Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, February 2002, p. 806-811, Vol. 184, No. 3
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.184.3.806-811.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Microbiology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
Received 2 August 2001/ Accepted 1 November 2001
|
|
|---|
S), but mutations in rpoS are surprisingly common in natural and laboratory populations. Evidence for the selective advantage of losing rpoS was obtained from experiments with nutrient-limited bacteria at different growth rates. Wild-type bacteria were rapidly displaced by rpoS mutants in both glucose- and nitrogen-limited chemostat populations. Nutrient limitation led to selection and sweeps of rpoS null mutations and loss of general stress resistance. The rate of takeover by rpoS mutants was most rapid (within 10 generations of culture) in slower-growing populations that initially express higher
S levels. Competition for core RNA polymerase is the likeliest explanation for reduced expression from distinct promoters dependent on
70 and involved in the hunger response to nutrient limitation. Indeed, the mutation of rpoS led to significantly higher expression of genes contributing to the high-affinity glucose scavenging system required for the hunger response. Hence, rpoS polymorphism in E. coli populations may be viewed as the result of competition between the hunger response, which requires sigma factors other than
S for expression, and the maintenance of the ability to withstand external stresses. The extent of external stress significantly influences the spread of rpoS mutations. When acid stress was simultaneously applied to glucose-limited cultures, both the phenotype and frequency of rpoS mutations were attenuated in line with the level of stress. The conflict between the hunger response and maintenance of stress resistance is a potential weakness in bacterial regulation. |
|
|---|
S controls the general stress response of E. coli and related bacteria (11), there is a paradoxical handicap in bacteria losing resistance to environmental challenges. Yet even in batch culture with rich media, the "growth advantage in stationary phase," or GASP, phenotype is associated with the acquisition of attenuated rpoS mutations (34). A possible explanation is that GASP rpoS mutations aid scavenging of recycled nutrients in stationary phase (9). In this study, we investigated the selective advantage of losing RpoS and whether RpoS contributes to fitness under nutrient limitation. Reduced growth rates controlled by the availability of glucose or a nitrogen source can be established in continuous cultures or chemostats. RpoS is expressed under these conditions, particularly at lower growth rates (µ
0.1 h-1) (27), so we compared wild-type and rpoS mutant bacteria under these suboptimal growth conditions. Interestingly, mutation of rpoS turned out to be a great advantage under steady-state nutrient limitation.
Glucose- or N-limited growth leads to a hunger response, with induction of high-affinity nutrient-scavenging mechanisms essential for competitive fitness under low-nutrient conditions (8, 35). The cellular components required for nutrient acquisition under glucose and N limitation are distinct, but both sets of proteins are expressed from genes transcribed by RNA polymerase primed with sigma factors other than
S. There is evidence that competition between the
S and
70 sigma factors for core RNA polymerase affects the relative expression of several genes, as does competition between
32 and
70 (6, 22). Also, the anti-
70 factor encoded by rsd (16) is under RpoS control and could contribute to competition for core RNA polymerase. Hence, a notion tested in this study is whether derepressed expression of nutrient-scavenging systems provides the selective advantage for the accumulation of mutations in rpoS under nutrient-limited conditions.
The hunger response in E. coli is induced by intermediate, micromolar levels of available glucose but is repressed under conditions of either nutrient excess or nutrient starvation (8). The induction of genes significant in transport under glucose limitation was therefore tested in the presence and absence of
S. The lamB and mglBAD genes contribute to the high-affinity pathway of glucose uptake (7), so their expression was tested in an rpoS mutant. Glucose limitation resulted in significantly greater induction of transporter genes in the rpoS mutant, providing a strong selective advantage to bacteria that lose RpoS at suboptimal nutrient levels.
