Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, November 2001, p. 6525-6531, Vol. 183, No. 22
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.22.6525-6531.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Complementation of the Essential Peptidoglycan
Transpeptidase Function of Penicillin-Binding Protein 2 (PBP2) by
the Drug Resistance Protein PBP2A in Staphylococcus
aureus
Mariana G.
Pinho,1,2
Sérgio R.
Filipe,1,2
Hermínia
de Lencastre,1,2 and
Alexander
Tomasz1,*
Laboratory of Microbiology, The Rockefeller
University, New York, New York 10021,1 and
Molecular Genetics Unit, Instituto de Tecnología
Química e Biológica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Oeiras,
Portugal2
Received 8 May 2001/Accepted 22 August 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The essential function of penicillin-binding protein 2 (PBP2) in
methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus RN4220 was clearly established by placing the pbp2 gene under control
of the inducible Pspac promoter; the resulting bacteria
were unable to grow in the absence of inducer. In contrast, the deficit
in PBP2 caused by inhibition of transcription of the pbp2
gene did not block growth of a methicillin-resistant S. aureus strain expressing the extra penicillin-binding protein
PBP2A, a protein of extraspecies origin that is central to the
mechanism of methicillin resistance. Several lines of evidence indicate
that the essential function of PBP2 that can be compensated for by
PBP2A is the transpeptidase activity. This provides direct genetic
evidence that PBP2A has transpeptidase activity.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The wide-spectrum resistance
of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) to all
-lactam antibiotics has had a devastating impact on the chemotherapy
of staphylococcal infections ever since the first appearance of MRSA in
clinical specimens in the early 1960s. The key component of this
resistance mechanism is an acquired penicillin-binding protein
(PBP), PBP2A, which has unusually low affinity for all
-lactam
antibiotics. The genetic determinant of PBP2A, the mecA
gene, is not native to S. aureus but was imported from an
as-yet-unidentified extraspecies source (2). Until recently, the accepted model of this resistance mechanism implied that
in the presence of
-lactam antibiotics the only PBP that remains
functional is the low-affinity PBP2A, since the other four
staphylococcal PBPs had high enough affinities to penicillin type
antibiotics to become rapidly and fully acylated and inactivated even
at low drug concentrations that were several orders of magnitude below
the concentration needed to inhibit the growth of many MRSA strains. In
this model, PBP2A is a surrogate enzyme capable of taking over the
normal functions of staphylococcal PBPs in cell wall biosynthesis.
However, some new observations require basic revision of this model.
The structural determinant of staphylococcal PBP2 was shown to be an
auxiliary gene; transposon inactivation of pbp2 resulted in
a massive reduction in the level of resistance in an MRSA strain
despite the fact that the bacteria continued to produce normal amounts
of PBP2A (20). Recent experiments showed that expression
of high-level resistance required the cooperative functioning of PBP2A
and the penicillin-insensitive transglycosylase (TGase) domain of
PBP2 (17).
These observations brought back into focus the possibility that native
staphylococcal PBPs, primarily PBP2, are participants in the mechanism
of
-lactam resistance. The purpose of the study described in this
paper was to examine in more detail the role(s) PBP2 plays in
staphylococcal wall synthesis in antibiotic-susceptible bacteria as
well as resistant bacteria (i.e., both in the absence and in the
presence of acquired PBP2A). To do this, pbp2 was put under
control of the inducible promoter Pspac, which allowed
testing of the essentiality of this gene in the backgrounds of
methicillin-susceptible and -resistant strains of S. aureus.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains and plasmids.
The bacterial strains and
plasmids used in this study are described in Table
1. S. aureus strains were
grown in tryptic soy broth (TSB) (Difco Laboratories) with aeration at
37°C or on tryptic soy agar (TSA) (Difco Laboratories) plates at
37°C. Escherichia coli strains were grown in Luria-Bertani
broth (Difco Laboratories) with aeration at 37°C.
DNA methods.
Routine DNA manipulations were performed by
using standard methods (1, 21). Restriction enzymes were
purchased from New England Biolabs. Plasmid DNA was purified by using
Wizard Plus SV Minipreps or Midipreps DNA
purification systems (Promega). DNA sequencing was done at The
Rockefeller University Protein/DNA Technology Center by the BigDye
terminator cycle sequencing method with either a 3700 DNA analyzer for
capillary electrophoresis or ABI Prism 377 DNA sequencers for slab gel electrophoresis.
Construction of pPBP2i.
Plasmid pDH88 was digested
with EcoRI and BamHI. The digestion products were
electrophoresed on a 1% low-melting-point agarose gel (Gibco-BRL Life
Technologies), and the 1.6-kb fragment was cut from the gel and
purified by using a QIAquick gel extraction kit. This fragment
contained the IPTG
(isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactoside)-inducible Pspac promoter followed by a polylinker and by the
lacI gene under control of the constitutive Ppcn
promoter. The 1.6-kb fragment was cloned into pSP64E, resulting in
plasmid pMGPI.
