Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, March 2002, p. 1340-1348, Vol. 184, No. 5
0021-9193/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.184.5.1340-1348.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
and Ulla Bonas*
Institut für Genetik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, D-06099 Halle (Saale), Germany
Received 24 September 2001/ Accepted 4 December 2001
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Relatively few effectors transported by the TTSS have been identified in plant pathogens (11). Examples are PopB and PopC from Ralstonia solanacearum (21), DspA from Erwinia amylovora (19), and HopPsyA from Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae (1), which are encoded in the regions flanking the respective hrp (hypersensitive reaction and pathogenicity) gene clusters. hrp genes encode the TTSS in plant pathogens and are essential for bacterial growth in planta, causing disease in susceptible hosts and eliciting a hypersensitive reaction (HR) in resistant plants (2). The HR is a rapid, localized cell death that is part of the plant's innate defense responses and that halts pathogen ingress (27). In most cases, specific recognition of the pathogen by the resistant plants is based on a gene-for-gene interaction: bacteria expressing a given avirulence gene (avr) are recognized by plants carrying the corresponding disease resistance gene (46). Activity of all avirulence genes tested so far depends on a functional Hrp TTSS system, and more than 10 avr genes elicit the HR when they are expressed within the resistant-plant cell, indicating that Avr proteins are translocated effector proteins (11).
Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria is the causal agent of bacterial spot disease of peppers and tomatoes. The chromosomal 23-kb hrp gene cluster contains six operons, hrpA to hrpF (9, 15, 16, 24; U. Bonas, unpublished data). Among the more than 20 proteins encoded by the hrp region, nine are highly conserved in plant and animal pathogens. These genes were renamed hrc (hrp conserved) and are likely to form the core of the TTSS (8). Analysis of nonpolar mutants in the hrp operons also identified hpa (hrp-associated) genes, which contribute to, but are not essential for, the interaction with the plant (24; U. Bonas, unpublished data). We recently demonstrated Hrp-dependent secretion of HrpB2 and HrpF, which are encoded within the hrp gene cluster and which are essential for pathogenicity (35). Other secreted proteins that are not essential for pathogenicity are Xanthomonas outer proteins (Xop) such as XopB (34) and avirulence proteins AvrBs3, AvrBs4, AvrRxv, AvrBsT, and AvrBs1 (5, 14, 34, 36).
Expression of hrp genes is induced in plant leaves and in minimal medium XVM2 (38, 43) and is controlled by regulatory genes hrpG and hrpX, located outside of the hrp gene cluster. The HrpG protein belongs to the OmpR family of two-component regulatory systems and regulates the expression of a large regulon, which was recently identified using cDNA-amplified fragment length polymorphism (cDNA-AFLP) analysis. The expression profiles of two isogenic X. campestris pv. vesicatoria strains, 85-10 and 85*, which differ in their hrp gene expression status, were compared (34). Strain 85* expresses hrpG*, a mutated form of key regulatory gene hrpG, which leads to the constitutive expression of hrp genes (45). Expression of the second known regulator, hrpX, is dependent on hrpG. HrpX, an AraC-type transcriptional activator, controls expression of operons hrpB to hrpF (43) and is essential for expression of most new members of the hrpG regulon. Among the 35 known genes belonging to the hrpG regulon, seven hrpG-induced (hgi) cDNA fragments map to the large hrp gene cluster (34) (Fig. 1A). Three of these hgi genes map to the hrp flanking regions, which had not previously been characterized.
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Map of the large hrp gene cluster. (A) Schematic overview of the hrp operons hrpA to hrpF plus flanking regions. Gray circles, locations of seven hgi fragments; black dots, PIP boxes. (B) Restriction map of the region downstream of hrpA. Arrows indicate the extent of deletions generated. *, introduced frameshift mutations. (C) ORFs in the region downstream of hrpA. Single-headed arrows, ORFs with high coding probability (DNAstar; Genequest, Pseudomonas aeruginosa codon preference matrix) and the direction of transcription; double-headed arrow, insertion sequence ISXc 7; *, frameshifts; black dots and open dots, PIP and hrp boxes, respectively; gray circles, hgi fragments. The most distal part of the sequence does not contain ORFs with high coding probability (see also Table 2). (D) Comparison of the region shown in panel C to the orthologous sequence in X. oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo; GenBank accession no. AF026197 and AF232058) (48). Gray areas, noncolinear DNA regions between X. oryzae pv. oryzae and X. campestris pv. vesicatoria. Conserved sequences are more than 80% identical on the DNA level.
