Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, December 2001, p. 7329-7340, Vol. 183, No. 24
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.24.7329-7340.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Correlation between Bacillus subtilis
scoC Phenotype and Gene Expression Determined Using Microarrays
for Transcriptome Analysis
Robert
Caldwell,
Ron
Sapolsky,
Walter
Weyler,
Randal
R.
Maile,
Stuart C.
Causey, and
Eugenio
Ferrari*
Genencor International, Palo Alto, California
94304
Received 2 July 2001/Accepted 26 September 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The availability of the complete sequence of the Bacillus
subtilis chromosome (F. Kunst et al., Nature 390:249-256,
1997) makes possible the construction of genome-wide DNA arrays and the
study of this organism on a global scale. Because we have a
long-standing interest in the effects of scoC on
late-stage developmental phenomena as they relate to
aprE expression, we studied the genome-wide effects of a
scoC null mutant with the goal of furthering the
understanding of the role of scoC in growth and
developmental processes. In the present work we compared the expression
patterns of isogenic B. subtilis strains, one of which carries a null mutation in the scoC locus
(scoC4). The results obtained indicate that
scoC regulates, either directly or indirectly, the
expression of at least 560 genes in the B. subtilis
genome. ScoC appeared to repress as well as activate gene expression. Changes in expression were observed in genes encoding transport and
binding proteins, those involved in amino acid, carbohydrate, and
nucleotide and/or nucleoside metabolism, and those associated with motility, sporulation, and adaptation to atypical conditions. Changes in gene expression were also observed for transcriptional regulators, along with sigma factors, regulatory phosphatases and
kinases, and members of sensor regulator systems. In this report, we
discuss some of the phenotypes associated with the scoC
mutant in light of the transcriptome changes observed.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The transition state of
Bacillus subtilis, which carries the cells from vegetative
growth to stationary phase, is a stage in which the cell population is
highly differentiated. In this stage, which is governed by the
phosphorylation status of Spo0A, the cells can carry out a number of
highly specialized functions (13). These functions include
not only those controlling the initiation of the spore-forming process
but also those responsible for competence and motility as well as the
production of scavenging enzymes (e.g., AprE and NprE) and a host of
secondary metabolites (33). By a
not-yet-completely-elucidated mechanism, the fate of the individual
cells within the population is determined by synthesis, secretion,
processing, and uptake of signaling peptides used for cell-to-cell
communication (29, 34). In addition, a number of other
genes called transition state regulators play an important role in this
differentiation process (28, 37). Hyperexpression and/or
loss of function of any of these genes profoundly affects several
aspects of the cell physiology.
One gene that belongs to this group of transition state regulators is
scoC. Mutations in scoC have been isolated
independently, by using different screening criteria, in at least three
laboratories and are known as hpr (12),
catA (14), and scoC
(22). We suggest the adoption of the designation
scoC for this gene and all its alleles to avoid confusion
with the HPr system involved in sugar transport.
scoC (as the hpr allele) was first noted and
defined by the study of B. subtilis mutants overproducing
alkaline and neutral proteases as an approach to isolate
sporulation-associated mutations. Other genetic lesions,
catA (14) and scoC
(22), which lead to a glucose-insensitive sporulation
phenotype and exoprotease overproduction, were also mapped in the same
chromosomal region. Later DNA sequencing showed that all of these
mutants resulted from mutations in the same gene (27).
Northern blots to quantify subtilisin-specific mRNA suggested that the
activity of the scoC gene was exerted at the level of
transcription of the aprE promoter (8).
Sequencing of the scoC locus and of its alleles showed that
the observed phenotypes were due to a loss-of-function mutation of ScoC
(27), indicating that ScoC acts as a negative regulator of
transcription of aprE. This study also showed that
overproduction of the gene product reduced sporulation by 3 to 4 orders
of magnitude. Transcription of the scoC locus became
constitutive by null mutations in the spo0A gene, suggesting
that Spo0A is a negative regulator of scoC transcription.
Purification of the ScoC protein demonstrated that it is a DNA binding
protein. A consensus binding sequence, RATANTATY, was shown by
footprint analysis to lie upstream of the nprE,
aprE, and sinI genes (16).
It has been shown recently that scoC plays a direct role in
the initiation of sporulation by acting as a repressor of the two major
signaling peptide transport systems, opp and app
(17). However, inactivation of the rapA gene,
which rescues the sporulation defect of an opp mutant, does
not rescue the sporulation defect caused by the presence of
scoC in a multicopy plasmid (17). As pointed
out by Koide et al. (17), this suggests the existence of
other regulatory mechanisms by which the scoC gene controls sporulation. Furthermore, while scoC null mutations allow
sporulation in the presence of glucose, they do not allow sporulation
if both glucose and glutamine are present in the medium
(33). In addition, the observation that scoC
mutants affect alkaline phosphatase expression (4),
motility (16), oxidative stress response (5),
and competence (S. Causey and E. Ferrari, unpublished data) suggests
that the ScoC gene product plays a major role in the physiology of
B. subtilis. We have attempted to understand the effects of
the scoC mutation in B. subtilis by comparing the gene expression patterns of wild-type cells and those of the
scoC mutant using DNA microarrays.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Strains and growth conditions.
The strains used in this work
are BG2815 scoC4
nprE522 and the isogenic
strain BG2822
nprE522. The presence of the
scoC4 mutation, a stop codon at position 32 (accession no.
M20237), in strain BG2815 was verified by PCR and sequencing. The
nprE522 mutation has been described previously
(41). Fresh cells were streaked onto Luria-Bertani
medium-1.6% skim milk plates for overnight growth at 37°C. For each
strain, single colonies were then inoculated into 10 ml of freshly
prepared 2× SNB medium in a 125-ml flask. This medium contained the
following (per liter): 16 g of Difco nutrient broth, 50 ml of 10%
maltrin M150, and 40 ml of 25× SNB salts (25× salts contain [per
liter] 3.7 g of CaCl2 · 2H2O, 9.6 mg of FeSO4
· 7H2O, 6 mg of
MnCl2 · 4H2O,
25.0 g of KCl, and 3.26 g of MgSO4
· 7H2O). From this flask, two serial 1:3,000
dilutions were made, each into 10 ml of the same medium, for slow
overnight growth (30°C at 150 rpm). The following day, the starter
culture closest to logarithmic growth was used to inoculate the
prewarmed (37°C) 75-ml primary culture in a 500-ml flask to an
optical density (600 nm) of ~0.015. From the primary culture, 25 ml
was transferred to a separate 250-ml flask for growth measurements.
Both primary and measurement flasks were shaken together at 37°C at
250 rpm. Figure 1 shows the growth curves
for the wild-type and scoC4 cultures.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Growth curves for Bacillus strains BG2822
(wild type) (open diamonds) and BG2815 (scoC4) (filled
diamonds). t1, t2, t3, and t4, time points used for RNA isolation and
array analysis (log phase, early transition, late transition, and
stationary phase, respectively).
|
|
Harvesting.
