Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Fakultät
für Biologie, Lehrstuhl für Biologie der Mikroorganismen,
D-44780 Bochum, Germany,1 and Department
of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
631302
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Rhodobacter
capsulatus is a nonsulfur phototrophic purple bacterium which can
grow with a variety of different nitrogen sources, such as ammonium,
almost all amino acids, purines (xanthine and hypoxanthine), urea,
polyamines (putrescine and spermidine), and molecular nitrogen.
Like in many other bacteria, ammonium is a preferred N source, and
consequently, the highly energy-demanding nitrogen fixation process is
repressed by ammonium.
R. capsulatus measures the cellular nitrogen status (e.g.,
availability of ammonium) by an Ntr system similar to that of
enterobacteria involving the two-component regulatory system NtrB-NtrC
(10, 15, 18). NtrC is the transcriptional activator of a
number of genes directly or indirectly involved in nitrogen fixation in
R. capsulatus (glnB-glnA,
nifA1, nifA2, anfA, and
mopA-modABCD [3]). These genes
code for the signal transduction protein PII (GlnB) and glutamine
synthetase (GlnA), the transcriptional activators of the two
nitrogenase systems (nif- and anf-encoded), a
molybdenum repressor of the Anf system, and a high-affinity molybdate
uptake system. Despite the similarities of the Ntr systems of R. capsulatus and of enterobacteria, mutations in R. capsulatus ntrC do not produce the "classical" Ntr phenotype of
enterobacteria, since the NtrC protein in R. capsulatus is
not required for the utilization of amino acids as an N source
(11, 13, 25).
Under conditions of nitrogen limitation, the NtrB sensor kinase
autophosphorylates and transfers the phosphate to the NtrC response
regulator. NtrC~P in turn activates transcription of its target
genes. Transcriptional activation of these genes requires binding of
NtrC~P to enhancer-binding sites distant from the promoters that are
activated. Members of the enhancer-binding protein family characteristically activate transcription from promoters recognized by
the alternative sigma factor
54 (NtrA). The NtrC protein
from R. capsulatus (RcNtrC) is a unique enhancer-binding
protein that does not require
54 but instead activates
transcription of the genes mentioned above together with RNA polymerase
containing the
70-like housekeeping sigma factor
(RNAP-
70 [3, 8]).
Since an R. capsulatus ntrC mutant does not grow with urea
as the sole N source (17), genes required for utilization
of urea (ure genes) were likely targets for NtrC-mediated
activation. Degradation of urea is catalyzed by the enzyme urease,
which is an inducible enzyme in R. capsulatus E1F1
(7). Urease is a nickel-containing enzyme that catalyzes
the hydrolysis of urea to form ammonia and carbamate, which
spontaneously decomposes to produce carbonic acid and additional
ammonia. In Klebsiella aerogenes and many other bacteria,
the ureA, ureB, and ureC genes encode
the catalytically inactive apoenzyme, and the ureD,
ureE, ureF, and ureG gene products are
required for assembly of the nickel metallocenter (5, 22).
This work describes genetic analyses of the R. capsulatus
ure gene region showing that expression of the ure
genes is activated under nitrogen-limiting conditions in an
NtrC-dependent manner. DNA footprinting studies demonstrate direct
binding of NtrC to the ureD promoter. This is the first
example of an NtrC-activated target gene in R. capsulatus
which is not somehow involved in the process of nitrogen fixation.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains and plasmids.
The bacterial strains and
plasmids used in this study are listed in Table
1. Methods for conjugational plasmid
transfer between Escherichia coli and R. capsulatus and the procedures for selection of mutants, anaerobic
growth conditions, and antibiotic concentrations have been previously
described (14, 19, 23, 24).
DNA techniques.
DNA isolation, restriction enzyme analysis,
and cloning procedures were performed according to standard methods
(27). Restriction endonucleases, T4 DNA ligase, and
Superscript I reverse transcriptase were purchased from MBI Fermentas
(St. Leon-Rot, Germany) or Life Technologies (Karlsruhe, Germany) and
were used as recommended by the supplier. DNA sequence analysis was
done by the chain termination method with fluorescein-labeled primers
for use in the A. L. F. DNA sequencer (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech, Freiburg, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Construction of an ureDA-lacZ fusion
plasmid.
