Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, January 2001, p. 512-519, Vol. 183, No. 2
Division of General Microbiology, Department
of Biosciences,1 and Institute of
Biotechnology,2 FIN-00014 University of
Helsinki, Finland, and Microbiology and Tumor Biology
Center, Karolinska Institute, 17177 Stockholm,
Sweden3
Received 7 June 2000/Accepted 20 October 2000
The GafD lectin of the G (F17) fimbriae of diarrhea-associated
Escherichia coli was overexpressed and purified
from the periplasm of E. coli by affinity chromatography on
GlcNAc-agarose. The predicted mature GafD peptide comprises 321 amino
acids, but the predominant form of GafD recovered from the periplasm
was 19,092 Da in size and corresponded to the 178 N-terminal amino acid
residues, as judged by mass spectrometry and amino acid sequencing, and
was named Bacterial adhesion to epithelial and
subepithelial surfaces is a prerequisite for colonization of mammalian
tissues by pathogenic bacterial species as well as by members of the
normal bacterial flora. Pathogenic and commensal strains of
Escherichia coli express a variety of fimbrial types with
characteristic receptor-binding specificities and serological
properties. In the best-characterized fimbrial filament, the P fimbriae
of uropathogenic E. coli, the globoside-binding PapG adhesin
is a minor component of the filament and is located in the
tip-associated fibrillum of the P fimbria (23). Although
detailed studies on P-fimbrial biogenesis have increased our
understanding of bacterial adhesive structures (reviewed in reference
48), it has remained uncertain how well the P fimbria serves as a structural model for other fimbrial types. For example, the
mannoside-binding FimH lectin of the E. coli type 1 fimbria is located on specific sites along the fimbrial filament as well as at
the fimbrial tip (1, 18, 22).
It has remained an open question whether the carbohydrate-binding
specificity of fimbrial filaments is dictated by the lectin peptide
alone or whether the other components of the fimbrial filament also
influence binding. The mannoside-binding specificity of the FimH lectin
in different enterobacterial species has been, by complementation
assays, found to be influenced by the fimbrial shaft (31).
On the other hand, variability in type 1 fimbria binding to mannosides
and nonmannoside targets has been found to result solely from sequence
variations in FimH (37, 45, 47), and purified, aggregated
SfaS lectin has been shown to exhibit sialic acid-binding activity
(32). PapG, FimH, and the G-fimbrial lectin GafD have been
expressed as fusions to maltose-binding protein (14, 40,
54) and have been shown to exhibit the correct mono- or
disaccharide binding. Hence, several reports strongly indicate that
carbohydrate-binding specificity relies on the lectin.
The correct biosynthesis of P and type 1 fimbriae requires the
periplasmic chaperones PapD and FimC, which form complexes with lectin
proteins PapG and FimH, with the other minor fimbrial proteins, and
with major fimbrial subunits PapA and FimA (reviewed in reference
48). PapD has been proposed to protect PapG from proteolytic cleavage, prevent misassembly of PapG in the periplasm, and
facilitate import and folding of subunits in the periplasm (19,
49). PapD binds to a hydrophobic C-terminal motif in PapG to
form a 1:1 complex, whereas the N terminus of PapG is important for
receptor binding (14, 15, 24, 49). The X-ray structure of
the FimC-FimH chaperone-adhesin complex, resolved recently by Choudhury
and coworkers (8), showed that the FimH lectin consists of
two domains connected by a short linker region. The N-terminal
receptor-binding domain of FimH accommodates the carbohydrate-binding
pocket at the distal tip of the domain, and the C-terminal
fimbrillin-binding domain binds to the chaperone and subsequently
anchors the adhesin to the fimbrial shaft. In the absence of specific
chaperones, fimbrial subunits are proteolytically processed by the
periplasmic DegP protease and other so far unidentified proteases
(3, 51, 57). C-terminally truncated receptor-binding forms
of fimbrial minor proteins have been detected in the periplasm of
recombinant E. coli expressing the adhesin gene or
chaperone-deficient fimbrial gene clusters; the coexpression of the
chaperone significantly decreases the rate of proteolysis of fimbrial
proteins in E. coli periplasm (15, 17-19, 26, 46,
57).
Due to aggregation, complex purification procedures, and sensitivity to
proteolytic cleavage, few fimbrial adhesins have been purified for
binding or structural analysis. Moch and coworkers (32)
purified the sialic acid-binding SfaS adhesin from the S fimbria of
E. coli; the lectin was, however, aggregated into complexes
of an apparent molecular weight of >106. PapG and FimH
have been affinity purified from the bacterial periplasm as a complex
with their specific chaperones PapD and FimC (8, 15, 19,
54). Recently, two independent reports have shown that stable
forms of FimH can be obtained in the periplasm of E. coli by
fusing the C terminus of FimH with a polyhistidine tag or a
fimbrillin-derived peptide; these fusion proteins apparently are
resistant to proteolysis (4, 44).
The G fimbria belongs to the closely related F17 family of fimbriae
that are present on bovine enteropathogenic and septicemic E. coli and that bind to the intestinal brush border as well as to
the basement membrane (9, 28, 29, 40, 41, 43). In contrast
to type 1 and P fimbriae, which are encoded by chromosomal gene
clusters comprising 9 and 11 genes (15, 22), the fimbriae in the F17 family are encoded by only four chromosomal genes
(27). Two of the f17 gene products (F17A and
F17G) are components of the fimbrial filament, the major fimbrillin and
the adhesin (28, 29). It has been suggested that F17C is
an outer membrane usher needed for translocation of subunits across the
outer membrane (27) and that the fourth protein, F17D, has
amino acid sequence homology to the prototype chaperone PapD and hence
should be considered a fimbrial chaperone (16, 24).
In this paper, we describe the construction and purification of a
soluble, nonfusion form of the G-fimbrial GlcNAc-binding GafD lectin of
E. coli in the absence of its chaperone. Such soluble fimbrial peptides may be useful in the analysis of structure-function relationships in fimbrial adhesins and as convenient antiadhesive vaccine antigens.
Bacteria and plasmids.
The G-fimbriate E. coli
strains IHE11165, IHE11088(pRR-5), and IHE11088(pHUB110) have
been described earlier (38, 41, 56). Plasmid pRR-5
contains the complete gaf gene cluster from E. coli strain IHE11165 on a 7-kb DNA fragment in pACYC184
(38), and pHUB110 contains a 6-bp in-frame deletion within
the coding region of gafD, resulting in G fimbriae lacking
GlcNAc-binding capacity (40). pHUB113 (40)
contains the gafD reading frame cloned into pUC19. Type 1 fimbria-expressing E. coli strain EH826 and DegP-deficient
E. coli strain KS474 have been described (39, 50). E. coli strain BL21 Expression and purification of the GafD constructs.
