Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, October 2002, p. 5672-5677, Vol. 184, No. 20
0021-9193/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.184.20.5672-5677.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Departamento de Microbiología Molecular, Instituto de Biotecnología,1 Departamento de Biología Molecular y Biotecnología, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca Morelos 62250, Mexico2
Received 29 May 2002/ Accepted 7 July 2002
|
|
|---|
S. Six conserved 18-bp sites, designated R1 to R6, are present within the phbR-phbB intergenic region and are proposed to be putative binding targets for PhbR. R1 overlaps the -35 region of the pB1 promoter. A model for the regulation of phbB transcription by PhbR is proposed. |
|
|---|
A PHB biosynthetic gene cluster (phbBAC) codes for the enzymatic activities involved in PHB synthesis, including ß-ketothiolase (PhbA), acetoacetyl-CoA reductase (PhbB), and PHB synthase (PhbC), in Azotobacter sp. strain FA8 (16) and A. vinelandii (D. Segura, T. Cruz, and G. Espín, unpublished results). Linked to the phbBAC biosynthetic genes, phbR, a gene coding for a protein exhibiting identity to transcriptional activators of the XylS/AraC family, was identified in A. vinelandii (D. Segura, unpublished); 310 nucleotides upstream and in the direction opposite that of the phb biosynthetic cluster a phbR gene is also present in Pseudomonas sp. strain 61-3. It has been proposed that this gene is a positive regulatory factor for the PHB biosynthetic genes (11). The AraC family includes more than 100 proteins from different bacteria. Most family members are transcription activators that bind to specific 18- to 20-bp sequences at target promoters (for a review see reference 6). The 100 amino acids of the AraC C-terminal domain constitute the DNA binding domain, which is predicted to contain two helix-turn-helix DNA binding regions (6). The conservation of the AraC family DNA binding domain is such that other family members are likely to bind to their targets in a similar manner.
The presence of phbR upstream of the phbBAC biosynthetic gene cluster in A. vinelandii (Segura, unpublished) suggests that PHB synthesis in this bacterium may also be controlled at the transcriptional level.
In this paper, we report isolation and characterization of a phbR mutant and identification of four promoters within the phbR-phbB intergenic region: two overlapping promoters that transcribe phbB and two promoters that transcribe phbR. Our data indicate that PhbR activates transcription from one of the phbB promoters.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this work
|
Enzymatic activities. ß-Galactosidase activity was measured as reported by Miller (13); 1 U of activity corresponded to 1 nmol of o-nitrophenyl-ß-D-galactoside hydrolyzed per min per mg of protein. ß-Glucuronidase activity was measured as reported by Wilson et al. (25). ß-Ketothiolase, acetoacetyl-CoA reductase, and PHB synthase activities were assayed by the methods of Segura et al. (unpublished). Protein was determined by the method of Lowry et al. (9). All measurements were done in triplicate.
Nucleic acid procedures. RNA and DNA isolation and cloning and Southern blotting procedures were carried out as described previously (17).
Construction of A. vinelandii phbR and rpoS mutants. It was previously shown that in A. vinelandii insertion of the gentamicin cassette from plasmid pBSL98 (1) into the ampD gene in the same orientation as the direction of transcription produces a nonpolar mutation, which allows transcription of a downstream gene in the same operon (15). A 2.2-kb PstI restriction fragment containing phbR and phbB from strain UW136 was cloned into plasmid pBluescript KS(+), producing plasmid pTC2P (Fig. 1). This plasmid was partially digested with BamHI, and the ends were made blunt by treatment with the Klenow fragment. A 4.25-kb EcoRI fragment with a spectinomycin resistance gene (Sp) and the gusA reporter was isolated from plasmid pCAM140 (25) and cloned into plasmid pBSL97 (1). The resulting plasmid was designated pMP01. The Sp gene in pMP01 was replaced by a 0.8-kb fragment containing a gentamicin resistance gene (Gm) from pBSL98 (1) to create plasmid pSM-Gus-Gm. A 2.8-kb XhoI fragment containing gusA and the Gm gene was isolated from pSM-Gus-Gm, made blunt by treatment with the Klenow fragment, and inserted into the phbR gene at the BamHI site (also made blunt by treatment with the Klenow fragment) in the same orientation as the orientation of phbR transcription, to create a phbR::Gus-Gm nonpolar mutation. The resultant plasmid, pSMR4 (Fig. 1), which is unable to replicate in A. vinelandii, was introduced by transformation into strains UW136 and AJ2, as reported by Bali et al. (2) Two gentamicin-resistant transformants, one from each strain (designated JGW-R and AJ2-R, respectively), were chosen for further analysis. Replacement of the phbR gene with the phbR::Gus-Gm mutation on the chromosomes of strains JGW-R and AJ2-R was confirmed by Southern analysis by using plasmid pTC2P as the probe (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Physical map of the A. vinelandii phbB and phbR region and plasmids constructed in this study.
|
High-resolution S1 nuclease mapping.
