Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, November 2001, p. 6532-6537, Vol. 183, No. 22
Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology,
University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8W 3P6
Received 14 May 2001/Accepted 31 August 2001
Amino acid-deprived rplK (previously known as
relC) mutants of Escherichia coli cannot
activate (p)ppGpp synthetase I (RelA) and consequently exhibit relaxed
phenotypes. The rplK gene encodes ribosomal protein L11,
suggesting that L11 is involved in regulating the activity of RelA. To
investigate the role of L11 in the stringent response, a derivative of
rplK encoding L11 lacking the N-terminal 36 amino acids
(designated 'L11) was constructed. Bacteria overexpressing 'L11
exhibited a relaxed phenotype, and this was associated with an
inhibition of RelA-dependent (p)ppGpp synthesis during amino acid
deprivation. In contrast, bacteria overexpressing normal L11 exhibited
a typical stringent response. The overexpressed 'L11 was incorporated
into ribosomes and had no effect on the ribosome-binding activity of
RelA. By several methods (yeast two-hybrid, affinity blotting, and
copurification), no direct interaction was observed between the
C-terminal ribosome-binding domain of RelA and L11. To determine
whether the proline-rich helix of L11 was involved in RelA regulation,
the Pro-22 residue was replaced with Leu by site-directed mutagenesis.
The overexpression of the Leu-22 mutant derivative of L11 resulted in a
relaxed phenotype. These results indicate that the proline-rich helix
in the N terminus of L11 is involved in regulating the activity of RelA.
In Escherichia coli,
amino acid deprivation results in a comprehensive reorganization of
cellular metabolism known as the stringent response (see reference
7 for a recent review). The types of metabolic changes
observed suggest that the stringent response is designed to promote the
survival of the starved bacterium. One of the hallmarks of the
stringent response is the rapid intracellular accumulation of guanosine
5'-triphosphate 3'diphosphate (pppGpp) and guanosine
3',5'-bispyrophosphate (ppGpp). These nucleotides are collectively
designated (p)ppGpp. They are believed to play a central role in
signalling starvation and in mediating the various metabolic changes
that constitute the stringent response.
In amino acid-deprived bacteria, the synthesis of (p)ppGpp is catalyzed
by ppGpp synthetase I, the product of the relA gene (7). The synthesis of ppGpp during the stringent response
is ribosome dependent, and RelA has been shown to be associated with the 50S subunit of the ribosome (22). The ppGpp synthetase
activity is associated with a 455-residue N-terminal fragment of RelA
(26). This fragment is constitutively active and is not
ribosome associated. The C-terminal portion of RelA represents the
regulatory domain which involves ribosome-binding and oligomerization
(14). Amino acid deprivation restricts the levels of the
corresponding aminoacyl-tRNA species. The in vitro studies of Haseltine
et al. (15) indicate that the synthesis of (p)ppGpp is
associated with the codon-specified binding of an uncharged tRNA
species to the acceptor site on the ribosome and the resulting stall in
polypeptide chain elongation. A conformational change during this event
may activate RelA.
Mutations that confer relaxed phenotypes cause the inhibition of
(p)ppGpp accumulation by amino acid-deprived E. coli. Such mutations map in either the relA (1) or the
relC (11, 20) genes. The relC gene
was later shown to be identical to rplK, the gene encoding
ribosomal protein L11. This suggests that L11 plays a role in
regulating the stringent response. The basis for the relaxed phenotype
of rplK (relC) has not been determined. Here we
report that the N-terminal domain of L11 is involved in the regulation
of RelA activity. We show that the overexpression of a derivative of
L11 lacking a 36-amino-acid N-terminal segment resulted in the
inhibition of the RelA-dependent synthesis of (p)ppGpp and in the
concomitant relaxation of the stringent response in amino acid-deprived
relA+ bacteria. This N-terminal segment contains
a proline-rich helix which is involved in regulating the elongation
cycle of translation (8, 34). The Pro-22 residue of the
proline-rich helix is shown, by site-directed mutagenesis, to be
involved in RelA regulation.
E. coli strains.
Strain W3110 was a prototrophic
derivative of E. coli K-12 from our laboratory collection.