The DNA
fragment encoding the entire GafD peptide (GafD1-321) on pHUB113 was
cloned as a BamHI-HindIII fragment into
pET-22b(+) to obtain plasmid pKJ1. The gene fragments encoding
C-terminally truncated peptides GafD1-252, GafD1-224, GafD1-189,
GafD1-178, and GafD1-157 were amplified by PCR using plasmid pHUB113 as
a template. The universal pUC19 primer was used as the 5' primer; the
3' primers of each construct were designed on the basis of the
nucleotide sequence of gafD (40) and contained
a stop codon and a HindIII site. After restriction with
BamHI and HindIII, the DNA fragments were
ligated into BamHI- and HindIII-digested pET-22b(+) and transformed into E. coli BL21 Immunological methods.
Antiserum against the purified GafD
peptide was raised in rabbits using standard procedures. The antiserum
raised against the purified G-fimbrial filaments of E. coli
has been described elsewhere (38). Agglutination of
bacterial cells in anti-GafD antisera was performed as described
previously (40). For Western blotting, purified fimbriae
available from previous work (39, 40), the purified GafD
peptides, periplasmic peptides, whole cells, and spheroplasts were
analyzed by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane
(Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.) using a semidry transfer apparatus
(Pharmacia) at 0.9 mA/cm2 for 2 h. After the transfer,
the membranes were quenched with 2% (wt/vol) bovine serum albumin
(BSA) in PBS for 18 h at room temperature. Polypeptides were
visualized by staining with anti-G fimbria or anti-GafD peptide
antibodies (diluted 1/1,500 in PBS containing 1% BSA). Bound
antibodies were visualized by alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary
antibodies (Dakopatts, Glostrup, Denmark) diluted 1/2,000 in PBS-BSA
and a phosphatase substrate containing nitroblue tetrazolium (Sigma)
and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-1-phosphate (Sigma).
Binding and inhibition assays.
Hemagglutination and
inhibition assays using endo- Protein chemical methods.
For molecular weight
determination, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of
flight mass spectrometry was performed in the linear positive-ion mode
with a BIFLEX mass spectrometer (Bruker-Franzen Analytik, Bremen,
Germany), using a 337-nm nitrogen laser. One microliter of sample was
mixed with 1 µl of matrix solution (saturated solution of sinapic
acid [Fluka Chemika, Buchs, Switzerland] in 30% [wt/vol]
acetonitrile-0.1% [wt/vol] trifluoroacetic acid) and dried with a
stream of air. External calibration was performed with horse heart
myoglobin (Sigma). For protein sequencing, an aliquot corresponding to
approximately 50 pmol of protein was concentrated to 30 µl in a
vacuum centrifuge and subjected to Edman degradation in a Procise 494A
protein-sequencing system (Applied Biosystems, Perkin-Elmer, Foster
City, Calif.). Protein concentration was estimated
spectrophotometrically as described previously (36).
Ultracentrifugation was performed for 100 min at 100,000 × g and 4°C in a 50 Ti rotor in an L8 ultracentrifuge (Beckman
Instruments Inc., Palo Alto, Calif.).
Protein sequence analysis.
The amino acid sequences of
GafD1-321 and GafD1-178 were sent to the ExPASy SWISS-MODEL automated
protein modeling server (version 3.5; Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
[http://www.expasy.ch/swissmod]) (13) and modeled
without user-defined templates as well as with FimH (1QUN.pdb;
Structural Bioinformatics Protein Databank code 1QUN) of the FimC-FimH
chaperone adhesin complex as the template (8).
Amino acid sequence accession numbers.
The amino acid
sequences of GafD, F17-D, FimH, PapG, MrkD, and CooD are deposited at
EMBL/GenBank under the accession no. AAA69514, AAC45720, S56545,
AAA24290, AAA25098, and CAA54230, respectively (10, 11, 20, 27,
30, 37, 40).
Purification and chemical properties of
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.2.512-519.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
The gaf Fimbrial Gene Cluster of
Escherichia coli Expresses a Full-Size and a Truncated
Soluble Adhesin Protein

![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
GafD. Expression of gafD from the cloned
gaf gene cluster in DegP-, Lon-, and OmpT-deficient
recombinant strains did not significantly decrease the formation of
GafD. The peptide was also detected in the periplasm of the
wild-type E. coli strain from which the gaf
gene cluster originally was cloned. We expressed gafD
fragments encoding C-terminally truncated peptides. Peptides GafD1-252, GafD1-224, GafD1-189, and the GafD1-178, isolated
from the periplasm by affinity chromatography, had apparent sizes
closely similar to that of
GafD. Only trace amounts of truncated
forms with expected molecular sizes were detected in spheroplasts. In contrast, the shorter GafD1-157 peptide was detected in spheroplasts but not in the periplasm, indicating that it was poorly translocated or
was degraded by periplasmic proteases. Pulse-chase assays using gafD indicated that
GafD was processed from GafD and is
not a primary translation product. The
GafD peptide was soluble by biochemical criteria and exhibited specific binding to GlcNAc-agarose. Inhibition assays with mono- and oligosaccharides gave a similar inhibition pattern in the hemagglutination by the G-fimbria-expressing recombinant E. coli strain and in the binding of
[14C]
GafD to GlcNAc-agarose.
GafD bound
specifically to laminin, a previously described tissue target for the G
fimbria. Our results show that a soluble, protease-resistant
subdomain of GafD exhibits receptor-binding specificity similar to that
for intact G fimbriae and that it is formed when gafD is
expressed alone or from the gaf gene cluster.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
DE3 (ompT lon)
and expression vector pET-22b(+) were from Novagen Inc. (Madison,
Wis.). The bacteria were cultivated at 37°C in Luria broth
(42) containing the appropriate antibiotics.
DE3.
Restriction enzymes were used according to the manufacturers'
instructions (New England Biolabs, Inc., Beverly, Mass.; Promega,
Madison, Wis.), and routine methods were used for PCR, DNA ligation,
and plasmid transformation (42). Expression of the
gafD constructs in E. coli BL21
DE3 was
performed essentially as described by Studier and coworkers
(52) and the manufacturer's instructions (Novagen Inc.).