A DNA fragment containing the ribosome-binding site and the first 171 codons of
pbp2 was amplified by PCR by using
PfuTurbo DNA polymerase (Stratagene) and primers PBP2pro20
(5'-TATCCCGGGAAAGTGAGGGACCGCGTATG-3')
and PBP2pro21
(5'-GGCATCGATGCTTCTTGAGCTTTACGTCC-3'). The following
conditions were used: 94°C for 5 min; 30 cycles of 94°C for 30
s, 53°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1.5 min; and one final
extension
step of 72°C for 5 min. The PCR product was cleaned with a
Wizard
PCR Preps DNA purification system (Promega), digested with
ClaI
and
AvaI, and fused with the inducible
promoter present in pMGPI,
which resulted in plasmid pPBP2i. The
correct sequence of the
pbp2 insert was
confirmed.
Construction of S. aureus strains with inducible
pbp2.
Plasmid pPBP2i was introduced into RN4220 by
electroporation essentially as previously described (12).
The transformation mixture was plated on TSA containing erythromycin
(10 µg/ml) and different concentrations of IPTG (0, 0.05, 0.5, and 4 mM).
Plasmid pMGPII was constructed by cloning the
BamHI/
EcoRI 1.6-kb fragment from pDH88 containing
the
lacI gene into
E. coli-
S. aureus
shuttle vector pGC2 and was electroporated into RN4220.
Two
transformants, RN
pPBP2iII-1 and RN
pPBP2iII-5,
were chosen
for further
study.
Plasmids pPBP2i and pMGPII were sequentially transduced to MRSA strain
COL by using phage 80

as previously described (
16),
except that 0.5 mM IPTG was added to the media used for preparation
of
the transducing lysate and for transduction. Transductants
were
selected with erythromycin (10 µg/ml) for pPBP2i and with
chloramphenicol (20 µg/ml) for pMGPII. COL
pPBP2iII-1 and
COL
pPBP2iII-5
were chosen for further
study.
For construction of pPBP2iC, the
EcoRI/
BamHI
fragment from pPBP2i containing the
pbp2 fragment fused with
the P
spac promoter
was cloned into pSP64 (Promega). A
1.1-kb PCR fragment encoding
the chloramphenicol resistance marker was
amplified from pSPT181c
by using primers
5'-CTGTCGACCAGTCATACCAATAAC-3' and
5'-CATGTCGACGCTCAACGTCAATAAAGC-3'
and was cloned into the
SalI site of
pSP64.
Plasmid pPBP2iC was electroporated into RN4220 in the presence of IPTG
and subsequently transduced to RUSA4 and to COL by
using media
supplemented with IPTG. Selection was done with 15
µg of
chloramphenicol per
ml.
Isolation of RNA and Northern blot hybridization.
Overnight
cultures of COLpPBP2iII-1 and COLpPBP2iII-5
were grown in TSB supplemented with erythromycin (10 µg/ml) and
chloramphenicol (10 µg/ml). Each strain was diluted 1:40 in two tubes
of TSB supplemented with erythromycin (5 µg /ml) and chloramphenicol
(5 µg /ml), and one of the preparations was also supplemented with
0.5 mM IPTG. After cells were grown to the mid-log phase (optical
density at 620 nm [OD620], ~0.7), they were pelleted
and processed with an RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen) or with a FastRNA Blue
isolation kit (Bio 101 Inc.) in combination with FastPrep FP120
(Bio 101 Savant) used according to the manufacturer's
recommendations. RNA (5 µg) was electrophoresed through a 1.2%
agarose-0.66 M formaldehyde gel in MOPS (morpholine propanesulfonic
acid) running buffer (Sigma). Blotting of RNA onto Hybond N+ membranes
(Amersham) was performed with Turboblotter alkaline transfer systems
(Schleicher & Schuell). For detection of specific transcripts, a
pbp2-specific DNA probe was constructed by PCR amplification
with two primers, 5'-AGCTTGGCAATCAGTTAAGC-3' and
5'-TCCCACCATAAAAGATGAAG-3'. The probe was labeled with a
Ready To Go labeling kit (Pharmacia Biotech) by using
[
-32P]dCTP (Amersham Life Sciences) and was hybridized
under high-stringency conditions. The blots were subsequently washed
and autoradiographed.
Depletion of PBP2.
Strains with pbp2 under
control of IPTG-inducible promoter Pspac were tested on
solid medium by using TSA plates containing the appropriate
antibiotic(s) (10 µg of erythromycin per ml and 10 µg of
chloramphenicol per ml for strains with pPBP2i and pMGPII or 10 µg of
chloramphenicol per ml for strains with pPBP2iC) and supplemented or
not supplemented with 0.5 mM IPTG.
Experiments in liquid culture were performed by using the following
protocol. Strains were grown overnight at 37°C in TSB
supplemented
with 0.5 mM IPTG and the appropriate antibiotic(s)
(see above). These
starting cultures were then each diluted 1:100
in 50 ml of TSB
containing 5 µg of erythromycin per ml and 5 µg
of chloramphenicol
per ml and supplemented with 0.5 mM IPTG, and
they were allowed to grow
until the OD
620 was approximately 0.2.
