Recently we reported an unusual multicellular organization in yeast
that we termed stalk-like structures. These structures are tall (0.5 to
3 cm long) and narrow (1 to 3 mm in diameter). They are formed in
response to UV radiation of cultures spread on high agar
concentrations. Here we present an anatomical analysis of the stalks.
Microscopic inspection of cross sections taken from stalks revealed
that stalks are composed of an inner core in which cells are dense and
vital and a layer of cells (four to six rows) that surrounds the core.
This outer layer is physically separated from the core and contains
many dead cells. The outer layer may form a protective shell for the
core cells. Through electron microscopy analysis we observed three
types of cells within the stalk population: (i) cells containing many
unusual vesicles, which might be undergoing some kind of cell death;
(ii) cells containing spores (usually one or two spores only); and (iii) familiar rounded cells. We suggest that stalk cells are not only
spatially organized but may undergo processes that induce a certain
degree of cell specialization. We also show that high agar
concentration alone, although not sufficient to induce stalk formation,
induces dramatic changes in a colony's morphology. Most striking among
the agar effects is the induction of growth into the agar, forming
peg-like structures. Colonies grown on 4% agar or higher are
reminiscent of stalks in some aspects. The agar concentration effects
are mediated in part by the Ras pathway and are related to the
invasive-growth phenomenon.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Some unicellular organisms are
capable of forming cooperative multicellular structures, mainly in
response to stress conditions, such as starvation or dryness. For
example, cells of the bacterium Bacillus subtilis change
their colony organization in order to reach potential food sources at
distant sites (2, 18). Filamentous fungi are capable of
forming hyphae for the same purpose (29, 31). Other
organisms form specialized fruiting bodies and even highly
differentiated stalks in order to produce and disperse spores (e.g.,
myxobacteria [4, 13] and the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum [12]). Such
developed and differentiated structures have not been observed in the
yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yet, in this organism too,
there are developmental switches and modifications in colony
organization in response to environmental stresses. In response to
nitrogen starvation, diploid yeast cells form filamentous structures
known as pseudohyphae (10, 21). This phenomenon is
genetically related to another phenotype, known as invasive growth,
that is observed in haploid yeast cells (24). When grown
on solid agar supplemented with rich media, haploid cells penetrate the
agar and are not washed away when placed under a water current. Both
invasive growth and filamentous growth require an intact Ras/cyclic AMP
(cAMP) cascade and Ras/Ste11/Kss1 cascade (19-21, 24, 26,
30). These Ras pathways are required for activation of specific
invasive/pseudohyphal genes, such as Flo11 (15, 21, 26),
and for suppression of stress-related genes, targets of the Msn2/4
system (30). Interestingly, some laboratory strains, such
as
1278b, are capable of showing the pseudohyphal/invasive phenotypes, whereas other strains, such as S288C, W303, and SP1, are
either completely incapable of invasiveness or show inefficient invasiveness (14, 30). In the SP1 genetic background,
invasive growth can be obtained through constitutive activation of the Ras pathway (e.g., through the RAS2Val19
and bcy1
mutations). The basis for the differences in
invasive capabilities of the different genetic backgrounds is not fully understood. Some strains seem to harbor mutations in genes essential for invasiveness (14). Another explanation is the
constitutive suppression of the stress response in the
1278b
background. Cells of this genetic background contain high cAMP levels;
consequently, their Msn2/4/STRE machinery cannot properly
respond to stress (30).
Recently, yet another multicellular organization of S. cerevisiae cells was reported. Engelberg et al. reported
stalk-like structures that are formed when cultures are spread on high
agar concentrations and are subsequently exposed to UV radiation (see details in reference 6) (see examples in Fig. 3 below of
this paper). The average length of a stalk is 1 cm (varying between 0.5 and 3 cm) and consists of 0.5 × 106 to
3 × 106 cells. A large variety of yeast
genetic backgrounds as well as various mutants were tested for their
ability to form stalks, and all were found capable (6;
data not shown). Notably, these mutants also included strains that are
defective in invasive/pseudohyphal growth. Furthermore, other types of
yeast (Candida albicans and Schizosaccharomyces
pombe) and even the bacterium Escherichia coli were
found capable of forming stalks under similar conditions. We suggested
therefore that stalk formation might not be genetically regulated and
proposed a mechanical/environmental model to explain the formation of
stalks (Fig. 3 in reference 6). Briefly, the model assumes
that when a dense layer of cells is spread on a plate, some cells fall
into tiny pits in the agar. Most of the cells on the surface die under
intensive UV radiation, but cells in the pits, which are shaded, or
covered by other cells have better chances of survival. Surviving cells
proliferate, but when the pit is filled, only cells in the bottom are
in contact with nutrients and continue to divide. Dividing cells
continue to fill the already crowded pit and thereby extrude other
cells of the colony out of the pit just as toothpaste is squeezed out
of the tube. The continued extrusion forms the stalk (Fig. 3 in
reference 6). It is not fully understood why dividing
cells in the bottom do not penetrate the agar. It seems, however, that
the geometry of the pit, the concentration of the agar, and its dryness
are the key factors that induce stalk formation and may prevent
penetration. This model suggests that a stalk is simply a pile of
unorganized cells, passively extruded from the pit by dividing cells in
the bottom.
