Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, June 2002, p. 3232-3241, Vol. 184, No. 12
0021-9193/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.184.12.3232-3241.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
BioCentrum-DTU, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby,1 Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark2
Received 10 December 2001/ Accepted 18 March 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
glutamine + ADP + Pi. When B. subtilis is grown in media with a less preferred nitrogen source, a number of enzymes and permeases involved in the assimilation of nitrogen from alternative nitrogen-containing compounds are induced. Among them are asparaginase (1), gabP-encoded
-aminobutyric acid permease (6), ureABC-encoded urease (4, 20), amtB-glnK-encoded ammonium transport proteins (19), and nasABCDEF-encoded nitrate assimilatory enzymes (9). The induction of these genes is dependent on the global nitrogen-regulatory protein TnrA. A second global nitrogen-regulatory protein, GlnR, is active during nitrogen excess conditions and negatively regulates the expression of the glnRA operon encoding GlnR and GS. TnrA and GlnR are homologous and bind to the same DNA sequence, known as the TnrA/GlnR box (5'-TGTNAN7TNACA-3'). During growth with excess nitrogen (glutamine or ammonia plus glutamate), feedback-inhibited GS stimulates GlnR binding activity but inhibits the action of TnrA through a direct protein-protein interaction (24), thereby preventing the expression of alternative nitrogen-assimilatory pathways. When cells are grown with limited nitrogen, the binding of GS to TnrA disappears and TnrA becomes active while GlnR binding activity is inhibited. This leads to the induction of alternative nitrogen-assimilatory pathways (7, 21, 23). B. subtilis is capable of taking up purine bases and using them for nucleotide synthesis and as a source of nitrogen. To enter the catabolic pathway, guanine, adenine, and hypoxanthine must be converted to xanthine (10). The genes encoding the enzymes and permeases necessary for a complete degradation of purine bases to ammonia and for the transport of uric acid and allantoin have recently been identified (15). They are pucABCDE (xanthine dehydrogenase), pucF (allantoate amidohydrolase), pucH (allantoinase), pucI (allantoin permease), pucJK (uric acid transport), and pucLM (uricase). Inactivation of the pucR gene prevents the expression of gde (guanine deaminase) and all of the puc genes (except pucA). The PucR protein (purine catabolism regulator) shows limited sequence homology to hypothetical proteins from various organisms and was suggested to be a transcriptional regulator responsible for the regulation of expression of the genes of the purine catabolic pathway (15).
This work presents genetic evidence that the PucR protein controls the expression of the genes involved in the purine catabolic pathway and that induction requires a cis-acting regulatory element. Furthermore, we have shown that TnrA induces transcription of pucR under nitrogen-limiting conditions and that PucR is not fully active unless purine degradation products are also present.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. ß-Galactosidase produced from transcriptional fusionsa
|
![]() View larger version (38K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Deletion analysis of PucR-induced promoters. The sequences upstream of the -35 sequence of the indicated gene-lacZ fusions, including the PucR box, are shown. The downstream sequence fusion points are +97 for pucH'-lacZ, +74 for pucI'-lacZ, +137 for pucJ'-lacZ, +94 for pucF'-lacZ, and +78 for gde'-lacZ. In the case of pucJ, the upstream TnrA/GlnR box (Fig. 2B) is also indicated. Cells containing the various lacZ fusions were grown under nitrogen-limiting conditions (glutamate) either with or without allantoin. nt, nucleotides. Boldface indicates a match to the consensus sequence.
|
Construction of transcriptional lacZ fusions. DNA fragments containing native promoters, promoters with deletions, or site-directed mutagenized sequences generated by PCR amplification were used. Random mutagenized sequences were generated by a modified PCR procedure (26). Specific DNA primers fitted with appropriate 5'-positioned restriction sites were used in a PCR to amplify the DNA fragments in question. PCR products were purified and digested with the restriction enzymes specific to the restriction sites incorporated at the 5' ends of the PCR primers. The digested DNA fragments were ligated to plasmid pDG268neo, which had been digested with the same enzymes. The ligation mixtures were transformed into Escherichia coli MC1061 by selection for Apr. Clones containing the promoter DNA fragments fused in front of lacZ in pDG268neo were identified, and the plasmid construct was isolated. The purified plasmids were linearized by digestion with KpnI and transformed into B. subtilis 168 by selection for Neor. Linearized pDG268neo derivatives were integrated by double homologous recombination into the amyE gene, resulting in Neor and amylase-negative transformants. The promoter containing fragments cloned in front of lacZ was amplified by flanking neo- and lacZ-specific primers, and the nucleotide sequence was determined to identify clones with the correct DNA sequence.