Each culture was
centrifuged at room temperature, washed with
TSB, centrifuged,
resuspended in 50 ml of medium lacking IPTG,
and divided into two
portions, one of which was supplemented with
0.5 mM IPTG. The cultures
were again incubated with agitation
at 37°C, and OD
620
was
monitored.
To measure the growth rate of COL
pPBP2iII-1 or
COL
pPBP2iII-5, an overnight culture was grown in TSB
containing 10 µg of erythromycin
per ml and 10 µg of
chloramphenicol per ml and supplemented with
0.5 mM IPTG. This starting
culture was washed and resuspended
in TSB without IPTG to remove traces
of the inducer before the
culture was diluted 1:200 in TSB containing 5 µg of erythromycin
per ml and 5 µg of chloramphenicol per ml and
supplemented or
not supplemented with 0.5 mM IPTG. Each culture was
incubated
with agitation at 37°C, and the OD
620 was
monitored.
Cell wall analysis.
COL, COLpPBP2iII-1, and
COLpPBP2iII-5 were grown overnight at 37°C in TSB
supplemented with 10 µg of erythromycin per ml, 10 µg of
chloramphenicol per ml, and 0.5 mM IPTG. Each starting culture was
washed to remove traces of the inducer before it was diluted 1:5,000 in
500 ml of TSB containing 5 µg of erythromycin per ml and 5 µg of
chloramphenicol per ml and supplemented or not supplemented with 0.5 mM
IPTG. Cells were grown until the OD620 was approximately
0.3. Also included was a culture of strain COL grown in the presence of
1 µg of oxacillin per ml. Isolation of cell wall peptidoglycan
and analysis of the family of enzymatically released muropeptides by
reversed-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) were carried
out essentially as previously described (3).
Electron microscopy.
COL was grown in TSB.
COLpPBP2iII-5 was grown in TSB containing 5 µg of
erythromycin per ml and 5 µg of chloramphenicol per ml and
supplemented or not supplemented with 0.5 mM IPTG from a
preinoculum that had been grown in the presence of the same antibiotics at concentrations of 10 µg/ml in medium that was
supplemented or not supplemented with the inducer. When the
OD620 reached 0.6, 5 ml of the culture was harvested by
low-speed centrifugation and fixed with 1 ml of 2.5%
glutaraldehyde. Electron microscopy was done at the Electron Microscopy
Service of The Rockefeller University.
 |
RESULTS |
PBP2 is essential for growth of an MSSA strain but not for growth
of an MRSA strain.
To determine if PBP2 is essential for survival
of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strain RN4220,
we constructed a pbp2 conditional mutant in which
pbp2 is regulated by the IPTG-inducible, LacI-repressible
Pspac promoter (26). A fragment containing the
ribosome-binding site and the first 171 codons of pbp2 was fused to the inducible promoter Pspac, creating plasmid
pPBP2i, which was electroporated into RN4220. As a result of the
integration of pPBP2i into the chromosome by a Campbell type of
mechanism, a full-length copy of pbp2 was placed under
control of Pspac, which is repressed by the product of the
lacI gene that is also present in pPBP2i. Transformants were
picked, and after correct insertion of the plasmid was confirmed by
PCR, they were plated on selective plates in the presence or absence of
IPTG. Supplementing the plates with 0.5 mM IPTG resulted in normal
growth of the transformants, so this concentration was routinely used
to propagate the mutants. In the absence of IPTG there was some growth
in the area where there was heavy inoculum, where some colonies seemed
to grow over a lawn of lysed cells. It has been found previously that
in S. aureus tight regulation of genes under the
control of Pspac can be obtained if lacI is
present in a multiple-copy plasmid while a single copy of
Pspac is present in the chromosome (11).
Therefore, RN4220 with integrated pPBP2i was transformed with pMGPII, a
plasmid encoding LacI, and two transformants, RNpPBP2iII-1
and RNpPBP2iII-5, were selected for further study. These
transformants did not grow when they were plated on solid medium in the
absence of IPTG, although the plates still had some colonies in
the zone where there was heavy inoculum (Fig.
1a), indicating that PBP2 was essential for growth of RN4220.

View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Effect of suppression of pbp2 transcription
on growth of MRSA strain COL and MSSA strain RN4220. (a) Bacterial
cultures grown on solid medium (TSA) supplemented or not supplemented
with IPTG. Sector A, COLpPBP2iII-1; Sector B,
COLpPBP2iII-5; Sector C, RNpPBP2iII-1; Sector
D, RNpPBP2iII-5. (b) Northern blot hybridization with probe
for pbp2. Lanes A, COLpPBP2iII-1 lanes B,
COLpPBP2iII-5. Lane COL contained wild-type strain COL. RNA
was prepared from cultures grown with or without 0.5 mM IPTG.
|
|
In order to test the essentiality of PBP2 in the background
of an MRSA strain which contained the extra PBP2A,
plasmids pPBP2i
and pMGPII were sequentially transduced to
MRSA strain COL. Two
transductants, COL
pPBP2iII-1 and
COL
pPBP2iII-5, were chosen for
further study.