In this report we present further investigation of the yeast stalk
phenomenon. Surprisingly, microscopic inspection of cross sections
suggested that a stalk is not composed of randomly piled cells but is
rather an organized, multicellular structure. We report that a stalk is
composed of an inner core in which cells are dense and seem vital. The
core is surrounded by an outer layer of cells (composed of four to six
rows of cells). The outer layer is physically separated from the core,
thereby forming a protective shell for the core cells. Further, within
the population of stalk cells we observed at least three types of cells
distinct in their morphology: (a) familiar rounded cells; (b) dying or
dead cells containing a large number of vesicles; and (c) cells
containing spores. We suggest therefore that stalk cells are not only
spatially organized but manifest some degree of specialization.
In addition to analyzing stalk anatomy, we attempted to dissect the
roles of UV radiation and high agar concentrations on the formation of
stalks. We report that UV radiation alone does not affect colony
organization, nor does it induce stalk formation. High agar
concentration, on the other hand, has a dramatic effect on the size,
height, and shape of the colonies. We further report that high agar
concentrations induce invasive growth. Rather strikingly, cells of a
colony, unlike cells plated to form a lawn, do not invade homogenously.
Cells in the center of the colony invade more deeply, forming a
peg-like structure. We show that the agar effect on formation of
peg-like structures is mediated through the Ras pathway, suggesting a
linkage between invasive growth and multicellular organization of yeast colonies.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Yeast strains and media.
Cells were plated on
yeast-peptone-dextrose (YPD) medium (2% glucose, 1% yeast extract,
and 2% Bacto Peptone). The agar concentration used for stalk formation
was 4%. Agar concentrations in other experiments are described for
each experiment. The strains used in this study are listed in Table
1.
Stalk formation.
Stalks were formed as previously described
(6).
Invasive-growth assay.
Cells were plated on YPD supplemented
with the agar concentrations described in each experiment. Plates were
washed under a water current as described (24).
Fixation for microscopic analysis.
As stalks were found to
disaggregate readily when incubated in solution (data not shown),
standard fixation protocols could not be applied. The following
protocols were therefore developed and used: stalks were cut out from
the plates together with the piece of agar on which they grew. They
were then placed horizontally on 1% agar drops that were kept on the
verge of solidifying temperature (40 to 42°C). Stalks were
immediately covered with similar agar drops at the same temperature.
Agar drops solidified readily upon contact with stalks. This treatment
embedded intact stalks inside agar cubes. In most cases stalks were not
affected by this treatment. The agar cubes that were containing stalks
were incubated in fixation solution (2.5% paraformaldehyde and 2%
glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylic acid) in room temperature for 1 h and were further incubated at 4°C for 48 h. Then fixation
solution was diluted (1:2) in cacodylic acid, and the
cubes were incubated at 4°C for 1 week. The cubes were washed in the
following order: 0.1 M cacodylic acid (10 min, three to five times),
double distilled water (DDW) (10 to 15 min, three times),
metaperiodate (2% in DDW; 40 to 60 min), DDW (10 to 15 min, two
times), and cacodylic acid (10 to 15 min, three times). The cubes were
then incubated in osmium solution (1% OsO4, 0.1 M cacodylic acid buffer, and 1% potassium ferricyanide) for 2 h
and were further washed with 0.1 M cacodylic acid (four to five times
for 1 min and three times for 15 min), ethanol (30, 50, 70, 90, and
95% for 15 min each and 100% for 30 min, three to five times), and
propylene oxide (10 min, two times). The cubes were then incubated with
agar 100 resin diluted in propylene oxide in the following order: 1:3
dilution for 24 h, 1:1 dilution for 24 h, 3:1 dilution for
24 h, and an undiluted solution for 24 h two times. Finally
the cubes were incubated at 60°C overnight.
Preparation of cross sections.
