Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, January 2001, p. 500-511, Vol. 183, No. 2
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.2.500-511.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Evidence for Horizontal Transfer of
SsuDAT1I Restriction-Modification Genes to the
Streptococcus suis Genome
Tsutomu
Sekizaki,1,*
Yoshiko
Otani,2
Makoto
Osaki,1
Daisuke
Takamatsu,1 and
Yoshihiro
Shimoji1
National Institute of Animal Health, Tsukuba,
Ibaraki 305-0856,1 and Kenhoku
Livestock Hygiene Service Center, Mito, Ibaraki
310-0002,2 Japan
Received 17 July 2000/Accepted 24 October 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Different strains of Streptococcus suis serotypes 1 and
2 isolated from pigs either contained a restriction-modification (R-M) system or lacked it. The R-M system was an isoschizomer of
Streptococcus pneumoniae DpnII, which recognizes nucleotide
sequence 5'-GATC-3'. The nucleotide sequencing of the genes encoding
the R-M system in S. suis DAT1, designated
SsuDAT1I, showed that the SsuDAT1I gene region
contained two methyltransferase genes, designated ssuMA and
ssuMB, as does the DpnII system. The deduced
amino acid sequences of M.SsuMA and M.SsuMB
showed 70 and 90% identity to M.DpnII and
M.DpnA, respectively. However, the SsuDAT1I
system contained two isoschizomeric restriction endonuclease genes,
designated ssuRA and ssuRB. The deduced amino
acid sequence of R.SsuRA was 49% identical to that of
R.DpnII, and R.SsuRB was 72% identical to
R.LlaDCHI of Lactococcus lactis subsp.
cremoris DCH-4. The four SsuDAT1I genes
overlapped and were bounded by purine biosynthetic gene clusters in the
following gene order:
purF-purM-purN-purH-ssuMA-ssuMB-ssuRA-ssuRB-purD-purE. The
G+C content of the SsuDAT1I gene region (34.1%) was lower than that of the pur region (48.9%), suggesting horizontal
transfer of the SsuDAT1I system. No transposable element or
long-repeat sequence was found in the flanking regions. The
SsuDAT1I genes were functional by themselves, as they were
individually expressed in Escherichia coli. Comparison of
the sequences between strains with and without the R-M system showed
that only the region from 53 bp upstream of ssuMA to 5 bp
downstream of ssuRB was inserted in the intergenic sequence
between purH and purD and that the insertion
target site was not the recognition site of SsuDAT1I. No
notable substitutions or insertions could be found, and the structures
were conserved among all the strains. These results suggest that the
SsuDAT1I system could have been integrated into the
S. suis chromosome by an illegitimate recombination mechanism.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
More than 3,000 restriction-modification (R-M) systems have been identified in a wide
variety of microorganisms, where they are thought to protect the host
from invasion by foreign DNA. Only a minority of R-M systems have been
sequenced (6, 37, 56). Among them, some type II R-M
systems, which recognize 4-bp palindromic sequence 5'-GATC-3', involve
a variety of isoschizomers. Three classes can be distinguished by their
manners of DNA cleavage and susceptibilities to DNA methylation. The
first class of isoschizomers, represented by Sau3AI, which
was described for Staphylococcus aureus, is prevented from
digesting host DNA by a cognate 5-methylcytosine methyltransferase and
is not influenced by the modification of N6-methyladenine (48, 56). The
second class, represented by DpnI, which was described for
Streptococcus pneumoniae, is unique among restriction
endonucleases in that it cleaves only at methylated DNA sequence
5'-GmeATC-3', and thus the cells producing DpnI do not
carry the corresponding methyltransferase gene (22, 23). The third class, including MboI, DpnII, and
LlaDCHI, which were described for Moraxella
bovis, S. pneumoniae, and Lactococcus lactis, respectively, contains restriction endonucleases
complementary to the second class, in that they cleave at the same
sequence, 5'-GATC-3', but only when it is unmethylated (11,
22, 23, 30, 55). Bacterial cells expressing the third
class of restriction endonucleases also contain an
N6-methyladenine methyltransferase, which
methylates adenine in the 5'-GATC-3' sequences of the host DNA.
The N6-methyladenine methyltransferase is
functionally identical to the Dam methylase of Escherichia
coli, and the evolutionary relatedness of these methylases has
been discussed (29, 35).
Except for the second class, the type II R-M systems described above
are generally composed of two structural genes, one for an endonuclease
and a second for a methyltransferase, as is typical of other type II
R-M systems (6, 56). However, two of these, DpnII and LlaDCHI, have genes that encode two
methyltransferases (8, 24, 30). A study of
well-characterized DpnII and a comparison of it with the
LlaDCHI system indicated that in addition to the
conventional double-stranded DNA methyltransferase, a single-stranded DNA methyltransferase was encoded, and this activity potentially facilitated the uptake of intact DNA via conjugation in the respective host bacteria. Another property of interest is that the two
methyltransferases of the DpnII system, M.DpnII
and M.DpnA, were highly homologous to those of the
LlaDCHI system, M.LlaA and M.LlaB, respectively (75 and 88% identity). Thus the two M systems are thought to have the
same origin, whereas the two restriction endonucleases showed relatively low homology (only 31% identity), suggesting the complexity of the evolutionary origin of restriction endonuclease genes
(30).
Many genes for R-M systems have been found to be located on
transferable elements such as plasmids and bacteriophages, or, in some
cases, genes encoding proteins involved in DNA mobility, such as
transposases, integrases, and invertases, are found in the vicinity of
R-M systems (5, 7, 19, 26, 38, 46, 51, 54, 56). These
genetic structures may facilitate the transfer of R-M systems and have
led to the speculation that R-M genes could migrate among
microorganisms of different genera. The acquisition or loss of an R-M
system followed by a double-strand breakage may play a role in
illegitimate recombination when the two genetic segments have a few
base pairs of homology (21). The above findings, together
with recent studies on the complete sequences of bacterial genomes,
have led to a proposal that R-M systems are likely to be mobile genetic
elements that mediate large-scale chromosomal conversions and that such
genome plasticity may play a role in genome dynamics (20).
However, these studies have thus far been conducted with only a few
strains or with few different species (3, 17, 20, 47, 58).
While the results of the above studies imply horizontal transfer of R-M
systems, the precise locations of R-M systems in the chromosome and/or the genetic structures flanking the R-M systems have yet to be studied
extensively. Therefore, further studies will be needed in order to make
a more generalized statement relative to the mobility of R-M systems.
Streptococcus suis is a gram-positive, facultatively
anaerobic coccus that has been implicated as the cause of a wide range of clinical disease syndromes in swine and other domestic animals. The
disease syndromes caused by S. suis in swine include
arthritis, meningitis, pneumonia, septicemia, endocarditis,
polyserositis, abortions, and abscesses (9). S. suis has also been implicated in human disease (28).
S. suis strains are currently classified into 35 serotypes
on the basis of their capsular polysaccharide antigens (12, 13,
36). Among them, strains frequently isolated from diseased pigs
and exhibiting a high degree of virulence mostly belong to serotype 2 (9, 15, 16). Although several genes of S. suis
have been cloned and characterized (34, 41, 43-45, 49),
the R-M system(s) of this bacterial species has not been described.
We found that some strains of serotypes 1 and 2 of S. suis
possessed an R-M system that mimicked the DpnII and
LlaDCHI systems, whereas the reference strain of serotype 2, NCTC10234, as well as other strains lacked this R-M system. This report
describes the genetic organization of the R-M system and its flanking
regions. The R-M system was found to contain two genes encoding
methyltransferases similar to those of the DpnII and
LlaDCHI systems and two genes encoding restriction
endonucleases, one similar to R.DpnII and the other highly
homologous to R.LlaDCHI. Comparison of the DNA sequences of
the R-M system and its flanking regions among different strains
containing the R-M system and those lacking the system indicated a
horizontal transfer of the R-M system, which may have occurred by a
unique mechanism of gene transfer.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains, vectors, enzymes, media, and culture
conditions.
