Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, October 2001, p. 5788-5792, Vol. 183, No. 19
Institute of Microbiology, Swiss Federal
Institute of Technology Zürich, CH-8092 Zürich,
Switzerland
Received 6 February 2001/Accepted 6 July 2001
Methanothermobacter wolfeii (formerly
Methanobacterium wolfei), a thermophilic methanoarchaeon
whose cultures lyse upon hydrogen starvation, carries a defective
prophage called Cultures of the thermophilic
methanoarchaeon Methanothermobacter wolfeii (formerly
Methanobacterium wolfei) (20, 21) spontaneously lyse upon hydrogen limitation (10). However, no phage-like
particles have been detected in the culture supernatant or autolysate.
A lytic enzyme was purified from the autolysate, and this enzyme has
been shown to be a pseudomurein endoisopeptidase (9).
M. wolfeii proved insensitive to the virulent phage Cloning, PCR amplification, and nucleotide sequence determination
of Properties of
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.19.5788-5792.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
The Genome of Archaeal Prophage
M100 Encodes the Lytic
Enzyme Responsible for Autolysis of
Methanothermobacter wolfeii
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
M100 on its chromosome. The nucleotide sequence of
M100 and its flanking regions was established and compared to that
of the previously sequenced phage
M2 of Methanothermobacter
marburgensis (formerly Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum Marburg). The
M100 genome extends over
28,798 bp, and its borders are defined by flanking 21-bp direct repeats of a pure-AT sequence, which very likely forms the core of the putative
attachment site where the crossing over occurred during integration. A
large fragment of 2,793 bp, IFa, apparently inserted into
M100 but
is absent in the genome of
M2. The remaining part of the
M100
genome showed 70.8% nucleotide sequence identity to the whole genome
of
M2. Thirty-four open reading frames (ORFs) on the forward strand
and one ORF on the reverse strand were identified in the
M100
genome. Comparison of
M100-encoded ORFs to those encoded by phage
M2 and to other known protein sequences permitted the assignment of
putative functions to some ORFs. The ORF28 protein of
M100 was
identified as the previously known autolytic enzyme pseudomurein
endoisopeptidase PeiW produced by M. wolfeii.
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
M1
and its deletion mutant
M2 of Methanothermobacter
marburgensis (formerly Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum) Marburg (P. Pfister, unpublished
observation). The results of Southern hybridization suggested that
there is a prophage in the chromosome of M. wolfeii,
M100, which is homologous to phages
M1 and
M2
(14, 19; P. Pfister, unpublished data). The approximate
location of
M100 in the M. wolfeii chromosome was
determined, and most of the prophage was shown to be located on a ca.
30-kb NotI-NheI fragment (19). Since
attempts to detect free phage particles had failed,
M100 was assumed
to be defective. In contrast, infection of M. marburgensis
Marburg with phages
M1 and
M2 consistently led to lysis of the
host. The complete nucleotide sequence of
M2 was established, and
some of its open reading frames (ORFs) and the proteins they encode
were characterized (15). In order to explore the
relationships between the defective prophage
M100, the autolysis
phenomenon, and the
M1 and
M2 phages, we determined and analyzed
the sequence of
M100 and its flanking regions.
M100 and its flanking regions.
Portions of
M100 and its
flanking regions were obtained from the M. wolfeii
chromosome as overlapping clones and PCR fragments (data not shown).
The methods used included the following: shotgun cloning, construction,
and screening of a SuperCos1-based cosmid library; screening of a
-ZAP Express genomic library (7); PCR amplification of
either nonclonable portions or portions that were difficult to clone on
both sides of
M100; and PCR amplification of the regions across the
restriction sites of fragments obtained by shotgun cloning. The
nucleotide sequences of both strands were determined by primer walking
and then assembled.
M100 DNA.
The border of
M100 is defined by
the flanking 21-bp AT-only direct repeats, which probably represent the
core of the putative attachment site (see below). The length of the
M100 genome extends over 28,798 bp with an overall GC content of
45.4%. This is somewhat lower than the 48.3% GC determined for
M. wolfeii by a melting point analysis (11).
Sequence alignment of
M100 and
M2 (Fig. 1) reveals that, other than point
mutations and small deletions or insertions, there is a large fragment
of 2,793 bp, IFa, inserted into
M100 between coordinates 5272 and
8066. The GC content of the IFa element is 33.4%, which is
significantly lower than those of
M100 and
M100 without IFa
(46.7%). Like
M2, the GC content of the
M100 sequence is not
evenly distributed, with five low-GC (<40%) DNA regions of at least
300 nucleotides (nt) extending over parts of ORFs orf6,
orf28, orf29, and orf30 and over the entire ORFs orf5, the IFa-encoded orfB,
-C, and -D, and the putative attachment sites
attL and attR (Fig. 1).

