Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, January 2001, p. 725-735, Vol. 183, No. 2
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.2.725-735.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Temporal Regulation of Genes Encoding the
Flagellar Proximal Rod in Caulobacter
crescentus
Charles H.
Boyd and
James W.
Gober*
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and
the Molecular Biology Institute, University of California at Los
Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095-1569
Received 14 June 2000/Accepted 31 October 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The gram-negative bacterium Caulobacter crescentus has
a life cycle that includes two distinct and separable developmental stages, a motile swarmer phase and a sessile stalked phase. The cell
cycle-controlled biogenesis of the single polar flagellum of the
swarmer cell is the best-studied aspect of this developmental program.
The flagellar regulon is arranged into a rigid trans-acting hierarchy of gene expression in which successful expression of early genes is required for the expression of genes that are later in
the hierarchy and in which the order of gene expression mirrors the
order of assembly of gene products into the completed flagellum. The
flgBC-fliE genes were identified as a result of
the C. crescentus genome sequencing project and encode the
homologues of two flagellar proximal rod proteins, FlgB and FlgC, and
one conserved protein, FliE, that is of unknown function. Footprint
assays on a DNA fragment containing the operon promoter as well as in
vivo mutant suppressor analysis of promoter mutations indicate that
this operon is controlled by the cell cycle response regulator CtrA,
which with
70 is responsible for regulating
transcription of other early flagellar genes in C. crescentus. Promoter analysis, timing of expression, and
epistasis experiments place these genes outside of the flagellar regulatory hierarchy; they are expressed in class II mutants, and
flgB deletions do not prevent class III gene expression.
This operon is also unusual in that it is expressed from a promoter that is divergent from the class II operon containing fliP,
which encodes a member of the flagellum-specific protein export apparatus.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
A fundamental aspect of biology is
the mechanism by which cells are able to control their progression from
one stage of the cell cycle to the next in a manner that ensures that
all necessary cellular functions are successfully completed. Study of
the cell cycle in bacteria has proceeded slowly, primarily due to the
difficulty of obtaining pure populations of cells at a particular point
in the cell cycle. The gram-negative aquatic bacterium
Caulobacter crescentus undergoes a life cycle which, upon
division, results in two dissimilar daughter cells: a sessile stalked
cell and a motile swarmer cell that possesses a single polar flagellum.
The swarmer cell stage lasts for approximately one-third of the life cycle, after which the swarmer differentiates into a stalked cell by
ejecting the flagellum and growing a stalk at the pole of the cell that
previously harbored the flagellum. Initiation of chromosomal replication depends on this differentiation event, so that swarmer cells are unable to initiate replication. The two cell types are easily
separable by differential density gradient centrifugation because
stalked cells are less dense than swarmer cells, so a pure population
of swarmer cells can be obtained which can be used to study cell
cycle-dependent phenomena.
The aspect of the C. crescentus cell cycle that has been
most thoroughly studied is the biogenesis of the single polar flagellum (reviewed in references 5, 15, 16, and 66). The flagellar regulon in C. crescentus is arranged in a complex,
trans-acting hierarchy composed of approximately 50 genes
(11, 12, 31) organized into four levels of gene
expression, in which a complete complement of gene products from the
early levels is required for proper expression of genes later in the
hierarchy (6, 38, 50, 52, 69). In addition, the order of
expression of the levels of the hierarchy reflects their order of
assembly from the cytoplasm of the cell outward. Cell-proximal
components such as inner basal body proteins are expressed before more
distal components such as the flagellar hook and filament (6, 7, 17, 19, 34, 41, 46-48). The first level of the hierarchy is
occupied by the cell cycle response regulator CtrA, which in response
to cell cycle cues activates the transcription of early flagellar genes
(55, 59, 68). Class II genes encode proteins that make up
the basal body of the flagellum, including the MS ring (encoded by
fliF) (29, 52), which anchors the flagellum in
the inner membrane of the cell and is the first component to be
assembled; the flagellum-specific protein export apparatus (including
fliO, fliP, fliQ, fliR, and
flhA) (20, 58, 69, 63, 71); the switch
components of the flagellum (fliG, fliM, and
fliN) (52, 70); and transcription factors
flbD (4, 49, 52, 57, 64, 67) and
rpoN (2, 5), which are required for expression
of class III and IV genes. All the promoters for class II genes share a
distinctive motif (20, 52, 60, 63, 71) that includes the
binding site for CtrA (55, 59, 68), which along with RNA
polymerase holoenzyme containing
70 (68) is
thought to be responsible for transcription of genes in this level of
the hierarchy. All of the class II components must be properly
expressed before transcription of the class III level of the hierarchy
can commence.
The master regulator of the flagellar regulon, CtrA, apparently has
multiple roles in the C. crescentus cell cycle. In response to a cell cycle cue, CtrA is thought to bind to 9-mer sequences (TTAA-N7-TTAA) at the origin and at many promoters (28, 40, 41). Binding to the origin has the effect of preventing
replication initiation, while binding to the promoters of flagellar
genes activates transcription. CtrA is proteolytically degraded in
stalked cells following formation of the septum between two incipient daughter cells, so that following division replication can immediately commence in that cell type (10). The presence of CtrA in
the swarmer cell ensures that replication is not initiated
inappropriately in swarmer cells until the swarmer-to-stalked cell
transition has occurred, at which time the CtrA that has remained in
that cell type is degraded, thus relieving repression of DNA
replication. In addition to its role in suppressing reinitiation of
chromosomal replication and in flagellar gene regulation, CtrA also
regulates transcription of the critical cell division gene
ftsZ (33). Thus, CtrA has an important role in
uniting three distinct morphological-developmental processes in
C. crescentus cells.
Class III genes encode proteins which compose both the outer components
of the basal body and the flagellar hook, which is a protein structure
that serves as a flexible universal joint connecting the rod to the
flagellar filament. In gram-negative bacteria, the rod spans the
periplasm and is composed of five proteins: FlgB, FlgC, FlgF, FlgG, and
FliE (1, 22, 32, 45). The distal rod, which spans most of
the distance between the inner and outer membranes, is composed of FlgF
and FlgG. The proximal rod connects the distal rod to the flagellar
motor and consists of FlgB and FlgC. FliE is required for assembly of
the proximal rod, although it is itself a protein of unknown function; it may serve as an adapter between the radially symmetric components below the rod and the helically symmetric rod components of the flagellum (43, 45).
The C. crescentus genome sequencing project was used to
identify and clone the three components of the proximal rod. Here we
report the timing and level of expression of flgB.
Additionally, we have determined the start site of transcription of
flgB and found that it is close (53 bases) to the start site
of a divergent operon that contains the class II component
fliP. Epistasis experiments demonstrate that the
transcription of these genes does not require complete class II gene
expression and that neither does class III gene expression depend on
successful expression of the proximal rod genes, indicating that they
lie outside the flagellar regulatory hierarchy. In addition, we show
that both flgB and fliP are dependent on the
transcriptional regulator CtrA for proper levels of expression.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains, growth media, and plasmid constructions.
Table 1 describes the bacterial strains
and plasmids used in this study. C. crescentus strains were
grown at 31°C in either peptone yeast extract or M2 minimal medium
containing glucose as the carbon source (30).