When these transductants were plated in the presence
and in the
absence of IPTG, normal growth was observed on both
plates (Fig.
1a),
in sharp contrast to what occurred in the MSSA
strain RN4220
background.
RNA was prepared from COL
pPBP2iII-1 and
COL
pPBP2iII-5 grown in the presence and in the
absence of IPTG. The amount of transcript
produced in the presence of
IPTG appeared to be similar to the
amount of transcript produced from
the two promoters of
pbp2 in
wild-type strain COL
(
19). However, transcription of
pbp2 was
severely suppressed in the absence of IPTG, confirming the deficit
of
PBP2 in the bacteria (Fig.
1b).
In order to rule out the possibility that survival of
COL
pPBP2iII strains depended on the presence of a
small number of PBP2
molecules carried over from the inoculum
(
23), a single colony
of COL
pPBP2iII was
streaked twice on medium without IPTG before
it was plated on IPTG-free
agar plates. Cells were still able
to grow, and the promoter remained
inducible.
A study to confirm that PBP2 is essential in the background of
drug-susceptible strain RN4220 but not in the background of
drug-resistant strain COL was also done in liquid media. Strains
RN
pPBP2iII and COL
pPBP2iII were grown in TSB
containing 0.5 mM
IPTG. When the OD
620 reached 0.2, the
cultures were washed with
fresh medium lacking IPTG and divided
into two portions, only
one of which was supplemented with IPTG.
After this the OD
620 was monitored, and the growth
curves indicated that removal of
IPTG prevented growth of
RN
pPBP2iII-5 but only slowed growth of
COL
pPBP2iII-5 (Fig.
2). The
presence of IPTG did not alter the
growth rate of strain COL (data not
shown).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Effect of suppression of pbp2 transcription
on growth of MRSA strain COL and MSSA strain RN4220. Growth of the
cultures in liquid medium was monitored by determining
OD620. Symbols: and , COLpPBP2iII-5
grown with and without IPTG, respectively; and ,
RNpPBP2iII-5 grown with and without IPTG, respectively.
Cultures were grown until the OD620 was approximately 0.2. At that point (indicated by grey and black arrows for
RNpPBP2iII-5 and COLpPBP2iII-5, respectively),
the IPTG was removed by washing, the cells were resuspended in fresh
medium without inducer, and each culture was divided into two portions,
only one of which was supplemented with 0.5 mM IPTG. We continued to
monitor the OD620 after this.
|
|
The growth rates of the COL
pPBP2iII strains in the presence
and in the absence of IPTG were measured, and the following results
were obtained (each value is the average ± standard
deviation
based on three independent experiments):
COL
pPBP2iII-1 with IPTG,
0.75 ± 0.09 h
1; COL
pPBP2iII-1 without IPTG, 0.60 ± 0.06 h
1; COL
pPBP2iII-5 with IPTG, 0.74 ± 0.04 h
1; and COL
pPBP2iII-5 without IPTG,
0.60 ± 0.06 h
1. These data showed that the deficit
of PBP2, although not lethal,
had a cost for the cells, as indicated by
the reduced growth rates
of the
bacteria.
Replacement of the essential function of PBP2 by PBP2A.
RN4220
and COL have unrelated genetic backgrounds. We assumed that the reason
why PBP2 was essential in antibiotic-susceptible strain RN4220 but not
in drug-resistant strain COL was the presence of PBP2A in the latter.
In order to verify this, the experiments described above were
repeated with strain RUSA4, an isogenic derivative of COL in which the
mecA gene was inactivated by Tn551 insertion, which prevented expression of PBP2A (15). We constructed a
RUSA4 strain with the pbp2 gene under control of the
Pspac promoter by inserting plasmid pPBP2iC into its
chromosome (plasmid pPBP2i could not be transduced to RUSA4
because its resistance marker, erm, is the same as the
resistance marker present in Tn551). Transformants RUSA4pPBP2iC-2 and RUSA4pPBP2iC-3 were chosen
for further study. Plasmid pPBP2iC was also inserted into the COL
chromosome, and COLpPBP2iC-2 and COLpPBP2iC-3
were used for experiments. When these strains were plated on solid
medium, RUSA4pPBP2iC was dependent on IPTG for growth,
while COLpPBP2iC grew both in the presence and in the
absence of IPTG (Fig. 3).

View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Effect of suppression of pbp2 transcription
on growth of MRSA strain COL and its isogenic derivative RUSA4
with inactivated mecA gene. Bacterial cultures
were grown on solid medium (TSA) supplemented or not supplemented with
IPTG. Sector A, COLpPBP2iC-3 construct; Sector B,
RUSA4pPBP2iC-3 construct.
|
|
The constructs were also tested in liquid media. Cultures were grown in
TSB containing IPTG, washed with fresh medium without
IPTG, and divided
into two portions, only one of which was supplemented
with IPTG.