|
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Strains and plasmids used in this study
|
DNA and RNA analyses. To sequence the region downstream of hrpA, the sequence of pK2 was completed using an ABI 377 Prism DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, Calif.). Deletions in both directions of the pBLB1 insert were generated using the Exo mung bean deletion kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.). A 3-kb HindIII fragment overlapping with pK2 and pBLB1 was cloned from pXV9 (9) into pBluescript II KS (pB-KS), giving pBLH1. To sequence the 3.1-kb region flanking hrpF, the sequence of pBF (5.4-kb EcoRV fragment encompassing hrpF) was completed. The adjacent 2.3-kb EcoRV fragment was subcloned from pXV4 into pB-KS, giving pBLr5, and partially sequenced.
Sequences were analyzed using the Sequencher program (Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, Mich.) and the DNASTAR package (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, Wis.). The tRNA gene was identified using the tRNAscan-SE algorithm (31).
RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) experiments were performed as described previously (34). Primer sequences are available upon request. Molecular biology experiments were performed according to standard procedures (4).
Generation of mutations in the genes downstream of hrpA.
To introduce the
L deletion into strain 85*, suicide construct pOLB (34) was used, creating 85*
L (24). A 1.0-kb deletion of ORF1, causing an out-of-frame (oof) mutation at codon 96, was achieved by BstEII digestion and religation of pULB1 (34), giving pU
ORF1. A 4.4-kb BamHI/ApaI fragment was cloned into suicide plasmid pOK (24), giving pOORF1, which was introduced in strain 85-10, creating 85-10
ORF1.
In hpaH, a frameshift mutation was introduced at codon 38 by digestion of pULB1 by Csp45I, filling in, and religation, giving pUhpaH. The 5.6-kb BamHI/ApaI fragment of pUhpaH was subcloned into pOK, giving pOhpaH, which was introduced into strain 85-10, creating 85-10 hpaH-oof.
To delete xopA, the 2.7-kb NheI/ApaI fragment of pULB1 was cloned into pB-SK digested by SpeI/ApaI, creating pBxopA. pBxopA was partially digested by ClaI and SalI, filled in, and religated, resulting in pB
xopA. In this construct, xopA (354 bp) contains a 312-bp deletion leaving only the first 11 amino acids of the protein unchanged. The 2.4-kb ApaI/XbaI insert was subcloned into pOK, giving pOxopA, which was introduced into 85-10, creating 85-10
xopA.
To mutate xopD, the 2.0-kb ApaI/BamHI fragment of pULB1 was subcloned into pB-SK, giving pBxopD. pBxopD was digested by EcoRI, filled in, and religated, giving pB
xopD. The 1.85-kb ApaI/BamHI insert of pB
xopD was cloned into pOK, giving pOxopD, which was introduced into 85-10, resulting in 85-10
xopD, which carries an oof mutation after amino acid 311 of XopD.
GUS assays. ß-Glucuronidase (GUS) assays were performed with exponentially growing X. campestris pv. vesicatoria as described previously (36). One GUS unit is defined as 1 nmol of 4-methylumbelliferone released per min per bacterium.
Epitope tagging of XopA, XopD, and HpaF. A 0.4-kb fragment containing xopA and a 2.0-kb fragment encompassing xopD were amplified by PCR from pXV331 and cloned into pIC1 in frame with a triple-c-myc epitope, giving pICxopA and pICxopD, respectively. Primer sequences are available upon request.
To tag hpaF, a 2.1-kb fragment starting 100 bp before the putative translation start codon of hpaF was cloned into pB-KS, giving pBhpaF. A PCR-amplified triple-c-myc tag was cloned in frame into the SalI site, which is situated 165 bp after the putative translation start codon of hpaF, giving pBhpaFC. The pBhpaFC insert was cloned into pLAFR3 under the control of the lac promoter, giving pL3hpaFC. Further cloning details are available upon request.