For light microscopy
analysis, blocks were sliced in a microtome (thickness, 4 to 7 µm) by
using glass knives. The slices were placed on slides, dried, and
covered by cover glass. For electron microscopy analysis, blocks were
sliced in a microtome (thickness, 700 Å) by using diamond knives.
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Cross sections of stalks reveal a core and shell organization.
The present model describing stalk formation is a
mechanical/environmental model (6). According to this
model, a stalk is a pile of unorganized, nondividing, similar cells
that were extruded out of a pit in the agar. To test whether stalks are indeed composed of randomly localized, unorganized, similar cells, we
prepared cross sections (thickness, 4 to 7 µm; see Materials and
Methods) from different locations along the stalk and inspected them
under the microscope (Fig. 1). A cross
section of the stalk's tip showed, as expected, a layer of cells (Fig.
1a and b). Strikingly, however, a cross section taken from several
millimeters below the tip showed that in this area there are no cells
in the center of the stalk (Fig. 1c). Cross sections made further below
revealed an even more unexpected picture (Fig. 1d and e). These cross
sections revealed an inner core that is composed of a large number of
dense cells. Surrounding the core is an outer layer, physically
separated from the core. The layer is composed of four to six rows of
cells. Cells of the outer layer seem less dense and are usually bigger than core cells (Fig. 1d and e). Closer inspection of the outer layer
cells showed that some of them are transparent, maybe lacking vital
cytoplasm and organelles (Fig. 1d' and e' and
2a). Many of the cells in the outer layer
may actually be dead cells that form a protective shell around the
stalk (see below).

View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Stalks are composed of a core and shell structure. Light
microscopy inspection of cross sections (thickness, 4 to 7 µm)
prepared from different locations along a stalk. Locations from which
cross sections were taken are indicated in the schematic illustration
on the left. Stalks were prepared from the strain 419M. Cross sections
were prepared from three different stalks, and a similar pattern of
organization was observed. Pictures were taken using the following lens
objectives (note that additional enlargements were made during printing
processes): (a) 40×; (b and c) 20×; (d) 16×; (d') same cross
section as for panel d but with a 20× lens; (e) 20×; (e') same cross
section as for panel e but with a 40× lens.
|
|

View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Stalks are composed of dying and dead cells,
spore-containing cells, and familiar cells. Electron microscopy
inspection of cross sections (thickness, 700 Å) of different locations
within a stalk. Cross sections of stalks and regular colonies were
prepared as described in Materials and Methods. The 419M strain (an
a/ diploid) was used in all cases. Electron microscopy
analysis was performed on two stalks and two colonies. (a) Cells of a
stalk. (b) Cells of a regular colony, used as control. (c and d) Cells
of a stalk that contain many vesicles (that could be fat bodies or
autophagic bodies), a wide cell wall, and unidentifiable nucleus and
ribosomes (these cells may be dying). (e) Cell of a regular colony,
used as control. (f) Intact cell of a stalk. (g to i) Cells of a stalk
that contain spores.
|
|
In summary, the analysis of cross sections at the light microscopy
level strongly suggests that a stalk is an organized structure and not
a random pile of cells. More importantly, these observations suggest
that there are morphological differences between cells in different
areas of the stalk. Do these results invalidate the mechanical model
for stalk formation? We believe that stalks are formed through the
mechanism suggested by this model, but spatial organization, cell
death, and (perhaps) specialization take place in a later phase, after
the stalks have been formed (see below).
Some cells in stalk contain many unusual vesicles, while others
contain spores.
To further test the notion suggested by the
analysis of cross sections that morphological differentiation does
exist between cells in a stalk, we examined stalk cells using electron
microscopy. This analysis revealed significant differences in the
morphological structure of different cells in the stalk. Many stalk
cells show an aberrant (very wide) cell wall and possess many vesicles
and in many cases unidentifiable nuclei and ribosomes (Fig. 2a, c, and
d). Many other stalk cells seem more like familiar yeast cells (Fig.
2f), but even these cells contain several vesicles or fat bodies and
are somewhat different from cells taken from regular colonies (Fig.
2e). The vesicles observed could be autophagic bodies, suggesting that
many cells are undergoing autophagy (1). To verify that
the aberrant appearance of many cells was not the consequence of
fixation and staining protocols, we looked at cells taken from a normal
colony that had been treated in parallel to a stalk with the same
technical procedures. These cells showed a familiar phenotype (Fig. 2b
and e), supporting the idea that the aberrant morphology of some stalk
cells is not a technical artifact. Interestingly, all stalk cells
inspected, including those with aberrant cytoplasm, organelles, and
cell wall, maintained cell shape. Namely, although unusually wide, in
all cases a complete cell wall surrounded the cell. Only intracellular
components were affected and ultimately destroyed, rendering the cells
transparent to the electron beam (Fig. 2a). This situation is
reminiscent of cells from higher eukaryotes when they are undergoing
programmed cell death (11, 22). We tested stalk cells for
apoptotic markers but could observe neither the classical chromatin
condensation nor DNA ladder (data not shown). We therefore cannot
define the process responsible for cell death in the stalk. It is
possible that many of the dying cells reside in the perimeter of the
stalks, an area that is exposed to the environment and is less
protected from dryness. As a result, the cells may be simply drying out.
