (Protein Data Base codes) as templates.
Overexpression and purification of the halohydrin
dehalogenases.
Both wild-type and mutant halohydrin dehalogenase
genes were expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) as described
before (23). A 1-liter culture of E. coli
BL21(DE3) (pGEFHheC) was harvested by centrifugation for purification
of HheC. Cells were resuspended in 10 mM Tris-sulfate buffer (pH 7.5),
and all further steps were carried out at 0 to 4°C. Cells were washed
twice with this buffer before they were resuspended in 10 mM
Tris-sulfate buffer containing 1 mM EDTA and 1 mM
-mercaptoethanol
(TEM buffer) or TEM buffer containing 3 mM NaN3
(TEMA buffer). After sonication, a crude extract was obtained by
centrifugation (200,000 × g, 60 min).
The crude extract was applied to a Resource Q anion-exchange column (6 ml; Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) that was connected to an LCC500
type fast protein liquid chromatography system (Pharmacia Biotech). The
buffer system consisted of TEMA buffer (buffer A) and TEMA buffer with
0.45 M
(NH4)2SO4
(buffer B). Retained protein was eluted with a three-step increasing
linear gradient: 0 to 5% buffer B in 15 ml, 15 to 45% buffer B in 100 ml, and 45 to 100% buffer B in 35 ml (flow rate, 5 ml
min
1; fraction volume, 5 ml). The dehalogenase
eluted at 110 to 150 mM
(NH4)2SO4,
and active fractions were pooled.
Ammonium sulfate was added to a concentration of 1.5 M, and the protein
was applied to a Resource Phe column (1 ml; Pharmacia
Biotech).
Retained protein was eluted with a 20-ml decreasing
linear gradient of
1.5 to 0 M ammonium sulfate in buffer A (flow
rate, 0.5 ml
min
1; fraction volume, 0.5 ml). The
dehalogenase eluted at 1.0 to
0.8 M
(NH
4)
2SO
4,
and active fractions were pooled, yielding a
pure protein as judged by
sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE).
The purified protein was dialyzed
against TEM buffer to remove azide,
filtered with a 0.2-µm-pore-diameter
filter, and stored at 4°C.
Construction of HheC mutants.
Site-directed mutagenesis was
done by using the Quickchange site-directed mutagenesis kit of
Stratagene (La Jolla, Calif.) with pGEFHheC as a template. Ser132 was
mutated to Cys with the primer set PCODS132C
(5'-GGACATATTATCTTTATTACCTGTGCAACGCCCTTCGGGCCTTGG-3') and PNONS132C
(5'-CCAAGGCCCGAAGGGCGTTGCACAGGTAATAAAGATAATATGTCC-3') (codon of substituted residue shown in boldface, substituted
nucleotides shown in italics). Ser132 was mutated to Ala with the
primer set PCODS132A
(5'-GGACATATTATCTTTATTACCGCTGCAACGCCCTTCGGGCCTTGG-3') and PNONS132A
(5'-CCAAGGCCCGAAGGGCGTTGCAGCGGTAATAAAGATAATATGTCC-3'). Tyr145 was mutated to Phe with the primer set PCODY145F
(5'-CCTTGGAAGGAACTTTCTACCTTCACGTCAGCCCGAGCAGGTGC-3') and PNONY145F
(5'-GCACCTGCTCGGGCTGACGTGAAGGTAGAAAGTTCCTTCCAAGG-3'). Arg149 was mutated to Lys with the primer set PCODR149K
(5'-CCTACACGTCAGCCAAAGCAGGTGCATGCACCTTGGC-3') and PNONR149K
(5'-GCCAAGGTGCATGCACCTGCTTTGGCTGACGTGTAGG-3').
Arg149 was mutated to Gln with the primer set PCODR149Q
(5'-CCTACACGTCAGCCCAGGCAGGTGCATGCACCTTGGC-3') and PNONR149Q
(5'-GCCAAGGTGCATGCACCTGCCTGGGCTGACGTGTAGG-3').
Arg149 was mutated to Glu with the primer set PCODR149E
(5'-CCTACACGTCAGCCGAAGCAGGTGCATGCACCTTGGC-3') and PNONR149E
(5'-GCCAAGGTGCATGCACCTGCTTCGGCTGACGTGTAGG-3').
CD spectroscopy.
Circular dichroism (CD) spectra were
recorded with an AVIV 62A DS spectrometer. The far-UV spectra of both
the wild type and the HheC variants were recorded at 25°C from 190 to
250 nm with a 0.1-cm cuvette containing 0.1 mg of halohydrin
dehalogenase (5 mM potassium phosphate [pH 7.5]) per ml.
Enzyme assays.
Halohydrin dehalogenase activities were
assayed at 30°C in 50 mM Tris-sulfate buffer (pH 8.0) containing 5 mM
substrate by monitoring halide liberation or epoxide formation or with
a colorimetric assay using the chromogenic substrate
p-nitro-2-bromo-1-phenylethanol. Protein concentration and
halide liberation were determined as described before
(30). Halohydrins and epoxides were analyzed by gas
chromatography. Samples (1.5 ml) were extracted with 1.5 ml of diethyl
ether containing 0.05 mM 1-chlorohexane, 1-bromohexane, or mesitylene
as an internal standard. Extracts were analyzed by split injection of 2 or 4 µl on an HP5 column (model HP 19091J-413; Hewlett-Packard) with
helium as a carrier gas. Separation of enantiomers of chiral compounds
was carried out with chiral gas chromatography as described before
(16).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The nucleotide
sequences described in this article have been deposited in the
EMBL/DDBJ/GenBank database under the following accession numbers: HheC,
AF397296; HheAAD2, AF397297;
HheBGP1, AY044094.
 |
RESULTS |
Cloning and sequence analysis of the halohydrin dehalogenase gene
from Agrobacterium radiobacter strain AD1.
The
gram-negative bacterium A. radiobacter strain AD1 was