Protein analysis and secretion experiments. Secretion experiments and Western blot analyses were performed as described previously (36). The following primary antibodies were used: a polyclonal anti-AvrBs3 antibody (28), a monoclonal anti-c-myc antibody (Roche, Mannheim, Germany; dilution 1:10,000), polyclonal anti-HrcN antiserum (36), and polyclonal anti-HrpF antiserum (D. Büttner and U. Bonas, unpublished data). Horseradish peroxidase-labeled goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit antibodies were used as secondary antibodies. Reactions were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, N.J.).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The sequences of the 9.1-kb fragment downstream of hrpA and the 3.1-kb sequence downstream of hrpF from X. campestris pv. vesicatoria have been submitted to GenBank (U33548 and AF056246, respectively). The predicted HpaF protein sequence from Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae has been added to the original submission (AB045312).
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Description of genes in the regions flanking the hrp gene cluster of X. campestris pv. vesicatoria
|
The three genes located between xopA and hrpA do not have orthologs in X. oryzae pv. oryzae (Fig. 1; Table 2). Interestingly, the C-terminal portion of XopD contains a putative nuclear localization signal (NLS; KKKK) at amino acid position 602 and shows 74% similarity to the last 300 amino acids of virulence factor PsvA from P. syringae pv. eriobotryae (26). The xopD promoter does not contain a PIP box, but rather a hrp box, which is found in all hrpL-dependent promoters in P. syringae and Erwinia spp. (GGAACTNA-N13-CGACNNA; consensus: GGAACcNa-N13/14-cCACNNA; lowercase letters indicate less-well-conserved bases [25]). ORF4 is predicted to encode a protein with similarity to transposases from X. campestris and Yersinia pestis. However, the sequence conservation is restricted to the N-terminal 84 amino acids and then continues in the product of another reading frame. Finally, ORF6, which is interrupted by a stop codon at codon position 121, encodes a protein highly similar to the putative transposase encoded by insertion sequence (IS) IS1595 of X. campestris pv. mangiferaeindicae. Since ORF6 is flanked by 23-bp inverted repeats and 2-bp direct repeats, it has features typical of an IS element and was designated ISXc 7.
Sequence analysis of the region flanking hrpF. Sequence analysis of the 3.1-kb region downstream of hrpF, which contains hgi203, revealed two ORFs, hpaF and hpaG, and a putative tRNAArg gene (anticodon CCG; Fig. 2). hrpF and the region downstream up to the tRNA gene are highly similar to the orthologous region of X. oryzae pv. oryzae. Curiously, in X. oryzae pv. oryzae, there is only one ORF, which we designated hpaF. X. campestris pv. vesicatoria cDNA-AFLP fragment hgi203 was derived from hpaF, which encodes a putative protein of 197 amino acids containing a putative NLS (RPRRR) at amino acid 43. hpaG encodes a putative protein of 432 amino acids, which contains six leucine-rich repeats (LRRs; consensus sequence, LXXLXXLXXLXLXXXXXLXXLPX X). HpaF is 87% similar to the N terminus of HpaF from X. oryzae pv. oryzae, and HpaG is 93% similar to its C terminus. The DNA sequences of hpaF and hpaG from X. campestris pv. vesicatoria and hpaF from X. oryzae pv. oryzae mainly differ by a 7-bp deletion in the 3" region of hpaF in X. campestris pv. vesicatoria. This deletion leads to a frameshift in hpaF which is present in all three different X. campestris pv. vesicatoria strains tested (data not shown). An imperfect PIP box (TTCGC-N16-TTCGC) is located 82 bp upstream of the predicted translation start codon of hpaF in X. campestris pv. vesicatoria.
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Genetic organization of the region downstream of hrpF. (A) Open arrows, ORFs; black arrow, tRNAArg gene; gray circles, hgi fragments; triangle, position and orientation of Tn3-gus insertion no. 462 (43); double-headed arrow, R deletion. (B) Schematic drawing of the orthologous sequence in X. oryzae pv. oryzae (GenBank accession no. AB045312). Black dots, PIP boxes (TTCGC-N16-TTCGC in X. campestris pv. vesicatoria and TTCGC-N16-TTCAC in X. oryzae pv. oryzae); gray areas, DNA sequences with more than 90% identity to the X. campestris pv. vesicatoria region.