Another type of cell found in the stalk was those that contain spores
(Fig. 2g to i). Interestingly, in most cases inspected by us, those
cells were not classical asci and contained only one or two spores
(Fig. 2g and i). In fewer cases three spores were observed (Fig. 2h),
and only in very rare cases did we see an ascus containing four spores,
as is the common case of cultures exposed to sporulation medium
(8). We do not know why most spore-containing cells
contain less than four spores. Curiously, in mammals and plants,
meiosis of an egg results in a single gamete, containing the cytoplasm
of the other three meiosis products, rather than four gametes
(9).
These findings show that stalks are composed of at least three
morphologically distinct types of cells. Combining the analysis of
cross sections (Fig. 1) with the electron microscopy studies, it seems
that dying cells are located mostly in the outer layers of the stalk,
whereas most of the spore-containing cells, as well as rounded,
familiar cells, are located in the inner core. Previously it was
reported that asci are localized to the upper parts of the stalk
(6). Thus, cell specialization is observed both along the
longitude and latitude of stalks.
High agar concentration but not UV irradiation affects morphology
of yeast colonies.
High agar concentrations and UV irradiation are
both essential for stalk formation (6), but each of these
treatments alone is not sufficient to induce stalks. It is still
possible, however, that these treatments have some effect on the
morphology of yeast colonies. To test whether UV irradiation per se has
any effect on colony organization, yeast cells were plated
(106 cells/plate) on YPD with different agar
concentrations (1 to 6%) and were subsequently UV irradiated (~40
J/m2) as described previously (6).
All surviving colonies were inspected carefully for any unusual
morphology. Also, the number of stalks formed on each agar
concentration was counted. As shown in Table
2, no stalks were formed on plates
containing less than 2% agar. Stalks were reproducibly observed on
plates supplemented with agar concentrations higher than 4%. We noted
that in some cases stalks aggregated in small areas on the plate,
suggesting that particular, localized properties of the agar are
beneficial for stalk formation. In some cases, several stalks
originated from a single colony (Fig.
3c). Finally, we noted that on plates supplemented with high agar concentrations, even colonies that were not
considered stalks acquired a particular appearance and tended to
aggregate (Fig. 3b). However, no unusual morphology of colonies was
observed on plates containing less than 2% agar (and lacking stalks),
showing that UV irradiation alone does not induce any unusual form of
multicellular organization.

View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Stalks and minute stalks tend to aggregate. (a) Two
stalks merging into one. (b) Aggregation of minute stalks, on a plate
supplemented with 4% agar (see text for details). (c) Eight stalks
originating from one colony. Pictures were taken by David Darom. The
419M strain was used.
|
|
High agar concentration alone induces dramatic changes in a
colony's morphology.
Next, we tested the effect of agar
concentration alone on the morphology of yeast colonies. We plated
yeast cells (about 50 cells of the wild-type strain SP1 per plate) on
YPD media with different agar concentrations (1 to 6%) and allowed
colonies to develop without any exposure to UV radiation. We found that
the agar concentration dramatically affected the size and shape of the
colonies. As the agar concentration increased from 1 to 4%, the
diameter of the colonies decreased logarithmically (Fig.
4a, upper row). At agar concentrations
higher than 4%, the colonies' diameter decreased only
slightly. The decrease in the size of colonies was associated with a
decrease in the total number of cells per colony (data not shown).
Corresponding to the decrease in diameter observed at high agar
concentrations, the height of the colonies increased. This effect can
be seen in Fig. 4b (upper row), which shows a side view of the same
colonies shown in Fig. 4a. Colonies formed at low agar concentrations
(<1.5%) acquired the shape of a large, flat disk. At high agar
concentrations (>3%), colonies became slim and relatively tall (1 to
3 mm) and acquired a cone shape (Fig. 4b and c, upper rows). In all
strains tested (see below), colonies appeared on the plates and
acquired their typical morphology within 24 to 72 h after plating.
