Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, October 2002, p. 5654-5660, Vol. 184, No. 20
0021-9193/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.184.20.5654-5660.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849-5407,1 School of Dentistry, Molecular Biology Institute, and Dental Research Institute, University of CaliforniaLos Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095-16682
Received 11 February 2002/ Accepted 7 June 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The developmental aggregation and cooperative movement of M. xanthus is supported by a form of bacterial surface motility known as gliding (17, 35). Despite recent advances, bacterial gliding is still one of the most mysterious modes of bacterial locomotion (34). Furthermore, there are likely multiple evolutionary origins for bacterial gliding because gliding bacteria, which are widespread in nature, can be found in many branches of the bacterial phylogenetic tree, and multiple mechanisms possibly exist for bacterial gliding (34). In fact, M. xanthus, one of the best-studied bacterial gliders, possesses two genetically separable gliding systems, the adventurous (A) and the social (S) motility systems (18, 19). These two systems appear to function independently such that mutations in either A or S motility genes rarely cause any obvious defects in the other gliding system. While A motility, as seen in A+ S- strains, is described as motility of well-isolated cells, S motility, as seen in A- S+ strains, is manifested only as movement of multicellular groups (18, 19). It has been proposed that the A-motility gene system regulates the movement of single cells and S-motility genes control the movement of cell groups (19). S motility is crucial for M. xanthus development because all S-motility mutants are defective in fruiting body development to various degrees (19, 31, 58). In addition, it was discovered that A motility is essentially nonfunctional on soft-agar plates and that S motility is absolutely required for effective translocation by vegetative cells on such highly hydrated surfaces (43).
It has become clear from various studies that M. xanthus social gliding requires at least two cell surface appendages: the polarly localized type IV pili (21, 54) and the peritrichous extracellular matrix fibrils (2, 3, 12, 45, 52, 58, 60). It has been hypothesized that type IV pili are the motors for M. xanthus S motility and for another form of bacterial surface locomotion known as twitching and that the retraction of pili powers both of these forms of bacterial surface motility (20). Recent studies with innovative microscopy have indeed lent support to the above hypothesis (37, 46, 48). Studies with various types of microscopy showed that M. xanthus fibrils can form a cell surface layer and/or filaments that are variable in dimensions and polymorphic in appearance (2, 12, 25). They have been observed to form connections between neighboring cells and between cells and their gliding surfaces. Preliminary biochemical analysis has indicated that they are composed of about equal amounts of protein and carbohydrate (4). Disruption or elimination of fibrils by chemicals or by mutations results in defects in M. xanthus S motility and cellular cohesion (2, 3, 12, 45, 52, 58, 60).
It was discovered that a wild-type dif (for defective in fruiting) locus is required for fruiting body development, S motility, and fibril biogenesis in M. xanthus (58, 60). The dif locus contains five genes, four of which encode homologues of chemotaxis proteins. DifA is homologous to methyl-accepting chemoreceptor proteins (MCPs): DifC is homologous to CheW, DifD is homologous to CheY, and DifE is homologous to CheA. These findings strongly suggest that M. xanthus S motility is a dynamic process regulated by sensory inputs.