Strains carrying both a lacZ fusion and either the pucR, Pspac-pucR, or tnrA genotype were obtained by transforming the lacZ fusion strains with DNA isolated from HØR18, HØR26, or LCC26, respectively.
Enzyme assay. Cells were harvested in the exponential growth phase and homogenized by sonication in Z buffer (0.06 M Na2HPO4, 0.04 M NaH2PO4, 0.01 M KCl, 0.001 M MgSO4; pH 7). ß-Galactosidase activity was measured as previously described (2). One unit of activity is defined as 1 nmol of substrate converted per min per mg of protein. The total protein content was determined by the Lowry method. All enzyme levels reported are the means of results of at least three experiments. The variation was less than 25%.
Homology searches. Preliminary sequence data were obtained from The Institute for Genomic Research website (http://www.tigr.org).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (64K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Mapping of the transcription start sites for pucA, pucF, pucH, pucI, pucJ, and pucR by primer extension. Total RNA was isolated from strain 168 grown with ammonia and glutamate (lanes 1) or glutamate and allantoin (lanes 2) as the nitrogen source. The most likely transcription start point for each gene is indicated by an arrow.
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. (A) Alignment of the PucR-regulated promoters of pucA, pucF, pucH, pucI, pucJ, and gde with respect to the -10 and -35 sequences. Boldface letters indicate transcription start sites (as determined from results shown in Fig. 1), -10 and -35 sequences are boxed, PucR boxes (5'-WWWCNTTGGTTAA-3') are underlined, and matches to TnrA/GlnR boxes (5'-TGTNAN7TNACA-3') are indicated by dots above the nucleotides. nt, nucleotides. (B) Alignment of the potential PucR boxes in the PucR-induced genes. Boldface indicates a match to the consensus sequence.
|
To demonstrate the role of PucR in the expression of the puc gene lacZ fusions, a pucR disruption mutation (pucR::pBOER) was introduced into the lacZ fusion strains. Compared to the expression in wild-type fusion strains grown under nitrogen-limiting conditions (glutamate), the expression of the lacZ fusionsexcept for that of pucRwas decreased in the respective pucR derivatives grown under the same conditions (Table 2). The decrease in expression varied between 2-fold for pucI and 334-fold for pucJ. The ß-galactosidase level in the pucR derivatives grown with allantoin was in general reduced to approximately less than 1% of the levels in the wild-type strains, except for pucI, in which it was significantly higher. This may suggest that additional regulatory factors have an influence on pucI expression. Again, pucA'-lacZ and pucR'-lacZ expression were derepressed in the pucR strain compared to those in the wild type (Table 2). We therefore conclude that pucR acts as a positive factor in relation to the pathway-specific induction of pucH, pucJ, pucF, pucI, and gde expression and as a negative factor in relation to pucR and pucA expression.
We introduced the lacZ fusions into a pucD disruption strain to test whether the PucR-dependent induction also would occur under nitrogen-limiting conditions (glutamate) in a strain unable to produce purine degradation products, as a pucD disruption strain cannot degrade guanine or hypoxanthine to uric acid. The lacZ fusion strains carrying the pucD disruption displayed the same expression pattern (data not shown) as the wild-type strains. Thus, we can conclude that PucR is able to induce transcription without purine degradation products but that the induction is much more effective when purine degradation products are available.