A 3.9-kb BamHI-HindIII fragment
encompassing the ureD promoter region (Fig.
1A) was inserted into the mobilizable
broad-host-range vector pPHU235, resulting in hybrid plasmid pNIRUB35
(Fig. 1C) carrying an in-frame ureDA-lacZ fusion.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Physical and genetic map of the R. capsulatus
ure gene region. Abbreviations: B, BamHI; E,
EcoRI, H, HindIII; M, SmaI; S,
SalI; X, XhoI. (A) The localizations of genes and
open reading frames are given by arrows carrying their respective gene
designations. Black arrows emphasize the highly conserved structural
and accessory ure genes found in many bacteria
(22). Vertical arrows above the genetic map indicate the
locations of Tn5 insertions in mutant strains Xan-9, Xan-10,
and Xan-19 (17) resulting in an Ure
phenotype. Below the map, the locations of interposon insertions are
shown. The interposon cassettes (Gm, gentamicin resistance; Km,
kanamycin resistance) are not drawn to scale. The directions of
transcription of interposon resistance genes are symbolized by
arrowheads, indicating polar and nonpolar insertions. (B) The ability
of the corresponding R. capsulatus mutant strains to grow
with urea as the sole nitrogen source is indicated by + or . (C)
Hybrid plasmid pNIRUB35 carrying an in-frame
ureDA-lacZ fusion is based on the mobilizable
broad-host-range plasmid pPHU235.
|
|
-Galactosidase and in vivo nitrogenase assays.
To
determine the
-galactosidase activities of R. capsulatus
strains carrying pNIRUB35 (ureDA-lacZ), cultures
were grown in RCV minimal medium supplemented with tetracycline
(23). For growth under nitrogen-limiting conditions,
either serine or urea was added to final concentrations of 9.5 or 4.0 mM, respectively. Nitrogen-sufficient conditions were achieved by
addition of 15 mM NH4Cl to the medium. Following
growth in the media to late exponential phase,
-galactosidase
activities of R. capsulatus strains were
determined by the sodium dodecyl sulfate-chloroform method (10,
20).
Nitrogenase activities of whole cells were determined by the acetylene
reduction assay as described by Wang et al. (31).
RNA isolation and primer extension analysis.
RNA was
prepared from R. capsulatus nifHDK deletion
strain KS36 harboring plasmid pNIRUB35
(ureDA-lacZ). For this purpose, cells were grown
in RCV minimal medium containing 4 mM urea as the sole nitrogen source
under photoheterotrophic conditions until the early exponential growth
phase. Cells were harvested and RNA was isolated according to the
method described by Chomczynski and Sacchi (4). The primer
extension procedure was performed with Superscript I reverse
transcriptase (Life Technologies), using a 5' fluorescein-labeled
oligonucleotide (5'-TGCGTCCGAATCAAGCCCATAGC-3', corresponding to codons 35 to 42 of the ureD gene).
Conditions for primer extension were as described by
Myöhänen and Wahlfors (26). Analysis of primer
extension products next to a sequencing ladder generated with the same
oligonucleotide was performed using the A. L. F. DNA
sequencer (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
DNase I footprinting.
PCR was used to generate a 286-bp
fragment spanning the ureD promoter region with
oligonucleotide primers ureD.F (5'-CGGGGTCGGGCAGATCGAAG-3') and ureD.R (5'-CACAAGACCCTTCAGACGCG-3') using
pNIRUB42-I as a template. In each reaction, one of the primers ureD.F
and ureD.R was end labeled with T4 polynucleotide kinase (Epicentre
Technologies, Madison, Wis.) and [
-32P]dATP. DNA
binding reactions with the unphosphorylated RcNtrC were carried out by
the addition of various concentrations of RcNtrC to binding buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 0.1 mM EDTA, 10 mM MgCl2, 50 mM
KCl, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) which
contained either upper- or lower-strand end-labeled probe
(approximately 20,000 cpm), either 0 or 1 mM ATP, and 100 ng of
poly(dI-dC) as a nonspecific competitor. Complexes were allowed to form
for 10 min at 23°C in a total volume of 50 µl, after which DNase I
digestion and DNA purification were performed as described previously
(8). DNA binding reactions with phosphorylated RcNtrC were
performed by incubation of maltose-binding protein-RcNtrB (MBP-RcNtrB;
1 µM) in binding buffer that contained 1 mM ATP as described
previously (6). DNase I digestion reactions were analyzed
on an 8% sequencing gel.