S. suis strains of serotypes 1 and 2 used are
listed in Table 1. Strain NCTC10234, a
reference strain of serotype 2, was purchased from the National
Collection of Type Cultures, Central Public Health Laboratory, London,
England. Strain DAT1 was previously described (49). Other
S. suis strains were independently isolated from diseases
pigs in Japan and stocked in our laboratory. E. coli strains
used were SCS110 (thr leu endA thi-1 lacY galK galT ara tonA tsx
dam dcm supE44 rpsL
(lac-proAB) [F' traD36
proAB lacIqZ
M15]) (Stratagene, La
Jolla, Calif.), C600 (F
thr-1 thi-1 leuB6 lacY1
tonA21 supE44) (39), XL-1 blue MRF' [
(mcrA)183
(mcrCB-hsdSMR-mrr)173 endA1 supE44 thi-1 recA1
gyrA96 relA1 lac [F' proAB
lacIqZ
M15 Tn10])
(Stratagene), XLOLR {
(mcrA)183
(mcrCB-hsdSMR-mrr)173 endA1 thi-1 recA1 gyrA96
relA1 lac [F' proAB
lacIqZ
M15 Tn10]
Su

} (Stratagene), and DH5
(F
endA1 recA1 hsdR17
(rK
mK+) supE44
thi-1 gyrA relA1
80lacZ
M15
(lacZYA-argF) deoR+)
(39). The plasmid vectors used for gene cloning were pUC19 (59), pCR2.1 (Invitrogen, Groningen, The Netherlands), and
pHSG576 (50). Phagemid vector
ZAP Express (Stratagene)
was used for the construction of the genomic library. All restriction
endonucleases and other enzymes were purchased from Takara Shuzo Co.
Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan) except DpnI, which was purchased from
Boehringer GmbH (Mannheim, Germany), and used according to the
manufacturers' recommendations. S. suis strains were
grown in Todd-Hewitt (TH) broth or agar medium (Difco Laboratories,
Detroit, Mich.) at 37°C under 5% CO2 for 18 h.
E. coli strains were cultured in Luria-Bertani broth or agar medium (Difco Laboratories) supplemented with, when necessary, ampicillin (50 µg/ml), kanamycin (25 µg/ml), and chloramphenicol (25 µg/ml) at 37°C for 18 h.
Analysis of DNA methylation.
Genomic DNA was isolated from
S. suis and E. coli grown on agar medium by
standard procedures as described previously (34, 42).
Methylation of DNA was determined directly by testing the susceptibility of genomic DNA to the restriction endonucleases DpnI and MboI in vitro. Restriction digests were
analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis by standard procedures
(39).
Restriction endonuclease assay in crude extracts.
The
presence of restriction endonucleases could be detected in crude
extracts of S. suis and E. coli. Extracts of
S. suis were prepared according to the procedures described
by Muckerman et al. (31). Briefly, 5-ml cultures of
S. suis were grown in TH broth to an optical density at 600 nm of approximately 0.4. After centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 2 min at 4°C, the cell pellet was suspended in 0.1 ml of
10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6)-50 mM NaCl. Then 2.5 µl of Triton X-100 was
added, and the mixture was incubated at 30°C for 15 min for cell
lysis. After incubation, the cells were removed by centrifugation at
20,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C, and the extracts were
directly used for the assay. Extracts of E. coli were
prepared as described by Schleif (40). Briefly, bacterial
cells collected from 1 ml of an overnight shaking culture in
Luria-Bertani broth supplemented with appropriate antibiotics were
suspended in 0.1 ml of 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6)-10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol in Eppendorf tubes. The cell suspensions were then sonicated on ice
with a Sonifier 250 (Branson Ultrasonics Corp., Danbury, Conn.) with a
microtip. Sonication was carried out twice for 10 s with a 1-min
interval and with a 50% duty cycle and an output of 7. After
sonication, the cell debris was removed by centrifugation at
20,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C, and the supernatants
were directly used for the assay. Enzyme reactions were performed by
standard procedures for restriction endonuclease digests with a
high-salt universal buffer (39).
PCR amplifications.
Synthetic oligonucleotide primers
specifically designed for amplification of the R-M gene region in this
study are listed in Table 2. Ex
Taq polymerase (Takara) was used for the amplification according
to the manufacturer's instructions except that the concentration of
MgCl2 was 3 mM. DNA amplification was carried out in a
Perkin-Elmer thermal cycler, model 2400 or 9600 (PE Biosystems Japan,
Tokyo, Japan), and the program consisted of incubation for 1 min at
96°C, 30 cycles of 20 s at 96°C, 20 s at 60°C, and 3 min at 68°C, and final incubation for 5 min at 68°C.
An LA PCR kit (Takara) was used for inverse PCR according to the
manufacturer's instructions except that the concentration
of
MgCl
2 was 3 mM. The rationale and the protocol for inverse
PCR were essentially the same as those described elsewhere
(
32).
Genomic DNA of
S. suis strain DAT1 was
digested with
BamHI and
self-ligated using a DNA ligation
kit (Takara). The ligation mixture
was used as a template for the
inverse
PCR.
Construction of genomic library and cloning procedures.
Genomic DNA of S. suis DAT1 was partially digested with
Sau3AI and size fractionated by standard procedures
(39). DNA fragments of approximately 5 to 7 kb were
ligated with BamHI-digested dephosphorylated
ZAP Express
vector (Stratagene) and subjected to in vitro packaging with a GigaPack
III kit (Stratagene) according to the instructions of the manufacturer.
The library was screened via plaque hybridization using standard
procedures (39). Phages from the hybridizing plaques were
purified. The phagemids were rescued by helper phage EXASSIST
(Stratagene) and used to infect E. coli XLOLR to create plasmid subclones by following the instructions of the manufacturer.
Construction of subclones was essentially accomplished by digestion and
self-ligation procedures using a restriction cleavage
site in a cloned
fragment and the multicloning sites of the vector
plasmid. The plasmids
were digested with an appropriate restriction
endonuclease and
self-ligated to create subclones in which a part
of the original insert
fragment had been deleted. The combinations
of restriction enzymes and
the subclones constructed were as follows.
For pDAM4, digestion with
KpnI,
SacI,
PstI,
ClaI, and
SpeI generated
pDAM4K, pDAM4Sa, pDAM4P, pDAM4C, and pDAM4Sp,
respectively; for
pDAM7, digestion with
AvaI generated
pDAM7Av; for pDAM9, digestion
with
KpnI,
SacI,
PstI,
ClaI, and
SpeI generated pDAM9K,
pDAM9Sa,
pDAM9P, pDAM9C, and pDAM9Sp, respectively; for pDAM10,
digestion
with
PstI generated pDAM10P. Some of the subclones
were modified
further by the same procedures. pDAM4C and pDAM9C
digested with
PstI generated pDAM4CP and pDAM9CP,
respectively. pDAM4Sa digested
with
EcoRI generated
pDAM4SaE. A 1.5-kb
HincII fragment of pDAM9K
was
subcloned in pUC19; the recombinant plasmid was designated
pDAM9KHc.
These subclones were used for sequencing the DNA of
the cloned
fragments using universal primers designed for the
different vector
plasmids.
Hybridization techniques.
Genomic Southern hybridization and
plaque hybridization were performed as described previously
(39) with a DIG DNA labeling and detection kit (Boehringer
GmbH). Restriction endonuclease fragments were separated on agarose
gels and transferred to positively charged nylon membranes (Nytran
Plus; Schleicher & Schuell, Dassel, Germany) by using the vacuum
transfer method with VacuGene (Pharmacia-LKB Biotechnology AB, Uppsala,
Sweden) without depurination in accordance with the instructions of the
manufacturer. Plaque hybridization was carried out on a positively
charged nylon membrane (MAGNA LIFT; Micron Separations Inc., Westboro,
Mass.). Prehybridization and hybridization were carried out at 63°C
for 2 and 16 h, respectively. After hybridization, the sheets were
washed twice at room temperature for 5 min in 2× SSC (1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate [pH 7.2]) containing 0.1% sodium
dodecyl sulfate (SDS), followed by two 15-min washes at 63°C in 0.1×
SSC containing 0.1% SDS. DNA fragments cloned in plasmids were
purified from agarose gels after electrophoresis and labeled with
digoxigenin by essentially the same procedures described previously
(42).
DNA sequencing and analysis.