Transcription fusions were to a promoterless Escherichia coli
lacZ gene or an E. coli nptII gene, in low-copy-number plasmid placZ/290 or pLacZ-nptII/290. Plasmid subclones and reporter fusions were introduced into C. crescentus cells by mating
with E. coli strain S17-1.
-Galactosidase assays were
done as described previously (42), and all were conducted
on strains grown at 31°C, including the temperature-sensitive
ctrA401 strain. The reported values were measured in
triplicate from extracts of three different cultures, grown on
different days. All routine molecular biology procedures were performed
as described by Ausubel et al. (3). Site-directed
mutagenesis was performed as described by Kunkel and Roberts
(37).
In order to clone
flgBC-
fliE DNA, a cosmid (J13)
known to contain the DNA adjacent to the
flgBC-
fliE genes (
20) was digested
with restriction enzymes
NcoI,
NarI, and
BssHII (Promega) in order
to isolate fragments that
contained
flgB,
flgC, and
fliE,
respectively.
flgB resides on a 602-bp
NcoI
fragment,
flgC resides on a 640-bp
NarI fragment,
and
fliE resides on a 590-bp
BssHII fragment.
Each
fragment was verified to contain the gene of interest by dideoxy
chain termination sequencing. The promoter for
flgB resides
on
a 321-bp
HindIII-
AflII fragment that has
been previously described
(
20). All three genes as well as
the
fliO-
fliP operon reside
on a 4.2-kb
BamHI fragment isolated from the same
cosmid.
Mapping the 5' end of the flgB transcript.
The
5' end of the flgB transcript was mapped by an S1 nuclease
protection assay. RNA was obtained from strain NA1000 grown to an
optical density at 600 nm of 1.0 in M2 minimal medium. Cells were
pelleted and resuspended in 20 mM sodium acetate with 1 mM EDTA (pH
5.4). Sodium dodecyl sulfate (10%) was added to make the suspension
0.4%, and then an equal volume of phenol equilibrated with 20 mM
sodium acetate and 1 mM EDTA (pH 5.4) was added. The mixture was
vortexed and incubated at 65°C for 10 min. This extraction was
repeated twice, after which the aqueous phase was ethanol precipitated,
washed twice with 70% ethanol, dried, and then dissolved in water. The
321-bp HindIII-AflII fragment containing the
predicted promoter region was labeled at the HindIII
site with [
-32P]ATP and the Klenow fragment of DNA
polymerase. The labeled probe was gel purified and hybridized (6.0 × 104 cpm) to total cellular RNA (30 or 60 mg) for 1 h at 45°C after boiling. Following digestion with S1 nuclease
(Promega), the protected fragment was phenol extracted, ethanol
precipitated, and electrophoresed on an 8% denaturing polyacrylamide
gel. The mobility of the protected fragment was compared to the
mobility of the products of a dideoxy chain termination sequencing
reaction that used a single-stranded DNA fM13 template and a primer
that precisely matched the sequence of the 5'-labeled end of the S1
nuclease probe.
Construction of mutants.
Gene knockouts were accomplished by
selection against an integrated mutant present on the vector pNPTS129.
This vector contains a sacB gene which confers sensitivity
to sucrose in the growth medium unless it is excised by homologous
recombination (61). The entire
flgBC-fliE region was deleted by cloning
approximately 1 kb of the 5'-flanking region and 1 kb of the
3'-flanking region together into pNPTS129, creating a chimeric fragment
that is missing the flgBC-fliE coding sequence.
The primers used to amplify the 5'-flanking region were
5'-GGTACCCTTCAGTTCCGAGATCATGA and
3'-GGATCCCATGCCGAAAAGAGGGATGT. The primers used to amplify
the 3'-flanking region were 5'-GGATCCTCCATCTTGTGATTTCTCCC and 3'-GAATTCTCGACTACGGCAACAACATC. When amplified by
PCR, the 5'-flanking sequence has a KpnI site at the 5' end
and a BamHI site at the 3' end. The 3'-flanking sequence has
a BamHI site at the 5' end and an EcoRI site at
the 3' end. The chimeric deletion was then constructed by sequentially
cloning the two flanking regions into pNPTS129, using the introduced
BamHI sites to connect them. Following introduction of this
deletion into strain NA1000, cultures were grown overnight in peptone
yeast extract and then plated onto peptone yeast extract agar
containing 2% sucrose. Survivors that were nonmotile, sucrose
resistant, and kanamycin sensitive were selected and verified by
Southern blotting to have the entire flgBC-fliE
region deleted. Additionally, the resultant knockout strain was
successfully complemented by the 4.2-kb BamHI fragment on
plasmid pJS14, indicating that this operon and not an independent locus
is the cause of the lack of motility. The knockouts of flgB
and fliE were accomplished by introduction via pNPTS129 of
frameshifted mutants. The 602-bp NcoI fragment that harbors
flgB contains a unique NdeI site at position 356 (codon 48 of 114). This NdeI site was cut, filled in with
Klenow fragment, and religated with T4 DNA ligase (Promega) to create a
frameshift mutation. The resultant polypeptide is out of frame from
codon 48 and terminates 60 codons later. The 590-bp fliE
fragment contains a unique NcoI site at position 175 (codon
42 of 103). This site was cut, filled in with the Klenow fragment of
DNA polymerase (Promega), and religated to create a +2 frameshift
mutation; the resultant polypeptide is out of frame from codon 42 and
terminates 43 codons later. Both the flgB and
fliE knockouts were mediated by sucrose antiselection and
verified by Southern blotting and complementation of the respective fragments.
Assay of temporal expression.
The temporal expression of
flgB was determined by assaying the cell cycle expression of
both flgB-lacZ and
flgB-nptII transcriptional fusions. To accomplish
the assay, the 321-bp HindIII-AflII fragment containing the promoters for both the flgB and the
fliO-fliP operon was cloned in both orientations
into the bidirectional reporter placZ-npt/290, which
contains a promoterless lacZ reporter in one direction and a
divergent promoterless nptII gene. Cultures of NA1000
harboring either of the resulting constructs were synchronized by
isolating pure swarmer cells via density gradient centrifugation in
Percoll (Sigma) as described previously (13). The swarmer cells were resuspended in minimal medium and incubated with shaking at
31°C. The cells were allowed to progress through the cell cycle, and
aliquots were pulse-labeled at intervals with 5 mCi of
[35S]methionine translabel (ICN) per ml for 10 min. The
label was chased with cold methionine, following which the cells were
pelleted; washed with buffer containing 0.45 M NaCl, 50 mM Tris (pH
8.3), and 0.5% Triton X-100; resuspended in the same buffer; and then lysed and subjected to immunoprecipitation with both
anti-
-galactosidase and anti-NptII monoclonal antibodies as
previously described (21). The immunoprecipitated proteins
were then separated on a 10% polyacrylamide biphasic Laemmli sodium
dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel and visualized on a PhosphorImager
445 Si (Molecular Dynamics).
CtrA footprinting assays.
