Journal of Bacteriology, November 2001, p. 6404-6412, Vol. 183, No. 21
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.21.6404-6412.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

andW. M. Keck Institute for Cellular Visualization, Rosenstiel Basic Medical Sciences Research Center, and Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454
Received 31 January 2001/Accepted 2 August 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Flagella purified from Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium contain FliG, FliM, and FliN, cytoplasmic proteins that are important in torque generation and switching, and FliF, a transmembrane structural protein. The motor portion of the flagellum (the basal body complex) has a cytoplasmic C ring and a transmembrane M ring. Incubation of purified basal bodies at pH 4.5 removed FliM and FliN but not FliG or FliF. These basal bodies lacked C rings but had intact M rings, suggesting that FliM and FliN are part of the C ring but not a detectable part of the M ring. Incubation of basal bodies at pH 2.5 removed FliG, FliM, and FliN but not FliF. These basal bodies lacked the C ring, and the cytoplasmic face of the M ring was altered, suggesting that FliG makes up at least part of the cytoplasmic face of the M ring. Further insights into FliG were obtained from cells expressing a fusion protein of FliF and FliG. Flagella from these mutants still rotated but cells were not chemotactic. One mutant is a full-length fusion of FliF and FliG; the second mutant has a deletion lacking the last 56 residues of FliF and the first 94 residues of FliG. In the former, C rings appeared complete, but a portion of the M ring was shifted to higher radius. The C-ring-M-ring interaction appeared to be altered. In basal bodies with the fusion-deletion protein, the C ring was smaller in diameter, and one of its domains occupied space vacated by missing portions of FliF and FliG.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The engine of the bacterial flagellum is a proton-powered, rotary motor (for a review of the field, see reference 14). Five proteins (FliG, FliM, FliN, MotA, and MotB) are thought to be directly involved in the generation of torque and the reversal of the direction of motor rotation. FliG is thought to be primarily involved in torque generation, while FliM and FliN are thought to be more involved in switching the direction of rotation (12). The inclusion of FliN as an integral component in torque generation or switching has been questioned (17, 21). MotA and MotB are transmembrane proteins that form a complex, which conducts protons from the periplasm to the cytoplasm (2, 18). The MotA-MotB complex is thought to be anchored to the peptidoglycan layer and hence to be part of the stator (3). In freeze fracture images of the flagellar motor, the presence of ca. 10 membrane particles (called studs) encircling the flagellar shaft depends on the expression of both MotA and MotB, suggesting that the studs correspond to the MotA-MotB complex (10).
Flagella purified from cells retain three of the five proteins required
for torque generation, namely, FliG, FliM, and FliN (6).
In electron micrographs, the basal body (the cell-proximal portion of
the flagellum) consists of a set of coaxial rings named for their
locations relative to the partitions of the bacterial cell (Fig.
1). The L ring lies in the outer
lipopolysaccharide layer, the P ring lies in the periplasmic space and
is believed to be associated with the peptidoglycan layer, the S ring
is a supramembrane feature (i.e., just outside the cytoplasmic membrane of the cell), the M ring crosses the cytoplasmic membrane, and the C
ring lies in the cytoplasm. FliF is a transmembrane protein that is
responsible for both the S ring and the M ring. Using antibody labeling
and electron microscopy, Francis et al. (5) demonstrated
that FliG is associated with the cytoplasmic face of the M ring to form
the extended (or thicker) M ring. (Hereafter, when we refer to the M
ring we include the extension due to FliG). The proteins FliM and FliN
were identified by Francis et al. (6) as components of the
C ring. Although these authors presented a structure of the basal body
with the C ring, they were not able to determine whether parts of FliM
or FliN also contribute to the M ring or whether parts of FliG
contribute to the C ring.