|
|
|---|
(argF-lac)U169 rpsL150 deoC1 relA1 thiA ptsF25 flbB5301 rbsR malG::
placMu55
(malG::lacZ)] (26). Derivatives of these two strains containing either rpoS::Tn5 or rpoS::Tn10 insertions were constructed by P1 transduction using P1 cml clr1000 grown on strain ZK1000 or ZK1171 (1), respectively, to create BW2938 (MC4100 rpoS::Tn5) and BW3511 (BW2952 rpoS::Tn10) by selection on plates containing kanamycin (30 µg/ml) or tetracycline (15 µg/ml). A strain (BW3245) containing an mgl(Con) mutation (mglD L126stop) in the MC4100 background (28) was also made RpoS- (BW3522) by introduction of the rpoS::Tn5 mutation from ZK1000. Growth medium and culture conditions. The medium used in chemostat cultures was minimal medium A (MMA) (25). The amount of ammonium sulfate in the medium was reduced from 1 to 0.04 g/liter in the nitrogen-limiting chemostats. The carbon source in all cases was glucose, which was present at 0.02% (wt/vol) in the feed medium in glucose-limiting experiments and at 0.2% (wt/vol) in nitrogen-limiting experiments. For batch cultures, glucose was included at a concentration of 0.2% (wt/vol). The medium pH was adjusted to 7 in standard cultures but to 6 or 5.5 in acid stress experiments. Eighty-milliliter chemostat cultures were set up as described previously (3, 21). Dilution rates were set to 0.1, 0.3, and 0.6 h-1 (doubling times of 1.15, 2.4, and 6.9 h, respectively) as specified. The culture densities were between 1.9 x 108 and 2.1 x 108 bacteria ml-1.
Detection of rpoS mutants. rpoS partial and null mutants were distinguished from the wild type by staining colonies on Luria agar plates. Plates were incubated overnight at 37°C and then left at 4°C for 24 h before being flooded with concentrated iodine. Dark brown colonies were wild type, while pale brown or white colonies indicated partial or null mutants with different levels of glycogen (12, 33). Chemostat isolates were also tested qualitatively for catalase activity by applying 6% (wt/vol) H2O2 directly onto colonies on Luria agar plates. Vigorous bubbling indicated wild-type RpoS activity.
ß-Galactosidase assay and transport studies. Five-milliliter samples from chemostat cultures were removed, and ß-galactosidase activity was measured as described by Miller (25) by using sodium dodecyl sulfate- and chloroform-treated cells. The initial rate of uptake of 1 µM [14C]galactose by the same chemostat samples was determined with bacteria resuspended in MMA to an optical density at 580 nm of 0.2 as described previously (3). The rate of transport was calculated in units of picomoles of sugar transported per minute per 108 bacteria.
rpoS amplification and DNA sequencing. A 1,302-bp fragment containing the rpoS gene was amplified from chemostat isolates by PCR using two external primers, RpoSF1 (5'-CGGACCTTTTATTGTGCACA-3') and RpoSR1 (5'-TGATTACCTGAGTGCCTACG-3'), and a gene-internal primer, RpoSI (5'-CTGTTAACGGCCGAAGAAGA-3'). The reaction profile consisted of 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 60°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min in a DNA thermal cycler (Perkin-Elmer Cetus, Norwalk, Conn.). PCR products were purified directly with Wizard DNA Preps DNA purification system (Promega Corp., Sydney, Australia). The nucleotide sequence was determined using the primers described above and dye-terminator sequencing reactions on a Catalyst Robotic Workstation. Mutations in mutant sequences were located by alignment with the known rpoS sequence in the E. coli genome database, using software available in the Australian National Genomic Information Service, Sydney, Australia.
Thermotolerance assay. The chemostat samples were diluted in 0.9% NaCl to a density of 5 x 103 cells/ml. One-milliliter samples were then transferred to prewarmed tubes held at 60°C. One hundred microliters was withdrawn at time intervals of 1.5, 3, 5, and 7.5 min and plated directly onto nutrient agar plates, and these were incubated overnight at 37°C. The initial 100% survival point was determined by plating a 100-µl suspension just before heat shock.
Hydrogen peroxide resistance. The chemostat sample was harvested, washed twice in 0.9% (wt/vol) NaCl, and resuspended in 0.9% NaCl to a final optical density at 580 nm of 0.1. Ten microliters of freshly diluted H2O2 (final concentration, 75 mM) was added to 1 ml of culture. The suspension was held at room temperature, and 100-µl samples were taken at 5, 10, 15, and 25 min. Serial dilutions in 0.9% NaCl were plated on nutrient agar and incubated overnight at 37°C. The initial 100% survival point was determined by counting the culture before addition of the H2O2.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Appearance of rpoS mutations in chemostat cultures operating at various growth rates. Chemostat cultures of strain BW2952 growing at dilution rates of 0.1, 0.3, and 0.6 h-1 were monitored for the first 10 days after inoculation. Under each condition, three replicate populations were established. At the same time each day, samples were diluted in MMA, plated onto Luria agar plates, and incubated overnight at 37°C. Plates were stored at 4°C for another 24 h before being flooded with iodine to distinguish dark brown glycogen-containing cells (RpoS+), the proportion of which is shown in each graph. (A) Glucose-limiting cultures; (B) nitrogen-limiting cultures. Error bars indicate standard deviations.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. rpoS sequences in chemostat isolates
|
To test if selection was dependent on the strain background, mutation of rpoS was also monitored in ZK126, another rpoS+ strain (genotype, W3110
lacU169 tna-2) (1). The kinetics of loss at dilution rates of 0.1 and 0.3 h-1 were slower than in the MC4100 strain (results not shown). There are numerous genotypic differences between BW3952 and ZK126, so it remains to be investigated how genetic background influences rpoS inactivation kinetics.