isolated for its capability to use chloropropanols and epichlorohydrin as growth substrates (30). The organism utilizes
(R)-2,3-dichloro-1-propanol, whereas the
(S)-enantiomer is not degraded (4). This is
caused by the high enantioselectivity of the first enzyme in the
degradation pathway, the halohydrin dehalogenase (16). To
clone the gene encoding the halohydrin dehalogenase, a gene bank of
strain AD1 was constructed in E. coli with the cosmid vector
pLAFR3. Three active clones were identified when 1,000 cosmid clones
were screened for dehalogenase activity with 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol.
Sequence analysis of one of the clones, pAD1-9B2, showed the presence
of a complete open reading frame of 765 nucleotides, designated
hheC. The first 104 bp were identical to a fragment of a
putative halohydrin dehalogenase gene that was located on a genomic DNA
segment of A. radiobacter strain CFZ11 that carried the
epoxide hydrolase gene (echA) (23). The deduced
protein, HheC, has a predicted molecular mass of 27,954 Da and is
highly similar to HalB of Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Table
1), for which no biochemical
characterization has been published. The hheC gene was
amplified by PCR, and the start codon was fused into the
NcoI site of pGEF+. The resulting expression vector was
designated pGEFHheC.
Cloning and sequence analysis of the halohydrin dehalogenase gene
of Arthrobacter sp. strain AD2.
Previously, Van den
Wijngaard et al. (31) purified the halohydrin dehalogenase
of the 3-chloro-1,2-propanediol-degrading Arthrobacter sp.
strain AD2. Out of the 34 N-terminal residues, 32 were identical to the
halohydrin dehalogenase HheA of Corynebacterium sp. strain
N-1074 (36), which suggests that the halohydrin
dehalogenase genes of both strains are highly similar. Therefore,
primers designed for the hheA gene were used to amplify the
halohydrin dehalogenase gene of strain AD2. Three independent clones
were sequenced and found to have identical DNA sequences. The gene
encodes a 244-amino-acid protein that was designated
HheAAD2, since it was identical to HheA except
for 7 amino acid substitutions (Table 1). The gene was fused into the
start codon of pGEF+, and the resulting plasmid was designated
pGEFHheAAD2.
Cloning and sequence analysis of the halohydrin dehalogenase gene
of Mycobacterium sp. strain GP1.
At least two
dehalogenases are produced by Mycobacterium sp. strain GP1
when 1,2-dibromoethane serves as a growth substrate (22).
A haloalkane dehalogenase, encoded by
dhaAf, catalyzes the hydrolytic
dehalogenation of 1,2-dibromoethane to 2-bromoethanol, which is
subsequently dehalogenated by a halohydrin dehalogenase to epoxyethane.
No halohydrin dehalogenase-producing clones were identified when a gene
library of strain GP1 in E. coli was screened for
dehalogenase activity with 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol, suggesting that
transcription or translation signals were not recognized in E. coli (22). However, when cosmid pGP1-4B5, which
carries dhaAf, was transferred to
Pseudomonas sp. strain GJ1 or Burkholderia cepacia G4, the resulting transconjugants rapidly dehalogenated 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol, indicating that active halohydrin dehalogenase was produced. Hence, pGP1-4B5 also harbors the gene encoding the halohydrin dehalogenase of strain GP1. Sequencing showed that the
halohydrin dehalogenase gene is located 2,637 bp downstream of
dhaAf and encodes a 235-amino-acid
protein. The gene was identical to dehalogenase gene hheB of
Corynebacterium sp. strain N-1074, except for 4 nucleotide
substitutions that result in 4 amino acid substitutions in the encoded
protein (Table 1). As in strain N-1074, a duplication of a
27-nucleotide region (36) has resulted in a duplicate set
of AGGA ribosome binding sites, each located 12 nucleotides upstream of
an ATG start codon. Hence, two polypeptides can be produced, which
differ in the presence or absence of a MANGRKRE amino acid sequence
extension at the N terminus, by translation starting from the first or
the second start codon, respectively. Previously, Yu et al.
(36) have shown that HheB is active as a tetramer and that
all possible combinations of the two slightly different subunits occur.
However, this subunit composition had little effect on substrate
specificity, since enzyme variants exclusively composed of either the
long or the short protein were kinetically indistinguishable. The
hheBGP1 gene was amplified by PCR, and the
second possible start codon was fused into the NcoI site of
pGEF+ to yield the expression vector pGEFHheBGP1. In this way, a homotetrameric protein consisting only of the shorter 245-amino-acid polypeptide was produced.
Substrate range of halohydrin dehalogenases.
All proteins were
expressed in a soluble and active form up to 15 to 25% of the total
cellular protein content of E. coli BL21(DE3) as judged by