Briefly, bacteria were cultivated in 20 ml of Luria broth containing
ampicillin (75 µg/ml) to an optical density at 600 nm
(OD600) of 1.0, washed twice with M9 (42) salt
solution, and starved for 1 h at 37°C in 10 ml of M9 solution
containing 1 mM isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside
(IPTG), 0.4% (vol/vol) glycerol, and ampicillin. In some experiments,
a mixture of inhibitors of serine and cysteine proteases (Complete;
Boehringer Mannheim) was added to the induction mixture as recommended
by the manufacturer. Cells were collected and incubated further for 30 min at 37°C in 2 ml of M9 supplemented with 200 µg of rifampin/ml.
The bacterial cells were then pulse-labeled by adding 100 µl of the
14C-amino acid mixture (Amersham Life Science,
Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) and by further incubation for 1 h. Samples for sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis and autoradiography were taken
immediately and at 1- to 10-min intervals after the addition of
14C-amino acids. The cells were chased by adding 1 ml of
Luria broth and by incubating them for 20 min at 37°C and then washed
twice with M9 solution; periplasmic peptides were released by an
osmotic shock procedure (7). For expression on a larger
scale, the cells expressing gafD were grown in Luria broth
without starvation, rifampin, and 14C labeling to an
OD600 of 1.0, induced with 1 mM IPTG, and further incubated
for 2 h at 37°C. Samples of the cells, spheroplasts, and of the
corresponding periplasms were analyzed by SDS-PAGE in 15% (wt/vol)
slab gels (25) and by autoradiography or Western blotting
(55). In autoradiography, radioactivity at a level of
7,000 dpm/sample was loaded on the gel. Bacterial cells were converted
into spheroplasts by treatment with lysozyme and EDTA as described
earlier (5). Plasmolysis was achieved by resuspending the
collected cells in ice-cold 20% glucose in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0 (40). Lysozyme was then added to a concentration of 100 µg/ml followed by two volumes of ice-cold 1.5 mM EDTA, pH 7.5, within
10 min. The cells were kept on ice for 15 min, the formation of
spheroplasts was confirmed microscopically, and then the cells were
centrifuged. The spheroplasts were resuspended into 480 µl of M9
solution or 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, and stored at
20°C. For
affinity purification of the GafD and the GafD constructs, the
periplasm was mixed with N-acetyl-D-glucosamine
(GlcNAc)-agarose beads (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.), the slurry was rocked
slowly for 16 h at 4°C, and the periplasm-agarose mixture was
packed into a column. Unbound material was removed by washing with
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.1, and peptides bound to the
GlcNAc-agarose particles were eluted in PBS containing 5% (wt/vol)
GlcNAc (Sigma) (GlcNAc-PBS). Gel filtration through a PD10 column
(Pharmacia) was used to remove the carbohydrate from the GafD peptide.
For expression of gafD from the gaf gene cluster,
plasmid pRR-5 was transformed into E. coli strains BL21
DE3, KS474, and IHE11088 and bacteria were grown in Luria broth as
described above, without IPTG induction. Expression of GlcNAc-binding G
fimbriae in these strains was verified by agglutination of
GlcNAc-agarose particles.
-galactosidase-treated human
erythrocytes were performed as previously described (38,
56). In the binding assays with the [14C]GafD
constructs, 50 µl of the periplasm from pulse-labeled cells was
incubated with 50 µl of the GlcNAc-agarose or amylose-agarose (New
England Biolabs) particle suspension for 30 min in Eppendorf tubes over
crushed ice. The particles were washed three times for 5 min in PBS,
and the radioactivity remaining on the particles was determined in an
LKB 1409 liquid scintillation counter (Wallac, Turku, Finland). In
inhibition assays, the carbohydrates were added to the incubation
buffer at a final concentration of 20 mM. The carbohydrates tested as
inhibitors were from Sigma. The binding of the purified GafD peptide to
laminin immobilized on microtiter plates was assessed by a modified
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as described earlier
(58). The microtiter plate was coated with laminin at a
concentration of 25 µg/ml, the GafD peptide was used at a final
concentration of 5 to 150 nM, the incubation time with the purified
GafD peptide was 4 h, and the anti-GafD peptide serum was used at
the dilution of 1/2,000 in PBS containing 0.05% (vol/vol) Tween 20. For a control, the binding of GafD to immobilized BSA (25 µg/ml) was
assessed. The effect of carbohydrates on the binding of
GafD (the
form of GafD corresponding to the N-terminal 178 amino acids; 75 nM) to
laminin was tested at the 50 mM concentration.
![]()
RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
GafD.
We cloned the
gafD gene on pHUB113 as a
BamHI-HindIII fragment into expression
plasmid pET-22b(+). In the plasmid obtained, pKJ1, gafD is
expressed with its own Shine-Dalgarno and leader sequences, and,
due to the stop codons upstream and downstream of the gafD
reading frame, the peptide lacks the PelB leader sequence as well as
the His tag sequence encoded by the vector. We first purified
14C-labeled GafD from the periplasm of rifampin-treated
and pulse-labeled E. coli BL21
DE3(pKJ1) cells using
affinity chromatography on GlcNAc-agarose. We tested the
binding of 14C-labeled periplasmic peptides to
GlcNAc-agarose and, as a control, to amylose-agarose.
With 50 µl of the labeled periplasm and 50 µl of the resin
suspension, a radioactivity of 20,818 cpm was bound to the
GlcNAc-agarose whereas only 329 cpm was bound to the
amylose-agarose, indicating specificity for GlcNAc in the binding.