Loss of RpoS and expression of nutrient-scavenging pathways. The results in Fig. 1 raised the question of why loss of RpoS should be strongly selected. The following experiments focused on glucose-limited cultures, in which the ability to scavenge glucose and the major determinants of fitness under chemostat conditions are well understood (7). The effect of rpoS status on glucose transporters was evaluated under glucose limitation. The high-affinity glucose uptake pathway involves expression of mglBAD genes as well as lamB in the separate mal regulon (7). In monitoring expression of these genes, wild-type and rpoS mutant strains were inoculated separately into chemostats, and expression of mgl and a transcriptional mal fusion were both assayed. As shown in Fig. 2, there was a strong difference in expression of both transport components (four- to fivefold) after 1 day of glucose limitation, with higher levels in the rpoS mutant. As the proportion of rpoS mutants in the wild-type population began to increase, as shown in Fig. 2, the expression of the mgl-mal systems converged to that found in the rpoS insertion mutant.
![]() View larger version (37K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Effect of rpoS mutations on expression of the glucose hunger response. (A and B) Chemostat cultures operating at a dilution rate of 0.3 h-1 with 0.02% glucose in the feed medium were inoculated with either BW2952 (malG-lacZ) or BW3511 (malG-lacZ rpoS::Tn10) and monitored for the rate of uptake of [14C]galactose (A) and for ß-galactosidase activity of the malG-lacZ fusion (B), as well as for the proportion of RpoS mutants (by iodine staining as described for Fig. 1). The culture of BW2952 showed decreasing proportions of wild-type rpoS colonies, with 100, 61, and 3% on days 1, 2, and 3, respectively. (C) Rate of uptake of [14C]galactose in cultures of a strain with an mgl(Con) mutation (mglD L126stop) (BW3245 rpoS+ and BW3522 rpoS::Tn5). Wild-type rpoS colonies dropped from 100% (day 1) to 60% (day 2) to <1% (day 3) in the BW3245 population. The pattern shown is representative of that for three or four replicates under each condition. WT, wild type.
|
A difference in mal expression between wild-type and rpoS mutant strains was not previously detected in an exponentially growing, glucose-excess batch culture (26). Likewise, we found differences of less than twofold in mgl expression between wild-type and rpoS mutant strains in glucose or glycerol batch culture (result not shown). Under these conditions of glucose excess, exponential-phase rpoS expression is quite low (11). Hence, there seems to be an inverse correlation between rpoS expression and the effect on mal-mgl expression. This trend extends to glucose-limited chemostats, where RpoS levels are much higher at lower growth rates (at D = 0.1 h-1) (27). These are precisely the conditions that provide the fastest loss of RpoS function (Fig. 1). As shown with the constitutive mgl mutant, the expression difference is elevated when transporter expression is high, as in Fig. 2C.
Loss of RpoS and effect on stress resistance. The mutations in rpoS affected the stress resistance of chemostat populations. In cultures assayed for susceptibility to elevated temperature and oxidative stress, as shown in Fig. 3, the general resistance properties of the cultures decreased day by day together with the proportion of bacteria carrying a wild-type rpoS gene. Hence, loss of RpoS caused by nutrient limitation makes these cultures more vulnerable to other environmental challenges.
![]() View larger version (27K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Effect of rpoS mutations on stress resistance. Chemostat cultures of strain BW2952 growing at a dilution rate of 0.3 h-1 were sampled daily after inoculation and challenged for resistance to elevated temperature (A) and H2O2 (B). Viable bacteria were determined from plate counts. At the same time, on each day samples were tested for the proportion of glycogen-containing (rpoS+) cells as described for Fig. 1. Wild-type bacteria decreased from 100% (day 1) to 24% (day 2), 15% (day 3), and <1%(day 4). The pattern shown is representative of that for three replicate experiments under each condition.
