Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, July 2002, p. 3746-3748, Vol. 184, No. 13
0021-9193/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.184.13.3746-3748.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
División de Genética, Universidad de Alicante, E-03080 Alicante, Spain
Received 16 January 2002/ Accepted 27 March 2002
|
|
|---|
47-53 at the T loop of the Escherichia coli GlnB (PII) protein impair regulatory interactions with the two-component sensor regulator NtrB (P. Jiang, P. Zucker, M. R. Atkinson, E. S. Kamberov, W. Tirasophon, P. Chandran, B. R. Schepke, and A. J. Ninfa, J. Bacteriol. 179: 4342-4353, 1997). We show here that these mutations also impair interactions between PII and NtrB in the yeast two-hybrid system, indicating that defects in NtrB regulation closely reflect binding impairment. The reported results underline the strength of two-hybrid assays for analysis of interactions involving the T loop of PII proteins. |
|
|---|
GlnB is involved in nitrogen status signaling to glutamine synthetase (GS), the key enzyme for the assimilation of ammonia. This is performed by regulating both the activity of GS by reversible adenylylation and the transcription of glnA, which encodes GS. The nitrogen status of the cell is sensed by the uridylyltranferase/uridylyl-removing (UTase/UR) enzyme encoded by glnD (12). The UTase/UR enzyme uridylylates GlnB at Tyr51 to form GlnB-UMP under nitrogen limitation conditions and deuridylylates it under nitrogen excess conditions (1). Nonuridylylated GlnB activates the adenylylation activity of the bifunctional GS adenylyl-transferase (ATase) and weakly inhibits its deadenylylation activity, while GlnB-UMP activates the deadenylylation activity of the ATase. Nonuridylylated GlnB interacts with NtrB to determine the balance of the phosphorylation and dephosphorylation reactions of NtrB (7, 8, 13) which, in turn, catalyzes the phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of NtrC, the transcriptional regulator of the ntr regulon. NtrB and NtrC are the sensor and response regulator, respectively, of a two-component signal transduction system based on histidine-aspartate phosphotransfer (reviewed in reference 15). Therefore, interaction of GlnB with three different bifunctional signal-transducing enzymes (UTase/UR, ATase, and NtrB) is at the center of nitrogen signal transduction.
The key issue of specificity of interactions of PII proteins with their protein receptors has already been addressed for GlnB, where mutational analysis indicates that functional interactions with its three known receptors map to the T loop and are genetically separable (9). Two types of GlnB mutants (also referred to as PII here) affecting interactions with NtrB were reported in that work: (i) those affected in interactions with all three receptors and (ii) those with the A49P mutation, which are unable to elicit NtrB phosphatase activity but interact normally with the UTase/UR and ATase enzymes. Unanswered by that study was the question of whether defects in eliciting the measured activities of the receptors reflect defects in binding.
In a previous work, we used the yeast two-hybrid system to probe interactions between NtrB and GlnB from Klebsiella pneumoniae, showing that GlnB specifically contacts the transmitter module of NtrB (11), a result in close agreement with in vitro cross-linking between GlnB and the C-terminal domain of NtrB (13). Here we investigated the impact on two-hybrid signals of mutations impairing the ability of PII to regulate NtrB phosphatase. To this end, we used two different types of E. coli PII derivatives: PII
47-53, in which the apex of the T loop is deleted and which is completely defective in interactions with all three receptors, and PIIA49P, which has a point mutation in the T loop that specifically abolishes NtrB regulation. The strains and plasmids used in this study are described in Table 1. To construct two-hybrid plasmids pUAG173 and pUAG174, pJLA503A49P was digested with NdeI, Klenow treated, and cut with BamHI and the corresponding 490-bp fragment was cloned into pGAD424 and pGBT9, respectively. Plasmid pJLA503
47-53 was cut with NdeI, Klenow treated, and cut with BamHI, and the corresponding 469-bp fragment was cloned into pGBT9, giving plasmid pUAG176. An EcoRI-BamHI fragment from pUAG176 was cloned into pGAD424, giving plasmid pUAG175.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Strains and plasmids used in this study
|
When mutant and wild-type versions of PII were tested for the ability to interact with NtrB or NtrBHNG, both PII
47-53 and PIIA49P failed to give signals with the two reporter genes while significant signals were always obtained with PII (Fig. 1). GlnB wild-type fusion proteins from both K. pneumoniae and E. coli were assayed with identical results (data not shown). Therefore, these results closely parallel the failure of the corresponding mutant PII proteins to regulate NtrB both in vivo and in vitro (9). To exclude a negative impact of the T-loop mutations on the stability of fusion proteins in yeast, their expression was analyzed by Western blot assays. As shown in Fig. 2, expression of mutant PII derivatives in yeast is as good as that of their wild-type counterpart, thus indicating that the lack of interaction in the two-hybrid system observed with PII
47-53 and PIIA49P is not due to reduced stability of the corresponding fusion proteins in the yeast system and suggesting that the inability of the corresponding mutant proteins to elicit NtrB phosphatase activity does, indeed, reflect binding impairment. The fact that PIIA49P specifically and completely abolished interaction with NtrB and NtrBHNG in the two-hybrid system suggests either that there are no additional determinants outside the T loop or that they are not important enough to overcome the deleterious effect of the A49P change on NtrB recognition.
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Effects of PII T-loop mutations on expression of GAL1::lacZ and GAL1::HIS3 in strain Y190 carrying different pairs of fusion proteins. Dashes indicate the absence of proteins fused to GAL4 domains. The numbered lines between panels A and B encompass blocks of data according to the type of comparison: 1, PII derivatives paired with GAL4BD-NtrB; 2, PII derivatives paired with GAL4AD-NtrB; 3, PII derivatives paired with GAL4BD::NtrBHNG; 4, PII derivatives paired with GAL4AD-NtrBHNG. (A) Each bar represents the mean ß-galactosidase activity of at least four independent transformants, each measured in triplicate. (B) Levels of growth on histidine-deficient medium.
|
![]() View larger version (52K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Western blotting of GAL4BD fused to PII and mutant derivatives. In each case, protein extracts were derived from 2- to 3-ml cultures (turbidity at 600 nm, 2) of Y190 also carrying GAL4AD-NtrB. Protein extracts were treated, separated, transferred to the membrane, and probed with a monoclonal antibody to GAL4BD (sc-510) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology as previously described (11). An arrowhead points to the protein indicated above each lane. The values to the left are molecular masses (in kilodaltons) of protein size standards.
|
47-53, gave signals with both the GAL1::lacZ and GAL1::HIS3 reporters (data not shown). In addition to establishing, for particular PII mutants, a clear correlation between regulation of NtrB and the ability to interact in the two-hybrid system, our results indicate that the yeast two-hybrid system used here may be particularly fruitful when used to study interactions mediated by T-loop-containing proteins such as PII, further validating the use of yeast two-hybrid approaches to address two different biological problems: the study of specific interactions with known PII receptors by direct and reverse strategies and the identification of additional receptors for PII proteins. Given the growing interest in the function of PII proteins from a great variety of organisms, for the majority of which there are no genetic tools available, it can be anticipated that the use of PII as bait to screen genomic libraries would greatly facilitate the task of identifying PII receptors.
We thank I. Fuentes for excellent technical assistance, R. Maldonado and A. Ninfa for providing plasmids, and A. Ninfa for encouragement of this work and comments on the manuscript.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»