Previous work has demonstrated that both difA and difE are essential for M. xanthus development, S motility, and fibril biogenesis (58, 60). It was proposed that the Dif proteins constitute a signal transduction pathway required for fibril biogenesis and S motility. It follows that difC, encoding the CheW homologue, would be required for the same processes. On the other hand, it is clear that multiple CheW homologues are present in M. xanthus (36, 58; J. Kirby, personal communication). Another bacterium with multiple CheWs is Rhodobacter sphaeroides, which has three CheW homologues (33). The deletions of these three cheW genes in R. sphaeroides resulted in very distinct phenotypes (33). Furthermore, although cheW3 and cheA2 are in the same operon in R. sphaeroides, mutations in these two genes resulted in different chemotaxis phenotypes (33). It is therefore not certain whether difC functions in the same pathway as difA and difE. In this work, we investigate the roles of difC in M. xanthus motility and development. Our results demonstrate that difC, like difA and difE, is essential for M. xanthus fruiting body development, S motility, and fibril biogenesis. We propose that the S-motility regulatory pathway defined by the dif genes shares certain characteristics and properties with the classical bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction pathways in enteric bacteria.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids
|
difC S-) and YZ145 (
difC A-) were constructed by Mx4-mediated transduction using SW403 as the recipient strain and DK3473 and MXH1216 as donor strains, respectively. pKB106, the plasmid used for ectopic complementation, was constructed by cloning a 2.76-kb PstI-BamHI fragment containing the difC gene into pYC274, an M. xanthus integrative vector with the Mx8 attachment site (15). This PstI-BamHI fragment contains sequences immediately downstream of difA to the 5' portion of difE. YZ143 was constructed by electroporation of pKB106 into SW403. Assays of development, motility, cellular cohesion, and binding of calcofluor white. For the examination of fruiting body development, 10 µl of cells at 5 x 109/ml were spotted onto MOPS (morpholinepropanesulfonic acid) plates (10 mM MOPS [pH 7.6], 2 mM MgSO4, 1.5% agar) (16) and incubated at 32°C for 4 days. Developmental aggregation was examined and documented with a dissecting microscope. For the examination of the formation of developmental spores, samples were scraped from developmental plates, suspended in MOPS buffer (10 mM MOPS [pH 7.6], 2 mM MgSO4), and observed by phase-contrast microscopy. For examination of motility on hard agar, 3 µl of cells at 5 x 109/ml were spotted onto the centers of CYE plates with 1.5% agar and incubated at 32°C for 6 days.
Cellular cohesion was examined by the agglutination assay as described by Wu et al. (56). M. xanthus cells from exponential cultures were adjusted to a cell density of
2.5 x 108/ml with CYE medium, and the optical density (OD) at 600 nm was measured with a Shimadzu UV-1601 spectrophotometer every 10 min for 1.5 h. Samples were kept at room temperature in the dark between OD readings. The relative absorbance was calculated by dividing the OD value at a given time by the initial OD of the sample.
Procedures similar to those described previously (40, 60) were followed for the examination of the binding of the fluorescent dye calcofluor white by polysaccharides on the cell surfaces. To briefly summarize, aliquots of 10 µl of cell suspensions at 5 x 107/ml were spotted onto CYE plates with 1.5% agar containing calcofluor white at 50 µg/ml. After 7 days of incubation at 32°C, the plates were examined and documented under 365-nm-wavelength UV illumination from a handheld UV lamp.
Analysis of pili and fibrils by immunoblotting. Detection of pili and fibrils was conducted as described previously (60). M. xanthus cell surface pili were prepared from liquid-grown cells by vortexing and differential precipitation (50). For the analysis of fibril-specific protein antigens, whole-cell lysates were prepared from overnight liquid cultures. Various samples were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-10% PAGE) and analyzed by immunoblotting (42). For the detection of surface pili or pilin, the polyclonal anti-PilA antibodies were used as the primary antibody and alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG were used as the secondary antibody (55). For the detection of the fibril-specific proteins, the monoclonal antibody MAb2105 was used as the primary antibody and alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG was used as the secondary antibody.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Homology among the deduced polypeptide sequence of M. xanthus DifC (Mx_DifC), the CheW domain of M. xanthus DifE (Mx_DifE), and T. maritima CheW (Tm_CheW). Identical residues in M. xanthus DifC and DifE and those in M. xanthus DifC and T. maritima CheW are highlighted in boldface. DifC has 21.7% (30 of 138) amino acid identity with DifE and 20.3% (28 of 138) identity with T. maritima CheW over the aligned region.