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Genetic organization of the R. capsulatus ure gene
region.
Random transposon Tn5 mutagenesis of an
R. capsulatus nifHDK mutant strain (deleted for
the structural genes of the molybdenum nitrogenase) led to the
identification of five mutants (Xan-9, Xan-10, Xan-19, Xan-20, and
Xan-22) unable to grow with urea as the sole nitrogen source
(17). Tn5-containing DNA fragments from these
mutants were cloned, and the sites of transposon insertions were
determined by nucleotide sequence analyses. Comparison with the
R. capsulatus genome sequence
(http://wit.mcs.anl.gov/WIT2/CGI/org.cgi) showed that the
Tn5-induced mutations in Xan-9, Xan-10, and Xan-19 mapped
within the ureF and ureC genes (Fig. 1A). Due to
the close proximity of the
ureDABC-orf136-ureEFG genes, it seems
likely that the ure genes are cotranscribed in R. capsulatus from a promoter upstream of ureD (see
below). The organization of ure genes in R. capsulatus is similar to that of K. aerogenes and many
other bacteria (22), except for the presence of an
additional open reading frame (orf136) located between
ureC and ureE. This orf did not show
homology to any known ure gene or any other gene in the
databases, indicating that orf136 might be specific for Rhodobacter. The remaining mutants Xan-20 and
Xan-22 carried the transposon within the ntrC and
ntrB genes, respectively (data not shown).
Mutational analysis of the R. capsulatus urease gene
region.
As mentioned above, urease catalyzes the hydrolysis of
urea to form ammonia and carbamate, which spontaneously decomposes to
produce carbonic acid and additional ammonia. Although this process
might produce free ammonium within the cell, urea did not prevent
nitrogenase synthesis or activity in R. capsulatus at
least under the conditions used in this study (Table
2). This is similar to the situation in
Azotobacter vinelandii, where urea has been used as a
nonrepressing nitrogen source (e.g., references 1 and 12).
Since urease contains a nickel cofactor, different amounts of
NiCl2 (Table 2) were added to the R. capsulatus
medium to rule out that the nickel concentration was limiting urease activity. In other studies nickel has been added in the micromolar range (e.g., 200 µM for E. coli carrying the K. aerogenes ure gene cluster [5]).
R. capsulatus exhibited growth rates in media containing
urea without nickel supplementation comparable to those in media with
ammonium (data not shown), demonstrating that sufficient amounts of
nickel were present due to impurities of the other chemicals used for
the preparation of the media. However, nickel concentrations of up to
100 µM did not significantly affect nitrogenase activities or
increase growth rates of R. capsulatus (Table 2; data not
shown). At present it remains speculative whether intracellular ammonium cannot be detected by the Ntr system or if ammonium
assimilation (via GlnA) is faster than ammonium production by urease.
To avoid any interference between the activities of urease and
nitrogenase, all mutations in the ure gene region (see
below) were analyzed in the genetic background of the R. capsulatus nifHDK mutant strain KS36. Owing to the deletion of
nifHDK, which encode the apoproteins of nitrogenase, this
strain is unable to fix molecular dinitrogen, and thus growth is
dependent on added nitrogen sources such as urea.
Two genes (lrp1 and lrp2) coding for Lrp-like
proteins were identified upstream of ureD, and two genes
(orf433 and orf323) coding for putative
periplasmatic proteins were located downstream of ureG (Fig.