Cells were collected by pipetting onto a
Millipore 0.8-µm mixed cellulose ester filter (catalog no. AAWPO4700)
using a Millipore vacuum filtration apparatus (catalog no. 1004700).
After filtration, the membrane circle with collected cells was quickly
transferred to liquid nitrogen in a heavy-walled 200-ml beaker,
allowing no more than 10 to 15 s to pass between pipetting and
freezing. In the presence of liquid nitrogen, the filters were
transferred to
80°C storage until used.
Each filter with a cellular sample was ground up for 3 min in a
standard hand-held coffee grinder with 45 ml of finely crushed dry ice
and 10 g of glass beads (~110-µm Glasperlen; B. Braun). The powdered contents were then transferred via funnel to a 100-ml heavy-walled glass bottle (VWR Scientific Product Corporation). All
equipment involved was prechilled with dry ice before use and
maintained at dry-ice temperature throughout. The loosely capped bottle
was then stored at
80°C overnight to allow the dry ice to sublime,
leaving frozen cell powder and glass beads.
Preparation of RNA.
The following protocol was adapted from
the work of Farrell (6). The frozen sample was rapidly
transferred to a 50-ml Oakridge centrifuge tube with 5 ml of extraction
buffer at room temperature (4 M guanidinium thiocyanate, 25 mM sodium
citrate [pH 7], 0.5% sarcosyl, 100 mM
-mercaptoethanol). The
sample was vortexed immediately for 45 s to ensure even mixing.
One-tenth volume of 3 M sodium acetate (pH 5.5) was added and vortexed
briefly. After centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 10 min
at 4°C, the supernatant was transferred to a fresh ice-chilled tube.
All remaining extraction steps were carried out on ice. An equal volume
of 25:24:1 water-saturated phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol was added,
mixed for 1 min, and incubated for 5 min. The mixture was recentrifuged
under the same conditions, and the aqueous phase was transferred to a
new tube. The nucleic acid was precipitated in 0.75 volume of chilled isopropanol at
20°C for at least 1 h and then centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C. The isopropanol was
removed completely, and the pellet was dissolved in 700 µl of
extraction buffer. The sodium acetate addition, organic solvent
extraction, and isopropanol precipitation were repeated. The second
pellet was washed three times with 500 µl of ice-cold 70% ethanol
(each for 10 min), followed by a final brief rinse with ice-cold 95%
ethanol. The pellet was air dried for not more than 20 min and
resuspended in 50 µl of diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated water
with 1 U of RNase inhibitor (BM/Roche) per µl. The yield was
determined by UV spectroscopy, and the crude RNA sample was stored at
80°C.
An adequate amount of crude RNA (~250 µg) contaminated with genomic
DNA was added to a 500-µl DNase I reaction mixture (40 mM Tris-HCl
[pH 7.6], 6 mM MgCl2, 2 mM
CaCl2, 1 U of RNase inhibitor per µl, 150 U of
DNase I per 500 µl [BM/Roche]) and incubated for 30 min at 37°C.
One-tenth volume of 3 M sodium acetate (pH 5.5) was added and mixed
well, followed by organic solvent extraction, isopropanol
precipitation, and ethanol washes as described above for the crude RNA
preparation. After the pellet had been resuspended in DEPC-treated
water with RNase inhibitor, the entire DNase I treatment and its
subsequent purifications were repeated to remove all traces of genomic
DNA. After final resuspension in 50 µl of DEPC-treated water with 1 U
of RNase inhibitor per µl, the yield was determined by UV
spectroscopy (with a 260/280 ratio of at least 1.8). RNA quality was
also verified by 3% agarose gel electrophoresis (i.e., 23S and 16S
rRNA band intensities at a ratio of 1.3:1 to 1.6:1). The purified total
Bacillus RNA sample was stored at
80°C.
IVT controls and RT-PCR preparation.
Genes encoding
Eryr (Staphylococcus aureus plasmid
pE194, accession no. J01755-58), Bleor (S. aureus plasmid pUB110, accession no. M19465),
Specr (Enterococcus faecalis,
accession no. M69221), and green fluorescent protein (GFP) (plasmid
pGFP; Clontech catalog no. 6090-1), start to stop codons inclusive,
were PCR amplified from plasmid DNA using primers containing unique
restriction sites for subsequent cloning into pBlueScript II KS(+)
(Stratagene). The resulting plasmids were linearized at a unique site
downstream of the coding sequence, and runoff in vitro transcription
(IVT) reaction products were prepared from the upstream T3 promoter of
the plasmid using the MEGAscript T3 IVT kit (Ambion catalog no. 1338)
following the supplier's recommended protocol. Final transcript
lengths were 735 nt (Eryr gene), 396 nt
(Bleor gene), 768 nt (Specr
gene), and 717 nt (GFP gene). IVT RNA was quantified by optical density
at 260 nm (40 µg/ml = 1 optical density unit). A staggered IVT
RNA mixture in RNase-free water was prepared: 4 nM
Bleor gene, 1 nM GFP gene, 200 pM
Specr gene, and 50 pM Eryr
gene. In addition, three transcripts (amyE, citC,
and sdhA) were assayed both by the microarray assay and by a
reverse transcription (RT)-PCR assay to quantitate mRNA independently
across two conditions (time or genotype). RT-PCR was performed with a
Roche Molecular Biochemicals light cycler instrument (software version
3 and RNA amplification kit SYBR green I) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. Primer pairs were chosen which gave a
good dose response on dilutions of genomic DNA, of IVT standards, and
of total RNA preparations used in chip assays. For RT-PCR, primer sequences were as follows (F denotes forward or sense strand; R denotes
reverse or antisense strand): 280-bp amyE product,
5'-TGAAACGGTTCTTAGACAGG-3' (F) and
5'-TGGGAGATATTCGACACG-3' (R); 227-bp citC
product, 5'-ATAAAACAGGTGAGYGGCTC-3' (F) and
5'-ACGGAAGATGACCATATCAG-3' (R); 243-bp sdhA
product, 5'-CGATCATCCACTTATTAGACC-3' (F) and
5'-GGCAGGTTCTGTCATCATC-3' (R). Products were verified by
melting curve analysis on the light cycler, by size determination on
agarose gels, and by DNA sequencing.
Target preparation
RNA harvested from a
given Bacillus strain and at a given time point was
reverse transcribed into biotin-labeled cDNA by the method of de
Saizieu et al. (3). Total RNA (25 µg) and 5.5 µl of
the staggered control IVT mixture were incubated at 37°C overnight in
a 100-µl reaction mixture: 1× GIBCO first-strand buffer (50 mM
Tris-HCl [pH 8.3], 75 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2); 10 mM dithiothreitol; 40 µM random hexamer; 0.3 mM concentrations (each) of
dCTP, dGTP and dTTP; 0.12 mM dATP; 0.3 mM biotin-dATP (NEN catalog no.