|
Ectopic complementation of the difC deletion mutant. The in-frame deletion of difC may minimize any polar effects on the transcription of downstream genes. However, since difE is downstream of difC and has been shown to be necessary for M. xanthus fruiting, S motility, and fibril biogenesis, it is possible that the deletion of difC might affect the secondary structure of the mRNA and thus the transcription, stability, or translation of the mRNA encoding difE. In addition, the difC mutation in SW403 resulted in the deletion of 62 residues from DifC, with a predicted total of 147 amino acids. The in-frame deletion could create a gain-of-function mutation, which could be responsible for any altered phenotype of SW403. If either or both of the above scenarios are true, the difC mutant should not be complemented by a copy of a wild-type difC gene ectopically. As described in Materials and Methods, a fragment containing the entire difC gene but less than half of difE was cloned into pYC274, an M. xanthus integrative vector with the Mx8 attachment (att) site (15). The resulting plasmid, pKB106, was electroporated (22) into SW403 to generate YZ143, a difC+ strain. Whenever possible, YZ143 was examined along with SW403 (the difC mutant) to ensure that any observed defects of SW403 were the consequences of the lack of difC products, not the results of any polar effects on downstream genes or a difC gain-of-function mutation. From the results described below, it is apparent that the fragment in pKB106 can complement the difC deletion mutant, as can the same fragment cloned into the same vector in the opposite orientation (data not shown). The integrative plasmid pYC274 is not designed as an expression vector for M. xanthus (15), and the fragment in pKB106 contains only sequences downstream of difA. The complementation results may suggest that difC can be expressed from a promoter other than the one for difA in M. xanthus.
Developmental defects of the difC deletion mutant. The difC deletion mutant SW403 was examined for fruiting body development as previously described (58). As shown in Fig. 2, the wild-type strain, DK1622, and the difC+ strain, YZ143, both formed visible fruiting bodies after 4 days of incubation on MOPS plates, and their fruiting bodies contained spherical myxospores as expected. In contrast, SW403 showed little aggregation under the same condition, and the cells remained as rod-shaped vegetative cells, indicating that difC, like difA and difE, is required for M. xanthus fruiting body development, including aggregation and sporulation, and that pKB106 can complement the developmental defects resulting from difC deletion.
![]() View larger version (76K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Development of fruiting bodies and sporulation. Developmental phenotypes of various strains were examined and photographed using a dissecting microscope as shown in the upper panels, where the scale bar represents 1 mm. The bright or light spots are top views of fruiting bodies. Spore formation was examined and documented using phase-contrast microscopy as shown in the lower panels, where the scale bar represents approximately 50 µm. Myxospores appear reflective and spherical, and vegetative cells appear rod shaped. (A and D) DK1622 (wild type); (B and E) SW403 ( difC); (C and F) YZ143 ( difC att::difC).
|
![]() View larger version (86K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Colony spreading of different M. xanthus strains on hard agar. (A) DK1622 (wild type); (B) DK3473 (S- strain); (C) MXH1216 (A- strain); (D) SW403 ( difC); (E) YZ144 ( difC S-); and (F) YZ145 ( difC A-). The scale bar represents 1 cm.