Strain VC6216 was a derivative of W3110 which was lysogenized with
phage General recombinant DNA techniques.
The procedures for
plasmid and genomic DNA purification, restriction endonuclease
digestion, DNA ligation, and PCR amplification were those described by
Sambrook et al. (25). Restriction endonucleases and T4 DNA
ligase were purchased from New England BioLabs Inc.
Cloning of the E. coli rplK and 'rplK
genes.
The rplK gene was amplified by PCR from strain
W3110 genomic DNA. The primers used for this purpose were
5'-GGGGGATCCTAATGGCTAAGAAAGTACAAGCCTA-3' and
5'-TGCGTCGACTTTCTCGCGGATAACACGC-3'. They were designed to introduce BamHI and SalI restriction sites on the
5' and the 3' ends of rplK, respectively. The amplified PCR
product was cloned into the BamHI-SalI-digested
vector, pET30c(+) (Novagen), to generate the plasmid pXY51. Thus, in
pXY51 the E. coli rplK gene was fused to His-tag and S-tag
sequences at its 5' terminus and was under the control of a phage T7 promoter.
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.22.6532-6537.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Involvement of the N Terminus of Ribosomal Protein
L11 in Regulation of the RelA Protein of Escherichia
coli

and
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
DE3 (obtained from Novagen). The
DE3 prophage contains the
gene encoding phage T7 RNA polymerase under the control of the
lac promoter. VC6216 was specifically constructed for the
purpose of expressing genes controlled by the T7 promoter. Cells were
routinely grown in a gyrotory shaker at 30°C in Luria broth
(LB) (Difco), M9 minimal medium (19), or modified M53
low-phosphate medium (4).

View larger version (8K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Relevant characteristics of plasmids pXY41, pXY51, and
pXY54. Plasmid pXY51 is a derivative of pET30c(+) carrying the complete
rplK gene, represented by the thick black line. The
BamHI and SalI sites at 5' and 3' ends,
respectively, were introduced through PCR primers. Plasmid pXY41 is a
derivative of pET30a(+) carrying 'rplK, which contains a
deletion extending from the 5' terminus of rplK to the
EcoRI site (nucleotide 109). Plasmid pXY54 is a derivative
of pXY51 which contains a change of Pro-22 to Leu-22 (*) created by
site-directed mutagenesis. Abbreviations: AI, AvaI; AII,
AvaII; B, BamHI; E, EcoRI; P,
PstI; S, SalI.
Site-directed mutagenesis of rplK. A derivative of rplK encoding a mutant L11 protein in which Pro-22 was changed to Leu-22 was constructed by site-directed mutagenesis. The sequence of the mutagenic primer was 5'-GGCTAACCCGAGTCTGCCAGTAGG-3'. PCR amplification of rplK was carried out using this primer and the 3' end primer for the wild-type rplK gene. The PCR product was digested with AvaI and SalI. The AvaI-SalI fragment of the wild-type rplK gene in pXY51 was replaced by the mutant PCR product to generate plasmid pXY54 containing the mutant derivative of rplK designated mrplK (Fig. 1). The change of Pro-22 to Leu-22 was confirmed by an amino acid sequence determination of the purified mutant L11 protein performed by the Protein Chemistry Center of the University of Victoria.
Expression and purification of L11 and 'L11.
The methods for
expression and purification of the L11 and 'L11 recombinant proteins
were according to procedures described in the pET System Manual
(Novagen). In summary, exponential-phase cultures of VC6216 carrying
either pXY41 or pXY51 grown in LB at 30°C were induced by adding 0.5 mM isopropyl-
-D-galactoside (IPTG). After 3 h of
incubation bacteria were harvested by centrifugation and broken by
sonication. The recombinant His-tag L11 and His-tag 'L11 proteins in
the crude extracts were purified by His-tag affinity chromatography
(His-Bind Resin; Novagen).