1A). Orf433 is of special interest since it shows similarity to the
FmdD protein of Methylophilus methylotrophus, which is
thought to comprise part of a high-affinity, binding-protein-dependent active-transport system for short-chain amides and urea
(21). To determine the role of these four genes and of
orf136 in urea utilization, interposon cassettes carrying
gentamicin (Gm) or kanamycin (Km) resistance genes were used to
construct corresponding mutant strains in an nifHDK deletion
background (Fig. 1A). Both interposons were previously shown to induce
polar or nonpolar mutations depending on their orientation (10,
28). Growth of the parental strain KS36 (
nifHDK)
and its derivatives was determined in RCV minimal medium containing
urea as the sole N source under phototrophic growth conditions
(see Materials and Methods). The corresponding Ure phenotype
is given in Fig. 1B. Mutations in ureD (BKRUB1-I and
BKRUB1-II) and ureG (BKRUB15-I) resulted in a
Ure
phenotype in R. capsulatus regardless
of the orientation of the interposon. Depending on the orientation of
the interposon, insertions within orf136 resulted either in
a Ure+ (NIRUB73-I) or Ure
(NIRUB73-II)
phenotype, suggesting that orf136 itself is not essential
for urea utilization but that orf136 is cotranscribed with a
gene essential for this process (e.g., ureG). Mutations in
lrp2 (NIRUB46), orf433 (NIRUB76-I and
NIRUB76-II), and orf323 (BKRUB16 and BKRUB17) did not
affect growth with urea (4 mM) as an N source, indicating that none of
these genes is essential for urea utilization. The
Ure+ phenotype of lrp2 mutant NIRUB46
indicates that lrp2 and the ure genes are not
cotranscribed, suggesting that the ure promoter is located
in the intergenic region between lrp2 and ureD
(see below).
Since Orf433 is thought to be part of a high-affinity urea transport
system, the urea concentrations in the growth medium were lowered. The
parental strain KS36 and the orf433 mutant strains did not
differ in growth within the range from 4 to 0.25 mM urea (data not
shown). All strains were unable to grow with less than 0.25 mM urea.
However, this does not necessarily exclude the possibility that there
are differences between the parental strain and the orf433
mutant strains in urea uptake in the micromolar range.
Transcriptional analysis of the R. capsulatus ure
operon.
Since expression of the ure operon appears to
depend on a promoter located directly upstream of ureD,
pNIRUB35 carrying an in-frame ureDA-lacZ fusion
was constructed (Fig. 1C; Materials and Methods). This broad-host-range
reporter plasmid was introduced into the R. capsulatus wild
type and selected mutants, and
-galactosidase activity was
determined in cultures grown with different nitrogen sources. The
results shown in Table 3 can be
summarized as follows. (i) Maximum expression of the ure
genes occurred under nitrogen-limiting conditions (serine or urea as
the sole nitrogen source). (ii) Transcription of urease genes was not
substrate (urea) inducible in R. capsulatus B10S. As
mentioned above, urease is an inducible enzyme in R. capsulatus E1F1 (7). However, the two R. capsulatus strains differ in several aspects (e.g., their
susceptibilities to several bacteriophages) from each other, including
those concerning the general nitrogen metabolism. R. capsulatus E1F1 is able to grow with nitrate as the sole source of
nitrogen, whereas R. capsulatus B10S is devoid of any
nitrate reductase activity. Therefore, it seems not unlikely that
regulatory circuits also differ from each other in these two
R. capsulatus strains. (iii) Expression of the
ureDA-lacZ fusion was down-regulated (3.5-fold)
under nitrogen-sufficient conditions, but significant expression
remains in the presence of ammonium. (iv) NtrC is essential for
expression of the ure genes under both nitrogen-limiting and
nitrogen-sufficient conditions, suggesting that expression of the
ure genes in the presence of ammonium somehow requires NtrC.
At present it remains a matter of speculation whether ammonium-grown
R. capsulatus cells contain low amounts of
phosphorylated NtrC sufficient for partial activation of promoters with
high affinity to NtrC~P. As shown by footprint analysis (see below),
NtrC~P indeed efficiently binds to the ureD promoter. (v)
54 (NtrA or RpoN) is not essential for urease activity
or expression of ureD. Expression of
ureDA-lacZ was somehow enhanced in an
ntrA mutant background, but this was typically less than
twofold.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3.
Transcriptional analysis of R. capsulatus
wild-type and mutant strains carrying an in-frame
ureDA-lacZ fusion (pNIRUB35)
|
|
DNase I footprint analysis of the ureD promoter
region.