SDS-PAGE. Further experiments focused on HheC, because it is
enantioselective with various valuable halohydrins (16).
Moreover, its sequence is very different from that of halohydrin
dehalogenases that have previously been characterized. HheC was
purified by anion-exchange chromatography followed by hydrophobic
interaction chromatography as described in Materials and Methods.
Purified HheC displayed optimal activity at around pH 8.0 to 9.0, and
the temperature optimum for activity was 50°C.
Purified HheC and crude extracts of
E. coli BL21(DE3)
overexpressing HheA
AD2 or
HheB
GP1 were used to study the substrate range
of
the three halohydrin dehalogenases (Table
2). Similar to the
known HheA and HheB
halohydrin dehalogenases, all three enzymes
were active with all
chlorinated and brominated C2 and C3 vicinal
halohydrins tested. The
only exception was HheA
AD2, for which
no activity
was detected with 2,3-dichloro-1-propanol. The activities
with
brominated substrates were in most cases higher than with
their
chlorinated analogs. The substrate range of recombinant
HheA
AD2 was in agreement with that of the enzyme
isolated from
strain AD2 (
31). The substrate range of
HheB
GP1 was similar
to those reported for HheB
(
20,
21) (Table
2) and DehA (
2).
Halohydrin
dehalogenase HheC displayed a relatively high level
of activity with
chloroacetone, which clearly distinguishes this
enzyme from
HheA
AD2 and HheB
GP1. The
kinetics of 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol
conversion by HheC were evaluated
by measuring initial degradation
rates at various substrate
concentrations (Table
3). The enzyme
followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics with a
kcat value of 37 s
1 and a
Km value
of 0.010 mM. The specific activity of HheC with
this substrate is
similar to that reported for HheA
AD2
(
31).
However, the
Km value
of HheC for 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol is 2
to 3 orders of magnitude lower
than those of HheA, HheA
AD2, and
HheB (
17,
21,
31).
Recently, it was shown that aromatic halohydrins can also be
dehalogenated by HheC (
16). To explore the substrate
specificity
of HheC, the steady-state kinetic parameters of HheC with a
range
of aliphatic and aromatic substrates were determined (Table
3).
It was found that HheC can efficiently convert aliphatic and aromatic
halohydrins. Purified HheC has
kcat
and
Km values for
(
R)-2-chloro-1-phenylethanol
of 48.5 s
1 and 0.37 mM, respectively, and for the
(
S)-enantiomer, these
values are 8.9 s
1 and 4.2 mM (Table
3). From these
steady-state kinetic data,
it can be calculated that the
enantioselectivity (
E-value) of
HheC for this substrate is
73, which is in close agreement with
the value calculated from kinetic
resolutions by Lutje Spelberg
et al. (
16). We tested
whether HheA
AD2 and HheB
GP1
could also
convert 2-chloro-1-phenylethanol, and found that both
enzymes
were active with both enantiomers. The highest activities were
observed with the (
S)-enantiomer (Table
2). The
enantioselectivity
of 2-chloro-1-phenylethanol conversion by
HheB
GP1 was evaluated
by means of kinetic
resolution (data not shown), which showed
that the
(
S)-enantiomer was preferentially converted with an
E-value
of 8. Hence, HheC and HheB
GP1
exhibit opposite enantioselectivities
for 2-chloro-1-phenylethanol
conversion.
Sequence similarities of halohydrin dehalogenases with SDRs.
The pairwise sequence identities of the three halohydrin dehalogenases
described in this paper are between 24.2 and 32.4% (Table 1).
Interestingly, similarity searches with the amino acid sequences of
HheAAD2, HheBGP1, and HheC
in various protein and DNA databases showed that these enzymes are
similar to proteins belonging to the family of SDR enzymes. Sequence
similarities of up to 25.5% were observed with well-characterized SDR
family members (Table 1). The SDR family constitutes a large number of
proteins that catalyze oxidation or reduction reactions with NAD(H) or
NADP(H) as a cofactor (13). They are active as dimers or
tetramers, where each monomer consists of approximately 250 residues.
Halohydrin dehalogenases consist of subunits with similar sizes, and
HheA (17) and HheB (20) also appear to be
active as tetramers.
In Fig.
1 is depicted an alignment of six
halohydrin dehalogenase sequences together with five members of the SDR
protein
family for which the three-dimensional structure is known. The
highest degree of conservation between members of the SDR protein
family is observed within the N-terminal part of these proteins,
which
contains a typical (G/A)-(G/A)-X-X-(G/A)-X-G fingerprint.
This
fingerprint is characteristic for the Rossman fold of the
cofactor
binding site (
13), but it is not conserved in the
halohydrin
dehalogenases. The absence of a cofactor-binding motif in
halohydrin
dehalogenases is in agreement with the fact that the
dehalogenation
reaction that is catalyzed by these enzymes is not a
redox reaction.