Yet we noticed that colonies grown at high agar concentrations undergo
changes in their morphology if further incubated for 2 to 3 weeks at
room temperature. As shown in Fig. 4c, 3 weeks after plating, the
colonies lose the cone shape and the upper part of the colony becomes
narrower. Some of the 3-week-old colonies are reminiscent of stalks in
their overall appearance (although significantly shorter) and were
therefore termed "minute stalks." The appearance of minute stalks
after 3 weeks suggests that colonies are dynamic, multicellular
structures in which morphological and structural changes take place
after they have been formed.

View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Agar concentration, incubation time, and the Ras pathway
affect the colony's morphology. The indicated strains were grown on
YPD supplemented with different agar concentrations (1 to 6%) as
indicated in the bottom of each panel. (a) Photographs of colonies
taken from above, 1 week after plating. (b) Photographs taken from a
side view, 1 week after plating. Same colonies are shown in panels a
and b. (c) Photographs taken from a side view, 3 weeks after plating.
|
|
Although minute stalks were observed, it should be stressed that on all
agar concentrations tested, not a single stalk was observed.
In summary, agar concentration alone, unlike UV, did affect the
morphology of the colonies but could not give rise to well-developed stalks. High agar concentrations induce formation of minute stalks, which are morphologically different from the disk-shaped colonies formed on low agar concentrations. Namely, just as with stalk morphology, the structure of a common colony is also regulated, at
least partially, by mechanical and environmental factors.
Formation of minute stalks is regulated both environmentally and
genetically.
The results described above show that the agar
concentration affects the morphology of yeast colonies of the strain
SP1. To verify that the phenomenon is general, we tested the effect of agar concentrations on strains of different genetic backgrounds. Cells
of the haploid strains W303, YPH102 (isogenic to S288C), and
L5527
(isogenic to
1278b) and the diploid strain 419M were plated on YPD
media with different agar concentrations (1 to 6%) and were allowed to
grow without any exposure to UV irradiation. All strains showed a
similar phenotype. Namely, as the agar concentration increased, the
colony's shape changed from a flat disk to a cone or to a minute stalk
(data not shown). In spite of the overall similar pattern, we observed
some morphological differences between colonies of the different
strains. For example, colonies of the
1278b background (the
L5527
strain in Fig. 4a and b) are larger than SP1 colonies (Fig. 4). Also,
SP1 colonies are smooth, while
L5527 colonies are furrowed (Fig. 4a
and c and 6). These differences between strains suggest that the
structure of colonies, unlike that of stalks, might be genetically
controlled in combination with the environmental control. This notion
is in agreement with the study of Reynolds and Fink, who showed that a
combination of low agar concentration with the activity of the
FLO8 and FLO11 genes is required for biofilm
formation in S. cerevisiae (23).
Which genes may affect the shape and morphology of the colonies? One of
the differences between SP1 and
1278b genetic backgrounds is the
more active Ras pathway in
1278b. Cells of the
1278b genetic
background were shown to contain higher cAMP levels, to induce
constitutive Gcn4 activity, and to suppress the cellular stress
response (16, 30). All those characteristics are known to
be associated with an active Ras pathway (3, 5, 7, 17, 25,
27). To test whether the Ras cascade is involved in determining
colony morphology, we used mutants in the Ras pathway and plated them
on YPD medium with different agar concentrations (1 to 6%). We found
that mutants carrying a constitutively active Ras cascade formed
unusual colonies compared to the corresponding wild-type strains. As
shown in Fig. 4b, colonies of the
SP1RAS2Val19 strain did not form a
flat disk on low agar concentrations and acquired a conical shape even
at 1% agar. Additionally, on high agar concentrations, this strain
formed colonies of very small diameter (~3 mm), reminiscent in
structure but not in size of stalks. Activation of the Ras pathway in
the
1278b background (by deleting the IRA1 gene) had a
similar but not identical effect (Fig. 4b). Similar to
SP1RAS2Val19 colonies, colonies of the
ira1
strain did not form a flat disk on low agar
concentration but rather formed a bulge at their center. This bulge
grew more significant as agar concentrations increased (Fig. 4b). These
results support the notion that a combination of environmental and
genetic factors determines the colony's morphology. They point at the
Ras pathway as an important element in the machinery that controls the
colony's morphology.
The same components affect a colony's morphology and invasive
growth.
During the course of growing colonies at high agar
concentrations, we noticed that unusual morphological changes occur not only above agar surface but also inside the agar under the visible colony. In fact, some of the colonies developed structures inside the
agar, large enough to be clearly observed through the agar (Fig.
