Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, January 2003, p. 142-147, Vol. 185, No. 1
0021-9193/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.185.1.142-147.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Eungbin Kim,1 Young T. Ro,2 Si W. Kim,3 and Young M. Kim1*
Department of Biology, Yonsei University, Seoul 120-749,1 Laboratory of Biochemistry, Konkuk College of Medicine, Chungju 380-701,2 Department of Environmental Engineering, Chosun University, Kwangju 501-759, Korea3
Received 8 August 2002/ Accepted 8 October 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The facultatively chemolithotrophic bacterium Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1 (originally Acinetobacter sp. strain JC1 DSM 3803; reclassified by Song et al. [41]), is capable of growing aerobically not only on CO but also on methanol as a sole source of carbon and energy (8, 39). This means that the bacterium is able to employ three distinct types of nutrition, chemoheterotrophy, chemolithotrophy, and methylotrophy, depending on substrate availability.
Combined with these results, the facts that many mycobacterial species including Mycobacterium tuberculosis (10; GenBank accession no. AL123456), Mycobacterium avium (NCBI reference sequence [RefSeq] NC-002943), Mycobacterium bovis (NCBI RefSeq NC-002945), Mycobacterium leprae (9; GenBank accession no. AL450380), and Mycobacterium smegmatis (NCBI RefSeq NC-002974) have genes encoding amino acid sequences similar to those of Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1 CO dehydrogenase (CO-DH) (T. Song and Y. M. Kim, unpublished data), that Mycobacterium phlei is able to oxidize CO (4), and that Mycobacterium cuneatum (40), Mycobaterium gastri (18), and Mycobacterium ID-Y (36) are capable of growing on methanol raise the possibility that all known mycobacteria have an intrinsic ability to grow on CO and/or methanol as the sole carbon and energy source.
In order to address this question, we examined several well-known mycobacteria for the ability to grow on CO and/or methanol, and we found that all the mycobacteria tested grew well on each of these substrates as the sole source of carbon and energy, except that M. tuberculosis did not grow on methanol. We also present several enzymological backgrounds for the growth of the mycobacteria on CO and methanol.
|
|
|---|
Cell extract preparation. All preparation steps were carried out at 4°C. Cells were harvested at the late-exponential-growth phase, washed once with 0.05 M Tris hydrochloride buffer (pH 7.5) (except that 0.05 M phosphate buffer [pH 7.0] was used to prepare cell extracts for the N,N-dimethyl-4-nitrosoaniline [DMNA]-dependent methanol dehydrogenase [MDH] assay), and resuspended in the same buffer. Cells in the suspension were then disrupted by sonic treatment (10 s/ml) in 20-ml portions and centrifuged at 15,000 x g for 30 min, and the resulting supernatant was used as the cell extract.
Protein determination. Protein quantities were determined by the method described by Bradford (6), with bovine serum albumin as a standard.
Enzyme assays.
All assays were carried out at 30°C unless otherwise described. CO-DH activity was assayed photometrically by measuring CO-dependent reduction of 2-(4-indophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium chloride (INT;
496 = 17.981 mM-1 cm-1) by the method of Kraut et al. (23).
Ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO) activity was assayed by the method of McFadden and Tu (28). One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to incorporate 1 µmol of CO2 per min.
Hydroxypyruvate reductase (HPR) activity was assayed by measuring the hydroxypyruvate-dependent oxidation of NADH (
340 = 6.22 mM-1 cm-1) by the method of Large and Quayle (26). One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to oxidize 1 µmol of NADH per min.
Hexulose 6-phosphate synthase (HPS) activity was assayed at 37°C according to the method of Ferenci et al. (13) by measuring the decrease in the amount of formaldehyde after the reaction of the added formaldehyde with the ribulose 5-phosphate formed in the reaction mixture. Formaldehyde levels were determined by the method of Nash (32). One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to consume 1 µmol of formaldehyde per min.
DMNA-dependent MDH activity was assayed by measuring the methanol-dependent reduction of DMNA (
440 = 35,400 M-1 cm-1) by the method of van Ophem et al. (43). One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of protein required to reduce 1 µmol of DMNA per min.
Pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ)-containing MDH activity was assayed by measuring the methanol-dependent decrease in the absorbancy of 2,6-dichlorophenol indophenol (DCPIP;
600 = 22,000 M-1 cm-1) by the method of Anthony and Zatman (2). NAD-dependent PQQ-containing MDH activity was assayed by measuring the methanol-dependent decrease in the extinction of DCPIP by the method of Duine et al. (12). NAD-dependent MDH activity was assayed by measuring methanol-dependent NADH (
340 = 6,220 M-1 cm-1) production by the method of Arfman et al. (3). NAD-dependent glutathione (GSH)-requiring MDH activity was assayed by measuring methanol-dependent NADH production at 340 nm by the method of Mehta (29). Cytochrome c-dependent MDH activity was assayed by determining the methanol-dependent increase in the extinction at 550 nm by the method of Kato et al. (17). Methanol oxidase was assayed by measuring the amount of formaldehyde or H2O2 produced during enzyme reaction by the method of Tani et al. (42).
Electrophoresis. Nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) was performed by a procedure described by Laemmli (25), but without sodium dodecyl sulfate.
Activity staining. Staining by activity of CO-DH was carried out in standard buffer flushed with CO, by using a nondenaturing gel in the presence of 0.05% phenazine methosulfate and 0.25% nitroblue tetrazolium as described previously (21).
Immunological test. Antisera against Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1 CO-DH (20), RuBisCO from cells grown on methanol (MeOH-RuBisCO) (19), and dihydroxyacetone synthase (DHAS) (38) were raised in New Zealand White rabbits as described previously (21). Double immunodiffusion assays were performed in a 1.2% agarose gel by a modification (24) of the method of Ouchterlony and Nilson (35). Immunoblot analyses were carried out as described in the ECL (enhanced chemiluminescence) Western blot protocols (Amersham, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, England) after transfer of the proteins in the nondenaturing gel to a nitrocellulose membrane (Hybond-ECL; Amersham).
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Rates of growth of several mycobacteria on CO and methanola
|
It was found that all the mycobacteria tested, except for M. tuberculosis, were also able to grow on SMB-MeOH (Table 1). The mycobacteria, except for Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1, which has already been adjusted to grow on methanol (39), also required a lag period of 7 to 8 days after they were first subjected to SMB-MeOH. Since the bacteria grew well in SMB-MeOH (td = 5.9 to 10.2 h [Table 1]), growth was not tested with 7H9 medium supplemented with methanol. During growth in SMB-MeOH, cultures of all mycobacteria reached maximum OD436 of 0.55 (M. flavescens) to 0.68 (Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1) in 50 h after inoculation.
The present results indicate that the ability to use both CO and methanol as carbon and energy sources is widely distributed among mycobacteria and suggest that this metabolic capability may be an intrinsic property of this group of bacteria. The presence of CO-DH genes in M. avium (NCBI RefSeq NC-002943), M. bovis (NCBI RefSeq NC-002945), and M. leprae (9), the growth on methanol of M. cuneatum (40) and Mycobacterium ID-Y (36), and the oxidation of CO by M. phlei (4) support this hypothesis.
The ability of all mycobacteria tested, except M. tuberculosis, to grow on both CO and methanol is interesting, because no other taxonomic group of bacteria is known to grow on both substrates as the sole source of carbon and energy.
Key enzymes for CO utilization. An enzyme assay (Table 2) and analysis by activity staining (Fig. 1) and immunoblotting (Fig. 2A) of gels after nondenaturing PAGE of cell extracts revealed that all mycobacteria grown in SMB-CO contained CO-DH, as did Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1 (20). Identical results were obtained with extracts prepared from cells grown in 7H9-CO, except that the CO-DH activity was not detectable by enzyme assay (data not shown), possibly due to the presence of a certain molecule(s) inhibiting the CO-DH assay when extracts prepared from cells grown in the presence of organic material were used, as suggested previously (11, 37). CO-DHs in the mycobacteria tested were also found to be expressed in cells grown in SMB-MeOH or 7H9 medium supplemented with 0.2% (wt/vol) glucose (data not shown), indicating that the enzymes in mycobacteria may be constitutively expressed, like that of Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1 (37). Double immunodiffusion revealed that the extracts prepared from cells grown in SMB-CO (Fig. 3A) or 7H9-CO (data not shown) cross-react with an antiserum raised against the purified CO-DH of Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1 and that all of the immunogenic epitopes on the Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1 enzyme used to generate the antiserum are also present on all the mycobacterial CO-DHs.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Activities of key enzymes involved in the utilization of CO and methanol in several mycobacteria grown on CO and methanola
|
|
View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Activity staining of CO-DHs in mycobacteria. After extracts (20 µg each) prepared from cells grown in 7H9-CO medium were subjected to nondenaturing PAGE (7.5% acrylamide), CO-DHs in these extracts were stained by activity by using CO as a substrate as described in Materials and Methods. Lanes: 1, Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1; 2, M. flavescens; 3, M. gastri; 4, M. neoaurum; 5, M. parafortuitum; 6, M. peregrinum; 7, M. phlei; 8, M. smegmatis; 9, M. tuberculosis; 10, M. vaccae.