|
In addition, Francis et al. carried out studies of two mutant strains that make FliF-FliG fusion proteins (5). The mutants appeared as spontaneous deletions that eliminated the stop codon in fliF and shifted the adjacent fliG gene to a location that is in frame with respect to fliF. The proteins made from the mutants are single polypeptides containing both FliF and FliG sequences. In one of the two FliF-FliG fusion mutants, the fusion protein contains essentially the entirety of both FliF and FliG with only 5 amino acids deleted from the C terminus of FliF accompanied by the insertion of an isoleucine at the junction of FliF and FliG. This is called the full-length fusion protein. Flagellar motors having the full-length protein are vigorously motile. In the second mutant, there is a large deletion in which 56 residues from the C-terminal part of FliF and 94 residues from the N-terminal part of FliG are absent. This is known as the fusion-deletion protein. The deleted portion of FliG contains the residues (i.e., residues 1 to 40) required for binding of FliG to FliF (11). Therefore, were it not for the covalent linkage of FliG to FliF, FliG would be lost from the basal bodies. Flagellar motors having the fusion-deletion protein rotate, but such cells have a less vigorous and more variable motility. The presence of the fusion-deletion protein provided an opportunity to determine the location of the terminal sequences of the FliF and FliG proteins.
In order to define more accurately the locations of the component proteins, we undertook a structural study of basal bodies purified from wild-type cells and cells making the fusion and fusion-deletion proteins. The basal body preparations were then treated to remove some of the component proteins: for example, incubation at pH 4.5 removed FliM and FliN and hence the C ring, but not FliG; CsCl density gradient centrifugation also produced the same result, whereas incubation at pH 2.5 also removed FliG. We compared images of differentially extracted basal bodies in order to map the locations of these proteins.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bacterial strains.
The Salmonella enterica
serovar Typhimurium strains used for these experiments are shown in
Table 1. SJW134 is wild type except for
the lack of an expressed flagellin gene, which makes it nonmotile.
SJW880 has the polyhook phenotype and as a result is nonmotile. Both
strains are otherwise wild type in motor function. The basal bodies
prepared from SJW134 and SJW880 are identical except for a mutation in
the fliK gene, which affects hook length. SJW3063-1 is a
spontaneous pseudorevertant of a nonchemotactic (cheY)
mutant. In this mutant, there is a small deletion that places
fliF and fliG in the same reading frame. The
mutant bacterium produces an essentially full-length fusion of the
proteins FliF and FliG (FliF-FliG) (5). SJW3063-1 has a
filament and is motile, though not chemotactic. MYR1101 is the same
strain as SJW3063-1 but has had the filament gene knocked out by
transposon insertion. It is, of course, nonmotile. SJW2334 also makes a
FliF-FliG fusion protein but with a 150-amino-acid deletion, of which
56 are the C-terminal residues of FliF and 94 are the N-terminal
residues of FliG. SJW2334 is weakly motile. SJW3821 is the same strain as SJW2334 but has had the filament gene knocked out by transposon insertion. The filament-free, full-length FliF-FliG mutant MYR1101 was
given to us by R. Macnab (Yale University). The SJW3281 fusion-deletion strain was provided to us by S. Yamaguchi (Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan).
|
Extraction and purification of flagellar motors.
The
preparation of flagellar motor complexes from these strains followed
procedures previously described (6) with some modification. Cells were grown as previously described in 8-liter cultures. At late log stage (8
10 h), the cells were
pelleted at 4,000 × g for 20 min. The pellets were
resuspended in 500 ml of an ice-cold solution of 0.5 M sucrose-50 mM
Tris-HCl at pH 8.0. The preparation was divided in two and kept on ice.
We added 8 ml of 0.5 M EDTA at pH 8.0 to each of the two aliquots to
bring their final concentrations of EDTA to ca. 8 mM. The solutions were stirred for 30 min, after which 15 ml of lysozyme at 2 mg/ml was
added, and the incubation continued for 30 to 60 min on ice with
stirring. We added 0.5 M Mg2
SO4 to a final concentration of 20 mM to activate
the endogenous DNase. The solutions were then incubated while stirring
the mixtures on ice for 30 min. Unlysed cells were removed by
centrifugation at 4,000 × g for 20 min. The
supernatant was adjusted to pH 11 by dropwise addition of 5 M NaOH. The
solution was centrifuged for 70 min at 90,000 × g. The
pellets were resuspended in 30 ml of buffer containing 100 mM KCl, 10%
(wt/vol) sucrose, 0.1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100, and 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH
8.0). The resuspended pellets were centrifuged at 4,000 × g for 10 min to remove debris. The supernatants were then
centrifuged at 120,000 × g for 60 min, and the pellets
resuspended in 100 to 500 µl of 0.1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100, 5 mM
EDTA, and 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 (TET) buffer. The basal body
preparation was then further purified by density gradient
centrifugation in 50% (vol/vol) Percoll (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.) in
TET buffer. The Percoll beads were removed by gel filtration using an
S-1000 column (Bio-Rad) as described earlier (9). The
complexes are stable on ice for several weeks.