DE3 is shown in Fig. 1B. After the pulse-labeling of
rifampin-treated cells with 14C-amino acids, three
radioactive peptides were detected in the periplasm of BL21
DE3(pKJ1) (lane 1 in Fig. 1A). The minor peptide with the
apparent molecular mass of 32 kDa was bound to the
GlcNAc-agarose (lane 3) and eluted in
GlcNAc-PBS, suggesting that it was GafD (calculated size,
33,889 Da). The peptide of 30 kDa not bound to the
GlcNAc-agarose (lane 2) was considered to be
-lactamase encoded by the vector on the basis of its migration
properties in SDS-PAGE gel and its lack of reactivity with
GlcNAc-agarose (lane 3) and with anti-GafD antibodies
(see below). The major radioactive peptide in the periplasm was a
peptide with an apparent size of 20 kDa that bound to the
GlcNAc-agarose (lane 3) and that was eluted in
GlcNAc-PBS (lane 1 in Fig. 1B); the affinity-purified 32-kDa minor peptide was clearly visible only when expressed on a
larger scale (lane 1 in Fig. 1B). For comparison, the affinity-purified proteolytically resistant peptide GafD1-178 is shown in lane 2. The
addition of Complete, a cocktail of various inhibitors of serine and
cysteine proteases, to the induction mixture did not prevent the
degradation (data not shown). The sequencing of the 20-kDa peptide
gave a single N-terminal sequence, AVSFIG, which perfectly
matches the N-terminal sequence of the mature GafD (40). The peptide was therefore named
GafD. Mass spectrometric analysis of
the
GafD peptide gave a mass of 19,092 +/
20 Da, which indicates that the C-terminal residue in
GafD is Thr-178 (calculated
molecular mass, 19,074 Da). An aliquot of the affinity-purified
[14C]
GafD was gel filtered to remove excess
GlcNAc, diluted 1/2 in PBS, and ultracentrifuged for 100 min
at 100,000 × g; the radioactivity in the supernatant
was 29,740 cpm/ml before and 28,410 cpm/ml after the
ultracentrifugation. This indicates that [14C]
GafD was
soluble and not sedimented.

View larger version (45K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Purification of GafD from E. coli BL21
DE3(pKJ1) periplasm by affinity chromatography and analysis
of the reactivities of fimbrial preparations with anti-G-fimbria and
anti-GafD antibodies. (A) Binding of 14C-labeled GafD to
GlcNAc-agarose. Lane 1, pulse-labeled periplasmic
peptides from rifampin-treated E. coli BL21
DE3(pKJ1); lane 2, peptides not bound to
GlcNAc-agarose; lane 3, peptides bound to
GlcNAc-agarose. (B) Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE gel
of GafD peptides eluted with 5% (wt/vol) GlcNAc from the
GlcNAc-agarose column. The peptides were prepared from
periplasm of nonlabeled E. coli BL21
DE3(pKJ1) (lane 1) and E. coli BL21
DE3 expressing
the truncated GafD1-178 (lane 2). (C) Western blot of fimbrial
preparations. Lanes 1 to 3, reactivities of fimbrial peptides with
anti-G-fimbria antibodies; lanes 4 to 6, reactivities with anti-GafD
antibodies. The fimbrial preparations were the G fimbria isolated from
E. coli HB101(pRR-5) (lanes 1 and 4), the mutated G
fimbria without lectin activity isolated from E. coli
HB101(pHUB110) (lanes 2 and 5), and the type 1 fimbria from
E. coli EH826 (lanes 3 and 6). The migration distances of
molecular weight markers are indicated on the left; those of the GafD
and the GafA peptides are indicated on the right.
Production and specificity of the anti-GafD antibodies.
We
immunized rabbits with the affinity-purified
GafD and assessed the
specificity of the obtained antibodies by Western blotting (Fig. 1C).
The antiserum raised against purified G fimbriae detected the GafA
fimbrillin as well as GafD in the G fimbriae purified from E. coli HB101(pRR-5) and HB101(pHUB110) (lanes 1 and 2 in Fig. 1C) but did not react with the type 1 fimbrial peptides tested as
the control (lane 3 in Fig. 1C). Plasmid pRR-5 expresses the complete
G-fimbrial gene cluster, whereas the 6-bp in-frame deletion within the
coding region of gafD in plasmid pHUB110 results in nonfunctional G-fimbrial filaments. The antibodies raised against the
purified GafD detected the full-length GafD peptide in the two
G-fimbrial preparations. The truncated 20-kDa
GafD form was not
detected in G-fimbrial preparations (lanes 4 and 5 in Fig. 1C).
Expression of gafD in pulse-labeled cells.
To
determine whether
GafD is a posttranslational processing product
from GafD or a primary translation product, we analyzed by SDS-PAGE and
autoradiography pulse-labeled cells of E. coli BL21
DE3(pKJ1). Samples were taken immediately after the addition of
14C-labeled amino acids and at short intervals up to 1 h 30 min after the addition of the label. Autoradiographic analysis of peptides expressed in the pulse-labeled cells are shown in Fig. 2A. A major polypeptide of 32 kDa
corresponding to intact GafD and trace amounts of 20- and 30-kDa
peptides corresponding to
GafD and vector-encoded
-lactamase,
respectively, were detected immediately after addition of the label
(lane 1 in Fig. 2A). The amount of
GafD increased over time, and the
peptide was clearly visible 1 h 30 min after addition of the
14C label (lane 2 in Fig. 2A).
|
Expression of gafD from the gaf gene
cluster in various host strains and in wild-type strain E. coli IHE11165.
To analyze whether
GafD was formed in
other host backgrounds, plasmid pRR-5 was introduced into the following
E. coli host strains: BL21
DE3, which is deficient in
cytoplasmic protease Lon and outer membrane protease OmpT, KS474, which
lacks periplasmic protease DegP, and IHE11088, which is a clinical
isolate previously shown to support fimbrial synthesis from plasmid
pRR-5 (41). A Western blot of periplasmic extracts
from these strains is shown in Fig. 2B, which also shows the blot
obtained from G-fimbriated clinical isolate E. coli
IHE11165, which expresses gafD from the chromosomal
gaf gene cluster and which was used as the source for
cloning the gaf gene cluster (38). GafD
appeared as a minor 32-kDa peptide and
GafD appeared as the major
form in the periplasmic extracts of all the strains tested (lanes 1 to 3 in Fig. 2B), including strain IHE11165 (lane 5). The
periplasmic forms of GafD expressed from E. coli
BL21
DE3(pKJ1) are shown for comparison in lane 4. As judged by
bacterial agglutination in anti-GafD antiserum and of
GlcNAc-agarose particles, the strains tested
expressed GafD lectin on their surfaces (data not shown). The
results show that
GafD was accumulated in the periplasm
concomitantly with the expression of functional G fimbrial
filaments in the clinical isolate of E. coli as well as in
the recombinant strains.
Expression and characterization of C-terminally truncated GafD
constructs.
To analyze the size requirements of
GafD expression
and binding activity in more detail, we constructed deletions in the 3'
region of gafD in pKJ1 and analyzed the peptide products in rifampin-treated, starved, and pulse-labeled E. coli BL21
DE3. The constructs are schematically shown in Fig.