NEL999); 2,500 U of SuperScript II reverse transcriptase. To remove
RNA, the reaction was brought to 0.25 M NaOH and incubated at 65°C
for 30 min. The reaction mixture was neutralized with HCl, and the
nucleic acid was precipitated at
20°C in ethanol with 2.5 M
ammonium acetate. The pellet was washed, air dried, resuspended in
water, and quantitated by UV spectroscopy. The reaction yield was
approximately 20 to 25 µg of biotin-labeled cDNA.
This cDNA (12 µg) was fragmented in 33 µl of 1× One-Phor-All
buffer (Amersham-Pharmacia no. 27-0901-02) with 3.75 mU of DNase I at
37°C for 10 min. After the DNase had been heat killed, fragmentation was validated by running 2 µg of the fragmented cDNA on a 3% agarose gel. Biotin-containing cDNA routinely ranged in size from 25 to 125 nucleotides. The remaining 10 µg of cDNA was hybridized to an
Affymetrix (Santa Clara, Calif.) Bacillus GeneChip array.
Array description
Probe sets on the custom
B. subtilis expression array were designed from the
wild-type (I168) B. subtilis sequence data of Kunst et
al. (19) by Affymetrix and Genencor. The total of 4,107 open reading frames (ORF) were represented by the tiling of at least 20 probes pairs per ORF, each pair consisting of one perfectly matching
complementary 25-mer and one control 25-mer with a centrally mismatched
base. Genes longer than 1,500 bp were represented by additional probe
sets, bringing the total number of ORF probe sets to 4,351. Probes sets
for 40 tRNA genes were also tiled, as well as probe sets for over 40 control sequences. Affymetrix performed probe selection and array
fabrication by published and proprietary methods (20, 40).
The entire array of 454-by-454 25-µm features is bordered and
interspersed by a standard oligonucleotide feature for the purposes of
grid alignment and data analysis.
Hybridization, scanning, and data collection.
Hybridizations
were performed as described in the Affymetrix expression analysis
technical manual (Affymetrix) using reagent suppliers as suggested.
Fragmented biotin-labeled cDNA (10 µg) was added to a 220-µl
hybridization cocktail containing 100 mM MES
[(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid], 1 M
Na+, 20 mM EDTA, 0.01% Tween 20, 5 mg of total
yeast RNA per ml, 0.5 mg of bovine serum albumin per ml, 0.1 mg of
herring sperm DNA per ml, and 50 pM control oligonucleotide (AFFX-B1).
The cocktails were heated to 95°C for 5 min, cooled to 40°C for 5 min, and briefly microcentrifuged to remove particulates, and 200 µl
was injected into each prewarmed prerinsed (1× MES buffer plus 5 mg of
yeast RNA per ml) cartridge. The arrays were rotated at 40°C overnight.
The samples were removed, and the arrays were filled with nonstringent
wash buffer consisting of 6× SSPE (1× SSPE is 0.18 M NaCl, 10 mM
NaH2PO4, and 1 mM EDTA [pH
7.7]) and 0.01% Tween 20 and washed on the Affymetrix fluidics
station with protocol Euk-GE-WS2, using nonstringent and stringent (0.1 M MES, 0.1 M Na+, 0.01% Tween 20) wash buffers.
Arrays were stained in three steps: streptavidin, antistreptavidin
antibody tagged with biotin, and streptavidin-phycoerythrin conjugate.
Signal on the arrays were detected with a Hewlett Packard gene array
scanner using 570-nm laser light with 3-µm pixel resolution. The
signal intensities (also known as average differences) of the 4,351 ORF
probe sets were scaled and normalized to a target value of 1,000 as
described in the Microarray Suite 4.0 user guide (Affymetrix). The
absolute analysis values for average difference and absolute call were
collected for all scans; the values for difference call and fold change
were also collected for all comparative analysis scans (scoC
versus wild-type cells at matched time points).
Data analysis.
A replicate RNA sample was prepared for a
given strain and time point. These two samples (R and R') were prepared
as identically as possible, followed by signal normalization in
GeneChip 4.0. For each of the 4,351 ORF probe sets, we prepared a table
of the average of the logs of the two replicate signals (ALS = 0.5 log R + 0.5 log R') and the log ratio (LR = log R/R'). For this
calculation, only the probe sets with two positive values were
considered. The resulting table was sorted by the ALS. Then, in a
series of sliding windows with a size of 201 ALS values, from one end
of the table to the other, the mean ALS and the standard deviation for
the corresponding LR (SDLR) values were
determined. These values were saved as a look-up table listing
SDLR in identical samples (i.e., scatter due to
chance) as a function of ALS: in general, SDLR
remained fairly constant when the ALS was >300 but increased as ALS
decreased below 300. The plot of these look-up values is very
consistent with a fitted equation based on a two-component error model
for microarray-based data developed by Silicon Genetics, Redwood City,
Calif. (B. Eynon and A. Conway, personal communication).
There were four experimental time points for both the scoC
and the wild-type shake flask cultures (80, 130, 190, and 310 min after
inoculation [t1 through t4, respectively]). For each time point, the
scoC array was treated as the experimental array and the
wild-type array was treated as the baseline array: GeneChip 4.0 software (Affymetrix) calculated fold change and difference change
values in these comparative analyses (GeneChip software user guide). A
gene was considered significantly changed between scoC and
wild-type cells if for at least one of the four time points three
conditions were met: (i) the difference change value was not "no
change"; (ii) the absolute call for the gene in the strain with the
higher expression level was listed as "present"; (iii) the fold
change calculated by GeneChip 4.0 software was at least 4.37 times
higher than SDLR for the ALS of the gene on scoC and wild type. A Z score of 4.37 corresponds to a
Bonferroni-corrected confidence level of one in 80,000, or 0.05 divided
by 4,000 genes. For large genes with multiple probe sets, at least one
of the probe sets needed to be significant by the above criteria.
 |
RESULTS |
Quantitating transcriptional differences.
To determine the
sensitivity and reproducibility of the microarray assay, several
controls were performed and other indicators were monitored throughout
the study. All RNA samples were spiked with a mixture of four in vitro
transcripts at various concentrations to monitor the sensitivity and
consistency of signal varying as a function of target concentration.
Figure 2 shows the linearity of the IVT
detection over several orders of magnitude in a complex mixture of
total Bacillus RNA. To determine if the changes in expression assayed by the array were similar to those in other established methods, total RNA from two samples varying in growth phase
or in genotype was quantitated by both RT-PCR and array hybridization
(Table 1). For transcripts increasing,
decreasing, and remaining unchanged under the conditions compared, the
two assay methods were in close agreement.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Spiked control IVT signal as a function of
concentration. Final concentrations of the four control in vitro
transcripts in the 200-µl hybridization cocktail (assuming an
equimolar reverse transcription from RNA template to biotin-labeled
cDNA): 40 pM Bleor gene, 10 pM GFP gene, 2 pM
Specr gene, and 0.5 pM Eryr gene. Plotted lines
are for each of the eight microarray samples (two strains; four time
points).
|
|
To determine array reproducibility, the intensities of all gene
transcripts assayed across two samples, prepared as identically as
possible, were compared. A Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.953 between replicates indicates good agreement. This value is slightly
lower than that calculated for nylon membrane arrays reported recently
(7). This is likely due to the higher signal values
acquired from detection of radiolabeled targets on membranes relative
to fluorescence-detected signals on glass microarrays used in this
study (R. Caldwell, unpublished observation).