Computer image analysis. All images of the hook-basal body complexes were processed by using the Brandeis package (15) and the single particle routines in SPIDER (7). All images were normalized by setting the average to zero and the standard deviation to a constant. This gave all images approximately the same statistical properties, and thus all images contributed equally to the averages. No correction for the contrast transfer function (CTF) was applied since the first node of the CTF occurred at ~1/17 Å for these images recorded at ~1 µm under focus. The resolution determined by spectral signal-to-noise calculation from the combined L and P rings from the samples used in this study was 22 Å (data not shown). We used the L and P rings as our resolution criterion since they should be the most constant portion of the structure across the various samples.
Averaging images.
Images of basal bodies were extracted from
large scanned fields by using a generous mask. The basal bodies were
rotated into an approximately upright position by eye. This upright
position was later determined to be within ~5° of vertical. The
images were then masked from their surroundings so that all images had the same dimensions. Separate averages were produced based on alignment
of the L and P rings, the M and S rings, and the C rings, and
these separate averages were spliced into a single image
(16). The reason for averaging parts separately is that
the images of the basal bodies are not quite superposable so
that alignment and averaging of the parts produced sharper features
than alignment of the whole structure. For example, when basal bodies
were aligned by using the L and P rings, the averages of the M and S
rings or of the C rings were noticeably worse than when these rings were used for alignment. The individually masked rings were aligned against a "best" particle. Subsequent rounds of alignment and averaging used the mirror-symmetrized intermediate average as a
reference image. The cycles of alignment and averaging were stopped
when the alignment parameters ceased to change significantly. A summary
of the numbers of images analyzed and averaged for each specimen is
included in Table 2.
|
Computing difference images. The differences were calculated between pairs of mirror-symmetrized averaged images. The most difficult aspect of calculating differences among data from different data sets was scaling the averages to one another so that the differences observed represent true structural differences. The best approach was to use histogram fitting with the function CE FIT in the SPIDER package on the actual windowed images to be compared, using the wild-type without a C ring as the reference when M rings were compared. The result is a fit based on the following parameters: x' = Ax + B, where x and x' represent the densities in the input and output images, respectively, and A and B are the scaling constants determined from the histograms. The corresponding variance map was multiplied by A2 prior to determining the significance levels. The statistical significance was determined by using the program DIFFTTEST (20).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In order to locate the features that had been altered by the removal of particular proteins, we compared images of the corresponding basal bodies. To obtain a representative image of a particular preparation, we selected and then averaged images of dozens of individual basal bodies. In computing the average, we also computed a variance map, in which regions of structural variation appear as bright features. Positive (bright) features arise from variations among the images in a preparation. Such variations can result from noise, from differences in orientation (e.g., tilt out of the plane of view), from variations in the degree of defocus used to obtain the electron micrographs, and from true variations in the structure, position, and numbers of the component parts. To look for features that were altered in different preparations, we subtracted the corresponding averaged images, thereby generating difference maps. Positive (bright) or negative (dark) features might indicate changes in the structures. To assess the significance of the differences, we computed significance maps in which bright and dark features corresponded to statistically significant positive and negative differences, respectively (20). Variations in the background surrounding the basal bodies were generally not significant because the backgrounds tended to be the same. Thus, when averages taken from the corresponding background areas were subtracted, the difference was no more than expected by chance given the noise. On the other hand, if one set of images had a feature not present in the other, then there was a significant change in one set of images relative to the other. Differences corresponding to this region of true structural variation were larger than expected by chance. Hence, statistical maps helped us sort out which differences correspond to structural changes and which arise just by chance due to noise in the images.