|
L was reduced in virulence compared to wild-type strain 85-10, i.e., delayed symptom formation and reduced growth in planta (34). Here, we introduced deletions or frameshift mutations in different genes flanking the hrp gene cluster into strain 85-10 to study their role individually. In strains 85-10
L and 85-10
R, the regions encompassing ORF1 to ORF4 and hpaF to hpaG, respectively, were deleted (34) (Fig. 1B and 2A). In addition, ORF1 (in 85-10
ORF1), xopA (in 85-10
xopA), and xopD (in 85-10
xopD) were deleted, and a frameshift mutation was generated in hpaH (in 85-10 hpaH-oof; Fig. 1B). The mutant derivatives of strain 85-10 were tested for HR induction in resistant pepper line ECW-10R (contains the Bs1 resistance gene, which recognizes avrBs1) and the induction of water-soaking symptoms in susceptible pepper line ECW (Fig. 3). Strains 85-10
L and 85*
L (85-10
L derivative carrying the hrpG* mutation) both caused clearly delayed water-soaking symptoms in ECW pepper plants and delayed HR in ECW-10R pepper plants (12 h to 24 h later than strains 85-10 and 85*, respectively) (Fig. 3A; data not shown). While strains 85-10
R, 85-10
ORF1, and 85-10
xopD behaved like wild-type strain 85-10, strain 85-10
xopA displayed an intermediate phenotype compared to strains 85-10
L and 85-10, i.e., slightly delayed water-soaking symptoms and HR. Strain 85-10 hpaH-oof induced sometimes a slightly delayed HR. The mutant phenotypes of strain 85-10
L in ECW and ECW-10R plants could be complemented by pXV331 (Fig. 3A; data not shown).
![]() View larger version (42K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Effects of deletions in the hrp gene cluster flanking regions on the plant interaction. (A) HR induction in resistant ECW-10R pepper plants. X. campestris pv. vesicatoria strains were inoculated at 108 CFU/ml in 1 mM MgCl2 into the intercellular spaces of a fully expanded leaf of an 8-week-old ECW-10R plant. The lower side of the leaf was photographed 48 h after inoculation. See text for details. (B) Bacterial growth in the susceptible ECW pepper plants. X. campestris pv. vesicatoria strains were inoculated at 104 CFU/ml in 1 mM MgCl2 into the intercellular spaces of fully expanded leaves of 8-week-old ECW plants. Growth of strains 85-10, 85-10 hrpG, 85-10 ORF1, 85-10 hpaH-oof, 85-10 xopA, 85-10 xopD, and 85-10 L was monitored as described earlier (9). Values represent the means of four samples from four different plants. Error bars, standard deviations. For the sake of clarity, growth of strains 85-10 ORF1 and 85-10 xopD, which was identical to that of wild-type strain 85-10, is not shown and error bars for strains 85-10 xopA and 85-10 hpaH-oof were omitted. Results (A and B) are from one representative experiment.
|
L is not specifically associated with the avrBs1-Bs1 interaction and was also observed in association with avrBs2 recognition in ECW-20R plants (contains the Bs2 resistance gene; data not shown). Similarly, strain 85-10
L(pDS300F), which expresses the avrBs3 gene, induced a delayed and partial HR in the corresponding resistant ECW-30R plants (contains the Bs3 resistance gene; data not shown). In addition, the necrosis normally induced by strain 85* in tobacco was weaker with 85*
L (data not shown) (45).
To determine which gene is responsible for the reduced growth of strain 85-10
L in susceptible pepper line ECW, we determined the growth of mutants with mutations in individual genes. Strain 85-10
ORF1 behaved like the wild type, whereas strain 85-10
xopA always showed a reduction in growth compared to strain 85-10 with levels intermediate between those of wild-type strain 85-10 and strain 85-10
L (Fig. 3B). The growth of strain 85-10 hpaH-oof was not affected or was weakly affected. The mutation in xopD, which was not included in the
L deletion, did not affect growth in planta (data not shown).
In summary, these results indicate that the reduced avirulence and growth in planta of strain 85-10
L are essentially due to the loss of xopA but partially also due to the loss of hpaH.
AvrBs3 and HrpF secretion is not affected in strain 85*
L.
To test if the reduced-virulence and avirulence phenotypes of the deletion mutants are due to reduced secretion of effector proteins by the Hrp system, we analyzed the secretion of two TTSS substrates: AvrBs3, which is secreted by the X. campestris pv. vesicatoria TTSS (36), and HrpF, which is an essential, secreted pathogenicity protein that, it has been suggested, plays a role in translocation (35). Levels of in vitro secretion of both AvrBs3 and HrpF in strain 85*
L were comparable to the wild-type levels (Fig. 4). Thus, the genes deleted in strain 85*
L do not encode components of the type III secretion machinery.