View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Sequence alignment of halohydrin dehalogenases with SDRs
with known three-dimensional structures. The sequences were aligned by
using the multiple alignment program ClustalW and are shown in
decreasing sequence similarity to HheC. Amino acids that are identical
in six or more sequences are depicted below the sequence. Positions at
which six or more similar residues occur are indicated by an asterisk.
The position of the G/A-G/A-X-X-G/A-X-G/A fingerprint typical of the
Rossman fold in the SDR family is indicated by $ on top of the
alignment. The proposed active site residues in halohydrin
dehalogenases are indicated by #. The structural elements identified in
three-dimensional structures of SDR family members are underlined. The
first line below the sequence alignment shows the secondary structure
elements and the nomenclature of 7 -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase
(29). -Strands are indicated as double broken lines,
and -helices are indicated as single broken lines. The second,
third, and fourth lines show the predicted secondary structure elements
for HheC, HheAAD2, and HheBGP1, respectively.
The nomenclature of the sequences is explained in Table 1.
|
|
The C-terminal part of members of the SDR family is involved in
substrate binding and is much less conserved within the SDR
protein
family. However, it contains three highly conserved residues
(a Ser,
Tyr, and Lys) that play a critical role in catalysis (
11,
13,
29). The conserved serine and tyrosine residues can also
be
identified in the halohydrin dehalogenase sequences (Ser132
and Tyr145
in HheC). However, halohydrin dehalogenases differ
from members of the
SDR family by the presence of an arginine
residue at a position at
which a lysine is conserved in the SDR
family (Fig.
1). The
implications of the partial conservation
of the active site residues
for the catalytic mechanism of halohydrin
dehalogenases will be
discussed
below.
Conservation in several other sequence regions also suggests a
structural relationship between SDR oxidoreductases and halohydrin
dehalogenases. For example, Jörnvall et al. (
13)
have noticed
that specific glycine and proline residues are typically
conserved
in more than 90% of the SDR family. Both residues are also
present
in four out of six halohydrin dehalogenases (Gly125 and Pro175
in HheC). Furthermore, two residues (Arg98 and Glu102 in HheC)
that
form salt bridges that stabilize dimers in some SDR family
members
(
11,
29) are also present in the halohydrin dehalogenases
HheA, HheA
AD2, HheC, and
HalB.
Structure determination by X-ray crystallography of several members of
the SDR protein family has shown that the subunits
share a common fold
that is highly conserved despite the low overall
sequence identity of
15 to 25% (
3,
11,
18,
29). Each
subunit has an