|
difC A- and
difC S- double mutants were constructed as described in Materials and Methods. The colony spreading of the double mutants and that of their parental strains on 1.5% agar plates were examined (Fig. 3). The
difC S- double mutant, YZ144 (Fig. 3E), showed spreading similar to that of its S- mutant parent (Fig. 3B), indicating that the difC deletion resulted in no apparent defects in the M. xanthus A-motility system. In contrast, the
difC A- double mutant, YZ145 (Fig. 3F), displayed no significant colony expansion after several days of incubation, indicating that the double mutant possesses little motility. The S motility of difC mutants was additionally examined on soft-agar plates as described previously (57). The difC mutant (SW403) was severely defective in locomotion on soft-agar plates, as expected for S- mutants, but YZ143 with the difC gene integrated at the Mx8 att site showed motility behavior on soft agar similar to that of the wild type (data not shown). These results indicate that difC, like the closely linked difA and difE, is required for M. xanthus S motility. Examination of cellular cohesion. There is a close correlation between S-motility defects and defects in cellular cohesion (45, 52, 56-58, 60). All of the known S-motility genes, with the exception of pilT (56), are required for wild-type cellular cohesion. This correlation suggests that physical cell-cell interactions are an integral part of the S-motility system in M. xanthus. The cohesion of the difC mutant SW403 was analyzed by agglutination assays (56) to examine possible defects in cell-cell interactions. As shown in Fig. 4, wild-type cells agglutinated as expected, as did YZ143 with the difC gene integrated at the Mx8 att site. On the other hand, the difC mutant, similar to the difE mutant (SW501), showed no obvious signs of agglutination. Like those of most known S- mutants, the defects of the difC mutant in S motility are therefore correlated with defects in cellular cohesion, which in turn indicate defects in physical cell-cell interactions and possibly alteration of cell surface properties.
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Agglutination assays of M. xanthus strains. Cells were grown at 32°C overnight in CYE medium, and the OD at 600 nm was adjusted to 0.5 with CYE. Except during measurements, the samples were kept in the dark at room temperature. The relative absorbance was calculated by dividing the OD reading at a given time by the OD reading at time zero. The experiments were repeated five times with similar results. The strains shown here are the wild-type DK1622, the difC deletion mutant SW403, the complemented difC mutant YZ143, and the difE mutant SW501 as a negative control.
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Immunoblot analysis using polyclonal antibodies against M. xanthus PilA protein. The fraction containing cell surface pili was prepared as described in Materials and Methods. Samples were separated by SDS-10% PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-PilA antibodies. Lanes A, C, and E contain surface pili from 2.5 x 109 cells. Lanes B and D contain surface pili from 5 x 108 cells. Lanes: A, DK1622 (wild type); B, DK10409 (pilT); C, YZ143 (difC complemented); D, SW403 (difC); and E, DK10407 (pilA).
|
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Immunoblot analysis of fibril-specific protein antigens with MAb2105. Whole-cell lysates from 1.25 x 107 cells were separated by SDS-10% PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting with MAb2105. Lanes: A, DK1622 (wild type); B, DK10409 (pilT); C, YZ143 (difC complemented); D, SW403 (difC); and E, SW501 (difE).
|
![]() View larger version (160K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Binding of calcofluor white (fluorescent dye) by M. xanthus. Aliquots of 10 µl of cell suspensions at 5 x 107 cells/ml were spotted onto CYE plates containing calcofluor white at 50 µg/ml. After 7 days of incubation at 32°C, the plates were examined and photographed under the illumination of 365-nm-wavelength UV light. The diameter of the plate shown is 9 cm. (A) SW403 (difC); (B) DK1622 (wild type); (C) SW501 (difE); and (D) YZ143 (complemented difC).
|
|
|
|---|
The clues for the requirement of a CheW homologue for fibril biogenesis may come from the well-studied bacterial chemotaxis pathway (1, 8, 14, 47). In chemotaxis regulation in E. coli, for example, chemotactic stimuli are detected by membrane chemoreceptors, or MCPs. Many of these proteins sense signals through their periplasmic domains either by direct ligand binding or by interactions with ligand binding proteins. Detection of signals results in conformational changes in MCPs, which transduce the signal to the CheA kinase for the regulation of flagellar-motor rotation. The transduction of signals from MCPs to the CheA kinase requires the chemotaxis protein CheW, which physically interacts with both MCPs and CheA kinases for the relay of signals. The requirement for DifA (MCP-like), DifC (CheW-like), and DifE (CheA-like) proteins for the same processes suggests that, for the regulation of fibril biogenesis and S motility, the dif gene products may interact with one another in a fashion similar to those in a chemotaxis signal transduction pathway in enteric bacteria. In particular, it is known that MCPs, CheAs, and CheWs assemble into polarly localized clusters which are essential for their functions (28, 29, 32, 44). Although the Dif proteins of interest have not yet been localized within the cell, their homology to chemotaxis proteins and the absolute requirement for difA, difC, and difE in the same processes examined so far have led us to propose that the dif genes define an S-motility regulatory-signal transduction pathway with chemotaxis-like interactions and characteristics.