Averaged images of basal bodies, the cell-proximal portion of the
flagellum.
The averaged images and variance images of basal bodies
with C rings from the wild-type and the gene-fusion strains are shown in Fig. 2. Both variation in the
diameters of the C rings (19) and a slight tilting of the
structure in some of the images lead to increases in the C-ring
portions of the variance maps (see arrows in Fig. 2A). The source of
variations in the S ring is unknown.
|
Changes associated with the loss of FliM and FliN.
Treatment
of the basal body preparations by either incubation at pH 4.5 or by
CsCl density gradient centrifugation results in the loss of FliM and
FliN (6). In the electron microscope, all basal bodies in
these preparations lack the C ring (Fig.
3B and C). In untreated samples, ca. 30%
of the basal bodies have no C ring (Fig. 3A). Using difference images,
we compared the M rings of basal bodies with C rings to those lacking C
rings, whether the C rings had been removed by incubation at pH 4.5 or by subjection to CsCl density gradient centrifugation or simply were
not present in the untreated samples (Fig.
4A to D). The differences in densities
comprising the M ring are very close to the background level in Fig. 4A
to D. When there are true differences in the M ring, there are strong
features in the difference map, as is the case in Fig. 4E (see below).
Thus, loss of the C ring does not appreciably alter the M ring.
|
|
Changes in the M ring associated with treatment at pH 2.5. Incubation of basal body preparations at pH 2.5 results in the loss of FliG, as well as FliM and FliN (5, 6). Images of the preparations reveal a loss of the C ring and a thinning of the M ring (Fig. 3D). Difference images between pH 2.5-treated basal bodies and untreated basal bodies reveal a loss of matter on the cytoplasmic face of the M ring (Fig. 4E).
Changes in the M ring of basal bodies containing the full-length
FliF-FliG fusion protein.
Most of the basal bodies with the
full-length fusion protein lacked C rings, suggesting that the mutation
destabilizes the C-ring-M-ring interactions. The averages of the M and
C rings are shown in Fig. 2C. An averaged image of M ring lacking the C
ring is shown in Fig. 3E. No difference was observed between the M
rings of basal bodies with the C ring and those lacking it (data not
shown). Figure 5A and B are difference
images between basal bodies from the full-length fusion strain and
those from wild type. As is the case in Fig. 4E, the maps show
differences in the M ring, as well as unexplained differences in the S
ring. The differences in the M ring suggest a redistribution of matter in the cytoplasmic part of the M ring, the region thought to contain FliG. There is a shift of matter from an inner part of the M ring to an
outer part of the M ring, as evidenced by the presence of a positive
peak in the difference maps at an inner portion of the M ring and a
negative peak at the outer edges of the M ring (Fig. 5A and B). This is
what one would expect to see in the difference image if there were a
net movement of density from one place to another.
|
Changes in the M rings of basal bodies containing the FliF-FliG fusion-deletion protein. We expected that differences due to the deletion would be confined to the M ring because FliF and FliG are thought to make up the M ring (5, 6). Instead there is a large rearrangement of matter involving part or parts of the C ring. Figure 5C shows the difference images between the M rings with wild-type proteins and the M ring with the fusion-deletion protein when the C ring is present. There are again changes in the S ring but essentially no change in the M ring (see the statistical significance map in Fig. 5C). But when the C ring is absent, the M ring with the fusion-deletion protein does indeed appear different. The difference images in the absence of the C ring show positive peaks that indicate material is missing from the cytoplasmic face of the M ring (Fig. 5D). Using basal bodies with the FliF-FliG fusion-deletion protein, we compared those lacking a C ring to those having a C ring (Fig. 5E) and again found a change in the cytoplasmic portion of the M ring. These same differences are more clearly seen when the same comparisons are made with basal bodies purified by CsCl density gradient centrifugation from the fusion-deletion mutant, as shown in Fig. 5F and G. These differences are similar to those shown in Fig. 4E in the comparison of the wild-type basal body with the C ring to the pH 2.5-treated basal body, which lacks the C ring and FliG.