5). In most cases "under-agar"
structures originated from the center of the colony and formed a
structure reminiscent of a peg or even a short root (Fig. 5). The
tendency to grow into the agar was clearly affected by agar
concentrations. Colonies of the SP1 strain, for example, developed
shallow peg-like structures when grown on 2% agar, whereas deep
structures were developed on 4% agar (Fig. 5, top row). Yet formation
of under-agar structures is also genetically controlled. Colonies of
the SP1ras2
strain did not produce significant peg-like
structures on 2 or 4% agar (Fig. 5, second row), whereas
SP1RAS2Val19 colonies developed such
structures on both low and high agar concentrations (Fig. 5, fourth
row). The most unusual under-agar growth was observed in colonies of
the
ira1
strain. This strain manifested its unusual
under-agar growth at high agar concentrations but not at low
concentrations (Fig. 5, fifth row). Thus, also in the
1278b genetic
background, a combination of environmental and genetic components is
required for formation of peg-like structures. In addition to their
well-developed under-agar growth, the
ira1
colonies
had an unusual, furrowed appearance (Fig. 5, fifth row, and 6). It is
clear that the Ras cascade has a strong impact not only on colony size
and height (Fig. 4a and b), but also on the development of an unusual
growth pattern under the colony.

View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
High agar concentrations in combination with an active
Ras pathway induce formation of organized structures under the agar
(peg-like structures). The indicated strains were grown on YPD
supplemented with the indicated agar concentrations. Photographs were
taken from side view, usually 3 weeks after plating. Colonies were
illuminated from the back, using a high-intensity lamp, to allow
photographing the structures formed inside the agar. Pictures were
taken by David Darom.
|
|
It seems that the colony's size, height, and under-agar growth are
related phenotypes and are all controlled by the same biochemical activity, seemingly that of the Ras pathway. The Ras pathway has been
previously shown to control invasive-growth activity through the cAMP
pathway and the Kss1 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway
(19-21, 24, 26, 30). As formation of peg-like structures requires agar invasiveness, it is not surprising that
ras2
colonies cannot form fully developed pegs and that
the RAS2Val19 and ira1
strains develop deep pegs (Fig. 5). The idea that formation of pegs is
part of the invasive-growth phenomenon is further supported by the fact
that the SP1ras2
yap1
strain produced deeper and more developed peg-like structures than did SP1ras2
colonies (compare second and third rows of Fig. 5). It was previously
shown that while ras2
cells cannot invade, they regain
some invasiveness capability if their YAP1 gene is
disrupted, thereby suppressing their stress response (30).
To directly test the linkage between classical invasive growth and
formation of peg-like structures, we tested the invasive-growth capability of the various mutants. As expected, strains that developed deep pegs (RAS2Val19, ira1
,
and ras2
yap1
strains; Fig. 5) showed strong invasive activity (Fig. 6). In
contrast, strains that did not develop deep pegs (ras2
strain [Fig. 5] and ste20
strain [data not shown]) showed very low invasive activity, supporting the idea that the phenotypes are linked. Strikingly, however, some of the strains that do
not invade well (e.g., SP1ras2
strain ) did invade if plated on high agar concentrations (Fig. 6), in particular if incubated
for long periods (2 to 3 weeks). Three-week-old colonies are attached
to the agar much more strongly than 1-week old colonies (Fig. 6b;
compare colonies of the
ira
strain). Thus, time plays an important role in invasive growth. Perhaps the increasing dryness and reduction in nutrient availability are the driving forces for
time-dependent increase in invasiveness. This result strengthens the
notion that colonies are dynamic moieties that change their properties
in time. This experiment also revealed that the pattern of invasiveness
of colonies is different from that of patches. As was shown in numerous
studies (19, 24, 26, 30), patches invade the agar
homogeneously. Colonies, on the other hand, seem to invade
differentially. Cells in the perimeter do not invade the agar deeply,
whereas cells in the center invade deeply and form peg-like structures
(Fig. 6).

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Formation of structures inside the agar is linked
to classical invasive growth. The indicated strains were grown on YPD
plates supplemented with different agar concentrations (1 to 6%, as
indicated in the bottom of each panel). Colonies were photographed
before washing ( ), washed under a water current, and photographed
again (+). (a) Colonies were washed 1 week after plating. (b) Colonies
were washed 3 weeks after plating. For the ira1
strain the 1-week-old colonies are also shown. Note that a complete
layer of cells was washed off the 3-week- old ira1
colonies. These layers lay above the colony and are indicated by
arrows.
|
|
Colonies may be forming a core and shell structure just like
stalks.