The percentage of ORF probe sets receiving an absolute call of
"present" ranged from 67 to 74% on each array, with slightly more
genes showing presence in the stationary than log phase. The percentage
of ORF probe sets showing presence for at least one of the four time
points in either scoC or the wild type is larger (>85%),
indicating that a vast majority of transcripts are detectable at some
point during growth by the GeneChip assay, though generally not at all
time points.
General overview.
Across the four time points at which
scoC cells were compared to wild-type cells, mRNAs
transcribed from 560 genes (representing 14% of the
Bacillus genome) met the significant-change criteria defined
in Materials and Methods. These 560 most stringently selected genes
fall into nearly all functional-class categories (Table 2), from genes coding for enzyme
catalysis to those coding for proteins with a regulatory role.
For genes that have been assigned known or presumed functions, the
largest group with altered transcriptional levels in the scoC mutant is a group of 76 genes coding for transport
proteins, binding proteins, and lipoproteins, all of which are
associated with the cell membrane. Forty-seven affected
genes belong to the group involved in amino acid (and related
molecule) metabolism, notably arginine, histidine, leucine, isoleucine,
valine, and threonine biosynthetic genes. As one might
expect, we identified changes in expression levels for
several genes associated with sporulation, belonging to the
SubtiList functional class 1.8 (25, 26)
(http://genolist.pasteur.fr/SubtiList/). These changes in sporulation
genes are summarized in Table 3.
Other large functional groups affected by scoC include 29 genes associated with motility, 38 associated with carbohydrate
metabolism (notably myoinositol and acetoin metabolism), 27 associated
with metabolism of nucleotides and nucleosides (purine and pyrimidine
biosynthetic genes), and 19 associated with adaptation to atypical
conditions and detoxification. Thirty-five ribosomal proteins also
showed a change in gene expression. The relevance of 35 out of 55 ribosomal proteins being transcribed at a higher level in the
scoC mutant at time point t3 is not immediately obvious.
There are 166 genes with unknown function or having no similarity to
any protein in existing databases.
Biochemical and genetic data are available for a number of genes for
which scoC-specific expression changes are known, as determined by earlier studies. Table 4
shows that there is a substantial agreement between our observations
and previously reported findings.
Regulatory genes affected by ScoC.
The functional category of
regulatory proteins shows a relatively large number of
scoC-affected genes. Tables
5 and 6 list these
genes and their changes in the scoC4 mutant relative to the
wild type, as well as the genes or operons known or conjectured to be
affected directly. This group includes not only gene products classified as transcriptional regulators (SubtiList functional class
3.5.2) but also sigma factors (as well as anti- and anti-anti-sigma factors), regulatory phosphatases and kinases, members of two-component sensor/regulator systems, and members of other categories (see "Sporulation and catabolite repression" below). The DNA sequence from
10 to
500 upstream of these regulatory genes was examined with
the GeneSpring software package (Silicon Genetics) for the presence of
potential ScoC binding sites (16). Tables 5 and 6 show the
results of this search, in which many of the listed regulators exhibit
potential ScoC sites. It is necessary to note that the sites identified
in these tables were found by using a consensus ScoC binding site
sequence which, because of its AT-rich nature and three ambiguous
bases, is likely to appear in intergenic regions upstream of many genes
and operons. Indeed, in more than 60% of these intergenic regions, we
can identify potential ScoC binding site sequences. At this point, we
do not have experimental evidence for ScoC binding in any of these
regions.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 5.
Genes encoding transcriptional regulatory proteins
(SubtiList functional class 3.5.2) whose expression is
significantly changed in the scoC4 strain
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 6.
Genes encoding regulatory proteins not acting through
transcription (nonmembers of SubtiList functional class 3.5.2)
whose expression is significantly changed in the scoC4
strain
|
|
For genes in Tables 5 and 6 where the ScoC-controlled genes are known,
the changes in the levels of expression for these affected genes are
also observed to meet our statistical cutoff. The decrease in the
transcription level of the antiterminator-encoding pyrR gene
(3.6-fold) is mirrored by the larger (13- to 48-fold) decreases in the
pyrimidine biosynthetic operon (pyrPBCADFE) in the
scoC mutant. Likewise, the 4-fold down-regulation of the
positive regulatory gene hutP at t2 leads to a concomitant
3- to 38-fold decrease in the histidine utilization genes
(hutHUIGM). Interestingly, a 3.3-fold decrease at t4 in the
rbsR transcript, originally annotated as encoding a
transcriptional repressor of the ribose operon, is accompanied by a
counterintuitive 3.8- to 5.1-fold decrease in ribose utilization
(rbsKDACB) at the same time point. ScoC also appears to
affect rbsR at the earliest time point (t1) in the opposite
direction: rbsR transcription is increased 2.3-fold, while
rbsKDACB also shows a 2.0- to 2.9-fold increase. This is consistent with the suggestion by Strauch (39) that
rbsR may not act as a repressor in B. subtilis,
as had been shown to be the case for its Escherichia coli ortholog.
Our data confirm the effect of scoC4 on increasing the
expression of SinI, the antagonist of the transcriptional regulator SinR. Footprinting experiments have shown that ScoC binds to
sinI upstream regulatory sequences (located at
131 and
200 from the sinI start codon). These binding sites
correspond to loci lying 9 and 78 bp upstream from the sinI
transcriptional start, as identified by Kallio et al.
(16). The ScoC binding consensus at
131 was not found in
our search of upstream sequences, as only one mismatch was allowed in
the search for the RATANTATY motif. However, by our computer analyses,
another additional ScoC-binding consensus was identified at
289.
Sporulation and catabolite repression.
In agreement with the
sporulation control phenotype of scoC, several additional
sporulation control genes are affected in the scoC4 null
mutant (Table 7). These regulatory genes,
which exert their effects through nontranscriptional means (e.g.,
bofA, spoIVFAB, spo0M, and
usd), were not previously known to lie under ScoC control.
It is important to note that the absence of ScoC lowers the level of
rapA phosphatase transcription and that of its inhibitor,
phrA, more than threefold compared to levels in the
wild-type strain (Table 3).
Recent studies on whole-genome analysis of catabolite repression in
B. subtilis describe the down-regulatory effect of glucose on the expression of a large number of genes (24, 42). The expression of some of these genes, such as gapB
(
5-fold), pckA (
2-fold), cstA
(
2-fold), msmX (
2-to
3-fold), acoA
(
30-fold) and yesLM (
2-to
4-fold) are also
down-regulated in the scoC mutant in this study. However,
the transcription of some other genes repressed in presence of glucose,
such as those of the iol and the opp operons, is
increased in scoC-deficient strains.