Deletion analysis of puc gene promoter regions. Since PucR induces transcription from the promoters of pucF, pucH, pucI, pucJ, and gde and the PucR C-terminal sequence shows some similarity to a LysR-like DNA binding domain (15), we looked for the presence of a conserved sequence upstream of the promoters that might function as a recognition site for PucR. As we could not identify any conserved sequence by visual inspection, we made a systematic deletion analysis of all five promoter regions. In all five analyses, transcription ceased when the deletions reached a certain point (Fig. 3), but no obviously common DNA sequence could be immediately identified around these points. The Ann-spec (18) bioinformatics computer program was used to search for conserved sequences within a region spanning 100 bp upstream of the -35 sequence of the promoters of pucF, pucH, pucI, pucJ, and gde. Since LysR-like regulators normally recognize the sequence T-N11-A (8, 13), the request was for a 13-bp sequence. The five 100-bp sequences were searched for a conserved sequence and compared to approximately 4,100 other upstream gene sequences from B. subtilis. Several 13-bp sequences were suggested. However, only one of the suggested sequences was supported by the experimental data presented in Fig. 3. This sequence was 5'-WWWCNTTGGTTAA-3', tentatively called the PucR box. The potential PucR box sequences in front of the puc genes and gde are aligned in Fig. 2B. Partial or total deletion of the PucR box can explain the loss of promoter activity in deletion mutants of the pucF'-, pucH'-, pucI'-, pucJ'-, and gde'-lacZ promoter fusions. It appears that the activation of transcription from these five genes requires a cis-acting sequence containing the PucR box motif and that this sequence could be part of a recognition site for the putative activator protein encoded by pucR.
The effect of the TnrA/GlnR box located upstream of pucJ was analyzed in strains LB035 and LB056, in which the TnrA/GlnR box was deleted (Fig. 3). A deletion of the TnrA/GlnR box did not affect expression under nitrogen-limiting conditions (glutamate), but with limited nitrogen plus allantoin the expression was elevated by a factor of 2.5. Hence, the TnrA/GlnR box upstream of the -35 sequence in the pucJ promoter exerts a negative regulatory function on pucJ expression under induced-growth conditions.
When the potential PucR box in front of pucR was deleted, the activity from the pucR'-lacZ promoter fusion increased almost 20-fold when cells were grown under nitrogen-limiting conditions (Fig. 4). Surprisingly, the activity was only slightly increased for limited nitrogen supplied with allantoin. This indicates that there might be another sequence important for the repression of the pucR promoter when allantoin is present (see below). Two potential PucR boxes overlapping the -35 and -10 sequences in the pucA promoter were also found (Fig. 2A and 4). This finding agrees with the data showing that PucR inhibited transcription from the pucA promoter under nitrogen-limiting conditions with allantoin present (Table 2).
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Deletion analysis of PucR-repressed promoters. The upstream sequences and the positions of the upstream fusion points of the pucA'-lacZ fusions are shown (the downstream sequence fusion point is +180), as are the positions of the downstream sequences and the downstream fusion points of the pucR'-lacZ fusions (the upstream sequence fusion point is -123). The PucR box is indicated (boldface indicates a match with the consensus sequence), as is the -35 sequence. A complementary PucR box in the pucR'-lacZ fusions is located in the noncoding strand. Cells containing the various lacZ fusions were grown under nitrogen-limiting conditions (glutamate) either with or without allantoin. nt, nucleotides.
|
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Site-directed mutational analysis of the proposed PucR box in the pucH and pucI regulatory regions. The sequences upstream of the -35 region of the pucH'-lacZ and pucI'-lacZ fusions are listed. The PucR box is indicated (boldface indicates a match to the consensus sequence), and the positions of the upstream fusion points are shown. The downstream sequence fusion points are +97 for pucH'-lacZ and +74 for pucI'-lacZ. Cells containing the various lacZ fusions were grown under nitrogen-limiting conditions (glutamate) either with or without allantoin. wt, wild type.
|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Random mutational analysis of the proposed PucR box in the pucH and pucR regulatory region. Part of the pucH-to-pucR intercistronic region is presented as a double-stranded DNA sequence. The pucH'-lacZ fusion strains (the upstream and downstream sequence fusion points are -110 and +97) are listed above the double-stranded DNA sequence, and the pucR'-lacZ fusion strains (the upstream and downstream sequence fusion points are -123 and +84) are listed below. The PucR box (5'-WWWCNTTGGTTAA-3') and TnrA/GlnR box (5'-TGTNAN7TNACA-3') are listed (boldface indicates a match to the consensus sequence), and the -10 and -35 sequences and the +1 positions are indicated. Cells containing the various lacZ fusions were grown under nitrogen-limiting conditions (glutamate) either with or without allantoin. wt, wild type.