Changes in the C rings of basal bodies with the FliF-FliG
full-length fusion protein.
The C ring in this mutant has the same
dimensions as the wild-type C ring, although the yield of C ring
containing basal bodies, ~10% versus ~70% for the wild type,
would suggest the connection between the C ring and basal body is less
stable. While the outer part of the C ring appears unaltered, the inner
domain of the C ring shows an upward tilt toward the outer edge of the
M ring, as if the angle or direction of the connection between C and M ring had been changed. We have indicated the angle of the connection with arrows. The connection in the wild type and the fusion-deletion mutant (Fig. 6, left-hand columns) is at
ca. 2 o'clock, whereas that in the full-length fusion is at ca. 12 to
1 o'clock. The movement of density associated with the change in
orientation is indicated by the presence of both positive and negative
peaks in the difference images.
|
Changes in the C rings of basal bodies from the fusion-deletion
mutant.
The averaged images of basal bodies having the
fusion-deletion protein (Fig. 2B) shows that there has been a ~6 nm
axial shift of the C ring relative to the M ring so that the top of the
C ring is now opposite the bottom of the M ring. The C ring is also reduced by 10% in diameter. Previously, we showed that this reduction was the result of having 10% fewer subunits in the ring
(19). The innermost domain of the C ring appears to be
missing, but the M ring appears to be complete. When the C ring is
absent, however, mass is missing from the M ring. Recalling that the
loss of the C ring produces no change in the M ring from wild-type strains, we conclude that the inner domain of the C ring occupies a gap
in the M ring resulting from the loss of the C-terminal portion of FliF
and the N-terminal portion of FliG. In this rearrangement, the inner
C-ring domain must be shifted relative to its position in basal bodies
from the wild-type strain. To demonstrate this, we altered the image of
the C ring from wild-type preparations to mimic the diameter and
position of the C ring of the mutant (Fig.
7B). The inner domain of the C ring after
the appropriate axial shift and reduction in radius still lies outside
the M ring (compare Fig. 7B and C) in a position that is unoccupied in
the mutant. The difference image shows a clear peak associated with absence of this domain but no negative peak that should indicate the
missing portions of FliF and FliG. This domain therefore appears to be
shifted to smaller radius and hence into the M ring, relative to the
rest of the C ring. The length of the connection between the outer part
of the C ring and what should be the inner domain thus would appear to
be stretched by at least 2.2 nm.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
FliM and FliN make no appreciable contribution to the M ring. It was shown previously (5) that basal bodies lacking FliM and FliN did not have C rings. Basal bodies in which the bulk of the C ring was missing could not be decorated with antibodies against FliN or FliM but could be decorated with antibodies against FliG. What was not known from these studies was whether FliM or FliN contributed domains to the M ring and whether FliG indeed was located on the cytoplasmic face of the M ring or whether it gave rise to a portion of the C ring. We show here that difference maps made by subtracting the averaged images of basal bodies lacking FliM and FliN but having FliG from the averaged image obtained from basal bodies with all three proteins reveal no significant differences in the M ring (Fig. 4A to D). The simplest interpretation is that FliM and FliN are components of the C ring, a ring that is missing in basal bodies lacking FliM and FliN. This result is evidence that FliM and FliN do not make up any significant portion of the M ring.
FliG contributes density to the cytoplasmic face of the M ring. When the preparations of basal bodies are treated with a pH 2.5 buffer, FliG is extracted from the preparations (5). Difference maps reveal loss of material from the cytoplasmic face of the M ring (Fig. 4E). We cannot conclude, however, that all of the missing mass corresponds to FliG since FliE, FliP, and FliR, which have a role in flagellar protein export, are present in our preparations (4) but may also be lost upon extraction.