Cloning of 'relA. Plasmid pALS10 (30) contains the complete relA gene. A PstI-BamHI fragment from pALS10, encoding the C terminus of RelA, was subcloned from pALS10 into the vector pGEX-5X-1 (Pharmacia) to create plasmid pXY37. This C-terminal fragment, designated 'RelA, represents amino acid residues 455 to 743 of RelA. This region contains the ribosome-binding domain of RelA (14). The 'RelA fragment in plasmid pXY37 contains glutathione S-transferase (GST) fused to its N terminus.
Effect of L11 and L11 derivatives on the stringent response. An exponential-phase culture of VC6216 carrying pXY41, pXY51, or pXY54 was grown in M9 minimal medium until it reached a density of about 2 × 108 cells per ml. The culture was divided into two portions, and 0.5 mM IPTG was added to one of these to induce the synthesis of L11, 'L11, or mL11. After 40 min, [5,6-3H]uracil (Amersham Corp.) was added to each of the two cultures at a final concentration of 1 µg per ml (0.5 µCi per ml). After an additional 20 min of incubation, each culture was further subdivided as indicated in Fig. 3 and 6, and portions were subjected to amino acid deprivation in the presence and absence of IPTG. From this point on the 100-µl samples were removed from the cultures at the indicated times, and the incorporation of [5,6-3H]uracil into cold trichloroacetic acid (TCA)-insoluble fractions was determined as described previously (17). Amino acid deprivation was achieved by the addition of either L-valine (13) or DL-serine hydroxamate (33) to cultures, each at 500 µg per ml. In addition to the amino acid-deprived cultures, an untreated control culture and a culture that was treated with IPTG alone were included in all experiments. In one experiment (see Fig. 3A), we relaxed the stringent response by treating an amino acid-deprived culture with 100 µg of chloramphenicol per ml (6).
Synthesis of (p)ppGpp. The synthesis of (p)ppGpp was measured in VC6216 carrying pXY41 grown in the modified M56LP medium of Bell (4). 32Pi (New England Nuclear; 40 µCi per ml) was added to an exponential-phase culture containing 2 × 108 cells per ml. One hour later the culture was divided into four portions as described in the legend to Fig. 4. One portion was a control that did not receive any further treatment for the duration of the experiment. Two of the portions received IPTG at 0.5 mM to induce the expression of 'L11. After one additional hour of incubation, the fourth portion and one of the IPTG-treated portions were subjected to amino acid deprivation by adding L-valine at 500 µg per ml. Ten minutes later, 200-µl samples were removed from each of the four cultures. Each sample was extracted with 20 µl of 11 M formic acid on ice for 30 min. The samples were centrifuged to remove cell debris, and 10-µl aliquots of the extracts were applied to a polyethyleneimine cellulose thin-layer chromatography plate (Aldrich Chemical Company Inc.). The chromatogram was developed in 1.5 M KH2PO4. The developed chromatogram was scanned on a Molecular Dynamics Storm PhosphorImager.
Ribosome preparation. Ribosomes were prepared by the methods of Gentry and Cashel (12) and Homann and Nierhaus (16) with minor modifications. Briefly, bacteria were collected by centrifugation and washed once with Ribosome Buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 14 mM MgCl, 10 mM K acetate, 1 mM dithiothreitol). The washed cells were resuspended in Ribosome Buffer and disrupted by sonication. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 30 min. The ribosomes were then recovered by centrifugation at 160,000 × g for 3 h. The ribosome pellets were resuspended in Ribosome Buffer and repurified in a two-step process. The crude ribosomes were first subjected to low-speed centrifugation (14,000 × g for 30 min), and the ribosomes in the supernatant from this step were pelleted by high-speed centrifugation (160,000 × g for 150 min). The concentration of ribosomes was estimated by measuring the absorbance of the preparation at 260 nm.
SDS-PAGE and Western blotting. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and Western blotting were performed according to methods described by Ausubel et al. (2). To detect L11 or 'L11, Western blots were developed with polyclonal rabbit antibodies prepared against 'L11. Alternatively, a monoclonal antibody specific for S-tag (alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-S-tag antibody; Novagen) was used. A polyclonal rabbit antibody preparation specific for RelA was used for detection of 'RelA.
