Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, December 2001, p. 7110-7119, Vol. 183, No. 24
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.24.7110-7119.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Transcriptional Analysis of the
tet(P) Operon from Clostridium
perfringens
Priscilla A.
Johanesen,
Dena
Lyras,
Trudi L.
Bannam, and
Julian I.
Rood*
Bacterial Pathogenesis Research Group,
Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia
Received 28 June 2001/Accepted 26 September 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The Clostridium perfringens tetracycline resistance
determinant from the 47-kb conjugative R-plasmid pCW3 is unique in that it consists of two overlapping genes, tetA(P) and
tetB(P), which mediate resistance by different
mechanisms. Detailed transcriptional analysis has shown that the
inducible tetA(P) and tetB(P) genes comprise an operon that is transcribed from a single promoter, P3,
located 529 bp upstream of the tetA(P) start codon.
Deletion of P3 or alteration of the spacing between the
35 and
10
regions significantly reduced the level of transcription in a reporter construct. Induction was shown to be mediated at the level of transcription. Unexpectedly, a factor-independent terminator, T1, was
detected downstream of P3 but before the start of the tetA(P) gene. Deletion or mutation of this terminator
led to increased read-through transcription in the reporter construct.
It is postulated that the T1 terminator is an intrinsic control element
of the tet(P) operon and that it acts to prevent the
overexpression of the TetA(P) transmembrane protein, even in the
presence of tetracycline.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The Tet P determinant from the 47-kb
conjugative R-plasmid pCW3 from Clostridium perfringens is
unique among tetracycline resistance determinants in that it consists
of two overlapping genes, tetA(P) and tetB(P),
which mediate resistance by different mechanisms. The
tetA(P) gene is 1,260 bp in length and encodes a 46-kDa
protein, TetA(P), which is responsible for the active efflux of
tetracycline from the cell (44). The TetA(P) protein is
predicted to contain 12 transmembrane domains but is atypical because
it does not have the typical structure or conserved motifs that are
common to the other classes of tetracycline efflux proteins (7,
21). The tetB(P) gene, which overlaps the
tetA(P) gene by 17 nucleotides (nt), is 1,956 bp in length
and encodes a putative 72.6-kDa protein. The TetB(P) protein has
significant amino acid sequence identity (37 to 39%) to Tet(M)-like
cytoplasmic ribosomal protection proteins (44).
The tet(P) genes are the most widely distributed
tetracycline resistance genes in C. perfringens,
being found in both conjugative and nonconjugative
tetracycline-resistant strains from diverse geographical locations and
environmental sources (1, 24). Conjugative transfer of
tetracycline resistance is invariably associated with plasmids that are
either identical to or closely related to pCW3 (2, 3, 41).
In these conjugative isolates, resistance is inducible. Inducible
resistance is also observed when pCW3 is introduced into derivatives of
strains CW234 and CW362, whereas in a strain 13 background tetracycline
resistance is constitutively expressed, suggesting that induction
requires an as-yet-unidentified host-encoded factor (19,
38). Resistance is also constitutively expressed in
nonconjugative isolates.
Analysis of the approximately 1 kb of sequence data that are available
upstream of tetA(P) (44) has revealed that this
region is AT rich, having an overall G+C content of 22%, which is
similar to the normal 24 to 27% G+C content of C. perfringens DNA (9, 20). There is a highly
AT-rich region between bp 377 and 575, which has a G+C content of only
14% (44). Although several sequences with similarity to
the consensus C. perfringens
70-like promoter sequence (39)
can be identified, the AT-rich nature of the upstream region has
prevented the precise identification of the tet(P) promoter.
No recognizable promoter appears to be present between the start codons
of the tetA(P) and tetB(P) genes, and a potential
factor-independent terminator (
G =
21.3 kcal mol
1) is present at the end of the
tetB(P) gene, suggesting that these genes comprise an operon
(44).
The objective of this study was to carry out detailed transcriptional
analysis of the pCW3-encoded tet(P) genes. The results have
shown that the tetA(P) and tetB(P) genes comprise
an operon that is transcribed from a single promoter, P3, located 529 bp upstream of the tetA(P) start codon. Induction was shown
to be at the level of transcription. A potential factor-independent terminator, T1, which is located some 390 bp downstream from the transcriptional start point but before the start of the
tetA(P) gene, was also identified.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains and plasmids.
The bacterial plasmids used
in this study are described in Table 1.
Escherichia coli strains were derivatives of DH5
(Life Technologies) and were routinely grown at 37°C in 2× yeast
extract-tryptone (YT) supplemented with ampicillin (100 µg/ml),
chloramphenicol (20 µg/ml), erythromycin (150 µg/ml), or
tetracycline (10 µg/ml). C. perfringens strains
were derivatives of the chlorate- and streptomycin-resistant strain
JIR33 (19) and were cultured under anaerobic conditions at
37°C in fluid thioglycolate medium (Difco), nutrient broth (38), or Trypticase peptone glucose broth
(40). Solid media were prepared by the addition of 1.5%
(wt/vol) bacteriological agar (Oxoid) prior to sterilization.
C. perfringens strains grown on agar medium were
incubated in an atmosphere of 80% N2-10%
H2-10% CO2 in an
anaerobic jar (Oxoid) or in an anaerobic chamber (COY Laboratory
Products Inc.). Antibiotics were added where appropriate, unless
otherwise stated, to the indicated concentrations: chloramphenicol (5 µg/ml), erythromycin (50 µg/ml), tetracycline (0.5 or 5 µg/ml), or streptomycin (1 mg/ml). Potassium chlorate-resistant
(chlorate-resistant) strains were cultured on the appropriate solid
medium containing 1% (vol/vol) saturated potassium chlorate solution.
DNA isolation and molecular techniques.
Plasmid DNA was
routinely isolated from E. coli strains using
either the Magic Minipreps DNA Purification System (Promega), the High
Pure Plasmid Isolation kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), or an
alkaline lysis method (32). Plasmid DNA was prepared from C. perfringens cells as previously described
(4, 27). Restriction endonuclease digestion and ligation
of DNA were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Transformation of E. coli (42) and C. perfringens (43) cells was performed as
described previously. PCR amplification was carried out with
Taq DNA polymerase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). PCR products for nucleotide sequencing and cloning were purified as described previously (26).
Nucleotide sequence analysis was performed either by the
dideoxynucleotide chain termination method using a T7 Sequencing
kit
(Pharmacia) or the ABI PRISM Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing
Ready
Reaction kit (PE Applied Biosystems) and an ABI 373A automated
fluorescent sequencing apparatus in accordance with the manufacturer's
instructions. Sequence analysis was carried out with Sequencher
3.0 software (Gene Codes Corporation). Oligonucleotide primers
(Table
2) used for the preparation of probes,
reverse transcriptase
PCR (RT-PCR), nucleotide sequencing, or primer
extension were
synthesized using a 392 DNA/RNA synthesizer (PE Applied
Biosystems).
Construction of the tetA(P)-catP
transcriptional fusion, pJIR1438.
An 839-bp pJIR71-derived
HindIII/SphI fragment, which carried the
upstream region and the start of the tetA(P) gene
(44), was cloned into the C. perfringens promoter probe shuttle vector pPSV
(29) to construct pJIR1438.
Construction of the deletion derivatives pJIR1617, pJIR1618, and
pJIR1494.
These deletion derivatives were constructed from a
pJIR1438 template by splice overlap extension (SOE)-PCR (15,
16). Initially, for each deletion two separate PCRs were
performed with pJIR1438 as a template. The first PCR, using the primers
UP and either 4393, 4392, or 4403 (Table 2), amplified the DNA upstream
of each of the respective primer extension endpoints. The second PCR
utilized primers 3534, which binds downstream of the catP translational initiation codon, and either 4400, 4401, or 4402 (Table
2) to amplify the region downstream of each of these endpoints. The
resultant PCR products contained complementary sequences and were
purified from a 1.0% low-melting-point agarose (FMC BioProducts) gel
with the Magic PCR Preps DNA Purification system (Promega). The two
products specific for each deletion derivative were then mixed, and a
third PCR was performed using primers UP and 3534. The PCR consisted of
30 cycles of 1 min of denaturation at 91°C, 1 min of annealing at
37°C, and 3 min of extension at 71°C. The resultant SOE-PCR
products were excised and extracted as before. These products were
digested with HindIII and SphI and ligated to
HindIII/SphI-digested pPSV DNA. The resultant
recombinant plasmids pJIR1617, pJIR1618, and pJIR1494 carried deletions
in the T1, PE2, and P3 regions, respectively. The insert in each of the
recombinant plasmids was sequenced to confirm that the precise deletion
had occurred and that no other changes were present.
Determination of chloramphenicol MICs.
For each of the
deletion mutants, chloramphenicol MICs were determined in both
E. coli and C. perfringens
at 37°C as described previously (21). Briefly, for
E. coli strains, overnight broth cultures were
diluted 1:25 into fresh 2× YT broth containing erythromycin and grown
until the turbidity at 550 nm was 0.7 to 0.8. Cultures were then
diluted 1:100 in fresh broth. Duplicate 10-µl aliquots were then
placed onto 2× YT containing chloramphenicol at concentrations ranging
from 0 to 200 µg/ml. The cultures were incubated for 18 to 20 h
at 37°C, and the MIC was determined as the lowest concentration of
chloramphenicol that completely inhibited growth. Assays were repeated
three times. For C. perfringens, an essentially
identical procedure was followed with the exceptions that brain heart
infusion medium was substituted for 2× YT medium and chloramphenicol
concentrations in the range of 0 to 80 µg/ml were used.
Preparation of C. perfringens
RNA.
Total RNA was extracted from 20 or 100 ml of C. perfringens broth cultures using Trizol reagent (Gibco-BRL)
as described previously (25) with the additional step of
treatment with RNase-free DNase (Promega). For strain JIR33(pCW3), RNA
was extracted from cultures that had been grown either in the presence
or in the absence of tetracycline (5 µg/ml) from starter cultures
grown in the presence or absence of medium containing subinhibitory
levels of tetracycline (0.5 µg/ml). For strains harboring the
tetA(P)-catP transcriptional fusion plasmid
pJIR1438 and its derivatives, cells were grown in medium containing
erythromycin (50 µg/ml). RNA either was used directly or was stored
at
70°C following the addition of 10 µl of 2 M NaCl and 2 volumes
of 100% ethanol. The concentration of RNA was determined by measuring
the absorbance at 260 nm using a DMS 100 UV-visible spectrophotometer
(Varian Technology). The RNA concentration was calculated based on the
assumption that an absorbance reading of 1 was equivalent to an RNA
concentration of 40 µg/ml (42).
RT-PCR.
RT reactions were performed on total RNA using a
commercially available Reverse Transcription system (Promega) with
slight modifications to the recommended protocol. RT reactions were
performed in a final volume of 20 µl, which contained 5 mM
MgCl2, 1× RT buffer, 1 mM (each) deoxynucleoside
triphosphates, 1 U of RNasin, 15 U of avian myeloblastosis virus RT, 3 µM oligonucleotide primer, and 2.5 to 5 µg of substrate RNA.
Reaction mixtures were incubated at 42°C for 1 h, and reactions
were terminated by boiling the mixtures for 5 min, followed by
incubation on ice for 5 min. cDNA products were amplified in 25-µl
PCR mixtures using 5 µl of the RT reaction mixture as the template
and a standard PCR protocol of 30 cycles of a 1-min denaturation step
at 95°C, a 2-min annealing step at 50°C, and a 3-min extension step
at 72°C. PCR products were analyzed on 1.5% agarose gels and were
sequenced to confirm that they represented the correct nucleotide sequence.
Primer extension analysis.
Primer extension analysis was
carried out using a commercially available Primer Extension system
(Promega) as described before (25). Initial experiments
involved primers 1947 (Table 2), which was complementary to the
tetA(P) translational initiation codon, and 3333 (Table 2),
which was complementary to a region 133 bp downstream of the initiation
codon of tetB(P). Further primer extension analysis was
performed using oligonucleotides 3334 and 3644. Oligonucleotides were
5' end labeled with 40 µCi of [
-32P]dATP
(4,000 Ci [148 TBq]/mmol) (GeneWorks) using T4 polynucleotide kinase
(Promega) and then annealed with approximately 50 µg of total
C. perfringens RNA. Extension reactions were
carried out using avian myeloblastosis virus RT according to the
manufacturer's instructions (Promega). cDNA products were ethanol
precipitated and separated on an 8% polyacrylamide gel containing 8 M urea.
RNA dot blots.
RNA samples for dot blotting were applied to
a Hybond-N+ nylon membrane using a dot blot
apparatus (Minifold SRC 96; Schleicher and Schuell). RNA (25 µg) was
precipitated and resuspended in RNA dilution buffer (diethyl
pyrocarbonate-treated distilled H2O, 20× SSC
[1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate], 37% [wt/vol]
formaldehyde [5:3:2]), and aliquots (100 µl) were heated at 65°C
for 15 min to denature the RNA before it was applied to the filter. The
filters were then air dried and cross-linked under UV light (312 nm)
for 3 to 5 min.
Radioactively labeled DNA probes specific for the
tet(P)
upstream region, and the
catP and
erm(B) genes,
were derived by PCR
with the following primer pairs: 4402 and 3644 for
P3-PE2, 8034
and 8133 for PE2-T1, 274 and 212 for
catP, and
2981 and 2980 for
erm(B). Oligonucleotides that bound to the
coding strand were
5' end labeled with
[