/

doubly wound structure in which seven parallel

-strands form a core

-sheet that is sandwiched between two arrays
of three

-helices
(
3,
11,
18,
29). We compared the available
X-ray
structures with predicted secondary structure elements of
HheC,
HheA
AD2, and HheB
GP1 (Fig.
1). All

-strands and

-helices
were predicted at the same position
at which these elements are
found in the structures of SDR family
members. These results strongly
suggest that the overall folding of
halohydrin dehalogenases closely
resembles that of SDR oxidoreductases.
This includes a conserved
topology for the cofactor binding domain,
which consists of a

A-

B-

B-

C-

C-

D-

D-

E motif,
despite the fact that the characteristic
Rossman fold fingerprint for
this motif in the SDR family (Fig.
1) (described above) is not
conserved in the dehalogenases. With
HheB
GP1,
some differences were observed, since the prediction
of

-helix F is
somewhat shifted and an extra

-strand is predicted
between

-helix
F and

-strand F (Fig.
1).
The sequence similarity and presence of conserved residues allowed us
to generate a model of halohydrin dehalogenases by using
the
coordinates of SDR family members as a template (Fig.
2).
The predicted model of

-helix D to
the C terminus of HheC closely
resembles that of the X-ray structure of
7

-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase
(
29). Moreover, the
proposed catalytic residues of HheC are
found at the same positions as
their counterparts in 7