The sequencing of cloned DNA
fragments and various PCR products was carried out by dye terminator
chemistry with specifically designed primers on an Applied Biosystems
model 373A automated DNA sequencer (PE Biosystems). The sequences were
assembled and analyzed with Sequencer, version 2 (Hitachi Software
Engineering Co., Ltd., Yokohama, Japan), and Genetyx-Mac, version 10.1 (Software Developing Company, Tokyo, Japan). Sequences were searched
against current DNA and protein databases by BLAST program network
services available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (Bethesda, Md.) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis.
Preparation of genomic DNAs and their restriction digests was performed
as described previously (33) with some modifications. Briefly, S. suis strains grown on TH agar were harvested and
suspended in TES (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 5 mM EDTA, 0.15 M NaCl) to
an optical density at 600 nm of 0.5. The cell suspensions were mixed with an equal volume of molten 3% low-melting-point preparative-grade agarose (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, Calif.) to obtain agarose plugs. Cells were lysed by submerging the plugs in lysis solution (N-acetylmuramidase [Seigagaku Kogyo, Tokyo, Japan] [30
µ/ml] and lysozyme [5 mg/ml] in TES) at 37°C for 1 h with
gentle shaking. The lysis solution was replaced with ESP solution (0.5 M EDTA [pH 9.5], 1% [wt/vol] laurylsarcosine, 1 mg of proteinase K
per ml), and the plugs were incubated at 50°C for 20 h. The
plugs were washed several times with TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 2 mM EDTA [pH 8.0]) and stored at 4°C until use. The plugs were cut into
small pieces, equilibrated with the recommended restriction buffer,
placed in fresh restriction buffer supplemented with 0.02% [wt/vol]
bovine serum albumin and 5 U of restriction enzyme SmaI, and
then incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Contour-clamped homogeneous electric field (CHEF) electrophoresis was done in a Bio-Rad CHEF DRII
system. Agarose gels (1.0% [wt/vol]) were electrophoresed in 0.5×
TBE buffer (45 mM Tris, 45 mM boric acid, 1 mM EDTA [pH 8.0]) for
20 h at 200 V and 10°C. The pulse times were ramped from 5 to
50 s.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The sequence of the
entire R-M region and its flanking regions of S. suis strain
DAT1 obtained in this study has been deposited in the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank
database under accession no. AB045609. The DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank accession
numbers of the genetic regions flanking the R-M genes of the strains
tested are as follows: 205, AB045610 and AB045611; 220, AB045612 and
AB045613; 211, AB045614 and AB045615; 212, AB045616 and AB045617. The
DNA sequences for the purH-purD loci of strains NCTC10234, 213, 246, 203, and 204 have been deposited in the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank database with accession no. AB045618, AB045619, AB045620, AB045621, and
AB045622, respectively.
 |
RESULTS |
Restriction enzyme phenotypes of S. suis.
The R-M
phenotypes of S. suis strains were first examined by testing
the susceptibility of their DNA to DpnI and MboI.
Cleavage by DpnI and not by MboI indicates
methylation of adenine at the 5'-GATC-3' sequence and, hence, an
MboI (or DpnII) methylase phenotype. The converse
indicates the absence of methylation. Total DNA prepared from 40 strains was incubated with either DpnI or MboI.
The results obtained are summarized in Table 1, and representative
cleavage patterns of several strains are shown in Fig.
1A. Genomic DNA isolated from 12 of 40 strains was digested to small fragments by MboI; thus these
bacteria had the unmethylated phenotype. On the other hand, the DNA
from the remaining 28 strains could be digested only by
DpnI, indicating that their DNAs were protected by
methylation from MboI digestion.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
(A) Methylation of 5'-GATC-3' sequence in the DNA of
various strains of S. suis. Total DNAs from the following
strains were treated with two complementary restriction endonucleases
and analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis: Lane 1, NCTC10234; lane 2, DAT1; lane 3, 204; lane 4, 205; lane 5, 207; lane 6, 211; lane 7, 213;
lane 8, 220. D, digested with DpnI (specific for methylated
sequence); M, digested with MboI (specific for unmethylated
sequence). S, 1-kb ladder DNA size standards (GIBCO/BRL). (B) DNA
cleavage activities of S. suis crude extracts using the
total DNAs of S. suis NCTC10234 (N, unmethylated DNA) and
DAT1 (D, methylated DNA) as substrates. Lane numbers for the strains
from which the crude extracts were prepared are the same as in panel A. S, 1-kb ladder size standards (GIBCO/BRL). (C) Restriction cleavage
activities of the crude extracts using unmethylated pUC19 as the
substrate. The lane numbers of the strains from which the crude
extracts were prepared match those in panel B. M, pUC19 digested with
MboI; S, 100-bp ladder size standards (GIBCO/BRL); Chr,
contaminating chromosomal DNA.
|
|
Crude extracts of the different strains were prepared, and their
restriction endonuclease activities were assayed by digestion
of the
genomic DNA of strain NCTC10234, as an unmethylated DNA
substrate, and
that of DAT1, as a methylated DNA substrate. Restriction
endonuclease
activity was only detected in strains that exhibited
the methylated DNA
phenotype (Fig.
1B, lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8),
whereas crude extracts of
the strains that showed the unmethylated
DNA phenotype digested neither
methylated nor unmethylated DNA
and were designated null phenotypes
(Fig.
1B, lanes 1, 3, 5, and
7). These results were confirmed further
by digestion of
E. coli genomic DNA.
E. coli K-12
strains are known to possess an orphan
methylase called Dam, with a
methylation property that is the
same as that of M.
MboI.
Genomic DNA of
E. coli C600, with a Dam
+
phenotype, and of SCS110, a Dam-deficient mutant, was digested
with
crude extracts of
S. suis; a restriction endonuclease
activity
that could digest only unmethylated SCS110 DNA was seen in
extracts
of the strains which showed the methylated phenotype, but no
endonuclease
activity was seen in extracts of the strains which showed
the
null phenotype (data not shown). To examine the enzymatic
specificity
of extracts of strains that showed restriction endonuclease
activity,
we compared the restriction endonuclease cleavage patterns of
vector plasmid pUC19 prepared from Dam-deficient mutant SCS110.
Representative cleavage patterns are shown in Fig.
1C. Although
chromosomal contamination derived from
S. suis strains
appeared,
the cleavage patterns of the crude extract were essentially
identical
to that of
MboI digestion. Therefore, these
strains were considered
to possess an R-M system similar to the
MboI (or
DpnII) system.
The R-M system of
S. suis DAT1 was designated
SsuDAT1I. The R-M
phenotype did not correlate with the capsular serotype, nor did
the
virulence phenotype of the strains correlate with the R-M
phenotype,
since the strains were isolated from diseased
pigs.
Presence and distribution of the R-M genes in S. suis strains.
Because the R-M phenotype found in 28 strains of S. suis was the same as that of the
MboI system, degenerate primers, designated dam-F and dam-R,
were designed on the basis of the nucleotide sequences of the related
methylase genes that are found in the database (Table 2). PCR
amplification was conducted with genomic DNA of strain DAT1 as a
template, and the amplified fragment was cloned into pCR2.1 and
sequenced. The nucleotide sequence of the cloned fragment was highly
homologous to that of M.DpnII (71.8% identity) (data not
shown). The fragment was then labeled with digoxigenin and used as a
hybridization probe against genomic DNA from several S. suis
strains that had been digested with either BamHI,
EcoRI, or HindIII and separated by agarose
gel electrophoresis. Strains expressing the R-M phenotype provided
hybridizing DNA fragments of approximately 6.5, 25, and 10 kb,
respectively, whereas no hybridizing fragments appeared in strains
which exhibited the null phenotype (data not shown). These results
suggested that strains expressing the R-M phenotype possessed a single
copy of the gene and that strains with the null phenotype lacked the
corresponding gene.
Cloning, sequencing, and genetic organization of the
SsuDAT1I gene region.
After plaque hybridization of
the S. suis DAT1 genomic library with the labeled probe
described above, 10 positive plaques were identified and the phagemids
were rescued to create plasmid subclones as described in Materials and
Methods. Five plasmid subclones, designated pDAM3, pDAM4, pDAM7, pDAM9,
and pDAM10, were obtained (Fig. 2).