We hoped that the FliF-FliG fusion protein would enable us to localize FliG. Recall that extraction by incubation at pH 2.5 removes FliG from the wild-type basal body. In the full-length fusion, FliG, which is covalently linked to FliF, is indeed not removed (6). Images of mutant and wild-type flagella incubated at pH 2.5 might be expected to reveal the location of FliG since the loss of other proteins (e.g., export proteins) will not be at issue because both wild-type and mutant preparations were treated the same. The images of the M rings, however, are the same and do not reveal the position of FliG (data not shown). The reason for a lack of visible difference in the M ring, despite the presence of FliG, is likely to be that FliG becomes disordered or denatured. This is a plausible result of treatment with pH 2.5 buffer, which in addition to removing FliG in wild-type preparations also depolymerizes the filament and could disrupt the noncovalent interactions between the FliG and FliF portions in the fusion protein, thereby causing disorder.The fusion of FliG to FliF causes a conformational change in the M ring and in the C ring. The full-length fusion mutant provides insight into the location of FliG in the M ring. Comparison of the M ring from the full-length fusion mutant with that of the wild-type strain reveals a shift of an inner feature to an outer position. The feature that is moved is believed to be a part of FliG since this movement occurs in the same region where mass is removed in pH 2.5- treated basal bodies that lack FliG (compare Fig. 4E and 5A and B). The fusion-deletion mutant basal bodies that either naturally lack the C ring or have been purified by CsCl density gradient centrifugation lack mass at the cytoplasmic surface of the M ring, a finding again consistent with the loss of mass observed in pH 2.5-treated basal bodies lacking FliG. These results all suggest that the location of FliG must be on the cytoplasmic surface of the M ring and that FliG is exposed at the outer radius where it can make contact with both the MotA-MotB complex and FliM.
In the fusion-deletion mutant, a domain of the C ring replaces material missing in the M ring. In the fusion-deletion mutant, the diameter of the C ring is 10% narrower (and has 10% fewer subunits) than the C ring of wild-type strains (19). The M rings in the M ring-C ring complex in basal bodies from the fusion-deletion mutant are indistinguishable in difference maps from wild type, but the inner domain of the C ring in the mutant appears missing (Fig. 5C and 7C). When the C ring is removed, however, the M ring of the fusion-deletion mutant lacks material on its cytoplasmic face (Fig. 5E), a finding similar to that obtained when FliG is removed by incubation at pH 2.5. There are two possibilities to explain this: (i) the "missing" domain in the C ring corresponds to the deleted residues in the fusion-deletion protein and (ii) the "missing" domain in the C ring is now located in the M ring, where it replaced the mass corresponding to the deleted residues. We argue that the latter possibility better explains the observations. First, there is a change in the M ring upon loss of the C ring, when no such change is expected if the first explanation were true. No such change is expected because when the C ring is removed from wild-type basal bodies there is no change in the M ring. If the M rings in the mutant and wild type are essentially identical, as should be the case in the first explanation, then there is no reason to expect that the M ring in the fusion-deletion mutant would be altered by removal of the C ring. The second reason involves the attachment of the C ring to the M ring. If the missing domain of the C ring corresponds to the missing sequences in FliF and FliG, then it is that portion of FliF and FliG that interacts with FliM and FliN. If this portion of FliF and FliG were deleted, we would expect that FliM and FliN would not bind to the M ring and hence that the C ring would be absent. The better interpretation of changes attending removal of the C ring is therefore that the missing domain of the C ring lies in the M ring of the fusion-deletion mutant and that removal of the C ring results in the loss or disordering of this domain so that it is not seen in the averaged image.
We next explored the possibility that changes in only the diameter and the position of the C ring, but not changes in its structure, could account for the features of the basal bodies from the fusion-deletion mutant. To test this possibility, we simulated such a change in position and diameter in the computer. We used the averaged image of the basal body from the wild type. We reduced the diameter of the C ring and shifted it to the position it takes in the mutant (Fig. 7B). The inner domain, however, did not occupy the expected position in the M ring for this possibility to be correct. The difference map (Fig. 7D) has a positive peak that lies in the region that is unoccupied in the fusion-deletion mutant. The inner domain instead must lie at a smaller radius than would occur if the conformations of the subunits in the C ring were unchanged. Thus, there must be distortion of the C ring that accompanies the assembly of the C ring at a smaller radius. To complete our argument, we made a rough calculation showing that the volume of the shifted inner domain of the C ring is approximately the volume expected for the missing residues of FliF and FliG in the fusion-deletion protein. The shifted domain is ca. 25 Å by 47 Å in two dimensions. We can estimate its size in the third dimension because we know there are 34 such domains packed into a ring that lies at a radius of 165 Å. The third dimension is therefore 330 Å
/34
30 Å. The estimated volume of the ellipsoid is then (4
/3)(25
Å · 47 Å · 31 Å/8)
18,000 Å3. The mass missing in the
fusion-deletion protein is ca. 16,000 Da which would correspond to a
volume of ca. 16,000 Da/0.75 Da/Å3
21,000 Å3, which is close to the estimated volume of
the shifted domain.