While washing the colonies, we noticed that in many
strains, even invasive ones, cells of the upper layer of the colony
were easily washed off the colony by a water current. As this upper layer was most fragile and usually peeled off in many small fragments, only in rare cases were we able to remove it in one piece for demonstration (Fig. 6, colonies of the
ira1
strain
grown on 1% and 1.5% agar). Such a composition of an outer layer
covering a core colony is reminiscent of stalks' spatial organization
reported above (Fig. 1). To further verify that colonies are similar to stalks in this respect, we prepared cross sections of a regular colony
for microscopic inspection. Figure 7
shows that, similarly to stalks, colonies are also composed of an outer
layer and a core. Yet some differences between colonies and stalks are
apparent. First, the outer layer of the colony is not well separated
from the core as was shown for stalks (compare Fig. 1 and 7). In
addition, cells in the outer layer of the colony seem denser than cells in the core of the colony, whereas in stalks the phenotypes are opposite (Fig. 1). It could be that separation of outer layer and
further differentiation of this layer (perhaps involving cell death)
are slow processes in colonies and may be observed in colonies that are
several months old. This idea is supported by the fact that the outer
layer is easily peeled off only in older colonies. Clearly many more
experiments are required to determine the spatial and temporal
organization of yeast colonies. Yet based on our initial analysis, we
suggest that many morphological characteristics of stalks are found in
regular colonies. A stalk could therefore be considered a colony in
which, as a result of particular conditions, many properties are
extended or emphasized. It must be noted, however, that although from
the morphological point of view, stalks could be considered a type of
regular colony, the mechanism and regulation of stalk formation are
still a puzzle. Clearly, environmental conditions affect the morphology
(size, height, invasiveness, and formation of peg-like structures) of
both colonies and stalks of S. cerevisiae. Yet while those
properties observed in colonies are also genetically controlled, we
could not measure any genetic control on stalk formation or morphology.
Namely, all mutants tested, including a large variety of mutants of the
Ras cascade, were capable of forming fully developed stalks
(6; data not shown). Thus, stalk formation is a robust
property, which seems to be controlled exclusively by environmental
components. Further spatial organization and temporal differentiation
of the stalk may be controlled genetically. The biological relevance of
cell organization within the stalk is not clear. The possibility
remains that these structures are formed only in the laboratory, in
response to a most unique set of conditions. Nevertheless, it is clear from the present study that both stalks and regular colonies are organized and dynamic multicellular moieties in which active processes continuously take place a long time after the formation of the colony
or stalk.

View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
A colony is composed of a core and an outer layer. Light
microscopy inspection of a vertical cross section prepared from a
regular colony of the 419M strain. The picture was taken using a 16×
lens. Additional enlargements were made during the printing processes.
Part of the colony is shown.
|
|
We thank David Darom, head of the scientific photography unit of
our institute, for taking many of the photos for this paper and for
advice and help throughout the project. We thank Gerald R. Fink for
yeast strains. We thank Alan Bar-Sinai, Michal Bell, Ricardo Capone,
Melanie Grably, Irit Marbach, Ayelet Oppenheim, Giora Simchen, Ariel
Stanhill, and Gilad Yaacov for critically reading the manuscript.
| 1.
|
Abeliovich, H.,
W. A. Dunn, Jr.,
J. Kim, and D. J. Klionsky.
2000.
Dissection of autophagosome biogenesis into distinct nucleation and expansion steps.
J. Cell Biol.
151:1025-1034[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Ben-Jacob, E.,
I. Cohen, and D. L. Gutnick.
1998.
Cooperative organization of bacterial colonies: from genotype to morphotype.
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
52:779-806[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Broach, J. R., and R. J. Deschenes.
1990.
The function of ras genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Adv. Cancer Res
54:79-139[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Dworkin, M.
1997.
The Myxobacterales [(fruiting) Myxobacterales], 2nd ed., vol. 1.
CRC Press, Cleveland, Ohio.
|
| 5.
|
Engelberg, D.,
C. Klein,
H. Martinetto,
K. Struhl, and M. Karin.
1994.
The UV response involving the Ras signaling pathway and AP-1 transcription factors is conserved between yeast and mammals.
Cell
77:381-390[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Engelberg, D.,
A. Mimran,
H. Martinetto,
J. Otto,
G. Simchen,
M. Karin, and G. R. Fink.
1998.
Multicellular stalk-like structures in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J. Bacteriol.
180:3992-3996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Engelberg, D.,
E. Zandi,
C. S. Parker, and M. Karin.
1994.
The yeast and mammalian Ras pathways control transcription of heat shock genes independently of heat shock transcription factor.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:4929-4937[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Esposito, R. E., and S. Klapholz.
1981.
Meiosis and ascospore development.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 9.
|
Gilbert, S. F.