Restriction digests of the five subclones showed that pDAM3 and pDAM4
were identical, whereas pDAM7 and pDAM10 contained the same insert in
opposite orientations relative to the vector plasmid (Fig. 2). These
subcloned fragments were sequenced, and the deduced translation
products of several open reading frames (ORFs) were compared to amino
acid sequences in databases using the BLAST program. The five subclones
contained one or both of the methyltransferase genes, designated
ssuMA and ssuMB. The region upstream of the
methyltransferase genes contained four ORFs associated with purine
biosynthesis (described in detail below). An inverse PCR was employed
to amplify a fragment containing the downstream DNA region using
synthetic oligonucleotides dam-in1 and dam-in2. An amplified fragment
of approximately 4.5 kb was then directly sequenced. The entire DNA
sequence of the SsuDAT1I genes and the flanking regions was
9,618 bp, and it included 10 putative ORFs (Fig. 2). These were
identified on the basis of the adopted criterion that an ORF consists
of at least 40 codons preceded by a potential Shine-Dalgarno sequence
at an appropriate distance (6 to 15 bp) from one of the commonly used
initiation codons (AUG, UUG, and GUG). The results of the database
analysis of the deduced amino acid sequences are summarized in Table
3. As expected, a gene encoding a
restriction endonuclease appeared just downstream of
ssuMB. However, unexpectedly, downstream of this gene
there was an additional restriction endonuclease gene. These two genes
were designated ssuRA and ssuRB (Fig. 2). Other ORFs found in the sequenced region encoded products that were highly homologous to enzymes involved in purine biosynthetic pathways (Table 3). Genes identified in the entire sequenced region were in the
order
purF- purM-purN-purH-ssuMA-ssuMB-ssuRA-ssuRB-purD-purE, as shown
in Fig. 2. All of these genes were encoded on the same DNA strand. No
transposable element or long-repeat sequence was found in the 9,618-bp
sequence. The average G+C content of the purine biosynthetic genes was
48.9%, which was higher than that of the total genome of S. suis (39 to 41%) (18), and the average G+C content
of the SsuDAT1I region was much lower (34.1%) (Fig. 2). The
codon usage pattern for the SsuDAT1I system genes was
somewhat different from that of the purine biosynthetic gene clusters. For example, the most frequently used codon for leucine in the SsuDAT1I system was TTA (45% of the total leucine codons in
SsuDAT1I genes), although TTA was the least-used codon for
pur genes (8.4% of the total leucine codons in
pur genes).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Physical and genetic map of the 9,618-bp sequence of
S. suis DAT1 with the putative genes indicated. Shaded and
solid arrows, ORFs of the SsuDAT1I genes and pur
genes, respectively. Horizontal solid lines, positions of the cloned
fragments of plasmids pDAM3, pDAM4, pDAM7, pDAM9, and pDAM10; striped
bar, region amplified by an inverse PCR; shaded and solid double-headed
arrows, average G+C content of the SsuDAT1I region and that
of the pur region, respectively.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3.
Predicted gene products and the homology exhibited by
their potential protein products to amino acid sequences in
the databasea
|
|
Genetic structure and protein analysis of the SsuDAT1I
system.
The complete DNA sequence and the deduced amino acid
sequences of the SsuDAT1I region are shown in Fig.
3. The four ORFs in the
SsuDAT1I gene region overlapped each other in a head-to-tail manner (Fig. 2 and 3). Only ssuRB had a typical
Shine-Dalgarno sequence (Fig. 3). Interestingly, the
competence-regulated sequence, the so-called combox, was present at the
translation initiation site of the ssuMB gene. This sequence
was originally found in several competence-regulated genes and was
recently shown to be present in the methyltransferase gene of the
DpnII system (25). The DNA sequence of the
combox, including the first start codon, the second start codon, and a
typical Shine-Dalgarno sequence prior to the second start codon, was
completely identical to that described for the DpnII system
(Fig. 3). A palindromic sequence, typical of an rho-independent
terminator, could not be found at the end of the ssuRB gene.

View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Coding sequence of the 3,960-bp region comprising a part
of the purH gene, the complete SsuDAT1I genes,
and a part of the purD gene. The deduced amino acid is
indicated underneath the first nucleotide of each codon in the coding
sequence. Arrows underneath the nucleotide sequence, positions of the
primers used for the amplification and cloning of the restriction and
modification genes; bent arrows, terminal ends of the cloned fragments
of plasmids pDAM3, pDAM4, pDAM7, pDAM9, and pDAM10; lines above the
sequence, sequences resembling a combox, the second Shine-Dalgarno
sequence (S.D.), and the second start codon in the ssuMB
gene. The coding sequence shown corresponds to nucleotides 3901 to 7860 of the sequence with accession no. AB045609.
|
|
Homology searches showed that the deduced protein encoded by
ssuMA was 71 and 70% identical to M.
LlaA and
M.
DpnII, respectively
(Table
3). Alignments of the sequences
of these three proteins
revealed significant similarities among them
(Fig.
4A). Thus,
it was concluded that
ssuMA encoded an
N6-methyladenine
methyltransferase, which was designated M.
SsuMA.
The deduced
protein encoded by
ssuMB was 90 and 86% identical
to
M.
DpnA and M.
LlaB, respectively (Table
3).
Alignment of these
three proteins highlighted striking similarities
among them (Fig.
4B). Thus it was concluded that
ssuMB
encoded a second
N6-methyladenine
methyltransferase, which was designated M.
SsuMB.
The
similarities among M.
SsuMB, M.
DpnA, and
M.
LlaB suggested that
M.
SsuMB methylates
single-stranded DNA, as described for M.
DpnA
(
8).

View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Sequence alignment of M.SsuMA,
M.DpnII, and M.LlaA (A); M.SsuMB,
M.DpnA, and M.LlaB (B); and R.SsuRA,
R.DpnII, R.SsuRB, and R.LlaC
(LlaDCHI) (C). Black background, amino acids identical among
all the sequences aligned; dashes, gaps in the aligned sequences.
DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank accession numbers of the sequences are given in Table
3.
|
|
The deduced amino acid sequence encoded by
ssuRA was similar
to that of R.
DpnII, whereas the sequence encoded by
ssuRB was
highly homologous to that of R.
LlaDCHI
(Table
3). Both R.
DpnII
and R.
LlaDCHI are
endonucleases which specifically recognize sequence
5'-

GATC-3' and
cleave prior to the 5' guanine as indicated by
the arrow. Thus, both
ssuRA and
ssuRB encode restriction endonucleases,
which we named R.
SsuRA and R.
SsuRB, respectively.
All currently
characterized type II endonucleases displaying
significant similarity
are isoschizomers of each other,
indicating that R.
SsuRA and R.
SsuRB
likely
recognize 5'-GATC-3' sites and cleave them as R.
DpnII and
R.
LlaDCHI do. Alignment of the amino acid sequences of these
four
endonucleases revealed similarities at their centers and near
the
C-terminal ends of the proteins (Fig.
4C). The conservation
of these
residues suggests that they may constitute the catalytically
active
sites of the enzymes. R.
SsuRA and R.
SsuRB have a
limited
homology (31%) with each other, and they do not have any
significant
homology with the GATC-specific type II endonucleases of
other
classes, such as
Sau3AI and
DpnI.
Organization of purine biosynthetic genes.
The genetic
organization of the region flanking the SsuDAT1I genes
revealed that the purine biosynthetic genes were clustered in this
bacterium, as has been observed in other gram-positive bacteria
such as Bacillus subtilis (4). The gene order,
excluding the SsuDAT1I genes, is identical to that
found in the genome sequence of Streptococcus pyogenes
(B. A. Roe, S. P. Linn, L. Son, X. Yuan, S. Clifton, M. McShan, and J. Ferretti, Streptococcal Genome Sequencing Project,
University of Oklahoma, Norman
[http://www.genome.ou.edu/strep.html]) and similar to the gene
order of the B. subtilis pur operon (4). All
the pur genes found in S. suis except
purF, of which the 5' end was truncated, were preceded by
typical Shine-Dalgarno sequences. These pur genes were
separated by intergenic sequences of 13 to 25 bp, with the exception of
purM and purN, which overlapped (Table 3).