-
32P]dATP using T4 polynucleotide kinase
(
18). PCR was performed
using pJIR71, pJIR45, and pJIR418
templates for the
tet(P)-,
catP-,
and
erm(B)-specific probes, respectively. The amplified labeled
products were either isolated from an agarose gel using the BRESAclean
DNA purification kit (GeneWorks), if nonspecific products were
also
present, or purified directly from the PCR with the BRESAclean
nucleic acid purification kit. In each experiment, probes of equivalent
specific activity, as determined in a scintillation counter, were
utilized for each
blot.
Prehybridization was carried out for at least 1 h at 60°C in
hybridization solution, which contained 1% bovine serum albumin,
5×
SSC, and 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate. Probe DNA in hybridization
solution was boiled for 10 min and placed on ice prior to use.
Hybridization was carried out at 60°C, followed by stringency
washes
(0.1× SSC, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate) at 60°C. After
washing, the
membranes were exposed to a storage phosphor screen
(Molecular
Dynamics), which was analyzed using a STORM Phosphoimager
system and
ImageQuant image analysis software (Molecular
Dynamics).
Northern hybridization.
Northern analysis was performed on
either 20 µg of RNA for analysis of the pJIR1438 derivatives or 10 µg of RNA for the analysis of strains carrying pCW3. RNA samples were
denatured in RNA sample buffer (150 µl of formamide, 52.5 µl of
37% [wt/vol] formaldehyde, 3 µl of 50× running buffer, 15 µl of
1-mg/ml ethidium bromide) at 65°C for 5 to 10 min and separated
through 1.5% agarose gels containing formaldehyde. Standards included
either unlabeled RNA markers (Promega) or
[
-32P]ATP (3,000 Ci [111 TBq]/mmol)
(GeneWorks)-labeled RNA markers prepared with the RiboMark labeling
system (Promega) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
RNA was transferred overnight at 4°C to a
Hybond-N+ nylon membrane by capillary transfer
using 10× SSC. The nylon membrane was air dried and cross-linked under
UV light (312 nm) for 3 to 5 min.
DNA probes specific for the
tet(P) upstream region and the
catP and
erm(B) genes were derived by PCR as
described for the
dot blots. The DNA probe specific for the
tetA(P) gene was derived
in an analogous manner, with
primers 1366 and 1367 (Table
2).
Prehybridization, hybridization, and
detection were carried out
as described for dot blot hybridization
analysis.
 |
RESULTS |
Transcriptional organization of the tet(P)
genes.
To determine if the tetA(P) and
tetB(P) genes were arranged in an operon, Northern blots
were initially performed with separate gene-specific probes on RNA that
was isolated from C. perfringens cells that
harbored pCW3. Unfortunately, a hybridizing smear was consistently
observed for both the tetA(P) and tetB(P) probes (data not shown), suggesting that the RNA transcript was unstable. Therefore, the alternative method of RT-PCR analysis was performed using primer 1370, which was specific for the putative
tetA(P)-tetB(P) transcript and bound 323 nt
downstream of the tetB(P) start codon (Fig.
1), and RNA from JIR33(pCW3), which
exhibits an inducible tetracycline resistance phenotype
(19). The resultant cDNA molecules were then amplified
using PCR with primers 1369 and 1370, which produce a product of 550 bp. The oligonucleotide 1369 binds within tetA(P), 179 bp
upstream of the tetB(P) start codon. An RT-dependent product
was observed, indicating that the tetA(P) and
tetB(P) genes were transcriptionally coupled (Fig. 1). To
determine whether a promoter was present upstream of the
tetB(P) gene, primer extension analysis was carried out on
RNA from JIR33(pCW3) using primer 3333, which was complementary to a
region 133 nt downstream of the initiation codon of tetB(P).
No cDNA products were detected (data not shown). Based on these
results, it was concluded that the tetA(P) and
tetB(P) genes formed an operon.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
RT-PCR analysis of tet(P) RNA. (A)
Schematic showing oligonucleotides utilized in RT-PCR experiments. The
locations and extents of the tetA(P) and
tetB(P) genes are shown. The locations of the
oligonucleotide primers used in RT-PCR analysis are indicated by the
numbered arrows. (B) Agarose gel electrophoresis of RT-PCR products.
RT-PCR analysis was performed using total RNA that was isolated from
JIR33(pCW3) cells grown in the presence of tetracycline (5 µg/ml) and
from JIR33 grown without tetracycline. The positive controls, labeled
DNA, used pCW3 templates extracted from JIR33(pCW3). The + and labels refer to reactions performed in the presence and absence of RT,
respectively. The + and under the DNA label refer to PCRs
performed in the presence and absence of DNA template, respectively.
|
|
Primer extension analysis of the tet(P) operon.
To identify promoters upstream of tetA(P), primer extension
analysis was performed on RNA extracted from JIR33(pCW3) cells that had
been grown in the presence and absence of tetracycline (5 µg/ml),
from starter cultures grown in the presence and absence of
subinhibitory but inducing levels of tetracycline (0.5 µg/ml). Total
RNA extracted from JIR33 was used as the negative control. Primer
extension reactions were carried out with primer 1947, which was
complementary to the beginning of the tetA(P) coding region.
Three major cDNA products were consistently obtained from RNA extracted
from JIR33(pCW3) cells that had been exposed to tetracycline, whereas
either smaller amounts of product or no products were observed for
cells grown in the absence of tetracycline (Fig.
2A).