Soluble CtrA-His6 was
purified as described from vector pET15b (Novagen) in E. coli strain ER2566 (New England Biolabs). PCR primers used to
amplify ctrA for cloning into pET15b were
5'-ATGCAGCATATGCGCGTACTGTTGATCGAG and
3'-ATGCAGCGCGAGTCAGGCGGCGTTAACCTGCT. Products were amplified with Pfu polymerase (Stratagene) according to the
manufacturer's directions, cloned directly into pET15b, and verified
by dye termination sequencing. EnvZ'-MalE fusion protein from pKJH5
(23, 26) was purified as described in the pMAL protein
fusion manual (New England Biolabs). CtrA-His6 (4.8 mM) and
EnvZ'-MalE (0.5 mM) were added to phosphorylation buffer (50 mM Tris
[pH 7.5], 50 mM KCl, 20 mM MgCl2, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM ATP) and incubated at 37°C for 1 h
(59). Various amounts of the phosphorylated protein were
mixed with 1.5 × 105 cpm of end-labeled probe (the
321-bp HindIII-AflII fragment already described)
in buffer A (200 mM Tris [pH 8.0], 100 mM KCl, 6 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 2 mM dithiothreitol, and 4 mg of salmon sperm DNA per ml). The mix (volume of 190 µl) was
allowed to bind for 20 min at room temperature, and then 0.05 U of
DNase I (Boehringer Mannheim) was added and allowed to digest for 3 min. At that time, 100 µl of DNase stop buffer (0.6 M ammonium
acetate, 150 mM EDTA, 20 mg of calf thymus DNA per ml) was added to
stop the reactions, and the reaction mixtures were then extracted once
with phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1; equilibrated with
Tris-EDTA, pH 8.0), precipitated with 3 volumes of ethanol, washed with
70% ethanol, dried, and resuspended in 12 µl of formamide loading
buffer. One microliter from each sample was counted in a scintillation
counter, and 1.5 × 104 cpm per lane was loaded and
run on an 8% denaturing polyacrylamide sequencing gel. The gel was
dried, and the bands were visualized on a PhosphorImager 445 Si
(Molecular Dynamics).
 |
RESULTS |
The C. crescentus flgB, flgC, and
fliE genes encode homologues of basal body rod
components.
The sequences encoding the C. crescentus
homologues of the flagellar rod proteins FlgB, FlgC, and FliE were
identified by comparison of enteric flagellar gene sequences to contigs
of the C. crescentus genome sequencing project. The results
of a sequence alignment program (BLAST) indicated that the C. crescentus homologue of FlgB is 29% identical and 59% similar to
the Rhizobium meliloti FlgB; the C. crescentus
homologue of FlgC is 43% identical and 76% similar to that of
R. meliloti; and for FliE, the C. crescentus homologue is 29% identical and 64% similar to that of R. meliloti (Fig. 1). In addition, the
characteristic rod motif that is present in all flagellar rod proteins,
including both distal (FlgF and FlgG) and proximal (FlgB and FlgC) rod
proteins, is present (18). FliE is known to interact with
FlgB (43) and is required for rod assembly in
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (31). It lacks the rod motif, but the high degree of similarity between the
C. crescentus homologue of FliE and that of other diverse bacterial species, including serovar Typhimurium and Bacillus subtilis, indicates that the gene encodes the C. crescentus homologue of the bacterial flagellar FliE protein (Fig.
1).

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
The C. crescentus FlgB, FlgC, and FliE gene
products. (A to C) Alignments of the three predicted gene products
encoded by flgBC-fliE. Conserved residues are
shaded. FlgB and FlgC from C. crescentus share a rod motif
common to all gram-negative bacterial flagellar rod proteins, the
so-called ANNLAN motif indicated by a bar above the sequences in panels
A and B. The presence of the ANNLAN motif is diagnostic of rod proteins
and shows that FlgB and FlgC are indeed proximal rod structural
proteins. FliE lacks the ANNLAN motif, so it is thought that FliE might
serve as an adapter between the helical symmetry of the rod and the
radial symmetry of the MS ring (43, 45). (D) Degree of
similarity to homologues from the three bacterial species used in the
alignments in panels A to C. B.s., B. subtilis; S.t.,
S. enterica serovar Typhimurium, R.m., R. meliloti. Of the three species listed, R. meliloti is
most closely related to C. crescentus (14).
|
|
The flgBC-fliE genes are not part of the
flagellar regulatory hierarchy.
Class II genes of the flagellar
hierarchy in C. crescentus are so called because their
expression is required for the transcription of genes later in the
hierarchy. To test whether the flgBC-fliE genes
lie within the C. crescentus flagellar hierarchy, we created frameshift mutations of flgB and fliE by filling
in and religating restriction sites within the coding regions of the
genes and then assayed the effect on the regulation of flagellar gene
transcription using reporter fusions to lacZ. We also
deleted the entire operon by splicing together the two flanking regions
by PCR and assayed transcription using the same reporter fusions. In
all cases, the mutant versions were cloned into vector pNPTS129, which
allows integration into the chromosome via homologous recombination and counterselection against the plasmid by virtue of a sacB
cassette when grown on media containing sucrose (47). The
resulting kanamycin-sensitive, sucrose-resistant strains were then
screened for motility on semisolid agar. Nonmotile colonies were
verified by Southern blotting to contain the desired mutation (data not
shown). The reporters used were the class II genes fliP,
fliL, and fliF, all fused to lacZ to
quantitate their respective transcription levels. All were expressed at
levels that were approximately 1.6 times greater than wild-type levels
(data not shown); this slightly elevated expression is well documented
for class II genes in class II mutant backgrounds, indicating that the
flgBC-fliE genes behave as early flagellar genes.
In order to test the idea that flgBC-fliE are class II flagellar genes, we assayed the expression of a
flgB-lacZ reporter fusion in several class II
flagellar mutants. This fusion was expressed in all class II null
strains tested, indicating that it is expressed at the class II level
of the hierarchy (Table 2). This result
was somewhat surprising; based on their similarity to genes for other
rod proteins, we expected that flgBC-fliE would be class III genes, because all other known rod components in C. crescentus are class III (8). rpoN and
flbD (the class II genes mutated in SC1055 and SC1032,
respectively) encode essential transcription factors for class III and
IV gene expression (2, 4, 5, 49, 52, 57, 64, 67), so the
fact that the flgBC-fliE genes are transcribed in
strains lacking those proteins provides additional strong evidence that
they are not expressed at the class III level.
We next examined the effect of deletions of the
flgBC-
fliE genes on the expression levels of
class III and IV flagellar genes.
If these genes are located at the
class II level of the hierarchy,
then deleting the operon should
eliminate expression of class
III and IV flagellar genes. In order to
accomplish this, we assayed
the expression of the class III
(
flbG::
lacZ) and class IV
(
fljL::
lacZ)
reporter fusions in strain
JG3108, which has the entire
flgBC-
fliE region
deleted. Surprisingly, both reporters were expressed in
strain JG3108,
indicating that the
flgBC-
fliE gene products are
not necessary for completion of the class II level of the hierarchy
(Table
2). In fact,
fljL::
lacZ
expression was elevated, showing
approximately a twofold increase in

-galactosidase levels over
those of the wild type. These results
indicate that the
flgBC-
fliE genes are not
components of the
C. crescentus regulatory
hierarchy.