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Schematic representation of the defective prophage with
its flanking regions and comparison to that of phage
M2. The ORFs
are represented by boxes numbered as in Table 1, and their vertical
placement indicates the gene location in one of the six possible
reading frames. Homologous ORFs carry the same numbers, and the
assigned functions for some ORFs of
M2 are reported. MTW1215 and
MTW1216 represent the two ORFs encoded by the chromosome sequences
flanking
M100. orfA to orfE are unique
to
M100. The experimentally determined pac locus for
M2 is shown as a solid black triangle. The IFa fragment (black bar)
and the DNA regions with at least 200 bp with >98% identity in
M100 and
M2 (grey bars) are indicated. Three arrowheads represent
three contiguous copies of a direct repeat of 125 nt in the vicinity of
the left end of the IFa fragment.
M2, which, based on
its similarity to oriC of Escherichia coli, was
proposed to be the most-probable replication origin (Pfister,
unpublished). Moreover, the direct repeats do not overlap any coding
regions of
M100 and
M2.
After the IFa element was removed, the remaining region of
M100
(26,005 bp) could be aligned with that of
M2 (26,111 bp) over their
full length with the GAP program of the Genetics Computer Group (GCG).
It shows 70.8% identity in a 26,752-nt overlap. Eight stretches of
sequence longer than 200 bp in
M100 and
M2, including the regions
harboring the putative origin of replication and the experimentally
determined pac site (8), have >98% identity (Fig. 1).
Coding capacity of
M100 and comparison to that of
M2.
Putative ORFs were defined based on the following assumptions: an ORF
should code for a polypeptide of at least 90 amino acids (aa) and be
preceded by a ribosome binding site with at least 45% identity to the
proposed consensus sequence 5'-AGGAGGTGATC-3' (2). Two exceptions were made; these exceptions were
orf2, encoding a 85-aa polypeptide with a homologue of 95 aa
in
M2, and orf29, encoding a putative integrase, the
ribosome binding site of which has only 36% identity to the consensus
sequence (as in
M2). Consequently, 34 genes were identified on the
forward strand and 1 gene was identified on the reverse strand (Fig. 1 and Table 1).
|
M2. The ORFs of
M100 and
M2 exhibit similarities in size, location in the genome,
and sequence identity, which ranges from 39.9 to 100% at both the
nucleotide and amino acid levels. The homologue of
M2
orf20 is missing in
M100 (Fig. 1 and Table 1). The ORFA protein (155 aa) apparently has no homologue of similar length in
M2. The nucleotide sequence of
M2 encodes a peptide of 86 aa,
homologous to the N terminus of ORFA (probability calculated using
BLAST, 10
24). Sequence alignment suggests that
the C-terminal part of ORFA was created by insertion of three
noncontiguous DNA stretches into the
M100 genome. Database searches
with BLAST at the National Center for Biotechnology Information
(1) also revealed that 16 of the proposed proteins are
similar to other protein sequences (Table 1).
Integration site of
M100 in the chromosome of M.
wolfeii.
Screening for ORFs encoded by regions of
the M. wolfeii chromosome flanking
M100 revealed two
genes encoding MTW1216 on the forward strand upstream of the
putative attL site and MTW1215 on the reverse strand downstream of the
putative attR site (Fig. 1). The two host genes share high similarity
to their counterparts (i.e., mth1215 and mth1216)
in the Methanobacterium thermautotrophicus
H genome
(18); therefore, the same numbers were used to designate the M. wolfeii homologues. At the amino acid level, MTW1216
exhibits 77% identity to MTH1216 (pantothenate metabolism
flavoprotein) and MTW1215 is 81.9% identical to MTH1215
(fibrillarin-like pre-rRNA processing factor). MTW1215 and
MTW1216 are transcribed convergently, as are MTH1215 and MTH1216. The
MTH1215 gene in the M. thermautotrophicus
H genome
is located at nucleotides 1117886 to 1118560 on the direct strand, and
the gene encoding MTH1216 is located at nucleotides 1119977 to
1118817 on the complementary strand (18). Remarkably, integration of
M100 occurred exactly within the intergenic regions between these two host genes and between prophage genes
orf28 (peiW) and orf29. Neither the
host genes nor ORFs of the defective prophage were disrupted in terms
of their transcription potential. Thus, the integration mode of
M100
resembles that of the major integration pattern of coliphage
(4).
Putative attachment sites of
M100.
Sequence analysis
revealed that
M100 is flanked by direct repeats of a 21-bp
pure-AT nucleotide sequence. This sequence is very likely the core
of putative attachment sites where the crossing-over occurred during
integration and/or excision. Therefore, the flanking regions of the
core might be defined as hybrid attL and attR sites. Conversely, the
sequences of attP [(pro)phage-encoded attachment site] and attB
[chromosomal attachment site] can be derived, although their exact
lengths remain to be determined (Fig.