The inner domain appears to be the domain that links the C ring to the
M ring because the change in the position of the inner domain alters
the diameter of the C ring. In the averaged image in Fig. 1, the C ring
seems unattached to the M ring, which of course cannot be true since
they are isolated as a complex. There must therefore be a connector
from the C ring to the M ring, although it is not visible in our
averages. We assume it has insufficient mass to be seen given the fact
that we are not determining a true three-dimensional structure from our
alignments and are presenting what are in effect cylindrically averaged
images. Does this connector arise from a portion of FliG that extends
out toward the inner domain of the C ring to make contact with FliM,
does it correspond to a portion of FliM that extends inwards to make
contact with FliG in the M ring, or does it arise from both FliM and
FliG? We have good evidence that FliM and FliN make up no significant part of the M ring. If FliM makes up the connector, it adds little if
any mass to the M ring. We do not know whether FliG contributes significantly to the inner domain of the C ring.
We know that FliM and FliN can be removed without loss of FliG. In the
averaged images of such preparations, the C ring is completely gone and
the M ring is unchanged (Fig. 4A to D). FliG either does not contribute
to the C ring or, if it does, that portion is disordered and thus is
not seen when the C ring is removed. In principle one might be able to
detect the disordered portions of FliG in difference maps or variance
maps, since a disordered portion of FliG would increase the average
density and the variance relative to the background. Neither is seen, but perhaps the changes are not significant. Thus, the identity of the
protein in the inner domain and the connector is unresolved.
How can a motor continue to operate as well as it does in the
fusion-deletion mutant? Since the C-terminal domain of FliG is
responsible for torque generation (12, 13), whereas FliM is responsible for switching, it may be that the C-terminal
torque-generating domain of FliG is largely unchanged by the changes in
its N-terminal portion and therefore the motor continues to function.
The changes in the other portions of the structure would only affect
switching, which is altered in the fusion-deletion mutant. The other
possibility is that it is the junction of FliG and FliM at which torque
is generated (19) and, although the junction is moved, the
relationship and hence the function is retained.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by Public Health Service grants R01-GM35433 and T32-GM07596 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences and by funds from the W. M. Keck Foundation.
We thank Noreen Francis for help in preparing samples.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Rosenstiel Center MS029, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454. Phone: (781) 736-2494. Fax: (781) 736-2405. E-mail: derosier{at}brandeis.edu.
Present address: Structural Biology Program, European Molecular
Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Present address: Department of Biophysics, Boston University
School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Aizawa, S. I.,
G. E. Dean,
C. J. Jones,
R. M. Macnab, and S. Yamaguchi.
1985.
Purification and characterization of the flagellar hook-basal body complex of Salmonella typhimurium.
J. Bacteriol.
161:836-849 |
| 2. | Blair, D. F., and H. C. Berg. 1990. The MotA protein of E. coli is a proton-conducting component of the flagellar motor. Cell 60:439-449[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 3. |
Blair, D. F.,
D. Y. Kim, and H. C. Berg.
1991.
Mutant MotB proteins in Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
173:4049-4055 |
| 4. | Fan, F., K. Ohnishi, N. R. Francis, and R. M. Macnab. 1997. The FliP and FliR proteins of Salmonella typhimurium, putative components of the type III flagellar export apparatus, are located in the flagellar basal body. Mol. Microbiol. 26:1035-1046[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 5. |
Francis, N. R.,
V. M. Irikura,
S. Yamaguchi,
D. J. DeRosier, and R. M. Macnab.
1992.