1997.
Developmental biology, 5th ed.
Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
|
| 10.
|
Gimeno, C. J.,
P. O. Ljungdahl,
C. A. Styles, and G. R. Fink.
1992.
Unipolar cell divisions in the yeast S. cerevisiae lead to filamentous growth: regulation by starvation and RAS.
Cell
68:1077-1090[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Jacobson, M. D.,
M. Weil, and M. C. Raff.
1997.
Programmed cell death in animal development.
Cell
88:347-354[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Kessin, R. H., and M. M. V.-L. Campagne.
1992.
The development of social amoeba.
Am. Sci.
80:556-565.
|
| 13.
|
Kim, S. K.,
D. Kaiser, and A. Kuspa.
1992.
Control of cell density and pattern by intercellular signaling in Myxococcus development.
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
46:117-139[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Liu, H.,
C. A. Styles, and G. R. Fink.
1996.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C has a mutation in FLO8, a gene required for filamentous growth.
Genetics
144:967-978[Abstract].
|
| 15.
|
Lo, W. S., and A. M. Dranginis.
1998.
The cell surface flocculin Flo11 is required for pseudohyphae formation and invasion by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Biol. Cell
9:161-171[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Marbach, I.,
R. Licht,
H. Frohnmeyer, and D. Engelberg.
2001.
Gcn2 mediates Gcn4 activation in response to glucose stimulation or UV radiation not via GCN4 translation.
J. Biol. Chem.
276:16944-16951[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Marchler, G.,
C. Schuller,
G. Adam, and H. Ruis.
1993.
A Saccharomyces cerevisiae UAS element controlled by protein kinase A activates transcription in response to a variety of stress conditions.
EMBO J.
12:1997-2003[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Mendelson, N. H., and B. Salhi.
1996.
Patterns of reporter gene expression in the phase diagram of Bacillus subtilis colony forms.
J. Bacteriol.
178:1980-1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Mosch, H. U.,
E. Kubler,
S. Krappmann,
G. R. Fink, and G. H. Braus.
1999.
Crosstalk between the Ras2p-controlled mitogen-activated protein kinase and cAMP pathways during invasive growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Biol. Cell
10:1325-1335[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Mosch, H. U.,
R. L. Roberts, and G. R. Fink.
1996.
Ras2 signals via the Cdc42/Ste20/mitogen-activated protein kinase module to induce filamentous growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:5352-5356[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Pan, X.,
T. Harashima, and J. Heitman.
2000.
Signal transduction cascades regulating pseudohyphal differentiation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Curr. Opin. Microbiol
3:567-572[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Raff, M. C.
1992.
Social controls on cell survival and cell death.
Nature
356:397-400[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Reynolds, T. B., and G. R. Fink.
2001.
Bakers' yeast, a model for fungal biofilm formation.
Science
291:878-881[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Roberts, R. L., and G. R. Fink.
1994.
Elements of a single MAP kinase cascade in Saccharomyces cerevisiae mediate two developmental programs in the same cell type: mating and invasive growth.
Genes Dev.
8:2974-2985[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Ruis, H., and C. Schuller.
1995.
Stress signaling in yeast.
Bioessays
17:959-965[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Rupp, S.,
E. Summers,
H. J. Lo,
H. Madhani, and G. Fink.
1999.
MAP kinase and cAMP filamentation signaling pathways converge on the unusually large promoter of the yeast FLO11 gene.
EMBO J.
18:1257-1269[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Shin, D. Y.,
K. Matsumoto,
H. Iida,
I. Uno, and T. Ishikawa.
1987.
Heat shock response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants altered in cyclic AMP-dependent protein phosphorylation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7:244-250[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Sikorski, R. S., and P. Hieter.
1989.
A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Genetics
122:19-27[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Springer, M. L., and C. Yanofsky.
1989.
A morphological and genetic analysis of conidiophore development in Neurospora crassa.
Genes Dev.
3:559-571[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Stanhill, A.,
N. Schick, and D. Engelberg.
1999.
The yeast Ras/cyclic AMP pathway induces invasive growth by suppressing the cellular stress response.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:7529-7538[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Timberlake, W. E.
1990.
Molecular genetics of Aspergillus development.
Annu. Rev. Genet.
24:5-36[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Toda, T.,
I. Uno,
T. Ishikawa,
S. Powers,
T. Kataoka,
D. Broek,
S. Cameron,
J. Broach,
K. Matsumoto, and M. Wigler.
1985.
In yeast, RAS proteins are controlling elements of adenylate cyclase.
Cell
40:27-36[CrossRef][Medline].
|