3A, and examples of autoradiographic
analysis of their expression in E. coli cells, spheroplasts,
and periplasm are shown in Fig. 3B. In whole cells and in
spheroplasts, the complete GafD molecule ([14C]GafD1-321)
migrated mainly as a 32-kDa peptide but appeared in the periplasm
mainly as a 20-kDa peptide (lanes 1 through 3 in Fig. 3B).
[14C]GafD1-157 (calculated size, 16,825 Da) was detected
in the cells and spheroplasts as a 15-kDa peptide and was not found in
the periplasm of pulse-labeled cells (lanes 4 through 6 in Fig.
3B). The GafD1-252 (26,348 Da), GafD1-224 (23,544 Da), GafD1-189
(20,216 Da), and GafD1-178 (19,074 Da) peptides were detected in cells, spheroplasts, and periplasm mainly as peptides with apparent sizes of 20 kDa; GafD1-252 and GafD1-178 are shown in lanes 7 through 12 in
Fig. 3B. GafD1-178 was subjected to mass spectrometric analysis, and
the result gave a mass of 19,113 Da, which is close to its calculated
molecular mass. The 32-, 20-, and 15-kDa peptides present in whole-cell
samples reacted in Western blot analysis with anti-GafD antibodies
(data not shown), indicating that these peptides indeed were different
forms of GafD.
|
Binding characteristics of
GafD.
We then assessed the
carbohydrate sensitivity of the binding of
GafD to
GlcNAc-agarose. D-Glucose, 2-deoxyglucose,
D-glucosamine, and D-mannose did not
inhibit binding, whereas N-acetyl-D-mannosamine was weakly inhibitory and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine
was more efficient. Oligosaccharides
N,N'-D-diacetylchitobiose,
N,N',N'"-triacetylchitotriose, N,N',N",N'"-D-tetraacetylchitotetraose,
and
N,N'-D-diacetylchitobiose were slightly more efficient inhibitors than was
N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (Table
1). These carbohydrates exhibited a
similar inhibition pattern in the hemagglutination by G-fimbriate
E. coli cells of erythrocytes with terminal
GlcNAc residues on their surfaces (Table 1).
|
GafD binds to laminin immobilized on microtiter plates (Fig. 4). A dose-dependent binding to laminin
was evident; no significant binding to BSA was detected (Fig. 4A).
The binding to laminin was inhibited by 50 mM
N-acetyl-D-glucosamine but not by 50 mM N-acetyl-D-galactosamine (Fig. 4B).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We describe here a soluble, C-terminally truncated form of the
GafD fimbrial lectin that was named
GafD. The truncated 20-kDa form
was present in the periplasm of G-fimbria-expressing E. coli strains but was not incorporated into the G-fimbrial
filament. Pulse-chase experiments indicated that
GafD is a
proteolytic product of GafD rather than a primary translation product.
GafD shows receptor-binding characteristics similar to those shown by the complete fimbrial filament, and our results support the concept
that the carbohydrate-binding specificity of a gram-negative fimbria is
dictated by the lectin subunit alone (14, 37, 45, 47). The
receptor-binding region of GafD is apparently located at the N terminus
of the molecule. This paper is the first to report on the expression
and purification on a larger scale of a soluble nonfusion form of a
fimbrial lectin. The biotechnological application potential of soluble
adhesin forms is high: they could be used in receptor identification or
isolation, in production of antiadhesive vaccines, and in structural studies.
The GafD peptide was not processed in the cytoplasm but appeared in the
periplasm as
GafD. These findings indicated that the C terminus
of GafD is resistant to cytoplasmic proteases but is processed during
translocation into or in the periplasm. Overexpressed GafD1-178, GafD1-189, GafD1-224, and GafD1-252 peptides appeared in the cellular, spheroplastic, and periplasmic compartments mainly as the
GafD form, which suggests that the peptides were
proteolytically processed to the stable 20-kDa structure already in the
cytoplasm. GlcNAc-binding peptides of 20 and 32 kDa in
apparent size were detected in Western blots of the periplasm of
E. coli BL21
DE3 cells overexpressing GafD. The peptides
were also detected when GafD was expressed from the entire
gaf gene cluster in plasmid pRR-5 in host strains deficient
in proteases DegP, Lon, and OmpT as well as in clinical isolate
E. coli IHE11088, previously shown to support fimbrial
synthesis from plasmid pRR-5 (41). In addition, we
detected
GafD in the periplasm of wild-type clinical isolate E. coli IHE11165, from which the gaf gene cluster
was originally cloned, which suggests that the
GafD form may be a
natural product of the gaf gene cluster. All strains with
the gaf gene cluster also expressed functional G fimbriae on
their surfaces, further indicating that
GafD is not a result of the
overexpression technology. However, G-fimbrial filaments contained
full-size GafD but not
GafD, which indicated that the C-terminally
truncated
GafD is not polymerized into the fimbrial filaments.
Coexpression of GafD1-321 with G-fimbrial putative chaperone GafB
(16, 24) or P-fimbrial chaperone PapD in E. coli BL21
DE3, according to procedures used for expression of
the PapG-PapD complex (46), did not prevent C-terminal
degradation of GafD (data not shown). In this respect GafD differs from
PapG, FimH, and the MrkD adhesin of type 3 fimbriae of Klebsiella
pneumoniae, which can form complexes with and utilize PapD in
assembly into the fimbrial tip (11, 17, 19, 46, 53). The
results suggest that the secretion and folding of
GafD to the
functionally correct conformation in the periplasm are not
dependent on GafB function in the expression system.