However, the intergenic sequences between purH and
purD, which were interrupted by the SsuDAT1I
genes, were longer than those found among pur genes, i.e.,
64 and 120 bp (Table 3).
Expression of methylation and restriction genes in E. coli.
Plasmid pDAM4C, used for DNA sequencing, was digested with
PstI (one PstI site is in the cloned insert and
the other is in the multicloning sites of the vector), and the
1.2-kb fragment containing ssuMA was subcloned into pUC19 to
create pSUMA1. The translational direction of ssuMA
was opposite in orientation to that of the lacZ promoter on
the vector. Introduction of pSUMA1 into E. coli SCS110 and
restriction cleavage analysis of the pSUMA1 recovered from SCS110 using
DpnI and MboI showed that SCS110 expressed the
methyltransferase (Fig. 5A).

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
(A) Methylation of plasmid DNAs containing the cloned
methylation gene(s) of the SsuDAT1I system. The plasmids
recovered from E. coli SCS110 were digested with restriction
endonucleases and analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Lane 1, pSUMA1; lane 2, pSUMAB14; lane 3, pSUMB1. D, digested with
DpnI; M, digested with MboI; S, 1-kb ladder size
standards (GIBCO/BRL). (B) DNA cleavage activities of crude extracts
prepared from E. coli strains carrying the following
plasmids using unmethylated pUC19 as the substrate: lane 1, pSURA1;
lane 2, pSURA2; lane 3, pSURA3; lane 4, pSURA4; lane 5, pSURB1; lane 6, pSURB2; lane 7, pSURB3; lane 8, pSURB4; lane 9, pSURB5. M, pUC19
digested with MboI; S, 100-bp ladder size standards
(GIBCO/BRL).
|
|
The DNA fragment from approximately 100 bp upstream of
ssuMA
to approximately 100 bp downstream of
ssuMB was amplified by
PCR using primers purH3' and ssuMB3' (Fig.
3). The amplified 2.2-kb
fragment was ligated to pCR2.1, and the ligation mixture was used
to
transform
E. coli DH5

. Fifteen clones were picked. The
translational
direction of
ssuMA and
ssuMB
was opposite to the orientation of
the
lacZ promoter in 14 clones. All 14 clones contained two or
more nucleotide substitutions
caused by misreading during the
PCR amplification, resulting in
undesired amino acid changes.
Clone pSUMAB14 contained only one
nucleotide substitution in the
ORF of
ssuMB (A at
nucleotide 667 of
ssuMB was replaced by G),
which converted
Ile
223 to a similar amino acid, Val
223, and
this
subclone was used for further study. pSUMAB14 was digested with
AvaI, filled in with Klenow enzyme, self-ligated, and
introduced
into
E. coli DH5

to create a plasmid carrying
only
ssuMB and
designated pSUMB1. pSUMAB14 and pSUMB1
were then introduced into
E. coli SCS110, and the plasmids
recovered from SCS110 were digested
with either
DpnI or
MboI. Both plasmids could be cleaved by
DpnI
but
not by
MboI (Fig.
5A), indicating that the methylation genes
were functional in
E. coli.
Several attempts to clone the two restriction endonuclease genes into
E. coli were unsuccessful. Thus,
ssuRA and
ssuRB were
individually amplified by PCR using synthetic
primers containing
unique restriction cleavage sites, i.e., ssuRA5'Ec
plus ssuRA3'Pst
and ssuRB5'Ec plus ssuRB3'Pst, respectively. The
positions of
the primers are indicated in Fig.
3. The unique
restriction sites
introduced in the primers permitted their cloning
into low-copy-number
vector pHSG576 in the orientation opposite to that
of the
lacZ promoter. Four and five clones containing
ssuRA and
ssuRB, respectively,
were obtained and
were designated pSURA1~pSURA4 and pSURB1~pSURB5,
respectively.
These plasmids were then introduced into
E. coli SCS110
carrying pSUMAB14. Crude extracts of these clones were
prepared by
sonication and examined for their DNA cleavage activities
using
unmethylated pUC19 DNA. All showed restriction endonuclease
activity indistinguishable from that of
MboI (Fig.
5B).
Comparison of the genetic region encoding the SsuDAT1I
R-M system with the corresponding region of strains lacking the R-M
system.
To confirm whether the genetic region encoding the
SsuDAT1I system was conserved among other S. suis strains and to compare the corresponding regions of strains
carrying the R-M system and strains with the null phenotype, we
performed PCR using primers purH3' and ssuRB3' to amplify the entire
R-M region with a part of the flanking regions. When genomic DNA
isolated from strains carrying the R-M system was used, a 3.8-kb
fragment was amplified from all the strains tested (data not shown). On
the other hand, when genomic DNA from the strains with the null
phenotype was used, a 323-bp fragment was amplified from all the
strains tested (data not shown). These results indicated that the
genetic organization of the R-M system was conserved among the strains
tested and that the entire R-M system was missing in the strains with
the null phenotype. Direct sequencing of the amplified fragments from
four strains having the R-M genes and comparison among them showed that
only a few nucleotide substitutions were present in this region (Fig.
6), indicating that the R-M region was
conserved among the strains. Direct sequence determination of the
323-bp fragments amplified from five strains with the null phenotype and comparison with those of the R-M regions revealed the differences in DNA sequence between them. The 323-bp DNA sequences obtained from
the five strains with the null phenotype were completely conserved. The
unique DNA sequence of the R-M region comprising 3,503 bp, which
extended from 53 bp upstream of the ssuMA gene to 5 bp
downstream of the ssuRB gene, was inserted in an intergenic sequence between purH and purD. The insertion
target site, 5'-GAT
T(T/G)-3', as indicated by the arrow, was highly
conserved among the strains tested (Fig. 6). The sequence where the R-M
genes were inserted was not the recognition site of
SsuDAT1I. Comparison of the 323-bp DNA regions of both
groups revealed several mismatches present in upstream and downstream
sequences (Fig. 6). No other notable substitutions or insertions could
be found in these regions. The only notable feature found in the
junction region was that a 3-bp sequence at the 5' end of the 3,503-bp
sequence, AAG (Fig. 6, left end) was also present at the 3' end of the
sequence (Fig. 6, right end). The DNA sequences of the region flanking
the R-M system showed no sequence homology to published sequences
flanking the DpnII and LlaDCHI systems (24,
30).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Alignment of the sequences from the 3' end of
purH to the 5' end of purD. Only the sequences
that flank the SsuDAT1I genes are shown. The 3,503-bp
sequences from 53 bp upstream of ssuMA to 5 bp downstream of
ssuRB (top) are connected by the lines with the lower
sequences flanking the SsuDAT1I region, which are aligned
with the corresponding sequences of the strains lacking the R-M system.
Strains are indicated to the left of the sequences (NCTC, NCTC10234).
Dots, nucleotides identical to those of the aligned sequence of DAT1;
dashes, gaps in the aligned sequences; boxes, stop and start codons of
the genes appearing in these sequences.
|
|
PFGE analysis.
Genomic DNAs of S. suis strains were
digested with SmaI and separated by PFGE. Representative
cleavage patterns of several strains are shown in Fig.
7. The PFGE patterns of the strains having the R-M system were distinguishable from those obtained from the
strains with the null phenotype. The PFGE patterns obtained from the
strains with the null phenotype were similar to each other, and some of
them were indistinguishable, suggesting that different isolates of the
same strain were included. However, striking variations were seen among
the PFGE patterns of the strains having the R-M system, demonstrating
that the strains used were independent.