Since transcription of ureDA-lacZ
was dependent on the ntrC gene, we predicted that RcNtrC
might directly contact the ureD promoter upstream of the
transcriptional start site. To verify this assumption, DNase I
footprinting was performed with unphosphorylated RcNtrC to identify DNA
sequences involved in contacting RcNtrC. Labeled DNA fragments
containing the ureD upstream region from
227 to +59 were
incubated with increasing concentrations of purified RcNtrC and
subjected to DNase I digestion. The DNase I protection patterns were
localized by comparison with dideoxy DNA sequence ladders generated
with the ureD.F primer for the upper strand (Fig.
2A) and the ureD.R primer for the lower
strand (Fig. 2B). A DNase I-hypersensitive site could be seen at
148
on the upper strand at an RcNtrC concentration of 10 nM and at
118
and
139 on the lower strand at an RcNtrC concentration of 20 nM. At a higher RcNtrC concentration (160 nM), several minor hypersensitive sites were observed on the upper strand. Full protection of the ureD upstream region was observed between
157 and
115
(upper strand) and between
155 and
110 (lower strand) at
concentrations of RcNtrC of 80 nM and higher (Fig. 2A and B). This
RcNtrC concentration (80 nM) is similar to that reported for complete
protection of the glnB (160 nM), nifA1 (80 nM to
160 nM), and nifA2 (80 nM to 160 nM) promoter regions
(6, 8). These regions of DNase I protection by RcNtrC
encompass the consensus tandem RcNtrC binding sites described
previously (Fig. 2A and B, regions I and II [3]).

View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Protection of the ureD promoter region by
RcNtrC from DNase I digestion. (A) Upper-strand protection by RcNtrC at
the indicated concentrations (nM); (B) lower-strand protection by
RcNtrC at the indicated concentrations; (C) upper-strand protection by
the indicated concentrations of RcNtrC with 1 µM MBP-RcNtrB and 1 mM
ATP; (D) lower-strand protection by the indicated level of RcNtrC with
1 µM MBP-RcNtrB and 1 mM ATP. The concentration of DNA probe was
approximately 0.1 nM for each reaction. Shaded bars indicate potential
RcNtrC binding sites (see text); numbers refer to the distance from the
transcription start site; arrowheads mark areas of increased DNase I
sensitivity. Brackets indicate regions of protection at 160 nM RcNtrC
(A and B) or 10 nM RcNtrC with 1 µM MBP-RcNtrB and 1 mM ATP (C and
D).
|
|
To determine whether the phosphorylated RcNtrC protein has enhanced DNA
binding activity, as described previously for the glnB
promoter (6), a comparison between the DNase I protection patterns of unphosphorylated and phosphorylated RcNtrC was performed. The labeled ureD upstream region was incubated with various
concentrations of RcNtrC that was phosphorylated with 1 µM MBP-RcNtrB
and 1 mM ATP. Complete protection of both the upper and lower strands
of the ureD upstream region by phosphorylated RcNtrC was
detected at the 10 nM concentration, as compared to 80 nM for the
unphosphorylated RcNtrC (Fig. 2, compare panels A and B [80 nM
RcNtrC] with panels C and D [10 nM RcNtrC]). We conclude that at the
ureD promoter, phosphorylation of RcNtrC increases
DNA binding by at least eightfold. Previously, an increase in binding
affinity of at least fourfold at the glnB promoter was
observed upon phosphorylation of RcNtrC (6). Increased
oligomerization at the enhancer tandem binding sites by phosphorylation
of RcNtrC may modulate the response to nitrogen via transcriptional
activation of RNAP at this promoter.
NtrC-dependent ure gene expression in K. aerogenes occurs indirectly via the action of the positive
regulator NAC (nitrogen assimilation control) (2, 9).
Under nitrogen-limiting conditions, K. aerogenes NtrC
activates expression of the nac gene in concert with
RNAP-
54, and in turn, NAC activates expression of the
ure genes together with RNAP-
70. Thus NAC
acts as a bridge between RNAP-
70-dependent operons and
the RNAP-
54-dependent Ntr system in K. aerogenes. Since RcNtrC acts directly with
RNAP-
70 (3) and directly on the
ure operon, as shown here, there appears to be no
requirement for a NAC-like protein in R. capsulatus.