We detected
GafD in host cells lacking proteases DegP, Lon, and
OmpT, which indicates that the C-terminal degradation of GafD is
mediated by some other, so far unidentified proteases. Very little data
on the target sequences of E. coli proteases exist; they
seem to recognize a target sequence in combination with a target
protein conformation (reviewed in reference 12). We found
no significant homology of the GafD region around residue Thr-178 to
target sequences of E. coli proteases (12). The
exact cleavage sites were not determined for the periplasmic
C-terminally truncated forms of FimH, PapG, and CooD previously
observed (15, 18, 57), which makes it more difficult to
infer why GafD is cleaved up to residue 178 but not more extensively to
the N-terminal region of this site. The X-ray structure of the
FimC-FimH complex, recently presented by Choudhury and coworkers
(8), reveals that FimH is composed of two domains, a
mannose-binding lectin domain that comprises the 156 N-terminal
residues and a chaperone-binding C-terminal domain that comprises
residues 160 to 279. Recently, Schembri and coworkers expressed in the
periplasm of E. coli the 156-mer receptor-binding domain
of FimH fused to a polyhistidine tail (44). In another
recent study, the 13 N-terminal residues of FimG were fused to the C
terminus of FimH and the modified FimH was expressed in the
periplasm (4). These reports suggest that protection
of the C terminus of FimH facilitates proper folding and renders the
peptide proteolytically resistant in the periplasm. In the primary
sequence alignment of GafD and FimH, the Thr-178 of GafD is located at
the position of the flexible linker region in FimH. However,
GafD
shows only 21.5% identity to the N-terminal domain of FimH, which does
not facilitate the modeling of the three-dimensional structure of
GafD on the basis of the FimH structure. We anticipate that GafD,
like FimH, has two domains, an N-terminal protease-resistant
receptor-binding domain and a C-terminal protease-sensitive one, but
that the fine structures of the two lectins differ. The explanation why
GafD is protease resistant and soluble requires the crystal
structure of
GafD, which we currently are solving.
The receptor-binding region of the GafD lectin is apparently located within the 178 N-terminal amino acids of the mature protein. GafD resembles PapG, DraE, and the FimH fimbrial adhesin of E. coli in that the N-terminal part of the adhesin molecule is important for the receptor-binding activity (6, 8, 14, 21, 54). Such an arrangement, however, is not shared by all fimbrial adhesins (35). In the sialic acid-binding SfaS minor protein of the S fimbriae, the receptor-binding region was mapped to the C-terminal part of the SfaS molecule (33). We have previously described in pHUB110 an in-frame deletion of the codons for amino acid residues Gly-94 and Thr-95, which abolishes GlcNAc binding by GafD (40). This mutated GafD peptide was detected as a component of purified G fimbriae, indicating that the nonbinding phenotype resulted from destruction of binding activity rather than from lack of GafD incorporation into the fimbriae.
GafD specifically bound to GlcNAc-agarose, and the
binding was inhibited by GlcNAc but not by GalNAc. We also
observed that purified
GafD binds to laminin, a glycosylated
basement membrane protein that we recently identified as a tissue
receptor for the G fimbriae using isolated fimbriae as well as
recombinant E. coli (41). These results confirm
the role of GafD as the GlcNAc-binding fimbrial lectin.
The inhibition of
GafD binding to GlcNAc-agarose by
carbohydrates exhibited a pattern closely similar to that seen for
inhibition of hemagglutination by G-fimbriate E. coli
(38, 56). The GlcNAc-di-, tri-, and
-tetrasaccharides
diacetylchitobiose [2-acetamido-2-deoxy-4-O-(2-acetamido-2-deoxy)-
-D-glucopyranosyl)-D-glucopyranose], triacetylchito-triose, and tetraacetylchitotetraose were only slightly more efficient inhibitors of
GafD binding than was
GlcNAc-monosaccharide, which indicates that the
1-4-linked GlcNAc chains are not well recognized by the
receptor-binding region of GafD. Indeed, in laminin, which is
recognized by GafD, the terminal GlcNAc residues are
1-3
linked to N-acetyllactosamine residues (2).
Similar receptor preference has been observed with the G lectin of the
F17 fimbriae. Inhibition by glycoproteins of hemagglutination by
purified F17 fimbriae or E. coli cells expressing F17
fimbriae has shown that the F17 fimbrial lectin preferentially
recognizes oligosaccharides carrying
1-3 linked GlcNAc
chains and binds only poorly to those having 1-4 and 1-6 linkages
(34). As far as it is possible to conclude from these
inhibition assays, the carbohydrate-binding specificity of
GafD and
that of the G fimbriae are closely similar. We are currently analyzing
the function of
GafD in the periplasm of E. coli.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Raili Lameranta for skilled technical assistance.
This study was supported by the Academy of Finland (projects 42103, 42107, and 164916), the Helsinki Graduate School in Microbiology, and the University of Helsinki.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of General Microbiology, Department of Biosciences, P.O. Box 56, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland. Phone: 358-9-19159251. Fax: 358-9-19159262. E-mail: Benita.Westerlund{at}Helsinki.Fi.
Present address: National Agency for Medicine, FIN-00300 Helsinki, Finland.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Abraham, S. N.,
J. D. Goguen,
D. Sun,
P. Klemm, and E. H. Beachey.
1987.
Identification of two ancillary subunits of Escherichia coli type 1 fimbriae by using antibodies against synthetic oligopeptides of fim gene products.
J. Bacteriol.
169:5530-5536 |
| 2. | Arumugham, R. G., T. C.-Y. Hsieh, M. L. Tanzer, and R. A. Laine. 1986. Structures of the asparagine-linked sugar chains of laminin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 883:112-126[Medline]. |
| 3. | Bakker, D., C. E. M. Vader, B. Roosendaal, F. R. Mooi, B. Oudega, and F. K. de Graaf. 1991. Structure and function of periplasmic chaperone-like proteins involved in the biosynthesis of K88 and K99 fimbriae in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 5:867-886. |
| 4. |
Barnhart, M. M.,
J. S. Pinkner,
G. E. Soto,
F. G. Sauer,
S. Langermann,
G. Waksman,
C. Frieden, and S. J. Hultgren.
2000.
PapD-like chaperones provide the missing information for folding of pilin proteins.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97:7709-7714 |
| 5. |
Birdsell, D. C., and E. H. Cota-Robles.
1967.
Production and ultrastructure of lysozyme and ethylenediaminetetraacetate-lysozyme spheroplast of Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
93:427-437 |
| 6. | Carnoy, C., and S. L. Mosley. 1997. Mutational analysis of receptor binding mediated by the Dr family of Escherichia coli adhesins. Mol. Microbiol. 23:365-379[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 7. | Charm, S. E., and C. C. Matteo. 1971. Scale-up of protein isolation. Methods Enzymol. XXII:476-556. |
| 8. |
Choudhury, D.,
A. Thompson,
V. Stojanoff,
S. Langermann,
J. Pinkner,
S. J. Hultgren, and S. D. Knight.
1999.
X-ray structure of the FimC-FimH chaperone-adhesin complex from uropathogenic Escherichia coli.
Science
285:1061-1066 |
| 9. |
El Mazouari, K.,
E. Oswald,
J.-P. Hernalsteens,
P. Lintermans, and H. De Greve.
1994.