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. The L deletion has no effect on type III secretion in vitro. X. campestris pv. vesicatoria strains expressing AvrBs3 from pDS300F were incubated in secretion medium. Total protein extracts (lanes 1 to 3) and supernatants (lanes 4 to 6) of strains 85* (lanes 1 and 4), 85* hrcV (lanes 2 and 5), and 85* L (lanes 3 and 6) were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and analyzed by immunoblotting using AvrBs3- and HrpF-specific antibodies. Total protein extracts and supernatants were concentrated 10- and 100-fold, respectively. Membranes were reprobed with the antiserum directed against cytoplasmic protein HrcN to assure that no bacterial lysis had occurred during the experiment (data not shown).
|
![]() View larger version (74K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Expression profiles of ORF1, hpaH, xopA, xopD, hpaF, and hpaG. Shown is RT-PCR analysis of X. campestris pv. vesicatoria strains 85-10, 85*, and 85* hrpX, grown in NYG, and of strains 85-10 and 85-10 hrpG, grown in hrp gene induction medium XVM2. 16S rDNA was used as a standard. The DNA samples were separated on a 1.5% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Promoter activities of xopA, xopD, and hpaF in X. campestris pv. vesicatoria strains 85-10 and 85*a
|
hrcV, a strain, which carries a deletion in a conserved component of the TTSS. For technical reasons, expression studies of HpaF were carried out in 82* and derivatives (Table 1).
Western blot analysis of bacterial total protein extracts revealed that, as expected from the promoter studies, XopA-c-myc and XopD-c-myc were not detectable in strain 85-10 grown in NYG (Fig. 6A). However, a protein of 18 kDa, corresponding to the expected size for XopA-c-myc (13 kDa plus a 5-kDa epitope), was detected in extracts of 85*::pICxopA. XopD-c-myc (predicted size: 70 plus 5 kDa) was detected at approximately 110 kDa in 85*::pICxopD. HpaF-c-myc (predicted size: 21 plus 5 kDa) could be visualized at approximately 33 kDa in total bacterial protein extracts (data not shown). To test for hrp-dependent secretion, bacteria were incubated in secretion medium. While HpaF could not be detected in culture supernatants (data not shown), XopA and XopD were present in culture supernatants of 85* strains (Fig. 6B). Since XopA and XopD were undetectable in culture supernatants of TTSS mutant 85*
hrcV, we conclude that XopA and XopD are secreted by the Hrp TTSS.
![]() View larger version (36K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. XopA and XopD are secreted by the Hrp TTSS. (A) Expression of XopA and XopD is hrpG dependent. pICxopA and pICxopD were conjugated into 85-10 and 85* to study the expression of XopA-c-myc and XopD-c-myc, respectively. Total protein extracts of X. campestris pv. vesicatoria grown in NYG were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE; 15 and 8% polyacrylamide for XopA and XopD, respectively) and analyzed by immunoblotting using an anti-c-myc antibody. The approximate sizes of the proteins are shown at the right. (B) Total protein extracts (10-fold concentrated) and supernatants (200-fold concentrated) of strains 85* hrcV and 85*, containing pICxopA or pICxopD, were separated by SDS-PAGE (15 or 8% polyacrylamide for XopA and XopD, respectively) and analyzed by immunoblotting using the c-myc antibody. Membranes were reprobed with antiserum directed against cytoplasmic protein HrcN to assure that no bacterial lysis had occurred during the experiment (data not shown).
|
|
|
|---|
The second virulence factor, XopA, from X. campestris pv. vesicatoria is similar only to the predicted Hpa1 protein from X. oryzae pv. oryzae, which also plays a role in disease in susceptible plants and HR induction in resistant plants (48). Here we show that xopA encodes a protein that is secreted by the Hrp TTSS. This finding, together with the fact that xopA deletion mutants are reduced in virulence without affecting type III-dependent in vitro secretion, suggests that XopA could be involved in effector protein translocation into the host cell. Whether XopA plays a role before or after its secretion and whether it is itself translocated into the host cell remain to be elucidated. Interestingly, both the predicted Hpa1 protein from X. oryzae pv. oryzae and PopA, a secreted harpin from R. solanacearum (3), are very glycine rich (more than 20% of the amino acid residues), a feature that is typical for harpins from plant pathogenic bacteria (48). Harpins are secreted by the Hrp TTSS and trigger an HR-like response when infiltrated into nonhost plants (11), and recent data suggest an interaction of the P. syringae harpin with the plant plasma membrane (29, 30). Although XopA (8% glycine) is not homologous to harpins, it shares a lack of cysteine residues and an acidic isoelectric point with PopA and Hpa1 and is secreted by the Hrp system, which was also shown for PopA (3). Preliminary results indicate that infiltration of an XopA-glutathione S-transferase fusion protein into tobacco leaves did not induce an HR-like response.