|
![]() View larger version (35K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Immunoblotting of CO-DHs and RuBisCOs in mycobacteria. The presence of CO-DH or MeOH-RuBisCO in cells of mycobacteria was analyzed by ECL Western blotting protocols after nondenaturing PAGE (7.5% acrylamide) of extracts (20 µg each) prepared from cells grown in 7H9-CO or SMB-MeOH medium, respectively, as described in Materials and Methods. (A) Immunoblotting of CO-DHs. Blots were incubated with an antibody raised against Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1 CO-DH. Lanes: 1, Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1; 2, M. flavescens; 3, M. gastri; 4, M. neoaurum; 5, M. parafortuitum; 6, M. peregrinum; 7, M. phlei; 8, M. smegmatis; 9, M. tuberculosis; 10, M. vaccae. (B) Immunoblotting of MeOH-RuBisCOs. Blots were incubated with an antibody raised against Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1 MeOH-RubisCO. Lanes: 1 to 8, same as in panel A; 9, M. vaccae. Extracts prepared from cells grown in 7H9-CO medium produced CO-RuBisCO immunoblot patterns identical to those of the MeOH-RuBisCOs.
|
![]() View larger version (34K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Double-immunodiffusion patterns for CO-DHs, RuBisCOs, and DHASs in mycobacteria. Immunodiffusion assays were performed in a 1.2% agarose gel for 24 h at 30°C, followed by staining with Coomassie brilliant blue R-250 as described in Materials and Methods. Extracts were prepared from cells grown in 7H9-CO (A and B) or SMB-MeOH (C) medium. (A) Immunodiffusion patterns of CO-DHs. Wells: AS, antiserum raised against purified CO-DH of Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1 (7 µl); a, Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1 (41 µg); b, M. flavescens (83 µg); c, M. gastri (23 µg); d, M. neoaurum (22 µg). Cell extracts of M. parafortuitum, M. peregrinum, M. phlei, M. smegmatis, M. tuberculosis, and M. vaccae also showed the presence of antigenic groups in their CO-DHs identical to those of the Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1 CO-DH. (B) Immunodiffusion patterns of CO-RuBisCOs. Wells: AS, antiserum raised against Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1 MeOH-RubisCO (3 µl); a, Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1 (45 µg); b, M. smegmatis (88 µg); c, M. tuberculosis (45 µg); d, M. vaccae (43 µg). Cell extracts of M. flavescens, M. gastri, M. neoaurum, M. parafortuitum, M. peregrinum, and M. phlei also exhibited the presence of antigenic sites in their RuBisCOs identical to those of the Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1 MeOH-RuBisCO. Extracts prepared from cells grown in SMB-MeOH medium gave MeOH-RuBisCO immunodiffusion patterns identical to those of the CO-RuBisCOs. (C) Immunodiffusion patterns of DHASs. Wells: AS, antiserum raised against Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1 DHAS (10 µl); a, Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1 (68 µg); b, M. parafortuitum (78 µg); c, M. peregrinum (67 µg); d, M. phlei (79 µg). Cell extracts of M. flavescens, M. gastri, M. neoaurum, M. smegmatis, and M. vaccae also were found to have antigenic groups in their DHASs identical to those of the Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1 DHAS.
|
-ketoglutarate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase (
-subunit [Rv2455C] and ß-subunit [Rv2454C]) in M. tuberculosis (10) suggests that a reductive tricarboxylic acid cycle may function to fix CO2 in this bacterium. The presence of RuBisCO in all mycobacteria tested, except M. tuberculosis, when they were grown in SMB-CO was further supported by immunoblot analysis of cell extracts (data not shown). Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1 contains two copies of highly homologous RuBisCO genes (H. S. Jang, E. H. Hwang, and Y. M. Kim, unpublished data). The MeOH-RuBisCO of this bacterium was found to contain antigenic groups identical to those of the RubisCO in CO-grown cells (CO-RuBisCO) but not to those of the enzymes in gram-negative carboxydobacteria (19). Double immunodiffusion revealed that the CO-RuBisCOs of the mycobacteria tested shared antigenic sites identical to those of the Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1 MeOH-RuBisCO (Fig. 3B).
Key enzymes for methanol utilization. It has been reported (39) that cells of Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1 grown on methanol do not exhibit activities of the classical PQQ-containing MDH in gram-negative bacteria (2), the NAD-dependent PQQ-containing MDH (12) and cytochrome c-dependent MDH (17) of Amycolatopsis methanolica, the NAD-dependent MDH of methylotrophic Bacillus (3), or the NAD-dependent glutathionine-requiring MDH (29) and methanol oxidase (42) of methylotrophic yeast.