Yeast two-hybrid techniques. The yeast two-hybrid technique was used in an attempt to determine whether L11 interacts with RelA. The technique was based on the Matchmaker Two-Hybrid System 3 (Clontech). The two cloning vectors, pGBKT7 and pGADT7, contain the GAL4 DNA-binding and activation domains, respectively. The BamHI-SalI fragment from pXY51 containing the complete rplK gene was subcloned into pGBKT7 and pGADT7 to yield plasmids pXY49 and pXY48, respectively. The source of the relA gene was plasmid pALS10 (30). We subcloned the PstI-BamHI fragment from pALS10 into pGBKT7 and pGADT7 to yield plasmids pXY62 and pXY63, respectively. As noted above, this fragment ('relA) encoded the C-terminal half of RelA, designated 'RelA, which contains the ribosome-binding domain of the enzyme (14). Plasmids pGBKT7-53 and pGADT7-T are positive controls encoding murine p53 fused to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain and simian virus 40 (SV40) T antigen fused to the GAL4 activation domain, respectively; these two proteins are known to interact with each other.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (MATa trp1-901 leu2-3,112 ura3-52 his3-200 gal4
gal80
LYS2::GAL1UAS
GAL1TATAHIS3 GAL2UAS
GALITATA
ADE2 ura3::MELUAS
MEL1TATA
lacZ) was used as a host for the two-hybrid plasmids. Yeast were grown at
30°C in either YPD or SD synthetic medium as described in
the Clontech User Manual for the Matchmaker System. In this system, a
positive yeast two-hybrid was indicated by growth on SD medium lacking
histidine, adenine, leucine, and tryptophan as well as by a high level
of
-galactosidase activity from a reporter gene as measured by the
method of Miller (19).
Attempt to demonstrate RelA-L11 interaction by affinity blotting. The wild-type RelA protein was overexpressed in strain W3110 carrying plasmid pALS10 by induction with 1 mM IPTG for 2 h at 30°C. A crude extract prepared by sonication of these cells was fractionated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The blot was incubated for 2 days at 4°C in a solution composed of 20 mM HEPES buffer at pH 7.9, 20% glycerol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl, and 5% skim milk. The membrane was rinsed twice with HEPES buffer and incubated overnight at 4°C with purified L11 (from expression of pXY51). The blot was then probed with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-S-tag antibody (Novagen) to detect any bound L11.
Attempt to demonstrate 'RelA-L11 interaction by affinity chromatography. The GST-'RelA fusion protein was overexpressed in strain W3110 carrying plasmid pXY37 by induction with 0.1 mM IPTG for 2 h at 30°C. The GST-'RelA in a crude extract, prepared by sonication of these cells, was adsorbed to a Glutathione Sepharose 4B column (Pharmacia) according to a protocol provided by Pharmacia. A preparation of His-tag L11, purified as described above, was then loaded on the column. After the column was extensively washed with phosphate-buffered saline the adsorbed protein fraction was eluted with glutathione elution buffer (Pharmacia). The adsorbed fraction was analyzed in a Western blot developed with anti-S-tag antibody to detect L11.
Reproducibility of experiments. All of the experiments described here were performed at least three times. The results in all cases were completely reproducible.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Expression and purification of the wild-type and truncated L11
protein.
Plasmid pXY51 carries the complete rplK gene
(Fig. 1). Figure 2A shows that the
expression of rplK in pXY51 yielded a protein of
approximately 21 kDa, which is consistent with the expected molecular
size of L11 fused to His-tag and S-tag sequences (lanes 4 and 5). A
truncated derivative of rplK, designated 'rplK,
was cloned into plasmid pXY41 (Fig. 1). The 'rplK gene
encoded a derivative of L11 containing a deletion of 36 amino acids at
its N terminus. When 'rplK was expressed, a protein of 17 kDa was produced (Fig. 2A, lanes 1 and 2). Both 'L11 and L11 were
readily purified by affinity chromatography (lanes 3 and 6, respectively). The identities of the purified 'L11 and L11 proteins
were verified in Western blots developed with anti-S-tag antibodies
(Fig. 2B, lanes 3 and 6, respectively).
|
Effects of N-terminal deletion fragment of L11 protein on stringent
response and accumulation of ppGpp.