The placement of the
flgBC-
fliE genes outside the
regulatory hierarchy is intriguing, given that all other components of
the
basal body that are located in the periplasmic space are class
III
genes. Perhaps these gene products serve as a signal to the
cell that
the basal body is competent for export of the distal
rod, hook, and
other components that must be exported in order
to be incorporated into
the flagellum. It is possible that an
increase in cytoplasmic pools of
the
flgBC-
fliE gene products
might inhibit class
III transcription, as would occur in the absence
of a functional
flagellar export apparatus. The elevated expression
of the
fljL::
lacZ fusion in strain JG3108
would tend to support
this possibility. In order to test this
hypothesis, we combined
the
flgBC-
fliE deletion
(JG3108) with a well-characterized class
II mutant, either SC1131
(
fliM::Tn
5) or SC1132
(
flhA::Tn
5), and
assayed expression of
fljL::
lacZ in the resultant
double-mutant
background. We reasoned that if any one of the
flgBC-
fliE gene
products serves as a negative
regulator in the absence of export,
then eliminating them in either of
these two export-deficient
strains should restore normal expression to
a
fljL::
lacZ transcriptional
fusion. No
such restoration in expression was evident (Table
2),
indicating that
the
flgBC-
fliE gene products do not serve as a
negative regulator of late flagellar gene expression in the absence
of
a functional export
assembly.
Determination of the flgB transcription start site and
the identification of a CtrA binding site.
Initial examination of
the sequence between the first residues encoding FlgB and the start
site of fliO-fliP transcription showed that there
can be only a very short distance between the two promoters. In order
to determine the extent of the intergenic region between the
fliO-fliP operon and flgB, S1 nuclease
protection assays were used to identify the start site of transcription
for flgB. Together with previously published data on the
start site of transcription for the fliO-fliP
operon (20), this permitted the precise determination of
the size of the intergenic region that contains these divergent
promoters. The region of protection from S1 nuclease digestion
indicated that the major start site of flgB transcription
lies 53 bp upstream of the fliO-fliP
transcription start sequence (Fig. 2A).
Therefore, the expression of flgB and the
fliO-fliP operon is regulated by an unusually
compact arrangement of divergent promoters with overlapping
10 and
35 regions of each promoter (Fig. 2B).

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Identification of the transcription start site for
flgB. (A) In order to map the start site of
transcription for flgB, an S1 nuclease protection assay was
carried out using a 321-bp HindIII-AflII
fragment labeled at the HindIII terminus as the probe.
The sequencing primer used to generate the dideoxy chain-termination
sequencing ladder has its 5' end corresponding to the
HindIII site in the probe. Lane 1, 30 mg of total
cellular RNA; lane 2, 60 mg of total cellular RNA; lane 3, 50 mg of
yeast tRNA; lane 4, probe alone. The start site of transcription
indicated corresponds to the top band in lanes 1 and 2. (B) The
resulting bands on the gel correspond to a transcriptional start site
for flgB that is only 53 bases upstream of the start site of
transcription for the fliO-fliP operon. The 9-mer
sequence corresponding to the CtrA recognition site (40)
is indicated by a box around the sequence.
|
|
The transcription factor CtrA has been shown to regulate the
transcription of several class II flagellar genes. Examination
of the
sequence between the two transcription start sites of these
divergent
promoters revealed the presence of a consensus core
CtrA binding
sequence (TTAA-N7-TTAA) (Fig.
2), indicating the
possibility that CtrA
regulates the transcription of either the
fliO-
fliP operon or that of
flgB. If
this is indeed the case,
the idea of two promoters both controlled by
the same
trans-acting
factor (CtrA) in close proximity to
one another raises the question
of which sequences within the promoter
are bound by the transcription
apparatus. Is there enough room in the
53-bp divergent promoter
region to have separate and distinct CtrA
binding sites, are there
separate but overlapping binding sites, or
does one binding site
serve the same function for both promoters? To
determine the area
of the divergent promoter that interacts with CtrA
to direct transcription,
DNase I protection assays were utilized. The
CtrA footprint extends
from 14 bp on the map shown in Fig.
3 to 41 bp, with hypersensitive
bands
appearing at positions 42 and 43 bp (Fig.
3). This 28-bp
region is of
approximately the same extent as most other published
CtrA footprints
(
33,
56,
59). Thus, it is clearly shown
that there is only
one segment of the dual promoter bound by CtrA;
how this single binding
site serves to direct transcription from
both promoters is not clear.

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
DNase I protection assay of purified, phosphorylated
CtrA on the 321-bp flgB-fliO-fliP divergent promoter
fragment. (A) GATC represents dideoxy chain termination sequencing
reactions. Lanes 1 and 6, probe alone (no CtrA added); lane 2, 0.12 mM
CtrA; lane 3, 0.25 mM CtrA; lane 4, 0.5 mM CtrA; lane 5, 1.0 mM CtrA.
DNase I protection assays were performed as described in Materials and
Methods. (B) The CtrA footprint extends 28 bases, from position 14 to
position 41, indicated by the bar over the sequence. This footprint
completely covers the putative 9-mer sequence (CtrA binding site)
indicated by the box around the sequence. Arrowheads indicate DNase
I-hypersensitive sites. The positions of the transcriptional start
sites for flgB and the fliO-fliP
operon are indicated by large arrows and are at positions 57 and 4, respectively.
|
|
DNA binding assays indicated that CtrA may regulate the expression of
both
flgB and the
fliO-
fliP operon. To
test this idea,
the expression of
flgB::
lacZ and
fliO-
fliP::
lacZ
transcriptional
reporter fusions was assayed in either wild-type
(NA1000) or CtrA
temperature-sensitive (LS2195,
ctrA401)
(
56) strains (Fig.
4).
Assays were conducted at the permissive temperature (31°C) for
the
ctrA401 allele, conditions which have been demonstrated
previously
to affect class II gene expression (
56).
Comparison of the transcription
levels of the wild-type promoter
sequence in strain LS2195 indicated
that CtrA acts as a repressor of
flgB expression and an activator
of
fliO-
fliP expression.
flgB
transcriptional activity approximately
doubled in the
ctrA401 strain at the permissive temperature, while
fliO-
fliP transcription was reduced to about 10%
of levels in
a wild-type background (Fig.
4). To define the sequences
that
are important for transcriptional regulation of either
flgB or
the
fliO-
fliP operon,
site-directed mutagenesis was used to create
mutants in the promoter
region. The site-directed mutants were
cloned in both orientations into
the transcriptional reporter
plasmid
placZ290, which
contains a promoterless
lacZ gene, in
order to assay the
effect of the mutations on transcription levels
for each promoter.

-Galactosidase activity generated from the
mutant promoters was
assayed in either wild-type (NA1000) or CtrA
temperature-sensitive
(LS2195) strains (Fig.
4). We created mutations
within the consensus
core CtrA binding sequence (mutants PM-1,
PM-5, and PM-7), as well as
mutations that lie outside this region
(mutants PM-2, PM-3, and PM-4).
The results of this analysis were
complex, indicating that, in the case
of
fliO-
fliP expression,
some mutations within
this promoter region can shift the role
of CtrA from a repressor to an
activator. For example, mutations
PM-1, PM-2, and PM-4 resulted in an
increase in
fliO-
fliP-generated

-galactosidase
expression in wild-type cells, ranging from a
2- to a 3.5-fold increase
over the level for the wild-type promoter.
These mutant promoters were
expressed at even higher levels in
the
ctrA401 strain, an
effect opposite from that of the wild-type
fliO-
fliP promoter. We speculate that these
mutations may alter
the position of CtrA bound to the promoter. One
mutation, PM-7,
clearly had a deleterious effect on both
flgB and
fliO-
fliP transcription
(Fig.