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Primer extension analysis of tet(P)
transcripts. cDNA products were produced by RT extension of
tet(P) transcripts using the 32P-end-labeled
oligonucleotides 1947 (A), 3334 (B), and 3644 (C) (Fig. 3). RNA was
extracted from the inducible strain JIR33(pCW3), which had been grown
in the media indicated. Primer extension reactions were performed on 50 µg of total RNA. RNA extracted from JIR33 was subjected to the same
treatment and used as negative controls. The sequencing lanes labeled
ACGT were produced using the same oligonucleotide on a pJIR71 template,
which contains the tet(P) upstream region. The three
major cDNA products detected are indicated by the arrows and are
labeled 1, 2, and 3. The 10 region of the putative P3 promoter is
indicated, as are the T1 and PE2 regions. N, nutrient broth;
Tc0.5, nutrient broth containing subinhibitory tetracycline
(0.5 µg/ml); Tc5, nutrient broth containing tetracycline
(5 µg/ml).
|
|
Primer extension endpoints may represent transcriptional start points
and thereby identify promoters. However, they may also
result from mRNA
processing or from the presence of secondary
mRNA structures that lead
to RT stalling. The smallest product
observed in these experiments was
located approximately 102 nt
upstream of the
tetA(P)
translational initiation codon and appeared
to be a result of the
latter process (Fig.
3). It was
subsequently
shown to represent the site of a transcriptional
terminator, designated
T1. The second product, designated PE2, was
mapped to a position
256 nt upstream of the
tetA(P)
initiation codon (Fig.
2B), and
the third was mapped to a point 522 nt
upstream of this ATG codon
(Fig.
2C). The latter was subsequently shown
to be the transcript
originating from the
tet promoter, P3.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Location of putative promoters in the
tetA(P) upstream region. The positions of the
oligonucleotide primers 1947, 3334, and 3644, which were used for
primer extension analyses, are indicated by the labeled arrows above
the sequence. The primer extension endpoints are indicated by the
downward-pointing arrows. The 10 and 35 regions of the P3 promoter
are boxed. Also indicated are other features of the upstream region
including ORF1, ORF2, ORF3, and the start of the tetA(P)
gene (44). The deduced amino acid sequence is shown below
the nucleotide sequence. Stop codons are indicated by the asterisks.
Potential ribosome binding sites are shown in boldface. The inverted
repeat that forms the factor-independent transcriptional terminator,
T1, is indicated by the horizontal arrows. The 12-bp palindromic
sequence previously identified is underlined and shown in boldface
(44). The positions of the P3-525 A and T1-G941A
mutations within the constructs pJIR1644 and pJIR1645, respectively,
are also indicated above the sequence. The regions deleted in the
construction of P3, PE2, and T1 derivatives are indicated in
reversed type. Coordinates refer to the published sequence
(44), GenBank accession no. L20800.
|
|
Mutagenesis and analysis of T1, PE2, and P3.
To examine the
roles of T1, PE2, and P3 in gene expression, SOE-PCR (15,
16) was used to construct separate plasmids that each contained
deletions in the regions upstream of the primer extension endpoints.
Because of difficulties experienced with the genetic manipulation of
shuttle vector constructs containing the tet(P) operon, it
was necessary to use a reporter construct containing an alternative
antibiotic resistance gene. An 839-bp HindIII/SphI pJIR71-derived fragment, which
carried the relevant upstream region and the start of the
tetA(P) gene (44), was cloned into the
C. perfringens promoter probe shuttle vector pPSV (29) to construct pJIR1438 (Fig.
4). SOE-PCR was then used to delete each
of the T1, PE2, and P3 regions, and each of the resultant PCR fusion
products was cloned into pPSV to construct pJIR1617, pJIR1618, and
pJIR1494, respectively (Fig. 4). pPSV contains a promoterless
chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene, catP, which confers
chloramphenicol resistance (29).