Since a mutation in
rplK (i.e., relC) is known to confer a relaxed
phenotype, we tested the effects of overexpressing either L11 or 'L11
on the stringent response. Figure 3A
shows the effect of the overproduction of L11 on the incorporation of
[3H]uracil into cold TCA-insoluble fractions. Strain
VC6216 carrying plasmid pXY51 exhibited a normal stringent response.
Thus, amino acid deprivation inhibited [3H]uracil
incorporation (compare curves a and b). Moreover,
[3H]uracil incorporation was relaxed when the amino
acid-deprived bacteria were treated with chloramphenicol (curve c). The
addition of IPTG to induce the rplK gene on pXY51 prior to
amino acid deprivation did not affect the stringent response (curve d).
However, IPTG induction had a slight inhibitory effect on RNA synthesis
in growing bacteria (curve e), and this probably reflects the
inhibitory effect of IPTG induction on bacterial growth.
|
|
Incorporation of L11 and 'L11 into ribosomes. Ribosomes were purified from strain VC6216 carrying either pXY41 or pXY51. They were used to confirm that the recombinant L11 protein was incorporated into ribosomes and to determine whether the N-terminal deletion in 'L11 prevented this from happening. The ribosomal proteins from these preparations were analyzed in Western blots using anti-S-tag antibodies to detect the recombinant ribosomal proteins. Both L11 and 'L11 were readily detected (data not shown; see Fig. 5A). These results indicate that the N-terminal deletion in L11 did not affect its incorporation into ribosomes.
Effect of 'L11 on RelA-ribosome interaction.
The effect of
'L11 on the interaction of RelA with ribosomes was determined under the
experimental conditions described in the legend to Fig. 3B. A culture
of strain VC6216 carrying pXY41 was grown in M9 minimal medium and was
divided into two portions, and one of the portions was treated with
IPTG at 500 µM for 60 min. Ribosomes prepared from these cultures
were then analyzed for 'L11 and RelA by Western blotting. As shown in
Fig. 5A (lane 2), the overexpressed 'L11
was efficiently incorporated into ribosomes. Moreover, Fig. 5B shows
that the ribosomes from the uninduced and the induced cultures had
similar amounts of bound RelA, indicating that the presence of 'L11 had
no significant effect on RelA-ribosome interaction. Therefore, the
inhibition of ppGpp accumulation in amino acid-deprived bacteria
overproducing 'L11 was not due to the inability of RelA to bind
ribosomes.
|
Influence of proline-rich helix of L11 on RelA regulation.
The
deletion in 'L11 removes a key region known as the proline-rich helix
(8, 34). To determine whether this region was involved in
RelA regulation, one residue in the proline-rich helix, Pro-22, was
changed to Leu-22 by site-directed mutagenesis to create plasmid pXY54.
The effect of overexpressing the resulting mutant protein, L11Leu-22,
on the incorporation of [3H]uracil into cold
TCA-insoluble material was tested as described in the legend to Fig.
6. Curve a represents an untreated
control culture of VC6216 carrying pXY54. The other cultures shown were induced with 0.5 mM IPTG for 60 min and then subjected to isoleucine deprivation at 0 min. As already described, the stringent response was
not affected when VC6216 with overexpressed levels of the wild-type L11
was amino acid deprived (curve b). In contrast, the overexpression of
either 'L11 (curve c) or L11Leu-22 (curve d) resulted in the relaxation
of the stringent response. These results indicate that Pro-22 plays an
essential role in regulating the activity of RelA.
|
Attempts to demonstrate L11-RelA interaction.
Table
1 summarizes the results of a yeast
two-hybrid analysis designed to test whether L11 interacts with 'RelA,
the ribosome-binding domain of RelA. Transformant 1 was a negative
control carrying the cloning vectors. Transformant 2 was a positive
control carrying two-hybrid plasmids encoding two proteins, murine p53
and SV40 T antigen, that are known to interact with each other.