A comparison of the transcriptional behavior of sporulation-associated
genes in the scoC mutant with the membrane array results obtained by Fawcett et al. (7) suggests both a synergistic and an antagonistic effect between spo0A and
scoC. In the present study, in at least one time
point, the absence of ScoC lowered the transcriptional levels of the
dpp, hut, and
ybcPQST-ybdAB operons. These genes have been
shown to depend on intact Spo0A for efficient transcription in the
published membrane study (7). Similarly, the transcription
of the yxbA, yxbB, and yxnB genes appears to require both Spo0A and ScoC (as determined from both studies).
Most of the scoC effects, however, suggest controlling
effects in opposition between ScoC and Spo0A. Several of the genes reviewed by Stragier and Losick (36) that have a known or
putative role in sporulation show a higher level of expression in the
scoC4 strain than in the wild type (Table 3). Furthermore,
more than 50% of the genes with unknown functions listed by Fawcett et
al. (7), genes whose transcriptions are both Spo0A and
F dependent, are transcribed at a higher level
in the scoC4 mutant (Table 7). This list includes the
yabP and yabQ genes, which have been identified
as essential for sporulation (1, 7).
It is interesting that not all the degradative enzymes whose expression
is associated with the stationary phase and which also appear to be
under spo0A control (7) are repressed by ScoC.
As an example, while the transcriptions of aprE,
nprE, and nprB are elevated in scoC,
the transcriptions of vpr, csn, and pel are not affected.
Nitrogen metabolism.
Microarray analysis reveals a number of
changes in the transcriptional profile of several genes coding for
enzymes involved in nitrogen utilization. The transcription of all the
genes in the hut operon is decreased in the scoC4
mutant between 3- and 20-fold compared to that in the wild-type strain
(Fig. 3A). Similarly, the
sigL-specific transcription of the genes involved in the
degradation of isoleucine and valine (2) is down-regulated
in scoC4, as is the transcription of the ureABC
genes (Figs. 3B and C). A striking observation is that these three
scoC-affected operons are also regulated by codY
(9, 32). Moreover, the transcriptional profile of these
three operons demonstrates the typically tight clustering of
transcriptional profiles expected for genes lying within operons,
giving further confidence in the robustness of the expression assay.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Expression patterns for several (putative or known)
operons as a function of time after inoculation. Intensities were
normalized twice, to whole-array median intensities for all genes and
to whole-gene median intensities for all arrays. (A)
Histidine-degradative genes (hutPHUIGM); (B) Ile/Val
degradative pathway genes (bkdR, ptb,
bcd, buk, lpd,
bkdA1, bkdA2, and bkdB;
formerly known as yqiRSTUV bkdAA,
bkdAB, and bkdB); (C) urea utilization
genes (ureABC).
|
|
In addition, with further implications for the influence of
scoC on genes involved in nitrogen metabolism,
transcriptions levels of the operon glnQHMP (coding for the
ABC glutamine transporter) are four- to sixfold higher in the mutant
than in the wild type.
Motility and chemotaxis.
To ascertain the motility of the
cells under our growth conditions, we looked at samples from cultures
of both strains at the four time points. Wild-type strain motility
ranged from approximately 60% at t1 to more than 90% at t4. In the
scoC4 mutant culture, however, most of the cells were
filamentous and only 5% (t1) to 20% (t4) of the cells were motile.
Figure 4 illustrates the transcriptional
profiles for all the genes from flgB to cheD, in
which a large number of motility and chemotaxis genes appear to be
expressed at a lower level at the three later time points. Expression
values were highest in mid-log phase (t1) and decreased progressively
to the last time point analyzed in stationary phase (t4), while
sinI transcription progressively increased with a steeper
slope in the mutant than in the wild type. The transcription of the
hag gene, which codes for flagellin, is also decreased in
the scoC mutant. It is interesting that, as in the case of
the hut, bdk, and ure operons, both
codY and scoC are known to play a role in the
expression of hag (23).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Expression patterns for the 30-gene
flgB-to-sigD transcriptional cluster as a
function of time after inoculation. The y axis shows the
relative expression levels for 30 chemotaxis and flagellar-motility
genes at position 145° to 146° in the B. subtilis
genome (thin lines) and for sinI (thick line). Intensity
was normalized as described for Fig. 3.
|
|
It is also interesting that the gene coding for McpC, a
methyl-accepting protein mediating the carbohydrate chemotaxis
in synergy with the phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent
phosphotransferase system, is also down-regulated in
scoC (10). A putative methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein, YfmS, is significantly down-regulated as well. mcpA and mcpB, although obviously down-regulated
in scoC in our assay, failed to meet the most stringent
requirements set by our statistical analysis (Z scores of only 4.1).
scoC4-dependent regulation of the
yclF gene.
The list of 560 significant genes
reflects Bacillus ORFs showing a significant expression
variation in at least one of the four assayed time points (log phase,
early transition, late transition, and stationary phase) between the
wild type and the scoC4 transcriptomes. Most of the genes on
this list vary significantly at only one or two time points. However,
only one gene, yclF, shows significant change at all four
time points. The yclF gene, encoding a hypothetical peptide/proton symporter orthologous to L. lactis
DtpT (11, 18), is expressed at 6- to 20-fold-higher levels
in scoC4 cells than in the isogenic wild-type cells. The Z
scores associated with these measurements are greater than 9.0, indicating a high degree of significance in the difference between the
two strains.
 |
DISCUSSION |
It has been recognized that, "[a]lthough transient in
laboratory cultures, the transition state is probably the predominant metabolically active state of Bacillus in the natural
environment of the soil where nutrients are usually limited"
(38). In order to maximize the utilization of available
resources, bacilli have developed complex regulatory circuits to allow
functional diversification of the population and to fine tune and
quickly adapt their metabolism to a constant state of nutrient flux.
This communal organization ensures that a fraction of the population
survives, either by the resumption of vegetative growth by exploiting
new nutrient sources made available by the secretion of degradative
enzymes, or by the entrance into sporulation, the ultimate survival
strategy in a nutrient-depleted environment. To this end, while Spo0A
acts as the master switch determining whether the cell continues
vegetative proliferation or carries out stationary-phase functions,
Bacillus has evolved a number of other regulators, called
transition state regulators (38), with partially
overlapping control functions. ScoC belongs to this group of
regulators. However, the complete role of ScoC in the life of bacilli
has not been fully elucidated.
In the present work, we have expanded the scope of our knowledge of
scoC's overall regulatory role. To do so, we analyzed the
B. subtilis transcriptome under defined laboratory
conditions with the aid of species-specific oligonucleotide
microarrays. The scoC4 mutant used in this experiment
reveals transcriptional changes from isogenic wild-type cells in
approximately 560 genes for at least one of the four time points tested.