Probes for S1 mapping were prepared by PCR amplification, after the 5' ends of the primers were labeled with [
-32P]ATP (3,000 Ci/mmol) by using T4 polynucleotide kinase. The labeled primer used to map the phbB transcriptional start site was 5'GATTGCTGTCCCGATTCCGC3', and the unlabeled primer was 5'CCAGCCCATAGGCCTTGAGC3'; these primers generated a 787-bp phbB probe. The PCR probe, uniquely labeled at one end, was purified from low-melting-point agarose gels. A total of 105 Cerenkov counts of probe per min (corresponding to about 50 ng) was hybridized to 50 µg of total RNA isolated from cells grown on PY medium supplemented with 2% sucrose. Hybridization, processing of the samples, and gel electrophoresis of the protected fragments were performed as previously described (21, 23). The protected fragments were electrophoresed parallel to sequence ladders obtained with the labeled primer used for probe preparation.
To map the phbR start sites, labeled primer 5'CCAGCCCATAGGCCTTGAGC3' and unlabeled primer 5'GATTGCTGTCCCGATTCCGC3' were used to generate the 787-bp phbR probe.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. PHB production and PHB biosynthetic activitiesa
|
Strain JGW-R, a UW136 derivative carrying a phbR::Gus-Gm nonpolar mutation, was constructed as described in Materials and Methods. Similar to the phbR::Tn5 mutation, the phbR::Gus-Gm mutation reduced PHB accumulation by 64% (Fig. 2B), confirming that this phenotype was due to inactivation of phbR and not to a polar effect on phbP.
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Growth (A) and PHB accumulation (B) of strains UW136 ( ) and JGW-R (). (C) ß-Galactosidase activity in strains AJ2 ( ), and AJ2-phbR ( ). Cells were grown on PY medium with 2% sucrose.
|
Analysis of phbB expression by using a phbB-lacZ gene fusion. We determined the effect of the phbR mutation on transcription of the phbBAC operon. The induction kinetics of phbB transcription was determined in vivo by measuring the ß-galactosidase activity in strain AJ2 (UW136 carrying the phbB::lacZ fusion) and is shown in Fig. 2. Expression of phbB was detected during the exponential phase and upon entry into and during the stationary phase. Figure 2 also shows that the ß-galactosidase activity in strain AJ2-R, an AJ2 derivative with the phbR::Gm mutation, was significantly reduced, in agreement with the reductions in both PHB biosynthetic activities and accumulation of PHB observed in phbR mutants, further supporting the hypothesis that PhbR activates transcription of the phbBAC operon.
Transcription of phbB is initiated from two overlapping promoters. High-resolution S1 nuclease mapping experiments were carried out to identify the transcription start site(s) upstream the phbB gene. They were carried out with total RNA isolated from exponentially growing cells and from stationary-phase cultures of UW136. The probe for mapping the phbB promoters was prepared by PCR amplification as described in Materials and Methods and is indicated in Fig. 1. As shown in Fig. 3 for UW136 (48 h), two transcriptional start sites, located 92 and 115 nucleotides upstream of the ATG start codon of phbB, were identified by using RNA from stationary-phase (48-h) cultures, which defined promoters pB1 and pB2, respectively. Transcription from pB2 was barely detected in RNA from exponentially growing cells (Fig. 3, UW136 [8 h]) and increased in stationary-phase cells (UW136 [48 h]). The intensities of the signals corresponding to the promoters detected indicate that pB1 is a stronger promoter than pB2. Figure 4 shows that the -35 region of pB1 overlaps the -10 region of pB2, suggesting that strong transcription from pB1 could affect transcription from pB2.
![]() View larger version (46K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. S1 nuclease mapping analysis of phbB transcription in strains UW136, JGW-R, and JGW-S.
|
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Intergenic phbR-phbB region. The arrows indicate transcription start sites. The phbB and phbR start codons are indicated by boldface type. The -10 sequences of pB1, pB2, pR1, and pR2 are overlined. Sites R1 to R6 are enclosed in boxes. The putative CydR binding site is indicated by asterisks.
|
In agreement with the PHB production leaky phenotype of the phbR mutant, transcription of phbB is not totally dependent on PhbR.
S is needed for expression of the pB2 promoter in the exponential phase.