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Transcriptional analysis of promoter mutants by RNA dot
blot hybridization. Total RNA was extracted from JIR33 cells harboring
the constructs indicated, grown in the presence of erythromycin (50 µg/ml). RNA extracted from JIR33 was used as a negative control. RNA
(25 µg) was spotted in duplicate onto each filter and probed with
-32P-labeled probes specific for the P3-PE2, PE2-T1,
catP, and erm(B) transcripts. A schematic
of the tet(P)-catP transcriptional fusion
showing the extent of the hybridizing probes, indicated by the black
bars, is shown in panel E, together with a diagrammatic representation
of each of the deletion mutants. RNA was quantified from each of the
dot blots with a Storm Phosphoimager and ImageQuant software (Molecular
Dynamics). For each blot, the average volume (the integrated intensity
of the pixels) of each duplicate dot for each construct was calculated.
This value was then standardized for the RNA levels of the
erm(B) control. The levels of transcript are expressed
as arbitrary units, and each value represents a ratio of average volume
per dot/average volume per erm(B) control. WT, wild
type.
|
|
In addition to these constructs, two other plasmids that contained
mutations in the
tetA(P) upstream region were analyzed.
These plasmids were derived from pJIR1694 and pJIR1716, which
had been
detected during previous studies that involved random
mutagenesis of
the
tetA(P) gene (
7). The plasmid pJIR1694
(
7)
had a deletion of an A residue at position 525, between the

35
and

10 regions of the putative promoter P3 (Fig.
3).
This deletion
resulted in a reduction of the tetracycline MIC in
E. coli from
30 to 15 µg/ml (
7).
The plasmid pJIR1716 had a mutation of
a G residue to an A residue at
bp 941, which was within the T1
region (Fig.
3). This plasmid also had
a change from an A to a
G residue at bp 2218 [TetA(P)-T386A]. The
result of these two
mutations was a hyper-tetracycline-resistance
phenotype in
E. coli, with a tetracycline MIC of
50 µg/ml (T. Bannam and J. Rood,
unpublished data). The
HindIII/
SphI fragments, containing the
upstream regions and the start of the
tetA(P) genes from
pJIR1694
and pJIR1716, were cloned into pPSV to construct pJIR1644 and
pJIR1645, respectively. Note that the TetA(P)-T386A mutation encoded
on
pJIR1716 was not present in the upstream region used to construct
pJIR1645. Therefore, any phenotypic changes observed with this
plasmid
must be solely the result of the G941A mutation in the
T1
region.
All of the pPSV derivatives, as well as the recombinant plasmid pJIR418
(
45), which carries the wild-type
catP gene and
its native promoter, were introduced into
C. perfringens strain
JIR33 for further analysis. The effect of
each of the deletions
and mutations on promoter activity was assayed in
vivo by determining
the MICs of chloramphenicol. The results (Table
3) showed that
deleting (pJIR1617) or
mutating (pJIR1645) the T1 region led to
a sixfold increase in MIC.
Similarly, deleting the PE2 region
(pJIR1618) resulted in a
greater-than-twofold increase in MIC.
By contrast, deleting the
putative promoter region P3 (pJIR1494),
or mutating it by changing the
spacing between the