|
![]() View larger version (44K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Effect of pH stress on rpoS mutations. Chemostat cultures of strain BW2952 growing at a dilution rate of 0.3 h-1 were grown in minimal medium whose pH was adjusted to pH 7, 6, and 5.5. At the same time each day, samples were tested for the proportion of glycogen-containing (rpoS+) cells as described for Fig. 1. Black bars represent wild-type bacteria, white bars represent null mutants, and hatched bars represent partial mutants. The pattern shown is representative of that for three replicate populations under each pH condition.
|
|
|
|---|
The simplest explanation for the lack of competitiveness of rpoS+ bacteria in chemostats is the reduced expression of transporter genes essential for nutrient scavenging. As shown in early studies (5), the selection in the chemostat environment is for a genotype that maintains the lowest equilibrium concentration of nutrient (10). Expression of mgl and mal genes is important in scavenging and is particularly sensitive to mutations increasing expression under glucose limitation (28, 29). The results in Fig. 2 suggest that an rpoS mutation will significantly enhance expression of these genes in chemostat cultures, and loss of rpoS during the culture of wild-type bacteria is associated with increased mal and mgl expression. Aside from LamB levels, outer membrane permeability is reduced in RpoS+ bacteria because the large-channel porin induced by the hunger response, OmpF (21), is also under negative control by RpoS (30). Hence, cell components involved in outer membrane permeability and nutrient scavenging are coordinately increased through rpoS mutation.
The effect of rpoS mutations on mal expression in glucose-excess batch cultures is not strong (less than twofold) (26), so mal genes were not previously considered to be rpoS regulated. However, we totally missed the difference in mal expression in chemostat culture in an earlier study (26). The error was that the "steady-state" samples for mal expression were taken after 3 days of continuous cultivation, by which time the original glucose-limited cultures must have been overrun by rpoS mutants (Fig. 1). This is a good illustration of the potential problems that RpoS status can cause in interpreting chemostat experiments.
Previous results (6, 22) strongly support the notion that competition between RpoS and other sigma factors offers a global explanation of why expression from non-RpoS promoters is reduced. The MalT activator and MglD repressor control the distinct and physically separate mal and mgl promoters, but both systems were influenced by loss of RpoS, with or without the induction process. This pleiotropic effect is consistent with the presence of competing RpoS having a global effect on
70-dependent transcription. Similarly, under nitrogen limitation, additional competition with the
54 regulating ammonia assimilation (23) may provide a comparable disadvantage, but further studies are needed to prove this point.
The results reported above throw new light on the central question of why rpoS mutations are present in many E. coli and Salmonella strains. An explanation can be based on the likelihood that many natural environments limit growth rates but that RpoS-mediated cross-resistance does not provide the means of overcoming the growth limitation. Indeed, in any situation where sigma factors other than RpoS are required for the regulatory response, there may well be a selective advantage in losing RpoS. Consistent with this notion, the GASP phenomenon is thought to be a reflection of the fact that higher growth rates in stationary phase require scavenging of micronutrients and are dependent on
70 for expression. As noted by Finkel et al., increased scavenging of nutrients was a feature of GASP mutants (for amino acids in the case of GASP) (9), so the selection pressure for expression of scavenger systems is common to chemostats and stationary phase. Also, in some niches (19), cell components useful for survival, such as type 1 pili (4) may be useful but under negative control of RpoS, again leading to rpoS mutations.
The nature of the enriched rpoS mutations was not independent of the environment. Partial mutants were enriched in the presence of low-level acid stress (Fig. 4) and in stationary phase with the GASP phenotype (9). In the absence of stress, the chemostats were selecting drastic loss-of-function mutations. Likewise, in natural environments, the type of rpoS mutation selected may depend on whether there is a need for a partial stress response. The attenuation-type GASP mutation may already be an evolutionary adaptation to avoid complete loss of stress responses under conflicting selection conditions, as would occur in complex stationary-phase media.
Making the hunger response and the general stress response compete for core RNA polymerase appears to be a basic weakness in the regulatory circuits of E. coli and S. enterica. The strong selection pressure in bacteria dependent on
70 or
54-RNA polymerase for continued growth is bound to lead to rpoS loss or attenuation in many environments not requiring a stress response. Why did evolution commit bacteria to this competing form of regulation? A possible explanation is that ancient, free-living bacteria were rarely under purely hunger conditions as occur in chemostats or human-made environments and that RpoS was always essential in response to multiple stresses. Yet the frequency of rpoS mutations in natural populations argues that environmental situations where loss of RpoS is at least a short-term advantage do currently exist.
|
|
|---|
We thank the Australian Research Council for grant support.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»