|
To test whether TnrA also plays a direct role in the PucR-dependent activation of puc genes and gde, the pucR gene expression was put under the control of the IPTG-inducible Pspac promoter. This construction (pIMut4, Table 1) was introduced into the pucA'-, pucF'-, pucH'-, pucI'-, pucJ'-, and gde'-lacZ fusion strains. The strains were grown under nitrogen excess conditions (ammonia plus glutamate), in which the TnrA protein is not active. The basal level of pucR expression under nitrogen excess conditions for the pucH'-lacZ fusion strain under the Pspac promoter was 4 U/mg of protein. In the presence of IPTG, which induces pucR expression, the level was increased to 11 U/mg of protein, while the addition of both IPTG and allantoin led to a strong induction of expression of the pucH'-lacZ fusion (371 U/mg of protein). These levels were similar to the ß-galactosidase level of strain CO7, which carries the same lacZ fusion in a PucR+ background. The same pattern of expression was observed for pucF'-, pucI'-, pucJ'-, and gde'-lacZ fusion strains (data not shown). However, in the case of a pucA'-lacZ fusion strain, the ß-galactosidase level was low (2 to 3 U/mg of protein) under all three conditions. This experiment demonstrates that synthesis of PucR, even under growth conditions where pucR normally is not expressed (excess nitrogen conditions), stimulates transcription from the promoters of pucF, pucH, pucI, pucJ, and gde. Expression was further stimulated 15- to 42-fold by allantoin, and the PucR protein did not require active TnrA protein to induce expression. PucR induction and the addition of allantoin in the Pspac-pucR strain did not induce pucA transcription. This is consistent with the observation that in the presence of allantoin, PucR most likely has a negative effect on pucA expression. The induction of pucA is PucR independent, since induction is observed in a pucR genetic background (Table 2). TnrA may be a candidate for a transcription factor responsible for the induction of pucA under nitrogen-limiting conditions. Evidence for this view comes from the finding that the expression of pucABCDE is high in a glnA background (10). However, this was not tested experimentally.
|
|
|---|
Two proteins, SrmR and SdaR, with known functions as transcriptional activators were recorded among the proteins showing similarity to PucR (15). An alignment (15) indicated that PucR, SrmR, and SdaR might contain a LysR-like DNA-binding domain in their C termini. However, the general sequence similarity to the LysR family and other known families of regulatory proteins is not significant, indicating that PucR is not related to any of the other known families. We therefore suggest that PucR, SrmR, SdaR, and the PucR homologues in E. faecalis, B. halodurans, M. smegmatis, C. perfringens, and C. acetobutylicum may constitute a novel family of transcriptional regulators.
Based on the results presented in this paper and on the work of Schultz et al. (15), we suggest a model for the global nitrogen catabolite repression and pathway-specific regulation of the PucR regulon genes in B. subtilis. Purine catabolic genes, together with other genes encoding alternative nitrogen-assimilatory pathways, are not expressed during nitrogen excess conditions due to the inhibition of TnrA activity by GS encoded by glnA. The glnRA operon repressor GlnR controls the level of glnA expression during excess nitrogen conditions (7, 14). Under nitrogen-limiting conditions (glutamate as nitrogen source), TnrA becomes active while GlnR becomes inactive. TnrA activates pucR transcription most likely by binding to the TnrA/GlnR box located upstream of the pucR promoter (Fig. 6). As shown in Table 2, expression of the pucABCDE, pucFG, pucI, pucH, pucJKLM, pucR, and gde operons is induced during growth with glutamate as the nitrogen source and, except in the cases of pucABCDE and pucR, PucR appears to be required for the expression of all puc genes, including gde (Table 2). The expression of pucABCDE, which encodes the subunits of xanthine dehydrogenase (XDH), which oxidizes hypoxanthine and xanthine to uric acid, is induced to a relatively high level during growth with glutamate as the nitrogen source. Uric acid acts together with allantoin and allantoic acid as the effector molecules for PucR-activated transcription (15).