Culture growth was monitored by determining OD
620.
A lack
of IPTG prevented growth of the RUSA4
pPBP2iC culture but
only slowed the growth of the COL
pPBP2iC culture (Fig.
4).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Effect of suppression of pbp2 transcription
on growth of MRSA strain COL and its isogenic derivative RUSA4 with
inactivated mecA gene. Growth of the cultures in liquid
medium was monitored by determining the OD620. Symbols: and , COLpPBP2iC-2 grown with and without IPTG,
respectively; and , RUSA4pPBP2iC-2 grown with and
without IPTG, respectively. Cultures were allowed to grow until the
OD620 was approximately 0.2. At that point (indicated by
grey and black arrows for RUSA4pPBP2iC-2 and COL
pPBP2iC-2, respectively) the IPTG was removed by washing,
the cells were resuspended in fresh medium without inducer, and each
culture was divided into two portions, only one of which was
supplemented with 0.5 mM IPTG. We continued to monitor the
OD620 after this.
|
|
Cell wall composition and morphology of S. aureus
constructs grown with and without PBP2.
Cell walls of
COLpPBP2iII-1 and COLpPBP2iII-5 were
purified from cultures grown in the presence and in the absence of
IPTG. The cell walls of parental strain COL grown with and without IPTG were also analyzed to control for a possible effect of IPTG on cell
wall composition; no evidence of such an effect was detected (data not
shown). A comparison of the muropeptide compositions of strains with
inducible pbp2 showed that the absence of PBP2 had only a
minor, if any, effect on the muropeptide profile of the cell wall
peptidoglycan (Fig. 5). Similar results
were obtained for COLpPBP2iII-5 (data not shown).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Effect of PBP2 deficit on the muropeptide composition of
the cell walls of MRSA strain COL. We determined the HPLC profiles of
COLpPBP2iII-5 grown in the presence (A) and in the absence
(B) of IPTG, as well as the HPLC profile of strain COL grown in the
presence of 1 µg of oxacillin per ml (C). Muropeptides were purified
and separated by HPLC as described in the text.
|
|
Replacement of PBP2 by PBP2A resulted in not only reduced growth
rates but also some morphological abnormalities. Thin sections
of cells
of COL and COL
pPBP2iII-5 grown in the presence and in
the
absence of IPTG were analyzed by electron microscopy (Fig.
6). Cells of COL
pPBP2iII-5
grown with IPTG were morphologically
indistinguishable from COL cells
(data not shown). However, in
the absence of the inducer, cells of
COL
pPBP2iII-5 exhibited premature
septum formation or
delayed division, which resulted in cells
with more than one septum.
When we scanned thin sections of 148
cells of strain COL, we did not
find any bacteria with more than
one septum (Fig.
6A and B), while
about 14% of COL
pPBP2iII-5 cells
grown without IPTG (19 of
133 thin sections scanned) had two or
more septa (Fig.
6C and D). In
addition, an abnormal ruffled appearance
of the cell wall occurred in
COL
pPBP2iII-5 grown without IPTG.

View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Morphological abnormalities in MRSA strain COL grown
with a deficit of PBP2. Strain COL was grown in TSB (A and B), and
construct COLpPBP2iII-5 was grown in medium without ITPG (C
and D). Thin sections of bacteria were analyzed by electron microscopy.
Bars = 1 µm.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The results described in this paper clarify several aspects of the
function of staphylococcal PBP2, in both antibiotic-susceptible and
antibiotic-resistant cells.
Contradictory reports have been published previously about the
essentiality of PBP2 based on correlations between antibiotic affinities for different PBPs and antibacterial activities (5, 6,
8). It has also been suggested that PBP2 is not essential in
MRSA strains (14) based on data obtained with a
spontaneous mutant that was not genetically characterized.
Our observations clearly demonstrate that PBP2 is essential for growth
of drug-susceptible strains of S. aureus; in a construct in
which PBP2 of MSSA strain RN4220 was placed under control of IPTG-inducible promoter Pspac (an approach used previously
to show the essentiality of murE in this organism
[11]) bacterial growth depended on the presence of the
IPTG inducer in both solid and liquid growth media.
When similar experiments were performed with drug-resistant strain COL
and its isogenic transposon mutant RUSA4, in which the mecA
gene was inactivated, strikingly different results were obtained. When
pbp2 was made inducible in the background of strain COL
expressing the mecA gene product PBP2A, growth of the
bacteria did not depend on the presence of IPTG in the medium. When
pbp2 was made inducible in the background of strain RUSA4,
in which production of PBP2A is inhibited, bacterial growth occurred
only in the presence of IPTG. These experiments clearly show that
acquired drug resistance protein PBP2A can replace an essential
function of native PBP2 in the absence of antibiotics in the
surrounding medium.