F17-like fimbriae from an invasive Escherichia coli strain producing cytotoxic necrotizing factor type 2 toxin.
Infect. Immun.
62:2633-2638 |
| 10. | Froehlich, B. J., A. Karakashian, L. R. Melsen, J. C. Wakefield, and J. R. Scott. 1994. CooC and CooD are required for assembly of CS1 pili. Mol. Microbiol. 12:387-401[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 11. |
Gerlach, G.-F.,
S. Clegg, and B. L. Allen.
1989.
Identification and characterization of the genes encoding the type 3 and the type 1 fimbrial adhesins of Klebsiella pneumoniae.
J. Bacteriol.
171:1262-1270 |
| 12. | Gottesman, S. 1999. Regulation by proteolysis: developmental switches. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2:142-147[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 13. | Guex, N., and M. C. Peitsch. 1997. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modelling. Electrophoresis 18:2714-2723[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 14. | Haslam, D. B., T. Borén, P. Falk, D. Ilver, A. Chou, Z. Xu, and S. Normark. 1994. The amino-terminal domain of the P-pilus adhesin determines receptor specificity. Mol. Microbiol. 14:399-409[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 15. |
Hultgren, S. J.,
F. Lindberg,
G. Magnusson,
J. Kihlberg,
J. M. Tennent, and S. Normark.
1989.
The PapG adhesin of uropathogenic Escherichia coli contains separate regions for receptor binding and for the incorporation into the pilus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:4357-4361 |
| 16. | Hung, D., S. Knight, R. M. Woods, J. S. Pinkner, and S. J. Hultgren. 1996. Molecular basis of two subfamilies of immunoglobulin-like chaperones. EMBO J. 15:3792-3805[Medline]. |
| 17. |
Jones, C. H.,
J. S. Pinkner,
A. V. Nicholes,
L. N. Slonim,
S. N. Abraham, and S. J. Hultgren.
1993.
FimC is a periplasmic PapD-like chaperone that directs assembly of type 1 pili in bacteria.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:8397-8401 |
| 18. |
Jones, C. H.,
J. S. Pinkner,
R. Roth,
J. Heuser,
A. V. Nicholes,
S. N. Abraham, and S. J. Hultgren.
1995.
FimH adhesin of type 1 pili is assembled into a fibrillar tip structure in the Enterobacteriaceae.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:2081-2085 |
| 19. | Jones, C. H., P. N. Danese, J. S. Pinkner, T. J. Silhavy, and S. J. Hultgren. 1997. The chaperone-assisted membrane release and folding pathway is sensed by two signal-transduction systems. EMBO J. 16:6394-6406[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 20. | Klemm, P., and G. Christiansen. 1987. Three fim genes required for the regulation of length and mediation of adhesion of Escherichia coli type 1 fimbriae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 208:439-445[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 21. |
Knudsen, T. B., and P. Klemm.
1998.
Probing the receptor binding recognition site of the FimH adhesin by fimbriae-displayed FimH-FocH hybrids.
Microbiology
144:1919-1929 |
| 22. |
Krogfelt, K.,
H. Bergmans, and P. Klemm.
1990.
Direct evidence that the FimH protein is the mannose-specific adhesin of Escherichia coli type 1 fimbriae.
Infect. Immun.
58:1995-1998 |
| 23. | Kuehn, M. J., J. Heuser, S. Normark, and S. Hultgren. 1992. P pili of uropathogenic Escherichia coli are composite fibers with distinct fibrillar adhesive tips. Nature 356:252-255[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 24. |
Kuehn, M. J.,
D. J. Ogg,
J. Kihlberg,
L. N. Slonim,
K. Flemmer,
T. Bergfors, and S. Hultgren.
1993.
Structural basis of pilus subunit recognition by the PapD chaperone.
Science
262:1234-1241 |
| 25. | Laemmli, U. K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature (London) 227:680-685[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 26. |
Langermann, S.,
S. Palaszynski,
M. Barnhart,
G. Auguste,
J. S. Pinkner,
J. Burlein,
P. Barren,
S. Koenig,
S. Leath,
C. H. Jones, and S. J. Hultgren.
1997.
Prevention of mucosal Escherichia coli infection by FimH-adhesin-based systemic vaccination.
Science
276:607-611 |
| 27. | Lintermans, P. 1990. Karakterizatie van de F17 en F111 fimbriae van Escherichia coli en genetische analyse van de F17 genkluster. Academic dissertation. Rijksuniversiteit Gent, Ghent, Belgium. |
| 28. | Lintermans, P., P. Pohl, A. Bertels, G. Charlier, J. Vanderkerckhove, J. van Damme, J. Schoup, C. Schlicker, T. Korhonen, H. De Greve, and M. van Montagu. 1988. Characterization and purification of F17 adhesin on the surface of bovine enteropathogenic and septicemic Escherichia coli. Am. J. Vet. Res. 49:1749-1759. |
| 29. |
Lintermans, P.,
F. A. Bertels,
C. Schlicker,
F. Deboeck,
G. Charlier,
P. Pohl,
M. Norgren,
S. Normark,
M. van Montagu, and H. De Greve.
1991.
Identification, characterization, and nucleotide sequence of the F17-G gene, which determines receptor binding of Escherichia coli F17 fimbriae.
J. Bacteriol.
173:3366-3373 |
| 30. |
Lund, B.,
F. Lindberg, and S. Normark.
1988.
Structure and antigenic properties of the tip-located P pilus proteins of uropathogenic Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
170:1887-1894 |
| 31. |
Madison, B.,
I. Ofek,
S. Clegg, and S. N. Abraham.
1994.
Type 1 fimbrial shafts of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae influence sugar-binding specificities of their FimH adhesins.
Infect. Immun.
62:843-848 |
| 32. |
Moch, T.,
H. Hoschützky,
J. Hacker,
K.-D. Kröncke, and K. Jann.
1987.
Isolation and characterization of the -sialyl- -2,3-galactosyl-specific adhesin from fimbriated Escherichia coli.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
84:3462-3466 |
| 33. |
Morschhäuser, J.,
H. Hoschützky,
K. Jann, and J. Hacker.
1990.
Functional analysis of the sialic acid binding adhesin SfaS of pathogenic Escherichia coli by site-specific mutagenesis.
Infect. Immun.