4). The bases mutated in PM-7 are located within the TTAA-N7-TTAA
core
CtrA binding sequence, as well as in the

35 region of the
flgB promoter. The reduction in transcription in the
fliO-
fliP direction in this case may be mediated
by failure of CtrA to activate
transcription. The reduction in
transcription in the
flgB direction
is probably a
consequence of the mutation interfering with the
binding of RNA
polymerase. The same may be true of the PM-3 mutation
in the case of
flgB transcription. In all cases, however, when
transcription of the
flgB promoter was active, CtrA still
apparently
had a repressive effect. These data taken as a whole
indicate
that CtrA has a differential effect on the activity of these
divergent
promoters.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Mutational analysis of the divergent flgB and
fliO-fliP promoters. Site-directed mutants
of the flgB and fliO-fliP promoter
region were created using the method of Kunkel and Roberts
(37). The site-directed mutants were then cloned in both
orientations into the reporter plasmid placZ290, which
contains a promoterless lacZ gene, in order to assay the
effect of the mutations on transcription levels for each promoter. The
transcriptional activity was measured by mating the various reporter
constructs into either wild-type (NA1000) or CtrA temperature-sensitive
(LS2195, ctrA401) strains (54) and then
performing -galactosidase assays. Cells were grown and assays were
conducted at the permissive temperature (31°C) for the
ctrA401 allele (54). -Galactosidase activity
levels of the wild-type promoters are nearest the vertical axes; 100%
activity corresponds in each case to the activity of the wild-type
promoter in strain NA1000.
|
|
Cell cycle expression of the flgB and
fliO-fliP promoters.
The results of
the epistatic analysis indicate that the position occupied by the
flgBC-fliE genes is unique in the C. crescentus flagellar hierarchy. No other flagellar structural
genes are known that are expressed as class II genes and yet have
no effect on class III gene expression when mutated. The
very short segment of DNA between the two transcription start
sites would seem to leave little room for two complete promoters that
are both able to specify not only correct levels of expression but also
correct timing of expression within the cell cycle. Furthermore, the
apparent differential effects of CtrA on the transcription of these
divergent promoters would suggest that their timing of expression
during the C. crescentus cell cycle may be different. To
test this idea, we assayed the cell cycle expression of both promoters
simultaneously (Fig.
5). In order to
accomplish this, the 321-bp HindIII-AflII fragment that was used to determine the start site of transcription was
cloned into a dual-reporter plasmid. This reporter plasmid (placZ-nptII) contains a dual fusion of the 321-bp
HindIII-AflII fragment with lacZ
in one direction and nptII (encoding neomycin phosphotransferase) in the other (Fig. 5D). Labeled cell extracts from
synchronized cultures were subjected to immunoprecipitation with both
anti-
-galactosidase and anti-NptII antibodies. The results indicated
that both the fliO-fliP and the flgB
promoters are present in wholly functional form, including the ability
to specify proper timing of expression in the cell cycle (Fig. 5A). Since both immunoprecipitations are from the same labeled cell extract,
a direct comparison of the timing of expression is possible. In all
dual synchrony experiments conducted, the peak in expression of
flgB preceded that of the fliO-fliP
operon by approximately 5 to 10% of the cell cycle (Fig. 5B and C).
This was confirmed by repeating the experiment with the promoter
fragment reversed in orientation (Fig. 5C).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Cell cycle pattern of expression of
flgB and the fliO-fliP operon.
(A) A dual synchrony experiment utilizing flgB fused to
nptII and fliO-fliP fused to
lacZ. The peak in transcriptional activity for both
promoters occurs near the middle of the cell cycle, at approximately
0.5 cell division units for flgB and approximately 0.6 cell
division units for fliO-fliP. This temporal
pattern of expression is approximately the same as that for other class
II genes that have been assayed. In all cases tested, expression
of flgB slightly preceded expression of the
fliO-fliP operon. To accomplish the assay, a
321-bp HindIII-AflII fragment containing the
promoters for both flgB and the
fliO-fliP operons was cloned into the
bidirectional reporter placZ-npt290, which
contains a promoterless lacZ reporter in one direction and a
divergent promoterless nptII gene. The constructions were
then assayed for cell cycle gene expression by synchronizing a culture
of NA1000 harboring the construct being tested. (B) Graphic
representation of the expression levels in panel A. The relative value
of expression at each time point is expressed as a percentage of the
sum of expression from all time points in the cell cycle for each
reporter. (C) Graphic representation of a cell cycle experiment using
NA1000 containing flgB::lacZ and
fliP::nptII on placZ-npt290.
(D) A diagram of the bidirectional reporter used in the cell cycle
expression assay described for panels A and B.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The study of flagellar biogenesis in C. crescentus has
proven to be very fruitful over the last several years in elucidating many aspects of the bacterial cell cycle. Several connections between
essential cell cycle processes such as the initiation of DNA
replication and cell division and flagellar biogenesis have emerged,
illustrating the high degree of interwining of motility and development
in this organism. Most of the connections that have been made are in
the form of cell cycle checkpoints. For instance, the
swarmer-to-stalked cell transition, while marked by ejection of the
flagellum and growth of a stalk, is accompanied by changes in the
protein complement of the nucleoid (13); also, flagellar
biogenesis does not occur in the absence of replication initiation
(9, 54), and cell division is altered in mutants that lack
proper expression of genes that are early in the flagellar hierarchy
(20, 70, 71). Determining the identity and function of the
proteins that mediate these checkpoints has become the primary focus of
study in the field of C. crescentus flagellar biogenesis, so that the examination of motility provides a window for
understanding how a bacterial cell coordinates and synchronizes the
many varied aspects of the cell cycle to successfully complete the
reproductive process.
In this work, we have characterized the genes that encode three
components of the proximal rod, FlgB, FlgC, and FliE. We show that
these genes lie outside the C. crescentus flagellar
hierarchy because, while the operon is expressed in class II
mutant backgrounds, class III genes are still expressed in
flgBC-fliE null strains. We show that
flgB is expressed in a temporal pattern that is similar to
that of other class II genes. We have mapped the start site of
transcription and used this information to construct site-directed mutations in the promoter region to examine the promoter architecture, in regard to both flgB and fliO-fliP
transcription. By analyzing expression of wild-type and mutant
promoters in a CtrA mutant strain, we have provided genetic evidence
that CtrA is responsible for regulating expression of both sets of
genes, and we have provided direct biochemical evidence that CtrA
interacts with the promoter sequences on the DNA itself.
A question in the study of C. crescentus flagellar
biogenesis is how the cell determines that assembly of the class II
elements of the flagellum is complete. Expression of all the class II
elements is required before transcription of class III promoters can
begin, so there must be some mechanism for sensing their presence,
their assembly, or their function, but no such mechanism has been
identified. It is difficult to imagine a sensing protein or apparatus
that can detect assembly of the class II components, because such a sensing protein would be required to simultaneously sample many points
on the surface of a rather large, multisubunit structure. A much
simpler checkpoint control would be to test the function of the
class II structure by assaying export of a component of the next part
of the flagellum to be assembled, a role for which the proximal rod
proteins, FlgBC and FliE, would seem to be suited. There are two
possibilities in this scenario: either a sensor protein in the
periplasmic space sends a signal to begin class III gene expression
once it detects the presence of the proximal rod, or the buildup of
unexported signal proteins (proximal rod or otherwise) in the
cytoplasm as a result of a nonfunctional flagellar export apparatus
sends a negative signal that inhibits commencement of class III gene
expression. In either case, the signal protein(s) must be expressed
even in the absence of complete class II gene product assembly. The
results of the epistasis analysis provide evidence that the
flgBC-fliE gene products are not this signal.