View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
PFGE of the S. suis genomic DNA digested with
SmaI. Electrophoresis was carried out with a CHEF system for
20 h at 200 V and 10°C with pulse time ramping from 5 to 50 s in a 1% agarose gel. Strains carrying the R-M system were as
follows: DAT1 (lane 1), 205 (lane 2), 220 (lane 3), 227 (lane 4), 243 (lane 5), 222 (lane 6), and 236 (lane 7). Strains with the null
phenotype were as follows: NCTC10234 (lane 8), 204 (lane 9), 207 (lane
10), 209 (lane 11), 210 (lane 12), 213 (lane 13), and 246 (lane 14). S,
DNA concatemers as size standards.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have demonstrated here the presence of an R-M system in
S. suis. Cloning and DNA sequencing of the
SsuDAT1I gene region revealed that the genetic organization
was unique for all type II R-M systems described to date, i.e., the
region contained two restriction endonuclease genes and two
methyltransferase genes. Other R-M systems comprising two
methyltransferase genes and one restriction endonuclease gene are
known and are isoschizomers of SsuDAT1I, i.e.,
DpnII, LlaDCHI, and MboI. In
DpnII and LlaDCHI, the order of the genes is
similar to that of the SsuDAT1I system. The gene encoding a
conventional methyltransferase for double-stranded DNA is upstream
of the gene encoding a second methyltransferase for single-stranded
DNA. The restriction endonuclease gene is downstream and the genes
overlap, as seen in the SsuDAT1I genes (8, 24,
30). In MboI, the order of the genes is different. The gene encoding R.MboI is flanked by two methyltransferase
genes, which are separated by 2-bp intergenic spaces (52).
These differences suggest that the genetic rearrangement among the R-M
genes could have occurred during the evolution of these R-M genes.
R.SsuRA was similar to R.DpnII, and
R.SsuRB showed extensive homology with
R.LlaDCHI, whereas R.SsuRA (or
R.DpnII) and R.SsuRB (or
R.LlaDCHI) showed limited homology. The results suggest
that an extra restriction endonuclease gene was acquired from some
other bacterium and that this resulted in a composite genetic
structure, i.e., the SsuDAT1I system. Alternatively, the
SsuDAT1I system could be the prototype and a deletion of one
restriction endonuclease gene resulted in the genetic structure
represented by DpnII and LlaDCHI.
The amino acid sequences of the methyltransferases share many conserved
structural motifs, and, on the basis of the presence of these motifs in
an unknown protein, one can predict its function (6, 56).
In this study, striking similarities among the methyltransferases indicated that M.SsuMA and M.SsuMB are highly
related to the methyltransferases of the DpnII and
LlaDCHI systems. On the other hand, different restriction
endonucleases usually do not have extensive homology at the level of
the amino acid sequence, even when they recognize the same DNA sequence
(6, 56). Nevertheless, some exceptions are known; for
example, the isospecific pairs EcoRI/RsrI
(1), PstI/BsuBI (57),
XmaI/Crf9I (56),
NgoI/HaeII (47), and
BanI/HgiCI (10) show some degree of
homology. While R.DpnII and R.LlaDCHI have limited homology, they were found experimentally to have the same
recognition sequence (30). R.SsuRA
and R.SsuRB had significant similarities to one of these
restriction endonucleases. This indicates that the specificity
and other enzymatic properties are the same, although differences in
enzymatic properties between DpnII and
LlaDCHI have not been studied. To date, one example of
an R-M system containing two restriction endonuclease genes has been
reported. In that case, a gene encoding R.Eco47I, which recognizes 5'-GGWCC-3' (W is A or T), was located in the vicinity of
another R-M system, Eco47II, which recognizes similar
but less specific sequence 5'-GGNCC-3', where N is any nucleotide
(46). In the SsuDAT1I system,
R.SsuRA and R.SsuRB, whose genes were individually cloned and expressed in E. coli, could digest
unmethylated pUC19 in the same way as MboI. Therefore, their
sequence recognition specificities appeared identical.
We could not clone the SsuDAT1I genes directly in E. coli from the phage library or from a PCR-derived fragment.
However, the isoschizomeric LlaDCHI and MboI
R-M genes have been cloned in E. coli on multicopy vectors
(30, 52). E. coli possesses orphan methylase
Dam, which has the same sequence specificity as the SsuDAT1I
system and which protects the host DNA from attack by the corresponding
restriction endonucleases. Recently, the Dam methylase was found to be
involved in the regulation of gene expression, and hence not all
the recognition sequences in the host chromosomal DNA were methylated
(14). If the enzymatic activity of SsuDAT1I is
stronger than those of the other isoschizomers, the cloning of the
genes will inhibit the growth of the E. coli host cells.
Indeed, the dual genes encoding the restriction endonucleases in the
SsuDAT1I system might be expected to express twice as much of the restriction endonuclease activity due in essence to a gene dosage effect (53).
The SsuDAT1I system was not found in several S. suis strains, including NCTC10234. Moreover, the identity of the
DNA sequences flanking this system, in conjunction with the
differences in G+C content and codon usage between
SsuDAT1I and the flanking regions, supports the notion that
this system did not arise in this organism. The SsuDAT1I
genes were not located on transferable elements such as plasmids and
bacteriophages. Comparison of the corresponding DNA regions of strains
with and without the R-M system revealed the precise location of the
R-M genes. The SsuDAT1I genes have been inserted into a
125-bp intergenic region separating purH and
purD. This may ensure constitutive expression of the
R-M genes. In most bacteria, purine biosynthetic genes are part of an
essential operon. The overall genetic organization of the
pur operon, except for the SsuDAT1I genes, was
identical to that found in S. pyogenes (Streptococcal Genome
Sequencing Project, University of Oklahoma, Norman
[http://www.genome.ou.edu/strep.html]) and was similar to
that reported in B. subtilis (4). Because the
pur regions of NCTC10234 and other S. suis
strains lack the R-M genes and because the sequences flanking the R-M
sequences in S. suis strains carrying the system are
virtually identical, it appears that the latter S. suis
strains have only recently acquired the sequence.
A natural competence for genetic transformation has not yet been
demonstrated in S. suis. However, the combox
(25), a competence-regulated sequence, was found in the
initiation region of the ssuMB gene. This might support a
hypothesis that the SsuDAT1I system is an exogenous element
and that S. suis acquired the SsuDAT1I genes via
a transformation event. However, the competence of some bacteria is
coordinately expressed in response to the growth phase and culture
conditions (2, 27). Further studies may be needed to
determine whether S. suis has the potential to be competent for genetic transformation.
Recently, studies of a novel R-M system, Hpy188I, found in
Helicobacter pylori strain J188 and comparison of its DNA
sequence with those of other strains revealed that the R-M system has
been horizontally transferred from other bacteria (58).
The Hpy188I genes are flanked by 92-bp long direct
repeats, suggesting that a transposition event involving the R-M system
had taken place. In the region flanking SsuDAT1I, we could
not find any long-repeat sequences or any notable nucleotide
substitutions. The genetic structure was conserved among the S. suis strains tested. However, from the results of the PFGE
analysis, we could not rule out the possibility that the strains
harboring the R-M system were clonal. The structure of the genetic
region flanking the SsuDAT1I system and stable maintenance
of this genetic structure in the different strains of S. suis lead us to propose another hypothesis to explain the genetic
conversion, i.e., illegitimate recombination. It is plausible that the
SsuDAT1I genes were initially transferred on a transposon,
followed by excision of the transposon, since no functions associated
with DNA mobility, such as transposase, integrase, and invertase
functions, were found in the vicinity of the SsuDAT1I genes.
However, this hypothesis does not explain the facts that the conserved
genetic structure of the R-M system was found in different strains and
that no transposable element could be found in any of the strains
tested. This indicated that excision of a transposable element did not
occur following passage through the strains tested. It is also possible
that the SsuDAT1I system was acquired by an ancestor of the
S. suis DAT1 strain via illegitimate recombination from
distant sources and that the R-M genes have been transferred among
strains of S. suis en bloc along with the conserved flanking
pur genes, perhaps by transformation, and incorporated into
the recipient chromosome by homologous recombination.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We are grateful to S. Yasuda and T. Hashimoto-Gotoh for providing
us with the vector plasmid pHSG576. We thank T. Fujisawa for preparing
photographs and M. Takahashi for technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratory of
Molecular Bacteriology, National Institute of Animal Health, 3-1-1 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0856, Japan. Phone: 81 (298) 38-7743. Fax: 81 (298) 38-7907. E-mail:
sekizaki{at}niah.affrc.go.jp.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Aiken, C., and R. I. Gumport.
1988.
Restriction endonuclease RsrI from Rhodobacter sphaeroides, an isoschizomer of EcoRI: purification and properties.
Nucleic Acids Res.
16:7901-7916[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Alloing, G.,
B. Martin,
C. Granadel, and J.-P. Claverys.
1998.