Transformant 3 carried plasmids encoding 'RelA fused to the
GAL4 DNA-binding domain and L11 fused to the GAL4
activation domain. This transformant clearly exhibited a negative
two-hybrid test. As a check, the roles of the proteins were reversed in
transformant 4. In this case, the L11 protein was fused to the
GAL4 DNA-binding domain and the 'RelA protein was fused to
the GAL4 activation domain. The results for this
transformant were also negative. Therefore, L11 apparently does not
bind to 'RelA.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The removal of the C-terminal ribosome-binding domain of RelA results in a metabolically unstable constitutive ppGpp synthetase (26, 30), indicating that the ribosome plays an important role in regulating RelA-dependent (p)ppGpp synthesis. The existence of rplK (relC) mutants implicates ribosomal protein L11 in the regulation of RelA activity during the stringent response in E. coli (11, 20). In fact, L11 has, so far, been the only ribosomal protein demonstrated to be involved in the regulation of RelA. However, the basis for the relaxed phenotype of the rplK (relC) mutants has not been determined.
The involvement of L11 in the regulation of RelA activity is especially interesting in view of its important functional role in the bacterial ribosome. L11 is complexed to a 58-nucleotide segment (nucleotides 1051 to 1108) of 23S rRNA (34). The elongation factors, EF-Tu and EF-G, bind to overlapping sites on the ribosome (5, 23). The L11-23S rRNA complex is involved in regulating the activities of EF-Tu and EF-G in the elongation cycle of translation, and because the elongation factors are GTPases the L11-rRNA complex has been referred to as the GTPase-associated site (9). The complex is highly conserved in Bacteria and Archaea, and its crystal structure has recently been solved at 2.8- and 2.6-Å resolution by Conn et al. (8) and Wimberly et al. (34), respectively. The rRNA domain is precisely folded, and the crystal structure suggests that the primary role of L11 is to stabilize the tertiary structure of the rRNA (8). Two domains have been characterized in L11 (34). A C-terminal domain is tightly bound to the tertiary structure of RNA and is responsible for stabilizing its conformation. There are only limited contacts between the RNA and the N-terminal domain of L11. An N-terminal domain is involved in the cooperative binding of thiopeptide antibiotics such as thiostrepton, as discussed below.
We have shown here that bacteria exhibited a relaxed phenotype when 'L11 was overexpressed. On the other hand, the stringent response was unaffected when the complete L11 protein was overexpressed. Overexpressed 'L11 was incorporated into ribosomes and did not affect the binding of RelA. These results indicate that the 36-amino acid N terminus of L11 played an essential role in the activation of RelA during amino acid deprivation. In this regard, it is notable that the ribosomes from the original relC mutant were found to still bind RelA (11). Although the nucleotide sequence of the L11 mutation in this strain has not been reported, it is clear that it affects the activity of RelA, which, in an in vitro assay, was less than 10% of the activity exhibited by the wild type.
Results from both in vitro and in vivo experiments implicate an association between RelA and the thiostrepton-binding site on the ribosome (15, 27, 28, 31). For example, thiostrepton inhibits in vitro RelA-dependent (p)ppGpp synthesis (15, 31). High-affinity binding of thiostrepton to ribosomes requires the L11-rRNA complex (32, 35). Thiostrepton-binding involves nucleotides A1067 and A1095 of 23S rRNA (24) and the proline-rich helix of the L11 N-terminal domain (21, 32, 35). Our results further substantiate a relationship between RelA and the thiostrepton-binding site on L11. To prove that the L11 proline-rich helix was directly involved in regulating RelA, we created the L11Leu-22 derivative. We based the construction of this derivative on the observation that mutations in Pro-22 of L11 confer resistance to thiostrepton (21).
The mechanism by which L11 regulates RelA activity is still unknown. However, considerable progress has been made in elucidating the function of L11, and this information could be useful in formulating a working hypothesis. Based on the L11-23S rRNA crystal structure, Wimberly et al. (34) hypothesize that the N-terminal domain of L11 may represent a molecular switch that alternates between RNA-bound and RNA-free states during the ribosomal elongation cycle. This switching mechanism is proposed to be controlled by the binding of the elongation factors. The results of studies on the action of thiostrepton support this proposal (9, 21). It is noteworthy that, despite the apparent critical function of L11 in translation, E. coli mutants that completely lack this protein are viable (10, 29). To account for this, Wimberly et al. (34) suggest that the putative N-terminal switch may function by regulating the conformation or the accessibility of the RNA in the GTPase-associated site. These L11-deficient mutants may be useful in future studies on RelA regulation.