None of the proteins encoded acts either positively by activating
transcription when exported or negatively by inhibiting transcription
if unexported (Table 2). There may be an as-yet-undiscovered signal
protein that is also expressed outside the hierarchy, or there may in
fact be a sensor that detects assembly of the class II components
directly. Determination of how the cell acts to monitor the assembly of
such a large, complex structure would be of general interest to the
study of other such structures, for example, photosynthesis reaction
centers and other secretion machinery.
Recent work on both general cell cycle regulation and the flagellar
hierarchy of C. crescentus has shown that CtrA is
responsible for regulating both chromosomal replication initiation and
transcription of early flagellar genes, thus uniting these two
regulatory aspects of the cell cycle of this organism (reviewed in
references 27 and 66). However, the mode of action of CtrA
at class II promoters has been largely uncharacterized. It is known
that CtrA cooperates with
70 holoenzyme to regulate
class II transcription, but the nature of the relationship between the
two is not clear. CtrA seems to play a dual role in the cell, sometimes
exerting its effect by virtue of its ability to repress transcription,
as at the origin of replication and some flagellar genes
(56), and sometimes by activating transcription
(55). In the case of the flgB and fliO-fliP divergent promoters, CtrA appears to
function as a repressor in the former case and as an activator in the
latter. This is an apparent consequence of the compact nature of the
divergent flgB-fliO-fliP promoter, and we
speculate that it has an effect on their relative timing of expression.
We have shown here that the flgB promoter, which is
repressed by CtrA, is expressed earlier in the cell cycle than is the
fliO-fliP promoter, which is activated by CtrA.
We hypothesize that the temporal phosphorylation and increase in CtrA
levels are responsible for the cessation of flgB transcription and the subsequent increase in the transcription of the
divergent fliO-fliP promoter.
The differential regulation and sequence organization of the
flgB and fliO-fliP divergent promoters
by a single transcription factor, CtrA, contrast with those of other
C. crescentus divergent flagellar promoters. An interesting
aspect of flagellar gene regulation in C. crescentus is the
apparent coordinated expression within the hierarchy of components for
substructures within the basal body. In particular, there are two
divergent flagellar promoters in C. crescentus that regulate
the expression of basal body genes, the flgI-fliX
(39, 44) and the fliL-flgF
(41, 70) divergent promoters. The
flgI-fliX and fliL-flgF
pairs are arranged as divergent class II-class III promoters. They
include a CtrA binding site proximal to the class II member of the
class II-class III pair, several sites that are used for class III
transcription including ftr sequences (binding sites for the
transcription factor FlbD), integration host factor binding sites, and
consensus
54 promoter elements proximal to the class III
member of the pair. The flgB-fliO-fliP divergent
promoter sequence is similar to neither of these examples; it is the
only divergent promoter that consists of two class II-type promoters,
and it is much more compact than the class II-class III divergent
promoters, which are approximately 160 bases in extent versus only 53 bases for the flgB-fliO-fliP divergent promoter.
The class II-class III divergent promoters do share an interesting
trait with the flgB-fliO-fliP promoter, however:
with the work presented here characterizing the expression of the
proximal rod proteins FlgB, FlgC, and FliE, it is now known that all of
the components of the flagellum that are located between the MS ring,
which is embedded in the inner membrane, and the outer membrane (i.e.,
the outer basal body components) are divergently transcribed from class
II operons. The reasons for this arrangement of all periplasmic
flagellar components being divergently transcribed may be related to
the requirement for sequential expression of the different elements
within each promoter. For example, binding of the transcriptional
activator FlbD to the class III member of a divergently transcribed
flagellar promoter may act to shut off transcription from the class II
member of the pair as well as to activate the class III member. It will
be of interest to test this hypothesis by determining if FlbD and CtrA
are mutually incompatible at divergent promoters, or if FlbD can bind
while CtrA remains bound, or if phosphorylated FlbD can displace CtrA or otherwise inhibit transcription. Active, phosphorylated FlbD is
already known to inhibit transcription from the class II promoter that
governs its own transcription, the fliF promoter
(65), but competitive binding assays with CtrA have not
been undertaken, either at that promoter or at any other class II promoter.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Ann Reisenauer and Ellen Quardokus for advice on CtrA
purification and footprinting, Michelle Igo for permission to use the
EnvZ'-MalE fusion, and Dane Mohl and members of the Gober lab for
assistance with the manuscript.
This work was funded by grant GM48417 from the National Institutes of
Health to J.W.G.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Chemistry and Biochemistry and the Molecular Biology Institute,
University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1569. Phone: (310) 206-9440. Fax: (310) 206-5213. E-mail:
gober{at}chem.ucla.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Aizawa, S.-I.
1996.
Flagellar assembly in Salmonella typhimurium.
Mol. Microbiol.
19:1-5[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Anderson, D. K.,
N. Ohta,
J. Wu, and A. Newton.
1995.
Regulation of the Caulobacter crescentus rpoN gene and function of the purified sigma 54 in flagellar gene transcription.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
246:697-706[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Ausubel, F. M.,
R. Brent,
R. E. Kingston,
D. D. Moore,
J. G. Seidman,
J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl.
1989.
Current protocols in molecular biology.
John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
| 4.
|
Benson, A. K.,
J. Wu, and A. Newton.
1994.
The role of FlbD in regulation of flagellar gene transcription in Caulobacter crescentus.
Res. Microbiol.
145:420-430[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Brun, Y. V.,
G. Marczynski, and L. Shapiro.
1994.
The expression of asymmetry during Caulobacter cell differentiation.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
63:419-450[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Champer, R.,
A. Dingwall, and L. Shapiro.
1987.
Cascade regulation of Caulobacter flagellar and chemotaxis genes.
J. Mol. Biol.
194:71-80[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Chen, L.-S.,
D. Mullin, and A. Newton.
1986.
Identification, nucleotide sequence and control of developmentally regulated promoters in the hook operon region of Caulobacter crescentus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
83:2860-2864[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Dingwall, A.,
J. Garman, and L. Shapiro.
1990.
Organization and ordered expression of Caulobacter genes encoding flagellar basal body rod and ring proteins.
J. Mol. Biol.
228:1147-1162.
|
| 9.
|
Dingwall, A.,
W. Zhuang,
K. Quon, and L Shapiro.
1992.
Expression of an early gene in the flagellar regulatory hierarchy is sensitive to an interruption in DNA replication.
J. Bacteriol.
174:1760-1768[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Domian, I.,
K. Quon, and L. Shapiro.
1997.
Cell type-specific phosphorylation and proteolysis of a transcriptional regulator controls the G1-to-S transition in a bacterial cell cycle.
Cell
90:415-424[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Ely, B., and T. W. Ely.
1989.
Use of pulsed field gel electrophoresis and transposon mutagenesis to estimate the minimal number of genes required for motility in Caulobacter crescentus.
Genetics
123:649-654[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Ely, B.,
R. H. Croft, and C. J. Gerardot.
1984.