35 and

10
sequences from 17 to 16 bp, resulted
in a decrease in MIC, essentially
to that observed for the vector
control, pPSV. These results suggested
that P3 was the promoter
responsible for transcription of the
tet(P) operon.
Transcriptional analysis of the
tetA(P)-catP fusions.
To determine
the transcriptional status of the upstream regions, primer extension
analysis was performed on each of the reporter constructs of the
deletion derivatives and the random mutants. Analysis of RNA extracted
from cells carrying either pJIR1617 (
T1) or pJIR1645 (T1-G941A)
revealed cDNA products corresponding to products previously mapped
downstream of T1, PE2, and P3 (data not shown). Analysis of pJIR1618
(
PE2) revealed cDNA products corresponding to those detected
downstream of T1 and P3 but barely detectable levels of product 2. Finally, for pJIR1494 (
P3), no cDNA products corresponding to those
products mapped downstream of PE2 and P3 were detected and only
extremely low levels of product 1 were observed (data not shown). Only
low levels of all three major cDNA products were observed for pJIR1644
(P3-525
A). Taken together, these results provided further evidence
that P3 was the tet(P) promoter.
Quantitative RNA dot blot analysis of the transcriptional
fusions.
Dot blot hybridization analysis was performed on RNA
isolated from JIR33 derivatives harboring the shuttle vector
constructs. The RNA was hybridized with DNA probes that were specific
for the regions between P3 and PE2 (P3-PE2 probe), PE2 and T1 (PE2-T1 probe), and for the catP gene (catP probe) (Fig.
4E). As a quantitative control for RNA concentration, the RNA
preparations were also probed using an erm(B)-specific
probe. Since the erm(B) gene located on pPSV is
constitutively expressed, the level of transcription of this gene
should be equivalent for each of the derivatives studied (Fig. 4D).
When the wild-type upstream region was present (pJIR1438), the level of
catP mRNA was slightly higher than that of background
(Fig.
4C). Hybridization analysis with the other probes showed
that in cells
containing pJIR1438 there was more upstream transcript
present than
catP transcript (Fig.
4A and B). Changes in the T1
region,
whether by deletion (pJIR1617) or point mutation (pJIR1645),
resulted
in an increase in the level of
catP transcript. This
increase was greater in the deletant than in the random mutant
(Fig.
4C). In the upstream region, lower levels of transcript
than that seen
for the
catP probe were observed. There was also
a decreased
amount of transcript within the P3-to-PE2 region compared
to that
observed for the wild type. Again, this effect was more
distinct in the
deletant (Fig.
4A). By contrast, a wild-type level
of hybridization was
observed for both the T1 deletant and the
T1-G941A mutant with the
PE2-T1 probe (Fig.
4B).
Deletion of the PE2 region (pJIR1618) resulted in a slight increase in
the amount of
catP transcript, to a level less than
twofold
higher than that observed for the wild type (Fig.
4C).
The effect of
this deletion on the upstream transcript(s) was
more dramatic (Fig.
4A
and B), with an increase of just under
threefold and slightly more than
eightfold compared to the wild
type for the P3-PE2 and P2-T1 probes,
respectively (Fig.
4A and
B).
Finally, deletion of the P3 promoter (pJIR1494) resulted in a decrease
in the level of all transcripts to that of background
(pPSV) (Fig.
4A
to C). Slightly higher levels of hybridization
compared to background
were observed for the P3-521

A mutant,
pJIR1644. These results were
in agreement with the primer extension
analysis and MIC determinations.
They confirmed that P3 was the
tet(P) promoter. When this
promoter was deleted or even changed
slightly by altering the spacing
between the

35 and

10 regions,
reporter gene expression was reduced
to background levels. This
result implied that there were no
significant promoters downstream
of P3. The results also implied that
sequences downstream of the
P3 transcriptional start point were
involved in modulating
catP expression resulting from the P3
promoter.
Putative RNA secondary structures in the tet(P)
upstream region.
Examination of the region upstream of the
tetA(P) gene for RNA folding predictions using the programs
Foldrna (52) and mfold (28, 53)
revealed that the T1 and PE2 regions were associated with potential RNA
stem-loop secondary structures with
G values of
17.1
and
13.3 kcal/mol, respectively. Modeling of the upstream regions of
the
PE2 and
T1 transcripts revealed no significant changes from
that observed for the wild type, apart from the deletion of the
appropriate structures. The T1 structure consisted of a stem containing
four G+C pairs followed by a string of T residues and resembled the
characteristic structure of a factor-independent terminator (10,
36, 37). Analysis of this potential structure by use of an
algorithm (10) designed to predict Rho-independent terminators suggested that it was a good terminator candidate. This
algorithm calculates a value, d, which correlates with a predicted termination efficiency, expressed as a percentage. In general, positive d values are regarded as the necessary
requirement to describe the structure of E. coli
Rho-independent terminators (10). The T1 region was
calculated as having a d value of 35.51, which correlated
with an in vitro termination efficiency of ~86%. The deletion of
this region would inhibit the formation of this structure, and changes
in this stem-loop structure caused by the G-to-A transition at position
941, which prevents the formation of a GC base pair, reduce the
G to
11.1 kcal/mol. This potentially creates a less
efficient terminator with a calculated d value of 17.95, which correlates with a termination efficiency of ~60%. Based on
these data and in conjunction with the MIC and dot blot hybridization
results, it was concluded that the structure located in the T1 region
represented a transcriptional terminator.
Examination of the PE2 structure revealed that it was also followed by
a string of T residues, with an A residue separating
the T residues
from the stem-loop structure. This structure also
bears some
resemblance to factor-independent terminators, but
analysis similar to
that performed for T1 revealed that the PE2
region did not meet the
minimum conditions that are used to define
a terminator. This result
does not rule out the possibility that
this region of RNA secondary
structure is acting as a terminator
in
C. perfringens. Even in
E. coli, a small
proportion of terminators
do not conform to the constraints of this
algorithm and have negative
d values (
10).
Evidence for small RNA transcripts derived from the
tet(P) upstream region.
If the predicted secondary
structures were formed in vivo, then short 5'-proximal RNA transcripts
representing terminated mRNA molecules would be present. To detect
these molecules, Northern hybridization analysis was performed on
purified RNA preparations extracted from the JIR33 derivatives used in
the previous experiments, using radioactively labeled P3-PE2 and
catP-specific probes (Fig. 4E).
Using the P3-PE2 probe, two small hybridizing bands, which were
estimated to be approximately 250 and 410 nt in size, were
observed for
the wild-type construct, pJIR1438 (Fig.
5A, lane
2). If the 5' ends of these
bands mapped to the transcriptional
start point downstream of P3, their
3' ends would map near the
PE2 and T1 structures, respectively. Further
evidence that the
410-nt transcript represented a product terminating
at T1 came
from examination of the profile of the

T1 and G941A
mutants.
When probed with the P3-PE2 probe, only the 250-nt RNA band
was
observed for the T1 deletant (Fig.
5A, lane 3), whereas both the
250-nt band and a faintly hybridizing 410-nt band were observed
for the
T1-G941A mutant (Fig.
5A, lane 7). Two larger bands estimated
as
approximately 1.43 and 0.77 kb in size were also observed for
both
mutants (Fig.
5A). These bands also hybridized to the
catP probe (Fig.
5B, lanes 3 and 7). Weakly hybridizing bands of
approximately
1.43 and 0.77 kb in size were also observed for wild-type
and

PE2 RNA when probed with
catP (Fig.
5B, lane 4).

