Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, November 2002, p. 6050-6055, Vol. 184, No. 21
0021-9193/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.184.21.6050-6055.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Carol A. Lichtensteiger,1 Ruth Caughlan,1,
and Eric R. Vimr1*
Laboratory of Sialobiology, Department of Pathobiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 618021
Received 30 April 2002/ Accepted 12 July 2002
|
|
|---|
is epidemiologically correlated with the emergence of K1 strains with increased virulence and with the Y. pestis biovar responsible for the current (third) plague pandemic. |
|
|---|
ExPEC (19), like other invasive pathogens that do not persist or multiply intracellularly, must have efficient mechanisms for escaping host innate immunity. Polysaccharide capsules are among the longest known and best understood virulence factors that allow such pathogens to resist antibody-independent (innate) destruction (21). In addition to capsules and other polysaccharides, ExPEC strains synthesize toxins (hemolysin, cytotoxic necrotizing factor), adhesins, and iron-scavenging systems found only sporadically in commensal E. coli strains (10). We hypothesized that in addition to these known pathogenicity factors there are unknown genes whose identification could help explain the strain-dependent virulence of certain ExPEC. For example, E. coli O18:K1:H7 is responsible for almost all cases of neonatal meningitis in the United States and the preponderance of uncomplicated cystitis in North American women (11). It is also the most virulent among all K1 strains in animal models of sepsis and meningitis (17). The molecular basis for this differential disease potential likely involves specialized virulence genes (10, 18) or some combination of such genes expressed in a particular genetic background (4).
To test for the existence of unknown systemic disease traits, we adapted the functional genomics method of signature-tagged mutagenesis (7) to the prototypic neonatal meningitis E. coli O18:K1:H7 strain RS218 (1) and the infant rat model of disease (6). In the process of validating this system, we detected a previously unidentified virulence gene, puvA, with 99% nucleotide identity to an uncharacterized open reading frame (ORF) in the Yersinia pestis strain CO92 genome (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Projects/Y_Pestis). Here we show that puvA is shared by two novel genetic elements with similarity to filamentous phage. Molecular epidemiological analysis showed that among E. coli and Y. pestis strains these elements were located almost exclusively in E. coli strain O18:K1:H7 and Y. pestis biovar orientalis. We designated the E. coli and Y. pestis elements CUS-1 and CUS-2, respectively, to indicate that they were identified in the trimunicipality consisting of Champaign, Urbana, and Savoy, Ill.
ORFs flanking puvA. Following random transposon mutagenesis of an E. coli derivative (EV291) of strain RS218 (O18:K1:H7) and negative selection in the infant rat model of disease, we identified several genes not previously associated with systemic propagation or survival (6). Because the mutants were neither growth defective in vitro nor unable to colonize the large intestine, we concluded that the transposon insertions inactivated genes whose products may function during the extraintestinal phase of disease. One of these gene products, PuvA (accession no. AF345992), was nearly identical to a derived polypeptide of unknown function in Y. pestis strain CO92. Several ORFs surrounding puvA or its Y. pestis orthologues also were nearly identical to each other, suggesting that puvA is part of a larger, conserved chromosomal region in both E. coli and Y. pestis. Because the RS218 genomic sequence is incomplete (http://www.genome.wisc.edu), we constructed a cosmid library in pWEB (Epicentre, Madison, Wis.) that was subsequently screened by colony hybridization with a puvA-specific probe generated with the primers shown in Table 1. The resulting cosmid was sequenced with a puvA-specific primer (5'-ACCAACTAACTGGATGAACAG-3'), and the data were used to connect RS218 sequence contigs. The results indicated that the genetic unit that includes puvA is approximately 10 kb long and is inserted into the XerC recognition site of dif, a recombinational locus that functions in the resolution of chromosome dimers (Fig. 1).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. PCR primers used in this study for analysis of CUS and control ORFs
|
|
View larger version (7K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Genetic organization of CUS-1 in E. coli K1. CUS-1 is an approximately 10-kb genetic element integrated into the XerC recognition site (5'-ATTGGTGCGCATAATGTA-3') of the strain RS218 dif locus (triangle labeled attR); there is a duplication (with one nucleotide difference) of this site at the other end of the phage (triangle labeled attL). The relative sizes (in kilobases) and the directions of transcription of the various ORFs are indicated by the large arrows. The small arrows over selected ORFs indicate PCR primers used to amplify the ORFs (Table 1). Each ORF is identified by a letter or number designation.
|
has been shown to be intimately involved with the pathogenesis of diarrheal disease caused by Vibrio cholerae because it encodes the cholera toxin (22). Therefore, if the genetic elements harboring puvA produce virions, they may encode transmissible virulence factors other than classical toxins, such as the lom and bor genes of phage lambda (3). |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. CUS-1 ORFs and proposed functions of their encoded products and selected flanking ORFs and proposed functions of their products
|
particles.