It has long been hypothesized that the activity of RelA is controlled by conformational changes in the ribosome. To date, we have been unable to demonstrate a direct interaction between L11 and RelA, suggesting that L11, through its N-terminal domain, indirectly controls RelA activation during the stringent response. Our data implicate the involvement of the proposed L11 N-terminal switch domain, and it is possible that this switch promotes the conformational change necessary to activate RelA during amino acid deprivation. Since there are no direct contacts between L11 and other ribosomal proteins (3), the putative L11 N-terminal switch may mediate RelA activation through 23S rRNA.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
|---|
This work was supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 3055, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8W 3P6. Phone: (250) 721 7077. Fax: (250) 721 8855. E-mail: eishuv{at}uvvm.uvic.ca.
We dedicate this paper to the memory of our friend and colleague,
Alistair T. Matheson, who passed away on 18 May 2001.
Present address: Department of Genetics, Yale University, New
Haven, CT 06510-3206.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Alfoldi, L., G. S. Stent, and R. C. Clowes. 1962. The chromosomal site for the RNA control (R.C.) locus in E. coli. J. Mol. Biol. 5:348-355[Medline]. |
| 2. | Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Sediman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl. 1994. Current protocols in molecular biology. Greene Publishing Associates & Wiley Interscience, New York, N.Y. |
| 3. |
Ban, N.,
P. Nissen,
J. Hansen,
P. B. Moore, and T. A. Steitz.
2000.
The complete atomic structure of the large ribosomal subunit at 2.4 Å resolution.
Science
289:905-920 |
| 4. |
Bell, R. M.
1974.
Mutants of Escherichia coli defective in membrane phospholipid synthesis: macromolecular synthesis in an sn-glycerol 3-phosphate acyltransferase Km mutant.
J. Bacteriol.
117:1065-1076 |
| 5. |
Cabrer, B.,
D. Vasquez, and J. Modolell.
1972.
Inhibition by elongation factor EF G of aminoacyl-tRNA binding to ribosomes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
69:733-736 |
| 6. |
Cashel, M.
1969.
The control of ribonucleic acid synthesis in Escherichia coli. IV. Relevance of unusual phosphorylated compounds from amino acid starved stringent strains.
J. Biol. Chem.
244:3133-3141 |
| 7. | Cashel, M., D. R. Gentry, V. J. Hernandez, and D. Vinella. 1996. The stringent response, p. 1458-1496. In F. C. Neidhardt, et al. (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed. ASM Press, Washington, D.C. |
| 8. |
Conn, G. L.,
D. E. Draper,
F. E. Lattman, and A. G. Gittis.
1999.
Crystal structure of a conserved ribosomal protein-RNA complex.
Science
284:1171-1174 |
| 9. | Cundliffe, E. 1986. Involvement of specific portions of ribosomal RNA is defined ribosomal functions: a study utilizing antibiotics, p. 586-604. In B. Hardesty, and G. Kramer (ed.), Structure, function, and genetics of ribosomes. Springer-Verlag, New York, N.Y. |
| 10. |
Dabbs, E. R.
1979.
Selection for Escherichia coli mutants with proteins missing from the ribosome.
J. Bacteriol.
140:734-737 |
| 11. |
Friesen, J. D.,
N. P. Fiil,
J. M. Parker, and W. A. Haseltine.
1974.
A new relaxed mutant of Escherichia coli with an altered 50S ribosomal subunit.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
71:3465-3469 |
| 12. |
Gentry, D. R., and M. Cashel.
1995.
Cellular localization of the Escherichia coli SpoT protein.
J. Bacteriol.
177:3890-3893 |
| 13. | Glover, S. W. 1962. Valine-resistant mutants of Escherichia coli K-12. Genet. Res. 3:448-460. |
| 14. |
Gropp, M.,
Y. Strausz,
M. Gross, and G. Glaser.
2001.
Regulation of Escherichia coli RelA requires oligomerization of the C-terminal domain.