The identification of these genes was based on a rigorous statistical
treatment of the data. We required a 4.37-SDLR threshold for significance of an expression change between scoC and
wild-type cells, relative to the expression changes assayed on
replicate samples. This is a very stringent level based on a Bonferroni correction for a large (4,000+) set of comparisons. However, there may
be biologically relevant changes in genes that do not quite meet this
strict cutoff, which minimizes false positives at the cost of excluding
true positives. Therefore, we also considered the expression changes
for a subsidiary set of 121 ORFs that meet a 3.89-SDLR
cutoff relative to the replicate data (corresponding to a 99.99%
confidence threshold).
It is very important to consider that the significance of a given
change in a gene's expression is a function of the intensity level at
which that gene is detected on the microarray. At high signal levels,
the scatter of the error of measurement is a small fraction of the
measurement. In contrast, at low signal levels, the error of
measurement tends to be dominated by an absolute value
(32). Therefore, a smaller change occurring between
scoC and wild-type cells might be more significant if the
scanned gene signal is >10,000 than a larger change of expression if
the gene signal is <100. Therefore, the Z score of a given expression
change relative to the replicate scatter distribution is a better
measure of significance than the gene expression change alone.
The reliability of the results obtained using this approach is
supported by their agreement with data previously reported in the
literature and summarized in Table 4. For example, the expression
patterns for the opp operon genes in our experiments are
similar to the results recently reported for an
oppA-lacZ fusion analysis by Koide et al.
(17). Furthermore, the scoC4-transcriptional level of aprE was substantially increased in the present
study, as has been reported elsewhere (8). Also, the
increase in the level of sinI-specific mRNA in
scoC cells is in agreement with previously unpublished data
(33). ScoC has been shown to also affect a previously
unidentified alkaline phosphatase. From our expression data, it appears
that this measured activity is due to PhoB (4).
A major role attributed to scoC has been its effect on the
sporulation process, coupled to catabolite repression (4,
14) by a not-yet-clarified mechanism. It has been reported that
scoC controls the activity of SinR by transcriptionally
modulating the gene expression of the SinR antagonist, sinI
(15, 32). In addition, ScoC has been described as
controlling the expression of the app and opp
operons, whose gene products are responsible for the import of
quorum-sensing signaling peptides (17). At first glance,
while these are very important roles, it may not be sufficient to
explain all the phenotypes associated with scoC. Data
presented here show that the level of transcription of rapA and phrA in a scoC null mutant is diminished more
than threefold. This is likely to affect the level of Spo0A
phosphorylation, which, in turn, will affect the level of
spo0A mRNA due to the fact that phosphorylated Spo0A
activates its own transcription (13). Although our
statistical analysis does not indicate a significant change in the
absolute level of spo0A transcript between the wild type and
mutant, there is a slight but noticeable difference in the level of
spo0A transcript in the scoC strain at t2
relative to the level of spo0F transcription. While in all
the strains we have tested so far spo0A mRNA rises sharply
around T0, it has already increased
considerably just before transition relative to the spo0F
mRNA in the scoC mutant (Fig.
5). We also find that the transcription
of bofA, spoIVFA and spoIVFb, involved
in the processing of
K, increases in the
scoC strain after t3 (fourfold higher at t4).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Expression patterns for spo0A and
spo0F transcripts in scoC and wild-type
strains. (A) Relative expression levels for spo0A (thick
lines) and spo0F (thin lines) from wild-type (closed
diamonds) and scoC (open diamonds) cells. Expression
levels were normalized as in Fig. 3. (B) Ratio of spo0A
to spo0F expression levels for wild-type (closed
squares) and scoC (open squares) cells.
|
|
However, while we find the level of rapA and phrA
significantly reduced in the scoC strain, the expression
levels of the other members of the Rap/Phr family, several of which are
under Spo0A control (7), do not appear to be significantly
affected. The expression of several of the other genes known to play an
important role in the initiation of sporulation, such as
spo0B, spo0F, abrB, kinA,
kinB, kinC, or those encoding the
sporulation-specific sigma factors, is likewise not significantly
affected by scoC4.
In all, the results show that ScoC affects the level of expression of
38 sporulation genes as tabulated by Stragier and Losick (36). In addition, about 50% of the genes with unknown
functions, identified by Fawcett et al. (7) as requiring
both Spo0A and
F for transcription, show
positive shifts in expression in the scoC null mutation
(Table 7). We show that ScoC has both negative (pckA and
gapB) and positive (iol operon) effects on the
expression of a number of genes involved in carbon metabolism
(24, 42). This balancing act of both down- and
up-regulation of genes may partially explain how scoC null
mutations relieve the sporulation repression exerted by glucose. While
these findings do not lead to a complete understanding of the mechanism
by which scoC plays a role in sporulation, it certainly
indicates a wider role for scoC in this process than
previously appreciated.
B. subtilis has a varied repertoire of genes regulating
nitrogen metabolism. The main regulatory genes identified to date are
codY, tnrA, glnR, and glnA
(9). In the absence of ScoC, it was a surprise to observe
a very strong downward effect on the transcription of genes involved in
the utilization of amino acids as a nitrogen source, such the
hut and bkd operons. The fact that
scoC also causes a decrease in the transcriptional level of
the ureABC operon seems to suggest that there is at least a partial overlap in the regulation of this nitrogen-related group of
genes by both CodY and ScoC. The possibility of a coregulatory function
is strengthened by the down-regulation effect we have observed in
scoC4 for other CodY-regulated genes, such as
gabP, comK, rapA (31),
the hag regulon (23), and, to a lesser extent, the dpp operon. However, there is no obvious scoC
effect on srfA, rapC, and citB, which
were reported as being regulated by codY (31).
In addition, the expression of codY itself has an unchanging profile between the wild-type and scoC strains.
A strong (fivefold) expression increase was exerted in the
scoC4 mutant on the glutamine transporter operon
(glnQHMP). This may indicate a higher level and/or
demand of glutamine, a key intermediary in nitrogen utilization in
B. subtilis. While the scoC mutation represses
nitrogen utilization by lowering the expression of the hut,
bkd, and ure operons, it elevates the expression
of the genes involved in the transport of the central player for nitrogen metabolism, glutamine. This may help explain the observation (33) that a strain carrying a mutation in scoC
can affect catabolite repression exerted by glucose but not that
exerted by glucose and glutamine together.
The slight but observable increase in the expression level of
sinI is bound to antagonize SinR activity. It has been
reported that sinR is a positive regulator of
sigD (30), involved in motility functions.
Therefore, a higher level of sinI, by inactivating sinR, would depress the motility of a scoC mutant
by repressing sigD transcription. This may explain the
observation that scoC mutants are somewhat less motile than
wild-type cells (16). We have shown that a great many of
the genes involved in motility and chemotaxis are indeed transcribed at
lower levels in the scoC4 strain (Fig. 4).