Localization of the Salmonella typhimurium flagellar switch protein FliG to the cytoplasmic M-ring face of the basal body.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:6304-6308 |
| 6. | Francis, N. R., G. E. Sosinsky, D. Thomas, and D. J. DeRosier. 1994. Isolation, characterization, and structure of bacterial flagellar motors containing the switch complex. J. Mol. Biol. 235:1261-1270[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 7. | Frank, J., M. Radermacher, P. Penczek, J. Zhu, Y. Li, M. Ladjadj, and A. Leith. 1996. SPIDER and WEB: processing and visualization of images in 3D electron microscopy and related fields. J. Struct. Biol. 116:190-199[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. |
Fukami, A., and K. Adachi.
1964.
On an adhering method of thin film specimens to specimen grids.
J. Electron Microsc.
13:26-27 |
| 9. |
Khan, I. H.,
T. S. Reese, and S. Khan.
1992.
The cytoplasmic component of the bacterial flagellar motor.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:5956-5960 |
| 10. | Khan, S., M. Dapice, and T. S. Reese. 1988. Effects of mot gene expression on the structure of the flagellar motor. J. Mol. Biol. 202:575-584[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 11. |
Kihara, M.,
G. U. Miller, and R. M. Macnab.
2000.
Deletion analysis of the flagellar switch protein FliG of Salmonella.
J. Bacteriol.
182:3022-3028 |
| 12. |
Lloyd, S. A.,
H. Tang,
X. Wang,
S. Billings, and D. F. Blair.
1996.
Torque generation in the flagellar motor of Escherichia coli: evidence of a direct role for FliG but not for FliM or FliN.
J. Bacteriol.
178:223-231 |
| 13. | Lloyd, S. A., F. G. Whitby, D. F. Blair, and C. P. Hill. 1999. Structure of the C-terminal domain of FliG, a component of the rotor in the bacterial flagellar motor. Nature 400:472-475[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 14. | Macnab, R. M. 1996. Flagella and motility, p. 123-145. In F. C. Neidhardt, et al. (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, vol. 1. ASM Press, Washington, D.C. |
| 15. | Owen, C. H., D. G. Morgan, and D. J. DeRosier. 1996. Image analysis of helical objects: the Brandeis helical package. J. Struct. Biol. 116:167-175[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 16. | Sosinsky, G. E., N. R. Francis, M. J. Stallmeyer, and D. J. DeRosier. 1992. Substructure of the flagellar basal body of Salmonella typhimurium. J. Mol. Biol. 223:171-184[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 17. |
Tang, H.,
S. Billings,
X. Wang,
L. Sharp, and D. F. Blair.
1995.
Regulated underexpression and overexpression of the FliN protein of Escherichia coli and evidence for an interaction between FliN and FliM in the flagellar motor.
J. Bacteriol.
177:3496-3503 |
| 18. | Tang, H., T. F. Braun, and D. F. Blair. 1996. Motility protein complexes in the bacterial flagellar motor. J. Mol. Biol. 261:209-221[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 19. |
Thomas, D. R.,
D. G. Morgan, and D. J. DeRosier.
1999.
Rotational symmetry of the C ring and a mechanism for the flagellar rotary motor.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:10134-10139 |
| 20. | Trachtenberg, S., and D. J. DeRosier. 1987. Three-dimensional structure of the frozen-hydrated flagellar filament. The left-handed filament of Salmonella typhimurium. J. Mol. Biol. 195:581-601[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 21. |
Vogler, A. P.,
M. Homma,
V. M. Irikura, and R. M. Macnab.
1991.
Salmonella typhimurium mutants defective in flagellar filament regrowth and sequence similarity of FliI to F0F1, vacuolar, and archaebacterial ATPase subunits.
J. Bacteriol.
173:3564-3572 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Appl. Environ. Microbiol. | Infect. Immun. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|---|---|
| Mol. Cell. Biol. | J. Virol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. |
| ALL ASM JOURNALS |