PBP2 is a bifunctional protein that has both a transpeptidase (TPase)
domain and a TGase domain (7, 13). The essential nature of
this protein demonstrated in the experiments described above does not
reveal which of these two activities is critical for survival and
growth of antibiotic-susceptible S. aureus. A combination of
the results of several experiments suggests that the critical function
of PBP2 is the TPase function. This conclusion is based on the
following observations. (i) In a recent study we showed that mutants
with mutations in the TPase domain of PBP2 could not be obtained for
MSSA while mutants with mutations in the TGase domain could be
isolated, indicating that the TGase activity of PBP2 is not essential
in the background of an MSSA strain (17). (ii) The
experiments described in this paper demonstrate that suppression of
production (transcription) of PBP2 is lethal in MSSA strains and also
in an MRSA strain with inactivated PBP2A (strain RUSA4) but not in an
MRSA strain with active PBP2A (strain COL). It follows that the
essential activity of PBP2 replaced by PBP2A must be the TPase activity.
Our data also provide direct genetic evidence that the enzymatic
activity of PBP2A is a TPase activity. Until now, the TPase activity
for PBP2A has been assumed based on homology with other PBPs and
current models of methicillin resistance in S. aureus (22). The exquisite dependence of antibiotic resistance on
an intact TGase activity of PBP2 (17) also implies that
PBP2A lacks such catalytic activity, which is in accordance with the
current classification of this protein as a class B PBP with a TPase
domain and a penicillin-insensitive second domain whose function is not known (7).
The muropeptide profiles of cell walls isolated from strain
COLpPBP2iII grown in the presence and in the absence of
IPTG (i.e., with and without PBP2) were very similar, if not identical,
supporting the genetic evidence that the TPase function of PBP2 can be
replaced by PBP2A. Under both conditions, HPLC analysis of enzymatic
peptidoglycan hydrolysates revealed the multicomponent muropeptide
profile with a high proportion of extensively cross-linked components
typical of S. aureus cell walls. Such cell walls differ
profoundly from the cell walls consisting of poorly
cross-linked, monomer- and dimer-rich peptidoglycan produced by
resistant strains of S. aureus grown in the presence of
-lactam antibiotics (Fig. 5), in which the TPase activity of PBP2A
must play a major role (4). What factors determine the
highly specific muropeptide composition of the staphylococcal
peptidoglycan are not clear at present. Previously published data
(25) clearly indicate that there is at least one
additional PBP, namely, PBP4, that plays a major role in production of
highly cross-linked staphylococcal peptidoglycan. It is likely that
PBPs act in concert, i.e., in a manner possibly similar to that of the
hypothetical multienzyme complex involved in biosynthesis of the cell
wall of E. coli (10). If such complex exists in
S. aureus, our results indicate that one of its
characteristics is enough plasticity to enable integration of new
components, such as PBP2A. However, the modest but frequent
morphological abnormalities and slower growth rates detected for the
staphylococci in which the deficit of PBP2 was compensated for by PBP2A
suggest that integration of the foreign PBP2A into the cell wall
synthetic apparatus may not be perfect.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
Mariana Pinho was supported by grant PRAXIS XXI/BD/9079/96.
Sérgio Filipe was supported by grant PRAXIS XXI/BD/9071/96.
We thank Adriano Henriques and Shangwei Wu, who kindly provided
plasmids pDH88 and pSPT181c, respectively.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratory of
Microbiology, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021. Phone: (212) 327-8278. Fax: (212) 327-8688. E-mail: tomasz{at}mail.rockefeller.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Ausubel, F. M.,
R. Brent,
R. E. Kingston,
D. D. Moore,
J. G. Seidman,
J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl.
1996.
Current protocols in molecular biology.
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
| 2.
|
Beck, W. D.,
B. Berger-Bachi, and F. H. Kayser.
1986.
Additional DNA in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and molecular cloning of mec-specific DNA.
J. Bacteriol.
165:373-378[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
de Jonge, B. L.,
Y. S. Chang,
D. Gage, and A. Tomasz.
1992.
Peptidoglycan composition of a highly methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain. The role of penicillin binding protein 2A.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:11248-11254[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
de Jonge, B. L., and A. Tomasz.
1993.
Abnormal peptidoglycan produced in a methicillin-resistant strain of Staphylococcus aureus grown in the presence of methicillin: functional role for penicillin-binding protein 2A in cell wall synthesis.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
37:342-346[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Georgopapadakou, N. H.,
B. A. Dix, and Y. R. Mauriz.
1986.
Possible physiological functions of penicillin-binding proteins in Staphylococcus aureus.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
29:333-336[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Gerogopapadakou, N. H., and F. Y. Liu.
1980.
Binding of beta-lactam antibiotics to penicillin-binding proteins of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus faecalis: relation to antibacterial activity.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
18:834-836[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Goffin, C., and J. M. Ghuysen.
1998.
Multimodular penicillin-binding proteins: an enigmatic family of orthologs and paralogs.
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
62:1079-1093[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Hayes, M. V.,
N. A. C. Curtis,
A. W. Wyke, and J. B. Ward.
1981.