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Northern hybridization analyses of RNA from each of the
promoter mutants. Total RNA was isolated from cells of JIR33
derivatives grown in the presence of erythromycin (50 µg/ml). RNA (20 µg) was subjected to electrophoresis through 1.5% formaldehyde gels
and transferred to nylon membranes, which were subsequently probed with
the -32P-labeled P3-PE2- and
catP-specific probes, respectively (Fig. 4). The arrow
represents full-length tetA(P)-catP
transcript. The asterisks mark the faintly hybridizing 1.0- to 1.1-kb
transcripts observed in the blot probed with catP. The
size of RNA markers is indicated at the left in bases. Lanes: 1, pPSV; 2, pJIR1438; 3, pJIR1617; 4, pJIR1618; 5, pJIR1494; 6, pJIR1644;
7, pJIR1645.
|
|
Promoter fusion constructs initiating at P3 and terminating at the
catP transcriptional terminator would yield an ~1,460-nt
transcript. As a result, it was concluded that the 1.43-kb band
(Fig.
5) represented a full-length mRNA transcript initiating
at the
transcriptional start point downstream of P3. The 0.77-kb
and 1.0- to
1.1-kb hybridizing bands observed in the T1 deletant
and T1 mutant most
probably represent transcripts resulting from
RNA processing or
degradation.
Analysis of the PE2 deletant with the P3-PE2 probe revealed that the
two smaller hybridizing bands were present but at greater
intensity
than that observed for the wild type (Fig.
5A, lane
4). The first of
these bands was smaller, correlating with the
29-bp deletion of the PE2
region. The presence of the second band,
slightly less than 250 nt, in
this deletant indicated that the
3' end of the smaller RNA transcript
did not map to the PE2 stem-loop
structure, as this sequence was not
present in the deletant. The
3' end of this transcript may map further
downstream, or alternatively,
it may represent a breakdown product
obtained from RNA processing.
In agreement with the results already
obtained, no hybridization
to any of the probes was observed with RNA
from the P3 deletant
(Fig.
5, lane 5), and only a very faintly
hybridizing 410-nt P3-specific
band was observed for RNA from the
P3-525

A mutant (Fig.
5, lane
6).
The observation of the smaller RNA transcripts in the reporter system
prompted two questions. Firstly, could the small transcripts
be
observed from the upstream region of the
tet(P) operon on
the
native plasmid, pCW3? Secondly, did the regulation of the
tet(P)
genes involve a transcriptional attenuation mechanism
similar
to that proposed for the
tet(M) gene of
Tn
916 (
49)? If such
a mechanism existed, then
in the absence of tetracycline,
tet(P)
transcription would
terminate in the upstream region, whereas
when tetracycline was added,
there would be read-through of transcription
from the upstream region
into the
tet(P) coding
region.
To answer these questions, Northern hybridization analysis was
performed using total RNA extracted from JIR33(pCW3) cultures
grown in
the presence or absence of tetracycline and using probes
specific for
the P3-PE2 and
tetA(P) regions. Northern analysis
with the
P3-PE2 probe showed that both of the small RNA bands
observed with the
reporter constructs were present in the pCW3-derived
RNA preparations
(Fig.
6). In addition, hybridizing smears
that
presumably represented a highly unstable full-length transcript
were also observed from cells exposed to tetracycline. Interestingly,
the intensity of hybridization of both the small RNA bands and
the
smeared RNA increased upon tetracycline induction. Although
the signal
intensity observed with the
tetA(P)-specific probe
was
relatively low, a broadly smeared band, which commenced at
the 23S rRNA
band and increased in intensity upon exposure to
tetracycline, was
observed (Fig.
6). Similar profiles were observed
when these
experiments were repeated with different RNA preparations.
Despite
numerous attempts, it was not possible to obtain better
resolution of
the full-length
tet(P) transcript. However, these
results
were consistent with the hypothesis that induction of
tetracycline
resistance was at the level of transcription from
the P3 promoter and
did not involve transcriptional attenuation
at T1.