Development of competence in Streptococcus pneumoniae: pheromone autoinduction and control of quorum sensing by the oligopeptide permease.
Mol. Microbiol.
29:75-83[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Alm, R. A.,
L.-S. L. Ling,
D. T. Moir,
B. L. King,
E. D. Brown,
P. C. Doig,
D. R. Smith,
B. Noonan,
B. C. Guild,
B. L. deJonge,
G. Carmel,
P. J. Tummino,
A. Caruso,
M. Uria-Nickelsen,
D. M. Mills,
C. Ives,
R. Gibson,
D. Merberg,
S. D. Mills,
Q. Jiang,
D. E. Taylor,
G. F. Vovis, and T. J. Trust.
1999.
Genomic-sequence comparison of two unrelated isolates of the human gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori.
Nature
397:176-180[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Anagnostopoulos, C.,
P. J. Piggot, and J. A. Hoch.
1993.
The genetic map of Bacillus subtilis, p. 425-461.
In
A. L. Sonenshein, J. A. Hoch, and R. Losick (ed.), Bacillus subtilis and other gram-positive bacteria. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 5.
|
Anton, B. P.,
D. F. Heiter,
J. S. Benner,
E. J. Hess,
L. Greenough,
L. S. Moran,
B. E. Slatko, and J. E. Brooks.
1997.
Cloning and characterization of the BglII restriction-modification system reveals a possible evolutionary footprint.
Gene
187:19-27[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Bickle, T. A., and D. H. Kruger.
1993.
Biology of DNA restriction.
Microbiol. Rev.
57:434-450[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Brassard, S.,
H. Paquet, and P. H. Roy.
1995.
A transposon-like sequence adjacent to the AccI restriction-modification operon.
Gene
157:69-72[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Cerritelli, S.,
S. S. Springhorn, and S. A. Lacks.
1989.
DpnA, a methylase for single-strand DNA in the DpnII restriction system, and its biological function.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:9223-9227[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Clifton-Hadley, F. A.
1983.
Streptococcus suis type 2 infections.
Br. Vet. J.
139:1-5[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Erdmann, D.,
A. Dusterhoft, and M. Kroger.
1991.
Cloning and molecular characterization of the HgiCI restriction/modification system from Herpetosiphon giganteus Hpg9 reveals high similarity to BanI.
Eur. J. Biochem.
202:1247-1256[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Gelinas, R. E.,
P. A. Myers, and R. J. Roberts.
1977.
Two sequence-specific endonucleases from Moraxella bovis.
J. Mol. Biol.
114:169-179[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Gottschalk, M.,
R. Higgins,
M. Jacques,
M. Beaudoin, and J. Henrichsen.
1991.
Characterization of six new capsular types (23 through 28) of Streptococcus suis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
29:2590-2594[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Gottschalk, M.,
R. Higgins,
M. Jacques,
K. R. Mittal, and J. Henrichsen.
1989.
Description of 14 new capsular types of Streptococcus suis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
27:2633-2636[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Heithoff, D. M.,
R. L. Sinsheimer,
D. A. Low, and M. J. Mahan.
1999.
An essential role for DNA adenine methylation in bacterial virulence.
Science
284:967-970[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Higgins, R., and M. Gottschalk.
1996.
Distribution of Streptococcus suis capsular types in 1995.
Can. Vet. J.
37:242[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Higgins, R.,
M. Gottschalk,
M. Beaudoin, and S. A. Rawluk.
1992.
Distribution of Streptococcus suis capsular types in Quebec and western Canada.
Can. Vet. J.
33:27-30[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Jeltsch, A., and A. Pingoud.
1996.
Horizontal gene transfer contributes to the wide distribution and evolution of type II restriction-modification systems.
J. Mol. Evol.
42:91-96[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Kilpper-Balz, R., and K. H. Schleifer.
1987.
Streptococcus suis sp. nov., nom. rev.
Int. J. Sys. Bacteriol.
37:160-162[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Kita, K.,
J. Tsuda,
T. Kato,
K. Okamoto,
H. Yanase, and M. Tanaka.
1999.
Evidence of horizontal transfer of the EcoO1091 restriction-modification gene to Escherichia coli chromosomal DNA.
J. Bacteriol.
181:6822-6827[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Kobayashi, I.,
A. Nobusato,
N. Kobayashi-Takahashi, and I. Uchiyama.
1999.
Shaping the genome restriction-modification systems as mobile genetic elements.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
9:649-656[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Kusano, K.,
K. Sakagami,
T. Yokochi,
T. Naito,
Y. Tokunaga,
E. Ueda, and I. Kobayashi.
1997.
A new type of illegitimate recombination is dependent on restriction and homologous interaction.
J. Bacteriol.
179:5380-5390[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Lacks, S., and B. Greenberg.
1975.
A deoxyribonuclease of Diplococcus pneumoniae specific for methylated DNA.
J. Biol. Chem.
250:4060-4066[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Lacks, S., and B. Greenberg.
1977.
Complementary specificity of restriction endonucleases of Diplococcus pneumoniae with respect to DNA methylation.
J. Mol. Biol.
114:153-168[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Lacks, S. A.,
B. M. Mannarelli,
S. S. Springhorn, and B. Greenberg.
1986.
Genetic basis of the complementary DpnI and DpnII restriction systems of S. pneumoniae: an intercellular cassette mechanism.
Cell
46:993-1000[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Lacks, S. A.,
S. Ayalew,
A. G. de la Campa, and B. Greenberg.
2000.
Regulation of competence for genetic transformation in Streptococcus pneumoniae: expression of dpnA, a late competence gene encoding a DNA methyltransferase of the DpnII restriction system.
Mol. Microbiol.
35:1089-1098[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Lee, K. F.,
P. C. Shaw,
S. J. Picone,
G. G. Wilson, and K. D. Lunnen.
1998.
Sequence comparison of the EcoHK31I and EaeI restriction-modification systems suggests an intergenic transfer of genetic material.
Biol. Chem.
379:437-441[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Lorenz, M. G., and W. Wackernagel.
1994.
Bacterial gene transfer by natural genetic transformation in the environment.
Microbiol. Rev.
58:563-602[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Lutticken, R.,
N. Temme,
G. Hahn, and E. W. Bartelheimer.
1986.
Meningitis caused by Streptococcus suis: case report and review of the literature.
Infection
14:181-185[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Mannarelli, B. M.,
T. S. Balganesh,
B. Greenberg,
S. S. Springhorn, and S. A. Lacks.
1985.
Nucleotide sequence of the DpnII DNA methylase gene of Streptococcus pneumoniae and its relationship to the dam gene of Escherichia coli.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
82:4468-4472[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Moineau, S.,
S. A. Walker,
E. R. Vedamuthu, and P. A. Vandenbergh.
1995.
Cloning and sequencing of LlaDCHI restriction/modification genes from Lactococcus lactis and relatedness of this system to the Streptococcus pneumoniae DpnII system.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
61:2193-2202[Abstract].
|
| 31.
|
Muckerman, C. C.,
S. S. Springhorn,
B. Greenberg, and S. A. Lacks.
1982.
Transformation of restriction endonuclease phenotype in Streptococcus pneumoniae.
J. Bacteriol.
152:183-190[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Ochman, H.,
A. S. Gerberi, and L. Hartl.
1988.
Genetic applications of an inverse polymerase chain reaction.
Genetics
120:621-623[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Ogata, K.,
R. I. Aminov,
T. Nagamine,
M. Sugiura,
K. Tajima,
M. Mitsumori,
T. Sekizaki,
H. Kudo,
H. Minato, and Y. Benno.
1997.
Construction of a Fibrobacter succinogenes genome map and demonstration of diversity at the genomic level.
Curr. Microbiol.
35:22-27[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Osaki, M.,
D. Takamatsu,
N. Tsuji, and T. Sekizaki.
2000.
Cloning and characterization of the gene encoding O-acetylserine lyase from Streptococcus suis.
Curr. Microbiol.
40:67-71[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Palmer, B. R., and M. G. Marinus.
1994.
The dam and dcm strains of Escherichia coli a review.
Gene
143:1-12[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Perch, B.,
K. B. Pedersen, and J. Henrichsen.
1983.