Genetic mapping of genes required for motility in Caulobacter crescentus.
Genetics
108:523-532[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Evinger, M., and N. Agabian.
1977.
Envelope-associated nucleoid from Caulobacter crescentus stalked and swarmer cells.
J. Bacteriol.
132:294-301[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Fox, G. E.,
E. Stackebrandt,
R. B. Hespell,
J. Gibson,
J. Maniloff,
T. A. Dyer,
R. S. Wolfe,
W. E. Balch,
R. S. Tanner,
L. J. Magrum,
L. B. Zablen,
R. Blakemore,
R. Gupta,
L. Bonen,
B. J. Lewis,
D. A. Stahl,
K. R. Luehrsen,
K. N. Chen, and C. R. Woese.
1980.
The phylogeny of prokaryotes.
Science
209:457-463[Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Gober, J. W., and J. C. England.
2000.
Regulation of flagellum biosynthesis and motility in Caulobacter, p. 319-339.
In
Y. V. Brun, and L. J. Shimkets (ed.), Prokaryotic development. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
|
| 16.
|
Gober, J. W., and M. Marques.
1995.
Regulation of cellular differentiation in Caulobacter crescentus.
Microbiol. Rev.
59:31-47[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Gober, J. W., and L. Shapiro.
1992.
A developmentally regulated Caulobacter flagellar promoter is activated by 3' enhancer and IHF binding elements.
Mol. Biol. Cell
3:913-926[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
Gober, J. W.,
R. Champer,
S. Reuter, and L. Shapiro.
1991.
Positional information during Caulobacter cell differentiation.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
1:324-329[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Gober, J. W.,
H. Xu,
A. Dingwall, and L. Shapiro.
1991.
Identification of cis and trans elements involved in the timed control of a Caulobacter flagellar gene.
J. Mol. Biol.
217:247-257[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Gober, J. W.,
C. Boyd,
M. Jarvis,
E. Mangan,
M. Rizzo, and J. Wingrove.
1995.
Temporal and spatial regulation of fliP, an early flagellar gene of Caulobacter crescentus that is required for motility and cell division.
J. Bacteriol.
177:3656-3667[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Gomes, S. L., and L. Shapiro.
1992.
Differential expression and positioning of chemotaxis methylation proteins in Caulobacter.
J. Mol. Biol.
178:551-568.
|
| 22.
|
Homma, M.,
K. Kutsukake,
M. Hasebe,
T. Iino, and R. MacNab.
1990.
FlgB, FlgC, FlgF, and FlgG: a family of structurally related proteins in the flagellar basal body of Salmonella typhimurium.
J. Mol. Biol.
211:465-477[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Huang, K.-J., and M. M. Igo.
1996.
Identification of the bases in the ompF regulatory region which interact with the transcription factor OmpR.
J. Mol. Biol.
262:615-628[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Hughes, K. T.,
K. L. Gillen,
M. J. Semon, and J. E. Karlinsey.
1993.
Sensing structural intermediates in bacterial flagellar assembly by export of a negative regulator.
Science
262:1277-1280[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Hung, D.,
H. McAdams, and L. Shapiro.
2000.
Regulation of the Caulobacter cell cycle, p. 361-378.
In
Y. V. Brun, and L. J. Shimkets (ed.), Prokaryotic development. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
|
| 26.
|
Igo, M. M.,
A. J. Ninfa,
J. B. Stock, and T. J. Silhavy.
1989.
Phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of a bacterial transcriptional activator by a transmembrane receptor.
Genes Dev.
3:1725-1734[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Jacobs, C., and L. Shapiro.
1998.
Microbial asymmetric cell division: localization of cell fate determinants.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
8:386-391[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Jacobs, C.,
I. Domian,
J. Maddock, and L. Shapiro.
1999.
Cell cycle-dependent polar localization of an essential bacterial histidine kinase that controls DNA replication and cell division.
Cell
97:111-120[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Jenal, U., and L. Shapiro.
1996.
Cell cycle-controlled proteolysis of a flagellar motor protein that is asymmetrically distributed in the Caulobacter predivisional cell.
EMBO J.
15:2393-2406[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Johnson, R. C., and B. Ely.
1977.
Isolation of spontaneously derived mutants of C. crescentus.
Genetics
86:25-32[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Johnson, R. C., and B. Ely.
1979.
Analysis of nonmotile mutants of the dimorphic bacterium Caulobacter crescentus.
J. Bacteriol.
137:627-634[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Jones, C. J.,
R. M. Macnab,
H. Okino, and S.-I. Aizawa.
1990.
Stoichiometric analysis of the flagellar hook-(basal-body) complex of Salmonella typhimurium.
J. Mol. Biol.
212:377-387[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Kelly, A. J.,
M. J. Sackett,
N. Din,
E. Quardokus, and Y. V. Brun.
1998.
Cell cycle-dependent transcriptional and proteolytic regulation of FtsZ in Caulobacter.
Genes Dev.
12:880-893[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Khambaty, F. M., and B. Ely.
1992.
Molecular genetics of the flgI region and its role in flagellum biosynthesis in Caulobacter crescentus.
J. Bacteriol.
174:4101-4109[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Kovach, M. E.,
R. W. Phillips,
P. H. Elzer,
R. M. Roop, 2nd, and K. M. Peterson.
1994.
pBBRIMCS: a broad host range cloning vector.
BioTechniques
16:800-802[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Kubori, T.,
N. Shimamoto,
S. Yamaguchi,
K. Namba, and S.-I. Aizawa.
1992.
Morphological pathway of flagellar assembly in Salmonella typhimurium.
J. Mol. Biol.
226:433-446[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Kunkel, T. A., and J. D. Roberts.
1987.
Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection.
Methods Enzymol.
154:367-382[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Mangan, E. K.,
M. Bartamian, and J. W. Gober.
1995.
A mutation that uncouples flagellum assembly from transcription alters the temporal pattern of flagellar gene expression in Caulobacter crescentus.
J. Bacteriol.
177:3176-3184[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Marczynski, G., and L. Shapiro.
1992.
Cell-cycle control of a cloned chromosomal origin of replication from Caulobacter crescentus.
J. Mol. Biol.
226:959-977[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Marczynski, G.,
K. Lentine, and L. Shapiro.
1995.
A developmentally regulated chromosomal origin of replication uses essential transcription elements.
Genes Dev.
9:1543-1557[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Marques, M. V., and J. Gober.
1995.
Activation of a temporally regulated Caulobacter promoter by upstream and downstream sequence elements.
Mol. Microbiol.
16:279-289[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Miller, J. H.
1972.
Experiments in molecular genetics, p. 352-355.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 43.
|
Minamino, T.,
S. Yamaguchi, and R. M. Macnab.
2000.
Interaction between FliE and FlgB, a proximal rod component of the flagellar basal body of Salmonella.
J. Bacteriol.
182:3029-3036[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Mohr, C. D.,
J. Mackichan, and L. Shapiro.
1998.
A membrane-associated protein, FliX, is required for an early step in Caulobacter flagellar assembly.
J. Bacteriol.
180:2175-2185[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Muller, V.,
C. Jones,
I. Kawagishi,
S. Aizawa, and R. MacNab.
1992.
Characterization of the fliE genes of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium and identification of the FliE protein as a component of the flagellar hook-basal body complex.