To determine if E. coli K1 and Y. pestis produce virions, filtered cell-free supernatants from RS218 or Y. pestis biovar orientalis spent culture media were treated with DNase I and RNase A and processed for phage banding in CsCl (19). By using the primer pairs (Table 1) indicated in Fig. 1, ORF1, ORF3, ORF5, ORF6, and ORF7 were amplified by PCR from the phage preparations. As controls for chromosomal contamination, the iron-regulated protein 2 (irp-2) and pyruvate kinase (pyk) genes from E. coli K1 and Y. pestis, respectively, were also tested. As shown in Fig. 2, each of the putative CUS-1 ORFs tested was amplified without evidence of chromosomal contamination. Although there was random variation in the relative amounts of some amplicons (Fig. 2, lane 7), the results represent one of six independent experiments in which puvA was specifically amplified without evidence of an irp-2 amplicon (Fig. 2, lanes 27 to 29), confirming that the results shown in Fig. 2 were not caused by chromosomal carryover. In contrast, compare the absence of an irp-2 signal in the phage preparations shown in Fig. 2, lanes 27 to 29, with the positive control results (lane 30). The results of this analysis also suggest that puvA is not required for the production of virions, because the same set of ORFs was successfully detected from puvA::kan mutant G-5 (Fig. 2, lanes 1, 6, 12, 16, and 21) as from wild-type strain RS218 (Fig. 2, lanes 2, 7, 13, 17, and 22). With the expected absence of an ORF1 amplicon from the Y. pestis preparation (Fig. 2, lane 23), all other CUS-2 ORFs tested were specifically amplified (Fig. 2, lanes 3, 8, 14, and 18) without evidence of chromosomal contamination by pyk (Fig. 2, lane 31). We concluded that both E. coli O18:K1:H7 and Y. pestis biovar orientalis produce particles with densities expected of intact phage.
![]() View larger version (93K): [in a new window] |
FIG.2. Identification of selected ORFs in phage preparations of E. coli and Y. pestis. Phage were purified (20) from E. coli strain RS218, the RS218 puvA::kan derivative G-5 (6), or Y. pestis biovar orientalis strain D30. Each group of four PCR lanes represents the results of PCR amplification performed with the appropriate primers (Fig. 1 and Table 1) and boiled phage preparations from G-5 (lanes 1, 6, 12, 16, and 21), RS218 (lanes 2, 7, 13, 17, and 22), Y. pestis (lanes 3, 8, 14, 18, and 23), or an RS218 genomic DNA control (lanes 4, 9, 15, 19, and 24). There was a blank lane between each group of lanes (lanes 5, 11, 20, and 26), and lanes 10 and 25 contained 1-kb ladders. Note the expected absence of ORF1 from the Y. pestis preparation (lane 23). In contrast, all other ORFs tested were successfully amplified, demonstrating homologies between the E. coli K1 and Y. pestis biovar orientalis phage particles; the signal for RS218 ORF5 (lane 7) was weak but clearly visible in the original. The control for contaminating genomic DNA was irp-2, which was negative (lanes 27 to 29). The positive control was chromosomal RS218 DNA (lane 30). Because the Y. pestis strain carried a deletion of irp-2, we used primers for pyk to control for chromosomal contamination (lane 31).
|
morphology by transmission electron microscopy, droplets of phage samples were placed on Parafilm and transferred by capillary action to copper grids coated with formvar plastic and carbon. Excess sample was removed with filter paper, and the grids were placed on a 2% ammonium molybdate solution for 2 min. The grids were dried by removing the excess fluid with filter paper and placed into a box covered with Drierite crystals for 10 min. The grids were then examined at 75 kV with an Hitachi H600 electron microscope at a magnification of x50,000. As shown in Fig. 3, filamentous particles which were consistent with the expected morphology of CUS-1 were detected in the RS218 sample. Similar particles were absent from control E. coli K-12 preparations. RS218 harbors prophage with lambdoid morphology (A. Nassar, C. Schouler, and M. Dho-Moulin, Abstr. 101st Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol., abstr. B-326, 2001), and some microscopic fields examined contained this type of particle. Therefore, while both E. coli K1 and Y. pestis biovar orientalis produced particles with densities expected of phage, additional evidence is needed to confirm the exact identity of the particles detected in Fig. 2 and 3. While the insertion mutation in puvA::kan mutant G-5 (6) did not block virion production (Fig. 2), we were unable to detect transmission of drug resistance to CUS-1-negative E. coli K1 strains by infection with phage preparations. Similarly, while we could detect an apparent replicative form of CUS-1 by PCR in standard plasmid preparations, we were unable to transfer kan by electroporation. Therefore, we are currently uncertain about the transmissibility of CUS
or its potential receptor(s).