Decreased affinity of a penicillin-binding protein for beta-lactam antibiotics in a clinical isolate of Staphylococcus aureus resistant to methicillin.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
10:119-122.
|
| 9.
|
Henner, D. J.
1990.
Inducible expression of regulatory genes in Bacillus subtilis.
Methods Enzymol.
185:223-228[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Holtje, J. V.
1996.
A hypothetical holoenzyme involved in the replication of the murein sacculus of Escherichia coli.
Microbiology
142:1911-1918[Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Jana, M.,
T. T. Luong,
H. Komatsuzawa,
M. Shigeta, and C. Y. Lee.
2000.
A method for demonstrating gene essentiality in Staphylococcus aureus.
Plasmid
44:100-104[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Kraemer, G. R., and J. J. Iandolo.
1990.
High-frequency transformation of Staphylococcus aureus by electroporation.
Curr. Microbiol.
21:373-376[CrossRef].
|
| 13.
|
Murakami, K.,
T. Fujimura, and M. Doi.
1994.
Nucleotide sequence of the structural gene for the penicillin-binding protein 2 of Staphylococcus aureus and the presence of a homologous gene in other staphylococci.
FEMS Microbiol Lett.
117:131-136[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Murakami, K.,
K. Nomura,
M. Doi, and T. Yoshida.
1987.
Increased susceptibility to cephamycin-type antibiotics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus defective in penicillin-binding protein 2.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
31:1423-1425[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Murakami, K., and A. Tomasz.
1989.
Involvement of multiple genetic determinants in high-level methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Bacteriol.
171:874-879[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Oshida, T., and A. Tomasz.
1992.
Isolation and characterization of a Tn551-autolysis mutant of Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Bacteriol.
174:4952-4959[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Pinho, M. G.,
H. de Lencastre, and A. Tomasz.
2001.
An acquired and a native penicillin-binding protein cooperate in building the cell wall of drug-resistant staphylococci.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
98:10886-10891[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Pinho, M. G.,
H. de Lencastre, and A. Tomasz.
2000.
Cloning, characterization, and inactivation of the gene pbpC, encoding penicillin-binding protein 3 of Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Bacteriol.
182:1074-1079[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Pinho, M. G.,
H. de Lencastre, and A. Tomasz.
1998.
Transcriptional analysis of the Staphylococcus aureus penicillin binding protein 2 gene.
J. Bacteriol.
180:6077-6081[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Pinho, M. G.,
A. M. Ludovice,
S. Wu, and H. De Lencastre.
1997.
Massive reduction in methicillin resistance by transposon inactivation of the normal PBP2 in a methicillin-resistant strain of Staphylococcus aureus.
Microb. Drug Resist.
3:409-413[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 22.
|
Song, M. D.,
M. Wachi,
M. Doi,
F. Ishino, and M. Matsuhashi.
1987.
Evolution of an inducible penicillin-target protein in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by gene fusion.
FEBS Lett.
221:167-171[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Williamson, R., and A. Tomasz.
1984.
Synthesis of penicillin-binding proteins in penicillin-treated Streptococcus pneumoniae.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
22:301-305[CrossRef].
|
| 24.
|
Wu, S.,
H. de Lencastre,
A. Sali, and A. Tomasz.
1996.
A phosphoglucomutase-like gene essential for the optimal expression of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: molecular cloning and DNA sequencing.
Microb. Drug Resist.
2:277-286[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Wyke, A. W.,
J. B. Ward,
M. V. Hayes, and N. A. Curtis.
1981.
A role in vivo for penicillin-binding protein-4 of Staphylococcus aureus.
Eur. J. Biochem.
119:389-393[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Yansura, D. G., and D. J. Henner.
1984.
Use of the Escherichia coli lac repressor and operator to control gene expression in Bacillus subtilis.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
81:439-443[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Bacteriology, November 2001, p. 6525-6531, Vol. 183, No. 22
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.22.6525-6531.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Antignac, A., Tomasz, A.
(2009). Reconstruction of the Phenotypes of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus by Replacement of the Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec with a Plasmid-Borne Copy of Staphylococcus sciuri pbpD Gene. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
53: 435-441
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lemaire, S., Fuda, C., Van Bambeke, F., Tulkens, P. M., Mobashery, S.
(2008). Restoration of Susceptibility of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to {beta}-Lactam Antibiotics by Acidic pH: ROLE OF PENICILLIN-BINDING PROTEIN PBP 2a. J. Biol. Chem.
283: 12769-12776
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Fan, X., Liu, Y., Smith, D., Konermann, L., Siu, K. W. M., Golemi-Kotra, D.
(2007). Diversity of Penicillin-binding Proteins: RESISTANCE FACTOR FmtA OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS. J. Biol. Chem.
282: 35143-35152
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Antignac, A., Sieradzki, K., Tomasz, A.
(2007). Perturbation of Cell Wall Synthesis Suppresses Autolysis in Staphylococcus aureus: Evidence for Coregulation of Cell Wall Synthetic and Hydrolytic Enzymes. J. Bacteriol.