How may the putative dif chemotaxis-like signal transduction pathway regulate M. xanthus S motility? In flagellated bacteria such as E. coli, the output of the chemotaxis pathway directly interacts with flagellar switches to achieve chemotaxis. Likewise, it is plausible that the dif gene products may regulate M. xanthus S motility by interactions with the elusive S-motility motor. However, the available evidence points to a regulatory mechanism through the mediation of the cell surface component fibrils instead. It has been known for some time that there is a tight correlation between the presence of fibrils and S motility. The disruption or elimination of fibrils, either by chemicals or by genetic mutations, is associated with S-motility defects (45, 52, 58, 60). Arnold and Shimkets first demonstrated that there is a correlation between energy-dependent cell cohesion and social motility and that cell cohesion requires extracellular matrix fibrils (2, 3, 45). They discovered that dsp mutants, which are defective in cell cohesion and fibril biogenesis, are also defective in S motility and development. In addition, sglK and dif mutants were shown to have simultaneous defects in S motility and fibril biogenesis (52, 60). It has also been demonstrated that the addition of isolated fibril materials can partially restore cellular cohesion, developmental aggregation, and sporulation to dsp and dif mutants (10, 60). Although the available experimental evidence does not rule out the possibility that Dif proteins are components of the S-motility motor, we favor a model where the dif genes regulate M. xanthus S motility through the regulation of fibril biogenesis.
Many questions remain concerning the functionality of the dif pathway. Concerning the way in which a chemotaxis-like signal transduction pathway may regulate the biogenesis of a complex cell surface structure composed of proteins and polysaccharides, there are at least two possibilities that should be considered. One possibility is that the putative Dif pathway may regulate the expression of genes essential for the synthesis, export, or assembly of fibrils. The other possibility is that the dif gene products may themselves play essential and direct roles in the export or assembly of fibrils. We have no evidence at present to favor one or the other possibility. In addition, the O antigens of M. xanthus lipopolysaccharides have also been found to affect gliding motility (7, 59). Since both lipopolysaccharide O antigens and matrix fibrils are associated with cell surfaces, they may interact with each other in ways we do not yet understand.
In addition to their involvement in fibril biogenesis and S motility, dif genes have also been implicated in the chemotactic responses of M. xanthus to phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) (23). It should be noted that the dif genes were the second set of chemotaxis-like genes discovered in M. xanthus. The first set of chemotaxis homologues are encoded by the frz genes (51). frz null mutants show defects in the regulation of reversal in their gliding direction. Cells of such mutants display considerably longer intervals between directional changes in movements. The frz genes have also been implicated in PE responses (24). A major difference is that frz mutants appeared to have normal excitation in response to PE, but they were defective in adaptation. In contrast, the dif mutants appeared to be defective in their excitation responses (23). The lack of excitation of dif mutants in response to PE cannot be attributed to their defects in fibril biogenesis alone because excitation responses to PE can be restored by the addition of isolated fibrils to certain dsp mutants but not to the dif mutants (23). How M. xanthus cells coordinate their chemotactic responses to PE using at least two sets of chemotaxis genes remains a mystery. How dif genes play roles in two seemingly distinct regulatory processes, fibril biogenesis and chemotaxis, has yet to be elucidated.
|
|
|---|
This work was supported by NSF grant MCB-0135434 and institutional grants from Auburn University to Z. Yang and NIH grant GM54666 to W. Shi.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»