![]() View larger version (150K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Transmission electron microscopy of CUS-1. E. coli K1 phage particles purified by CsCl (Fig. 2) appear as filamentous rods approximately 7 nm wide and 500 to 600 nm long. Magnification, x100,000.
|
Molecular epidemiology of CUS-1. The experimental and epidemiological evidence linking E. coli O18:K1:H7 with high virulence is unexplained at the molecular level. To determine if CUS-1 is correlated with this phenotype, we analyzed 149 different E. coli isolates for the presence of puvA by PCR. As shown in Table 3, almost all O18 strains tested were positive for ORF5 to ORF7 and thus CUS-1, whereas puvA was absent from all other K1 (non-O18) strains and most E. coli reference (ECOR) collection (14) strains. The invariant linkage of puvA with ORF6 and ORF7 (Table 2) is consistent with the unit inheritance of CUS-1. Two (#51 and #57) of the three CUS-1-positive ECOR collection strains were from the B2 group that, along with group D, includes serotype K1 and most other pathogenic E. coli strains. The third positive strain (#37) belongs to the nonaligned group. Several additional strains closely related to #51 or #57 were tested and were found to be negative for CUS-1 ORFs (Table 2), suggesting that CUS-1 is unlikely to have originated from any strain other than O18:K1 in the B2 group. On the basis of these results we think that it is more likely that #51 and #57 were lysogenized relatively recently, perhaps as a result of close association with CUS-1-positive K1 strains. Taken together, the prevalence data indicate the highly significant association of CUS-1 with E. coli O18:K1:H7 (Table 2), supporting our hypothesis that CUS-1 acquisition is correlated with virulence.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Prevalence of puvA (ORF5) in K1 and non-K1 E. coli
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Prevalence of puvA (CUS-2) in Yersinia spp.
|
Conclusion.
Our data show that the limited distribution of CUS-1 in E. coli is paralleled by the distribution of CUS-2 in Y. pestis. Despite the dramatically different lifestyles of Y. pestis and E. coli K1, the virulence of both of these organisms is dependent on their ability to avoid innate host defense mechanisms. The selection for CUS
thus may be causally related to the emergence of O18:K1:H7 and Y. pestis biovar orientalis if the decreased in vivo fitness of an E. coli K1 puvA mutant (6) is mimicked by a similar defect in Y. pestis, in which case the functions of CUS
may be identical in the two pathogens. Our results provide the first demonstration of the presence of conserved lysogenic filamentous phage-like elements in separate bacterial species and identify the integration sites of these elements in homologues of dif (Fig. 1A), indicating that CUS
may use the xer-encoded recombination machinery of their hosts. The results strongly indicate that filamentous prophage are more widely associated with the evolution of pathogenic microorganisms than could have been previously determined from the available evidence.
While our manuscript was being revised, Huber and Waldor (8) reported that CTX
uses the V. cholerae dif homologue for integration. This finding is in agreement with our data and suggests that a variety of chromosomal elements use the host's XerCD recombinational machinery for vertical transmission.
ADDENDUM IN PROOF After acceptance of this article, a paper (T. Iida, K. Makino, H. Nasu, K. Yokoyama, K. Tagomori, A. Hattori, T. Okuno, H. Shinagawa, and T. Honda, J. Bacteriol. 184:4933-4935, 2002) was published which reports that the CTX-related phage f237 of Vibrio parahaemolyticus is integrated into the dif-like site of its host chromosome.
M.D.G. was supported in part by a Howard Hughes Undergraduate Research Fellowship, by an American Society for Microbiology Undergraduate Research Fellowship, and by a University of Illinois Minority Graduate Student Fellowship. This work was supported by NIH grant AI42015 to E.R.V.
Present address: Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115. ![]()
Present address: Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»