-hydroxysteroid
dehydrogenase. Similar
results were obtained with HheA
AD2, whereas
with
HheB
GP1, a smaller portion of the protein
could be predicted.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Proposed tertiary structure of halohydrin dehalogenase
(HheC) of A. radiobacter AD1. A ribbon representation of
residues Lys52 to Ile246 of HheC is shown. The active site residues
that are critical for catalysis are indicated. Due to low sequence
homology, the N-terminal fraction of HheC could not be predicted by
using SDR proteins as a template.
|
|
Catalytic mechanism of halohydrin dehalogenases.
The strict
conservation of Ser132, Tyr145, and Arg149 (HheC numbering) in
halohydrin dehalogenases suggests a role of these residues similar to
that of their counterparts in members of the SDR protein family.
Studies of various SDR family members have shown that the active site
residues play a role in catalysis, as depicted in Fig.
3A (3, 13). In this
mechanism, the tyrosine acts as a catalytic base to extract a proton
from the substrate, and simultaneously NAD(P)+
accepts a hydride from the carbon atom. Throughout the catalytic cycle,
the conserved serine is hydrogen bonded with the substrate oxygen, thus
facilitating proper positioning of the substrate and stabilization of
the reaction intermediate (29). The conserved Lys149 may
be involved in lowering the pKa of the tyrosine
as well as positioning of the ribose moiety of the cofactor via
interaction with its 2'- and 3'-hydroxyl groups (29).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Proposed reaction mechanism of halohydrin dehalogenase.
(A) Reaction mechanism and active site residues of SDRs exemplified by
7 -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase of E. coli (adapted
from references 13 and 29). Interactions of
the conserved lysine residue with the ribose moiety of the cofactor are
not included. (B) Proposed reaction mechanism and active
site residues of halohydrin dehalogenase exemplified by HheC of
A. radiobacter (see text for explanation).
|
|
The role of the conserved Ser132, Tyr145, and Arg149 in the
dehalogenation catalyzed by HheC was investigated by
site-directed
mutagenesis. All HheC mutants (Ser132Ala,
Ser132Cys, Tyr145Phe,
Arg149Lys, Arg149Glu, and Arg149Gln) were
expressed as soluble
proteins at room temperature at levels
similar to that of overexpressed
wild-type enzyme, as judged by
SDS-PAGE (data not shown). Crude
extracts of
E. coli
BL21(DE3) expressing mutant or wild-type enzyme
were tested for
activity with 2-bromoethanol and chloroacetone.
While chloroacetone was
shown to be a very good substrate for
wild-type HheC, all mutant
enzymes were inactive with this compound.
The extracts containing the
Ser132 and Tyr145 mutants also did
not show significant activity with
2-bromoethanol, indicating
the critical role of these residues. Only
when Arg149 was replaced
by a basic lysine residue, as is found in the
SDR family at this
position, was some activity still observed for
2-bromoethanol.
For a more detailed kinetic analysis, several HheC
mutants (Ser132Ala,
Tyr145Phe, Arg149Lys, and Arg149Gln) were purified.
Proper folding
of these HheC mutants was verified by CD spectroscopy.
All mutants
displayed highly similar CD spectra compared with wild-type
HheC,
confirming proper folding of these HheC variants (data not
shown).
A kinetic analysis of the purified mutants revealed that the
Ser132Ala
mutant was totally inactive, while all other mutant enzymes
analyzed
displayed strongly decreased
k
cat/
Km values for
p-nitro-2-bromo-1-phenylethanol
(Table
4).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 4.
Steady-state kinetic parameters of purified wild-type and
mutant HheC with p-nitro-2-bromo-1-phenylethanol
|
|
These data support the proposed mechanism shown in Fig.
3B in which the
residues Ser132, Tyr145, and Arg149 have a similar
function to their
counterparts in SDR family members. In the first
step, Tyr145 abstracts
a proton from the hydroxyl group in the
substrate, and concomitantly
the substrate oxygen performs a nucleophilic
attack on the neighboring
halogen-substituted carbon atom, resulting
in ring closure and
liberation of halide. The conserved Ser132
could be hydrogen bonded,
thus ensuring proper positioning of
the substrate as in the SDR family,
whereas Arg149 may play a
critical role by lowering the
pK
a of
Tyr145.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Three genes encoding different halohydrin dehalogenases were
cloned, sequenced, and overexpressed in E. coli. The enzymes have significant sequence similarity to proteins of the SDR family, and
several residues that are highly conserved in SDR enzymes are also
present in halohydrin dehalogenases. The typical catalytic triad
(Ser-Tyr-Lys) observed in SDR enzymes (11, 13, 29) was
partially conserved in halohydrin dehalogenases. In the halohydrin dehalogenases, an arginine is observed at the position at which a
lysine is found in the SDR family. However, replacement of the catalytic lysine by an arginine is not unique for halohydrin
dehalogenases, since it has also occasionally been observed in other
members of the SDR family (e.g., in sorbitol-6-phosphate
2-dehydrogenase of Streptococcus mutans [5]
and 1-cyclohexenylcarbonyl coenzyme A reductase from Streptomyces
collinus [34]). The observed sequence similarities
between halohydrin dehalogenases and proteins of the SDR family
strongly point to a common evolutionary origin. Furthermore, kinetic
analysis of several HheC mutants revealed that the conserved
Ser-Tyr-Arg triad in halohydrin dehalogenases is crucial for efficient
catalysis. These results indicate that the dehalogenation reaction
catalyzed by halohydrin dehalogenases also shares interesting
similarities with the redox reaction that is catalyzed by members of
the SDR family of proteins (Fig. 3). These data also suggest that the
dehalogenation reaction catalyzed by halohydrin dehalogenases is
fundamentally different from that of hydrolytic dehalogenases, since it
does not involve a covalent intermediate.
Including the three new sequences presented in this paper, six complete
sequences of halohydrin dehalogenases are now available in the
databases. Based on sequence identities, they can be divided into three
distinct groups that share 23.9 to 32.4% sequence identity (Table 1).
Each group is represented by two sequences, but there are some
biochemical and immunological data that allow a preliminary assignment
of enzymes of which no complete sequence is known. Group A halohydrin
dehalogenases consist of the closely related halohydrin dehalogenases
HheA and HheAAD2. The dehalogenase of the
unidentified chloropropanol-utilizing strain AD3 and the DehC produced