58:2133-2138 |
| 34. | Mouricout, M., M. Milhavet, C. Durié, and P. Grange. 1995. Characterization of glycoprotein glycan receptors for Escherichia coli F17 fimbrial lectin. Microb. Pathog. 18:297-306[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 35. | Nagata, H., A. Sharma, H. T. Sojar, A. Amano, M. J. Levine, and R. J. Genco. 1997. Role of the carboxyl-terminal region of Porphyromonas gingivalis fimbrillin in binding to salivary proteins. Infect. Immun. 65:422-427[Abstract]. |
| 36. | Pace, C. N., F. Vajdos, L. Fee, G. Grimsley, and T. Gray. 1995. How to measure and predict the molar absorption coefficient of a protein. Protein Sci. 4:2411-2423[Medline]. |
| 37. | Pouttu, R., T. Puustinen, R. Virkola, J. Hacker, P. Klemm, and T. K. Korhonen. 1999. Amino acid residue Ala-62 in the FimH fimbrial adhesin is critical for the adhesiveness of meningitis-associated Escherichia coli to collagens. Mol. Microbiol. 31:1747-1757[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 38. |
Rhen, M.,
P. Klemm, and T. K. Korhonen.
1986.
Identification of two new hemagglutinins of Escherichia coli, N-acetyl-D-glucosamine-specific fimbriae and a blood group M-specific agglutinin, by cloning the corresponding genes in Escherichia coli K-12.
J. Bacteriol.
168:1234-1242 |
| 39. | Rhen, M., J. Knowles, M. E. Penttilä, M. Sarvas, and T. K. Korhonen. 1983. P fimbriae of Escherichia coli: molecular cloning of DNA fragments containing the structural genes. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 19:119-123[CrossRef]. |
| 40. |
Saarela, S.,
S. Taira,
E.-L. Nurmiaho-Lassila,
A. Makkonen, and M. Rhen.
1995.
The Escherichia coli G-fimbrial lectin protein participates both in fimbrial biogenesis and in recognition of the receptor N-acetyl-D-glucosamine.
J. Bacteriol.
177:1477-1484 |
| 41. | Saarela, S., B. Westerlund-Wikström, M. Rhen, and T. K. Korhonen. 1996. The G (F17) fimbrial complex confers adhesiveness of Escherichia coli to laminin. Infect. Immun. 64:2857-2860[Abstract]. |
| 42. | Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 43. | Sanchez, R., L. Kanarek, J. Koninkx, H. Hendriks, P. Lintermans, A. Bertels, G. Charlier, and E. van Driessche. 1993. Inhibition of adhesion of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli cells expressing F17 fimbriae to small intestinal mucus and brush-border membranes of young calves. Microb. Pathog. 15:407-419. |
| 44. | Schembri, M. A., H. Hasman, and P. Klemm. 2000. Expression and purification of the mannose recognition domain of the FimH adhesin. FEM Microbiol. Lett. 188:147-151[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 45. |
Schembri, M. A.,
E. V. Sokurenko, and P. Klemm.
2000.
Functional flexibility of the FimH adhesin: insights from a random mutant library.
Infect. Immun.
68:2638-2646 |
| 46. | Slonim, L. N., J. S. Pinkner, C.-I. Brändén, and S. J. Hultgren. 1992. Interactive surface in the PapD chaperone cleft is conserved in pilus chaperone superfamily and essential in subunit recognition and assembly. EMBO J. 11:4747-4756[Medline]. |
| 47. |
Sokurenko, E. V.,
H. S. Courtney,
D. E. Ohman,
P. Klemm, and D. Hasty.
1994.
FimH family of type 1 fimbrial adhesins: functional heterogeneity due to minor sequence variations among fimH genes.
J. Bacteriol.
176:748-755 |
| 48. |
Soto, G. E., and S. J. Hultgren.
1999.
Bacterial adhesins: common themes and variations in architecture and assembly.
J. Bacteriol.
181:1059-1071 |
| 49. | Soto, G. E., K. W. Dodson, D. Ogg, C. Liu, J. Heuser, S. Knight, J. Kihlberg, C. H. Jones, and S. J. Hultgren. 1998. Periplasmic chaperone recognition motif of subunits mediates quaternary interactions in the pilus. EMBO J. 17:6155-6167[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 50. |
Strauch, K. L.,
K. Johnson, and J. Beckwith.
1989.
Characterization of degP, a gene required for proteolysis in the cell envelope and essential for growth of Escherichia coli at high temperature.
J. Bacteriol.
171:2689-2696 |
| 51. |
Striker, R.,
F. Jacob-Dubuisson,
C. Frieden, and S. J. Hultgren.
1994.
Stable fiber-forming and non-fiber forming chaperone-subunit complexes in pilus biogenesis.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:12233-12239 |
| 52. | Studier, F. W., A. H. Rosenberg, J. J. Dunn, and J. W. Dubendorff. 1990. Use of T7 RNA polymerase to direct expression of cloned genes. Methods Enzymol. 185:60-89[Medline]. |
| 53. | Tarkkanen, A.-M., B. L. Allen, B. Westerlund, H. Holthöfer, P. Kuusela, L. Risteli, S. Clegg, and T. K. Korhonen. 1990. Type V collagen as the target for type 3 fimbriae, enterobacterial adherence organelles. Mol. Microbiol. 4:1353-1361[Medline]. |
| 54. | Thankavel, K. B., M. Madison, T. Ikeda, R. Malaviya, A. H. Shah, P. M. Arumugham, and S. N. Abraham. 1997. Localization of a domain in the FimH adhesin of Escherichia coli type 1 fimbriae capable of receptor recognition and use of a domain-specific antibody to confer protection against experimental urinary tract infection. J. Clin. Investig. 100:1123-1136[Medline]. |
| 55. |
Towbin, H.,
T. Staehelin, and J. Gordon.
1979.
Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
76:4350-4354 |
| 56. | Väisänen-Rhen, V., T. K. Korhonen, and J. Finne. 1983. Novel cell-binding activity specific for N-acetyl-D-glucosamine in an Escherichia coli strain. FEBS Lett. 159:233-236[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 57. |
Voegele, K.,
H. Sakellaris, and J. R. Scott.
1997.
CooB plays a chaperone-like role for the protein involved in formation of CS1 pili of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:13257-13261 |
| 58. | Westerlund, B., P. Kuusela, J. Risteli, L. Risteli, T. Vartio, H. Rauvala, R. Virkola, and T. K. Korhonen. 1989. The O75X adhesin of uropathogenic Escherichia coli is a type IV collagen-binding protein. Mol. Microbiol. 3:329-337[CrossRef][Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»