View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Northern hybridization analysis of tet(P)
RNA. Total RNA was isolated from JIR33(pCW3) cells grown in the media
indicated. RNA (10 µg) was subjected to electrophoresis through 1.5%
formaldehyde gels and transferred to nylon membranes. Nylon
membranes were subsequently probed with -32P-labeled DNA
probes specific for either the P3-PE2 or tetA(P)
transcripts as indicated. Lanes: 1, nutrient broth (N); 2, nutrient
broth containing subinhibitory tetracycline (0.5 µg/ml)
(NTc0.5); 3, nutrient broth containing tetracycline (5 µg/ml) (NTc5). Numbers at left are RNA sizes in
bases.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study, we have shown that the tetA(P) and
tetB(P) genes comprise an operon that is transcribed from a
single promoter, P3, which is located 529 bp upstream of the
translational initiation codon of the tetA(P) gene. This
conclusion is based on the results obtained from RT-PCR, primer
extension analysis, reporter gene expression, and Northern
hybridization analysis.
Although several potential promoter sequences were present between P3
and the start of the tetA(P) gene, analysis of the
P3 and
P3-525
A mutants provided strong evidence that there were no
functional promoters located downstream of the P3 promoter. Analysis of
this promoter revealed that it was identical to the consensus
C. perfringens
70
promoter (39) and contained only one mismatch to the
E. coli
70 consensus
sequence (14). The spacing between the
35 and
10 regions, at 17 nt, is the optimal spacing observed for C. perfringens (39) and E. coli (13) promoter sequences. This spacing
appears to be a stringent constraint on promoter function because it is required for recognition by the RNA polymerase holoenzyme (5, 14,
30, 33, 47, 51). Deviations from this spacing, as observed for
the P3
A mutant with the reporter construct in this study, have a
severe effect on expression. The close similarity of the promoter to
the consensus
70 sequence suggests that this
promoter, if not subjected to any regulatory constraints, would act as
a strong promoter in vivo (14, 35).
Transcription of the tet(P) operon appears to be under tight
regulatory control, which is not surprising given that the TetA(P) protein is a transmembrane protein that is involved in the active efflux of tetracycline from the cell (44). In
E. coli, the constitutive expression of
tetracycline efflux proteins has been shown elsewhere to reduce the
competitive fitness of the resultant strain (23, 34).
High-level expression of the tetracycline resistance proteins TetA(B)
and TetA(K) has also been shown previously to be highly toxic to the
host cell (11, 12).
In gram-positive bacteria, tetracycline resistance genes may be
regulated by transcriptional or translational attenuation (17,
22, 31, 49), translational coupling (46), or a tetracycline-responsive repressor protein (50). The
results from this study are consistent with the hypothesis that in
C. perfringens the induction of tetracycline
resistance is at the level of initiation of transcription from the
tet(P) promoter, P3. This postulate suggests the involvement
of a regulatory protein that modulates P3 promoter activity. We have
been unable to identify such a protein, although we have previously
shown that inducible expression of the tet(P) operon
requires an as-yet-unidentified host-encoded factor (19).
Once induced, transcription of the tet(P) operon is
dependent upon read-through of the factor-independent transcriptional terminator, T1, which is located 390 bp downstream of the
transcriptional start point. Northern blots using probes specific for
the upstream region identified two small RNA transcripts, approximately
410 and 250 nt in size. The size of the larger fragment is consistent with a transcript originating from the P3 promoter and terminating at
T1. Mutations that affected the formation or stability of this structure (
T1 and T1-G941A) resulted in high-level expression of the
downstream gene. The presence of such a structure suggested the
possibility that regulation was mediated by a transcriptional attenuation mechanism. However, the experimental data did not support
this hypothesis (Fig. 6). Instead, it is postulated that T1 is an
intrinsic control element that acts to prevent the overexpression of
the TetA(P) protein, even in the presence of tetracycline.
The role of the PE2 region is more difficult to understand. Deletion of
PE2 in the reporter construct leads to significantly increased levels
of the mRNA transcripts detected by the P3-PE2 and PE2-T1 probes and
slightly increased chloramphenicol resistance. However, the nature of
these transcripts appears unaltered compared to that of the wild type
(Fig. 5A), apart from the expected small reduction in size resulting
specifically from the deletion. It is possible that, like T1, PE2 is
also a terminator sequence but is less efficient and that its effects
are modulated by the presence of the downstream T1 terminator.
Alternatively, deletion of PE2 may act to stabilize the transcripts
originating from the P3 promoter.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This research was supported by grants from the Australian
Research Council. P.A.J. was the recipient of an Australian
Postgraduate Award.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Microbiology, P.O. Box 53, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia. Phone: 61 3 9905 4825. Fax: 61 3 9905 4811. E-mail:
julian.rood{at}med.monash.edu.au.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Abraham, L. J.,
D. I. Berryman, and J. I. Rood.
1988.
Hybridization analysis of the class P tetracycline resistance determinant from the Clostridium perfringens R-plasmid, pCW3.
Plasmid
19:113-120[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Abraham, L. J., and J. I. Rood.
1985.
Cloning and analysis of the Clostridium perfringens tetracycline resistance plasmid, pCW3.
Plasmid
13:155-162[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Abraham, L. J., and J. I. Rood.
1985.
Molecular analysis of transferable tetracycline resistance plasmids from Clostridium perfringens.
J. Bacteriol.
161:636-640[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Abraham, L. J.,
A. J. Wales, and J. I. Rood.
1985.
Worldwide distribution of the conjugative Clostridium perfringens tetracycline resistance plasmid, pCW3.
Plasmid
14:37-46[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Ayers, D. G.,
D. T. Auble, and P. L. deHaseth.
1989.
Promoter recognition by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. Role of the spacer DNA in functional complex formation.
J. Mol. Biol.
207:749-756[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Bannam, T. L.,
P. K. Crellin, and J. I. Rood.
1995.
Molecular genetics of the chloramphenicol-resistance transposon Tn4451 from Clostridium perfringens: the TnpX site-specific recombinase excises a circular transposon molecule.
Mol. Microbiol.
16:535-551[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Bannam, T. L., and J. I. Rood.
1999.
Identification of structural and functional domains of the tetracycline efflux protein TetA(P) from Clostridium perfringens.
Microbiology
145:2947-2955[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Berryman, D. I., and J. I. Rood.
1995.
The closely related ermB-ermAM genes from Clostridium perfringens, Enterococcus faecalis (pAM 1), and Streptococcus agalactiae (pIP501) are flanked by variants of a directly repeated sequence.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
39:1830-1840[Abstract].
|
| 9.
|
Cummins, C. S., and J. L. Johnson.
1971.
Taxonomy of the clostridia: wall composition and DNA homologies in Clostridium butyricum and other butyric-acid producing clostridia.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
67:33-46.
|
| 10.
|
d'Aubenton Carafa, Y.,
E. Brody, and C. Thermes.
1990.
Prediction of rho-independent Escherichia coli transcription terminators. A statistical analysis of their RNA stem-loop structures.
J. Mol. Biol.
216:835-858[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Eckert, B., and C. F. Beck.
1989.
Overproduction of transposon Tn10-encoded tetracycline resistance protein results in cell death and loss of membrane potential.
J. Bacteriol.
171:3557-3559[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Guay, G. G., and D. M. Rothstein.
1993.
Expression of the tetK gene from Staphylococcus aureus in Escherichia coli: comparison of substrate specificities of TetA(B), TetA(C), and TetK efflux proteins.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
37:191-198[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Harley, C. B., and R. P. Reynolds.
1987.
Analysis of E. coli promoter sequences.
Nucleic Acids Res.
15:2343-2361[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Hawley, D. K., and W. R. McClure.
1983.
Compilation and analysis of Escherichia coli promoter DNA sequences.
Nucleic Acids Res.
11:2237-2255[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Horton, R. M.,
Z. L. Cai,
S. N. Ho, and L. R. Pease.
1990.
Gene splicing by overlap extension: tailor-made genes using the polymerase chain reaction.
BioTechniques
8:528-535[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Horton, R. M.,
H. D. Hunt,
S. N. Ho,
J. K. Pullen, and L. R. Pease.
1989.
Engineering hybrid genes without the use of restriction enzymes: gene splicing by overlap extension.
Gene
77:61-68[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Hoshino, T.,
T. Ikeda,
N. Tomizuka, and K. Furukawa.
1985.
Nucleotide sequence of the tetracycline resistance gene of pTHT15, a thermophilic Bacillus plasmid: comparison with staphylococcal TcR controls.
Gene
37:131-138[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Iannello, R. C.
1995.
DNaseI footprinting using PCR-generated end-labeled DNA probes, p. 379-391.
In