Transcription from pB2 increases significantly during the stationary phase. To test whether pB2 is a promoter of the class recognized by
S, we carried out an S1 nuclease mapping experiment with RNA isolated from rpoS mutant JGW-S. As shown in Fig. 3, this promoter is not transcribed in the rpoS mutant during the stationary phase; however, and in contrast to the wild-type situation, transcription of this promoter increased in exponentially growing cells (Fig. 3, JGW-S [8 h]). This result suggests that pB2 is recognized by both
S and
D. In fact, the -10 region of pB2 (Fig. 4) has a sequence (CTATCCT) which corresponds well to the
S-dependent promoter consensus sequence CTACACT (8).
Transcription analysis of the phbR promoter.
We also identified the transcription start sites of the A. vinelandii phbR gene by performing S1 nuclease mapping experiments as described above (see Materials and Methods). Two transcriptional start sites were revealed; these sites were located 61 and 139 nucleotides upstream of the ATG start codon, identifying promoters pR1 and pR2 (Fig. 5, UW136 [48 h]). Transcription from the pR2 promoter was not detected in exponentially growing cells and in the rpoS mutant (Fig. 5, UW136 [8 h] and JGW-R). However, the CTACACT consensus sequence recognized by
S is not present in the -10 region of pR2 (Fig. 4), suggesting that transcription from pR2 is under
S control in an indirect manner. During the stationary phase, both promoters seem to contribute equally to the expression of phbR.
![]() View larger version (38K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. S1 nuclease mapping analysis of phbR transcription in strains UW136, JGW-R, and JGW-S.
|
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. ß-Glucuronidase activity in strains JGW-R ( ) and JGW-RS () during growth on PY medium supplemented with 2% sucrose.
|
Analysis of the phbB promoter region revealed two almost identical 18-bp sequences centered at positions -134 and -155 upstream from the ATG start codon (Fig. 4). We designated these putative PhbR binding sites R1 and R2. Scrutiny of the DNA sequences further upstream of site R2 revealed another four less-conserved 18-bp sites that we designated R3, R4, R5, and R6 (Fig. 4). Interestingly, we found that similar 18-bp sites are present in the phbR-phbB intergenic region of Pseudomonas sp. strain 61-3 (accession number AB014757), the other bacterium in which phbR has been described. An alignment of these R sites is shown in Fig. 7.
![]() View larger version (52K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. (A) Alignment of the A. vinelandii and Pseudomonas sp. strain 61-3 putative PhbR binding sites. (B) Alignment of the cydAB CydR binding sites with the putative CydR binding site present in the phbB promoter.
|
Although less conserved, putative PhbR binding site R5 overlaps the -10 region of the divergent phbR pR2 promoter, thus raising the possibility that PhbR acts as a repressor of its own transcription. However, when transcription of the phbR promoters in a phbR mutant was analyzed, transcription from the pR2 promoter was only slightly increased compared to transcription from pR1 (Fig. 5).
By analogy to the AraC (14) and MelR models, we propose that PhbR binds to the R1 and R2 sites and probably to the other less-conserved sites (R3 to R6) to activate transcription from the pB1 promoter. This proposal is based on the observation that in the phbR mutant, activation from pB1 is significantly diminished. We also propose that a reduction in transcription initiation from pB1 would free the -10 region of pB2 from PhbR occupation, favoring PhbR-independent transcription from pB2.
We also found a putative CydR binding site within the phbB promoter region that overlaps the -10 region of pB1 (Fig. 4 and 7). CydR is an Fnr-like regulatory protein that negatively regulates expression of cydAB (26, 27). The presence of this CydR binding site suggests that expression of the phbBAC operon could be negatively regulated by CydR. Interestingly, it has been shown that the levels of PHB biosynthetic ß-ketothiolase and acetoacetyl-CoA reductase proteins are elevated in a cydR mutant (28).
Based on previously published data and the results obtained in this study, a model for the regulation of PHB synthesis in A. vinelandii is proposed. In exponentially growing cells, low levels of PHB synthesis are due to inhibition of ß-ketothiolase activity and to a low level of phbR transcription. Upon entry into the stationary phase, the increase in transcription of rpoS and phbR increases transcription of the phbBAC operon, elevating the levels of the PHB biosynthetic enzymes. In addition, the tricarboxylic acid cycle activity might slow down during the stationary phase, allowing an increase in the acetyl-CoA/CoA ratio and in turn relieving the inhibitory effect on ß-ketothiolase.
In summary, this study showed that control of synthesis of PHB in A. vinelandii is regulated at the transcriptional level and that the transcriptional activator PhbR is a main regulator.
We thank R. Noguez for helpful discussions and S. Moreno for technical support.
|
|
|---|
S form part of a cascade that controls alginate production in Azotobacter vinelandii. J. Bacteriol. 183:6787-6793.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»