Another Xop identified in this study is XopD, which is similar to PsvA from P. syringae pv. eriobotryae but not to predicted proteins in the sequenced genomes of P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 and R. solanacearum (http://www.tigr.org/cgi-bin/BlastSearch/blast.cgi?organism=p_syringae and http://sequence.toulouse.inra.fr/ralsto/public/doc/RalstoForm.html). PsvA plays a role in virulence on loquat trees (26), whereas the pathogenicity of the X. campestris pv. vesicatoria xopD mutant was indistinguishable from that of the wild type under the conditions used. Interestingly, both XopD and PsvA contain a putative NLS, suggesting that they might be translocated to the plant nucleus to meet their virulence targets. Surprisingly, the xopD promoter contains an hrp box, which is typical for hrpL-regulated promoters in pathovars of P. syringae and Erwinia spp. (25, 47) and which is also found in the predicted promoter of the psvA gene from P. syringae pv. eriobotryae (GGAACCNA-N13-CCTACTA) 240 bp upstream of the predicted translation start codon. This is the first description of an hrp box in the promoter of an X. campestris pv. vesicatoria gene and is indicative of horizontal transfer of xopD from Pseudomonas or Erwinia spp. It would be interesting to know whether xanthomonads contain hrpL homologs and whether xopD could be regulated by hrpL in P. syringae.
On the other side of the hrp gene cluster, downstream of hrpF, we identified ORFs hpaF and hpaG, which belong to the hrpG regulon. Since deletion mutations have no effect, their role for the bacterium-plant interaction is unknown. Both genes are homologous to the single hpaF gene in X. oryzae pv. oryzae, which is predicted to encode a protein with nine LRRs, a feature found in many eukaryotic proteins but also in a number of type III effector proteins, e.g., PopC from R. solanacearum (21). The presence of LRRs in the predicted X. oryzae pv. oryzae HpaF protein is suggestive of secretion by the Hrp system. However our attempts to detect HpaG-His6 in X. campestris pv. vesicatoria were unsuccessful, suggesting that the hpaG RNA is not translated under the conditions used (F. Thieme and U. Bonas, unpublished data).
DNA sequence comparison of the X. campestris pv. vesicatoria and X. oryzae pv. oryzae hrp gene clusters and flanking regions revealed almost identical sequences in the core hrp gene clusters and downstream of hrpF. While the regions flanking hrpA in X. campestris pv. campestris and X. oryzae pv. oryzae show very similar organizations (M. Arlat, personal communication), the orthologous region in X. campestris pv. vesicatoria has a scrambled organization, probably due to deletions and insertions. The G+C contents of xopA (50%) and xopD (54%) are significantly lower than that of the hrp gene cluster (64%), suggesting that xopA and xopD might have been acquired by horizontal transfer. In addition, the Xanthomonas regions flanking the hrp gene cluster contain genes involved in virulence (xopA and hpaH), a tRNA gene, and mobile genetic elements (ISXc 7, IS1114, transposase coding sequence). Taking into account that mobility of the hrp gene cluster has been observed in X. campestris pv. vesicatoria (6), the region containing the hrp genes fulfills the criteria of PAIs (22). Similar conclusions were drawn for P. syringae (1). Sequencing orthologous regions from different P. syringae pathovars revealed an exchangeable effector locus (EEL) differing in G+C and gene content and containing sequences related to mobile genetic elements, whereas the region on the other side of the hrp gene cluster is highly conserved (conserved effector locus; CEL) (1). Genome sequencing of different xanthomonads will show whether the EEL/CEL concept is also valid for Xanthomonas spp. and will address questions of diversity and dynamics of the PAIs.
L.N. was supported in part by the École Normale Supérieure de Lyon. This work was funded by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 363) to U.B.
Present address: Bayer-AG Zentrale Forschung, D-51368 Leverkusen, Germany. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»