189: 7573-7580
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Goldstein, F., Perutka, J., Cuirolo, A., Plata, K., Faccone, D., Morris, J., Sournia, A., Kitzis, M. D., Ly, A., Archer, G., Rosato, A. E.
(2007). Identification and Phenotypic Characterization of a {beta}-Lactam-Dependent, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strain. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
51: 2514-2522
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pereira, S. F. F., Henriques, A. O., Pinho, M. G., de Lencastre, H., Tomasz, A.
(2007). Role of PBP1 in Cell Division of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol.
189: 3525-3531
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nadarajah, J., Lee, M. J. S., Louie, L., Jacob, L., Simor, A. E., Louie, M., McGavin, M. J.
(2006). Identification of different clonal complexes and diverse amino acid substitutions in penicillin-binding protein 2 (PBP2) associated with borderline oxacillin resistance in Canadian Staphylococcus aureus isolates.. J Med Microbiol
55: 1675-1683
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Perichon, B., Courvalin, P.
(2006). Synergism between {beta}-Lactams and Glycopeptides against VanA-Type Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Heterologous Expression of the vanA Operon. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 3622-3630
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gardete, S., Wu, S. W., Gill, S., Tomasz, A.
(2006). Role of VraSR in Antibiotic Resistance and Antibiotic-Induced Stress Response in Staphylococcus aureus.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 3424-3434
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Leimanis, S., Hoyez, N., Hubert, S., Laschet, M., Sauvage, E., Brasseur, R., Coyette, J.
(2006). PBP5 Complementation of a PBP3 Deficiency in Enterococcus hirae.. J. Bacteriol.
188: 6298-6307
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gardete, S., de Lencastre, H., Tomasz, A.
(2006). A link in transcription between the native pbpB and the acquired mecA gene in a strain of Staphylococcus aureus.. Microbiology
152: 2549-2558
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cooper, J. E., Feil, E. J.
(2006). The phylogeny of Staphylococcus aureus - which genes make the best intra-species markers?. Microbiology
152: 1297-1305
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Terrak, M., Nguyen-Disteche, M.
(2006). Kinetic Characterization of the Monofunctional Glycosyltransferase from Staphylococcus aureus.. J. Bacteriol.
188: 2528-2532
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sobral, R. G., Ludovice, A. M., de Lencastre, H., Tomasz, A.
(2006). Role of murF in Cell Wall Biosynthesis: Isolation and Characterization of a murF Conditional Mutant of Staphylococcus aureus.. J. Bacteriol.
188: 2543-2553
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
McAleese, F., Wu, S. W., Sieradzki, K., Dunman, P., Murphy, E., Projan, S., Tomasz, A.
(2006). Overexpression of Genes of the Cell Wall Stimulon in Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus Exhibiting Vancomycin-Intermediate- S. aureus-Type Resistance to Vancomycin. J. Bacteriol.
188: 1120-1133
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Leski, T. A., Tomasz, A.
(2005). Role of Penicillin-Binding Protein 2 (PBP2) in the Antibiotic Susceptibility and Cell Wall Cross-Linking of Staphylococcus aureus: Evidence for the Cooperative Functioning of PBP2, PBP4, and PBP2A. J. Bacteriol.
187: 1815-1824
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Severin, A., Wu, S. W., Tabei, K., Tomasz, A.
(2004). Penicillin-Binding Protein 2 Is Essential for Expression of High-Level Vancomycin Resistance and Cell Wall Synthesis in Vancomycin- Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Carrying the Enterococcal vanA Gene Complex. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
48: 4566-4573
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dmitriev, B. A., Toukach, F. V., Holst, O., Rietschel, E. T., Ehlers, S.
(2004). Tertiary Structure of Staphylococcus aureus Cell Wall Murein. J. Bacteriol.
186: 7141-7148
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gardete, S., Ludovice, A. M., Sobral, R. G., Filipe, S. R., de Lencastre, H., Tomasz, A.
(2004). Role of murE in the Expression of {beta}-Lactam Antibiotic Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol.
186: 1705-1713
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Severin, A., Tabei, K., Tenover, F., Chung, M., Clarke, N., Tomasz, A.
(2004). High Level Oxacillin and Vancomycin Resistance and Altered Cell Wall Composition in Staphylococcus aureus Carrying the Staphylococcal mecA and the Enterococcal vanA Gene Complex. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 3398-3407
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rohrer, S., Berger-Bachi, B.
(2003). FemABX Peptidyl Transferases: a Link between Branched-Chain Cell Wall Peptide Formation and {beta}-Lactam Resistance in Gram-Positive Cocci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
47: 837-846
[Full Text]
-
Goffin, C., Ghuysen, J.-M.
(2002). Biochemistry and Comparative Genomics of SxxK Superfamily Acyltransferases Offer a Clue to the Mycobacterial Paradox: Presence of Penicillin-Susceptible Target Proteins versus Lack of Efficiency of Penicillin as Therapeutic Agent. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
66: 702-738
[Abstract]
[Full Text]