It was found that all mycobacteria tested here, when grown on methanol, also failed to show activities of the enzymes listed above. However, when grown on methanol, the bacteria, including Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1, were found to exhibit DMNA-dependent MDH activity (Table 2), which had previously been reported for M. gastri (7), suggesting that the DMNA-dependent MDH may be responsible for the oxidation of methanol in these bacteria.
It has been reported that Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1 grown on methanol exhibited neither HPS nor HPR activity, but contained RuBisCO and DHAS, indicating that the bacterium employs a novel way of C1 assimilation (39); i.e., the Calvin cycle and the eukaryote-specific xylulose monophosphate (XuMP) pathway, instead of the prokaryote-specific ribulose monophosphate (RuMP) and serine pathways, are functioning in the cells growing on methanol.
None of the methanol-grown mycobacteria exhibited HPS and HPR activities, except that M. gastri showed HPS activity as previously reported (18). Methylobacterium extorquens AM1 and Methylobacillus sp. strain SK1, containing serine and RuMP pathways, showed activities of HPR (2.0 U per mg of protein) and HPS (0.8 U per mg of protein), respectively. It was found that all cells grown on methanol exhibited RuBisCO activity (Table 2). The presence of RuBisCO in all methanol-grown mycobacteria was identified by immunoblot analysis of cell extracts (Fig. 2B). Double immunodiffusion revealed that the antigenic sites of the MeOH-RuBisCOs in the mycobacteria were identical to those of the Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1 MeOH-RubisCO (data not shown), like those of the CO-RuBisCOs (Fig. 3B). Immunoblot analysis revealed that all mycobacteria grown on methanol also contained the yeast enzyme DHAS (data not shown). The DHASs in the mycobacteria were found to share antigenic groups common to the Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1 enzyme (38) (Fig. 3C).
The absence of HPR and HPS, and the presence of RuBisCO and DHAS, in all mycobacteria (except M. gastri, which also has HPS in addition to RuBisCO and DHAS) indicates that the mycobacteria do not synthesize cellular materials from methanol through the RuMP and serine pathways, the most common routes for C1 assimilation in methylotrophic bacteria (1), but synthesize through the Calvin and XuMP cycles, as does Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1 (38).
It has been generally known that several methylotrophic bacteria contain key enzymes of more than one C1 assimilation pathway, though not the XuMP cycle, and no methylotrophic yeasts possess key enzymes for prokaryotic C1 assimilation pathways such as the RuMP and serine pathways and Calvin cycle (1). Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1, however, was found to possess the key enzymes for both the XuMP and Calvin cycles (38) and was considered the first exception to the general concept. The present result that all mycobacteria grown on methanol contain RuBisCO and DHAS, therefore, is very interesting, since the mycobacteria may be the first prokaryotic group possessing the eukaryotic C1 assimilation pathway and also the first taxonomic group possessing both the prokaryotic and eukaryotic C1 assimilation enzymes. It is even more interesting that M. gastri contains HPS in addition to DHAS and RuBisCO, indicating that M. gastri may be the first bacterium possessing the eukaryotic C1 assimilation pathway in addition to the two prokaryotic routes.
Until now, Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1 (39) and Pseudomonas gazotropha (33) were the only carboxydobacteria which were known to be able to grow on methanol (22, 30), and no methylotrophic bacteria were known to be able to utilize CO (1, 15) as the sole carbon and energy source. It was also known that the CO-DH (20) and RuBisCO (19) of Mycobacterium sp. strain JC1 had no immunological relationship with those of gram-negative carboxydobacteria. The present work clearly shows that all mycobacteria tested, except M. tuberculosis, grow not only on CO but also on methanol, that all the bacteria grown on methanol possess the novel DMNA-dependent MDH as a key enzyme for methanol oxidation and the eukaryotic DHAS in addition to RuBisCO for C1 assimilation, that all adopt common pathways for CO and methanol utilization, and that several key enzymes for the pathways share common antigenic groups. Considering the fact that bacteria from many diverse biological groups utilize CO or methanol as a growth substrate, these results suggest that the ability to utilize CO and methanol in mycobacterial carboxydobacteria has been acquired primarily by conservative independent evolution of an ancestral mycobacterium able to grow on both CO and methanol at a very early time before divergence occurred, rather than by genetic exchange through mechanisms dispersing the respective common ancestral genes for CO and methanol utilization to each mycobacterium at some remote time.
Present address: The Genome Research Center for Respiratory Pathogens, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 12-752, Korea. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»