To further confirm that the transcriptional start point of the
ure operon is located within the intergenic region between lrp2 and ureD (Fig. 1A), primer extension
analysis was carried out (see Materials and Methods). As shown in Fig.
3, putative "
10" and "
35"
regions for a
70-RNAP were identified at reasonable
distances upstream of the transcriptional start site of the
ureD gene. The "
35" region contains at least four of
the optimal nucleotides of a "
35" hexamer identified by
mutagenesis of the R. capsulatus nifA1 promoter, which are
also present in the corresponding promoter elements of the
R. capsulatus nifA2 and glnB genes
(3).

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Summary of the R. capsulatus ureD promoter
region analysis. Boldfaced letters indicate oligonucleotide primers
used to generate the indicated probe for DNase I protection
experiments. Arrowheads represent major and minor DNase
I-hypersensitive sites, and potential RcNtrC binding sites are
indicated by horizontal shaded bars. The horizontal arrows show the
direction of transcription, with +1 indicating the ureD
transcriptional start site. Putative " 10" and " 35" regions
are boxed. The asterisk marks the translational stop codon for the
lrp2 gene.
|
|
We thank F. Führer, S. Löbbe, S. Mayrhofer, L. Schmiedeberg, and Y. Wiencek for carrying out initial experiments and
K.-U. Riedel for critical reading of the manuscript.
This work was supported by financial grants from Fonds der Chemischen
Industrie. Work in the lab of R.G.K. is supported by USDA 9935305.
| 1.
|
Bageshwar, U. K.,
R. Raina, and H. K. Das.
1998.
Characterization of a spontaneous mutant of Azotobacter vinelandii in which vanadium-dependent nitrogen fixation is not inhibited by molybdenum.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
162:161-167[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bender, R. A.
1991.
The role of the NAC protein in the nitrogen regulation of Klebsiella aerogenes.
Mol. Microbiol.
5:2575-2580[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Bowman, W. C., and R. G. Kranz.
1998.
A bacterial ATP-dependent, enhancer binding protein that activates the housekeeping RNA polymerase.
Genes Dev.
12:1884-1893[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Chomczynski, P., and N. Sacchi.
1987.
Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction.
Anal. Biochem.
162:156-159[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Colpas, G. J., and R. P. Hausinger.
2000.
In vivo and in vitro kinetics of metal transfer by the Klebsiella aerogenes urease nickel metallochaperone, UreE.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:10731-10737[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Cullen, P. J.,
W. C. Bowman, and R. G. Kranz.
1996.
In vitro reconstitution and characterization of the Rhodobacter capsulatus NtrB and NtrC two-component system.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:6530-6536[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
del Mar Dobao, M.,
F. Castillo, and M. Pineda.
1993.
Characterization of urease from the phototrophic bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus E1F1.
Curr. Microbiol.
27:119-123[CrossRef].
|
| 8.
|
Foster-Hartnett, D.,
P. J. Cullen,
E. M. Monika, and R. G. Kranz.
1994.
A new type of NtrC transcriptional activator.
J. Bacteriol.
176:6175-6187[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Goss, T. J., and R. A. Bender.
1995.
The nitrogen assimilation control protein, NAC, is a DNA binding transcription activator in Klebsiella aerogenes.
J. Bacteriol.
177:3546-3555[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Hübner, P.,
J. C. Willison,
P. M. Vignais, and T. A. Bickle.
1991.
Expression of regulatory nif genes in Rhodobacter capsulatus.
J. Bacteriol.
173:2993-2999[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Jones, R., and R. Haselkorn.
1989.
The DNA sequence of the Rhodobacter capsulatus ntrA, ntrB and ntrC gene analogues required for nitrogen fixation.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
215:507-516[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Kennedy, C., and M. H. Drummond.
1985.
The use of cloned nif regulatory elements from Klebsiella pneumoniae to examine nif regulation in Azotobacter vinelandii.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
131:1787-1795.
|
| 13.
|
Keuntje, B.,
B. Masepohl, and W. Klipp.
1995.
Expression of the putA gene encoding proline dehydrogenase from Rhodobacter capsulatus is independent of NtrC regulation but requires an Lrp-like activator protein.
J. Bacteriol.
177:6432-6439[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Klipp, W.,
B. Masepohl, and A. Pühler.
1988.