J. Bacteriol.
174:2298-2304[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Mullin, D.,
S. Minnich,
L. S. Chen, and A. Newton.
1987.
A set of positively regulated flagellar gene promoters in Caulobacter crescentus with sequence homology to the nif gene promoters of Klebsiella pneumoniae.
J. Mol. Biol.
195:939-943[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Mullin, D. A., and A. Newton.
1989.
Ntr-like promoters and upstream regulatory sequence ftr are required for transcription of a developmentally regulated Caulobacter crescentus flagellar gene.
J. Bacteriol.
171:3218-3227[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Mullin, D. A., and A. Newton.
1993.
A 54 promoter and downstream sequence elements ftr2 and ftr3 are required for regulated expression of divergent transcription units flaN and flbG in Caulobacter crescentus.
J. Bacteriol.
175:2067-2076[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Mullin, D. A.,
S. M. Van Way,
C. A. Blankenship, and A. H. Mullin.
1994.
FlbD has a DNA-binding activity near its carboxy terminus that recognizes ftr sequences involved in positive and negative regulation of flagellar gene transcription in Caulobacter crescentus.
J. Bacteriol.
176:5971-5981[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Newton, A.,
N. Ohta,
G. Ramakrishnan,
D. Mullin, and G. Raymond.
1989.
Genetic switching in the flagellar gene hierarchy of Caulobacter requires negative as well as positive regulation of transcription.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:6651-6655[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 51.
|
Ohta, N.,
L.-S. Chen,
E. Swenson, and A. Newton.
1985.
Transcriptional regulation of a periodically controlled flagellar gene operon in Caulobacter crescentus.
J. Mol. Biol.
186:107-115[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 52.
|
Ohta, N.,
L.-S. Chen,
D. A. Mullin, and A. Newton.
1991.
Timing of flagellar gene expression in the Caulobacter cell cycle is determined by a transcriptional cascade of positive regulatory genes.
J. Bacteriol.
173:1514-1522[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 53.
|
Ohta, N.,
E. Swanson,
B. Ely, and A. Newton.
1984.
Physical mapping and complementation analysis of transposon Tn5 mutations in Caulobacter crescentus: organization of transcriptional units in the hook gene cluster.
J. Bacteriol.
158:897-904[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 54.
|
Osley, M. A.,
M. Sheffery, and A. Newton.
1977.
Regulation of flagellin synthesis in the cell cycle of Caulobacter: dependence on DNA replication.
Cell
12:393-400[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 55.
|
Quon, K. C.,
G. Marczynski, and L. Shapiro.
1996.
Cell cycle control by an essential bacterial two component signal transduction proteins.
Cell
84:83-93[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 56.
|
Quon, K. C.,
B. Yang,
I. J. Domian,
L. Shapiro, and G. Marczynski.
1998.
Negative control of bacterial DNA replication by a cell cycle regulatory protein that binds at the chromosome origin.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:120-125[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 57.
|
Ramakrishnan, G., and A. Newton.
1990.
FlbD of Caulobacter crescentus is a homologue of the NtrC (NRI) protein and activates sigma 54-dependent flagellar gene promoters.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:2369-2373[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 58.
|
Ramakrishnan, G.,
J.-L. Zhao, and A. Newton.
1991.
The cell cycle-regulated flagellar gene flbF of Caulobacter crescentus is homologous to a virulence locus (lcrD) of Yersinia pestis.
J. Bacteriol.
173:7283-7292[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 59.
|
Reisenauer, A.,
K. Quon, and L. Shapiro.
1999.
The CtrA response regulator mediates temporal control of gene expression during the Caulobacter cell cycle.
J. Bacteriol.
181:2430-2439[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 60.
|
Sanders, L. A.,
S. Van Way, and D. A. Mullin.
1992.
Characterization of the Caulobacter crescentus flbF promoter and identification of the inferred flbF product as a homolog of the LcrD protein from a Yersinia enterocolitica virulence plasmid.
J. Bacteriol.
174:857-866[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 61.
|
Schweizer, H. P.
1992.
Allelic exchange in Pseudomonas aeruginosa using novel ColE1-type vectors and a family of cassettes containing a portable oriT and the counter-selectable Bacillus subtilis sacB marker.
Mol. Microbiol.
6:1195-1204[Medline].
|
| 62.
|
Simons, R.,
U. Priefer, and A. Puhler.
1983.
A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in gram negative bacteria.
Bio/Technology
1:784-790[CrossRef].
|
| 63.
|
Stephens, C. M., and L. Shapiro.
1993.
An unusual promoter controls cell-cycle regulation and dependence on DNA replication of the Caulobacter fliLM early flagellar operon.
Mol. Microbiol.
9:1169-1179[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 64.
|
Wingrove, J. A.,
E. K. Mangan, and J. W. Gober.
1993.
Spatial and temporal phosphorylation of a transcriptional activator regulates pole-specific gene expression in Caulobacter.
Genes Dev.
7:1979-1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 65.
|
Wingrove, J. A., and J. W. Gober.
1994.
A 54 transcriptional activator also functions as a pole-specific repressor in Caulobacter.
Genes Dev.
8:1839-1852[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 66.
|
Wu, J., and A. Newton.
1997.
Regulation of the Caulobacter flagellar gene hierarchy: not just for motility.
Mol. Microbiol.
24:233-239[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 67.
|
Wu, J.,
A. K. Benson, and A. Newton.
1995.
Global regulation of a 54-dependent flagellar gene family in Caulobacter crescentus by the transcriptional activator FlbD.
J. Bacteriol.
177:3241-3450[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 68.
|
Wu,
J. N. Ohta, and A. Newton.
1998.
An essential, multicomponent signal transduction pathway required for cell cycle regulation in Caulobacter.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:1443-1448[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 69.
|
Xu, H.,
A. Dingwall, and L. Shapiro.
1989.
Negative transcriptional regulation in the Caulobacter flagellar hierarchy.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:6656-6660[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 70.
|
Yu, J., and L. Shapiro.
1992.
Early Caulobacter crescentus genes fliL and fliM are required for flagellar gene expression and normal cell division.
J. Bacteriol.
174:3327-3338[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 71.
|
Zhuang, W. Y., and L. Shapiro.
1995.
Caulobacter FliQ and FliR membrane proteins, required for flagellar biogenesis and cell division, belong to a family of virulence factor export proteins.
J. Bacteriol.
177:343-356[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Bacteriology, January 2001, p. 725-735, Vol. 183, No. 2
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.2.725-735.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Redondo-Nieto, M., Lloret, J., Larenas, J., Barahona, E., Navazo, A., Martinez-Granero, F., Capdevila, S., Rivilla, R., Martin, M.
(2008). Transcriptional Organization of the Region Encoding the Synthesis of the Flagellar Filament in Pseudomonas fluorescens. J. Bacteriol.
190: 4106-4109
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mallik, P., Pratt, T. S., Beach, M. B., Bradley, M. D., Undamatla, J., Osuna, R.
(2004). Growth Phase-Dependent Regulation and Stringent Control of fis Are Conserved Processes in Enteric Bacteria and Involve a Single Promoter (fis P) in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol.
186: 122-135
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Laub, M. T., Chen, S. L., Shapiro, L., McAdams, H. H.
(2002). Genes directly controlled by CtrA, a master regulator of the Caulobacter cell cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
99: 4632-4637
[Abstract]
[Full Text]