by Arthrobacter erithrii H10a may also belong to this group
(2, 31). Group B enzymes are constituted of HheB and HheBGP1. The DehA of A. erithrii H10a
probably also belongs to this group, since sequencing of peptides of a
tryptic digest showed 100% homology to the sequence of HheB
(2). Finally, group C halohydrin dehalogenases consist of
HheC and halohydrin dehalogenase B of Agrobacterium
tumefaciens. A recently isolated halohydrin dehalogenase from an
Agrobacterium strain probably also belongs to this group,
because it exhibits a similar substrate specificity (9).
The halohydrin dehalogenases HheAAD2,
HheBGP1, and HheC were active with C2, C3, and
aromatic halohydrins and exhibit some remarkable differences in
substrate range. The enantioselectivity of halohydrin dehalogenases can
be useful for the preparation of optically active compounds.
Previously, the epoxide hydrolase of Agrobacterium
radiobacter sp. strain AD1 has been cloned, overexpressed, and
used for the preparation of optically pure epoxides (15, 23). HheC is the second enzyme in the degradation pathway of chloropropanols in this organism that exhibits high enantioselectivity to chiral substrates. Some promising examples of the application of
HheC (16) and other halohydrin dehalogenases for the
preparation of optically active aliphatic or aromatic epoxides or
halohydrins have been described (1, 14). Interestingly,
HheBGP1 exhibits the opposite enantioselectivity
for 2-chloro-1-phenylethanol. Thus, several members of the SDR family
and the halohydrin dehalogenases display a high enantioselectivity to
many chiral substrates. The stereoselectivity may be determined by only
a small number of residues that constitute the substrate binding site
(18). These residues are located in the substrate binding
loop or in the loops linking
-strand D with
-helix E and
-strand E with
-helix F. In two highly identical tropinone
reductases (Table 1 and Fig. 1) that have opposite
enantioselectivities, stereoselectivity is determined by only 5 amino
acid residues (19).
The present study provides insight in the structure and catalytic
mechanism of halohydrin dehalogenases, but some important mechanistic
questions remain. The reverse reaction, the halogenation of epoxides,
is also efficiently catalyzed by these enzymes (1, 31).
This probably requires the activation and proper positioning of the
halide ion that acts as a nucleophile. From sequence alignments, we
were not able to identify a halide-binding site, but it may be formed
by residues located at the position at which the cofactor is bound in
the SDR family. Tryptophan or arginine residues are involved in halide
binding in hydrolytic dehalogenases. Three of the four tryptophan
residues of HheC are located in the part of the protein that is
predicted in the structure model in Fig. 3. Comparisons with structures
of proteins belonging to the SDR family suggest these three residues
could interact with the substrate. Future experiments will aim at
identifying a halide binding site and elucidating the kinetic properties.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This research was financially supported by the EU Environment and
Climate Program (grant ENV5-CT95-0086) and the Innovation Oriented
Research Program of the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Biochemical
Laboratory, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology
Institute, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, NL-9747 AG Groningen,
The Netherlands. Phone: 31-50-3634209. Fax: 31-50-3634165. E-mail: d.b.janssen{at}chem.rug.nl.
Present address: NIZO Food Research, 6710 BA Ede, The Netherlands.
Present address: Friedrich Miescher-Institut, Maulbeerstrasse,
4058 Basel, Switzerland.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Assis, H. M. S.,
A. T. Bull, and D. J. Hardman.
1998.
Synthesis of chiral epihalohydrins using haloalcohol dehalogenase A from Arthrobacter erithrii H10a.
Enzyme Microb. Technol.
22:545-551[CrossRef].
|
| 2.
|
Assis, H. M. S.,
P. J. Sallis,
A. T. Bull, and D. J. Hardman.
1998.
Biochemical characterization of a haloalcohol dehalogenase from Arthrobacter erithrii H10a.
Enzyme Microb. Technol.
22:568-574[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Benach, J.,
S. Atrian,
R. Gonzalez-Duarte, and R. Ladenstein.
1998.
The refined crystal structure of Drosophila lebanonensis alcohol dehydrogenase at 1.9 A resolution.
J. Mol. Biol.
282:383-399[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Bosma, T.,
E. Kruizinga,
E. J. de Bruin,
G. J. Poelarends, and D. B. Janssen.
1999.
Utilization of trihalogenated propanes by Agrobacterium radiobacter AD1 through heterologous expression of the haloalkane dehalogenase from Rhodococcus sp. strain m15-3.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65:4575-4581[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Boyd, D. A.,
T. Thevenot,
M. Gumbmann,
A. L. Honeyman, and I. R. Hamilton.
2000.
Identification of the operon for the sorbitol (glucitol) phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system in Streptococcus mutans.
Infect. Immun.
68:925-930[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Boyer, H. W., and D. Roulland-Dussoix.
1969.
A complementation analysis of the restriction and modification of DNA in Escherichia coli.
J. Mol. Biol.
41:459-472[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Castro, C. E., and E. W. Bartnicki.
1968.
Epoxidation of halohydrins, epoxide opening and transhalogenation by a Flavobacterium sp.
Biochemistry
7:3213-3218[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Copley, S. D.
1998.
Microbial dehalogenases: enzymes recruited to convert xenobiotic substrates.
Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
2:613-617[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Effendi, A. J.,
S. D. Greenaway, and B. N. Dancer.
2000.
Isolation and characterization of 2,3-dichloro-1-propanol-degrading rhizobia.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
66:2882-2887[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Geourjon, C., and G. Deleage.
1994.
SOPM: a self-optimized method for protein secondary structure prediction.
Protein Eng.
7:157-164[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Ghosh, D.,
C. M. Weeks,
P. Grochulski,
W. L. Duax,
M. Erman,
R. L. Rimsay, and J. C. Orr.
1991.
Three-dimensional structure of holo 3 ,20 -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase: a member of a short-chain dehydrogenase family.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:10064-10068[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Guex, N., and M. C. Peitsch.
1997.
SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling.