2A). In the region between
orf28 and orf29 of phage
M2 (i.e., in
the putative attP site of phage
M2) and between MTH1216 and
MTH1215 of M. thermautotrophicus
H (i.e., in the putative
attB site), similar AT-rich sequences with four and three mismatches,
respectively, were identified (Fig. 2B). Interestingly, one stretch of
sequence which is 100% identical to the core sequence but located in a different context was present in another region of the
M. thermautotrophicus
H genome (Fig. 2B). It is not known
whether additional core-like sequences occur in the M. wolfeii genome. For phage
, the core of the attachment sites
consists of 15-bp AT-rich sequences (3). There are some
similarities between the sequences of the
and
M100 cores (Fig.
2C).
|
Experimental identification of the autolytic enzyme pseudomurein
endoisopeptidase PeiW.
The deduced N-terminal sequence of the
protein encoded by orf28 of prophage
M100 is identical to
that of the experimentally determined N-terminal sequence (18 aa) of
the autolytic enzyme produced by M. wolfeii
(15). This strongly suggests that the ORF28 protein is the
pseudomurein endoisopeptidase PeiW that has been known for more than 10 years (9). The predicted molecular mass (33.4 kDa) is
consistent with the observed 33 kDa for the autolytic enzyme
(9).
Conclusions.
The complete nucleotide sequences of phage
M2 of M. marburgensis and of the defective prophage
M100 of M. wolfeii and its flanking regions now
allow us to make a thorough comparison between these two elements. In
contrast to two other archaeal defective prophages in
Halobacterium halobium (17) and in
Sulfolobus sp. strain B12 (16), the sequence of
M100 contains all the information necessary for synthesis of
structural proteins homologous to those of
M2. In addition to small
insertions, deletions, and point mutations, downstream of the
putative replication origin,
M100 carries the inserted
fragment IFa of 2,793 bp, which apparently originated from another
source. The IFa element has none of the distinct characteristics
usually found in IS sequences (13). It encodes three
putative ORFs, of which two short ones (i.e., orfB and
orfC) are similar to hypothetical ORFs of M. thermautotrophicus
H. The largest ORF, orfD, has
no homologues in the database, although PropSearch at
the EMBL (6) yields some hits related to DNA metabolism.
One of these hits is the potential transposase for
IS1151 of Clostridium perfringens
(5). Using the GAP program of GCG, the two proteins show
18% identity in a 522-aa overlap. Only the 5' part of the IFa DNA
sequence, which is a duplication of the sequence harboring the
putative origin of replication, shows traces of terminal
redundancy, possibly derived from the packaging mechanism of phage
M2 (8). Therefore, the rearrangement due to the
insertion of this IFa in the DNA of
M100 might have led to this
defect. However, there is no evidence explaining the order of insertion
of IFa into the
M100 genome and integration of the
M100
ancestor(s), if any, into the M. wolfeii chromosome. Alternatively,
M100 might be defective due to the lack of a
functional excisionase, which is usually required to excise
(pro)- phage genomes from their host chromosomes, while
M2
might recruit the putative excisionase function of the ORF5 encoded by
plasmid pME2001 present in the host strain (12).
M2 and
M100 are highly similar to members of the Int family of site-specific recombinases, the presence of a 21-bp pure-AT direct repeat in the flanking regions of
M100 supports the view that
M100 is really a
M2-related prophage. Such direct repeats are typically derived from integrative recombination of phage DNA with the
host chromosome (3). Since genes encoding site-specific integrases are not found in genomes of virulent phages, phages
M1
and
M2 might be temperate phages.
Nucleotide sequence accession number. The sequence is available in GenBank under accession number AF301375.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank R. Hedderich for providing the
-ZAP Express genomic
library of M. wolfeii and U. Kües for providing
E. coli strain NM554 and cosmid SuperCos1.
This work was supported in part by grant 3100-50593.97 from the Swiss National Foundation for Scientific Research.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of Microbiology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zürich, Schmelzbergstrasse 7, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland. Phone: 41 1 632 4488. Fax: 41 1 632 1148. E-mail: wasserfallen{at}micro.biol.ethz.ch.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Altschul, S. F., W. Gish, W. Miller, E. W. Myers, and D. J. Lipman. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 2. | Brown, J. W., C. J. Daniels, and J. N. Reeve. 1989. Gene structure, organization, and expression in archaebacteria. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 16:287-338[Medline]. |
| 3. |
Campbell, A. M.
1992.
Chromosomal insertion sites for phages and plasmids.