The combination of nitrogen-limiting conditions and excess purine or purine degradation intermediates (e.g., glutamate plus allantoin as the nitrogen source) results in PucR-dependent repression of pucABCDE and pucR expression and strong induction of pucFG, pucH, pucI, pucJKLM, and gde expression (Table 2). These observations are in agreement with previous findings (15). Based on the position of the putative PucR recognition site (PucR box) as revealed by genetic and bioinformatic analysis, we are able to explain both the positive and negative roles of PucR in puc and gde gene expression. The PucR-induced promoters contain PucR boxes located 17 bp (gde) to 39 bp (pucH and pucI) upstream of the -35 elements (Fig. 2 and 3). These upstream promoter positions are consistent with the suggested transcription activator function of PucR. The PucR-repressed promoters in front of pucR and pucABCDE (Fig. 2 and 4) have PucR boxes overlapping the promoter -35 element (pucABCDE) and/or located downstream of the transcription start point (pucABCDE and pucR). Binding of PucR to these sites in the presence of an inducer represses transcription. An alternative explanation for the repression of pucR is that because (i) the pucR and pucH promoters overlap and (ii) PucR activates pucH transcription, the activation of pucH transcription (by PucR) reduces pucR transcription due to the competition of RNA polymerase for the two overlapping promoters. Since the pucH promoter is expressed at low levels in strains containing either a pucR mutation or an inactive PucR-binding site, this competition would not occur and the pucR promoter would be transcribed at higher levels. By subjecting pucABCDE (XDH) expression to uric acid-, allantoin-, or allantoic acid-induced PucR repression, B. subtilis is able to modulate the cellular contents of purine catabolic enzymes in response to the available nitrogen source. During nitrogen-limiting conditions in the absence of purine degradation intermediates, XDH (pucABCDE) is expressed at higher levels than the other puc gene-encoded catabolic enzymes. The presence of uric acid, allantoin, or allantoic acid, which are the inducers of PucR-activated transcription, results in a shift in the relative gene expression towards the expression of pucLM (uricase), pucH (allantoinase), and pucF (allantoic acid amidohydrolase) instead of pucABCDE (XDH), which is not required for purine degradation under these growth conditions.
A model for the role of PucR in the regulation of the purine catabolic genes under nitrogen-limiting conditions with purine degradation products available based on the experimental results is presented in Fig. 7. Under nitrogen-limiting conditions, TnrA is activated and induces the expression of PucR. When purine degradation products also are present, PucR induces transcription of gde and the puc genes, except for pucABCDE and pucR, which it represses.
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Model for the role of PucR in the regulation of purine degradation in B. subtilis under nitrogen-limiting conditions with purine degradation products (e.g., allantoin) available. TnrA induces transcription from pucR, and PucR induces transcription from the purine catabolic genes, as purine degradation products are available. PucR also inhibits its own transcription and transcription from the pucABCDE operon. The sizes of and distances between genes and operons are not drawn to scale. Short bent arrows indicate promoters; long arrows indicate induction; lines ending in a bar indicate repression; boxes denote genes or operons.
|
The TnrA/GlnR box located upstream of the pucR promoter was found to be required for the induction of pucR expression. Except in the case of pucR, TnrA/GlnR boxes were located around the +1 position of all puc genes and gde. The presence of TnrA/GlnR boxes in front of puc genes and gde may indicate that TnrA is required for gene expression. However, this is not likely the case, since the induction of PucR synthesis in strains growing under excess nitrogen conditionsconditions during which TnrA is inactiveresulted in the activation of puc and gde gene expression. However, in the case of pucJKLM, TnrA may play a role in gene expression. The pucJKLM operon has two potential TnrA/GlnR boxes, and deletion of the upstream promoter box resulted in derepression of the PucR-dependent pucJ expression (Fig. 3). The TnrA/GlnR box and the PucR box are separated by 12 nucleotides (Fig. 2), and binding of TnrA to the TnrA/GlnR box under nitrogen-limiting conditions may reduce the binding efficiency of PucR to the downstream-located PucR box. TnrA may therefore be directly involved in the modulation of functions connected to the uptake and oxidation of uric acid; however, this remains to be shown experimentally.
This work was supported by EU contract BIO2-CT95-0278 and by Danish National Science Research Council grant 9901855. This project also received financial support from the Novo Nordisk Foundation and from the Saxild Family Foundation.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»