Given the large number of genes affected by ScoC, as determined by
comparing the scoC4 mutant and wild-type transcriptomes, it
is perhaps not surprising that a large number of affected genes themselves encode regulatory proteins, thus transmitting the direct effects of ScoC to other genes. ScoC is known to be a pleiotropic regulatory protein, and we suggest that some of these effects are
likely due to an indirect action mediated through other regulators (Tables 5 and 6). Potential ScoC DNA binding sites were found upstream
of several regulatory genes, including ykoM,
ykvE, cheY, cheB, rbsR,
ywrC, and cggR, in which transcription appears to be decreased in the scoC loss-of-function mutant in at least
one of the four time points assayed (Tables 5 and 6). The
bidirectionality of these regulatory effects and of the effects seen on
genes involved in nitrogen metabolism points to the interesting
possibility that ScoC acts both in a negative and, perhaps directly or
indirectly, in a positive manner.
The effect of the scoC mutation on comK
expression (discussed above), together with the effect on the
transcription of the opp operon, may explain the lower level
of competence reached by a scoC mutant (Causey and Ferrari,
unpublished). It is interesting that comK appears to have a
putative scoC binding site at upstream position
147 (Table
5).
The yclF gene is unique in our set of significantly changed
expressions in scoC. It is the only gene that showed an
increased expression level at all four time points tested. In the
promoter region of yclF, upstream of its ribosomal binding
site, there are clear and canonical
10 and
35
A promoter sequences. Overlying the sequences
of this region are two close matches to the ScoC-binding consensus
sequence, RATANTATY (Fig. 6). These
sequences are potential binding sites repressing yclF in
wild-type cells relative to the scoC4 mutant, in which this
repression would be relaxed. The function of the 492-amino-acid yclF protein in B. subtilis is unknown, but its
amino acid sequence shows high similarity (E value = 10
106) to the 463-amino-acid Lactococcus
lactis dtpT gene product, a novel di- and tripeptide transporter
(11, 18). Both DtpT and YclF appear to be members of the
PTR superfamily, peptide/proton symporters, which are structurally and
functionally distinct from the multisubunit ABC peptide transporters,
such as Opp and Dpp (35). A point mutation in
dtpT leads to increases in protease gene transcription in
L. lactis (21). Research aimed at investigating the role of yclF in B. subtilis is in progress.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
The 280-bp promoter region of the yclF
gene (and the yclG gene). Start codons are underlined
and in bold capitals. R.B.S., ribosomal binding site. The 10 and 35
boxes of the yclF promoter are indicated. The
ScoC-binding consensus sequences overlying these promoter elements are
double underlined.
|
|
In this paper, we present a global analysis of the effects of the
scoC4 null mutation on the B. subtilis
transcriptome. This study has correlated known phenotypes of the
scoC null mutation (lower motility, sporulation phenotype,
development of competence, and degradative enzyme production) with
changes detected in the expression pattern of a large number of genes
with both known and unknown function. The data suggest (Table 7) that
there are many additional genes involved in the complex network of
sporulation genes, an observation echoed by the recent report by
Fawcett et al. (7). In addition, our work suggests a close
and unforeseen link of ScoC to the regulation of nitrogen metabolism.
We propose that there may exist a strong interaction of scoC
with the global nitrogen metabolism regulators, such as CodY. Finally,
we have demonstrated that ScoC clearly plays a major role in various
cellular functions of the life cycle of this bacterium. These
observations allow us to paint a picture in which Spo0A is still the
master switch of the transition phase, but the real differentiation
occurring within the transition state population is mediated by a
number of transition state regulators, one of which is scoC.
By way of the global regulatory network implemented by these transition state regulators, the bacterial culture can swiftly achieve a redistribution of functions within its populations to carry out the
most needed tasks. Elucidating the mechanistic details of how ScoC
exercises control among the various processes it participates in will
usher in an exciting era for the investigation of Bacillus growth and development.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Anita van Kimmenade, Mick Ward, and Mike Arbige for help
and support throughout the study; Maria Diaz-Torres, Don Naki, and Jian
Yao for helpful discussions; and Molly Schmid, Roopa Ghirnikar, Doug
Crabb, Brian Schmidt, and Maggie Cervin for reviewing the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Genencor
International Inc., 925 Page Mill Rd., Palo Alto, CA 94304. Phone:
(650) 846-7538. Fax: (650) 621-7938. E-mail:
eferrari{at}genencor.com.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Asai, K.,
H. Takamatsu,
M. Iwano,
T. Kodama,
K. Watabe, and N. Ogasawara.
2001.
The Bacillus subtilis yabQ gene is essential for formation of the spore cortex.
Microbiology
147:919-927[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Debarbouille, M.,
R. Gardan,
M Arnaud, and G. Rapoport.
1999.
Role of BkdR, a transcriptional activator of the sigL-dependent isoleucine and valine degradation pathway in Bacillus subtilis.
J. Bacteriol.
181:2059-2066[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
de Saizieu, A.,
C. Gardes,
N. Flint,
C. Wagner,
M. Kamber,
T. J. Mitchell,
W. Keck,
K. E. Amrein, and R. Lange.
2000.
Microarray-based identification of a novel Streptococcus pneumoniae regulon controlled by an autoinduced peptide.
J. Bacteriol.
182:4696-4703[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Dod, B.,
G. Balassa,
E. Raulet, and V. Jeannoda.
1978.
Spore control (Sco) mutations in Bacillus subtilis. II. Sporulation and the production of extracellular proteases and amylases by Sco mutants.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
163:45-56[CrossRef].
|
| 5.
|
Dowds, B. C., and J. A. Hoch.
1991.
Regulation of the oxidative stress response by the hpr gene in Bacillus subtilis.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
137:1121-1125[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Farrell, R. E., Jr.
1996.
Protocol: guanidinium-acid-phenol extraction in RNA methodologies, 2nd ed., p. 81.
Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.
|
| 7.
|
Fawcett, P.,
P. Eichenberger,
R. Losick, and P. Youngman.
2000.
The transcriptional profile of early to middle sporulation in Bacillus subtilis.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97:8063-8068[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Ferrari, E.,
D. J. Henner,
M. Perego, and J. A. Hoch.
1988.
Transcription of Bacillus subtilis subtilisin and expression of subtilisin in sporulation mutants.
J. Bacteriol.
170:289-295[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Fisher, S.
1999.
Regulation of nitrogen metabolism in Bacillus subtilis: vive la difference!
Mol. Microbiol.
32:223-232[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Garrity, L. F.,
S. L. Schiel,
R. Merril,
J. Reitzer,
M. H. Saier, and G. W. Ordal.
1998.
Unique regulation of carbohydrate chemotaxis in Bacillus subtilis by the phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system and the methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein.
J. Bacteriol.
180:4475-4480[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Hagting, A.,
E. R. Kunji,
K. J. Leenhouts,
B. Poolman, and W. N. Konings.
1994.
The di- and tripeptide transport protein of Lactococcus lactis. A new type of bacterial peptide transporter.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:11391-11399[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Higerd, T. B.,
J. A. Hoch, and J. Spizizen.
1972.
Hyperprotease-producing mutants of Bacillus subtilis.
J. Bacteriol.
112:1026-1028[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Hoch, J. A.
1998.
Initiation of bacterial development.
Curr. Opin. Microbiol.
1:170-174[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Ito, J., and J. Spizizen.