J. Bacteriol.
174:7495-7499 |
| 4. | Campbell, A. M. 1993. Thirty years ago in genetics: prophage insertion into bacterial chromosomes. Genetics 133:433-437[Medline]. |
| 5. |
Daube, G.,
P. Simon, and A. Kaeckenbeeck.
1993.
IS1151, an IS-like element of Clostridium perfringens.
Nucleic Acids Res.
21:352 |
| 6. | Hobohm, U., and C. Sander. 1995. A sequence property approach to searching protein databases. J. Mol. Biol. 251:390-399[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 7. | Hochheimer, A., R. Hedderich, and R. K. Thauer. 1998. The formylmethanofuran dehydrogenase isoenzymes in Methanobacterium wolfei and Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum: induction of the molybdenum isoenzyme by molybdate and constitutive synthesis of the tungsten isoenzyme. Arch. Microbiol. 170:389-393[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. |
Jordan, M.,
L. Meile, and T. Leisinger.
1989.
Organization of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum bacteriophage M1 DNA.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
220:161-164[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9. |
Kiener, A.,
H. König,
J. Winter, and T. Leisinger.
1987.
Purification and use of Methanobacterium wolfei pseudomurein endopeptidase for lysis of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum.
J. Bacteriol.
169:1010-1016 |
| 10. | König, H., R. Semmler, C. Lerch, and J. Winter. 1985. Evidence for the occurrence of autolytic enzymes in Methanobacterium wolfei. Arch. Microbiol. 141:177-180[CrossRef]. |
| 11. |
Kotelnikova, S. V.,
A. Y. Obraztsova,
K.-H. Blotevogel, and I. N. Popov.
1993.
Taxonomic analysis of thermophilic strains of the genus Methanobacterium: reclassification of Methanobacterium thermoalcaliphilum as a synonym of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
43:591-596 |
| 12. | Luo, Y., T. Leisinger, and A. Wasserfallen. 2001. Comparative sequence analysis of plasmids pME2001 and pME2200 of Methanothermobacter marburgensis strains Marburg and ZH3. Plasmid 45:18-30[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 13. |
Mahillon, J., and M. Chandler.
1998.
Insertion sequences.
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
62:725-774 |
| 14. |
Meile, L.,
U. Jenal,
D. Studer,
M. Jordan, and T. Leisinger.
1989.
Characterization of M1: a virulent phage of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum Marburg.
Arch. Microbiol.
152:105-110[CrossRef].
|
| 15. |
Pfister, P.,
A. Wasserfallen,
R. Stettler, and T. Leisinger.
1998.
Molecular analysis of Methanobacterium phage M2.
Mol. Microbiol.
30:233-244[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16. | Reiter, W. D., and P. Palm. 1990. Identification and characterization of a defective SSV1 genome integrated into a tRNA gene in the archaebacterium Sulfolobus sp. B12. Mol. Gen. Genet. 221:65-71[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 17. |
Schnabel, H.
1984.
An immune strain of Halobacterium halobium carries the invertible L segment of phage H as a plasmid.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
81:1017-1020 |
| 18. |
Smith, D. R.,
L. A. Doucette-Stamm,
C. Deloughery,
H. Lee,
J. Dubois,
T. Aldredge,
R. Bashirzadeh,
D. Blakely,
R. Cook,
K. Gilbert,
D. Harrison,
L. Hoang,
P. Keagle,
W. Lumm,
B. Pothier,
D. Qiu,
R. Spadafora,
R. Vicaire,
Y. Wang,
J. Wierzbowski,
R. Gibson,
N. Jiwani,
A. Caruso,
D. Bush,
H. Safer,
D. Patwell,
S. Prabhakar,
S. McDougall,
G. Shimer,
A. Goyal,
S. Pietrokovski,
G. M. Church,
C. J. Daniels,
J.-I. Mao,
P. Rice,
J. Nölling, and J. N. Reeve.
1997.
Complete genome sequence of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum H: functional analysis and comparative genomics.
J. Bacteriol.
179:7135-7155 |
| 19. | Stettler, R., C. Thurner, D. Stax, L. Meile, and T. Leisinger. 1995. Evidence for a defective prophage on the chromosome of Methanobacterium wolfei. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 132:85-89[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 20. | Wasserfallen, A., J. Nölling, P. Pfister, J. Reeve, and E. Conway de Macario. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of 18 thermophilic Methanobacterium isolates supports the proposals to create a new genus, Methanothermobacter gen. nov., and to reclassify several isolates in three species, Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus comb. nov., Methanothermobacter wolfeii comb. nov., and Methanothermobacter marburgensis sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50:43-53[Abstract]. |
| 21. | Winter, J., C. Lerp, H.-P. Zabel, F. X. Wildenauer, H. König, and F. Schindler. 1984. Methanobacterium wolfei sp. nov., a new tungsten-requiring, thermophilic, autotrophic methanogen. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 5:457-466. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»