M. J. Tymss (ed.), In vitro transcription and translation. Humana Press Inc., Totowa, N.J.
|
| 19.
| Johanesen, P. A., D. Lyras, and J. I. Rood. Induction of pCW3-encoded tetracycline resistance in
Clostridium perfringens involves a host-encoded factor.
Plasmid, in press.
|
| 20.
|
Johnson, J. L., and B. S. Francis.
1975.
Taxonomy of the clostridia: ribosomal acid homologies among the species.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
88:229-244[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Kennan, R. M.,
L. M. McMurry,
S. B. Levy, and J. I. Rood.
1997.
Glutamate residues located within putative transmembrane helices are essential for TetA(P)-mediated tetracycline efflux.
J. Bacteriol.
179:7011-7015[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Khan, S. A., and R. P. Novick.
1983.
Complete nucleotide sequence of pT181, a tetracycline-resistance plasmid from Staphylococcus aureus.
Plasmid
10:251-259[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Lee, S. W., and G. Edlin.
1985.
Expression of tetracycline resistance in pBR322 derivatives reduces the reproductive fitness of plasmid-containing Escherichia coli.
Gene
39:173-180[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Lyras, D., and J. I. Rood.
1996.
Genetic organization and distribution of tetracycline resistance determinants in Clostridium perfringens.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
40:2500-2504[Abstract].
|
| 25.
|
Lyras, D., and J. I. Rood.
2000.
Transposition of Tn4451 and Tn4453 involves a circular intermediate that forms a promoter for the large resolvase, TnpX.
Mol. Microbiol.
38:588-601[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Lyras, D.,
C. Storie,
A. S. Huggins,
P. K. Crellin,
T. L. Bannam, and J. I. Rood.
1998.
Chloramphenicol resistance in Clostridium difficile is encoded on Tn4453 transposons that are closely related to Tn4451 from Clostridium perfringens.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:1563-1567[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Lyristis, M.,
A. E. Bryant,
J. Sloan,
M. M. Awad,
I. T. Nisbet,
D. L. Stevens, and J. I. Rood.
1994.
Identification and molecular analysis of a locus that regulates extracellular toxin production in Clostridium perfringens.
Mol. Microbiol.
12:761-777[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Mathews, D. H.,
J. Sabina,
M. Zuker, and D. H. Turner.
1999.
Expanded sequence dependence of thermodynamic parameters improves prediction of RNA secondary structure.
J. Mol. Biol.
288:911-940[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Matsushita, C.,
O. Matsushita,
M. Koyama, and A. Okabe.
1994.
A Clostridium perfringens vector for the selection of promoters.
Plasmid
31:317-319[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30.
|
McKane, M., and G. N. Gussin.
2000.
Changes in the 17 bp spacer in the P(R) promoter of bacteriophage lambda affect steps in open complex formation that precede DNA strand separation.
J. Mol. Biol.
299:337-349[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Mojumdar, M., and S. A. Khan.
1988.
Characterization of the tetracycline resistance gene of plasmid pT181 of Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Bacteriol.
170:5522-5528[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Morelle, G.
1989.
A plasmid extraction procedure on a miniprep scale.
Focus
11:7-8.
|
| 33.
|
Mulligan, M. E.,
J. Brosius, and W. R. McClure.
1985.
Characterization in vitro of the effect of spacer length on the activity of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase at the TAC promoter.
J. Biol. Chem.
260:3529-3538[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Nguyen, T. N.,
Q. G. Phan,
L. P. Duong,
K. P. Bertrand, and R. E. Lenski.
1989.
Effects of carriage and expression of the Tn10 tetracycline-resistance operon on the fitness of Escherichia coli K12.
Mol. Biol. Evol.
6:213-225[Abstract].
|
| 35.
|
Record, M. T. J.,
W. S. Reznikoff,
M. L. Craig,
K. L. McQuade, and P. J. Schalx.
1996.
Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (E 70), promoters, and the kinetics of the steps of transcription initiation, p. 792-820.
In
F. C. Neidhardt, R. Curtiss III, J. L. Ingraham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, W. S. Reznikoff, M. Riley, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed., vol. 1. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
|
| 36.
|
Reynolds, R.,
R. M. Bermudez-Cruz, and M. J. Chamberlin.
1992.
Parameters affecting transcription termination by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. I. Analysis of 13 rho-independent terminators.
J. Mol. Biol.
224:31-51[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Richardson, J. P., and J. Greenblatt.
1996.
Control of RNA chain elongation and termination, p. 822-848.
In
F. C. Neidhardt, R. Curtiss III, J. L. Ingraham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, W. S. Reznikoff, M. Riley, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed., vol. 1. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
|
| 38.
|
Rood, J. I.
1983.
Transferable tetracycline resistance in Clostridium perfringens strains of porcine origin.
Can. J. Microbiol.
29:1241-1246[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Rood, J. I., and S. T. Cole.
1991.
Molecular genetics and pathogenesis of Clostridium perfringens.
Microbiol. Rev.
55:621-648[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Rood, J. I.,
E. A. Maher,
E. B. Somers,
E. Campos, and C. L. Duncan.
1978.
Isolation and characterization of multiply antibiotic-resistant Clostridum perfringens strains from porcine feces.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
13:871-880[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Rood, J. I.,
V. N. Scott, and C. L. Duncan.
1978.
Identification of a transferable tetracycline resistance plasmid (pCW3) from Clostridium perfringens.
Plasmid
1:563-570[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 43.
|
Scott, P. T., and J. I. Rood.
1989.
Electroporation-mediated transformation of lysostaphin-treated Clostridium perfringens.
Gene
82:327-333[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Sloan, J.,
L. M. McMurry,
D. Lyras,
S. B. Levy, and J. I. Rood.
1994.
The Clostridium perfringens Tet P determinant comprises two overlapping genes: tetA(P), which mediates active tetracycline efflux, and tetB(P), which is related to the ribosomal protection family of tetracycline-resistance determinants.
Mol. Microbiol.
11:403-415[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Sloan, J.,
T. A. Warner,
P. T. Scott,
T. L. Bannam,
D. I. Berryman, and J. I. Rood.
1992.
Construction of a sequenced Clostridium perfringens-Escherichia coli shuttle plasmid.
Plasmid
27:207-219[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Stasinopoulos, S. J.,
G. A. Farr, and D. H. Bechhofer.
1998.
Bacillus subtilis tetA(L) gene expression: evidence for regulation by translational reinitiation.
Mol. Microbiol.
30:923-932[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Stefano, J. E., and J. D. Gralla.
1982.
Spacer mutations in the lac ps promoter.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
79:1069-1072[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Steffen, C., and H. Matzura.
1989.
Nucleotide sequence analysis and expression studies of a chloramphenicol-acetyltransferase-coding gene from Clostridium perfringens.
Gene
75:349-354[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Su, Y. A.,
P. He, and D. B. Clewell.
1992.
Characterization of the tet(M) determinant of Tn916: evidence for regulation by transcription attenuation.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
36:769-778[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Tauch, A.,
A. Puhler,
J. Kalinowski, and G. Thierbach.
2000.
TetZ, a new tetracycline resistance determinant discovered in gram-positive bacteria, shows high homology to gram-negative regulated efflux systems.
Plasmid
44:285-291[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Warne, S. E., and P. L. deHaseth.
1993.
Promoter recognition by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. Effects of single base pair deletions and insertions in the spacer DNA separating the 10 and 35 regions are dependent on spacer DNA sequence.
Biochemistry
32:6134-6140[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 52.
|
Zuker, M.
1989.
Computer prediction of RNA structure.
Methods Enzymol.
180:262-288[Medline].
|
| 53.
|
Zuker, M.,
D. H. Mathews, and D. H. Turner.
1999.
Algorithms and thermodynamics for RNA secondary structure prediction: a practical guide, p. 11-43.
In
J. Barciszewski, and B. F. C. Clark (ed.), RNA biochemistry and biotechnology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, N.Y.
|
Journal of Bacteriology, December 2001, p. 7110-7119, Vol. 183, No. 24
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.24.7110-7119.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Parsons, J. A., Bannam, T. L., Devenish, R. J., Rood, J. I.
(2007). TcpA, an FtsK/SpoIIIE Homolog, Is Essential for Transfer of the Conjugative Plasmid pCW3 in Clostridium perfringens. J. Bacteriol.
189: 7782-7790
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bannam, T. L., Teng, W. L., Bulach, D., Lyras, D., Rood, J. I.
(2006). Functional Identification of Conjugation and Replication Regions of the Tetracycline Resistance Plasmid pCW3 from Clostridium perfringens. J. Bacteriol.
188: 4942-4951
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Spigaglia, P., Mastrantonio, P.
(2004). Comparative analysis of Clostridium difficile clinical isolates belonging to different genetic lineages and time periods. J Med Microbiol
53: 1129-1136
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Grkovic, S., Brown, M. H., Skurray, R. A.
(2002). Regulation of Bacterial Drug Export Systems. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
66: 671-701
[Abstract]
[Full Text]