J. Bacteriol.
183:570-579 |
| 15. | Haseltine, W. A., R. Block, W. Gilbert, and K. Weber. 1972. MSI and MSII are made on ribosomes in an idling step of protein synthesis Nature 238:381-384[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 16. | Homann, H. E., and K. H. Nierhaus. 1971. Ribosomal proteins. Protein compositions of biosynthetic precursors and artificial subparticles from ribosomal subunits in Escherichia coli K-12. Eur. J. Biochem. 20:249-257[Medline]. |
| 17. |
Ishiguro, E. E., and W. D. Ramey.
1976.
Stringent control of peptidoglycan biosynthesis in Escherichia coli K-12.
J. Bacteriol.
127:1119-1126 |
| 18. | Lund, E., and N. O. Kjeldgaard. 1972. Metabolism of guanosine tetraphosphate in Escherichia coli. Eur. J. Biochem. 28:316-326[Medline]. |
| 19. | Miller, J. H. 1972. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 20. | Parker, J., R. J. Watson, and J. D. Friesen. 1976. A relaxed mutant with an altered ribosomal protein L11. Mol. Gen. Genet. 144:111-114[Medline]. |
| 21. | Porse, B. T., I. Leviev, A. S. Mankin, and R. A. Garrett. 1998. The antibiotic thiostrepton inhibits a functional transition within protein L11 at the ribosomal GTPase centre. J. Mol. Biol. 276:391-404[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 22. |
Ramagopal, S., and B. D. Davis.
1974.
Localization of the stringent protein of Escherichia coli on the 50S ribosomal subunit.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
71:820-824 |
| 23. |
Richman, N., and J. W. Bodley.
1972.
Ribosomes cannot interact simultaneously with elongation factors EF Tu and EF G.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
69:686-689 |
| 24. |
Rosendahl, G., and S. Douthwaite.
1994.
The antibiotics micrococcin and thiostrepton interact directly with 23S rRNA nucleotides 1067A and 1095A.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:357-363 |
| 25. | Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 26. |
Schreiber, G.,
S. Metzger,
E. Aizenman,
S. Roza,
M. Cashel, and G. Glaser.
1991.
Overexpression of the relA gene in Escherichia coli.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:3760-3767 |
| 27. | Smith, I., P. Paress, K. Cabane, and E. Dubnau. 1980. Genetics and physiology of the rel system of Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Gen. Genet. 178:271-279[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 28. |
Smith, I.,
P. Paress, and S. Pestka.
1978.
Thiostrepton-resistant mutants exhibit relaxed synthesis of RNA.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
75:5993-5997 |
| 29. |
Stöffler, G.,
E. Cundliffe,
M. Stöffler-Meilicke, and E. R. Dabbs.
1980.
Mutants of Escherichia coli lacking ribosomal protein L11.
J. Biol. Chem.
255:10517-105122 |
| 30. |
Svitil, A. L.,
M. Cashel, and J. W. Zyskind.
1993.
Guanosine tetraphosphate inhibits protein synthesis in vivo. A possible protective mechanism for starvation stress in Escherichia coli.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:2307-2311 |
| 31. |
Sy, J.
1974.
Reversibility of the pyrophosphoryl transfer from ATP to GTP by Escherichia coli stringent factor.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
71:3470-3473 |
| 32. | Thompson, J., E. Cundliffe, and M. Stark. 1979. Binding of thiostrepton to a complex of 23-S rRNA with ribosomal protein L11. Eur. J. Biochem. 98:261-265[Medline]. |
| 33. |
Tosa, T., and L. I. Pizer.
1971.
Effect of serine hydroxamate on the growth of Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
106:966-971 |
| 34. | Wimberly, B. T., R. Guymon, J. P. McCutcheon, S. W. White, S. W., and v. Ramakrishnan. 1999. A detailed view of a ribosomal active site: the structure of the L11-RNA complex. Cell 97:491-502[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 35. | Xing, Y., and D. E. Draper. 1996. Cooperative interactions of RNA and thiostrepton antibiotic with two domains of ribosomal protein L11. Biochemistry 35:1581-1588[CrossRef][Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»