Identification and mapping of nitrogen fixation genes of Rhodobacter capsulatus: duplication of a nifA-nifB region.
J. Bacteriol.
170:693-699[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Kranz, R. G., and D. Foster-Hartnett.
1990.
Transcriptional regulatory cascade of nitrogen-fixation genes in anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria: oxygen- and nitrogen-responsive factors.
Mol. Microbiol.
4:1793-1800[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Kutsche, M.,
S. Leimkühler,
S. Angermüller, and W. Klipp.
1996.
Promoters controlling expression of the alternative nitrogenase and the molybdenum uptake system in Rhodobacter capsulatus are activated by NtrC, independent of 54, and repressed by molybdenum.
J. Bacteriol.
178:2010-2017[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Leimkühler, S.,
M. Kern,
P. S. Solomon,
A. G. McEwan,
G. Schwarz,
R. R. Mendel, and W. Klipp.
1998.
Xanthine dehydrogenase from the phototrophic purple bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus is more similar to its eukaryotic counterparts than to prokaryotic molybdenum enzymes.
Mol. Microbiol.
27:853-869[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Masepohl, B., and W. Klipp.
1996.
Organization and regulation of genes encoding the molybdenum nitrogenase and the alternative nitrogenase in Rhodobacter capsulatus.
Arch. Microbiol.
165:80-90[CrossRef].
|
| 19.
|
Masepohl, B.,
W. Klipp, and A. Pühler.
1988.
Genetic characterization and sequence analysis of the duplicated nifA/nifB gene region of Rhodobacter capsulatus.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
212:27-37[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Miller, J. H.
1972.
Experiments in molecular genetics, p. 352-355.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 21.
|
Mills, J.,
N. R. Wyborn,
J. A. Greenwood,
S. G. Williams, and C. W. Jones.
1998.
Characterization of a binding-protein-dependent, active transport system for short-chain amides and urea in the methylotrophic bacterium Methylophilus methylotrophus.
Eur. J. Biochem.
251:45-53[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Mobley, H. L. T.,
M. D. Island, and R. P. Hausinger.
1995.
Molecular biology of microbial ureases.
Microbiol. Rev.
59:451-480[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Moreno-Vivian, C.,
S. Hennecke,
A. Pühler, and W. Klipp.
1989.
Open reading frame 5 (ORF5), encoding a ferredoxinlike protein, and nifQ are cotranscribed with nifE, nifN, nifX, and ORF4 in Rhodobacter capsulatus.
J. Bacteriol.
171:2591-2598[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Moreno-Vivian, C.,
M. Schmehl,
B. Masepohl,
W. Arnold, and W. Klipp.
1989.
DNA sequence and genetic analysis of the Rhodobacter capsulatus nifENX gene region: homology between NifX and NifB suggests involvement of NifX in processing of the iron-molybdenum cofactor.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
216:353-363[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Moreno-Vivian, C.,
G. Soler, and F. Castillo.
1992.
Arginine catabolism in the phototrophic bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus E1F1. Purification and properties of arginase.
Eur. J. Biochem.
204:531-537[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Myöhänen, S., and J. Wahlfors.
1993.
Automated fluorescent primer extension.
BioTechniques
14:16-17[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 28.
|
Schmehl, M.,
A. Jahn,
A. Meyer zu Vilsendorf,
S. Hennecke,
B. Masepohl,
M. Schuppler,
M. Marxer,
J. Oelze, and W. Klipp.
1993.
Identification of a new class of nitrogen fixation genes in Rhodobacter capsulatus: a putative membrane complex involved in electron transport to nitrogenase.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
241:602-615[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Simon, R.,
U. Priefer, and A. Pühler.
1983.
A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in Gram negative bacteria.
Bio/Technology
1:784-791[CrossRef].
|
| 30.
|
Vieira, J., and J. Messing.
1982.
The pUC plasmids, an M13mp7-derived system for insertion mutagenesis and sequencing with synthetic universal primers.
Gene
19:259-268[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Wang, G.,
S. Angermüller, and W. Klipp.
1993.
Characterization of Rhodobacter capsulatus genes encoding a molybdenum transport system and putative molybdenum-pterin-binding proteins.
J. Bacteriol.
175:3031-3042[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|