Serology of capsulated streptococci pathogenic for pigs: six new serotypes of Streptococcus suis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
17:993-996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Roberts, R. J., and D. Macelis.
2000.
REBASE-restriction enzymes and methylases.
Nucleic Acids Res.
28:306-307[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Rochepeau, P.,
L. B. Selinger, and M. F. Hynes.
1997.
Transposon-like structure of a new plasmid-encoded restriction-modification system in Rhizobium leguminosarum VF39SM.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
256:387-396[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 40.
|
Schleif, R.
1980.
Assaying of organisms for the presence of restriction endonucleases.
Methods Enzymol.
65:19-23[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Segers, R. P.,
T. Kenter,
L. A. de Haan, and A. A. Jacobs.
1998.
Characterisation of the gene encoding suilysin from Streptococcus suis and expression in field strains.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
167:255-261[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Sekizaki, T.,
H. Ito,
T. Asawa, and I. Nonomura.
1993.
DNA sequence of type 1 fimbrin, Fpul1, gene from a chicken pathogenic Escherichia coli serotype O78.
J. Vet. Med. Sci.
55:395-400[Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Serhir, B.,
D. Dugourd,
M. Jacques,
R. Higgins, and J. Harel.
1997.
Cloning and characterization of a dextranase gene (dexS) from Streptococcus suis.
Gene
190:257-261[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Smith, H. E.,
U. Vecht,
A. L. J. Gielkens, and M. A. Smits.
1992.
Cloning and nucleotide sequence of the gene encoding the 136-kilodalton surface protein (muramidase-released protein) of Streptococcus suis type 2.
Infect. Immun.
60:2361-2367[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Smith, H. E.,
M. Damman,
J. van der Velde,
F. Wagenaar,
H. J. Wisselink,
N. Stockhofe-Zurwieden, and M. A. Smits.
1999.
Identification and characterization of the cps locus of Streptococcus suis serotype 2: the capsule protects against phagocytosis and is an important virulence factor.
Infect. Immun.
67:1750-1756[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Stankevicius, K.,
P. Povilionis,
A. Lubys,
S. Menkevicius, and A. Janulaitis.
1995.
Cloning and characterization of the unusual restriction-modification system comprising two restriction endonucleases and one methyltransferase.
Gene
157:49-53[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Stein, D. C.,
J. S. Gunn, and A. Piekarowicz.
1998.
Sequence similarities between the genes encoding the S.NgoI and HaeII restriction/modification systems.
Biol. Chem.
379:575-578[Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Sussenbach, J. S.,
C. H. Monfoort,
R. Schiphof, and E. E. Stobberingh.
1976.
A restiction endonuclease from Staphylococcus aureus.
Nucleic Acids Res.
3:3193-3202.
|
| 49.
|
Takamatsu, D.,
M. Osaki, and T. Sekizaki.
2000.
Sequence analysis of a small cryptic plasmid isolated from Streptococcus suis serotype 2.
Curr. Microbiol.
40:61-66[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 50.
|
Takeshita, S.,
M. Sato,
M. Toba,
W. Masahashi, and T. Hashimoto-Gotoh.
1987.
High-copy-number and low-copy-number plasmid vectors for lacZ -complementation and chloramphenicol- or kanamycin-resistance selection.
Gene
61:63-74[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Twomey, D. P.,
L. L. McKay, and D. J. O'Sullivan.
1998.
Molecular characterization of the Lactococcus lactis LlaKR2I restriction-modification system and effect of an IS982 element positioned between the restriction and modification genes.
J. Bacteriol.
180:5844-5854[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 52.
|
Ueno, T.,
H. Ito,
F. Kimizuka,
H. Kotani, and K. Nakajima.
1993.
Gene structure and expression of the MboI restriction-modification system.
Nucleic Acids Res.
21:2309-2313[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 53.
|
Uhlin, B. E., and K. Nordstrom.
1977.
R plasmid gene dosage effects in Escherichia coli K12: copy mutants of the R plasmid R1drd-19.
Plasmid
1:1-7[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 54.
|
Vaisvila, R.,
G. Vilkaitis, and A. Janulaitis.
1995.
Identification of a gene encoding a DNA invertase-like enzyme adjacent to the PaeR7I restriction-modification system.
Gene
157:81-84[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 55.
|
Vovis, G. F., and S. Lacks.
1977.
Complementary action of restriction enzymes Endo R.DpnI and Endo R.DpnII on bacteriophage f1 DNA.
J. Mol. Biol.
115:525-538[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 56.
|
Wilson, G. G., and N. E. Murray.
1991.
Restriction and modification systems.
Annu. Rev. Genet.
25:585-627[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 57.
|
Xu, G.-L.,
W. Kapfer,
J. Walter, and T. A. Trautner.
1992.
BsuBI an isospecific restriction and modification system of PstI: characterization of the BsuBI genes and enzymes.
Nucleic Acids Res.
20:6517-6523[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 58.
|
Xu, Q.,
S. Stickel,
R. J. Roberts,
M. J. Blaser, and R. D. Morgan.
2000.
Purification of the novel endonuclease, Hpy188I, and cloning of its restriction-modification genes reveal evidence of its horizontal transfer to the Helicobacter pylori genome.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:17086-17093[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 59.
|
Yanisch-Perron, C.,
J. Vieira, and J. Messing.
1985.
Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors.
Gene
33:103-119[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 60.
|
Zalkin, H., and P. Nygaard.
1996.
Biosynthesis of purine nucleotides, p. 561-579.
In
F. C. Neidhardt, R. Curtiss III, J. L. Ingraham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, W. S. Reznikoff, M. Riley, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed., vol. 1. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
|
Journal of Bacteriology, January 2001, p. 500-511, Vol. 183, No. 2
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.2.500-511.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Fittipaldi, N., Sekizaki, T., Takamatsu, D., Harel, J., Dominguez-Punaro, M. d. l. C., Von Aulock, S., Draing, C., Marois, C., Kobisch, M., Gottschalk, M.
(2008). D-Alanylation of Lipoteichoic Acid Contributes to the Virulence of Streptococcus suis. Infect. Immun.
76: 3587-3594
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Takamatsu, D., Osaki, M., Tharavichitkul, P., Takai, S., Sekizaki, T.
(2008). Allelic variation and prevalence of serum opacity factor among the Streptococcus suis population. J Med Microbiol
57: 488-494
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ishikawa, K., Watanabe, M., Kuroita, T., Uchiyama, I., Bujnicki, J. M., Kawakami, B., Tanokura, M., Kobayashi, I.
(2005). Discovery of a novel restriction endonuclease by genome comparison and application of a wheat-germ-based cell-free translation assay: PabI (5'-GTA/C) from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus abyssi. Nucleic Acids Res
33: e112-e112
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sekizaki, T., Takamatsu, D., Osaki, M., Shimoji, Y.
(2005). Different Foreign Genes Incidentally Integrated into the Same Locus of the Streptococcus suis Genome. J. Bacteriol.
187: 872-883
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Harel, J., Martinez, G., Nassar, A., Dezfulian, H., Labrie, S. J., Brousseau, R., Moineau, S., Gottschalk, M.
(2003). Identification of an Inducible Bacteriophage in a Virulent Strain of Streptococcus suis Serotype 2. Infect. Immun.
71: 6104-6108
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Takamatsu, D., Osaki, M., Sekizaki, T.
(2002). Evidence for Lateral Transfer of the Suilysin Gene Region of Streptococcus suis. J. Bacteriol.
184: 2050-2057
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Osaki, M., Takamatsu, D., Shimoji, Y., Sekizaki, T.
(2002). Characterization of Streptococcus suis Genes Encoding Proteins Homologous to Sortase of Gram-Positive Bacteria. J. Bacteriol.
184: 971-982
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sekizaki, T., Osaki, M., Takamatsu, D., Shimoji, Y.
(2001). Distribution of the SsuDAT1I Restriction-Modification System among Different Serotypes of Streptococcus suis. J. Bacteriol.
183: 5436-5440
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kobayashi, I.
(2001). Behavior of restriction-modification systems as selfish mobile elements and their impact on genome evolution. Nucleic Acids Res
29: 3742-3756
[Abstract]
[Full Text]