Electrophoresis
18:2714-2723[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Jörnvall, H.,
B. Persson,
M. Krook,
S. Atrian,
R. Gonzalez-Duarte,
J. Jeffery, and D. Ghosh.
1995.
Short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases (SDR).
Biochemistry
34:6003-6013[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Kasai, N.,
T. Suzuki, and Y. Furukawa.
1998.
Chiral C3 epoxides and halohydrins: their preparation and synthetic application.
J. Mol. Catal.
4:237-252[CrossRef].
|
| 15.
|
Lutje Spelberg, J. H.,
R. Rink,
R. M. Kellogg, and D. B. Janssen.
1998.
Enantioselectivity of a recombinant epoxide hydrolase from Agrobacterium radiobacter.
Tetrahedron Asymmetry
9:459-466[CrossRef].
|
| 16.
|
Lutje Spelberg, J. H.,
J. E. T. van Hylckama Vlieg,
T. Bosma,
R. M. Kellogg, and D. B. Janssen.
1999.
A tandem enzyme reaction to produce optically active halohydrins, epoxides and diols.
Tetrahedron Asymmetry
10:2863-2870[CrossRef].
|
| 17.
|
Nagasawa, T.,
T. Nakamura,
F. Yu,
I. Watanabe, and H. Yamada.
1992.
Purification and characterization of halohydrin hydrogen-halide lyase from recombinant Escherichia coli containing the gene from a Corynebacterium sp.
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
36:478-484.
|
| 18.
|
Nakajima, K.,
A. Yamashita,
H. Akama,
T. Nakatsu,
H. Kato,
T. Hashimoto,
J. Oda, and Y. Yamada.
1998.
Crystal structures of two tropinone reductases: different reaction stereospecificities in the same protein fold.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:4876-4881[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Nakajima, K.,
H. Kato,
J. Oda,
Y. Yamada, and T. Hashimoto.
1999.
Site-directed mutagenesis of putative substrate-binding residues reveals a mechanism controlling the different stereospecificities of two tropinone reductases.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:16563-16568[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Nakamura, T.,
T. Nagasawa,
F. Yu,
I. Watanabe, and H. Yamada.
1994.
Characterization of a novel enantioselective halohydrin-hydrogen-halide lyase.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
60:1297-1301[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Nakamura, T.,
T. Nagasawa,
F. Yu,
I. Watanabe, and H. Yamada.
1992.
Resolution and some properties of enzymes involved in enantioselective transformation of 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol to (R)-3-chloro-1,2-propanediol by Corynebacterium sp. strain N-1074.
J. Bacteriol.
174:7613-7619[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Poelarends, G. J.,
J. E. T. van Hylckama Vlieg,
J. R. Marchesi,
L. M. Freitas dos Santos, and D. B. Janssen.
1999.
Degradation of 1,2-dibromoethane by Mycobacterium sp. strain GP1.
J. Bacteriol.
181:2050-2058[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Rink, R.,
M. Fennema,
M. Smids,
U. Dehmel, and D. B. Janssen.
1997.
Primary structure and catalytic mechanism of epoxide hydrolase from Agrobacterium radiobacter AD1.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:14650-14657[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 25.
|
Schanstra, J. P.,
R. Rink,
F. Pries, and D. B. Janssen.
1993.
Construction of an expression and site-directed mutagenesis system of haloalkane dehalogenase in Escherichia coli.
Protein Expr. Purif.
4:479-489[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Solovyev, V. V., and A. A. Salamov.
1994.
Secondary structure prediction based on discriminant analysis, p. 352-364.
In
N. A. Kolchanov, and H. A. Lim (ed.), Computer analysis of genetic macromolecules. World Scientific, Singapore.
|
| 27.
|
Staskawicz, B.,
D. Dahlbeck,
N. Keen, and C. Napoli.
1987.
Molecular characterization of cloned avirulence genes from race 0 and race 1 of Pseudomonas syringae pv. glycinea.
J. Bacteriol.
169:5789-5794[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Studier, F. W.,
A. H. Rosenberg,
J. J. Dunn, and J. W. Dubendorff.
1990.
Use of T7 RNA polymerase to direct expression of cloned genes.
Methods Enzymol.
185:60-89[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Tanaka, N.,
T. Nonaka,
T. Tanabe,
T. Yoshimoto,
D. Tsuru, and Y. Mitsui.
1996.
Crystal structures of the binary and ternary complexes of 7 -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase from Escherichia coli.
Biochemistry
35:7715-7730[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Van den Wijngaard, A. J.,
D. B. Janssen, and B. Witholt.
1989.
Degradation of epichlorohydrin and halohydrins by bacteria isolated from freshwater sediment.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
135:2199-2208.
|
| 31.
|
Van den Wijngaard, A. J.,
P. T. W. Reuvekamp, and D. B. Janssen.
1991.
Purification and characterization of haloalcohol dehalogenase from Arthrobacter sp. strain AD2.
J. Bacteriol.
173:124-129[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Van Hylckama Vlieg, J. E. T.,
H. Leemhuis, and D. B. Janssen.
2000.
Characterization of the gene cluster involved in isoprene metabolism in Rhodococcus sp. strain AD45.
J. Bacteriol.
182:1956-1963[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Verschueren, K. H.,
F. Seljee,
H. J. Rozeboom,
K. H. Kalk, and B. W. Dijkstra.
1993.
Crystallographic analysis of the catalytic mechanism of haloalkane dehalogenase.
Nature
363:693-698[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Wang, P.,
C. D. Denoya,
M. R. Morgenstern,
D. D. Skinner,
K. K. Wallace,
R. Digate,
S. Patton,
N. Banavali,
G. Schuler,
M. K. Speedie, and K. A. Reynolds.
1996.
Cloning and characterization of the gene encoding 1-cyclohexenylcarbonyl coenzyme A reductase from Streptomyces collinus.
J. Bacteriol.
178:6873-6881[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Yanisch-Perron, C.,
J. Vieira, and J. Messing.
1985.
Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors.
Gene
33:103-109[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Yu, F.,
T. Nakamura,
W. Mizunashi, and I. Watanabe.
1994.
Cloning of two halohydrin hydrogen-halide-lyase genes of Corynebacterium sp. strain N-1074 and structural comparison of the genes and gene products.
Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.
58:1451-1457[Medline].
|
Journal of Bacteriology, September 2001, p. 5058-5066, Vol. 183, No. 17
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.17.5058-5066.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
de Jong, R. M., Kalk, K. H., Tang, L., Janssen, D. B., Dijkstra, B. W.
(2006). The X-Ray Structure of the Haloalcohol Dehalogenase HheA from Arthrobacter sp. Strain AD2: Insight into Enantioselectivity and Halide Binding in the Haloalcohol Dehalogenase Family. J. Bacteriol.
188: 4051-4056
[Abstract]
[Full Text]