1973.
Genetic studies of catabolite repression insensitive sporulation mutants of Bacillus subtilis.
Colloq. Int. Cent. Natl. Rech. Sci.
227:81-82.
|
| 15.
|
Jeannoda, V., and G. Balassa.
1978.
Spore control (Sco) mutations in Bacillus subtilis. IV. Synthesis of alkaline phosphatase during sporulation of Sco mutants.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
163:65-73[CrossRef].
|
| 16.
|
Kallio, P. T.,
J. E. Fagelson,
J. A. Hoch, and M. A. Strauch.
1991.
The transition state regulator Hpr of Bacillus subtilis is a DNA-binding protein.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:13411-13417[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Koide, A.,
M. Perego, and J. A. Hoch.
1999.
ScoC regulates peptide transport and sporulation initiation in Bacillus subtilis.
J. Bacteriol.
181:4114-4117[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Kunji, E. R.,
E. J. Smid,
R. Plapp,
B. Poolman, and W. N. Konings.
1993.
Di-tripeptides and oligopeptides are taken up via distinct transport mechanisms in Lactococcus lactis.
J. Bacteriol.
175:2052-2059[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Kunst, F., et al.
1997.
The complete genome sequence of the Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis.
Nature
390:249-256[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Lockhart, D. J.,
H. Dong,
M. C. Byrne,
M. T. Follettie,
M. V. Gallo,
M. S. Chee,
M. Mittmann,
C. Wang,
M. Kobayashi,
H. Horton, and E. L. Brown.
1996.
Expression monitoring by hybridization to high-density oligonucleotide arrays.
Nat. Biotechnol.
14:1675-1680[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Marugg, J. D.,
W. Meijer,
R. van Kranenburg,
P. Laverman,
P. G. Bruinenberg, and W. M. de Vos.
1995.
Medium-dependent regulation of proteinase gene expression in Lactococcus lactis: control of transcription initiation by specific dipeptides.
J. Bacteriol.
177:2982-2989[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Milhaud, P.,
G. Balassa, and J. Zucca.
1978.
Spore control (Sco) mutations in Bacillus subtilis. I. Selection and genetic mapping of Sco mutants.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
163:35-44[CrossRef].
|
| 23.
|
Mirel, D. B.,
W. F. Estacio,
M. Mathieu,
E. Olmsted,
J. Ramirez, and L. M. Marquez-Magana.
2000.
Environmental regulation of Bacillus subtilis D-dependent gene expression.
J. Bacteriol.
182:3055-3062[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Moreno, M. S.,
B. L. Schneider,
R. R. Maile,
W. Weyler, and M. H. Saier.
2001.
Catabolite repression mediated by the CcpA protein in Bacillus subtilis: novel modes of regulation revealed by whole-genome analyses.
Mol. Microbiol.
39:1366-1381[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Moszer, I.,
P. Glaser, and A. Danchin.
1995.
SubtiList: a relational database for the Bacillus subtilis genome.
Microbiology
141:261-268[Abstract].
|
| 26.
|
Moszer, I.
1998.
The complete genome of Bacillus subtilis: from sequence annotation to data management and analysis.
FEBS Lett.
430:28-36[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Perego, M., and J. A. Hoch.
1988.
Sequence analysis and regulation of the hpr locus, a regulatory gene for protease production and sporulation in Bacillus subtilis.
J. Bacteriol.
170:2560-2567[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Perego, M.,
G. B. Spiegelman, and J. A. Hoch.
1988.
Structure of the gene for the transition state regulator, AbrB: regulator synthesis is controlled by the spo0A sporulation gene in Bacillus subtilis.
Mol. Microbiol.
2:689-699[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Perego, M.
1999.
Self-signaling by Phr peptides modulates Bacillus subtilis development, p. 243-258.
In
G. M. Dunny, and S. C. Winans (ed.), Cell-cell signaling in bacteria. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 30.
|
Rashid, M. H., and J. Sekiguchi.
1996.
flaD (sinR) mutations affect SigD-dependent functions at multiple points in Bacillus subtilis.
J. Bacteriol.
178:6640-6643[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Ratnayake-Lecamwasan, M.,
P. Serror,
K.-W. Wong, and A. L. Sonenshein.
2001.
Bacillus subtilis codY represses early-stationary-phase genes by sensing GTP levels.
Genes Dev.
15:1093-1103[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Rocke, D. M., and S. Lorenzato.
1995.
A two-component model for measurement error in analytical chemistry.
Technometrics
37:176-184[CrossRef].
|
| 33.
|
Smith, I.
1993.
Regulatory proteins that control late-growth development, p. 785-800.
In
A. L. Sonenshein, J. A. Hoch, and R. Losick (ed.), Bacillus subtilis and other gram-positive bacteria: biochemistry, physiology, and molecular genetics. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 34.
|
Solomon, J. M.,
B. A. Lazazzera, and A. D. Grossman.
1996.
Purification and characterization of an extracellular peptide factor that affects two different developmental pathways in Bacillus subtilis.
Genes Dev.
10:2014-2024[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Steiner, H. Y.,
F. Naider, and J. M. Becker.
1995.
The PTR family: a new group of peptide transporters.
Mol. Microbiol.
16:825-834[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Stragier, P., and R. Losick.
1996.
Molecular genetics of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis.
Annu. Rev. Genet.
30:297-341[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Strauch, M. A.,
G. B. Spiegelman,
M. Perego,
W. C. Johnson,
D. Burbulys, and J. A. Hoch.
1989.
The transition state transcription regulator abrB of Bacillus subtilis is a DNA binding protein.
EMBO J.
8:1615-1621[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Strauch, M. A., and J. A. Hoch.
1993.
Transition-state regulators: sentinels of Bacillus subtilis post-exponential gene expression.
Mol. Microbiol.
7:337-342[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Strauch, M. A.
1995.
AbrB modulates expression and catabolite repression of a Bacillus subtilis ribose transport operon.
J. Bacteriol.
177:6727-6731[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Wodicka, L.,
H. Dong,
M. Mittmann,
M. H. Ho, and D. J. Lockhart.
1997.
Genome-wide expression monitoring in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Nat. Biotechnol.
15:1359-1367[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Yang, M. Y.,
E. Ferrari, and D. J. Henner.
1984.
Cloning of the neutral protease gene of Bacillus subtilis and the use of the cloned gene to create an in vitro-derived deletion mutation.
J. Bacteriol.
160:15-21[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Yoshida, K.,
K. Kobayashi,
Y. Miwa,
D.-M. Kang,
M. Matsunaga,
H. Yamaguchi,
S. Tojo,
M. Yamamoto,
R. Nishi,
N. Ogasawara,
T. Nakayama, and Y. Fujita.
2001.
Combined transcriptome and proteome analysis as a powerful approach to study genes under glucose repression in Bacillus subtilis.
Nucleic Acids Res.
29:683-692[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Bacteriology, December 2001, p. 7329-7340, Vol. 183, No. 24
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.24.7329-7340.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.